I know no one having one. I only read about it in news outlets that such thing exists. In doubt transfer all your data, change the password and delete the configuration in your email clients.
Well but think of all the money. We need to go for the money not for human rights. That is why the EU signed that treaty again, after EU courts eliminated the previous agreement and they will again.
It does not tell the fact that this story is so old it has a long beard, like a married Amish men with 200 years. I know this story from several books on data mining (now called big data) from the 2000 years.
There are separate meanings of free. In this case free refers to the access. You can access it regardless of your economic situation. However, the money has to come from somewhere. Therefore, all pay our bill together based on how capable they are. Also in free software, free refers to the freedom of access and not to the you do not have to pay for it, as you have to invest your time to make it executable and adjust it to your needs.
Of course we have to pay. No one said it is free. However, in our system the wealthier support the poor. Through this everyone gets descend healthcare. While without such a system, the poor have no healthcare and health cost can ruin your life. We prevent that and it is a good thing. Also it follows the notion that you are not only responsible for yourself and your actions, but also for your fellow humans.
Recursion is acceptable, but you may run out of stack space iff you get into endless recursion. However, this can be detected by a compiler under some conditions.
GOTO however, is weaker in semantics than a loop or condition, as it can imply both.
The article is stupid anyway. He only added recursion so that he can easily claim that it us useful and so is goto. That happens when.people stop reading Kuth and get their education from YouTube.
The Swedish think about that differently and it is very ignorant of you. Just because in your opinion anarchy is preferable and the state is not the facility to support the people by the people, you should not dismiss their choice.
Nope they were a socialist state and a dictatorship. West Germany and Sweden ate welfare states. For example, they both provide healthcare for everyone and money for unemployed people or the poor in general.
They are already a welfare state where all people have healthcare, good schools (by US standards) for all, kindergarten and of course support for poor people. Do not try to look down at them. It won't work. They are actually more humane than you.
This goes in the direction of autonomous drones which do not need a pilot controlling them (that much). They can then carry a 100 kg (220,462 pound) load 80 km (50 miles) which allows to provide supplies to troops or deliver bombs to certain areas even in cities.
Software writing tasks and related stuff can be transferred to Europe, Russia and India without any hassle. Yes there is a little bit more friction in the process when your workers are not close to the management, therefore, they used to bring them here, but if they stay in India they are even cheaper. This is capitalism. You voted for a super capitalist. What do you think will happen? If you wanted a socialist you should have supported Sanders.
Why do you think the process is linear? Present sea level rise is due to expansion of the water due to higher temperatures. Arctic and Antarctic ice sheet melting is only a small contribution to that. However, this will change in future. http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/f...
We are talking 200 years perspective. 200 years ago Europe looked quite different. In case the nationalists fuck up our continent AGAIN, there might not be an EU. Also it is a big difference from 1 or 2 mio people moving from the Netherlands to lets say Germany or the UK to work there or 26 mio.
"Siberia IS in the arctic circle, as is a lot of Canada and Alaska. That was my point. Currently no one lives there because it's too cold."
It still will be cold. It will be 1-2 degrees warmer, but it will not be like south Canada or central Europe. Lets assumes that is gets 4 degrees warmer, than it will still be -25 C in winter and the "no light period" will not be changed. You cannot grow crops there as efficient as in current regions. The fertility of the ground is also not equally good.
"The effectiveness of agriculture on existing lands is not likely to be reduced due to advances in productivity" There are not much advances in the last decade. It more or less flattens out. In addition we will loose to some extend fertilizers, due to resource shortages in that area.
"genetic engineering"
Genetic engineering did not produce crops with higher yield.
"and increased production from longer growing seasons and more CO2 concentration."
Plants use light to process CO2. The further north you go, the lesser your energy input from the sun is. In additions higher CO2 concentrations do not result in faster plant growth in general (there are some few exceptions). The processing is limited by resources in the ground and sunlight. In case there is too much CO2 the leaves close their stomas which reduces water vapor. This contributes to heating (as water vapor provides cooling). Unfortunately, the plants are not growing faster.
"Have you been to Alaska? Canada? Siberia?" Yes, I have (Alaska and Canada). I also live in the EU. Have you ever visited the Netherlands? They will be gone when we have a 13 m sea level rise. Also other densely populated areas, like Bangladesh. Do you want 160 mio Bangladeshis relocated to your country? Have you ever visited China? (I did 2012) You have to move Beijing 21 mio, Shanghai 23 mio, Tianjin 14 mio, and many many more. And China is already densely populated. Siberia is BTW largely in the arctic circle. It is too cold and parts of Siberia will be flooded too. Also you do not only need place for houses, you need places to produce food (they do not grow in the supermarket). The effectiveness of agriculture will be reduce in the US under a warming scenario.
No. I mean all the big cities and city conglomerates close the coast. It is a big difference to have cities grow in that area, because the population grows, as compared to a relocation of all the people. This is a bigger problem than you think, as a relocation brings no short term benefit. therefore the motivation to start relocation is low. It is expensive. you need strong government or a lot of public incentive to help people and industries to relocate.
We also have right now not enough space for mankind on this globe, reducing the land area does not improve the situation. Furthermore, no one starts relocation now. Most cities are still building new things close to the coast. Ask China what they want to do in Beijing and Shanghai.
On top of these issues, we have a lot of toxic waste in and near our cities which will end up in the oceans when the coastline is flooded. This will harm our food supply.
Do you want to discredit research with your false comments? Really. Some effects are already present and other effects will hit the net generation. Massive sea level rise, which would require to relocate many of our larger cities on this globe will be necessary in 200-300 years. Anyway, we will have problems with food supply long before that.
Is your work repetitive? Then you should get afraid. However, processing contradicting documentation of requirements requires creativity, which is currently out of the grasp of AI. It also will be that way for the coming 20-30 years. However, AI could read the documentation for you detect the inconsistencies and support you by searching the bloat and code for you. This will make you more efficient. Unfortunately, less programmers are then necessary for the same amount of programming. Fortunately, we live in the information age which requires more developments every year.
In a country where you can patent everything including a business model and a fart, this is no surprise. The initial idea (the one which was put forward) of patents was to protect the hard work of single poor and lonely inventor. However, it never worked very well for that purpose. In the last couple of decades it was completely converted in a weapon of big companies to battle each other in and outside court, and to protect them from smaller companies and real start-ups (not those money pampered "unicorns"). Therefore, patents should be abolished or at least replaced by non-monopoly patents where you have to share the patent and you get paid based on the price or revenue of the product of patent user.
You are mixing things up. First, it has already been pointed out by others in this forum that the original author describes something which can be better described as bullying, which is in fact something different than usually described by gaslighting. Bullying can lead to psychological harm too, but usually you are aware of being bullied. Second, we are discussing what to do in an environment where you feel to be manipulated and your ego is suppressed or gone, and the person feeling that feels disoriented. And in that case seeking help is usually the best thing to do in conjunction with leaving the the "toxic" environment. Third, with your rant about "Donald Trump" etc. you are definitely leaving the topic we discussed before. It looks like you want to talk about something completely different. You can do so, but it has nothing to do with anything I posted before.
BTW: Donald Trump made racist comments and he also categorized people by their value which are two common characteristics of fascism. Also he is authoritarian including his believe in a strong leader (which is obviously him). That is another common trade of fascism. However, you are right about: "Classroom Topics ~= Uncomfortable ~= Triggering ~= Abusive ~= Violent, ergo Classroom Topics == Violent and Abusive and requiring federal intervention and so on." This is typical bullshit of people who did not grow up, but are at university. This comes often together with "Why should I know that? I passed that exam last semester/year."
Slashdot Mirror
I know no one having one. I only read about it in news outlets that such thing exists. In doubt transfer all your data, change the password and delete the configuration in your email clients.
Well but think of all the money. We need to go for the money not for human rights. That is why the EU signed that treaty again, after EU courts eliminated the previous agreement and they will again.
It does not tell the fact that this story is so old it has a long beard, like a married Amish men with 200 years. I know this story from several books on data mining (now called big data) from the 2000 years.
There are separate meanings of free. In this case free refers to the access. You can access it regardless of your economic situation. However, the money has to come from somewhere. Therefore, all pay our bill together based on how capable they are. Also in free software, free refers to the freedom of access and not to the you do not have to pay for it, as you have to invest your time to make it executable and adjust it to your needs.
Of course we have to pay. No one said it is free. However, in our system the wealthier support the poor. Through this everyone gets descend healthcare. While without such a system, the poor have no healthcare and health cost can ruin your life. We prevent that and it is a good thing. Also it follows the notion that you are not only responsible for yourself and your actions, but also for your fellow humans.
Personally, I hope for a set of Marvin's to replace brokers. That would make stock trading more fun for us.
Exactly. But it can be done by the compiler and I can specify the function much more elegant and readble.
Recursion is acceptable, but you may run out of stack space iff you get into endless recursion. However, this can be detected by a compiler under some conditions.
GOTO however, is weaker in semantics than a loop or condition, as it can imply both.
The article is stupid anyway. He only added recursion so that he can easily claim that it us useful and so is goto. That happens when.people stop reading Kuth and get their education from YouTube.
The Swedish think about that differently and it is very ignorant of you. Just because in your opinion anarchy is preferable and the state is not the facility to support the people by the people, you should not dismiss their choice.
Nope they were a socialist state and a dictatorship. West Germany and Sweden ate welfare states. For example, they both provide healthcare for everyone and money for unemployed people or the poor in general.
They are already a welfare state where all people have healthcare, good schools (by US standards) for all, kindergarten and of course support for poor people. Do not try to look down at them. It won't work. They are actually more humane than you.
This goes in the direction of autonomous drones which do not need a pilot controlling them (that much). They can then carry a 100 kg (220,462 pound) load 80 km (50 miles) which allows to provide supplies to troops or deliver bombs to certain areas even in cities.
Software writing tasks and related stuff can be transferred to Europe, Russia and India without any hassle. Yes there is a little bit more friction in the process when your workers are not close to the management, therefore, they used to bring them here, but if they stay in India they are even cheaper. This is capitalism. You voted for a super capitalist. What do you think will happen? If you wanted a socialist you should have supported Sanders.
That would explain a lot in America these days.
Why do you think the process is linear? Present sea level rise is due to expansion of the water due to higher temperatures. Arctic and Antarctic ice sheet melting is only a small contribution to that. However, this will change in future. http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/f...
We are talking 200 years perspective. 200 years ago Europe looked quite different. In case the nationalists fuck up our continent AGAIN, there might not be an EU. Also it is a big difference from 1 or 2 mio people moving from the Netherlands to lets say Germany or the UK to work there or 26 mio.
"Siberia IS in the arctic circle, as is a lot of Canada and Alaska. That was my point. Currently no one lives there because it's too cold."
It still will be cold. It will be 1-2 degrees warmer, but it will not be like south Canada or central Europe. Lets assumes that is gets 4 degrees warmer, than it will still be -25 C in winter and the "no light period" will not be changed. You cannot grow crops there as efficient as in current regions. The fertility of the ground is also not equally good.
"The effectiveness of agriculture on existing lands is not likely to be reduced due to advances in productivity"
There are not much advances in the last decade. It more or less flattens out. In addition we will loose to some extend fertilizers, due to resource shortages in that area.
"genetic engineering"
Genetic engineering did not produce crops with higher yield.
"and increased production from longer growing seasons and more CO2 concentration."
Plants use light to process CO2. The further north you go, the lesser your energy input from the sun is. In additions higher CO2 concentrations do not result in faster plant growth in general (there are some few exceptions). The processing is limited by resources in the ground and sunlight. In case there is too much CO2 the leaves close their stomas which reduces water vapor. This contributes to heating (as water vapor provides cooling). Unfortunately, the plants are not growing faster.
"Have you been to Alaska? Canada? Siberia?" Yes, I have (Alaska and Canada). I also live in the EU. Have you ever visited the Netherlands? They will be gone when we have a 13 m sea level rise. Also other densely populated areas, like Bangladesh. Do you want 160 mio Bangladeshis relocated to your country? Have you ever visited China? (I did 2012) You have to move Beijing 21 mio, Shanghai 23 mio, Tianjin 14 mio, and many many more. And China is already densely populated. Siberia is BTW largely in the arctic circle. It is too cold and parts of Siberia will be flooded too. Also you do not only need place for houses, you need places to produce food (they do not grow in the supermarket). The effectiveness of agriculture will be reduce in the US under a warming scenario.
No. I mean all the big cities and city conglomerates close the coast. It is a big difference to have cities grow in that area, because the population grows, as compared to a relocation of all the people. This is a bigger problem than you think, as a relocation brings no short term benefit. therefore the motivation to start relocation is low. It is expensive. you need strong government or a lot of public incentive to help people and industries to relocate.
We also have right now not enough space for mankind on this globe, reducing the land area does not improve the situation. Furthermore, no one starts relocation now. Most cities are still building new things close to the coast. Ask China what they want to do in Beijing and Shanghai.
On top of these issues, we have a lot of toxic waste in and near our cities which will end up in the oceans when the coastline is flooded. This will harm our food supply.
Do you want to discredit research with your false comments? Really. Some effects are already present and other effects will hit the net generation. Massive sea level rise, which would require to relocate many of our larger cities on this globe will be necessary in 200-300 years. Anyway, we will have problems with food supply long before that.
Maybe it works also with decaffeinated coffee.
For once, we will have PCs in future to write software. In addition we have open devices such as the raspberry pi , arduino and others.
They already replacing lower management with AI.
Is your work repetitive? Then you should get afraid. However, processing contradicting documentation of requirements requires creativity, which is currently out of the grasp of AI. It also will be that way for the coming 20-30 years. However, AI could read the documentation for you detect the inconsistencies and support you by searching the bloat and code for you. This will make you more efficient. Unfortunately, less programmers are then necessary for the same amount of programming. Fortunately, we live in the information age which requires more developments every year.
In a country where you can patent everything including a business model and a fart, this is no surprise. The initial idea (the one which was put forward) of patents was to protect the hard work of single poor and lonely inventor. However, it never worked very well for that purpose. In the last couple of decades it was completely converted in a weapon of big companies to battle each other in and outside court, and to protect them from smaller companies and real start-ups (not those money pampered "unicorns"). Therefore, patents should be abolished or at least replaced by non-monopoly patents where you have to share the patent and you get paid based on the price or revenue of the product of patent user.
You are mixing things up. First, it has already been pointed out by others in this forum that the original author describes something which can be better described as bullying, which is in fact something different than usually described by gaslighting. Bullying can lead to psychological harm too, but usually you are aware of being bullied. Second, we are discussing what to do in an environment where you feel to be manipulated and your ego is suppressed or gone, and the person feeling that feels disoriented. And in that case seeking help is usually the best thing to do in conjunction with leaving the the "toxic" environment. Third, with your rant about "Donald Trump" etc. you are definitely leaving the topic we discussed before. It looks like you want to talk about something completely different. You can do so, but it has nothing to do with anything I posted before.
BTW: Donald Trump made racist comments and he also categorized people by their value which are two common characteristics of fascism. Also he is authoritarian including his believe in a strong leader (which is obviously him). That is another common trade of fascism. However, you are right about:
"Classroom Topics ~= Uncomfortable ~= Triggering ~= Abusive ~= Violent, ergo Classroom Topics == Violent and Abusive and requiring federal intervention
and so on." This is typical bullshit of people who did not grow up, but are at university. This comes often together with "Why should I know that? I passed that exam last semester/year."