You FOOL! Mr. Quayle, those potatos were perfect for making some good vodka, and the hard part was already done, making them into mush.
Re:I'm all for science/technology/astronomy but...
on
Back to Moon in 2015?
·
· Score: 1
Note to self: 1. Find location of lost nuclear subs 2. Build *successful* Howard Hughes type ship to mine the sea for manganese nodules. 3. Get contact info for rogue states/terrorist groups/some guy named Raven. 4.Profit!!!
Speaking as someone who has endured the "medication is the only solution" "cure", I think that you've probably cornered the market. For whatever reasons, psychiatrists dole out prozac, ritalin, zoloft, risperdal etc... like they were candy. Keep up the actually informative blog.
>Quite an achievment for Intel to produce a "next generation" architecture that's slower per cycle than the previous.
Repeat after me: CPI != performance. #instructions/program != performance. cycles/second != performance. Performance = Time = 1/(CPI*(instructions/program)*(cycles/second)). Now go learn some more about processor design before you decide to lecture someone who does it for a living.
Comparison of G5 P4 transistor counts IBM PPC 970 = 25M -> PPC 970FX = 28M
Intel P4 "Northwood" = 28M -> P4 "Prescott" = 65M Comparison of G5 P4 spec performance SPECint2000 3800 Pentium 4 E 1815 1793 2200 PowerPC 970 1040 986 So the G5 had between 90% and 45% of the transistors, to get, assuming the fastest 2.7ghz G5 has 1.25x the performance of a 2.2ghz, performance that still leaves the P4 1.4x faster, as well as being cheaper.
RISC architecture has won over CISC, because the Pentium is RISC. It may have a CISC ISA, but that gets decoded to RISC micro-ops. One of the major reasons that all new CPUs use a RISC ISA as well as internal archicture, is because it's much simpler to design.
The right/best move in a poker game is the one with the highest expected value. This can easily be calculated if you know the probabilities of your opponents cards/moves based on their's and your actions, the board and your cards. Note that this does in now way equate with being predictable, and it includes in it the ideas of check raising and bluffing, as well any other tactical move. If you opponents knew exactly what you were doing, they would only know that you were making a move that on average would make money.
P4 spec performance. The only consumer processor comparable to the P4 is AMD64, and it has a lower base int score, with higher int peak, and lower base/peak fp scores.
Handwriting analysis:
Use of precise straight lines indicates unyielding nature towards achieveing goals. Constant spacing supports this with evidence that Peristarkawan is a man of action. No slant tends towards highly disciplined. Space between letters shows logical and systematic thinking. Highly legible - FLAG! - Wolf in sheeps clothing.
Conclusion: Subject is dangerous member of terrorist cell. Suggest immediate apprehension and tort^H^H^Hdetainment at Gitmo.
There's always stenography. I highly doubt that any system that is implemented would be able to detect people sending some pictures of their weekend bbq with some encrypted text hidden inside.
Re:ATTN: department of homeland security
on
The Evil in E-Mail
·
· Score: 1
Well duh, he didn't want to get in *real* trouble.
Realistically, how many people would be necessary to do a little tinkering? I don't have a clue, but if it's more than a handfull, I doubt it was electioneering, and just plain dirty politics as usual. Comparing the 2000 and 2004 presidential debates, Gore/Kerry both came off as wooden intellectuals, while Bush was more dumbass common man, and apprently America wants a dumbass common man.
You haven't proven your assertions, because they're wrong, yet you continue attacking me, so the fact remains that you're an ignorant fool, doomed to a pitiful life of failure and broken dreams.
You don't seem to understand the big O notation. O(1) time means for *any* size input it's a constant time operation, likewise, O(lgN) scales as the log, and so on. So if you were trying to make a constant time multiply, you'd need an infinite lookup table, which does tend to present a slight engineering challenge. For factoring keys, sure you could just use a 2^1024 bit lookup table, but the big O notation would be used on the factoring algorithm for a general purpose n digit number, which would be something like O(e^(n)).
You are a retard. If you had read my post, you'd see that your delusions were completely discredited. And now, instead of providing ever providing any refutations, you proceed to pretend that I'm making ad homiem attacks, when 2 minutes before you call me an apologist for racism based on, what exactly? Since no troll can suck this bad, I must conclude you're a whiney "activist". Learn to tell the difference between ad homiem attacks and calling someone an idiot because they are.
1. Your claim of the jewish stereotype of victimization was refuted, and you can only latch onto me not included the Jewish homeland defn of Zion, which is moronic because if you knew anything about Jews you would know that.
2. You do not prove your extraordinary claim that the majority of Jews are racist, latching onto some false defn of goy. The real defn is here, and here, and webster.com disagrees with the dictionary.com defn
webster.com goy nation sometimes disparaging
dictionary.com goy Used as a disparaging term for one who is not a Jew. Since the two Jewish sites and webster.com disagree with dictionary.com, I'd say dictionary.com is wrong.
Since you then go own to claim that Jews were the first to practice genocide, and you do not have the reading comprehension skills to understand that the sentance "I must conclude that you were either trolling, or a moronic "activist" whining about the plight of the Palestinians or Mumia Abu-Jamal" never mentions you whining about the Palestinians or Mumia Abu-Jamal, only putting you in the same class, my points stand, and my conclusions are now competely proven
Slashdot Mirror
You FOOL!
Mr. Quayle, those potatos were perfect for making some good vodka, and the hard part was already done, making them into mush.
Note to self:
1. Find location of lost nuclear subs
2. Build *successful* Howard Hughes type ship to mine the sea for manganese nodules.
3. Get contact info for rogue states/terrorist groups/some guy named Raven.
4.Profit!!!
Speaking as someone who has endured the "medication is the only solution" "cure", I think that you've probably cornered the market. For whatever reasons, psychiatrists dole out prozac, ritalin, zoloft, risperdal etc... like they were candy. Keep up the actually informative blog.
Yeah, something like that happened to me once. Borders kicked me out for moving all the bibles to the fiction section.
>Quite an achievment for Intel to produce a "next generation" architecture that's slower per cycle than the previous.
Repeat after me: CPI != performance. #instructions/program != performance. cycles/second != performance. Performance = Time = 1/(CPI*(instructions/program)*(cycles/second)). Now go learn some more about processor design before you decide to lecture someone who does it for a living.
Comparison of G5 P4 transistor counts
IBM PPC 970 = 25M -> PPC 970FX = 28M
Intel P4 "Northwood" = 28M -> P4 "Prescott" = 65M
Comparison of G5 P4 spec performance
SPECint2000
3800 Pentium 4 E 1815 1793
2200 PowerPC 970 1040 986
So the G5 had between 90% and 45% of the transistors, to get, assuming the fastest 2.7ghz G5 has 1.25x the performance of a 2.2ghz, performance that still leaves the P4 1.4x faster, as well as being cheaper.
RISC architecture has won over CISC, because the Pentium is RISC. It may have a CISC ISA, but that gets decoded to RISC micro-ops. One of the major reasons that all new CPUs use a RISC ISA as well as internal archicture, is because it's much simpler to design.
The right/best move in a poker game is the one with the highest expected value. This can easily be calculated if you know the probabilities of your opponents cards/moves based on their's and your actions, the board and your cards. Note that this does in now way equate with being predictable, and it includes in it the ideas of check raising and bluffing, as well any other tactical move. If you opponents knew exactly what you were doing, they would only know that you were making a move that on average would make money.
P4 spec performance.
The only consumer processor comparable to the P4 is AMD64, and it has a lower base int score, with higher int peak, and lower base/peak fp scores.
I've only played a little of code veronica, but what exactly is the "intricate, well-established storyline" of resident evil, besides survival horror?
Handwriting analysis:
Use of precise straight lines indicates unyielding nature towards achieveing goals.
Constant spacing supports this with evidence that Peristarkawan is a man of action.
No slant tends towards highly disciplined.
Space between letters shows logical and systematic thinking.
Highly legible - FLAG! - Wolf in sheeps clothing.
Conclusion: Subject is dangerous member of terrorist cell. Suggest immediate apprehension and tort^H^H^Hdetainment at Gitmo.
Learn more about gcrapology here!
There's always stenography. I highly doubt that any system that is implemented would be able to detect people sending some pictures of their weekend bbq with some encrypted text hidden inside.
Well duh, he didn't want to get in *real* trouble.
L0L!!! UR 4 pH49 |\|00B!! U 907 p\/\/|\|3D U 91RL!!!!
Realistically, how many people would be necessary to do a little tinkering? I don't have a clue, but if it's more than a handfull, I doubt it was electioneering, and just plain dirty politics as usual. Comparing the 2000 and 2004 presidential debates, Gore/Kerry both came off as wooden intellectuals, while Bush was more dumbass common man, and apprently America wants a dumbass common man.
Someone else has seen the light of 8.1% abv $2 40oz Steel Reserve!
Remember, if you're gonna drink crap beer, at least drink cheap and highly alcoholic crap beer.
I think this is a case that calls for the wisdom of dogbert.
I'm going to hunt down the people who have strong opinions on subjects they dont understand. Then I'll bop them with this cardboard tube. - Dogbert
I agree totally. Too bad Slartibartfast was busy with Norway, or else he could've put some bitchin' fjords on it.
Might wanna take a look in the mirror, cause you give no basis for your ridiculous claim that all Jews are racist.
The Feeling of Power
You haven't proven your assertions, because they're wrong, yet you continue attacking me, so the fact remains that you're an ignorant fool, doomed to a pitiful life of failure and broken dreams.
Things to do list:
Steal rjelks password
Do Laundry
Buy Corn Holders
You don't seem to understand the big O notation.
O(1) time means for *any* size input it's a constant time operation, likewise, O(lgN) scales as the log, and so on. So if you were trying to make a constant time multiply, you'd need an infinite lookup table, which does tend to present a slight engineering challenge. For factoring keys, sure you could just use a 2^1024 bit lookup table, but the big O notation would be used on the factoring algorithm for a general purpose n digit number, which would be something like O(e^(n)).
You are a retard. If you had read my post, you'd see that your delusions were completely discredited. And now, instead of providing ever providing any refutations, you proceed to pretend that I'm making ad homiem attacks, when 2 minutes before you call me an apologist for racism based on, what exactly? Since no troll can suck this bad, I must conclude you're a whiney "activist". Learn to tell the difference between ad homiem attacks and calling someone an idiot because they are.
The *creative* way to use that excess ammo would've been to form a secret crack guerilla team that assasinated wasteful bureaucracy, you lazy bastard.
1. Your claim of the jewish stereotype of victimization was refuted, and you can only latch onto me not included the Jewish homeland defn of Zion, which is moronic because if you knew anything about Jews you would know that.
2. You do not prove your extraordinary claim that the majority of Jews are racist, latching onto some false defn of goy.
The real defn is here, and here, and webster.com disagrees with the dictionary.com defn
webster.com goy nation sometimes disparaging
dictionary.com goy Used as a disparaging term for one who is not a Jew.
Since the two Jewish sites and webster.com disagree with dictionary.com, I'd say dictionary.com is wrong.
Since you then go own to claim that Jews were the first to practice genocide, and you do not have the reading comprehension skills to understand that the sentance "I must conclude that you were either trolling, or a moronic "activist" whining about the plight of the Palestinians or Mumia Abu-Jamal" never mentions you whining about the Palestinians or Mumia Abu-Jamal, only putting you in the same class, my points stand, and my conclusions are now competely proven