To video record in Illinois you do not need to inform anybody, only audio requires consent.
Illinois's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. Illinois makes it a crime to use an "eavesdropping device" to overhear or record a phone call or conversation without the consent of all parties to the conversation. The law defines an "eavesdropping device" as "any device capable of being used to hear or record oral conversation or intercept, retain, or transcribe electronic communication whether such conversation or electronic communication is conducted in person, by telephone, or by any other means." 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/14-1, -2. If you are operating in Illinois, you should always get the consent of all parties before recording an in-person conversation or telephone call. In addition to subjecting you to criminal prosecution, violating the Illinois wiretapping statute can expose you to a civil lawsuit for damages by an injured party.
While you generally are permitted to photograph or record video of people without permission in most public places, it is illegal in Illinois to "videotape, photograph, or film" people without their consent in "a restroom, tanning bed, or tanning salon, locker room, changing room or hotel bedroom." 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/26-4(a) (scroll down).
I got to say that you need to be modded up out of flamebait. not because you are right, but because you are not flamebait. you may be dumb IMO but not flamebait.
please remember people, there is no mod for "you don't agree with me", and not everybody who disagrees with you is a troll or flamebait.
"rapidly" is not exactly a precise amount. What if they mean 10 dB every 10 meters?
Also, this device is made for crowd control. Sooner or later it will get used at close range, either by accident or because some idiot tought it was a good idea.
you chopped off the important part again.
the rest of the statement gave details, "The sound level will drop off rapidly according to the inverse square law as you get farther away"
Acoustics
The inverse-square law is used in acoustics in measuring the sound intensity at a given distance from the source.
Example
In acoustics, the sound pressure of a spherical wavefront radiating from a point source decreases by 50% as the distance r is doubled, or measured in dB it decreases by 6.02 dB.
meaning that every time the distance is doubled the power is halved.
so precise amount was given, you just ignored it or did not know what it was.
only 150 dB? that's plenty to cause irreversable damage.
That was a good attempt at spinning mrcaseyj's statement, but you fell short.
You know what he was saying is that the only place the device reaches the level of 150 dB is in a one meter range.
Not that 150 dB is a low amount.
The evidence is in the next statement of "The sound level will drop off rapidly according to the inverse square law as you get farther away"
But I have a suspicion that you are the type to not care about what the truth is, only how it can be twisted to fit whatever cause of the moment you are fighting for.
Well, the US side of the border now wants to search "laptops, digital cameras, cell phones and any other electronics on your person or in your vehicle", as described in the article.
What we want on our side of the border is for our authorities to enforce our own gun laws and stop and search people coming from the US into Mexico.
So what you are saying is.... It will not stop the gun runners, you were just being (A. sensationalist; B. off topic; C. dumb). pick one.
The real difference is going to be when you cross the border driving. There's been waaay too many documented cases of people buying guns (and I mean big guns, like assault rifles) legally in the US with their God-given 2nd ammendment right and smuggling them to the drug cartels here.
Searching "laptops, digital cameras, cell phones and any other electronics on your person or in your vehicle" will stop the gun runners how?.....
it's because they've got a large number of armed goons at their disposal and you have nothing.
This made me think of V (from V for vendetta) passing the DHS check point...
DHS: "Bollocks. What you gonna do, huh? We've swept this place. You've got nothing. Nothing but your bloody knives and your fancy karate gimmicks. We have guns."
V: "No, what you have are bullets and the hope that when your guns are empty, I'm no longer standing, because if I am, you'll all be dead before you've reloaded."
The short and simple solution to this problem is to do what your Grandad did in 1950 and his Grandad in 1925:
You spring for a good external antenna - and you install it by-the-book.
Exactly! go here and find out what direction your antenna should point, and what kind of antenna you need. then get a Lensatic compass ! climb up on your roof and get to work!
It is not hard at all.
note: it appears that TVfool's web-servers have been turned in to molten slag by people preparing for the switch to DTV, give them a few days to cry and they will be back
Slashdot Mirror
here you go.
http://www.thinkgeek.com/geektoys/plush/ea64/?srp=1
Illinois's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. Illinois makes it a crime to use an "eavesdropping device" to overhear or record a phone call or conversation without the consent of all parties to the conversation. The law defines an "eavesdropping device" as "any device capable of being used to hear or record oral conversation or intercept, retain, or transcribe electronic communication whether such conversation or electronic communication is conducted in person, by telephone, or by any other means." 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/14-1, -2. If you are operating in Illinois, you should always get the consent of all parties before recording an in-person conversation or telephone call. In addition to subjecting you to criminal prosecution, violating the Illinois wiretapping statute can expose you to a civil lawsuit for damages by an injured party. While you generally are permitted to photograph or record video of people without permission in most public places, it is illegal in Illinois to "videotape, photograph, or film" people without their consent in "a restroom, tanning bed, or tanning salon, locker room, changing room or hotel bedroom." 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/26-4(a) (scroll down).
http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/illinois-recording-law
The results are so haphazard, it feels like their parody of google is what actually drives Bing.
I don't know how this late in the game a search engine can be so bad.
answer:
Because
:D
It's
Not
Google
It's all in the name
here are answers to all your doubts. This video states it better then I could.
not like we did not warn them
and the bomb was no worse then Japans actions
That is fine, but you missed the point of my original post.
That point was: I do not agree with your stand point, but you were not being flamebait.
You only focused on the fact I said you were being dumb IMO (in my opinion).
Are you done? Because I am going to go over there now, you can continue arguing with your self if you want.
some people.....
I apologize profusely for defending your ability to say something I personally do not agree with. Trust me it will never happen again.
I got to say that you need to be modded up out of flamebait. not because you are right, but because you are not flamebait. you may be dumb IMO but not flamebait.
please remember people, there is no mod for "you don't agree with me", and not everybody who disagrees with you is a troll or flamebait.
"rapidly" is not exactly a precise amount. What if they mean 10 dB every 10 meters? Also, this device is made for crowd control. Sooner or later it will get used at close range, either by accident or because some idiot tought it was a good idea.
you chopped off the important part again.
the rest of the statement gave details, "The sound level will drop off rapidly according to the inverse square law as you get farther away"
A simple google search will show you that the inverse square law says
Acoustics The inverse-square law is used in acoustics in measuring the sound intensity at a given distance from the source. Example In acoustics, the sound pressure of a spherical wavefront radiating from a point source decreases by 50% as the distance r is doubled, or measured in dB it decreases by 6.02 dB.
meaning that every time the distance is doubled the power is halved.
so precise amount was given, you just ignored it or did not know what it was.
only 150 dB? that's plenty to cause irreversable damage.
That was a good attempt at spinning mrcaseyj's statement, but you fell short.
You know what he was saying is that the only place the device reaches the level of 150 dB is in a one meter range.
Not that 150 dB is a low amount.
The evidence is in the next statement of "The sound level will drop off rapidly according to the inverse square law as you get farther away"
But I have a suspicion that you are the type to not care about what the truth is, only how it can be twisted to fit whatever cause of the moment you are fighting for.
Well, the US side of the border now wants to search "laptops, digital cameras, cell phones and any other electronics on your person or in your vehicle", as described in the article.
What we want on our side of the border is for our authorities to enforce our own gun laws and stop and search people coming from the US into Mexico.
So what you are saying is.... It will not stop the gun runners, you were just being (A. sensationalist; B. off topic; C. dumb). pick one.
The real difference is going to be when you cross the border driving. There's been waaay too many documented cases of people buying guns (and I mean big guns, like assault rifles) legally in the US with their God-given 2nd ammendment right and smuggling them to the drug cartels here.
Searching "laptops, digital cameras, cell phones and any other electronics on your person or in your vehicle" will stop the gun runners how?.....
it's because they've got a large number of armed goons at their disposal and you have nothing.
This made me think of V (from V for vendetta) passing the DHS check point...
DHS: "Bollocks. What you gonna do, huh? We've swept this place. You've got nothing. Nothing but your bloody knives and your fancy karate gimmicks. We have guns."
V: "No, what you have are bullets and the hope that when your guns are empty, I'm no longer standing, because if I am, you'll all be dead before you've reloaded."
Now that i would like to see
Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Seriously
you mean the KGB?
from TFA
The law firm pledges to donate any proceeds from the litigation to charity.
from TFA
"Developers of The Pirate Bay have launched their new Virtual Private Network (VPN) service to some 180,000 pre-registered beta testers"
The developers, not the current owners of the name.
if these downdrafts are so strong that they can rip the wings off a airplane, one would think that the downdraft could collapse a parachute.
just a thought.
So assuming that pedophilia is a kin to vampirism...
The original has died, now the others go back to being "regular" people?
Putting the meme aside....
Your ideas intrigue me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
seriously
The short and simple solution to this problem is to do what your Grandad did in 1950 and his Grandad in 1925:
You spring for a good external antenna - and you install it by-the-book.
Exactly! go here and find out what direction your antenna should point, and what kind of antenna you need. then get a Lensatic compass ! climb up on your roof and get to work!
It is not hard at all.
note: it appears that TVfool's web-servers have been turned in to molten slag by people preparing for the switch to DTV, give them a few days to cry and they will be back
so where is the field test for pain killers? or viagra?
Viagra? would you be arrested for?
Conspiracy to commit road head?
well I guess there is the blood pressure issue.....
I run it under XP, which runs under Parallels, which runs under OSX. :o)
Which runs under........ Kevin Bacon!!!!!
I have a Tandy Color Computer 2 and the tape drive for it, so you could save the programs you coded.