1. Marketers (including tech company execs promoting their companies)
2. Extreme leftists (including ISIS)
3. Hackers (trying to exploit the above two groups)
4. LUDDITES
My suggestion for the LGBT community is to look at the Libertarian Party, which views rights not as only for specific"Groups" but as absolutes for individuals.
That is as likely as a Sanders fanatic voting for Trump.
If you had two brain cells to rub together you would understand that in international affairs, a country, or "power" that has the ability to maintain or increase its sphere of influence, will always do so. Would you prefer a power vacuum filled by some other power besides the US? Think about that.
The government of the USA does that, as does any other government that has that ability.
Sure, you can put moral judgements on what the US has done, but if you do, please add every other government or "power" that has done the same, such as Russia, the USSR, Germany, Japan, China, the British Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Aztecs, etc, etc
And no, I'm in no way apologizing for any of the "bad things" the US has done, and continues to do, but in the grand scheme of history in the last 200 years, the US has been on the right side of things more often than not.
It is worth pointing out that these events have happened in the lights of Facebook launching its own publishing network called Instant Articles on the social media and encouraging publishers to directly publish on its platform instead of their respective websites.
As human civilization gets increasingly complex and reliant on computers to manage and maintain the things that allow us to exist in this First World, there will come a time when human civilization will have to us AI just to "maintain course"
But he admits that this will require "a bold and ambition approach that goes beyond anything that can be achieved through incremental improvements to current technology," he wrote.
But the article says:
Doing so, however, requires a bold and ambitious approach
It's interesting that you needed to change ambitious to ambition.
Why?
Microsoft also will revert to making clicking on the Red X at the corner of the Windows 10 update box dismiss the update, rather than initiate it, as it has done for the past several weeks.
when Google has so much power over what we can search for and the results that we get, that they will be able to(at first) subtly modify things, whether its song lyrics or news or opionions, etc;
Wait, they are already doing that...
So they'll use the techniques BMW used to mass-produce the i3 to make carbon fiber drones that can take even more. Taking the pilot out of the equation saves volume that lets you make the craft smaller, and then you benefit from square-cube law instead of getting fucked by it.
The same reason sending humans to Mars is ridiculous.
Send machines controlled by humans.
This right here is one reason why I couldn't stand the last two Matrix films, especially the last one when the machines make it to ZION and have the big battle with the guys in the mechs.
Even in a contrived reality like The Matrix films/Comic, the machines would have laid waste to ZION in about, oh... two or there minutes, tops.
The summary headline is:
"In the Aftermath Of Brexit, Brits Google About Irish Passport, Meaning Of EU, and Why it All Happened"
Wouldn't it have made more sense to have "google" lowercase, and leave out the "About".
Something like this:
"In the Aftermath Of Brexit, Brits google Irish Passport, Meaning Of EU, and Why it All Happened"
Slashdot Mirror
1. Marketers (including tech company execs promoting their companies)
2. Extreme leftists (including ISIS)
3. Hackers (trying to exploit the above two groups)
4. LUDDITES
This. Star Trek Continues is actually better than the original series.
Wrong
Nothing is better that TOS.
How come this didn't get modded up!?!
then I guess I'll just have to buy whatever Dell wants to sell me now, even if it is Microsoft crap that no one wants.
We knew you'd come along eventually...
They get better every day!
Elizabeth Warren, an American academic and member of the Democratic Party
This is like saying "Paul Ryan, an American academic and member of the Republican Party"
My suggestion for the LGBT community is to look at the Libertarian Party, which views rights not as only for specific"Groups" but as absolutes for individuals.
That is as likely as a Sanders fanatic voting for Trump.
If you had two brain cells to rub together you would understand that in international affairs, a country, or "power" that has the ability to maintain or increase its sphere of influence, will always do so. Would you prefer a power vacuum filled by some other power besides the US? Think about that.
The government of the USA does that, as does any other government that has that ability.
Sure, you can put moral judgements on what the US has done, but if you do, please add every other government or "power" that has done the same, such as Russia, the USSR, Germany, Japan, China, the British Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Aztecs, etc, etc
And no, I'm in no way apologizing for any of the "bad things" the US has done, and continues to do, but in the grand scheme of history in the last 200 years, the US has been on the right side of things more often than not.
So, to conclude, fuck the right off.
It is worth pointing out that these events have happened in the lights of Facebook launching its own publishing network called Instant Articles on the social media and encouraging publishers to directly publish on its platform instead of their respective websites.
More interesting use of the English language...
You might want to think about this possibility, that certain things are allowed to happen.
Think about who benefits from the increase in FEAR.
The vast majority of Muslim terrorism targets other Muslims.
You've made the best point in this whole discussion.
As human civilization gets increasingly complex and reliant on computers to manage and maintain the things that allow us to exist in this First World, there will come a time when human civilization will have to us AI just to "maintain course"
no undo harm (that leaves out alleged MS software)
What are you talking about?
Ctrl-Z saves me every time!
But he admits that this will require "a bold and ambition approach that goes beyond anything that can be achieved through incremental improvements to current technology," he wrote.
But the article says:
Doing so, however, requires a bold and ambitious approach
It's interesting that you needed to change ambitious to ambition.
Why?
Keep this in mind:
There is so much wealth/money in SF its a joke.
Microsoft also will revert to making clicking on the Red X at the corner of the Windows 10 update box dismiss the update, rather than initiate it, as it has done for the past several weeks.
Nothing more, nothing less...
Isn't it interesting how it works out that way.
This is actually true.
What does Winston Smith do in 1984?
Doesn't he has to stand in a certain part of his apartment so the omnivision can't see him?
Were almost there.
when Google has so much power over what we can search for and the results that we get, that they will be able to(at first) subtly modify things, whether its song lyrics or news or opionions, etc;
Wait, they are already doing that...
The airframes can't take 8G either.
So they'll use the techniques BMW used to mass-produce the i3 to make carbon fiber drones that can take even more. Taking the pilot out of the equation saves volume that lets you make the craft smaller, and then you benefit from square-cube law instead of getting fucked by it.
The same reason sending humans to Mars is ridiculous.
Send machines controlled by humans.
You always wanted to be the pet of a world dominating AI, didn't you...?
This right here is one reason why I couldn't stand the last two Matrix films, especially the last one when the machines make it to ZION and have the big battle with the guys in the mechs.
Even in a contrived reality like The Matrix films/Comic, the machines would have laid waste to ZION in about, oh... two or there minutes, tops.
I can't wait for Trump to get elected so paradise on earth can break out.
It will be tremendous.
The summary headline is:
"In the Aftermath Of Brexit, Brits Google About Irish Passport, Meaning Of EU, and Why it All Happened"
Wouldn't it have made more sense to have "google" lowercase, and leave out the "About".
Something like this:
"In the Aftermath Of Brexit, Brits google Irish Passport, Meaning Of EU, and Why it All Happened"