In theory, it smooths out random changes to the price, reducing the risk of any investment that people make (because a stock that is moving steadily up is less risky then a stock that is going up in crazy waves of ups and downs), which, in turn, allows for companies to borrow money easier.
Wikipedia keeps its past articles. In any case, that can be said of anything on the internet, as it can all be changed. Books can go out of print. Short of keeping a copy yourself and emailing them to others as needed, there is no form of citations that will get around the problem.
You don't have to build a self-modifying learning machine. You can emulate one of those via a machine that is not self-modifying. See:Turing completeness.
I hope you are doing this a lot longer then just 100 times. For example, if a coin have a 97% chance of coming up heads, then it is actually not very unlikely that if you only toss it 100 times, all 100 times will turn out be tails. 3% is hardly damn small.
If the connection between the intercom and the operator is good enough for voice, that is good enough of a bit rate for googling things. Then just putting a computer there will make things much more efficient. (you won't have to hire a operator, for one thing)
Skype is actually perfectly legal in china. So I am not entirely sure what VOIP apps have to do with sureillance - they can simply use a laptop instead
Essentially, what they do is they recommend people to subscribe to certain feeds, and then charges the feeds for it. Not entirely a bad idea. What is unknown here is how in the world they actually plan to get people to actually subscribe to those feeds. In the worst case, they have a bunch of sock puppet accounts.
You know, if he indeed sold the patent, then you can do the world a great service by simply publishing the patent number. Patents are required by law to detail everything about the invention, so we would all have a very good idea of how it is done. Just as importantly, we could all do it, as patents only last 17 years, so it is in the public domain now.
AT&T have committed to giving all money to charity. The person at yahoo developed his entry while working at AT&T, so I will be surprised if yahoo gets any of it.
There is always the good old general welfare clause. It is not hard to argue that getting us off of oil is beneficial to the general welfare of the nation.
It is certainly unpatriotic - the founders of the nation did not claim to be patriotic toward the country that they resisted paying taxes to, did they?
Considering how well camera phones are doing, I really don't think the "just a phone" sentiment is really what is successful in the marketplace. The iphone did a lot, and it sold a lot. And what is the most popular apps on the iphone? Games. It is logical to think, therefore, that a good game playing cell phone would sell, and if it did not, it would not be because it have too many features.
So what does he plan to do with the money instead? Stuffing it under his mattress? That is same as a reduction in the money supply, and the fed can simply print the money to replace it. If he puts it in a bank, the bank will invest it.
Slashdot Mirror
In theory, it smooths out random changes to the price, reducing the risk of any investment that people make (because a stock that is moving steadily up is less risky then a stock that is going up in crazy waves of ups and downs), which, in turn, allows for companies to borrow money easier.
In practice, you are basically right.
how about a physical keylogger? Live CD won't help there, as it is hardware, not software.
Wikipedia keeps its past articles. In any case, that can be said of anything on the internet, as it can all be changed. Books can go out of print. Short of keeping a copy yourself and emailing them to others as needed, there is no form of citations that will get around the problem.
Actually, we had nuclear weapons long before the USSR did anything in south America.
Considering inflation, they are doing all of this really cool tech for really cheap. Maybe there is a good side for this DRM craze.
Not entirely sure how he would be "doing" this last year. See, he only came to office this year.
You don't have to build a self-modifying learning machine. You can emulate one of those via a machine that is not self-modifying. See:Turing completeness.
Not to say that you are wrong, of course, but do you actually have proof that they don't work?
I hope you are doing this a lot longer then just 100 times. For example, if a coin have a 97% chance of coming up heads, then it is actually not very unlikely that if you only toss it 100 times, all 100 times will turn out be tails. 3% is hardly damn small.
If the connection between the intercom and the operator is good enough for voice, that is good enough of a bit rate for googling things. Then just putting a computer there will make things much more efficient. (you won't have to hire a operator, for one thing)
Skype is actually perfectly legal in china. So I am not entirely sure what VOIP apps have to do with sureillance - they can simply use a laptop instead
Essentially, what they do is they recommend people to subscribe to certain feeds, and then charges the feeds for it. Not entirely a bad idea. What is unknown here is how in the world they actually plan to get people to actually subscribe to those feeds. In the worst case, they have a bunch of sock puppet accounts.
Easy - print a hash of the correct solution. Have fun coming up with the actual answer!
You know, if he indeed sold the patent, then you can do the world a great service by simply publishing the patent number. Patents are required by law to detail everything about the invention, so we would all have a very good idea of how it is done. Just as importantly, we could all do it, as patents only last 17 years, so it is in the public domain now.
The last one is actually quite possible, and indeed is a huge area of compiler research.
AT&T have committed to giving all money to charity. The person at yahoo developed his entry while working at AT&T, so I will be surprised if yahoo gets any of it.
There is always the good old general welfare clause. It is not hard to argue that getting us off of oil is beneficial to the general welfare of the nation.
Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, and so on and so forth publish road maps about future products all of the time. They can still sell their inventories.
It is certainly unpatriotic - the founders of the nation did not claim to be patriotic toward the country that they resisted paying taxes to, did they?
Considering how well camera phones are doing, I really don't think the "just a phone" sentiment is really what is successful in the marketplace. The iphone did a lot, and it sold a lot. And what is the most popular apps on the iphone? Games. It is logical to think, therefore, that a good game playing cell phone would sell, and if it did not, it would not be because it have too many features.
So what does he plan to do with the money instead? Stuffing it under his mattress? That is same as a reduction in the money supply, and the fed can simply print the money to replace it. If he puts it in a bank, the bank will invest it.
As there are no shortage of workers, it would not be a major issue if a large proportion of the executives decide to retire.
They are a extremely small part of any fan base for a certain IP.
As they are doing Data Mining, I expect their software to actually pickup on the fact that the number of emails sent is a poor predictor.
Actually, intent is often considered in the law. IANAL, but I am assuming their legal department signed off on this.