The only news here is that they're doing it across the entire lineup... but even that's not shocking, since it isn't like they have a serious sports car in their lineup.
Many, many typical cars are already limited by the manufacturers. For instance, Mazda limits them at 118 mph.
All coinbase users must be tax evaders simply because... uh... uh... Okay well not ALL users just the ones who bought more than $20k because that sounds like a really big number to [edited] people who are afraid of spooky numbers and computers and stuff
Actually, given the figures, that's not that unreasonable. The estimated figures say under 900 users reported bitcoin earnings from 2013-2015, during which time 14,000 users at Coinbase sold, sent or received more than $20k worth.
Now, clearly not all of those users are committing tax fraud. But that's not the point of a tax probe. It's likely that enough are to make a review worth it. Transactions of that magnitude are routinely monitored in the world.
So companies chase profits? Wow.
Heck, even if it was a public utility, not all are equal. The less density the less likely to have sewer or water, for instance.
That's... entirely untrue. The Official Georgia Code is the law of the land. Annotations are just that - annotations.
It's available here, for free: http://www.lexisnexis.com/hott...
Well yeah, that was the goal. The problem was that they weren't cutting the risk by more than the cost cutting. They lost two "cheap" missions in a row.
It isn't like there's so many of these that it easily averages out.
Because you're less likely to lose the expensive mission - more testing, better technology, etc.
FBC sounds good because you don't care as much if you lose any given mission. But if you start losing multiple, even that adds up.
You mean, for their motives? Yes. We do that every day. "Motives" are not protected free speech. They're a way of determining the reason something negative happened. If he had simply developed the software as a tool, that's one thing. To market it for the express purpose of illegal activity is another.
If you own a gun store and sell people guns that may end up being used illegally, that's fine. If you own a gun store and sell a gun to someone that says they're going to use it for illegal acts, that's another.
That's true, many are not good with technology. But they don't have to be. Their tech services departments push out certain systems that they use. Most libraries don't maintain client records, for instance, because of this.
Actually really annoying from a usability standpoint, but good from a privacy one.
I'm not sure I understand how this is different from any phone. An iOS define would be bricked, too, and plenty of them are out there running modern apps as well.
The Nexus is the biggest example of this problem... it isn't getting updates when they are released either, and there's no excuse of other manufacturers to ameliorate the problem.
I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean, or what your point is? What does the fact that Apple pushed a U2 album have to do with anything? What does the fact that updates take space have to do with anything? Heck, beyond that, updates don't take space if you do them while connected to iTunes. So I really don't get what your point is in all this?
I agree with that, if that's the reason. But the reason can't be "because there's no possibility of evidence" on it.
Now, the article is a little different than the headline, I'm just being clear.
That seems like a weird decision... I mean, even if the drive itself has failed it doesn't mean the platters have no data on them that could be recovered.
Of course, the secondary question is whether the destruction was intentional or not, but as for the question at issue here, I don't see how a court could say that there is no evidence that was destroyed. The likelihood is completely opposite.
That's the point though... this really isn't a push for open formats. We could scour the web looking for mentions in a lot of places. Until it's actually close to a policy it means absolutely nothing.
Ooh look, a MEP said something!
I think we should have a front page post on/. anytime Boehner says something too.
I mean, seriously? Someone said something and it used a TLA so therefore it's/. news, apparently.
I have a Mac Mini server set up hosting about 8 TB of primary data on mirrored USB3 drives. I then have it running Time Machine on all of that to a 16 TB RAID5 array on a NAS. Total cost (not including the server itself)? About $1,000... and that's for two sets of backups, one for drive errors (primarily) and one that has an always-available actual backup.
Unless you're like a thousand years old there has never been a time it hasn't been political. The Olympics are entirely a political statement... it's all about interaction of nations.
Slashdot Mirror
The only news here is that they're doing it across the entire lineup... but even that's not shocking, since it isn't like they have a serious sports car in their lineup. Many, many typical cars are already limited by the manufacturers. For instance, Mazda limits them at 118 mph.
Piracy, I'll assume
All coinbase users must be tax evaders simply because ... uh ... uh ... Okay well not ALL users just the ones who bought more than $20k because that sounds like a really big number to [edited] people who are afraid of spooky numbers and computers and stuff
Actually, given the figures, that's not that unreasonable. The estimated figures say under 900 users reported bitcoin earnings from 2013-2015, during which time 14,000 users at Coinbase sold, sent or received more than $20k worth. Now, clearly not all of those users are committing tax fraud. But that's not the point of a tax probe. It's likely that enough are to make a review worth it. Transactions of that magnitude are routinely monitored in the world.
So companies chase profits? Wow. Heck, even if it was a public utility, not all are equal. The less density the less likely to have sewer or water, for instance.
Meh, going to zero is a pretty interesting data point, even if it is only a month. I'm sure they'll publish more as more data comes out.
What about Thunderbolt and Thunderbolt enclosures, though?
That's... entirely untrue. The Official Georgia Code is the law of the land. Annotations are just that - annotations. It's available here, for free: http://www.lexisnexis.com/hott...
Well yeah, that was the goal. The problem was that they weren't cutting the risk by more than the cost cutting. They lost two "cheap" missions in a row. It isn't like there's so many of these that it easily averages out.
Because you're less likely to lose the expensive mission - more testing, better technology, etc. FBC sounds good because you don't care as much if you lose any given mission. But if you start losing multiple, even that adds up.
You mean, for their motives? Yes. We do that every day. "Motives" are not protected free speech. They're a way of determining the reason something negative happened. If he had simply developed the software as a tool, that's one thing. To market it for the express purpose of illegal activity is another. If you own a gun store and sell people guns that may end up being used illegally, that's fine. If you own a gun store and sell a gun to someone that says they're going to use it for illegal acts, that's another.
Yep, that's what almost every library does, and for that very reason.
That's true, many are not good with technology. But they don't have to be. Their tech services departments push out certain systems that they use. Most libraries don't maintain client records, for instance, because of this. Actually really annoying from a usability standpoint, but good from a privacy one.
They reached a settlement agreement. BB did not defeat Typo "in court."
How is this a surprise announcement? We knew Apple only had it as an exclusive for a few weeks.
I'm not sure I understand how this is different from any phone. An iOS define would be bricked, too, and plenty of them are out there running modern apps as well.
The Nexus is the biggest example of this problem... it isn't getting updates when they are released either, and there's no excuse of other manufacturers to ameliorate the problem.
I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean, or what your point is? What does the fact that Apple pushed a U2 album have to do with anything? What does the fact that updates take space have to do with anything? Heck, beyond that, updates don't take space if you do them while connected to iTunes. So I really don't get what your point is in all this?
I agree with that, if that's the reason. But the reason can't be "because there's no possibility of evidence" on it. Now, the article is a little different than the headline, I'm just being clear.
That seems like a weird decision... I mean, even if the drive itself has failed it doesn't mean the platters have no data on them that could be recovered. Of course, the secondary question is whether the destruction was intentional or not, but as for the question at issue here, I don't see how a court could say that there is no evidence that was destroyed. The likelihood is completely opposite.
They charge more for BD, so why wouldn't they charge more for 4K? It's a good opportunity for them to be able to raise fees.
That's the point though... this really isn't a push for open formats. We could scour the web looking for mentions in a lot of places. Until it's actually close to a policy it means absolutely nothing.
Ooh look, a MEP said something! I think we should have a front page post on /. anytime Boehner says something too.
I mean, seriously? Someone said something and it used a TLA so therefore it's /. news, apparently.
I have a Mac Mini server set up hosting about 8 TB of primary data on mirrored USB3 drives. I then have it running Time Machine on all of that to a 16 TB RAID5 array on a NAS. Total cost (not including the server itself)? About $1,000... and that's for two sets of backups, one for drive errors (primarily) and one that has an always-available actual backup.
Unless you're like a thousand years old there has never been a time it hasn't been political. The Olympics are entirely a political statement... it's all about interaction of nations.
Was Steve Jobs right? Is a single, restrictive & tested, marketplace the way to go?