Slashdot Mirror


'Haute Cuisine' on Mars

Roland Piquepaille writes "If you're lucky enough to be a crew member of one of the next European Space Agency (ESA) long-term missions, you will have the choice between eleven new delicious recipes, such as 'martian bread and green tomato jam' or 'potato and tomato mille-feuilles' when it's time for dinner. In 'Ready for dinner on Mars?,' ESA says that these recipes will use fresh ingredients grown in greenhouses built on Mars colonies or other planets. The future astronauts -- should I write 'farmonauts'? -- will grow potatoes, onions, rice, soya or lettuce. And it's interesting to note that the new menus were elaborated with the help of Alain Ducasse, the French chef who has almost as many stars in the 'Guide Michelin' as there are planets in our Solar system. This overview contains more details and references about eating in space."

295 comments

  1. Oh well... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny


    I used to want to go into space...but if I have to eat that damned Frenchy food while I'm up there, forget it.

    (Note: This post may seem like flamebait, but I really do hate the French, so I feel I'm justified.)

    ^_^

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No biggie, they hate us, too.... and unlike us, they have justification.

    2. Re:Oh well... by AnusesBaskets · · Score: 2, Interesting

      French cusine is actually some of the best food. Just becuase you don't like modern French politics or social habits doesn't mean you have to throw away their entire rich cultural history.

    3. Re:Oh well... by tgd · · Score: 1
      Just becuase you don't like modern French politics or social habits doesn't mean you have to throw away their entire rich cultural history.

      No, thats because you don't like historical French politics or social habits.

    4. Re:Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are a complete and utter fucking moron.

    5. Re:Oh well... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1
      French cusine is actually some of the best food.
      The best food for what? If you mean for building business for the medical and pharmaceutical industries, I can go along with that. "Yes, I'll have my butter drenched in more butter, on top of my cheese, thank you."

      But as food? Far too heavy for my taste (although I do like brie occasionally). I'm generally into the left-coast sushi, grilled everything, and twigs-and-berries diet.
      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    6. Re:Oh well... by UnixRawks · · Score: 1, Funny

      But the French are good at defendi..oh nevermind, I surrender.

      --
      I
    7. Re:Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then stay where you are and eat your own food. We don't want you to go into space anymore either.

      (Note: This post may seem like flamebait, but I speak for the rest of the rational-thinking world when I say we really do hate you, so I feel I'm justified.)

    8. Re:Oh well... by AnusesBaskets · · Score: 1

      And how does that justify not eating French food?

      You eat American food? Does that imply you like every unjust thing Americans might have done, minor or major, in the past or present?

      These anti French arguments are getting silly. The food has nothing to do with the politics.

    9. Re:Oh well... by xutopia · · Score: 1
      I read it and realized that you were joking. Still the joke was of very bad taste and I was offended.

      People say all kinds of nasty things in the name of humor. Your humor was racist.

    10. Re:Oh well... by Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can just picture it now... the US plans to settle Mars. Huge announcements are made as to how the mission will be a cakewalk. "Martian" defectors tell us that the atmosphere already has enough oxygen to breathe and enough plants to eat. The French try and tell us otherwise and advise us to bring space suits, but to no avail. However, shortly after arriving on newly renamed "Libertas Planum", the trouble starts...

      Next plan: Colonize the sun. To avoid a firey meltdown, we'll go at night.

      --
      Did he just go crazy and fall asleep?
    11. Re:Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It cant be that unhealthy; the french life expectancy is far higher than that of the average american, wine-drinking nontheless.

    12. Re:Oh well... by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      like polish screen door jokes arnt.

      Gee last I looked people still make them and people dont bitch about those being racist to Poles.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    13. Re:Oh well... by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      That because most of the french dont eat what "The French" consider to be french food.

      French food IS extreamly unhealthy, but most food there is common peasant food which is a lot more healthy and light.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    14. Re:Oh well... by SUB7IME · · Score: 1

      Hey, how come when I filled out my college apps I couldn't check 'French'? That must be a new one.

    15. Re:Oh well... by UnixRawks · · Score: 0

      Your argument is weak, there are no Martians :)

      --
      I
    16. Re:Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you know what? With all of that butter, cream, cheese, lard, etc they will still have a better blood lipid profile and heart health than sushi, grilled everything, twigs and berries diet. Not to mention it is more satisfying and nutrient packed, so a little food can go a long way while that twigs and berries diet is very carbohydrate rich, but nutrient poor. Guess what that means: you have to eat far far more calories to actually get the necessary vitamins (which can only be absorbed in the presence of fat... you did know that, right?) minerals and proteins to remain healthy.

      No scientific study has shown that saturated fats are bad for you. They all use the combination of: 1)lowering fat intake, 2)reducing calories and 3)excercising. Guess what... that is not a valid scientific experiment or study. While there are many studies out there which show that versus low fat diets, extremely low carbohydrate diets, even without added excercise or even cutting overall calories, will lead to A)better blood lipid profiles (because fat becomes fuel, not energy storage. Your body CAN NOT burn fat while there is a lot of insulin in the bloodstream. Gues what... carbohydrates dump tons of insulin in the blood, even complex carbs.) B)lose fat and C)have a more consistant level of energy and D)have less cravings for "bad" foods.

      But, still, exercise is one of the most important parts of maintaining good health. It builds lean muscle mass, which in turn boosts the metabolism. Exercise releases endorphins which A)suppress hunger and B) make one feel better about themself in general. I've also found that when I am exercising regularilly I happen to play soccer and enjoy long walks on rugged terrain (sort of like hiking, I guess) but pick and choose untill you find something you like. You'll be healthier, happier, and more attractive for it. Oh, and many sports will help you meet new people. Even the solitary ones like running lead to opportunities to meet different people.

    17. Re:Oh well... by Rei · · Score: 1

      After 6 months of announcements, speeches, and TV appearences by top officials, 70% of the American public will believe that there are. :)

      --
      Did he just go crazy and fall asleep?
    18. Re:Oh well... by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This post may seem like flamebait, but I really do hate the French, so i feel I'm justified

      What sort of argument is "I'm a bigot, so I shouldn't get modded down"? What's next - +5 for someone saying "Before you mark me as a troll, understand that I really do hate Jews"?

      --
      Did he just go crazy and fall asleep?
    19. Re:Oh well... by mbbac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's also the basis for most other modern cuisines.

      --

      mbbac

    20. Re:Oh well... by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

      It's not a very good smiley. I thought it was part of your sig actually. Of course, I thought you were joking from the beginning anyways. But I can see how others misinterpretted.

    21. Re:Oh well... by rhsanborn · · Score: 2, Informative

      From Wikipedia, from the UN:

      Quote...

      The United Nations uses a definition of racist discrimination laid out in the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and adopted in 1965: ...any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.

      End Quote.

      I think your apps weren't comprehensive enough.

    22. Re:Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, Polish jokes were started by the Germans before the second world war. Keep in mind that one of the justifications for the Polish jokes was the fact that the poles rode horses to fight the German armor as it advanced- the thing is, they were not doing it because it was dumb- they were doing it knowing that they would die, but would die fighting. YOu can make comparisons to the French's actions during that time, that is your right.
      I predict the American and French people are going to start liking each other more and more. Why? The French individualism in voting down the EU constitution is something that a lot of Americans will appreciate. LIKE IT OR NOT, IF SOMETHING HAPPENED IN FRANCE AND THE FRENCH NEEDED HELP, AMERICANS WOULD DO ANYTHING TO HELP THEM. AND IF THE AMERICANS NEEDED HELP, THE FRENCH WOULD DO ANYTHING TO HELP US. it may be fun to have little rivalries, but when it comes down to it, we are friends.

    23. Re:Oh well... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Please refer to this post for your response, as I cannot be bothered to type it all over again.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    24. Re:Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know... I sorta thought he was making fun of racism there. One of my friends knows a few racist jokes that are actually quite funny, and he's comfortable telling them in mixed racial company. He usually ends with "And you know what the best thing is? There's some redneck slob in a trailer somewhere that came up with these jokes, and he finds them funny 'cause he thinks they're true." Now, maybe that line is just being classist, but it does put racist jokes in a different perspective.

      There are a lot of racist jokes that are simply offensive, but some are actually humerous.

    25. Re:Oh well... by rogabean · · Score: 2, Funny

      personally I find French food to be not heavy enough for my taste...

      I'd prefer my butter drenched in crisco on top of my cheese and then deep fried.. preferably breaded in that mixture used to make corndogs. :)

      (you'd never know I'm actually a very skinny guy reading that either...)

      but umm anyway... food on mars? yay?

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    26. Re:Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "French" is not a race.

      His humor was bigoted, not racist.

    27. Re:Oh well... by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1

      Unhealthy? What are your sources?
      And "french food" doesn't mean much, it's a wide array of recipes.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    28. Re:Oh well... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      French food tends to be on the heavier side, for my asian pallet it's a bit too much. I prefer italian, the sharpness of the tomatoes cuts down on the heavy olive oil ussage.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    29. Re:Oh well... by king-manic · · Score: 2, Informative

      What sort of argument is "I'm a bigot, so I shouldn't get modded down"? What's next - +5 for someone saying "Before you mark me as a troll, understand that I really do hate Jews"?

      modern cultural bigottry aside, the french were right bastards during their colonialist era. Not as bad as the spanish, worse then the british, makes modern imperial america look like boy scouts.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    30. Re:Oh well... by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 1

      Obviously you haven't read Mireille Guiliano's new book French Astronauts Don't Get Fat

    31. Re:Oh well... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      personally I find French food to be not heavy enough for my taste...

      I'd prefer my butter drenched in crisco on top of my cheese and then deep fried.. preferably breaded in that mixture used to make corndogs. :)


      Well, howdy! Nice to see another Texan on the board -- or at least, from your description, you'd be right at home here. Your message gives me a hankerin' for some Chicken-Fried Chicken. Or a trip to the State Fair of Texas for dessert: Fried Twinkies, Fried Ice Cream, Fried Snickers, Fried Oreos, and for the health food nuts, the not-fried Pie-On-A-Stick.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    32. Re:Oh well... by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

      Oh we have justification too. We must...I mean the rest of the european union hates them too. There must be some reason for all that worldwide animosity tward the french. Sheesh! There are some countries that the only thing the USA has in common with is disliking the french:P

    33. Re:Oh well... by rogabean · · Score: 1

      Love some Fried Twinkies... :-D

      You've got to try a Deep Fried Mars Bar sometime.

      hmmm that actually managed to seem ontopic.

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    34. Re:Oh well... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      So French food is to cuisine what grunts are to spoken language?

    35. Re:Oh well... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Where do the freaky-deak Dutch figure into all of this? Or did Sid Meier just add them to the game for their funny looking ships?

    36. Re:Oh well... by rsynnott · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most large European powers were fairly bad back then. America's actions weren't exactly to be commended, either; genocide of natives, anyone? If you're allowed discriminate about people because they weren't very nice in the past, then, erm, that more or less leaves you with the Dalai Llama. Maybe.

      --
      Me (Blog)
    37. Re:Oh well... by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      Ah, he's racist, but he's also classist, so that makes it okay? Hmm, does he get a Nobel Peace prize if he can also demonstrate he's a homophobe, or something?

      --
      Me (Blog)
    38. Re:Oh well... by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      Really? America didn't exactly rush to France's aid last time it was in need. In fact, about the only obvious assistance rendered on either side was the French assistance in the American revolution, as far as I can see...

      --
      Me (Blog)
    39. Re:Oh well... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Yeah. We sure did kick their arses when they invaded fra.. oh wait..

      Well there was the time they screwed up indochina and dropped it in our laps. we sure did show them.. oh wait..

      Maybe they're mad at us because of continued above ground nuclear testing.. oh got that backwards too.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    40. Re:Oh well... by spectral · · Score: 1

      Especially from a 1 star french chef. "As many stars in our solar system." Well.. that basically means that he has almost as many as .. one. The sun. And he isn't even quite there.

      Poor farmonauts.

    41. Re:Oh well... by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, all the people who acted like bastards during the colonial era are dead now.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    42. Re:Oh well... by SUB7IME · · Score: 1

      From your post, the criteria that the UN uses:
      'race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin'

      Clearly, even the UN can differentiate between race and etnicity. Are you showing me this just to bolster my point?

    43. Re:Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      France feels they're the best country in the world because they're France.

      The United States feels they're the best country in the world because they're the United States.

      Let's see here...

      France assisted the American Colonies during its revolution, and presented the gift of the Statue of Liberty that shines freedom to everybody who arrived by boat to the new world in the early 20th century.

      Yeah, damn those Frenchies, they havn't done ANYTHING to help Americans.

    44. Re:Oh well... by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      Any defamation etc based on any one of those, including national origin, including French. Bigotry toward French people because they are French people is racist.

    45. Re:Oh well... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Those are both true, but I don't see why they would be mad at us over them.

      Then again, I don't see why the'd be mad about those other things i've mentioned (except I think we made a bit of a stink about the nuclear testing), but they seem to be.

      A little of it is that france seems to be a bit of a hypocrite country. Many of us see them as taking the dubious stance AGAINST self-defense (and by extension premptive strikes) while engaging in some sort of activity in Ivory Coast that we don't fully understand. (Our media barely reports that it even happened) Yet, they also seem perfectly content to allow the US to continue to be the main peacekeeping force in the EU.

      In other words, it seems of late that they are perfectly ok with spending american blood on french interests and french blood on french interests, but french blood on american interests (and even american blood on american interestes) is somehow dirty.

      And btw, the statue of liberty was given to the US because they didn't want it in their country. and they helped during the revolution because it kept british troops bogged down in the colonies instead of fighting in europe. Both instances where french interests happened to coincide with american interests briefly. Though they certainly are valid motives, they are not the altruistic motives you imply.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    46. Re:Oh well... by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      Hey, how come when I filled out my college apps I couldn't check 'French'?

      Check again, they might have changed it to 'Freedom', although even that senator has changed his tune: http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,149156 7,00.html

      They're going to have to also put a pretty good wine cellar on that spacecraft. I can visualize an angry Astronaut 1, sitting at the dinner table in front of his Chateaubriand, glaring at hungover Astronaut 2 while angrily barking the question "Any wine left?", just about a month before they get to Mars. Space madness indeed.

      Meanwhile, Astronaut 3 will have to be keeping an eye on the History Eraser Button.

      Mmmmm...chicken pot pie...chocolate covered raisins...glazed ham!

      And if they happen to be Taikonauts: "Honey, this chicken kung pow is...(drum roll)...OUT OF THIS WORLD!!!"

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    47. Re:Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unhealthy? I've never eaten a hamburger until the age of 14! Sadly, French are becoming fater and fater, we'll soon be as fat as you Americans with all that junk food, our womens who don't know how to cook anymore.
      Anyway we still live longer than you, perhaps becouse of our great healthcare system...

    48. Re:Oh well... by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

      Okay, the rule seems clear.

      Please note that it remains inapplicable to defaming that fraction of Belgans who only speak French.

    49. Re:Oh well... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Where do the freaky-deak Dutch figure into all of this? Or did Sid Meier just add them to the game for their funny looking ships?

      Look up African history, and indonesian history. The dutch were a little bit meaner thent he french.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    50. Re:Oh well... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Of course, all the people who acted like bastards during the colonial era are dead now.

      You forget that they were a colonial power until the 1960's. Those bastards are mostly still alive and doing well in france.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    51. Re:Oh well... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Most large European powers were fairly bad back then. America's actions weren't exactly to be commended, either; genocide of natives, anyone? If you're allowed discriminate about people because they weren't very nice in the past, then, erm, that more or less leaves you with the Dalai Llama. Maybe.

      Technically, that was "british" and Spanish forces that wiped out the natives. But thats splitting hairs since those "british" colonists are now americans.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    52. Re:Oh well... by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      English, back then (Britain is a new invention). And no-one sat down in London and said "I know, genocide!" That was the colonists.

      --
      Me (Blog)
    53. Re:Oh well... by mbbac · · Score: 1

      If by grunts, you mean syllables, then yes.

      --

      mbbac

    54. Re:Oh well... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      English, back then (Britain is a new invention). And no-one sat down in London and said "I know, genocide!" That was the colonists.

      Indeed, except most of the genocide was committed through unintentional/intentional germ warfare. The spanish were brutal, and the "english" were bastards, but most of the estimated deaths were from european diseases and not through direct warfare.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    55. Re:Oh well... by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      Ah, fine, that makes it all okay, then, I suppose. :S

      --
      Me (Blog)
    56. Re:Oh well... by tabrnaker · · Score: 1
      Are you sure the french hate you? I think most people in general are just annoyed at the big bully mentality of the states.

      Aside from that, do you think they'd spend time thinking about you?

      I think a lot of it is your media. They keep telling you people hate you, so that maybe it doesn't seem so bad when the states does things against the international communities wishes.

  2. Just add water by hydroxy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunetly, all plants grown on Mars will still be freeze-dried before eaten.

    1. Re:Just add water by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunetly, all plants grown on Mars will still be freeze-dried before eaten.

      *chuckle* No, they really are thinking about growing the food. :-)

      The article was interesting (despite the fact that the ESA seems to be already picking out foods for a mission they don't yet have), but I would have liked to know more about how they planned to grow food on Mars. For example, the soil samples seem to tell us all kinds of different things about the actual composition of Martian soil. Have we found a concensus on what materials we'll need to bring to grow plants. Last I heard, nitrogen was going to be the biggest issue.

      The other thing I'd like to see is someone actually developing a Martian greenhouse design. However you make it, you'll want the greenhouse to be light, portable, and easy to setup. My current thoughts are that a transparent, inflatable tarp would do the trick. We'd first need to know what the minimum pressure is that the plants require before we design the tarp. Hopefully, they can survive in pressures similar to Mars's surface. That knowledge could then be used to develop a greenhouse that works like this:

      1. The tarp would be planted into the ground. Depending on the pressure required, it could either be nailed in with stakes (how primitive, but effective) or a stiff ring could be buried into the ground, thus creating an airtight seal.

      2. CO2 could then be pumped from the surrounding atomosphere into the greenhouse. Depending on the plant, a certain amount of oxygen may need to be initially pumped in.

      3. The pump system should move air in and out of the tarp area. Oxygen would be separated out, and replacement CO2 would be pumped from outside.

      So far, so good. But then what about solar energy? Does enough energy reach Mars' surface to support these plants? Does artifical lighting need to be added? (I guess that's why they went with potatos. Little to no light necessary.)

    2. Re:Just add water by hydroxy · · Score: 1

      Dont forget about the sand storms, freezing to boiling temps and such that the green house would have to withstand

    3. Re:Just add water by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The other thing I'd like to see is someone actually developing a Martian greenhouse design.

      I've commented about this in the past, but here's a quote from the Wikipedia article on Elon Musk:

      In 2001, Musk had plans for a "Mars Oasis" project, which would land a miniature experimental greenhouse on Mars, containing food crops growing on Martian regolith. He put this project on hold when he discovered that launch costs would dwarf the mission development and construction costs for the project, and decided to work on lowering launch costs by founding SpaceX.

      If I recall correctly, he actually hired a team of engineers and scientists to do a feasibility study, and I'm betting they put together at least some preliminary designs. Hopefully we'll see him return to this project once he gets launch costs lowered some.

    4. Re:Just add water by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mars's pressure is little higher than a vacuum. NASA has been doing experiments to get plants to grow in the sparsest atmosphere possible. Currently, if the pressure gets too low, plants think that there's a drought even if they're given plenty of water and kept at 100% humidity.

      As for light, Mars gets half the sunlight we do on Earth; plenty of plants on Earth grow in partial shade.

      --
      Did he just go crazy and fall asleep?
    5. Re:Just add water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good news is that Ronco will have a solution for that any day now.

    6. Re:Just add water by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Looks like potatos need light as well. Just because the root grows underground doesn't mean the plant as a whole doesn't need light.

    7. Re:Just add water by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      In my experience, potatos will happily grow even with little to no light. My family used to keep large bags of potatos in the storage room in the basement, and pull them out as needed. Oddly, the potatos would occasionally sprout some pretty impressive roots.

      Anecdotal, I know, but it seems that potatos hold up pretty well in low light. :-)

    8. Re:Just add water by jnaujok · · Score: 1

      That's because at low enough pressure (about 1% of 1 atmosphere) the water boils right out of the leaves at room temperature. The lower the pressure, the lower the temperature that water boils. I live at 6300 ft (2000m) above sea level, and water boils as low as 199 degrees f (~91C) here on a stormy day.

      In fact, if you go up to the top of Pike's peak here (14110ft/~4500m), it becomes impossible to hard boil an egg, because you can't get the water hot enough (about 160F/78C) to cook the egg.

      --
      Life, the Universe, and Everything... in my image.
    9. Re:Just add water by shawb · · Score: 1

      Those potatoes are just using energy stored as starch to grow. As those sprouts grow, the potato itself will shrink as the starches are used up. In order to make more edible potato matter, light is needed to actually make the starches to fill it out.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    10. Re:Just add water by jdray · · Score: 1

      How about a complete pressurized sphere, set in a hole that's half it's size, filled with the dirt that came out of the hole? You'd end up with an exposed dome over a pressurized volume of Martian soil. Ammend the soil as necessary with components required to grow crops, plant the seeds, and wait.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    11. Re:Just add water by kingofalaska · · Score: 1
      Sometimes even adding water won't help.

      Back in 1988, I got a screaming deal on a few hundred pounds of Alaskan-grown potatoes. I stored them in a bus I was converting to an RV, and then the temp dropped to -30 below. One fine day, I got some potatoes out to prepare a meal. They were as hard as rocks, literally. They even sounded like rocks when I tapped them together. I thought "no problem, I'll just thaw them out." I put them in a large bowl of very hot water, and after a few minutes, I noticed that the water was frozen. When the potatoes finally thawed out, they were disgusting. Gray, mushy, and wrinkly. (Insert joke here).

      They went into the compost pile.

      KoA

      Navy to Test Shape Shifting Catamaran in Alaska

    12. Re:Just add water by NOPteron · · Score: 1

      What about, as another pointed-out, radiation?

      Mass? ( a kilogram into orbit costs, a kilogram to Mars costs more than my entire live is worth, in economic-terms )

      Perforation & Abrasion?
      ( those planet-wide dust-storms exist, eh? )

      Being coated with grimy submicroscopic seal-eating dust?
      ( would someone please come-up-with an electro-static, or fluorinated-polimer, coating that makes that dust NOT stick? )

      Multi-generation problems: maybe the first-gen plants are OK, but gradually generate more-sterile seeds, then they're fsck'd. . .

      ( anyone betting their lives on a within-one-generation test deserves to lose the bet, badly: multi-generation tests keep coming-up-with surprising results, like that one showing a single atom of plutonium could measurably increase cancer-rates in the distant-descendents of mice ( reported in NS ), or the multi-generation enhancement of the harm done-by Agent Orange ( not the music-group: no-one's tested that ). . .

      Unfortunately, multi-generation, full-spectrum testing means consideration & patience, and it also means making the experiment-design & experiment-engineering open, so-that ANY flaw can be discovered, before everything has been committed on an "authorized", and rong, design/implementation. . . )

      Interactions-between plants when in such conditions?

      Increased sensitivity to the radio-energy they're bathed-in, when in low-pressure, low-gravity, low-light metabolism?

      Increased sensitivity to chemical/metals distortion in the same conditions?

      That NASA page says chemicals ( hormones, etc. ) diffuse through plants much quicker in low-pressure, so what does that sabotage? Will it be impossible to get ripe fruit there?

      Temperature? Not many foods I eat naturally grow at -60C, maybe that's just odd-diet, here, but. . .

      Green-house-floor? You can't make it 1-mil polyester & then go walking-on it, can you? ( not with that desolate & sharp rocky/dust stuff beneath. . . )

      Contamination? Some of us are violently offended when some meat-brain decides that science need be obliterated in order to put up a ( graffiti ) Name(plate/scrawl) in some location that had been pristine. . .

      I remember reading about some spelunkers who destroyed the pristine-ness of multi-kilometre-deep cave-system ( breaking walls in it ) in order to make-indelible that
      THEY HAVE BEEN THERE, so now the subtle-ecology that was there is murdered, and the entire-world can't get that back, but the fsck-wits got Their Names in The Book...
      (long-term black-rage)

      I expect politics/BS/national-macheezemo to trump science, every-single-day, in any world defined by mass-media, but science is possible, you know? And some, perhaps only few, have the guts to value discovering what truly-is, no-matter what our various establishments ( including "science" establishment ) say. . .

      It means being systematic, open-design of directed-shotgun approach, robot-probes, discovering-what-is, etc, but making our ignorance stand prouder and bigger than Universe's offerings gets nothing of any real worth. . .

      Any bubble-ecology we put there is going to contaminate the local conditions, and that removes some-of-the potential that was there, but maybe knowing only-our-own-sh*t is so unconsciously-only-answer to our race, that alternative is utterly unthinkable?

      In short, though, I don't believe that unit-tests can be summed-on-paper and considered-to-be equivalent to a whole-system-test: any pattern has structure, implications, & interactions/resonation, and ignoring the dimensional-depth of reality doesn't prove anything, long-term ( except stupid self-extintion being a right. . . )

      --
      IPTables enhancement Fail2Ban bans cracker-login's
    13. Re:Just add water by coopex · · Score: 1

      You FOOL!
      Mr. Quayle, those potatos were perfect for making some good vodka, and the hard part was already done, making them into mush.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    14. Re:Just add water by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well that's one way to ensure that your eggs are always soft boiled...

      --
    15. Re:Just add water by jnaujok · · Score: 1

      Except that I hate soft-boiled eggs.

      --
      Life, the Universe, and Everything... in my image.
  3. "Midichlorian stew again?" by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I HATE midichlorian stew!"

    "Shut up and eat, kid. You want to grow up to be big and strong like your father, don't you?"

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:"Midichlorian stew again?" by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know the real Sith would just use some anti-biodics on the Jedi to take away their powers.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:"Midichlorian stew again?" by vbrtrmn · · Score: 1

      They tried, the antibiotics were over perscribed for minor matters like viruses, so they didn't work.

      --
      it's a sig, wtf?
    3. Re:"Midichlorian stew again?" by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      antibiotics

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  4. avacados by udderly · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What? No avacados? What's the point of good to space if you can't have an avacado while you're there.

  5. Another nifty side effect of farming by dannyitc · · Score: 0

    would be the oxygen created from the plant's metabolic process. Maybe on a larger scale it could be used as a renewable supply of oxygen for settlements or return travel to earth.

    1. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by Kainaw · · Score: 1

      Another nifty side effect of farming would be the oxygen created from the plant's metabolic process.

      My rudimentary understanding is that the green in plants comes from chlorophyl. Chlorophyl reacts with the photons from the sun and creates Oxygen as a by-product. That is just one reaction. In the rest of the plant, the biochemistry is your basic oxygen-sucking carbon-based lifeform. Plants do create more oxygen than the suck up, but the point most people miss is that they do consume oxygen.

      The point here is that the chlorophyl requires the sun's light or artificial sunlight to create oxygen. Artificial sunlight will require fuel of somekind. So, that's a waste of time to pursue. Real sunlight on Mars is less powerful than on Earth. So, a plant on Mars will create less oxygen than it will here on Earth.

      Finally, explaining my possible misunderstanding of biology, I think my question can be understood: Even if we cover Mars with plants, will they produce enough oxygen to make a difference?

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    2. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by dannyitc · · Score: 0

      Well, the issue is that farming is an energy intensive process, so using artificial sunlight isn't necessarily a waste of time since farming is a natural resource sink as-is. Utilizing the oxygen would just be a nice way to make the process more resource efficient. And I hate to quarrel, but plants don't suck up oxygen. Their metabolism works by utilizing CO2 and, through the photosynthetic pathway, releasing oxygen at the end. As to your oxygen question, although if I'm not mistaken algae produces the greatest proportion of atmospheric oxygen, terrestrial plants do produce quite a bit. It is estimated that the rainforests alone contribute 20%. Keep in mind this is total atmospheric oxygen, and that our total oxygen supply on earth is much much more than we could ever hope to utilize in a storage capacity.

    3. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      And I hate to quarrel, but plants don't suck up oxygen.

      Actually, the GP is correct. While the photosynthetic pathway does produce a surplus of O2, when the plant metabolizes that stored food for energy, it uses O2 in that process, just like animals. The surplus of O2 we enjoy at the present time is only here because of the biomass of green plants present on this planet...if all those plants were to be eaten or burned, the O2 levels would go right back to zero (or nearly so).

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    4. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by dannyitc · · Score: 0

      Perhaps I should have been more specific. I was referring more to the semantics of "consume" rather than "suck up." In a sense, given a starting supply of oxygen, in the net system oxygen isn't "consumed" as the reaction produces much more oxygen than it takes in. In effect all you're doing is using a supply of oxygen as a jump starter for the plant's own metabolism, which will then return the expended oxygen as well as supply an excess.

    5. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they will make enough of a differance, sadly to do it this way would take alot of time. There are alot of surface minerals that react with oxygen. Before you've reacted everything away could cover millenia or worse, for all I know. And that is before surface oxygen levels even start rising, so it would take a long long time.

    6. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by Kainaw · · Score: 1

      In effect all you're doing is using a supply of oxygen as a jump starter for the plant's own metabolism, which will then return the expended oxygen as well as supply an excess.

      That does not take into account the original question: On Mars, with less sunlight to convert CO2 to O2, will you need to pick and choose which plants give you a surplus. Some plants might not create a whole hell of a lot of surplus on Earth and barely break even on Mars.

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    7. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by dannyitc · · Score: 0

      Yes, but I was assuming the farms to be done in a closed, artificial atmosphere "bubble" of sorts. The theoretical scientist in me would assume that closed-air territories would first be constructed before any terraforming/atmosphere forming would take place.

    8. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by dannyitc · · Score: 0

      As I said before, I don't see any reason for artificial light to not be utilized to supplement the lack of sunlight once it is assumed that farming would have to be done at a net resource loss anyways due to the transportation of minerals and nutrients for growth. The main point here is that the farming's main purpose is to produce food, with oxygen being a nice bonus. The amount in this case is not important as long as it is above self-sustaining, and there is no reason to believe that it would not be, as all plants produce quite a net surplus of oxygen. Even so, you have to keep in mind that the proportion of consumption/excretion will remain the same if the light is the limiting factor. In a light-deprived environment plants both consume and produce less oxygen.

    9. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 1

      Mars has approximately 36% of the sunlight insolation as earth does at aphelion (not counting atmospheric effects for either body). If this isn't sufficient, it's possible (with mirrors or the like) to focus additional light into a greenhouse. It likely would be sufficient, with proper plant selection.

      Just think of all the indoor house plants that get by with far less light (less than a third outside daylight).

      Also, any plant chosen as a food source will be producing more O2 anyway. Oxygen is produced when the plant stores energy as sugar and is consumed when it burns that sugar for energy.

    10. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 1

      The low point of martian solar insolation (amount of light), at the aphelion, is approx 36% of the average energy at the earth's orbit. It's above 50% at the perhelion.

      Plants produce O2 when they store energy as sugar. Sugar is converted to cellulose which gives the plant it's rigidy and is a good portion of most plants mass. Thus, any plant that grows, is releasing more O2 than used for other metabolic processes.

      Last point, that there are plants that do well in low light conditions as long as other conditions are decent.

    11. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be nice, if we as humans could focus on creating farming bubbles like this. They should be mass-produced, and sent to a variety of places. By the time people get to Mars, there would be enough food. Might be a full-time job or worse, just checking on each bubble, and grabbing enough O2 and food just to survive.

      I'd like to see massive fields of marijuana, tho.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    12. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by guitaristx · · Score: 1

      This is why the greenhouses are going to be relatively "sealed" - so that you can create an incubator environment with enough oxygen in it for the plants to grow. What I'm curious about is whether or not they believe the local concentration of O2 for relatively dense vegetation will make the greenhouses unnecessary; a sort of "critical mass", so to speak.

      It would be interesting to have an environment where the local concentration of O2 is high enough for humans to breathe, but they would asphyxiate if they ventured too far away from the garden. I'd be willing to bet that it's unlikely, though, considering that Mars's atmosphere is primarily CO2, which is more dense than O2. The lighter O2 would get dissipated into the Martian atmosphere relatively quickly without some sort of containment to keep it nearby. Although it's (probably) not quite possible on Mars, it would make for a sci-fi setting that I don't believe I've ever seen before.

      Another interesting thing to consider about Mars is its lack of the vast oceans that Earth has. You could cover far more of the Martian terrain (conceivably, if you're considering terraforming) than you could on Earth to make up for the difference in solar intensity. Although it does present an interesting challenge for keeping all these plants hydrated.

      --
      I pity the foo that isn't metasyntactic
    13. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by tabrnaker · · Score: 1
      Ever hear of wind energy? They could have the whole settlement underground with solar/wind panels above ground. Natural insulation, protection from the harsh environment, easier to pressurize, no dependance on the sun, just use HID lights.

      You could have a whole dome community underground, and you wouldn't have to worry about radiation either.

    14. Re:Another nifty side effect of farming by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      look up dome greenhouses. Cheap to build, conserves energy, and if you have a big enough heat sink, can be used year round without external energy input.

  6. spirulina ? by ilikeitraw · · Score: 1, Funny

    omg... they mentioned spirulina ! smart astronauts !!

    my girlfriend takes a heaping spoonful of it and mixes it with warm rice milk. she loooves it, and i think it smells like raw chicken.

    i'm sure Monsanto will find a way to get in on this, to ensure the first seeds planted on Mars are genetically modified and prevent strange new martian diseases that only Monsanto knows about.

    1. Re:spirulina ? by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course they'll be genetically modified. It's either that, or extremely heavily bred. There's no way we could take full-pressure domes covered in thick radiation shielding. We're going to need plants with a number of traits: high radiation resistance, the ability to take very thin atmospheres with higher-than-usual CO2 percentages, proper growth in low gravity, hydroponic or martial-soil adapted, low light, easy to grow and resistant to any diseases that may be carried (crop failure on Mars? ack!), etc, while still being nutritious.

      NASA life scientists will probably do the engineering, though, at least at first.

      --
      Did he just go crazy and fall asleep?
    2. Re:spirulina ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a gf and you read/post on slashdot !! Whats wrong with you ?

    3. Re:spirulina ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG, your GF is a freak.

      I feed that stuff to my fish as food pellets/disks.

      Soy milk = yuck, spirulina = Double yuck.

      I suggest getting a non nutty GF.

    4. Re:spirulina ? by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      This is /. and the man has a girlfriend... Why should he listen to any of us lesser geeks?

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    5. Re:spirulina ? by jdray · · Score: 1
      There's no way we could take full-pressure domes covered in thick radiation shielding.

      Um, why not? A fabric dome is packable (look at camping tents). The fabric can be air tight (look at balloons). The radiation shielding is already there (soil). If you pressurize to even low earth atmospheric pressure (10 p.s.i.), that's plenty of pressure to hold up a fair bit of soil (each square inch of fabric essentially can hold up to 10 pounds of soil, which is a thick layer). In practice, it's quite a bit less than that, but a 10 p.s.i. pressure vessel should hold up a layer of soil that's at least several inches thick, particularly considering that Martian gravity is about 1/3 that of Earth.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    6. Re:spirulina ? by Rei · · Score: 1

      It's not an issue of packing: it's an issue of weight. And no, you can't use soil for radiation shielding: we're trying to grow plants here ;) Last I checked, Martian regolith isn't transparent. So, unless you want to ship in huge lights and provide solar-intensity power over a couple dozen acres... Lastly, you have to take most of the air with you as well, so there's further motivation to make it sparse.

      --
      Did he just go crazy and fall asleep?
    7. Re:spirulina ? by jdray · · Score: 1

      I thought that plants, in general, survive on CO2. Plenty of that there. Also, mirrors do a great job of redirecting light without bouncing ions. One window with a fresnel lens at the apex of the dome can distribute a lot of light that's pumped into it from a wide array of mirrors on the outside.

      Also, whoever said that a project like this was going to get done without a great degree of materials being hauled up there? The point is that, even if you have to bring every bit of infrastructure up with you, once you set it up, it grows food in a nearly-self-sustainable fashion if you nurture it correctly. Even if you have to keep pumping in biomass, if the output is food, all the better.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    8. Re:spirulina ? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Pure CO2 is damaging to plants; they also need O2, and you want a buffer of nitrogen.

      mirrors do a great job of redirecting light without bouncing ions

      In short, you're trading several acres of thin plastic for several acres of mirrors on heliostats. What an awful trade. By the way, UV does get reflected by mirrors (you won't get the gamma or protons, however)

      --
      Did he just go crazy and fall asleep?
  7. Looking at the article by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    how are those chefs going to keep their hats from floating away in space?

    Luckily in space, no one can hear Gaston say "Sacre blu!".

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:Looking at the article by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Velcro.

      Or tie a rope around their chin

      Or because they are cheifs in space their heads will get bigger and the friction will be enough to keep them on their heads.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  8. Yum. Martian food. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once you pick the antennas off, and drain all the green ichor, the stuff's pretty good! Looking forward to the first Martian fast food restaurant to open "Barsoom King", with its slogan "Take me to your eater!"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Yum. Martian food. by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      How is that different then lobster? Lobster is pritty good and I like it. But when you put it like that it seem discusting.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Yum. Martian food. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      The lobster usually doesn't kidnap your girlfriend and try to kill you with huge scimitars...usually...

      ^_^

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  9. next ? by Ragnagnor · · Score: 1

    "If you're lucky enough to be a crew member of one of the next European Space Agency (ESA) long-term missions..." Next ? ESA hasn't even had a first manned mission as far as I know...

    1. Re:next ? by bluGill · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't count all the space lab trips in the shuttle? Or the other ESA manned missions in various other ships?

      The ESA hasn't launched a mission all on the own, but they have been an important part of many missions.

    2. Re:next ? by deadtree9 · · Score: 1

      Important? In what way? So they got to run shotgun a couple times.. that doesn't make them important. I would call the ESA "scrubs"... "Oh yes son, I'm talkin' to you.."

    3. Re:next ? by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      Supplying the Titan probe and various other probes, having a heavy launch vehicle that beats anything the US currently has deployed, various bits of the space station...

      --
      Me (Blog)
  10. What! No Burger by views · · Score: 2, Funny

    Count me out. I'll wait for McDonald to open first

    1. Re:What! No Burger by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I'm not going until there are at least three Starbucks over there. Oh, excuse me, my shuttle is boarding!

    2. Re:What! No Burger by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Burgers aren't exactly haute cuisine.

      --

      mbbac

  11. should I write 'farmonauts'? by hugerobot · · Score: 5, Funny

    -- should I write 'farmonauts'? -- No... you should not. Some things can not be un-read.

    1. Re:should I write 'farmonauts'? by caldroun · · Score: 1

      I agree, if you question what you are about to write...let it go.

      BTW wasn't Luke Skywalker the first Farmonaut?

      --
      "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
    2. Re:should I write 'farmonauts'? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      farmonauts? I like fartonauts instead!

    3. Re:should I write 'farmonauts'? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Luke worked on his uncle's moisture farm. He did not have the mindset of a farmer, according to his aunt.

  12. ROLAND PIQUEPAILLE ALERT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't read the overview. Just more ad revenues for him. (Info on Roland Piquepaille)

    1. Re:ROLAND PIQUEPAILLE ALERT! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't read the overview. Just more ad revenues for him. (Info on Roland Piquepaille)

      Perhaps he's saving up for a trip to Mars, to enjoy the tres, tres haute cuisine.

      I say we all pitch in, send him up, then cut off his web connection. Or his oxygen, whichever is easier to grab.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    2. Re:ROLAND PIQUEPAILLE ALERT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So don't read Slashdot. Just more ad revenues for them.

    3. Re:ROLAND PIQUEPAILLE ALERT! by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      This is an improvement from his previously questionable submissions.

      However, it appears that he did not RTFA. There is no evidence that Alain Ducasse had anything to do with this project--just his company.

      This would be much like saying that "Bill Gates, the world's wealthiest man, was personally involved with removing spyware." Well, Microsoft was, but Bill. Ehhhh....

    4. Re:ROLAND PIQUEPAILLE ALERT! by numLocked · · Score: 1

      You just can't stand someone making a little money. The ads aren't hurting anyone.

      GTFO, socialist.

    5. Re:ROLAND PIQUEPAILLE ALERT! by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      The problem is he makes his money off of other people's work. Read the grandparent's link for more info. In a nutshell, he takes text and pictures from other sources and puts it on his own site, then links to it off slashdot instead of linking directly to the original sources.

    6. Re:ROLAND PIQUEPAILLE ALERT! by numLocked · · Score: 1

      Yeah I read the entire original source. So what? He goes and finds the articles and submits them to /.

      There is nothing wrong with that. He wouldn't be finding the articles otherwise.

  13. It has to be said. by citizenklaw · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, crops farm you!

    --
    the future is but past forgotten
  14. Iron Chef Martian... by idontgno · · Score: 3, Interesting
    And today's ingredient is...

    Chlorella!

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    1. Re:Iron Chef Martian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Chlorella, Truffle Flavor
      2. Foie Gras with Natural Chlorella Sauce (pond scum)
      3. Chlorella Salt Crust Grill
      4. Sobarella Supreme
      5. Chlorella Ice Cream

    2. Re:Iron Chef Martian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lovely Chlorella! Wonderful Chlorella!

  15. Jingoism of the future. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "French cusine is actually some of the best food. Just becuase you don't like modern French politics.... "

    Didn't you hear? "Mars is the new France".

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Jingoism of the future. by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      Didn't you hear? "Mars is the new France".

      Well, we can fix that!
      I'm on hold right now for the Rush Limbaugh show, I am going to have him rename Mars to "The Freedom Planet!"

    2. Re:Jingoism of the future. by floron · · Score: 1

      well, it's free of a magnetic field, breathable atmosphere and liquid water. You can't get much free-er than that.

    3. Re:Jingoism of the future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to sound pretty stupid when Freedom Attacks! and we have hordes of invading Freedomians to kill.

  16. Other planets? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1
    in greenhouses built on Mars colonies or other planets.

    Er, what other planets? Other than Earth I'm not aware of any other planet which has the potential for allowing greenhouses to be built. At least none that are close enough to allow resupply of food without a multi-year trip.

    Was this a slipup or are the folks at the ESA not telling us something (tinfoil hat goes on).

    P.S. To see some of the stories you've been missing, check out my journal.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Other planets? by Aerog · · Score: 1

      In other news, EU officially redefined to mean "European Universe".

      --

      - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
    2. Re:Other planets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are confused, greenhouses can be built anywhere, supply extra light,heat and air as required.

    3. Re:Other planets? by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Moon might be conceivable given that the term planet isn't very firmly defined. The moon's poles might be usable for greenhouses.

      Other possibilities might be orbital greenhouses around venus, earth or mars. Much further out and the insolation amount is questionable but possible with mirrors to focus more energy. Of course, other than earth orbiting greenhouse, these are even more unlikely than the moon.

  17. No You Shouldn't by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 0, Redundant
    . The future astronauts -- should I write 'farmonauts'?
    No. No you should not. It is really stupid.
  18. Meat, Its what is for Dinner by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Cut to a scene of a bunch of green aliens running around, making strange sounds.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  19. Say that again? by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

    If you're lucky enough to be a crew member of one of the next European Space Agency (ESA) long-term missions

    ESA says that these recipes will use fresh ingredients grown in greenhouses built on Mars colonies or other planets. So one of their next missions will feature food grown on Mars? Talk about jumping the gun! Oh wait, this is Roland. Dang it, I took the bait.

    --
    Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
  20. Emerald anyone? by part_of_you · · Score: 0

    Let's just hope that nothing goes, "BAM!"

  21. Let Me Be One of the First to Say It by Compulawyer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have not noticed any posts from Roland in a long while. It was nice while it lasted.

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

    1. Re:Let Me Be One of the First to Say It by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      It would have been nice if they have to post something of his, if it had at least been a marginally newsworthy story. Of all the crap he comes up with, was this really the most interesting?

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Let Me Be One of the First to Say It by Compulawyer · · Score: 1
      Of all the crap he comes up with, was this really the most interesting?

      Probably. And sadly. Very sadly.

      --

      Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

    3. Re:Let Me Be One of the First to Say It by idontgno · · Score: 1
      Ulch - that meat was tainted! You feel deathly sick.

      Your sig is serendipitous in view of the subject. It's a funny ol' world, isn't it?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  22. Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by pla · · Score: 4, Funny

    And it's interesting to note that the new menus were elaborated with the help of Alain Ducasse, the French chef

    No specific offense to the French intended, but as a vegetarian, I can think of much better choices to have designed the menu (not to mention, not everyone likes real French-style food).

    Indian food, for example, has a truly huge variation of veggie-only dishes, as does Spanish (though on that, I'll admit, my experience with it involves mostly South-American-Spanish, not Southern-Europe-Spanish food). Greek has a decent selection as well, and you replace the lamb with falafel for most of the rest.

    But French? The French have a reputation for taking perfectly good, otherwise healthy and veggie safe foods, and drenching them in lard. Wrapping them in thinly sliced meat. Stuffing them with unnameable mollusks and cephalopods.

    Not the best choice, IMO.

    1. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      mmmmmmm mollusks and cephalopods

    2. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Indian food, for example, has a truly huge variation of veggie-only dishes...

      That may be true, but perhaps curry isn't the best choice of food for groups of people in a sealed environment...

      ^_^

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    3. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not familiar with Provence style cuisine are you.

    4. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not everyone likes real French-style food...taking perfectly good, otherwise healthy and veggie safe foods, and drenching them in lard. Wrapping them in thinly sliced meat. Stuffing them with unnameable mollusks and cephalopods

      Totally agree. I actually like France and the French generally (despite that Je suis un ros beef), but their cooking is typically gross. While I'm on a roll, I'll also note that French wine is grossly over-rated too.

    5. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I don't know too much about Spanish food, but I'd point out that Indian food achieves most of its flavor buy using a wide variety of spices and ingredients. That presents quite a logistical issue when your're growing your own food on Mars...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    6. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I think the rugged conditions and nutritional requirements of the Martian environment will truly put the vegetarian diet to the test as a legitimate and viable diet for human survival.

    7. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by pla · · Score: 1

      That presents quite a logistical issue when your're growing your own food on Mars...

      They can grow potatoes but not fennel?

      Okay, some spices (saffron, for example) they would most likely need to import. But even then, a single kilogram of most spices would last a few dozen people for years. And for most commonly used spices, they literally grow as weeds in the wild. Deliberately growing them requires no more effort than stuffing the right seeds in some healthy dirt.

    8. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Adelbert · · Score: 1
      The French have a reputation for taking perfectly good, otherwise healthy and veggie safe foods, and drenching them in lard.

      Yes, but they also make a hell of a foie gras. You could go for that instead.

    9. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by mbbac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may be forgetting that this is coming from the ESA. Secondly, this isn't traditional French food, but is instead haute cuisine -- they are very different.

      --

      mbbac

    10. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stuffing them with unnameable mollusks and cephalopods.

      So would that be the Gaul of Cthulhu?

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    11. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by mrtrumbe · · Score: 4, Informative
      You are modded "Funny" right now, but maybe I just don't get it...

      As a chef, I think you are uninformed as to exactly what French cuisine is and how much the French have contributed to modern techniques used in all types of cuisine around the world.

      For some background, I suggest these two wikipedia.org articles:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_cuisine

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provence (note the culture section)

      I prefer the flavors of the Southwest, Latin america and India in my own cuisine, but there are very good reasons that most modern chef schools teach primarily French techniques in their curriculums. In the majority of dishes I prepare, there is some piece of the dish whose core is a French invention, or at least has a parallel in French cuisine. For instance, read wikipedia's article on sauces (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sauce), where you will learn about the huge effort French chefs put into creating and codifying the various root types of sauces. These sauces are heavily used in nearly all types of cooking.

      In regards to use of vegetables, I'd think a classically trained (read: French) chef could come up with many tasty dishes with just a few vegetables.

      I think you have some misconceptions about French cuisine.

      Taft

    12. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Informative
      my experience with it involves mostly South-American-Spanish, not Southern-Europe-Spanish food
      In my experience, people never refer to food from South America as "Spanish" cuisine. It's usually either Mexican or Salvadoran or some Americanized (in a good way! Tex-Mex or California) equivalent. If you say "Spanish food" you mean paella and tapas. Not burritos or tacos or enchiladas or chimichangas. Not guacamole.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    13. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Elsebet · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the viability of a vegetarian diet has obviously not been thoroughly tested by the millions of vegetarians alive and well in the world today.

      --
      Sacré-bleu! Where is me mama?
    14. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1) I don't think you understand what "funny" means.

      2) You're also missing the fact that this menu involves food grown in a greenhouse on Mars. How the hell are they supposed to make Velouté sauce up there? His point is eminently sensible -- the spice issue others have raised is a much more reasonable objection.

    15. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      The problem with Indian and Spanish dishes is that they require spices that are difficult to grow, especially in the kind of temperate climate people like, and take up a significant amount of room that could otherwise be used for crops.

      While I'm sure you could import curry powder or saffron strands (dried, so they're low weight), you have the problem of the spices losing their efficacy over long storage times.

      French food uses herbs that are generally found in the temperate climate of France, so they can be grown in the same greenhouse as the crops to save space.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    16. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by mrtrumbe · · Score: 4, Informative
      Spice refresher...

      First, most spices are not nearly as easy to cultivate as you describe. Take black pepper, for instance. There is a reason that it was once one of the more valuable spices in the world. Read up on wikipedia for the details of its cultivation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_pepper). A key point in the article is that getting an initial harvest of a consumable size would likely take a few years. Cumin and corriander (which would also produce cilantro) are far more viable options. But I'd just like to point out that if a spice so integral to most cuisines as pepper is difficult to grow, these astronauts better prepare to make some sacrifices. Many spices require so much cultivation time and/or post-harvest treatment as to make them impractical, especially on another planet. I would think vanilla, saffron and cardamom would fall into these categories. And then there are the spices which would be nearly impossible to cultivate without an extended stay and a large amount of land. Cinnamin comes to mind...

      As for shelf life, spices generally don't fare very well. In ground form, spices generally lose their pungency well within a year. In whole form, you can eek another year or two out of them. But that isn't a long time in planet-hopping years. Storage mechanisms might be created to extend their potency, but I use air-tight containers at home for whole spices and I never keep them for over a year. You can taste the difference, trust me.

      In terms of herbs, they would fare much better. A little herb plant can go a long way. And so long as there is enough light and water, cultivation is a snap.

      Taft

    17. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      No, not really, because vegetarians are part of a society that includes omnivores and rely upon interactions with omnivores. An early Martian society composed entirely of vegetarians will give a better indication.

    18. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wrapping them in thinly sliced meat. Stuffing them with unnameable mollusks and cephalopods.

      You shouldn't forget that astronauts needn't limit themselfs to vegetarian food. Maybe you could even grow snails. People would argue that this would be inefficient but maybe just once in a while as an appetizer...

    19. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by mrtrumbe · · Score: 1
      1) I don't think he was really trying to be funny.

      2) My personal space veloute recipe:

      1/2 cup of oil of choice (would corn oil be the easiest on another planet? hard to say)
      1/2 cup flour
      6 cups vegatable stock made from leavings of daily used veggies (onions, carrots, leeks, tomatoes, potatoes, garlic, peppers, califleur, etc.)
      1 1/2 tsp. salt
      1/8 cup fresh chopped herb of some variety.
      1 tsp pepper (which might be a difficult one to get/keep fresh in space over long periods of time).

      Heat oil in large sauce pan over medium-low heat. Add flour and whisk in. Reduce heat to low and cook while whisking until mixture gives off a nutty aroma and begins to darken slightly. Add room tempature stock to mixture and stir until mixture begins to boil and thicken. Finish with salt and pepper (to taste) and fresh chopped herbs.

      Granted, this isn't EXACTLY veloute, but it is an easy and simple approximation that I'd love to use with veggies, meats, or whatever was on the space-menu that evening.

      Taft

    20. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Elsebet · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in the sense that it would be fascinating to see how a purely vegetarian society is different (if at all) from our current mix of vegetarian and carnivores.

      When you say "interaction with carnivores" are you referring to the exposure to food born illnesses, pollution, and energy comsumptions related to the meat industry? Or is it more the "accidental" things like getting beef broth in your minestrone, or biting into what you thought was a bean burrito but was filled with beef (true stories on my part).

      Regardless I still disagree with your theory that the vegetarian diet has not been truly deemed viable. There are many people who are lifelong vegetarians for one reason or the other and the health benefits have been studied. I just don't understand questioning of the basic viability of a diet which has proven medical benefits.

      --
      Sacré-bleu! Where is me mama?
    21. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .unnameable mollusks and cephalopods.

      I call this one Herbert, that one you're eating right now is George. Didn't anyone teach you not to eat food you've been introduced to? Sheesh!

      Anyhoo, that one flopping around on the floor is Aloysius. . .

      KFG

    22. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by jalet · · Score: 1

      > Not the best choice, IMO.

      Of course it is the best choice : you forgot to say that we drink huge quantities of wine with all this good stuff !!!

      And frankly, a year on Mars without wine would be horrific !

      --
      Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
    23. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Indian food, for example, has a truly huge variation of veggie-only dishes, as does Spanish (though on that, I'll admit, my experience with it involves mostly South-American-Spanish, not Southern-Europe-Spanish food).

      For a minute there, I was confused, because if there's something the Spanish eat a lot of, it's meat. Jamon, chorizo, chicken paella, and once upon a time you could end up answering to the inquisition if you cooked your dinner in anything other than lard. Then I realised you didn't mean Spain at all, you meant South America, home to vegetarian paradise Argentina.

    24. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet it's a project by Europeans for Europeans - why would we use any other cuisine?

      South-American-Spanish is hardly Spanish at all. USAmericans don't know squat when talking about Spain and Latin-America.

    25. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by J05H · · Score: 1

      >In my experience, people never refer to food from South America as "Spanish" cuisine. It's usually either Mexican or Salvadoran or some Americanized (in a good way! Tex-Mex or California) equivalent. If you say "Spanish food" you mean paella and tapas. Not burritos or tacos or enchiladas or chimichangas. Not guacamole.

      Right! That's because American Indians were eating burritos and tacos for hundreds of years before the Conquistadors arrived. Aztecs, Maya, Hopi, etc all have similar foods in their native diets. See "Indian Givers" by Weatherford for more. Native America produced corn, potato, tomato, chili, peanut, pineapple, amaranth, quinoa and many other "basic" foodstuffs.

      jOSH

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    26. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      That would explain why we don't call it Mayan food, you idiot.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    27. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. I completely misunderstood your comment. I totally assumed you were being sarcastic.

      Way to go, me. Apparently it *is* Mayan food. I'll shut up.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    28. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by doyen2000 · · Score: 1
      It is totally wrong to classify Mexican and Salvadorean food as South American. Each section of Las Americas has very distinctive food. Even between countries because the climate differences are great together with the different ethnicity of people that immigrated to the region. (informative how??)

      As you most probably guess the dishes prepared in Brazil are very different to the ones in Argentina.

      You can see this in the US.. people in California have a very different diet to people living in New York.. even though we have the technology to transport fresh produce to wherever we live.

      If army rations are anything to go by.. the french ones are still the best and most tasty.

      Cheers, A.

    29. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      Are you approaching this from an American point of view? As far as I can see, all European food served in America is required to be covered in cheese and full of meat, or something. (I think it's the law ;) ) This is not an accurate reflection of reality.

      --
      Me (Blog)
    30. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course he wasn't trying to be funny - that he was modded funny, sortof makes you think what the moderators thought of his comment. get it yet?

    31. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      ....that was horrible. :D

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    32. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "When you say "interaction with carnivores" are you referring to the exposure to food born illnesses, pollution, and energy comsumptions related to the meat industry? Or is it more the "accidental" things like getting beef broth in your minestrone, or biting into what you thought was a bean burrito but was filled with beef (true stories on my part)."

      All of that, plus economically, but mostly economically. If we were a purely vegetarian society on Earth, the global economy would be different, since land usage would be geared entirely for the production of vegetable matter, probably freeing up zillions of acres that would have been used by relatively inefficient cattle and chickens.

    33. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      In terms of herbs, they would fare much better. A little herb plant can go a long way. And so long as there is enough light and water, cultivation is a snap.

      Your herb may lose that delicious pungent aroma after a year or so, but that doesn't affect the potency. Besides, hydroponics ought to work on mars anyway.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    34. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by shawb · · Score: 1

      Wow, I never stopped to think that saffron could be on of the more affordable spices in space. Yes, saffron is very expensive here. But pound for pound it is very concentrated, and the shipping costs could make it more affordable per flavor unit.

      Umm... flavor unit. I should probably define that. I guess I'll start as the amount of flavor needed to flavor one meal for one person. For curry this would be something like a quarter cup of spice. For saffron, two strands would be overkill for one meal.

      And saffron might actually be relatively painless to grow in space (compared to some other spices.) The saffron crocus is a pretty small plant. Probably not quite as easy as some fresh herbs, but not all that difficult either.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    35. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

      Good man. I'd agree... While I don't particularly enjoy many French dishes, they did invent (or perfect) just about every cooking technique in the book.

    36. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by mrtrumbe · · Score: 1

      Got it and missed that.

    37. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by oliderid · · Score: 1

      But French? The French have a reputation for taking perfectly good, otherwise healthy and veggie safe foods, and drenching them in lard. Wrapping them in thinly sliced meat. Stuffing them with unnameable mollusks and cephalopods.

      If you are so eager of "healthy" stuffs, then go directly to the provences (mediterranean food). I guess you will be positively surprised.

      Concerning Spanish food. Let me tell you that they don't eat just vegetables out there. They have some of the best piece of meat and see food I've ever eaten (Barcelona). Olivier

    38. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Of course, the nationality of a chef rigidly defines the food he can cook. It's not like a chef from France can cook anything other than stereotypically 'French' food. And it's not like Indian food isn't drenched in oil and cooked and spiced beyond all recognition. And the Greek don't have a reputation for being greasy at all. Sweaty lamb kebabs? Unheard of in Greece.

      And I don't think vegetarians would qualify for space-travel. The low gravity environment is harsh enough on the body, but a low-protein diet would lead to terrible muscle wastage.

      As for lard, it's the Americans you're thinking of. Burger King anyone?

    39. Re:Not a "Freedom Fry" thing, but... by J05H · · Score: 1

      LOL! Elwood you are to funny! I only do sarcasm with smilies at the end!

      Indeed, it IS Mayan food. And Mixtec, O'Odham, Aztec, Mochi, etc. We owe the absolute greatest debt to our ancestors for their crops.

      Peace,
      Josh

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  23. Nice idea, but... by nystagman · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ....it's the variety of the diet, at least as much as the quality that keeps you (well, me at least) from going nuts, or potentially worse, losing interest in eating.

    I hope that these fancy new meals do not end up displacing "comfort foods" such as may have previously been on the menu.

    As Martha would say, "It's a good thing."

    --
    Theory and practice are the same in theory, but different in practice.
    1. Re:Nice idea, but... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Since they are targeted at 40%, I would have to say that this adds to variety, not displaces it. Particularly considering the quality of most freeze dried foods.

  24. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new ant overlords, who now happily carry martian food crumbs to their space nests.

  25. Oh nos!!!1! by aftk2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    'martian bread and green tomato jam'

    But the book isn't named How to Cook For Humans on Mars, it's named How to Cook Humans on Mars!!

    --
    concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    1. Re:Oh nos!!!1! by milgr · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you are thinking of, To Serve Man.

      --
      Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
  26. Oops.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "If you're lucky enough to be a crew member of one of the next European Space Agency (ESA) long-term missions, you will have the choice between eleven new delicious recipes, such as 'martian bread and green tomato jam' or 'potato and tomato mille-feuilles' when it's time for dinner. In 'Ready for dinner on Mars?,' ESA says that these recipes will use fresh ingredients grown in greenhouses built on Mars colonies or other planets."

    The same minds that destroyed a spacecraft because they forgot the Metric system existed will likely be involved. On the first mission, the astronauts will be told that there is no food on the spaceship. However, they have 1.25 years to fill out order forms for Martian delicacies which will be served to them by Martian robot chefs once they land. Future film adaptations of the shocking results bear such titles as "Donner Party... in SPACE!" and "Houston, could you send up some burgers?"

    (Cue scene of emaciated John Malkovich being pulled from the lander saying. "The kzinti boarding party did this!")

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  27. Does this mean... by suman28 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What about plumbing and the rest of the infrastructure needed for maintaining this 'farm'?

    1. Re:Does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was the moon.... but at least on mars they can eat buggalo.

  28. Martian Menu samples by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The Helium Special". Four-armed green martian basted in its own ichor. Favorite of John Carter.

    "The War of the Worlds". This blobby Martian is served to you live, at which point you sneeze on it, and your Earth germs instantly render it dead...and tasty.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  29. Cephalapoids? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Stuffing them with unnameable mollusks and cephalopoids."

    I once ran down a cephalapoid on foot. But then he blinked the wrong eyelids and jumped off the Guggenheim Museum.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  30. Low GEE by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    I'm interested in seeing how veggies grow in lower gravity.

  31. Farmonauts? by norminator · · Score: 1

    should I write 'farmonauts'?

    Maybe try "agronauts"?

  32. Soil by irritus · · Score: 1

    How much do we really know about Martian soil at this point? All things considered, for a greenhouse to be a serious plan, we'd have to know we wouldn't need to ship fertilizer, nutrients, and minerals to support them. All of those things add a lot of weight, so if we can't use the soil on Mars as it is, the idea of thriving communities based around greenhouses is a work of science fiction.

  33. French Food For Thought from Roland! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing, a story people hate more than Frenchman Roland Pickmyscabs: a story about French food!

  34. Oh ye gods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not another Piquepaille "story"...

  35. Does this mean... by suman28 · · Score: 1

    We will soon have the Crushinator 3000 and Lulabell working the martian farm or is it the moon :)

  36. I'd want one of these! by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    May I have some of them Illudium PU-36 Explosive Space Beans?

  37. What's to drink? by donnyspi · · Score: 1

    Fermented Tang?

  38. Mars dining? by Tengoo · · Score: 1

    That's haute.

  39. Recent Book Covers Topic by gmletzkojr · · Score: 1
    I read a book recently called "The Shortcut To Mars". It is a horribly written book (I have it at home, if anyone is morbidly curious for more details), but the author goes into details of how a Mars mission would be handled, including the growing of food. In the author's fictious example, the astronauts had difficulty growing food. Which brings up general questions about growing food on other worlds....

    • What sort of tools do you bring with you to work unknown types of soil?
    • How do you know that earth plants will grow in the unknown soil?
    • Do you bring fertilizer? (The astronauts in the book used their own poop.)
    • What sort of shelter do you put up to protect your new earth/mars plants?
    • Once you grow the plants (hopefully more than you can eat), how do you store them? Mars freezer? Canning?
    --
    I for one welcome our new [insert main topic] overlords.
  40. I made fermented tang once by Thanatopsis · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was in fifth grade. I then used the "Tang" as wine in a school play, getting the kids pretty well buzzed. It was incredibly funny at the time. The nuns did appreciate that I was able to change "Tang" to Wine.

  41. The TRUTH about Roland by Asshat+Canada · · Score: 0, Informative

    Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot: Is there a connection?


    I think most of you are aware of the controversy surrounding regular Slashdot article submitter Roland Piquepaille. For those of you who don't know, please allow me to bring forth all the facts. Roland Piquepaille has an online journal (I refuse to use the word "blog") located at http://www.primidi.com/. It is titled "Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends". It consists almost entirely of content, both text and pictures, taken from reputable news websites and online technical journals. He does give credit to the other websites, but it wasn't always so. Only after many complaints were raised by the Slashdot readership did he start giving credit where credit was due. However, this is not what the controversy is about.


    Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends serves online advertisements through a service called Blogads, located at www.blogads.com. Blogads is not your traditional online advertiser; rather than base payments on click-throughs, Blogads pays a flat fee based on the level of traffic your online journal generates. This way Blogads can guarantee that an advertisement on a particular online journal will reach a particular number of users. So advertisements on high traffic online journals are appropriately more expensive to buy, but the advertisement is guaranteed to be seen by a large amount of people. This, in turn, encourages people like Roland Piquepaille to try their best to increase traffic to their journals in order to increase the going rates for advertisements on their web pages. But advertisers do have some flexibility. Blogads serves two classes of advertisements. The premium ad space that is seen at the top of the web page by all viewers is reserved for "Special Advertisers"; it holds only one advertisement. The secondary ad space is located near the bottom half of the page, so that the user must scroll down the window to see it. This space can contain up to four advertisements and is reserved for regular advertisers, or just "Advertisers".


    Before we talk about money, let's talk about the service that Roland Piquepaille provides in his journal. He goes out and looks for interesting articles about new and emerging technologies. He provides a very brief overview of the articles, then copies a few choice paragraphs and the occasional picture from each article and puts them up on his web page. Finally, he adds a minimal amount of original content between the copied-and-pasted text in an effort to make the journal entry coherent and appear to add value to the original articles. Nothing more, nothing less.


    Now let's talk about money. Visit BlogAds to check the following facts for yourself. As of today, December XX 2004, the going rate for the premium advertisement space on Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends is $375 for one month. One of the four standard advertisements costs $150 for one month. So, the maximum advertising space brings in $375 x 1 + $150 x 4 = $975 for one month. Obviously not all $975 will go directly to Roland Piquepaille, as Blogads gets a portion of that as a service fee, but he will receive the majority of it. According to the FAQ, Blogads takes 20%. So Roland Piquepaille gets 80% of $975, a maximum of $780 each month. www.primidi.com is hosted by clara.net (look it up at Network Solutions ). Browsing clara.net's hosting solutions, the most expensive hosting service is their Clarahost Advanced ( link ) priced at £69.99 GBP. This is roughly, at the time of this writing, $130 USD. Assuming Roland Piquepaille pays for the Clarahost Advanced hosting service, he is out $130 leaving him with a maximum net profit of $650 each month. Keeping your website registered with Network Solutions cost $34.99 per year, or about $3 per month. This leaves Roland Piquepaille with $647 each month. He may pay for additional services related to his online journal, but I was unable to find any evidence of this.


    All of the

  42. Other planets by a1cypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ESA says that these recipes will use fresh ingredients grown in greenhouses built on Mars colonies or other planets.

    On other planets... like Earth?

    1. Re:Other planets by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "On other planets... like Earth?"

      That is indeed interesting. It just might be possible to terraform this planet!

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  43. 'farmonauts'? by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    No farmonauts would be a voyager into a farm.

    I think you mean astrofarmers or cosmofarmers.

    Still, I just ate a pizza hut pizza, so stick that in your shuttle and eat it! :-)

    I wish dominos/hut would do mars delivery one day, but I think subaqueous hotels will exists first, and the first subaqua society. That'd be cool.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  44. Cart before horse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is either silly or a P.R. stunt. (Actually, it's both.)

    The early missions to Mars will be supplied w/ food shipped from Earth. We may use crates of MREs, or even more every-day food, but the food won't be grown on Mars.

    There are a couple of reasons for this:

    First, MREs and other prepackaged foods can be prepositioned one launch-window ahead of time, and will survive with long shelf lives as stockpiles. Sufficient food for mission success (and even comfort) will be delivered prior to humans leaving Earth, and the crew will bring another complete set of rations, in case something goes wrong.

    Second (and the reason the first is feasible) is that the necessary mass of food per person per year is not a huge fraction of the mass that needs to be sent. It is a lot of mass, and eventually you will want to begin production on the other side. But, there are other things that need to be transported fron Earth which account for a much larger fraction of the cargo shipments from Earth. Propellant will probably be made automatically on Mars even before humans arrive, and major concern of the early crews will be to ensure that the propellant production pipeline is prepared for the demand of later missions. Water supply is also a much, much higher priority than food production, since the hydrogen is so useful for propellant, since humans need it directly, since it is of intense scientific interest, and since many of our manufacturing processes rely on water. Greenhouses and cooking will start up along the way, experimentally and then eventually for a significant fraction of nutrition. However, there will be higher priorities to in the early stages than producing food on Mars.

    Marvin fillets with Tabasco may be tasty, though.

  45. 11 Recipes? by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

    Ok, even if they are VERY good I would be board stiff in like, a month and a half. Not to mention with a hand full of ingredients and some creativity you can think of 11 different meals very quickly. I think instead of hiring a world renowned French chef they should hire a mom who has 3+ kids and normally has a very limited budget to feed them with. That way you can get several million recipes in a month.
    Potatoes: baked, fried, mashed, soup
    Tomatoes: Salad, soup, baked dishes
    Wow, we are up to eight, and I haven't even spent a minute on this!

    --
    We are the Borg...
    1. Re:11 Recipes? by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

      LOL! yea, I'm glad I'm not flying to mars w/ a limited menu like that, especially from some rude french chef.

      --
      the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  46. law of conservation of mass by briancnorton · · Score: 1
    IANAFarmer, but food grows from nutrients and water. Assuming we can find or make water ther, we have to do one of two things to farm Mars

    1)Take a lot of soil/hydroponic nutrients with us, or
    2)Use martian "ingredients" to grow food in.

    #1 would seem counterproductive as the mass of soil would be greater than the amount of food you could grow on it. That said, how do you grow anything in soil with no organic material as viking and spirit/opportunity have shown us?

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

    1. Re:law of conservation of mass by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

      1)Take a lot of soil/hydroponic nutrients with us

      No, we'd be able to produce fertile ground using the crew's excrements, mixed with martian soil, and probably some sort of very concentrated chemical fertilizers.

      Water is still an issue. I probably can be extracted from urine (and I think they still do that)

      The plant themselves will probably be some funky, genetically modified versions designed to require as little water, nutrients and heat as possible.

      --
      Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  47. Eleven Dishes by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    While it sounds cool, and I'm sure they are good, any group of 11 meals that you eat day after day, is going to become tiresome after an extended period. One would hope they will be able to have variations and other new meals beyond those.

    RTFA? I barely RTFS.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  48. why no animals? by taxman_10m · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know they take up space, oxygen, food... but can't those be overcome by just building a place with more space, oxygen, and whatever the animal eats?

    Would it hurt that much to bring a few frozen chicken eggs on the voyage and then raise some chickens on Mars?

    1. Re:why no animals? by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      If you eat a herbivore, that's roughly 100 times less energy efficient than eating the plants ;) (In turn, plants don't gather sunlight, all THAT well).

      --
      Me (Blog)
  49. and toast.. by lupinstel · · Score: 0

    Avocados on toast with a bit of salt is quite good.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
    1. Re:and toast.. by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      You could also replace the toast with a corn tortilla, with excellent results.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  50. Please don't. by Dirtside · · Score: 1
    The future astronauts -- should I write 'farmonauts'?
    Ah, I see you've opted for our "Please shove a fork in my eye" menu option. Excellent choice, sir.
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  51. Soylent Green! by emtboy9 · · Score: 1

    Its PEOPLE!!! SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE!!!

    Hell, send them with some women and children and they would have a completely replenishable food supply... mmmm Veal...

    --
    "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
  52. Great idea, but.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Would it hurt that much to bring a few frozen chicken eggs on the voyage and then raise some chickens on Mars?"

    You know, that was a great idea. But no one would have thought that Dr. Smith would decide that a "nice omelette would hit the spot!" halfway through the voyage.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  53. Agronaut by Venner · · Score: 1

    agronauts

    I was just going to suggest that. It's also a nice play on argonaut, which is appropriate for anyone who'd go on such a dangerous, far off, long term expedition. :-)

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
    1. Re:Agronaut by hesiod · · Score: 1

      You aren't the only one... And I thought I was gonna be so original, until I searched the page for it :)

  54. Mad Magazine circa 1970..... by AsimovBesterClarke · · Score: 1

    ..."2001, A Space Odyssey" parody [1]:

    "What's for dinner?"

    "A glass of steak, a glass of potatoes, and a glass of carrots."

    "What? Nothing to drink?"

    "Oh, and a piece of coffee."

    [1] undoubtedly some play on Odyssey -> Idoicy....

    --
    Ads are broken.
  55. This Just In.... by zarthrag · · Score: 1

    FAMINE STRIKES ON MARS "It's like a fuc*ing desert!" says one astronaut.

    --
    Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
  56. Or logic by imarsman · · Score: 1

    The future astronauts -- should I write 'farmonauts'? -- will grow potatoes, onions, rice, soya or lettuce.

    I hope that's an and list, not an or list. I don't know that I could survive on just onions.

  57. Ganymede Sea Rat by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

    Jet: The house specialty is sea rat. Used to be a staple food harvested in the Ganymede sea. After the gates stabilized food wasn't scarce anymore and people stopped eating it. So they ran some fancy ad campaigns and claimed it was a delicacy.

    Spike: And...? Is it tasty?

    Jet: It's totally discusting. But people eat it anyway for status - it's in.

    Spike: Well in that case I'm out. Lobster Miso Stew please.

    ----------

    Good old Cowboy Bebop. Probably off-topic, but it was the first thing I thought of after seeing this.

    --
    Happy people make bad consumers.
  58. "He's got a board, with a nail in it!" by barbara_oreily · · Score: 1

    While the aliens weigh Bart and Homer, Lisa explores. She discovers the cook reaching for a spice rack. ``This will give the humans the perfect flavor...'' He licks his lips and carries off the pot. Lisa looks at the cookbook: ``How to Cook Humans.'' She rushes back to the dining room and shows the family her discovery. Nobody, but NOBODY eats the Simpsons! -- Homer, ``Hungry Are the Damned'' in ``Treehouse of Horror'' (Homer's face is smeared with barbecue sauce.) Kodos takes the book and blows off the dust. The real title is ``How to Cook Humans.'' Lisa blows off more dust: ``How to Cook Humans.'' Kodos blows off yet more dust. The full title reads ``How to Cook Forty Humans.'' The aliens are shocked and hurt that the Simpsons thought they were going to eat them. (``Frankly, you people made pigs of yourselves.'') Serak the Preparer cries.

    --
    "Freedom of speech won't feed my children" - Manic Street Preachers
  59. So if Mars Candy is made on Earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then would candy made on Mars be from the Earth Candy Company? How would the trademark infringment laws work in this case study?

  60. Tell us some Polish screen door jokes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't heard (or seen) any screen door jokes, let alone Polish screen door jokes!- tell us some. Unfortunately I have heard white supremecist tell jokes.. and they're not funny. Its true, diehard racists don't have any sense of humor.

    1. Re:Tell us some Polish screen door jokes! by Aerog · · Score: 2, Funny

      The French and Poles have, however, a fantastic sense of humour. In particular, while talking with two uncles (one French, one Polish), the topic switched to similarities between the two countries. Of course, that led to my Polish uncle mentioning how the Poles bought the idea of the Maginot Line from France. With the most subtly sarcastic tone ever, my French uncle looked at him and said "yeah, I see it worked out really well for you guys, too."

      Laughed for days, we did.

      --

      - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
  61. NOVA laser miscredited in Rolands blog? by Hex4def6 · · Score: 1


    Roland has an article about a supposed "Z Machine" which shows a really neat picture that is supposedly the "arcs and sparks produced by the gun"
    (http://www.primidi.com/images/z_machine_2.j pg)
    I have to call BS on this. This picture is of the NOVA lasers target chamber at Livermore Labs, California, not Sandia, and not this Z machine.

    This is at least my impression. Am I mistaken?

    1. Re:NOVA laser miscredited in Rolands blog? by Hex4def6 · · Score: 1

      Meh -- I'm wrong I guess. I thought this because I saw the same picture in my physics book, and they credit it to the NOVA laser (Physics for Scientists and engineers, 3rd edition, pg 714)

  62. Mushrooms? by airship · · Score: 1

    Why not grow mushrooms on Mars? They're a great meat substitute. And they'd make great stools for the giant hookah-smoking caterpillars that live there!

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
    1. Re:Mushrooms? by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      And they don't photosynthesize, unlike vegetals. They absorb organic matter to grow. No organic matter on Mars = no mushroom salad for dinner.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
  63. Biosphere 2 by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Biosphere 2 demonstrated convincingly that even with a massive infrastructure, hundreds of millions of dollars, and access to convenient and widespread inputs and manicured, primed soil, that creating and maintaining an artificial, productive, self-sustaining biosphere is a herculean task with no easy solution. And they propose to erect something similar on Mars, a terrifically hostile environment with no escape route? Good luck! NASA's Biomass Production Chamber has not fared especially well, and the USSR's BIOS experimental results are acceptable only as long as you are willing to eat algal slime.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Biosphere 2 by shawb · · Score: 1

      This doesn't seem to be QUITE the same as biosphere 2. These greenhouses are meant to supplement the astronauts diet with some fresh foods, not be the entire basis of it.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  64. And You'll Fly to Mars on Magic Space Unicorns! by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 1
    "In other news, the European Space Agency also claimed that all it's crewmembers would have their own Hot Martian Love Slave."

    All the aforementioned scenarios are about as likely. The ESA needs NASA's help merely to keep the white elephant known as the "International Space Station" alive; given the cracks in both the EU and the Eurozone, not to mention the creeping Euroscoliosis, the idea of ESA funding a Mars mission in our lifetimes is laughable on its face.

    Crow T. Trollbot

  65. John Carter of Mars Cooking Show by Ranger · · Score: 1

    In a recent episode of Barsoom Barbecue on the Mars Food Channel John Carter of Mars made an excellent rub for Thoat. Tars Tarkas said when John barbecues Thoat ribs the meat just falls right off the bone. And that his Thoat brisket was to die for. You can really sink your teeth into it. Later Dejah Thoris made some tasty Calot dumplings. John said they tasted a bit like dog. And at the end Tars Tarkas showed how he could make a mean White Ape Stew.

    John wrapped up the show my mentioning that Zitidars make a good roast, but you'll be eating leftovers for a Barsoomian year. Tars piped in that even for Green Martians Banth meat was just too tough and stringy. Next week on Barsoom Barbecue John will bring in some special guests, Plant Men. They prefer to eat their Red Martians raw and will show the best way to prepare them. Usually jumping over them and clubbing them with their powerful tails.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  66. How European... by bullitB · · Score: 1

    The ESA has never actually completed a human-rated space craft, let alone sent someone into space...but when they do, they'll eat like kings!

    (ok, ok, just kidding, don't mean to belittle the ESA astronauts who routinely contribute to Russian and American space missions, in addition to the ISS)

  67. Dr Seuss' last words to the ESA: by jd · · Score: 1

    I will not eat green eggs in jam

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  68. It's by joelpt · · Score: 1

    It's agrinauts.

  69. Anti-bio dics by screwthemoderators · · Score: 1

    Is that anything like Saltpeter as a food additive? Those Sith sure are dedicated to their cause!

  70. "One of the next"? by tjic · · Score: 0
    If you're lucky enough to be a crew member of one of the next European Space Agency (ESA) long-term missions,

    "One of the next"?

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only Europeans to *ever* go into space did so by hitchiking on an American or Soviet vehicle.

    The correct phrase is not "one of the next", but "one of the first...assuming it happens at all".

  71. So close.... by bluGill · · Score: 4, Informative

    You were so close to the answer. Even used the correct word: hydroponic. Yet you still missed it.

    Plants just need water and nutrients to grow. They do not care much about the soil, so long as the roots get enough (but not too much) water and nutrients. Tomatoes have been grown in just water and fertilizer for years! No soil needed at all. Most plants are more picky than tomatoes, but many grow in gravel sprayed with water and fertilizer.

    This is old by now. Tomatoes were first grown in the lab this way in the 1930s. (There are claims to have done it before then, but they are hard to pin down) Though tomatoes are particularly easy to grow with hydrophonics.

    I'm not sure what nutrients potatoes need, but they prefer sandy soils, which generally doesn't have much in the way of nutrients. Most of the other plants in the article seem to have been selected in part because they don't need much in the way of nutrients.

    In short, we know we can find CO2. We can crack that to get a little O2 to start things out. We are pretty sure we can find water. The amount of fertilizer needed is small for many plants, and thus trivial to bring. (Not to mention it is a by-product of digestion once humans are nearby) The only worry is nitrogen doesn't seem to be plentiful. It could easily end up that getting the nitrogen is the hardest part. Depending on how the greenhouse needs to be designed of course.

    1. Re:So close.... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Though tomatoes are particularly easy to grow with hydrophonics.

      I've had some experience with this, and I can tell you that I've yet to see a tomato grow because of underwater sounds.

    2. Re:So close.... by shawb · · Score: 1

      Or you could even go full blown airponics. Basically the whole plant is suspended in air with a nutrient bearing mist being sprayed on the roots. This method doesn't require quite as much water (which I assume would be at a premium on a martian colony) and grows plants faster and quicker than hydroponics. I think the plants grow better because the roots can get more oxygen, and so develop a lot better than they would underwater like in hydroponics. I tried to find some links with more info, but could only really find star trek references. I did have a bio T.A. that had set up his own simply airponics room to run experiments on, and was amazed at the growth rate.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  72. Just say no to veggies by smartfart · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will they also grow cows up there? I mean, seriously, what fool would submit to years-on-end leaf-eating? If I have to live on another planet, I'm going to be compensated with prime rib every now and then.

  73. You haven't been to my Indian grocery - by wsanders · · Score: 1

    - where they sell 2 KG bags of yellow curry powder mix. Either very large families, or very large spice loadings. Even I, white-bread all-American dude that I am, use a quarter-kilo of the stuff a year.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:You haven't been to my Indian grocery - by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      Even I, white-bread all-American dude that I am, use a quarter-kilo of the stuff a year.

      Kilo?!? KILO!?!?

      what kind of white-bread all-American are you?

      POUNDS, man! Pounds!

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  74. Europe in space by amightywind · · Score: 1

    If you're lucky enough to be a crew member of one of the next European Space Agency (ESA) long-term missions

    When is the next log-term European space mission, or rather, when is the next European space mission of any kind? Hitchhiking to ISS on Soyuz or Space Shuttle does not count. I would be very interested to see Europe use the Ariane V for manned missions.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Europe in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  75. Free the Martian chefs! by zenbanana · · Score: 1

    How typical of the Europeans. They are talking about a mission that doesn't exist that may or may not include farming, yet they are choosing to waste time on telling people what they should be doing with that food. I'm sure an EU office in Brussels will soon issue a standard or directive with a list of approved recipes for Martian cooking. I say let the astronauts decide! Free the Martian chefs from regulation!

    --
    In theory, theory is better than practice, but in practice, it isn't.
    1. Re:Free the Martian chefs! by craXORjack · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. As soon as the U.S. starts offering subsidies, corporate farmonauts will put the family farmonauts out of business and 90% of the ingredients in any martian recipe will be corn syrup, just like it is now at your friendly neighborhood food mega-distribution points.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    2. Re:Free the Martian chefs! by zenbanana · · Score: 1
      Ah, yes, the great American megafood industry. I ate an Army MRE last year and was shocked to find that every single item in the package not only had sugar/corn syrup/yuk in it, but had about two to three times the amount reasonable and necessary.

      Plus, our agricultural subsidy program has distorted markets all over the world, while lowering the price of food in America to the point where supersizing everything in your Happy Meal costs a nickel. No wonder our obesity problem is out of control.

      --
      In theory, theory is better than practice, but in practice, it isn't.
  76. As many stars than planets in the solar system by dascritch · · Score: 1

    Are there only 3 planets in our solar system ?

    --
    (Sorry my bad French) Je fais parler les Guignols de l'Info. Le pied, quoi.
    1. Re:As many stars than planets in the solar system by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

      Well, it said "almost" as many... and considering Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, the rest hardly matter.

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  77. Grow-House in space! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those long missions, they should investigate how well pot grows in space. (Mind you, I'm sure there's plenty of data on how to grow it hydroponically already.)

    Suggestion: Make darned sure that the indulging crew are secure in the Party Module until it wears off.
  78. Just like submarine crews by mrbooze · · Score: 1

    No surprise that there's talk of "gourmet" food for astronauts. The Navy has long had a tradition of assigning the best chefs to submarines, with the thought that if you're trapped in a tin can for several months, at least if the food is good it will help morale a little.

    Now make that tin can even smaller and send it out into space, I can see where astronauts would be craving some fine food after a few months.

  79. Re:Just add water...and chickens. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if you can muster a greenhouse that simple and effective, it could also be used to grow chickens, which would travel very, very well in embryonic form. Once that greenhouse has been in business for a few months, start hatching chickens and watch the perpetual protein (and fertilizer) machine rev up.

  80. Send Prosthetic-bodied humans to Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humans setting foot on mars for the short term is pretty pointless. Our technology is not sufficiently mature to be able to do anything other than plant a flag and come home.

    Economically getting enough payload to mars to even begin to start farming, this is several hundred or thousand tonnes of material! This borderlines on the nigh impossible with our current chemical rocket boosters and lack of on-orbit assembly facilities. Why send flesh humans when our machine-surrogates go on less and last longer, and every decade their abilities double.

    What would be more acheiveable in the short term would be a manned lunar base on the moon. A heck of a lot closer, and more of a challenge environmentally to live on, than Mars. The moon could be our space cradle. Develop and debug our technologies there. Learn to construct and fabricate dwellings there.

    While you're fussing with baby steps on the moon, build an orbital elevator or two. Get this technology perfected, and it all but opens up the heavens. Use it to start sending heavy payloads to the moon. Large excavation an boring machines. Aluminum smelters, dig cities down into the lunar regolith 5 kilometers deep. A permanent outpost of humanity, self-suficient from earth.

    By this time it is 2100 and Medical and computer technology have matured to the point where we can replace the human body with a machine similacrum, perhaps even replace the human brain with one that is emulated in a computer. This is the most ideal.

    With their brain clock-speed turned low so that months pass like seconds (for the long journey), and cocooned up in ships that are little more than little more than giant balls of primitive von-neuman machines, these will be the ideal colonists to Mars. Their wholly machine bodies require no powersource other than taking a charge off the solar panels or ships reactors. No taking along biomass like stupid algae for breathable air or any of that rot. Able to withstand dozens of Gs for sustained periods.

    These people land on mars, and start boring into the planet, setting up small smart assembly lines capable of making a variety of equipment from iron in the soil, small dumb robotic/teleoperated scouts. Find and secure water, build vast underground arcologies for flesh-bodied people to inhabit if so wanted.

    From there on, our ability can J curve. Fleets of cheap explorers, little more than mini millionaires fed up with earth and housed in splended new-metal bodies leave the giant spaceport that is now the moon. They head for Mercury, Venus, the various Lagrange points, the Asteroid belt and Jupiter. Setting up techno-fifdoms. It is 2200 and human intellect can be housed in something little larger than a juice box and run on a few dozen watts. There are new governments and cultures that have no flesh at all now, existing only with prosthetic bodies and simulated e-space. There are techno-luddites, flesh bodied people still inhabiting earth. The bounty of the solar-system is great.

    At the other end of the machine spectrum giant organic vessles resembling 2 kilometer long silicon borite skinned sea-cucumbers grow in low earth orbit, space elevator like tendrils rooting them to earth. Inside their thick skin is a warm salty mini-sea swimming with blind whale like floating wombs, capable of spawning/manufacturing lifeforms adaptable to a immense range of environmental conditions, variations of all the extant species on our earth now. including humans, but no humans immediately crew these seed pods which when mature sprout solar-sails and set course for another solar system, with the mindless patience of a simple plant. Capable of spending centuries poking along at a small fraction of the speed of light, until hospitable planets can be seeded.

    Oh it will be grand. Humanity will spread and transcend. We can acheive these Western Lands in but 300 years. Will it be our path?

  81. Chlorella Scrapple by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Anyone hear of scrapple? It's an eastern Pennsylvania thing. It's a breakfast food, like sausage, but comes in a brick. I like it sliced thin, and fried all crunchylike.

    I wonder if the same thing can be done with chlorella, or other small life forms. We could grow these in outer space, right? I'm getting hungry...

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  82. Farmonauts? by IronChef · · Score: 1

    I just threw up a little in my mouth.

  83. NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The future astronauts -- should I write 'farmonauts'?
    No, you should not.
  84. Re:Just add water...and chickens. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if you can muster a greenhouse that simple and effective, it could also be used to grow chickens

    Again the pressure could be a problem. If you can help it, you don't want to be placing 10 times the inner pressure on the wall as is received by the outer wall. That also places extra stresses on the buried ring stiffener. But if necessary, it is doable.

    Once that greenhouse has been in business for a few months, start hatching chickens and watch the perpetual protein (and fertilizer) machine rev up.

    Not a bad idea, actually. It may make more sense to have a fully pressurized coop, then move the materials back and forth (as it were). Especially since loose chickens could potentially damage the tarp.

    BTW, sorry dude, but you're going to have a hard time getting your C10H14N2 fix on Mars. The potatos might have a little, but the prime crops are unlikely to grow. ;-)

  85. The only thing Worse than 'farmonauts'? by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Would be the first astro/cosmo naut with a blog would be called a ... can you guess... ok aready....

    A Blogonaut!!!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  86. You don't grow "Soya" by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

    You grow SOYBEANS.

    Goofy-ass vegetarians.

    -JT

  87. First things first by aCapitalist · · Score: 1

    Before planning meals, why don't they start planning on their first try at getting a man up off the rock we live on.

  88. For those who do not want to visit his site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Haute Cuisine' on Mars?

    If you're lucky enough to be a crew member of one of the next European Space Agency (ESA) long-term missions, you will have the choice between eleven new delicious recipes, such as 'martian bread and green tomato jam' or 'potato and tomato mille-feuilles' when it's time for dinner. In 'Ready for dinner on Mars?,' ESA says that these recipes will use fresh ingredients grown in greenhouses built on Mars colonies or other planets. The future astronauts -- should I write 'farmonauts'? -- will grow potatoes, onions, rice, soya or lettuce. And it's interesting to note that the new menus were elaborated with the help of Alain Ducasse, the French chef who has almost as many stars in the 'Guide Michelin' as there are planets in our Solar system. Read more...

    Below is a picture showing a 'potato and tomato mille-feuilles,' a recipe prepared for ESA (Credit: ADF - Alain Ducasse Formation -- site in French). Here is a link to a larger version (283 KB).

    A 'Potato and tomato mille-feuilles' for Mars astronauts

    The thin slices of potato, tomatoes and onion are cooked one by one, for a homogeneous colour and a melting and crispy sensation in the mouth. The basic ingredients are potatoes and tomatoes, both thought to be easy to to grow in space, on Mars or other planets.

    So, what kind of vegetables will the 'farmonauts' be able to grow?

    The menus were all based on nine main ingredients that ESA envisions could be grown in greenhouses of future colonies on Mars or other planets. These nine ingredients must comprise at least 40% of the final diet, while the remaining (up to) 60% could be additional vegetables, herbs, oil, butter, salt, pepper, sugar and other seasoning brought from Earth.

    The nine basic ingredients that Christophe Lasseur, [ESA's biological life-support coordinator,] plans to grow on other planets are: rice, onions, tomatoes, soya, potatoes, lettuce, spinach, wheat and spirulina -- all common ingredients except the last. Spirulina is a blue-green algae, a very rich source of nutrition with lots of protein (65% by weight), calcium, carbohydrates, lipids and various vitamins that cover essential nutritional needs for energy in extreme environments.

    Besides the fact that astronauts will have better food than today, this will have additional benefits.

    Today all the food for astronauts in space is brought from Earth, but this will not be possible for longer missions. Although still on the drawing board, ESA has already started research to see what could be grown on other planets -- and what a self-supporting eco-system might look like on Mars.

    "In addition to being healthy and sufficiently nutritious for survival, good food could potentially provide psychological support for the crew, away from Earth for years," emphasises Lasseur.

    It is extremely difficult today to be selected as an astronaut. But tomorrow, when a candidate needs to show additional qualifications in farming and in cooking, it will become almost impossible...

    Anyway, for other stories about space food, you also can read two previous posts, "Eating in Space" or "Astronauts To Eat Italian-Style."

    Sources: ESA, June 13, 2005; and various sites

  89. Support independent farming! by electrosoccertux · · Score: 0, Troll

    Funny, its going to cost millions of dollars to put plants up there, millions of dollars to put water up there (unless there really _is_ water on Mars and they aren't just lying to us), and millions of dollars to put the astronauts up there. All just to do some long distance vegetable growing. Whats wrong with our earth grown vegetables? People make a living off that. But its going to take 300 people's yearly sallary in taxes to do this. If they would put this much money towards getting pestecides removed from our own vegetables...now that would be something. How are these plants going to survive the radiation on the way?

  90. GM is our friend here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother with green plants. They take up alot of space.
    All you need is a water tank. Add normal bodily waste + GM algea + light + CO2. wait a few days then open. Miss The taste of meat, simply GM the algea to express the flavouroids.
    Ok so you might like the occasional bit of salad but have a few pot plants in the habitat module, duh.

    Simply do not waste space on a greenhouse when you could use the water tank as part of your recycling system.

  91. foie gras by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    yes! It's a much better choice for vegetarians. It's not like ordinary meat; it's force fed!!

  92. Roland Piquepaille is a dork by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    Yeah, what the hell is up with this guy? I don't care about the making money off his webpage thing that everyone else is up in arms about, but making up cute "scientific" names for things just for the sake of making cute names is stupid, and doubly so when you get it completly wrong.

    As this comment pointed out he's not even using the right word. The name for people who grow food in space would be "astrofarmers or cosmofarmers," though i suppose you might want to use some fancy name for mars rather than for space. (Aresfarmers?)

    But beyond that, they're now "space farmers" because they happen to be growing food so they can eat it? Using the stupidly wrong terminology he uses does that also mean they're aquanauts because they drink water? If they didn't grow the food would they just be phageonauts? Are they shiponauts because they're flying in a ship? Are they excrenauts because they, well, you know?

    No, their primary purpose would be to explore, so they would be astronauts, or aresnauts, or whichever. Someone who traveled to mars after it had already been settled and ran a farm there would be a astrofarmer, though we'd probably just call them a colonist rather than coming up with specific terms for each kind of settler.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  93. Potatoes Are Not Perpetual Motion Machines by Vagary · · Score: 1

    You do realise that's because seeds are like eggs, right? They contain enough energy (and nutrients) to grow the organism to the point where it can gather its own resources (leaves in the case of plants, teat-sucking in the case of mammals). That energy was put there by the parent plant when it grew the seed. So a potato is just a carrying case for the genetic material + energy you need to start a potato plant on Mars. It'll need plenty of sunlight to get to the next generation.

  94. Damnit Roland.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Nobody want's to eat your French boulliabaise a la creme du tarmac. Now if he were an Italian chef, then we might have something to talk about.

    First he's trying to promote his blog, now his cuisine... when will it end?

    "Ah weel suejest to you zat zee assturownauwts will reequieur zee amazine talons ouef ze Ferench lewver for ze long treep tu Mars, no?"

    No, Roland, no! OMG stop licking us.. what are you doing!?!

  95. But will French Atronaughts use Soap? by netglen · · Score: 1

    Yes the beloved French. The only country in the world where every bar of soap of sold has instructions printed o nthe box. Yack.

    Don't forgot all the thousands of old people that died a few summers back in France from the heat. Yes I can see why AC is a bad thing. They had to call back Grave diggers from vacation and retirement to handle all the heat deaths.

  96. Open the pantry doors, HAL! by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

    Good afternoon, gentlemen. I am a HAL 9000 computer. I became operational at the French Culinary Institute in New York City on the 12th of January 2022. My pastry instructor was Mr. Langley, and he taught me this recipe. If...you'd like...to try...it...I...can...prepare...it...for...you..... .

  97. Re:I have great news for vegetarians! by rsynnott · · Score: 1

    No, quite the opposite. There won't be much meat in a long-term colony on the moon or mars, you know ;).

    --
    Me (Blog)
  98. Another plant that's easy to grow with hydroponics by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

    is Marijuana. It's been done this way for decades and the results have been spectacular, or so I'm told. Not only that, Cannabis is one of the most tenacious plants out there and will outlive almost any other plant in the harshes conditions.

    I say the ESA should establish a large pot plantation on Mars. They could harvest the crop every 3-6 months and with the revenue they generate from the bud, they'll have enough money for the next launch. Now, all they have to worry about is looking out for those Martian potheads...

  99. Re:I have great news for vegetarians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There won't be much meat in a long-term colony on the moon or mars, you know

    Oh, that all depends how many of those tasty vegetarians get sent along with you! Mmmmm, herbavors....tasty, tasty herbavors...

  100. But you still need organic chemicals by briancnorton · · Score: 1
    Don't you? The biomass of a tomato is not made up of rocks and water. To create a tomato one needs organic material for the plant to extract and chemically recombine into a tomato. Even gravel and sand have organic materials in them, martian soil does not. Hydroponics still requires all the chemicals that the plant would normally get in the ground. Sure much of it can be recycled from waste, but there is always some loss in any system.

    The algae I can see flourishing, as it is a far simpler organism that has proven that it can eat rocks. (it was the first lifeform on earth) Tomatoes are somewhat more picky.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

    1. Re:But you still need organic chemicals by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on the plant. Tomatoes are in fact easy to grow in water enriched with the right stuff. Corn is extreemly difficult. Note that I said enriched water, not pure water.

      Loss should not be a big deal, as this is intended to replace ~40% of the food on a mars mission, and that other 60% can be recycled into more.

      In any case, that organic matter in earth soil came from other plants - it wasn't always there. If we are careful we should be able to likewise enrich Mar's soil.

  101. Va te faire foutre by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 0

    Mangez mon âne vous baiseur détestant français de mère.

  102. EU long term mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of their long term missions? Perhaps I missed when they've ever had a successful human _short term_ mission in space. I know the yanks have done it, and the russians, and the chinese, but the EU? Do they even have a manned space program?

  103. The chef's stars by ndogg · · Score: 1

    Alain Ducasse, the French chef who has almost as many stars in the 'Guide Michelin' as there are planets in our Solar system.
    So...he has one?

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  104. "farmonauts"? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Idiot. That's "colonists", or, after naturalization, "Martians".

    mark

  105. Food: Weapons of Mass Coercion by craXORjack · · Score: 1
    Plus, our agricultural subsidy program has distorted markets all over the world

    Absolutely. That's the whole purpose of the subsidies. Why do you think Bush increased that already bloated government program by another $30 billion as soon as he got into office? By making sure third world local farmers can't make a living growing food, the U.S. assures its position as the bread basket of the world. Going into the 21st century, arabs may have the oil but we have the corn syrup. And ultimately that is much more valuable. After all, Juan Valdez can get by without driving a car but the man has to feed his family.

    This informational message was not brought to you by the Archer Daniels Midland Company

    But don't get me wrong. I think it's a better way to maintain dominance than, say, invading and occupying some viper pit on the other side of the planet.

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.