Slashdot Mirror


Computer Jargon Too Difficult for Office Workers

slashflood writes "Most office workers find computer terms such as javascript and jpeg just as difficult to understand as a foreign language, according to a new survey. A poll of 1,500 staff by recruitment firm Computer People showed that three out of four wasted more than an hour every week simply finding out what some technical term meant. 'A massive 61% don't understand the difference between gigabytes, kilobytes and megabytes and as a result have sent e-mails with huge attachments that have blocked clients' systems.'"

601 comments

  1. Its not just computers. by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its not just computer jargon that is confusing

    I still don't know what TPS stands for.

    1. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not supposed to.

      That's the joke.

    2. Re:Its not just computers. by Eslyjah · · Score: 5, Informative

      I still don't know what TPS stands for.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TPS_report.

    3. Re:Its not just computers. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Test Procedure Specification" as defined by IEEE 829, mostly used in government work.

      And as far as I'm concerned, workers need to get used to the jargon or take a hike. Measurements and particular jargon abound in all walks of life. If you're making cookies, for example, you need to understand a cup, teaspoon, pint, etc. (or liter and the like if you're not American). If you build a shed, you need to know what a foot or meter is, don't you? In those disciples, you also need to know things like what a hammer is, or a mixer. Computers aren't any different. No one is asking that the average user understand coding, but understanding things like storage space is a requirement.

    4. Re:Its not just computers. by Nasa+Rosebuds · · Score: 1

      Uh, yeah! Isn't that what is supposed to make the parent posters comment funny and ironic. As well as the article.

    5. Re:Its not just computers. by dlZ · · Score: 1
      I still don't know what TPS stands for.

      Tiny Plastic Sword, of course!

      http://www.kingdomofloathing.com/

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    6. Re:Its not just computers. by op12 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I still don't know what TPS stands for.

      Didn't you get that memo?

    7. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I totally agree with you, a lot of people are very lazy and don't want to take the time to learn. Most just want the dang PC to work. When I start work at a new company, I always like to ask to give a few training classes or give a copy of my own 'computers for beginners' manual to everyone. Also, I find a lot of companies hire people who are clueless about computers, when the majority of their job revolves around using it. Here, unfortunately, they hire the cutest, DUMBEST bimbos as sales agents, and we spend the majority of our time trying to clean up their spyware riddled or corrupted (via "I tried to install ") Windows.

    8. Re:Its not just computers. by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      > Tiny Plastic Sword, of course!

      That was my first thought. GPoaS was the one that threw me for the longest time. Now I have one,
      it's name is Vlasic. Hurray for in-jokes !

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    9. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it wasn't dumbass. The joke was that he made a simple mistake, but he kept getting the same lecture.

    10. Re:Its not just computers. by xsbellx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What is truly amzaing is how we haven't managed to blow up the world yet with all of these acronyms especially when they are so context specific.

      To my simple mind, TPS is "Transactions Per Second". "Test Procedure Specification" would never have entered my mind.

      --
      If VISTA is the answer, you didn't understand the question
    11. Re:Its not just computers. by dlZ · · Score: 1

      I named mine Oops because of the whole eye poking thing ;D Now, time to go for some of that HCOxy!

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    12. Re:Its not just computers. by stonedonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Measurements and particular jargon abound in all walks of life. If you're making cookies, for example, you need to understand a cup, teaspoon, pint, etc. (or liter and the like if you're not American). If you build a shed, you need to know what a foot or meter is, don't you? In those disciples, you also need to know things like what a hammer is, or a mixer. Computers aren't any different.

      True, but a computer is a device, not a tradecraft. Furthermore, unlike a device like a car or pocket calculator, it is a platform for entertainment and productivity, and it is far more complex than both and truly requires an additional vocabulary to operate it efficiently. And the complexity isn't necessarily the hardware, but in the lack of standardization, the abstraction of the interface, and in the necessities of modern security. The home computer is still a novelty to the general public, believe it or not. Partly because it's still a relatively expensive investment and prone to all kinds of exploits, tricks, and scams as soon as you connect it to the Internet.

      Think about evertyhing you must put in place to properly secure a Windows PC, for example. First, you must install a virus scanner. For the majority of users, this *is* a must, because they really aren't savvy about e-mail attachements, message spoofing, and shady-looking websites. Then you need at least a software firewall, which pops up a prompt the first time each app request a network connection -- and the prompts aren't always very informative. Win32 Generic Host Process? Um, okay, I guess. Either that, or you get a router, and that requires hooking it up with the modem and the computer. And God help you if you need to start forwarding ports and setting up wireless encryption. Then there's IE's default settings that allow browser helper objects, referral IDs, and every cookie that gets thrown your way.

      So what to do when you don't even know what a firewall is? When you aren't aware of the importance of shrinking down that huge "jpeg" you took with your digital camera before mass mailing it to all your friends and family who have email addresses? There's a lot of technical awareness that /. takes for granted, but it's important to remember that we represent a very small percentage of the populace.

    13. Re:Its not just computers. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > I still don't know what TPS stands for.

      "Time Processing System"--an old pay and billing
      time-tracking system. TPS was recently retired
      and replaced by something called "Kronos". I know
      because I used to support a TPS system. I
      managed to duck running the Kronos replacement
      (partly because it runs on Windows and I don't
      do Windows). Fortunately, nobody ever bugged
      my about cover sheets for it.

      Chris Mattern

    14. Re:Its not just computers. by sleighb0y · · Score: 1

      Throttle Position Sensor

    15. Re:Its not just computers. by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 0

      Wow- I understand your point, but computers are getting to be appliances. How many words specific to a washing machine do you need to know to operate one? Most of us drive every day, yet many don't know the jargon for the parts of what a car does. We just want to turn the key and go somewhere.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    16. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA:

      But with the computer people have not got to the point where they are willing to lift up the bonnet and have a go themselves

      WTF is a "bonnet" and why does it require lifting? I hate jargon!

    17. Re:Its not just computers. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How many words specific to a washing machine do you need to know to operate one?

      Washing Machine: Hot cycle, Cold cycle, Permanent Press, Colors, Whites, Dry Clean Only, Gentle, Cotton, Polyester, etc, etc, etc.

      I hate to say it, but those things are damned hard to operate properly.

      ? Most of us drive every day, yet many don't know the jargon for the parts of what a car does.

      Car: Accelerator/Gas, Brake, Shift, Gear, Mile(KM), Miles(KM) per Hour, bucket seats, overdrive, fuel efficiency, gallons, gas tank, windshield, wipers, wiper fluid, oil/lubricant, glove compartment, tire rotation, coolant, etc, etc, etc.

      And yes, you need to know these things to operate it.

      We just want to turn the key and go somewhere.

      If you think about that for a moment, you'll realize that you won't get very far. Plus you have to understand what a keyed ignition is first, not to mention the steering wheel, the gas, the brake, the shifter... ;-)

    18. Re:Its not just computers. by gemtech · · Score: 1

      and there inlies the problem with acronyms.
      I am the acronym nazi where I work. We have several different people in a building where the accounting, IT, and engineering have to work together. The accounting people are the worse about using acronyms.

      --
      Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein
    19. Re:Its not just computers. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      And in complete contradiction to the flamewar on the lack of computer jobs since GWB took office I started the other day- there's opportunity in this situation someplace. If only I had the money to rent a classroom....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    20. Re:Its not just computers. by Skater · · Score: 1

      "Throttle Position Sensor" for me. I sometimes get to work on cars.

    21. Re:Its not just computers. by TaGirl_Keri · · Score: 0

      n00bs. LOLOLOL!!!!!

      --
      My fav units are dead Mavs
    22. Re:Its not just computers. by rovingeyes · · Score: 1

      Well you sent a gigabyte attachment with it. My system blocked it ;)

    23. Re:Its not just computers. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So what to do when you don't even know what a firewall is?

      You learn. A firewall is a very simple idea - it attempts to keep dangerous stuff away from you, just like a real firewall.

      When you aren't aware of the importance of shrinking down that huge "jpeg" you took with your digital camera before mass mailing it to all your friends and family who have email addresses?

      Knowing about files and their sizes is a basic part of operating a computer. That's like driving a car and not knowing that you have to change the oil.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    24. Re:Its not just computers. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      True, but a computer is a device, not a tradecraft.

      Ahem. Wordprocessing, spreadsheets, web research, photo processing, graphics design, etc. All are tradecrafts that employ a computer.

      Furthermore, unlike a device like a car or pocket calculator, it is a platform for entertainment and productivity, and it is far more complex than both and truly requires an additional vocabulary to operate it efficiently.

      I addressed the vocabulary for a car here. It's not like a car is simpler, we just grow up understanding it.

      Think about evertyhing you must put in place to properly secure a Windows PC, for example.

      This is where I agree with you. The computer is currently too complex because of unnecessary management issues. This is akin to the early age of cars where you needed to understand a LOT about how it operated in order to start it and keep it running. Today, there is very little management. You still have to understand a lot of terms, but the management side has been reduced to regular use plus occasional oil changes. Many vehicle owners will never have to change their tires, flush their coolant, top off their battery, or touch their transmission fluids. Computers aren't there yet, and won't be until we can knock Microsoft off the top of the food chain. :-) (And NO, Linux in its current form won't solve the problem either.)

    25. Re:Its not just computers. by hetfield_guitar · · Score: 2, Funny

      And Uh, I'll go ahead and make sure you get another copy of that memo Mmmm, Ok?

    26. Re:Its not just computers. by nsfw · · Score: 1

      I still don't know what TPS stands for.

      I work for a government contractor that does automatic test systems for aircraft (My specialty is avionics on the V-22). Around here that stands for Test Program Set.

      Every once in a while I have to write a TPS Report

    27. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding, Like ROI isn't confusing and if you ask they look at you like your a moron. Please. At least alot of computer Jargon has been around a hell of alot longer and sometimes even makes sense.

    28. Re:Its not just computers. by uncoveror · · Score: 1
      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    29. Re:Its not just computers. by Enigma_Man · · Score: 4, Informative

      A lot of people complain about automotive analogies, but I really like them:

      Knowing about files and their sizes is a basic part of operating a computer. That's like driving a car and not knowing that you have to change the oil.

      Not anymore. Any new car you buy, they tell you to bring the car in for service every 3000, 5000, or what-have-you miles. They don't tell you every specific thing they're going to do. They might not even necessarily mention that they're changing the oil. Obviously most people have been brought up enough around cars to realize that you need to change the oil every so often, but that's often the extent of their knowledge. If you bring up other maintenance, like flushing of coolant, suspension alignment and greasing, brake fluid changing; a lot more people will know a lot less information about it. While it may be obvious to an auto-enthusiast, people just don't know what they have to do, which is why manufacturers have "service intervals" where they do _something_ and your car continues to work. It stands to reason that most people probably need something like this for thier computer, something that automatically scans/protects/assumes things for them, such that for 99% of people, their computer "Just Works", just like for 99% of people, the service you get at the dealership so your car "just works" is ok-happy-fine.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    30. Re:Its not just computers. by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      Toyota Production System. It's both a shield and a sword--it's how they win all those quality awards, and also how they produce some of the blandest-looking and most boring to drive cars on the road today, earning them the nickname "Japanese Buick."

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    31. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. If you can't deal with change. You should not leave your house.

    32. Re:Its not just computers. by utnow · · Score: 1

      what's scary here is not that the don't understand computer terms (these are for communication between IT personel, not sales agents). The scary part is that in not understanding the difference between mega, kilo, giga, etc.

      Maybe the problem isn't that computer jargon is too difficult... maybe the problem is that we're hiring people who aren't intelligent, don't have educations, or were allowed to get degrees despite a lack of proper instruction.

      I'm going to patent that idea as the "American Public University System"

    33. Re:Its not just computers. by wolfdvh · · Score: 2, Informative
      To my simple mind, TPS is "Transactions Per Second". "Test Procedure Specification" would never have entered my mind.

      The problem is there are too many of these and not enough "letters" ;-)

      The current one that jumps out at me every time I hear it is: SOA

      To these aged ears that is clearly 'Start of Authority' as one would see on DNS servers. Now those letter have been co-opted with some new buzzword compliant term that I still don't remember because when I hear it I first think of its orignal meaning.

    34. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice post.
      Just to expand one more that early car drivers did not have..

      Steering Wheel Fluid. :)

      I know quite a few cars that still need the owner to put more in so they can acutally turn the car.

    35. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good thing you're not the grammar nazi! You'd be the worse!

    36. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The accounting people are the worse about using acronyms.

      The superlative is your better friend.

    37. Re:Its not just computers. by Xibby · · Score: 1

      It's really not. I had to fill out the requisition paperwork for a new office laptop this week. I did something wrong, and got a message something along the lines of:

      This needs to be coded for GL 2.5.38392, NAA, with the proper vendor code.

      GL codes, NAA, and whatever other jargon appeared nowhere on the electronic form, so I e-mailed back:

      Hi,

      I'm sure this all makes perfect sense to you, but I speak IT not Accounting. Could you clarify please?

      And if you think IT jargon is bad, try working with Quality Assurance people for a week.

      --
      I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
    38. Re:Its not just computers. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
      but computers are getting to be appliances

      Yes and no. Everybody's trying to get them there, but it will never happen. Even with an old 486 I can still do a million and one things. Conversely, a washing machine is good only for washing my clothes and having sex on. This whole 'appliance' idea for PCs is a daydream at best.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    39. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (or liter and the like if you're not American)

      Excuse me, but the people of every country from Canada to Chile and the Caribbean islands are Americans, and almost all those countries use metric units like liters.

      Just because the founders of the United States of America didn't come up with a proper single-word name for the country it doesn't give the USA the right to steal the name of the continent. Which, by the way, had been in use for over 200 years before the USA came to be. This is a remnant of the ill-fated first attempt at a new country, the Articles of Confederation. They had no central authority and tried to maintain a loose "union of states" where each had their own government.

      As somebody pointed out in another /. discussion, imagine if Germany called itself Republic of Europe or if China (PRC) chose the name People's Republic of Asia. Would you call those countries Europe and Asia, respectively?

      The USA's awkward, inflexible name doesn't even allow for a simple single-word term for its people. Other languages do have it, by the way. In Spanish your incorrect term of "American" is more accurately called "estadounidense".

      http://www.firstgov.gov/Espanol/Topics/Recien_LLeg ados/Inmigracion.shtml

      And this concludes today's lesson of Geography 101, have a nice weekend.

    40. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're a Kebeker, Taxe sur les Produits et Services! Goods and Services Tax!

    41. Re:Its not just computers. by Zerbey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Washing Machine: Hot cycle, Cold cycle, Permanent Press, Colors, Whites, Dry Clean Only, Gentle, Cotton, Polyester, etc, etc, etc.

      Oh come on...:

      * If you wear it: wash it in cold, or luke warm if it's really dirty. Separate white and colours.
      * If you sleep on it (bedsheets, you dirty bastards): wash it warm
      * If you dry or wash yourself with it, wash it on hot.

      As far as the dryer is concerned, never, ever, use the hottest setting (which my dryer does by default for some stupid reason) unless you intent to shrink everything :).

      Seriously, it's not that hard. Most things you wear have instructions on the label. You do know how to read a manual, right?

    42. Re:Its not just computers. by anotherone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd wager that a fair percentage of drivers don't realize that they have to change the oil, either.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    43. Re:Its not just computers. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      *Whoosh* goes the point.

    44. Re:Its not just computers. by Joker1980 · · Score: 1

      No one is asking that the average user understand coding, but understanding things like storage space is a requirement. Where i work as an sys admin i wish they understood how to logon for gods sake. also removing paper from a printer is not a specialist skill.

      --
      Well, Bart, your uncle Arthur used to have a saying: "Shoot 'em all and let God sort 'em out."
    45. Re:Its not just computers. by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or you could just drive it until it breaks.. I've saved a lot on unnecessary repairs over the years. (I do believe in regular oil changes, though)

    46. Re:Its not just computers. by CokeBear · · Score: 1

      One thing I've never been able to figure out: WTF is "Permanent Press"?

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    47. Re:Its not just computers. by moxley · · Score: 1

      TPS reports are one thing...

      But ESO issues are where the real fun begins!!!

      ESO - "Equipment superior to operator."

    48. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as far as I'm concerned, workers need to get used to the jargon or take a hike. Measurements and particular jargon abound in all walks of life. If you're making cookies, for example, you need to understand a cup, teaspoon, pint, etc. (or liter and the like if you're not American). If you build a shed, you need to know what a foot or meter is, don't you?

      I don't have to understand how my car works to drive it. I don't have to understand how the electric motor in my blender works to make a smoothie. I don't have to understand plasma dynamics or scan lines or pixels to watch TV. If something like 61% of computer users are confused by even the most basic computer jargon, then the users aren't broken - the computers and software are broken.

    49. Re:Its not just computers. by shawb · · Score: 1

      I thought Toyotas made bland looking cars because of differences between American and Japanese culture. In Japan you generally won't be able to see a car from far away, so the overall shape is less important than little flourishes such as tight seams and little decorative elements. That, and the automobile is considered more of a utilitarian tool there than some fulfilment of a lifestyle.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    50. Re:Its not just computers. by Psycho+909NL · · Score: 1
      Seriously, it's not that hard. Most things you wear have instructions on the label. You do know how to read a manual, right?
      no SERIOUSLY how many users have you seen who read the computer manuals???? me... so far none
    51. Re:Its not just computers. by sd_diamond · · Score: 1

      And as far as I'm concerned, workers need to get used to the jargon or take a hike. Measurements and particular jargon abound in all walks of life. If you're making cookies, for example, you need to understand a cup, teaspoon, pint, etc. (or liter and the like if you're not American).

      Whatever. Here's my cookie recipe:

      • Some milk
      • A lot of flour
      • A little bit of baking powder
      • A lot of sugar
      • A lot of chocolate chips
      • Some butter
      • A few eggs

      Mix it all together and put lumps of the batter on a sheet. Turn the oven on and bake for a while. If it doesn't work, try again.

    52. Re:Its not just computers. by rossifer · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it isn't as obvious as you think. My clothes washing approach is pretty different from yours.

      Whites, blue jeans, towels and bedclothes: hot water, normal cycle.
      Delicates: cold water, gentle cycle.
      Everything else: warm water, normal cycle. Group dark colors, bright colors, light colors into separate loads.

      Dryer: hottest setting unless the garmet tag says otherwise (usually not).

      I buy extra-large T-shirts, which fit me after a few washes. Nothing else seems to shink all that much. Most of my casual clothes last between 5 to 10 years. Nicer clothes tend to get retired after a few years by tears/rips or stains that even the professional cleaners can't get out.

      Regards,
      Ross

    53. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I tried to print it, but the printer said there was a paper jam. Why does it say paper jam when there is no paper jam?!?!?!

    54. Re:Its not just computers. by operagost · · Score: 1

      My Olds Alero and Buick Skylark manuals detailed each maintenance item to be performed at 3,000 mile intervals: oil changes, air filter inspection, fuel filter replacement, brake inspection, etc.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    55. Re:Its not just computers. by tutori · · Score: 1

      Well, personally I always confuse the DD and the DoD. And then there's always the HSoAFR (or is it HSoFAR?), the ultra-rare smurf from smurfadia.

    56. Re:Its not just computers. by matzebrei · · Score: 1

      I see it as "Suspicion Of Authority", a fairly common meme in our modern society.

      -------

      IAAMOAC

    57. Re:Its not just computers. by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      In French Canada, it's the Tax on Products and Services... I hate TPS...

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    58. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ross you are not the weirdo. The parent must be the guy around town with the dirty-ass, smelly clothes.

    59. Re:Its not just computers. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't have to understand how my car works to drive it.

      Why yes, yes you do.

      And it's not so much a matter of how it works as how to operate it. You can't effectively operate a computer without understanding things like storage measurements.

      I don't have to understand how the electric motor in my blender works to make a smoothie.

      No, but you do have to understand what blend, puree, high, low, and off mean. You also need to know how to measure the milk, ice, and flavoring. Which requires an understanding a units, doesn't it? Just like the units on a hard drive!

      I don't have to understand plasma dynamics or scan lines or pixels to watch TV.

      Nor do you need to understand head movement, staged pipelines, wait states, or memory refresh cycles to operate you computer. But you *do* need to understand the power button, channels, volume, video source, audio in/out, RCA cabling, and a variety of other details to operate your TV. You probably even need to understand measurements to make sure your TV will fit your home! (There's those pesky units again!)

      If something like 61% of computer users are confused by even the most basic computer jargon, then the users aren't broken - the computers and software are broken.

      No, the users are broken enough. The problem is that you have a generation that didn't grow up with computers. They're the ones having problems. (Remember, baby boomers outnumber the baby busters.)

      It was the same problem with cars. Have you ever seen an old lady driving *really* slowly down the road? Ever wonder why they do that? It's because they didn't grow up with cars. Since they didn't experience the concept early on, they had difficulties with it later in life. For example, my mother had the hardest time teaching my grandmother to drive years ago. My grandmother kept wanting to look out the side window, because that was what she was used to doing!

    60. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, personally I use the Red in tooth and Claw method.

      I dump all my clothes in and put it on hot water and full detergent, whatever makes it through, I wear, what doesn't, I don't.

    61. Re:Its not just computers. by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Car: Accelerator/Gas, Brake, Shift, Gear, Mile(KM), Miles(KM) per Hour, bucket seats, overdrive, fuel efficiency, gallons, gas tank, windshield, wipers, wiper fluid, oil/lubricant, glove compartment, tire rotation, coolant, etc, etc, etc.

      My turn for Car:

      Get in, sit down, turn the key. Transmission in drive. Gas pedal, brake pedal, steering wheel. That's about it. If the car says "low fuel", add fuel. If it says "need maintenance" (or, on older/cheaper cars, every x000 miles), take it to the shop. They do "stuff," I pay money.

      Oil? Coolant? Rotation? Lubricant? Bucket? Shift? Not necessary to get from point A to point B really. Want to get into it? The jargon becomes to get more useful. However... if you don't need the extra detail, you don't have to worry about it. Personally, I'm a bit of a car nut, but that's just me. My mother certainly isn't, doesn't want to be, and doesn't have to be either.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    62. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP
      Seriously- Be a fucking man. FUCK anyone who mods anything "overrated"
      Especially anypost that hasn't even fucking been moderated yet.
      MOD PARENT UP
      especially on a Friday afternoon. Is it because you know you will be getting no PUSSY this weekend?
      MOD PARENT UP

    63. Re:Its not just computers. by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      > And then there's always the HSoAFR (or is it HSoFAR?), the ultra-rare smurf from smurfadia.

      HSoFAR. I'm going to farm one of those after I get a couple of IDMGs, which are what
      I'm currently after.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    64. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can spout your prescriptive grammarian/lexicographer nonsense as much as you'd like. In ENGLISH (other languages can use whatever words they damn well please) "American" is used to mean "of or related to the US" and understood as such by speakers of English. Have a nice day, you elitist snob.

    65. Re:Its not just computers. by killproc · · Score: 1


      Momoo dogface to the banana patch.

      --
      When you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness. So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.
    66. Re:Its not just computers. by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      Makes sense, what I said was entirely tongue-in-cheek!

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    67. Re:Its not just computers. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you cheated. You read the manual. I seriously wish computer programs still came with paper manuals. The ones on the computer are nice, but they don't work too well when the computer stops working.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    68. Re:Its not just computers. by bdeclerc · · Score: 2, Informative

      And in Europe it gets worse, with all the different languages... SOA in Dutch means STD (as in AIDS, Syphillis and the like :)

    69. Re:Its not just computers. by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Its not just computer jargon that is confusing

      I still don't know what TPS stands for.,


      For me it's Telus Plaza South.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    70. Re:Its not just computers. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I'm sure everyone's computers would work much better too if they took them in for a checkup every 3 months. Seriously, most computer problems results from piles and piles of problems. People hear their car making a little sputtering noise, and they take it into the shop. People will wait until their computer is on it's last legs before going to get it fixed. And at that point, they don't get it fixed, they usually just buy a new one. A computer is a much more complicated device than a car. I can't believe people maintain their car, but not their computer.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    71. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it does not mean 'terapicosiemens'.

      It stands for 'Trivial Posting on Slashdot'.

    72. Re:Its not just computers. by tutori · · Score: 1

      Things I know about my washing machine: Difference between a large and small load Now, I know how to sort my laundry into colors and whites, and where to put the detergent in, but I have no clue on the different cycles, I just always use normal. Do my clothes end up looking horrible? No. I could probably get them cleaner if I knew more about how to operate the machine, but as it is now it makes them not smell and that's good enough for me. As for driving a car, there is a certain level of competence you need there, that's why we need to be licsensed to drive. However, to just be able to drive, you don't really need to know all that much. Gas, brakes and the steering wheel for certain, definitely assuming automatic transmission. After that, blinker, windshield wipers and headlights to lower chances of an accident/traffic violation. Also, how to use a key. Certainly many other things are needed to maintain a vehicle in working condition, but you don't really need to know anything else to drive one. I successfully drove my parents car for a year or so after getting my licsense without needing to know how to fill a car with gasoline. I just had to keep track of how much gas each had, and drive the other car if one was low.

    73. Re:Its not just computers. by Salvo · · Score: 1

      I work in Automotive and TPS is Throttle Position Sensor.

    74. Re:Its not just computers. by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      You are sure those are not initialisms?

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    75. Re:Its not just computers. by TechStuff.ca · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. There's no such thing as a good TLA. *

      * Three-Letter Acronym

    76. Re:Its not just computers. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Clearly those wankers should consider converting to the metric system.

      maybe the problem is that we're hiring people who aren't intelligent, don't have educations, or were allowed to get degrees despite a lack of proper instruction I'm going to patent that idea as the "American Public University System"

      Unfortunately if you actualy RTFA, you might have noticed that it was Llandudno, where Office administration worker Chloe Oldfield works, is in Wales, a country in Great Britian. A quick google on Llandudno brings up the links to a very pleasent looking town.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    77. Re:Its not just computers. by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Easy way to show the K >M > G >T progression Kilobyte =Box of stuff = move in Car Megabyte =Shelf Unit of stuff = move in Truck Gigabyte = Room of Stuff =move in Semi TeraByte = House of Stuff = move on Train tuck in the ~1000 multipler for each step and its sorted then you just tell your users that they need to keep stuff smaller than truck size

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    78. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too! But half my socks, shirts, and underwear are now pink due to color mixing...

    79. Re:Its not just computers. by agraupe · · Score: 1

      One thing I want to add: adding gas/petrol is not an easy endeavor if you haven't done it before. Sure, the pump is fairly self-explanitory, but nowhere in the manual (yes, I had to check) does it say how to open the gas door. There is no handle on it, no handle in the car, nothing. I later found out that you had to press on it. There is no indication on where on the door to push, and I ignored it because I pushed on the wrong side the first time.

    80. Re:Its not just computers. by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      really? i didnt know any of that! i actually learned something on slashdot..

      personally i set the washer on warm because that turns on both the hot and the cold water and the washer fills up faster. then i dont have to wait as long for my clothes to wash.
      your ways good too tho.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    81. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then you wonder why the rest of the world doesn't like us? For what it's worth, I think the GP had a good point. I've seen the term "USian" in some other posts here and I think it makes sense.

    82. Re:Its not just computers. by denominateur · · Score: 1

      Would you consider that a car can cost up to 100 times more than a computer? You don't want that breaking... Yet service costs for computers would probably be higher than for regular car service since they would be more time consuming.

    83. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I've never been able to figure out: WTF is "Permanent Press"?

      Are you really that fucking stupid? Permanent press means that you do not have to iron it... Idiot.

    84. Re:Its not just computers. by plumby · · Score: 1
      Transmission in drive.

      And there is the problem - you think that's all blatantly obvious terminology, but I've never heard those words uttered together in my life before (if it hadn't been for the context, I'd assume you were talking about broadcasting from the driveway outside my house). I've no idea if this is common terminology to everyone who drives (I don't), or just Americans (I'm not), but to me it's car jargon.

    85. Re:Its not just computers. by daigu · · Score: 1

      Not to mention install a Microsoft patch that breaks your machine's configuration. Automatic Update has a habit of making a computer unusable. How do you explain that people need to patch their machines and that doing so make break them?

    86. Re:Its not just computers. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I, OTOH, laugh whenever anyone talks about a POS.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    87. Re:Its not just computers. by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Oh, please. How many people know what a real firewall is?

      The auto-repair industry and architects are about the only people you can count on to know what a 'firewall' is.

      I started talking about the firewall in a car to someone one day and they thought I was talking about something related to a car's computer.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    88. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this sex you speak of, and can it be done at the laundromat?

      Your point about a computer doing a million things and a washing machine doing a couple is quite valid. If you took the washing machine, the dishwasher, the radial arm saw, the car, etc. and put them together in one machine, you'd have a lot of jargon. In fact, just the car alone has a lot of jargon, and has a nice arsenal of acronyms to go with it.

      "Shit, my ABS, O/D, and OIL lights are on... what do they mean, and are any important?"

      In terms of user education, cars don't require as much training as computers, despite the fact that cars can kill and computers usually don't. That's because most car owners don't try to install a supercharger on their own because they didn't want to bother the mechanic. However, a lot of spyware gets installed due to clicking on simple "Is your computer running slowly?" ads.

      As for the terms causing confusion,

      kilobytes - gigabytes : anyone sending snail mail knows that heavier things are harder to send. Analogies sometimes do work.

      javascript : who the fuck cares?

    89. Re:Its not just computers. by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Ha! That's the system I use, too. I set it to heavy duty warm. Full load of random stuff. Any grouping done is solely so I do less work when I take them out. (Today, stuff I have to fold. Tomorrow, stuff I don't.)

      If I'm worried new something is going to bleed, I save up some towels and then throw them in together. After a few times, it stops bleeding. (Few things do actually bleed, but I have some interesting looking towels.) Or I toss it, I can't be arsed to remember about it.

      Then I throw them into the dryer. If they aren't dry, I dry them again. Ifit shrinks, then it shrinks. It's not going to keep shrinking, and better it shrink now than later. And no anti-static, that's for silly people. Who cares?

      The only things I actually pay the slightest bit of attention to the settings of are coats. Of course, those get washed like four times a year. And suits, but I only wear those three or four times a year.

      Damn wimpy-ass clothes wanting me to baby them. I'm glad they get destroyed, saves me the trouble of throwing them out.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    90. Re:Its not just computers. by calzones · · Score: 1

      Actually, understanding jpegs and filesizes is like knowing which kind of envelope to use and how much it weighs before FedExing it somewhere. If you tried to mail a massive poster instead of a polaroid to share a picture, I'm sure your boss would question your common sense.

      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    91. Re:Its not just computers. by tenton · · Score: 1

      POS always cracked me up. When I first heard it, I went "what's so bad about it?"

      Then I started to use the system; that POS was a POS.

      (POS is also known as a Point of Sale, i.e., a register, for those that don't know, or didn't really work cash registers).

    92. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A lot of people complain about automotive analogies, but I really like them:

      Knowing about files and their sizes is a basic part of operating a computer. That's like driving a car and not knowing that you have to change the oil.

      Not anymore. Any new car you buy, they tell you to bring the car in for service every 3000, 5000, or what-have-you miles. They don't tell you every specific thing they're going to do. They might not even necessarily mention that they're changing the oil. Obviously most people have been brought up enough around cars to realize that you need to change the oil every so often, but that's often the extent of their knowledge. If you bring up other maintenance, like flushing of coolant, suspension alignment and greasing, brake fluid changing; a lot more people will know a lot less information about it. While it may be obvious to an auto-enthusiast, people just don't know what they have to do, which is why manufacturers have "service intervals" where they do _something_ and your car continues to work. It stands to reason that most people probably need something like this for thier computer, something that automatically scans/protects/assumes things for them, such that for 99% of people, their computer "Just Works", just like for 99% of people, the service you get at the dealership so your car "just works" is ok-happy-fine.

      I think a better analogy would be owning a car and not understanding miles, miles per hour, miles per gallon, or gallons (apologies to my metric friends). If you don't understand mph, and you think you're going to get from NY to CA in 2 hours in your Ford Taurus, you're sadly mistaken. And I don't cry for you if you only put a half gallon of gasoline in your car to do it. Yeah, someone can fill your tank for you, but if the attendant says "that will be $1000" (and you're not driving a Hummer), you should know there's no way you could have spent that much. Cars and computers are both tools we use every day. You either learn the terminology, or you should stay home.
    93. Re:Its not just computers. by devnulljapan · · Score: 1

      Hmmm....But here's one you all miss. I can't drive - never got around to learning and I've so far never lived in a country where the auto industry killed the public transport systems. Now, I don't expect to be able to jump in a car and have it "just work" for me. Haven't a clue how to even start the thing, let alone anything else. Oil change, carburetor, clutch: all obscure arcane technical terms to me. I'll get around to learning some day, but that's the point. Most people have no intention of ever learning anything about computers but still expect to be able to use them, often for some vague purpose they've heard about on Oprah, and them blame the computers/geeks when they don't understand something, can't do something, try to do something but actually do something else...etc. And to top it all, many of those people are resolutely proud of their lack of ability. I agree that the informative page 2 What it all means of this article is symptomatic of the problem: "Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC" WTF?

    94. Re:Its not just computers. by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      And the complexity isn't necessarily the hardware, but in the lack of standardization, the abstraction of the interface, and in the necessities of modern security.

      No, the complexity isn't because of the hardware, nor is it because of the software. The complexity of a computer lies in what it is...

      A computer is a "Universal Machine". I don't mean that in a fully literal sense - I mean it, I suppose, in a mathematical sense. A true computer (a Universal Turing Machine) is arguably not only the most elegant device on the planet, it is also arguably the most complex. Elegant, in that such a machine can be represented and actually do true processing, using the simplest of logical elements and the least amount of them. Complex, because this same machine, provided it is built right, can do the same work (albeit at a much slower pace) as a more complex and faster version of the machine.

      The software of a computer can simulate exactly the hardware of another computer (and in theory, turtles all the way down - that is, you could have an emulator of a computer running an emulator of a computer, running an emulator of a computer, ad infintum - or until you hit the limits of memory and time, of course). This is nothing short of amazing, that we humans have been able to devise such machines and that most of the time, they work. It also seems to point to the idea that hardware is nothing more than software embodied in physical form. It also seems to indicate that hardware isn't necessary for software to function or to come about - and that complexity can arise from simple sets of rules (this is the fundamental point behind Wolfram's "A New Kind of Science").

      Indeed, computers (and the idea of software and symbolic logic - both fairly recent inventions themselves - read up on the history of the computer and you will learn what a great leap it was to move from mere mathematical calculation to symbolic logic processing - something which didn't emerge in full until Turing and others made the grand leap in the 1940's!) are the closest thing that mankind has managed to create that imitates the processes within the human brain and mind.

      The computer is probably the most revolutionary device and tool mankind has ever created. We are so close to the point of its full realization, that most of us don't realize this. We don't fully realize or appreciate the drastic and dramatic changes which its invention and use have brought upon us. The vast majority of humanity still has not grasped the fact that our knowledge aggregation is speeding up at an exponentially increasing rate. It is this issue that people are trying to come to grips with, when they talk about "information overload" and not understanding computers. They just don't realize it yet, and many of them never will...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    95. Re:Its not just computers. by empvirus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's crazy how little you have to know about anything other than your job to get around. As you said, they take their cars to a mechanic every so often and it "just works". Unfortunately it seems to get a computer work exactly the way you want it, you gotta know your computer-- inside and out.

      --
      Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
    96. Re:Its not just computers. by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      This is the truth. Regular oil changes, air filter changes, plugs and wires on occasion, maybe a transmission flush now and again, plus keeping the gear oil topped on the differential (if you have one) is about all the real maintenance a car needs on a regular basis. Keep an eye on the power steering and brake fluid levels, and an ear (and nose!) on everything else, and a car will easily last for a very long time. Yeah, you should lube the chassis every now and again (at least once or twice a year), change the brake pads when they are worn, rotate your tires, change the shocks when your car is bouncing, and align the sucker every now and again. For the most part though, cars tend to be real tough things. I have seen enough jalopies going down the road to know that you can really abuse the hell out of a car before it will stop running (been to enough destruction derbies as well to know this truth, too). Granted, it might not pass a state inspection or emmissions checks once it has gotten past a certain point - but it will run.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    97. Re:Its not just computers. by typical · · Score: 1

      "Shit, my ABS, O/D, and OIL lights are on... what do they mean, and are any important?"

      But you can go to a mechanic and he can reasonably reliably fix it for a small chunk of the cost of the car. Cars don't change that fast, they're (relatively) simple, and the industry is well understood.

      With a computer, you've got enough yahoos who have no idea what they're doing running computer repair shops to fill a football stadium (sorry, folks on here that *do* know that they're talking about). And you get problems on a much more frequent basis. I use a Linux box, but simply from Firefox, I probably see an error dialog of one sort or another at *least* on an every-other-day basis. Maybe I don't have Flash installed, or maybe I needed to not reload a page in the middle of a website. I see error dialogs *far* more often at work on Windows machines. If my car started flashing new warning lights several times a day, yes, I'd be intimidated.

      kilobytes - gigabytes : anyone sending snail mail knows that heavier things are harder to send. Analogies sometimes do work.

      Do they know what "KB" or "kB" or "KiB" stand for when they show up in dialogs, though?

      I kind of agree, though. Maybe you don't really know what data is or how computers work at all, but you should be able to at least know what the common SI prefixes are. To be fair, I think that "giga-" probably doesn't come up much in everyday life.

      Javascript -- websites bring up errors saying that it needs to be enabled, and Javascript scripts frequently bring up error dialogs themselves.

      Cars are built and then tested to kingdom come by competent engineers. There isn't *that* much change each year. There are a lot of people without much competence (and companies, sometimes quite large) writing bad software. I'll bet not a tenth of a percent of the "C++ programers" out there would be able to give coherent, correct answers in comp.lang.c++. Perl -- *maybe* Larry Wall knows all of perl's secrets. Win32? Yeah, right. And the more high-level the language and API, the more likely that a developer in it can kinda-sorta use it, but fails to understand lots of the details and implications of what he's doing (exception: many functional languages are high level, and you get lots of language freaks using them.)

      When it comes down to it, computers are expensive, unreliable, changing at an incredible rate, frequently misunderstood, only recently supplied to the public at large, and absolutely, entirely essential. That's a heck of a combination.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    98. Re:Its not just computers. by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, really. I just read the shapes. Come on: "Triangle Circle 65F" is _so_ intuitive.

    99. Re:Its not just computers. by typical · · Score: 1

      First, you must install a virus scanner. For the majority of users, this *is* a must, because they really aren't savvy about e-mail attachements, message spoofing, and shady-looking websites.

      Fair enough. I have *never* had a passive virus scanner on my computer (and used an active one only briefly, the free Disinfectant from the Mac's glory days), but I can see this being plausible.

      Then you need at least a software firewall, which pops up a prompt the first time each app request a network connection -- and the prompts aren't always very informative.

      Bullshit. You do *not* need a personal firewall. The fact that AV companies managed to sell this nonsense to consumers always amazed me. Those things are more a source of problems than a fix, anyway, and they cause all kinds of interesting breakage in network applications. I'm comfortable playing with IPTables on my router, because I know enough to be able to diagnose any problems that I introduce on my network. The typical home user is the *last* person who should be screwing with the functioning of their network.

      I think that most people, even self-proclaimed techies, still treat the firewall (especially the useless "personal firewall") as sort of a magic black box that brings safety. It can be a useful tool in particular situations, but it is *vastly* overused.

      It's like me doing EE. I don't know much about EE, so when I build a circuit, I buy really fancy parts. They make me feel better, because they are higher quality. Now, in reality, there's no way that an audio circuit needs 1% accuracy in resistance or that a cap capable of sucking MHz-range noise out of a signal will be at all useful in such a circuit. However, it "feels better". The same applies to most computer users WRT utility software. Someone tells them that they need it, so they get it and feel happier. The herbal medicine industry is entirely based upon this premise.

      When you aren't aware of the importance of shrinking down that huge "jpeg" you took with your digital camera before mass mailing it to all your friends and family who have email addresses

      And the funny thing is that I *do* happily email those enormous high-resolution JPEGs out to family and friends (even those on modems). They aren't pulling this down over ZMODEM -- they can be doing other things while downloading it.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    100. Re:Its not just computers. by metaphorever · · Score: 1

      Damn, I always thought it stood for "This Place Sucks." At least that was the impression I got from this video I guess real life is less funny than the Superfriends.

      --
      If people continue to abuse this feature, I will have to remove it. - Slashdot Comment Box, 1998
    101. Re:Its not just computers. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Having a car break down will only cost the whatever it costs to fix it. Having a computer filled with spyware may cost you more than the cost required to get rid of it. You may lose data, or you may have credit card numbers and other important information stolen from you. If your car breaks down, you may have to take the bus to work. If your identity is stolen because of spyware is on your computer, you might have a hard time getting your credit rating back.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    102. Re:Its not just computers. by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      WHOA!

      Wait? You mean things have manuals? There are instructions on stuff? This idea is going to revolutionize the laundry industry, nay, the entire world!!! Just like laundry, there are instructions for using computers/digital devices, too, you know...

      I know that things like bytes and file formats aren't very tangible, but they still aren't that hard to grasp. It's the same concept as not overloading your washer, or putting too much stuff in your trunk-- a file is a certain "size", and it's just as easy to comprehend that as a quantity of liquid, or a dry good having a certain measure of quantity.

      I'm sorry, but people saying this stuff is too hard is a cop-out. Sure, you can look at a 2-liter bottle and see it's larger than a 3-liter one. But, it's no different than being able to look at one thing that says "100MB", and another thing that says "600MB". People use mL and L all the time, and there's never a problem, so what's so hard about bytes, kilobytes, and megabytes? It's the same concept, applied to something else.

      (That last part wasn't directly in response to the parent poster, but it is my $.02 on the matter.)

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    103. Re:Its not just computers. by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Well, Best Buy (the Geek Squad) charges 59USD to take in a computer and diagnose if it has a problem. Then they charge 79USD to do an OS Service, which basically is clearing out temp files, making sure the registry isn't hosed, and ripping out any spyware or viruses they can find.

      And they require the diagnostic, they will not just do an OS Service for whatever reason - probably just to gouge money.

      So, hmm 138USD for computer service - you realize that is about a third of the cost of some of the new computers that Best Buy sells? If you were really going to do this every 3 months, you might as well do what I recommend people do - buy a new cheap PC every year!

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    104. Re:Its not just computers. by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      This depends on the car. My Mom's Subaru has a lever that is marked with a gas picture that you pull - it's also described in the manual.

      The Oldsmobile I have just has a finger notch on the gas door that you pull on. It's rather obvoious with that.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    105. Re:Its not just computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote from my sister-in-law when she drug the contents of her Windows\System folder to the trash bin to free up disk space and hosed it completely: "I don't want to understand how a computer works, I just want to use it." Uh huh. You know, when I drive a car, I like to mash the gas pedal and drive 60 mph in first gear everywhere I go. I feel that, as a driver of a car and not a mechanic, I should be free to be a complete dumbass if I so choose.

    106. Re:Its not just computers. by nique · · Score: 1

      That's just what I was thinking. Yay for working in ETC.

    107. Re:Its not just computers. by nique · · Score: 1

      I'm a big fan of the automobile / computer analogy because they're both complex systems that are or are becoming a necessity in life. Ignorance in both cases is expensive. Most people know to change the oil in their car, but most people don't know why their car is making noises or why their air-conditioning just stopped working or why their breaks suck all of a sudden. So they go and take their car to the shop where the mechanic charges them just to find out what's wrong, and then charges them again to fix all the these things that they say are wrong with their car. The driver doesn't know whether or not he's being had, but he has to trust the mechanic because... what's he going to do? People expect their car to get them from A-B without any unexpected sounds, with airconditioning/heat on full blast, music playing from all the speakers, windows that move up and down... etc. They have similar expectations with computers. When they turn it on it should boot up, have all of the perfierals recognized and working, if they plug in their digital camera the computer should see it and know what to do, if they want to go on the i-net the should press a button and a browser should welcome them immediately, sending email should be instantaneous no matter what's attached, and all links that are clicked should work.... every time. Oh, and it shouldn't get slower as time goes by either. People who don't know much about cars go to the shop to get them fixed and pay premium prices for things that would ordinarily be inexpensive. The same goes for computers in that people pay money to be told to download spybot. It's too simplistic to think that cars work for the average person a lot better than computers do. People with a drivers license can drive a car, but they can't necessarily fix it if it's broke. People can turn on a computer, send email, chat on AIM, and browse the web without even needing training (most of the time), but if it's "broke".... they dont necessarily believe they can fix it. As for not knowing the difference in file sizes.... I know it's an abstract concept. You can't see kilo,mega, or terabytes....but really, if you figured out how to attach a file to your email you ought to understand how big the file is.

    108. Re:Its not just computers. by syousef · · Score: 1

      Oh I love intolerant folk like yourself. Most businesses use computers as a tool, not the focus of their existence. Their jargon may very well be engineering or cookie making or banking or anything else. THAT is what they need to know well.

      What you're suggesting is the same as suggesting that everyone who flies an airplane should be a aeronautical engineer and mechanic, as well as a fully qualified air transport pilot. Everyone who drives a car needs to be a motor mechanic, engineer etc.

      In otherwords you've missed the point and missed the boat. I would absolutely loathe working with you, and I'm in IT.

      Get a clue.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    109. Re:Its not just computers. by syousef · · Score: 1


              Seriously, it's not that hard. Most things you wear have instructions on the label. You do know how to read a manual, right?

      no SERIOUSLY how many users have you seen who read the computer manuals???? me... so far none


      How many people actually read washing instructions on all their clothes every time they wash them?

      You think they magically assimilated their knowledge of Windows explorer, Word and Excel. There are more ways to learn than reading a manual. They may have done a course, or been shown by a friend...

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    110. Re:Its not just computers. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Love you too. Especially when you're one of those people who reply before understanding my point. e.g. If you fly an airplane, you had better damn well understand you fuel, range, altimeter, angle of attack, ailerons, rudder, and many other concepts required for flynig a plane. If you fail to understand these things, then you WILL DIE when you crash the plane.

      BTW, I love how you accuse me of requiring users to be engineers when I EXPLICITLY said that I'm not (note the NOT and the NOT) looking for these people to be coders, but to understand the basic metrics (e.g. Kilobyte, Megabyte, etc.) of the machine that they're using. Of course, if you'd taken the time to read the wonderful discussion we had on this, you'd know that already. Then again, it's much eaiser to smack that Reply button and flame someone isn't it?

      Invisible Woman: "Don't even THINK about it!"
      Human Torch: "Never do."

      FLAME ON!

    111. Re:Its not just computers. by syousef · · Score: 1

      And as far as I'm concerned, workers need to get used to the jargon or take a hike. ...and then...
      Then again, it's much eaiser to smack that Reply button and flame someone isn't it?

      Bit of the pot calling the kettle black I think. I did read a large part of the discussion. Here's what I think you're failing to understand. Most business users, trades people etc. don't want to know about the detail. I grant you planes are harder but how much do you need to know to drive a car for example? You need to know the road rules but you can make a car move without them (though I wouldn't condone it). What you need to know is how to put the thing in drive or reverse, how to steer and how to use the brake and gas. It's also helpful if you understand the operation of the lights if you're travelling at night :-) Knowing what an oil light means will save you ruining the car but for the most part in a modern car you can practically ignore all that. The only gauge you typically use all the time is the speed. It then takes a little practice to get the car moving in the direction and at the speed you want. All of that isn't particularly hard and yet we have driving schools.

      Now lets look at computing. Every OS is different...very very different for some. The amount you need to know is incredible because things that should work don't. Yes computers are complex because they do more than a car (multi purpose), but look at the headaches you have with just windows and office. Don't get me started on how unfriendly Linux is to admin. Use a computer for more than a few days and you NEED to be your own computer mechanic.

      But I think you already realise all this and simply don't care. As far as you're concerned people who don't like it can get stuffed.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    112. Re:Its not just computers. by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1
      Get in, sit down, turn the key. Transmission in drive. Gas pedal, brake pedal, steering wheel. That's about it. If the car says "low fuel", add fuel. If it says "need maintenance" (or, on older/cheaper cars, every x000 miles), take it to the shop. They do "stuff," I pay money.
      Now for the person who hasn't gone through thousands of hours of watching other people do it, followed by a written exam, followed by many hours of practical training, followed by a practical exam (remember? You didn't spring forth from your mother's womb knowing how to drive):
      Get in, sit down - damn can't reach the pedals "tech support! I can't reach the pedals... ...okay, so I lift that lever and pull the seat forward... okay."
      Turn the key - damn car just jumped forward "tech support! My car's not working - I turned the key and it jumped forward instead of starting... oh? really? Okay um, which one's the clutch?"
      Depress clutch, turn key... Okay, that wasn't fair, I'll do that bit again with an automatic...
      Turn the key - nothing happened "tech support! My car isn't working!" - several minutes of investigating "oh, you mean it has to be in P or N to start?" A quick explanation of what the different gear selector settings are for is provided by tech support to save a call in a few seconds.
      Selector to R because we want to go backwards, onto the road and selects D for forwards - that bit was pretty easy.
      Now we're on the road, no need for technical terms here! Don't need to know what a red hexagon means, nor a white triangle outlined in red, point down, nor a sign with numbers on it, okay arrows are pretty intuitive, but what about a circle with a horizontal line through it?

      Don't confuse the huge amount of training you've received in operating a car with intuitiveness of the interface or machine. Sure you don't need to know how a motor works to operate a car, but there is no shortage of specific technical knowledge or technical terms that you do need to know.
    113. Re:Its not just computers. by raoulotoole · · Score: 1

      Would you take a trip without a thought about stopping for gas when your tank nears empty?

    114. Re:Its not just computers. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I did read a large part of the discussion. ... I grant you planes are harder but how much do you need to know to drive a car for example?

      You're either lying or fooling yourself. The car analogy was discussed IN DETAIL in the thread. We discussed that to drive a car, you have to understand the keyed ignition, the tramission shifter, the accelerator, the brake, the fuel gauge, and the speedometer just to pull out of the drive! If you plan on driving for more than a short period, you also need to understand the fuel tank, the gasoline octanes (so you don't overpay), the range of your vehicle (so you don't get stranded), the mantenence schedule (so you don't send a piston through the empty oil pan), the rules of the road, headlights for darkness, etc, etc, etc. There is a LOT to driving a car! We just don't think about it because a) we grew up with them b) we had special training before we were allowed to use them.

      Two posts stick out in my mind from the thread. One is from a fellow who's never driven or used a car. To him, even using the key in an ignition is a foreign concept. The other post was from a fellow who's sister dragged the Windows/system folder into the trash can then complained she didn't want to understand it, she just wanted to use it! (He likened this to smashing your foot on the accelerator and driving around at 60MPH in first gear. Apt analogy. It's good to understand things.)

      Now lets look at computing. Every OS is different...very very different for some. The amount you need to know is incredible because things that should work don't.

      Again, if you'd paid attention, you'd know that I already said that the current complexity shouldn't be so. I likened computers today to the early days of cars when you had to manually crank the car, all cars were manual, you had to top off the battery yourself, flush the radiator, change the transmission fluid, rotate the tires, and perform a wide range of emergency repairs. Cars didn't get truly easy to manage until the 80's and 90's.

      Again, all I'm asking is that users have a basic knowledge of the metrics their using when they operate their computer. You don't bake cookies without knowing your metrics, and you sure as hell shouldn't be operating a computer without knowing them. And this comes from a guy who pissed off the Linux community by calling for a simpler interface! I even delivered a scathing rebuttal to a fellow who thinks new Linux users need to "read the manual first".

      Basic knowledge is a very easy thing to come by. The extents that people will go through to EXPLICITLY not learn basic knowledge about a computer ("I don't want to understand it, I just want to use it!") is just astounding.

      But I think you already realise all this and simply don't care. As far as you're concerned people who don't like it can get stuffed.

      Just so AMAZINGLY easy to smack that reply button and flame, isn't it?

    115. Re:Its not just computers. by syousef · · Score: 1

      You're either lying or fooling yourself.

      No I just don't browse at -1. However you'd rather call a person a liar and/or dillusional than understand that.

      The extents that people will go through to EXPLICITLY not learn basic knowledge about a computer ("I don't want to understand it, I just want to use it!") is just astounding.

      Your arrogance is amazing. Users who say that are typically overwhelmed by the concepts they have to grasp to use a computer but are unwilling to admit it because people don't tend to admit to their own failings, especially when it could get them fired for not being able to do their jobs.

      Just so AMAZINGLY easy to smack that reply button and flame, isn't it?

      Yes it is, and you keep proving it too.

      Now if you're trying to tell me that driving a car is as hard or harder than sitting down in front of a computer, I think you're the dillusional one.

      Just about everything to do with driving a car makes sense. There is nothing intuitive about some of the messages coming out of a computer when things go wrong. When it comes to computers you have to be unafraid to experiment and research things to fix a problem. People brough up in the 1940s and 1950s especially tend to be unable to cope with technology because it requires this sort of experimentation, while they're use to learning simple step by step procedures and sticking to them so that things don't go wrong. Some have adapted better than others but I know many intelligent people that I respect who have trouble operating something as simple as a digital camera because they panic at the complexity, let alone administering their own PCs.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    116. Re:Its not just computers. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      No I just don't browse at -1.

      I post at +2, nearly all my posts on the subject are rated +5, and the two examples I gave are at +1 and +0 respectively. You've just proven my point.

      I see no reason to continue this discussion. You're obviously not serious about it, and are just looking to flame. Enjoy talking to yourself.

    117. Re:Its not just computers. by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Its a cultural thing. Growing up in England, I knew one (and only one) person with an automatic transmission and I never did understand it. Moving to the 'States, its pretty much all people drive - 90% at least I'd say. Stick shifts are for people who actually want to get more involved in the whole driving process. I'd say that any born American would have understood it, drivers or no, from popular cultural references. Apologies for the confusion :)

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    118. Re:Its not just computers. by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      People have been operating automobiles for about, what, 90 years, so there is a lot of passed-down knowledge from generations. Your possibly now-dead great grandfather could jump into a new car today and understand how it works within seconds.

      The car-to-computer analogy is inappropriate.

    119. Re:Its not just computers. by syousef · · Score: 1

      I post at +2, nearly all my posts on the subject are rated +5, and the two examples I gave are at +1 and +0 respectively. You've just proven my point.

      Your point is what? That you've got plenty of time to waste and you're a karma whore who'll write whatever's most popular? "Linux good. Mac good. Windows bad. Uggg!". That it buddy? Some of my posts are rated +5, others are rated much lower and I'm damn proud of that. I browse at +4 by the way.

      I see no reason to continue this discussion. You're obviously not serious about it, and are just looking to flame.

      You're incredible. You haven't attempted to refute one of my very valid points from my last point. You just hurl insults and keep saying the same thing again and again. I think you should learn how to argue before you start going around and saying that people should "go take a hike". (Your words and the beginning of the so called "flame"). It takes all kinds in this world you inconsiderate self centered narcissit.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    120. Re:Its not just computers. by ProfFalcon · · Score: 1

      Service Oriented Architecture. A way of organizing an IT group to be "service oriented" instead of just being another cost center.

      [buzzzz][buzzzzz] Anybody hear the buzzing?

      --
      Simply stating [Citation Needed] does not automatically make you insightful or brilliant.
    121. Re:Its not just computers. by ProfFalcon · · Score: 1

      When you aren't aware of the importance of shrinking down that huge "jpeg" you took with your digital camera before mass mailing it to all your friends and family who have email addresses?

      Knowing about files and their sizes is a basic part of operating a computer. That's like driving a car and not knowing that you have to change the oil.


      That reminds me. I kept getting emailed Word documents from a coworker where the fonts always came out odd. The fonts were always Arial 4pt. I just could not figure out where the document was getting mangled. She had learned that her attachments were too big. She was shrinking the font to make them smaller.

      There is a large amount of learning to do about computers. Unfortunately, there's no single baseline for "you've learned enough, you're no longer dangerous." She thought she knew enough to make her attachments smaller. How would she have known she did not know enough without someone patient enough to explain the differences to her?

      We need to be patient in the IT world. People have no idea what they don't know. They think they know enough. We need to teach them (not tell them) the difference.

      Teach, it's the only way.

      --
      Simply stating [Citation Needed] does not automatically make you insightful or brilliant.
    122. Re:Its not just computers. by HeroreV · · Score: 1
      So in Dutch:
      using namespace soa;
  2. Article misses the point by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I laughed myself sick reading this article...especilly the oh-so-helpful second page, entitled 'what it all means'.

    Here's an especially good one from the list:
    • Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.

    With 'helpful' articles like this, us IT professionals should remain in demand for a good long time. ^_^

    But seriously, a good IT professional isn't one who's good at explaining the jargon, or getting laypeople to understand the technical isues...it's one that takes care of the issues for the laypeople, so they don't need to worry about them. A correctly managed IT department should be all but transparent to the other people in the office. Everything should just work, with the IT guy making certain the users' needs are met before they even know what they are. In a correctly managed facility, the IT guy's phone should almost never ring.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Article misses the point by Skiron · · Score: 1

      'Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.' Ummm. And reading articles like this really helps the lusers too.

    2. Re:Article misses the point by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 2, Funny

      Erm. There were no studies cited by this article, making it even more laughable. Some guy in Wales says Office people have a hard time understanding ITSpeak. I say I have a hard time understanding a welsh accent in the FIRST place, so it's completely possible that if someone was discussing Network setup in Welsh I wouldn't even have anything to compare it to, seeing as NetworkSpeak is so foreign to even certain types of IT professionals.

      But regardless, it has no 'base' layer of knowledge, no gradation, and no real study... Now a study, I'd be quite interested in that kind of study.

    3. Re:Article misses the point by canfirman · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Also notice from TFA:

      Among office workers 26% aren't sure what a firewall does and therefore have been tempted to turn it off.

      ...and yet, on the second page, they didn't even explain what a firewall was, so I guess that 26% still won't know.

      --
      It is not our abilities that show what we truly are... it is our choices.
    4. Re:Article misses the point by TurdTapper · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is it some UK term that I'm missing? Or is he just proving he is part of the statistics in his report?

      --
      A man with a gun is called a citizen. A man without a gun is called a subject.
    5. Re:Article misses the point by Nos. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But seriously, a good IT professional isn't one who's good at explaining the jargon, or getting laypeople to understand the technical isues...it's one that takes care of the issues for the laypeople, so they don't need to worry about them.

      I think you came very close to hitting the nail on the head, but instead walked away with a brusined thumb. For most of us, understanding the issues that these people don't understand is common knowledge to us. We can take the time to explain these things to our customers or we can fix the problem, we can explain how to avoid similar problems in the future, or structure the environment to avoid them. To me, a "good IT professional" is one who recognizes what the customer wants and provides. Having worked a few help desk and similar type positions, I can tell you that some people don't want the problem fixed, they want to understand the problem. Others don't care, they just want it to work.

      Now, there may be other obstacles to providing exactly what the customer wants. Most help desks don't want you spending 20 minutes on the phone with someone explaining why sending Grandma who's on dial up, 20 pictures from your 8MP digital camera may not be a good idea. However, I've always found that taking the time you have available to explain things at the level the customer wants, results in a much happier customer.

      I said customers, but this of course can apply to anyone for whom you are working on a problem for. This also applies outside of IT. When I had someone in last year to clean our ducts, I spent a lot of time talking with him to find out what I could do to reduce dust and such in the air and picked up a lot of valuable information that has saved me money since then. Next time I need the ducts cleaned, I'll be calling him back because he was willing to pass on information and experience to me.

    6. Re:Article misses the point by sedyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I almost spit out my tea while reading the worm part.

      But to comment on the quote: "But I don't feel I should know more - that is their job. If we did it all ourselves they would be out of a job." There is a big difference between knowing how to do day to day things (like not running programs from shady websites / MSN / email / etc.) and knowing how to configure a computer.

      To entend the car analogy, I recall being a small child and not knowing what the "triangle" button did. And, being four or five, I had two viable options, push the button, or ask. In my experience with supporting users, either case is terrible for support staff (they either have to explain way too much, or fix the broken machine). Pity support staff.

      --
      Am I open minded towards open source, or closed minded towards closed source?
    7. Re:Article misses the point by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But seriously, a good IT professional isn't one who's good at explaining the jargon, or getting laypeople to understand the technical isues...it's one that takes care of the issues for the laypeople, so they don't need to worry about them.

      This is only sort of true. Sometimes users have to know some jargon. Sometimes users have to understand the technical issues well enough to avoid them. A real helpdesk pro (or anyone that deals with customers/users) will avoid jargon when possible. When technical issues need explaining, a good IT professional will distill the issues into a couple simple metaphorical ideas, making them no more complicated than they must be, and expect that the user probably won't remember the explanation for next time.

      Some users even insist on knowing why. You tell them you can't send an EXE through the e-mail system, and they ask "why?". You tell them it's a security issue, and they say, "so?"

      Some users won't accept any explanation they're given if it keeps them from doing what they want, and that's the real measure of your skill. How well does your helpdesk tech deal with the belligerent CEO who is completely irrational and has unrealistic expectations? If your tech can walk away, without giving in to the unrealistic demands, but also without the CEO feeling insulted or ignored, your tech has just earned his paycheck.

      So what am I saying? Forget the education angle. Users can't be educated. The real key to helpdesk interaction is to keep your users happy and feeling good about their computers, so that when you tell them "You can't do that," you won't really have to explain why (with all the jargon). They'll just believe you.

      I'm barely joking.

    8. Re:Article misses the point by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Yet... we're the ones who live in fear of outsourcing. Ain't that a kick in the teeth?

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    9. Re:Article misses the point by Soko · · Score: 2, Funny

      In a correctly managed facility, the IT guy's phone should almost never ring.

      Mine never rings. It's not because the lusers don't have problems, I've just instilled the correct level of fear in them - turned my fair share into "high protien animal feed slurry".

      Let me re-write your conclusion a bit:

      In a correctly managed facility, with correctly managed lusers, the BOFH's phone will never ring.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    10. Re:Article misses the point by RandoX · · Score: 1

      Immediately following the sentence you referenced:

      A firewall is a form of computer security that prevents unauthorised access from the internet and turning it off is the worst thing you can do.

    11. Re:Article misses the point by techno-vampire · · Score: 2
      My favorite was: "Jpeg - this is a compressed picture file."

      Not very helpful is it, when he doesn't bother to define "compressed?"

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    12. Re:Article misses the point by mjperson · · Score: 1

      > Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.

      Who writes this trash! And why do they get paid more than I do!

    13. Re:Article misses the point by RandoX · · Score: 1

      So your users have a yellow post-it with their password on the monitor too?

    14. Re:Article misses the point by DaoudaW · · Score: 1

      There were no studies cited by this article...

      Here's the write-up by Computer People which did the study. It's still not great, nothing written about methodology or even where the study was done, but this should have been TFA instead of the lame Welsh newspaper article.

    15. Re:Article misses the point by Not+The+Real+Me · · Score: 1

      Jeez! And I thought the jpeg spec employed lossy algorithms as opposed to lossless. With that out of the way, let me go back to my modified height balanced AVL tree. I have added a middle node queue structure that is sorted inorder.

    16. Re:Article misses the point by linzeal · · Score: 1

      If you users are not learning than force them to take classes at the local community college after the 3rd call out for the same program. IT staff should be treated like lepers and locked in the server room anyways.

    17. Re:Article misses the point by loconet · · Score: 1

      Another beauty..

      Worm - this is a virus that replicates itself until it fills all of the storage space on a drive or network.

      Is this a joke?

      --
      [alk]
    18. Re:Article misses the point by justforaday · · Score: 1

      And what's a "picture"?

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    19. Re:Article misses the point by ChocoBean · · Score: 2, Insightful

      very good, sir, very good

      some people really do want to know, and if you're there to help them with it, I think that's part of the job.

      other people don't want to know what something means not because he's stubborn or stupid, but sometimes it's only because "the issue will never come up again"

      I think that everyone's time is just as valuable as mine, and there are a lot of things I don't know about that others do, such as how to work an excel spreed sheet properly. It's not because they're stupid, it's simply because they have other things to take care of while we had our time to learn what things mean. To me, a good IT person will teach you how to do most simple things that the user is likely to see again, but will take difficult tasks, or tasks that are unrelated to the user's usual work day, off his hands.

    20. Re:Article misses the point by ghideon · · Score: 1

      They explained it in the first page.

      Among office workers 26% aren't sure what a firewall does and therefore have been tempted to turn it off. A firewall is a form of computer security that prevents unauthorised access from the internet and turning it off is the worst thing you can do.

    21. Re:Article misses the point by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You think teaching a CEO is hard. Try teaching a teacher.

      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
    22. Re:Article misses the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of something the BOFH once said...

      ">> DUMMY MODE ON <<"

      If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.

    23. Re:Article misses the point by anotherone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because they know how to use a question mark!

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    24. Re:Article misses the point by SonVoltMMA · · Score: 1

      Here's an especially good one from the list: * Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC. Not to be confused with 'Excel', the spreadsheet from Microsoft.

    25. Re:Article misses the point by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      They get paid more than we do because they're willing to perform certain acts for money that we would only watch in revulsed horror... We resort to calling them "horrs" for short, but none of us can get the spelling corrected...

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    26. Re:Article misses the point by Xarius · · Score: 1

      Any company that runs the firewalls on the workers desktop computers is just asking for them to be turned off anyway.

      --
      C17H21NO4
    27. Re:Article misses the point by shawb · · Score: 1

      Oh... thank's for the horrible memories. I used to work helpdesk for a university, and the professors were the worst clients. Some types of profs were great, some were just painful, and it pretty much depended on what type of professor they were. In order of best to worst:

      Math professors: Almost never had to do anything for them, and when I did I often ended up learning new things from them. If I was called in to help them, it was almost always because they didn't have access to the resources (passwords, permissions, tools, authority to RMA parts) they needed to fix the problem themselves.
      Hard sciences: Just wanted it to be fixed, generally had enough of a grasp to be able to tell what they needed and enough sense to get out of the way and let me do my job.
      Social Sciences (psych, sociology, etc): Generally knew what they wanted to accomplish, but would have a hard time explaining what they wanted.
      Fine Arts: Fascinated by computers, but didn't know much aside from how to operate photoshop, word, etc. Would always promptly forget advice given.
      Liberal Arts (especially english): Knew exactly what they wanted their computer to do, even though it was physically impossible for them to do it at the time. Would pitch a fit when told that it's impossible, or that they would have to change the way they were doing things. Never understood why their Mac Plus was slower than everyone elses computer, or why they had to buy new stuff to get it hooked up to the internet.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    28. Re:Article misses the point by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 1
      Some users even insist on knowing why. You tell them you can't send an EXE through the e-mail system, and they ask "why?". You tell them it's a security issue, and they say, "so?"

      Telling them its a security issue usually doesn't mean squat to someone. However, if you explain to them that since viruses and other bugs (viruses and bugs are something people understand in meatspace) usually come as EXE files, lots of people think that all EXE files that come over email will infect their computers. Usually other email systems then delete the attachment or bounce the email. Therefore you should zip them (explained as stuffing it in a bag and zipping the bag up) so that their email won't be deleted or bounced back.

      Explaining it to them in terms that:

      1. They understand.
      2. Shows them how they're affected (eg: Time, Money, Convenience)

      usually gets the point across.

    29. Re:Article misses the point by TylerL82 · · Score: 1

      The most depressing thing I came across after working in education for four years (high school) is teachers that don't want to learn.

    30. Re:Article misses the point by Salvo · · Score: 1

      And 90% of all statistics are fabricated on the spot.
      26%? That doesn't sound right, I would have thought closer to 70%!

      Explaining what a Firewall is to Non-tech people isn't easy either; I just say "it stops certain types of connections to the internet". Not technically accurate, and the people who hear this still don't really know what a firewall is, or how it works, or that it's actually the Proxy Server stopping their AV software from downloading updates, not the Firewall.

    31. Re:Article misses the point by nine-times · · Score: 1
      However, if you explain to them that since viruses and other bugs (viruses and bugs are something people understand in meatspace) usually come as EXE files, lots of people think that all EXE files that come over email will infect their computers.

      I don't wait for my users to jump to that false conclusion. I just go ahead and tell them that every EXE file that comes through the e-mail is a virus. I tell them that every file they receive in the email with instructions to "install it" is a virus. Might not be true, but it's close enough.

      Explaining it to them in terms that:...They understand.

      Yeah, I think that's your mistake right there. If you expect people to understand, you've already lost. Now, some people might-- I'll grant you that. But not everyone. Instead, you have to know when to lie to them, when to scare them, and when to make them feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

    32. Re:Article misses the point by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd go a step further and say that a good IT professional also operates in a manner designed to increase the knowledge and abilities of coworkers regardless of whether or not they want to learn. In this I don't mean being annoying, forcing people to learn, or being confrontational... but rather using subtle strategies to demonstrate or convey knowledge.

      For example, a number of my users occassionally use loaner laptops for presentations, but they really do not "get" dual displays. Why does projector screen show something different than this screen? But I want to see presentation notes on the laptop screen but not the projector! More than once, these folks have been stuck in front of mostly technical audiences, unable to get their presentations going.

      These same kind of people are the ones who want things to "just work" and who don't want to spend any time understanding how to operate the equipment. To combat this in a non confrontational manner, I'm pushing dual displays for a few users in the office. The hope is that we can increase a few people's productivity while simultaneously spreading understanding of the operation of dual displays throughout the office.

      I'm also looking into methods to allow users who normally have a helpless mentality to figure out how to do certain tasks without extensive IT intervention. For example, we have a few people that we've had to walk through burning cds in xp multiple times. We've provided written instructions with variable success. I'm looking into getting screen capture/video software that would let us produce extremely easy to follow tutorials. The next time, a user asks for help burning a cd, we'll send them the tutorial first before visiting them for the nth time.

      A lot of people get angry or embarassed when they have to ask for IT support. This is one of the main reasons people become adverse to learning about computers. If we can give people the ability or at least the illusion that they can help themselves, then they will be more open to learning in the future. A downloadable tutorial that they can follow by themselves and refer back to later gives people that sense of independent achievement.

      Sometimes you have to do a salesman job. We've got a few users who refuse to abandon Eudora Pop mail clients. They refuse to switch to Outlook because they don't want to learn anything. So, without confronting them on this issue (yet) we've been doing things like introducing them to Webmail (OWA) and selling them on storing mail on the server (imap) all the while making it more and more desirable to switch to Outlook (or hell - anything other than Eudora). Of course, jumping through all these gradual transition hoops is a LOT of work for us. It would probably be more efficient for the business unit if we just kicked them into Outlook.

      Anyways, the moral is there are a lot of subtle things you can do to improve the competency and confidence of your coworkers regardless of whether or not they want to learn.

    33. Re:Article misses the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True the article missed the point and I think to one degree or another most respondents have as well. I've been working the support field for last fourteen years in one capacity or another. One constant is this, not every environment is the same. While the people quizzed for TFA may have been confused they by no means represent all of corporate or end user america.

      True for the most part the people that I support (and this is true of both joe end user and high level corporate executives) do not have a grasp of all the jargon or terminology involved in the operation of their computers. The truth of the matter is that they don't need to know what DHCP stands for. However what they do want/need to have their problems addressed. Part of addressing that issue is and always has been making sure they understand that the DHCP issue is why they can't browse the internet. What I'm saying is that you can make life much easier down the line is being able to educate the people you are supporting, and part of being a quality support person is the ability to do just that. Yes you need to adjust how you explain things and the terminology you use, often in mid sentence. What you end up with though is someone who is not only infinitely more happy because you have not only fixed the issue you have in the process treated them like an intelligent human being and helped them feel as though they don't necessarily HAVE TO call you should that same issue arise again.

      So are people confused by jargon? I'm sure they are but I believe that is more a symptom of poor IT departments rather than a short coming of the IT industry in general or IT professionals specifically. You are very correct when you state that ideally a correctly managed IT department should be transparent and that the best person in said department should be the one who's phone almost never rings. It is heartening to hear that there are still others in this field who feel that way. I have run into far to many who are of the opinion that if me and my department are not running around like mad men pounding away at terminals 24/7 then we are some how not doing our jobs. That couldn't be further from the truth, we are not in a constant frenzy of activity because we FIX the problems properly the first time and we take the time to educate our end users. It's because of this that we can support 300+ users, manage 5 mission critical servers, and deal with the normal day to day activities of an IT department with only three employees including myself.

    34. Re:Article misses the point by raddan · · Score: 1
      Everything should just work, with the IT guy making certain the users' needs are met before they even know what they are. In a correctly managed facility, the IT guy's phone should almost never ring.

      While this is a longtime dream of mine, I don't see the calls diminishing anytime soon. I think that I can make a very good case that the state of my company's IT is much better now than it was before I came: no more internet outages, much less spam, no more virus/malware outbreaks, and a standardized set of platforms for office workers. And yet, my phone rings like crazy (acutally, not the phone so much, the BOFH in me has trained my users to use email unless it is urgent).

      I suspect that, because my predecessor was so God-awful at his job, that most people simply wrote off asking him any questions because he was unhelpful. People come to me now, because they know I won't make them feel like an idiot for asking how styles work in Word, or why they can't email this picture to the production department, etc.

      And I always make the point of explaining jargon to someone. Granted, I scale the level of explanation depending on that particular user's interest/temperament, but I found that the time spent training people pays off big time. Well, except for those few crazy users. The crazy ones are the bane of my existence...

    35. Re:Article misses the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever I need my ducts cleaned I call Harry Tuttle.

    36. Re:Article misses the point by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      What's even more amusing is that people say "jpeg" but they usually mean a jpeg-compressed image in a jfif container (which may well just be the backwards-compatability part of a spiff container for jpeg data, rather than straight jfif). Or, at least *I* think that's amusing... :)

    37. Re:Article misses the point by dodobh · · Score: 1

      You have a phone? A phone which actually works? Hand in your BOFH card on the way out.

      Your phone should just go to irritating people in random departments. You know, the kind that should become slurry, but you haven't had the time to fix them yet.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    38. Re:Article misses the point by BKX · · Score: 1
      You forgot one:

      Computer teacher: Doesn't know what to do to fix the problem but think they do. Won't accept your explanations if your use of jargon differs from thier flawed definition. Doesn't know how to teach subnetting, let alone subnet for themselves, and kicks you out of their class when you teach the class the concept in 20 minutes after they spent 6 class-hours trying to. Hates it when you get a 720 on the MCP exam after not using Win2k for 2 months or attending class in that time, and they took practice exams three times a day for the 30 days leading up to the exam and only got a 540 (minumum passing grade at the time). Especially when you and the other dude that missed 45 straight days were the only students out of 10 that passed. Doesn't understand that grabbing an IP address from a DHCP server does not give you access to password-protected NetWare shares, even though she claims to understand the concepts. (Yes, this lame teacher extisted. I was the only person in her class to get my MCSE, and I only got it after she kicked me out for only showing up every third day to teach my classmates the material. No one learned anything else after I left, according to the students themslelves. The principal thought I was a malicious hacker for knowing more than the teacher and promptly ignored my complaints.)

    39. Re:Article misses the point by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the author asked the office techie for some definitions, and said techie threw that one in to give us a bit of laugh.

    40. Re:Article misses the point by Soko · · Score: 1

      I keep it as a trophy, is all.

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    41. Re:Article misses the point by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      A lot of people get angry or embarassed when they have to ask for IT support.

      What pisses me off most is asking IT for support and they just don't know the answer. Then again, I work in a fairly specialized industry.

    42. Re:Article misses the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What planet are you living on?

      I get numerous calls every day from stupid users who screw up their passwords (we only allow 3 attempts; after that it requires a reset). The users have a Windows password, a Unix password, and an application password.

      The morons I deal with can't even grasp the terms for these 3 different passwords, and it's like pulling teeth to figure out which password they've screwed up.

      At the manager level, we've got one that confuses the terms 'file' and 'record'. She calls records 'files'. When she talks to someone from outside the company, this causes real communication trouble. She also calls file loads 'drops' (of course 'drop' is a synonym for 'delete', not 'load').

      To really drive me crazy, these people proliferate industry jargon (it's an insurance provider) that I am supposed to fully understand.

      AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH!

      As long as stupid moron users exist, we will always get tons of calls from them.

    43. Re:Article misses the point by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      IT is too broad a field for people to always be able to know the answer. For example, I do development, support, and administration in Linux and Windows using hordes of different kinds of technologies. If it were possible for me to know everything about how everything interacts, it wouldn't be hard.

      Often, an IT guy won't have any better idea of what the answer is to a problem than you do, he's just better at troubleshooting the situation and finding answers. For example, I went to move a eudora user from pop (mail stored on pc) to imap (mail stored on server). Well, there were all sorts of Eudora specific problems getting the mail moved over. As my BS degree wasn't in Eudora idiosyncracies, and as we only had 5 Eudora users in the whole office, I had to spend time researching the answers to a lot of the problems and then experimenting until I foudn solutions to the problems where no solution seemed to exist.

      I think one big problem in the IT industry is that some people expect IT to always know the answers and that's just not possible. This results in an IT staff that is pressured into promoting wild guesses into factual solutions. This results in IT failing to deliver on more promissed solutions, which results in angrier more demanding customers, which results in more pressure on IT. IT should always be honest when they don't know the answer, and you should give them a break when they are honestly trying to work with you to find the answer.

    44. Re:Article misses the point by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      I was referring to 2D and 3D CAD software, not word processing or web browsers. In many cases it's just painful to watch an IT guy stumble around trying to fix something that should be a no-brainer.

      There's always "CAD IT specialists" upstream but I've found that they basically do whatever the CAD software vendor tells them to do (much fun when the support contract expires) and never bother to learn the intricacies of the software. Despite being paid very nicely, they are quite often no help at all. And since management typically has no clue about CAD, well, draw your own conclusions about what eventually happens.

      Hint: users eventually find workarounds and use them to get the job done outside of "official channels" and then get reprimanded.

  3. News Flash - Lusers Don't Get It by deutschemonte · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This and more tonight at 11.

    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
  4. Users aren't the only problem by MoxCamel · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Among office workers 26% aren't sure what a firewall does and therefore have been tempted to turn it off.

    Among CIOs, an amazingly large number of them think that office workers should have the permissions to turn their firewall off.

    A massive 61% ... have sent e-mails with huge attachments that have blocked clients' systems.

    A massive number of mail administrators don't know how to configure their mailservers thus allowing this to happen.

    I could go on...

    1. Re:Users aren't the only problem by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      A massive number of mail administrators don't know how to configure their mailservers thus allowing this to happen.

      Yeah, you try explaining to a person that needs to be taught what Excell is how to share their 15 meg PDF via FTP, or a shared folder.

      Most of the people I deal with do not understand what happens when a bounce they recieve says "mail quota full". When they see an error that says "mail size exceeded" they'll assume the server is broken and tell you to "please fix ASAP," literally.

    2. Re:Users aren't the only problem by sammy+baby · · Score: 1
      A massive 61% ... have sent e-mails with huge attachments that have blocked clients' systems.

      A massive number of mail administrators don't know how to configure their mailservers thus allowing this to happen.

      True confessions time: many years ago, I ran the mail server for a small non-profit ISP. One day, it started choking suddenly at regular intervals, for a few minutes at a time, before suddenly going back to normal.

      As it turns out, two of the users of the mail system were working for local business: one was the manager of the other. The manager had decided that it was important for is employee to see some design blueprints he'd been working with, and attached them to an e-mail to her.

      The attachment was over a gig. The figurative grinding sound was the pop server attempting to give the employee her mail over dial-up.

      (Failure can be an excellent teacher: I never failed to set the maximum acceptable attachment size after that, and converted all our mail servers to use maildir format for storage instead of mbox.)

    3. Re:Users aren't the only problem by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      That's when you tell them that it is fact desired behavior. Even make up things to help your cause, like the mail server will break if they send large attachments. Hell, it might. Then map easy-to-find shares on their desktops, aptly named something like "Bobs_big_files" and a network icon like "Big_company_files." Tell them to put their big files in the big file folder to give them to other people.

      Yes, they'll forget, and you'll constantly be telling them how to do it, but it's better than having the mail server nuked.

    4. Re:Users aren't the only problem by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      Even make up things to help your cause, like the mail server will break if they send large attachments.

      If you ever need help thinking up appropriate excuses, here's an Excuse of the Day Server you can use. Lots of interesting reasons for things to break. Some, but by no means all, are real.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Users aren't the only problem by Neil+Watson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ok, so you limit the size of allowed email attachments to a frugal 3MB. Now someone sends a 3MB attachment to all 500 people that use the mail server.

    6. Re:Users aren't the only problem by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Now someone sends a 3MB attachment to all 500 people that use the mail server.

      If it's only 500 people, it may not kill the server, but it can make things dodgy for awhile. If you have dialup customers (like the GP), it's time for the shotgun email that says taht some people are on dialup in BIG RED LETTERS, followed by a simple table that shows how long it takes to download 1MB on dialup. Some people still won't learn, but at least their damage potential is limited.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:Users aren't the only problem by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      ...and the 4 meg email bounces off the server because neither they nor you understand ASCII encoding overhead.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    8. Re:Users aren't the only problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern email systems are single instanced for mail. Simply put, even if they send one 3 mb attachment to 500 people on that same mail server, its only stored once. So that's not that bad a problem.

    9. Re:Users aren't the only problem by gibbsjoh · · Score: 1

      One of my users sent a 75 MB (yes you saw that right) attachment to 100 users on our mail servers yesterday, as well as 20 or so at some other server. That was fun. The charcoal briquette in the server room now makes an interesting conversation starter. Off topic but what the hell.

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
    10. Re:Users aren't the only problem by ErikRed1488 · · Score: 1
      In Exchange 2003 it won't take up 1500 MB. It stores one copy, then uses pointers to reference it for everyone. Of course, each of them gets 3 MB added to their mailbox, pushing them closer to the quota limit.

      This makes me think somewhere on the Exchange dev team there is a BOFH.

      --
      I was not touched there by an angel.
    11. Re:Users aren't the only problem by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1
      Now someone sends a 3MB attachment to all 500 people that use the mail server.
      And most companies use Exchange server which stores a single copy of the 3MB attachment that everyone who got the mail can read.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    12. Re:Users aren't the only problem by glwtta · · Score: 1
      My favourite game around here is "VP Presentation Ping-Pong": starts out with a 100MB to 250MB presentation [1] sent out to five or so people (only one copy on the server at this point), each one corrects a spelling mistake and sends that back to all five people, which in turn have something else to contribute - you can see how this tends to grow, and of course no old mail is ever deleted (at best it's put in the "trash", but never emptied). What amazes me most is how often the system can actually cope with this - we just need to go around every once in a while and clean out their 8GB mailboxes.

      [1] Easily, usually it's a bunch of pictures sized to a 100-200 pixels square, but of course powerpoint still keeps the original size of a few megs each.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    13. Re:Users aren't the only problem by pbhj · · Score: 1

      >>> "A massive number of mail administrators don't know how to configure their mailservers thus allowing this to happen."

      I don't know how to setup sendmail ...! However, it's too late if the email has to be sent to the server before it's rejected. The email client should ask the server it's max attachment size and then warn users before the mail is sent. The email client should also be settable to warn idiots that it's going to take a dialup recipient (but say "ordinary user") 3 days to download the file they're trying to send them.

      Do any clients do that yet?

    14. Re:Users aren't the only problem by INHCNN · · Score: 1

      ...and since you run an Exchange server, only one copy exists in the Exch DB, distributed to all users. Did I miss the problem or other point? :)

    15. Re:Users aren't the only problem by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Exchange isn't the only option for supports single-instance store. :) And yes, I'm intentionally not linking to Groupwise.

  5. Simple solution by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Empower IT with HR's traditional roles of hiring, promotion, and termination. Allow IT to veto any hire or promotion decision, and to terminate employees who are completely techno-clueless.

    This will aid the security mission greatly as well.

    Another word for this arrangement is "meritocracy".

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In practice, the word for this would actually wind up being "bureaucracy".

      Not enough hoops and approvals? Let's add more! Surely it will always go to plan and no one will ever be sitting on something forever for fear of making the wrong decision. That never happens!

    2. Re:Simple solution by Pichu0102 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, a more appropriate decision would be to train those that are tech-clueless and help them learn more things about technology. Firing employees because they don't know something they never learned seems a bit harsh, especially since most of those employees could become quick learners at technology.

    3. Re:Simple solution by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Empower IT with HR's traditional roles of hiring, promotion, and termination.

      And you wonder why people hate IT departments.

      Listen, this "holier than thou" attitude is just stupid. Do you know how to diversify a portfolio to meet acceptable risk according to an efficient frontier formula? Well, some of those "idiot users" do. Does that make them smarter than you? If so, should they have veto power on how you run the network?

      IT people are not necessarily smarter, despite what they may think. The goal is to work together in a company, and find solutions that take into account problems that employees may have. Which also means that locking everyone's computer so they can't do anything may not be the correct solution. Maybe, just maybe, users occassionly have a need that you're going to have to work extra to fullfill. That's why you were hired, not so you can sit on your duff and complain about all the work that users make for you.

    4. Re:Simple solution by ddimas · · Score: 1
      Empower IT with HR's traditional roles of hiring, promotion, and termination. Allow IT to veto any hire or promotion decision, and to terminate employees who are completely techno-clueless. This will aid the security mission greatly as well. Another word for this arrangement is "meritocracy".

      You mean like the PhD Chemist who still uses a slide rule for calculations?

    5. Re:Simple solution by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      That is a good solution, when and where it does work, but frequently it does not work. There are people who can't and won't learn. If IT skills and knowledge are indeed important for their jobs, then they are unqualified and are in need of remediation -- whether that be training and education, transferral to a position where those skills are not essential, giving them an IT "seeing eye dog" to follow them around and explain and handhold every thing they do, or termination. Whatever works best should be done, but by and large the capability for IT to deny access to its clueless (l)users to corporate assets (such as higher positions in the company or even access to the company at all beyond "guest" level access) would be a smart thing.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    6. Re:Simple solution by SoloTraveller · · Score: 0

      And when those "lusers" are completely unwilling and uninterested to learn all those nifty IT things that WE think they should know? They have their own work to do: why the heck should they have to learn to speak like us?? We're the customer support people, not them: we damn well better know how to converse with them and determine what they want/need, or it's US that should be fired! ;) Simple fact is most office people don't give a crap about that kind of thing, and will care even less if we try to make them talk like us!

    7. Re:Simple solution by Demonix · · Score: 1

      Then again, we don't really NEED to know how to do that to do our job (as IT professionals), do we?

      However, the better a user's grasp is on technology, and specifically a few computer basics/intermediate concepts can do wonders in boosting tier productivity...if they would ever bother to take the time to find out.

      I'm not saying that the OP is correct in giving IT HR functions and authority, but saying that the end user needs to know nothing about computers and still be productive (or as productive as a knowledgable user) is laughable to the point of absurdity.

      --
      when all is said and done, all a man has left are his blades and his honor.
    8. Re:Simple solution by jinzumkei · · Score: 1

      IT people are not necessarily smarter

      I'd say more often than not, they aren't smarter.

    9. Re:Simple solution by Jjeff1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Using a computer is part of any kind of office job, and plenty of other non-office jobs these days. It's along the same lines as using a phone or sorting through a file cabinet or any other common office tool.
      Think of it this way... Worker is given work -> worker does something -> worker produces finished product. That something might include alphabetizing files, or driving their car, or hammering in nails. If the worker couldn't read, couldn't drive a car, or couldn't use a hammer, we'd call them unqualified to do their job. We'd wonder why they were ever hired and when they'll be canned. How is using a computer different?

    10. Re:Simple solution by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about ceding total control of the organization to IT, but allowing IT input into HR decisionmaking. If everyone in the company is my "customer" and I have to make them all happy in order for good "total customer service" to happen, then the head of IT ought to have the capability to hire/fire/promote all of these people. It's only fair.

      Yes, there are people who have specialized skills, but that does not mean that their lack of IT skills is excusable. Either train them, get them a "seeing eye dog" IT monkey to follow them everywhere and do things for them, or fire them. We currently have too many "seeing eye dogs" in IT helpdesks, and not enough trained, competent employees. IT is sick of managing the burden of idiots who don't have a clue how their business tools work or how to do their work with their systems.

      And, yes, I believe I could manage a risk portfolio. If I can figure out how to manage IT security risk, I can figure out how to manage a company's financial risk position. It's not really that different, just apply a the same types of reasoning and information gathering to a different set of scenario parameters and information.

      Unlike a lot of these white-collar executives, I also know how to drive my own car, iron my own clothes, and buy my own groceries, too.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    11. Re:Simple solution by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

      How is using a computer different? Simple.
      A computer is MUCH more complicated than hammering nails, filing paperwork, or driving a car. Knowing what each key does, and knowing how to open programs or edit files is something many people that regularly use computers find easy. But those that never learned how to find it very hard and complicated. Training would help those people to learn and find it less difficult, and make it so that they can use a computer to do their job.

    12. Re:Simple solution by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      How about just putting someone in IT in HR/Training to cover the basic information for new hires? Include a tutorial CD and a basic manual. TADA!!! You've just made your life so much easier. Include web-training for basic apps, class training for your advanced apps. We did this all about 5 years ago when we converted from PCs to Thin Clients. Worked like a charm!

      Jho

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    13. Re:Simple solution by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not talking about ceding total control of the organization to IT, but allowing IT input into HR decisionmaking. If everyone in the company is my "customer" and I have to make them all happy in order for good "total customer service" to happen, then the head of IT ought to have the capability to hire/fire/promote all of these people. It's only fair.

      Oh. Well then, accounting should also have a say in hiring. (Including tech people.) As should the mail room. Not to mention the cafeteria staff. And let's not forget the janitorial staff! It's very important that people who understand how to properly read the recycling labels are chosen! After all, it's only fair.

      Either train them, get them a "seeing eye dog" IT monkey to follow them everywhere and do things for them, or fire them.

      I agree. Has your department taken proactive action to see that all the employees are properly trained or have the support they need?

      And, yes, I believe I could manage a risk portfolio. If I can figure out how to manage IT security risk, I can figure out how to manage a company's financial risk position. It's not really that different, just apply a the same types of reasoning and information gathering to a different set of scenario parameters and information.

      Oh, good Lord. If that were true, you'd be out making all the money you need, not stuck with "idiot users" in a job you obviously hate. BTW, here are the computations for Modern Portfolio Theory. Knock yourself out. I hope you know where to get the data from and how to adjust the frontier for a variety of inputs, investment styles, tax limitations, bonds, and mutual fund products. (Not that you're likely to know what an investment product is. They're all stocks, right?)

    14. Re:Simple solution by justforaday · · Score: 1

      Then again, we don't really NEED to know how to do that to do our job (as IT professionals), do we?

      You do realize that this is the exact same argument that's coming from the other side of the aisle, don't you?

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    15. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few months ago, I overheard one woman telling another, "Okay, click on the blue 'E' and go to H-T-T-P, colon, backslash, backslash...." And I was the temp. Jesus.

    16. Re:Simple solution by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 1

      At the same time should we empower the finance department to hire /fire anybody who doesn't understand the terms ROI, balance sheet, income statement, TCO, and all of the other jargon that they use?

      Frankly, in the modern corporation, these terms are infinitely more important than any computer jargon. They are directly connected to the most important part of everybody's job: maximizing the bottom line (do you even know what the "bottom line" is?).

      That means that the average I.T. worker's prediliction to use the latest technology because it's cool even though some less cool technology would have a better ROI would be a good reason for termination. But then, most I.T. workers don't know what ROI means.

      --
      Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
    17. Re:Simple solution by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's my take on this thread.

      First, regarding Modern Portfolio Theory: Most people are very prone towards the "If I don't know how to do it, it can't be hard" mentality. I certainly am.

      Second, I think IT's mission is far different from that of the janitorial staff, the mail room, etc., and that it's makes more sense to give them some measure of control than your mockery would indicate. But I think it would make more sense to just give IT some measure of control over the policies governing computer use within the company, and then treat violations of those policies as seriously as any other violations. This seldom happens, because the people in charge of setting policies don't understand the computer system well enough to understand the sort of hassle that some violations cause.

      For example, the IT department might be allowed to say, "You should be storing your files on the network, not your local hard drive. We will not assist you in recovering data not stored on the network." Given that policy, if the CIO loses his spreadsheet because he insists on keeping things local "so he can access them faster", any complaints and threats of termination should fall on deaf ears.

      Another example: If an otherwise competent person keeps hosing the network by running suspicious executables, that person's manager should be willing to recognize the inconvenience this causes. It shouldn't be up to the IT department to fire the guy; it should be up to the guy's boss to recognize the overall effect the behavior is having on the company, and do whatever it takes (disciplinary action, new IT procedures, etc.) to ensure that the IT people can keep the infrastructure reliable.

      As it stands at many companies, IT people take the blame when the users trash the network, even though the management won't give the IT people the tools or authority needed to keep them from trashing the network. Sometimes, it really is a case of people needing to do X with their computer, even though forbidding X would make administration much easier. IT folks can be insensitive to business needs. But other times it's just a case of management not wanting to be told how they can and cannot use their computers, and figuring administration can't be hard because they don't know how to do it.

      It's tricky to strike a balance between those competing needs.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    18. Re:Simple solution by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      That's because backslashes work in Internet Explorer. Try it sometime. Type "http:\\www.google.com" and see where it takes you. It also works in Mozilla.

    19. Re:Simple solution by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      BTW, here are the computations for Modern Portfolio Theory. Knock yourself out. I hope you know where to get the data from and how to adjust the frontier for a variety of inputs, investment styles, tax limitations, bonds, and mutual fund products. (Not that you're likely to know what an investment product is. They're all stocks, right?)

      Thanks for the link. This all looks within my abilities and yes, I do know what an investment product is. I doubt that I have the sort of portfolio that will benefit from this theory, but who knows - maybe I'll do a career change in 10 years.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    20. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you do realize that they're wrong, don't you?

      They use computers, so they probably need to know a little bit about them.

    21. Re:Simple solution by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Hmm...I'd like to meet someone who regularly used something like this but didn't understand how to use computers.

      Are these people really all over the place?

      My experience is that knowledge of math and the ability to learn how to use computers quickly go hand in hand (to a point; simple, practical stuff like this and computers ability seem to go hand in hand. OTOH, people who do the really high level stuff are often clueless).

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    22. Re:Simple solution by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      Are you claiming that HR knows how to do their job better than people who understand an actual subject - ANY subject? Or that financial advisors are somehow not giant weasels who could be replaced by a very small shell script with better results?

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    23. Re:Simple solution by glwtta · · Score: 1
      A computer is MUCH more complicated than hammering nails, filing paperwork, or driving a car.

      Not for the purposes of general office work. Driving is far more complicated than the basics of a word processor.

      But those that never learned how to find it very hard and complicated. Training would help those people to learn and find it less difficult, and make it so that they can use a computer to do their job.

      Yeah - that's what the parent said. That's the way in which computers are just like construction, office work, driving, painting, sex, cooking or theoretical physics - you have to learn how to do it before you are any good at it.

      The biggest problem is that so many people think that computers are exempt from this rule for some reason.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    24. Re:Simple solution by megarich · · Score: 1
      And you wonder why people hate IT departments...The goal is to work together in a company, and find solutions that take into account problems that employees may have

      Your last statement is right but what you fail to realize the end users and most importantly the managment don't see this goal either. Many just want to bitch bitch bitch until the problem is fixed without giving an inch without moving a yard. It can't work that way. It takes TWO to tango. Both sides have to be willing to work with each other. Won't do much good if IT does what you want it to but the user fails to cooperate. But yes there is a major problem in that IT doesn't think from the user's vantage point and vice versa so a big gap is forming defeating that goal.

      That's why you were hired, not so you can sit on your duff and complain about all the work that users make for you.

      I wasnt hired either to get belittle and bitched at by management or whoever else because they f up their machine or expect me to drop everything to fix a problem they are having. Or simply because they are having a bad day and I'm the easiest and lame duck target to take there agression out on. I guess that's ok though and acceptable though since I'm off my "duff". Like any other profession, when you're overwork, you complain and since many IT deptartments are understaff since management either hates nor understand IT, naturally alot of complaining will occur. Its why I don't like being in the IT profession and thinking of moving on. You don't deal with people when things go well in this profession you deal with them at their worst. You can tell who will handle themselves well in a crisis and who would throw their own mother in the flames just to get out of a burning building alive.

      But there are 2 sides to every story, to every IT department. Remember not all of us are "holier than thou" and you don't see either some of the shit we have to put up with just like we don't see all of the shit you have to put up with.

    25. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better idea -- send them to Silicon Pines

    26. Re:Simple solution by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      I hope you know where to get the data from and how to adjust the frontier for a variety of inputs, investment styles, tax limitations, bonds, and mutual fund products. (Not that you're likely to know what an investment product is. They're all stocks, right?)

      I sense hypocracy here. You are the one who needs to get off his high horse and stop practicing a "holier than though" attitude (quoting your own earlier post).

      You are showing off knowledge of a model that has been introduced in 1952 by Markowitz as if this was something unique. You need to realize that you are not the first nor the last person who understands it, uses it or innovates it.

      So unless you are Sharpe or a similar capacity, I suggest you STFU for a minute and consult your curriculum vitae and your paycheck for your portion of today's special, the humble pie.

    27. Re:Simple solution by Demonix · · Score: 1

      it is, but they have to use computers every day to carry out the functions of thier positions. When was the last time you had to calculate interest to do yours (as an IT professional)?

      --
      when all is said and done, all a man has left are his blades and his honor.
  6. News at 11... by Steamhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other news people have trouble understanding lawyer speak, medical terms, names of car components, how to build a house to proper code, publishing industry slang etc...

    I guess that means people just have to learn eh?

    1. Re:News at 11... by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      As well, people who take a trip to France often have trouble understanding what people are saying. If you take that trip, you either expect to be confused or you learn the language. The same goes with computers, cars, and the rest of your excellent examples.

    2. Re:News at 11... by swestcott · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OH my god Learn somthing new you must be crazy I want you to do it for me and no I am not going to watch and learn how to do it my self

    3. Re:News at 11... by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > In other news people have trouble understanding lawyer speak, medical terms, names of car components, how to build a house to proper code, publishing industry slang etc...
      >
      > I guess that means people just have to learn eh?

      And that's the fundamental problem. Most people these days not only don't think they have to learn, they don't think they should have to learn. (And why, indeed, should they? Since the 1970s and 1980s, their teachers pretty much gave up teaching in the name of boosting self-esteem. If self-esteem is something everybody has - that is, if it's not something earned through performance, then everybody can feel great about themselves even though they're a bunch of ignorant fuckspittles who'll be first under the water when the revolving hurricane comes.)

      Every time you hear someone say "I shouldn't have to read the manual to figure out how to use it!", you're seeing another example of the problem.

    4. Re:News at 11... by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      The difference:

      You can get a for dummies book on your computer. Countless free guides exist online that will help you solve any computer problem you may ever run into. There is tons of quick, easily available computer information.

      Likewise, your car comes with a manual, and an endless supply of car-oriented-websites will provide you with insite on the parts of your car.

      There are numerous free help information systems available for medical advice. Here in Canada, all the medical treatment you could ever want is free (but slow).

      Law, on the other hand, which was made by and for the people of your country, is not meant for your eyes. No, you cannot figure out your tenant problems without a lawyer. There is no "law for dummies". You'd better have a darned impressive heroic cause before you try and get pro bono help.

      Which industry has the barriers? hmm.

    5. Re:News at 11... by halo8 · · Score: 1

      I guess that means people just have to learn eh?

      Who is Jhon Galt?

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    6. Re:News at 11... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should like a Linux user. Software for most tasks should not need a manual, and there should be tooltips for help on every button and warnings when you're about to do something stupid.
      Of course, you want people reading a 2,000 page UNIX Manual of Confusion just to edit a file.

    7. Re:News at 11... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      In other news people have trouble understanding lawyer speak, medical terms, names of car components, how to build a house to proper code, publishing industry slang etc..

      This would be a problem if you worked in or with these industries. Most people in an office environment don't work with cars, don't build homes, nor have anything to do with the medical industry. These people work with computers mostly.

      If I hired a contractor to rip out my sidewalk and install a new one I'd be fairly put off if the construction guy called a compressor "that thingy that makes the air for the watchamacallit that busts up the old concrete".

      There is a reasonable expectation of understanding associated with the tools you use in your workplace, be that the calling them by the correct name to the basic concepts such as powering your monitor off and on is NOT the same thing as rebooting.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    8. Re:News at 11... by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      yes there is.

      There does not, however, seem to be a "verifying 'facts' you made up before posting them on slashdot and looking like a dumbass for dummies" book, though.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    9. Re:News at 11... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who hear reads manuals first?

    10. Re:News at 11... by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1


      I'm going to have to disagree, most things should not require a manual to operate.
      For example my cell phone came with like a 100+ page manual (no joke it really did). Fuck if I'm going to waste 2+ hours to figure out how to run a phone. Now I don't expect to be able do everything with out reading the manual, but most of the basic functions like calling, address book, ring tones should all be readily discernable by pressing the menu button. And even more complex features like personalized ring tones for callers and 1 touch dialing should be easy to figure out from the phone it's self. I shouldn't need to carry around a book for everything I own to consult every time I want to use it.

      Well maybe the problem isn't that one shouldn't have to read a manual... maybe it's just the manual shouldn't be so damn big that no one wants to read it. Or it should at least come with some version of a quick start guide.

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    11. Re:News at 11... by dominion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (And why, indeed, should they? Since the 1970s and 1980s, their teachers pretty much gave up teaching in the name of boosting self-esteem. If self-esteem is something everybody has - that is, if it's not something earned through performance, then everybody can feel great about themselves even though they're a bunch of ignorant fuckspittles who'll be first under the water when the revolving hurricane comes.)

      I've heard this over and over again, and I fail to see where this concept of education originated. Nobody has ever given up teaching in the name of boosting self-esteem. Although teachers don't smack kids around anymore, and they make an effort to not call a kid a know-nothing retard, doesn't mean that school is just one big shoulder massage.

      If anything, teaching has been replaced by rote memorization in the name of standardized tests. This is why nobody has the skills to learn things on their own, most of schooling is the teacher handing you the answer, and asking you to memorize it so you can spit it out at a later date. Self-esteem has nothing to do with it.

      And as for the comment about the Hurricane Katrina victims, somebody who would talk shit about people who have had their whole lives ripped out from under them, and showed incredible courage through a hell most of us will never know, should be really careful about how he uses the word 'ignorant.'

    12. Re:News at 11... by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      Every time you hear someone say "I shouldn't have to read the manual to figure out how to use it!", you're seeing another example of the problem.

      "Simple things should be simple. Complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay.

      If a user is trying to do a simple task (play music, write a letter, send e-mail) then it should be a simple affair and they shouldn't need to know any of this. I have no idea how to personally repair my car, but that doesn't mean I can't drive it with some basic knowledge. Now, if you want to do complex things, then you'll need to really understand things, and the interface should make it possible (one of the reasons I love having the command line underneath OS X).

      Since the 1970s and 1980s, their teachers pretty much gave up teaching in the name of boosting self-esteem.

      There's nothing about having self-esteem that precludes learning. Some people are going to be more intelligent than others. Where the school system in the US has truly failed us is focusing "teaching" on passing random tests, rather than teaching someone how to think critically and learn new things for themselves. Facts and details will be lost in a week, concepts and critical thinking will last a lifetime.

      Take history - who honestly cares what date something happened on? It's much more important to know what the causes and effects were, politically, socially, how it influenced later events, what possible other scenarios could have taken place, etc. Dates and factoids are not history.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    13. Re:News at 11... by ThePolkapunk · · Score: 1

      Every time you hear someone say "I shouldn't have to read the manual to figure out how to use it!", you're seeing another example of the problem.

      The problem isn't that people say "I shouldn't have to read the manual..." the problem is that no one includes manuals anymore! Help file my ass, I want instructions!!!

      --
      Dear diary: Today I stuffed some dolls full of dead rats I put in the blender.
    14. Re:News at 11... by X_Bones · · Score: 1

      Every time you hear someone say "I shouldn't have to read the manual to figure out how to use it!", you're seeing another example of the problem.

      Cute rant on how everyone but you is stupid. Too bad it's arrogant and inapplicable.

      Why do you expect me (a hypothetical customer) to read your manual? I'll look at it when I install your program and again when I need to troubleshoot it, but I just don't have the time to sit there and read it cover-to-cover no matter how much I'll learn from it. I'm too damn busy doing my own work. If I'm forced to read the manual to learn something about how your program functions, that means your interface designer needs to be fired.

    15. Re:News at 11... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that people refuse to learn. It's that they already have their own particular field that they are learning in.

      There is so much human knowledge out there that no one person can be expected to learn it all, let alone posses it all. There are disciplines with their own branches, and branches with their own specialities, each of them requiring their own dedication level to become proficient.

      An IT professional with 5-7 years of experience will always have more experience with jargon than say an accountant with the same experience. That doesn't make the accountant lazy or dumb, just on a different learning path.

    16. Re:News at 11... by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      Modded +5 insightful here. If this were a thread about desktop Linux it would be -1 troll.

      I would agree with your post in both cases.

    17. Re:News at 11... by eklitzke · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that it's a bad thing when people think they don't have to learn. People should be willing, even eager, to learn new things. Knowing more can only help you.

      On the other hand, I have to agree with the other posters who have said that most people shouldn't NEED to learn jargon. Most people need to understand a very small subset of all the computer jargon words to do whatever they're being paid to do. You shouldn't need to understand how your car works to drive it, you shouldn't need to understand the what a .m4a file extension means to play a song you bought online, and you shouldn't need to understand what a jpeg image is to open one. The ONLY jargon that you really need to understand is the jargon that's related to your job. If your job is in computer graphics, it's important to know the difference between the different file extensions of image files. In general however, you shouldn't need to know about all the other programs that run on your computer (e.g. the firewall) when you're not being paid to use them.

      --
      #include ".signature"
    18. Re:News at 11... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      (And why, indeed, should they? Since the 1970s and 1980s, their teachers pretty much gave up teaching in the name of boosting self-esteem. If self-esteem is something everybody has - that is, if it's not something earned through performance, then everybody can feel great about themselves even though they're a bunch of ignorant fuckspittles who'll be first under the water when the revolving hurricane comes.)

      Yeah, sure, whatever Grandpa. Things were so much better back in YOUR day. Before ignorant fuckspittles like me and my generation came along.

      Sorry, I'll get off your precious manicured lawn now.

    19. Re:News at 11... by l0b0 · · Score: 1
      Every time you hear someone say "I shouldn't have to read the manual to figure out how to use it!", you're seeing another example of the problem.

      Ever wonder why Gmail is more popular than Mutt? Maybe it's because not everyone is willing to learn Vim and read two 50 page manuals to get their emails. People have different views on how to best spend their time. Obviously, me even having to say this means I don't value my time enough.

    20. Re:News at 11... by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > Why do you expect me (a hypothetical customer) to read your manual? I'll look at it when I install your program and again when I need to troubleshoot it, but I just don't have the time to sit there and read it cover-to-cover no matter how much I'll learn from it. I'm too damn busy doing my own work. If I'm forced to read the manual to learn something about how your program functions, that means your interface designer needs to be fired.

      Why do you expect me (a hypothetical pilot in training) to read your owner's manual? I'll look at it when I can't figure out how to start the engine and again when the engine stalls at 5000 feet, but I just don't have the time to sit there and read it cover-to-cover no matter how much I'll learn from it. I'm too damn busy doing my own work. If I'm forced to read the manual to learn something about how your aircraft functions, that means your aircraft engineer needs to be fired.

      If you've never flown a plane before, and you get hired as a commercial pilot, "your own work" is flying a plane. Sorry, but that involves knowing lots of unnecessary crap like what an engine is, what RPMs mean, why oil pressure is important, and so on.

      If you're an office worker who's never emailed someone before, and your co-workers use email to communicate with each other, learning what "email" is (bits, bytes, file sizes, file formats, base64/MIME, addresses, domain names, bounce messages, headers, and where messages are stored on the server and client side... is part of your job.

      The intuitiveness of the UI is orthogonal to the real problem -- the less the end user reads, the more likely it the end user is going to lack the theoretical foundations that are essential to "doing their own work" in a way that doesn't result in spectacular failure.

      Whether that failure is 500 copies of a 24-megabyte .BMP file sitting on a mail server ("well, I just had to click 'send to everyone' when I saw that cute picture of that kitten!") or a smoking crater ("My job is to fly the plane, I don't put gas in it, and besides, it's not my fault that some stupid mountain was sitting under those fluffy white clouds!"), the root cause is the same.

    21. Re:News at 11... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...Lemme guess...Dr. Seuss, right?

    22. Re:News at 11... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      So, the people killed and trapped by Hurricane Katrina were "ignorant fuckspittles?"

      You clearly don't understand what it's like to be impoverished to the point where you can't get transportation. You clearly don't understand the fear that comes with being told to leave your home, and knowing you don't have anywhere to go. You clearly don't understand the average person's capacity for convincing themselves that things will be okay, even when more objective people recognize that it clearly won't.

      Moreover, you clearly don't want to learn. You're happy in your ignorance, blaming the victims for their poverty, and blaming liberals for everything else.

      This, I believe, is a textbook case of the pot casting the first stone at the kettle.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    23. Re:News at 11... by cniebla · · Score: 1
      I have to agree with you. It's becoming too-permisive in the name of self-steem (and whatever), and is only making people more and more dependent on the gurus (those of us who can and do read manuals). Only that I don't object the trend, I like it, I like to have these people at my feet worshiping me as the leader, the provider, the one and only guru :)

      On the other side: many of the replies to your comment simply don't belong to Sladhdot's massive army of nerds (like me), it seems to struck hard on the bunch of ignorant fuckspittles that come here from time to time to have something to say when asked 'bout IT by superior people.... hehehehehe.... in case they're any questions.... yes... I'm a System Administrator from Hell!!!!

    24. Re:News at 11... by iabervon · · Score: 1

      The real issue is that ordinary users of computers are expected to understand a lot of computer jargon, while ordinary citizens, humans, drivers, residents, and so forth can use plain language to get by. People are having trouble understanding that 10 gigabytes is really large, and 10 kilobytes is pretty small, but they don't try to buy a $10B car instead of a $10K car. They don't consider disabling their amygdala, while they do consider disabling their firewall. You don't have to know which color wire is hot and which is neutral to turn on a light switch. If I'm writing a book, I don't need to know what "widows" and "orphans" are to have my book come out nicely; but I'm using Word, my documents are hard to read if I don't know this jargon.

    25. Re:News at 11... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      If you've never flown a plane before, and you get hired as a commercial pilot, "your own work" is flying a plane. Sorry, but that involves knowing lots of unnecessary crap like what an engine is, what RPMs mean, why oil pressure is important, and so on.

      If you're an office worker who's never emailed someone before, and your co-workers use email to communicate with each other, learning what "email" is (bits, bytes, file sizes, file formats, base64/MIME, addresses, domain names, bounce messages, headers, and where messages are stored on the server and client side... is part of your job.


      Whoa. I need to know what base64 is in order to email someone? Bounce messages? Headers? Where messages are stored? That's what email administrators should know in the same way that a passenger on a commercial jet doesn't (and shouldn't) need to know much more than boarding procedures and the fact that a beer costs $5. As an email user, I should simply know how to click "send" and that new mail "appears" in those folder thingies.

      If I shouldn't send a large attachment (individually or in aggregate) my client software should tell me so, and prevent me from doing it, in the same way that an airline will stop me from bringing on a 3 kiloton suitcase rather than letting it get put on board and crash the plane.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    26. Re:News at 11... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      A cell phone is a complicated device, and many of them can do many, many things.

      You claim you shouldn't have to read the manual. Why not?

      And why do you need a quick start guide? There's a table of contents, isn't there? You can turn to the page that lists what you want to do.

      What makes one device less worthy of a menu than another? The only thing that changes is whether or not you need to read it.

      After reading the manual to my first digital watch, I haven't needed to read another manual for a digital device with a small number of buttons. However, had I not read that first manual, I might never have gotten the idea. If I was less intelligent, I might not be able to abstract from that first manual to deal with all the phones, pdas, etc, and might have needed the additional manual to figure out how to do everything.

      The manual needs to be there for all those situations where you can't figure it out, or if you're learning the general procedure for the first time.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    27. Re:News at 11... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      So, the people killed and trapped by Hurricane Katrina were "ignorant fuckspittles?"

      The parent was being a little too broad with his generalization, but I can't help but think that in some cases, it was true.

      You clearly don't understand what it's like to be impoverished to the point where you can't get transportation.

      Some of the people involved were too old, too weak, or were sick/in the hospital/disabled, etc - these people I can understand not being able to get out. The others? The others had, at a minimum, two legs to walk on. If they had kids, they could have figured out a way to haul their kids out of there - tear the wheels off of something and make a makeshift trailer to drag thier kids and other stuff around in. There was plenty of warning time to make this simple preparation. Hell, they could have stole a few grocery carts to push down the street (they probably had a few in the neighborhood from grocery shopping earlier - I see people walk away with carts from the store all the time). Worst case scenario, everyone just starts walking - people have and can walk long distances in the past, they can still do it today. Can it be painful? Yes. Can it be difficult? Yes. Should you take plenty of water? Yes. Does it beat probable death? You betcha!

      You clearly don't understand the fear that comes with being told to leave your home, and knowing you don't have anywhere to go.

      No, I can't understand it, and I hope I won't ever have to (but, given the way things are going in this country, I am no longer certain as to what the future will hold). But you can bet that if I heard that a category 5 hurricane was barrelling down on my ass, and my choice was to either stay and hopefully not die due to a myriad of causes (the hurricane itself and debris, possible/probable flooding, exposure, lack of food, lack of water, etc) - or walk out to someplace else carrying enough stuff to allow me to survive wherever I am - I am pretty sure I would choose the latter. In the end, as was apparent to anyone paying attention at the start of the storm - it didn't matter if you didn't have anywhere to go, because in the end, whether you stayed or left - you didn't have anything to return to!

      You clearly don't understand the average person's capacity for convincing themselves that things will be okay, even when more objective people recognize that it clearly won't.

      Oh, I recognise this, alright - it is same damn "drive" that causes people to believe in the flying spaghetti monster/invisible man in the sky/$DEITY despite all rational logic that says otherwise. Such nonsense pervades the human race and continually proves that the majority of us are still angry, superstitious, poo-flinging monkeys.

      Moreover, you clearly don't want to learn. You're happy in your ignorance, blaming the victims for their poverty, and blaming liberals for everything else.

      I am not the parent poster, so I can't speak for him, only myself. I know that nobody wants to be poor. I don't blame "the liberals" either (hard to do so when you are one). I don't blame the other "side" either. Although, actually, I do. I blame everyone involved. There are ways of getting out of poverty, if you really want to. Although I realize I am talking out my ass here, because I have never known poverty. But I am pretty sure that if I ever found myself in the situation, I could get out of it. I am pretty sure of this because I have made it my personal mission not to find myself there, by making proper choices and continuing my learning and study by many avenues about many things. I know of ways to keep me out of poverty and ways to get me out if I found myself there. Most of this, though, comes down to making good, intelligent, and rational choices throughout life. The rest comes from realizing when those choices don't work, and learning from those mistakes. Not, as some people do, by blaming others for the failure and then trying the same thing over again only to fail a second time. What is

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    28. Re:News at 11... by empvirus · · Score: 1

      Yup. Most of us Americans (I guess) believe we can just be lazy not having to learn anything new and if something breaks or we want something done but don't know how to do it, someone else will do it for you or fix it. Yeah, this comment isn't too well thought out on wording (tired), but I hope you get the point regardless.

      --
      Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
    29. Re:News at 11... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how to personally repair my car, but that doesn't mean I can't drive it with some basic knowledge.

      Most drivers in the USA go through a driver education program. It teaches you things like using the turn signals that you'd never figure out if you didn't make an effort to learn them. In order to drive, you also need to understand the traffic signs, and some basic rules of the road. Another example of something non-obvious that most drivers know is the various times when there is an implied stop sign (i.e. Minor road entering major road).

      If most people who use computers had the same level of understanding of the basics of using a computer as drivers have of driving a car, there wouldn't be much of a problem.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    30. Re:News at 11... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      If your job is sitting in front of a computer, you should know a good chunk about computers. If you hired someone as a trucker carrying oranges and they destroyed the gearbox on one of your trucks by shifting wrong, would you want to hear "knowing the details of operating a truck isn't my job, my job is to transport oranges"?

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    31. Re:News at 11... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Why should I need to know what a "gas petal" is to drive a car? When I ran into a curb, I had to "change a tire"! One day the lights wouldn't turn on in the house. It took me a while to figure out that I hadn't paid my "electrical bill". I wanted to get some food at the store, but they said I needed "money".

      There are a lot of concepts that people need to deal with, and words for those concepts. The human brain is capible of storing and processing an extremely large amount of information. If you can't handle using a computer, I suggest not doing it. If you want to use a computer, you should be expected to understand what a megabyte is the same way you should be expected to understand what a "gallon" or "liter" (depending on where you live) is if you drive a car.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    32. Re:News at 11... by megarich · · Score: 1
      That's why you were hired, not so you can sit on your duff and complain about all the work that users make for you.

      Your not seeing or using a lawyer, medical term, name of car components nor housing codes etc. as a critical part of your DAILY JOB either. Fact is if your job rely's on using a computer everyday, you damn well better know the bare basics. Maybe not to the level as some on here believe you should but you should know how to move your way around and know basic file extensions and common terminology (i.e e-mail or the net). Just like if your job relies using the phone(as most jobs do) you should know how to use it and know enough to go ok this is the phone cord, this is the speaker, these are the numbers you punch to dial out. I really don't get what the big deal is.

    33. Re:News at 11... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I hear you. For the most part, I agree with you.

      I'm not saying that the people who stayed made a rational decision. I'm sure that, given the hindsight we all have now, they would have been grabbing anything with four wheels to escape. But when faced with the prospect of abandoning the only home they had, without the security of knowing that they had somewhere to go and some way to get there, I can see why they might have stayed put and hoped for a miracle. Maybe they thought God would save them. I wish people would just figure out that God doesn't exist, or that he's a malicious rat-bastard. Then they could do a more reasonable risk analysis.

      We really are a bunch of superstitious feces-flingers. I get that. We do stupid, incomprehensible things. My feeling is that, however stupid people were, they're still people. Survival of the fittest, right? Only not so much. Evolution got us here, and got us these big old brains. But these brains, they're big enough to learn to understand the programming, and even to defy it in some measure.

      I want for us to stop quibbling about who deserves to live and who deserves to die. We're not smart enough to make that determination, and we never will be. So we may as well come to terms with our inability to make the distinction, and then set about trying to save us all. Even the stupid, the shiftless, the deranged.

      I'm something of a genetic determinist. I don't believe that anybody can grow up to be President (even though the bar does seem to be set shockingly low at the moment), or that America is the land of boundless opportunity. The way I see it, the path of a person's life is determined 75% by his or her genes, and another 15% by his or her upbringing. Neither is under that person's control, so why spend time faulting them for who they are?

      On some level, I think New Orleans was a failure of our collective humanity. I mean, those poor people have been crapped on their whole lives. Why in the world would they leave? It's not like we can fault them if they thought nobody outside the city would stop and give them a lift. We've never given them a reason to believe in us before. Our entire society takes what we can from them, offering minimum wage in return. We give them government assistance that isn't enough to live on, then revile them as "welfare queens" or whatever.

      I'm sitting here on the verge of tears, just thinking about how thoroughly fucked we all are.

      You're a good guy, and I respect you. You're probably right when you say that you would never stay in poverty for very long. Even in poverty, the genes you got from birth and the values you got from your upbringing would help you rise. But those are riches that not everybody has, and not everyone can be taught to have them. But I have to believe that, if we were all committed to the goal of making the best possible life for everyone, rather than inflicting pain on the down-and-out in order to weed out the undeserving, we might all be able to salvage this mess.

      You know, you'd make one hell of a bartender. Thanks for your time.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    34. Re:News at 11... by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 0

      HE sure would. That sort of pseudo-intellectual bullshit drives me to drink!

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
    35. Re:News at 11... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time when most education wasn't rote memorization?

    36. Re:News at 11... by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      And that's the fundamental problem. Most people these days not only don't think they have to learn, they don't think they should have to learn.

      There is a problem with this attitude. It promotes the concept that average skilled workers (or even highly-trained workers) have to learn a new software concept every few years. It's called "make work".

      I call bullshit. Most new software deployment is done at the whim of senior management couched by MBAs so that the accountants can have a better and firmer grip (some might say, "stranglehold") on everything that a company does.

    37. Re:News at 11... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a lot of different ways to learn things.

  7. TPS Reports? by Kimos · · Score: 1
    I still don't know what TPS stands for.
    I'm not sure but I've got some suggestions.
    1. Re:TPS Reports? by squidfood · · Score: 2, Funny
      I still don't know what TPS stands for.

      Just another Tango Lima Alpha, that's Whisky Tango Foxtrot.

  8. Computer jargon too difficult for authors? by shiloh.sharps · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I always thought Excel was a spreadsheet program (from article):
    Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.

    --
    When you're hammered everything looks like it needs nailed....
  9. Just Words... by eMartin · · Score: 1

    The article mentions foreign languages, but we aren't asking people to be able to read code.

    Learning a few common terms is no different than understanding what taco or rendevous mean.

    1. Re:Just Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think taco is something to eat, but I have no idea what rendevous is. But I do know what firewall and gigabytes are, and I can speak more than 5 languages (C, C++, Java, Javascript, QBasic, PHP, ... )

  10. Why should they care? by kevin_conaway · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some people don't need to know what javascript is. They just want to use their computer to type documents and read email. I'd say a good portion of business users need their computers for just that.

    As far as sending huge files goes, they still don't need to know the differences between file sizes. People shouldn't be sending large documents through email anyway. A few megs at the MAX. Public drives or a webserver for anything else and the users should be educated on that.

    1. Re:Why should they care? by Requiem+Aristos · · Score: 1

      You say: they still don't need to know the differences between file sizes.

      Then you say: People shouldn't be sending large documents through email anyway. A few megs at the MAX. Public drives or a webserver for anything else and the users should be educated on that.

      The problem is that these people have no conception of "a few megs" or even what's "large" and "what's small". This is basic computer literacy, which many people don't have, and what's worse, don't think they need.

      Of course, part of the problem is many places equate "computer literacy" with "is able to move the mouse and click on things". It's like saying that using a McDonalds cash register with pictures on the buttons indicates [English] literacy.

    2. Re:Why should they care? by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      As far as sending huge files goes, they still don't need to know the differences between file sizes. People shouldn't be sending large documents through email anyway.

      If people don't need to know the differences between file sizes, how do you expect them to identify which files are too large for email?

    3. Re:Why should they care? by Delphiki · · Score: 1
      As far as sending huge files goes, they still don't need to know the differences between file sizes. People shouldn't be sending large documents through email anyway. A few megs at the MAX. Public drives or a webserver for anything else and the users should be educated on that.

      So, if they don't need to know the differences between file sizes, how do they determine what stuff they can email versus what goes on the public share? If you're suggesting that file size limits be configured on the mail server, that's all well and good, but you're saying they should be educated on using public drives and a webserver, which seems to suggest they would need to be taught when to use them, not just how to use them. I don't think educating them to just use the public drive when email gives them an error is a good idea, so you would have to teach them file sizes.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    4. Re:Why should they care? by Godeke · · Score: 1

      I understand your point, but to operate any complex device or system *some* knowledge transfer has to happen. JavaScript surely isn't relevant to most people's daily life, but your example on sending "large" documents... how do they learn what that means if they can't tell the difference between kilo, mega and giga? Perhaps e-mail clients shouldn't *allow* the attempt in the first place, but I don't know of any way to limit the size of the files that the user *tries* to attach. (I do know how to get the server to reject such messages on send, but that's a server configuration, not a client side feature).

      Meanwhile, when the message is rejected by the server, the user will be presented with a cryptic non-delivery message.

      The problem isn't the users (as much as I feel like it is some days...) but the user interfaces and software still are not idiot proof. Until we have a system where "send file->mail recipient" determines the proper pathway for the user (instead of just pulling the default e-mail client) these problems will continue.

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
    5. Re:Why should they care? by eggegg · · Score: 1

      As far as sending huge files goes, they still don't need to know the differences between file sizes... A few megs at the MAX.

      I don't think you fully understand the problem -- they have no concept of what a "meg" is. As a result, they are highly likely to consider any file they might want to send to be "a few megs".

      As pointed out earlier, the mail server (actually, the user's mail client) should be configured to ensure there aren't any problems and such an oversize message would never be sent in the first place. If the user repeatedly is unable to email files whose size ends in "GB" or "MB", they'll soon learn, at least, the orders-of-magnitude difference between the two and "KB", and stick with the latter.

    6. Re:Why should they care? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      don't need to know the differences between file sizes. People shouldn't be sending large documents through email anyway.

      I know others have called you on this, but here's an example: Let's say Suzy Smith has two files she wants to send to her coworker down the hall. One is a ten-page text-only document, and the other is a high-resolution jpeg that looks 5"x7" when she views it in her viewer of choice (not realizing it's very zoomed out). Which is bigger in terms of file size? But which LOOKS bigger to her? She probably thinks it'd be easier to send the high-res photo than the seemingly-huge text file. If she doesn't need to know the differences between file sizes, how else is she to judge?

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    7. Re:Why should they care? by PhilipMckrack · · Score: 1

      A possible solution would be for the email client to say something like "you have chosen an attachement of X size, this will take Y minutes to upload using your current internet connection".

      I know I'm in the minority, but I agree with the OP. The end user shouldn't really need to know this stuff. It should all work with as little knowledge as possible beyond knowing how applications work that are related to the job they do.

      A secretary needs to know how a word processor works. An accountant needs to know how a spreadsheet works. Neither of them even need to know a firewall exists.

      A computer for most people is a tool that is used to get some other type of work done. Our job (I'm assuming most /. readers are in the IT field) is to make sure that the computer is as unobtrusive as possible. If lots of people are having trouble sending large emails then it is our job (ours as in the computer industry as a whole) to try to fix that.

    8. Re:Why should they care? by NewNole2001 · · Score: 1
      The problem is that these people have no conception of "a few megs" or even what's "large" and "what's small". This is basic computer literacy, which many people don't have, and what's worse, don't think they need.
      There are a few ways to fix this:
      1. In an email program, prominently note in the "browse" box that files that are too large to be emailed are not shown.
      2. In the OS, the icon, or whatever is used to represent a file and/or directory can be made to expand when moused over. The size of the expanded icon will vary based upon the file's size. Since a text file will be relatively small, it's icon may only expand just enough to be noticeable, whereas a 2 gig Xvid file will triple in size. For the uninitiated, this gives a visual clue to the relative size of files.
      3. Again, in an email program, when the user attaches a file, the program could pop up a message notifying the user that "NapoleanDynamite.avi" is going to take 30 minutes to arrive in the recipient's Inbox due to the large size of this file, and recommend that the user think twice about emailing such a large file.

      Using techniques like this allow people who have no idea of what the difference between a Megabyte and a Gigabyte is to be able to use a computer. Think of newer stick shift cars. Many manual transmission cars now lack a tachometer, electing to have two lights: Shift Up, and "Shift Down." While the power user will want his tachometer to see just how many RPM's his Porsche is turning, there is college student who doesn't care, but just wants the manual because it gets better gas mileage. Making the system work for the user should be seen as a good thing, not a bad thing.
    9. Re:Why should they care? by PhilipMckrack · · Score: 1

      Two possible solutions. Either her client tells her that her attachements will take x minutes to upload at her current internet connection, does she really want to continue, or the client on the other side could say "hey, you have an attachement that is going to take 20 minutes to download, do you want to 1) download it 2) save it for later and go to the next one or 3) delete it from the server now." Or both. The client in the latter case could be configured to automatically download mail of up to a certain size and prompt for the larger ones when the person actually sits at the computer.

      I know neither of these are possible with the clients we have now, or at least I'm not aware of it, but they should be. I don't claim these are the only solutions or even the best solutions, but it is one way of handling it so the user really doesn't need to be aware of the size.

    10. Re:Why should they care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Some people don't need to know what a seatbelt is. They just want to drive their car from point A to point B.

      What is so special about computers that they are the only piece of technology where we demand 100% ignorance from all users? No one says "toaster users shouldn't be required to know how to empty the crumb tray" or equally stupid things.

    11. Re:Why should they care? by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1
      they still don't need to know the differences between file sizes.

      Just wait till your users start sending 40MB excel files.
      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
    12. Re:Why should they care? by Anitra · · Score: 1

      You make excellent points. I have just one nitpick:

      any manual transmission cars now lack a tachometer, electing to have two lights: Shift Up, and "Shift Down."

      Most of the ones I've seen recently (such as my 2002 Ford Focus) only have one light: "Shift Up". I guess they figure that you'll know when to shift down yourself.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    13. Re:Why should they care? by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      1. In an email program, prominently note in the "browse" box that files that are too large to be emailed are not shown.
      But how is an email client going to know what limits are placed on the recipient's emails?
      2. Again, in an email program, when the user attaches a file, the program could pop up a message notifying the user that "NapoleanDynamite.avi" is going to take 30 minutes to arrive in the recipient's Inbox due to the large size of this file, and recommend that the user think twice about emailing such a large file.
      Again, how does the client know over what types of networks the email must flow to get to the recipent's email client? There are huge differences in bandwiths between dial-up and cable.
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    14. Re:Why should they care? by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      Most of the ones I've seen recently (such as my 2002 Ford Focus) only have one light: "Shift Up". I guess they figure that you'll know when to shift down yourself.
      Just wait until Ford is sued by someone who crashed while changing up on an icy road and going round a corner because "the light told me that I had to change gear"
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    15. Re:Why should they care? by fossa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the real world, it's easy to tell if something should be mailed or not. Pick it up. Is it a brick or is it a few sheets of paper? In a computer, it's very difficult. Click "view details" on your file manager. Compare that number with what you know about hard drive sizes, network speeds, etc. Computers need a different way to indicate file size than an often obscured number. For text files, it's not too hard. Maybe show a thicker icon that looks like a stack of pages. One sheet == small. Many sheets == big, might want to FedEx that one -- I mean not email it. With images and other file types, it's not so easy. More creative minds than mine can surely come up with something though. Maybe it needn't be a real space analogy like the stack of pages.

      That still leaves one problem. File size per se doesn't matter; it's relative file size. But relative to what? Ten years ago, you might not want to email 1 meg attachments. Now it's not such a big deal (excepting dialup). How does an interface like above reflect this and answer the question: is this ok to email? Or at a different level, what are we trying to indicate by "file size"? How much disk space it needs? How long it will take to download? How long it will take to read? All of these are intuitively known for real space objects due to lifetimes of experience. The fact that every computer file has an icon the same size as every other icon isn't helping people build up experience in computer space.

      I'm sure that some people don't need to decide whether to use the postal service or, say, FedEx. The shipping department decides for them. So, what is this person's goal when emailing a large attachment? "I want these other people to see this document. Computer, make it so." Could the computer not make a decision whether to email this as an attachment or for example, upload it somewhere and email a link? Sure that opens up a bunch of problems, but it's not outside the realm of possibility. And there are probably better ways to implement such a thing, but the idea is there.

    16. Re:Why should they care? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that some people don't need to decide whether to use the postal service or, say, FedEx. The shipping department decides for them. So, what is this person's goal when emailing a large attachment? "I want these other people to see this document. Computer, make it so." Could the computer not make a decision whether to email this as an attachment or for example, upload it somewhere and email a link? Sure that opens up a bunch of problems, but it's not outside the realm of possibility. And there are probably better ways to implement such a thing, but the idea is there.

      Very good point, and of course I don't have mod-points so I have to say so the old fashioned way. This is exactly the kind of service that companies like Apple are becoming better at providing - and that people get completely up in arms about when companies like Microsoft (yeah, yeah, evil, whatever) so much as mention them. Of course, it makes it harder for geeks to differentiate themselves, making it seem that there's less "value" for being one as far as acting superior, so no wonder that people don't go for it. Yeah, that's an exaggeration, but you get the idea.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    17. Re:Why should they care? by fossa · · Score: 1

      I think it's just that computers are fairly new and unfamiliar (my baby boomer parents didn't grow up with them), fairly complex, and fairly poorly implemented (possibly due to their newness).

      Familiarity I can easily see when a toaster is full of crumbs or smoking, and I know how to get rid of the crumbs by shaking them out due to my familiarity with the basic physics of everyday life. Complexity I can learn everything about a toaster in a few minutes. Computer have vastly more functions that a toaster. Poor Implementation I can also easily see that the toaster won't fit in a standard envelope. If I want to send it across the country, I'll have to use DHL or something. It's not so easy on a computer. Even the experienced can hardly do it at a glance. "ls" doesn't tell you, icons don't tell you; you need "ls -l" or "view details". P.S. I thank GNU extensions for ls -lh
  11. Abort mission, they have the port! by Namronorman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has anyone else had a friend that works in an office enviroment that is extremely paranoid call you up screaming that the hackers have their port?

    --
    $fortune
    Tomorrow has been canceled due to lack of interest.
    1. Re:Abort mission, they have the port! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had someone get woried because they saw a vibrating banner ad that said "WARNING - Your computer is broadcasting its IP address!" My kingdom for a bottle of valium, please.

    2. Re:Abort mission, they have the port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, but there's Klingons on the starboard bow.

    3. Re:Abort mission, they have the port! by justforaday · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got one of those too. Thankfully the software that they sold me fixed that problem.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    4. Re:Abort mission, they have the port! by Mike+Keester · · Score: 2, Funny

      All your ports are belong to us!

    5. Re:Abort mission, they have the port! by kyrina · · Score: 1

      I'm still drastically disappointed at how upset my boyfriend became when he saw a sig on a message board that told him his ip address. He complained over and over again about how it's just not right that it knows what it is. I tried to explain it but he seemed to not believe me when I told him it was nothing to get worried over.

      It's incredibly frustrating!

  12. WTF? by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A massive 61% don't understand the difference between gigabytes, kilobytes and megabytes and as a result have sent e-mails with huge attachments that have blocked clients' systems.

    And a massive 99% of people don't need to understand that. Mail servers should be designed to ignore e-mails of a larger size than they can handle. It's not up to the users to understand KB, MB, GB, mail server loads, HTTP, FTP, SMTP, SSH, whatever.

    Their understand lies in doing their jobs effectively, whatever that may be. When my doctor refers to medical jargon I may not know what it means and may be confused (I'm generally well versed in my particular conditions) so do you really expect them to understand what the jargon in your field is?

    Blah.

    1. Re:WTF? by Feyr · · Score: 1


      Mail servers should be designed to ignore e-mails of a larger size than they can handle

      mine is, yet i still get an amazing number of angry queries asking why i was blocking their very important email!

      it's set at 25megs damnit! i am NOT increasing that, no matter how much you bitch.

    2. Re:WTF? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      And...if the two people emailing each other are in the same office, they should NOT send file attachments to each other! They should both work with the same file on the server. This happened today...a Word doc was going back and forth, the edited version staying in the Outlook message. No one realized that whatever happens to the copy of the doc in Outlook does not affect the original file sitting on the server. Long story short--the email was deleted along with the changes to the Word file. Guess who had to scan and OCR an old printout that had the info we needed?

    3. Re:WTF? by merreborn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When my doctor refers to medical jargon I may not know what it means and may be confused... so do you really expect them to understand what the jargon in your field is?

      I'm not a mechanic -- hell, I don't even change my own oil -- but I understand "spark plug", "alternator", "transmission", "brake pad", "muffler"...

      I'm not a doctor, but I understand "catheter", "seratonin reuptake inhibitor", "priapism", "cyst", "tumor", "intestinal tract"...

      So why the fuck can't these people understand that 1,000,000 KB = 1,000 MB = 1 GB, and that it takes about a minute to download 20 MB? I don't mind that they can't write a shell script, set up keys for SSH, configure a firewall, or understand that MSIE is not "the internet". But for fucks sake, you know how much a galon of gas is, you know how much a quart of oil is, how much 10mg of prozac is... How hard is it to understand one more unit of measurement?

    4. Re:WTF? by eMartin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "And a massive 99% of people don't need to understand that. Mail servers should be designed to ignore e-mails of a larger size than they can handle. It's not up to the users to understand KB, MB, GB, mail server loads, HTTP, FTP, SMTP, SSH, whatever."

      I don't get this.

      You suggest blocking emails past a certain size, but you don't think people need to understand those sizes?

      How are they supposed to know whether what they are trying to send is too big or not?

    5. Re:WTF? by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having a mail server simply ignore messages greater than a certain size will no doubt cause just as many problems as it will solve. Now the user will wonder, "Why the hell didn't my email get sent?" and chances are they'll hassle their IT guy or administrator about being unable to sent their mail. Either way, it will be their lack of very basic knowledge that is causing the problems. And until they acquire such knowledge, perhaps the best thing to do is for them to not use such systems at all.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    6. Re:WTF? by FauxPasIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > When my doctor refers to medical jargon I may not know what it means and may be confused
      > (I'm generally well versed in my particular conditions)

      If your doctor regularly says things you don't understand, and you don't bother to ask/learn,
      some day you might die as a result. I would have died in July of 1996 if I hadn't been
      curious at that the acronym "TBI" stood for. I was slated for spot radiation to complement
      my high-dose cytoxan chemotherapy. If I had gotten the total body irradiation that was
      written on my order, I would not have survived.

      Jargon is fucking important. People should take the time to understand it.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    7. Re:WTF? by Delphiki · · Score: 2, Informative
      I find it amusing that you're preaching about people not knowing what terms mean, and then saying

      1,000,000 KB = 1,000 MB = 1 GB

      1GB = 1024 MB = 1048576 KB! Apparently one more unit of measurement isn't that easy.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    8. Re:WTF? by merreborn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find it amusing that you're preaching about people not knowing what terms mean, and then saying 1,000,000 KB = 1,000 MB = 1 GB 1GB = 1024 MB = 1048576 KB! Apparently one more unit of measurement isn't that easy.

      In raw orders of magnitude, 1 million : 1 thousand : 1 is sufficiently close to correct.

      Also: I'm a hard drive manufacturer. Bob Maxtor's the name.

    9. Re:WTF? by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      Mail servers should be designed to ignore e-mails of a larger size than they can handle.

      Which is fine, but by itself does nothing to help the problem and improve the underlying needs. Sending out an email which never gets there, or gets there without attachment, or bounces back with a proportionally cryptic message, may save the email server, but makes a corporate headache for the IT tech who still has to explain to the clueless and unwilling non-techie why their very important email attachment didn't make it upstairs on time.

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    10. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I shouldn't have to understand the difference between ounces, pounds, and tons.
      The post office should just ignore packages that are too big.

    11. Re:WTF? by msaulters · · Score: 1
      And a massive 99% of people don't need to understand that. Mail servers should be designed to ignore e-mails of a larger size than they can handle. It's not up to the users to understand KB, MB, GB, mail server loads, HTTP, FTP, SMTP, SSH, whatever.

      The mail server may be able to handle the mail, but it may still cause problems upstream, say at the ISP level. I once saw a user mail a 75MB file to 250 people from his Exchange server. The server had no problem with that, but it tried to send a couple dozen copies at a time and saturated the connection. The designers of the mail server can't account for all situations, but the administrators who are in a position to prevent this kind of thing are at the mercy of powers-that-be who don't want any explanations, they just want it to work, dammit! So, you can't prevent the users doing stupid things. You can't teach the users to NOT do stupid things. You can only wait for them to do something stupid, clean it up, and slap 'em on the hand and say "don't do it again" knowing fully that they WILL do it again. It's kinda like running a day care.
      --
      These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    12. Re:WTF? by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Having the mail server kick out an error such as:
      Error
      The attachment you are attempting to send is larger than allowed.

      Your attachment can be no larger than 5 megabytes (5,242,880 bytes). The attachment you attempted to send was 36,542,180 bytes.


      Not only does it protect the mail server, it also educates the user without being "holier than thou".

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    13. Re:WTF? by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      But that doesn't get around the problem with regular users being unable to understand the concept of file size. So now instead of a email server administrator (ie. hopefully a knowledgable person) deal with the problem of large attachments, you have a regular user again being confused. And there's a good chance they'll enlist the help of an administrator. Either way, the administrator will still be hassled.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    14. Re:WTF? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      1GB = 1024 MB = 1048576 KB! Apparently one more unit of measurement isn't that easy.

      No

      1GB = 1000MB = 1000000 KB

      1GiB = 1024MiB = 1048576 KiB..

      Kilo means 1000. Just because memory manufacturers were forced to use powers of 2 doesn't mean the definition of "kilo/mega/giga" got changed.

    15. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a massive 99% of people don't need to understand that. Mail servers should be designed to ignore e-mails of a larger size than they can handle. It's not up to the users to understand KB, MB, GB, mail server loads, HTTP, FTP, SMTP, SSH, whatever.

      Their understand lies in doing their jobs effectively, whatever that may be. When my doctor refers to medical jargon I may not know what it means and may be confused (I'm generally well versed in my particular conditions) so do you really expect them to understand what the jargon in your field is?


      But when I go see my doctor, I expect him to know a few things: Which end of the scalpal to poke me with, how to bang my knee with the mallet, and what to feel for when I'm turning and coughing...

      Anyone using a computer for work needs to at least know a little bit about it, ignorance is not a cop-out here.

    16. Re:WTF? by js3 · · Score: 1

      You're both missing the point. They are mad because the most mail servers never let them know the email was blocked, either to the sender or the receiver. The message just disappears half the time and users are left wondering what happened. Of course this all makes mr. admin guy look like a genius

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    17. Re:WTF? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      And a massive 99% of people don't need to understand that. Mail servers should be designed to ignore e-mails of a larger size than they can handle. It's not up to the users to understand KB, MB, GB, mail server loads, HTTP, FTP, SMTP, SSH, whatever.

      Yes they do. KB, MB, and GB are basic literacy requirements, just like g, Kg, metric ton. It is up to users to understand that a 20M file should generally not be emailed to 20 people and that overloaded servers are a fact of life. They don't need to fix the problems that overload servers, but they need to know enough not to add to them.

      Car analogy time: I like subarus, especially the imprezas. These cars are AWD and, for some reason, people like to drag race them. The think that they can do a clutch drop and spin the wheels just like a 2wd car, but they can't. The extra 2 wheels in the drivetrain limit wheel slip, so all the shock load hits the tranny. The upshot is that a bunch of idiots break their trannies, then complain when Subaru denies the warranty claim for abuse. You don't need to know the details of transmission construction, but you do need to know how to properly use the equipment.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    18. Re:WTF? by astronouth7303 · · Score: 1

      "And a massive 99% of people don't need to understand that. Mail servers should be designed to ignore e-mails of a larger size than they can handle. It's not up to the users to understand KB, MB, GB, mail server loads, HTTP, FTP, SMTP, SSH, whatever."

      That's like suggesting that people don't need to know that a 36 foot (12m) 2x4 won't fit in a 12 foot (4m) car.

      While they may not need to understand the history or the technical details behind the various protocols, they should at least recognize them and learn to make note of them.

      The only difference between this and other jargon is that it's fairly intangible.

      Oh, yeah. My computer literacy class did not have anything about KB, MB, GB, or anything that would leviate this problem. (I tested out of it. It seemed to all be how to use features of MS Office I'll never need. Like how to make a graphic into a textbox.)

    19. Re:WTF? by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      Hi, Bob! It's me, Barry Seagate! Want to grab a bite to eat?

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    20. Re:WTF? by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      "1GB = 1024 MB = 1048576 KB"

      Unless you write harddrive press releases.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    21. Re:WTF? by Kidbro · · Score: 1

      1GB = 1024 MB = 1048576 KB! Apparently one more unit of measurement isn't that easy.

      Significant digits, son... significant digits.

      Also, please refer to other replies about binary (as opposed to SI) prefixes.

    22. Re:WTF? by boarder · · Score: 1

      I find it funny you know what a priapism is.

      And don't let that jerk get you down... 1MB SHOULD be 1000KB (which SHOULD be 1000 bytes), but some lazy electrical engineers decided the significant figures were confusing their managers.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
    23. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very disturbing, IMO, to regard doctors as nothing more than "fix me" professionals. I have found not only that I get better care but also the doctor performs better diagnosis when I take the time to learn medical "jargon" so that we can communicate about my health.

    24. Re:WTF? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      When I have a disease, my doctor expects me to understand the basics of that disease and how to deal with it.

      When you have a computer, I expect you to understand the basics of that computer and how to deal with it.

      Basic computer use isn't a field specific skill any more than how to open a door is a skill specific to locksmiths. People should understand how to deal with the tools they are using - being intentionally ignorant is not some sort of natural right.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    25. Re:WTF? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      kilo/mega/giga are S.I. prefixes, yes. Bytes are not S.I. units though, so there's no reason for the S.I. prefix rules to apply, any more than you need to use kiloyard instead of mile.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    26. Re:WTF? by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 1

      "...why can't these people understand that 1,000,000 KB = 1,000 MB = 1 GB..."

      Try dealing with finance people who can't agree on which letter stands for what. They use M for 1000, MM for a million, and have no idea what a K is for. (I've also seen G used for "grand" or 1000.) Kilo and mega are completely foreign words to them. A $15M project is big money to one department and petty cash to another.

    27. Re:WTF? by fusion9290991 · · Score: 1

      ...if they actually read the error message returned by the server, they'd probably get an idea of what went wrong. However it's a sad fact that the same 99% of users won't bother to read the error message, because they'll assume it's too technical for them anyway.
      Either that or they're too damn lazy, and it's easier to call an IT person to get them to sort it out. It's easier to pick up the phone and waste the time of someone else than to have to actually think. Of course, they go all to pieces when I am on vacation :)

      --
      remember to loot and pillage before you burn!
  13. Have fun with it! by MudButt · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why I like to throw in the term "flux capacitor" every once in a while when I'm explaining stuff to end users...

    1. Re:Have fun with it! by stlhawkeye · · Score: 5, Funny

      I do that, too. When there's too much technobabble jargon being bandied about in meetings, I said, "Do we have the 1.21 jigga watts for the flux capacitor?" At least one person always thinks I'm serious. I also frequently suggest that we solve any given problem by degaussing the main deflector dish or reversing the flow control to the plasma relay conduits.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    2. Re:Have fun with it! by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      My flux capacitor overheated because the oscillation overthruster fan was pointed at it.

    3. Re:Have fun with it! by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about the overthruster, otherwise the info won't be able to get through their rock of a skull...

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    4. Re:Have fun with it! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      I once mentioned in a meeting way back when we had Mac SE/30s about the office that I heard SE/30s needed annual reanodizing of their processor shields or there could be a gamma radiation leak, and at least three people believed me. Two of them complained to their section heads about the dangerous computers. As Dave Barry said, I am not making this up.

      No, I did not get into trouble. :)

    5. Re:Have fun with it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehehe

    6. Re:Have fun with it! by KillShill · · Score: 1

      "flow control"?

      that's reversing the polarity, you ignorant clod. ;-)

      just WHERE did you get your geek diploma from?

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    7. Re:Have fun with it! by Doug97 · · Score: 1

      Isolating the reverse power couplings also often helps.

    8. Re:Have fun with it! by mshmgi · · Score: 0

      Back in the dark ages (when I was an auto mechanic), we had a guy who used to like to tell customers that their exhaust system was load because the "muffler bearings" had seized.

      This guy felt that most people are too cheap to fix a small exhaust leak under the floor boards - but tell them they've got a bad bearing and they'll pawn their own grandmother to get it fixed.

      Surprisingly - he was right 99% of the time.

    9. Re:Have fun with it! by evdelst · · Score: 1

      I routinely ask if they tried "polarizing the hull plating", if a bug cannot be found.

    10. Re:Have fun with it! by codergeek42 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to reverse the polarity of your fluid dilation coils. ;-)

    11. Re:Have fun with it! by rsadelle · · Score: 1

      A level three diagnostic might help you uncover the problem.

    12. Re:Have fun with it! by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1
      just WHERE did you get your geek diploma from?

      I don't have one. I take pride in not understanding or caring about 80% of what is posted on Slashdot. So does my girlfriend. You'll learn all about in a few years, probably, when you hit your mid-30's.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    13. Re:Have fun with it! by KillShill · · Score: 1

      heh touche.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    14. Re:Have fun with it! by netjeff · · Score: 1

      Here's a classic Dilbert, helping the boss solve a network problem.

      http://img295.imageshack.us/my.php?image=tokenring 6om.gif

  14. In other news, 3 out of 4 are thick .. by bushboy · · Score: 1

    It doesn't exactly take a rocket scientist to grok that most these complaints are from complete morons - duffers with more shine that substance, more muck that spine. :)

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:In other news, 3 out of 4 are thick .. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      No, they're not complete morons; at best, they're incomplete morons. Most of the time they're just your common, garden-variety luser proud of their ignorance and unwilling to abandon it.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  15. Education by Apreche · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Proper computing education should be mandatory for high school graduation and equivalent. Not knowing this kind of information in today's world is the equivalent of being illiterate. You wouldn't hire an illiterate person to read books all day. So don't hire a computer illiterate person to sit at a computer all day.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should we care about explaining, informing or educating people in IT? This desire of explaining our knowledge to others is part of the reason for the decline of IT - meaning decline of how IT people are handled. Think about it hard.

      I don't remember having had a law, medical, engineering and so on education in my computer science curriculum. Don't expect a surgeon to explain each medical term he's using, care about the result.

      AC

    2. Re:Education by kbielefe · · Score: 1
      Why should we care about explaining, informing or educating people in IT?

      We may be able to control their PC at work, but not at home. And their ignorance affects everyone to a certain extent.

      We license people to drive cars because they have a great potential of hurting others if they do it badly. We don't license people to ride bicycles, even though they have more potential to get hurt if they don't follow the rules of the road.

      I'll stop caring about educating users when the potential damage a default Windows installation can cause stops being a Mac truck, and starts being a bicycle. They don't need the knowledge of a mechanic, just a regular licensed driver.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Education by Kirth · · Score: 1

      You're right. I don't expect users of books to be able to write them, but I surely expect them to be able to read.

      --
      "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
    4. Re:Education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proper computing education should be mandatory for high school graduation and equivalent.

      I don't know about that, but learning the metric system certainly should be. I had to learn it when I was in public school (grad 1996). If you don't know the difference between "kilo-" and "mega-" and "giga-", you're going to be lost on a lot more than just computers.

      I would bet the people in this survey know the difference between tablespoons and gallons, too -- even those who don't cook and use full service at the pump. And I'd bet that office workers in, say, Germany, would at least know that a kilobyte is a lot bigger than a byte.

      This is a direct consequence of still using a confusing and obsolete system of measurement, and it's an embarassment to this country.

    5. Re:Education by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      I was horrified when I saw some kid who was taught about computers say there were 1000 bytes in a kilobyte.

      Finding qualified teachers and maybe even stabilizing basic terminology would be the first step here...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    6. Re:Education by superyooser · · Score: 1

      Proper computing education should be mandatory for high school graduation and equivalent.

      The problem is not computing education, but education in general.

      Since when are standard metric prefixes considered "jargon"? Kilo-byte, mega-byte, etc.

      (Yes, I know that in technical contexts, a kilobyte is 2^10=1024 instead of 10^3=1000, but either is sufficient for most purposes of common end users in grasping general differences in file or disk sizes.)

  16. In related news by SlayerofGods · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your average office worker is lazy and doesn't want to learn what those terms mean.
    The terms aren't the problem; it's the fact that your average cubical dweller simply doesn't want to learn them.
    I've personally explained how to fix a the same problem several times to the same person, yet they keep asking me how to fix it every time it comes up. If they'd simply listen the first time and learn how to do it rather then noding the whole time maybe they'd be able to help themselves once and a while.

    --

    Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    1. Re:In related news by xiando · · Score: 1

      "If they'd simply listen the first time and learn how to do it rather then noding the whole time maybe they'd be able to help themselves once and a while." ?? Please don't encurage people to actually THINK for themselves or to listen or learn. Are you trying to get me unemployed???

    2. Re:In related news by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Why should they have to learn what JavaScript and gigabyte mean?

      If your mechanic told you your car needed new tie rods, the OBDII reader detected code P1443, you should install tires with a wear rating of 600 and the engine's woodruff key is worn out, would you understand what he's telling you? Confusing jargon is not unique to the IT industry.

    3. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the engine's woodruff key is worn out

      That's no problem. I'll just go to Home Depot and have them cut me a duplicate key.

    4. Re:In related news by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      I've personally explained how to fix a the same problem several times to the same person, yet they keep asking me how to fix it every time it comes up.

      I've run across the same thing, many times. Sometimes, in doing phone support, I've had to tell a caller how to do something twice in less than three minutes. They didn't learn the first time, and I knew they wouldn't the second. I've come to the conclusion that these people see no reason to learn how to do things because of course they'll never need to do it again so there's no point in remembering it. It isn't that they can't learn, it's that they won't.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've personally explained how to fix a the same problem several times to the same person, yet they keep asking me how to fix it every time it comes up.

      Maybe we need to start realizing that we need a whole new approach to computers - maybe these problems should not be occurring in the first place, and maybe end-users should not be expected to know how to fix a problem.

      As someone else pointed out, take the automobile as an example. They have gotten pretty worry-free in the last 10 years or so. Take it in for a tune-up once or twice a year (and even that is going by the wayside), fill it with gas every now and then, and that is about it.

      No more adjusting the valves, checking the oil every time you put gas in the car, and so on.

    6. Re:In related news by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Most of this terminology is hardly in the realm of true jargon.

      The things you mention for mechanics are quite specific to the internal workings of an automobile. They're not important for you to know.

      On the other hand, one should be expected to understand the general functioning of things like antilock brakes, cruise control, oil and fluid changing, tire rotation, and antifreeze. You know that the thing under the hood is an engine, even though you never touch it, and you probably know that there are some cylinders with spark plugs somewhere in there. The thing is powered with gasoline, which is not the same as kerosene. Unleaded and leaded gasoline are different from one another and different from diesel fuel. Gasoline tank capacity is measured in gallons, travel distance in miles, and fuel efficiency in miles per gallon. These are all things that you wouldn't necessarily know without learning them first, and people generally know them because they drive cars.

      Most of the computer "jargon" presented is no harder to understand than these basics about automobiles. For God's sake, megabytes and gigabytes are just units of size. If you can understand pounds and ounces or ounces and gallons, you can understand them. The same goes for "firewall" or "jpeg". I mean, people don't say, "I don't know what the brakes do. Is it okay if they don't work?" No.

      Nobody's asking them to *write* in JavaScript, but considering half the websites out there use it far to liberally and usually do it incorrectly, they're going to run into the term mentioned on their web browser.

      Training, learning, and a little focus would go a long way with computer terminology.

    7. Re:In related news by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

      Why should they have to learn what JavaScript and gigabyte mean?
      Because then maybe they could answer their own questions
      -My email account says I'm out of space why is it saying that I only have a few emails in saved?
      Because those damn joke movies that people keep email you are 50 megabytes each.
      -This website says I need JavaScript turned on, what's JavaScript.
      JavaScript is a language that browsers use to display certain webpages. We have it turned off for security reasons.

      It's not that those are unreasonable questions... the first time.
      But they don't learn, and they'll ask the same exact questions again because they didn't listen the first time.
      I mean all those people that didn't know what a megabyte was. I find it imposable to believe they've never heard that term before. I mean how many times do they have to hear it before they remember what it is?
      I don't expect them to know everything, but I expect them to be able to help themselves.
      Here's the perfect example. There was program that is used here that has the annoying side effect of sometimes changing the resolution to a much lower value.
      And I've explained many times how to change the resolution back if the problem comes up. Yet it never fails that some people keep coming to me and getting all huffy that their icons are really small and that they can't read any of the words on the computer.
      How many times am I expected to explain to them how to fix the god damn resolution. It's not a complex procedure. Yet the damn people refuse to learn it and keep fucking bugging me to do it.
      And nothing pisses me off more then people who refuse, not can't, but refuse to help themselves!

      would you understand what he's telling you
      Maybe not... but I'd learn mainly so he doesn't rip me off ;)

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    8. Re:In related news by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      So true. People always ask me how many songs my 1 GB iPod Shuffle holds and I say it depends. Why? Well it DOES depend on:

      How long the song is
      What bitrate it is stored at

      At that point thier eyes glaze over and I usually say about 200.

      I ain't talking rocket science or hell even computer science.

      --

      Gorkman

    9. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yeah... with the exception that I would have to look up what code P1443 is. Oh and while I don't know exactly what the woodruff key does, I do know it's alternator related.

      BTW P1443 is ECS vents.... :-)

    10. Re:In related news by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      If you can understand pounds and ounces or ounces and gallons

      Most people don't even understand these. Furthermore, most people (who aren't cooks) don't understand the difference between dry measurements and wet measurements (f'ing imperial measurements). Some cooks don't even understand why you shouldn't use a measuring cup without flat edges (like a common pyrex cup - which is for liquids) to measure dry ingredients. They then wonder why things don't come out right.

      In reality, I think it is a combination of laziness and apathy for most people. I am a professional software developer - I have coded in a ton of languages, and have wrote my own scripting language interpreters (nothing I am really proud of). But that doesn't mean I neglect learning about auto related stuff when it comes to repairing and maintaining my trucks. That doesn't mean I neglect learning how to properly set the "heat" (current) on an arc welder before I strike an arc with the "stinger". That doesn't mean I neglect learning how to read the color code for resistors or how to read a schematic (or draw one) when I use my soldering iron to build a robot.

      I learn - constantly - every day is a new learning oppourtunity, and more often than not, contains a new learning experience. What I have yet to truely understand, except on the most broad level, is why there are so many people who go through life refusing to learn basic (and not so basic) things. I wonder how these people manage, how they are able to simply go through life without dying. To be honest, the fact that this is possible is a true wonder of our age (even if it does lead to a lot of hardship and anguish for others).

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  17. There's only 1 thing office workers need to know.. by octaene · · Score: 1

    (Insert completely sarcastic obligatory flame-bait 'RTFM' exclamation here)

  18. Eeeeecellent by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    Rubs hands together a'la Mr Burns

    Our long-term job security protection program is going precisely as planned.

    Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.

    Especially with assistance like this from our allies in the media

  19. ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does IT stand for?

  20. Whata buncha n00bs!! by FortKnox · · Score: 0, Troll

    Geez... newbies...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  21. Well by Ikn · · Score: 5, Funny

    They don't seem to understand basic instructions, either. "Don't open any suspicious attachments, especially from someone you don't know." == "Open anything! It's fun! Oooh, pretty smileys!"

    --
    I know nothing
    1. Re:Well by Rhoon · · Score: 1

      And right there is where your logic is flawed. The issue is, they are opening attachments from people they DO know... because their 'friend' is also computer illiterate and said "Ooooo, pretty smileys!" and hit the worst button in an email client... "Forward"

      Internal Emails shouldn't even have a need for attachments... use a public shared drive!! Block people from installing any programs... there are ways to do it... my company operates very effectively under these circumstances. The only IT calls we get... computer won't boot, phone doesn't work.

      --
      "If all the world's a stage, I want to operate the trap door." - Paul Beatty
  22. PEBKAC by McLetter · · Score: 0

    This is just further evidence supporting PEBKAC.

    Best advice ever.. "RTFM!"

  23. seriously? by solesoul · · Score: 1

    C'mon now, not knowing what Excell is? Thats a bit to much, pun intended.

    1. Re:seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be a byte too much, assuming we're not using multi-byte character systems?

    2. Re:seriously? by solesoul · · Score: 1

      Pun editing is wrong. Very wrong. :(

  24. Some Users Drive Me Nuts! by canfirman · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    'But I don't feel I should know more - that is their job. If we did it all ourselves they would be out of a job.'

    Oh, it's users like this that drive me nuts! Because this user feels she 'should know more' is the reason we have so many computer viruses/worms running rampant. I'll bet any cash that she'll be the first person who's demanding the IT staff fix her PC when things go wrong - probably because she didn't know but felt she doesn't feel she 'should know more'.

    (/rant)

    --
    It is not our abilities that show what we truly are... it is our choices.
  25. Simple prefixes by rxrfrx · · Score: 1

    Megabytes - the amount of disc space on your computer and the amount of memory

    Gigabytes - also refers to disc space, but measures it in larger quantities


    These people are in Europe for crying out loud! They use the metric system! It's hard to believe that they can't understand that "giga" means something larger than "mega." I mean, it's not as if people can't understand that a kilometer is bigger than a meter is bigger than a centimeter. jeez people

    1. Re:Simple prefixes by malraid · · Score: 1

      People lack basic math knowledge, that's it. Sad, I know, but true.

      --
      please excuse my apathy
    2. Re:Simple prefixes by Edzor · · Score: 1

      Britain, an island floating off the continent of Europe uses a hybrid system of British imperial and metric. anyone over the age of 40 would of been taught in british imperial measurements, inches, feet, yards etc and still 'think' with regards to those units. rulers / tape measures here have both cm and inches.

      Even though EU regulations have mostly changed all measurements to SI you will still find on petrol(gas) pumps a smaller gallon readout with a main litres readout or at least a conversion table. Miles are still used for distances.

      anyone below 40 would be firstly taught in metric, but still be aware and how to use britsh imperial measurements.

  26. Users by Kiashien · · Score: 0

    Well, sadly, this is why Microsoft continues to be in power of the desktop.

    People (in general) seem to have no flaming clue what in the name of they are running. Or how to run it.

    Or even what to call it. There's plenty of people in my office that walk in, and after 2 minutes glaze over. Even if I'm just talking about Word. They just don't know the lingo. It's kind of odd... Someone who does things that I couldn't dream of doing on Excel (because I simply never had a need to do them, and therefore never learned) doesn't know what a Macro is. And gets confused when I start talking about formatting tables.

    It's just.. baffling, I suppose.

    Then again, I write helpfiles for software that'll be used by 60-year-old people. Oh-so-much fun, when you can't assume they know what "keyboard" and "mouse" means (yes, I was told I can't assume they even know those terms, or the word Monitor).

    Just goes to show... the only way to combat it is to compare it to what you'd say/do if you hired a contractor. Do YOU know what a 2x4 is? Can YOU read a blueprint? Do YOU know the exact term for where two supporting beams come together to form a load-bearing doorway? Do YOU even know that doorways are load-bearing? I suppose it's the same principle. I have no interest in carpentry, yet I have to interact with carpentry-type things daily. Same concept.

    However unthinkable it is to Code Monkeys (tm), they don't even want to know.

    --
    Code. Writing. Writing Code. Writing in general. What? They aren't -that- differnet.
    1. Re:Users by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do happen to know these things.. of course my getting into computers in the first place was through my interest in art and drafting... just had an aptitude for computers, and learned programming as an extension of that.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  27. Sounds like Pebcak by SCO+STINKS · · Score: 0

    Problem Exists Between Chair and Keyboard

    --
    Reason #32767 not to use VB6: Integers are 2 bytes... Think about it!
  28. Jpeg png, javascript T-1 by Rinzai · · Score: 5, Funny
    GIF USB IT, Java Ethernet Perl. PHP? Jpeg bandwidth kilobyte, iPod Bluetooth nano buffer kilobyte!

    Visio, visio--powerpoint PCX GIMP tar c++ RAM. Outlook? Gigahertz!

    1. Re:Jpeg png, javascript T-1 by AndreiK · · Score: 1

      Microsoft. (Get it? A curse word in IT? Eh, its not as funny when you explain it)

    2. Re:Jpeg png, javascript T-1 by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Jpeg bandwidth kilobyte, iPod Bluetooth nano buffer kilobyte!

      You bastard, my mother is a saint!

    3. Re:Jpeg png, javascript T-1 by Nethead · · Score: 1

      That T-1, is that a 24xDS0, a PRI with 23B1D or a P-P Clear Channel... and which end is the clock source?

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re:Jpeg png, javascript T-1 by justforaday · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see what your problem is...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    5. Re:Jpeg png, javascript T-1 by KillShill · · Score: 1

      anyone else crave a cigarette after reading through the parent's post?

      err maybe twinkie, since this is /.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    6. Re:Jpeg png, javascript T-1 by angrytuna · · Score: 1

      GIF, USB, Java Perl IT,
      Ethernet, PHP, buffer kilobyte,
      Jpeg bandwidth iPod,
      Bluetooth nano powerpoint
      Visio, visio--PCX, Outlook? Gigahertz!

      We didn't start the fire....

      --

      It is a solemn thought: dead, the noblest man's meat is inferior to pork.

    7. Re:Jpeg png, javascript T-1 by Rinzai · · Score: 1
      And I was thinking more along the lines of

      It's the end of the world as we know it....

    8. Re:Jpeg png, javascript T-1 by waveclaw · · Score: 1

      f u cn rd ts, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmng

      Aren't abbreviations fun?

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
  29. Level of Knowledge by SolusSD · · Score: 1

    There should be a certain level of understanding when required by office users when they are given access to things like email, computer systems, etc. If they can't learn and function in their role at work... maybe they should be looking for a new job. Ignorance is self afflicted.

  30. Partly IT's fault by realmolo · · Score: 1

    Users shouldn't have to know about a firewall, and the IT department should have their computers locked down so much, they should never even know there is one.

    HOWEVER...if your job requires you to use a computer all day, you should know something about them. Saying "I shouldn't have to know that stuff to do my job" is a copout.

    As far as e-mails cloggin the servers....well, that shouldn't happen unless the server is really underpowered/misconfigured. Now, users sending HUGE attachments for no reason...that's the user's fault. I blame digital cameras. Everyone takes pictures with their 3 megapixel camera, and then tries to email the un-resized picture to all of their friends, not realizing how big those files are. And trying to explain how to resize an image to someone who barely can operate their camera is an exercise in futility.

    1. Re:Partly IT's fault by Cheeze · · Score: 1

      I agree with you up to the point about the e-mail attachment size. Every mail server I've run has the ability to limit attachment size. If you run a mail server and have the problem of your users sending files that are too large through the server, it is YOUR fault.

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  31. Dangers of Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So, the other night I was watching a DVD of the old TV show Profit. In one episode, our hero, Jim Profit, is helping a Russian gangster clean his books. At some point, he is supposed to have a new version of the spreadsheet program "modemed" to him (this was pre-Internet) but an enemy of the gangster who working in Profit's company sends him a Trojan horse instead which will allow him to steal all the accounting information and erase it on the host computer.

    Of course, when the Russian gangster finds that all his files have been erased, he plans to kill Jim and feed him to some rats. Jim explains to him that the files were stolen electronically, and fortunately when the gangster asks his accountant, "You can do that?" the gangster's accountant nods his head.

    Profit is actually a pretty cool evil cracker character, but the FreeLSD OS he uses in the episodes is painful to watch ^_^

  32. Jargon problems? How about Reporting Problems! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the second page of the article:
    What it all means
    The it terms most likely to leave you baffled:

    Megabytes - the amount of disc space on your computer and the amount of memory
    Gigabytes - also refers to disc space, but measures it in larger quantities
    Jpeg - this is a compressed picture file
    PDF - portable document format, which means the file is in a format that can be read on any PC
    Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.
    Java Script - a computer programming language.
    Cookies - this enables some web pages to 'remember' your previous visits - for example, an E-Commerce site might use a cookie to remember which items you've placed in your online shopping cart.
    Trojan horse - this is a virus disguised as an innocent programme.
    Worm - this is a virus that replicates itself until it fills all of the storage space on a drive or network.

    No wonder people are confused.
    ~opticsdoug
  33. Office workers by JymBrittain · · Score: 1

    Office workers, you mean those with IQs of 120+ that accept the term lifelong learning as an important fact of life? Or, do you mean the traditional office worker who thinks learning is like operating a trashcan, ie there's a switch in their arse...when they sit in a desk in a classroom that switch opens their head into which they expect the instructor to just shovel knowledge? Or, do you possibly mean the office worker bright enough to think Intelligent Design is scientific fact? /sarcasm

  34. Learning is bad? by oGMo · · Score: 1
    A poll of 1,500 staff by recruitment firm Computer People showed that three out of four wasted more than an hour every week simply finding out what some technical term meant.

    I see, so learning things and educating yourself is a waste of time. I love our modern mentality.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:Learning is bad? by xiando · · Score: 1

      I think you are missing a vital point: They DO NOT learn. It is just like when people ask you the same thing over and over and over again even though you patiently explain every single time (the joy of being payd by the hour is that you can be patient): They simply use the information then and there and forget it. So obviously they will be looking up the same term over and over and that is why they spend so much time doing it... if those who do that would actually learn and remember the first time they'd signifficantly reduce the time they spend looking things up.

  35. My Secretary by OctoberSky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My secretary just came in and said "my email is broken" Well rather than ask her what the problem is I just went out to see. Seems what one of her stupid Cursor/screensaver/spyware/smiley things locked up and borked the system. I just hit Ctrl+Alt+Delete and ended Outlook, Dog thing (not sure, don't ask) and another unnecessary program. It gave me no real problems and I walked away. She asked what I did, I just say "I am not sure". See the problem is not that they don't get it. The problem is that we try and explain it to people who won't get it. She's 60 and never going to know the difference between 1 GB of Ram and 1.21 Gigawatts. Trying to explain it to her only wastes both our time.

  36. Too Bad - Jargon Is Necessary by taylor_venable · · Score: 1

    It sounds heartless, but 'jargon' is absolutely necessary for people who do anything beyond the basics with computers. How else would we communicate precise information? And the truth is, most computer language comes from other contexts, where the phrases are even more established. So if comprehending the difference between kilo-, mega-, and gigabytes is too difficult (even though it's exactly the same for any other measurement dimension, like length or weight!), they should just surf over to Wikipedia and type it in. Professionals can't spend their whole day educating clueless users; they'll have to do it themselves.

    1. Re:Too Bad - Jargon Is Necessary by Trevin · · Score: 1
      they should just surf over to Wikipedia and type it in.

      Yeah, but then you have to explain to them what "surfing" means and what a "wiki" is.

      :-P
  37. That is normal ... sort of by kbahey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, this is normal.

    Every field has its jargon that is virtually undecipherable for outsiders.

    Think about medicine for example, and the names of medical conditions.

    Or think about botany, or construction engineering.

    Where the problem lies is that unlike the above fields, computers have become pervasive, and embedded everywhere.

    If computers have remained in mainframe rooms with an army of programmers and operators, this would never have been an issue. It became an issue after the PC was invented and made it to every office and every home...

    Live with it ...

    1. Re:That is normal ... sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only is it normal, but it is desirable to protect your job.
      Often the desire to share knowledge leads to IT people being less appreciated.

      How many times have you heard business people explain you how their stuff is working?

      AC

    2. Re:That is normal ... sort of by kbahey · · Score: 1

      For business (and other fields) do not have the need or mandate that they educate everyone in their jargon. They can keep it to themeselves as long as their gear works as part of the bigger machine.

      But in our case (IT) it is inescapable. The genie is out of the bottle for good, no matter what we think. Computers are used by secretaries, clerks, kids at home, ...etc.

      Our field has become pervasive, and it is not going back to the 1970s and before.

      Some things were better then (no spyware, no upgrades to dumb terminals, ...etc.), but the world has changed now. We need wordprocessors, spreadsheets, games, ...etc. to be in the hands of everyone for business to function the way it is today...

    3. Re:That is normal ... sort of by pjludlow · · Score: 1

      I found that the most abbreviations I've used was in World of Warcraft. I'm sure this is true for any MMORPG. Try to teach someone what the following means: Lvl 60 LFG UBRS/DM/ZG/BRD/LBRS/Scholo I constantly find myself emailing friends where I have to remember not to put abbreviations in. QFT, 8, etc. It's interesting to chat and then realize you hardly use a complete word.

    4. Re:That is normal ... sort of by MrLizard · · Score: 1

      The whole "Well, I don't understand medical jargon" (etc) argument misses the point dramatically. If you WORKED IN A DOCTORS OFFICE, and the "jargon" was PART OF YOUR JOB, you'd bloody well BETTER understand it -- or be fired. Could you imagine this exchange?

      "Nurse, I asked for a hypo full of adrenaline. Why did you give me a bottle of aspirin?"
      "Oh, I just find all those medical terms so confusing!"
      "OK, well, I guess it's not your job to know all this fancy doctor speak!"

      If you work in a typical office, then knowing what "Excel" is, how to tell how big a file is relative to how much storage space you've got, and the basis of "firewalls" and "viruses" *is* part of your job -- as much as knowing how to forward a call on your office phone system or work the copier is. No, IT people probably can't diversify a portfolio -- but doing their job doesn't require them to know how. No one is saying Joe Cubicle ought to be able to configure an Oracle server or write scripts to manage sendmail, but he ought to be able to use the basic tools he needs to do his job. Asking a bus driver to know how to drive a bus is different from asking him to be able to assemble the engine blindfolded.

    5. Re:That is normal ... sort of by kbahey · · Score: 1

      You are right of course.

      But the article was talking about javascript, jpeg, which is not regular office jargon.

  38. jargon too difficult? by justforaday · · Score: 2, Informative

    My boss has been using computers since the early 80s, and was a tech journalist during that time. He still doesn't even understand the simple concept of a zip file. I don't think it's just the jargon that's too difficult. I think it's simply that computers are too difficult for many people. And no, I don't think that dumbing any of it down will ever make it better. I really think it's just that some people out there are too dense to begin to understand anything remotely technical.

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:jargon too difficult? by Sahib! · · Score: 1

      I think it's simply that computers are too difficult for many people. And no, I don't think that dumbing any of it down will ever make it better. I really think it's just that some people out there are too dense to begin to understand anything remotely technical.

      No, the real problem is that the lay-person has been led to believe that the realm of technology is too difficult, therefore they don't even bother to try to learn. Tech professionals should learn to be patient and lucid when explaining technical matters. Excessive use of jargon exacerbates the problem. Very few people are too stupid to learn how to use a computer.

      --

      I prayed about it, and God said, "Don't do it!" But I thought, "I know better."

  39. Tell them... by bchapp · · Score: 1

    FTA:

    Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.

    Java Script - a computer programming language.

    OK, Excell has been covered. But Java Script is not a programming language, hence the term "SCRIPT". It is a scripting language. Most people wouldn't know the difference only because stupid things like this give misinformation.

    Really, if we are going to try and tell people what these terms mean, actually tell them the truth. Don't dumb it down because you think they wont understand. If they care, they want to know what it really means, if they don't care, why should you?

    1. Re:Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?query =scripting&action=Search -- Nothing in there implies a "scriping language" isn't a programming language. Ruby and python can be used for scripts, are they not programming languages now?

    2. Re:Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I looked, Javascript was Turing-Complete.

    3. Re:Tell them... by swimmar132 · · Score: 1

      How is a scripting language not a programming language?

  40. Why did they choose this job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a pale geek with no muscles, thick glasses, and back problems. I don't work for "two men and a truck", that'd be stupid.

  41. Simple answer - don't use Office then by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    use Open Office instead.

    Problem solved!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  42. This'll Learn 'EM! by Legendof_Pedro · · Score: 2, Funny

    A massive 61% don't understand the difference between gigabytes, kilobytes and megabytes and as a result have sent e-mails with huge attachments that have blocked clients' systems.'

    Give 'em all 28.8k modems, that'll teach 'em!

  43. I always said by gomel · · Score: 1

    they should be called klein bites, medium bites and grand bites.

    --
    Fight Frist Psoting!
    Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
  44. don't blame the office worker community by yagu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My experience has been that office workers (non-IT) are not the only ones who are confused by IT jargon.

    From the article:

    • Among office workers 26% aren't sure what a firewall does and therefore have been tempted to turn it off.

      Yeah, well a LOT of IT people don't really know what a firewall does either. I've cringed at some of the definitions of firewalls I've heard peer IT workers give for firewall. And, of those who have an inkling, I would not be surprised at all if 75% of IT workers don't really know how and why firewalls work.

    • A massive 61% don't understand the difference between gigabytes, kilobytes and megabytes...

      I've seen IT people play fast and loose with these terms too. I've been on projects where estimations are off by 1 to 6 magnitudes because some erudite IT person didn't understand the differences. (I got an emergency call one time because an entire project was going to get canceled because a team member had confused baud (bits per second) with Bps (bytes per second, combined with parity bits, essentially a magnitude difference) and had said what we were attempting would kill our network. I walked them through a pencil estimate and put them back on track that night with an estimate of bandwidth within 2%.

    • Around 48% are confused by different kinds of files like Jpegs and PDFs and don't know how they should be used.

      Again, find me an IT team fo which the majority knows this, too. It's amazing how many times jpg's vs. gif's vs. pdf vs. pbm, etc. are selected mostly on the basis of only what the person involved knows.

    • further 23% are not sure whether to upload or download - requiring further conta ct with the IT department for an explanation.

      yeah, good luck getting consistent answers on this one. Again, my experience, IT people can be amazingly clueless about the notion of "direction" and server-side vs. client-side technology.

    • Nearly 75% of people said they spend more than an hour every week simply trying to find out what something means in order to finish a task, according to the survey by recruitment consultants Computer People.

      Yeah, me too! The IT jargon is inconsistent, overloaded, pseudointellectual, and obfuscated. It's a constantly moving target making true currency in technology jargon a royal pain-in-the-ass.

    • And it isn't just the older generation who feel out of the loop - more than one in two (54%) office workers under 30 have made a blunder because of confusion over the meaning of IT jargon.

      This is NOT a surprise. As may be inferred from my previous points, IT "experts" probably reach this level of blundering also.

    The fluid and obfuscated universe of IT jargon has long driven me crazy. And foisting it on the lay community is a crime -- it's fscked enough in the IT universe, who the heck would expect the user community to spend the time and energy to stay current. I would like to think in an industry as driven by rigorous technological underpinnings the language would distill to a more formal, stable, and consistent language. Unfortunately, that's not been my observation.

    Theory(?) The language is less driven by the technology and more by the commercial/business bent, thus pushing all in IT to distinguish themselves with the best and most sophisticated sounding terminology. (Just my theory.)

    1. Re:don't blame the office worker community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I got an emergency call one time because an entire project was going to get canceled because a team member had confused baud (bits per second) with Bps (bytes per second, combined with parity bits, essentially a magnitude difference) and had said what we were attempting would kill our network. I walked them through a pencil estimate and put them back on track that night with an estimate of bandwidth within 2%.

      Since we're all talking about jargon and technical differences in terms, it should be pointed out that Baud does not actually equal bits per second. A 1200bps modem technically operates at 300 Baud. Baud is the number of times per second that the carrier signal shifts value. A 1200bps modem is operating at 300baud where each baud moves 4 bits of data.

      FWIW

    2. Re:don't blame the office worker community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baud is the number of times per second that the carrier signal shifts value.

      The proper technical jargon for this is symbols per second.

    3. Re:don't blame the office worker community by buddhahat · · Score: 1

      You mean the PTJ is symbols per second (Sps).

      --
      ------ How can making people laugh lead to bad karma?
    4. Re:don't blame the office worker community by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      baud (bits per second)

      Accurately speeaking, "baud" does not represent "bits per second".

      Colloquially, people often use "baud" as a synonym for "bps" as a result of early consumer modems having had baud rates that were equal to their bps data rates. Though this stopped being universally true somewhere around the debut of the 1200 bps modem, the term stuck anyway.

      The Wikipedia entry has some good basic information:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baud/

    5. Re:don't blame the office worker community by yagu · · Score: 1

      Damn!, Thanks, and duly noted!

      I actually did know that, one of the very best articles ever on how bps rates were squeezed out of baud was in a very old issue of BYTE Magazine. It talked about amplitude, phase shift, terracing (correct term?) and how they were used and combined to squeeze out bps rates up to 56K.

      You're right, while they're typically described and used interchangably, they're not.

    6. Re:don't blame the office worker community by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Don't forget that some somewhat IT-savvy people can always blame fuckups on IT (whether hardware, software or the actual IT department). The higher-ups generally have no clue and a full forensic analysis is always too expensive to perform.

      This is dishonest and I've never done it, but I've been on the receiving end of some smug IT "specialist's" attitude where the assumption is made. Nevermind that I know more about computers than he does...

  45. Bad headline. Not too difficult. Unkonwn. by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    It's worth remembering that what you know you had to learn. These technical terms are not "too difficult." They are merely unknown or unfamiliar, and many people couldn't give a rat's ass what they mean, because they don't have to. Danish is not "too difficult for English-speakers," it's just not what they speak. If I said "crocheting patterns and terminology are 'too difficult' for IT workers," you'd spot the fallacy right away.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  46. Fun-ducation! :D by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Let's teach them computer jargon the fun way!

  47. Metric system by doorbot.com · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A massive 61% don't understand the difference between gigabytes, kilobytes and megabytes and as a result have sent e-mails with huge attachments that have blocked clients' systems.


    This is partially a side effect of not understanding the metric system. Cue Grandpa Simpson's quote about gas milage. While certainly a mail administrator can configure this to avoid overflowing their own system, the end user will still generate a complaint as to why they can't send mail. The real misunderstanding is file size comparisions. For example, if you didn't know how big a "gigabyte" was, you might think one or two gigabytes wasn't very large (as far as emails go).
  48. What the hell? by Stevyn · · Score: 1
    Megabytes - the amount of disc space on your computer and the amount of memory


    Gigabytes - also refers to disc space, but measures it in larger quantities


    Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.

    Is this supposed to help or hurt things? These definitions don't explain anything. Maybe this is the problem. What they should get is a simple course or some terms with proper definitions posted. If people learn the basics, they can figure out a lot more on their own. These just raise more questions than they answer.

  49. I didn't need to be told this.... by east+coast · · Score: 1

    The number of idiots I work with who don't know the difference between a hard drive, a modem and their PC is astounding, and most of these people are also home users.

    I just love getting the calls about how "My Microsoft isn't working".

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  50. It gets even better when you localize by xiando · · Score: 1

    I have the humble opinion that some things just should not be localized and this applies very much to computer jargons. Understanding the commonly used English version is one thing, but it is very much harder when someone translates already hard computer terms into the local gibberish and then makes a short term for the local version which, obviously, is completely different from the English equivalent..

  51. I know the feeling... by bassgoonist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    PC Load letter? What the %*&# does that mean!?

    --
    You can tell I'm an aries because of my ram.
    1. Re:I know the feeling... by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      I know you are trying to be funny, and I know it is from Office Space, but it always made me wonder that these guys were supposed to be "computer geeks" - and they couldn't figure out "PC Load Letter". On older HP LaserJet printers, this was a common error. If you couldn't figure it out, I am sure it was written somewhere in the manual for the printer. Even so, all you had to do was think what "PC" means (I would hope you could figure out what "Load Letter" means - load more "Letter" - or 8.5 x 11 - paper) - likely it means "Paper Cartridge" or "Print Cartridge" - ie, the paper tray where the paper is put. I am not saying it isn't somewhat cryptic - but if a printer isn't printing, and it is giving you an error telling you to load something, wouldn't your first thought be "out of paper"? Now, of course, if they were in Britain, I could understand (although I wonder if the LaserJet gave the error as "PC Load A4", or whatever the common "letter size" paper is there)...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    2. Re:I know the feeling... by nharmon · · Score: 1

      They weren't computer geeks. They were programmers. Different breed.

  52. blame M$ by crabpeople · · Score: 1

    "Around 48% are confused by different kinds of files like Jpegs and PDFs and don't know how they should be used."

    if windows shipped with the default of "extentions turned on", this wouldnt be a problem. Theres also the fact that every time you create a user it defaults to this behavior. I have never found a group policy setting that addresses this issue, but i havent really looked too hard either.

    its just one of those intelligent microsoft decisions that make things "easier". because theres nothing like having no idea what a file is when your talking ease of use...

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  53. Re:In related news - (to complement) by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    In addition, this confirms that the rot in the quality of education has now spread to the UK. I'm assuming the research was made there. Here in the US, it is even worse. Students here are very confident but cannot deliver!

    I met a group of students from some poor African country on a study tour here and all of them could write essays a teacher could think were written by some university graduate. These students were at least 4 grades before university! I think the trouble is that the students of today are faced to too many distractions - the PS2s and iPODs and the like. I know I am right. I have a kid!

  54. Techspeak Vaporware by ezweave · · Score: 1

    What I dislike more is the technical people who misuse an acronym or word because it is the "in thing" and makes them look current to managers. Like the guy who told me I could just get the connection hand-off from the LDAP. Or the people who say "Just write it in EJB" or "Why do we need JMS when we already send email?"... it works both ways.

  55. Damn Sheep by vertaxis · · Score: 0

    Listen to the sheep bleat. Baaaa Baaaa Computers are everywhere. In business; In schools; at home; in the car; in the fridge.....on your damn wrist. In my experience, people who are totally clueless about computer basics generally don't have much of a clue about their own jobs either. If someone is not willing to learn about the basic use and operation of a computer when they have to use it every day at their jobs, then what are they doing there in the first place? I've worked in IT over 20 years and it's time for the clueless to step up or get lost. Time to lose the dead weight and clear the luddites out.

    --
    Fear is the enemy; the one true enemy. {Sun Tzu-The Art of War}
  56. The Solution by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    Just stop hiring people who don't know the lingo.

    What PHB decided it was a good idea to let anyone near a computer when they don't know what kilobytes, megabytes, or gigabytes are? If they lose productivity and efficiency because their "office workers" don't possess basic computer knowledge, I'd say that's entirely their own fault for making stupid hiring decisions.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  57. Pinky and the Brain by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    Brain: Pinky, I have set up your computer so that nothing can go wrong. Just press the "conquer the world" button NOW.

    Pinky: Oh, which one is that?

    Brain: The big red one in the middle of the screen, Pinky. Hurry!

    Pinky: Ok ..
    Pinky: It is starting again .. So now we rule the world?

    Brain: Argh! Not the reboot button! ..

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  58. PCMCIA by Brain_Recall · · Score: 1

    People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms, and I honeslty don't remember the real definition of PCMCIA. But, technobable has a purpose, as my one professors says. Just like every other inudstry, we make up acronyms so that other people have no idea what we're talking about. :-)

    1. Re:PCMCIA by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms, and I honeslty don't remember the real definition of PCMCIA


      Personal Computer Memory Card International Association. You only hear about it when dealing with laptops.
    2. Re:PCMCIA by quibbs0 · · Score: 1
      My favorite acronym is the ol' PBKAC.

      Problem Between Keyboard and Chair....which brings us full circle.

    3. Re:PCMCIA by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      I always used PEBKAC (P Exists BKAC).

      My favorite, though, is the "eye-dee-ten-tee" error. When they're confused I'll tell them to write it out: ID10T.

      In fact, using these jokes directly is often a good way of explaining that sometimes the problem isn't the computer - it's the user. As users begin to realize that they might be at fault, they're usually less likely to come blaming you for something that almost certainly wasn't because of you.

  59. How to solve this... by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 1

    I teach intro computer classes at several colleges, so it's my job to solve this.

    1. Show them how to click a web browser (90% know this.)

    2. Bookmark http://en.wikipedia.org/ for them - that's for the things they don't know.

    3. Teach them the orders of magniutde of thousands, millions, billions, etc. For example, if you ask a common office critter how many thousands are in a billion, you will head "2," "3," or "8." The reality is that if you take a stack of 100 dollar bills, it will be 4/10ths of an inch long.

    $1,000 (one-thousand dollars) will be 4 inches tall. This fits in your hand.

    $1,000,000 (one-million dollars) will be 300+ feet tall. That's the length of a football field.

    $1,000,000,000 (one-billion dollars) will be 60+ miles tall. That's tall enough to reach the space station.

    $1,000,000,000,0000 (one trillion dollars) will be 60,000+ miles tall. That's tall enough to wrap around the earth almost 3 times.

    4. Show them what Kilo (Thousand), Mega (Million), Giga (Billion), and Terra (Trillion) mean. Give examples where they find out how many 4.5 GB DVDs will fit on a half-terrabyte HDD. How many 14 MB MP3 files (half-hour meeting recordings) will fit on a 495 MB keychain drive? Show them real examples from your company, using their disks. Show them how much each disk holds and how to find out how much capacity a disk has.

    5. (optional) explain that network tranmission speeds are in bits, and storage is in bytes, so sending 56k over a 56k/second connection takes 8 seconds.

    6. Give it away on /. for free instead of the usual final step ($$$)

    Andy Out!

    1. Re:How to solve this... by Yankel · · Score: 1

      Just like studying the imperial system in math -- when the pot-heads finally had the edge.

      --
      --- Dan
  60. Sorry folks by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    but not everyone should be using a computer.

    When I got my first car, I didn't know much about them. I learned about them as I needed to. When your choices are "learn how something works so you can fix it" or "pay someone who knows how it works to fix it" some people do the former while most people do the latter. The real problem arises when people don't want to do either.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Sorry folks by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The real problem arises when people don't want to do either.

      That's why we mandated inspections.

      Hmmm.... are we going to require government 'inspection' software to connect to the public Internet at some point?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  61. Math? by alvieboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A massive 61% don't understand the difference between gigabytes, kilobytes and megabytes


    They would if it was gigadollars, kilodollars and megadollars.

    This is not a jargon issue, this is bad math.

    Alvaro
    1. Re:Math? by isbhod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      tis neither a jargon nor a math issue, it is a "how flipp'n important is this to me" issue. Where one will weigh the benefit one receives form wasting ones time to learn new things. For example, will the 30 seconds it takes for me to learn what a gigabyte, vs kilobyte is be more beneficial to me, or will i better spend those 30 secs. looking at boobies on one of those them thar Interwebs. Me thinks you know the answer. now repeat that but this time replace gigabyte with gigadollars and kilobyte with kilodollars and see if boobie watching wins out again. So it comes down to what people feel is most important for them to know. Much like the guy the posted about people driving cars without knowing what innards do, people do not need to know what the innards do as it is not required for them to perform the action they want to do. But just as not know the innards of your car may leave you with higher repair bills for less scrupulous repair shops, not knowing computer terms will have adverse consequences as well. So the trick is to convince people that learning computer terms is vitally important to them, much more so than looking at boobies. But this is just my opinion, i could be wrong.

  62. Even crazier than that... by SARSpatient · · Score: 1

    I venture to say 90+% of office workers drive or take some type of automobile transport, and don't know what a turbocharger is, or how to ensure they have a safe air/fuel ratio.

  63. Reboot the internet! by tradjik · · Score: 1

    After explaining several times what was causing issue X I found myself just giving up and telling users I was going to just 'reboot the internet'. Seemed to make them happy ;) There is a line where I can de-geek something and still explain to the user what is happening or what needs to be done. Below that level they get the reboot comment.

  64. Shouldn't they change their name? by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If "Computer People" has a staff that doesn't understand these terms, perhaps they should change their name. Maybe I'm reading this wrong, but it sounds like they're doing piss-poor resume screening.

  65. backups by Cally · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, I well remember the management consultants where I worked in the late 90s, where official policy was to make "backups" of Access databases which were basically flat lists, but which were 100Mb or so and grew ten meg every time they were 'backed up' by the management consultants. Naturally, all these copies lived on our then-enormous 240Gb RAID equipped file servers - which, of course, were backed up every night, with the whole off-site, firesafes, random files verified and everything. We realised what was going on when we worked out this one project team had consumed something like 20% of the other 250 users' total space, within a month.

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    1. Re:backups by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      official policy was to make "backups" of Access databases which were basically flat lists, but which were 100Mb or so and grew ten meg every time they were 'backed up' by the management consultants.

      Explain please: what were these backups the mgmt sluts recommended?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:backups by Cally · · Score: 1
      I didn't know then what exactly it was, but as management consultants they put a lot of emphasis on 'data' and 'crunching the numbers'. So typically hat would be reams of sales figures, accounting info and the like. The clients were often huge megacorps and would often supply tons of raw unprocessed figures. The "backups" of these were, simply, ctrl+C / ctrl+V copies of copies of copies of Access .mdb files.

      True story.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  66. The other side of the coin by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Me and my office mate back from 4 years, use to play a little game, when we got bored of programming.

    We would try to explain "what we do", in simple lay-man's terms, It was not as easy as we thought it would be. Expecially if you are working on stuff like lax parser, CORBA,.

    There were times when we couldn't even begin to describe what we do, without using some kind of jargon or other. As we got better in the game, we narrowed down what terms we could use and , by the end of 3rd year, we weren't even using the term computer in our description.

    It worked wonders for me, at my next job interview. My would be boss asked to describe my current job (which involved building and distributing a J2EE app using perl scripts ) , to sombody like a stock broker. When I did, he told me that's the best answer he has ever heard from a techie, and I got the Job :-)

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    1. Re:The other side of the coin by Freexe · · Score: 1

      Are you going to give us an example then?

      --
      "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
    2. Re:The other side of the coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TELL US WHAT YOU SAID

    3. Re:The other side of the coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      which involved building and distributing a J2EE app using perl scripts

      I remember my only attempt to explain J2EE (specifically RMI and EJB) to a layperson (albeit with a very high opinion of their own technical knowledge), involved a complicated analogy to ordering a sub from a deli over the phone - I'm guessing you did better than me.

    4. Re:The other side of the coin by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
      well to be honest, I had already worked in a stock market bofore, so I had sound knowledge of trading principles

      So my analogy involved terms from financial sector.

      e.g do describe content seperation i.e presentation (jsp/servlet) from business logic (ejbs) I equated it with asset diversification, not putting all your money in one stock etc.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    5. Re:The other side of the coin by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1
      There were times when we couldn't even begin to describe what we do, without using some kind of jargon or other. As we got better in the game, we narrowed down what terms we could use and , by the end of 3rd year, we weren't even using the term computer in our description.
      "I sit in a chair, press small plastic rectangles with my fingers and look at millions of tiny coloured dots. Occasionally I swear profusely and break things."
  67. Culture by garver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've flipped jobs more than I'd like to admit, but I usually land in telecom. Despite that these jobs are all in the same specialty and usually java development work, I still spend months trying to understand what's going on in a group meeting. Every worksite has it's own culture (e.g. terms, in jokes, personalities) and much of it has nothing to do with technology.

  68. weak article but It gave me an idea by bomonguny · · Score: 1

    So, the article may not have been that great but it did get me thinking, what is wrong with teaching people this? I think i am going to set up a class at our office and teach people this stuff. At least that way when I say you can't email a 50 Meg attachment, they will not give me that glazed over look. Has anyone tried this? Did it help?

    --
    and to you, I say,.. good day
  69. Compare with DVD players. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I work at a helpdesk, where I frequently support users I've never heard from before and will never again. Thus, I explain the same things time and time again. For instance, when I tell them to turn off their computer and turn it back on, they will, more often than not, turn off their monitor and turn it back on. It's because they're not computer-savvy, and I shouldn't be hard on them, right?

    Well, consider this: a desktop computer consists of a device that does the actual processing (the box), an output device (the monitor) and an input device (the keyboard). However, the user thinks of the monitor as "the computer". Now, think of the standard home theater setup, which people tend not to have much trouble using: a device that does the actual processing (the DVD player), an output device (the TV) and an input device (the remote control). So why does the same user, confronted with what's largely the same user experience, do something analogous to thinking of the TV as "the home theater system".

    I've been trying to come up with an answer for that one, and I have yet to figure out a satisfactory one. Has anyone else run into the same problem?

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Compare with DVD players. by yEvb0 · · Score: 1
      There is psychological research (I'm sorry, I don't have the citation...if anyone can find it, let me know) out there on the ability of humans to learn by analogy. Humans are very good at making analogies, but often have trouble finding analogies and applying them to other problems. The experiment went something like the following:

      1) Subjects were told a story about an army attacking a fortress. The main road to the fortress was too narrow to allow the passage of the entire army. However, there were several smaller roads leading out radially from the fortress. The general had the brilliant idea to divide his army into smaller groups and attack the fortress from multiple sides, thus winning the battle.

      2) After some delay/distraction task, the subjects were presented with a problem: A patient is suffering from an inoperable tumor. The location of the tumor is such that the amount of radiation in the beam required to kill it would severely damage the other tissues in the radiation path. What should the doctor do?

      correct answer: use several weaker beams centered on the tumor to create the same radiation at the tumor site (analogous to the army attacking the fortress).

      the results:

      1) without any instruction, almost none of the subjects correctly answered the problem
      2) when the subjects were instructed to remember the fortress story because it might come in handy later, only *a few* answered the problem correcty
      3) after being presented with the problem, if the subjects were instructed to "think back to that story. Is there anyway you could apply that to this problem?" many subjects responded correctly.

      It seems that many people just aren't good at making that connection. You have to make it abundantly clear to them. "Intelligent" (perhaps "clever" is a better word) people might not know any more things than others, but may just be better at making these connections.

      --
      "Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony!"
    2. Re:Compare with DVD players. by ninjagin · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I've run into that one with some of my older relatives.

      Here's my guess as to where the confusion may stem from:

      My older relatives grew up in the 50s and 60s. Back then, a computer was this big hulking thing in the back office that you fed stacks of cards in one end and paper flew out of the other end. There were buttons and switches and lights to show the registers or make adjustments to how it functioned. The first teletype I ever used was just a keyboard with a noisy printer attached to it and a little wheel and spool for you to crank your paper-tape programs into it. At some point, instead of the cards and all those little switches and buttons, or the halfway-step of the teletype, there was a B&W TV mounted into the thing along with a keyboard. The little switches got concealed behind a panel or a door somewhere so that the person (the "data processor") didn't accidentally hork the configuration of the thing. (When I was really little in the early 70s, my mother was a systems analyst at the phone company and my dad was an accountant at Control Data. There are pictures of me sitting in front of exactly this kind of hardware, and my very first artistic efforts were enshrined on the punch cards that held mom's old programs.)

      The computer was still one big hulking monstrosity with a screen and a keyboard. When terminals came into fashion, the screen and keyboard were still in the same physical package. Even though the actual computing horsepower was not there at the terminal, anyone who didn't understand what a terminal was could guess that the terminal WAS the computer without being too far from the mark. Over time, as the desktop PC thing took off in businesses and then homes, when you bought a computer you got the monitor and keyboard with it -- the whole thing was still "the computer".

      Over time, the individual components have become separate and generic. You can use any keayboard or any monitor with your computer, but in the minds of people who built their associations with computers long ago, these devices are still recognized as "the computer".

      At least that's where I think it comes from.

      As for the difference between "the computer" and the DVD player example, the two have different roots in the collective mindset. When the home entertainment system consisted of nothing more than a big radio and the TV set, these were two components. If you were a radio enthusiast, you might have had a number of components for your radio, each with its own narrow technical function. When the VCR came into the picture, this was an accessory component to the TV, which wasn't much different from accessory radio componentry or what you might encounter if you were into HIFI and had an amplifier, tuner, turntable and reel-to-reel. The DVD player and surround-sound speaker setups borrowed from that traditon of componentry in HIFI setups.

      The odd thing is that home entertainment is moving towards having all those devices stuffed into the TV set itself, and some people are really sold on that idea. One of my Dad's friends remarked to me that he was shopping for a VHS-DVD-TV all-in-one for his daughter to take to college and asked me which brand I thought was best. When I told him that none of them were any good because it's a bad design, he asked me why. When I explained that when the DVD and videotape players inside the TV decided to not work anymore (at different times, of course), they'd require repair or replacement that would cause her to go without the TV. If the components are kept seperate, she could choose what to repair or replace without losing the ability to use the TV for anything else. It took awhile, but he understood the point.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  70. No Computer Education by eieken · · Score: 1

    General computer operation skills are not required to use basic software. (AOL, browsers, instant messaging, email) Generally people who use computers in the office don't see the value in learning the basics about a computer before using it. They view that as only necessary if you are a different class of user, a geek, nerd, or whatever, which of course is a accepted belief.

    For instance, if I don't know how big this image is, or what format it is in, it is commonly accepted that it is OK for me to remain at that level of education. You won't see that level of skill/education being acceptable in different areas, such as driving. If you are horrible at driving a car, you will undoubtedly fail the driving test (atleast that is the basic premise behind it), and until you get better at honing your driving skills you will have to live with not driving.

    We don't have this kind of training required to use a computer, which is why we have so many "sucker"-traps such as spyware, viruses and all manner of other kinds of problems with computers the world over, no training is required to use them.

    Some programs are designed so that a little baby could use them, but if you have a user that has the computer skills of a baby operating a computer full time, there will undoubtedly be times they will cause problems.

    --
    Meet new people, and kill them.
  71. Unprepared to Use a Standard Office Tool by kmactane · · Score: 1

    So what this article is saying is that a huge percentage of today's office workers are completely unprepared to use a standard office tool. Back around the early 1900s, did they say, "I just can't understand these typewriters. What's the difference between 'shift' and 'carriage return'? Why should I have to know these technical terms?"

    Or imagine a modern office worker who said: "I don't know the difference between 'facsimile' and 'photocopy'. I mean, they even sound pretty similar; they both begin with an F sound, and end with 'ee'. And what's the difference between 'sending' and 'receiving' these faxes? I always have to ask for help on that."

    Nobody here (or anywhere else, really) is arguing that the average office worker should understand how to code, or know what an IRQ conflict means. But simple concepts like upload and download, or the meaning of basic prefixes like kilo-, mega- and giga-, or the difference between a JPEG and a PDF, are things that anyone trying to use modern computing technology needs to know. Remaining willfully ignorant of these kinds of things is like remaining willfully ignorant of the difference between your car's brake fluid and windshield washer fluid (Hey, they're boh fluids, right? Lots of room for confusion there!), or not knowing what "miles per gallon" means.

    The kilo-/mega-/giga- thing, in particular, is not solely important in deciding whether to send an attachment via email. (I agree with those pointing out that mail servers should be configured to reject overly-large messages.) But without an understanding of file sizes and disk space:

    • you have no idea how long a file will take to download from a web site;
    • you have no idea how big your hard drive is, how much space you have left, or whether that file you're about to download will fit on it;
    • you have no idea how much space there is on your iPod or other portable MP3 player (it's not just computers; bytes are a common unit in all sorts of modern technologies)

    These folks need to learn to use the tools that are necessary for their jobs, or else find new jobs. If an office worker claimed not to be able to use a copier or fax machine, we'd laugh at them. ("Hey, how about the coffee maker? Can you figure that one out, or do you need help there, too?") We need to stop coddling those who can't be bothered to learn the basics about a tool they're getting paid to use every day.

  72. A Worm does what? by quibbs0 · · Score: 1
    Worm - this is a virus that replicates itself until it fills all of the storage space on a drive or network.

    This is the goal of a worm? I didn't know that. I have got some catching up to do. I better start "excell"ing myself.

    Hopefully those "cookies" won't go stale while I'm catching up.

  73. Definitions by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    Has anyone read the "definitions" on page 2 of the article? What a joke:

    "PDF - portable document format, which means the file is in a format that can be read on any PC

    Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.

    Java Script - a computer programming language.

    Worm - this is a virus that replicates itself until it fills all of the storage space on a drive or network."

  74. What. The. Hell. by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

    File under heading: "Duh!"

  75. Did Anyone Else Notice? by eklitzke · · Score: 1

    To make it that much better, they even misspelled "Excel."

    --
    #include ".signature"
  76. People have no curiosity by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
    I'm asked every day how to do some simple things on Windows by people who have used every version every work day from Win3.1 through to WinXP. And I'm a Mac-head! I had a guy (he'd been using Windows since Win95) drop his jaw when he saw me drag a file from one window to another to move them. I mean, is he for real? Wassup wit all dis?

    And the ones who store everything on their Windows desktops so it's a mass of icons in some sort of personal Rorschach pattern from which I'm sure you can derive ther sexual proclivities... don't get me started. Do they even know you can create new folder/directories to store files in? Ooooo! Ebola bombs for them all!

  77. My mother-in-law's famous line by Yankel · · Score: 1

    When referring to someone's computer: "How many megabytes is it?"

    --
    --- Dan
  78. Bytes, KB, and GB by HawaiianMayan · · Score: 1

    How about instead of KB and GB, which means nothing to normal people, you have apps report things in grams instead of bytes?

    "Hmmm, maybe I shouldn't send this by email... should I really send a 2 ton file through this little wire?"

  79. Re:Are they stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know IHBT but...

    Normally one takes the derivative of a function.

    Unless you were taking the limit of a sequence of functions, how could you take the derivative of a limit?

  80. funny stuff! by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

    Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.

    Umm....aside from the fact that it's Excel, not Excell, it doesn't "help to run programs," it IS a program. See, this is article is PART of the problem, and at the same time, proof it's right!

  81. Re:Are they stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take the derivative of a limit... whaa?

    Surely you mean you learnt how to use limits to calculate derivatives.

  82. Say what? by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

    A lot of "normal" office jargon is far too difficult for many computer workers.

  83. It's also how its explained... by Marnok · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Having managed an IT help desk for a few years and working in IT as a SysAdmin for quite a while, I've found a lot of times your typical desk-sitter is gunshy about asking questions, or calling for help. This has usually been due to being made to feel like a fool by the condescending, "you are too dumb to understand me" IT-types that you find all over this field. I've found that if you take the time to talk to the person AS A PERSON, they are more apt to listen and learn. I continually find that the "unknowing masses" at most of the places I've worked in my career happily come and ask questions, and retain most of the info, when they know that they will not be mentally abused. Of course, you always have the handful that ask the same things over, and over, and over....

  84. Gimme my GiB by moil · · Score: 1

    If they can't understand the difference between gigabytes, kilobytes, and megabytes, how will they understand the difference between gigabytes, kilobytes, megabytes, gibibytes, kibibytes, and mebibytes?

  85. Uhm yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMFGWTFEROFLAMOBBQSAUCE

  86. java-script? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently the 'jargon' is a little tough for journalists too. :)

  87. Learning to use your tools by tigheig · · Score: 3, Informative

    So... if the worker is working a 40 hour work week, then they are essentially saying that they are spending 1/40th of their time learning the commonly accepted terminology used on what amounts to being their primary productivity tool. And I can see the term "wasted" being used if they were never going to use the words again, but I would hope that once they've learned the word and its meaning that it will stick for a little while.

    If they were going to be an auto mechanic would they be "wasting" their time learning the terms "torque wrench" or "floor jack", as well as what they mean and how to use them?

    At one point the article says:

    'It's like driving a car - you don't have to be a mechanical engineer to drive and most people will learn something about the mechanics of cars, like what the spark plugs or carburetors do. But with the computer people have not got to the point where they are willing to lift up the bonnet and have a go themselves.'

    The analogy is faulty. They're not being asked to swap out the hard disk, install a new video card, or bump up the RAM, just know the basics of their tool. In a large corporation the computer is the equivalent of a fleet car or other company asset the employee is being allowed to use. If the employee wants to "lift up the bonnet and have a go themselves" they need to buy one with their own dime and learn. I'm sure most desktop support people have had more than enough experience with repairing systems from users who decided to "have a go themselves". To continue the broken analogy, a driver that doesn't know the difference between an accelerator pedal and a break pedal probably shouldn't be driving.

    Nearly 75% of people said they spend more than an hour every week simply trying to find out what something means in order to finish a task, according to the survey by recruitment consultants Computer People.

    I've spent huge amounts of time trying to work my way through labyrinthine HR policies, Employee Manuals, and other detritus of the corporate world. It comes with the territory when you have to deal with something new.

    Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.

    I feel much better now. Does the author mean Microsoft Excel? If this is what the writer of the article thinks "Excell"does then much of the tone and content of the article itself becomes clearer. And the HR department shoulldn't be hiring people who are this easily confused.

    1. Re:Learning to use your tools by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      I believe there's a distinction between overwhelming people with unfamiliar terms, and expecting those who have used a technology or held a position for a long time to understand terms specific to their work and/or tools. I've worked in computer/network support for nearly 13 years. There have always been individuals who do everything they can to learn about their work and tools, and there have always been individuals who don't want to learn anything new (they're satisfied with the old way). The majority of people in between will pick up on the appropriate terminology in time. If you dumb down the jargon too much, you risk miseducating the person you are trying to help. I know some people who were taught that the main part of the computer was called "the big boxy thing", and they use that lingo to this very day (I cringe thinking about it). The best we can do is to introduce the proper terminology along with a plain language definition. The problem is that most people don't do that in other areas of life. Think about how many parents used pet names for various private body parts rather than using the appropriate lingo. Such reclassifications are common, but they tend to perpetuate the lack of knowledge rather than promoting a better understanding. As to the masses who don't know the lingo...they'll get it, eventually. As more and more things utilize computers, and until autonomous, artificially-intelligent machines are the norm, people will need to learn more about them. Think about the development of the automobile, which was an analogy used in some other comments. Did anyone know what an automatic transmission was when the first automobiles (horseless wagons) were produced? What about overdrive? Fuel injection? ABS? 4x4? AWD? Today, most drivers would at least recognize those terms (and many more). Just give it time. Personal computing is still very new to most people. They'll get it eventually, if we techies are willing to explain what we do with the appropriate terms.

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  88. good advice by yEvb0 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Managing director of Computer People Adam Fletcher said the best IT professionals will tailor their language to their audience, explaining themselves in layman's terms to ordinary office workers.

    1) good idea. Ignorance of computer terms may be frustrating to those of us who use them fluently, but know-it-alls who overuse jargon (in any field) to appear smarter to novices are just assholes.

    2) is Manging Director of Computer People Adam Fletcher's real job title? Is IT Director jargon? ;)

    --
    "Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony!"
    1. Re:good advice by cgori · · Score: 1

      "Managing Director of Computer People" translated from UK-ese means: CEO of (a firm called) Computer People.

      CEO is a fairly American-ish job title.

    2. Re:good advice by yEvb0 · · Score: 1

      oops. My American ignorance is showing.

      --
      "Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony!"
  89. Don't be so hard on the non-techies by geekwithsoul · · Score: 1

    Yes, even the articles explaining the problem have errors, but if you think about it, most modern workers are required to have a much broader skill set, vocabulary, and concept literacy than at any time in human history. We're only a few decades separated from being a manufacturing/agricultural society where a person would work 50 years in the same job and never do anything else. Now we have begun the transition to a service-based economy made possible by an ever increasing influx of technologies and concepts. Not only are we in jobs for a much shorter time, but more and more of us switch careers and/or industries.

    Take all that and add it on to the fact that by the time you learn anything to a significant degree, the technology has become obsolete and you have to start all over again, and it is no wonder that some people stick their fingers in their ears, shout "LALALALALALALALA, I'm not listening," and refuse to try to learn anything again.

    I'm not saying this is the correct approach, but before we blame the luddites, perhaps we should recognize there is a combination of factors at work, and some of the blame can be fairly apportioned to us bleeding-edge /. types who keep coming up with new stuff and abandoning perfectly usable technologies in the name of "progress."

  90. The answer is probably meeting the users half-way. by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see this from both sides. On one hand, it's easy to say "Users need to *learn* the basics. If they're going to just say "I refuse to be bothered to learn what a megabyte is!" - then maybe they need to work elsewhere!" On the other hand, there's a strong argument for setting up a more user-friendly environment that makes a lot of this unnecessary. (EG. I was pleasantly surprised to discover that Apple's Mail application in OS X is smart enough so when you tell it you want to attach an image to your message, it asks you if you'd like it sent "Small, Medium or Large size" and auto-scales to one of 3 reasonable preset sizes suitable for emailing. If this became standard behavior for all popular email clients, most of the problem of clogging mail servers with huge graphics attachments would disappear.)

    Like most things, the answer is probably somewhere in the middle. Educate the users on *some* of the jargon, but try to construct an environment where as many technical details are invisible as possible, so they only need to know a few basic concepts to function in the office.

    The biggest obstacle I see these days is the tendency for smaller or mid-sized businesses to try to cust costs on I.T. - eliminating full-time I.T. support staff, in favor of going with a service contract or a part-time worker. This does prevent the problem of paying someone to sit around and surf the web, etc. while they "wait for something to break". But it also causes such things as the situation mentioned in the article where users could simply "turn off their firewall" or make other harmful system changes. (EG. Can't send out my email!? Hey, maybe it's my network card settings! I remember the support guy at home walking me though that stuff in my "Control Panel" under "Networking" when I called for help with my DSL!. I'll try changing some of these numbers around in here!) Users are given more "administrator-type" system privileges due to the lack of real, full-time I.T. staff, and they begin tinkering with things, knowing it'll be a while before they get help otherwise. Then you've got much worse problems....

  91. Jargon by burtdub · · Score: 1

    It's so true... I asked Slashdot readers what a GB and an MB were, and they told me "STFU^H^H^H^H RTFA, N00B."

  92. Breaking news -- average IQ is 100 by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and half the population have IQ's below that...

    1. Re:Breaking news -- average IQ is 100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Doesn't that mean that the median IQ is 100?

    2. Re:Breaking news -- average IQ is 100 by Xarius · · Score: 1

      half the population that have taken IQ tests have IQ's below that, thank you.

      --
      C17H21NO4
    3. Re:Breaking news -- average IQ is 100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't back this up, but it's probably safe to say that the half that have not taken the test probably don't break the bank, so to speak. If they were tested, i'm sure you'd find extremes in both directions, with the bulk of the population settling at 100....

    4. Re:Breaking news -- average IQ is 100 by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 1
      Doesn't that mean that the median IQ is 100?
      Yes, but the two statements aren't mutually exclusive. For symmetric distributions the median and the mean are the same. IQ is often used as a classic example of the famous (and symmetric) "bell-shaped curve".

      An example of asymmetric distributions would be incomes - lots of people at the low end, and some rare but very large extremes. In that case the median and mean can be wildly different. If we're all hanging around some bar, and Bill Gates walks in the door, the median income for people in the room won't shift by much but the average income will go through the roof.

    5. Re:Breaking news -- average IQ is 100 by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 1
      half the population that have taken IQ tests have IQ's below that, thank you.
      Bzzzzzt!!!!! Thanks for playing, but that is incorrect! The median/mean IQ is 100 by definition. Test results are then scaled to make it so in practice as well as in definition.
    6. Re:Breaking news -- average IQ is 100 by Pastis · · Score: 1

      And knowing that smart people don't need computers, more than 50% if the users are below 100.

  93. Speaking of not understanding... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    'A massive 61% don't understand the difference between gigabytes, kilobytes and megabytes and as a result have sent e-mails with huge attachments that have blocked clients' systems.'

    Speaking of not understanding, the people writing the mail client that let you attach and send such large files without even a pop-up warning box along the way are the real ones who don't understand their users.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  94. Not so easy for you, either. by raygundan · · Score: 4, Informative

    He's actually right, you know. Kilo, Mega, and Giga meant exactly what he said-- powers of 10. We computer-folk have been mis-using them for years to refer to nearby powers of 2, and there are new prefixes we *should* be using to avoid confusion. The "new" prefixes were published by the IEC in 1998.

    for this:

    1GB = 1024 MB = 1048576 KB

    you should be using:

    1GiB = 1024 MiB = 1048576 KiB

    Where the GiB, MiB, and KiB stand for Gibibytes, Mebibytes, and Kibibytes.

    Do I use them? No. They sound funny, and like many programmers I'm cranky and stuck-in-my-ways. But you should be prepared to accept that the standard "power of 10" usage of the SI prefixes mega, giga, and kilo you were taught in college science classes is indeed correct, and that the way we've been using them is an awkward legacy kludge that grafts a second meaning onto a widely-used standard.

    Obligatory link.

    1. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although you are technicaly correct I'd like to say that it would be much more awkward to use the
      real mega/giga/kilo with regard to binary computers. They just don't apply. There will, for example,
      never be a computer with n megabytes of ram (for any integer n), simply because it would be stupid to
      not use the address space or have little holes at the top.

      All the best,
      rob

    2. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to add more flames to the fire...

      1 KB == 2^10
      1 MB == 2^20
      1 GB == 2^30

      While it isn't "powers of ten" it is "two to the tens power".

    3. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by raygundan · · Score: 1

      Agreed, which is why we have a new standard to use instead of mega/giga/kilo. You'll never get power-of-10 storage space from something that has power-of-2 storage locations. We should never have "borrowed" the prefixes in the first place, because now it's our own fault that we're angry every time we buy a hard drive that's got slightly less storage space than we expected.

      As it stands, I just make sure it's clear which way I'm using "mega". Perhaps 20 years from now, enough kids will come through college learning the right way that I'll make the switch to "mebi".

    4. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by kencurry · · Score: 1

      people have been f!!king up the metric system for decades, why should computer geeks be any different?

      --
      sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    5. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the GiB, MiB, and KiB stand for Gibibytes, Mebibytes, and Kibibytes. Pipibytes?

    6. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by raygundan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they sound ridiculous. It's actually Pebibytes, for whatever reason. My favorite is "Exbibytes."

    7. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      "College science classes"? Try High School, or junior high maybe.

      That's what gets me, that nearly everyone working in an office learned this shit, but for some reason can't (or won't) apply their existing knowledge to the field of computers.

    8. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by Delphiki · · Score: 1
      If you look at wikipedia, it lists three definitions for megabyte.. one is the one used by the person I was responding to, one the one used by myself. The "official" one is that a megabyte is 1 million bytes, yes, but the one most commonly used in software, and therefore the one people use the most is that a kilobyte is 1024, megabyte is 2^20, etc. Honestly, I don't really care which one the "official" meaning is, since trying to regulate language is laughable to me, especially when the meaning you wish to impose goes against the standard usage.

      But mainly, I know they're both acceptable and I was just being a jerk because the person I was responding to was being so self-righteous about people not knowing tech terms. I love being a jerk.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    9. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um.... could you tell me what a googlebyte is then?

    10. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      The way I look at it is that even after all these years sailors are still using their own version of the mile, the nautical mile, it barely if at all relates to a normal mile yet its known by the same name. Everyone accepts this as part of sailors nomenclature. Therefore is it such a strech to think that inside the IT world Kilo, Mega, and Giga have their own slightly different meanings and that once you get past the minor conversion its easy to understand?

    11. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      Don't you think creating new terms for old ideas is a little confusing?

    12. Re:Not so easy for you, either. by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to 'k' for 1000 and 'K' for 1024?

  95. WTF is Excell? by razmaspaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC

    What is Excell and what does this mean. I have never heard of it, but aparrently I should have it, because otherwise programs won't run on my PC.

    My favorite comment though was the PDF- a document that can be read on any PC. Oh yeah? Can it be read on the PC that doesn't have a PDF reader on it? Hmm!

    --
    I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
    1. Re:WTF is Excell? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Excel (With one L instead of the two the article cites) is a spreadsheet program. It is used to format data and then use formulas to analyze it as well as offering charting functionality. Excel also is superior to word when working with anything that needs to be in a table since spreadsheets are big tables.

    2. Re:WTF is Excell? by rtaylor · · Score: 3, Funny

      My favorite comment though was the PDF- a document that can be read on any PC. Oh yeah? Can it be read on the PC that doesn't have a PDF reader on it? Hmm!
      Yes, it can often be read on PCs without PDF readers. Strings is your friend.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    3. Re:WTF is Excell? by bro1 · · Score: 1
      PDF- a document that can be read on any PC. Oh yeah? Can it be read on the PC that doesn't have a PDF reader on it? Hmm!


      This is what I tell people when explaining Open Office PDF export. Sure, it's oversimplification however this is almost true.
    4. Re:WTF is Excell? by binford2k · · Score: 1

      If you heard a whooshing sound, that was the joke as it passed over your head.

  96. Computer jargon eh? by Zetta+Matrix · · Score: 1

    In my opinion, accounting jargon is too difficult for this IT worker. If you buy expensive stuff for your employer and have to forecast when it goes in service, you know what I'm talking about. It's all a matter of perspective.

  97. i don't know what Excell is by real_smiff · · Score: 1

    I know Excel is the spreadsheet part of MS Office, but i'm wondering what Excell is. Some enterprise app?
    or just a typo? or was the article writer taking the piss? googling shows lots of software/tech service related companies using the name "Excell" (serious Q, i just wonder what they were trying to define..)

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  98. refusal to learn by thetoaster17 · · Score: 1

    ...Normally when the technical support people come to fix my computer I just disappear and make a cup of tea..
    Don't worry we like making trips to your funky-tea-smelling cubicle

    --
    "You'll have to speak up, I'm wearing a towel." ~ Homer
  99. It's All a D*ck Measuring Contest by eldavojohn · · Score: 0

    Seriously, there's some satisfaction in whipping out an acronym your peers don't understand. For example, I was at a conference and the speaker started talking. Without laying down any definitions, he gave a lecture using primarily the acronyms: CORBA, SOAP, UDDI, WSDL, etc. Ok, how many people were confused? Probably a few considering I knew what they ment and he was using them very liberally. Example, "So you UDDI that service from the registry..." UDDI is not a verb.

    I believe this speaker smelled other nerds in his presence and felt threatened. He assumed a dominant stature (on the stage) and began to challenge our ability to keep up with him, thus affirming his alpha nerd status.

    So before you get upset with someone asking you "what does that mean?" just remember to politely explain it to them and try not to snort and treat them like they're Ralph Wiggum.

    This is communication, there's no need for a d*ck measuring contest in the workplace.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  100. All I can say is... by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

    If I hear someone use the term download incorrectly someone is going to get hurt. Almost everyone I talk to says they are going to download something when referring to tasks such as uploading, sending attatchments, copying from hard to floppy drives, and even copying or moving files from one folder to another. It gets pretty painful sometimes, and I don't know crap diddly about computers. I can only imagine what a network admin, or coder might think.

    --
    Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    1. Re:All I can say is... by Whisperingwolf · · Score: 0

      And don't forget the whole RAM, hard disk space that everyone thinks is interchangable.

      Random user: I'm running out of RAM!
      Me: No your running out of Hard Disk space.
      Random user: Isn't that the same thing?

      --
      The whisper in your ghost.
  101. OMFG!!!111 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROFLMAO!!!

  102. Happy to be a nerd by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    Well doesn't this just make you happy you're a nerd instead of one of these idiots:

    ... A massive 61% don't understand the difference between gigabytes, kilobytes and megabytes ...

    A lot of these folks may be more successful that we are, but in the end nearly all of them have to deal with computers at least some of the time and then they're completely helpless. Ha! >:->

  103. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 1

    Homer: "Ooh, the new issue of 'Weird' is here! [opens magazine] Gigabyte! [laughs] They've done it again! Gigabyte!
        Wait, this isn't 'Weird!' [looks at 'Wired' cover] Why, there's no magazine *called* "Weird", is there?

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
  104. Windows Certified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a tech that is supposed to be a Microsoft Certified on Windows 2000 updates that tried to send an email with 2GB of data with proprietary information in it!! Oh my.

  105. It's too difficult because... by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1
    It's too difficult because jargon is not not intended to be used while in conversation with a typical office worker. Jargon is a shorthand language of its own, used by those in a technical profession to save on lengthy explanations or descriptions in favour of a quick abbreviation. If an office worker doesn't know what something means, they should be asking or looking it up. The problem isn't the lack of understanding of jargon -- it's the lack of courtesy by using jargon when speaking to those people.

    This is no different than any other profession. Jargon isn't for those not in the know!

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

  106. I hope they at least follow the standard .. by thetoaster17 · · Score: 1

    Procedures for working with the IT department

    1. When you call us to have your computer moved, be sure to leave it buried under half a ton of postcards, baby pictures, stuffed animals, dried flowers, bowling trophies and children's art. We don't have a life, and we find it deeply moving to catch a fleeting glimpse of yours.
    2. Don't write anything down. Ever. We can play back the error messages from here.
    3. When an I.T. person says he's coming right over, go for coffee. That way you won't be there when we need your password.
    It's nothing for us to remember 700 screen saver passwords.
    4. When you call the help desk, state what you want, not what's keeping you from getting it. We don't need to know that you can't get into your mail because your computer won't power on at all.
    5. When I.T. support sends you an. E-Mail with high importance, delete it at once. We're just testing.
    6. When an IT person is eating lunch at his desk, walk right in and spill your guts right out. We exist only to serve.
    7. Send urgent e-mail all in uppercase. The mail server picks it up and flags it as a rush delivery.
    8. When the photocopier doesn't work, call computer support. There's electronics in it.
    9. When you're getting a NO DIAL TONE message at home, call computer support. We can fix your telephone line from here.
    10. When you have a dozen old computer screens to get rid of, call computer support. We're collectors.
    11. When something's wrong with your home PC, dump it on an I.T. person's chair with no name, no phone number and no description of the problem. We love a puzzle.
    12. When an I.T. person tells you that computer screens don't have cartridges in them, argue. We love a good argument.
    13. When an IT person tells you that he'll be there shortly, reply in a scathing tone of voice: "And just how many weeks do you mean by shortly?" That motivates us.
    14. When the printer won't print, re-send the job at least 20 times. Print jobs frequently get sucked into black holes.
    15. When the printer still won't print after 20 tries, send the job to all 68 printers in the company. One of them is bound to work.
    16. Don't learn the proper name for anything technical. We know exactly what you mean by "My thingy blew up".
    17. Don't use on-line help. On-line help is for wimps.
    18. If the mouse cable keeps knocking down the framed picture of your dog, lift the computer and stuff the cable under it. Mouse cables were designed to have 20kg of computer sitting on top of them.
    19. If the space bar on your keyboard doesn't work, blame it on the mail upgrade. Keyboards are actually very happy with half a pound of muffin crumbs and nail clippings in them.
    20. When you get a message saying "Are you sure?" click on that "Yes'" button as fast as you can. Hell, if you weren't sure, you wouldn't be doing it, would you?
    21. When you find an IT. person on the phone with his bank, sit uninvited on the corner of his desk and stare at him until he hangs up. We don't have any money to speak of anyway.
    22. Feel perfectly free to say things like "I don't know nothing about that computer crap". We don't mind at all hearing our area of professional expertise referred to as crap.
    23. When you need to change the toner cartridge in a printer, call IT support. Changing a toner cartridge is an extremely complex task, and Hewlett-Packard recommends that it be performed only by a professional engineer with a master's degree in nuclear physics.
    24. When something's the matter with your computer, ask your secretary to call the help desk. We enjoy the challenge of having to deal with a third party who doesn't know anything about the problem.
    25. When you receive a 30mb (huge) movie file, send it to everyone as a mail attachment. We've got lots of disk space on that mail server.
    26. Don't even think of breaking large print jobs down into smaller chunks. Somebody else might get a chance to squeeze a memo into the queue.
    27. When you lose your car keys, send an email to the entire company. People out i

    --
    "You'll have to speak up, I'm wearing a towel." ~ Homer
    1. Re:I hope they at least follow the standard .. by trezor · · Score: 1

      It's when I read posts like yours, I regret the fact that I say no to mod-points.

      Doesn't happen to often, though.

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  107. Wales by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    It does say Wales at the top of the artical, thats a bit like it saying Texus.

    Jpeg - this is a compressed picture file.

    What's a file, just call it a compressed picture.

    PDF - portable document format, which means the file is in a format that can be read on any PC

    Unless it has DRM... try explain that one. and what about PDA's and maybe Macs or Linux (even though a Mac is technically a PC I doubt a layman would make the connection)

    Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC.

    Replace Programs with viruses and your about there.

    Java Script - a computer programming language.

    Doh, Joe sixpack doesn't know what a computer programming language is,
    Java Script - Makes web pages interactive.

    Cookies - this enables some web pages to 'remember' your previous visits - for example, an E-Commerce site might use a cookie to remember which items you've placed in your online shopping cart.

    Yeh, WTF is a E-Commerce site and online mean? moron.

    Worm - this is a virus that replicates itself until it fills all of the storage space on a drive or network.

    Umm... not really, it's just a virus that distributes itself via the network (or over the internet for Joe)

    As for filewall, maybe the author doesn't know what it means either.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Wales by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      One can read PDFs in Linux. There's Acrobat, kdpf, xpdf, and maybe more.

    2. Re:Wales by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      My point was that Linux doesn't have to run on a PC, it runs on IBM Big Iron too, and nowadays the generic term PC (Personal Computer) has come to mean x86, which excludes Macs and other workstations.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  108. I hate the media. by flutkatastrophe · · Score: 1



    three out of four wasted more than an hour every week simply finding out what some technical term meant.

    You can stop reading the article right there.
    1. Everyone knows that users don't educate themselves, as this implies.
    2. Doing so is not a "waste of time", as this implies.

    Don't know which is worse, users, or this media distortion, acting like educated people using "computer jargon" are to blame. It's not jargon when everyone is now required to know what it means. Computers are ubiquitous. Deal with it.

  109. this one fresh from today! by nottings · · Score: 1
    This literally just happened to me 20 minutes before reading this post!

    A guy at work informs me that he can't type in excel because everything he tries to type is aligning with the center of the header in his worksheet. "I need it to start typing from the left" he says.

    Well no need to explain any further... but I will mention that he has missed his deadline by 2 days now b/c of this!
  110. But it's not just Jargon by ellem · · Score: 1

    I have seen fairly bright people absolutely freeze up at the hint of having to operate a computer.

    Me: Jerry, just turn off the monitor.
    Jerry: How?
    Me: With the button.
    Jerry: Which button?
    Me: On the monitor Jerry, just press it.
    Jerry: Which one?
    Me: Jerry, press the on/off switch.
    Jerry: Where is it?
    Me: I'll be right there.
    tap tap tap tap tap
    Me: There, push that!
    Jerry: Oh I was looking for an icon.
    Me: When you lose you remote do you just leave your TV on for weeks?
    Jerry: I tied it to my couch.

    Jerry is not an idiot.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  111. My Mother by Arandir · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was going to post about my visit with my mother and the argument we had over computers. Then I saw your post.

    My mother gives people legal advice without being a lawyer: "Save your money, here's a website that will make a durable power of attorney for you that you can print out and sign."

    My mother gives medical advice without being a physician: "Here, take these pills for your cold, they really helped my thyroid problem."

    My mother knows next to nothing about cars, but that doesn't stop her: "My check engine light came on, could you replace my alternator while you're down this weekend?"

    Building codes: "You don't need a building permit, it's just a porch!"

    My mother seems to know everything. Thanks to the wonderful technology of email forwarding, she now knows even more! "Barbara sent me this mail about how to prevent identity theft, so I scraped my signature off of all my credit cards and peeled off those magnetic strips."

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  112. You need to take a hike. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    And this attitude is why most non-technical people think computer support people are arrogant assholes. You and your flawed "cookies and cups" example should take a hike and quit giving the rest of us geeks a bad name.

  113. Can't Wait for the Old Farts to Retire by Mike+Keester · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a topic discussed Wednesday on NPR's Talk of the Nation about the Baby Boomer generation getting ready to retire soon.

    Personally, I can't wait for the older folks (the ones typically who don't know much about computers) to get out of the way and let the people who grew up with the technology and are much more comfortable with it to really begin transforming the workplace.

    I waste so much time dealing with people who never got over the fact that there aren't secretaries anymore to take their dictation and can't even send a simple email without screwing it up. Supposedly they have these "invaluable skills" that came to them by virtue of being old that we'll all be losing out when they retire in a few years

    Mod me as flamebait but I believe if you can no longer properly use the tools of your business, then you need to get out. You don't see too many NFL running backs in their 40's.

  114. Hillarious example. by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    Delta Airlines, just prior to their recent bankruptcy filings, launched a new website that they are so proud of they are advertising the new website on television and radio. In their radio commercial they described the site as being "written in delicious Java".

    Now it's one thing to be proud of a website and it's another thing to advertise that website. But, why would anyone need to know that it was written in Java? It's an airline reservation website for the general public! Why is the public supposed to know or care that the Delta Airlines website is "written in delicious Java"? What moron would put that in the advertisement?

  115. "Lab top" by wodelltech · · Score: 1

    I've encountered more than a few engineers and IT folks who think laptops are 'lab tops'. In each case, I've initially ascribed it to mispronunciation only to have my suspicions later verified by their writing/e-mail.

    --
    Your monitor is staring at you.
  116. Don't understand? Learn... by bastardadmin · · Score: 1

    This is ridiculous. If you work on a factory floor with this level of ignorance about your tools you either:
    a) die; or
    b) get fired.

    "It's too hard..." Tough shit. Learn it, you work in an office, it's part of your job.

  117. So I guess learning = bad by krazikamikaze · · Score: 1
    A poll of 1,500 staff by recruitment firm Computer People showed that three out of four wasted more than an hour every week simply finding out what some technical term meant.
    Since when was learning a waste of time?
  118. *sigh* by raygundan · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure that really adds any flames. You did, however, make the same mistake as the first time around. To reiterate:

    IEC standard:
    1 KiB == 2^10
    1 MiB == 2^20
    1 GiB == 2^30

    SI prefixes:
    1 KB == 10^3
    1 MB == 10^6
    1 GB == 10^9

  119. Jargon == Foreign Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jargon just as difficult as a foreign language? These people obviously have never taken a foreign language.

  120. two words... by ericbrow · · Score: 1

    Natural Selection. Those that fail to learn, adapt, overcome will not survive.

  121. Blame Apple... Maybe Even More than MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about it:

    - With a graphical interface, what me worry about file structure? (not to mention type) It's all in FOLDERS, baby!

    - MS soooo wanted to make its OS experience mimic that of Apple's Mac. They knew a good thing when they saw one. Guess what? XP is nearly, if not already, there.

    Combined with the hugest user base EVAR, the result is a mess of folks who are eegnant about this appliance. And yes, it is an appliance.

    Flame on.

  122. /.ed -- any mirrors? by griffjon · · Score: 1

    Hey, does anyone have a mirror or torrent of this? The site's slashdotted!

    No? No copies? No torrents? What, it deleted your torrent software?

    I love the smell of irony in the morning... it smells like... victory...

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  123. The problem: the manual keeps growing by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1
    And that's the fundamental problem. Most people these days not only don't think they have to learn, they don't think they should have to learn.

    Sure some people are too lazy to learn anything, but that's too negative a view of people in general. Show me someone who has never used some fancy tech gadget, gets one, and is not willing to spend even 10 minutes on getting to know what it is, and how to work the thing. Not gonna happen, people are curious by nature.

    The problem is not in the learning curve, but in the number of things to learn, and the amount of things to learn about each individual item.

    Image teaching someone to use a regular, old-style phone in say, 1960. There's a dial, numbers 0-9, a speaker/mic thing you can pick up and hold next to your ear. Every other phone's got a unique number, pick up the 'earpiece', dial the number of that other phone, wait for connection, and place earpiece back when conversation ends. Easy enough to explain to anyone, and once explained, this knowledge holds for the next 50 years or so.

    Fast forward to today: the cellphone. Each model looks different, has changed/new functions, sometimes does basic work differently from its predecessor, comes with a 100+ page manual, and people change phones (and numbers!) yearly as a fashion statement. 90% of any details you learn about your phone, doesn't hold anymore for your next model. And then there's carriers, pricing structures, GSM, GPRS, UMTS, Bluetooth, ...

    And there's cellphones, computers, VCR's, television sets, microwave oven's, cars, electronic thermostats, ATM's, pincodes/passwords to remember, PDA's, the WWW, e-mail, instant messaging, equipment/software at the workplace, and your average pile of paperwork (taxes, employer, health insurance, ...) to deal with.

    There's only so much you can learn in a day. Let's face it: our society is growing in complexity very rapidly. Technology can help us deal with that complexity (the pocket calculator comes to mind), but it's clear that this help is outpaced by the speed of complexity growth itself. Life may be getting easier, more fun or comfortable, but it sure isn't getting any simpler. Keywords: "Information overload".

    Anyone who claims people are too lazy to read the manual for their latest gadget, is misinformed. It's just that people have better things to do than read manuals. Technology is supposed to make our lives easier and more fun, remember? Good design is when people can use a gadget without going through a 500+ page manual.
    1. Re:The problem: the manual keeps growing by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      And there's cellphones, computers, VCR's, television sets, microwave oven's, cars, electronic thermostats, ATM's, pincodes/passwords to remember, PDA's, the WWW, e-mail, instant messaging, equipment/software at the workplace, and your average pile of paperwork (taxes, employer, health insurance, ...) to deal with.

      The thing is, there's a general pattern to how these things work. Once you've figured out the basics of personal electronics, there's no problem when you get a new VCR. Once you've figured out GUI computer applications, they're all basically the same. Every once and a while there's an exception, I still haven't learned to use Blender (the 3D modelling/animation package) yet, but mostly computer software is pretty much the same. Given how common items in these two categories are, not learning how to use them is just a sign of laziness and general incompetence.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  124. Re:This calls for a new operating system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Porn Finder, Porn Hider

    wahahahaah, man, that's a good one!

  125. IT Services and Resorces by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

    As someone that's a help desk analyst; I talk to people all the time that just don't understand anything related to IT simply because no one has helped them understand. This is because companies do not provide central IT information resources and cut their IT services to the point where the people that do IT are so strung out they don't have time for the work alloted to them.

    It is amazing that companies will give some of their employees laptop computers, VPN accounts and Secure ID tokens but no information on how to use them. Often times, help desk personnel get so stressed with users who don't know anything about the technology they use. It's easy to think of the average caller as stupid or an idiot. Their knowledge range is so narrowly focused on just their assigned tasks so I like to think of them as having "specialized intelligence" but I guess id10t works too.

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  126. ugh by Abstract_Me · · Score: 0

    "Nobody crashes their sedan into a tree and giggles while stating they are car illiterate"

    The problem is that its ok to be proud of not knowing.. you crash you computer and just shrug it off... you chuckle while mentioning you have no idea what a 'jigawad interweb uploader' is and thats just fine.

  127. Ok then by binary+blizzard · · Score: 1

    Ok, we have our terms that we use and nobody wants to learn them. So, what do these people prepose we do? IM00987.fileformatthatsuportstransparenceofindexed ormonotonepictures?
    or IM00987.gif, I mean is that really that hard, the "confusing" jargon is there for your own good.

    --
    - Shrödinger's Cat is Dead, Or is it?
  128. Re:Don't understand? Learn... by ByrneArena · · Score: 1

    Here is a difference... on the factory floor they are trained to use the tools. Some people are morons but a vast majority are not and to say that they just need to learn is silly since it seems that most of the people on my side of the fence won't bother to teach them.

  129. as with anything by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

    people don't understand, education does help.

  130. Gigawatts/Jigga-watts by stevemm81 · · Score: 1

    Many Back to the Future fans don't realize that what they hear as "jigga watts" is actually the preferred pronunciation (notice it's listed first) of the SI/metric prefix giga.

    With respect to computer-related units, the hard g is of course strongly preferred, but 1.21 gW is certainly not a made up unit.

    1. Re:Gigawatts/Jigga-watts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1.21 GW is the correct unit:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giga/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix/

      The prefixes for powers of 10 smaller than 10^6 are lowercase, those greater than or equal to 10^6 are uppercase.

      DrWeesh

  131. Help, Doc Brown didn't tell me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The flux capacitor needs 1.21 jigowatts to work! How many watts is that?

    Hurry, there isn't much time...

    1. Re:Help, Doc Brown didn't tell me! by master_gopher · · Score: 1

      Stay well away, them thar flux capacitors are liable to explode if you put .2 of a watt too much through them!!

  132. Let me know how that works out by jcorno · · Score: 1

    Good luck getting the teachers to understand it. Computer classes in my high school were taught by football coaches, because the school couldn't justify their salaries without a class or two on their schedules. This stuff isn't so complicated that you need a teacher for it, anyway. It'd be easier just to train the two or three dumbest people in the class or office. That way you'll demystify it a little, and maybe the rest of the class or office will be shamed into showing some initiative and learning what a damned megabyte is.

  133. We just need more TLAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need more TLAs

  134. This reminds me by jjoyce · · Score: 1

    The case is not the CPU. Please spread the word.

    1. Re:This reminds me by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      Yes it is, at least if by "the case" you mean the whole shebang, including PSU, motherboard, RAM, drives, any expansion cards, and of course, the [micro]processor.

    2. Re:This reminds me by necrostopheles · · Score: 1

      yeah, when will ppl learn it's actually the hard drive?

  135. I'm a pedantic jerk, and I love it! by raygundan · · Score: 1

    We all love being jerks. That's why I called you out on it. In fact, there's very little more satisfying than being a jerk to someone who is already being a jerk themselves-- you can understand my temptation to reply to your post, as you were doing the exact same thing to the jerk in front of you. This is the force that drives slashdot. We're all here to be pedantic jerks.

  136. I dunno about you by jjoyce · · Score: 1

    In my office people can't read, write or speak basic English. Getting them to understand computer lingo is wishful thinking.

  137. lack of research by MoreNoiseThanSignal · · Score: 1

    i'm sure someone caught this on the second page:
    "Excell - this helps to run programs on your PC."
    but it's still funny anyways. you think they'd put a little bit more time into things like that since, you know, that IS what the article is about.

    --
    abort, retry, fail?
  138. I'm too stoopid to learn Kompyooters huh huh huh by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

    What makes me homicidal (well, more than usual) is people who are actually proud that they don't understand computers. At least, they think it's funny. There is a "ditzy housewife folk wisdom" person who writes a column for the local fishwrapper where about every other weeek she talks about how she just doesn't get all these gigglebites and interwebs and hard driver things (chuckle chuckle). She should be either (a) not so damn proud of being too stupid to understand something or (b) deeply ashamed of being too lazy to learn something new. Computers are not new. They have been in most businesses for 25 years and in most homes for 10 or 15 years. If my 5 year old kid and my 75 year old mother can learn to use a computer, then you can too. Learn the basics, or, for the love of God, SHUT UP.

    People dont crash their cars and then say "I never could tell the brakes from the accellerator, huh huh huh".

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  139. Changing the oil... by GungaDan · · Score: 2, Funny

    My sister's response when asked how often she had the oil changed in her car: "when it runs out."

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    1. Re:Changing the oil... by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      That would be a few weeks after the head gasket blew?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  140. I'm not trying to be difficult... by JargonScott · · Score: 1

    I just hate office workers. I'm an insensitive clod!

    --
    Nuke Gay Whales for Jesus.
  141. Speaking of being a jerk... by raygundan · · Score: 1

    I just can't help myself!

    Nobody's trying to impose restrictions on common-use language here-- this isn't one of those "hacker/cracker" debates. The situation we have here is one where the older, widely-used interpretation of an international series of prefixes for use with systems of measurement is getting two meanings, and a new standard has been proposed to prevent confusion. Does it really make sense that we measure hard-drive storage as powers-of-10, but RAM as powers-of-2?

    Use them however you want in everyday speech, but when you need to put down proper specs as an engineer, it's best to be absolutely clear, whether you do it with the new prefixes or simply by making annotations indicating which interpretation you're using.

    1. Re:Speaking of being a jerk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new prefixes don't help completely, since the old ones are still supposed to be used and so are completely ambiguous. You know what it means when you see "MiB" now, but good luck to you when all you see is "MB".

  142. First line should've read.... by LinuxPoultergist · · Score: 1

    Office workers are baffled and make serious business blunders.

  143. That's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That's funny, most of the people I encounter at work have no problem with computer jargon.

    "I have to check EBAY"
    "I can't talk to you know, I'm IM-ing with my girlfriends"
    "I'm too busy downloading free music from the kazaa"
    "All this porn on my computer? I think it was the computer virus"

  144. Managers lack understanding by Pop69 · · Score: 1

    Our IT manager insisted that we switch off both virus checking on the mail server AND the firewall.

    Was very surprised when the mail server stopped working and there was no external network traffic going in or out.

    We took him at his word and just switched them off ;-)

  145. Service intervals ... GUI by pbhj · · Score: 1

    Cars often have a graphical user interface (dashboard display) that indicates when a garage service is required. You don't need to know about oil changes you just take the car to the garage when the light comes on with the little man on it.

    Computers should be set up more like this for non-geeks. Yes I know you can do more to make things easy for non-geeks (I want to say "idiots", but that's not quite fair, is it??) - for example, 3 icons on the Kicker, "internet", "email", "[open]office[.org]".

    Your email app should have a (switch-offable, eg via an install option "I am not an idiot [o]") nag that says "this email will take an average user 3 years and 42 days to download, do you really want to send it?".

  146. People Send Large e-mail Attachments Because... by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mostly they don't look at how big the file is in the first place. Or realize that it is a big file.

    I had a group of users who had a one page MS Word file that they were using as a template that got broken somehow and it became 12 Megabytes. When they got a complaint from a recipient who was on a modem they asked me to look into it.

    I remade the file and it was 43 kilobytes. Then I showed them the way to figure out how to check the size and spent the next hour explaining about file sizes.

    New cameras are also very much to blame but nothing is more to blame than XP's default way of dealing with big images and just shrinking the image view. They have no idea that the files are huge, and have no desire to learn about re-sizing, compression, file formats.... Mailserver be damned I am going to send this collection of worthless pictures anyway, I just got this cool camera and I am going to use it.

  147. As it should be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise, how can we leach off the public? I mean, *everyone* has an angle, a monopoly, a skill that they must capitalize on to make a decent living. This is ours, like a lawyer, like a doctor.

    Watch: you'll see *they* will be the ones that complain about it (in reference to how much it costs them)...

  148. Excel, not Excell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does everyone here misspell "Excel"?

  149. Re:I'm too stoopid to learn Kompyooters huh huh hu by dookus · · Score: 1

    On the contrary, people who have no business using computers should accept that fact, and not try and follow the fad just beccause it makes them look cool. A clueless person using the Internet is a prime target for viruses and phishing. A person who's educated will know better than to open that friendly-looking I love you.exe attachment, or than to buy into a phishing scam. Thing is, most of those who use the Internet because it makes them look cool don't bother getting educated.

    [Insert obligatory "this is my first /. post" here]

  150. Usability and education are *both* required by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Insightful
    > Whoa. I need to know what base64 is in order to email someone? Bounce messages? Headers? Where messages are stored? That's what email administrators should know in the same way that a passenger on a commercial jet doesn't (and shouldn't) need to know much more than boarding procedures and the fact that a beer costs $5. As an email user, I should simply know how to click "send" and that new mail "appears" in those folder thingies.

    Yes, you should, if you want to make sure that every time you click "send", your new mail really will "appear" in your friend's folder thingie.

    > If I shouldn't send a large attachment (individually or in aggregate) my client software should tell me so, and prevent me from doing it, in the same way that an airline will stop me from bringing on a 3 kiloton suitcase rather than letting it get put on board and crash the plane.

    If you don't know that "weight" is a property of matter under the force of a gravitational field, and why it's important to pilots, you're going to be frustrated when you exceed it.

    Dialogue 1:
    Airline: I'm sorry, we can't take the four of you, at 350 pounds apiece, plus your 200 pounds of luggage, in this Cessna.
    Moron: Do you know who we are? We paid for our tickets. How dare you discriminate against us? You put us and our golfing equipment on that plane or I'll personally sue your airline into the ground!
    Airplane: *crash*

    (Granted, any pilot that lets such passengers board his aircraft deserves to crash with 'em. But the point is that an educated customer isn't going to be a moron, because they're going to be willing to listen to the error message "you weigh too much", and they're going to be capable of understanding it, and they're going to be able to take corrective action, by either taking two flights, by chartering a bigger aircraft, or by leaving some of their luggage behind.)

    Similarly, if you don't know that "size" is a property of "files", and why it's important to sysadmins, you're going to be frustrated when you try to send big ones.

    Dialogue 2:
    Client: I'm sorry, I can't send that attachment to everyone in the company. It's way the hell too big.
    Moron: This software sucks. Hey, sysadmin! I want to use a better mail software, the one you use! We make the sales this company relies on, and you answer to us! Either I get to email this DVD to my golfing buddy right now or your ass is fired!
    Server: *crash*

    Same problem. (And same comments about an admin who lets himself get browbeaten into blowing up his own server :)

    There's a happy medium to be struck - but ultimately, it can't be solved only through clever UI design. Some user education is going to be required.

    Computers have existed in the office for only 20 years, and have changed pretty radically over those 20 years. They're complex devices, and you have to understand at least some of what's going on under the hood to know what's common between a TRS-80, a Sun workstation, and an AMD64 running XP.

    We had the same problem with automobiles in their first 20-30 years. The electrical starter, automatic choke, and the automatic transmission are about the only "new" UI developments for automobiles in the past 50 years. (The difference between EFI and carbureted engines didn't affect the car's UI.)

    Ironically, we're seeing the usability problem more often in automobiles today than we did 20 years ago - it's not about being able to change your own oil, it's about knowing that oil needs to be changed, regardless of whether your engine was designed for oil changes every 3000 miles or 10000 miles. 50000 miles later, having never had an oil change, the car dies, and the user blames the auto manufacturer for the sludged engine.

    1. Re:Usability and education are *both* required by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      the difference between EFI and carbureted engines didn't affect the car's UI

      Actually it did, quite a lot. Think about cold starts, for example. The coordination needed between pumping the gas pedal - or not, dealing with a flooded carb, handling a powerful engine's rough idle while moving off from a start: all of that mess pretty much disappeared with EFI, greatly simplifying the car's UI (even if not visibly simplifying the dashboard). Same with things like stability control. Grandma can comfortably drive a 500hp supercar these days, not something that most grandma's would have been comfortable with 40 years ago.

      Ironically, we're seeing the usability problem more often in automobiles today than we did 20 years ago - it's not about being able to change your own oil, it's about knowing that oil needs to be changed, regardless of whether your engine was designed for oil changes every 3000 miles or 10000 miles. 50000 miles later, having never had an oil change, the car dies, and the user blames the auto manufacturer for the sludged engine.

      Actually, a lot of newer cars just say, "Service in xxxx miles," doing a countdown by hundreds, until its "Time for Service." The user never needs to know what happens.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  151. 61% don't know SI prefixes? by vistic · · Score: 1

    It doesn't scare me so much that they don't know the difference between kilobyte, megabyte, and gigabyte... and would scare me much less if they didn't know how many bits are in a byte.

    What does scare me though is that this means 61% people don't know what the prefixes kilo mega and giga mean.... how did they get through high school (I presume... or even elementary school) without knowing anything about metric prefixes?

    Scientists they are not.

    1. Re:61% don't know SI prefixes? by Blacken00100 · · Score: 1

      If you want to split hairs, knowing SI prefixes wouldn't help you much with computers.

      SI definition of "Mega": 10^6 of something
      Computer definition: 32^4 bytes

      Technically we should be calling it a "Mebibyte" or something similar. But I'm just being an asshole and splitting hairs here. :)

    2. Re:61% don't know SI prefixes? by vistic · · Score: 1

      Well... no one uses those as far as I've seen... and the computer industry isn't even standard when it describes kilobyte versus kibibyte... as far as I can remember... I think hard drive manufacturers list the capacity in gigabytes on the box, but then the operating system displays it in gibibytes... or maybe i have that backwards.

    3. Re:61% don't know SI prefixes? by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      Who said they were scientists?

      I've used computers for the past 10 years and I know more than most people I know (slashdotters being an exception to that rule). I know the difference between a megabyte and a gigabyte and I know a kilobyte is smaller than both, but I don't know how big a kilobyte is (wich I also often confuse with some other metric-based unit starting with a "k" that escapes me now...

      Oh and SI prefix? Beats me...

      Oh wait! nfl.si.com! There ya go! ;-)

      Oh and I didn't finish high school and hated math.

      But, I'm lovin' Linux! ;-)

      Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050929 Firefox/1.0.7 (Ubuntu package 1.0.7)

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  152. That's not a flame, THIS is a flame! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft switched ethernet OC-45 nanotube oxymoron!

    Flaming World of Warcraft promiscuous mode goatse packet sniffer!

  153. This is nonsense on the face of it. by jpellino · · Score: 1

    C'mon. Three out of every four people in an office spend an hour a week wandering the halls like Diogenes with a lantern to find out what (insert term here) means. I call BS. Horrifically crap research at the very least. Just because Chloe says they might as well speak Arabic doesn't mean that users are as tested as if they were actually speaking Arabic. It's a FIGURE OF SPEECH. You don't report research results based on one comment. And let's see - they rounded up a mess of office workers, who excuse me, but most cubicle dwellers would probably hold up their hands if they could anonymously vote on anything even mildly annoying in displacement of (insert gripe here), as bludgeoning your boss often offends.

    And Christ, from what I've seen of Welsh, they could be thinking every consonant laden acronym is some obscure Welsh word and they spend the hour looking for a dictionary. (I suspect I'll hear about that one but hey - google "BWRDD".)

    Thanks for the insight that "worms" work until they completely fill your hard drive. Either they couldn't even be bothered to ask the expert firm for definitions, or the expert firm is crap for having given those.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  154. Not just computer terms by glwtta · · Score: 1
    The office is filled with foreign concepts that are a pain to learn. For example: the copier, printer, fax machine and shredder all look deceptively alike and it's very hard for a layman to figure out which one he is supposed to be using!

    The article tries to blame "jargon" for everything, and that seems to oversimplify the issue a bit. Filesizes are too "computery" for office workers to understand? Well, tough shit - if you want instant world-wide communication via email, you are going to have to learn a new system of measurement. When you order a desk, you don't whine about accidentally putting down "miles" instead of "feet", no one tries to get a "pint" and ends up with a "milliliter" instead.

    Most modern people ("modern" being the last couple thousand years) can grasp the concepts of length, volume, weight, and even time - understanding that data has a measurement too, is not too much too ask. It's not "elitist" and it's not a "holier than though" attitude manifesting itself. No one's asking them to know that in common usage kilobyte refers to 1024 bytes, even though technically "kilo" is 1000; just like most people don't know the difference between weight and mass - they don't need to. But a vague awareness that a 100MB file might not be something you just stick into an email - that would be helpful.

    Some of the examples in the article make no sense whatsoever - why on earth would "office workers" have the ability to turn off firewalls (I'm really hoping they mean personal firewalls)? That is definitely something they have no reason to worry about.

    Oh and 48% don't get filetypes, but 74% know what a firewall does? I'm somewhat skeptical about the latter part.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  155. a)Users all stupid (b) We have to change (c) Both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    having JUST spent YET ANOTHER ½ hr explaining "Save As" to YET ANOTHER end user, I really feel that we have not addressed the fact that the majority of users just don't know how to use the GUI's out there, let alone understand jargon.

    While it frustrates the hell out of me that such a simple task baffles so many people, and we can of course blame the users for being stupid, but I'm talking educated adults who do their jobs and lives fine in all other respects.

    Almost all computer issues are described in terms of some kind of metaphore, which is not true of the car analogy others have posted here. Take "save as", people have trouble understanding the "Save in" field, let alone "save as type". These refer to metaphores; virtual cardboard folders in virtual file cabinets, and arbitrary technical formats (what does "format" mean anyway? its another metaphore!). So that makes 2 out of 3 of pieces of info needed to save a file that otherwise intelligent people get confused by, so they waste time, save things in the wrong place (yes that's why MS came up with "My Documents"!) and can never find stuff.

    I still spend time on the phone saying, "Click on 'View' in the Menu... yes the menu.... That's the strip of words at the top of your screen. Can you see it? 'View'? Yes click on 'View'... yes one click."

    And have YOU ever tried to explain when it's one click and when it's two? It is disheartening.

    I would like to see a radical rewrite of the GUI. 15yrs and people just aren't getting it. So either people are just hopelessly stupid (except for us), or somewhere along the line, us computer folks have misunderstood the way the mind generally assimilates information.

  156. In mother Russia... by maxter3185 · · Score: 1

    In mother Russia, computer language learns YOU!!!!

    --
    I have pictures o' your momma and sista naked
  157. Average / Mean / Median by antizeus · · Score: 1

    Both the mean and the median values of a sample are considered to be averages. The same applies to modes, as well as the different types of means (arithmetic, geometric...).

    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
  158. A recent survey... by marco13185 · · Score: 0

    A recent survey has determined that the majority of office workers are extremely dense.

    A survey among 1500 office workers determined that 61 percent spend more time IMing and drinking coffee than working. A very interesting discovery; employers may have to start monitering employee computer use more tightly.

  159. There was this time... by kuzb · · Score: 1

    ...about 4 years ago, when myself and a bunch of friends (who were all programmers) were at a party on our employer's property. Of course, after a lot of beer we naturally got down to talking shop. Behind us (sleeping on a pool table someone had put outside under a tarp) was this guy who got up, came over, and quite seriously said: "If you ever call me a f**king javascript again, I will kick your ass!"

    Needless to say, it was then the running joke for the next year :)

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  160. Yeah, you are part of the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations on utterly failing to be able to communicate with people. Jeez, the average Slashdotter ROFLs at reports like this, but really its their own failure they are celebrating. Woohoo for me, I understand this crap, but its the people who put this cruft and jargon-encrusted shit in the way of me doing my non-IT related job who should be breathing a sigh of relief for that, not me. Never in a million years could you IT monkeys have a clue how to do my job, so get the fuck out of my way huh.

    1. Re:Yeah, you are part of the problem by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      I think maybe you missed the point. What annoys me is not people who don't understand computers. Some do, some don't, whatever. What annoys me is people who are bragging that they don't understand. People who are _proud_ of their ignorance.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  161. Come on, this has got to be obvious. by empvirus · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure someone's already said this, but perhaps to work in an office with computers, perhaps one should have to learn computer basics like file size and how to get around in windows and stuff like that. It wouldn't eliminate the confusion, but it'd help out methinks.

    --
    Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
  162. My personal favorite by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

    Javascripts is NOT an acceptable plural form. The singluar is not a "Javascript." Would you say "I'm writing some Perls, Pythons, and Bashes?" I think not!

    The correct form is the admittedly unweildy "Javascript scripts." (or better yet, "Javascript routines" etc) Blast Netscape for the stupid name, catchy though it is.

  163. What's suspicious by pbhj · · Score: 1

    >>> "Don't open any suspicious attachments, especially from someone you don't know."

    Office Worker 1: I wonder if this attachment is suspicious ... no it's santa on a sleigh ... Hey!? Where'd my windows go?
    Office Worker 2: Oh, don't worry I have the same email, I'll have a look at it for you ... Hey!? Where'd my windows go?
    Office Worker 3: What happened?
    Office Worker 1: We got an email from George Bush, I think he "hacked" [waves fingers in the air] our computers.

    ???

  164. To me this clearly is a case of... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    ... PEBKAC!

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  165. It's not old people (notes from an old fart) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The problem is that you have a generation that didn't grow up with computers. They're the ones having problems.

    I am of the generation that didn't grow up with computers. They existed when I was a child (1950s), but there weren't many at all, and almost no one had ever seen or used one.

    But you know what? I got off my ass and learned, since it was clear these things were moving more and more into general society - you could even buy one for your own home! Now, I've done everything from writing ring-0 device drivers to code that let commercial *nixes boot mounting / over NFS. I learned OO languages when those appeared, and HTML when that appeared, and LISP just because it was cool. I managed to *get* computer literate even though I wasn't exposed to them until I was firmly in adulthood.

    I (mostly) disagree the problem is age. I run into just as many clueless 20-somethings who don't understand the first thing about the technology. The salesdroids at Best Buy tell me I "need Microsoft Windows to access the internet". I believe the problem is people who are not willing to learn new things even when they have a reason to, like using computers at their job.

    I really believe if the person doesn't know the mega from kilo prefix, that's a symptom of something much deeper than not wanting to know about computers. It is more likely that person is not interested in learning, *period*. Prefixes apply outside computers, after all. How will they know a centimeter from a kilometer if they don't know SI prefixes?

    I agree with the rest of your post though.

    (Posting this as an AC, so I don't imagine anyone will see it :) )

    Signed,
        an old fart

    1. Re:It's not old people (notes from an old fart) by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I am of the generation that didn't grow up with computers. They existed when I was a child (1950s), but there weren't many at all, and almost no one had ever seen or used one.

      But you know what? I got off my ass and learned


      So, you're the little old lady from Pasadena? ;-)

      Seriously, there are exceptions to every rule, and you're one of them. With most of the older generation, the problem isn't that they don't want to learn. The problem is that they are set in their ways and just don't feel a compelling need to use computers. My own mother is an amazing example of this, and she programmed BASIC on VAXen and PCs! If they had a highly compelling reason, I'm sure most of your generation would learn, though. Unfortunately, what compels the younger generation does little to compel the older generation. :-)

      I run into just as many clueless 20-somethings who don't understand the first thing about the technology. ... It is more likely that person is not interested in learning, *period*.

      That's a completely different problem that you REALLY don't want to get me started on. Growing up home schooled gave me a rather unique perspective on my own generation. ;-)

    2. Re:It's not old people (notes from an old fart) by mam_bach · · Score: 1

      Wanting to learn and being able to learn are not synonymous

      Ok, many people have used cars as an analogy. My local driving school offers 12 * 1 hr lessons, plus practical and theory exam, for a bulk deal of £300 all in. Lets assume for the moment that it takes a similar timescale and cost to use a computer.

      Now imagine walking in to the bosses office, and telling him that not only can you not do your job for twelve weeks, but its going to cost another week-and-a-half's wages (at minimum wage) to get you to the minimum competency level. Then you can actually start practicing and getting good. Most bosses' response: Mind the door on your way out.

      If you don't have a job, of course, you have plenty of time. However, since IT courses cost money somewhere along the line, so you still won't be able to get the training you need, since IT isn't seen as a necessity by jobcentres, and dole sure as sugar won't leave enough to pay for it.

      Unless you are lucky enough to have family or friends to help you learn, computers are going to remain a mystery. This is likely to be the norm for about another 20 or so years - until the majority of working people had to do IT at school.

      Then we need to persuade schools to stop using BBC micros and other obsolete technologies...

      Next problem. Terminologies change fast. How long ago did we only need kilo and mega to describe memory? 5 years? Now my other half wants a terabyte server for Xmas. Therefore every computer user in order to be compliant with new technologies must report for a weeks training every three months....

  166. not jargon, but acronyms! by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    being a tech guy, jargon is fine, but my company uses so many 3 letter or 6 letter acronyms, i learn at least a few each day. before, i could just type acro "abc" (firefox keyword acro links to acronymfinder.com) and i'd get the definition easily. but now, these acronyms my colleagues are using arent even on there!

  167. The world needs ditch diggers too by Somatic · · Score: 1
    "Megabyte", "kilobyte" and "gigabyte" are not jargon. Not understanding the difference between them is like driving a car and not understanding the difference between the gas and the brake. People who don't know the difference between gas and brake aren't allowed to drive cars-- it's pretty simple. If you still haven't learned the difference between MBs, KBs and GBs by 2005, you should not be allowed to use a computer in the workplace. And by that I mean you shouldn't be allowed to touch the power button, or remove the protective cover you find in some offices.

    The world needs ditch diggers too.

    --
    My script don't crash! She crashes, you crashed her!
  168. AOL et al... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly I predicted this back when AOL began, I honestly believe it's a result of the dumbing down of everything, had that not occured folks would be smarter

  169. This is the same for any jargon by houghi · · Score: 1

    I do not understand the jargon docters use. I do not understand what the guy in the garage uses. If I come into a new company, I have no idea WHAT they are talking about.

    I am sure there are a lot of jargons going on in any company that the IT-people do not get. Unfortunatly SLA (Service Level Agreement) is often one of them.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  170. You think that's bad? by edremy · · Score: 1

    Try explaining to your National Guard tank crew what your theoretical chemistry PhD work is about. "Umm, well, my dissertation title is Methods in Hartree-Fock Molecular Dynamics. That clear enough? No. Ok, how about 'I sit in front of a computer'"?

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  171. "Firewall" in Lay Terms. by kf6auf · · Score: 1

    Among office workers 26% aren't sure what a firewall does and therefore have been tempted to turn it off.

    Just tell them it's an e-condom.

  172. Fire them by lzygenius · · Score: 1

    Personally I feel if they are unwilling to learn then they should be fired or at the very least have their computer use suspended until they do. If you are unwilling to learn to do somthing required of your job then it could result in serious monetary loss for your company and possibly life if it concerned safety regulations.

    I am glad high schools in my area have decided to make a computer literacy class mandatory for graduation.

  173. sorta... by raygundan · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but they call it a "nautical mile". Or a "knot". It is abbreviated "nm" (although this can be confused with nanometer) or "nmi", rather than "mi". If we wanted to call it a "computational kilobyte" and abbreviate it "ckB" or something, it would be a fair analogy.

    Heck, it might even be reasonably straightforward if all computer-storage things used the same convention. But we use kilo=10^3 for hard drives and kilo=2^10 for RAM.

    As long as you're clear, I don't care which you use. But engineers can't afford ambiguity-- that's how we get little spaceships crashed into mars. I still use the 2^n version everywhere. But when it matters, I make sure I specify that.

  174. con-fusion by raygundan · · Score: 1

    Yes, I do. Don't you think that giving one term two meanings is a little confusing?

    Which is better, the confusion resulting from learning a new set of prefixes, or the confusion resulting from nobody knowing whether you meant 10^3 or 2^10 in a spec?

    Before you answer that question, you should know that I have invented a second meaning for the word "better", but I'm not going to tell you which meaning I used.

  175. Obligatory Einstein by dirkstoop · · Score: 1

    you just got me started.. actually read the article because of your comment

    they forgot the golden rule of education, dictated by Einstein:
    'Make it as simple as you can, but not simpler'

    well, these asshats have made it a lot simpler than possible with their stupid little list of 'what' 'it' 'all' 'means'.

    come on:
    PDF - portable document format, which means the file is in a format that can be read on any PC
    that's simply not true. a simple matter of oversimplification turning fact into manure..

    and this one:
    Megabytes - the amount of disc space on your computer and the amount of memory
    Gigabytes - also refers to disc space, but measures it in larger quantities


    now is it so effing hard to actually write down the factor in which those gigathingies actually are larger than the megadingbats them computer nurds keep talking bout all the time?

    these uninformed, poorly written articles filled with useless 'knowledge' to inform people that shouldn't need to truly understand the matter at hand totally completely piss me off!

    @icWales and all the other 'popular' magazines:
    either explain it right or stfu!

    /rant

    --
    (may read 'IMHO' wherever omitted from above text)
  176. That works, but it isn't right by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Your method works, and it is unlikely shrink anything. It is also unlikely to actually get your clothes clean - though you may never realize the difference.

    To get the best cleaning you need to wash everything in the hottest water (liquid) you can get. Because some cloths shrink, and dye is just a stain that doesn't come out easily you cannot wash most cloths like that, so you have to modify your washing scheme to get the hottest temperatures you can without causing the unwanted side effects of hot water.

    Whites can generally be washed in the hottest water you can get, and come out the better for it. Colors need a cooler temperature, but warm is good enough. Dress clothes (suits) should be washed in cold water, if at all - many are dry-clean only.

    I'd say read the tag, but the tag may be wrong. I've seen things listed as dry-clean only that would be destroyed by dry cleaning chemicals. (dry cleaners know about this and will clean things right most of the time) I wash my dry-clean (not mislabeled) only stuff in cold water without problem, and put air-dry only stuff in the dryer. However I understand why things are labeled that way, and the downside of not doing it right, and consider it worth the risks.