Slashdot Mirror


Drug Reverses Effects of Sleep Deprivation

Ryan O'Rourke writes "According to a study led by Dr. Sam A. Deadwyler and published by the Public Library of Science Biology, a new drug called CX717 developed by Cortex Pharmaceuticals has been shown to reverse the biological and behavioral effects of sleep deprivation. Tests performed on monkeys that were subjected to 30-36 hours of sleep deprivation revealed an average test performance accuracy drop to 63 percent, but that performance was restored to 84 percent after administering CX717. During normal alert conditions, performance accuracy of the animals was improved from an average of 75 percent to 90 percent after an injection of CX717. It is also believed the drug may help prevent or restore memory loss in Alzheimer's patients."

610 comments

  1. Coming soon... by lastchance_000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The 167 hour work week!

    1. Re:Coming soon... by Ossifer · · Score: 1, Funny

      And all you gaming monkeys need never put down the controllers!

    2. Re:Coming soon... by ccarson · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the C in the drug name stands for cocaine.

    3. Re:Coming soon... by i_will_frag_u_all · · Score: 1

      .. a new cocktail: half caffiene half CX717. the ultimate nodoze!

    4. Re:Coming soon... by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other news:

      EA_spouse spontaneously combusts.

    5. Re:Coming soon... by SunPin · · Score: 1

      Do they anyway?

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    6. Re:Coming soon... by tumanov · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think we should all be focusing on being able to work better instead of being able to work longer. I've been doing a lot of introspective thinking about how much I work vs. how much actually gets done. And really its only the last 4 hours before a deadline that the work gets done - regardless of how many all-nighters were pulled.

      So while getting read of sleep deprivation effects might be nice, I really just need a drug that'll push me into the last-mile mindset and get me to actually do the amazing work that gets done under pressure. Caffeine and nicotine just don't cut it anymore.

      Heck, like one of the replies to your post mentions, the C in this drug could stand for cocaine and it'd probably have the same effect if it WAS just cocaine, except maybe with the downside of addiction.

      --
      http://tumanov.com
    7. Re:Coming soon... by LittLe3Lue · · Score: 1, Funny

      you cnt imagin how hrd it is to type contrlr in hand!

    8. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait?! Someone didn't take their humour pill this morning.

    9. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Heck, like one of the replies to your post mentions, the C in this drug could stand for cocaine and it'd probably have the same effect if it WAS just cocaine, except maybe with the downside of addiction.

      Except that no-body holds the patent on cocaine so its illegal.

      But regarding addiction, at least you can make an argument with cocaine against using it. But this - I can see bosses coming along and expecting employees to just pop one of these in order to pull off a 48 hour overtime to meet a deadline. And you know that some idiot employees will be escalating the standards of company loyalty by using these.

      Honestly, we shouldn't be looking at ways of improving our capacity to work. We not only devote more time to work than our ancestors, but 90% of us aren't even working for ourselves. We have modern technology, farming techniques, transport and communication. One person does what would take a hundred a century ago and our hours are going up?

      We don't need a pill to help us work harder, we just need to adjust our expectations.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    10. Re:Coming soon... by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Damn it. Usually when I'm sick it isn't so much the symptoms of sickness that keep me out of work but the attendant sleep deprivation that the symptoms help bring on.

      So now I won't even have that as an excuse.

    11. Re:Coming soon... by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, thats already about the average work week for the people in China that make everything at Walmart.

      Which entirely explains the quality products they sell :)

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    12. Re:Coming soon... by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      I recall that one of the early uses of dexadrine and its cousins was with pilots, sspecial forces, and other military personel heading into harm's way. the drug was given before parachute jumps, firefights, bombing runs and the like to help the solider keep their "edge". After combat the user woud...in 60s parlance: "crash" for a few days to recover. Will this drug be the new "speed"?

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    13. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is that study that you hear at the beginning of the movie just before the zombies start attacking everyone.

    14. Re:Coming soon... by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      Unless you work for AOL - then it's a 300 hour work week.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    15. Re:Coming soon... by over_exposed · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't you think you're exaggerating just a tad? Do you really expect employers to hand out drugs that they require their employees to take? Having a coffee pot in the break room and maybe some sammiches is the closest I've EVER seen (or heard of) to an employer providing (not even requiring) a work enhancing substance to their employees. Even if this drug passes FDA approval, you think it'll be cheap, safe in large quantites, or non-prescription?

      The only real "work-place" application I can see for this is extended military missions. People like pilots and snipers could/would use this to great advantage and the miliary is the only organization with enough clout to try to make this mandatory for certain people in their "work force."

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    16. Re:Coming soon... by scovetta · · Score: 1

      Except that no-body holds the patent on cocaine so its illegal.

      Your tin-foil hat is showing again.

      And your argument is silly. Do employers demand employees to stop smoking? Or eat right? Or exercise? They can encourage it, but demand? No way.

      You won't be seeing employers putting these capsules in the kitchen next to the coffee any time soon.

      --
      Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    17. Re:Coming soon... by russianspy · · Score: 1

      Did you know that hunter gatherers tribes only needed to work 2-4 hours a day to maintain their lifestyle? I mean after your camp is setup, all you do is set a few traps, feed the animals you do have and cook. They were probably much happier overall as well.

    18. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Don't you think you're exaggerating just a tad? Do you really expect employers to hand out drugs that they require their employees to take?

      No, I don't think I'm exagerating, and I'd also expect employees to have to fork out for this from their own pockets. :(

      Why do I think my scenario is plausible? Firstly, there is nothing in TFA that suggests that this drug will be a prescription only drug, or in fact anything other than an over-the-counter tablet. Indeed, there would be many complaints if it weren't - "I crashed my car because they wouldn't sell me this at the garage and I fell asleep at the wheel."

      Secondly, given it's likely widespread availability, the effect is likely to be one of relegating sleep deprivation to the same level of headaches, et al. Tell many employers that you're taking the day off because of a headache?!?! Unless you get actual migraines, most would expect you to just take some paracetemol if it were really that bad and get on with it. Sleep deprivation is about to become the same. And you know that there will be idiot co-workers who start using this stuff to put in even more hours. And then there will be those who use it to have more late nights without interfering with work the next day. All of which increases its acceptance and leads to that moment when after a 14-hour day and the project still not finished, the use of this stuff is sort of expected.

      First it will be the super-star employee who is still fresh when everyone else is starting to type with their noses, then it will be most of the people, then it will be all of them looking at you as you struggle to work saying "Look, why don't you just take one of these? You're letting us down."

      I'm happy to be proved wrong on this, but, pending serious side-effects, I don't think I am.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    19. Re:Coming soon... by OreoCookie · · Score: 1

      And really its only the last 4 hours before a deadline that the work gets done - regardless of how many all-nighters were pulled. So while getting read of sleep deprivation effects might be nice, I really just need a drug that'll push me into the last-mile mindset and get me to actually do the amazing work that gets done under pressure.
      This should be +5 Insightful. Mod this up, you know this is how you work too.

    20. Re:Coming soon... by 'nother+poster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes they can, and they do. Several companies have gotten press time in the last year for laying off people who smoke. Not just smoke at work, but smoke away from the workplace. Several others have had terminations for obesity and other things. You may actually want to read the news a bit before making the sweeping comments.

    21. Re:Coming soon... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      But this - I can see bosses coming along and expecting employees to just pop one of these in order to pull off a 48 hour overtime to meet a deadline. And you know that some idiot employees will be escalating the standards of company loyalty by using these.

      Unless your employer is the military, they'd be awfully hard-pressed to be in any legal situation to insist/expect that you take medication for them.

      That would most assuredly be out of the purvue of any corporation except in the most backward of countries. [ at least, I would like to keep hoping ]
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    22. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1, Insightful


      Your tin-foil hat is showing again.

      Your ad hominem attacks are crude and blatant.

      You misread my comments about use of these drugs at work. My reply to a previous poster will help you.

      Regarding my sarcastic aside that cocaine would be legal if one of the big pharmaceuticals had a patent on it? Yeah - I don't think that's so far from the truth. Prozac is more damaging than (reasonable usage of MDMA) and that's legal where the other is not. Ritalin is very little different in effect and chemical structure to the speed you'll get on the street, yet one is legal and the other not. Marijuana is not super for your health, but I can make a strong case that it's less damaging than alcohol and no-one's ever got stoned and then gone out physically aggressive with me like they have when they're drunk. Yet one is legal and the other is not. Whether coke would pass the FDA if it were developed today? Maybe, maybe not. I'd say yes for prescription use.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    23. Re:Coming soon... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      We don't need a pill to help us work harder, we just need to adjust our expectations.

      You don't mean.. no, surely not.. but.. no, not "Work smarter, not harder" do you? :-)

    24. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They can encourage it, but demand? No way.

      Wouldn't take much, though. It was alledged earlier about "abnormally loyal" employees taking it just to stay with the firm. If Bob is more efficient than Joe, Bob will get picked everytime.

      UPS keeps some pretty stringent metrics on how their employees perform. Same thing with Telemarketers. Now that the Unions are weakening (yup, tipped my hat...) who's going to prevent this in other industries?

      And I'm talking to a bunch of saps who probably take pride in above 40hr work weeks. I can already hear someone say 40hrs, I work 50s routinely...

      Which sort of makes my case.

    25. Re:Coming soon... by Thangodin · · Score: 1

      I'll wait for an independent confirming study, thank you very much. More than 1/3rd of all scientific reports about drugs are later proven false. Nothing like a falsified article to hype your stock so you can dump it and make a quick fortune.

    26. Re:Coming soon... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Out entire programming team was threatened with the sack unless we got eye tests. With our own money. On our own time.

      Yes, companies do demand ridiculous things.. it's not even ucommon.

    27. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Out entire programming team was threatened with the sack unless we got eye tests.

      They need to check that you're short-sighted. If your eyesight is good, you're not working long-enough hours.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    28. Re:Coming soon... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "Honestly, we shouldn't be looking at ways of improving our capacity to work."

      This should read "I shouldn't blah blah etc..." not WE, as I enjoy my work, and would love the opportunity to do it more effectively. Since my work often requires longer hours than most people would be happy with, such a drug would be ideal.

      "We don't need a pill to help us work harder, we just need to adjust our expectations."

      Again, this should read "I just need blah blah blather etc...." as my work requires a set amount of time, and no amount of expectation adjusting will change that.

      Blanket generalizations about what YOU think are best are probably only best for YOU.

    29. Re:Coming soon... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that whole dying thing from your first major infection, sickness, or injury tends to put just a small blemish on things. Average maximum age was, what, 30? And let's not talk about childbirth death rates...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    30. Re:Coming soon... by ifwm · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Whether coke would pass the FDA if it were developed today? Maybe, maybe not. I'd say yes for prescription use. "

      You CAN get cocaine for prescription use, so stop acting like you have any knowledge of the subject.

      It is a Schedule 2 drug, meaning it has VERY LIMITED and specific medical uses, and requires a TON of hoop jumping to get.

      BUT, if you do eye surgery, cocaine is often the anesthetic of choice.

      Look it up, then come back and eat your crow.

    31. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cocaine is legal with a perscription, I was perscribed it for a nose bleed, the Dr administered it in the Hospital.

    32. Re:Coming soon... by Zordak · · Score: 2, Insightful
      pending serious side-effects
      Every drug has side effects. The only difference between a "side" effect and a "use" of a drug is which one gets advertised on the television. Drugs are designed to mess with your body. This particular drug messes with your body in very big ways. You can't mess with a brain this dramatically (especially on a regular basis) and expect that nothing bad will happen as a consequence.
      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    33. Re:Coming soon... by over_exposed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Taking it to stay competitive is a far cry from being mandatory. Here's a stretch: Steroids enhance athletic ability and many athletes take them to stay competitive "Because taht guy did it and the only way to beat him is to take them too."

      What I see happening is substances like this coming out and then people will abuse them. They will become addicted to them. Maybe not physically, but psychologically. "I can't be the best at my job if I don't take these so bottoms up!" As soon as abuse is spotted, public outcry will commence, support groups will spring up and tehy will become as popular as caffeine pills and speed. Not to say that caffeine pills aren't a problem, but they aren't mandatory by any employer and any company that doesn't want a lawsuit will not recommend or even offer them to their employees.

      Your ideas have some merit to them and the "Look, why don't you just take one of these? You're letting us down." situation will probably occur, but it won't be at the company level. It will strictly be from employee to employee, peer to peer. Does your company have NoDoz (tm) in the break room? I doubt it.

      Lastly, you "I crashed my car because they wouldn't sell me this at the garage and I fell asleep at the wheel." situation is not too likely in my mind. I can complain that my doctor didn't give me an adrenaline shot so I couldn't lift the car off of my wife when we got into a wreck. Ok, bad example, but anywho. I don't think you'll ever be able to register a justifiable complaint against someone because they didn't provide you with performance enhancing (because that's essentially what this is) drugs in any situation. You can complain on a medical basis (ie. my doctor wouldn't give me enough insulin and I went into a diabetic coma) but not on a supplemental basis.

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    34. Re:Coming soon... by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      Quoting from the movie Major League

      Rick Vaughn: You put snot on the ball?

      Eddie Harris: I haven't got an arm like you, kid. I have to put anything on it I can find. Someday you will too.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    35. Re:Coming soon... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      Thank God I'm paid by the hour.

    36. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I don't think you'll ever be able to register a justifiable complaint against someone because they didn't provide you with performance enhancing (because that's essentially what this is) drugs in any situation.

      This is a performance enhancing drug, no need to qualify it. But people don't have to lodge a successful court case to get it legalised. The situation is a big pharmaceutical company wanting it sold everywhere and a public that will grouse if it isn't. 1 + 1 = 2 much pressure to resist. Short of serious side-effects, this will be a common over-the-counter medicine. By serious side-effects, I mean the medically inevitable things like kidney damage, et al. Not the equally serious but non-blameable-on-a-company side-effects of misuse (i.e. repeated or sustained use).

      any company that doesn't want a lawsuit will not recommend or even offer them to their employees.

      Company doesn't have to offer these to employees or require them. It'll just become part of the culture.

      Taking it to stay competitive is a far cry from being mandatory.

      This is my point. It isn't. What we need a cultural change so that it is.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    37. Re:Coming soon... by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except that no-body holds the patent on cocaine so its illegal.

      Nope. Cocaine is illegal because of racism. The fear was that "Negro Cocaine Fiends" have an insatiable need for white women. These "Cocainized Niggers" were ostensibly immune to gun fire. The terms in quotes are actual quotes from newspapers.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    38. Re:Coming soon... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      You don't find your supposals/accusations against employers in general as ad hominem ?
      You're making a large sweeping statement about employers in general, and painting them all as despotic slave drivers.

      Sure, some misanthropic types might try this, but in general, the vast majority of situations, this simply won't be happening. Those employers who might be tempted would be standalone rogues who don't represent the culture in general. There are already enough parallels today to indicate this.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    39. Re:Coming soon... by zagmar · · Score: 0

      A doctor can get it. But they cannot prescribe it for use. However, as the previous poster mentioned, ritalin/aderol are basically the same as the speed you get on the street (and for that matter, cocaine.) And they give those to 8 year olds.

    40. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      You don't find your supposals/accusations against employers in general as ad hominem ? You're making a large sweeping statement about employers in general, and painting them all as despotic slave drivers.

      ad hominem attack is where you dismiss someone's argument not with logic, but by attacking the person who presents it. If an employer said something and I said he was wrong because he was an employer, then that would likely be an ad hominem attack. No employer put forward any argument and if they did, I would address it with logic, not with prejudice.

      I don't believe that I have made a sweeping generalisation either. I've gone back to my original post and what I wrote was this:
      I can see bosses coming along and expecting employees to just pop one of these in order to pull off a 48 hour overtime to meet a deadline.
      I think the normal interpretation of this is that I can see it happening, not that all bosses will be doing this routinely. I believe that the situation may well become common enough that it is a problem, but I never described "all as despotic slave drivers," as you say. That incidentally, is a straw man attack (on your part).

      What I see is an acceptance of these drugs to the degree where a boss can get away with this pressure. This may seem odd to you, but my position is not that employers are at fault if they put this pressure on people, but that the employees are at fault for opening the door to that sort of pressure by working too hard or using these themselves in the first place.
      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    41. Re:Coming soon... by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      You get an hour off each week?

    42. Re:Coming soon... by hhlost · · Score: 1

      Maybe what we really need is for all the assholes who's job it is to do fucked up stuff like force innocent monkeys to stay awake to do all the work while the nice people get to hang out on the beach.

    43. Re:Coming soon... by ifwm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ritalin/Adderall (your misspelling has me wondering how credible your knowledge is) are simialr to methamphetamine, but what does that have to do with anything? Similar chemicals can behave in VASTLY different ways.

      They ARE NOT however, even remotely similar to cocaine, and by making such a statement, you show how little understanding you have of the chemistry involved.

    44. Re:Coming soon... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "I don't believe that I have made a sweeping generalisation either."

      Really? What about this?

      "Except that no-body holds the patent on cocaine so its illegal."

      Oh, wait you're right, that's not a sweeping generalization, it's just a LIE.

      Sorry, my bad.

    45. Re:Coming soon... by mahmud · · Score: 1
      This should read "I shouldn't blah blah etc..." not WE, as I enjoy my work, and would love the opportunity to do it more effectively. Since my work often requires longer hours than most people would be happy with, such a drug would be ideal.
      You dear sir are very likely to run into serious health problems several years from now, if you are not already suffering from them.

      It is not yet possible to regularly sleep less than the 7-8 hours for a day for several years without screwing up your:

      1. nervous system
      2. digestive system
      3. mind (acquiring depression, burnout, various other disorders of lesser and greater graveness)
      To preempt some of the possible counterarguments: yes we all are different, and some of us indeed possess titanic stamina(at least by normal standards) and are in general very resistant to disease of all kinds, yet the limits are still there, and after crossing them we all tend to run into problems. And overworked human being is a physiological timebomb waiting to explode.

      I may be mistaken, and you may have already reached a ripe age where you can know for sure what is and what is not good for you and your body, having lived 60 years and still growing stronger. In that case - my most sincere apologies.

    46. Re:Coming soon... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      Yes they can, and they do.

      You forgot to add 'in the US' : I am 100 percent sure that my government won't let companies have that much power over the individual. (btw, I'm from the Netherlands).

    47. Re:Coming soon... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      And YOU dear sir, don't know DICK about me, so save your advice.

      I suffered frontal lobe trauma as a child, and as a result CANNOT naturally sleep more than 5 hours a night. Medicating myself helps, but only (very) temporarily. Even then, 6 hours is a good night.

      I am so unique in the type of sleep disorder I have that I have been flown to several sleep centers simply to be studied. If you read enough abstracts, you'll probably find one about me.

      Also, I am not an expert, but have been consistently given a clean bill of health relating to all the potential trouble spots you list. (Fuck man, they test EVERYTHING)

      Lastly, if you believe that we know fuck-all about sleep, you're naive in the extreme. The why, how, and other important details are still being hashed out.

      But I accept your apologies.

    48. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, the thing you people forget is that Slashdot is a site created by Americans, and most of its users are American. Therefore, most of the articles and comments pertain to Americans, whether you like it or not. I know a lot of you like to come out and say "Hey, what about me? I'm from Country X! Country X is different from America because..." No offense, but you are not the target audience of this website. It's fine if you find this site interesting and enjoyable, but keep in mind this is primarily an American site. With that in mind, feel free to create your own version of Slashdot for the Dutch that focuses on technology and science in the Netherlands.

    49. Re:Coming soon... by ChibiLZ · · Score: 1

      Actually Adderall and Ritalin are quite different, and neither is quite like methamphetamine. Adderall is a brand name for a blend of levo- and dextro-amphetamines, and Ritalin is methylphenidate. I've been on both medications, and they don't feel or work the same. Methylphenidate increases the brain's level of free dopamine by shutting down the excess dopamine receptors found in the brain. Amphetamines work by stimulating the release of dopamine. Similar, but different.

      I haven't taken methamphetamines myself, but a friend of mine was on Desoxyn, which is prescription meth. He claims that it was also similar to Adderall, but again, different. Stronger, for one, and it gave him more mental clarity than the Adderall.

      --
      Don't buy WoW Gold! Make it yourself!
    50. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      They ARE NOT however, even remotely similar to cocaine, and by making such a statement, you show how little understanding you have of the chemistry involved.

      Actually, I think the parent poster has a much stronger grasp of the argument than you do. You are under the impression that someone has declared cocaine to be chemically similar to ritalin. I've no idea if they are or not, but nobody has said that they were.

      The case made was that the legality of drugs is influenced by whether some big pharmacy company has a patent on it and can milk it for money or not. Hence the highlighting of chemical similarities between ritalin and speed (not cocaine), one of which is patented, the other not.

      No company can make big money out of cocaine, so it's currently illegal.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    51. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may have come out harsher than I intended. No offense was intended. I just meant to remind users in general that Slashdot is a US-centric site.

    52. Re:Coming soon... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      You CAN get cocaine for prescription use, so stop acting like you have any knowledge of the subject.

      While the letter of the law allows for this, the overall principle of medical necessity applies. There is no accepted use for cocaine that would require regular administration. Its only accepted use is in certain surgical procedures where general anesthesia is not an option and the vasoconstrictive properties of the drug are benificial. Eye surgery is an example.

      No drug stores even stock the stuff.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    53. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      You've already commented on this further up (and recieved a reply). Why do you leap in to a different branch of the discussion (the ratio of nice:nasty employers) and make the same comment where it has no relevance to what is being discussed?

      Oh, wait you're right, that's not a sweeping generalization, it's just a LIE.

      I don't lie. I sometimes make mistakes, but if so, please point out the flaws in my logic, rather than get excited and start throwing accusations like that about.

      Sorry, my bad.

      I forgive you.

      -H.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    54. Re:Coming soon... by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      Yes, companies do demand ridiculous things.. it's not even ucommon.

      "ucommon"? Is that like "umount"? What does the "common" command do, just out of curiosity?

    55. Re:Coming soon... by dusik · · Score: 1

      Mostly true, but are you sure about childbirth mortality rates? I heard that it was more of a modern problem due to women wearing corsets and infections (as people lived in more crowded conditions).

      Anyone got the straight dope on this one?

    56. Re:Coming soon... by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      A little dose of CX717 and you would have been alert enough to avoid making that rude remark in the first place.

    57. Re:Coming soon... by doug141 · · Score: 1

      And really its only the last 4 hours before a deadline that the work gets done - regardless of how many all-nighters were pulled. Note to this guy's boss... he can do any project in 4 hours.

    58. Re:Coming soon... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Your point about the military missions is 100% valid. The great methamphetamine problem we have today is the direct result of government research and distribution to soldiers beginning in WW2. It was used for exactly what you mentioned: pilots and snipers, people that had to be up at all hours of the day and functioning within acceptable limits.

        Sure, if this drug hits widespread release, we'll see yet another backlash of domestic problems springing from it's abuse. What's really shameful is the social underpinnings that lead to abuse, not the drug itself.

    59. Re:Coming soon... by enjerth · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't it be the 187 hour work week? Because at the end of the week it kills you.

    60. Re:Coming soon... by linzeal · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mod parent up, the same was done with Lazy Mexicans being used to illegalize marijuana.

    61. Re:Coming soon... by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "Average maximum age was, what, 30?"

      I think I'd rather work 2-3 hour days for 15-18 years of my life and live to 30, than work 8-12 hour days for 45+ years of my life and live to 65...

      But maybe i'm just lazy...

    62. Re:Coming soon... by Rectal+Prolapse · · Score: 1

      Your condition certainly explains your temper. ;)

      I'm kidding. People without any obvious neurological damage can have mood swings, tantrums, sleep problems, and flame people on the internet.

      From a general population point-of-view, most people require 7-8 hours of sleep a night. Don't take it personally if you are not one of them. I don't.

    63. Re:Coming soon... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      You keep saying, "Super star employee" and I really want to know who has one of these.

      I don't have anyone around like that here and I've never quite seen anyone like that anywhere.

      The nearest example here is me and if I'm a "super star employee" the world is in for some serious changes. (First things first, we're tearing down disney land)

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    64. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can't mess with a brain this dramatically (especially on a regular basis) and expect that nothing bad will happen as a consequence.
      Why not? I don't see any medical or scientific reason why that should be true.
    65. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Heh! I was more thinking work less, actually. :)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    66. Re:Coming soon... by chill · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are on crack.

      Cocaine is quite legal and is still available in Europe and the U.S. to dentists who use it as an alternative to NO2 and novacaine.

      Yes, according to the FDA, cocaine has medicinal value and marijuana does not.

        -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    67. Re:Coming soon... by user9918277462 · · Score: 1
      You don't know what you're talking about. Cocaine causes ulceration and corneal sloughing when admistered topically in the eye as an anesthetic. It was used in the 19th and early 20th centuries when there was nothing else but now there are far safer, non-abusable alternatives such as tetracaine, proparacaine and many others.

      Yes, cocaine is technically a Schedule II drug in the US but it is not available commercially and anyone trying to obtain it for supposed "medical use" would find themselves in rather unpleasant conversations with law enforcement.

    68. Re:Coming soon... by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 1

      How about the massive amount of side effects Anti-Depressants and Anti-Psychotics have? Or were you just trolling?

      A.A

      --
      Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
    69. Re:Coming soon... by shawb · · Score: 1

      I recall hearing in my anthropology classes that child mortality was indeed much higher among primitive peoples. In fact, the child mortality rates were what brought the average age down to 30ish. Once you made it to a certain age (about 50-10 I believe) you were just about as likely to make it to 60-70 years old. As of very recently we are extending the upper edge of the life span a little bit, but it's the child mortality rates that really affects the average lifespan. And some new diseases appear to be popping up, but I think a lot of that is people who would have died and no cause of death found.

      Although take this for what it's worth... I've been out of college for a few years, haven't really seen the statistics in even longer, and didn't bother to look them up.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    70. Re:Coming soon... by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      I have found that most useful work is done while my mind is fresh, not after 12 hours of non-stop work. The reason I see for getting "things done" near a deadline is that management generally stops changing the requirements once deadlines loom.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    71. Re:Coming soon... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      umm... You might want to take a look at the history of amphetamines and who used them, how, etc...
      Just because the military uses them doesn't mean that they are the only ones.
      IIRC, the military already has a "wake up" and "knock out" pill, although being awake doesn't necessarily mean you're functioning at full capacity.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    72. Re:Coming soon... by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      (your misspelling has me wondering how credible your knowledge is) are simialr

      LOL

    73. Re:Coming soon... by Panaphonix · · Score: 1
    74. Re:Coming soon... by Panaphonix · · Score: 1

      I've been doing a lot of introspective thinking about how much I work vs. how much actually gets done. And really its only the last 4 hours before a deadline that the work gets done - regardless of how many all-nighters were pulled.

      Same here. As I have said before, a 3-day work week could potentially preserve current productivity while increasing happiness.

      I really just need a drug that'll push me into the last-mile mindset and get me to actually do the amazing work that gets done under pressure. Caffeine and nicotine just don't cut it anymore.

      I would recommend Provigil to almost anyone.

    75. Re:Coming soon... by Forbman · · Score: 1

      No, give it to methamphetamine addicts (or sell it to meth addicts) to help them keep from getting psychotic from prolonged sleep deprivation...

      Imagine HOPE or DEFCON with 5-day straight hacking sessions with their special "mountain dew".

    76. Re:Coming soon... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      It is not yet possible to regularly sleep less than the 7-8 hours for a day for several years without screwing up your:

      Have you read about a polyphasic sleeping schedule? Apparently, you can force your body to adapt to sleeping for 1/2 hour every 4 hours (just long enough to get the required amount of REM sleep per day). As long as you're not physically stressing yourself, you can keep this schedule indefinitely & still be mentally alert.

      I haven't tried it myself, however - just read about it. Apparently the transition period is hell.

    77. Re:Coming soon... by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      Sir, I think you are talking out of your ass. The last thing that a pharma company desires is to have its unique patented medicine available over the counter. OTC medications have to be reasonably priced and are not covered by HMOs as a rule. The typical example are non-sedating antihistaminics of Claritin/Clarinex series. The company was forced by FDA to make it available OTC because the drug is effective and very safe. This greatly reduced health care costs since patients do not need precription. This was also a great blow to the company selling the stuff because the people use it less when they have to pay for it out of their pocket.

      A medication that reverses effect of sleep deprivation and fatigue exists for at least 10 years. It is called Modafinil and endurance sport profesionals just love it. So does US army and Airforce: Modafinil can produce quite safe alertness without sleep for several days without jitternes, clenched jaw, hypomania and addiction, the typical problems of amphetamines. It gives no pleasurable high.

      The downside of Modafinil is that if you don't sleep for a week, the immune system breaks down and you can die from a massive abdominal infection.

      If you are eager to experiment on yourself, you can buy Modafinil from some Viagra-peddling web sites. Not that I would recommended it but the drug is supposed to be reasonably safe.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    78. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just don't test games for a living...after 3 weeks, you will gnaw off your own leg that they chained to the desk when you started...

      oh, and catheters are no fun either...

      and watch for low flying poo too..

    79. Re:Coming soon... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The hunter-gatherer lifestyle won't support modern hospitals etc. And hospitals are a good thing.

      I think a lot more babies AND their mothers died in childbirth in the old days. That brings lifespans down a lot.

      I'm sure back then lots of teenage boys/young men got themselves killed too, with injuries would be typically nonfatal given modern medical treatment.

      The other trouble with the hunter-gatherer lifestyle is you often have little or ZERO reserves. A few bad days, or get injured/sick and be unable to hunt/gather and you could be in trouble. I suppose that's where friends/relatives/tribe members help a lot.

      Whereas nowadays given the modern "ecosystem of agriculture, hypermarkets, banks etc", individuals can store up a fair amount of useable reserves.

      That said, I think most countries don't have more than a few weeks of oil and other critical reserves.

      --
    80. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, im with ya

    81. Re:Coming soon... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "However, as the previous poster mentioned, ritalin/aderol are basically the same as the speed you get on the street (and for that matter, cocaine."

      Perhaps you need to re-read this.

      If he meant the EFFECTS were similar, then he is even more off the mark.

    82. Re:Coming soon... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "I don't lie. I sometimes make mistakes, but if so, please point out the flaws in my logic, rather than get excited and start throwing accusations like that about. "

      NO dude, you lied. You were very much aware that cocaine isn't illegal, yet you chose to continue to spread you drug company conspiracy crap.

      As to why I post where I do, WHY DO YOU CARE? It's my time, so address the point or not, but stop asking about my motives.

      But to answer, I DESPISE LIARS LIKE YOU, who insist on preying on individuals who are easily influenced. Your attempts to misrepresent the current state of drug laws is one example, and it's because of people like you that so much misinformation is around.

      So, stop ;ying, and I'll stop calling you on it.

    83. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      NO dude, you lied. You were very much aware that cocaine isn't illegal

      So what makes you so certain about what I do and do not know? I suppose it's reasonable to extrapolote from my wonderful insightful posts that I do in fact know everything, but it's really not the case. From the fact that you get arrested for possessing, selling, puchasing or manufacturing cocaine, combined with the fact that there are no remaining clinical uses for it and any doctor attempting to prescribe it would get an unfriendly visit from the DEA, I made a wild supposition that it's illegal. Seems reasonable to me. IANAL, so perhaps there is a legal technicality, but it seems to be the case that cocaine is effectively illegal so it doesn't change what I said.

      yet you chose to continue to spread you drug company conspiracy crap.

      I mentioned (in passing), that if there is money in something, the drug companies will try and get it legal and push it on people. Take Prozac for example. Terrible side-effects on some people, still legal and prescribed commonly. Take Aspartame and Acesulfame K, both with probable side-effects, neither with much dietary merit and omnipresent. It's hardly conspiracy theory when you suggest that where there is big money involved, policy can be influenced.

      As to why I post where I do, WHY DO YOU CARE?

      We were having this discussion further up the thread and you'd recieved a reply. Here I was talking with someone else about the state of employers. You saw a post by me and leapt in where it wasn't connected, to say the same thing you'd said earlier and call me a liar.

      I DESPISE LIARS LIKE YOU, who insist on preying on individuals who are easily influenced. Your attempts to misrepresent the current state of drug laws is one example, and it's because of people like you that so much misinformation is around.

      Do you honestly think that of every hundred people who read this thread and see the discussion between us, that more than one will favour CAPTAIN CAPITALISATION over the one who presents calm and reasoned debate? It's not a competition to see who can type loudest, you know. It's by discussion that we reduce misinformation. I've learnt a couple of things in this discussion, and a couple of people presented good criticisms of what I've said. You were not one of them, however.

      I repeat, I have not lied in this discussion and you should apologise.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    84. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      If this is true and it remains prescription only, then that would go a long way to countering the situation I'm afraid of.

      I don't entirely follow the logic of why it is more profitable for the pharmacy corporations to have it be prescription only though. There may be people who want regular prescriptions of sleep-deprivation cures, but I'd think most demand would be people who just need it occasionally for over-work, a badly timed late-night, etc. For this sort of use, I wouldn't think you'd want to spare the time to see the doctor, explain, get your prescription etc. And if you had to, maybe you'd just not go through it - hence lost sale.

      I'm not certain on this, but it sounds plausible. IANAPITUSA (I am not a patient in the USA) and I'm happy to be corrected on this if you have more detail.

      -H.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    85. Re:Coming soon... by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      The drug usage may actualy decrease when drug becomes OTC because the OTCs are not covered by US insurances as a rule. And the price has to be lower if patients end-up buying it out of their pocket (rather than paying some small fixed co-pay for dispensing a prescription). Doctors would not over-prescribe either because they would not profit from OTC prescription. Lose-lose situation.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    86. Re:Coming soon... by mahmud · · Score: 1
      Have you read about a polyphasic sleeping schedule?
      Yes, at least the concept rings the bell. Has it been proven that it does not have any negative side efects on overall condition of the organism in the long run?

      If yes, than my original post is incomplete :-)

    87. Re:Coming soon... by jtjin · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with the childbirth death rates? It would have been an excuse to have more sex!

      Yup, definitely happier ...

      --
      No rest for the livid.
    88. Re:Coming soon... by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that's the case. It wasn't entirely illegal at first. In fact, my father has a certificate that was granted to his grandfather, allowing him to legally dispense cocaine and heroin as a doctor. While racism might have been involved in limited cases, I'm pretty sure that doctors and scientists figured out the very substantial downsides to those particular drugs. They've been controlled substances for a very long time.

    89. Re:Coming soon... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Cocaine is still Schedule II, which means it can be used medically. It's often used in facial surgery, because it has vasoconstrictor activity other local anesthetics don't. That helps stop blood flow.

      As for the psychoactive properties of cocaine, they're pretty much the same as ritalin which we (regrettably) give to our kids by the handful. Heroin is less damaging than alcohol and less addicting than nicotine. Marijuana, LSD, and psilocybin are some of the most physiologically nontoxic drugs known.

      Public policy, especially drug policy is not supported by science, but by power politics. The war on drug users criminalises large sections of our society, making them politically impotant. This goes as much for the leftist hippie as for inner city minorities. The war on drugs is bigger than a war on personal freedom, it's a culture war.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    90. Re:Coming soon... by anaesthetica · · Score: 1
      Heroin is less damaging than alcohol and less addicting than nicotine.

      I find this very hard to believe. Withdrawal from heroin is far more harrowing (and life-threatening) than withdrawal from nicotine.

      Also, simply because something is physiologically non-toxic does not mean it's good for you, or even safe to use.

      Public policy on drugs is rightfully the area of power politics because of what's involved in the drug business. If you want a picture of what legalized drugs would be like, take Big Tobacco, Big Oil, and the entire Fashion Industry, roll it all up together into one package, and there you have it. It would be a monster with more power, greater reach, and more fundamental ability to control than any other industry in the history of mankind.

      It is a culture war, because every war is a culture war. Those sectors that are criminalized for drugs would be criminalized for *insert whatever reason here* if drugs weren't illegal--that's just a fact of politics. Drugs are just one way to do it, and there are plentiful others. Drug use became part of the culture of the disenfranchised--not the other way around--and the system perpetuates it.

    91. Re:Coming soon... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I find this very hard to believe. Withdrawal from heroin is far more harrowing (and life-threatening) than withdrawal from nicotine.

      Do not talk about things you do not know about. Heroin withdrawl is like a bad case of the flu and is non life threatening. It may be the straw that breaks the camels back if it's an addict weakend by AIDS he caught because he couldn't get clean needles. Or somebody poisoned by impurities caused by illicit synthesis. Both tragedies that would be avoided if clean measured doses of heroin were available.

      If you want to learn something, check out the Merck Manual: Withdrawal: The withdrawal syndrome is self-limited and, although severely discomforting, is not life threatening.

      In fact, you can go through the "Complications" sections and see how many items would disappear if clean cheap sterile measured doses were available.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    92. Re:Coming soon... by Hatta · · Score: 1
      In addition to The Merck Manual, I really should recommend that you read The Consumer's Union Report on Licit and Illicit Drugs. Particularly the sections on heroin, but the entire book is excellent. Here's a particularly relevant extract from the section on caffeine:
      Some readers may here be moved to protest that the bizarre behavior of rats fed massive doses of caffeine is irrelevant to the problems of human coffee drinkers, who are not very likely to bite themselves to death. Let us promptly and wholeheartedly agree. There is a lesson to be learned, nevertheless, from these rat reports. If the drug producing this effect in rats were marijuana, or LSD, or amphetamine, the report would no doubt have made headlines thrown about the country. One of the distorting effects of categorizing drugs as "good," "bad," and "nondrugs" is to protect the "nondrugs" such as caffeine from warranted criticism while subjecting the illicit drugs to widely publicized attacks--- regardless of the relevance of the data to the human condition.

      Thus we come to the coffee paradox--- the question of how a drug so fraught with potential hazard can be consumed in the United States at the rate of more than a hundred billion doses a year (see Chapter 61) without doing intolerable damage--- and without arousing the kind of hostility, legal repression, antisocial condemnation aroused by the illicit drugs.

      The answer is quite simple. Coffee, tea, cocoa, and the cola drinks have been domesticated. Caffeine has been incorporated into our way of life in a manner that minimizes (though it does not altogether eliminate) the hazards inherent in caffeine use. Instead of its being classified as an illicit drug, thereby grossly amplifying caffeine's potential for harm, ways to make caffeine safer have been searched for and found.[...]

      That other drugs now deemed illicit might be similarly domesticated, with a similar reduction in the damage they wreak on individuals and on society, is a possibility readers may wish to keep in mind as they read the chapters that follow.
      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    93. Re:Coming soon... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      Haven't seen any official studies on it - just anecdotal descriptions of some people who have done it for a year or so without much complaint.

    94. Re:Coming soon... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "there are no remaining clinical uses for it"

      Another LIE. Why do you INSIST on lying, even when I've made it clear that there are clinical uses for it. Now I'm sure you're a liar, because you responded to MY post, in which I stated it is still used for eye surgery.

      So, what is your excuse now, Lieutenant LIAR?

      "It's by discussion that we reduce misinformation."

      No, It's by discussion that I am reducing the misinformation, you CONTINUE to lie, intentionally or not. Regardless of what you claim to know, the facts, which you clearly failed to bother with, prove you wrong.

      Over and over you attempted to appear to be an authority, and when called on it, you tried to change the focus of the discussion.

      Anyone who reads this will probably wonder why I'm so zealous, but they'll KNOW you are a sad, patheitc piece of trash interested in SOUNDING like an authority without actually knowing anything.

      You lied. Admit it. It MAY have been a mistake, but when you typed this

      "We were having this discussion further up the thread and you'd recieved a reply"

      That's when we knew that you had the FACTS (from the very post you admit replying to) and still chose to spread misinformation. What is that other than a LIAR?

    95. Re:Coming soon... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "there are no remaining clinical uses for it"

      Another LIE. Why do you INSIST on lying, even when I've made it clear that there are clinical uses for it. Now I'm sure you're a liar, because you responded to MY post, in which I stated it is still used for eye surgery.

      So, what is your excuse now, Lieutenant LIAR?

      "It's by discussion that we reduce misinformation."

      No, It's by discussion that I am reducing the misinformation, you CONTINUE to lie, intentionally or not. Regardless of what you claim to know, the facts, which you clearly failed to bother with, prove you wrong.

      Over and over you attempted to appear to be an authority, and when called on it, you tried to change the focus of the discussion.

      Anyone who reads this will probably wonder why I'm so zealous, but they'll KNOW you are a sad, patheitc piece of trash interested in SOUNDING like an authority without actually knowing anything.

      You lied. Admit it. It MAY have been a mistake, but when you typed this

      "We were having this discussion further up the thread and you'd recieved a reply"

      That's when we knew that you had the FACTS (from the very post you admit replying to) and still chose to spread misinformation. What is that other than a LIAR?

    96. Re:Coming soon... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      There are no remaining clinical uses for cocaine that I'm aware of. You mentioned eye surgery, but cocaine was last commonly used for this in the early twentieth century. Tetracaine, proparacaine and others which are all non-abusable and don't cause corneal sloughing have long since replaced cocaine.

      So your information is quite some time out of date. Now ordinarily I would say that you are mistaken, but I suppose it's only fair to apply your own standards, which would make you a LIAR, eh?

      Regards,
      -H.

      p.s. I noticed that you posted the exact same reply in three seperate places. Well, I'm happy to deal with trolls for a while, but only for the sake of the audience which is probably dwindling now. I get no satisfaction out of a slanging match for it's own sake, so you can have the last word if you like. You'll probably make a bigger pratt of yourself with it than I ever could anyway. G'night!

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    97. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, I'm from country X, and up here there is a LOT of anti-American sentiment. I am constantly pointing out to all the little zealous tree-hugging college kids that Americans are very nice people, with a very bad President. With posts like that, though, perhaps the zealots are right. You sir, are a jerk.

    98. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er...what are YOU on?

  2. More links by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Informative
    NPR had a good piece on this study this morning.

    Here

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:More links by SunPin · · Score: 1

      Anything that shortens a human lifespan is fine with me. As we become older, we become profit centers for the medical system. Living longer is living for misery. Definitely better to burnout than fade away.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
  3. Don't ignore the signals. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't like this. Sleep deprivation effects are there for a reason, to signal that you need to sleep. I can understand if people who can't sleep and need to be alert need to use this (e.g. soldiers in combat), but it's not going to be very good for the average person who needs to do some more work. People need to sleep for various reasons (rest, various chemicals get regenerated, etc). It's not a whim of nature.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Chicane-UK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly the same sort of post I was going to make.

      The body tell us its tired for a reason - it needs good healthy sleep, in order to keep you all in check. People who avoid sleep, people who keep themselves awake with drugs, people who burn the candle at both ends.. they are just setting themselves up for premature death. Just go to sleep!

      As Kramer once said in an episode of Seinfeld.. "Well.. I don't argue with the body Jerry. It's an argument you can't win!"

      Its a comment I whole heartedly agree with! :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    2. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by qw(name) · · Score: 1

      I agree. There are more than enough drugs out there have detrimental effects. Now with this "wonder-drug" we get to skip nature's way of fixing itself. "Just take this other pill to aleviate _________________."

      Before long, perfectly healthy people will carry IV backpacks so they will have a constant stream of drugs "correcting" what the previous drug caused to enable us to live without sleep.

      One thing I've noticed with all the new drugs announced in the news is that they tie the drug to some ribbon-based disease. In this case it's Alzeimer's Disease. I'm sure this is help the approval process along with the FDA.
    3. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer a premature (or even better, instant) death rather than keep working 80hr per week for the rest of my life.

    4. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      People need to sleep for various reasons (rest, various chemicals get regenerated, etc). It's not a whim of nature.

      Nature can take a flying fuck, I'm going to get me a case of these and finish my degree in one year.

      I always knew sleep was a poor substitute for coffee, now it's a poor substitue for CX717.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    5. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We take allergy medication because of how our body reacts to pollen, animal fur, etc. How is this any different? We're trying to stop the reaction from happening.

    6. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      I forget the name of it- But one of the "street drugs" (Maybe Ketamine?) that used to be used by bodybuilders supposidly (sp) allows you to feel rested fully with a few hours of sleep a night- I guess it puts you right into deep sleep and you stay there, rather than the usual sleep cycles we all have. This seems, if possible, more natural- forcing more recuprative sleep rather than creating alertness...

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    7. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Eightyford · · Score: 0, Troll

      I agree, but it's also pretty easy to take the positive effects of these drugs for granted too. Big Pharm, is doing a lot more for our quality of life than hippies with their wonder herbs!

    8. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by VoidWraith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course, Kramer also does things like covering himself in butter, and falling asleep in a hot tub, and installing a garbage disposal in his shower so he can spend more time there, so I wouldn't take all of his advice. =P

    9. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by eatmywake · · Score: 0

      Could someone clarify if this "reverses" or just masks the very real effects of sleep deprivation?

    10. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shoot, regarding my above post- is it GHB? I need more sleep- my memory is shot....
      Anyhow- I would love to not have to sleep- as long as the workday was still 8 hours. Man, I could get a lot done...

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    11. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sleep on average 2-3 hours per night. You think I want to? I give myself a long enough resting period that I should be able to put down 8 hours each night. I could synthetically alter my night pattern, or now, my day pattern.

    12. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Our body reacts like that because it mistakenly believes that pollen is trying to hurt it. We don't take allergy medication for actual diseases.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    13. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by aduzik · · Score: 4, Interesting
      As someone who suffers from chronic insomnia -- and yeah, I've gone through all the medical nonsense for them to tell me there's nothing wrong with me physically or emotionally -- having a drug to counteract the effects of sleep deprivation sounds like a godsend. For me, all the sleep deprivation effects in the world can't help me fall asleep. For example, I finally fell asleep at about 5:30 this morning and had to get up about an hour and a half later for work.

      Some of us are jealous of the relative ease with which the rest of you fall asleep. (The absolute worst is sharing a hotel room after a long trip, where your traveling companion falls asleep right away, but you don't fall asleep for hours) I'd be happy to at least feel as awake as most people seem. The only time I feel that way is when I can sleep in on the weekends. It's mostly just depressing that I can't be that alert the rest of the week -- you know, when it matters most.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    14. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The feeling of tiredness is there for a reason. But aren't poor concentration and lack of alertness the problem sleep solves? Seems this drug causes the chemicals (or suitable alternatives) to get to the brain.

    15. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      you;re thinking of ghb.... wonderful, wonderful affect on the body, actually... and very few side affects when used correctly.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    16. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Gah, fed the troll. Didn't realize until it was too late.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    17. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      I'm with you, but for different reasons. Nature might require sleeping for all its woodland creatures, but us humans with our mighty science can conquer whatever we want. If something chemically happens overnight that we can replicate with a pill, why not? I'd love to never have to sleep, I could have so much time for all the projects I'm working on. If you say it's something mental that happens overnight, humans can change that too. I can't wait for all this stuff to come of age. I'll be the first to volunteer for brain-chip implants.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    18. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by cecille · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ha ha...no kidding...my last semester of school we had a huge project where we were working in a lab we could only use at night. Classes, of course, were still during the day, so sleep was something like 9:00-11:00 MWF and 10:30-1:30 TTH. Not a great schedule, but what can you do. Well, about 4 weeks into this (just before exams) I left the lab one morning feeling quite ill. Woke up 4 hours later on the floor of my bathroom. Don't even remember getting home, but from what my friends tell me I was talking about a chipmunk and kept swerving the car. From that point on we decided that it might be good to get a little sleep. Sure enough, 8 hours of solid sleep later I felt like a million. At that point, I think I would have taken something like this gladly, but really...if you're getting that broken, suppressing the symptoms CAN'T be a good idea.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    19. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      But if someone discovers a drug that does everything that sleep is supposed to do, then what's the problem? It's not like nature is perfect, if we can develop a way of doing something more effectively then why not? Now I don't know if this drug does that, but surely they'll test it for any potentially negative side-effects.

    20. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Interesting
      (Disclaimer: Drugs are useful. My brother is in the hospital right now, and was likely going to die on Saturday, but is hopefully going to be moved out of the cardiac ICU soon. His life was saved by modern drugs.)

      My favorite oddball drugs that are heavily advertised are the "prevents that uncomfortable full feeling" and "cures fullness".

      We literally live in a time when being full is considered a major problem worthy of heavy advertising to a large chunk of the human population. Consider the fact that the majority of human history is full of people fighting not to starve to death... and now we're worried about being uncomfortably full.

      You can look at that with either bitter sarcasm or wonder at the accomplishments of humanity -- I rotate back and forth. But either way, it's durn funny.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    21. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 3, Funny

      The thing about insomnia is, you are never really asleep, but you are never really awake.
      The second rule of fight clib, is don't talk about fight club...
      Anyhow, I always try and fall asleep first if there is a woman sleeping in my bed with me- If she falls asleep first, you are likely to hear a terrific fart (women don't fart less than us, they just hold them, while we are proud of them, and as such they are much stinkier and louder) and once you hear a woman fart, the magic is gone....

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    22. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by numbski · · Score: 1

      What I'm really wondering is whether or not this stuff can help me.

      Up until 6 months ago, I quite literally didn't know WTF was wrong with me. I could go into a laundry list of items, but suffice it to say that I just couldn't function normally anymore. We finally nailed it down to hyper-somnolence. My brain apparently can't regulate my need to sleep normally, and is constantly, unless I'm on medication, trying to put me to sleep. It's not traditional narcolepsy, but they share many symptoms.

      I'm on something called Provigil now, which works wonders, although I'm thinking about asking the doctor to up the dose a bit. I don't know if my brain behaves as though I'm sleep-deprived, I would have to ask my doctor about that one, but without medication, at any given moment I can fall asleep in under 2 minutes. Under 5 is dangerous (or so says my dr.).

      Hmm...

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    23. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two words: Vi. Oxx.

      We live in a shamelessly corporate age, and you simply cannot trust that the drugs the FDA approves are actually safe. IANAD(octor), but my advice would to take only those drugs which you absolutely need, and give new drugs five or six years on the market unless the benefits are just too important to pass up. Somehow, I don't consider "eliminating sleep from my life" to be a medical necessity.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    24. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by moviepig.com · · Score: 1
      I don't like this. ... People need to sleep for various reasons...

      The rule that says there is no free lunch is fine... as a first reservation. But, e.g., people also need natural food and clean air and water... yet seem to survive on lesser substitutes, even voluntarily when the incentive's high enough. And a 50% lengthening of your wake-day is a pretty strong incentive for trying to fool Mother Nature...

      --
      Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    25. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you wake up, are you refreshed for a while? Or would you fall asleep in another couple minutes?

    26. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Mondoz · · Score: 1

      That stuff is great. I have it to counteract the drowsy effects of another medication I'm taking. It's terrific to take when I haven't gotten enough sleep the night before, and I'm completely exhausted. Like legal speed. :)

      --
      /sig
    27. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      'Sleep deprivation effects are there for a reason'

      It looks like this drug is just stopping the 'feeling tired' effects, not the build up of toxins in the brain and the fsck + defrag (or whatever it is that sleep does). 30 odd hours isn't really sleep deprivation either it more like an increased fatigue level, I'm sure the monkeys would still be tripping out after a few days without sleep and dieing after a few months.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    28. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by swillden · · Score: 1

      It looks like this drug is just stopping the 'feeling tired' effects

      Actually, it doesn't keep you from feeling tired at all, it just allows you to think clearly even though you're feeling very tired.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    29. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by archen · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly people ALREADY ignore the signals. Take your average person, they start to feel tired. What do they do? DRINK COFFEE. Seriously, we already live in a sleep deprived society (among deprived of other things). Instead of getting adaquate ammounts of rest, people string themselves out with caffine, nicotine, and whatever else keeps them awake. Feeling tired isn't just an inconvinience - our bodies need sleep for a zillion reasons, but people still ignore it.

      Many modern health issues stem from really simple fundamental problems: lack of rest, lack of proper diet, lack of exercise. Instead of addressing the problem we have others capitalizing on the issues and creating hysteria about this mess which they "claim" can be fixed from simple pills. I'm sure this pill will help someone out, but for every person it does, there will be 1000 taking it who do not need it.

    30. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Mondoz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "The body tell us its tired for a reason - it needs good healthy sleep, in order to keep you all in check."

      I've often thought about why we still have certain primal signals.
      Pain from obvious sources, for instance.

      I skinned my knee. I know I skinned my knee. I can see it. I'm looking right at it. I just cleaned the darn thing. Yet it still smarts like hell.

      Why can't I turn off the darn pain receptors?
      Why, as a (okay, this next bit is questionable, but just go with it) intelligent being can't I just acknowledge those signals, and snooze them or something?
      I know. It hurts. Leave me alone until I get to the hospital.
      I know, I'm exhausted. Let me get to a bed without falling over.
      I know, I get the picture, send the right chemicals to the right places until I get the right treatment, but until then, just leave me alone!

      My knee tells me it hurts for a reason: it needs attention so it won't get infection.
      Broken bones hurt so they will get mended.
      Neither one know they've been fixed once they've been tended to, so they continue to complain.

      "The body tell us its tired for a reason - it needs good healthy sleep, in order to keep you all in check."

      If this drug can keep us from actually needing to sleep, then it's just like my knee. I don't really need to sleep, but nobody's actually informed my body yet.

      --
      /sig
    31. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by eestar · · Score: 0

      Sleep plays a large part in the ability of someone being healthy. For my situation, a good amount of sleep allows me to avoid taking medication for my epilepsy. I have had no seizures for two years without any medication and therefore no side effects , just because I have been getting 8 hours every night.

    32. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

      Did they ask you what you ate, and what time of day?

      Do you drink coffee, tea, or eat chocolate or other sugary or caffeinated foods?

      Have you tried aerobic exercise, at various times of day?

      Do you anage your blood sugar level.

      If all else fails, try a serving or two of beer or wine before bedtime.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    33. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      During the period when I was abusing my body to the limit, I could go three or four days with about 8 hours of sleep. And then I'd crash and LOSE A DAY...i.e. pass out around 3pm on friday and wake up sunday morning at 4:00am. I remember falling asleep in my car, right in front of my apartment, because I was too tired to walk up the stairs.

      Passed out once, and my roomate had 5 guys over working on a CS project and it didn't wake me up until 10:30 at night. They'd been there since about 11:00 and I'd been there, asleep, since the night before. And when I say "roommate" I mean we shared a ROOM. I scared the hell out of him when I woke up because they'd thought the big bump in my bed was just a continuation of all the crap piled on top of it. I got up, ate dinner, went right back to sleep.

      I'm still paying for that crap, ten years later. It's totally not worth it.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    34. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I forget the name of it- But one of the "street drugs" (Maybe Ketamine?) that used to be used by bodybuilders supposidly (sp) allows you to feel rested fully with a few hours of sleep a night

      Do NOT take Ketamine as an aid to health! *LOL* .You're probably thinking of GHB. Take a little, you feel relaxed and good, take a bit more and you go Zzzz.

      GHB will send you to sleep when you ordinarily wouldn't and do so in a natural (loose definition of the word) way. And when it wears off, you'll be very fine and refreshed. Taking it before bed so you can concentrate the night's sleep into a couple of hours, isn't going to work however.

      GHB is considerably less harmful to you than many patented drugs (including some over the counter drugs), but was made illegal in the US and the EU. As you have natural GHB in your brain, being attached to your head can now count as possession.

      The criminalization of GHB was a dubious process, with indications that big pharmaceuticals had a hand in the process. More information on the history of this here.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    35. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Council · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People need to sleep for various reasons (rest, various chemicals get regenerated, etc).

      From what I understand, there's not a clear consensus on why we need sleep. I mean, it does a number of things, and we've figured many of them out, but as far as biology goes none of them seems to be a deal-breaker. I can easily imagine a large mammal that just walks around eating and doing stuff all day. Why is it that we spend a third of our lives in this comatose state?

      I mean, it's pretty much taken for granted, but when I stop to think about it, it seems pretty damn weird. Imagine an alien that shows up and we say "we need to go, gotta sleep" and they say "why?" and we say "uhhhh, to recharge." "I thought you ate food for energy." "yeah, it's for . . . maintanence?" "what kind?" "not sure. it's just this powerful compulsion." "what are the leading theories? you mean you aren't even sure why you do this every night?" "zzzzzzz."

      Just something interesting that I've given a lot of thought to, especially since I started working unpredicatble night shifts. I wonder if every major mammal needs sleep because we evolved with a light/dark cycle, or if it's just something that it's impossible to construct a complex brain without.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    36. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The bone and the knee both want you to stop fucking moving so they can heal.

    37. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by tremor_tj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why?

      Take a look around you. People STILL do stupid things, like jump skateboards down stairs, riding rails, etc...

      If you could simply turn off the pain receptor, you're turning off what is essentially a survival mechanism. In this case, the recurring pain is a constant lesson to not do that again. If Joe Skateboarder can just turn off the pain any time he gets hurt, what's to stop him from trying to ride the edge of a building that's three stories tall? Only death is an unacceptable injury then.

    38. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by zardo · · Score: 1
      This is exactly what the doctor asks me when I tell him I can't sleep at night. What I want are drugs to help me sleep! (Or to stay awake like the poster 2 levels up explained)

      But the beer and wine before bed sounds like it might work, I'll tell the wife!

    39. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by aduzik · · Score: 1
      Actually, yes. I've actually never been healthier. I've totally given up soda and sugary crap, and I exercise about four times a week, usually in the afternoon. My one vice is still coffee, but only in the morning.

      Oddly enough, my boss suggested having a beer before bed, too. But, my doctor says that's a bad idea. It makes your sleep more restless and you're more likely to wake up in the middle of the night.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    40. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Fishead · · Score: 1

      Not sure if I would resort to taking a drug to keep me awake, but when doing an install that requires going to a timezone 9 hours in the future, it sure would be nice to be alert. As it is right now, when I have traveled, I go an extra day so that I can sleep when I get there. Sure I do the usual and drink a bunch on the plane to try get some sleep (free booze on Air Canada w00t!) but it still messes a guy up for a few days. That and going back to work when I get home. (they let me come in late for a few days so it isn't too bad)

    41. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      Some of us are jealous of the relative ease with which the rest of you fall asleep. (The absolute worst is sharing a hotel room after a long trip, where your traveling companion falls asleep right away, but you don't fall asleep for hours)

      I've suffered with insomnia for all of my life. Various techniques such as drugs, meditation, and other relaxation techiniques don't work in that even if I do get to sleep, I wake up soon afterwards.

      (Actually, the latter 2 help me during the day to keep my brain from going into the depression cycles I used to deal with constantly so it's not all bad). At least I'm happy most of the time now. Most chronic depression can be blamed on bad sleeping patterns. Treating chronic depression directly is most often fruitless because it's not the main issue.)

      I've learned to live with that. I work for myself so I can get up at 11:00am and go off to fix computers. I completely avoid the 'zOMG, I have to be to work in 60 minutes and I haven't slept a wink' stress.

      But, what really makes me jealous is that my girlfriend can go to sleep anywhere, anytime, ( I'm not kidding ) in 1 or 2 minutes. She just decides to go to sleep and she's sleeping for ~6 hours straight.

      I'm not sure what I'd trade to be able to fall asleep that fast and go through a full sleep cycle with ease . It would probably be something pretty significant.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    42. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by DisownedSky · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sleep is important, and sleep deprivation shuldn;t be encouraged, but as a parent, I can vouch that there are unavoidable situations in which sleep simply isn't possible, and your are still required to be coherent and awake the next day. You will sleep when grandma gets here, but until then, you need help.

      There are also obvious military applications. An exercise left to the reader.

      That said, this study was done with monkeys. Earlier studies were done with undergraduates and hamsters. So we are a long way from having this drug legally in our hot little hands for human use.

      --

      "The impossible often has a certain integrity that the merely improbable lacks" - Dirk Gently

    43. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by zardo · · Score: 1

      Some of us are jealous of the relative ease with which the rest of you fall asleep.

      I hear ya bro. Me and my boss both have the same problem as you. We were talking about it the other day and we came to an interesting agreement, that staying up until 5AM and then going to sleep works out better for us. My boss owns his own business, he goes to sleep at 5AM and comes in to work at around 3:30 or 4:00PM. I tend to do that on the weekends, but I have to be here at 9 (which usually works out to 10:50) and I stay up until 2AM, which makes sleep easier.

      If you go out on the web and do some research you can find info on how the human sleep cycle is tuned to the wavelengths of light you're getting. There may be better ways of fooling your brain, but you're like a plant, your brain chemistry changes according to the type of light you're encountering. Do you find flourescent lights to be extremely annoying, causing incessant yawning? Your brain probably just needs more darkness in order to adjust. There's some advise you can experiment with, I can't say anything for certain, but I've found if I spend 3 or 4 hours at night in a dark room, with just my laptop LCD screen on low contrast, I can fall asleep easier.

      -Night person

    44. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by skuenzli · · Score: 1
      Have you ever read The Promise of Sleep? I don't have anything that would classify as a sleep disorder (just a part of the "too busy" crowd), but I still found this book useful. It's written by Dr. Dement, who is one of the pioneers of sleep research and disorder treatment. The book has helpful advice on how to get in touch with doctors who understand and can treat sleep disorders.

      You can also find it at Barnes & Noble. Should be less than $15.

    45. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by aduzik · · Score: 1
      You don't want drugs unless you like to feel like ass the next morning. Believe me, I've been there. Even the so-called "next-generation" sleep drugs -- your Ambiens, Sonatas, and what-have-you's -- can still make you feel lousy.

      I used to take one -- very briefly -- that actually made me into an emotional basketcase the next day. Literally can't stop crying, can't explain why you're crying in the first place, plus usually a nasty headache. I used to work with a couple of my good friends, and they said it's the most bizarre they've ever seen me act -- and they've seen me drunk.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    46. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by SecondHand · · Score: 1

      Apparently half of the monkeys that participated in the test are dead now from exhaustion

    47. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyhow, I always try and fall asleep first if there is a woman sleeping in my bed with me

      You're not fooling anyone, virgin.

    48. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by MaineCoon · · Score: 0

      Im the same, although its usually about 1 to 2 am I fall asleep; it used to be worse, and its gotten much better with changes I've made lately.

      Things I've found that helped, you may have tried them, but just in case you haven't, heres advice from personal experience:

      No sugar, no soda, switch to water entirely, with occasional juice (this is also great for your teeth, even diet soda is too acidic). Give up caffeine entirely, or at least stop it past 10 am. It stays in your system a while. Takes a week or so to adjust to water but after 2 weeks of water even diet soda was too sweet for me.

      Get off the computer 1-2 hours before bedtime and switch to something non-interactive, like reading a book. If I am on the computer up until I go to bed it takes me about half an hour longer to fall asleep; if I was doing something fun like playing a game, it might take me an extra half hour on top of that. Go to bed about an hour before you want to fall asleep and read.

      Consider a new bed. The most expensive proposition, but a crappy bed can be a major cause of problems. A couple issues: if you are a side sleeper, your bed could be resulting in your hips twisting sideways and torquing your back. My wife also rolls around and that used to shake our crappy bed, which was a decent queen size double pillowtop... but it was too soft and not supportive enough, and developed a sag in the center. We switched to a king size Simmons Beautyrest (independent coils, so if I roll over or she rolls over its not nearly as jarring to the other), and latex memory foam layer so that its more conforming to the body without sacrificing firmness. A lot firmer than the old bed, and we're sleeping a lot better, and it's made a difference on my insomnia; I have a reasonably good chance of falling asleep. Too soft IS a bad thing.

      Finally: Go to bed earlier, even if you're not tired. Get on a set schedule.

      It's difficult for those of us who seem to have a 26 hour circadian rythym... after a sleep study, full medical exam, and trying several sleep meds (beware Ambien, you can convince yourself of anything about 20 minutes after taking it; the first time I took it, I was convinced I had just thought up the best game idea ever, and started writing stuff down; in the morning I couldn't read a damn thing I wrote, it was all nonsense)

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    49. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by zardo · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't want sleeping pills, I'd go for a replacement for my morning cup of coffee. I was prescribed pain killers, ultram which is not opiod more like an anti-depressant, and I take them for a wake up more often than I take them for knee pain (in moderation of course, maybe once every two weeks when I feel I need a good work day). A while back I was prescribed a tri-cyclic anti-depressant which was to help me sleep at night (doc thought the insomnia might be related to some form of depression), I forget the name of it but it works as a sleeping pill, so I know the groggy feeling in the morning, like there's ambisol in your head.

      There is a drug called modafinil (provigil) that looks really attractive, but you know, I don't want to be taking pills the rest of my life, even if it is healthier than coffee. I like the taste of coffee. :)

    50. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of that Aspirin commercial where the woman is complaining that her wrists are on fire, and somebody recommends that she should take an Aspririn to get rid of the pain. Then you see a picture of her gladly typing away. Those pains are there for a reason. They are telling you there is something wrong. You shouldn't just take something to mask the pain, and pretend that nothing is wrong.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    51. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by fupeg · · Score: 1

      Well then you shouldn't take this drug if/when it becomes available! Pretty simple, right?

      Now there will be people who do want to use this. Certainly some professions like the military, doctors, truck drivers, rescue workers, air traffic controllers, etc. will find this useful. And just imagine combining a supply of this stuff with an offshore programming facility...

    52. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Andrewkov · · Score: 1
      ...and you're more likely to wake up in the middle of the night.

      But that's only to pee, not much of a bad side effect..

    53. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by johnlenin1 · · Score: 1
      The body tell us its tired for a reason [...]

      You're absolutely right, but according to this NPR story this morning, this drug reverses the foggy thinking associated with being tired, but you will still feel tired. The drug does not prevent tiredness itself.

    54. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by fieran_daychred · · Score: 1

      Except that we don't really know for sure what sleep is for. Granted, people who don't sleep perform worse cognitively, but if there's a drug that erases that deficeit and has no other negative side-effects, why not? Think about how many more Slashdot stories you could comment on if you never had to sleep!

    55. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by aduzik · · Score: 1
      A while back I was prescribed a tri-cyclic anti-depressant which was to help me sleep at night (doc thought the insomnia might be related to some form of depression), I forget the name of it but it works as a sleeping pill, so I know the groggy feeling in the morning, like there's ambisol in your head.

      It wasn't trazodone, was it? I took that, and as I described in an earlier post, made me into a groggy basketcase the next day.

      Plus, I invested in an expensive espresso machine. There's no way I can give up coffee altogether.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    56. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by asoap · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When is the last time of the day that you drink coffee, and how much do you consume? I know you and your doctor have probably gone over this, but you might want to take a good look at it. My mother who regularly drinks 3-4 cups of tea a day started having problems sleeping. She was becoming an insomniac like yourself, where she wouldn't fall asleep until the early morning.

      She would take Melatonin which is aparently a "natural" chemical in the body that is released to make it sleep. I convinced her to stop drinking tea after 3pm. She now has no problems sleeping, and has no need for the pills.

      You may want to try exercise and smoking a lot of weed. The exercise will help you get tired, and also burn off all of the fat you will absorb when you order pizza every night after smoking up. It is sure to knock you out, but then again I've never had an insomnia problem. So take my advice for what it is.

      --
      Treat me like a marketing stat, and I'll treat your movie like a series of ones and zeros
    57. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually it's not because you need to pee it's because it mucks around with the proportion of different stages of sleep..

    58. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      Click through my link and take a gander at me and the other doctors in my practice. Then you will see why I get the ladies.
      Anyhow, even ugly dudes get laid. Who do you think all the ugly chicks are sleeping with?
      For all the basement living virgin jokes on slashdot, the only virgins I know are people who want to be virgins....

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    59. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It may simply be essential for the body to rest, peridocly. When you sleep you don't move very much, of course, your heart rate, breating and such go way down. Your organs fall in to a low activity state, you use less energy, etc.

      Well it may be as simple as that if you go all the time, things start to wear out. There is some justification for this in injuries. If you keep working the thing that is injured, it won't heal, if however you allow it to rest, your body will fix itself. Well some things, like our heart, can't ever really rest as in do nothing, so perhaps sleep is the next best thing, a perodic low state where essential organs can rest.

    60. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a person with CFIDS, I have much the same hope. I sleep plenty, sometimes I even sleep well... but it doesn't do me a damn bit of good. If this lets me think clearly enough, then I could work again. That would be the end of my hell.

    61. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Drug companies have their tentacles in US politics? The hell you say! Why, I thought Merck and GSK are in it to CURE people. Its almost as if these companies would bribe elected officials to make more profit.

      My fragile little mind is warping. Help meeeeee!

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    62. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by ewieling · · Score: 1

      "GHB is considerably less harmful to you than many patented drugs (including some over the counter drugs), but was made illegal in the US and the EU. As you have natural GHB in your brain, being attached to your head can now count as possession."

      My problem with GHB is that the EFFECTIVE dose is not all that much lower than the dose that KILLS you (when compared to many other drugs). This means that it's easy to overdose. When was the last time you heard of someone overdosing on weed? For weed the effective dose is much, much, much smaller than the dose that will kill you. This is a good thing.

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    63. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by rihjol · · Score: 1

      People make jokes and attacks to get responses and mod points, but you show a good example of where this might be useful.

      Like most drugs, this one (providing it works) sounds like it has some good places where it might prove helpful to people, but also runs the risk of being misused and abused.

      I don't have insomnia or anything quite so severe, but I have sleep issues as well. I can empathize. There are times that a little help could go a long way.

      --
      I like bread.
    64. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you fucking serious?! really, just imagine it for like two seconds.

    65. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think this drug only enhances mental cognition and alertness. it doesn't counteract physical fatigue from lack of sleep.

    66. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Oh, yuck, dewd! Didja really have to offer those pictures? Hell, I have plenty of pictures, but none of them are like *THAT*. Ugh!

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    67. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by jandrese · · Score: 1
      Some of us are jealous of the relative ease with which the rest of you fall asleep. (The absolute worst is sharing a hotel room after a long trip, where your traveling companion falls asleep right away, but you don't fall asleep for hours)
      Especially if they are heavy snorers. I have a friend like that. He falls asleep in an instant and snores so loud that your ears ring in the morning. Worse, he snores no matter what position he's in. Heck, he'll start snoring a bit when he's awake if he's not paying attention. It's just awful to room together. Fortunatly I got a girlfriend finally and have an excuse to get a seperate room (not adjacent though, because he tends to project through thin motel walls).
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    68. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      What's to stop them, apart from simple fucking sense? <:-)

      Just because you can choose to not feel pain doesn't mean you're going to be blasé about life-threatening situations. If you know you're hurt and you know you're in trouble, I seriously doubt most normal people[2] would choose to damage themselves to the extent that it become an evolutionary pressure.

      Now, the thing I've never understood was why pain persisted for so long, evolutionarily. If homo erectus is wandering about the savannah and he has an unfortunate encounter with a lion, is he (slightly) more likely to survive if he lies on the ground writhing and screaming, or if he scoops up his intestines, holds them in with his hand and runs like buggery?

      [1] Also, skateboarders are not normal people. I know a few (was one for a while), and they already seem to have the ability to turn off pain. Or at least, not the sense to learn form their injuries ;-)

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    69. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "People need to sleep for various reasons (rest, various chemicals get regenerated, etc). It's not a whim of nature."

      Right, because we don't have any vestiges of evolution left that may not have any real use. Like your appendix or anything...

      And before you get snippy, TRY to find sommeone credible who will definitively state why we sleep. Apart from vague suppositions, there is no real consensus on the WHY of sleep at all.

    70. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      I'm still paying for that crap, ten years later. It's totally not worth it.

      I was wise enough to take this advice while I was in college.

      The problem is that you have your CS degree, and I don't.

      So now ask yourself, was it not worth it?

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    71. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't mean to be facetious, but have you tried an hour of yoga and a good spliff?

      Or failing that, Russel & Norvig's "Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach"? My university-long insomnia cure - never could get more than four pages in before I dropped off...

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    72. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first thought when I read about this drug was, gee, Maybe I could have gotten an A in CalcII if only this drug has been available! My all night study session would have given me the knowledge, with out the detrimental sleep deprivation!

    73. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by zardo · · Score: 1
      I drink one cup of coffee as soon as I get in to work every day. I have a box of folgers singles in my desk.

      It's a fix for the insomnia, which I've had as long as I can remember. I only started drinking coffee around age 19, when I started my career.

    74. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't trolling. I still don't see why we need [so much] sleep if we can do something to lessen the effects of a lack of sleep.

    75. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Bobby+Infinity · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend took some of those "next-generation" sleep drugs for the first time when we were on vacation with some friends. She went to bed before us while we stayed up for a while. About an hour later she came upstairs talking giberish. The stuff she was staying was off the wall. She was acting extremly emotional (even for a woman). Apparently, they gave her paranoid dilusions. Just from seeing her reaction to them, the closest I'd ever come to using a sleep aid would be some booze.

    76. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by zardo · · Score: 1

      It was Amitriptyline, generic for Elavil. It's not as powerful of an anti-depressant, being in an older class called tri-cyclics, I didn't notice any of the effects the newer SSRI's have (looks like trazodone is an SSRI). You may want to give it a try, it's dirt cheap.

    77. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Stalemate · · Score: 1

      Well.. I don't argue with the someone who quotes Kramer, VoidWraith. It's an argument you can't win!

    78. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by QuantumPion · · Score: 0

      Actually in that case if you pick up your innards and start running, causing your heart rate to increase, you will end up pumping all your blood out and quickly succumb. However, if you remain on the ground, you are more likely to go into shock which will lower your heart rate and slow bleeding, at the same time the screaming will hopefully attract help from anyone nearby that can possible rescue you.

    79. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "If all else fails, try a serving or two of beer or wine before bedtime."

      Ok, this is the WORST thing you have listed, by far.

      Alcohol prevents you from reaching the deepest levels of sleep, and turns into a STIMULANT when processed by the body.

      Leave the advice to the experts (I'm not one, but I have been to several)

    80. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by ifwm · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. Alcohol disrupts your sleep pattern, preventing you from reaching the most restful sleep states.

      And it also becomes a mild stimulant when processed by the body.

    81. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by ifwm · · Score: 1

      If she was a hnoest neurscientist, she'd admit to you that she was guessing, and that it's entirely possible that the effect is psychosomatic.

      No one knows why we sleep, even the experts. The best they can do is hammer away one substance at a time until they get the combo right.

      I hate being an insomniac.

    82. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't hurt for a while, there's less of a disincentive for you to avoid the behavior in the future.

      Prolonged pain after the damage is done (like from a burn) should perhaps be interpreted as "I mean REALLY don't touch fire, dammit!!!", not "Take your hand off the flame. Take your hand off the flame. Take your hand off the flame."

      And lets face it: sometimes our instincts make better decisions for us than our intellects. what we intellectually do. For example, a programmer just out of college may WANT to work 110 hours / week, but that's genuinely not good for him. He needs the sleep to do things like transfer short-term memories into long-term memory. Also to repair DNA damage (I think). But because he's not aware of those reasons to get sleep, he might (foolishly) choose to stay awake if only he could take the drug that this article talks about.

    83. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by borawjm · · Score: 1

      I have the same feeling about poison ivy/oak/sumac. It would be nice to not itch so much from a reaction. I understand that it's natures way of telling me that something's wrong.. but why be so cruel! Argh where's the turpentine!

    84. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Simple experiment: Remove your appendix and see what happens. Then, stop sleeping and see what happens.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    85. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by ifwm · · Score: 1

      When I played volleyball in college, I got roomed with just such a person.

      Every time he snored, I woke him up. Since I was always up anyway (being a real live insomniac), he SUFFERED, and begged to be moved to a different room.

      I get pretty surly when people fuck with my sleep.

    86. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I skinned my knee. I know I skinned my knee. I can see it. I'm looking right at it. I just cleaned the darn thing. Yet it still smarts like hell.

      Why can't I turn off the darn pain receptors?
      Why, as a (okay, this next bit is questionable, but just go with it) intelligent being can't I just acknowledge those signals, and snooze them or something?

      If Joe Average's computer's antivirus system has a pop-up that tells Joe that the antivirus system needs to be updated, and it has snooze and update buttons, which one will Joe hit ? Snooze, of course - that way he doesn't have to interrupt whatever he's currently doing.

      Now, if that same Joe Average will go to tend to his garden, and hurts his knee, getting dirt into the wound, will he continue gardening or will he get the wound cleaned and dressed ? The latter, of course. Why ? Because it hurts like hell and pain doesn't have a snooze button.

      Human bodys user interface assumes that the user is an idiot. Consequently, the important messages (thirst, hunger, pain, sleepiness, fear, lust) don't have snooze buttons, because they tell the user about important things that need to be taken care of right now instead of waiting for the current entertainment to be finished (a bit like interrupts with computers). If reacting to them is postponed, the user may die (expect in the case of lust, which is there to bring about the next generation), so making sure that they are taken care of takes priority over any discomfort the user may experience.

      Or, to put it another way, survival is more important than comfort.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    87. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a pussy then.

      In my college days, and initial dot-com startup hating life days I would go a week on 8 hours of sleep. I suffered for about 2 weeks after, and then just got healthy.

      It's probably your fat ass and doritos that is causing you to pay for it.

    88. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by joh · · Score: 1

      Why can't I turn off the darn pain receptors?
      Why, as a (okay, this next bit is questionable, but just go with it) intelligent being can't I just acknowledge those signals, and snooze them or something?
      I know. It hurts. Leave me alone until I get to the hospital.


      Well, you can. More or less. Nothing easier than that. When you're in a situation like that, just try to accept the pain. Fall into it. Become the pain. And it's gone. Try it. The major factor in pain is fear, not the pain itself. Get over the fear and you've mastered the pain. So accept it, probe into it, as if you'd be enjoying it and tell yourself "it's just a signal, no need to panic" and you will see that pain is easy to bear.

      I had a time where I had some lengthy sessions with the dentist and learned that just by relaxing and looking right into it I could degrade pain to be nothing more than a sensory input among others. Trying to ignore it or to fight it is futile and makes it "painful" in the first place. Accept it instead and let it fill your mind and you'll see it's gone.

      Our mind is based on complex chemical and electric processes and all drugs are like going with a soldering iron at a computer CPU. It's much easier to just re-adjust some lines of code or to change the priority of some process. Try it and you'll it works.

      If this drug can keep us from actually needing to sleep, then it's just like my knee. I don't really need to sleep, but nobody's actually informed my body yet.

      Hah! You don't have a body, you are a body!

    89. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I've often thought about why we still have certain primal signals.

      It's evolutionary. We don't actually need a lot of things with the human body. Take the appendix for example... However, it would take a lot of technology to get around this.

      The best case scenario would be to replace the body with something totally synthetic. Think Ghost in the Shell where the brain is encapsulated in a vat or cyberbrain enclosure.

      With a total machine or prosthetic body you would no longer need to sleep, eat, feel pain, go to the bathroom and various other things. Of course that level of technology may not exist for another 50 years or so and will open it's own can of worms. I would suggest reading up on Transhumanism which is mostly about Philosophy on what happens to humans after that get rid of the physical limitations of being human.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    90. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      My favorite oddball drugs that are heavily advertised are the "prevents that uncomfortable full feeling" and "cures fullness".

      This is an actual drug? I've never heard of this.
      If someone really needs the drug that bad, I have some non-medical advice.

      PUT THE FORK DOWN ONCE IN A WHILE, FATASS.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    91. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      and once you hear a woman fart, the magic is gone....

      This gives new meaning to the classic escaping magic smoke joke.

    92. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      The pain isn't just for you, its there for a reason. There are people who don't feel any pain at all and they never know when something is amiss with their body and many times before its too late, also if you shut off your pain receptors you'd also shut off the exact same receptors that give you pleasure. It's a double edged sword they say.

    93. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by aduzik · · Score: 1
      HAHA. I think I might still have that text around somewhere. Fortunately, the professor who taught the intro AI class was well-known for being an easy A, so I never felt the need to read more than about two or three pages.

      Although, come to think of it, his PowerPoint slides were usually pretty sleep-inducing.

      It's been a really long time since I've smoked. Although I think I did sleep better in those days. Hmm... wonder if I still know any dealers...

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    94. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Thank you for updating Microsoft Windows. Restart your computer now or we will break your knees."

    95. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by superstick58 · · Score: 1
      I've read a few articles (Time is one that I can remember) that described sleep not as a physical need, but a mental need. The basics of the articles say that we need to sleep to convert the days memories and thoughts into long term storage and to reinforce the connections between neurons for things that were learned. Apparently the body doesn't mind so much going without sleep, but it's pretty apparent what happens to the mind if you stay awake for too long.

      Of course, it's probably a combination of mind and body, but I like the explanation of recharging the mind.

    96. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Couldn't agree with you more. There definitely is no consensus on why sleep is necessary.

      One of the more interesting theories I've read about the reason we sleep is this: since we are not nocturnal animals, roaming around in the dark was not good for our ancestors: with limited senses that can perceive in the dark, the chances of getting killed by a predator or for other reasons were pretty high. So the theory says thats sleep might have evolved as a way to get us to shut the heck up and be inactive at night, rather than be active and get killed.

    97. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Hah! You don't have a body, you are a body!

      The mind doesn't own a body, but the mind's consciousness and the body are two separate unique beings but both must be present to be aware of reality.

      The body can function without a conscious mind (on life support and feeding tube), but consciousness must have the mind to function, as we know it. You are that consciousness and well... If you don't have that consciousness then you don't exist now do you? Of course this leads to the debate whether other people exist or not, but in truth you can only prove to yourself that you alone exist and must assume that everyone else exists and you cannot even prove that you do not exist and if you are even aware of this fact than it's obvious that you are conscious and somewhat aware and therefore do exist.

      As a Buddhist saying goes "You are neither body or mind, but neither are you not the body or mind." (Strange double negative saying)

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    98. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1
      Why can't I turn off the darn pain receptors?
      Why, as a (okay, this next bit is questionable, but just go with it) intelligent being can't I just acknowledge those signals, and snooze them or something?

      As an intelligent being, you can take painkillers and/or seek proper treatment. That turns off the darn pain receptors, partially at least.

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    99. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by NetSettler · · Score: 1
      People need to sleep for various reasons (rest, various chemicals get regenerated, etc). It's not a whim of nature.

      It's likely chemicals can replace missing chemicals. It's not likely chemicals can replace computation. SO the question comes down to one of whether what the brain is doing is merely "regenerating" or if it's instead "actively computing".

      If all the brain is doing in sleep is rebooting (zeroing memory) then a chemical might really help. If instead it is doing a neural net training cycle, and hence aquiring not just history records ("what happened yesterday?"), which might be easily testable, but also skill improvement ("how could I do better tomorrow?"), which might be harder to test, then it's hard to see how you could add a chemical that makes it better. I guess if the chemical cranks the clock cycle, it might make something run faster, but I doubt it would make you feel more rested if it ran you at a higher speed.

      I think they should not only test whether it restores prior memories but whether it inhibits "sleep learning" and "overnight insight", if indeed these can be quantified at all.

      Rather than just testing people on whether they can do a skill that is probably well-understood to them, they should see how fast they learn new skills (e.g., how to become expert at a video game) when they are or are not under the effect of this drug. On the assumption that some people get better while they sleep and their dreams are constructing and testing hypotheses or running other neural training examples, one might construct a test based on the idea that these effects could be neutralized by the drug "skipping a step".

      I think there are already studies that have been done of similar nature to do with what happens when you interrupt someone's sleep cycle to prevent or slice up their REM sleep phases. This other stuff would fit in.

      In sum, I think it's one thing to "restore your ability to do a new day" and it's quite another to "make sure you made full use of the previous day". It sounds like the drug does the former, but that they didn't test the latter.

      --

      Kent M Pitman
      Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

    100. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall hearing that, aside from very small mammals, the energy savings are not great enough to explain the need for sleep.

    101. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by shayne321 · · Score: 1
      FUD. You cannot die from an overdose of GHB. If you managed to ingest tons and tons you would die from the sodium content (most street GHB is NaGHB) long before the GHB had any effect. Deaths have been attributed to GHB, but in 100% of those cases the victim took GHB along with another CNS depressant (alcohol, xanex, ketamine, etc). As long as you are not taking any other CNS depressants you can drink ounces of GHB and all that will happen is you will sleep for 3 or 4 hours and wake up feeling fine.

      Maybe you meant to say that the Recreational dose is close to a dose which causes you to sleep, and in this case you would be correct. But you cannot die from GHB alone.

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    102. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      ""cures fullness".

      This is an actual drug? I've never heard of this."

      Yah it's called pot...

    103. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by ewieling · · Score: 1
      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    104. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      In the lion situation, pain doesn't stop you "scooping up your intestines and running" as it were. The body can still do what it needs to even in immense agony. Read this.

      A doctor friend of mine described for me in detail what was actually involved in this. He had to cut through each of the nerves one by one with a blunt knife. Twang...twang... twang....
      Shudder!

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    105. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Duck+of+Death · · Score: 1

      That's been my question since I was a kid. Why do I get tired? Has something built up in my body and brain that needs to be cleaned out? Or has something been used up that needs to be replenished.

      With a full time job, 2 kids and a working spouse, I would not be interested in using this drug for work, I would want to use it to increase my leisure time. Sometimes after a hard day and an equally tough evening, I lay down in bed at 10pm, pick up a book, read two paragraphs and start dozing off. I don't want to sleep dammit! I want to read my book for awhile.

      DD

      --
      "Can I finish? Can I finish? ... Okay, I'm finished."
    106. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by parvati · · Score: 1

      One word: Provigil. It's FDA-approved for narcolepsy, but many doctors will prescribe it if you have chronic insomnia. I got my rx when I pointed out to my doc that, if there was nothing that could put me to sleep, I might as well take something that would keep me awake. It's been a wonder drug for me: no side effects, and I don't have to be terrified of falling asleep while driving to work in the morning. It's as close to normal as I've been in a decade.

    107. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Oh... Well, the symptoms of the lack of sleep are just that, symptoms. Just like how an inflammed appendix hurts, if you take painkillers and it stops the pain, that doesn't mean it's ok. You're going to die and not realise it. Sleep deprivation is harmful, regardless of if you can fight the symptoms or not. I'd imagine that someone would go on living a perfectly normal life without sleep taking these pills and then one day just die (pure speculation).

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    108. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      My husband has severe sleep apnea. I t went undiagnosed for over 10 years (while they misdiagnosed him with bi-polar, depressions, epilespy, etc...), and they are still not sure if he has a side serving of narcolepsy. His has a 10 year deficiet on levels 3 and 4 deep sleep.

      For someone like him, who suffers from short term memory problems, occasional sleep deprevation based hallucinations and major irritability issues, this could be a godsend. I will be forwarding copies of the article to him to take to his specialist.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    109. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be modded up; the brain is very active during sleep (going through the various stages, each with different activity), and obviously requires large amounts of it. Dolphins for example need to stay awake almost continuously, lest they drown. But even then they still let one half of their brain sleep at a time, so their brains still apparently need to switch over to sleep mode just as ours do. Also, for neural networks (extremely simplistic simulations of the brain) there is a "wake-sleep" algorithm, which uses cycles of interaction with the environment (wake) and internal processing (sleep), which can be used to easily teach such a network to recognize patterns in its input. Very interesting stuff.

    110. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      Just a tip from a hypnotherapist & sympathetic ex-insomniac: learn self-hypnosis & progressive relaxation. A hypnotic trance is very similar to sleep and even provides many of the benefits.

      If you want other tips (free), email me - address on website.

    111. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by numbski · · Score: 1

      Another couple minutes? More like a couple more hours, and that's after 8-10 hours of sleep. :\

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    112. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by willy_me · · Score: 1

      But I wonder how true this really is. Why do we need ~8h of sleep? Why do we have different levels of sleep?

      Here's my take on it - and for the record, I have narcolepsy so I've researched this quite a bit. Firstly, we need sleep but the reason why we sleep for ~8h is that during our evolution there was no need for us to be awake at night. It's dark, so to be awake would be a waste of energy. But it would also be dangerous for us to sleep deeply throughout the entire night - predators might attack.

      The solution is to sleep for ~8h per night but to also sleep in cycles. During some cycles you are fast asleep and during others you'll wake up at the drop of a pin. When sleeping in groups, it's very likely that there would always be someone alert enough to wake up and alert the group in case of predators.

      This solutions minimizes energy use by sleeping throughout the night, minimizes potential danger from predators (remember that people evolved in groups), while still allowing us to get the necessary recovery time.

      Ok, enough with the past. In today's world, do we really need to sleep for ~8h a night? We have electricity and can be productive during the night. We don't have to worry about starving. And finally, we don't have to worry about predators. So if we can trick our body into going into a deep sleep and getting the required rest in ~3h, why don't we?

      So I agree that there is no such thing as "a whim of nature", but do we really have to wait for us to evolve in order to change? Now I don't think that this drug is the right solution to this problem, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't keep looking.

      fyi, Narcolepsy is the result of missing a small portion of the brain required for producing this chemical required for going into deep sleep. As a result, one sleeps all the time without getting rested. It sucks... They are currently looking at creating that chemical artificially - but it is still 10-15 years away.

    113. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, there's not a clear consensus on why we need sleep. I mean, it does a number of things, and we've figured many of them out, but as far as biology goes none of them seems to be a deal-breaker.

      If I recall correctly, a psychology professor once mentioned that the very few people who literally do not dream--as opposed to those who simply don't remember their dreams--die in a relatively short period. Is this inaccurate? If it's true, that would seem to be a dealbreaker to me.

    114. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Mondoz · · Score: 1

      I think your example was a bit more extreme...
      I wasn't talking about repeatedly deadening the nerves, just letting me acknowledging the signals once they've been tended to, and move on appropriately.

      In my skinned knee example, I wanted to turn off the pain after I had already cleaned it. I didn't want to turn off the pain as I was sitting there in the dirt, getting infected just so I could go on pulling weeds.
      I want the notification, I want to know there's something wrong. Ow! My liver!
      But once I know, once I get proper treatment, get the right medications, etc... why do I have to endure the pain?

      Why can't it be an informative sensation instead of a painful one?

      I'd like a HUD explaining the condition of my major organs, skin condition, blood alcohol content, lung capacity, etc... No pain please. If something goes wrong, let me see it on the monitors. No need for nasty primal painful sensations, thanks.

      --
      /sig
    115. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by syousef · · Score: 1

      I skinned my knee. I know I skinned my knee. I can see it. I'm looking right at it. I just cleaned the darn thing. Yet it still smarts like hell.

      Why can't I turn off the darn pain receptors?


      Because the pain will deter you from doing it again. Skinning your knee once is no big deal. Skin it 100 times in a short timespan and it's a very big deal.

      Pain is part of what makes you human. There are certainly flaws to the human body, but pain isn't one of them.

      As for sleep, we don't even UNDERSTAND why we need sleep. We do know you end up not functioning correctly without it, so there was probably an evolutionary reason that sleep was/is useful.

      I think you'd want to more fully understand something before seeking to modify it.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    116. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by syousef · · Score: 1

      Sleep disorders are awful. I have sleep apnea. I sleep each night with a mask pumping me up with positive pressure (look up CPAP) since otherwise I'm continually choking in my sleep (and therefore never get to the REM states required for rest).

      So anyway before I was diagnosed I had some real experience with the effects of sleep deprivation. (Even though I'd sleep I'd wake up unrested as if I'd had none). Thankfully my condition is under control (and though I hate the treatment walking around like a zombie is a worse alternative).

      If this drug does what is claimed, and if people can use it sensibly, it could be a very good thing. If it just masks symptoms it's uselss. Like anything empowering if misused by idiot monkies who want to extend their working day to 48 hours we'll all suffer for it.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    117. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I want the notification, I want to know there's something wrong. Ow! My liver!
      But once I know, once I get proper treatment, get the right medications, etc... why do I have to endure the pain?

      How is your nervous system supposed to know if you've gotten proper treatment ? It only knows if there's something wrong in your liver or not. Now, it could read your mind for this information - but suppose the treatment hadn't been effective ? Suppose the liver was still infected, and you only thought that it had been taken care of ? Should the nervous system risk ignoring the "something's still wrong" message from liver (and therefore your life), or should it force you to seek further aid ?

      Why can't it be an informative sensation instead of a painful one?

      Ever seen people speed past red light at crossroads and nearly get themselves (and a lot of other people) killed as a result ? That's why.

      I'd like a HUD explaining the condition of my major organs, skin condition, blood alcohol content, lung capacity, etc... No pain please. If something goes wrong, let me see it on the monitors. No need for nasty primal painful sensations, thanks.

      Common sense speaks with a quiet voice. You have to concentrate to hear it. Pain, on the other hand, shouts with a voice that cannot be ignored.

      Is drinking bad for you ? Yes. Do people still drink ? Yes. Is the same true if you replace drinking with smoking, using drugs, sleeping around, speeding at red lights or any of the stupidly dangerous things people do ? Yes. Why ? Because common sense doesn't stop people from doing stupidly dangerous things, it just can't compete with the excitement of doing so. Common sense might not stop you form picking a fight with a three-meter tall bodybuilding boxing champion, but a fear of the resulting pain will.

      I repeat my earlier statement: Human bodys user interface assumes that the user is an idiot. And add that, based on what I've observed about human behaviour (including my own), this assumption is correct.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    118. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      > I'm still paying for that crap, ten years later. It's totally not worth it.

      Tell me about it. I never did extended awake time, but instead spent about 2 years averaging 5 hours sleep a night, including one fortnight where I had something on the order of 2 hours sleep a night.

      I look back at this, and particularly moments like falling asleep while talking to someone, and wonder what I was thinking.

    119. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

      LOL

      That was funny! ;-)

      I've just been given some mod points (again, sigh), and thought about giving you one extra +1 funny - or just say something.

      Decided for the latter, hope you don't mind; you'll get an extra, no doubt.

      --
      --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
    120. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      Not that I disagree but our bodies tell us a lot of stupid things too. Like, eat that cheeseburger. Eat another one. Now drink that shake. Ok, go into a coma in your lazy-boy recliner in front of reruns of 1970s game shows.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    121. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In all seriousness, there are two things that will put me right to sleep without a doubt: sex and marijuana.

      Smoke a joint and either arouse your spouse's interest or proceed to toss one off. If you're not in dreamland within 15 minutes after the show's over, I don't know what to tell you. I sleep like a baby under these conditions.

    122. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by nihilogos · · Score: 1

      I'm still paying for that crap, ten years later. It's totally not worth it.

      Wow. Your amphetameine dealer let you pay it off over 10 years?

      --
      :wq
    123. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "there are no remaining clinical uses for it"

      Another LIE. Why do you INSIST on lying, even when I've made it clear that there are clinical uses for it. Now I'm sure you're a liar, because you responded to MY post, in which I stated it is still used for eye surgery.

      So, what is your excuse now, LIEUTENANT LIAR?

      "It's by discussion that we reduce misinformation."

      No, It's by discussion that I am reducing the misinformation, you CONTINUE to lie, intentionally or not. Regardless of what you claim to know, the facts, which you clearly failed to bother with, prove you wrong.

      Over and over you attempted to appear to be an authority, and when called on it, you tried to change the focus of the discussion.

      Anyone who reads this will probably wonder why I'm so zealous, but they'll KNOW you are a sad, patheitc piece of trash interested in SOUNDING like an authority without actually knowing anything.

      You lied. Admit it. It MAY have been a mistake, but when you typed this

      "We were having this discussion further up the thread and you'd recieved a reply"

      That's when we knew that you had the FACTS (from the very post you admit replying to) and still chose to spread misinformation. What is that other than a LIAR?

    124. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Before I loved you, I loved Scrameustache, another Slashdotter who thought he could go toe to toe with me. I've been ejaculating on his moist buttocks for almost a year now. Do you hear me? One YEAR. You'll have to be a man with stamina to keep up with my sex life.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    125. Re:Don't ignore the signals. by mink · · Score: 1

      Also for people suffering sleap apnea and using CPAP machines booze at night will cause them to be less effective.
      The sleep doctor told me also to confine my exercise to first thing in the morning as nighttime exercise would disrupt my sleep even more.
      I was experianceing around 400 interruption events per night, dangerously low blood oxygene levels and other fun stuff. The CPAP machine has given me the ability to have normal sleep patterns.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  4. Heart attack in a pill by bigwavejas · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Sleep is critical for muscles/ organs to rebuild themselves. If I were Cortex I'd be a bit hesitant to release this drug to the public, without the strictest prescription. Lest they end up like Merck with Vioxx

    --
    "Simplify, simplify, simplify!" Thoreau
    1. Re:Heart attack in a pill by WVDominick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There have been studies that suggest sleep is simply a method for the brain to purge itself of "weak memories" (basically clean up the clutter) rather than rebuilding muscles/organs as you suggest. Has anybody else read these studies? I wish I had a link for the one I read. I'll look for it.

    2. Re:Heart attack in a pill by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1

      Maybe conjecture as opposed to studies. And, on that note, let's start a memory-erasing company that will purge all of a person's "weak memories" so that he/she doesn't need to sleep! Our first order of business will be to devise a method that will erase the person's memory of visiting us at all! Our slogan will be, "Only the strong survive!"

      --

      ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    3. Re:Heart attack in a pill by SunPin · · Score: 1

      That is a misconception not supported by facts.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    4. Re:Heart attack in a pill by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that sleep is only required by the brain, and that the rest of the body only requires rest. Do you have any sources to support your assertion? (I don't have any to support mine to hand, but I might be able to dig some out later)

    5. Re:Heart attack in a pill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was under the impression that sleep is only required by the brain, and that the rest of the body only requires rest.

      IIRC, it's because the brain controls hormone production and the hormones do the other stuff. But no, I don't have a source for that to hand.

    6. Re:Heart attack in a pill by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      There have been studies that suggest sleep is simply a method for the brain to purge itself of "weak memories" (basically clean up the clutter) rather than rebuilding muscles/organs as you suggest. Has anybody else read these studies? I wish I had a link for the one I read. I'll look for it.

      Interesting, but it doesn't explain why my cats sleep so darned much.

      It's not like they really need to purge a bunch of 'food, chase the mouse, take a dump, lick butt, repeat' memories each day.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    7. Re:Heart attack in a pill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Misconception that your body needs sleep? Tell you what, why don't you stay up for 24 hours a day the rest of your life (however short that may be), we'll see who outlives who.

    8. Re:Heart attack in a pill by zymano · · Score: 1

      Sleep coincides with darkness. There is also activity happening in the brain .

      Sleep is mainly energy conservation. All animals do it.

    9. Re:Heart attack in a pill by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Will Kirsten Dunst jump around in her underwear? IF so, I'm so fucking there

    10. Re:Heart attack in a pill by itchy92 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not like they really need to purge a bunch of 'food, chase the mouse, take a dump, lick butt, repeat' memories each day.

      Quite to the contrary, if I spent the day licking my own butt, I'd probably need my memory erased every night, too.

      --
      Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
    11. Re:Heart attack in a pill by jafac · · Score: 1

      Merck got nailed because they were too cheap to slap a warning label on their pills. They knew they were dangerous. But didn't want to put on a warning label.

      If Cortex puts a warning label on their bottle, and does proper due dilligence with their studies and tests, they have nothing to worry about.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  5. Slep deprvaiton .. by Entropy · · Score: 3, Funny

    wuld it lt me imporv my tiping and speeling after 60 ours playing mmporgs?

    --
    The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
    1. Re:Slep deprvaiton .. by Mondoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How long till WoW vendors start selling this stuff?

      --
      /sig
  6. They tested with monkeys... by Fitzghon · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and now they want Slashdot junkies?

    Fitzghon

    1. Re:They tested with monkeys... by alfrin · · Score: 0

      don't you mean Slashdot monkeys? I guess it's all the same

    2. Re:They tested with monkeys... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Talk about a step backwards...

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  7. bad movie plot by boarder · · Score: 1

    Does this remind anyone else of that movie Project X with Matthew Broderick? Won't these scientists ever learn?

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  8. Slashdot by saskboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I stopped reading slashdot until 12:00AM that would help with my sleep deprivation, without the use of drugs.

    I have a feeling most other computer users would find the same benefits from turning off their computers at 10:00PM.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Slashdot by sameerdesai · · Score: 1

      You betcha. I keep in mind to not sit in front of my computer after 9 pm. Unfortunately I have taken to watching tv and watching adult swim till late night. Arghh....

    2. Re:Slashdot by vertinox · · Score: 2, Funny

      It doesn't matter what time you go to sleep. It is the time when you wake up that counts.

      You could go to sleep at 4am and still be refreshed the next morning... Err... Afternoon. Well.. As long as it's after 2pm and you have to get up to go to the bathroom and can't sleep anymore and since you're in the bathroom you might as well take a shower and maybe since you are already up you might as well check your email... Next thing you know it's 3am and you start to think that maybe you should stop playing WoW at this point, but you're this close to the next level... Argh...

      Ah the joys of unemployement... Not that I am talking on personal experience or anything. *coughs*

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:Slashdot by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 2, Funny
      I have a feeling most other computer users would find the same benefits from turning off their computers at 10:00PM.

      Blasphemy! Everyone knows the really good shit doesn't start happending until 4 am or 3 hours before you have get to work.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    4. Re:Slashdot by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It worked for me.

      I went for a week where I didn't allow myself to stay on the computer later than 10:00PM because of a severely distorted sleeping schedule, and by the end of the week, I had my schedule back to a very sane 11PM-8AM (I'm a teenager, so that might even be a little on the light side compared to some others, haha.) and I felt considerably more alert, as well as just feeling more healthy.

      I doubt this drug will become a sleep replacement for the average man, but I can see it being used to help at critical times, such as having an emergency amount of it on-board a space shuttle in the event of a prolonged emergency where maximum alertness is necesary or similar scenarios.

      I wouldn't mind having a few doses of this, though, for LAN parties. While everyone else is struggling to drag their mouse across their mousepad, I'll still be zipping around, even long after the Bawls run out.

    5. Re:Slashdot by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Not for me. The issue isn't that I stay glued to my PC, gaming or surfing or whatever; the issue is that I simply neither want nor feel the need to go to bed until significantly later than I should.

      Without a PC, I'd just stay up watching TV, or reading, or doing something else (and on occasion, I do just that).

    6. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think the problem is that not enough computer geeks have a woman or man to keep them interested in going to bed on time.

    7. Re:Slashdot by zardo · · Score: 1
      You couldn't be more wrong. Sitting at the computer until my eyes water is one of the things that helps me sleep. You light sleeper types just don't understand, you're not the same as us. I have tricks I use to go to sleep, I have to wear my brain out at night before I can sleep, I have to be tired of thinking or I won't sleep. If I go lay down in bed with something on my mind, I think about it as hard as I possibly can until I'm ready to sleep (which usually comes unexpectedly). We can't just lay down and turn off like you people.

      My suspicion is we should just operate at a +4-6 hour day, wake up at 2PM and go to sleep at 5AM. I would prefer that, but doesn't work out well for a programmer unless I'm self employed. I think there should be some laws to make life easier for the so called insomniacs. (I prefer to be called a night person).

    8. Re:Slashdot by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      It does matter when you go to sleep.

      actually, for most people, the liver flushes at night. It's why people with gall bladder problems tend to have the most pain at night, as it contracts to dump dead blood cells, cholesterol, and toxins from the liver. the assumption is to rid the body of the stuff while you're not doing anything to minimize damage to organs and systems. So you work through the night and you work through the "dump" cycle, and you do the body some harm. Sleep is associated with increases in serum levels of growth hormone, but those levels are highest during night sleep, which is why even an 8 hour nap is not as refreshing as a night's worth of sleep.

      For the most part, unless you want to be recycling all that mercury from the salmon you had for dinner, its in your best interest to get a good night's sleep.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    9. Re:Slashdot by saskboy · · Score: 1

      For 90% of people, they'd benefit from going to sleep at a time closer to when the sun sets, and getting up about the time it rises. The other 10% have found ways to get around doing that, and remain healthy, but I'm certain that a majority of society's ills come at least in part from sleep deprivation.

      Wearing out your brain is a physically demaning job, I don't deny that. Real energy is expended through serious thinking, but I think you're having trouble falling asleep at night not because your brain isn't worn out, but rather because your body isn't worn out. How much physical activity do you do in a day? Are you biking for about 30 minutes, walking for 45 minutes, or working outdoors for a few hours? If not then you're probably not getting enough physical activity, and if you did you'd find you'd fall asleep after being in bed for 30 minutes or much much less. When I was younger I had trouble falling alseep the first hour I was in bed, so I read and daydreamed. Now that I'm not getting enough sleep, and I bike about 20 minutes a day at least, I can get to sleep in minutes.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    10. Re:Slashdot by zardo · · Score: 1
      I'm not training for a triathlon or anything, but I'm not overweight, I walk around the corner to buy lunch most days, I have dogs I walk a couple times a week, I do yard work on the weekends. I hiked about 6.5 miles last saturday which left my legs feeling sore, I went to sleep at 3 or 4am that night, like most friday and saturday nights although like you say I'm sure I would have been able to sleep earlier. My wife hardly does anything physical during the day, she falls asleep during almost every movie we watch at home, takes her 60 seconds to fall asleep in bed. She sleeps TOO good, she went to see a doctor about it but doc says she's fine, she just needs to get more physical activity. Go figure.

      So what I'm saying is there is a biological difference between us, your 90/10 figures I think are off, I'd say 1 in 4 people have some degree of insomnia, another 1 in 4 maybe sleep too well, perhaps half of society has a perfect sleep at night.

    11. Re:Slashdot by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't mind having a few doses of this, though, for LAN parties. While everyone else is struggling to drag their mouse across their mousepad, I'll still be zipping around, even long after the Bawls run out.

      There's already a drug for this purpose. It's an alkaloid from some plant in South America. Because of typical government overregulation, it is not available over the counter, but your local street corner may have an independent entrepreneur or two willing to sell it to you.

    12. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that half the fun?.. wait.. high school? have you to a lan party with liquor yet? you'll understand.

      err. i mean, stay away from booze. it's bad for you and stuff.

    13. Re:Slashdot by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 1

      Way ahead of you. I already have a strict personal no-drinking policy. Alcohol just doesn't interest me. Although, I have no qualms with watching my friends get drunk and make fools of themselves...

  9. In the future... by lxs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...we'll all be working 36 hour shifts.

    1. Re:In the future... by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      Shhh my boss can hear you

    2. Re:In the future... by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1

      Correction:Iin the future, the people of India and China will be working 36 hour shifts!

      --

      ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    3. Re:In the future... by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      What corporate-loving sadist modded this funny? Better science/technology is supposed to bring us less work, not more.


      -Colin

    4. Re:In the future... by FuckTheModerators · · Score: 1

      Meh. In the future there will be robots.

    5. Re:In the future... by Crag · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I could work one 40 hour shift a week, and have the rest of the week off, I'd be thrilled. Even more so if science finds a way to reduce my weekly sleep time without negative health consequences.

    6. Re:In the future... by rhvarona · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean like interns at hospitals have been doing for pretty much forever? Gotta tell my intern friend that she is a time traveler.

  10. Re:Wow, monkey by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    But what are the effects on humans?

    well lets try it out on the /. editors....oh wait...

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  11. That would work for a while by peragrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but People do need REM sleep on a regular basis for our conscience to rest.

    Though I am sure there are many coders who would try it for a week to get that project done(aka MSFT forcing it on longhorn developers?)

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    1. Re:That would work for a while by RoadKillian · · Score: 1
      but People do need REM sleep on a regular basis for our conscience to rest.

      I'm autistic and only get 5 minutes of REM sleep during a 12 hour resting period. Is my conscience an insomniac?

    2. Re:That would work for a while by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      but People do need REM sleep on a regular basis for our conscience to rest. Though I am sure there are many coders who would try it for a week to get that project done(aka MSFT forcing it on longhorn developers?)

      Which would explain the disappearance of Jiminy Cricket from the MS Labs.

      And I'm not sure what you've been up to if you've been taxing your conscience enough that it needs a rest...

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:That would work for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right.

      Microsoft forces intake of harmful drugs on its underpaid, overworked staff of tortured child-only developers, right? Good one, peragrin.

      You folks just keep getting nicer and more mature by the day, don't you?

    4. Re:That would work for a while by protoshoggoth · · Score: 1
      At MS I thought you checked your conscience at the door.

      Geez, it's a joke. Some people...

  12. Just in time for me ! by freedom_india · · Score: 1
    Iam going through another sleepless face of design & development now and return home by 1 AM every day.

    Guess this is a boon to me !!!

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    1. Re:Just in time for me ! by WrongByDefinition · · Score: 1

      1 AM?

      Slacker...

  13. /. machinery rusty? by thc69 · · Score: 1

    Just like somebody else said in reply to the last article, I got a "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along." when I clicked on "Read More...".

    ObSleep: I'm frickin tired. Also, I'm prone to bouts of CRS (Can't Remember Schitt). Wait, make that constant CRS. I forgot how bad I have it...

    Maybe I could take this. I suspect that I really do get enough sleep and just fail to believe that I do.

    --
    Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
  14. Lawnmower man by Niebieski · · Score: 1

    I plan on bribing the researcher in injecting me too much of this stuff and then lown my cute neighboor's lawn.

    Oh yeah, and then take over the world.

  15. Grad students! by warmgun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Grad students, rejoice!

  16. Reversal? by matt4077 · · Score: 1

    How are those figures supposed to support the term "reverse"? Would not "mitigate" be the better term, since the drug just improves test performance, slightly more so when tired?

    1. Re:Reversal? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I read the study, it refers to alleviating and mitigating some of the brain effects.

      Article and summary are full of marketing-speak, short on qualifications to their statements.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  17. great! now I can work longer... by utexaspunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...so i can make more money. ...so i can buy more cx717 ...so i can work longer. ...so i can make more money ...so i can buy more cx717 ...so i can...

    1. Re:great! now I can work longer... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      of course, lots of people will think this, employers will begin expecting it, and then you won't be able to make a livable salary by working less than 20 hours a day.

    2. Re:great! now I can work longer... by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Wow. That's probably the first upwards spiral I've ever heard of.

    3. Re:great! now I can work longer... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      i doubt it would go upwards. my prior post was actually based on a classic anti-drug commercial from the 80's- "i do coke so i can work longer, so i can earn more money, so i can buy more coke..."

  18. Meth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately meth has already been invented.

    Yay those damned blue collar tweekers!

  19. Is the trademarked name going to be by joeflies · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Methamphetamine?

  20. Oh boy by bogie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The military is going to love this.

    Expect Cortex's IP to be bought the us mil any second now.

    Of course the real fun will be when they discover that taking this for months and sleeping 1 hour a night, you go insane and think your a humming bee.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Oh boy by youngerpants · · Score: 1
      Honey bee/ humming bird = humming bee


      Dude, I think you need to take some more CX717.

    2. Re:Oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be wonderful! Then you could have soldiers with a strict hive mentality!

      "Johnson! Smith! Go release your stingers at Drop Site Delta! Gordon, hover over there and distract the enemy with your bright yellow behind!"

      "Bzzzzzz! Bzzzz! Bzzzz...!"

    3. Re:Oh boy by MmmmAqua · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have never met anyone in the Army who had any trouble falling asleep any time, anywhere. My experience is limited to cavalry and infantry, though, so maybe that's just something about combat arms troops. Over the course of a year in Baghdad, I was able to fall asleep in some surprising situations.

      Of course, when going on extended missions, we also had the option of asking the platoon medics for stimulants. I don't remember what the name of the drug was, but one little white pill kept you up and alert for about two days. You did crash pretty hard after that. Anyway, while there may be some interest in the military for this drug, its use won't be anywhere near as prevalent as you seem to think. The Army likes its combat units to be operationally ready all the time, but also keeps mission durations and objectives as tight as possible to minimize battle fatigue and risk of combat losses. Sometimes you can't avoid a mission that lasts for a week, and in those (relatively rare - I only remember doing maybe a dozen of those two-day-plus missions over a year) situations, a drug to mitigate sleep-dep would be a godsend.

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
    4. Re:Oh boy by ewieling · · Score: 2, Informative

      we also had the option of asking the platoon medics for stimulants. I don't remember what the name of the drug was, but one little white pill kept you up and alert for about two days. You did crash pretty hard after that.

      I think it's called Crystal Meth. Well, I'm sure they don't call it that....

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    5. Re:Oh boy by sgtsilver · · Score: 1

      Militaries have used drugs to keep their soldiers awake long before this. In WW2 Hitler gave his troops speed to fight for days on end, and there were loads of drugs given to the troops in Vietnam for similar reasons.

    6. Re:Oh boy by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have never met anyone in the Army who had any trouble falling asleep any time, anywhere. My experience is limited to cavalry and infantry, though, so maybe that's just something about combat arms troops.

      Same in the air force. "15 mins until the next aircraft? OK...wake me when he taxis in."
      Snoozing while 120db fighter jets are rolling by 25 feet away is definately doable.

    7. Re:Oh boy by JohnnyLocust · · Score: 1

      It's a shame we can't get the military interested in marijuana instead. I think we'd have a few less wars.

    8. Re:Oh boy by weilawei · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm a military brat and even though I obviously didn't have to go do anything, the amount of travel is insane. I learned to sleep anywhere as well. I think it's just a common trait to all military/dependants.

    9. Re:Oh boy by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      In WW2 Hitler gave his troops speed to fight for days on end

      Speed is still in use today, e.g. by the air force where it has been blamed for many friendly fire incidents.

    10. Re:Oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea no shit, you can thank Hitler for that one.

      Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "Blitzkrieg".

    11. Re:Oh boy by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Snoozing while 120db fighter jets are rolling by 25 feet away is definately doable.

      Well, that beats me, but I did once fall asleep within a couple of metres of a sound system in a night club. That was after taking half a gram or so of speed, too - boy did I get ripped off...

  21. What about caffeine by Kirmeo · · Score: 1

    I guess I can throw out those caffeine pills now. And the diet Coke. And the coffee. Well maybe not the coffee.

  22. WOOOOOOOOOOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Finnaly! Now I can play WOW for weeks!

    1. Re:WOOOOOOOOOOW by cp5i6 · · Score: 1

      But then everyone will hit 60 after the first 2 weeks of playing =(

  23. Soon to follow: beverages by I_am_Rambi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Watch, coffee and pop will soon have versions of with this drug and without this drug. Soon the human race will become dependant on this just as we are on caffinee.

  24. Interesting... by ovit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I read somewhere that a significant biologic reason for sleep was simply that animals who laid down in a dark place for half the time had an evolutionary advantage over thos who didn't (it's about 50% harder to be eaten by a predator if 50% of your time your asleep)...

    Rather than do the usual slashdot "Science is EViL" thing, why not really think about the potential here...

    Yes, they will probably discover that over use of this has some serious side effect, but all that means is that it shouldn't be over used... It does not mean that we all need to run an hide...

    For being a site full of geeks this place is remarkably anti science sometimes...

    1. Re:Interesting... by k_187 · · Score: 2, Informative

      wait, so if you stand still half the time you're harder to catch? right...

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    2. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't know, in the past, I have found that I have a much smaller risk of being of eaten while I am awake and activly defending myself. Unless of course you kickbox in your sleep...

    3. Re:Interesting... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You read wrong. The problem is, there is a direct, linear correlation between body size and amount of time spent sleeping, that has nothing to do with whether one is predator or prey. For example, mice spend the vast majority of their time asleep, while cats spend a good 75% of their time asleep. When you get up to human sized creatures, you expect to see them spend about a third of their life asleep. Elephants sleep about four hours a night. What they do with all those long, dark hours is anybody's guess.

      The question of why we sleep is still a bit of a mystery to me, but if you're simply looking at it as "defense from predators", you're going to fundamentally misunderstand the phenomenon.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    4. Re:Interesting... by rkcallaghan · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Rather than do the usual slashdot "Science is EViL" thing, why not really think about the potential here...

      I'm pretty sure you got modded up just because you insulted Slashdot, which is so ironic it's stupid.

      Not only is Slashdot usually quite excited about new scientific discoveries, at the time of your post there is only one overarcing concern among the other posts -- That the drug if successful would lead to futher destruction of our already overworked lives. This isn't "Science is EViL" it's "Corporations are EViL, and pointing the starvation gun at our heads already saying 'WORK more!' ".

      ~Rebecca

      PS-- For futher irony, mod me up for insulting a mod.

    5. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are always bigger and stronger humans to woop the shit out of you. When you rest for a good portion of the day, you are exposed to a much slimmer portion of humans (even the one's that YOU can kick the shit out of).

    6. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the moderator read the same anti-evolution crackpottery that shows up here every few months and agreed with the poster.

    7. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Your contention that there is a linear correlation between body size and amount of time sleeping seems to be untrue. Mice spend the vast majority of time asleep? If 50.3% is the vast majority, then yes, they do. See here.

    8. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You read wrong. The problem is, there is a direct, linear correlation between body size and amount of time spent sleeping...Elephants sleep about four hours a night."

      So shouldn't elephants then sleep the whole day, if there's a direct linear correlation?

    9. Re:Interesting... by Deideldorfer · · Score: 0

      Do you have sources for this? I am seriously interested.

      --

      Power off before disconnecting connecting connector. Seen on a cash register
    10. Re:Interesting... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see references to research on this. What else seems to be related to body size? The first thing that pops into my mind is metabolism. Mice burn energy fiercely, humans and elephants less so. Could it be that sleep is required to offset some side-effect of the basic metabolism of energy?

      How long do hummingbirds sleep?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    11. Re:Interesting... by bigtangringo · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/artic les/whatissleep.shtml

      Why do we sleep?

      So why do we sleep? This is a question that has baffled scientists for centuries and the answer is, no one is really sure. Some believe that sleep gives the body a chance to recuperate from the day's activities but in reality, the amount of energy saved by sleeping for even eight hours is miniscule - about 50 kCal, the same amount of energy in a piece of toast.

      We have to sleep because it is essential to maintaining normal levels of cognitive skills such as speech, memory, innovative and flexible thinking. In other words, sleep plays a significant role in brain development.


      Personally, I'm a fan of the "so you don't get eaten" school of thought. But really, we have no damn idea.

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    12. Re:Interesting... by bigtangringo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh, you're also dead wrong about the size thing, from the same article I just posted:
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/artic les/whatissleep.shtml

      Species Average total sleep time per day
      Python 18 hrs
      Tiger 15.8 hrs
      Cat 12.1 hrs
      Chimpanzee 9.7 hrs
      Sheep 3.8 hrs
      African elephant 3.3 hrs
      Giraffe 1.9 hr

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    13. Re:Interesting... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

      How about this: We sleep because it is too dark for that 1/3 of our life to do much of anything else. If we were active during that time, we'd stumble over things, fall and get hurt.

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    14. Re:Interesting... by pla · · Score: 1

      Rather than do the usual slashdot "Science is EViL" thing, why not really think about the potential here...

      Think about the potential... Hmm, let's see... 168 hour work weeks. 24-hour "rush hour" traffic. Overpopulation as bored people start "getting it on" more to pass the time. Massively increased demands on the electrical grid. And of course the obvious, no more sleeping and dreaming (I happen to enjoy sleep - I consider it something to look forward to every night, not as some sort of nuissance that interferes with my available productivity).

      And those assume this drug works perfectly and safely. Based on past attempts at freeing humans from our need for sleep, I wouldn't bet my health or sanity on CX717 as a magic bullet.

    15. Re:Interesting... by thefirelane · · Score: 1

      >How long do hummingbirds sleep?

      Hummingbirds actually enter a form of hibernation at night, so they are a little different. Otherwise, their afore mentioned high metabolism would kill them as they paused feeding for sleep

    16. Re:Interesting... by YankeeInExile · · Score: 1

      Does this mean, that if I continue to gain weight I will need less sleep?

      Woohoo! Pass me another jelly donut!

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    17. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the body mass data you just described, does that mean the average computer nerd only needs to sleep 2 hours/night?

    18. Re:Interesting... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I don't know about dead wrong. There is variance in any trend, and no rule regarding something as broad as sleep is going to be a perfect linear curve.

      Overall it seems that the larger the mammal, the less sleep it needs. I don't think non-mammalian species are relevant to our discussion.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    19. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...perfect linear curve...

      Could you draw that for me?

    20. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're missing the fact that herbivores sleep a lot less than carnivores or omnivores, simply because they need longer feeding hours to maintain an adequate nutritional intake.

      The larger mammals tend to be herbivores simply because carnivores require a huge prey population for a stable population (eg. to support a pack of 20 breeding wolves, you might require a group of 200 breeding caribou). Once large carnivores get over a certain size they couldn't effectively form a stable breeding population because they would require a huge stable prey population to sustain them. This counts against them in terms of evolutionary success.

      Because of this quirk, our larger mammals are almost invariably herbivores, and this complicates the issue of sleep.

      To get a clearer idea, it would be better to separate herbivores from carnivores/omnivores, and plot body size versus sleep requirements for both.
      It could be that the trend still holds, and the analysis has probably already been done, but you should be careful not to forget that there are many other complicating factors which influence sleep patterns, including predator patterns, environment and feeding types :)

    21. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if it is true that sleep is evolutionarily advantageous, it doesn't mean that sleep isn't a necessary life function. Using this logic, animals that rejuvenated muscle, hormones, etc. while being asleep had the added benefit of being less likely to be eaten by predators, and so this system won out against other biological systems that did not require sleep. Regardless, sleep is still necessary for the biological processes that created it in the first place. Survival is a result of advantageous adaptations. The emergence of new adaptations are not driven by survival but, instead, by completely random mutations.

    22. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A straight line is a curve. Don't believe me? Open a mathematics textbook and look up the definition of a curve.

    23. Re:Interesting... by stupid_is · · Score: 1
      I wonder if the idea has been floated that having a population asleep for a period of time means that more population can be supported - less energy demands for the sleeping animals means that if an animal is asleep for half the time, it takes less than twice the energy to support twice as many animals. Call it statistical multiplexing population gains, if you will

      Just a thought - IANABiologist

      --
      -- Intelligence is soluble in alcohol
  25. Restores memory loss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know, but that doesn't seem like a selling point to me!

    1. Re:Restores memory loss? by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 1

      I think I read it the same way as you:
      "prevent or restore memory loss" seems like it means "prevent memory loss or cause memory loss.

      So they probably mean it may prevent memory loss or restore lost memory. But you'd have to read the article to be sure right?

      Well, when you read the headline from the last linked article you get "Alzheimer's Memory Loss Possibly Restored by Ampakine CX717". Which is no more helpful. If the reporter didn't use the phrase "may improve memory function". We might never know what he meant.

      Oh, and they want to use this sleep deprivation prevention drug military on pilots. Since they already use stimulants on pilots maybe this is a good thing. But aren't there some nasty long term effects of sleep deprivation? I hope we don't go from accident prone pilots to hallucinating pilots.
  26. side-effects by genckas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Drugs like this end up messing up more than helping. A drug that can alter your normal biological functions (tiredness) and turn you more active cannot have good effects. You need sleep, simple as that. Maybe work should become more efficient instead of keeping people awake (or monkeys).

    --
    --gks
    1. Re:side-effects by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      What? we'll never get the complete works of shakespeare rewritten if we let those lazy monkeys sleep at the typewriters.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  27. EA by wikkiewikkie · · Score: 5, Funny

    In related news, productivity at EA is up 44%.

  28. sideeffects by js3 · · Score: 1

    and what are the side effects? Instant deaths?

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
    1. Re:sideeffects by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Side effects? LUDDITE! We should not care about the side effects (like in Viagra's case, death and blindness) when we are having our Gee Whiz moment with a sexy (purrrrr!) new drug!

      Just take the damned drug and be the test subject for the drug industry. We test Microsoft's software for them, don't we? So it's only natural that we're becoming drug testers for Big Pharma.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  29. Richie Rich foretold this by L.+VeGas · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had a Richie Rich comic book, and his dad took a drug EXACTLY LIKE THIS. And he became EVIL. No kidding.

    Richie Rich: harbinger of the future.

  30. Ahhh.....But... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ... WHY do you need sleep?

    Your turn smart boy.


    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  31. volunteer monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just find it odd that they were able to find monkeys that would volunteer for this experiment.

    1. Re:volunteer monkeys by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      I just find it odd that they were able to find monkeys that would volunteer for this experiment.

      I don't find it odd at all, I mean monkeys need time mor ethan anyone. Its hard enough for them find time to jerk off and fling poo at passerbys, then they have to go forrage for food too. Why do you think they're always picking lice off each other and eating it. Not because it tastes good.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    2. Re:volunteer monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's been pretty hard finding work ever since that "punch the monkey" place shut down...

  32. How much will it cost? by mysterious_w · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because I'm guessing if it's cheap enough they'll start feeding it to Chinese factory workers so they can increase tat output by 100%.

    1. Re:How much will it cost? by hammackj · · Score: 1

      What about the Chinese Gold Farmers?

    2. Re:How much will it cost? by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1
      they'll start feeding it to Chinese factory workers so they can increase tat output by 100%.

      ...so wait, are you saying that Chinese factory workers would turn out twice as many tattoos, or that the tattoos of Chinese factory workers would be twice as productive as before?

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  33. I apologise in advance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a tiresome story. The /. editors have obviously been caught napping.

  34. Fruitition by z3r0w8 · · Score: 0

    It is nice to see that the all the research the US Army has done on its apache pilots is finally getting some civilian play. The military has been injecting its people for years with drugs that no one knows what they are, but a lot of it has to do with off-setting sleep deprivation to be able to perform longer missions more accurately.

    --
    -----
    1. Re:Fruitition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an asshole.

      Oh, you're not? Well then, cite your sources.

      Asshole.

  35. Sometimes it's good to forget. by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was just thinking this morning as I punched in the old door combination for the hundredth time that it would be nice if that memory vanished a bit more quickly.

    Your brain already does a pretty good job at figuring out what memories should be stored strongly and which ones should be left to fade away. It's almost certainly possible to override that mechanism, but you'll probably end up with incredibly vivid memories of things that aren't very relevant.

    Imagine if I popped these pills before studying for organic chemistry in college. Now I'd be having flashbacks of acid/base interactions and other useless trivia while I try to go about my daily job.

    1. Re:Sometimes it's good to forget. by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Imagine if I popped these pills before studying for organic chemistry in college. Now I'd be having flashbacks of acid/base interactions and other useless trivia while I try to go about my daily job.

      So if you'd had access to better drugs in college, you might be having acid flashbacks today?

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    2. Re:Sometimes it's good to forget. by so+sue+mee · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a study that links THC to stimulation of the ability of the body to forget trauma so if you wire this ild combination to some device that will shock you with a minor current of electricity for say 30 times that will induce stress then get some thc and this most recent trauma will disappear forever taking the memory with it

    3. Re:Sometimes it's good to forget. by RayBender · · Score: 1
      Imagine if I popped these pills before studying for organic chemistry in college. Now I'd be having flashbacks of acid/base interactions and other useless trivia while I try to go about my daily job.

      As opposed to just having flashbacks of acid-based interactions in college, eh?

      Besides, some of us wish we could remember our Lewis acid chemistry...

      --
      Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
    4. Re:Sometimes it's good to forget. by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 1

      It's pretty easy to block the transfer of memories from short term to long term. That's one of the reasons why people who have been in serious trauma often forget what happened right before.

      Removing long-term memories is more of a challenge. There have been some studies that suggest that recalled memories can be blocked, though it's not as permanent as people thought.

      Movies like the Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind may be fun to watch, but that sort of surgical removal of memories doesn't seem to be possible. What seems to typically happen is that the connections to recall certain memories are weakened over time due to disuse. My understanding is that those synaptic connections are eventually "reused" in the formation of new memories, though the specifics are very complicated.

    5. Re:Sometimes it's good to forget. by elasticwings · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or worse yet... imagine that you couldn't forget the horrible visage that is tubgirl.

    6. Re:Sometimes it's good to forget. by Brass+Cannon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, acid flash backs are the worst.

      Hey, when you lob it over the plate like that you gotta expect me to take a swing at it.

    7. Re:Sometimes it's good to forget. by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Now I'd be having flashbacks of acid/base...

      I have flashbacks of Ace of Base.

    8. Re:Sometimes it's good to forget. by Gondola · · Score: 1

      I try, but people keep BRINGING IT UP.

    9. Re:Sometimes it's good to forget. by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Tubgirl's not so bad...it's lemonparty (dot org) that you have to watch out for.

      Your hairless ape curiosity won't let you stay away for long. :)

    10. Re:Sometimes it's good to forget. by Gondola · · Score: 1

      If you compare it thusly to tubgirl, there is no freaking way I'm going to go out of my way to see it.

    11. Re:Sometimes it's good to forget. by mink · · Score: 1

      RIMMER: Ha ha ha. Lister, where's my revision timetable?
      CHEN: Sir, it's Saturday night!
      LISTER: Come on, no one works Saturday night!
      RIMMER: You don't work *any* night. You don't work any *day*!
      LISTER: Skive hard, play hard! That's our motto!
      RIMMER: Look, I've got my engineering re-sit on Monday. I don't know anything. Where's my revision timetable?
      LISTER: Wait, is this the thing in all different colours, with all the subjects divided into study periods and rest periods and self testing time?
      RIMMER: It took me seven weeks to make it. I've got to cram my whole revision into one night.
      LISTER: Hang on, is this the thing with the note on it in red which said, "Vital. Valuable. Urgent. Do not touch on pain of death?"
      RIMMER: Yes!
      LISTER: I threw it away.

      LISTER and his friends crack up.

      RIMMER: Ha ha ha ha. Tee hee. Where is it?
      LISTER: No, I didn't. I pinned it up on the wall.
      RIMMER: What? Why?
      LISTER: To dry it out.
      RIMMER: What do you mean, dry it out?
      LISTER: Well, I spilled a cold vindaloo on it. Don't worry, it's a little bit red, but you can read most of it, especially if you scrape the lumps off.
      RIMMER: You spoiled my -- no, I haven't got time. I'm taking learning drugs and all I'm memorising is this conversation.
      PETERSEN: They're illegal!
      RIMMER: (Going into a sort of trance) Where's my revision timetable, Lister? It's Saturday night. No one works Saturday night. You don't work any night. You don't work any day. Skive hard, play hard, that's our motto. Lister, where did you put my revision timetable. It's Saturday night. No one works Saturday night. You don't work...

      He wanders off into the crowd in a daze, muttering to himself.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  36. Misleading summary, article by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Revision: "reverse [some of] the biological and behavioral effects of sleep deprivation"

    This drug also increased test performance in the control group. The increase in test performance was slightly more pronounced in the sleep-deprived group.

    Caffeine would likely show similar results, as would nasal decongestants and stimulant diet pills (both of which are amphetamines).

    Hell, for that matter, I bet crystal meth, in low doses, would produce the same effect.

    Meh, wake me up when the real fix for sleep deprivation is discovered... oh, wait...

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Misleading summary, article by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      ..or mountain dew, the drink of (programming) champions.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    2. Re:Misleading summary, article by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      "CX717 can temporarily alleviate the effects of prolonged periods of sleep deprivation"

      The statement above is from the article also. I find the use of the word "reversal" and "temporary" relief from in direct contradiction of each other. Which is it? Much of the article is dedicated to describing the effects as similar to existing drugs and stimulants. So what is the point then?

      Closed door Cortex Pharmaceuticals corporate meeting: "Yea! If we repackage caffeine, give it a cool name and call it a prescription drug, we can collect insurance dollars and charge 10,000 times what you pay at your local truckstop"
      "Good work team! We can all collect our six figure bonuses now for finding a new way to scam the public out of money."


      Are pharmaceutical companies the tobacco companies of tomorrow or is it the other way around? I forget. ;)

    3. Re:Misleading summary, article by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I read the study, available here: http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request= get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0030299

      The class of compounds being researched does have the potential for being better than amphetamines and other stimulants because of its selectivity for brain function affected by sleep deprivation.

      This could, potentially, mean fewer side effects and less addiction than other stimulants.

      There is also further research to be done regarding the use of this class of compounds to treat non-sleep-deprivation related decreased neuro function. Brain damage due to Alzheimer's comes to mind, and might have been mentioned in the article.

      Finally, look for compounds in this class to be used to make people "better than well" for selected reasons -- airline pilots, truck drivers, baseball players, etc. It will still be several years, perhaps decades, before compounds in this class make it to your pharmacy.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Misleading summary, article by Cadallin · · Score: 0, Troll
      The answer is yes, Pharmaceuticals ARE the tobacco companies of tomorrow. The worst part is, we pay for it both ways. All research in America is at least mostly publicly funded (By all, I mean 90+%) Even Pharmaceutical companies get federal grants to aid in their research, but mostly they just grab stuff done at the big research Uni's. Then when it's time to sell their "product" they bitch and whine about how they need money to do research and reap unholy profits gouging the sick.

      It's disgusting and pathetic. They spend more money hawking their wares than they do coming up with them.

    5. Re:Misleading summary, article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hell, for that matter, I bet crystal meth, in low doses, would produce the same effect.

      It shames me to say it, but when I was a little younger, I used to do just that. I would do a small line of meth every morning when I woke up, just to get me going. I wouldn't do it any other time. For me it was just my morning coffee substitute. As it turned out, it was cheaper than coffee too. I could get meth for $80 a gram, which would last me about a month, which works out to about $3 a day. A vinti latte from Starbucks cost more than that. So meth was quite a bargain in that regard. I had to stop however because it was having a similar affect to my body as drinking 5 cups of coffee all at once, every day.

      For the record, meth is nasty, nasty stuff. Just say "no", kids.

  37. Don't ignore the signals-NoDoze. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The body tell us its tired for a reason - it needs good healthy sleep, in order to keep you all in check. People who avoid sleep, people who keep themselves awake with drugs, people who burn the candle at both ends.. they are just setting themselves up for premature death. Just go to sleep!"

    So what about those rare people who never sleep? What does that say about the necessity of sleep?

    1. Re:Don't ignore the signals-NoDoze. by badmammajamma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is an extremely rare disease (less that 100 people in the world) that is hereditary that makes it impossible for someone to sleep. However, when the onset of this system appears they ALWAYS die within a few months. There is no cure and it's 100% terminal. Anyone tells you that they never sleep and keep going is full of shit.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    2. Re:Don't ignore the signals-NoDoze. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally they start hallucinating and get quite ill.

      Unless of course you're referring to people who have the ability to power nap, getting the sleep they actually need in a much shorter space of time.

    3. Re:Don't ignore the signals-NoDoze. by ClassicG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just in case anybody wants to know more about it, here's the Wikipedia page on that rare disease:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatal_familial_insomn ia

      It's an inherited 'prion' disease, the same type of disease as mad cow disease and it's relatives. Scary stuff.

      --
      I game, therefore I am...
    4. Re:Don't ignore the signals-NoDoze. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, we don't know if the symptom, not being to sleep, or the cause (prions out of whack) results in the person's death. Nor have they tested this new drug on people suffering from the affliction. I doubt it would work because once your prions get out of whack, you are very unlikely to come back. Sleep or no sleep.

    5. Re:Don't ignore the signals-NoDoze. by Angostura · · Score: 1

      From the Wikipedia link, it appears that the disease has many attendent symptoms, of which insomnia is just one small part, so it isn't clear that insomnia is killing the patient.

      Just thought I'd point that out.

  38. From TFA: by jolar · · Score: 0
    CX717 would particularly benefit individuals affected by extended work hours or night shifts.

    What about people who suffer from real sleep disorders, like narcolepsy and insomnia?

  39. Tweekers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh good, now all those meth addicts can stay up for days without all those pesky shadow people.

  40. Long term memory effects? by philodox · · Score: 1

    I remember there being lots of research on how sleep not only helps with the maintenance of chemicals and neurotransmitters within the brain, but also with the formation of long term memory. Although debatable, our REM sleep stage is where our brain goes through and categorizes information, along with forming stronger connections between things that we learned or experienced during the day. If our REM sleep is circumvented, what would happen to our long term memory capabilities?

    I haven't read TFA, but I suppose this new drug may help us in researching what the effect of sleep on long term memory really is. Since extended sleep deprivation ultimately leads to death, psychologists may be able to use this to form better hypotheses.

  41. CX717 Available at 7-11! by gweedoz · · Score: 1

    CX717 is a code word for Red Bull. The lab techs got caught giving monkeys some Red Bull to watch them dance all night and had to come up with a quick cover story.

  42. Plus extended hours for truckers = Perfect timing by GojiraDeMonstah · · Score: 1

    Thanks to the Bush Administration's new extended hours for truckers, America's truck drivers will need an extra boost to keep them awake. Happy highway driving!

    --
    "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it's just a goddamned piece of paper!" - George W. Bush Nov. 2005
  43. Another sleep depriving drug... by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    I saw something a little similar to this a couple months ago I read an article talking about various drugs. It mentioned one that would allow you to go for long periods of time without sleep and feel fine (24 hours? 48 hours? i forget) Afterwards you'd just need 8 hours of sleep like normal and you'd be ready to do it again. I believe they said the military was investigating it for possible use.

    Unfortunatly i can't remember the name of the drug and i can't find the article again. Anyone have any idea as to what it might be?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Another sleep depriving drug... by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      I drank a whole bunch of water and stayed up for about 96 hours once... passed out when I sat down and relaxed at the end and was out for about 16 hours, but felt fine afterwards.

    2. Re:Another sleep depriving drug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Medafinil is the drug I read about with these qualities.

    3. Re:Another sleep depriving drug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. Modafinil.

    4. Re:Another sleep depriving drug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=159839 &cid=13381089

      (Anon so that I don't hear shit from the Mormons and Christian Scientists lurking Slashdot.)

  44. Three words: by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    SIGN. ME. UP.

    Between a baby/toddler teething and my CIO position, sleep is something I hear about more than actually get.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  45. They should call it the Rick James drug by jasonmicron · · Score: 1

    Tests performed on monkeys that were subjected to 30-36 hours of sleep deprivation revealed an average test performance accuracy drop to 63 percent, but that performance was restored to 84 percent after administering CX717.

    I am reminded of the famous line from Chappelle:

    Cocaine is a helluva drug!

    Not trollin', just sayin'...

  46. This Was Popular In The 80's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they called it coke...

  47. or go natural by brickballs · · Score: 1

    You know, i heard of this other great way to reverse the effects of sleep deprivation: they call it "sleep".

    --
    "What does slashdotting mean?"
    "You've never heard of slashdot?"
    "I know it makes websites not work."
  48. Women everywhere moan by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 5, Funny

    Women everywhere moan.... as their number two excuse, right after I have a headache, becomes scientifically irrelevant....
    I'm too tired honey....

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    1. Re:Women everywhere moan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Elsewhere this would be modded funny, but on /. no one understands that a "woman" is what you're supposed to have sex with.

    2. Re:Women everywhere moan by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      Ugh- Whomever modded the parent offtopic is either
      A: a woman (not likley because women tend to have great senses of humor when it comes to the headache/honey I'm tired thing) or
      B: a virgin

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    3. Re:Women everywhere moan by slughead · · Score: 1

      Women everywhere moan.... as their number two excuse, right after I have a headache, becomes scientifically irrelevant....
      I'm too tired honey....


      Actually, this drug does not prevent tiredness, it just allows your brain to function while tired.

    4. Re:Women everywhere moan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP! VERY FUNNY, NOT OFFTOPIC! Any one who has ever had sex with (someone else) will think it is hilarious

    5. Re:Women everywhere moan by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Women don't have to actually *be* tired to actually be tired, nor do they actually have to have a headache.

      It's their way of telling you to smeg off, in a way that doesn't offend.

    6. Re:Women everywhere moan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A: I'm aware that they don't really have to be tired, thus the "excuse" and not "reason"
      B: Explaining, after every joke, why whatever is in the joke is not scientificly possible, will not make you the life of the party....

    7. Re:Women everywhere moan by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      In other words, they were a Slashdotter?

  49. Monkeys using cursors?! by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find the idea of monkeys using a symbolic interface (using a cursor to select something) even equally as remarkable as the drug itself?

    I really hadn't thought monkeys could learn that, maybe gorillas, but not monkeys.

    1. Re:Monkeys using cursors?! by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah... you've been giving humans more credit than they deserve all this time. Humans aren't all that great except we're pretty good at reproducing. And with the little extra other advantages we have with what seems to be more complex thinking and speech as a form of communication, we've managed to squander those to the point of being ineffective. Many of us are little more than hairless apes.

  50. Talking about memory less... by SirJorgelOfBorgel · · Score: 1

    I forget what I was going to put here... Can't wait for this to hit the market, I'd forget my own head if it wasn't attached.

  51. The big sl;ee... hmm what was I saying ? by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

    I was reading all what yu were saying about the sleep issues, however, I think that the real issue is the Alzheimers thing. Anything like that is potentially good. Any company that 'ecourages' frug use as a conditon of employment should be nuked/

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
  52. Is it called... by dividedsky319 · · Score: 1

    ...Mountain Dew?

  53. Jet Lag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this drug has any effect on the body's sleep cycles beyond reducing the symptoms of sleep deprivation. If so, it could be marketed and sold to reduce the effects of jet lag. This would do wonders for international travelers. I'm looking forward to having some of this stuff on my next long trip!

  54. Premature death. by SunPin · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with premature death? I completely agree with the Seinfeld quote but there's another side to it. It's just sinister to let people think they'll be happy in old age. Depression, health problems, etc. Living longer is advantageous to everyone except the person doing the living.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Premature death. by mahmud · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't write off old age so quickly.

      Each age has its own little joys, and if you have lived your life without unnecessary excesses while being young you are sure to find out being old is quite nice. Quite a lot of people are both old and happy. It's not that hard to be healthy and old, it's just that modern urban lifestyle makes people prone to disease in old age. Diet, exercise and good friends/family do miracles for one's wellbeing. Just look at old people in Mediterranean Europe - happy and healthy, watching football and drinking wine ;-)

      Also, allow me to generalize: when I was 16 I thought that I should get everything from life then, because the older you get the less fun you have...
      Now I am 23 and I have way more fun than when I was 16, I simply enjoy being myself more, and I think it only gets better as you learn about who you are and how best to satisfy your own needs.

      Ok, enough preaching for today...

    2. Re:Premature death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...And to the people paying for medicare, social security, higher medical insurance rates, nursing home fees, obscene amounts of prescription drugs, etc.

      Do society a favor and kill yourself at age 60! (it worked in STTNG) :)

  55. nothing new... by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

    I've been using this drug for years... its called bawls

    --
    I got nothin'
  56. Re:Drug in DARPA trials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, DARPA (Defence Advanced Research Projects Administration) is already funding some of the tests.

  57. Re:patterns by saskboy · · Score: 1

    "
    You could go to sleep at 4am and still be refreshed the next morning... Err... Afternoon."

    I don't find that personally. When I go to sleep about 4 hours late at 4AM, even if I sleep until noon, the day never seems quite right. I think it has more to do with getting to bed at a regular time, and also getting enough hours to have a restful and rejuvenating sleep, than simply getting the hours in.

    Just try being productive or creative on a day you got up after staying up past when you usually go to sleep.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  58. Ofcourse, they are supporting it by Baikala · · Score: 1

    One of the articles mentions that the research is being supported by the military, for pilots to be more specific.

    --
    16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
  59. My Own Research by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 2, Informative

    has shown that crystal meth works just as good!

    1. Re:My Own Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...until the hallucinations begin to set in ^ ^

    2. Re:My Own Research by JohnnyLocust · · Score: 1
      My Own Research has shown that crystal meth works just as good!
      Yes, and I'm sure you look just darling in that tinfoil hat.
  60. It's a trick: by dsginter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone, I did some digging and found that this "CX717" is simply this.

    --
    More
  61. Sleep Imperative? by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Interesting
    One sleep theory is that a brain consumes more energy than the bloodstream can deliver, thus sleep is required so the brain can store energy (food) for proper operation. If sleep is a physical requirement, avoiding it could be life-threatening if the body-controlling part of the brain also requires sleep.

    If this drug eliminates the desire for sleep but not a physical requirement, it provides a test for the theory. See if people fall over dead after not sleeping for a while.

  62. Today's miracle drug... by stankulp · · Score: 1

    ...is tomorrow's meth.

    I remember the first time I read about Ecstasy in Time magazine.

    They thought it was the greatest thing since sliced bread.

    --
    We must be alert to the danger that public policy could become captive to a scientific-technological elite. - Eisenhower
  63. I think they just invented meth by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think they just invented meth.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  64. Are we being fooled? by Typingsux · · Score: 1
    Is CX717 the scientific name for coffee?

    --
    The above post is an editorial, the poster cannot and will not be held responsible for all or in part for it's contents
  65. We used this in college... by jhealy · · Score: 1

    I think it was called Cocaine back then.

  66. Whoah by Mercenary_56 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read the title as "Drug Reverses Effects of SHEEP Deprivation." I really need to get some sleep...

    --
    /* Insert some overused slashdot quote here */
    1. Re:Whoah by Auraiken · · Score: 1

      so it's true what i hear about swedish people.

  67. A new age of Red Bull by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

    Not only will we have wings, but the will have jet engines strapped to them

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  68. Re:It's a trick: Your sig/today's fortune cookie by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    And the men who hold high places
    Must be the ones to start
    To mould a new reality
    Closer to the heart

    Interesting when I match your sig to today's /. fortune cookie:

    Everyone's in a high place when you're on your knees.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  69. Obligatory Question by MonkeyGone2Heaven · · Score: 1


    It is also believed the drug may help prevent or restore memory loss in Alzheimer's patients.

    What drug is that?

  70. This is what the world needs! by Evolt's+RonL. · · Score: 3, Funny

    More efficient monkeys! I took the grandkids to the zoo recently and the dang monkeys were only operating at 68% effectiveness. Stupid zoo. A little money spent on ex717 and those monkeys could easily have been an extra 15-20% more effective! Hmmmm, I imagine they'll need a bigger dose for the hippo though.

  71. New drug makes people smarter! Quick! Ban It! by TheNarrator · · Score: 2, Funny

    ANYTHING that tastes good, makes us feel good, makes us stronger, gives us a better memory or helps us concentrate or otherwise gives us any kind of advantage over someone not ingesting said drug is dangerous and must have hidden side effects. Some nutjobs might argue that a drug that might improve our memories dramatically and thus advance the productivity and technology of our civilization would be beneficical. However, any drug that does this is bound to be toxic, addictive, and otherwise damaging and even if it kills 1 person out of a million. Even if that one person who dies took thirty times the recommended dosage we must ban it because the only acceptable use of ingestible non-food substances should be to cure disease.

    That being said, there is a horrible drug plaguing our streets known as 1,3,7-trimethylxanthine. It is lethal in doses as small as 3.2 grams. It is consumed compulsivley by a growing number of American addicts. It can cause psychomoter agitation, rambling flow of though and speech, tachycardia or cardiac arrhythmia. Large evil megacorps are trying to poison our childrens lives with them by getting them addicted to it early and it is even being distributed in schools by their dealers! Some people even say it helps them concentrate and lets them stay up longer but these benefits pale in comparison to the evils of this psychotropic drug. The Deaths piling up because of this drug should lead us to ban it immediately! We should also ban a substance often taken in conjunction with this awful drug known as DHMO.

  72. Sleep by phorm · · Score: 1

    At the moment we really don't fully understand as much about sleep as we could. Certain chemicals flow , other processes slow, and various 'maintenance' tasks initiate whilst our consciousness slumbers. While this drug may help by either replacing chemicals restored by sleep, or reducing chemicals removed during sleep... how about all the other functions of the body that depend on it. By taking a 'magic pill' to restore alertness we're taking a big risk of burning out other systems that just can't be fixed by anything except good, old-fashioned R&R.

  73. Is CX717 a.... by demachina · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is CX717 an American drug companies marketing name for Meth. American drug companies are missing out on some major bucks not being able to market Meth. If they can give it a new name, have the Bush administration give them a green light in the name of free enterprise I'm sure it will be fine to start selling it over the counter or maybe at worst with an easy to acquire prescription. After all the government lets them sell Oxycontin, often with the drug company's full knowledge its going out the back door on to the steet. It is for all practical purpose legalized narcotics.

    --
    @de_machina
    1. Re:Is CX717 a.... by crimsonclear · · Score: 0

      yeah...they already have heroin out there (oxy), why not go ahead and leagalize meth too.

    2. Re:Is CX717 a.... by Nalgas+D.+Lemur · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, they DO sell meth already. It's called Desoxyn, and it's used for things like ADD, but generally only after things like Ritalin and Adderall have failed to help (enough). When taken as prescribed (and not abused in larger dosages or by people using it for other reasons), it can be very helpful for people who other things don't work for, just like Oxycontin.

    3. Re:Is CX717 a.... by demachina · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " it can be very helpful for people who other things don't work for"

      Well that can be said about medical Marijuana. Do we have to get Merck of Phizer to want to market, and profit from it, to get the Federal government to allow it. For people wanting to expand their consciousness I image LSD is helpful. For people looking to improve their sociability Ecstasy is very helpful.

      --
      @de_machina
    4. Re:Is CX717 a.... by Nalgas+D.+Lemur · · Score: 1

      Do we have to get Merck of Phizer to want to market, and profit from it, to get the Federal government to allow it.

      It seems that way sometimes, doesn't it? Speaking of medical marijuana, some pharmaceutical company sells a THC extract in a pill (Marinol, used to increase appetite in people with things like cancer, I think), which I think is Schedule III (controlled, but still available with a prescription), while marijuana itself is Schedule I (not legal or acknowledged to have any medical benefit). Go figure. I sometimes wonder how they came up with the scheduling and regulations and laws around all those sorts of things, because half the time it doesn't entirely make sense.

  74. Improvement shortcuts by nuggz · · Score: 0

    Finally, look for compounds in this class to be used to make people "better than well" for selected reasons

    Yeah I'm waiting for a few years after that when they find the side effects from chronic usage.
    Good diet and physical activity will make you better, and there are no known side effects.

    I'm pretty sure this wonder drug (and the next) just like every other artificial booster will end up having a problem. There are no shortcuts.

    1. Re:Improvement shortcuts by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Sure, but even sub-consciously, there is a cost-benefit analysis going on. Why do you think so many baseball players use amphetamines during games? And fuggedaboud 'roids...

      I'm not saying there will be no side effects, interactions, long-term usage effects, or anything else.

      The point is, there is a market for products developed from this class of compounds, that is distinct from the market for caffeine and amphetamines.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Improvement shortcuts by nuggz · · Score: 0

      Sure, but even sub-consciously, there is a cost-benefit analysis going on. Why do you think so many baseball players use amphetamines during games? And fuggedaboud 'roids...

      and this is why we have a world full of unhappy people doing nothing hoping for a quick fix.
      They don't want to put in the effort to reach their maximum potential.
      Or they're right at the top of their field and they'll do anything to get ahead, regardless of the cost.

  75. I have ridden the mighty moon worm! by pizen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Soon the human race will become dependant on this just as we are on caffinee.

    So when do I get my sweet glowing blue eyes?

    1. Re:I have ridden the mighty moon worm! by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      Right here.

      I'm getting a pair of these for Halloween - TOTALLY worth the $200.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    2. Re:I have ridden the mighty moon worm! by pizen · · Score: 1

      Oh man. Those are totally sweet. I wonder what the folks at work would say.

    3. Re:I have ridden the mighty moon worm! by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      The thing about scleral lenses is that you can only have them in for a short period of time before your eyes start to hurt - perhaps 3 hours max. Enough time to win a costume contest with though. :) I'm working on a stillsuit right now, just for Halloween.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    4. Re:I have ridden the mighty moon worm! by pizen · · Score: 1

      Going for more of a Sting-movie look or Sci-Fi Channel miniseries look?

    5. Re:I have ridden the mighty moon worm! by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      Sting, for sure. :) The Dune 2000 stillsuits, while more faithful to the descriptions in the book, made the wearer look more like the Gimp from Pulp Fiction. The Lynch ones were more biomechanical - they show Giger's influence on the movie.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
  76. many questions by SecretSqrl · · Score: 0

    1) how do they know it's not addictive? 2) what are effects of long term usage? 3) how is it actually working? The last one scares me the most. Can get permission to use the drug before they know how it is working?

  77. What's so new about this? by tyrus568 · · Score: 1
    Without reading TFA, this seems like nothing new. Provigil http://www.provigil.com/ (modafinil) has been out for several years now, and speaking from personal experience, it works great. Fatigue evaporates like water, with no other side effects like jitteriness or irritability.

    The Air Force I know was testing this on pilots two years ago to replace the use of Dexadrine (a controlled substance - and rather slightly addictive amphetamine) in pilots sustaining 30+ hour patrol missions.

    A friend of mine who has cancer reported a varying effect, saying it felt like speed. On fire all day with energy..

    Provigil is mainly prescribed for sleep apnea and narcolepsy and can sustain a person without sleep for up to 88 hours.

    Timothy

  78. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't need to take drugs to sleep you insensitive cloud!

  79. Now you need half as many monkeys to by crovira · · Score: 1

    type the complete works of Shakespeare. Or half as much elapsed time.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  80. Wet Planet Beverages launches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jolt Cola CX717 - The hacker's new best friend.

  81. Yawn... by fnurb · · Score: 1

    Zzzzzzzz

    --


    Flout 'em and scout 'em,
    and scout 'em and flout 'em;
    Thought is free. - Shakespeare [The Tempest]
  82. Soma...Soma...mmmm good by RagingChipmunk · · Score: 1

    20mg CX717 in the morning
    30mg Ephedrine suppliments every 2 hrs
    75mg Prozac to keep you sane
    40mg Previcid to keep it all from being vomitted

    Finish the day with a happy dose of 20mg Ambien

    "Better Living Through Chemicals" I say. Who needs a stinkin' Food Pyramid!

    --
    The only PT Boat Journal on the web: http://www.PT171.org
  83. What about people with bipolar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the anecdotal rules for people with bipolar is to maintain a consistent sleeping schedule. Both when a person is depressed and when they are manic, it is evident that there are circadian rhythm shifts/problems. There is also a strong correlation between sleep deprivation and the probability of triggering another hypomanic or manic episode. It has been reported that between 25 and 65% of people experiencing a manic episode had a disruption in their sleep wake cycles prior to the episode. It would be interesting to know how this kind of medication would affect people these people.

    Too bad I'm a part of this group. It sucks. :(

  84. Re:patterns by vertinox · · Score: 1

    On a more serious level I would agree. I was joking about the unemployement part and staying up and playing WoW, I haven't been unemployed for a long time for about 4 years now, but I do miss not being able to sleep whenever I want to when I was and back then I was playing Ultima Online and not Wow, but...

    I think that it might be genetic, habbit, or enviorment related with when one does their best work. I find myself geared up in the Afternoon rather than the morning, but mostly because most of my prior jobs were late shifts such as 2pm to 11pm at night kind of range which led me to either learn to be personally productive after work at very late hours.

    I think there was a study done on people who perfer to do mental work in the morning, afternoon, or late at night but I can't remember what it concluded but there seems to be a difference between most people.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  85. Re: Coming soon... - CX717 - I know the formula by too_poland · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Check this out: 7 + 1 + 7 = 15, reversed: 51, 51ST STATE!

  86. WHOA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I need some of that. Now. Now, now, now. Gimme. Don't worry about the FDA just shoot me up like a heroin whore.

    /me waves hands furiously... VOLUNTEER FOR A DRUG TRIAL. Come at me with that damn thing.

  87. And they'll deny it to the end. by crovira · · Score: 1

    Even though the dog is dead on the floor an the sheets on her side of the bed are smouldering.

    That is one of the many joys of being married.

    My nose gets blocked up (out of self preservation) after one of her cabbage and broccolli caseroles.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  88. And Bill Gates finally gets his wish.. by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1
    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  89. Uhm. by bdowne01 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be easier to just get some sleep? I'm sure we'll be able to get to the point of 20-hour workdays with magical advances of medical science--but personally, i'd rather just get some rest.

    --
    -brain
  90. Wasn't there an episode of X-Files like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to recall an X-Files episode that had something to do with the military testing a "no sleep" drug on military personnel. So are we all gonna be able to start manifesting our dreams into reality? Personally I think it'd be great because we could finally have flying cars!

  91. Time for drastic measures? by chl · · Score: 1
    When lack of sleep has such a great (negative) impact on your life, is it maybe time for you and your doctor to reconsider the benefits of just drugging you up with diazepam or the like every night (at least for a few months)?

    chl

  92. Nothing new by Frangible · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Amphetamines have been around for what, 100 years or so? Dextroamphetamine is the Air Force's "go pill" and is quite effective at keeping someone alert when they should be sleeping.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=1462046 8&query_hl=4

    While they argue that this drug is different because of possibly less abuse potential (yet have no data to back that assertation up with, such as self-reinforcing studies in animals), I think the real reason is because pharmaceutical patents only last 20 years. As far as abuse potential goes, addiction is usually characterized by increased dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens, of which amphetamine activates indirectly; I have seen no evidence as to whether or not CX717 will indirectly raise dopamine levels in that region of the brain as well.

    They may claim they're not stimulants, but the action is that of binding to receptors and releasing a neurotransmitter called glutamate. Is that really so different than stimulants binding to a receptor and releasing norepinephrine, another neurotransmitter?

    From the journal article, revealed increased activity in prefrontal cortex, dorsal striatum, and medial temporal lobe (including hippocampus) that was significantly enhanced over normal alert conditions following administration of CX717. You would see similar increases in brain activity following the administration of amphetamine as well.

    Furthermore, high levels of glutamate have neurotoxic properties: In excess, glutamate causes neuronal damage and eventual cell death, particularly when NMDA receptors are activated.

    Somehow though, I think the combination of a pharmaceutical company making $2.00 in profit per pill combined with possibly less of an abuse potential or political incorrectness of usage will make this drug preferred in spite of whatever risks it carries.

    Of course, maybe I'm just bitter and skeptical in my old age.

    1. Re:Nothing new by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      releasing a neurotransmitter called glutamate. Is that really so different than stimulants binding to a receptor and releasing norepinephrine, another neurotransmitter?
      Yes, it really is different.

      The patent for Adderall ends next year so they've cooked up with a replacement. Basically they're adding an amino acid to an amphetamine and :wham: new drug. It gets metabolized in a completely different fashion, therefore it is really that different.



      What I'd like to hear about is what happens when CX717 wears off.

      Just coming down from a caffeine high can be a bitch (not to mention adderall or ritalin). Did any of those monkey's commit suicide later?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All recreational drugs cause brain damage. The Australian AMA Medical Journal published comparative unbiased numbers of brain cell deaths. Opiates were by far the safest, less damaging than beer or cigarettes. The keep-you-awake pills were seriously brain damaging. Bottom line, if you have an IQ don't do drugs.

  93. It isn't vioxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vioxx is a pain releiver that causes heart attacks when there are a lot of pain relievers that actually HELP your heart (eg aspirin).

    This compound would be compared to amphetamines, which WILL give you a heart attack (and bad teeth) if you use it too much.

    Compared to placebo it will certainly be more risky, but compared to any of the real drug alternatives it is likely the safest one.

    1. Re:It isn't vioxx by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Vioxx is a pain releiver that causes heart attacks when there are a lot of pain relievers that actually HELP your heart (eg aspirin).

      Actually, by "a lot" you probably mean "just one" - aspirin.

      I don't believe that any other pain medication has a cardioprotective benefit. The only one which seems up for debate was Naproxen, which was a theory advocated in fact by Merck. Early studies showed that Vioxx caused as many heart attacks as placebo, and more heart attacks than Naproxen. The question was whether Vioxx was killing people, or Naproxen was saving people.

      It eventually turned out that Vioxx was in fact causing heart attacks, although most likely Naproxen was also saving people.

      The real problem for Merck was that heart attacks were an undisclosed side effect. If the risks had been known in advance there probably would be no grounds for a lawsuit - after all, the doctors knew what they were prescribing. The big item debated in the Vioxx cases is whether Merck should have concluded that Vioxx caused heart attacks based on the data they had years ago, or whether as Merck maintains there wasn't any solid evidence prior to late 2004.

  94. A scary world indeed... by teutonic_leech · · Score: 1

    ... where the pharmaceutical industry devotes itself to researching drugs like these while people all over the world are dying/suffering from various incurable diseases. Now, I am aware that these types of drugs are often found by chance, but I think my argument still stands. The pharmaceutical industry has their own priorities and in most cases it's not the benefit of mankind. Am I the only one getting upset reading these types of press releases, while having given up hope a long time ago to ever learn about a real AIDS drug (one that really works)? I mean, this planet and its inhabitants are slowly drifting up the river without a paddle (we're running out of sweet water resources, we're nearing peak production of oil, the artic regions are in melt-down mode, overpopulation, war, diseases crossing continents, 35 animal species become extinct each day, etc..), and the best we can come up with to stem the tide is a fucking anti-sleep drug???

  95. Excellent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With this drug my team of monkeys will type out Shakespeare in no time!

  96. Death of MMORPGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugh.. MMORPGS will be ruined forever by these babies. Can you imagine some 13-year-old using these puppies to power-level for 96 hours straight?

  97. Provigil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take about 200 mg per day of Provigil to improve performance when I pull 80 - 100 hour weeks (got it from my doc to combat "excessive sleepiness.")

    One study of the drug had US Airforce pilots working 80 hours out of 88 (40 awake, then 8 asleep, then 40 more awake,) without the ill effects of amphetamines.

    Anyway, the stuff works great. I don't feel all "cracked out," and I'm able to stay productive many hours longer than before. We should put the stuff in the water supply, like we do with floride....

    1. Re:Provigil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use provigil as well(200mg/day)... only, I use it every day due to Multiple Sclerosis related fatigue. Just wanted to say thanks for making it that much more difficult for legitimate users of Provigil. Your 'recreational'/occupational use of the drug has helped tremendously!

    2. Re:Provigil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing to worry about. My pharmacist told me its about $300 a bottle without prescription (I have a script, I'm borderline narcoleptic and wear a CPAP for a sleep disorder as well). Even with my co-pay its $50 (I assume it is for most) for a month's supply.

    3. Re:Provigil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Difficult? Is there a shortage or something?

      If you're talking about insurance, it costs me about $10 per dose and I pay 100% out of pocket. I wouldn't expect my insurance to cover any portion of it in my case. In fact, I'm probably subsidizing guys like you that have a "legitimate" to reason to stay awake.

  98. Monkeys on Speed. by ksjfhdsalf · · Score: 0

    Screw long days.

    I'm just going to get a monkey hooked on amphetamines to work for me. Just like the ones in the study.

  99. correction by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

    Decogestants and diet pills contain ephedrine or psuedo-ephedrine--are stimulants and precursors to amphetimine, but by no means are they the same chemical. If they had very similar effects, then people would be smoking cold pills instead of spending hours scraping red phosphate off of matches and doing all kinds of dangerous acetone extractions in order to turn their ephedrine into meth.

    Of course, some people do chug straight cough syrup, but that's usually for the DXM, a dissociative hallucinogen similar to (but much more dangerous than) ketamine.

    ...I'm beginning to think I know way too much about this shit.

    1. Re:correction by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      *would not be

    2. Re:correction by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the general class of compounds known as amphetamines, not the specific 'amphetamine'. Interestingly enough, this class also includes MDMA (Methylenedionemethamphetamine -- Ecstasy).

      They do have very similar effects, but the response differs for a bunch of reasons, including chemical structure, rate of absorption, rate of metabolysis, activity of metabolites, etc.

      Methamphetamine happens to have an extremely high affinity for certain alpha-adrenergic receptors, whereas ephedrine and pseudophedrine are less active there.

      Dextromethrophan (DXM) is actually an opiate that happens to have high selectivity for the hallucinogenic receptors, rather than the hypnotic and pain receptors that other opiates primarily affect. DXM activity is pretty much unrelated to amphetamine activity.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  100. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  101. Something funny from the summary by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I noted that the summary stated that it could restore memory loss in Alzheimer's patients.

    Darn'd grandma. Her memory is improving again. Time to restore her memory loss.......

    Ok, this is sort of scary....

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  102. Oh, bartender... by jahknow · · Score: 1

    One Red Bull and Grey Goose with a shot of CX717, please!

    --
    ^^
  103. Mental / Physical consequences? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there are studies of people who run on short sleep periods and the results of that. But I always thought the REM-sleep to be CRUCIAL for mental wellness.
    I can imagine that after being excessively awake some people might start suffering psychosis and other maladies.

    What about physical regeneration?
    I've run on very little sleep for long periods of time. If you strain yourself fe. and are up for 24hrs, it doesn't seem to get any better, but it get more nagging... yet a few hours of sleep does wonders.

    Can this drug really replace all that? (as I can imagine some of the human 'regenerating' in sleepstate might be emulated in some way)

    Or is it more like going on speed for a week, until you collapse and die cause you don't feel your body is over-performing? (I never have used speed btw)

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    1. Re:Mental / Physical consequences? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I can imagine that after being excessively awake some people might start suffering psychosis and other maladies.

      I was wondering about a related question.

      The psychosis caused by psych issues like schizophrenia is the same effect that you get from extreme sleep deprivation.

      I would be curious to see if this drug had any beneficial effect on people with those disorders. It seems unlikely, but the more options for treating them, the better.

      Or is it more like going on speed for a week, until you collapse and die cause you don't feel your body is over-performing?

      No. This is a new class of non-stimulant drugs. The effect is very different.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  104. Tired... by Eudial · · Score: 1

    Sure could use some of that just about now ;)

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  105. sleep is a metabolic process? by cats-paw · · Score: 1

    Here are two interesting factoids for consideration. The first I am sure is from Scientific American. I am relatively sure the second is also.

    1. Someone managed to get funding to study sleep in FRUIT FLIES. How do you get that kind of funding ! In any event the researcher pestered the flies, either by disturbing them or by administering caffeine. Turns out the flies started having a really hard time flying and performing other fly actions. If flies need sleep then there is something tremendously fundamental about sleep that is probably impervious to drugs. Perhaps you can be deprived in the short term with better performance...

    2. A canonical rat experiment was done. I don't remember this too well but I believe that the final verdict on the test was: keep rats awake ALL the time and eventually they starve to death, regardless of how many calories they consume. interesting, eh ?

    Number 2 may relate to the fact that the brain consumes both calories and oxygen well in excess of its mass relative to the rest of the body.

    My hypothesis is that sleep is more of a metabolic-related process than it is a mental-related process.

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
  106. When will we see this... by theufo · · Score: 1

    on ThinkGeek? Sounds like the next best thing after coffee.

  107. Yay! by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny
    Orlando, FL - Gary Buzzeye has been taking CX717 for seven months now, and says he gets by on two hours of sleep a week.

    "It's absolutely fantastic." Buzzeye says as he scrapes away the skin around his eyes with a rusty nail-puller. "I've never felt better, and my productivity is way up." When asked if there were any side-effects, Buzzeye replied "None whatsoever. Since I killed my wife and sold my children to Satan, who happens to live two doors down, things have been great. Now if I could only get the snakes to stop eating my feet, I'd be one hundred percent. Oh, could you get the door, I think it's Napoleon. He's a real bitch, and he likes to steal my aluminum brainguard."

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  108. fallacies and false hope by circletimessquare · · Score: 1
    sleep repairs damage, it recreates and rebuilds what mental stress and mental exertion destroys

    no pill can replace that function of sleep: a pill can influence a biological pathway, but a pill can't replace the functions of multiple overlapping pathways... some working in cooperation, some not working cooperation, pathways that require work to be done on engines that are not currently moving

    what a pill can do instead is allow for more damage to be done to the brain than natural biological stop-gap measures would otherwise allow: to dig yourself into a deeper hole

    you need know no more about the biochemical pathways involved here, you merely need to know two principles are at work here:

    • it is easier to destroy than create
    • occam's razor takes care of the rest

    many "wonder drugs" fail basic bullshit tests like these, don't buy the snake oil

    you were given only one brain, protect it from hype
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  109. No, it's not Mountain Dew, it's Jolt by infonography · · Score: 1

    Dew is for Newbies. A serious coders/admins drinks serious stuff.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    1. Re:No, it's not Mountain Dew, it's Jolt by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Serious coders/admins refuse to get suckered by the crooks selling "energy drinks" and get their caffeine from coffee.

  110. Let me guess... by saddino · · Score: 1

    reverse the biological and behavioral effects of sleep deprivation ...was this drug developed in Soviet Russia?

  111. The age of drug tests before exams by Crook+C-Digital-Art · · Score: 0

    I'm sure this drug, coupled with a new discovery of a drug that increases IQ on the short term would be of enormous benefit to students worldwide :) Is there such a drug combination I wonder?

  112. I can see it now by LeonardsLiver · · Score: 1

    Patient: "Doc, I'm really having a hard time sleeping. Can you help?"

    Doc: "Sure, pal. But first, I need to know if you actually want to sleep, or if you'd just like to not need to sleep. If you want to sleep, we can go with Lunesta. Otherwise, I've got this really good shit..."

  113. Reports also stated that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the drug makes you want to feed on living human brains. A spokesperson for the company that produces the drug stated that this doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing, adding that she would suck my brain and feel much better than.

    This was Kent Brockman, now back to the monkey.

  114. Why in the world would you say that? by QMO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Except that no-body holds the patent on cocaine so its illegal."

    I can't believe that reasoning.

    First: Asprin and Alcohol aren't patented, and aren't illegal.

    Second: Lots of patented drugs are VERY illegal. (It takes a lot of money, time, red tape, and testing to get a new patented drug to the point where it is even legal to test on people.)

    But then you say:
    "We don't need a pill to help us work harder, we just need to adjust our expectations."

    Which I totally agree with.

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    1. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Hi,

      The reasoning wasn't so much that something without a patent must be illegal, but that if it were patented and a big corp could make big bucks from it, then they would find a way of getting it legal. After all, Ritalin is chemically very little different to Speed and it has the same effect. But one is legal and the other is not? Your own hypothesis for that situation would be ? ;)

      Anyway, it was more of a sly-dig at the pharmaceuticals industry than a fully-researched argument. Still, I think I have basis. Glad you agree that we (the species) should be working less though. I think only a CEO could disagree with that. ;)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    2. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      After all, Ritalin is chemically very little different to Speed and it has the same effect.

      I've seen you repeat this several times now - in what way does Ritalin "have the same effects" as speed?

      Moreover the whole "is chemically very little different to" is incredibly suspect, small chemical changes have very large changes of effect. See also ethane v ethanol and dihydrogen monoxide v hydrogen peroxide.

    3. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by Binestar · · Score: 1

      Moreover the whole "is chemically very little different to" is incredibly suspect, small chemical changes have very large changes of effect. See also ethane v ethanol and dihydrogen monoxide v hydrogen peroxide.

      Caffeine v Morphine

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    4. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, his point was very valid, even if he didn't use a proper example. The latest (well, later than ritalin) drug to catch on to treat "ADHD" is Desoxyn. Desoxyn is methamphetamine hydrochloride. Sound familiar? That's because the drug that's currently got a pretty good grip on us is "Crystal Meth", or...Methamphetamine. Same drug, stronger potency...one is backed my pharm. companies, the other by "superlabs"

      The pharmaceutical industry is FUCKED.

    5. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I've seen you repeat this several times now - in what way does Ritalin "have the same effects" as speed?

      Ritalin's chemical structure is based on Dexedrine (dextroamphetamine). All of the stimulant-based ADHD medications are. The Concerta I take is basically Dexedrine with an extra carbon ring or phenyl group, I can't remember which offhand.

      Prescription doses for ADHD are below the recreational threshold for stimulants, but if they're abused (as I've seen people do), the effects are the same as with e.g. crystal meth.

      As a side note: the first time I took Concerta (a higher dose than I settled on eventually), I really understood why the Air Force gives it to pilots. It turned me into an emotionless robot focused on the goal I'd set before I took it, and willing to do anything to accomplish it. The difference was that instead of flying a fighter jet or a bomber, I was studying for my chemistry final, Grammaton Cleric-style.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    6. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by blincoln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is true in some cases, but if you look at the chemical structure of the various neurotransmitters like norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine, and compare them to the amphetamine class of stimulants, they're virtually identical as a whole, not isolated examples.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    7. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Informative


      I've seen you repeat this several times now - in what way does Ritalin "have the same effects" as speed?

      Both Ritalin (called Methylphenidate in its non-brand name) and Speed (phenylisopropylamine) operate in a similar manner - both prevent the reabsorbtion of monoamine transporters for dopamine and norepinephrine which results in increased amounts of dopamine and norepinephrine in the brain. This promotes nerve impulse transmission in neurons that have those receptors. The effect is something you're probably familiar with (either through experience or second-hand).

      Likewise you can get the same high from snorting ritalin (powder it first unless you have biiig nostrils) as you can from speed, and you can get addicted to it too. Both are also used by students and workers desperate to keep focused on a project in that final night of panic. It's just the same as speed for practical purposes. Ritalin doesn't come in huge dosages (per pill), but then they are prescribing it to children.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    8. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Ritalin is chemically very little different to Speed and it has the same effect. But one is legal and the other is not? Your own hypothesis for that situation would be ? ;)

      Even discounting the very valid "small chemical differences can make a HUGE difference in biological functions' pointed out by others, here is a hypothesis for you:

      That the other is prescription drug controlled by medical experts who have the necessary knowledge about it's effects and dosage, and the other is substance of unsure purity and blending sold by random crooks with no medical background whatsoever?

      Ritalin isn't any more legal than Speed if you buy it from the streets. It's not the patent, or even the drug that counts. It's the doctor.

    9. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by sydb · · Score: 1

      but that if it were patented and a big corp could make big bucks from it, then they would find a way of getting it legal.

      Yes, well, what they did is fiddle with the chemical structure a bit and got Procaine aka Novocain.

      Is that like your Ritalin idea? Because I have no experience or knowledge of Ritalin.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    10. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Insightful


      That the other is prescription drug controlled by medical experts who have the necessary knowledge about it's effects and dosage, and the other is substance of unsure purity and blending sold by random crooks with no medical background whatsoever?

      I agree. But the downside has relatively little to do with the drug itself and rather its legality. But that was your point too, so perhaps we're just agreeing with each other loudly. :)

      Regarding this discrepancy between the two drugs' similarity yet their differing legal status, I think it happened something like this:

      In the early sixties, Speed was outlawed and the police cracked down on it. This was accompanied by all the usual propaganda and hoo-ha, demonising Speed as a terrible evil. Later however, drug companies saw an opportunity to make money from speed but you can't suddenly turn round and say "You know that terrible stuff that will destroy your children, well it's okay if we give it to them." People would smell a rat.

      So something that has a very similar effect is patented, marketed and in comes the money. But you know, Ritalin is spelt differently to Speed, so nobody panics about their children being fed it.

      I normally avoid using any personal information in a discussion on /., anecdotal evidence and all that, but it might be interesting to know that I personally don't smoke, drink alcohol or drink coffee, tea, anything fizzy or containing aspartame or akasulfame-k. As far as I'm concerned, speed, ritalin, cocaine or prozac - all look pretty dodgy to me. But I do like to discuss things openly, and the pharmaceutical industry doesn't like that game at all.

      My £0.02.

      -H.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    11. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Both Methylphenidate and phenylisopropylamine prevent the reabsorbtion of monoamine transporters for dopamine and norepinephrine"

      It's at times like this your realise that you can't understand every one of the 2500000 experts on slashdot when they talk in their native subjects...

    12. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      " Ritalin is chemically very little different to Speed and it has the same effect. But one is legal and the other is not? "

      Another good analogy to this would be marijuana (illegal) and maranol(SP? Legal)...

      You can't patent something that occurs naturally, but you can patent a process for synthesizing something that would otherwise occur naturally and then profit from it...

    13. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      After all, Ritalin is chemically very little different to Speed and it has the same effect.

      I can also attest to the fact that it is VERY addictive.

      When I was a teenager I developed some drug problems. My little brother was prescribed Ritalin and since it was readily available I stole it to get high. I started with crushing up 2-4 pills to snort them. It eventually got to the point where I became too lazy and dependant to snort them and would just down 20 - 30 at a time.

      My mother would lock them up and hide them but I'd always find them and find a way to unlock them. She said she finally realized the full extent of my problem when I snuck into her bedroom one night and stole them right out of her pants pocket while she was sleeping.

      Coming down from Ritalin is what I imagine coming down from speed or cocaine would be like. It's aweful. It's not a physical depedance, medically, but it sure as hell feels physical. You get very depressed, tired and you just all around feel like death.

      Eventually, after being on a huge binge for a few nights and not sleeping, I came down and slept for 3 days straight. When I awoke my mother called an ambulance and requested 2 police escorts to take me to the hospital where I underwent forced rehabilitation.

      I honestly can not believe that this shit is prescribed to 4 year-olds. Marijuana is illegal but we're dealing out highly addictive drugs to school kids on a regular basis for the sake of controlling their behaviour.

    14. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by Klaus+Obermeyer · · Score: 1

      Except a five milligram dose of Ritalin is also effective for an adult and the dosage never needs to be increased. The dosage of "speed" on the other hand must grow pratically exponentially because it's not being used to treat a medical condition, it's being used to get high and the brains dopamine receptors can only take so much abuse. Really though it has to do with strength, Methamphetamine is a much stronger drug than Methylphenidate and therefore has a more prominent effect on mood. That's why people take it to get high - it makes the feel good. Yes you can take a very large quantity (fifty to one hundred times the thereaputic dose) of Ritalin to get the same effect as one hit of speed, but it's pretty impractical and a big waste. Following your faulty logic one could just as easily conclude that Vioxx and OxyCotin (Rush Limbaugh's fix) are exactly the same thing because they're both COX-2 inhibitors. Sadly drug company bashing is in vouge right now so researched and reasonable responses will usually fall to the wayside.

    15. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by Klaus+Obermeyer · · Score: 1
      The chemical structures of Norepinephrine, Serotonin and Dopamine are completely different than the Amphetamine class of stimulates. Amphetamine's are designed to prevent the re-uptake, or destruction, of Dopamine - they are not a direct dose of Dopamine are are therefore chemically completely different! (C6H3(OH)2-CH2-CH2-NH2 vs. C14H19NO2)!

      Just for a little example of how drugs with only small difference in chemical effect have completely changes the potential for abuse of a drug compare Vioxx and Oxycotin. One is an arthrits drug for little old ladies and the other is a morhpine subsitute which is now referred to as Hippy-Heroine and now a favorite for painkiller addicted Hollywood personalities.

    16. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by blincoln · · Score: 1
      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    17. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by Klaus+Obermeyer · · Score: 1
      I call BS.

      From your post: If you look at the chemical structure of the various neurotransmitters like norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine, and compare them to the amphetamine class of stimulants, they're virtually identical as a whole.

      They are not virtually identical. Between the four neurotransmitters the only commonality is that they all center around a carbon pentagon. Ontop of that the site you quotes is either wrong or very selective in what they decide to leave out, such as the four OH groups in noradrenaline.

      Well I guess you're right in a way, most molecules are pretty similiar when you choose to ignore half their components!

    18. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      According to my doctor friend, Ritalin also doesn't carry the risk of nasty pulmonary embolisms. Seems it's much easier to get pharmaceutical grade too.

    19. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methamphetamine is a much stronger drug than Methylphenidate and therefore has a more prominent effect on mood. That's why people take it to get high - it makes the feel good. Yes you can take a very large quantity (fifty to one hundred times the thereaputic dose) of Ritalin to get the same effect as one hit of speed, but it's pretty impractical and a big waste.

      I've never done Meth, and never will. But I do know that it takes a hell of a lot less than 50 - 100 pills of Ritalin to get high. When I was a teenager I used to get high by snorting 4 - 6 pills. Then I became addicted and eventually started taking 20 - 30 orally. Never took 50 - 100 though.. but of course not having ever done Meth I'm not sure if 20 - 30 would produce a similar high. I can tell you I'd sure as hell be wasted though and scared shitless about how fast my heart would be beating if I downed that many.

      Meth might be more practical as a recreational drug for adults .. but teenagers who are either prescribed Ritalin for themselves or who have siblings who are prescribed it have a very ready supply of a recreational drug that they can become very addicted to.

      I'm pretty much against the regulation of any drugs (I favour education and rehabilitation over prohibition and criminilization), but as long as Meth is illegal I strongly believe that it's just plain stupid that Ritalin, Dexedrine and other such stimulants aren't...

      And they sure as hell should not be prescribed to 4 year-olds (the age my little brother was when he was diagnosed with ADHD and prescribed Ritalin).

    20. Re:Why in the world would you say that? by Klaus+Obermeyer · · Score: 1
      It's all about difficulty, if you're using Ritalin to get high you'll run through a perscription which should last half a year in a week. If you go back to the doctor and request another perscription a week later they'll turn you in for drug abuse.

      If you go to your friendly speed dealer and ask for twice the dosage two days later they'll happily give it to you and you'll die from a heart attack. I don't see why it should be necassary to have that be a risk parents should consider might be available on the corner Walgreens. Education on such matters is in my opinion completely hopeless, I've seen too many intelligent well informed people die or ruin their lives over drug abuse. They knew roughtly (no worse than a government sponsered program would have done them) what they were getting into but still couldn't really grasp it until it was too late.

      Ritalin is also a therapeutically effective drug - it has different effects in people with actual ADD than those without ADD. Namely in those with ADD it is actually a downer not an upper. It helps them calm down.

      In your and your little brother's cases it sounds like you were perscribed Ritalin by an overzealos Physchiatrist and that abuse I agree needs to be controlled. In my opinion anyone with ADD should themselves first seek treatment and then perhaps get a perscription for Ritalin, it should never be "suggested" by parents.

  115. Additionally by Cadallin · · Score: 1

    Do you realize how much drug and medical research is done on prison inmates? In exchange for which they get something like $1/day? This is Nazi class shit we have going on here. Many end up with horrible diseases from testing vaccines, or have the diseases induced just to study them, it's absolutely abhorrent.

  116. 24 by lowry-kun · · Score: 1

    Too bad Jack Bauer and the folk from 24 couldn't get a prescription.

    --
    I no longer need to punish, deceive, or compromise myself. Unless, of course, I want to stay employed.
    1. Re:24 by Shai-kun · · Score: 1

      Just imagine.. I could actually watch an entire season of 24 all at once with this pill!

      --
      ...or so I've been told.
  117. Bound to happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember a few fringe articles a few months ago, regarding what the Pentagon's skunk works were up to and there was talk of a "Universal Soldier" type stuff, where the troops would be able to function non-stop 24/7 for a couple of weeks with very little food and no sleep, resulting in a formidable fighting force for intensive blitzkrieg type assaults. Now this drug comes up, so it seems that research is continuing on this line.

    However, with the Iraq experience, this will probably not be the solution for long-term campaigns that will drag on for years, unless you have a neverending supply of fresh meat and having bunches of burned-out husks of soldiers is not a problem.

  118. Monkeys on speed by amightywind · · Score: 1

    Tests performed on monkeys that were subjected to 30-36 hours of sleep deprivation revealed an average test performance accuracy drop to 63 percent, but that performance was restored to 84 percent after administering CX717.

    Mountain Dew or Amphetamines have the same effect. Does the new drug put the brain through the same 'regenerative process' as sleep, whatever that is? Can't say I am happy to hear that monkeys are being derived of sleep. Animal research like this is pretty repugnamt.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Monkeys on speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does the new drug put the brain through the same 'regenerative process' as sleep, whatever that is?
      A lot of the newer drugs work directly on the sleep generators, rather than directly stimulating other parts of the brain like caffeine and friends do. They actually reduce the need for sleep.
      Can't say I am happy to hear that monkeys are being derived of sleep. Animal research like this is pretty repugnamt.
      Why? The natural state of a monkey is to be crunched between teeth and torn apart alive.
  119. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody has yet noticed the usefulness of this drug to improve concentration and attentiveness.

  120. Great, that's all we need... by bitweever · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...sleep deprived, drugged up monkeys running amok.

  121. Also for ADHD by ewieling · · Score: 1

    I'm more interested in their study of how/if this new drug helps ADHD people. It even mentions it in TFA

    --
    I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
  122. Re:Don't ignore the signals. Manipulate them. by smokin_juan · · Score: 1

    Maybe you're not sleeping right for you. I'd be interested to know if you've ever tried polyphasic sleep... sleep for about 25 to 45 miuntes 6 to 4 times a day. From what I've read, your body adjusts to the schedule so that you do get a full sleep cycle within that short amount of time. Supposedly it's a hard schedule to nail down, but if you're into the habbit of waking shortly after sleeping then this might be exctly what you need.

    I'd be interested to know if you or any other insomiacs have tried polyphase. I'm quite the opposite - once asleep (a chore) I play hell trying to wake back up and that has it's own drawbacks. I've concidered polyphase just to get the extra 4 hours a day it yields (more like 5 or 6 for me).

  123. Sleep and Orgasm. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Funny
    Sexual energy is the base form of energy which we need to function properly and generally exist. It recharges during sleep, drawn from the universe and entering in through the sexual center just below the stomach. (Or so it is said in various ways by various sources.)

    In this society, we are powerfully encouraged to discharge that energy as quickly as possible through orgasm. According to some, sexual energy, once thus spent, is collected and consumed by etheric beings who exist in a higher level of reality and keep the human race like cattle for this purpose, (among others). True or not, you don't get to use your sexual energy once it's been given up through orgasm.

    On the other hand, sexual energy can also be saved up and used in other ways. People who have a lot of regular sex tend to be exhausted and dim behind the eyes because their primary source of 'income' energy is much reduced. One's level of awareness and the availability of energy are directly linked to one another.

    This is not to say that having orgasms is 'bad'. Physical sex is part of why we all came to this reality. It's fun, and it can be used to link in very powerful ways to other people, as well as link to otherwise difficult to access knowledge. But for the most part, people are instructed by the media to channel away their sexual energy immediately before it can be effectively used for anything else. In the morning, people often wake up in states of heightened arousal. This has nothing to do with holding back urination as conventional medicine tells us, (you don't get a woody any other time during the day when you need to 'go'. And it happens for women as well, who don't have the same plumbing) Sexual energy is there to be used as you wish.

    In any case, sleep is the way this energy finds its way into us from the Universal source. Drugs which prevent sleep are, I assume, accessing stored wells of energy, which cannot last forever. There is a reason why they say, "Speed Kills". --Of course, there are other ways in which to draw energy from the world around us other than sleep, including drawing energy from the earth through grounding meditations and exercises, (good!) Eating food and consuming life force, (standard), energetic vampirism through direct and indirect methods of torturing others, (nasty and ultimately self-destructive.). But above all of these, Sexual energy is potent and pure and freely available to anybody who can catch 40 winks.


    -FL

    1. Re:Sleep and Orgasm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yeh, that was the most unexpected post on slashdot i've read in a while ... /me shakes head

    2. Re:Sleep and Orgasm. by sumirati · · Score: 1

      If that would be true, viagra would be enough to "re-energize" manhood.

      Since it's all about a boner ;)

    3. Re:Sleep and Orgasm. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      Um, yeh, that was the most unexpected post on slashdot i've read in a while ... /me shakes head

      Expectations limit. Perhaps you're not shaking your head hard enough to break free.


      -FL

  124. Modafinil by swb · · Score: 1

    ...from what I've read, it's supposed to be only used for people suffering from narcolepsy.

    The story I read (about 3 years ago, in the New Yorker) mentioned that in experiments with it, normal people were able to stay awake for *days* on end (I think the longest was a week) without any of the symptoms typically associated with sleep deprivation -- fatigue, loss of mental abilities, and with enough deprivation, psychotic behavior.

    And as you said, they only needed a normal night of sleep to be back to square one -- no 36 hour marathons of sedative-laced sleep or days of recovery to feel normal. (*I* need 2-3 days of consecutive quality sleep to recover from even one all-nighter, and that's without using any stimulants).

    IIRC they really hadn't identified any substantive problems with it in terms of side effects, although I think it's probably new and there's always the chance of long-term brain rot. The article did say that while the drug was only approved for narcolepsy, it's apparently prescribed at a level beyond what's considered statistically appropriate given the known narcoleptic population. Apparently some people have figured out it's value.

    I asked my doctor if we could have a prescription after our son was born. I was mostly joking, but kind of serious. The sleep deprivation with a new child is pretty punishing, and being able to "take over" for 24 hours while the other slept would have been a huge benefit. Oddly the doctor didn't give me modafinil, but did give me Xanax.

    1. Re:Modafinil by sl956 · · Score: 1
      IIRC they really hadn't identified any substantive problems with it in terms of side effects
      It depends on what you mean by "substantive": the most commons side effects are headache, nervousness, and anxiety. A less common side effect is insomnia (often due to combination with alcohol).
      although I think it's probably new and there's always the chance of long-term brain rot.
      Modafinil is hardly new:
      • in France, it was approved by the french equivalent of the FDA back in 1992.
      • in the USA it was approved by the FDA for the treatment of narcolepsy in 1998.
      Oddly the doctor didn't give me modafinil, but did give me Xanax.
      Stupid... but common reaction. Xanax is higly addictive when Modafinil (or Adrafinil) is not... but Xanax, like most benzodiazepines, is socially well accepted, when Modafinil is mostly known as an item on the list of prohibited substances in anti-doping tests.
    2. Re:Modafinil by swb · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you mean by "substantive": the most commons side effects are headache, nervousness, and anxiety. A less common side effect is insomnia (often due to combination with alcohol).

      I haven't seen a comprehensive data sheet on it, what percentage of people report those symptoms? They could fit pretty much any drug with the slightest chance of an increase in blood pressure.

      Compared to something like Xanax, it is new, and the idea of using it on non-narcoleptic people for the purpose of increased wakefulness is pretty new, or at least that's the impression I got.

      I think my doctor was trying to treat the symptoms of anxiety, which he thought would improve sleeping, without coherently recognizing that while anxiety contributed to lack of sleep, the baby being awake and needing care @ 2 AM contributed to it more.

      I personally think that 2-3 months of Modafinil would have been more beneficial.

  125. Your body will revolt! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1
    And you know that some idiot employees will be escalating the standards of company loyalty by using these.

    At first I read that as using "three" but I've been up for 17 hours (how ironic)...

    But this drug won't make the 167 hour work week (6.958333 days) possible, as the user 'lastchance' has suggested in jest.

    From Wikipedia:
    Sleep debt is the cumulative effect of not getting enough sleep. The body seems to maintain an awareness of the cumulative amount of a person's missed sleep, when that person does not get enough sleep. Unlike sleep debt, a sleep surplus cannot be accumulated.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_debt
  126. Don't hold me in suspense! by Epistax · · Score: 1

    Felt like a million what?

    1. Re:Don't hold me in suspense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yen.

  127. Love your marketing plan for leprosy! by ianscot · · Score: 2, Informative
    Why can't I turn off the darn pain receptors? Why, as a (okay, this next bit is questionable, but just go with it) intelligent being can't I just acknowledge those signals, and snooze them or something?
    I know. It hurts. Leave me alone until I get to the hospital.

    Because if you can consciously 'snooze' nerves, you will reinjure yourself by trying to do stuff you shouldn't. (My knee hurts, so I think I'll just shut that pain down... Oops, I guess it wasn't good to try to push the accelerator normally on my way to the hospital. Is that supposed to bend that way?)

    Leprosy isn't associated with immediate mortality. People die of it indirectly, though, because they don't have the nerve feedback they need to protect themselves. Your conscious snooze system would run the same risks.

    Meanwhile the body does prevent you from feeling pain in some circumstances. People who break their legs can get past the point where they feel the pain any more. And the body sort of knows when that'd be best, for my money, better than I would.

    If you'd like to start shutting stuff down, I suggest bowing to the hystrionic news coverage from a couple of years back and turning off your car's airbag system. Just for starters.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Love your marketing plan for leprosy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree.

      The body just isn't adapted very well to our modern life. Look at chronic stress as an example. Yes, I know the pressures of modern life are bad, but having my body become a traitor to me by raising my levels of cortisol, increasing cell damage (free radical flux is higher in tissues with chronically high cortisol, due to inflammatory response), increased inflammation in general, raised blood pressure and altered adrenalin response...

      You get the picture. Even though I logically know that everything will be okay, and I can maintain a modern job, duties etc. without imminent death, my body and brain are falling behind.

      Inappropriate physiological responses like this are something we can do without. If drugs like this become available to help us, I'm all for it.
      (Plus, I would love to get my hands on something like this or modafinil. I rarely need to pull an all-nighter, but I always feel tired, and something like this might actually help me feel alert for once!)

  128. As a new father... by CokeJunky · · Score: 1

    My first child was born just three weeks ago (Boy, 7lbs, 11oz!)

    I am recently back at work, and let me tell you, I could use some of this stuff!

    --
    More Caffeine. NOW
  129. Take some melatonin by orfanotna · · Score: 1

    Have you tried taking melatonin? Worked like a charm for me when I had a couple of weeks when I had to work day shift for 2 days, night shift for 4 nights, day shift for 3 days, night shift for 1 night, i.e. totally random shift changes. Also useful in jet lag.

    If you have a big problem with falling asleep, your brain is probably not producing enough melatonin on its own, so give it some more.

  130. There is already Speed and Cocaine by tezza · · Score: 1
    The US Air Force is on record as charging pilots for not using the drug Speed on long missions [link].

    Truckers in outback Australia take speed to help them stay awake and make up for all the time they spent with mates/at brothel/corporate deadline.

    In the case of the Air Force, they have determined a safety regime to make the drug measured and safe to protect their multi million $$$ investment [the pilot]

    In the case of Truckers, they self diagnose, self dose and often overdo it or underdo it. Several High Grossing Vehicles have killed innocent people because of the practice.

    If you have ever had an ecstacy tablet, it most likely had speed in it. I hate speed myself. The worst thing about speed, having tried it, is that it makes you aggressive, short of temper and makes your teeth loose.

    I wonder what side effects these awake drugs will have.

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
  131. I can think of a few good uses... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    I think there are more innocent uses.

    Imagine the truck driver that gets a good night of sleep and is bound to strict regulations on how much he/she can drive in one day (without a fellow team driver) - but they tend to get tired seven hours into their (legally mandated maximum) 8 hour shift (or is it 12?). Now even though they are not yet racking up a sleep debt they start to lose some functions they need to stay alive (and possibly keep you alive too). Instead of using crystal meth, which is very popular amongst truck drivers, or even caffeine, they can actually use a drug that will really restore their brain functions - no stimulants needed, no addiction necessary.

    Another great use that comes to mind are those beat to death medical residents out there. My buddy just started his OB/GYN residency and has to work one 30 hour shift a week, usually finishing the week with four more shifts all lasting 12 hours each. If he can take something that keeps him from dropping a baby (which already almost happened) then I'd say 'pop those pills'!

    This drug sure has the potential to be abused, like any other. But like any drug it has great benefits, especially for those who work in dangerous jobs that have to push themselves to their limits with sleep deprivation building up on them.

    (I hope this makes sense, I've now been up for 17.5 hours. I'm not kidding, I've got bi-polar and find it's impossible to sleep when manic. Maybe I could score a few on the street in a few years.)

  132. insomnia - try a light and sound machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an older Innerpulse, similar to this
    http://www.iproducts.ws/InnerPulse.htm

    I set it on manual at a couple HZ and it makes me sleepy. The built-in programs are very entertaining - some of the visual and aural effects are spectacular

  133. I know what CX717 stands For! by GecKo213 · · Score: 1

    It's just the number of caffeine molecules crammed into the pill!

    See, that formula is simple!
    C = Caffeine X = multiplication (from simple math people) 717 = cafeine molecules.

    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
  134. symptoms may include but are not limited to: by DonniKatz · · Score: 0

    Abrasion Ache Aches and pains Aches and pains such as stiffness lumbago rheumatism and sciatica Aching limbs Acid indigestion Acid stomach Acne Acute gastroenteritis Acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis After care of haemorrhoids treated by surgery or injection Airway Alcohol Alkali intolerance Allergic condition Allergic conditions of the respiratory tract Allergic conjunctivitis Allergic contact dermatitis Allergic dermatoses Allergic rhinitis Allergic rhinitis with nasal congestion Allergic skin reaction Allergy through contact Allergy, allergies Amino acids Ammoniacal dermatitis Anaemia Anaemia in pregnancy Anal fissure Angi neurotic oedema Anti inflammatory agent Antiflatulent Antiseptic Antiseptic and analgesic for boils and minor skin infections Antiseptic wound cleansing Anus Artificial tear and lubricant Asthma Athletes foot Atopic dermatitis Atopic dermatoses Atopic eczema B Baby, babies Backache Bacteria Bacterial infections of the mouth and throat Bad breath Bath skin softener for dry skin Before and after dental surgery Before bathing skin softener Biliousness Bite, bites Blepharitis Blister, blisters Blocked nose due to allergy Blocked nose due to hayfever Blocked sinuses Blood blister Boil, boils Bowel regulation in bed ridden and pregnant women Breath freshener Breathing help Breathlessness Broken skin Bronchial and nasal congestion Bronchial breathlessness Bronchial catarrh Bronchial cold Bronchial congestion and catarrh in babies from three months Bronchial cough Bronchial cough wheezing and breathlessness Bronchial cough wheezing and breathlessness in children Bronchial wheezing Bruise Bruising Bunions Burn C Callouse Candida infections Catarrh Catarrh and head cold Catarrh bronchitis flu and throat infection Catarrh hayfever and nasal congestion Chaffing Chapped and sore hands Chapped flaky skin Chapped hands Chapped lips Chapping Chestiness Chesty bronchial and dry tickly cough Chesty cough Chesty cough and catarrh Chesty cough and nasal congestion Chesty cough and sore throat Chesty cough hoarseness and sore throat Chicken pox Chilblain, chilblains Children Chronic constipation Clean and refresh the mouth after meals Cleanser for face and body Cleansing Cleansing and disinfection of minor wounds cuts grazes and minor abrasions including insect bites and stings Cleansing and prevention of infection of all types of lesions Clear the chest of mucus after infection Clearer whites of the eye Coital discomfort in postmenopausal women Cold Cold and catarrh Cold and flu Cold and flu pains Cold and flu symptoms with aches and pains Cold and flu with a cough Cold and flu with a decongestant for catarrh Cold at night time Cold cough and catarrh Cold flu and a blocked nose Cold flu and catarrh Cold flu and headache Cold sores Cold sores of face Cold sores of lips Colds Colic Colon Common cold Common mouth ulcer Congestion Congestion and blocked nose associated with cold catarrh flu or hayfever Congestion and excess secretions in the upper respiratory tract Congestion and heavy mucus in the nasal cavity and sinuses Congestion associated with pain and fever Congestion of the upper airways Congestion relief in coughs colds and catarrh Conjunctivitis Constipation Contact dermatitis Contact with irritants Control and prohylaxis of skin infection Control of skin infection Convalescence Corn, corns Corns and callouses Corns and hard skin Cough Cough and associated congestion of nasal and bronchial mucous membrane Cough and associated congestive symptoms Cough and cold Cough and cold especially for babies and young children Cough and cold in children Cough and cold symptoms Cough and congestion Cough and congestion without drowsiness Cough and congestive symptoms particularly those associated with colds Cough and other upper respiratory tract infections Cough associated with bronchial catarrh Cough associated with bronchial cold Cough associated with bronchial influenza Cough associated with bronchial laryngitis Cough associated with bronchial pharyngitis Cough cold and influenza Cough colds and bronchial catarrh C

  135. side effects by blackdragon7777 · · Score: 1

    Here is what this thing will do: http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=73

  136. Sounds like a bunch of quacks to me by WebCowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    There have been studies that suggest sleep is simply a method for the brain to purge itself of "weak memories"

    If any medical person was to suggest that I would immediately dismiss him as a total quack. There is NO SUCH THING as an outside environmental influence that affects just one portion of the body. "Cleaning up the clutter" in your brain is only one effect of sleep. Your brain isn't a computer hard drive that needs defragging every night--it is much more complex than that and what affects the brain can affect any and all other parts of the body. There are autonomic responses that change when the brain is asleep vs. awake, changes to hormone levels, etc. that without doubt promote regeneration of the body. Sure, you can rest your skeletal muscles and let them rebuild without actually sleeping, but you cannot consciously control your heartbeat, muscles controlling your GI tract, the levels of hormones in your bloodstream and so on, so how can you expect to simulate the effects of sleep without actually sleeping?

    Beyond that, even if sleep was only about the brain, can you imagine the psychological effects of an accumulation of "weak memories" or excessively prolonged conscious brain activity? At best I think you'd end up being an ADD-like basket case. At worst you could go clinically insane.

    I think that should such a drug that counteracts the symptoms of sleep deprivation become widely available those who abuse it would reveal to us a whole host of side effects related to lack of sleep never before encountered. Apart from degrading mental health I think that people would physically age faster without sleep. Look at drug addicts today-sometimes they start out as "normal", smart, professional people that fro some reason get caught in an addiction. Early in the addiction they can function amazingly well with little or no sleep, but they slowly degrade as they fry their brains. While they are hooked these addicts age twice as fast as normal--even if they never end up on the street addicts in their 30s look like they are 50.

    This drug is like methadone--it is cocaine or speed without the highly addictive properties and some of the other adverse side effects. I believe that further, long-term/multi-year studies would reveal that the test animals might show good performance initially, but in a few years they'd look like junkies--even if they are still more mentally alert. I forsee similar results in humans--they might be very productive and alert compard to heroin addicts, but they'll look just as old and worn out.

    1. Re:Sounds like a bunch of quacks to me by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "that without doubt promote regeneration of the body."

      Well, since it's been so CLEARLY proven, how about you share the proof, insider?

    2. Re:Sounds like a bunch of quacks to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read in a psych textbook that they did a study on some rats where they prevented them from sleeping at all, and the rats died in something like two weeks.

      Dissection revealed that their regulatory systems (to maintain body temperature, etc.) had gone completely out of whack.

    3. Re:Sounds like a bunch of quacks to me by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Your brain isn't a computer hard drive that needs defragging every night

      If only it were. The first thing I'd do is delete all the crap and then defrag it. And then I'd index it.

  137. Is this tantamount to torture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how they kept the monkeys up 30 to 60 hours.

    Played a lot of heavy metal music?

    Poked it whenever it looked sleepy.

    Oh for the good old days when researchers tested on themselves.

  138. BS. Sleep is a disease and needs to be cured. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BS. Sleep is a disease and needs to be cured. It's a chronic disease that affects every human on the planet. We need a cure for sleep!

  139. Cyber-Monkeys! by Y2 · · Score: 1
    From TFA:
    EEG recordings were obtained in four animals from a set of five recording electrodes consisting of 1 mm diameter Ag/AgCl pellets on silver wire placed on the exposed dura around the circumference of a 1.5 cm diameter craniotomy access cylinder positioned over the parietal cortex and permanently attached to the skull.
    Trepanation with all the modern improvements!
    --
    "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
  140. Reverses or Ameliorates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is: what happens once it wears off?
    Does it *reverse* the effects of sleep deprivation?
    Or does it merely ameliorate them?
    Once it wears off, is there a crash landing?

  141. this is progress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Viagra sometimes causes 4 hour erections. Right now it's a side-effect, but it might be considered progress to our new CX717-popping overlords.

  142. Why another drug? We already have modafinil... by Mixel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Modafinil (aka Provigil) is already about, tested with very few side effects, only it is restricted to use in miliraty and by prescription only.

    The trick is to sell modafinil on the streets (no need to sleep for a week! w00t!), and use the surplus doctor/nurse shifts to treat those with the minor side effects. And extra police hours to tackle the odd abuser. Sorted.

    1. Re:Why another drug? We already have modafinil... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Modafinil is also habit-forming, which is the main reason I don't actively seek it anymore. I did get a shitload of extra stuff done while I was awake, though.

  143. Caffiene no longer a geek's best friend? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

    In other related news, geeks around the world are turning down caffiene in favor of CX717 for those long nights of coding and video game playing.

    --
    Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
  144. I would have to wonder... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    if this drug only masks a problem. One can mask the effects of fatigue by taking speed too but burn out will occur. I doubt that this drug is a replacement for sleep. More likely one would just feel great until heart failure occurs.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  145. Might meditation help? by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    I found that this guy gets me to sleep every time, when I am having trouble though it's usually because my mind is running and this type of meditation forces you to not think about everything by focusing on your breathing.

  146. Re:Sometimes its better to remember by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and the reverse is true(as per those power memory courses)...which ties also into old age, the more you are "comfortable doing nothing"...and delve less & less into the adventurous, the less & less you need to remember.
    By forcing a traumatic response in the brain to help remember something, you actually promote memory....
    so next time you need to remember that phone #, just imagine something "extreme"...and view the phone # in your head....you would be surprised at how easy it becomes to remember stuff....(96% average in college with a breeze)...
    Also i guess if you stay busy and keep your "self" always moving and more importantly build the neccessaty to remember things (even at 75) you will help promote against memory loss.

  147. Unfortunate news. by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you Google this, you can read all about Peter Tripp who never quite recovered completely from his sleep-deprivation publicity stunt. Ended up divorcing his wife, losing his job, etc. etc...

    Although sleep is still mostly a mystery, it is clear that it performs some sort of restorative effect. Does anyone know how this drug works and if it just blocks the symptoms of sleepiness?

    Get your 8 hours a night!

  148. Synthetic... by XO · · Score: 1

    so, what you're saying is, we've got synthetic caffeine now?

      I'll stick to the $1 pseudoephedrin pills available at most gas stations + a bottle of mt. dew or jolt to wash it down. Thanks!

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  149. We have carnival :-) by hummassa · · Score: 1

    At least two times (Porto Seguro both times) I went thru carnival (starts friday night, ends wednesday noon) with no sleep at all. Ok, I dozed off half an hour each day, but no real sleep. Worked the thursday and friday, and then, lose the entire weekend (go to sleep friday 21:00, wake up sunday 17:00, attend mass, go to sleep again, wake up monday 7:00 to go to work again.

    The good side is that it's 120h samba/axé, booze, making out, and occasionally having sex :-)

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  150. Doesn't caffiene do the same thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have no evidence this reverses the effects of sleep deprivation, only that it increases sleep-deprived monkeys ability to complete a certain task. A stimulant like caffiene does the same thing, so CX717 could simply be a stimulant. Until they demonstrate otherwise (like in a test that might demonstrate their claim, like 5 days of sleep deprivation followed by immense improvement in the ability to accomplish a task) this is all hype.

  151. Inhumane and Pointless by DukDuk · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    < rant >
    Why oh why does no one blink or yet shutter at the idea of this experiment and the torture of the primates that is involved.

    Please spare me any arguments of necessity of animal experimentation, it's all bullsh*t. The vast majority of torture disguised as science is just like this one - of questionable merit and hardly a life-or-death necessity that vivisectionist might have you believe.

    What contemptable crap. Of all the tools available to science and all the things this world needs, this is how some people spend their time - pursuing military dollars by torturing animals - socially-aware and emotive primates.

    < /rant >

    1. Re:Inhumane and Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice first post, we don't have enough flaming idiots around here, no sir.

      Well I sure hope to fuck to never see you in a hospital for any reason. You will be given untold numbers of treatments and tests using machines and chemicals which were initially tested on animals.

      If you truly care, then you'll stay at home and die.

    2. Re:Inhumane and Pointless by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Hey, what else are the monkeys going to do with their time? Fling poop? Now they have a little excitement in their lives.

  152. This is bad. I give it 2 weeks before recall. by Gldm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm having a hard time believing the following can be true:

    1. This doesn't get you high, even if taken at higher doses, like cough medicine.

    2. It does't get you high if you combine it with other legal or prescription substances.

    3. It's not addictive.

    One of the above is probably false. And that's bad. I give it two weeks before the first college kid goes on a 3 day binge the weekend before midterms, and pops 5x the reccomended dosage at 6am Monday morning, with a BAC still over the legal limit where it's been since Thursday.

    Granted these could be very useful and I would probably want to use them myself, but people are idiots, and this is going to harm or kill them, I guarantee it. I'm not anti-drug, I believe what you do with your own body is your own business and what I do with mine is mine (if only a single government on the planet agreed). But in the world we live in, this isn't going to fly. There'll be lawsuits all over the place.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  153. There are people who can't feel pain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They exist. Very very rarely, humans are born without the ability to feel pain. They usually die before reaching puberty as a result of some sort of injury that would have been much more minor had they been able to feel pain. I'm not joking; I'm too lazy to look it up right now but this is the truth.

  154. Bah, alcohol is a proven sleep inducer by lheal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Alcohol prevents you from reaching the deepest levels of sleep

    He's talking about not sleeping at all, or an hour or two a night. A lot of insomnia is in your head. He just might need that little something to relax and forget about not being able to sleep.

    Not trying something because it's not perfect is a sure way to fail. Alcohol changes the mood, relieves tension, and can make some people very sleepy. The stimulant effect is overrated, about like eating ice cream before bed.

    Self-hypnosis also can work, and as far as I know it's free of side effects.

    1. Get comfortable.
    2. Breath slowly.
    3. Close your eyes, with eyes looking slightly up inside the lids
    4. Start at 1000 and silently count slowly backwards. Allow your counting, breathing, and heartbeats to become rhythmic.
    5. I've never gotten past 800.
    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:Bah, alcohol is a proven sleep inducer by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "Alcohol changes the mood, relieves tension, and can make some people very sleepy."

      TEMPORARILY. You won't find ONE sleep expert who suggests its use for long term sleep disorders.

      "The stimulant effect is overrated, about like eating ice cream before bed."

      Strange, I recall reading a (actually a half dozen) study that CLEARLY showed a significant decrease in stage 4 and rem sleep. Care to show me a study that suggests YOU are right? Don't bother, it doesn't exist. More importantly, you're suggesting it is a GOOD thing to take a stimulant before bed. Do you see the flaw there?

      STOP GIVING ADVICE ABOUT SLEEP WHEN YOU HAVE NO FUCKING IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.

    2. Re:Bah, alcohol is a proven sleep inducer by lheal · · Score: 1

      Long term? Who gives a rat's ass about long term! I'm telling someone on Slashdot who hasn't had a night's sleep in forever how he can get one without paying an arm and a leg.

      This guy didn't complain about his sleep quality, just that he couldn't get any.

      Off my back, Ahole.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    3. Re:Bah, alcohol is a proven sleep inducer by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Dude, fuck you.

      You offered DUMB, WRONG advice to someone, and would have made his situation WORSE.

      That part about stage 4 and rem sleep that you ignored, that's the part that would help him feel better.

      So, if you want me to stay off your back, stop making STUPID, WRONG comments.

    4. Re:Bah, alcohol is a proven sleep inducer by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      This is what you wrote to me. You are a fucking hypocrite, since you write "Dude, fuck you" to the other guy. You are hiding behind your ifwm slashdot ID, anonymously. You fucking coward.

      It's a good thing you are good at licking jizz, or I'd have to get rid of you.

      Never mind, I can tell by your name that you think cursing and insulting people is a good idea.

          How pathetic your life must be that you hide behind a computer and call names, fully aware that if we ever met, you woudn't even be able to look me in the eye, much less try me like you have here.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    5. Re:Bah, alcohol is a proven sleep inducer by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Orlando, Fl. Ifwm@hotmail.com, ANYTIME YOU WANT TO TRY IN REAL LIFE, LET ME KNOW.

      But you won't because you know what would happen.

    6. Re:Bah, alcohol is a proven sleep inducer by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I don't live anywhere close to you, so you won't be able to have sex with me. sorry.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    7. Re:Bah, alcohol is a proven sleep inducer by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "I don't live anywhere close to you"

      Yeah, your mom's basement isn't all that close.

      So, given the opportunity, you show your colors. Now it's pretty obvious that despit all your talk, when given the chance to DO something, you turn coward.

      God you're a chickenshit, but that was obvious from the start.

      And save your excuses. We all know that people like you talk, then turn tail when confronted. You proved it once again.

    8. Re:Bah, alcohol is a proven sleep inducer by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You missed a little bit of cum dribbling out your ass.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  155. How to make it work by Carlbunn · · Score: 1

    1- Deprive monkeys of sleep 2- Test monkeys (crappy awareness results) 3- Scare the hell ou of the monkeys with big needle injections 4- Re-test monkeys (high awareness) 5- ????? 6- Profit!

  156. Symptoms, not cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A lot of people are talking about how this could revolutionize human life (or be abused in order to) to just get rid of sleeping all together -- this is missing the point. The drug doesn't seem to directly counteract sleep deprivation; in fact, it is just compensating for how sleep deprivation is manifested in human behavior.

    For example, two blind men are given a test where they have to organize objects by color. One is also given a textural cue on each object, the other is not. Obviously the subject with the texture cue will perform better, but that doesn't mean that texturizing is a cure for blindness!

  157. Here's why you sleep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sleep because it's the primordial, natural state of life itself. You only wake up to obtain nutrients and to procreate. Anything else you do while awake is extraneous to this. You share this with all animal life forms. You may even share it with all plant life forms, too. Being awake is a temporary state, too much of which will kill you because it is not natural to be awake. This is a metabolic fact of life. Sleep isn't a behavioral adaptation. Being awake is a temporary metabolic phase. Without it you'd starve and you wouldn't procreate, but that is all you really need to do while awake. Everything else you do while awake is a "bonus". The fact that too much sleep won't kill you is the key idea here. Why do we sleep is the wrong question. Why do we wake up is the right question, and that's an easily answerable question.

  158. Nothing new here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds just like cocaine; and I'd hardly be surprised if the long-term effects, also on personality, turned out to be pretty similar.

    Sleep is a vital ingredient for the sustained function of practically every complex neurobiologically controlled organism.

    If it could be replaced by drugs without detrimental side effects (at least in the long run), we'd have glands providing the equivalent neurotransmitter substances non-stop.

  159. the next fen-phen, vioxx, or prozac? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Any drug that can affect your nervous system can have all kinds of side-effects around the body. Nurotransmitors not only affect brain cells, but are whidely used in the digestive system and blood vessels too. Fuck around in one place and you may fuck around elsewhere and a bunh early corpses found out.

  160. Alertec/modafinil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This drug is extremely effective in reversing the effects of sleep deprivation, without the side-efects. Indeed, it increases alertness without sacrificing response times (ordinarliy a major drawback of traditional "stimulants", (which Alertec is not, BTW, at least in the conventional sense)).

    It's already prescribed, off-lable, for use by the likes of shift workers. For example: it is known to be in wide use by doctors an other medical professionals that wotk in emergency environments.

    I've tried it, and it's uncanny: you could have been awake for 20 hours straight, and be falling-down tired. Then you take a dose of modafinil and, in no time, it's like you just woke up. Twitchyness or jitteryness? Foret about it, coz it doesn't happen w/this drug. After a time depending on the dosage you took, you become tired again, and can fall asleep normally.

    I once used it to stay awake for just under a week (that's _seven_ days w/o sleep), and was alert and "normal" the whole time (and have been fine since). It sounds crazy, I know, but educate yourself on this drug before you jump to conclusions.

    1. Re:Alertec/modafinil? by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 1

      glad it works for you.
      for the vast majority of people (at least those I met)
      jitteryness, anxiety, lack of concentration, irritability, mild nausea, headaches, even nightmares are common side-effects to modafinil.

      Plus the fact it can be pretty tolerance building.

      Modafinil maybe be hyped but is no wonder drug
      of course self-suggestion and faith has always increased any medicine's potency.

      The article suggests Provigil is addictive, now that I think is nonsense.

      Addictive is that substance that you immediately feel real physical withdrawal symptons (aka cold turkey) once you stop. That does not happen with modafinil.
      But seem to happen with other drugs like: sleeping pills, anti-depressants and even alcohol in some cases where sudden withdrawal can be life-threatening.

  161. sigh... everyone thinks they are right by extra+the+woos · · Score: 1

    uhhhhh.. yo

    ritalin is NOT an amphetamine last i checked... and is not really too similar to meth at all!!! Well, of course it is similar, but you know what i mean... Last i checked it was actually very similar in action to.. cocaine...

    So yes

    Ritalin=similar to coke
    Adderall=a mix of 4 amphetamine salts designed to be the smoothest acting (seriously, and you wonder why it gets abused)...

    but since no one has bothered to link to any reputable sites, lemme just go

    http://slate.msn.com/id/2076413/

    --
    replacing it with NEW Folger's Crystals! (lets see if they notice the difference)
    1. Re:sigh... everyone thinks they are right by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "sigh... everyone thinks they are right"

      From the wiki:

      "The pharmacological profiles and relative usefulness of dextro- and laevo-methylphenidate is analogous to what is found in amphetamine, where dextro-amphetamine is considered to have a more beneficial effect than laevo-amphetamine"

      So you should be sighing about yourself, then apologizing to me.

  162. could it help.... by The_Candyman · · Score: 1

    Maybe it would allow me to remember where I put my keys!

  163. Monkeys?! by m487396 · · Score: 1

    Test it on _nurses_ and then we'll see how well it works!

  164. How about sleeping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't sleeping the sleep deprivation cure? I think it would be many times more worthy finding a drug that could double the effects of sleeping. So you could sleep 4 hours and awake feeling great and totally restored.

  165. The solution by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    And really its only the last 4 hours before a deadline that the work gets done

    It seems like you should be given far more deadlines!

  166. Become a freelancer. Seriously. by Post · · Score: 1

    Man, whatever it is you do for a living:
    Try to become a freelancer.

    Get up. Enjoy a big, healthy breakfast. Take a walk, go shopping, enjoy the sun, meet friends.

    Six or seven hours later, go to work (you still need a "buffer" in case something goes wrong with your job.)

    Work until you are too tired to go on. When you cant understand what you just wrote/read, it is definitely time to go to bed.

    This may feel weird at the start (our culture seems to be hardwired to the "work first/play afterwards" model), but it works for me.

    I have been living like this for almost twenty years, and it works. I go to bed when I am tired. I get circa eight hours of fun, eight hours of work and eight hours of sleep out of the day, like almost everybody else. I just accept the offset (and I have clients who are willing to do the same, among them a tiny little software company from Redmond).

    Try it. You might like it.

    PS: Never, ever use your bed for something else than sleep or sex. Condition your brain to accept this as the place where it is supposed to shut down. This is important. Trust me.

  167. It's street name is Crystal Meth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Works wonders once, unfortunately after that giving a damn about anything else ends forever.

  168. Now we have drugs for sleep deprivation? by VanessaDannenberg · · Score: 2, Insightful
    TFA doesn't really say exactly what the drug does, but it looks like it simply masks or relieves the symptoms of sleep deprivation.

    As a long-time sufferer of obstructive sleep apnea (got the official diagnosis today in fact, after 15 or more years suffering from it), and showing all of the symptoms of it including extreme weight gain, lack of coordination, restlessness , ittitability, fatigue, and so on, I think I speak for everyone here - I'd much rather correct the problem of sleep deprivation itself than take some drug that claims to restore my mental state (in the case of depression: Zoloft, anyone?)

    The few pills I take every day are already enough - stop typing to shove MORE chemicals down my throat that only take care of the symptoms, and start fixing the problem at the source. That's where our research needs to be focused, for *any* condition that needs corrected.

    If the problem is lack of sleep because of lack of time or deadlines or something, then maybe a change of career or priorities is needed. But if it's medical, then corrective *action* is needed. I had to get totally out of the working world because I couldn't handle it anymore, and it was literally killing me. Is it really so hard then, to keep your job and just adjust your lifestyle to make more time for sleep?

    --
    Karma: I don't care too much, but it's 0.0% (mostly due to lack of interest)
  169. I invented this years ago.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I do for the same effect is mix caffeine and nicotine. Works for me, I've been up for 6 days now and no probbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

  170. CX717's a hell of a drug. by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    Is this just rebranded cocaine?

  171. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  172. For the /. crowd... by PrntlUnit27 · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just overclocking the human body? Seriously, as a narcoleptic "friend" tells me, his Modafinil overrides normal sleep deprivation effects. His body then allows him to continue on an artificially acceptable minimum sleep level. The problem is that just a few days of this leads to strange headaches and moods. The only way to set things straight is to actually *sleep*. How novel!

  173. I know you're just being funny, but... by wurp · · Score: 1

    Yeah, yeah, offtopic, but I have karma to burn.

    I have found that using a very fine grained task work method keeps me in that "last 4 hours" mindset all the time.

    I have heard it explained as Agile, and also as XP, but here are the bits that I think are really important:

          * break down the whole project into user stories: the complete list of stuff the user gives a shit about, in the form of little one or two sentence stories about what the user does/the results he expects
          * estimate the time to implement the user stories and rank them by risk (high, medium, or low). The risk is how likely it is to take significantly longer than you estimated to do it. Sometimes something could take 2 days, or 2 weeks, depending on whether something goes wrong. Estimate in team days.
          * pick a list of 2 weeks worth of user stories. Break them down into tasks. The vast, vast majority of tasks should be 2 days or less of work; break 'em up if they're more. The 2 week period is called an iteration.
          * every single day, meet with everyone on the team and tell what tasks you finished since the last meeting, what tasks you're working on, and what you plan to do tomorrow. Also if you face any roadblocks. This meeting is your "last 4 hours" mentality. This meeting should take less than 20 minutes.

    There's lots more, but basically this is a combination of Rational Unified Process, XP, and Agile. In my fairly considerable experience doing software development, it kicks ass. It is not only more productive, it is more fun.

    BTW, estimation should be done using planning poker... everyone on the team discusses the scope of the user story and what new things have to be done to accomplish it, estimates in team days on a hidden card, then all show their card at once. Argue until you all agree. If the estimate is more than 5 team days, break up the user story.

    End off-topic rant.

  174. Truck Drivers by clickster · · Score: 1

    I would like to take this opportunity to extend my deepest sympathy to truck drivers everywhere. Watch for this to become mandatory as a way to decrease accidents with current driving hours, then slowly but surely they will increase the driving hours.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  175. 10 years off sleep deprivation. by keilinw · · Score: 1

    For about ten years of my life I've suffered from Obstructive Sleep Apnea (a condition where breathing problems interfere with the bodies ability to get REM sleep). While I did get stage 1-3 sleep I was pretty deficient in stage for REM sleep... and I really did feel horrible all the time. This drug promises to improve poeples lives!

    While I am certain that countless evil corporations would love to further enslave their busy laborers there is quite a bit to think about here.

    Why do we suffer from sleep deprivation symptoms? If sleep deprivation is natures method of preventing further damage by warning the body that it needs further sleep then what will happen if we ignore these signals. This would be like taking a pain killer to allow us to hurt ourselves more.

    On the other hand, perhaps sleep deprivation is just a nasty side effect of our body's inhereted need for nocturnal protection. In this case people everywhere might simply choose not to sleep. Would this have an impact on our lifespans? Stress levels? Etc. I for one do enjoy sleep quite a bit...

    I find this article quite interesting but I'd be afaid to try the drug without further research into the field of sleep study. After all, I'm finally free from 10 years of sleep deprivation...

  176. You asked... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    ..and so I'll provide an answer

    There is actually a lot of evidence backing my point...

    This is hardly "insider" stuff--it is "popular science" material my friend. Hormones affect sleep, sleep affects hormones and so on...it is all linked and involves more than cognitive abilities are physical alertness. Sleep deprivation (especially long-term/chronic) can affect growth, metabolism, aging, sex drive...everything. There is no way a single drug that merely keeps you physically and mentally alert without sleep would be healthy if used chronically.

    1. Re:You asked... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Did you read your OWN links? There is not a single bit of proof of ANY of the claims you make. Nice try though

  177. Propecia+Viagra+CX717=Rob Jeremy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Horny hairy guys going at it for 36 hours straight! Is it me or are the drug manufacturers trying to turn all men into Ron Jeremy??!?!

  178. This just in... by ryanov · · Score: 1

    Hey, you know what else reverses the effects of sleep deprivation? SLEEP! And that's not all -- it's FREE!

    1. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time is money.

  179. Simpson's reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is it kind of like Focusin?

  180. Ritalin; drugs not a substitute for the real thing by AzureLunatic · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I would not say "nobody panics", given the number of books I've seen on the topic of avoiding it:

    Talking Back to Ritalin
    Ritalin-Free Kids
    No More Ritalin
    The Myth of the A.D.D. Child
    (some of the selections from an Amazon.com search on the word "ritalin".)

    In the case of ritalin and similar drugs intended to curb hyperactivity, especially in children, I would say, both anecdotally and as the result of doing a college freshman-level research paper, that while I'm very certain that it's been overprescribed and abused (I am not a doctor, but I do not think that a single half-hour session of observing a child is sufficient to label them hyperactive) that there are those cases where it is appropriate to treat hyperactivity and attention problems that don't respond to other methods.

    I don't think that Ritalin is an appropriate substitute for parental and teacher time, attention, training, and exercise to run the wiggles out before sitting down to learn. If I, as an aunt, can get my six-year-old nephew to sit still and behave himself for the entirety of a three hour college lecture on a weekly basis (ten minute breaks in between sessions, during which there were bathroom visits and an opportunity to tear around like a mad thing) and the first grade teacher cannot get the same child to hold still in class, that speaks more of a too-large class size, not enough individualized attention, not enough opportunity to burn all that youthful energy on physical activity, and a behavioural problem with listening to the teacher, rather than a medical condition.

    I can see using a focus-enhancing drug to prove to a kid that yes, you can too sit still and learn in class, and this is what it feels like -- and now you are going to learn to do the same thing without the pill. One of my camp buddies was on Ritalin, and he was much more focused on the drug, but much more personable and interesting to be around when unmedicated.

    Similarly, I do not think that this new sleep-deprivation drug is going to in any way replace the actual sleep. It will be used and abused, and people are going to make an unholy fuss over it, but I think in the long run, people who use it wisely or people who just go with natural sleep are going to be ultimately more productive and pleasant to work with. The article does not mention side effects. There's no guarantee that people on this are going to be any more pleasant to work with while alert and sleep-deprived on this rather than on coffee. It didn't mention how much sleep someone requires after using this; it could well be something where people feel alarmingly hung-over after using unless they've gotten a solid ten to twelve hours of sleep. It doesn't mention effectiveness as a morning caffeine substitute.

    The one brilliant application that does spring to mind is actually for resetting a funky biological clock: for jetlag and schedule-based insomnia. If this provides alertness without some of the harsh effects of caffeine, I would definitely apply it for myself on those days when I have to work mornings and start burning out around 3 pm. (I usually work afternoons and evenings, so my scheduled bedtime is somewhere upwards

  181. Hopefully will Help my Epilepsy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm posting this as an AC, I think for obvious reasons, but I have epilepsy caused by sleep deprivation. Its a somewhat rare occurance that's misunderstood by people. Most think that seizures from epilepsy just "happen". This is true for many. There are other causes like certain smells or visual senses such as 'disco lights' that trigger a seizure.

    In my case, if I literally do not get 6 to 8 hours of sleep per night or I'm sufficiently sleep deprived I will suffer a seizure (minor now because I'm medication but much worse otherwise). I'm hoping that this medication might lead to a better epilepsy treatment in a few years that might not only prevent the seizure but also prevent the effect of sleep deprivation from setting in. But I won't work 36 hours straight ;)

  182. Re: "Negro Cocaine Fiends" by Sinner · · Score: 1

    Good to see The New York Times is maintaining the same journalistic standards today as it did in 1914!

    --
    fish and pipes
  183. Beggars in Spain by Calroth · · Score: 1

    Beggars in Spain, by Nancy Kress - I think that link is referral-free, but post better ones if you like.

    It's a novella set in the near future where people have found that sleep really is useless and an evolutionary relic, and people without sleep seem to perform just fine. Not just fine - they're smarter (due to all that extra study time) and happier (due to the resulting changes to brain chemistry).

    They find a gene that turn sleep off, and start disabling it in newborns - kicking off an entire race of smarter, happier humans who have no need to sleep. For some reason, the rest of us feel threatened by it...

    Anyway, for anyone interested in this discussion, the novella is worth a read. (It also took the double of both Hugo and Nebula Awards in 1992 and 1991, for those who care.)

    1. Re:Beggars in Spain by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      The whole series of novels is excellent.

      As for the topic...I've been on Modafinil for marathon 39-hour waking binges but the side effects (stomach problems) weren't necessarily worth it. This new drug sounds promising in combination if they can improve Modafinil or similar drugs to the point where the side-effects are minimal. If I could completely eliminate sleep with no ill-effects I'd do it in a heartbeat.

  184. The Unsleep by blastard · · Score: 1

    There was a book from 1961 called "The Unsleep" It featured the drug Sta-Awake." It is a good read if you can find a copy of it. Authors were Diana and Meir Gillon. I have a copy somewhere having read it about 10 years ago. It still pops up in my mind these days. In the wide awake world of the future, beds become known only for its non-sleep purpose, and people have to find ways to use up their extra time they have available. The social impact of all of this is explored. I won't say anything more to spoil the story if you can find it.

    1. Re:The Unsleep by blastard · · Score: 1
      I have found a link to the cover of the version I have. http://members.cox.net/sjrohde3/images/books_g/gil lon_unsleep_balf571.jpg

      The quote on the front from none other thatn Athur C. Clarke is. "Both an amusing fantasy and a serious warning of the 24-hour a day future."

  185. Give me some of that Tromacyllin by KJSwartz · · Score: 1

    Work getting you down? Bloodsuckers and backstabbers at your doorstep? Got that sudden urge to suck on some grey matter?

    Try Tromactyn !

    Listen to some unsolicited comments we've pai^H^H^Hreceived.

    [Swamp Thing] I had a real problem with my family life, what with the pollution, the local yokels always shooting up the place.

    [Sgt. Kabukiman] Thats tough Swampy, but with me its the Rads that really drain you. After 16 hours walking the halls of THS, dealing with mutant freaks, this miracle drug really straightens you out.

    [Both smiles at cameraman]

    [Cameraman runs for cover]

  186. All a marketing ploy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Scientist: That appetite depressant is amazing!
    Scientist 2: Homer... you really have no desire to eat that food?
    Homer: Food... food?! I'm blind! Augh! Augh!
    Scientist: Who's gonna buy a pill that makes you blind?
    Scientist 2: Why don't we let marketing worry about that.

  187. modafinil by uptoeleven · · Score: 1

    same benefits, fewer side-effects, no reports of dependency or aggression.

    It's good shit. Doesn't make you high though which is why some people find it a little disappointing. Having become used to the flood of seratonin, melatonin and adrenalin which kicks in with coke & sulphate - ie the high - some people don't appreciate having it taken away when they take safer stuff like modafinil. But once you get over that it's quite nice to stay awake without having your judgement impaired.

  188. Adrenaline shot? by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
    I can complain that my doctor didn't give me an adrenaline shot so I couldn't lift the car off of my wife when we got into a wreck. Ok, bad example

    Preposterous example! What you would have needed was a dose of gamma radiation!

  189. Yes I read them, you just ignored them by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    From the first link:

    We found that the metabolic and endocrine changes resulting from a significant sleep debt mimic many of the hallmarks of aging

    That was EXACTLY ONE OF THE POINTS I MADE in my original post--if one were to abuse a medication that allowed you to stay awake for extended periods, and did so for many years, then you could very well age at an accelerated rate, much like junkies hooked on cocaine, speed or heroin do. yes, junkies often lead hard lives that can wear tehm down faster, but one of the characteristics they share is that they all suffer from significant sleep deprivation at various times. The article only mentions the findings, but if you want to see details of the proof then go find Dr Van Cauter's study.

    The other articles I referenced are more to prove the point that sleep does more than let your brain get organised. The fact that the study mentioned in the first article is the first serious study EVER on the effects of LONG TERM sleep deprivation and it only happened in the last few years indicates to me that medical science is extremely unqualified at this point to say with confidence that we can medicate our way out of requiring sleep.