For a while Firefox had tabbed browsing, nice plugins and stability going for it
It still has tabbed browsing, nice extensions, and stability.
has had issues with insecure plugins
Which is not at all the fault of Firefox. That's like blaiming your operating system for the problems of some random executable from the internet.
rolling bug fixes that involve a reinstall rather than a simple update
Firefox 1.5 will change that, it's working great already on nightlies. And fixes are actually released, unlike with Microsoft Internet Explorer.
has become as bloated and heavy as what it tried to replace
That's completely untrue, you're just making shit up. It is only getting faster. Perhaps if you didn't pile thounsands of extensions on, you wouldn't think this.
I would not be surprised if market share declined now as people forget all about it.
Unless someone only uses a web browser once a month, they're not going to leave Firefox just because they forgot about it.
But Firefox's innovation has slid, though the Lightning project may just boost it along again.
The Lightning project has nothing to do with Firefox. Maybe you're thinking of the plan to run both Thunderbird and Firefox with XULRunner.
Not really. Domain names ending in . are Fully Qualified Domain Names. If they don't end in., the resolver should try your search list before falling back to the root domains.
So are you saying that it's possible to have a site like "name." instead of "name.com"? That seems pretty interesting; I've never heard anything like this before. Got a link or something?
The Mozilla Foundation didn't become a for-profit company, it created a for-profit company. The Mozilla Foundation still exists, and since the company is owned by the not-for-profit foundation, it doesn't pose much risk to the freedom of foundation.
Could you give the bug number? Why didn't you give proof when it is so easy to do so?
Even if you aren't lying, sadly your case is nothing next to the people begging for libmng to be compiled in on normal releases.
But there are also lots of compatability problems between Linux distros. Until Windows also has this remarkable feature, they're still sooooooo inferior to the glory that is Lixux.
I'm the same way. I see some people here talking about fast backtracking helping a lot with message boards, but I just open 10 or so tabs at a time and close them as I read them. In my opinion, it's much better than going back over and over and over again.
What's your point? Broken HTML that would qualify as XHTML if were sent as such is better than correct HTML?
the WHATWG's Web Applications 1.0 is not HTML 5.0
They want it to be, and it may eventually be. See the section on DOM Feature strings. In one place, they even refer to Web Applications 1.0 as HTML 5 several times. In any case, my point was that there are still people interested in HTML and that it is nowhere near dead.
But it's a whole lot easier if you code XHTML now. There's no denying that.
I deny that. It's just as easy to code valid HTML as it is to code valid XHTML.
For me, working with XHTML and HTML has been the same for the most part. When a browser supports XHTML 2.0, I'll use it (whether that's horribly stupid or not) and then translating from XHTML to HTML and back may not be so easy, but for now I can do it without any trouble at all.
Slashdot Mirror
Ok, I see what you're saying now. Wikipedia did a decent job of explaining.
Konqueror can already use the Gecko layout engine. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konqueror#Web_browser
The Mozilla Foundation didn't become a for-profit company, it created a for-profit company. The Mozilla Foundation still exists, and since the company is owned by the not-for-profit foundation, it doesn't pose much risk to the freedom of foundation.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=163040&cid=136 22468
Could you give the bug number? Why didn't you give proof when it is so easy to do so? Even if you aren't lying, sadly your case is nothing next to the people begging for libmng to be compiled in on normal releases.
I read this on Wikipedia months ago, and it's not even a news site. Whatever happened to the "new" in "news"?
It's not funny at all. Not even a little. Shittiest spoof site ever.
But there are also lots of compatability problems between Linux distros. Until Windows also has this remarkable feature, they're still sooooooo inferior to the glory that is Lixux.
Isn't that what the preview function is for?
Maybe they are asuming that "you" is a Windows user that isn't willing to pay for a web browser? That's probably true most of the time anyway.
I'm the same way. I see some people here talking about fast backtracking helping a lot with message boards, but I just open 10 or so tabs at a time and close them as I read them. In my opinion, it's much better than going back over and over and over again.
Already fixed. I'm not sure if it's fixed on just the trunk or not, but it's fixed somewhere.
For me, working with XHTML and HTML has been the same for the most part. When a browser supports XHTML 2.0, I'll use it (whether that's horribly stupid or not) and then translating from XHTML to HTML and back may not be so easy, but for now I can do it without any trouble at all.
Is that really what they're doing? I haven't heard anything like this before.
114 for "smells like froot loops".
You're fighting
losing battle
It's impossible
doesn't even
grasp of English
too good
Choose your battles
Did I catch the joke?
(your misspelling has me wondering how credible your knowledge is) are simialr
LOL
Even more obvious is that RSS' should be RSS's instead.