No, that doesn't make any sense at all. The key thing about NeWS and AJAX is that you can use whatever language you want on the server, but the client that actually does all the drawing has its own, different language (PostScript and JavaScript, respectively).
It could be made, but it couldn't store nearly as much at nearly as high a quality as they can with a Blu-ray. Consider that a Blu-ray disc can store 50GB of MPEG-4 AVC (which I expect is a pretty common format), as opposed to 8.5GB of MPEG-4 AVC with this idea.
That is in fact the point of the Many Worlds interpretation. You only observe the universe you're in, because you're only in the universe you're in. Why would you expect to be able to determine anything about a universe that you're not in, even if it had, at some point, branched off of yours?
You could rewrite the license, but then the original author would not be giving you permission to distribute it, as you're not following the BSD license. However, nothing is preventing you from adding additional terms. Additionally, if it's dual-licensed and you're going to be distributing it under the terms of the GPL, nothing prevents you from modifying or removing the terms of the BSD license, because nothing at all says it has to stay intact. The license you have was from the person who gave you the code to you; your ability to redistribute the code in any form that you want is only affected by the terms of that original license that you agreed with.
"Fly me to the moon" is just the headline of the story and the name of a song; it does not, in fact, have anything to do with the location of the hotel. The hotel would probably be built in low earth orbit.
Not all radiation is made of photons. Specifically, alpha rays are made of helium nuclei (and are therefore positive) and beta rays are made of electrons (and are therefore negative).
As far as I know, health insurance isn't supposed to be protecting against the risk of risk. You don't get health insurance to protect against the risk that you start smoking and have to deal with the likely consequence, you get health insurance to protect against the likely consequences of smoking (e.g. cancer).
The reason a healthy person should get health insurance is to protect against the risk that he will randomly become unhealthy (because once you have health problems, it's much harder to get insurance that covers them). As such, nonrandom effects (choices) should not be protected against - doing so reduces any incentive to do what's best overall.
This means absolutely nothing for Terry Schiavo, as they tried this technique (or at least one very similar to it) and it didn't work.
He noted that a similar treatment did not help Terri Schiavo, the Florida woman in a vegetative state whose care triggered national controversy before her death in 2005. That's the typical outcome for electrical brain stimulation in vegetative states, he said.
Oh, since you said "Remember people, locks [...a]re about making you FEEL secure," and you apparently don't feel secure because of them, you had no use for them. My mistake. I suppose you meant "Remember people, locks aren't about making you secure, they're about making you more secure than you were previously (and maybe they'll make you feel more secure too)." In which case, they might be a valid technique.
"True" QC, "fake" QC, what does it really matter? The only things that really matter in the end are performance and price (and possibly power dissipation). From the standpoint of a consumer, the internal technology has no importance at all.
Now, if you said that "true" quad core was going to make the chips be twice as fast as Intel's, at half the price, then that would be interesting. Of course, you could say that the chips would twice as fast at half the price, and that would be just as interesting - the technology has nothing to do with it.
Slashdot Mirror
They're made out of sugar or potassium hydroxide, so good luck with that.
The law firm is a partnership, but SCO is not: SCO is probably a limited liability corporation, which would limit any investors' liability.
No, that doesn't make any sense at all. The key thing about NeWS and AJAX is that you can use whatever language you want on the server, but the client that actually does all the drawing has its own, different language (PostScript and JavaScript, respectively).
Or unless it DMAs stuff over, right on top of the kernel...
The medium is, in fact, the solar wind.
Well, the general knowledge really is "it is at the right price." If everyone thought it cost too much, then they would all be selling or shorting it.
You seem to be a bit confused. ATI has not released the source to fglrx, and they haven't yet released the spec for doing 3D.
Paypal seems to be doing just that. Now, we just have the problem of trusting Paypal's servers.
It could be made, but it couldn't store nearly as much at nearly as high a quality as they can with a Blu-ray. Consider that a Blu-ray disc can store 50GB of MPEG-4 AVC (which I expect is a pretty common format), as opposed to 8.5GB of MPEG-4 AVC with this idea.
That is in fact the point of the Many Worlds interpretation. You only observe the universe you're in, because you're only in the universe you're in. Why would you expect to be able to determine anything about a universe that you're not in, even if it had, at some point, branched off of yours?
You could rewrite the license, but then the original author would not be giving you permission to distribute it, as you're not following the BSD license. However, nothing is preventing you from adding additional terms. Additionally, if it's dual-licensed and you're going to be distributing it under the terms of the GPL, nothing prevents you from modifying or removing the terms of the BSD license, because nothing at all says it has to stay intact. The license you have was from the person who gave you the code to you; your ability to redistribute the code in any form that you want is only affected by the terms of that original license that you agreed with.
They've actually done it. It's time to buy an ATI card.
Make sure you tell the enemy first, or they won't know to avoid triggering your doomsday device.
Shotguns? How déclassé - they would definitely use katanas.
"Fly me to the moon" is just the headline of the story and the name of a song; it does not, in fact, have anything to do with the location of the hotel. The hotel would probably be built in low earth orbit.
Not all radiation is made of photons. Specifically, alpha rays are made of helium nuclei (and are therefore positive) and beta rays are made of electrons (and are therefore negative).
Well, if they're providing the data to someone who's using mythtv, it's quite possible that that person won't be watching the advertising.
As far as I know, health insurance isn't supposed to be protecting against the risk of risk. You don't get health insurance to protect against the risk that you start smoking and have to deal with the likely consequence, you get health insurance to protect against the likely consequences of smoking (e.g. cancer).
The reason a healthy person should get health insurance is to protect against the risk that he will randomly become unhealthy (because once you have health problems, it's much harder to get insurance that covers them). As such, nonrandom effects (choices) should not be protected against - doing so reduces any incentive to do what's best overall.
Please read the article next time.
Oh, since you said "Remember people, locks [...a]re about making you FEEL secure," and you apparently don't feel secure because of them, you had no use for them. My mistake. I suppose you meant "Remember people, locks aren't about making you secure, they're about making you more secure than you were previously (and maybe they'll make you feel more secure too)." In which case, they might be a valid technique.
In this case, it might be better to call it a "do not kill" switch.
Remember people, locks aren't about making you secure, they're about making you FEEL secure.
So you never lock your car, or your house, or anything you own?
"True" QC, "fake" QC, what does it really matter? The only things that really matter in the end are performance and price (and possibly power dissipation). From the standpoint of a consumer, the internal technology has no importance at all.
Now, if you said that "true" quad core was going to make the chips be twice as fast as Intel's, at half the price, then that would be interesting. Of course, you could say that the chips would twice as fast at half the price, and that would be just as interesting - the technology has nothing to do with it.
Apparently it's more effective than the other system I heard about that does that.