That's how I used to run TOR, until I found out about the Tor Browser Bundle a few months ago and made the swtich. That was the "secure" way to do it, they said.
Now I'm thinking I should have just stuck to modern Firefox Private Browsing + FoxyProxy.
I'd post anonymously, but oh hell what's the point?
You missed the most obvious option. Microsoft didn't 'give' that signature away to the state. They sold it at a very hefty price, boosting their bottom line without putting as much as a ding in our defense budget. That corporations would sell our sensitive secrets to a government that promises to protect them from any legal fallout is a given. Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Apple, everyone, they're going to sell out that data and trust without thinking twice.
I used Sprint for over 10 years, always with "unlimited" data and texting. That same service over doubled in cost during that 10 year timeframe. They never once updated coverage in my area. One time last year I was stranded in the center of downtown Dayton, Ohio and couldn't even get a signal to make a call!
Shitty reception, shitty prices, shitty customer service, shitty marketing, Sprint is just shitty all the way around.
Google quickly lead me to the SHA1 of 78a7ecf065324604540ad3c41c3bb8fe1d084c50 and to a publicly available SHA1 reverse lookup utility that already has the match in it.
Instead of cracking each encoded message they intercept, it would be much easier for the NSA to simply obtain the decryption codes directly from the central authorities like Symantec/VeriSign. This would greatly simplify the problem and would allow the NSA to instantly decode much of the encrypted communication it intercepts
Symantec and VeriSign don't create the encryption keys. You do. The private key remains private. Their job is to simply add a trusted digital signature to the public key that you've produced.
I participated in beta release testing for 5.5 and I'm frustrated that it still has old bugs that cause segfaults that continue to go ignored by the maintainers. I even supplied the patch and submitted a Github pull request, but the maintainers continue to ignore it.
It's no fun having to keep our own custom patchsets for PHP just to keep it running properly.
this is exactly how so many Obama supporters went from being pro-transparency, anti-wars, anti-Guantanamo, anti-torture, etc. to anti-transparency, pro-wars, pro-waterboarding. They have to support their "side" at all costs, even when it means reversing their opinions.
Yeah, not all of us. Frankly, screw that guy. What a disappointment.
On the way to lunch today, a coworker mentioned this movie to me and said he thought it was pretty funny. An ad for Google? Perhaps, he says, but still worth watching anyways.
I've never taken up the guy on any movie recommendations before, so I can vouch for his credibility. Yet, anyways.
I've always thought iTunes and friends were slow on Windows because Apple has a big fat 80+ MB "compatibility" layer sitting between their software and the Windows OS.
I'm not so sure how I feel about this whole Linux advocacy thing you're trying to promote. But spam, now there's an idea I can get behind! Take my money!
Slashdot Mirror
You have not always been able to cancel XBOX Live service using a webpage.
That's how I used to run TOR, until I found out about the Tor Browser Bundle a few months ago and made the swtich. That was the "secure" way to do it, they said.
Now I'm thinking I should have just stuck to modern Firefox Private Browsing + FoxyProxy.
I'd post anonymously, but oh hell what's the point?
You missed the most obvious option. Microsoft didn't 'give' that signature away to the state. They sold it at a very hefty price, boosting their bottom line without putting as much as a ding in our defense budget. That corporations would sell our sensitive secrets to a government that promises to protect them from any legal fallout is a given. Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Apple, everyone, they're going to sell out that data and trust without thinking twice.
I agree with you that most people won't care. However, if that were my iPhone 5, I would have sued Sprint immediately had they refused to unlock it.
I used Sprint for over 10 years, always with "unlimited" data and texting. That same service over doubled in cost during that 10 year timeframe. They never once updated coverage in my area. One time last year I was stranded in the center of downtown Dayton, Ohio and couldn't even get a signal to make a call!
Shitty reception, shitty prices, shitty customer service, shitty marketing, Sprint is just shitty all the way around.
Astronaut pudding? My favorite!
That bootloader is locked and won't allow you to disable UEFI Secure Boot or change the keys on it, so Surface RT (the hardware) is still dead to me.
Want an NSA Clearance?
That grammar is not incorrect. Phonetically, the "N" begins with a vowel sound so "an NSA" is correct.
You forgot about Kurt.
Oh but that's right, we're supposed to be morally "superior" right?
What is so difficult to grasp about why it's important to be morally superior to a mass murderer? Why do you speak about that like it's a bad thing?
as long as he is left lifeless in the end.
Easy there, ganjadude. Personally, I'd like to see the guy rot in a cell.
Keeping people alive to make them think about what they've done seems far more just to me than letting them escape their guilty conscience.
This could be useful if the robot lady in Google Maps understood to STFU when I started yelling at her.
So hackers are gonna change the colors on my lightbulbs?
Google quickly lead me to the SHA1 of 78a7ecf065324604540ad3c41c3bb8fe1d084c50 and to a publicly available SHA1 reverse lookup utility that already has the match in it.
Instead of cracking each encoded message they intercept, it would be much easier for the NSA to simply obtain the decryption codes directly from the central authorities like Symantec/VeriSign. This would greatly simplify the problem and would allow the NSA to instantly decode much of the encrypted communication it intercepts
Symantec and VeriSign don't create the encryption keys. You do. The private key remains private. Their job is to simply add a trusted digital signature to the public key that you've produced.
I participated in beta release testing for 5.5 and I'm frustrated that it still has old bugs that cause segfaults that continue to go ignored by the maintainers. I even supplied the patch and submitted a Github pull request, but the maintainers continue to ignore it.
It's no fun having to keep our own custom patchsets for PHP just to keep it running properly.
Unlike the last several Bitcoin articles, this one at least had some meat to it.
this is exactly how so many Obama supporters went from being pro-transparency, anti-wars, anti-Guantanamo, anti-torture, etc. to anti-transparency, pro-wars, pro-waterboarding. They have to support their "side" at all costs, even when it means reversing their opinions.
Yeah, not all of us. Frankly, screw that guy. What a disappointment.
/disenfranchised American
The reason Apple cares so much about jailbreaking has always been about preventing piracy of apps.
On the way to lunch today, a coworker mentioned this movie to me and said he thought it was pretty funny. An ad for Google? Perhaps, he says, but still worth watching anyways.
I've never taken up the guy on any movie recommendations before, so I can vouch for his credibility. Yet, anyways.
gewalker's obviously a shoe-selling schill.
How many times are you going to post the same comment in this thread?
I've always thought iTunes and friends were slow on Windows because Apple has a big fat 80+ MB "compatibility" layer sitting between their software and the Windows OS.
Somebody should write an algorithm that perfectly reverses lossy compression. Brilliant!
I'm not so sure how I feel about this whole Linux advocacy thing you're trying to promote. But spam, now there's an idea I can get behind! Take my money!