So if Moore's law is ending, we have Betteridge's law to let us know it is not. Thanks for putting that question mark on the end of the headline! We are saved.
The article is from WSJ and the so called alternative source is a rewording of the WSJ article, even going so far as to use 'according to WSJ' to downplay any non investigating of their own.
Quit using FUCKING WSJ articles. What's next, National Enquirer as a reliable source?
that banks are allowing the users of Slashdot to decide whether or not some programming language dies. Even more surprising is that everyone who is not a bank would go along with the decision, which would be required to kill off said language.
No results found for "The foreigner who moves to your land is to be treated as an equal and welcomed as a citizen and a brother.".
Funny that it is in the Bible but Google has no reference to it.
A friend of mine won $1,000,000 playing the lottery, at least that's what he was told. All he got was a piece of paper that he had to take to the bank to get turned into $$$.
We always called them call them Female Body Inspectors, but Backdoor Men is more appropriate. They don't care if you're male or female, they just want you to bend over and take it.
BTW, they are trying to establish the new normal.
53 qubits ought to be enough for anybody.
Would this article be on SlashDot if the game had been made by an average white male American?
Maybe people think that his kind is so dumb that we should praise them when they get all creative and do stuff.
Treating people like Pockets Warhol is offensive.
You'd rather be an Anonymous Coward than a known fool. amiright?
"What you have here is a failure to communicate"
Why so many WSJ articles??? This isn't even an interesting article.
If one can trademark 'Best Buy', anything goes.
So if Moore's law is ending, we have Betteridge's law to let us know it is not. Thanks for putting that question mark on the end of the headline! We are saved.
The article is from WSJ and the so called alternative source is a rewording of the WSJ article, even going so far as to use 'according to WSJ' to downplay any non investigating of their own.
Quit using FUCKING WSJ articles. What's next, National Enquirer as a reliable source?
Have we really come to the point where we discuss WSJ articles? I have seen proof that they create fake news.
that banks are allowing the users of Slashdot to decide whether or not some programming language dies. Even more surprising is that everyone who is not a bank would go along with the decision, which would be required to kill off said language.
And of course there is Betteridge.
What a stupid topic.
Now that's what I call Stallmansplaining!
Postal 2 was the legendary violent video game.
"Windows 10 For PCs Build 14997 Leaks Online"
but that's AFTER you install it.
"You're a mass murderer if you think that way. Nothing less."
Big brother called, he wants his ideology back.
No results found for "The foreigner who moves to your land is to be treated as an equal and welcomed as a citizen and a brother.".
Funny that it is in the Bible but Google has no reference to it.
How old were you before you made that wish?
I think you would enjoy this...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
That was Harry Houdini
Happy Anniversary Steve!
Arguably, he is.
A friend of mine won $1,000,000 playing the lottery, at least that's what he was told. All he got was a piece of paper that he had to take to the bank to get turned into $$$.
I'm no statistician, but I could probably prove that it is indeed acceptable, depending on the construct.
You don't need VR to fly by the seat of your pants.
We always called them call them Female Body Inspectors, but Backdoor Men is more appropriate. They don't care if you're male or female, they just want you to bend over and take it. BTW, they are trying to establish the new normal.
/me doesn't like the use of the word predecessor here.