Slashdot Mirror


California Student Arrested For Console Hacking

jhoger writes "Matthew Crippen was arrested yesterday for hacking game consoles (for profit) in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. He was released on a $5,000 bond, but faces up to 10 years in prison. This is terribly disturbing to me; a man could lose 10 years of his freedom for providing the service of altering hardware. He could well lose much of his freedom for providing a modicum of it to others. There is no piracy going on, necessarily — the games a modified console could run may simply not be signed by the vendor. It's much like jailbreaking an iPhone. But it seems because he is disabling a 'circumvention device' it is a criminal issue. Guess it's time to kick a few dollars over to the EFF."

1,016 comments

  1. The cops that arrested him must be proud by BigHungryJoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    oh right, they're just "doing their job"

    1. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They probably are proud, since the particular cops in this case - "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents"- are doing their job.

      If you have some snide comments to make, they would be better directed at the elected officials that created their posts, not the grunts on the ground.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by emkyooess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No one accepted these arguments of "just doing my job" in the Nuremberg trials -- why should we now? (Sorry, Godwin.)

    3. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, they are doing their job. This doesn't exempt them from responsibility for unjust actions, though, anymore than the fact that they were the ones on the ground would exempt those who passed the laws. This is called the Nuremberg defense, and it is increasingly common now as peoples' roles in society become increasingly narrow and more specialized (ie, I just build the bombs, its not my responsibility what happens after that). "Just following orders" or "just doing my job" are not usable defenses. In certain cases they could bring about slight mitigation to the crimes, but certainly not exemption from personal responsibilities.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    4. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      If you have some snide comments to make, they would be better directed at the elected officials that created their posts, not the grunts on the ground.

      What if they threw a war on drugs/copying/circumvention/etc, and no one came?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    5. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The grunts on the ground still have a conscience. They are not excused from using it. If they honestly think this is right, their conscience is as defective as any common thug. They deserve a thousand times the scorn they will get.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Kenja · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Would you rather have police interpreting the laws as they see fit and only enforcing the ones they agree with?

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    7. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Phoenixhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All too often, they already do...

    8. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      They don't already do that where you live?

    9. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Aurisor · · Score: 1, Troll

      Do you realize that the Nuremberg defense logically follows from your suggestion?

    10. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by suso · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because there is a HUGE difference between liquefying people and copying someone's game.

    11. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hojima · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, they were proud of what they did, not just doing their job. FTA (chief of the investigation no less):

      "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers," he said.

      Counterfeiting and piracy have grown in recent years in both magnitude and complexity, according to ICE. Industry and trade associations estimate that counterfeiting and piracy now cost the U.S. economy as much as $250 billion a year and a total of 750,000 American jobs.

      I wonder what his source of information is. Oh the MAFIAA? Thought so. Next thing you know they're going to release videos saying it supports terrorism and child molesters.

    12. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      'couse piling millions of jews into large ovens and console hacking are roughly the same...

      GP is right. These people are doing thier job. Your gov't decided this job needed to be done, so someone did it. If he had to toture and kill people to find this console hacker, then your Nuremberg comment might be appropriate.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    13. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how it's supposed to work. That's why they have the option of giving you a warning instead of a ticket.

    14. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because there is a HUGE difference between liquefying people and copying someone's game.

      SOYLENT GAMES ARE PEOPLE! THEY'RE PEOPLE!

      /Heston

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    15. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Canazza · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He wasn't comparing copying games to Nazi war attrocities, he was comparing ARRESTING him to Nazi War attrocities, like this:

      Judge: Why did you shoot 15,000 Jews, Gays and Arabs?
      Nazi Soldier: I was just doing my Job

      Us: Why did you arrest that kid for modding his X-box?
      Govt. Official: I was just doing my job

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    16. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because there is a HUGE difference between liquefying people and copying someone's game.

      The actual comparison would be liquefying people vs. arresting someone for console hacking. It was the perpetrators of the holocaust who were tried at Nuremberg, not its victims.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    17. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by YayaY · · Score: 1

      BTW, I believe jailbreaking an iphone is criminal under DMCA...

      --
      Votator.com implements a fair voting scheme (free
    18. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is this a job of Immigration and Customs enforcement?

    19. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I think you might make a similar choice when it is "do your job or be unemployed." The whole not having a job thing speaks a lot louder than conscience.

      The blame needs to go directly to the top and not slow down much for distributing the blame along the way.

    20. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Talchas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only do they do that, they pretty much have to do that in many places given the ridiculous laws that are out there.

      --
      As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century,free flow of information is the only safeguard against...
    21. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would you rather have police interpreting the laws as they see fit and only enforcing the ones they agree with?

      If the law is unfair, unjust, or just plain disproportionate, then yes, I'd prefer to see the enforcers refuse to do the law's bidding.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    22. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by TheSambassador · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But the comparison is still dumb because of the differences in "moral wrong." It's very clear that what the Nazi's did was wrong, but it's not as clear when it comes to modding consoles (especially since the officers probably didn't even know what "modding xboxes" was).

      We really went to Godwin's law fast, eh?

    23. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by westlake · · Score: 5, Insightful
      No one accepted these arguments of "just doing my job" in the Nuremberg trials -- why should we now? (Sorry, Godwin.)

      It interests me when a geek equates the enforcement arm of US customs and immigration to the SS. That his right to a hacked and modded PS3 seems to count for as much as what a prisoner lost in the Nazi death camps.

      The Nuremberg defendants were charged with crimes against humanity - and, and among the specific changes, the crime of institutionalized murder on an industrial scale. That is why the defense of "just following orders" does not work. They were the ones giving the orders.

      Your apologies to Godwin are fraudulent.

    24. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by AP31R0N · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Eh. Its' hard for a cop with a associates degree in CJ know that the law is wrong in the eyes of /. members. They're job is to conduct the arrest, not to determine guilt or sentencing. It's for the judge to throw out the case, for a jury to not convict, for the judge to decide the punishment, for the legislators to craft just laws and the supreme court to evaluate those laws.

      Sometimes those charged with enforcement don't understand the why and wherefore. Sometimes they even... agree with the laws. Sometimes they opt to keep their jobs and pension rather than lose their job and possibly go to jail.

      The fault here lies with the laws and our culture's values (specifically, valuing the rights of companies over the rights of citizens).

      i get your point as a matter of a more general principle, following orders is a cheap excuse. In this case, i'm willing to let the arresting officers off the hook. We don't know what is going to happen with this case. Like others have said here, i don't want cops that pick and choose who to arrest and for what, aside from the most dire cases. Ordering a cop to shoot a shoplifter, yeah... that's wrong and all out of whack. Bringing in a kid for an investigation is hardly gross misconduct.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    25. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by BigHungryJoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      they're trying to put a kid away for ten years of his life for tinkering with a console. I'd say the moral wrongness of that is quite clear.

    26. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      So you think the people doing the arrest were the ones who ordered the arrest?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    27. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Just like a thug who knocks over a quickie mart for a couple hundred bucks. Would you be so quick to defend them?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    28. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by jerep · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly, and it just shows how dumb most people are, especially those enforcing the law. They apply it without a single thought. You could make a law about people having to wear specific colors every day of the week, and you'd have officiers enforcing that the next day without asking themselves if it makes sense or not.

      Morals have very little to do with it, the nazi soldiers were obeying orders without questions, just like our soldiers and policemen are. Cases like this guy being arrested for modding consoles just shows how corporations are really running the show in america, and our freedoms can be taken away at any time. They're temporary privileges at most.

      Oh and remember, Hitler was elected in a democracy. I wouldnt be so quick as to compare them to us and make them the bad guys and we the good guys, the line between our two societies is very thin.

    29. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes, they are. From TFA:

      "College student is accused of modifying consoles for personal financial gain"

      "The Cal State Fullerton student was arrested Monday on federal charges that he illegally modified Xbox, Playstation, Wii and other video game consoles to enable the machines to play pirated video games.
      Crippen, 27, of Anaheim, was taken into custody Monday morning by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. The arrest follows his indictment by a federal grand jury on two counts of violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act."

      "The charges against Crippen stem from an ICE investigation initiated late last year after the agency received a tip from the Entertainment Software Association.

      "Last May, ICE agents executed a federal search warrant at Crippen's home, where they seized more than a dozen Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony video game consoles."

      Just because he is cracking DRM doesn't make him a saint although I'll probably get modded down for that. It's more likely he's just a petty criminal given the fact that they found over a dozen different consoles in his place of residence.

      If he was just Joe Schmoe cracking his games for personal gratification in his own home and going no further than that, its unlikely he would have come to attention of the Entertainment Software Association who turned him in.

    30. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Otto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Would you rather have police interpreting the laws as they see fit and only enforcing the ones they agree with?

      YES. Absolutely.

      The law only works as a system when every single person enforcing it applies common sense to the situation. Without that injection of common sense, "law" is nothing more than tyranny and oppression.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    31. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by jerep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would much rather have people and policemen interpreting the law and questionning it and fully making sense of it before applying it, than applying it blindly without questionning, THAT is dangerous.

      Religion is already a clear example of what happens if you follow the law down to the letter without questionning, billions of meaningless deaths, billions more suffering, and noone happy in the end.

      What history teaches us is that only bad things come out of not questioning things and obeying blindly. When we work together and everyone understands the bigger picture, we're capable of the most wonderful things. Its the price to pay for such a brain, the ability to go both for the best and the worst.

    32. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah Apple will just have you believe that anything that violates the "spirit" of Apple is evil. It actually doesn't even need to be against the DMCA because there are armies of Apple Fanboys who will gladly tar and feather anyone who violates Apple's precious products. BTW has anyone seen Mr Schmidt since he was escorted off the board?

    33. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      There's a huge leap between the officers and officials who set policy and are responsible for implementing orders and the guys on the ground who truly are just riding on the waves. In this case, look to the district attorney and the elected officials.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    34. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's a difference of degree, not one of substance. Arresting people for exercising their rights to their property is not as unjust as killing people for their race, but it's still unjust. Perpetrators of unjust acts should not be exempt from the consequences, whether they are paid to do it or not.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    35. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Requiem18th · · Score: 0, Troll

      Just pedant nitpicking but the comparison is apt.

      It's true that these cops didn't kill anybody, that is why they aren't being accused of killing people.

      It's a little like saying that if someone steals a wallet following orders then they are innocent because the Nuremberg defense is valid as long as you didn't kill hundreds of people.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    36. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 1

      without the sentries that watch over attempts to guard our freedom, we may take the first step down the path (although it would be a much longer one) to the same restrictive and overbearing governments seen in the past. You don't have to worry about the frog boiling if you raise the alarm every time someone tries to turn on the fire underneath the pot.

      If we don't yell and raise the alarm every single time the corporations try to cut our freedoms, they'll cut our freedoms.

    37. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No one accepted these arguments of "just doing my job" in the Nuremberg trials -- why should we now? (Sorry, Godwin.)

      It interests me when a geek equates the enforcement arm of US customs and immigration to the SS. That his right to a hacked and modded PS3 seems to count for as much as what a prisoner lost in the Nazi death camps.

      The Nuremberg defendants were charged with crimes against humanity - and, and among the specific changes, the crime of institutionalized murder on an industrial scale. That is why the defense of "just following orders" does not work. They were the ones giving the orders.

      Your apologies to Godwin are fraudulent.

      This is a common logical fallacy I see all the time -- that just a comparison differs in degree that the comparison is invalid. In this case, the term Nuremberg Defense is a commonly used term to refer to a specific legal/moral argument, the "I am not morally/legally responsible for the actions in question because I was just following orders."

      You are creating a blatant straw man in arguing that the commenter is honestly considering a modded PS3 equal in worth to a death camp inmate, he is using a commonly accepted figure of speech.

      To get more to the heart of the issue, you do have a right to a hacked and modded PS3, it is absurd that the government can get away with passing a law telling me what I can and cannot do with a piece of hardware that I own, never mind mandating a decade of jail time for it. This young man's civil rights are being violated, and EVERYONE down the line is responsible for it, from the arresting officer to the prosecuting attorney, to the jury who convicts him and the judge that sentences him, and the politicians and lobbyists that pushed through the DMCA. "Just doing my job" is NO excuse, and the legal precedent for this was set during the Nuremberg trials, that is all that is meant in the comparison.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    38. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 1

      I just wish that they'd apply a subject to the whole "protect and serve" motto. Who are they protecting and who are they serving? If every cop asked themselves that today and really thought about it, the US might be a better place tommorrow.

    39. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by GaratNW · · Score: 1

      Just to provide a counterpoint (to the general tenor, not your comment specifically, parent):
      "It's much like jailbreaking an iPhone"
      It's NOTHING like jailbreaking an iPhone. There are tons of apps available on the iPhone, and easy to develop for one. There are very few to no unsigned apps widely available for the Xbox 360, PS3 or Wii. Programming for the PS3 is akin to ramming your head into a wall, and while the latest XDK for the 360 is pretty easy to get a hold of, developing for it isn't something most people do casually. For profit circumvention efforts like this (not hobbyists, but guys who circumvent the hardware in a retail console and then turn around and sell them) is generally for a single purpose: so the person who buys it can get their unlimited supply of games from GameFly, copy them with relative ease, and run it on their console that has no way to tell the difference now. So, I understand that many in this community don't respect copyright or fair rights management, and that's certainly their view to hold, but based on current copyright law and property ownership laws in the US, the primary intent of this sort of operation is to allow customers to copy games in an illegal fashion. There is no justification for what he was doing. If he was doing this to one of each machine as a hobbyist for his own use, it's highly unlikely this article, or prosecution would have ever happened.
      The article was light on details of the indictment, so if people have more information that indicates this truly wasn't his intent, I'll happily admit to being wrong.
      So in regards to the Nuremberg defense, it seems particularly inappropriate, because this wasn't some David vs. Goliath case. This was someone making profit off of other peoples hard work to facilitate piracy. It's hard to feel much sympathy for this guy, unless as I stated, there some giant facts missing from the article that provide more details as to why he was somehow the victim here.

    40. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by lalena · · Score: 1

      And yet sometimes the judges have no problem ignoring the laws because they don't like it or don't understand it.
      Remember the slashdot article about suing spammers: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?no_d2=1&sid=07/04/18/1247229

    41. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      I think you might make a similar choice when it is "do your job or be unemployed."

      Wow how do you know what he would do, are you psychic? Quick I'm think a number between 1 and 1000000, guess it!

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    42. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 1

      politician "I'm not responsible, I just propose and vote on the laws, the judges and cops apply and enforce them!"
      judge "I'm not responsible, I just apply and interpret the laws, I don't make them or enforce them!"
      cop "I'm not responsible, I just enforce the laws, I don't make or apply them!"

      Nobody believes the are really and truly to blame for anything, and the great thing about a bureaucracy is that it's everybody's fault and nobody's fault.

    43. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the comparison is still dumb because of the differences in "moral wrong."

      It's a difference of degree only. Why does that change anything? Doing evil is always wrong, even if it's just a little evil. Getting paid to do it does not make it OK either.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    44. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by twidarkling · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Didn't they already do that?

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    45. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Like a previous poster said,

      They're taking away 10 years of a kid's life for hacking a game.

      Sorry, but that's a crime against humanity. Maybe not on the same scale as the Nazis, but still an atrocity on one life.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    46. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by plague3106 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, he's being put away because he profitted helping people play pirated games.

    47. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Skillet5151 · · Score: 1

      That is why the defense of "just following orders" does not work. They were the ones giving the orders.

      I'm not sure what you mean by that but there were certainly people executed for carrying out orders they didn't originate themselves. Nuremberg is hardly the epitome of justice, hell the first man to die was convicted of relaying an execution order against a group of Allied commandos captured while conducting military operations in civilian clothing, which made them unlawful combatants still entitled to "humane" treatment under the Geneva conventions but not protected against execution like ordinary uniformed prisoners.

      Obviously, should the first German officer tried in an allied war trial be exonerated and released, it would be an embarrassment for the Roosevelt administration. For that reason, the prosecutor and my father sent a wire to Washington, informing the administration of the situation. Shortly thereafter, the prosecuting officer received the reply: "Lacking standard evidence, hearsay will be accepted as evidence in the trial."

      http://www.nd.edu/~com_sens/issues/old/v17/v17_n5.html#dostler

      Many of the others were convicted of "waging wars of aggression."

      After the United States gobbled up California and half of Mexico, and we were stripped down to nothing, territorial expansion suddenly becomes a crime. It's been going on for centuries, and it will still go on.

      http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Hermann_G%C3%B6ring#Nuremberg_Diary_.281947.29
      Yeah so "justice" at Nuremberg makes a neat bedtime story but reality is important if you're going to cite it as precedent.

    48. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by mea37 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You forget the enforcers are human, and have their own idea of what is unfair, unjust, or just plain disproportionate.

      If you allow that a police officer should, at his discretion, refuse to sieze a computer because he doesn't believe in the DMCA, then you accept that another officer might just refuse to enforce an anti-discrimination law.

      The police have a job, and it isn't "deciding what the law should be".

    49. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by MindKata · · Score: 1

      "moral wrongness"

      Its not just morally wrong, also its legally wrong, but apparently thats overlooked by the governments.

      For example, if I buy a console, and then write a manual about how to modify that console, then legally that is wrong.

      However, if I buy a car, and then write a manual about how to modify that car, then legally that is ok. (For example http://www.haynes.co.uk/ have been doing exactly this for decades).

      So Lobbyists have fought to distort the legal status of consoles and media in general. An audio/film/game protection system isn't any more important than a car, yet we are all supposed to blindly just accept that it is because Lobbyists say it is and have forced a protectionist market onto these forms of media.

      The closed nature of consoles prevents other smaller companies growing to support 3rd party products without the expressed legal permission of the console makers. They therefore control the market and the government helps them. So much for Capitalism's concept of goods traded in a free market when that market is closed off to all but the console makers and anyone forced to pay console makers effectively protection money, preventing the console makers taking legal action against them for violating access to their turf.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    50. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      I want them to only enforce the ones the general populace agree with ... if the general populace do not agree with them then they should be always dismissed in court and arresting people for that crime is therefore a waste of time ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    51. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      There is no justification for what he was doing.

      Yes there is. The justification is in allowing a company to tell us what we can and can't do with our own private property -- it is entirely irrelevant that he was doing this for profit to others' machines, the fact remains that he is being busted for circumventing copyright. This sort of thing is unprecedented -- that would be like (WARNING: Obligatory car analogy) making it against the law to use aftermarket parts in a car AFTER buying the car in full. Are we really going to allow companies to tell us what we can and cannot do with a product after we purchase it? It is well within their rights to void your warranty and disallow returns after you do something like this, but to make it illegal? I see no way that this can be justifiable.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    52. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      What if they threw a war on drugs/copying/circumvention/etc, and no one came?

      Your alarm clock would wake you up.

    53. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Locklin · · Score: 1

      Follow the thread man, the officers decided to prosecute this guy, which means taking away his freedom for a substantial part of his lifetime -all for a "crime" of being an inconvenience to some people's ambitions. That's not as far from the Nuremerg trials as I would like.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    54. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      Cases like this guy being arrested for modding consoles just shows how corporations are really running the show in america

      ...But corporations are people too!

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    55. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes because unjustly incarcerating a person is the same as murdering thousands of people in cold blood.

      I would highly recommend that you pose rational and logical arguments, instead of emotionally based hyperbole if you want anyone to take you seriously.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    56. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      The problem here is the presumption that common sense is that this should be legal, etc. Many Slashdotters may be in for a surprise when they find the population at large may not necessarily agree with them.

    57. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Sure. But do you mean the general populace, or "me and my geek buddies"? From a quick straw poll amongst my non-geek friends, there wasn't one who thought that modding an Xbox to circumvent copy protection (LMAO, "to allow unsigned homebrew games"? Really? How many people are homebrew coding a 360 game?) wasn't wrong. Even amongst those who had a modded Xbox themselves. People do it, typically, because they realize that for the private person, there's an infinitesimally small chance they'll be caught and prosecuted, not because they believe they have a moral, ethical or legal right to "free games/music/movies".

    58. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by TheSambassador · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the OP was taking a shot at the officers arresting the kid and not the people making up the laws, maybe the point then is the ignorance of the officers involved. While everybody (hopefully) knows the "wrongness" of killing people (thus making the "I was just doing my job when I killed 30 people" argument null), it's different here.

      Obviously us slashdotters (who are 100% right all the time) know how silly the prescribed punishment is for an offense like this. However, people in other areas of expertise don't really understand the laws they are enforcing (currently modding consoles IS illegal... whether it should be is another story). All the officers know is that a kid was doing something against the law, thus they arrested him for it. They probably don't know what console modding is, nor are they the ones deciding the punishment.

      The real question is - should we expect law enforcement officers to be the interpreters of "moral right" and not enforce the law when they take issue with it? Clearly we'd have many issues if each officer were to do this. Should we expect the officers to know and understand every facet of the law, as well as the technicalities of very specific offenses? I'd argue that this is too much. This is why we have the justice system, and not Robocop.

    59. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by GaratNW · · Score: 1

      Buying car parts is entirely legal. The automakers support it. A console is basically worthless without games to run on it. Pirating games is illegal, as it should be, in my opinion. Since this circumvention has about a 1% chance of being used for legal purposes, making it illegal to circumvent these sorts of protections in a for-profit manner seems perfectly acceptable. There's a reason I at least called out the difference between hobbyist and for-profit. I have never, once, seen data to indicate this sort of operation is used for anything other than to facilitate piracy. With that in mind, since he's just enabling the ability to pirate, he's just "doing his job"? No more culpable for the illegal actions he's enabling than those already accused in this thread of the Nuremberg defense?

    60. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by ivogan · · Score: 1

      Actually, they were proud of what they did, not just doing their job. FTA (chief of the investigation no less):

      "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers," he said.

      Counterfeiting and piracy have grown in recent years in both magnitude and complexity, according to ICE. Industry and trade associations estimate that counterfeiting and piracy now cost the U.S. economy as much as $250 billion a year and a total of 750,000 American jobs.

      I wonder what his source of information is. Oh the MAFIAA? Thought so. Next thing you know they're going to release videos saying it supports terrorism and child molesters.

      LOL reading that quote FTA made me think of the investigator in Hackers giving interviews to the news media, all high and mighty. HACK THE PLANET!!! (scurries off to go watch Hackers)

      --
      Who was that pointy-eared bastard?
    61. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Locklin · · Score: 1

      Locking people up (and removing all their freedoms) for decades when they cause no real harm *is* a crime against humanity -just not as bad as torturing and killing them.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    62. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by CodeArtisan · · Score: 5, Informative

      they're trying to put a kid away for ten years of his life for tinkering with a console. I'd say the moral wrongness of that is quite clear.

      Just for clarification, the 'kid' is actually 27 years old. More importantly, as is often the case in these reports, the maximum penalty for the charges would be 10 years. As the case hasn't even gone to court yet, there is no indication as to what the actual sentence (if any) will be.

      Not saying I agree with the charges, but at least let's discuss the facts.

    63. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except it hasn't been OUR government since WW2. Which is why the Soviets have been gone for a couple of decades now and we are still cranking out super weapons like we are getting ready for WW3. This is why voting is now a pointless exercise, because all it takes is five minutes with a lobbyist and a pen to make your vote meaningless. When bribery is legal and corporations have more protections than people do it is time to just admit the system has failed folks.

      Hell Obama did a full 180 and could run against his 2008 self and not have anything in common! That is the power of money. We might as well change the national anthem to "mighty mighty dollar bill" and be done with it. Even my 92 year old grandma who voted every election from 1942 onwards refuses to vote anymore because she thinks it is pointless. It really doesn't matter what we think or believe anymore, you can't compete with big fat checks. Sad but true.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    64. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you get a cop whose idea of unfair or unjust is very different than your own...

    65. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by 1729 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A while back, I considered going into federal law enforcement, based on their need for computer scientists and my fascination with criminal investigations. The ~50% pay cut ultimately dissuaded me, but I spent some time thinking about issues like this.

      For example, I'm generally in favor of drug legalization, but I would have had to enforce the current drug laws in this job. I'm okay with busting drug traffickers (and people selling alcohol without a license, for that matter), but would I have a problem arresting someone for personal drug use? After some contemplation, I decided that I wouldn't have a problem doing so. Law enforcement officers don't make the law or even interpret ambiguities in the law. This is the job for the legislatures and the courts, respectively.

      Simply put, I don't want a cop to refuse to enforce a law for personal reasons. I have to qualify this, though. First, although selective enforcement of the law can be dangerous, there should still be some room for common sense (i.e., it's not necessary to ticket someone for jaywalking on an empty street.) At the other end of the spectrum, if a cop considers a law truly immoral, then they should resign rather than fail to do their job. However, there's a huge difference between laws one might disagree with and laws which are truly reprehensible and immoral. We shouldn't conflate a law like the DMCA with a genocidal regime like Nazi Germany; the Nuremberg references are way overblown here.

    66. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Moryath · · Score: 1

      It is NOT illegal, however, to run "unauthorized" code (alternate operating system, non-"licensed" game, etc) on a console.

      THAT right was established in court back in the days of the NES, when companies found a way around Nintendo's crappy "security" chip and began manufacturing non-licensed cartridges. Big N, at least in the US, had no legal ground to stop them from producing same.

      "Unlicensed code" is the equivalent to your "car part" in the analogy you describe.

    67. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The real question is - should we expect law enforcement officers to be the interpreters of "moral right" and not enforce the law when they take issue with it?

      Yes. No person should ever do something they believe is wrong. Henry David Thoreau addressed this issue better than I can:

      Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right. It is truly enough said that a corporation has no conscience; but a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscience. Law never made men a whit more just; and, by means of their respect for it, even the well-disposed are daily made the agents of injustice. A common and natural result of an undue respect for law is, that you may see a file of soldiers, colonel, captain, corporal, privates, powder-monkeys,(5) and all, marching in admirable order over hill and dale to the wars, against their wills, ay, against their common sense and consciences, which makes it very steep marching indeed, and produces a palpitation of the heart. They have no doubt that it is a damnable business in which they are concerned; they are all peaceably inclined. Now, what are they? Men at all? or small movable forts and magazines, at the service of some unscrupulous man in power? Visit the Navy Yard, and behold a marine, such a man as an American government can make, or such as it can make a man with its black arts -- a mere shadow and reminiscence of humanity, a man laid out alive and standing, and already, as one may say, buried under arms with funeral accompaniments
      -snip-
      The mass of men serve the state thus, not as men mainly, but as machines, with their bodies. They are the standing army, and the militia, jailers, constables, posse comitatus,(7) etc. In most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgment or of the moral sense; but they put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones; and wooden men can perhaps be manufactured that will serve the purpose as well. Such command no more respect than men of straw or a lump of dirt.

      As for the ignorance issue, you have a responsibility to ensure that your actions are moral. Ignorance of the legal status of your actions will not get you off the hook in court. Ignorance of the moral ramifications of your actions will get you no sympathy from me.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    68. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you rather have police interpreting the laws as they see fit and only enforcing the ones they agree with?

      Are you implying that this doesn't already happen? Or more specifically, only enforcing laws they agree with on people they want to enforce them on. See most any story regarding cops engaging in spousal abuse for the other side of the coin - denial's not just a river in Egypt...

    69. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      Since this circumvention has about a 1% chance of being used for legal purposes

      The 1% is who we are worried about here. By making this sort of action illegal you are making people that mess with their consoles for non-piracy purposes (maybe they just want to hack it to install Linux on it and use it as a media server) liable to be SENT TO JAIL for nothing more than modifying a piece of hardware that they legally own. The government is letting a corporation decide what I am and am not allowed to do with something that I own, which is not acceptable. If there was a way to mod your XBox that turned it into a nuclear bomb, then we can talk about making it against the law to mod it, but if it is just piracy we are talking about (something I also think should be legal, but that is a different story), is it really reasonable to allow this sort of collateral damage?

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    70. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Police time and resources are finite. There is no reason why the police officer can't take a pass at the kid playing imported games on his consol, and investigate child abuse reports instead.

    71. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      How would YOU know "noone would be happy in the end"? Hell the man just made some bad 60s pop and now he gets blamed for everything!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    72. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that different than the way it works now?

    73. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Tassach · · Score: 1

      "Just doing my job" is NO excuse, and the legal precedent for this was set during the Nuremberg trials, that is all that is meant in the comparison.

      That message needs to be repeated loudly and often. Great job setting fire to the straw man, BTW.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    74. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your car gets stolen and you go to the police. Maybe he thinks it is unfair, unjust or just plain disproportionate that you drive a bigger car than he does.

    75. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in whose's eyes is it unfit? Certinally everyone has a different view of what is right an just! So let's let the cops decide. Why, so you can see cops on the news every day for acting unjustly in the eyes of the judge and the people? Get real. Give the police that power and its over.

    76. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by joeytmann · · Score: 1

      Cops don't make laws, or get to choose whether or not they should be applied. Ok there are some instances, traffic tickets...etc, that a cop can make a judgement call. But more than likely in this instance the DA called down to the local precinct and said "Arrest him for this...." so the cops did. As to the comparisions to Nazi death camps soldiers...don't you think that's a bit of overkill and maybe a little sensationalistic? As the law defines the kid broke it...and now he has to pay the price. Does that mean the law is crap....well tell your local congressmen/senators and get it taken off the books and the kid will be released. Don't blame the cops for "just doing their job".

      --
      Insert funny smart-ass comment here.
    77. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      â(TM)¦Remember that the next time you see a cop tazing some young stoner because he did not comply fast enough. Clearly, in the cops view, the stoner was not complying fast enough, so he was resisting arrest. Since the cop can interpret the law and apply it as he sees fit, he was interpreting the slow reaction as resistance and decided that the appropriate way to apply the law was to taze the guy repeatedly until he stopped 'resisting'.

      The point of the law is to have something solid to rely on. If you do not agree with the law change it. If you can't directly change it, work to have people who can change it elected.

      Telling the police that each and everyone one of them is judge, jury, and executioner is not the solution.

    78. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, he's being put away because he profitted helping people play pirated games.

      No, he's being put away because he profitted helping people play BACKUP games (and pirated games as a side effect). Do you see how the DMCA is evil, now?

    79. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by aevan · · Score: 1

      No, but the USA did for My Lai.

    80. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Weeksauce · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in the case of the Nazis, they individual soldiers were acting as judge and executioner (i.e. physically shooting the person). Here the cops are not judge and do not execute the sentence. The cops wouldn not be morally wrong in this situation, the judge who puts through the order to have the kid actually put in jail for 10 yaers is.

      --
      An inventor is a man who asks 'Why?' of the universe and lets nothing stand between the answer and his mind.
    81. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Not as clear? So maybe we should be arrested for modifying our cell phones, cars, computers, DVD players, consoles, and cameras?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    82. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by tixxit · · Score: 1

      Because there is a difference. The people that arrested him have not fined him or sent him to jail for 10 years; a judge (or jury) will do that after a (presumably) fair trial. A cop can never have all the facts of a case, that's why their job is not to punish people. We have trials, judges and juries to deal with the "moral" issues, whether the law was actually broken and what a fair punishment should be. This kid has not yet been sentenced to life or fined. He will be given a trial, if he does not settle early. If need be, he will even have a jury of his peers that will listen and judge him based on the facts. Given this is a young college bound kid, I imagine he'll probably get a steep fine as a deterrent then go back to racking up even more debt at school.

    83. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by ildon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      He could have been arrested for jay walking with a 10 year maximum prison sentence and arresting him would still not be morally equivalent to putting someone on a train Auschwitz.

      He will have a fair trial, likely with a jury of his peers if he chooses to fight it, and, if it really is "some kid tinkering with his console" either get acquitted or, at worst, some probation, a fine, or community service. If only the Jews in Poland had received that much "moral wrongness"...

    84. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You forget the enforcers are human, and have their own idea of what is unfair, unjust, or just plain disproportionate.

      You forget that the legislators are also human, and have their own idea of what is fair and just. There is no reason to believe that the legislator necessarily has a superior conscience to your own. Given what we know about politicians, it's a near certainty that he doesn't.

      If you allow that a police officer should, at his discretion, refuse to sieze a computer because he doesn't believe in the DMCA, then you accept that another officer might just refuse to enforce an anti-discrimination law.

      I will take that deal. If you can't find anyone willing to enforce a law, it should not exist.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    85. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by interval1066 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      @MindKata: "For example, if I buy a console, and then write a manual about how to modify that console, then legally that is wrong."

      Is it? I believe I have seen plenty of books on the shelves at B&N that purport teaching you to do something that if you actually carried out the activity described you could be arrested. So I think you're wrong on that score. Did you mean to say "Morally wrong?" cause I'll buy that.

      Even so, I think its ridiculous to sentence this guy to term that is equal to the minimum sentence for manslaughter if he is convicted. Someone is out of control, and its not this guy.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    86. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes because unjustly incarcerating a person is the same as murdering thousands of people in cold blood.

      I would highly recommend that you pose rational and logical arguments, instead of emotionally based hyperbole if you want anyone to take you seriously.

      it may not be the same, but it's evil, anyway. And it sets a precedent: Circumventing a copy protection device is now a criminal offense, even if you do it for fair use purposes. The law is completely wrong, it was lobbied by a monopoly, and helping enforce it is evil.

      Since when was The Law supposed to benefit the rich?

      The worst part is that if I wanted people to rebel against this unfair law, suddenly I'd legally become a conspirator.

    87. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by hey! · · Score: 1

      The reason murder and arrest are in different moral categories is that with the exception of those guys in Guantanamo arrest is a reversible state. Death is not.

      The cop is concerned about whether it was issued by the proper authorities, has the right form, specifies exactly what needs to do etc. It's not normally his job to evaluate whether the legal principles used in justifying the warrant are properly construed. That is supposed to be sorted out later by habeas corpus and due process.

      There are of course exceptions. If the cop knew that a judge was abusing his warrant authority for personal reasons, e.g. issuing arrest warrants on his ex-wife, then he'd probably be obliged to those warrants. If he had reason to believe that a suspect would not be given his constitutional due process rights, he'd have a moral duty not to use the warrant. But in general, the cop's duty is to mind his own business.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    88. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Asclepius99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a little like saying that if someone steals a wallet following orders then they are innocent because the Nuremberg defense is valid as long as you didn't kill hundreds of people.

      That's not like saying that at all. Because these officers were enforcing a law, not breaking it. Wasn't the point of the Nuremberg defense that they were following legal government and military orders, not just that they're following orders in general?

    89. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by falcon5768 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except he wasn't using a hacked and modded console, he was SELLING them, a LOT of them. No matter how you look at it, even if you agree that you hacking a console yourself should be legal, reselling consoles that are basically being designed to pay illegally copied games rather than imports is NOT ok.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    90. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by wondersparrow · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I love the car analogy, but lets get more specific. How about "chipping" a car. You are modifying a computer component by soldering or wiring in an extra piece of hardware. Often circumventing safety and environmental controls the manufacturer has installed. Now in some states this is illegal, but 10 years? C'mon lets be reasonable here. Oh wait, this is in the US, reasonable is an illegal word down there I bet.

    91. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Otto · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot, so I have to use the car analogy.

      Are you suggesting that the population at large would think it should be illegal to, say, modify their own car? That AutoZone is providing millions of Americans the tools and instructions on how to break the law?

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    92. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by unitron · · Score: 1

      Obviously us slashdotters (who are 100% right all the time)

      If that were true, you would have said "...we slashdotters...". : - )

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    93. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by pentalive · · Score: 1

      Because they are a part of the treasury department. They who enforce copyright.

      This same treasury department inspects incoming shipments for counterfeit goods
      like Nike shoes that were not made by Nike.

    94. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Otto · · Score: 1

      The point of the law is to have something solid to rely on.

      No. The point of the law is to have guidelines to rely on. Because if they're anything other than guidelines, then you're suggesting that people who know nothing of the details of the situation and who may have wrote those words many years ago are nevertheless more qualified to judge than the man on the spot.

      Telling the police that each and everyone one of them is judge, jury, and executioner is not the solution.

      At what point did I say the police should find somebody guilty and then kill them? You're taking the situation too far.

      The policeman has a choice to either enforce the law (arrest somebody) or not (let them go, warn them not to do it again, etc). That's it. They can do their job or look the other way. This capability of applying humanity to their jobs exists at every level of the system, or it should. Nobody should blindly follow orders, ever. You have a brain, you're supposed to use it.

      Or do you really think that every speeding violation should result in arrest and jail time?

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    95. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You opened the door to Godwin's Law.

    96. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      I meant "following official orders" but yeah bad example.

      I should have used something that is legal but morally wrong. I could use water-boarding but then they'll complain that water-boarding is nothing like unfairly arresting someone for facilitating fair use (and yes, copyright circumspection).

      What about, that's like managing corporate lobbies? Shouldn't that get you nailed?

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    97. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      > YES. Absolutely.

      Then you won't mind getting thrown in the slammer for having an empty alcohol bottle in your back seat, despite that bottle's last use as a planter. And for the governor's son to skate by with a warning after a near miss at 0.05% blood alcohol level (where the limit is 0.08%).

      Common sense may be a good yardstick, but there have to be limits on discretion. And at that, you still have to be wary of allowing corruption a foothold.

    98. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by TheSambassador · · Score: 1

      I still think you're missing the point.

      First of all, the cops were merely arresting him so that he could be brought to trial. They were not deciding the punishment.

      Second, laws are created for the sole purpose of eliminating moral relativism (at least in the bounds of our society). We created laws so that we could agree on standards that can be enforced. This doesn't necessarily mean that a law is always morally right... nor does it mean that everybody agrees that the law is morally right. However, it hopefully means that we've agreed that there's a problem with the action the law is restricting, and that law was the solution thought up to deal with that problem. If the law is problematic... well, that's what the courts are for.

      Third, this is a technical issue that not everybody has knowledge or experience in. Once again, this is why we have the courts and a justice system... cops aren't supposed to be making decisions on morality, they're there to "protect and serve" the people and the law. If a law told them to gun down 15 year olds with freckles... hell yes they can protest! But if they get a warrant for the arrest of somebody who's broken a law that they don't know or understand... then they leave it to the courts to decide. You really can't expect people to have a moral stance and knowledge of the law on every single possible issue.

    99. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by russotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He could have been arrested for jay walking with a 10 year maximum prison sentence and arresting him would still not be morally equivalent to putting someone on a train Auschwitz.

      Really? There's a reason it's called "pound me in the ass Federal Prison". I suppose you could argue that sending someone off to be tortured and raped for no good reason is not morally equivalent to sending them off to be killed for no good reason, but there isn't _much_ moral difference.

      He will have a fair trial, likely with a jury of his peers if he chooses to fight it, and, if it really is "some kid tinkering with his console" either get acquitted or, at worst, some probation, a fine, or community service. If only the Jews in Poland had received that much "moral wrongness"...

      No. Most likely, he'll be offered some sort of plea deal, which he'll almost have to take because the stakes are just so high. If he gets a trial, it'll be a trial by a jury of those who agree with the law and who have agreed in advance to convict even if they feel it is unjust. Silliness about probation, a fine, and community service is just wishful thinking; violation of the DMCA is a felony.

    100. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by PRMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      While a lot of people have been killed in the name of religion throughout the centuries, it is nowhere near "billions". And the only people to come close to billions in the last century were all atheists (Stalin, Mao) or followers of eugenics teaching (Hitler).

      So while the religious may be dangerous at times, they seem a lot less dangerous than the irreligious.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    101. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You could make a law about people having to wear specific colors every day of the week, and you'd have officiers enforcing that the next day without asking themselves if it makes sense or not.

      Unfortunately, it doesn't always work that way. For instance, in Tucson, Arizona, it's illegal for women to wear pants. However, I'm quite sure women walk around all the time wearing pants, and aren't cited for it.

      Enforcement of laws is completely arbitrary, and up to the officers and their bosses at the police departments. It's illegal to do a lot of things in motor vehicles which people do all the time, and are dangerous (tailgating, road rage, etc.). However, police never cite people for these infractions, because they only concentrate on speeding to the exclusion of everything else.

      So the Federal government could pass a law requiring specific colors as you say, and it might be rigidly enforced in Kansas, while completely ignored in California, even though the law technically applies everywhere.

    102. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Is it? I believe I have seen plenty of books on the shelves at B&N that purport teaching you to do something that if you actually carried out the activity described you could be arrested.

      I tend to remember lots of 'take down' notices sent to web sites for printing the DeCSS code, so yes I think it is somehow illegal or at least you will get sued to death...

    103. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by greenbird · · Score: 1

      This doesn't exempt them from responsibility for unjust actions, though, anymore than the fact that they were the ones on the ground would exempt those who passed the laws.

      Ummm...There's a slight difference in determining the moral wrongness in trying to slaughter an entire race of people just because you don't like them and bypassing the encryption on an electronic device. I think one can, with a fair amount of confidence, say that it is morally wrong to try and slaughter an entire race of people and have the vast majority of people agree with that statement. You're on slightly more ambiguous ground it declaring certain provisions of DMCA a morally bankrupt. And those carrying out the orders are much less likely to know enough to judge whether the DMCA is morally bankrupt.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    104. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Ok, so why is it that police won't cite any women in Tucson, Arizona for wearing pants (which is illegal there)? The law is on the books.

      The fact is, police enforce do laws arbitrarily. They don't enforce ones that they don't agree with, or will get them in trouble with their superiors.

    105. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Kineel · · Score: 1

      If the law is unfair, unjust, or just plain disproportionate, then yes, I'd prefer to see the enforcers refuse to do the law's bidding.

      That is far too broad a brush for the police to decide. Life isn't fair, I suspect most people who are mature enough to get through a Police Academy are mature enough to understand that. If the law is clearly immoral or unethical then I'd agree with you. However I don't see this law as being either of those.

      Is it unfair? Yes.

      Should the police not enforce it because of that? No

      That is for the courts to decide. If a jury of this man's peers cannot be convinced the law is wrong, then he's going to jail. I have no doubt that any worthy sheis...lawyer will be able to argue this well enough to keep the man out of jail. He may end up paying fines.

      Same argument goes for "just plain disproportionate." I don't think the Police should be in the habit of deciding what laws have disproportionate penalties. That is also what the courts are for.

      I am not a crackpot.

      Lets just agree to disagree. :)

      --
      -- Should there be smoke coming out of my CPU?
    106. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Or do you really think that every speeding violation should result in arrest and jail time?

      That's probably not a good comparison, because speeding is actually much more rigidly enforced than most other things, with the punishment strictly controlled by a formula: $X per mph over the limit. It doesn't result in arrest and jail time because the statutes specifically rule that out, instead mandating a fine. (And of course, there's a reason for this: speeding is a source of revenue for local governments. They don't want to jail people over it because that would cost them money.) However, in many places, going >= 20 mph over the limit changes from "speeding" to "reckless driving" with much higher penalties.

    107. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Who are you to say what cops can't do? Unless the boss is breathing down their neck, or there are a bunch of angry witnesses, they have total discretion on whether to arrest someone. They may not exercise this discretion very often, but if a cop chooses not to arrest someone for something, it's their prerogative.

    108. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Actually that would be a matter of department policy.

      Or again, along the lines of my previous post (which you didn't address): do you equally think it's ok for the officer to take a pass on some guy committing battery because the victim happens to belong to a minority the cop doesn't like? Maybe he thinks his resources could be better used elsewhere, dealing with crimes whose victims he respects.

    109. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 1

      We created laws so that we could agree on standards that can be enforced. This doesn't necessarily mean that a law is always morally right...

      Yes, and when a law is morally wrong, it is everyone's duty to disregard it. The purpose of the law is to work for justice, when it becomes harmful to that end it's necessary to disregard it.

      If the law is problematic... well, that's what the courts are for.

      Those same courts will use similar arguments that they can't go contrary to the law, even when the law is obviously unjust. They are just as immoral as the police.

      cops aren't supposed to be making decisions on morality

      EVERYBODY is supposed to be making decisions on morality. That's why we have a conscience.

      But if they get a warrant for the arrest of somebody who's broken a law that they don't know or understand... then they leave it to the courts to decide. You really can't expect people to have a moral stance and knowledge of the law on every single possible issue.

      I expect everyone to have an understanding of the moral ramifications of their actions. If you don't understand an issue enough to honestly state that you believe so-and-so belongs in jail, recuse yourself.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    110. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by mea37 · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't forget that legislators are human. I did remember that we have a system of government that addresses this concern (albeit imperfectly) and we are nonetheless a nation of laws.

      There were cities in which you could not find anyone to enforce most civil rights laws in the 60's. I'm sorry to hear you think those laws shouldn't have existed for residents of those cities.

    111. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to strongly disagree. When laws are only applied when police feel like it, it leads to an extremely biased system, just like we have now, where virtually anyone is guilty of SOME crime. If you piss off someone in government, all they have to do is look at you and discover some obscure (or common but rarely enforced) law being broken, and just like that you're gone. Even if all they can get you for are civil offenses, what danger are you when you're broke and homeless?

    112. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would highly recommend that you pose rational and logical arguments, instead of emotionally based hyperbole if you want anyone to take you seriously.

      From a guy quoting Mr. Limbaugh in his sig. Classic.

    113. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by mea37 · · Score: 1

      "The fact is, police enforce do laws arbitrarily"

      We aren't talking about whether they do. We are talking about whether they should.

      "They don't enforce ones that they don't agree with, or will get them in trouble with their superiors"

      You're half right. Individuals not enforcing laws they "don't agree with" get disciplined, and rightly so. Individuals following department policy (i.e. not enforcing laws if it "will get them in trouble") is a different story, and becomes the department's responsibility.

    114. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      There have been a few cases here in the UK that got the angry internet left in a ruff, until it was pointed out that the consoles in question (chipped xboxes) were preloaded with over 100 pirated games when sold. I can't find any information in TFA if this guy is doing that, but it wouldn't be surprising.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    115. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Opie812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when was The Law supposed to benefit the rich?

      Since the first person wrote the first law.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    116. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, all the NAZIs did was kill people. This wholesale destruction of our property rights is a much more fundamental, insidious problem!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    117. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      Except he wasn't using a hacked and modded console, he was SELLING them, a LOT of them. No matter how you look at it, even if you agree that you hacking a console yourself should be legal, reselling consoles that are basically being designed to pay illegally copied games rather than imports is NOT ok.

      The only problem with what you say here is that he is being charged with the hacking, not the selling. And even if this were the case, why is that not okay? It is okay to sell a non-modded console. I see absolutely no defensible reason that modding a console should be illegal. It should then follow that there is no defensible reason for selling a modded console to be illegal. What if someone were to mod their XBox, put Linux on it to use as a media server, and then sell it to someone else to use as a media server? Are we going to make a certain number of systems illegal? If so, where is the line? 5? 10? If you follow all of the basic assumptions that lead to this arrest you realize that the ground that all of these laws stand on is extremely shaky from a personal freedom standpoint.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    118. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Fumigator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh please! Your hyperbole is off the charts! You are hurting your position in the debate by spewing such drivel.

    119. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by The+Grand+Falloon · · Score: 1

      Hitler was never elected. He was appointed Chancellor by President Hindenburg.

    120. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      Yes because unjustly incarcerating a person is the same as murdering thousands of people in cold blood.

      It's not the same. It's analogous. As in, analogy. In your example, the common element is injustice.

      For example, riding a bike is analogous to driving a car. Both are machines used for human transport. That doesn't mean they're the same .

      They never should have gotten rid of the analogies on the SAT.

    121. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but if it's OK for the police to ignore a law requiring women to wear dresses, then I don't see the problem with police ignoring the DMCA if they disagree with it. You can't have it both ways. If police have to enforce laws they don't agree with, then they need to enforce them ALL, including ridiculous ones.

    122. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, and it just shows how dumb most people are, especially those enforcing the law. They apply it without a single thought. You could make a law about people having to wear specific colors every day of the week, and you'd have officiers enforcing that the next day without asking themselves if it makes sense or not.

      It's not the officer's job to ask why--congress already asked that question. If the law got passed, then it's grounds for enforcing that law. Yes, certainly, the police officer should evaluate the situation. The person isn't supposed to be wearing blue, but they're wearing a blue sweater. Arrestable? sure. The person was wearing a white sweater, but was hit with a can of blue paint. Arrestable? probably not. However the officer should not be choosing which laws he wants to enforce, and which ones he doesn't.

      The situation of the crime is a valid reason to not enforce a law (if it seems unjust, if it seems unintended), but not the instance of the crime.

    123. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      Except he wasn't using a hacked and modded console, he was SELLING them, a LOT of them. No matter how you look at it, even if you agree that you hacking a console yourself should be legal, reselling consoles that are basically being designed to pay illegally copied games rather than imports is NOT ok.

      No. Now matter how I look at it, I think one needs to actually copy games to do something "NOT ok". Many murders have been committed with baseball bats--but that does not make the distribution of baseball bats "NOT ok". It's how you use the baseball bat that makes it "NOT ok" or "ok". Do you make screwdrivers and soldering irons illegal because they could be used to hack consoles? I'm just trying to figure out how far you think we ought to go in our prevention laws.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    124. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Jeffrey_Walsh+VA · · Score: 1

      I just don't see what this "violation" has to do with immigration or customs. Have they always had this or only since Cheney/Bush turned a blind eye to allow an atrocious act of terrorism so they could, among other thing things, create a new uber-powerful cabinet-level agency?

      --
      I'm not giving in to security under pressure -Rush

    125. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      This doesn't exempt them from responsibility for unjust actions, though, anymore than the fact that they were the ones on the ground would exempt those who passed the laws.

      Ummm...There's a slight difference in determining the moral wrongness in trying to slaughter an entire race of people just because you don't like them and bypassing the encryption on an electronic device. I think one can, with a fair amount of confidence, say that it is morally wrong to try and slaughter an entire race of people and have the vast majority of people agree with that statement. You're on slightly more ambiguous ground it declaring certain provisions of DMCA a morally bankrupt. And those carrying out the orders are much less likely to know enough to judge whether the DMCA is morally bankrupt.

      Really? You can't see that it is objectively wrong and evil to lock someone in a cage for TEN YEARS for copyright infringement? That seems pretty black and white to me.

      The heinousness of the crimes are obviously not comparable, but I never claimed that they were, the term Nuremberg Defense simply refers to a very specific moral/legal argument that was named thus after being established as legal precedent during the Nuremberg trials. The fact that they happened to be trying Nazis is entirely irrelevant to the term. Please, leave your straw man out in the fields where he belongs.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    126. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by TheSambassador · · Score: 1

      You're assuming morality is specific and concrete! The lawmakers behind any law obviously thought that their law was morally right.

      There's a huge difference between a cop saying "man, it doesn't seem right that a kid has to be arrested for running a business modifying consoles" and the actual debate that happens in a courtroom. Why would we place our definition of "moral right" in the hands of the individual that happens to be there? There's a reason we don't. In a courtroom at least you can make your argument and persuade the judge and jury. If they rule against you, you can appeal and put your case before ANOTHER judge and ANOTHER jury. If a cop thought that it was morally wrong for people wearing green t-shirts to be alive, should the cop have the freedom to act on that belief and start shooting everyone with a green t-shirt?

    127. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by operagost · · Score: 1

      Oh and remember, Hitler was elected in a democracy.

      No, he was appointed Chancellor by Hindenburg, who he later pressured into resigning and subsequently seized the power of the office instead of holding a presidential election. That being said, an actual democracy does result in mob rule and atrocity, and the repeated dissolution of the Reichstag that Hitler enabled had that effect.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    128. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by db32 · · Score: 1

      Awesome! So can we do this with the military too? Only follow orders that they want to? Do you maybe have another word for that other than military dictatorship or police state? I just absolutely love such forward thinking people ready to leap head first into despotism. Clearly having the military and police act on their own whim instead of answering to the "people" collectively through the existing government channels is WAY better. I mean...why should we burden the populace with fixing their own damned screwups in electing bad officials...we should just let the enforcers of laws decide how it should all work instead.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    129. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by fugue · · Score: 1

      If you have some snide comments to make, they would be better directed at the elected officials that created their posts, not the grunts on the ground.

      emkyooess is right but I'm going to try to spell it out more clearly (or at least more verbosely and less Godwiny):

      If you are part of an organisation, and that organisation is doing something immoral, and you follow along, then you are part of the transgression. A member of any group is a part of that group. Duh, but people who are "just doing their job" are every bit as much part of what gets done as the people pulling the strings.

      To put it another way: you are responsible for your actions even if you're getting paid.

      --
      "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
    130. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is why the Soviets have been gone for a couple of decades now and we are still cranking out super weapons like we are getting ready for WW3.

      Our nuclear stockpile has been halved since 2001 and should be about 2,200 by 2012.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    131. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. The laws are so outrageous that anyone pointing out the honest truth about them looks like they're spewing hyperbole.

      I mean, consider that if I claimed you could be found liable for damages of $675,000 for copying 10 songs? Ridiculous, right? But undeniably true. Same goes for the DMCA. Yes, circumventing a technological copy protection measure can result up to 5 years in prison for each violation. Yes, jurors are required to state that they will obey the judge's instructions no matter what their personal feelings on the law. Yes, expressing disagreement with the law is reason to be excluded for cause during voir dire. And yes, prosecutors take advantage of long maximum sentences to force defendants to give up their right to a trial and plead guilty.

    132. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely you mean there's a difference between liquefying people and locking them up with rapists and murderers for a decade.

      In this case, copying someone's game is analogous to being a Jew. It's the trivial imagined offense which brings about the disproportionate punishment.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    133. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Problem.

      Jews were definitely guilty of the crime of being Jews. You could have all the trials you wanted, it wouldn't change the verdict, because it was the legislator's hand that was unjust, not the application of the resulting rules.

      In 1939, being a Jew in Germany was illegal. The punishment was death. By your logic, that's perfectly just.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    134. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by NickW1234 · · Score: 1
      He wasn't "tinkering with a console", he was running a console modding business.

      I totally agree that 10 years is excessive, and as an avid hardware hacker I think the anti-circumvention laws are totally crap to begin with, but painting the guy as a tinkerer casts a bad light on the rest of us tinkerers who aren't making a living off of what he knows is mostly being used for pirating games.

      He's morally in the wrong, IMO, but it still shouldn't be any more illegal than manufacturing DVD-R drives/discs which also mostly used for piracy, with a small percentage used for legit purposes.

      If piracy is already illegal, why not just go after the pirates directly, and avoid the gray area of anti-circumvention.

    135. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Duffy13 · · Score: 1

      No. Our system is specifically designed so as not to put that much power in a single person. If you disagree with what you are asked, you do not "pick and choose" which laws to enforce (as an officer), you resign from your position as you are unable to enact the duties required of you. If enough officers "resign" they might just see a trend develop, and if the people who control the legislature (that would be us indirectly) disagree so much, do something to change it. Sitting back and claiming they are wrong is nice and all, but that's not how it works (in any system for that matter). They will not magically realize their mistake, we must, as citizens and people, insure that our values as both individual people and as a nation are represented. The "king" makes the rules, if you disagree, get a new "king".

      --
      "Now you know, and knowing is half the battle!"
    136. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I have to give you Kudos.

      Not only did you explain things pretty well, but you used analogies and seeing how this was slashdot, even worked a car into the mix. Great job :)

    137. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Please. The ones that put the laws into place are EXACTLY the ones who are responsible. That is exactly where it starts. Judges CAN and have been known to nullify laws based on constitutionality and other criteria. It is only the enforcement arm that has the choice of "enforce or be unemployed."

    138. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You're assuming morality is specific and concrete!

      No, I'm not at all. Morality is of course extremely subjective, and we should not pretend that it isn't. That's what strict adherence to the law does, it makes us believe that there are not shades of grey. The law cannot be our guide to morality, the only guide we have is our own conscience.

      Why would we place our definition of "moral right" in the hands of the individual that happens to be there?

      Why would we place our idea of moral right in the hands of individuals who aren't there? In fact, why would we place our idea of moral right in anyone's hands but our own?

      There's a reason we don't. In a courtroom at least you can make your argument and persuade the judge and jury

      Except that the judge and jury never hear the debate between right and wrong. Only guilty and innocent. There's a world of difference.

      If a cop thought that it was morally wrong for people wearing green t-shirts to be alive, should the cop have the freedom to act on that belief and start shooting everyone with a green t-shirt?

      If he honestly believes that is the right thing to do, he should do it. In that case, I know that the right thing to do is to defend myself and those around me. Everyone else knows that too, so I don't think the problem of crazy cop rampages is real. In any case, I have far more respect for someone who stands up and does what he believes is right than those who sit around clucking their tongues saying "there ought to be a law!"

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    139. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by NickW1234 · · Score: 1
      So, it's okay to circumvent DRM as long as the non infringing uses are "easy"?

      I agree with you that most of the guys doing this are pretty much slime, but there needs to be a well defined line of what's legal and what's not. It's not a good idea to just make everything illegal, and then let off those who don't have ill intent, or pretty soon all of your freedoms are at the whim of the police/legal system.

      People do write unsigned apps for all of those systems. It doesn't make it okay to make it illegal just because the average Joe isn't capable.

    140. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by westlake · · Score: 1

      This is a common logical fallacy I see all the time -- that just a comparison differs in degree that the comparison is invalid.

      A difference in degree can be a difference in kind.

      There is no fallacy.

      To get more to the heart of the issue, you do have a right to a hacked and modded PS3, it is absurd that the government can get away with passing a law telling me what I can and cannot do with a piece of hardware that I own, never mind mandating a decade of jail time for it

      There are many things you can own or possess but cannot touch - without consequences.

      You can't boost the power of a VHF or shortwave radio beyond its legal limits. You must follow the correct procedures "on air."

      You can't drive "your car" on a public road without a license, registration, inspection and insurance. If you draw on your bag of tricks to rake in a little more - more likely a lot more - on the sale of your clapped-out Hyundai, you have committed a fraud.

      This "kid" is 27 years old.

      He was in the business of customizing hardware or modding it for resale --- not his own personal use.

      The real-world function of the mod is to run the pirated game - or perhaps get a steroid boost-up in competitive on-line play.

      One of the most interesting things about the American federal Constitution is that a general "right to property" is nowhere to be found.

      The federal government is, however, granted broad powers over interstate commerce. It can force individuals into compliance. The federal government has the explicit right to grant patents and copyrights - and the implied right to meaningfully enforce them.

    141. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      See, I don't really buy the "backup" arguement. Call it a hunch, but I suspect most people aren't having the console hacked to make backup discs to play with... sorry. Just like people DO use things like p2p to get legit content, most of it is pirated.

    142. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      This is why we have the justice system, and not Judge Dredd

      FTFY

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    143. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Please point me to the codicil that states it is illegal to modify your own car. Alternatively, I can point you to the codicil of law that states that it is illegal to modify a device for the purposes of circumventing another tenet of law/society, that of copyright.

      Your analogy is flawed, in no jurisdiction is AutoZone providing instruction on breaking the law. And in no jurisdiction would you find a reputable licensed mechanic willing to break the law, for example in regards to speed limiters, safety devices, emissions control, and so forth.

      Evidently some notable part of the community believes that it should be illegal to breach copyright, and it should be illegal to profit from providing a service to enable that.

      Regardless of what you or I think of the above, it is codified in law. You may have opinions on the concept of copyright, the people or organizations who desired from their lawmakers such laws be enacted, or their motivations, but it is there, in objective fact. It is not illegal to modify your own vehicle with AutoZone parts, so the analogy is flawed, fatally.

    144. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by greenbird · · Score: 1

      Really? You can't see that it is objectively wrong and evil to lock someone in a cage for TEN YEARS for copyright infringement?

      First, let me say that I definitely agree that copyright laws have gone beyond ridiculous in both the level of restrictions and punishment for violation. I would even say they gotten to the point that they are counter to the constitutional purpose for them in the first place and are thus in violation of the constitution (in the US where this takes place).

      That being said, there are defensible arguments that they are justified. The primary basis for those are that large amounts of money (billions are claimed) are being lost through copyright infringement and that those moneys are being "stolen" from the "owners of the IP" (the moral justification). So if you believe those arguments then yes, 10 years in jail for contributing to the theft of billions from poor starving artist is morally justified.

      Now you and I know that those arguments are based on fallacies and made up statistics. The problem is the vast majority of people don't know that. Just ask a few. And that includes the congress critters that created the laws. But most people would tend towards the government not passing laws that are ridiculously overreaching. So please admit that there is room for someone without our level of knowledge of these issues to believe that these laws are both morally and legally justified.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    145. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cops would have been following orders from the prosecutor to arrest him. Cops don't arrest people for crimes such as this, they are told to do so by the prosecutors.

    146. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by dissy · · Score: 1

      The Nuremberg defendants were charged with crimes against humanity - and, and among the specific changes, the crime of institutionalized murder on an industrial scale. That is why the defense of "just following orders" does not work. They were the ones giving the orders.

      Your apologies to Godwin are fraudulent.

      Technically you are the only one so far to trigger Godwin, not the GP.

      The topic at hand is the excuse given, not the crime the excuse was made to get out of.

    147. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by brkello · · Score: 1

      Common sense on /. != common sense in the real world. And even some /.ers don't agree that this guy was in the right. You guys are just complaining about the cops when they don't apply your personal moral judgement to the laws. That's stupid and unrealistic.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    148. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by greenbird · · Score: 1

      Replying to my own post

      Let me add that the main stream media has been a major contributor to the mis-held beliefs of the general public with regards to "intellectually property" laws. They blind reprint the press releases from those companies that have an interest in "intellectually property" laws whose sole purpose is to extend their obsolete business models. Unfortunately the MSM companies are the primary ones with the obsolete business models trying to get these bogus laws passed. They make no effort to refute the blatantly obvious lies and misinformation in such press releases and refuse to print studies and statistics that are counter to the lies.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    149. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Seriously, this does not warrant the flamebait mods it got. He WAS making money by providing a service that had, as one of its effects, allowing people to play pirated games. I feel pretty confident in saying that more than than one of his customers probably used it for that purpose, and that he knew this.

    150. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by meerling · · Score: 1

      All the people I know with modded consoles have done it to play the import games that are not (and never will be) available in their region.

    151. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Grim+Beefer · · Score: 1

      We should never ever as a society condone people that don't "understand the why and wherefore" to have guns, badges, and the authority to beat your ass and get away with it. The fault lies with everyone involved in proportion to their involvement, in any situation in which your right are being removed (by being arrested, for example).

      It's called personal responsibility, and you should have it no matter what your job is, or how many guns you're allowed to carry.

    152. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the point is that the practice of obeying orders without question *leads* to situations where people end up doing horrifying things. In order to prevent such things from happening, we must be in the habit of questioning authority from the beginning -- not necessarily disobeying, but at least questioning in the proper place, at the proper time, in the proper manner, even if only in our heads -- else we are in the habit of blind obedience.

      (Slow the fuck down yourself, Slashdot... 1 hour and 45 minutes?! I'm sick of seeing your warnings every time I post more than once a day.)

    153. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 1

      IANAL but I believe that it's illegal in the U.S. under the DMCA to transfer instructions for circumventing devices whose stated purpose is to "protect" copyright. So, if those books of which you speak show how to hack around the copy-protection circuitry then they are illegal (~no, not censorship though!~). That's why so many people used the DeCSS key as their sig a while back- to flaunt that provision of the law. Regardless, I agree that the possible sentence is way out of line for the crime. It's the wacked-out-ed-ness of so many laws that makes is so hard for so many to respect any of them.

    154. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "Specifically, the college student is accused of modifying for personal financial gain technology affecting control or access to a copyrighted work, according to an ICE statement."(Emphasis added by me)

      Actually, it seems to me like they were going after the kid for making and selling the modifications. If he had just been merely "tinkering with a console" they would have never gotten involved - the key point being the "for personal financial gain" part. Same reason people are not arrested for having or playing a bootleg copy of a DVD. Now if you started selling them on the street for a profit, that is a much different story.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    155. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by ildon · · Score: 1

      Still not as bad as the holocaust. You still lose.

    156. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by russotto · · Score: 1

      That's a strawman. You didn't say anything about "as bad as the Holocaust". You said it wasn't morally equivalent to putting ONE PERSON on the train to Auschwitz. Sending a single person to a death camp, bad as it is, isn't as bad as the Holocaust either.

    157. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      You would be wrong. Its not "illegal", a take down notice is an action taken by a private party, not by a public enforcement agency. Unless you have signed an agreement (and even then its an agreement by two private parties) you've done nothing wrong by writing anything you want about any product. Don't forget; reverse engineering is legal.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    158. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MindKata rubbed his nipples slowly through his diaphanous robe. A small, rodent-like erection popped through a hole in the fabric.

      "Mmmmm..." he moaned, as a GOLDEN DROP OF PRECUM oozed STICKLY from his PIN-SIZED HOLE.

      Just then, morgan_greywolf appeared from the heavens. "Rape me like one of mcgrew's prostitute friends!" he shrieked.

      Diarrhea flooded the room, and all was well.

    159. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the law is unfair, unjust, or just plain disproportionate, then yes, I'd prefer to see the enforcers refuse to do the law's bidding.

      Who decides if the law is unjust? Cops are often stereotyped to be racist - that's okay with you, then, since these cops don't consider the laws protecting minorities to be just? Clearly not. If individuals can pick and chose which laws to follow or enforce, there's no point in a legal system at all.

      If a law is unjust, it needs to be changed. Those who enforce the laws need to, well, enforce the laws or quit their job. Being selective about it is completely unacceptable.

    160. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by yfarren · · Score: 1

      "Just Doing My Job" is a GREAT excuse, in the vast majority of cases, if you are a soldier, policeman, fireman, whatnot.

      The idea that someone in one of those positions should, on a regular basis be ALLOWED to substitute their "judgment" for their job is absurd. Institutions like the police and army, HAVE to do their job, even (especially!) when they find that job distasteful or even mildly wrong, because if they didn't, if a private, or a beat cop, or whoever got to willy nilly substitue their judgment for that of their CO, or of the law as it stands, in ANYTHING but the most outrageous situations, those institutions would entirely cease to function, as institutions, and you would get not the rule of Law, but the rule of Thugs.

      In VERY EXTREME cases, "just doing my job" doesn't cut it, post Nuremberg. But in run of the mill cases (and arresting someone for breaking the law, even a silly, or wrong (in the eyes of cop/soldier) law is very run of the mill) "just doing my job" is needful.

    161. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From a gut reaction standpoint, I'm inclined to agree with you that the backup and fair use argument is used as an excuse in a great many cases. Heck, does your roommate really expect you to believe he's clogging the tubes with 20 gigs a day of Linux ISO torrents? No.

      I just hope no one gets sent to prison on a "hunch" like this one.

    162. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uhhhh....who said ANYTHING about nukes? Nukes were a last resort "got you last" kind of deal and weren't big profit makers anyway. for examples look how much effort it took to finally kill that POS F-22. Why? Big fat checks baby! And I can promise you there are literally hundreds of "bridges to nowhere" lining every defense and civilian budget. Why? Because bribery....errr I mean large PACs and campaign contributions are legal.

      Politics shouldn't be a career, it should be like jury duty. We take a pool of our best and our brightest and we 'draft" them for four years. Once drafted they are paid the same salary as they were at their previous job, and the company they worked for has to give them their job back when their "duty" is over. One term, no exceptions. As it is the revolving door between the private sector and "public service" pretty much guarantees that corruption will be rampant. After all, you want that cushy job after your political career is over, don't you?

      Without a fundamental reworking of the system like I just described voting is simply a pointless exercise. Does anyone think that McCain would have been ANY different? Nope, he just would have kissed the defense dept booty instead of the ACORN booty. Both of them would be puckering up and lining up to kiss the corporate ass. Just another case of SSDD. Sad, but true.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    163. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      Does that matter? Smith and Wesson make money by providing hardware that, as one of its effects, allow people to seriously hurt, maim, injure and kill people. Boeing has made money by providing materials that, as one of its effects, allow people to kill hundreds to thousands of people.

      Don't hit reply yet. I know that the majority of people who use Boeing's stuff have never killed anyone, and even the majority of Smith and Wesson's products have never been used to hurt a human (War notwithstanding). But the point is people should be responsible for what they do, not what others do. If every single one of his customers played nothing but pirated games, he still should not be held liable for that.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    164. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      You are so wrong, on so many levels, it's hard to know where to begin.

      For example, if I buy a console, and then write a manual about how to modify that console, then legally that is wrong.

      Incorrect. You can modify or repair, or upgrade the system all you like. You can even write a manual instructing others how to do so.

      If you want to change the LED colors, knock yourself out. If you'd like to solder in connector on your wii so you can plug a classic NES controller in, there is nothing stopping you. If you'd like to include a beefier (or quieter) cooling fan, go ahead. If you want to cover your case with stickers or add a plexiglass window and internal lighting, who's going to stop you?

      The only legally prohibited element is that you can not bypass a digital copy protection scheme. If you want to jailbreak, and let the console run unsigned apps, that's a violation of the DMCA. This of course may varry by locality.

      However, if I buy a car, and then write a manual about how to modify that car, then legally that is ok. (For example http://www.haynes.co.uk/ have been doing exactly this for decades).

      Also, once again: wrong. Your car analogy falls flat. Yes Chiltons, Haynes, and others provide manuals on how to repair your car. But I've not seen one that instructs you on how to modify it beyond stock. Even though you're wrong here, it's not strictly relevant. If Haynes wanted to publish a "Carbon Fiber Hoods and Bigger Injectors 101" manual, they could, legally. They just don't. They tell you how to conduct routine repairs and maintaince.

      However, your car analogy actually fails in another way: There are elements of a car which are illegal to modify too! It is unlawful (again, may vary by jurisdiction) to tamper with an emissions control device. Just because you don't like your catalytic converter, doesn't mean you can legally hollow it out, or remove it.

      I'll give you that your next comment isn't so much wrong so much as it is something I simply have to disagree with.

      The closed nature of consoles prevents other smaller companies growing to support 3rd party products without the expressed legal permission of the console makers. They therefore control the market and the government helps them. So much for Capitalism's concept of goods traded in a free market when that market is closed off to all but the console makers and anyone forced to pay console makers effectively protection money, preventing the console makers taking legal action against them for violating access to their turf.

      Also, I'm not going to loose any sleep that consoles are closed systems. The free market doesn't prevent a console maker from releasing a system that's open. But there hasn't been a successful one since Atari's heyday. And that nearly brought the industry down. There have been other smaller players to come along since then, but none have had much success. There's your free market.

      Also, nobody was ever stopped from developing a game for PCs. Generally if your idea is good enough to get traction in that free market, you can find a publisher, (or a publisher will find you) to get your game onto a console. It happens all the time.

      Since we're in the mood for terrible analogies, this is like being an indie film maker, and complaining that your local Sony Zillionplex won't play the movie you made with your friends last summer. You can burn it to DVD, and sell it on the street corner. You just can't show it in the theater, because that's more or less a closed system, where the man wants to keep you down. Maybe if you're lucky, a major distributor will notice you and pick it up.

    165. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      While I agree that there should be a debate over the penalties prescribed for these actions, your main point is not what I'd like to address here.

      Please stop spreading FUD (knowingly or not).

      It is *not* illegal to modify a console.

      It is illegal to bypass a digital copyright protection scheme, which is just one specific way (out of limitless ways) of modifying a console.

      You don't have to like it. You don't have to agree with it. But there is nothing that says you can't solder in a VGA bridge and connector to the back of your Playstation. Nor does the law prohibit you from shoving all your Wii's hardware into 13" portable TV/DVD player combo unit, and adding a battery pack to it. Any mod you can think of is probably legal. So long as it doesn't bypass these protections. They are the *only* element that the law concerns itself with (perhaps there are some electrical safety laws in some locations as well).

    166. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Omega996 · · Score: 1

      i guess it *does* matter in that there apparently is a law or set of laws in place to make it illegal to do stuff like this. Companies like like Winchester or S&W or Boeing are legally operating manufacturers of firearms or aircraft used as weapons delivery systems, and so on.

      I think the DMCA is stupid, but what you and I may think ethically doesn't mean a single thing from a legal standpoint. Here's hoping he gets off with a fine (though after seeing what happens to people who admit in court that they knowingly pirate songs, maybe that wouldn't be so great).

    167. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      No, please explain to me how preventing someone from playing "BACKUP games (and pirated games as a side effect)" is "evil". I really don't see the connection.

      It may be disappointing. I may not like it. But murder is evil. Denying people their basic human rights is evil. Torture is evil.

      It is hard for me to swallow that a law that prevents you from circumventing a digital copy protection scheme is "evil".

      Perhaps I misunderstand the word evil? I don't believe I've ever actually looked up it's definition.

      Unless you're talking about Hitler, Pol Pot, Stalin, or the like; "evil" is a word best reserved for use by comic books and George W. Bush.

      Let me paint you a picture of how the DMCA might not only be "un-evil" but perhaps justified:

      1. Like it or not, these publishers have a *legal* right to the works they create, or fund the creation of.
        So, they publish these works. Unscrupulous people pirate them.
      2. They ask "please don't do that". Shockingly, this doesn't work.
      3. Console makers decide that the situation is untenable and decide they have to do something. They take manners into their own hands, and implement protection schemes to make it very hard to run unsigned code. This has a tremendous effect on diminishing piracy / bootlegs, and unlicensed games. Both of which the publishers and console makers consider to be a "win".
      4. Smart people who don't like this, because they feel this trods on some kind of inalienable rights to run unsigned code on bizzaro hardware come up with ways to bypass these protections
      5. An arms race has started. Both sides realize there is no way that the console makers can ever stave off the bypassers forever. But the console makers have a legitimate concern for the protection of their works. So they lobby to have legislation passed to not only digitally protect their work, but legally make it a crime to pick the proverbial lock.

      While there are of course *significant* differences between physical and digital goods. This is no diffrent in this respect than the way shoplifting laws evolved.

      1. Shops came. They had goods. They charged for these goods.
      2. Some people tried to get around paying for the goods by sneaking goods out of the store.
      3. Shopkeepers invested in cases and locks to keep goods secure from shoplifters.
      4. Some shoplifters were not deterred. Determined to shoplift, they learned to pick locks, or find other more creative ways to circumvent the protections shopkeepers had implemented to protect their goods.
      5. Eventually, as a society, we decided that just because you *could* bypass the protections, because you are smart / talented / sneaky / whatever; doesn't mean you should have a *right* to. Eventually as society progressed, this is formalized in law.

      You can walk into Wal-Mart if you like. Pick the lock on the electronics case, and browse all you like. Don't steal a thing. It's still illegal to bypass this protection, regardless of the fact that you just wanted to read the package.

      I Realize the biggest problem is that you purchase the console. So it feels like you should have the right to do whatever you wish to it. Well currently, the law disagrees. And if there was no reason for it to disagree, I'd be 100% behind you. But I see the other side of the argument. And to me, it's more compelling. To tell publishers that they can't do anything, and anything they do will have zero backing from the laws that are supposed to protect their copyright... that strikes me as unrealistic and wrong.

      I'd like to see some links in this thread. Someone send me pictures of your backup games. In front of your pile of originals. Like so:

      http://pyromosh.org/images/misc/show_me_the_backups.jpg

      I believe that *someone* out there does this. But I'll be surprised if I get even one response. I really do believe that there's next to nobody that chips their co

    168. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because morality is so set in stone.

    169. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Analogies are abused highly and their purpose poorly understood, as you eluded to with your SAT comment. a good purpose for an analogy is to extend the understanding of one experience into another. Analogies are not useful (in my opinion) for proving a position. And in this particular case such a device is completely unnecessary because we all (hopefully) understand that throwing someone in jail without just cause is unacceptable. We don't need to compare it to genocide and war crimes to make a point, doing so would be hyperbole. I would argue that hyperbole and analogy don't belong together, unless you want to appeal to emotions. Using either one alone can be an effective tool, depending on context. But right now you seem like an ineffective tool.

    170. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Asclepius99 · · Score: 1

      I suppose that's a better example. And seriously people, his original post makes a point even if he did pick a bad example. No need to mod him troll.

    171. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by westlake · · Score: 1

      Henry David Thoreau addressed this issue better than I can:

      Socrates accepted his death sentence.

      Thoreau made no attempt to avoid going to jail. Neither demanded that anyone else pay the price for their own civil disobedience.

      When a geek pleads guilty to breaking the law - then we can continue this discussion with a little less hypocrisy.
       

    172. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      You must have not finished reading my post so here it is again....

      or at least you will get sued to death.

      The net effect is equal-enough to illegal for anyone above the age of 18.

    173. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in this country they already do. the only time i ever see cops doing anything is when there stopping traffic for blown lights or slightly speeding and shit like that - yet bigger crimes happen all the time. also when a local disturbance commonly called a domestic happens they always (read ALWAYS) take the side of the ones who call - even if the ones who call are the AGGRESSORS (speaking from personal experience here - dont ask). the police and law systems worldwide need to be overhauled as i think corporations have way too much power, and this is because they can afford it - the regular joe cant. whenever money is invovled there will be a corruption of the power to a point where the most powerfull are the ones who have the most cash - fact.

      on topic a fine would be the most he should get - our local pirates get less than that and get regularly stripped off all the hardware and whatever cash they make that day, and of course a fine, but NEVER jail time - its genuinely not worth it for them to stop the pirates as they know fine well another will pop up in there place, and the REASON that it happens is because of the corporations greed meaning regular people cant afford the games prices, so there directly feeding piracy yet they have the power to drag a poor student through the courts and possibly place him behind bars? its insane. they shouldnt have this level of power - end of story.

    174. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by babyrat · · Score: 1

      http://www.snopes.com/legal/arizona.asp

      maybe it's just me, but I'd really think someone who was geeky enough to read slashdot would run silly stories through snopes first...

    175. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It is hard for me to swallow that a law that prevents you from circumventing a digital copy protection scheme is "evil".

      You misunderstand law.

      Laws don't really prevent you from murdering people, for example. You could go shoot your mom in the head right now, that's fine, it'll work, trust me. She'll die too. That's murder. It's illegal, but that won't stop you.

      What laws do is punish people for performing some action. For example, if you did kill your mom, you'd be put in jail, and then later executed. The only thing preventing you from killing your mom is the execution thing; if you don't want lethal injection, then don't kill your mom, plain and simple. It's sort of a package deal.

      Now, what we have here is a law that basically says that if you or a friend buys a hardware device, and then alters that device in a certain way for personal use, you lose 10 years of your life rotting in a prison cell OR you get a major huge fine that cripples your credit for life and prevents you from getting loans for cars/houses/etc and possibly clearance (fucks your career). Does this sound good to you?

      Moreover, the essentials of the law are that you did something that could possibly enable you to commit a real crime. Basically something else was a crime, and we said that if you take a first step that puts you closer to committing that crime, you're guilty already. So we're arresting and trialing you for being able to commit a crime (or enabling others), whether or not the particular action that put you there was intended in your case to commit said crime; we've just written in law that this in itself is a crime, to make it official. Sound evil yet?

      There was talk a few years ago about making the discussion of such circumvention methods illegal, so if you have academic interest in such things it becomes a crime as soon as you investigate it and start talking to people. Sound fair?

    176. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Now, what we have here is a law that basically says that if you or a friend buys a hardware device, and then alters that device in a certain way for personal use, you lose 10 years of your life rotting in a prison cell OR you get a major huge fine that cripples your credit for life and prevents you from getting loans for cars/houses/etc and possibly clearance (fucks your career). Does this sound good to you?

      Um, yes, this sound totally fine to me. If you help a friend with a hardware device such that it steals people's pin numbers when a debit card is inserted, you should spend 10 years rotting in jail with your career fucked. In this case, people are helping people to make use of stolen goods. I don't have a problem.

    177. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Otto · · Score: 1

      Please point me to the codicil that states it is illegal to modify your own car. Alternatively, I can point you to the codicil of law that states that it is illegal to modify a device for the purposes of circumventing another tenet of law/society, that of copyright.

      Who said anything about violating copyright? There's plenty of other reasons to modify your game hardware. The primary one, in most cases, is to play imported games or to be able to run homebrew type software (ala XBMC and others). Copying of games is indeed possible, but rarely the primary use.

      To go back to the car analogy, there are ways you can modify the car which are, in fact, illegal. Emissions comes to mind right away, since you can increase power by ignoring emissions and fuel standards. Does this mean that all car modification is illegal?

      And in no jurisdiction would you find a reputable licensed mechanic willing to break the law, for example in regards to speed limiters, safety devices, emissions control, and so forth.

      Disabling speed limiters is not against the law, and yes, reputable mechanics will indeed help you change the chips in your car, for improved performance and such. Or have you not been to a car show?

      "Breaking the law" is really a matter of application. With the same hammer I can either pound a nail or kill a person.

      Also, I was talking about the viewpoint of the common person, aka "common sense", which is a fair bit different than the letter of the law.

      It is not illegal to modify your own vehicle with AutoZone parts, so the analogy is flawed, fatally.

      False. It is illegal to perform certain types of modifications, and yes, AutoZone (along with every other auto parts store) carries the parts that will let you do that.

      Legal vs. illegal is a matter of intent, not of what tools you use.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    178. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Not quite the same. In the modding, the pirating is theft. With guns, they do in fact allow you to kill someone... the truth of the matter is that in this world, sometimes that's the only way you have to defend your own life and property. There's no right to be able to make a backup of a game. There's no right to steal a game either, which is mainly what this is used for.

      The vast majority of guns and gun owners are law abiding citizens who are interested in a way to defend themselves, because they understand the cops are useless. The truth of the console modding is that the vast majority of the modders are doing it to steal a game, not play from a backup.

    179. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Interesting assertion, because at least the PS3 doesn't enforce region locking for games. Do you only know people with modded xboxes?

      http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/23/playstation-3-to-ship-region-free/

    180. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      So, if I modify your DVD player to not do any more non-encryption copy protection checking, which unlocks it for playing Japan-region DVDs, I should go to jail because you can also play copied DVDs that don't have the proper bits knocked out of them too?

      These modified consoles could play software like available from WiiBrew (obviously, Xbox homebrew software). There's plenty of this available for Wii and DS, and the law applies to them as well. XBox Media Center is itself a non-sanctioned product produced by a completely independent party that requires a hacked XBox capable of playing pirated games to use, but has nothing to do with video games (it plays movies and music). You can run Linux or ReactOS on a hacked XBox.

      All of these things are legal, have nothing to do with stolen goods, but require an illegal modification to a piece of hardware you use. The modification is illegal because it allows you to make use of stolen goods, but it can be very personally profitable without any such use of such stolen goods ever.

      In effect, this is like if selling a shotgun were totally illegal, because you could kill someone with it. I could use a shotgun to go deer hunting. Well, I could also use it to go deer hunting out of season, which is illegal... I could even have a hunting license, but use the firearm before/between seasons, or use it on humans.

    181. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but if it's OK for the police to ignore a law requiring women to wear dresses, then I don't see the problem with police ignoring the DMCA if they disagree with it. You can't have it both ways. If police have to enforce laws they don't agree with, then they need to enforce them ALL, including ridiculous ones.

      Your apology notwithstanding, vigorous enforcement of ridiculous laws is probably the best way to get them changed. Probably wouldn't work for something like the DMCA, since average people wouldn't understand the ridiculousness.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    182. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      My point was not about what the vast majority of people do. There are legitimate reasons to mod a console ranging from playing game backups to using the Xbox Media Center and more. What the vast majority of people do with it should be irrelevant. The only thing that should matter is what this guy did. I'll grant that he broke the law (provided the courts agree). However, that is because modding consoles is illegal (circumvention clause in the DMCA, which is a stupid law, IMO), not because modding allows someone else to do something else illegal (copyright infringement). You should never be held liable for the actions of others.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    183. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The US Drug Czar is required by law to lie.

      "Responsibilities. --The Director-- [...]

      (12) shall ensure that no Federal funds appropriated to the Office of National Drug Control Policy shall be expended for any study or contract relating to the legalization (for a medical use or any other use) of a substance listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of a substance (in any form) that--

            1. is listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812); and
            2. has not been approved for use for medical purposes by the Food and Drug Administration;"

      http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/about/98reauthorization.html

      Picked from http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2007/10/09/theDrugCzarIsRequiredByLaw.html

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    184. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      So, if I modify your DVD player to not do any more non-encryption copy protection checking, which unlocks it for playing Japan-region DVDs, I should go to jail because you can also play copied DVDs that don't have the proper bits knocked out of them too?

      If you're being paid to do it, and you do it for lots of people yes... because the fact is the majority of unlocking is to play pirated content... not imports. I'm sorry if you find that uncomfortable, and it wrecks your ability to watch imported DVDs, but that's how it is.

      The fact that there is some legit uses doesn't negate that the most substanial use is pirating.

      In effect, this is like if selling a shotgun were totally illegal, because you could kill someone with it. I could use a shotgun to go deer hunting. Well, I could also use it to go deer hunting out of season, which is illegal... I could even have a hunting license, but use the firearm before/between seasons, or use it on humans.

      I've already addressed this comparision in another post.

    185. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      And my point is that what the vast majority do matters immensely when deciding if something should be illegal or not. In this case, most of the modding is done for the purpose of playing pirated games.

      However, that is because modding consoles is illegal (circumvention clause in the DMCA, which is a stupid law, IMO), not because modding allows someone else to do something else illegal (copyright infringement). You should never be held liable for the actions of others.

      So its ok to supply the bomb making materials to the terrorists as long as you don't help them build or detonate the bomb? That's quite an interesting world view, but I have serious issues with it. Knowlingly helping people that are most likely going to use what you do for illegal acts is not ok to me.

    186. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      So its ok to supply the bomb making materials to the terrorists as long as you don't help them build or detonate the bomb?

      Correct. I do not hold Ryder or any of the other companies that supplied Timothy McVeigh with the supplies that he used during the Oklahoma city bombing. Nor do I hold Boeing, American Airlines, nor United Airlines for providing planes to terrorists. Provided, of course, that they had no knowledge of what those supplies were intended for.

      If this guy was telling people they could play copyrighted games with the mod, or people were asking him to mod it and told him that it was for playing pirated games, then he should be charged as either an accomplice or an accessory to the crime. But if neither of that happens, then he should, IMO, not be held liable for the actions of others. Similarly, if McVeigh told the Ryder truck rental person that the purpose was a make-shift bomb, and the rental still took place, then the renter should be held liable as an accessory. If Mohamed Atta had told the ticketing agents the purpose for his flight and the sale still happened, then the agent ought to be held liable as an accessory.

      The article doesn't say whether he was encouraging the modding for pirated content, nor does it say whether he was aware of any of his clients' specific purposes. Certainly I'm sure he was aware that pirated content was possible. Perhaps he knew and didn't care, maybe he operated under a "Don't ask, don't tell" policy, or maybe he was outed because he refused to help someone who told them they wanted to pirate games. The article doesn't indicate any of that. However, In this article he is quoted as saying "If you're talking about piracy, I'm not helping you out." It's now up to the courts to decide, but if what he says is true, then I certainly don't think he should have been arrested, and this only highlights how stupid the DMCA anti-circumvention clause really is.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    187. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Really? There's a reason it's called "pound me in the ass Federal Prison". I suppose you could argue that sending someone off to be tortured and raped for no good reason is not morally equivalent to sending them off to be killed for no good reason, but there isn't _much_ moral difference.

      You're aware that he would undoubtedly be sent to a minimum security prison, which is, by definition, NOT where all the rapists and murderers go, right?

      I'm with you on the absurdity / wrongness of the law, but I still think that calling this "evil", comparing it to Nazi genocide, blaming the cops who arrested him, etc, doesn't help the issue at all. It simply labels one as an extremist, and provides ammunition for the supporters of these stupid laws.

           

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    188. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      It is hard for me to swallow that a law that prevents you from circumventing a digital copy protection scheme is "evil".

      You misunderstand law.

      Moreover, the essentials of the law are that you did something that could possibly enable you to commit a real crime. Basically something else was a crime, and we said that if you take a first step that puts you closer to committing that crime, you're guilty already. So we're arresting and trialing you for being able to commit a crime (or enabling others), whether or not the particular action that put you there was intended in your case to commit said crime; we've just written in law that this in itself is a crime, to make it official. Sound evil yet?

      Except that... you will also be arrested for pulling a gun on a cop, even if you don't pull the trigger.

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    189. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      If you're being paid to do it, and you do it for lots of people yes... because the fact is the majority of unlocking is to play pirated content... not imports. I'm sorry if you find that uncomfortable, and it wrecks your ability to watch imported DVDs, but that's how it is.

      The fact that there is some legit uses doesn't negate that the most substanial use is pirating.

      Your method here is idiocy. Banning an action that isn't a crime because it may lead to a crime is retarded. What about personal ownership of handcuffs? It's illegal for me to use them to arrest someone, and the other major use is rape; they can, in some cases, be used for bondage play, but that's what rope is for...

      I contend that the creation, distribution, and use of DeCSS is illegal, and also the primary use of DeCSS is to watch DVDs legitimately purchased on Linux; if you wish to rebut this, please make note that pirated DVDs won't be encrypted, and downloads will be transcoded without encryption. The primary purpose of CSS itself is to prevent piracy.

    190. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You won't be arrested for owning knives or shotguns though, which enable you to shoot cops.

    191. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Your method here is idiocy. Banning an action that isn't a crime because it may lead to a crime is retarded. What about personal ownership of handcuffs? It's illegal for me to use them to arrest someone, and the other major use is rape; they can, in some cases, be used for bondage play, but that's what rope is for...

      In many places it wouldn't be illegal for you to arrest someone and restrain them as necessary. Handcuffs are also NOT used in a majority of rapes either. I'd like to see your evidence to back that up though. But all one has to do is look on P2P and see its mostly illegal content. Someone else here posted a challege to show your burned discs next to your purchased ones. I'd like to find it again to see if anyone actually has... the fact is that most people aren't playing from backups, their pirating games.

      I contend that the creation, distribution, and use of DeCSS is illegal, and also the primary use of DeCSS is to watch DVDs legitimately purchased on Linux; if you wish to rebut this, please make note that pirated DVDs won't be encrypted, and downloads will be transcoded without encryption. The primary purpose of CSS itself is to prevent piracy.

      But we're not talking about DeCSS are we? We're talking about a guy taking money from people who are more than likely going to use their modded consoles to play pirated games. Also, it still does appear that DeCSS would be illegal, although no one is filing court cases over it anymore. Your comment on pirated DVDs backs me up though; while the pirated copy may not be encrypted, it was illegal hacking which allowed that unecrypted copy to be made.

    192. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Correct. I do not hold Ryder or any of the other companies that supplied Timothy McVeigh with the supplies that he used during the Oklahoma city bombing. Nor do I hold Boeing, American Airlines, nor United Airlines for providing planes to terrorists. Provided, of course, that they had no knowledge of what those supplies were intended for.

      You're trying to setup a strawman here, and its not going to work. The apt comparison is that a single person sold all the materials to make a bomb... and the most logical conclusion of buying all those items together is that their intent it to build a bomb. Simiarlly, if this guy did one task of 30 required to play pirated games on the ps3, I wouldn't say he should be in jail. But it was just him, and the most logical reason for one to pay him to hack the ps3 (or whatever console) was to allow the owner to play a pirated game.

      If this guy was telling people they could play copyrighted games with the mod, or people were asking him to mod it and told him that it was for playing pirated games, then he should be charged as either an accomplice or an accessory to the crime. But if neither of that happens, then he should, IMO, not be held liable for the actions of others. Similarly, if McVeigh told the Ryder truck rental person that the purpose was a make-shift bomb, and the rental still took place, then the renter should be held liable as an accessory. If Mohamed Atta had told the ticketing agents the purpose for his flight and the sale still happened, then the agent ought to be held liable as an accessory.

      Right... that is my point. This kid likely knew that he was helping people play pirated games. After all, that's the most compelling reason for most to want his services. (Those that want homebrew are likely interested enough to learn how to mod their own console). So I think its pretty safe to say he knew that the people who paid him were going to play pirated games... even if they didn't say it, he should have logically concluded it (much like someone selling every item needed to make a bomb should reasonabl conclude that the purchaser is planning to build a bomb).

      The article doesn't say whether he was encouraging the modding for pirated content, nor does it say whether he was aware of any of his clients' specific purposes. Certainly I'm sure he was aware that pirated content was possible. Perhaps he knew and didn't care, maybe he operated under a "Don't ask, don't tell" policy, or maybe he was outed because he refused to help someone who told them they wanted to pirate games. The article doesn't indicate any of that. However, In this article he is quoted as saying "If you're talking about piracy, I'm not helping you out." It's now up to the courts to decide, but if what he says is true, then I certainly don't think he should have been arrested, and this only highlights how stupid the DMCA anti-circumvention clause really is.

      Ya right... "don't be playing pirated games, [wink wink nudge nudge]." I don't buy it, I believe he understood what his clients were going to do.

    193. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      But we're not talking about DeCSS are we? We're talking about a guy taking money from people who are more than likely going to use their modded consoles to play pirated games. Also, it still does appear that DeCSS would be illegal, although no one is filing court cases over it anymore. Your comment on pirated DVDs backs me up though; while the pirated copy may not be encrypted, it was illegal hacking which allowed that unecrypted copy to be made.

      I haxed my Wii. It has teh homeberw channul on it! This lets me download Virtual Console games without paying for them, and run them. This is, reportedly, what 99% of the Homebrew Channel installs are used for, according to media outlets that feel like reporting on it (read: why does Nintendo keep trying to break it?)

      Of course, there's a HUGE row of free and outright open source software run on The Homebrew Channel. I run ScummVM and some games like BaSS and Flight of the Amazon Queen; also I could pirate the Monkey Island series and run that on ScummVM I guess (or buy the CD and copy it off there to run it). There's a guitar hero clone, there's tetris clones, there's a Linux install, there's a variety of games, Quake's there... things that just aren't possible without this sort of illegal crack.

    194. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by ragethehotey · · Score: 1

      Except he wasn't using a hacked and modded console, he was SELLING them, a LOT of them. No matter how you look at it, even if you agree that you hacking a console yourself should be legal, reselling consoles that are basically being designed to pay illegally copied games rather than imports is NOT ok.

      Then tell me, would you feel differently if people were simply bringing their already purchased consoles to him and he was making after-market modifications to them and simply charging a parts and labor fee? (Rather than reselling modded consoles)

    195. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Of course, there's a HUGE row of free and outright open source software run on The Homebrew Channel. I run ScummVM and some games like BaSS and Flight of the Amazon Queen; also I could pirate the Monkey Island series and run that on ScummVM I guess (or buy the CD and copy it off there to run it). There's a guitar hero clone, there's tetris clones, there's a Linux install, there's a variety of games, Quake's there... things that just aren't possible without this sort of illegal crack.

      Oh well, its irrelevent that you COULD use it for legit purposes. As I said, the majority don't and thus ruins it for you, and make your actions illegal. For every one of you there are 50 that just use it to pirate.

    196. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Because there is a HUGE difference between liquefying people and copying someone's game.

      Right, one offense is a human rights violation by an authority figure, the other offense is a civil matter.

      Now, back to the actual argument: there isn't THAT MUCH of a difference between wrongly imprisoning people for bullshit laws vs. wrongly imprisoning people for xenophobic reasons. If we were locking up Ecuadorians in prison just because of their race, many people would be upset. The fact that we're locking people up, for up to ten years, for altering hardware should have people up in arms.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    197. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Nyder · · Score: 1

      since when did slashdot peeps care about the facts?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    198. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Oh well, its irrelevent that you COULD use it for legit purposes. As I said, the majority don't and thus ruins it for you, and make your actions illegal. For every one of you there are 50 that just use it to pirate.

      And here is the stupidity.

    199. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Ah, "poppycock" to the rest of your post. 1) I was making a point. 2) Losing a suite doesn't make your action illegal. It merely allows the winner of the suite to attempt to collect some kind of restitution from you. Legality has nothing to do with civil suites.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    200. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Otto · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, your examples are exactly contrary to what I was advocating. I was arguing FOR common sense, not against it.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    201. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      You say that until you or your parents get the summons....

    202. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Modding an XBox is a strange one, it is likely to be upheld in court (so the police should arrest) but most of the general population's attitude is that, they own the hardware, they can do what they like with it?

      If they were getting free access to a service they would otherwise have to pay for then the general population could see that the person had done something illegal...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    203. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do have a right to a hacked and modded PS3 in the US, you just can't make or sell mod chips or modded consoles

    204. Re:The cops that arrested him must be proud by alexo · · Score: 1

      Really? There's a reason it's called "pound me in the ass Federal Prison".

      What I can never understand is how you, as civilized individuals, are able to tolerate and turn a blind eye toward this phenomenon.

  2. Throw away the key !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do it now or do it later, but do it !!

  3. Misread by dontPanik · · Score: 4, Funny

    I misread this as "California Student Arrested for Console Hating."

    I imagined a college student having an impassioned argument with a police officer on whether the ps3 or the xbox 360 is better. The student goes too far and insults Halo and he's lead away in handcuffs.

    --
    "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Misread by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      They see me pwnin'. They hatin'.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I misread this as "California Student Arrested for Console Hating."

      I imagined a college student having an impassioned argument with a police officer on whether the ps3 or the xbox 360 is better. The student goes too far and insults Halo and he's lead away in handcuffs.

      In many states in the US, that's not too far from the truth:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_libel_laws

    3. Re:Misread by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I misread this as actual news, not a ranting editorial by someone about what it MIGHT be about..

      Fact is, the kid broke the law. You can hate the law, and work to change it, but that doesn't change the fact the kid broke the law.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    4. Re:Misread by jerep · · Score: 1

      "The student goes too far and insults Halo and he's lead away in handcuffs."

      Its actually a good analogy to what really happened: the student went too far and insulted the income of a big corporation and he's lead away in handcuffs.

    5. Re:Misread by gabebear · · Score: 1
      The law is far from clear... The kid didn't violate any copyrights or steal anything, he provided services to disable locks on a game console for money.

      There are good reasons to want to disable the @#$@# locks on your own hardware, such as:
      • playing imported games that the console maker either:
        • doesn't offer in your language in your country
        • charges WAY more for in your country
        • doesn't offer at all in your country
      • playing homebrew games
      • XBMC!!!, which was probably the best media front-end before high-def content became the norm.
      • Wanting to tinker
        • developing home-brew games(there is still a vibrant PS2/PSP and DS homebrew community)
        • Porting BSD to it... I don't know why
        • just for fun
      • Make is run better
        • modified XBox1s can have the game CDs coppied to their built-in hard-drives which eliminated the random Disk-Read errors in the middle of games and sped up load-times TREMENDOUSLY!... The DVD drive in most XBoxs was a POS
        • Copy PSP games to memory sticks to do the same as the XBox... why did they go with spinning optical media in the PSP?
    6. Re:Misread by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      No, the law is crystal clear. the reasoning's behind the law are not, nor whether the law is fair, or balanced. But the law says: "Thou shalt not circumvent protection features" so when you do just that, you really shouldn't be surprised that the authorities come after you. The person at the heart of this article could use their trial to take on whether the law is fair or not, but the fact is, they broke the law.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    7. Re:Misread by the_B0fh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yup. Helping slaves escape used to be against the law too. All those people should have went to jail and have the full weight of the law thrown against them as well.

      FWIW, I used to think that way too - you break the law, pay the price, and work to fix the law. Then, started thinking about people who just want to sit down at the front of the bus... or drink from a water fountain...

    8. Re:Misread by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Fact is, the article claimed nothing that indicated his actions were illegal, only that he modified consoles and charged a fee for his work. Unless you have some information you haven't shared with the rest of us, both you and the author of the article -- who quoted idiotic statements that console modifications "pose significant health and safety risks to consumers" -- are seriously deficient in the skill of rational thought.

    9. Re:Misread by hey! · · Score: 1

      I misread it as "California Student Arrested for Console Humping", so my reaction was "This is probably in Orange County, not San Francisco."

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:Misread by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 1

      If I only had mod points. Well played, sir!

      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
    11. Re:Misread by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      Fact is, the kid broke the law. You can hate the law, and work to change it, but that doesn't change the fact the kid broke the law.

      Uh, could I humbly point out that the kid allegedly broke the law? The article alleges that he hacked some number of game consoles "to run pirated programs". Even if he "hacked" some game consoles, it remains to be seen if he did this to run pirated programs. There are a lot of questions here, and the law under discussion is a highly complex piece of...legislation. Meanwhile, as someone who likes to screw around with...I mean modify everyday objects—not all electronic—this kind of news makes me just a little bit more afraid that I'm going to, in some prosecutor's eyes, break some law and get sent to the Gulag.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    12. Re:Misread by riegel · · Score: 1

      The law is clear eh. Ok help clarify it for me. What "work" did he circumvent illegally?

      --

      Web based Cut and Paste http://p8ste.com/

      --
      http://p8ste.com - Web based Clipboard
    13. Re:Misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dontPanik is a government minion. This is very bad. This kid would be chief scientist for obtaining WGA keys for China if he lived there, and he would be whipped and then paid $2 for his daily effort

    14. Re:Misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does every conversation on slashdot turn into how the white man has put the black man down.

    15. Re:Misread by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Wait - who claimed that he hasn't broken the law?

      Thank you Captain Obvious for pointing out that he broke the law. Even those who don't RTFA can see that in the summary, which even quotes the name of the law. (Yes, it looks like the OP wasn't previously aware that this is illegal, but he isn't disputing that fact.)

      The discussion that the rest of us are having is whether it's right that this should be against the law. You know, "You can hate the law, and work to change it". Perhaps that's why he suggested donating to the EFF?

    16. Re:Misread by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Fact is, the kid broke the law. You can hate the law, and work to change it, but that doesn't change the fact the kid broke the law.
      >>>

      Yes but there are *higher* laws, typically called "human rights", which nullify these lesser laws. I think the founder of the Democratic Party, Thomas Jefferson, said it best - "No man has a right to harm another... and that's all the government should restrain him."

      This anti-hardware modifying law is a case of a victimless crime, like anti-plant smoking or anti-porn laws. For example if I draw a cartoon of a little girl licking a little boy's penis (playing doctor), I can get arrested for child pornography even though nobody's harmed. These types of victimless laws should be declared unconstitutional and voided, since no victim exists.

      If I crack-open my PS2 to make it output high-def video, nobody is harmed by this act. It's MY property purchased with MY labor, and therefore my right to modify however I please. Not until I start making illegal copies of games should I be arrested.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    17. Re:Misread by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      If this guy does get several years of jailtime, then we should join a gang of freedom fighters and shoot the Sony-America CEO. Death to tyrants that infringe upon the People's rights.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    18. Re:Misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought he was arrested for opening a console window. Because that's hacking.

    19. Re:Misread by amohat · · Score: 1

      At least it did not devolve into a Nazi comparison. Yet. Oops.

      Seriously, wtf is wrong with having a gold standard, something universal everyone ought to understand? Such are the stuff cliches are made of, makes for efficient communication most of the time.

    20. Re:Misread by twosat · · Score: 1

      In New Zealand it is not illegal to modify your own computer hardware, I believe that the EU also has similar laws.

    21. Re:Misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not circumventing the copy protection features if you never copy anything that is copy protected. Not that it will help him, the DMCA doesn't care if anything protected got copied, just that the possibility exists.

      How will we explain to our children that the digital information revolution began with artificial restrictions on copying to the point we sent people to jail just for letting a machine copy freely.

    22. Re:Misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 Insightful??
      what the hell?

    23. Re:Misread by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of questions here, and the law under discussion is a highly complex piece of...shit.

      Let's just call a spade a spade here.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    24. Re:Misread by mambodog · · Score: 1

      Halo? More like GAYLO!

  4. Apphrended by ICE by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The DHS wants you to think of them like this: http://www.dhs.gov/index.shtm

    But this is what they really are: http://www.ice.gov/

    No quarter to tired, poor, huddled masses yearning to breathe free.

  5. Justice by Kamokazi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And hundreds, if not thousands, of violent crime offenders go without jail time every week. I love a functining legal system.

    --
    As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    1. Re:Justice by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Funny

      And hundreds, if not thousands, of violent crime offenders go without jail time every week. I love a functining legal system.

      But isn't violating a "business model" a seriouser threat to our homeland security?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:Justice by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is how law enforcement works: Go after the low hanging fruit, generate press about it, and people think you're doing a great job. Solving major crimes is HARD. Much easier to just round up some petty criminals like pot smokers and "console hackers". That way, you can say you put away so many thousands of criminals this year, and everyone will want to give you a big fat raise and a pat on the back for being "tough on crime". Meanwhile, the really dangerous criminals get to go about their business, and you don't have to worry about doing any actual police work.

    3. Re:Justice by vintagepc · · Score: 1

      Exactly- The faster the big guys are back on the street, the faster they get caught again, so the lawyers can make more money! Small fish can't afford much in legal fees, so there's no sense in letting them out...

      --
      Evolution - Est. 4500000000 B.C. Don't piss in the gene pool.
    4. Re:Justice by megamerican · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you haven't realized it already the Legal system is functioning the way it is intended.

      Plato states quite clearly that there is no true justice, but the appearance of it is what matters in society. The lower classes of society must believe there is justice else the upper classes may lose their power.

      Don't worry however, the DHS has plenty of training manuals stating that people who question the government are possible domestic extremists. There will be a few agents on their way to send you to a re-education camp.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    5. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't worry, California doesn't have the money to keep him locked up for long :-)

    6. Re:Justice by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You actually hit it on the head.

      If you go after big gangs and organized crime you end up with dead cops because those guys will defend themselves.

      Cops choose to grab the helpless citizen that is beaking an obscure law that in reality is not harming others or society. It's easier to rough up a unarmed college student, less chance of having a 10gauge with a slug unloaded at your chest.

      Note: if you wear kevlar, a 10gauge to your chest will put you on the ground for at least 30 minutes, thugs with shotguns scare the shit out of cops because their armor does nothing to stop kenetic energy from knocking them over and making it hard to breathe.

      Honestly, cops need to be going after the hard crap that actually harms others and society, and not the harmless crap.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violating the English language should be even more seriouser.

    8. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this arrest was just to provide some nice tight young student ass to keep the current inmates happy.

    9. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem and issue here is that altering the systems should not be a criminal offense to begin with. Last I checked, if I want to build my own computer... or even build one and sell it for profit, I can do anything I damn well please with the hardware. Also, last I checked - the consoles were nothing more than glorified computers hooked to television screens. If I wanted to, I could theoretically build one of those from scratch too... with the necessary know-how of course.

      I work as a software developer... am I going to be arrested for fixing a block of poorly written and restrictive code? I think not... same should hold true for this guy.

    10. Re:Justice by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Note: if you wear kevlar, a 10gauge to your chest will put you on the ground for at least 30 minutes, thugs with shotguns scare the shit out of cops because their armor does nothing to stop kenetic energy from knocking them over and making it hard to breathe.

      Very true, but the perp can just as easily and more effectively use most any rifle. Body armor generally stops slow moving and lighter projectiles - namely most handgun rounds and shotgun loads. Almost all high power rifles (even grandpa's 100 year old .30-06 deer hunting rifle) will punch right through body armor without flinching. You still see "armor piercing" rounds listed for those and people tend to think of those as "cop killer" rounds, but what they don't realize is that "armor piercing" rounds for most rifles are referring to vehicle armor, not personal. Against personal armor it's all armor piercing.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    11. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is only one of many viewpoints Plato discusses, lets not paint with broad strokes.

    12. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much easier to just round up some petty criminals like pot smokers

      More precisely, it pays to make a crime out of peaceful activities. Let's call a spade a spade here: drug prohibition is about the billions of dollars per year being pulled through government, not about making law enforcement "look good" or making their job easier.

      Let's put this in terms we can all understand: if drug prohibition was abolished today, the business of government would be worth less tomorrow.

      Somewhere near the top of the power pyramid, a very rich man is laughing at the thought.

    13. Re:Justice by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Violating the English language should be even more seriouser.

      Truly, the seriousest!

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    14. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this re-education camp, do you suppose that there will be capture the flag games, nature hikes, and macaroni art? If so, please sign me up.

    15. Re:Justice by 2names · · Score: 1
      I believe the proper conjugation is as follows:
      • Serious
      • Seriouser
      • Most Seriouser
      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    16. Re:Justice by Jager+Dave · · Score: 1
      Please... don't call it "re-education camp"...

      It's called the "Republican National Convention"....

    17. Re:Justice by SBrach · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless you're talking .50BMG when you say "high powered rifle" Level IV body armor will stop most high powered rifle rounds. I believe level III will stop most as well (in areas reinforced with ceramic plates). Also, to the GP, read Newtons laws of physics some time please.

    18. Re:Justice by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 1

      You actually hit it on the head.

      If you go after big gangs and organized crime you end up with dead cops because those guys will defend themselves.

      Cops choose to grab the helpless citizen that is beaking an obscure law that in reality is not harming others or society. It's easier to rough up a unarmed college student, less chance of having a 10gauge with a slug unloaded at your chest.

      Note: if you wear kevlar, a 10gauge to your chest will put you on the ground for at least 30 minutes, thugs with shotguns scare the shit out of cops because their armor does nothing to stop kenetic energy from knocking them over and making it hard to breathe.

      Honestly, cops need to be going after the hard crap that actually harms others and society, and not the harmless crap.

      Wouldn't this law break the criminal's arm or something, then?

      --
      Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
    19. Re:Justice by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 1

      The real problem and issue here is that altering the systems should not be a criminal offense to begin with. Last I checked, if I want to build my own computer... or even build one and sell it for profit, I can do anything I damn well please with the hardware. Also, last I checked - the consoles were nothing more than glorified computers hooked to television screens. If I wanted to, I could theoretically build one of those from scratch too... with the necessary know-how of course.

      actually, not quite. Not without the secret keys. You would be able to build a computer that could run the same stuff *if* you had the unencrypted media available. This is one of the reasons why I don't own a console.

      --
      Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
    20. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, to the GP, read Newtons laws of physics some time please.

      you need to learn about guns some time please. Either that or the Laws of physics you think you know are not based in reality.

    21. Re:Justice by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      This makes me wonder what happens with SMG rounds, after all there are quite a few SMGs that use 9mm rounds just like handguns.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    22. Re:Justice by ashtophoenix · · Score: 1

      This is how everything works in 99.9 % of the world.

      --
      Life is about being a Phoenix!
    23. Re:Justice by nomadic · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you go after big gangs and organized crime you end up with dead cops because those guys will defend themselves.

      That's just not true; in fact, federal agents especially tend to focus on the bigger gangs and organized crime because they think it's more efficient to get rid of the big fish than chase after a lot of small ones. There's a reason that organized crime organizations (in the U.S. at least) have tended to go out of their way to avoid violence with police; in fact, if an individual in one of those organizations killed a cop he would usually be killed by his own organization in a very public way to assuage police anger.

    24. Re:Justice by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      ...but what they don't realize is that "armor piercing" rounds for most rifles are referring to vehicle armor, not personnel. Against personnel armor it's all armor piercing.

      Fixed that for you. Oh wait, was that too lame? So then "deal with" it!!

      Ok, on a more serious note, you're absolutely correct.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    25. Re:Justice by GooberToo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And hundreds, if not thousands, of violent crime offenders go without jail time every week. I love a functining legal system.

      Our legal system could begin to function again if it was not completely overwhelmed with crimes related to drugs. If they legalized drugs and made them a family issue rather than a criminal issue, 80% of crime would vanish almost overnight. With such a drastic reduction in crime suddenly the courts could focus on things that actually matter and could then spend those hundreds of billions of dollars toward education and other social programs. Not to mention we would suddenly have a multiple billion dollar tax base which has gone completely untapped. And best of all, we'd stop making the scummiest of scum drug lords filthy rich. Its a win-win for everyone yet no elected official will get off their ass and do something about it.

    26. Re:Justice by ludomancer · · Score: 1

      >Meanwhile, the really dangerous criminals get to go about their business...
      >Much easier to just round up some petty criminals like pot smokers and "console hackers".

      I'm inclined to say the really dangerous criminals are going about their business right there.

    27. Re:Justice by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, California doesn't have the money to keep him locked up for long :-)

      IOU's for jail time? "Come back next month, maybe we can incarcerate you then".

      Gotta love that progressive California streak ....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    28. Re:Justice by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      On my country, murderers gets only 5 years (or much less with a lawer). Soon,hacking a game for the U.S. is worse than killing two people.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    29. Re:Justice by SBrach · · Score: 1

      Many people have repeated debunked this myth that powerful hand and shoulder fired guns knock people down due to force. Some people may fall down due to shock, but ask anyone who has unloaded a .357 magnum or a 12 gauge shotgun into the chest of a meth head charging at them with a knife and they will tell you about reality. 1oz of buckshot @ 1300 fps is less than twice the kinetic energy of a fastball.

    30. Re:Justice by SBrach · · Score: 1

      Many if not most SMGs use special 9mm rounds, not standard handgun rounds. If you have a 9mm handgun, look in the manual, most forbid the use of 9mm SMG rounds.

    31. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thrasymachus, a character in one of Plato's dialogues, states that. Socrates, Plato's mouthpiece character, doesn't agree with him.

    32. Re:Justice by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Indeed. There are few things that bother the establishment more than the idea of holding the powerful accountable for their actions.

    33. Re:Justice by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Which is of course followed by super serial!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    34. Re:Justice by modecx · · Score: 1

      9mm loads developed specifically for SMGs use do exist (with pressures higher than 9mm NATO specs, approaching "proof" loads), but reality is they're pretty rare. Even SWAT and military teams who use 9mm SMGs (MP5s) aren't likely to ever see special SMG ammo. You'll see 9mm +P, and 9mm NATO (pressures are similar in both), but both are also capable of being used in service pistols, but beyond that.... No.

      The Nazis had some pretty high pressure stuff for their MP40s, which might destroy their Lugers, but they were the last major users of such ammo. The truth is, there isn't that much benefit to it, simply because the volume of gases capable of being generated by the small powder capacity of 9x19 doesn't scale well for long arms. To get a marginal increase in velocity you must use powders which burn faster, giving the bullet higher initial velocity, but they also push the pressure levels up. The only reason anyone uses 9mm SMGs is they provide superior firepower and accuracy compared to pistols.

      The Russians are re-inventing Nazi bullets designs, however. They use really light jacketed bullets, with iron or tungsten cores together with high pressure loads to get velocities needed to defeat body armor. I'd say the chances of gangs possessing these arms negligible at best, however.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    35. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow fabulous paraphrasing right there.

      If you could be bothered to extend Plato's argument it would've made more sense. Besides that I don't think Plato is the best source to quote regarding modern morality or justice. It seems we no longer live in a polis, keep slaves and deny women as capable persons.

      There are a lot more recent philosophers out there which you could use to support your train of thought.

      Is it just me or do we keep teaching ancient philosophers as having significant bearing on modern life? Yes they were important, and no not everything they said is moot, but more recent philosophers have built upon their works and are a lot closer to modern reality (as far as that is even possibble in philosophy).

      Teach the basics AND then focus on the relevant

    36. Re:Justice by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      Right. So head shots it is.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    37. Re:Justice by modecx · · Score: 1

      Level III (not flexible, usually 1/2 inch of ceramic, in addition to typical fiber components) will stop up to non steel core 7.62x51 (nothing to sneeze at), but most officers will wear at best Level IIIA with the addition of a trauma plate over the sternum (some vests allow for the level 4 insert)... Most rifle rounds, of course, will sail right through that armor.

      Also, the GP you refer to is quite right. A 12 gauge slug or heavy & fast .45 bullet (most gang bangers will never see a 10 gauge, however) might not knock you over, but even with the blunt trauma plates you're gonna get the wind knocked out of you, and you might also have some broken ribs. It's gonna reduce your fighting capacity, bottom line.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    38. Re:Justice by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Looked it up, and Type IV will indeed stop some .30 caliber rounds with a weight of 166gr or under and at a velocity of 2850 fps or slower. There are a lot of rifle rounds that will hit either much faster or with much more force than that though. The .220 Swift for example can drive a lighter 40gr projectile as fast a 3600 fps. Or if you want to go heavier, the .375 H&H can drive a huge 270Gr bullet up near 2600 fps (slower than the max speed listed for Type IV, but a much, much heavier bullet delivering more energy). Or meet in the middle with a .300 Win Mag. You'll get a 180gr bullet up around 3000+ fps with that.

      And in any event Type IV provide single shot protection for most of the rounds that it does stop. It won't stop a second impacting shot.

      Overall body armor just isn't very effective against high powered rifle cartridges (by which I mean most rimless centerfire cartridges designed primarily for rifle use).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    39. Re:Justice by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Are you mad ? Violent criminals are *gasp* VIOLENT!

      How many times have you heard about a cop getting shot in the face by an Xbox modder ?

        (for those readers who fail english)

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    40. Re:Justice by rtechie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the WHOLE POINT of most 9mm SMGs is that they can use standard 9mm pistol ammo, which is cheap and plentiful as opposed to expensive rifle ammunition. Most American police agencies use Heckler & Koch MP5 SMGs chambered in 9x19mm Parabellum, the exact same round used by the common Beretta and Glock pistols used by police officers.

    41. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are incorrect in believing that "modern" morality and justice is any different than during Plato's age. The basics remain the same. People will take as much power as they can and use it to lord over others for their own gain and pleasure.

      The biggest mistake in with regards to history is to think that it cannot be repeated because this time "it's different", or "we're smarter".

    42. Re:Justice by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Seeing as how there are people smuggling legal drugs like cigarettes (due to the high taxes on legit products offering high profits for illegitimate imports), legalizing drugs may or may not have the effect you expect it to.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    43. Re:Justice by rtechie · · Score: 1

      That's just not true; in fact, federal agents especially tend to focus on the bigger gangs and organized crime because they think it's more efficient to get rid of the big fish than chase after a lot of small ones.

      So you're saying that the majority of people in federal prison are crime "kingpins"? Really?
      There doesn't seem to be any evidence of this. For example, most people in federal prison for cocaine charges are there for less than 10 grams, or even nothing at all. Just "conspiracy". This is true across the board. The FBI seems to do a good job at catching kidnappers and serial killers, but that's not organized crime.

      The reality is that most people charged are charged with relatively petty offenses because the big fish have money and lawyers and political connections. Bernie Madoff operated openly for decades, as has Amway and countless banking and trading scams. The "organized crime" folks at the FBI spend most of their time going after petty drug smugglers and gun dealers because the big fish (like the finance people and the gun MANUFACTURERS) are too well protected.

    44. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people have this belief because they see it all the time in Hollywood movies: guy gets shot, guy flies backward. The stunt man who was "shot" had a rope tied around him, someone yanked hard at the appropriate moment, and you see the effect.

      BTW, I have always assumed that the guns in Blade Runner fire little missiles, that keep accelerating after they have left the barrel; they obviously hit with WAY more energy than the recoil to the shooter!

    45. Re:Justice by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Fixing things is bad for the bottom line. Haven't you noticed nothing really has been fixed in years?

    46. Re:Justice by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Because you didn't provide any more info I will http://www.bulletproofme.com/Ballistic_Protection_Levels.shtml

      I just wonder what my 7mm Mag would do to that. It's half again as big as a 30.06 casing and I've punched through a 3/4" hunk of cast iron from an old train wheel i found while out shooting a couple years ago.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    47. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what happens to the minor criminals, but I can tell you, as a Corrections Officer in a Level 5 Maximum security prison, we don't see these guys at all. All we have are rapists, murderers, child molestors, cannibals, vivisectionists and so forth. Apparently someone is solving the "Hard Cases".

    48. Re:Justice by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      SMG by definition uses handgun rounds, usually 9mm.

      Only difference between a Sub-Machine-gun and a Machine-gun is caliber size. A Machine-gun uses rifle rounds while a Sub-Machine-gun uses handgun rounds.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    49. Re:Justice by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I see your re-education is working perfectly.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    50. Re:Justice by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      By 80% of crime disappearing then cops would have 80% less to do and there would be job cuts and people complaining that they are only locking up 20% as many "criminals" as before.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    51. Re:Justice by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      Momentum is conserved but doesn't break the shooter's arm because the shotgun is much heavier than the payload.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    52. Re:Justice by hot+soldering+iron · · Score: 1

      And hundreds, if not thousands, of violent crime offenders go without jail time every week. I love a fucksioning legal system.

      Here's the oblig. ftfy (fixed that for you).

      --
      When you want something built, come see me. If you want correct grammar and spelling, get a F*ing liberal arts student.
    53. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1oz of buckshot @ 1300 fps is less than twice the kinetic energy of a fastball.

      More importantly, the buckshot has nowhere near as much momentum as the fastball, and momentum is what actually "knocks you down." Body armor can't protect you from momentum (except by making you heavier), but in an ideal case it can at least convert kinetic energy into heat.

      Also, I'm sick of all these horribly undereducated posts on Slashdot. This "Anonymous Coward" fellow needs a tall glass of STFU.

    54. Re:Justice by rpillala · · Score: 1

      That's not to mention the powerful people who could get implicated by following a money trail.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    55. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Police body armor will only stop low to mid caliber handgun rounds. Bust out a .45 with FMJs and that body armor ain't gonna do shit.

      There is also the possibility to blow up, incinerate, freeze, electrocute or use chemical weapons. Body armor won't stop a bomb, flamethrower, liquid nitrogen, high voltage discharge or hydrochloric acid.

    56. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may have raped and killed three kids, but it's not like he did something serious like unscrewing the back of his X-Box.

    57. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violating spelling rules is even the most seriousest!

    58. Re:Justice by nomadic · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that the majority of people in federal prison are crime "kingpins"? Really?

      There is nothing in my statement that even IMPLIES this. Let me ask you a question; do you think the FBI put more resources in bringing John Gotti down or one of these petty drug smugglers?

      The reality is that most people charged are charged with relatively petty offenses because the big fish have money and lawyers and political connections.

      The FBI are shameless self-promoters; they LOVE going after big fish because that gets them on TV. Billions of dollars didn't keep Martha Stewart out of jail, and political connections didn't keep Jack Abramoff out of jail.

      Bernie Madoff operated openly for decades, as has Amway and countless banking and trading scams. The "organized crime" folks at the FBI spend most of their time going after petty drug smugglers and gun dealers because the big fish (like the finance people and the gun MANUFACTURERS) are too well protected.

      The feds have admittedly been too lax on policing the finance world, though this has been mainly the result of an unfortunate libertarian economic ideology that has taken hold in government over the past few decades. As for the gun manufacturers, I think a lot of what they do is reprehensible, but I'm curious as to what laws you think they've broken.

    59. Re:Justice by wolf12886 · · Score: 1

      The fact that you got modded up is a bit disconcerting. The vast majority of police armor is either class II or IIIA. The lowest class even rated for any rifles is III.

       

      IIIA is rated up to 427m/s for 124gr 9mm FMJ rounds. Even assault rifles like the ak47 fire 200gr bullets at at least 700m/s. OP is dead on, light rifles (ak, m4 ect) firmly outclass police body armor. If the attacker's wielding a full power rifle like the m14 or an m700 in .300, the officer might as well be wearing a thick sweater.

    60. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, I'm sick of all these horribly undereducated posts on Slashdot. This "Anonymous Coward" fellow needs a tall glass of STFU.

      Talking to myself, huh?

      Ah yeah, medication.. brb

    61. Re:Justice by CompMD · · Score: 1

      There are some ranges you can't practice at if you bring steel core military surplus ammunition. I can't take my Dragunov, M91/30 (both 7.62x54R) or HK G3 (7.62x51) to a lot of ranges because the surplus ammo will blow right through their baffles and backstops. There isn't much a 203gr 54R round *won't* go through.

    62. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, your grammar is. Seriouserly.

    63. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And hundreds, if not thousands, of violent crime offenders go without jail time every week. I love a functining legal system.

      that student should have just taken up becoming a drug dealer, he would've gotten less time in jail....
      the judiciary system makes me laugh...

    64. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, when someone searches "Robert Schoch" on the internet, what description would best fit this courageous special agent?

      Your comments will be listed in the Google search results.

    65. Re:Justice by kirillian · · Score: 1

      Isn't 'conjugation' in reference to verb forms only? Can't remember, but I could swear that there is another term for nouns...

    66. Re:Justice by Spewns · · Score: 1

      Far more serious than actual terrorism or any other American Fear of the Week. And I wish I was actually joking.

    67. Re:Justice by SBrach · · Score: 1

      We are not talking about the vast majority of police, we are talking about the officers likely to encounter someone armed with a rifle willing to use it. This is why SWAT teams and other tactical units wear at least Level IV.

    68. Re:Justice by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Plato states quite clearly that there is no true justice, but the appearance of it is what matters in society. The lower classes of society must believe there is justice else the upper classes may lose their power.

      Bzzt.

      Plato states quite clearly that he considers justice to be *the harmonious functioning of all parts in order to accomplish its telos*. So there is justice inside of a dog when all of the parts are working together to help the dog track some prey, for example. Justice in society is when all components of society are working together harmoniously as well.

      It's an odd concept, and rather different from what we consider justice today. I think you just picked up on Glaucon's argument, or one of the other alternative views Plato writes about in the Republic.

    69. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An AK-47 is more like 154gr (10g) @ 630m/s, you're WAY off.

    70. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Body armor won't stop a bomb, flamethrower, liquid nitrogen, high voltage discharge or hydrochloric acid.

      Let's take these one at a time

      • bomb - early Kevlar vests were used as flak jackets to protect soldiers against bomb fragments.
      • flamethrower - Kevlar is highly fire resistant. In fact it is used as safety equipment to protect emergency services workers from fire.
      • liquid nitrogen - along with being an insulator Kevlar maintains its strength at cryogenic temperatures.
      • high voltage discharge - I don't know if Kevlar conducts electricity but I would guess it does not.
      • hydrochloric acid - Kevlar is highly insoluble. In the manufacturing process it precipitates out of concentrated sulfuric acid.

      Obviously body armor only protects the areas it covers. Those areas are protected against everything you just threw at them.

    71. Re:Justice by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      There are some ranges you can't practice at if you bring steel core military surplus ammunition.

      It's a minor quibble, but most of that surplus ammo is steel jacket, not steel core. The core is still lead. They replace the copper with steel (with a light copper wash or plating to prevent rust) because it's cheaper, but steel is still more expensive than lead. They do make steel core bullets, but they're special purpose and most of your standard surplus or cheap Russian stuff aren't it.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    72. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking SMG specific ammunition, that for one reason or another would not be functional/safe to use in a pistol. It's not altogether unheard of, but not common.

    73. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thermite. Nuff said.

      Kevlar is fire resistant, in that it will put itself out if you light it with a match. A flamethrower would completely melt your kevlar body armor in second.

      Liquid nitrogen is, surprisingly, a liquid. That mean it will seep right in between the cracks and weave of kevlar.

      Kevlar is electrically conductive, so you're wrong.

      Hydrochloric acid can be a liquid, in which case it will seep between cracks and the weave of kevlar, or it can be a gas in which case the person absorbs and breathes it in.

      Kevlar wouldn't stand up to a single one of these things and you're a fucking moron for thinking it would.

    74. Re:Justice by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      This is also why you use a shot gun with pellets, body armor doesn't protect the face and arms.

      For home protection only, of course.

    75. Re:Justice by dragonturtle69 · · Score: 1

      If you haven't realized it already the Legal system is functioning the way it is intended.

      Plato states quite clearly that there is no true justice, but the appearance of it is what matters in society. The lower classes of society must believe there is justice else the upper classes may lose their power.

      I agree that the justice system is working exactly as designed, and that the appearance of it working equally for all is required for the ruling class to remain in power. Quite a few years have passed since I last read The Republic or other texts from that era. What sources led you to conclude that this were Plato's thoughts?

      --
      "What luck for the rulers that men do not think." - Adolph Hitler
    76. Re:Justice by modecx · · Score: 1

      A good deal of that ammo IS steel tipped. The steel jacket alloy on soviet ammo isn't appreciably harder than copper--it pretty much has to be, otherwise barrels would wear out much sooner than need be. It wouldn't effect a metal backstop more than copper for that reason--except it'll spark and cause potential fire issues at the ranges which don't clean as often as they should.

      No... Most indoor ranges I've been to had holes shot into their armor plate with steel core ammo. Now, most make it a point to use a magnet to check the bullets if it's suspect, and they weed out the steel jacket the same way.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    77. Re:Justice by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 1

      Momentum is conserved but doesn't break the shooter's arm because the shotgun is much heavier than the payload.

      I wasn't worrying about the shutgun nor the payload. The force that knocks down the officer for 30 seconds would be opposed by an equal force which should be transferred from the gun to the shooters arm --- more actually, due to inefficiencies. If the officer cannot remain standing, neither should the shooter. Or else I am missing some detail, like perhaps a shutgun shot isn't nearly instant, but actually takes half a second before the explosion in the gun chamber is done and the payload leaves the gun, giving the shooter more time to absorb the recoil.

      Not that I claim to be a gun expert. But I think the claim about the knockdown effect is false. I would expect a heavy punch-like effect, like the recoil of a gun: Enough to bruise, or even knock down an unbalanced person, but far from enough to unconditionally knock over someone. The 30 minute thing is more likely a psychological effect, and no wonder!

      --
      Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
    78. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... you'd think a country with 10,000+ gun related homicides a year would have better things to do with its law enforcement resources. But of course none of those victims were out of pocket from intellectual property theft, and, yes, nearly all of them were comparatively or actually poor.

    79. Re:Justice by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      legalizing drugs may or may not have the effect you expect it to.

      Not likely. History indicates otherwise. Sure its not going to eliminate all crime but you no longer have drugs being sold on every street corner. Not to mention, the price of drugs falls which also reduces all of the associated drug crimes committed to obtain them in the first place.

    80. Re:Justice by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Sure, people could argue that but most would be happy with drastic reduction in crime. And those jobs cut would be unneeded jobs which currently exist to keep the world's largest criminal population locked up of any industrialized nation in the world.

      In the US, prisons and prison related services are the fastest growing government services. Do you really want to support a system where its in the state's best interest to lock you up?

    81. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is this "we"? The rest of us were discussing "why don't they go out and arrest the real criminals, instead of picking on a kid with a hobby?"

      f you limit "they" to the ones with the military grade body armor, the rest will still be out picking on kids with hobbies.

    82. Re:Justice by SBrach · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, yes. If you look at the statistics the VAST majority of the 57 officers killed in 2007 were shot in the head. Only 2 were shot with rifles through their armor, one with a .308 and one with a .30-06. Linky.

    83. Re:Justice by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Wait.. LOL, are you saying pot smokers are dangerous criminals? I've been on slashdot many years and I would have to say that is the dumbest thing I have ever read on here. Congrats, I guess.

    84. Re:Justice by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Who the hell smuggles cigarettes? And where do you actually find these cigarettes? I've never seen a pack of "under the counter" cigarettes and I don't know anyone who has. Yet if I wanted to buy an ounce of weed I could have it in my hands within an hour.

    85. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you read Plato. I did, so perhaps you can educate me by telling me where Plato states there is no true justice. On the contrary, he was apalled when Thrasymachus made the point you just made. The fine point is of course that it is not Plato who talked about justice but Socrates, which Plato then penned down.

    86. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thugs with shotguns scare the shit out of cops

      If every action has an equal and opposite reaction then wouldn't the shotgun similarly put the person firing it on the ground also? I have a 12 gauge Mossberg 590 with a pistol grip and no butt. I have fired it one handed (yeah I know, a stupid thing to do) and although very unwieldy it was as easy to control the kick as when firing a .38 special. And I am not some big strong guy either.

      In my experience the tales of people getting shot with shotguns and being knocked backwards into a wall, etc are pretty much urban myths. I am sure that cops really don't want to get shot with shotguns but I'd think that they would be far more scared of some trailer park hillbilly shooting them at close quarters with a .308 or .30-06 hunting rifle which would easily penetrate the cops body armor.

    87. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And hundreds, if not thousands, of violent crime offenders go without jail time every week. I love a functining legal system.

      But isn't violating a "business model" a seriouser threat to our homeland security?

      No. Bad grammar is a more seriouser threat.

    88. Re:Justice by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      It actually does have something about the time interval during which the force of the explosion is applied, but not really in the way you think.

      Force F.
      Mass m.
      Acceleration a.

      F = m * a.

      During the explosion, force is exerted on the gun in one direction and the bullet in the other.

      I don't know what shotguns are popular with gangbangers nowadays. Say the mass of the shotgun is 5kg and the mass of the slug is 10g.

      Mass m1 = 5kg
      Mass m2 = 0.01kg

      Say the force applied to the bullet by the explosion is 100N (I don't even know if I'm in the right ballpark, but hey). Then

      F1 = F2 = 100N.
      a1 = 100 / 5 = 20m/s^2
      That's about 2 Gs. Not that much.

      a2 = 100 / 0.01 = 10000 m/s^2
      That's about 1000 Gs. A lot.

      So as you can see, the bullet sees a lot more acceleration out of the same force.

      Now this is where it gets complicated.

      1) Read up on Impulse.
      2) You have to realize force is not always applied instantaneously - it's applied over time, in a graph like this one: http://www.antonine-education.co.uk/New_items/TRA/Stopping_files/image001.gif
      The area under the graph is impulse.

      3) Since the acceleration on the shooter side is much lower, the shooter can handle the recoil better and spread the impulse over a wide time, which means on the impulse graph the time interval is long. On the other hand, the bulletâ(TM)s deceleration is almost instant, so the impulse is concentrated in a very short time interval. That means during this time interval, the maximum force is much higher than the maximum force at any point on the shooterâ(TM)s impulse graph.

      For a simple illustration, look to the sample impact graph above. Think of the orange bar as the impulse applied to the target, and the yellow bar as the impulse applied to the shooter. The total impulse is equal so momentum is conserved, but the maximum force experienced is different.

      There are other factors involved, one of which is obviously pressure - the force on the shooter's side is spread over a higher surface area, whereas the force on the shootee's side is concentrated in a small area.

      The point is, the force is applied over a shorter amount of time over a smaller area to the target of the shooting, which means the maximum force experienced by the shootee is higher than the maximum force experienced by the shooter.

      You're probably thinking of the related movie factoid where a bullet makes a guy go flying for ten feet, which is the impossible one.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    89. Re:Justice by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I actually took the time to type this up. A physics professor can probably explain this in two sentences.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    90. Re:Justice by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 1

      I am well aware of 1, and 2 + 3 is what I wrote earlier might be an explanation (but I don't believe it, personally.) Personally, I think the original claim is simply false. For one thing, I seem to recall a soldier explaining that getting hit by a shot from an assault rifle was like "getting punched", and I presume that assault rifles are even more powerful than a shotgun.

      As for the time issue: Getting hit by a bullet is by no means instantaneous since the suit, the bullet and the body deforms. The area of effect if in a kevlar suit is probably similar, since those things a designed to spread out the impact. The shooter will take the shock either on the hand or on the shoulder, depending on whether he braces with the stock or not.

      So it really rest upon one thing: Is there a timing issue big enough to account for the difference claimed? It would have to be a few orders of magnitude. I doubt it, but I have not found any texts about it.

      --
      Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
    91. Re:Justice by SenseiC · · Score: 1

      Well if you read the AP version of this story (a fancy way of saying get it w/o jhoger's obvious bias) you will see that this guy was "arrested on federal charges that he illegally modified video game consoles to enable the machines to play pirated video games." http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jsj3JhDd6Ad_tq6wuDmO6SsLx7mwD99RR63O0 Key phrase there... "enable the machines to play pirated video games". The issue isn't that he was "tweaking" a console he owned, it was what he could do with it afterward, to permit it to use illegally stolen s/w. Yeah he didn't hold up some convenience store. Yeah he didn't give heroin to a kid on the playground. What he DID do is absolutely no different that walking into a store, stuffing a few dozen video games into your backpack and running out the door. It is no different that buying an illegal cable descrambler so you can watch pay per view television without paying for it. By your argument doing this is perfectly fine because no one actually got PHYSICALLY injured. So when someone steals your identity, just remember that you weren't PHYSICALLY injured, so that makes it okay. Wake up for crying out loud.

  6. Not-for-profit by TechForensics · · Score: 1

    This is most likely a student helping his friends, not a commercial profit-driven entity. I would hope penalties would be minimal. This case is one that will be diverted short of a conviction upon a submission to sufficient facts-- then continued for dismissal at a later date. At least this is likely what would happen in my state (MA).

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    1. Re:Not-for-profit by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is most likely a student helping his friends

      Uh huh. Let's not bother to read the article, shall we?

      The charges against Crippen stem from an ICE investigation initiated late last year [...] agents executed a federal search warrant at Crippen's home, where they seized more than a dozen Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony video game consoles.

      Look, the sentence this guy is facing is ridiculous and the law needs changing, but we don't have to pretend that he's just some nerd modding a console or two for his homies.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Not-for-profit by PotatoFarmer · · Score: 1

      According to TFA, when his home was searched they came up with "more than a dozen Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony video game consoles." While that could be a student helping (a whole lot of) his friends, it sounds slightly more commercial to me.

      Regardless, a potential 10 year sentence for this sort of thing is ridiculous.

    3. Re:Not-for-profit by SkankinMonkey · · Score: 1

      According to the article there were 'dozens' of hacked consoles found. It seems very likely that he was running a modding service.

    4. Re:Not-for-profit by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      and I ran a rather dedicated repair/modding service as well:
      xbx.networkboy.net
      fact of the matter was that in order to repair some of these consoles you had to mod them.
      in addition I never placed hacked code on the machine (I would use the cromwell BIOS, which had *no* ms code).
      suppose it's time to take down that site before I get arrested for it.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:Not-for-profit by chaboud · · Score: 1

      So it falls within the umbrella of the law, but, as you sort of said, the law itself is ridiculous. In this case, the DMCA protects the razors/blades business model. Otherwise, these consoles, sold at or near a loss, might be used for other purposes. To be fair, the most common use for this is probably the play of pirated games, but there are other legitimate reasons to modify a console. It's mine. If I want to put a spoiler, intake, and huge rims on it, that's my call.

      Are we going to have to worry about the DMCA (or laws like it) keeping people from modifying their cars, their legos, or their synthesizers? If I can do something for myself, is it fair to make it illegal to have someone else do it for me? Is it reasonable to make it illegal to have them tell me how to do it? We have a serious problem with entitlement in the US, but not just at a personal level. Business-people appear to believe that they are entitled to the hidden business model of their choosing, and, in the absence of the technical wherewithal to implement that business model, they seek out "legal" protections for their revenue stream.

      The DMCA should serve as a strong lesson to all of us. We need to be more involved in the actions of our legislature, and we need to vote and campaign punitively. When your representative has just given you the shaft for a nice dinner and a couple of "gift" azalea bushes, you need to make sure that they know that they've lost your vote, forever.

    6. Re:Not-for-profit by jhoger · · Score: 1

      I understand you were correcting another poster, but if you agree that this is an issue of the government intruding on personal freedom, it shouldn't matter whether he was modifying the consoles for profit. The owners were exercising their own freedom in getting the console modified. They paid someone else to do it. That doesn't bear on the question of whether it is right to imprison someone for taking a soldering iron to some computer equipment.

    7. Re:Not-for-profit by Vectronic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Quantity doesn't really mean anything, I've got 6 computers, that doesn't mean that I am selling 5 of them. How many of those "...more than a dozen..." are actually running? or in a closet? covered in 3mm of dust?

      ...Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony video game consoles.

      Well MS hasn't been involved that long, but what if some of the "Nintendo's" are NES/SNES, are the "Sony's" PS1's? I'd still have a Commodore64, Atari, NES, Sega Genesis, etc if I hadn't moved, and I likely wouldn't be doing anything with them.

      ...illegally modified Xbox, Playstation, Wii and other video game consoles

      Fine, but what constitutes "illegal", are they all modded? or were some of them just sitting there without there shells "potentially modified" or some shit? I'm not saying the guy is innocent, only that the article is full of fuck all, and uses the classic tactics to enrage (frankly, idiotic) people like trailing off into

      "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers," he said.

      Like this guy modding consoles caused your favorite store to close, and is going to make YOU lose your job, and hell fuckit, he might even give you cancer. KILL THE BASTARD.

      He deserves a fine, and nothing more.

    8. Re:Not-for-profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than a dozen! Most gamers have at least this many consoles.I have 5 Xboxen (3 for xbmc), 2 xbox 360s, 2 ps2, a wii, a game cube, and a dreamcast. I have a dozen! Oh noes I am a threat to civilization!

    9. Re:Not-for-profit by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      no the point is you make sure you can either hide or destroy evidence. They cant convict you easily without evidence.

      They don't have R4 cartridge sniffing dogs, you can if you try hard enough, hide crap in a house that even the best investigators cant find. Make sure you have decoys in place. your "hacking PC" is seperate from your regular pc so they get nothing.

      It's not hard, and honestly you have to live that life to be safe from them.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Not-for-profit by Omnifarious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that it is criminal at all is ridiculous. Either my property is mine to dispose of as I wish, or it isn't. If it isn't then we should just declare ourselves communists and have the truth of it out.

    11. Re:Not-for-profit by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      According to the article there were 'dozens' of hacked consoles found. It seems very likely that he was running a modding service.

      The fiend!

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    12. Re:Not-for-profit by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if it's for profit.
      Going around the encryption schemes is against the DMCA.
      Reverse engineering is against the DMCA.

      The only cases where it's been allowed involved researching shit to get a clone/emulator going for hardware that is no longer available/supported.

      Bitch all you want about how you think the law is wrong or the punishments too severe. I agree completely. But there's no question at all that hacking your consoles is illegal. Running emulators (for any system with built-in copy protection/code signing/etc, i.e., all modern consoles, handhelds, and arcade units) is illegal (Bleem! was the last one to get in just before the DMCA).

      That's the way it is. I don't like it. But I don't feign shock and outrage when some fool gets caught because he was being too open and too large-scale about it.

      You can thank Bill Clinton for the DMCA.

    13. Re:Not-for-profit by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you agree that the actual facts of the case don't matter and it's fine to just make shit up, why not say he's blind and has never touched a console in his life?

      Yes, the law itself shouldn't care, but let's not pretend some random falsehood for no reason, when the law is perfectly stupid on its own.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    14. Re:Not-for-profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear this is how MS-13 and the Bloods raise money now. Fuck heroin, they sell modded xboxes!

    15. Re:Not-for-profit by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      With that load out, I'd agree. You definately are a threat to civilization.

    16. Re:Not-for-profit by AndrewNeo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Reverse engineering is against the DMCA.

      Woah, I think you need to re-read your DMCA.

    17. Re:Not-for-profit by Desler · · Score: 1

      No, you can thank Republican Representative Howard Coble for the DMCA. You know, him being the originator of the bill and all.

    18. Re:Not-for-profit by kokojie · · Score: 1

      Why is it a crime to modify something you purchased and will enjoy in the privacy of your own home?

    19. Re:Not-for-profit by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      I've got 6 computers

      When the Feds come for your "6 computers", then we can talk about your irrelevant strawman comparison.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    20. Re:Not-for-profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can thank Bill Clinton for the DMCA.

      It passed unanimously in the Senate. There was no way for Clinton to prevent it, should he have preferred to.

    21. Re:Not-for-profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is what you did, because you are an idiot: <a href="xbx.networkboy.net">

      Congrats. You fucking fail everything.

      Why are you so FUCKING STUPID?! Do you not understand what a RELATIVE URL is??? Maybe you DO deserve to go to jail.

    22. Re:Not-for-profit by SkankinMonkey · · Score: 1

      Not commenting on whether he was 'right' or not, just disputing the 'not-for-profit' post.

    23. Re:Not-for-profit by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      You can thank Bill Clinton for the DMCA.

      You can, but you'd be thanking the wrong person. Since the DMCA passed unanimously in the Senate, the only thing Clinton could have done was issue a token veto that wouldn't have any effect on reality. If you want to thank the correct people, you should thank the senators, both Republican and Democrat, that voted for it, as well as the contributors that paid for those votes.

    24. Re:Not-for-profit by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Nah the feds wouldn't come after him for that.

      Owning 5 or more computers is a state offense.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    25. Re:Not-for-profit by Krneki · · Score: 1

      He deserves nothing, he bought the hardware and he can do what he wants with it. At least this would apply in a free country, but I guess in the US this is not the case.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    26. Re:Not-for-profit by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 2, Informative
      Defending the GP: My friend works for a video game company. One of the "perks" is that they get a debit card with a decent amount of cash on it every year that they *must* spend on games or game-related material (the idea is to allow him to discern what makes a game good or bad and serve as inspiration at work). The amount of money provided is enough that he, at last check a year or so ago, owned the following:
      • NES
      • SNES
      • Wii
      • Dreamcast
      • PS1
      • PS2
      • PS3
      • Xbox
      • Xbox 360
      • Some ancient cartridge based TI system (TI-92)
      • Two gaming capable PCs
      • Probably one or two more consoles hidden in the cabinet gathering dust

      Even without that sort of eclectic collection, if the guy from the article had a few friends that played LAN games between a few copies of a console, twelve would be easy. That said, I'm guessing the feds have more evidence than the console count, but there's nothing intrinsically incriminating about having twelve consoles.

      Beyond that, arresting a guy for modding consoles on any level below mass-production (at least a few hundred consoles a month) seems like a real waste of time. Much like arresting prostitutes, you're shutting down one small time provider of an "illegal" service, but the built-in demand will ensure that you do nothing to stem the tide.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    27. Re:Not-for-profit by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I don't care if it's for profit or not. He didn't commit rape, murder, assault and battery, armed robbery, grand theft auto or any other actual "crime". He infringed someone's copyright via reverse engineering and modification. How is copyright infringement type of violations even the business of the government? They should be of concern only to private parties -- individuals or corporations -- and they should be able to take people to civil court and forced to pay restitution (not saying I agree with this stupid legislation in the first place, but since we're stuck with it...).

      Otherwise, why don't we just put people in prison and steal a decade of their entire life just for breaking their cell phone contract? If we're going to start sticking people in prison on behalf of corporations for non-criminal "crimes".... why the fuck not?!

    28. Re:Not-for-profit by kirillian · · Score: 1

      Why is this parent NOT modded higher for insight? It actually has GOOD mini-analogies, good analysis, and conclusions. Where are his points for having a brain. Get on this moderators!

    29. Re:Not-for-profit by sexconker · · Score: 1

      He still should have vetoed it.
      What's the point of rolling over and saying "Oh they'll override my veto anyway."?

    30. Re:Not-for-profit by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I think YOU need to.

    31. Re:Not-for-profit by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      On a side note, is Xboxen the proper plural for them now? Outside Brian Regan's however-many boxen of donuts, never heard it used.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    32. Re:Not-for-profit by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The Cartridge TI computer you speak of is the TI-99/4A. The TI-92 was a graphing calculator.

      I still own my TI-99/4A. Still works, too. Sadly my LCDTV doesn't have a co-axial input on the back. Doesn't matter, I just emulate it for fun.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    33. Re:Not-for-profit by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "But there's no question at all that hacking your consoles is illegal."

      Which definition of hack? The moronic one everyone uses now, or the real one by the group that coined the term, the Tech Model Railroad Club at MIT?

      The true definition of hack is "any useful modification to a system that improves efficiency and functionality or reduces complexity." (paraphrased)

      Also, I bought the hardware. It is in my possession. At that point and time, they have no legal authority to interfere with my consumer right to modify that hardware as I see fit. This is not digital software, there is no license. I own this hardware physically and they have NO RIGHT to stop me from doing what I please with it. If that includes hacking the damned PS3 to play PS2 games (As they advertised originally but never got right so they scrapped it in later models, I'm just fulfilling their advertised ability,) then they have no legal authority to stop me.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    34. Re:Not-for-profit by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I meant to insert a question mark before the close parentheses because I wasn't sure.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    35. Re:Not-for-profit by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Any definition of hack, except for the real one. You know, with an axe or such, that's still legal. Provided what you're hacking is RoHS compliant I suppose.

      They DO have a right to stop you.
      Read the DMCA.

      You're just completely WRONG about this.

      Early PS3s have a PS2 inside them and still play PS2 games.
      Later PS3s had software backwards compatibility, and I believe it was removed because it sucked ass.
      PS3s after that have no support for PS2 games.

      None of this was a secret.

    36. Re:Not-for-profit by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I can still hold Sony to the fact that they advertised their 80GB model PS3 to play PS2 games, or I could nail their ass for false advertisement. That little issue has not been addressed in court, yet. Right then and there it becomes DMCA versus Truth in Advertising, which one are they going to sacrifice first? Neither, the provision will be made to allow owners of the model of PS3 that could play PS2 games (80 GB model) to be legally allowed to modify their systems in order to achieve the originally advertised functionality. I'll be willing to bet on it, just like I bet on being able to force EA to change their EULA and I fucking did it. It's pretty easy once you get down to raw absolute truth - Sony advertised it, then pulled it without issuing a recall on those units with PS2 capability. That advertisement is still in effect as far as any informed consumer is concerned.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    37. Re:Not-for-profit by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Every PS3 system says on the box whether or not is supports PS2 games.

      That advertisement is definitely not in effect.

  7. Scary by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's terrifying to me (and a sign of the times) that we can't do what we please with the material we've paid for. Sure, violating copyright is counter productive in the long-run, which is why we have it, but tinkering with stuff has a long proud history. Imagine if the guy who invented pneumatic tyres was taken to court because it violated the bicycle company's right to sell him replacement solid rubber rims? I doubt this guy was doing anything innovating, but he sure won't be doing so now.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    1. Re:Scary by Hubbell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only reason to mod a console for MOST people, not the nerds on /., is to play pirated games. The summary and your post are both misleading and naive.

    2. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The only reason most people own guns is to kill stuff. Only the naive would have you think that it was for deterrent purposes.

      Therefore since guns are mostly used for anti-social, anti-economic development purposes we should criminalize the making, possession, use or sale of guns!

      Or maybe there's another interpretation somewhere....

    3. Re:Scary by Hubbell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The fact that guns are used to kill stuff IS the deterrent. Talk about a failure of an analogy.

    4. Re:Scary by purpledinoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why can't everyone see that the legal system is slowly being steered to work against the people, to benefit corporate interests? Why isn't it a crime for executives at AIG and other bailed out banks to receive huge bonuses at the expense of tax payers? Why is it a crime for some college kid to hack some game consoles? We're talking about billions vs hundreds of dollars.

    5. Re:Scary by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Once I buy the device, it's mine, and I should be able to do whatever I want with it. If I, say, decide to make a bomb with it and blow something up, you can prosecute me for blowing something up, and for possessing explosive materials, but not for the act of fiddling with the device. Saying most people who do X do so because of Y doesn't mean that doing X should be illegal. People who buy bongs or make pipes out of random household materials do so in order to smoke weed, but buying bongs or fashioning pipes out of weird shit is not illegal. Playing pirated games on any device is and should be illegal. Modifying the device in a way that makes it possible to play pirated games should NOT be illegal.

    6. Re:Scary by tepples · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you are looking for a place to take the pitchfork and torch mob, it really ought to be the console manufacturers. And if you think their business model is awful, your primary avenue of activism is to not buy their product.

      A boycott generally starts "I'm not buying your product anymore; instead, I'm buying product X from vendor Y." But what PC game in the same genre as Mario Party series or Super Smash Bros. series do you recommend?

    7. Re:Scary by rliden · · Score: 1

      We've never been able to always do exactly what we want with all the hardware we have. There was a time when we didn't really even own our own phones and modifying them to take advantage of the phone system was a criminal offense. This is a lot different from tinkering with your desktop or laptop. In this case you're tinkering with a paid service where the revenue model and possibly the integrity of the system could be compromised by this. I think this is more akin to modifying hardware to steal cable or network service.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame, more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage.
    8. Re:Scary by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      What part of the word tinkering don't you understand? When was the last time you signed a use contract before you were allowed to buy a machine?

      And if you think their business model is awful, your primary avenue of activism is to not buy their product.

      No it is not, it is to educate people about why the DMCA is so stupid, to pressure lawmakers to change the eff'ing law. That market triumphalist "vote with your wallet" is a such a pathetic, submissive cop-out. Most people will never have buying power more powerful than their vote. We aren't lobbyists.

    9. Re:Scary by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You aren't buying material. You are paying for a license to use the material in a certain way.

      When you buy a game console, does the store have you sign some licensing document? No? Then the "you don't own, you're just licensing" theory is a steaming pile of horseshit.

      These game consoles are the rightful property of their owners, who can rightfully use them in an consensual act, including hiring someone to repair or modify them.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    10. Re:Scary by JPLemme · · Score: 1

      You seem to think that a boycott is only possible if it's painless. "I can't get Super Smash Bros. on any other platform so how can I boycott the Wii?" That's like saying "We can't go on strike because we won't get paid." (Except more trivial.)

      A boycott punishes a company by withholding funds. Doing without something you actually want is sort of the point. I don't buy scrapbooking things, but it's not because I'm "boycotting" the scrapbook industry -- I just don't want anything they make.

    11. Re:Scary by Itchyeyes · · Score: 1

      Your analogy does not negate the GP's argument. In fact I think quite a few people would read that as supporting of the GP's argument.

    12. Re:Scary by vishbar · · Score: 1

      ....so?

      The act itself does not constitute a violation of copyright. Sure, maybe he enabled a few folks to violate copyright; however, unless he was placing copyrighted code onto their modded consoles, he only made some software and hardware modifications on boxes that had been legally purchased with the owner's consent.

      Services like Tor can be used to mask the identity of a child pornographer; however, the use of a service like Tor is not equivalent to downloading or sharing child pornography until the actual crime is committed. I'm for a reasonable enforcement of copyright, but only when an actual crime is committed.

      --
      Ride the skies
    13. Re:Scary by amplt1337 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why can't everyone see that the legal system has historically, with very few exceptions, done nothing but work against the people, to benefit corporate interests? Why isn't it a crime for executives at AIG and other bailed out banks to receive huge bonuses at the expense of tax payers? Why is it a crime for some college kid to hack some game consoles? We're talking about billions vs hundreds of dollars.

      FTFY.

      It works this way because their billions buy Congressmen, while our hundreds pay them rent.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    14. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You aren't buying material. You are paying for a license to use the material in a certain way.

      What? No, that's retarded.

    15. Re:Scary by Omnifarious · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's even questionable whether or not violating copyright is always counter productive in the long run. Our current copyright laws are mainly the result of people with lots of money and influence getting laws passed that profit them at our expense.

    16. Re:Scary by ookaze · · Score: 1

      It's terrifying to me (and a sign of the times) that we can't do what we please with the material we've paid for. Sure, violating copyright is counter productive in the long-run, which is why we have it, but tinkering with stuff has a long proud history.[...] I doubt this guy was doing anything innovating, but he sure won't be doing so now.

      But there's no problem with that. Or perhaps there are problems with that, but you won't get caught and won't face potential 10 years in prison.
      But if, like this guy (the link : http://www.scpr.org/news/2009/08/03/xbox-crime/ ), you specifically advertise on the Web that you will modify people's consoles for money, so that they can play pirated games, then no wonder you're facing such hardships.
      Sure what he was doing wasn't innovating, and I hope he won't be doing so ever again.

    17. Re:Scary by Teun · · Score: 1
      Your DA thanks you for a novel way of busting terrists.

      Modifying things likely includes circumvention.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    18. Re:Scary by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      If you are looking for a place to take the pitchfork and torch mob, it really ought to be the console manufacturers. And if you think their business model is awful, your primary avenue of activism is to not buy their product.

      A boycott generally starts "I'm not buying your product anymore; instead, I'm buying product X from vendor Y." But what PC game in the same genre as Mario Party series or Super Smash Bros. series do you recommend?

      A boycott doesn't require buying a competing product. A boycott could also simply be "I like this but I'm not happy with the terms - I don't need it badly enough to accept this."

      The problem there is that we all seem to have this sense of entitlement. Many people apparently don't consider it an option to simply do without these things. That's one of the basic reasons why consumers are ineffective at asserting their rights.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    19. Re:Scary by sorak · · Score: 1

      I have an old X-Box, that I have been thinking about modding for a long time, mostly to use as a network-enabled Divx/DVD player.

    20. Re:Scary by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I am not sure whether buying bongs is illegal. However, selling them is.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    21. Re:Scary by Verdatum · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bad analogy. Building bombs is indeed illegal. So is possession of drug paraphernalia. Bongs may only be sold for purposes other than smoking marijuana; namely smoking tobacco.

    22. Re:Scary by gnapster · · Score: 1

      [...]He sure won't be doing [any innovating] now.

      Who can say? Pilgrim's Progress, one of the best-selling books ever (next to the Christian Bible) was written when the author was in jail. And Marshall Williams came up with an innovative new firearm design while in prison in the 1920s.

    23. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I, say, decide to make a bomb with it and blow something up, you can prosecute me for blowing something up, and for possessing explosive materials, but not for the act of fiddling with the device.

      The problem with your analogy is that after it blows up, you're no longer in posession of explosive materials. So the only thing with which you could be charged is blowing something up, but at that point, the damage has already been done.

      That's why we criminalized the posession of explosive materials. So we can charge our would-be boom-maker before anything goes boom.

      And as much as it pains me to say it, that's why the MAFIAA goons arrested this guy. Because busting his customers for copyright violation after they start playing games on the modded consoles doesn't solve MAFIAA's problem. At that time, the modder is no longer in posession of the consoles, and the modder never was in posession of the pirated games; the economic damage has already been done. Which is why MAFIAA bought a law that criminalized the modding of the consoles.

    24. Re:Scary by gnapster · · Score: 2, Informative

      But at that time, the phone was rented, not purchased.

    25. Re:Scary by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Playing pirated games on any device is and should be illegal. Modifying the device in a way that makes it possible to play pirated games should NOT be illegal."

      And therein lies the rub. From TFA:

      "The Cal State Fullerton student was arrested Monday on federal charges that he illegally modified Xbox, Playstation, Wii and other video game consoles to enable the machines to play pirated video games."

      "Specifically, the college student is accused of modifying for personal financial gain technology affecting control or access to a copyrighted work"

      'They' aren't trampling your rights to mod the hardware you own. They're trampling this guys (non-existent) right to mod consoles for profit. This isn't some basement hacker getting his door kicked in by the jack booted thugs. He's no different (legally anyway) from guys selling pirated movies.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    26. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When I bought my console, my receipt says I purchased 1 PS3, and in return I paid the agreed upon amount. It makes no mention of purchasing a license.

      The receipt represents the contract I entered into with the seller.

      I was not required to sign any license agreement. When I took the console out of the box, again I was free to use the device without any license.

      I therefore own my PS3 and I have the contract to prove it. I can therefore do what I wish with it.

    27. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong. just because a manufacturer says that you don't have the right to open up and mess about with the device that they sold to you, doesn't make it true. just because the federal government / law enforcement agrees with them, also doesn't make it right. YOU DO HAVE THE RIGHT TO OPEN UP AND MESS ABOUT WITH YOU XBOX THAT YOU BOUGHT. they can't take that right away from you, but they can violate your right and put you in jail.

      the solution: vote. but not for anyone who doesn't deserve your vote. prolly gonna have to look 3rd party for that. libertarians are a good place to start looking, but don't stop there. educate your friends and family, too. get these R's and D's out of office, they are letting this happen at best, encouraging it at worst.

    28. Re:Scary by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Slowly steered? I hate this idealizing the past fallacy. People like to assume things were better when they were children or before they started taking political things seriously. Its always been like this.

    29. Re:Scary by Desler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, maybe he enabled a few folks to violate copyright; however, unless he was placing copyrighted code onto their modded consoles, he only made some software and hardware modifications on boxes that had been legally purchased with the owner's consent.

      Facilitating copyright infringement is against the law.

    30. Re:Scary by tepples · · Score: 1

      You seem to think that a boycott is only possible if it's painless.

      The point of naming a competitor is to show that contrary to popular belief, gamers have options other than the boycotted supplier.

      "I can't get Super Smash Bros. on any other platform so how can I boycott the Wii?"

      I never said that. I said I wanted another platform fighter, not the exact same title.

      That's like saying "We can't go on strike because we won't get paid." (Except more trivial.)

      If you wish to continue the analogy to the sale of labor, it's like saying "Another employer is giving me a better offer."

    31. Re:Scary by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. Next he'll say, "guns don't kill people, they kill people." LOL

    32. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it's the fiddling with the device then selling it for profit that gets people worked up.

    33. Re:Scary by bevoblake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the actions of building an atomic bomb or a biological weapon should be illegal for the public good. It's too late to prosecute someone for "blowing something up" with a highly-destructive device. As for possessing explosive material - what about ammonium nitrate? It's a high explosive with legitimate uses as a fertilizer. The "act of fiddling" with it is what makes it dangerous, not the inherently useful materials to begin with.

      I understand your argument and where you're trying to go with it, but there are many shades of grey here that aren't handled. I'd tend to argue that the cops may be doing something correct by arresting someone who is modding consoles solely for the purpose of copyright violation (which I'd be shocked if he wasn't), but I'd say the main error here is that the potential penalty is too draconian. Furthermore, if they apply DMCA to more legitimate practices, such as modifying the PS3 to run home-made programs that you couldn't otherwise run, the cops should take it on the nose. I haven't heard of that happening; although as crappy as the DMCA is, I won't be surprised to hear it.

    34. Re:Scary by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Imagine if the guy who invented pneumatic tyres was taken to court because it violated the bicycle company's right to sell him replacement solid rubber rims?

      We would undoubtedly have continued to improve metal tires, eliminating this foolish dead end of "rubber" tires which are dangerous and prone to exploding! And for what? Making sure the rider isn't shaken like a can of paint going down the road? Traction? Making sure these pansy "asphalt" roads last longer than a week? Codswallop I say!

    35. Re:Scary by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      There's tons of shit that is modded or built where MOST of the time it's only to do something illegal. In MOST cases it still doesn't make the modding or building of that shit illegal. And most of that shit is actually illegal for good reasons, not simply to keep all those vile wicked people from stealing Mickey Mouse for another 100 years.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    36. Re:Scary by JPLemme · · Score: 1

      You originally wrote:

      A boycott generally starts "I'm not buying your product anymore; instead, I'm buying product X from vendor Y." But what PC game in the same genre as Mario Party series or Super Smash Bros. series do you recommend?

      I keyed in on the word "but", as that would normally imply you would boycott the console makers, but you need to find a replacement item first. Which of course implies that if you can't find a replacement item, the boycott would be unrealistic.

      It's entirely possible I read too much into your choice of conjunction, in which case there's no real disagreement.

      On the other hand, if it was meant as written I will continue to argue that an economic boycott shouldn't be based on the availability of substitute goods. It's a war of attrition in which the two sides suffer until one of them caves. If you (generically, not YOU specifically) want to make a statement, then a boycott should happen even if there were no games available for the PC at all.

      If people had refused to buy DVDs or videotapes unless the DVDs were non-region coded and unencrypted (despite having no ability to watch any new movies at home), then the studios would have been forced to give in. The fact that 95% of the population neither understands nor cares about the issue is why the remaining 5% of us have to put up with this shit.

      And finally "another employer is giving me a better offer" is not a reasonable analogy. A boycott means "I won't do business with you even if you give me the best offer." Striking workers (a labor boycott) suffer in the expectation that their employer will suffer even more. It's a short-term sacrifice for (hopefully) a long-term gain. If going to work someplace better is an option, then you wouldn't need to strike; you would just need to resign.

    37. Re:Scary by Endo13 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is that in the video game industry, when you boycott by simply not buying, you instantly become a "pirate". We are way beyond this type of boycott having any kind of positive desirable effect.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    38. Re:Scary by wastedlife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. It is a machine, just like a vacuum. If I want to modify my vacuum to have double the suction power, I can do so. Modifying can make it easier to pirate games, but the modification of the console itself does not pirate games. I can use Internet Explorer to download pirated games, should we outlaw that as well? Granted, there may be some problems if you advertised your modification as allowing you to do so, as it would be like a gun shop advertising that you can use it to kill your boss.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    39. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because its not a crime for a company to incentivize performance. It is bad business to provide those incentives to underperforming executives. It IS criminal for the goverment to step in and start using tax payer money to prevent a bank or company from crumbling "because it is too big to fail".

    40. Re:Scary by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      In this case turning a vase you own into a bong would be illegal. Even if it were to be used only for tobacco. There are soo many holes in the logic behind the DCMA, the parent poster could drive a bomb laden truck through it. It amazes me how money can keep such a stupid law on the books. Maybe we should start a fund to buy our very own set of lawmakers. They come in sets of two, republican and democrats.

    41. Re:Scary by mattOzan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When you buy a game console, does the store have you sign some licensing document? No? Then the "you don't own, you're just licensing" theory is a steaming pile of horseshit.

      As with all the EULAs that we so love to hate, no signature is required for it to be actionable. If you see the EULA which states "if you disagree, you must return the product," and then you keep the product (Xbox, CD album, DVD movie, video game, etc.), it is assumed that you agree to the EULA. Yes, I think this is BS just as much as you do. But what should we do with our frustration? I think it boils down to three options:

      1. Ignore it. We all do this. But it doesn't really lead to positive change.
      2. Take legal action (complain to your representative, donate to the EFF, educate users, etc.) I agree that this is ultimately how change must happen (i.e. the overthrow of the DMCA). But your representatives have many reasons (aka lobbyists) to preserve the DMCA. This is the slow path to change.
      3. Boycott the product. Honestly, this would be just as difficult to organize as Option #2, at the scale needed to provoke change. But if enough people stopped buying consoles with EULAs, I do believe that the EULAs would change overnight. These companies listen to their accountants much more seriously than they listen to Congressmen.
    42. Re:Scary by Antisyzygy · · Score: 2

      Why can't everyone see that the legal system is slowly being steered to work against the people, to benefit corporate interests? Why isn't it a crime for executives at AIG and other bailed out banks to receive huge bonuses at the expense of tax payers? Why is it a crime for some college kid to hack some game consoles? We're talking about billions vs hundreds of dollars.

      The justice system, and every government ever in existence has always been based around benefiting the rich over the people. To be fair, the people who received bonuses at AIG received them because they performed well. Its not like they were rewarding people for sucking at what they do. A few branches brought the whole AIG down, and those that didn't handle themselves typically did not receive a bonus. It shouldn't be a crime to modify your own property. Though modifying a console could make piracy possible, the justice system is supposed to punish people for what DOES happen, not what COULD possibly happen. E.g. if someone almost killed another they don't get charge for murder in the first degree.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    43. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because in America, if you don't like the law, you aren't supposed to subvert it; what you try to do is change it. How do you change it? Well, one of the things you do is petition the legislature. For example, in the 60s and 70s, was it more right for Minorities being discriminated against to commit crimes, or to get educated and work to change the system?

    44. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 Walmart shot shells full of gunpowder: $25
      Length of pipe: $10
      Wick: $.25

      Going to federal Pound-me-in-the-ass prison for making an explosive device... priceless

      Just because you own something doesn't mean you can do whatever you want with it. Nobody in my neighborhood wants me making bombs, so it is therefore illegal. The people spoke, and the law was made.

      The people spoke, and the law was made to not allow DRM circumvention. "The people" in this case corporate leadership, boards, shareholders, and probably most employees. When anti-DRM nerds' societal influence (i.e. taxes paid, campaign contributions given, PR noise) exceeds that of the corporate interest, the law will change.

      It's funny how people here think law should be based on some philisophical ideal, but they sure don't want religions forcing *their* ideals via the law.

      It's simple: the influential groups who affect more of society write the laws and make the rules, not the freloading philosophers living in their basements.

    45. Re:Scary by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      I am fine with, for example, Xbox Live banning modded consoles. That is a service and using a modded console may violate the terms of that service. Same thing with the Wii Store and the Playstation Network. However, your console is machine that you purchase without signing any contract, and the same for the games you buy. Therefore, you have a right to modify it as you please and as long as you do not break laws or violate FCC rules, etc. Technically this violates the DMCA, as it defeats copyright protection mechanisms, but that is an effect of the DMCA being absolute shit.

      Cable, phone service, internet service, etc, are things that you sign into a contract for. I would assume that modification of supplied equipment would violate terms in said contract.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    46. Re:Scary by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

      Each individual can modify their gear all they want.

      HOWEVER if you modify gear for others for profit, THAT is where you get into trouble.

      I can hack my Wii all I want. But if I start hacking Wii's for money, then I can get arrested. (Or if I start selling hacked Wii's)

    47. Re:Scary by Tynin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's no different (legally anyway) from guys selling pirated movies.

      I would agree if he was selling pirated games, but what he was doing is more akin to selling a DVD player that is region unlocked.

    48. Re:Scary by smaddox · · Score: 0

      Playing pirated games on any device is not and should not be illegal. It shouldn't even be copyright infringement (a civil offence). There is no distribution, and there for no infringement, involved.

      However, commercial distribution of copyrighted material, AKA commercial copyright infringement (which this student may have been commiting if he provided games with the modded consoles), is a criminal offence.

    49. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the Anti-Gun people and see the reaction you get. You might get shot.... and that would be quite ironic.

    50. Re:Scary by tepples · · Score: 1

      I keyed in on the word "but", as that would normally imply you would boycott the console makers, but you need to find a replacement item first.

      In my case, there comes a point at which I'd make my own retro, SNES-looking platform fighting game for PC based on public domain fairy-tale characters before buying Super Smash Bros. 4. The only thing you need to read into "but" is that I'd like to know if a platform fighter for PC exists before I go and make the first one.

      A boycott means "I won't do business with you even if you give me the best offer."

      By "offer" I wasn't referring only to pay but also to an agreement to stop the conduct that inspired the boycott.

    51. Re:Scary by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Bongs may only be sold for purposes other than smoking marijuana; namely smoking tobacco.

      And crack?

      Anyway, the "purpose" clause isn't to exempt tobacco smokers, it's an excuse for them to harass retailers for selling bongs, period, because purpose is always subjective.

    52. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the media represents the corrupt corporations and not the common people, duh.

    53. Re:Scary by russotto · · Score: 1

      Facilitating copyright infringement is against the law.

      Only because of the DMCA, which is a steaming pile of bullshit which should never have been passed in the first place. So-called nybble and bit copiers were legal.

    54. Re:Scary by russotto · · Score: 1

      Each individual can modify their gear all they want.

      HOWEVER if you modify gear for others for profit, THAT is where you get into trouble.

      Nope, check again. It's illegal either way; it's just that modifying for profit makes it more likely you'll come to the attention of law enforcement.

      Both should be legal.

    55. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to see how this develops. Was the student just modifying consoles, or was he pre-loading software on them as well? Admittedly, the charges are strictly DMCA and against the hacking of the consoles, but I am curious if the reason he was chosen was because he was also loading games.

      I must say that this shows the danger of the DMCA. Next it will be those who jailbreak iphones. Heck, why not arrest those who modify the EPROMs in their cars? It has a checksum, and therefore supposed to be immune from tampering. You need to "fake" a checksum to change those.

    56. Re:Scary by Desler · · Score: 1

      Only because of the DMCA, which is a steaming pile of bullshit which should never have been passed in the first place.

      Sorry, but that's false. Elektra Records Co. v. Gem Electronic Distributors, Inc. from 1973 established precedent that secondary liability for copyright infringement exists in "enabling or inciting another to infringe, at least when the enabler knows that her conduct will result in infringement". The Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. which established the fair use right of time-shifting didn't override this precedent because it was decided that in Sony's case they know way of knowing what precisely the end users were doing once the device left their hands contrary to the Elektra case where the record shop knew full well that their selling of tapes was directly facilitating others to infringe.

    57. Re:Scary by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No you may not. Section 103 (17 U.S.C Sec. 1201(a)(1)) of the DMCA states: "No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title." Be sure to thank your helpful Congressmen for this provision.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    58. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you pay sales tax?

      If you do, it probably can't be a license*.

      *depending upon the state, obviously.

    59. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guns don't kill people. Bullets kill people.

    60. Re:Scary by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So, what's the difference between me modding my own hardware and then saying "well, done with that fun hack... I'm putting this on eBay so I can get my next toy to see if I can hack it" and this guy hacking the hardware and then selling it? Really, what, specifically is different? Intent?

      Good luck making intent illegal without trampling all over everyone's rights.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    61. Re:Scary by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Facilitating copyright infringement is against the law.

      On NO! That means the Internet is Illegal.. WE are all GOING TO JAIL! RUN!!!!

    62. Re:Scary by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

      OK I double checked... It is only illegal to mod your own gear, if it breakes any encryption. So if I mod my Wii to play ISO files off of a USB HD, that is illegal. If I mod my Wii to have a headphone jack, that is legal.

      Personally I feel that if I paid for it, I should be allowed to do what I want with it.
      However I can see where modding for prof fit could be a grey area... If I mod Wii's to play any disk, than that is making it easier for people to play illegally copied games...
      But I should be allowed to mod a Wii to have a headphone jack and sell that, as many parents would LOVE to not have to hear video game music all day.

    63. Re:Scary by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I am planning on modding my Xbox to use XBMC so I can stream my videos from my server through my projector and enjoy my own "home theatre" using my own legally purchased DVDs that are ISOs on my server. So, according to the DMCA, when I load Rainbow 6 and use a save game from a memory card that has a specifically modified save game on it, I am committing a felony? Taking my useless XBox and turning it into a useful piece of electronics with a little knowhow is somehow illegal because it could be used to circumvent copyright?

      CRAP, my PC could be used to circumvent copyright. Should I be arrested for owning a dozen PCs (I do) or modifying PCs so that they are capable of infringing copyright by installing more than one DVD-RW drive in a box? It's not much differnent. I am 'assisting' in circumvention by installing the hardware and software (both legal to purchase!) into a box as service for someone.

      Sleazy seeming or not, this guy was performing a service on hardware for the individual since the individual didn't know how to do it. Is it breaking the law if a friend comes over with his PC, a stack of his personally owned DVDs, and asks me to help him get them onto his computer so he can watch them on the laptop or on his iPod?

      Ghah, this whole thing is ridiculous. I need to move to Mars or something... get far enough away from the MAFIAA that they can't do anything about us pioneers... anyone with me?

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    64. Re:Scary by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but things get better and worse. Politics may always seem bad, but sometimes they get so bad we might go to war with each other. Such as, Taxation without representation, or Federal excise of power over states, mostly in regards to slavery. I only hope it wont get that bad again anytime soon.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    65. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact of the matter is that there is inovation to be done here too. For example, I know a guy who jail broke his IPhone so that he could write custom software for it. Now is able to send data from the sensors in his phone to software on his computer which renders video and sound. He has done some very cool performance art this way, but according to Apple what he is doing with the device he paid for is illegal.

      The culture war that is going on right now is one we can't afford to lose! The bicycle example you gave is great. The world around us is increasingly filled with electronic devices. How are we going to inovate if we are not aloud to discect and alter the world around us?

    66. Re:Scary by bigngamer92 · · Score: 1

      Your statement doesn't differentiate between the pools of money we're looking at. There's the re-election campaigns which are filled by corporations, and there is the federal money which is just a giant gold sink like those of an MMO.

    67. Re:Scary by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      there is the federal money which is just a giant gold sink like those of an MMO

      I'm afraid I don't really understand what this means.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    68. Re:Scary by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      Playing pirated games on any device is and should be illegal.

      Wait, why should that be illegal? Should downloading copied music and playing them on any device be illegal too?

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    69. Re:Scary by Chees0rz · · Score: 1

      Which is why they are sold under the guise of 'art' in most shops... with a big sign that says THIS IS NOT A BONG... I love it.

    70. Re:Scary by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1

      The grandparent poster was talking about what should be legal, not what actually is. And modding other people's hardware for money should be legal. If it would be legal to do for myself (admittedly, it isn't, but it should be), it should be legal to pay someone else to do for me.

    71. Re:Scary by brit74 · · Score: 1

      Services like Tor can be used to mask the identity of a child pornographer; however, the use of a service like Tor is not equivalent to downloading or sharing child pornography until the actual crime is committed. I'm for a reasonable enforcement of copyright, but only when an actual crime is committed.

      Well, the problem with that is that the legal system must sometimes make 'upstream' activities illegal because the 'downstream' activities are harder to catch. For example, should it be illegal to stop people from printing counterfeit money? In some sense, you could say that printing money isn't a crime - rather, passing it off as real money is a crime. The problem is that if you allow someone (e.g. the Mafia) to print money, it will be very hard to catch them in the act of actually passing it off as real money. Even worse, they could startup a business selling counterfeit money to people around the world (with full disclosure that it is counterfeit). Those other people could buy it for (say) 10% of it's face value, then pass off the nearly-perfect counterfeit money as real. The printers aren't doing anything illegal, and the people passing-off the money as real would be located in markets all over the planet. It would be a legal nightmare to stop it -- unless you make the production of counterfeit money a crime in itself, even though printing counterfeit money is not directly a crime.

    72. Re:Scary by NickW1234 · · Score: 1
      Yep, done that. It's great.

      Illegal in the US though.

    73. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bollox - copyright is counter productive. everything is a derivative work. ideas are infinite (ie. very cheap).

    74. Re:Scary by Desler · · Score: 1

      No, it just means that if you willfully facilitate others infringing copyright that your actions are against the law. This is a 36 year old precedent and nothing new.

    75. Re:Scary by rliden · · Score: 1

      What you, and gnapster, say is true. I don't think it's the same as phone, cable, or internet. I think it's also a bit more than just modifying a piece of hardware. There is a service and system tied to that console.

      I understand that the console makers want to protect their business model, and I'm fine with that to a degree, but I don't necessarily think the crime and punishment fit the act here. Game development seems a bit more spendy than standard desktop or web application development (although I guess that is subjective to the project and its scope). So there has to be a reasonable middle ground between looking the other way and long term imprisonment with regards to protecting the investment and punishing those provide a service to rip off the business.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame, more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage.
    76. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Most people do own guns so that they can kill, because after all they are designed to do exactly that. Guns should be illegal and not just for the average citizen, but for everyone, police included. I think there would be a lot less crime and murder all around if that were the case.

      It's funny when you see these NRA gun-nut types around. They actually try to convince people that they need guns to keep the "king of England" out of their face or something.

    77. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how about the people who made the games? Do they lose the right to own it since you apprently now "own the right"? You can't both own it, that'd be a strange legal dispute if the game maker decided to take you to court. Do they pull a gordian knot and cut the physical disc in two?

      No, sorry, no matter what you want to believe, someone else wrote the game, developed the code, drew the art, etc. They own it. You paid money to use it. You can't own it unless you want to take away the fact that they created it. Legally, you are licensing their creation. Too bad. QQ

    78. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who buy bongs or make pipes out of random household materials do so in order to smoke weed

      Not necessarily, and even then there are tons of types of weeds.

    79. Re:Scary by suuutch · · Score: 1

      Hundreds of dollars? I know someone who has _at least_ 60 games illegally added to his console. At $50 per game, that's a $3000 loss to companies. If 333 people also mod and add 60 games, that's a million dollars. 333 is obviously a gross underestimation of the number of people throughout the US illegally using their mods. Now many of the games would never have been bought otherwise, and the number of added games will vary, along with the cost, but my point is to show that your claim is quite misleading. A case like this acts as a deterrent beyond this one kid. FYI, at 333,000 people modding and adding 60 games (I think more than a reasonable figure if you include the world), the industry is now at billion dollar losses.

    80. Re:Scary by Lil'wombat · · Score: 1

      My Blackberry, my cell phone, my kindle, my tivo, my directTV recievers

      --

      Truth: If it's not one thing, it's another

    81. Re:Scary by Lil'wombat · · Score: 1

      The Boycott would be better served is you bought the item, then returned it BECAUSE of the EULA. Now you show up on the company's radar as a LOST SALE and as an expense in RETURNED MERCHANDISE.

      --

      Truth: If it's not one thing, it's another

    82. Re:Scary by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      http://www.itnews.com.au/News/25005,australian-high-court-rules-in-favour-of-modders.aspx
      The High Court of Australia has ruled that Australian consumers and overseas travellers can buy cheaper computer games and hardware offshore and modify them locally.

      Or to be able to play legally bought games from other markets. Damn those thieving consumers, wanting to use their legally purchased but cheaper products!

      Gadens added in its statement that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) had stepped in as a friend of the court at Federal Court level to argue that regional coding was detrimental to consumer choice.

    83. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't everyone see that the legal system is slowly being steered to work against the people, to benefit corporate interests?...

      Uhm... slowly? Plenty of people have seen this for a long time already.

      The problem is that "plenty" is relative: "A few million people" should be "plenty". But as long as there are a few hundred million people not seeing it... no chance.

      And "everyone" is not seeing it, because not everyone cares, which brings us back to square one.

    84. Re:Scary by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1
      Wait, what?

      Car analogy time: Nothing in the world stops you from changing the engine in your car to some aftermarket model. Nothing stops you from offering the same service to other people for a profit. Just because some people want to use that engine to break the speed limit doesn't mean it's illegal to alter something you own. I don't see an ethical problem with offering hacked Wiis for sale; it's not your business what other people use the product for, anymore than it's the fault of a gunstore operator if his products are used in a murder.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    85. Re:Scary by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between actually paying for something, and stealing it. If you don't pay for it, you stole it. It's EXTREMELY simple, and the only reason he was modding consoles was for people to play games they had pirated and didn't pay a dime for.

    86. Re:Scary by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Playing pirated games on any device is and should be illegal. Modifying the device in a way that makes it possible to play pirated games should NOT be illegal.

      If you admit the one, you admit the other. Look up tortious interference some time (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference). If you admit playing pirated games are illegal, and you help others do so (presumably in violation of the EULA they have from using their Xbox) then you are helping them break their contract and are guilty of such. It's how they beat the WoWGlider (who should have restricted sales only to people who avowed they had never clicked on the EULA, IMO).

      Of course, I think the entire notion is an entire steaming pile of crap - first sale doctrine should take precedence, and EULAs should basically be taken out back and chainsawed to death with a Lancer.

    87. Re:Scary by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Try modifying your FM transmitter to transmit more powerful signals and just wait until you see how much the FCC gives a damn.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    88. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its perfectly legal to buy and sell any sort of smoking device in California and many (all?) other states. You don't sell "Pot Pipes," you sell "Tobacco Pipes."

    89. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I am just buying the right to use a type of media it should be replaced if lost or broken. Well, I PAID to play the game system and then spilled a soda on it. If I wasn't paying for the specific box sitting on the shelf then a new one should be ups'd post haste!

      Seems logical enough to me.

    90. Re:Scary by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      So, what's the difference between me modding my own hardware and then saying "well, done with that fun hack... I'm putting this on eBay so I can get my next toy to see if I can hack it" and this guy hacking the hardware and then selling it? Really, what, specifically is different? Intent?

      Ask a homebrewer and a moonshiner what the difference between selling and personal use is. The DMCA is as legit as any alcohol tax laws (and it exists for essentially the same purposes, ensuring profits.)

      TFA doesn't give specifics, but he was specifically indicted for modding for the purposes of "financial gain" so I sorta doubt he was just selling what he had lying around the house. TFA also says he was modding 360's, PS3's, and wii's, which sounds much more like cottage industry than knocking around. Granted, that could just as easily be six as it could be six hundred.

      At the end of the day, this is just about the money. If he's been making real money at this, the DMCA violations will just be used as precursors to go after his ill-gotten gains.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    91. Re:Scary by twosat · · Score: 1

      It's perfectly legal to modify your computer hardware in New Zealand, I believe it's the same in the EU

    92. Re:Scary by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      and for possessing explosive materials

      No, its suppose to be intent to use explosives. Or that farm fertilizer and diesel fuel for the tractor makes every farmer a terrorist.

    93. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were doing A or B with it as well, Microsoft would have you arrested for breach of copyright I'd imagine.

    94. Re:Scary by BillX · · Score: 1

      'They' aren't trampling your rights to mod the hardware you own. They're trampling this guys (non-existent) right to mod consoles for profit.

      First they came for the Communists...

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    95. Re:Scary by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      ...and the only reason he was modding consoles was for people to play games they had pirated and didn't pay a dime for.

      Talk about a giant jump to conclusions. If you read any number of above topics, there are SEVERAL other possible reasons for modding a game console (holy shit, one of which would be playing games you purchased for another region's console). Just because the knee-jerk reaction news post that is TFA says this is why does not, by default, make it true, it's a reactive statement intended to get readership and viewership, when not a damn thing has been proven. Just because it CAN be done with a modded console does not directly infer that's WHY it was done. As well, if that's what the end-user ended up doing when they got their modded console back, there is very little possibility of the Feds reliably being able to prove that he knew about it--it'd take some real creative maneuvering to get the people who bought the service of modding the console to speak up, because quite frankly, the prospect of an X-for-1 conviction by getting people to admit that's why they asked him to do it is much more tantalizing than giving those people any sort of amnesty in the whole deal, seeing as they would then be the primary infringers.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    96. Re:Scary by Atario · · Score: 1

      Good luck making intent illegal without trampling all over everyone's rights.

      Intent is a standard differentiator between crimes. Example: murder and manslaughter. One means you intended to kill and the other means you didn't. Each has its own legal implications and sentencing guidelines, and are properly considered different crimes.

      Taking intent into account is long-standing and unexceptionable.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    97. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like a powerful world leader once said: "One dollar is stolen, and it is a tragedy. One million dollars are stolen and it is a federally protected business model."

    98. Re:Scary by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Good point. I had forgotten about intent being used to determine the severity of a crime.

      My point, however, it that it is hard (if not impossible) to do this "without trampling over everyone's rights."

      Take, for example, laws against possessing the materials with which to make a bomb. Those same materials are common household items, or hobbyist materials. The strong attempt to make it illegal to intend to build a bomb has severely restricted the rights of those who simply wish to experiment and learn, or those who wish to build real, fully functional rockets as a hobby.

      A lot of our nation's technology was built by someone doing something that if done today would be considered "terrorist activity", and this is a problem.

      But I digress. The point is that when we attempt to legislate intent as opposed to actions, we start down a slippery slope to "thought crimes" where it is argued that intending to break a law is, in and of itself, against the law, so we are punished for considering to break a law.

      Again, if I don't intend to make profit, but do, how is this distinguishable to an outsider from my intending to make profit? What if I chose to mod boxes for all of my friends (and their friends), for free, but every single one of them insisted on giving me $50 for my time. Is this the same as what this guy is getting pinned to the wall for? He just set a reasonable rate for his time, and did the work for others. So, if what he does is illegal, then it is required that what I do for my friends to be considered illegal, and I absolutely see a problem with not being able to tinker with hardware I legally own or not being able to tinker with hardware that another owns at their request.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    99. Re:Scary by wastedlife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is different, you would then be violating FCC regulations. However, if you modified your FM transmitter so you could plug your iPod shuffle into it (I believe that does not have a standard headphone jack), then you would be fine. I bought the hardware from the store and never signed a contract, so I should be able to do as I please with the hardware as long as I do not violate laws. When you modify a console, you are opening it to run software other than what it normally runs. The problem is that this is the basis for a lot of copy protection on these systems. Instead of protecting the media or using keys like they do with computer software, they prevent the console from playing software other than licensed software. Since this is considered circumventing copyright protection under the DMCA, it violates this law. This is another example of how the DMCA violates your rights to lawfully use and repair/improve the things you own.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    100. Re:Scary by wastedlife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These devices function just fine without the services offered (i.e. Nintendo Store, Playstation Network, and Xbox Live), otherwise they would not be able to sell these consoles to the tons of people without broadband internet access. I am fine with these services banning modded consoles, and in many cases it would be best if they did so. However, protecting a bad business model is not a legal right. Stopping copyright infringement is good, but go after the people doing the copyright infringement, not the modders and the homebrew scene.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    101. Re:Scary by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty much on the side of gun control, but it is does turn into a vicious cycle. It seems that it far easier to illegally purchase guns than it is to legally do so. As long as that is the case, gun control will not work.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    102. Re:Scary by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure the MAFIAA had nothing to do with that one, unless you lump ESA and BSA in with them. And the difference is that when you illegally possess explosives, you are very likely going to use them to kill many people. I also would not be surprised if the punishment for possession of explosives is less than the 10 years this guy might be facing. Pirated software does no direct harm to anyone, while it very likely does indirect harm. Punishing someone for doing an act that may allow someone else to pirate software is a pretty weak argument for the need for that law. Busting the distributors of pirated software would go much further toward stopping piracy than busting some guy getting paid to mod consoles.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    103. Re:Scary by skeeto · · Score: 1

      You aren't buying material. You are paying for a license to use the material in a certain way.

      Bzzt. Wrong.

    104. Re:Scary by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      So then bust the people distributing pirated games (TFA doesn't say but this guy may have been including games along with the mod, which if he did he should be punished for) and maybe even the people downloading pirated games. However, modding in and of itself should not be punishable, just the act of pirating media and games. Baseball bats are often used to kill or hurt people, should we ban those as well?

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    105. Re:Scary by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Building bombs is indeed illegal."

      Yea, right. That's why I can walk into the house of a licensed demolitionist and see all sorts of made bombs on shelves and such, and the police know and never arrest him.

      PLEASE. Laws vary depending upon the state. How else are you supposed to blast big holes in the sides of mountains, huh?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    106. Re:Scary by brit74 · · Score: 1

      Though modifying a console could make piracy possible, the justice system is supposed to punish people for what DOES happen, not what COULD possibly happen. E.g. if someone almost killed another they don't get charge for murder in the first degree.

      Not necessarily. I think most people agree with laws that punish speeding, running red-lights, and driving drunk - even if no one ends up in an accident.

    107. Re:Scary by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Wow, you caught me making a generalization. Don't you feel special!

    108. Re:Scary by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      No, it just means that if you willfully facilitate others infringing copyright that your actions are against the law. This is a 36 year old precedent and nothing new.

      O... then Verizon, Charter, Cox, RoadRunner, Google, Microsoft, CISCO, d-link, netgear, etc, etc are going to jail then? Yeeaahhh...

    109. Re:Scary by SenseiC · · Score: 1

      Reality Check! The store doesn't... they don't HAVE to... Sony already has that covered. It's called a License Agreement (http://www.scei.co.jp/ps3-eula/ps3_eula_en.html) which you agree to the instant you break the seal on the box. Welcome to THE LAW people. And for your information (like you'd read it anyway): 7. TERMINATION If SCE determines that you have violated the terms of this Agreement, blah blah blah, HERE'S WHERE OL' MIKEY'S DOOMED>>> implementation of upgrades or devices intended to discontinue unauthorized use, or reliance on any other remedial efforts as reasonably necessary to prevent the use of a modified PS3â system, or any pirated material or equipment. SCE and its licensors reserve the right to bring legal action in the event of a violation of this Agreement. SCE reserves the right to participate in any government or private legal action or investigation relating to your conduct. Jail time is the LEAST of ol' Mikey's worries, because he's also opened the door to all sorts of legal action against himself.

    110. Re:Scary by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is, there's a reason why sometimes you're not allowed to to do as you please with your own equipment. Perhaps I didn't make that part abundantly clear.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    111. Re:Scary by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Funny how that in all the recorded history before guns, there wasn't a single murder! You must be right!

      I have been a gun owner for about 12 years and have never shot at a living creature with my guns at any time. Could you possibly open up your closed mind a little to actually include the possibility that some people like to target shoot with their guns, or own them for protection hoping that they will never need to use them, but would rather have something and not need it that need something and not have it? The only gun control I am in favor of is holding it with both hands. And I am a liberal in one of the bluest states around before you start making incorrect stereotypical statements.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    112. Re:Scary by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between actually paying for something, and stealing it. If you don't pay for it, you stole it. It's EXTREMELY simple

      So you would take the position that I stole the linux distribution I use? I didn't pay for it. What about the air I'm breathing? I didn't pay for that either. It would seem that there is at least one more level of complexity to the issue than you acknowledge in your post.

      the only reason he was modding consoles was for people to play games they had pirated and didn't pay a dime for.

      So say you. The Australian High Court and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission think otherwise.

      Describing the decision as a win for console owners, ACCC chairman Professor Allan Fels said Sony's arguments had failed because the copyright protection measures used by Sony placed limitations on the right of console owners to play games they had purchased overseas.

      -The ACCC has long believed that region coding is detrimental to consumer welfare as it severely limits consumer choice and, in some cases, access to competitively priced goods. The ACCC was concerned to ensure that technology which can overcome these unfair restrictions remains generally available for consumer use," Fels said.

    113. Re:Scary by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      Did I refer to anything other than this specific case? He was modding consoles for a profit so others could play pirated games. This isn't up to debate, it's a FACT.

    114. Re:Scary by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      Did I refer to anything other than this specific case?

      Yes, you said "The only reason to mod a console for MOST people, not the nerds on /., is to play pirated games."

      Well the Australian High Court, who tried the case, decided unanimously that you are wrong. They reasoned regarding the motivation of those placing the region encoding restrictions in the products though: "In effect, and apparently intentionally, those restrictions reduce global market competition. They inhibit rights ordinarily acquired by Australian owners of chattels to use and adapt the same, once acquired, to their advantage and for their use as they see fit."
      Text of the decision http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/2005/58.html

      So in FACT, they decided that everyone has a valid reason to use a mod chip, that being to enable them to play a game legally bought from another region (should they ever choose to purchase one).

  8. jailbreaking an iphone? by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    more like he was jailbreaking an Iphone for idiots who don't know how to do it but they just want it done. so they pay this guy to do it for them.

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
    1. Re:jailbreaking an iphone? by YayaY · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah, that would be criminal too. This is the current state of affairs in your country. Time to wake up!

      --
      Votator.com implements a fair voting scheme (free
  9. US of A by Krneki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The land of the free. On less Trollish note, it's time you do something about this corporation laws, I can't understand how the freedom of a business comes before the freedom of the people.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:US of A by TechForensics · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't understand how the freedom of a business comes before the freedom of the people.

      There is a quote attributed (perhaps erroneously) to Mussolini, but he is alleged to have said "Socialism should more properly be called corporatism, because it combines the power of the business sector with the power of the state".

      I do believe America is suffering now under a kind of corporatism. The term seems more accurate than capitalism. At least since we are also a democracy there may be hope.

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    2. Re:US of A by gordona · · Score: 1

      According to a past Supremes interpretation of the 14th amendment, corporations are people.

      --
      "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" -- Dr. Strangelove
    3. Re:US of A by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I think Mussolini said "Fascism", actually. Or rather, the quote: "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power" is the one you're thinking of that is often attributed to Mussolini. I haven't found any definitive source, and much of what Mussolini published was actually ghost-written anyway. Note, that's the 1930s Italian definition of "Fascism".

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:US of A by jpmorgan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The quote usually given is 'Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power,' not socialism. However as you point out, there is no evidence that he ever made that statement. However, is we presume he did, the important thing to remember is that Mussolini understood what corporatism meant. It does not mean rule by large corporations, in the modern western sense. The 'corporations' referenced by corporatism does include business groups, but also includes trade unions and guilds, military organizations, religious groups, farming lobbies, etc... The idea being that strong government power would be delegated to these groups within their own perspective field of interest, and government itself would be responsible for keeping them from each others' throats, like a pack of rabid dogs.

    5. Re:US of A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was Fascism.

    6. Re:US of A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quickly becoming the "Land of the Fee"

    7. Re:US of A by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      There is a quote attributed (perhaps erroneously) to Mussolini, but he is alleged to have said "Socialism should more properly be called corporatism, because it combines the power of the business sector with the power of the state".

      Wow, mindless anti-socialism hits a new high.

      It is fascism -- a radically anti-socialism dogma -- that Mussolini spoke of: "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- attributed to Benito Mussolini

      Socialism, on the other hand, is control of economic resources -- capital -- by the workers who use them to produce goods and services, rather than by a government-backed class of absentee owners or "investors". Such control can be exercised through the proxy of a state (state socialism, e.g. Marxism) or directly (libertarian socialism, e.g. anarchism).

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    8. Re:US of A by alukin · · Score: 1

      You are completely right. Whole DMCA stuff has nothing related to safety or security. It is all about profit. Corporations are defending profit that they get from selling copies of content. They do not want to think of new profit models of digital millennium.

      They just want old dust covered methods to keep working forever and only way to keep this models working is personal freedom violation.

    9. Re:US of A by iron+spartan · · Score: 1

      The actual quote is "Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power"

      Lets see, government take over of the banks, government take over the auto industry, treasury secretary empowered to take over any corporation who's failure my threaten the economy...

      Nope, don't see it happening here.

    10. Re:US of A by m00nch1ld · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, the companies were owned by the state. In the modern US of A, the state is owned by the companies.

    11. Re:US of A by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen, a significant portion of the populace is in favor of fascism as a form of government. Considering those are the same people that wanted to impose democracy in Iraq and Afghanistan, it's not really a shock how that's been going.

      And this whole bit is just the logical extension, giving people the freedom to use their property how they wish threatens the growth of the economy. Which is for some reason bad. I can't figure out how since the vast majority of the wealth in the US goes to people that don't actually create it.

    12. Re:US of A by Krneki · · Score: 1
      It's much worse then that.

      Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.

      http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/b/benito_mussolini.html

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    13. Re:US of A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The land of the free.

      On less Trollish note, it's time you do something about this corporation laws, I can't understand how the freedom of a business comes before the freedom of the people.

      Don't kid yourself! This is not freedom of a business vs. freedom of the people. This is freedom of a business vs. freedom of a business. You want to tinker with a piece of hardward you bought? Go ahead! Just don't try create a commercial venture out of it, get caught, and pretend your individual rights are being trampled.

    14. Re:US of A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't understand how the freedom of a business comes before the freedom of the people.

      In the same way that some fundie's freedom of religion trumps my right to marry.

    15. Re:US of A by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      The US has been a hybrid of corporatism and capitalism for decades. People are just not taught the truth. In school everyone is taught the US is a capitalistic economy. This is flatly untrue. To be truly capitalistic, the government would play no role in the economy or markets. Yet in reality governments play a significant role to limit and constrain a would-be capitalistic economy. The current world-wide economic failure is one such example when government fails to properly regulate and capitalism is allowed to run unbridaled. When this happens, exactly as theory dictates, the rich get richer and most everyone else suffers at their profiteering. In short, you wind up with classic examples like the Robber Barrons; where only a small handful actually accumulate wealth built on the misfortune of the majority.

    16. Re:US of A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "democracy" was hijacked LONG ago by the corporations. Your vote does not count.

    17. Re:US of A by Relic+of+the+Future · · Score: 1
      You have that quote unFRACKingbelieivably wrong.

      Mussolini (is reported to have) said fascism should be called corporatism.

      Normally, I wouldn't jump down someone's throat and psudo-swear at them, but with the idiocy and lies floating about in the US about what socialism and fascism are (OMG! The "national socialist"! Democrats are Nazis!), I'm on edge. Especially when the ignorance gets "+5 interesting"; a sad day indeed.

      --
      Those who fail to understand communication protocols, are doomed to repeat them over port 80.
    18. Re:US of A by BooRolla · · Score: 1
      FYI - Mussolini was referring to Fascism, not socialism

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism#Fascism_and_corporatism

    19. Re:US of A by Keynan · · Score: 1

      At least since we are also a democracy there may be hope.

      At least since we also pretend to be a democracy we feel hope.

      Fixed that for you

    20. Re:US of A by labnet · · Score: 1

      Where's Alan Shore when you need him?

      --
      46137
    21. Re:US of A by VShael · · Score: 1

      Quick point : In your kneejerk desire to bash "socialism" you have misquoted the alleged quote.

  10. Organized crime by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is behavior you'd expect from the Mafia. It just underscores the fact that there's not much difference between our government and an organized crime syndicate.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Organized crime by corbettw · · Score: 1

      This is behavior you'd expect from the Mafia. It just underscores the fact that there's not much difference between our government and an organized crime syndicate.

      Judging by The Sopranos we would be so lucky to have a government that well run.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:Organized crime by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

      Oh, but sir, if you're talking about the U.S. Government and the U.S. Italian Mafia, then I disagree. There's a major difference, just ask Northern Ireland.

      --
      Get your dogma outta my yard!
    3. Re:Organized crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't steal, your government hates the competition.. And, we want everything you have and just a little bit more.. The American ways..

    4. Re:Organized crime by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Our government? Try any government.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    5. Re:Organized crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. government is definitely the new Mafia. It took over the drug trade, Numbers, protection racket, and the loan shark industry shortly after it took the Mafia out of power.

    6. Re:Organized crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I resent that, even we don't stoop that low... -Guido

    7. Re:Organized crime by kp5b68802 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, except organized crime doesn't owe China $billions and what the government does is sometimes legal.

    8. Re:Organized crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      International crime syndicate.
      The other day a Japanese guy was condemned to 10 years for selling a DS memory card. If you want to screw with your country, please do so. But don't screw with the whole world.

    9. Re:Organized crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mafia would at most break a few of his bones for that, not take 10 years of his life away.

    10. Re:Organized crime by Gremlin_256 · · Score: 1

      That is except for the "organized" part of it.

  11. Hooray by Rydia · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thanks for the mini-editorial and half-baked legal theorizing in the summary. I look forward to the scintillating and insightful conversation this invitation to discuss will bring!

    (Especially the OMG MAH FREEDOMS replies sure to follow this comment, despite the fact I took neither 'side.')

    1. Re:Hooray by Vernes · · Score: 1

      How should one respond to this then?

    2. Re:Hooray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How should one respond to this then?

      +1 Insightful

    3. Re:Hooray by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hate it when people talk about things outside their area of expertise. In fact, what the hell are you doing on Slashdot. Shouldn't you be summoning Bahamut or something?

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    4. Re:Hooray by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 0, Troll

      How should one respond to this then?

      Why, as the periodic astroturfing-for-donations that the EFF does on Slashdot, of course!

    5. Re:Hooray by eln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The whole tone of your post makes it obvious which side you're on. Shoveling scorn on one side of an argument while proclaiming to be neutral is intellectually dishonest.

    6. Re:Hooray by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The summary made some good points, but your reply contributes nothing to the discussion. I'm not sure why you were modded insightful. If you think a discussion on this topic is going to be pointless, why are you here?

    7. Re:Hooray by qortra · · Score: 1
      Yes, the summary wasn't so good, but as a good Slashdoter, wouldn't you just be reading the source article anyway? That would barely have taken more time than composing your troll response.

      I look forward to the scintillating and insightful conversation this invitation to discuss will bring

      Are you implying that Slashdot commenters just sheep with the summary? Nothing could be further from the truth - half the time, the loudest voices here scorn the summaries (including yours apparently). If the vast majority of people here are saying the same thing, maybe it's because there's some amount of truth in it. Everybody here said the DMCA would be used for this kind of crap when it was passed, and now it is. Why not scream?

      mini-editorial and half-baked legal theorizing in the summary

      In defense of the summary, the article itself was a bit one sided too (on the other side IMHO).

    8. Re:Hooray by jhoger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, it sounds like you have an opinion. But I'm not really sure since you didn't say anything substantive.

    9. Re:Hooray by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      FFIV owns.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    10. Re:Hooray by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      No, the summary didn't make good points. Did the summary talk about how the kid is really innocent? no. It talked about how the kid broke the law, but that the submitter didn't really think the law was fair, for reasons that "Might" happen. this is news for nerds, not editorials from geeks. Now if the kid was writing games, and modding his own machine to make the games he wrote play, then that would be a bit different of a case, wouldn't it? Where, besides in the editorialized part of the summary, does the kid try to run applications that are locked out?

      I think we can trust the slashdot masses to make their own minds up about the law.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    11. Re:Hooray by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      "Did the summary talk about how the kid is really innocent?" But he's not, he broke the law. Not only did he break it he was selling them too, which I see no mention of anywhere here. He didnt get caught cause he modded them, he got caught because he was selling the service and profiting from it. THATS the illegal part.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    12. Re:Hooray by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      I believe that both parts are illegal, but only the "for profit" part is likely to attract the attention of the law.

      The whole thing is absurd, though. People should be able to do anything they like with their own property, so long as it doesn't directly hurt anyone else.

    13. Re:Hooray by Rydia · · Score: 1

      My opinion is that this was the sorriest excuse for a summary I've seen in a long time. I think that was pretty clear. If he wanted to comment on it, he can submit the story with the facts and post comments like everyone else.

      Although apparently I'm wrong there, and I was a troll!

    14. Re:Hooray by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      (Especially the OMG MAH FREEDOMS replies sure to follow this comment, despite the fact I took neither 'side.')

      Don't you mean "Especially the OMG DON'T FUCKING BREAK THE LAW THEN CUZ MODIFIED CONSOLES ARE ONLY USED FOR BAD THINGS replies, despite how 'neutral' I'm pretending to be."

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
  12. I wonder where these numbers came from? by nizo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Industry and trade associations estimate that counterfeiting and piracy now cost the U.S. economy as much as $250 billion a year and a total of 750,000 American jobs.

    I mean, aside from being pulled out of thin air that is?

    1. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funnily enough 750,000 seems to be the go-to figure for jobs, either created or lost. I read "Risk" by Martin Gardener recently and I've found it's great for noticing when people use their memory of other numbers to cue-up made-up stats like these. (That will also take you to some debunkings of those numbers.)

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by rainmaestro · · Score: 1

      I mean, aside from being pulled out of thin air that is?

      I can think of another place these numbers were pulled out of.........

    3. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 2, Informative

      i'm looking into buying the book, is it risk by dan gardner?

      page here

    4. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by Vernes · · Score: 1

      {{Citation needed}}

    5. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by infalliable · · Score: 1

      I like how that number is nearly 2% of the US GDP. The total lost jobs is roughly 0.5% of the total US workforce.

      Seems really high to me but then I'm always highly suspect of any job lost numbers. In general, jobs are only lost to a specific sector. If I'm not spending X dollars for Y, I'm spending it on something else. The jobs lost needs to factor in jobs gained in other sectors to have any relevance, and that's exceeding difficult to quantify.

    6. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $250 billion a year

      This figure is especially interesting, because it represents over $800 per American resident. It's pretty far-fetched to suggest that every man, woman, and child in the US is ripping off $800 of counterfeit movies, music, and video games every year, but even if it were true it's even less likely that they would actually pay $800 to get that material if they were unable to get it for free.

      Of course, this figure probably represents worldwide copying, not just what happens within the US. The point still stands: this number do not represent sales that the industry would have made if it were able to prevent counterfeiting

    7. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      D'oh, yes.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    8. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironic that the guy who's job exists because of these people is worried about American jobs being lost. How many jobs are in turn created in police force and political jobs?

    9. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by Teun · · Score: 1
      Well said, the amount of money in circulation will hardly change because of piracy.

      As a matter of fact there are examples where a significant drop in price of a product was more than offset by the larger numbers sold.

      But where would Microsoft be if they hadn't allowed large scale copying of Win3.1, 95 & 98?

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    10. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by exodus2 · · Score: 1

      From his description it is. It was a good book, I believe it was the one talking about cognitive dissidence and how people only believe things that backup their current beliefs.

      --
      .sigs suck, thus nothing here.
    11. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by DeadboltX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like how generic piracy is lumped together with counterfeiting, which could include the printing of several billion dollars... I wonder how much money/jobs software piracy alone is estimated to cost.

    12. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by ArundelCastle · · Score: 1

      The people "making up" those nice round numbers are also afraid of becoming one if they don't instill a sufficient FUD factor.

    13. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I estimate that counterfeiting and piracy now cost the U.S. economy as much as one hundred million billion dollars and a total of one hundred million billion jobs too!

      Now of course these figures are just estimates, and it's plain to see that they're really not accurate as it would mean that each job paid only $1/year. But they're still estimates.

    14. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

      If this article can pull a number out of thin air and claim that piracy costs America 750,000 jobs, I am going to pull a number out of thin air and say that it creates 750,000 + 1 jobs. Here is how:

      If piracy supposedly costs 750,000 American jobs and it is such a huge concern, it must create jobs as well. After all, more people in various government departments must be used to find and track piracy. More people are required to find pirates and people that modify gaming consoles. More people are required to fill the positions of the lawyers that persecute and defend the suspected pirates. More people are required to manage and guard the prisons. More people are required to act as parole officers. When the prisons become too full due to housing all of the pirates, more prisons must be created. This requires a lot of new jobs in construction, planning, and even more prison guards. And with this sudden boom in all of these trades and professions, more teachers, professors, assistants, and instructors are needed to train and teach people in this these fields. I estimate all of this creates 750,001 jobs.

      Or maybe not.... but at least I can justify my random numbers better than the article.

       

    15. Re:I wonder where these numbers came from? by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      Industry and trade associations estimate that counterfeiting and piracy now cost the U.S. economy as much as $250 billion a year and a total of 750,000 American jobs.

      I mean, aside from being pulled out of thin air that is?

      I also like how they don't add any details, such as Iraq having once owned stolen mint plates from the US Treasury, thus allowing them to literally print their own US money. I'm sure some kids taking apart their toys is somehow MUCH worse than that...

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
  13. They force you to lease software by Vovk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And Now they expect you to only lease hardware as well?

    If he owns an xbox he should be able to do whatever he damn well pleases to the xbox, it is the same as any other computer. It's fair for the company (microsoft/sony/nintendo) to make it so that their games will not work on a hacked system, they shouldn't have to guarantee the games will work unless you use their specifications, but it's not fair to take him to jail even if the modifications allow him to use unsigned software. hell, I build computers that have the capability to play pirated games all the time. How is this different?

    PS: in before RTFA, he's modifying consoles for financial gain, how is this different from building a computer for financial gain?

    1. Re:They force you to lease software by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      Re: "how is this different from building a computer for financial gain?"

      It's not illegal to build computers for financial gain or otherwise.

      --
      Gone!
    2. Re:They force you to lease software by Vovk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that's my point. It shouldn't be illegal to mod an xbox, it's just a computer which has been built with the hardware and software required to run xbox games. It should be treated just like any other computer

    3. Re:They force you to lease software by tonyreadsnews · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is it illegal, though?
      Car Analogy:
      You can legally mod cars (for financial gain even) to exceed speed limits to the extreme.

    4. Re:They force you to lease software by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      That's the most effective car analogy I've seen on /. yet. Well played, sir.

    5. Re:They force you to lease software by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Damn straight! And if someone wants to remove the catalytic converter and muffler from his car, that should be legal too! Fuck the environment and the neighbors!

      And, if someone wants to roll back an odometer, that should be legal. Caveat emptor, baby.

      And, if someone wants to remove the seat belts in his car. Who cares if he and/or his passengers die?

      Fuck all these laws that control how we use stuff we own!

      [/sarcasm]

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    6. Re:They force you to lease software by mistralol · · Score: 1

      What about microsoft? They turned a PC into an xbox (badly) but didnt they just do the same as this effectivly?

    7. Re:They force you to lease software by ohcrapitssteve · · Score: 1

      It's illegal because the law, in this case the DMCA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act) specifically criminalizes the circumvention of a copyright measure. Sure this flies in the face of hypothetical fair use, for example, making backups of original games to protect the originals from damage. But he intentionally modified hardware put in place to enforce copyright, and therefore broke the law.

      Modifying a car doesn't run afoul of the DMCA. The car is still legal to own and drive, is usable on the road if kept inside the legal speed limit and passes whatever vehicle inspections your local municipality imposes, and is usable on closed tracks and in legal racing situations and the like. Modifying a console so that it no longer handshakes with content to ensure the media is the original factory media; circumventing the console's ability to control access to copyrighted works (to quote the DMCA) breaks the law.

    8. Re:They force you to lease software by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      he's modifying consoles for financial gain, how is this different from building a computer for financial gain?

      General-purpose computers serve a wide variety of "non-infringing" uses; modding a console has no other obvious purpose except infringement. Read the Universal v Sony (the "Betamax" case) for an explanation of why this matters.

    9. Re:They force you to lease software by ablaze · · Score: 2, Informative

      Everyone is allowed to remove the catalytic converter and muffler from his car. The car is not allowed to be used after that though. The same goes for removing seat belts. Rolling back an odometer is forging, a completely different topic. I cannot understand why changing some kind of hardware you own, or changing hardware of other people can be illegal. The use of unlicensed games on a modified device could be, but not the modification itself. In that way, your remark was very much to the point, although to be read without sarcasm.

    10. Re:They force you to lease software by Minwee · · Score: 1

      You can legally mod cars (for financial gain even) to exceed speed limits to the extreme.

      You can also legally modify a bagel by slicing it open with a knife and spreading cream cheese on it. That doesn't mean that I should try doing the same thing to people who cut in front of me in line.

    11. Re:They force you to lease software by Whorhay · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are perfectly free to remove the emmissions controls from your vehicles. Just don't get mad when you are no longer allowed to drive them on public property.

      You are also allowed to do whatever you want with an Odometer in your own vehicle. Just don't go and claim that the reading is accurate.

      You may also remove all the seatbelts from a vehicle. Operating it in that condition though on public property or with passengers will likely get you in trouble.

      The only semi valid point is the odometer adjusting, and that's because it's not a safety issue but an honesty one. When I purchased my xbox there was no aggreement for me to sign or not that said I could not modify it or have another modify it.

      If the beverage companies got a law passed so that no one could re-use their bottles would you find that law valid? What if Nalogen started selling their bottles prefilled with water and stated selling "refills" for their bottles and tried to restrict you from refilling your bottle on your own through acts of congress?

      Unless it breaks someone elses basic human rights we should be allowed to use and modify any product legally purchased as we see fit.

    12. Re:They force you to lease software by ookaze · · Score: 1

      PS: in before RTFA, he's modifying consoles for financial gain, how is this different from building a computer for financial gain?

      Because as per this link http://www.scpr.org/news/2009/08/03/xbox-crime/ , he was advertising on the Web that he was modding people's consoles for money so that they could play pirated games.
      So he explicitely wrote that he was making a business of circumventing protections to allow illegal things, like play pirated games on its consoles.
      There just aren't any excuse for this guy, like the original article try to mislead people into thinking him having not done anything wrong.

    13. Re:They force you to lease software by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      The real irony is that, without that sarcasm tag, you probably would've had plenty of Slashdotters cheering right along with you... AFAICT, you accidentally described what is effectively a Libertarian's wet dream.

    14. Re:They force you to lease software by ookaze · · Score: 1

      that's my point. It shouldn't be illegal to mod an xbox, it's just a computer which has been built with the hardware and software required to run xbox games. It should be treated just like any other computer

      But it's not.
      Even making a business of modding consoles so that people can import games or use homebrew, I think, would be tolerated.
      But advertising that you make a business of modding consoles to play pirated games, I understand that won't be tolerated.

    15. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with all of these, minus the sarcasm.

    16. Re:They force you to lease software by jhoger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fuck all these laws that control how we use stuff we own!

      [/sarcasm]

      Yes... so are you arguing that the government has a right to control how we do everything because we permit it to control some things? Where does liberty come into the equation then?

      The general idea is that your right to swing your arms stops at your neighbor's chin.

      The Supreme Court may have found a corporation to be a person, but I don't.

      All these examples you gave are pretty weak. Disable your catalytic converter, and you have a fairly direct effect on air pollution which impacts you and your neighbors health. Roll back your odometer... there's really no reason to do that ever except to cheat someone. That's effectively interfering with an official measurement. Remove seat belts in a car... again, a safety issue.

      Now, a game console. There is a legitimate purpose to doing that: running unsigned games on hardware you own (did you sign a contract saying otherwise when you bought your console?). That shouldn't be illegal, if you believe in liberty.

    17. Re:They force you to lease software by ookaze · · Score: 1

      Why is it illegal, though?

      Car Analogy:

      You can legally mod cars (for financial gain even) to exceed speed limits to the extreme.

      But they never say that you should exceed speed limits on the road.
      You still have circuits made specifically for people that want to make races with their cars, where there are no speed limits.

    18. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that depends on the city or county you live in. In a lot of places in California for instance, the police can indeed arrest you for illegal modifications to your car intended for street racing.

    19. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your car analogy sucks:
      There are legal places to drive your car beyond any legal speed limit; just visit any race track when they are having a true-street stock race.

      Building a PC is not the same as modding an xbox.

      A more accurate comparison would be comparing people who provide cracked versions of pc games and this xbox-modding individual.

      If he did it for his own systems and kept them for himself, we would probably not be hearing about it. The fact is he did this for others and profitted from it... well, almost profitted... Looks like he lost in the long run... HA!

      He got what he deserved.

    20. Re:They force you to lease software by maddmike · · Score: 1

      It sounds like he was modding consoles for other people. The article states:
      Last May, ICE agents executed a federal search warrant at Crippen's home, where they seized more than a dozen Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony video game consoles.

      People were paying him to mod their consoles.

    21. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, it SHOULD be legal to remove the catalytic converter - but of course your car may not pass inspection and be allowed on the road.

      It should be legal to roll back an odometer, too, as long as you're also not defrauding the person you sell to - you should be required to state how far back it was rolled when you sell the vehicle.

      It should also be legal to remove seatbelts, although it may not be legal to drive that way, there should be nothing preventing you from so modifying your vehicle.

    22. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that all of these things should be allowed.

      However, to drive on a street with the car it should have to be 'street legal' (muffler and CC, seat-belts included), also selling a car with a turned back odometer is fraud, but the actual turning it back shouldn't be illegal.

    23. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight! And if someone wants to remove the catalytic converter and muffler from his car, that should be legal too! Fuck the environment and the neighbors!

      NASCAR is a legal reason to make these modifications.

      And, if someone wants to roll back an odometer, that should be legal. Caveat emptor, baby.

      Fraud is already has its own laws.

      And, if someone wants to remove the seat belts in his car. Who cares if he and/or his passengers die?

      He and/or his passengers should care, right?

      Fuck all these laws that control how we use stuff we own!

      [/sarcasm]

      When you put the /sarcasm tag it makes this sound like double sarcasm!

    24. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's the point, all these things you mentioned IS legal. (Not sure about odometer)
      It's not illegal to drive with car which generates above some sound level.
      It's not illegal to sell a car with rolled back odometer, as long as you tell the future owner upfront about that.
      And you can remove the seat belts from your car, but you can't drive without them.

    25. Re:They force you to lease software by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Once modified, the consoles are used. Under your own examples, once modified there is no legal use.

      If the beverage companies got a law passed so that no one could re-use their bottles would you find that law valid?

      That is not a comparable law. Not even close. No one is re-using anything in the current example. Someone is modifying, for profit, systems to allow them to play pirated games. That is against the law and is in furtherance of other crimes. Refilling bottles one owns for one's own use involves no modification, no profit, and does not further other crimes. Refilling bottles one owns and then selling those bottles as containing the original contents is against the law. Refilling the bottles one owns and then selling those bottles as containing what one has put in is not necessarily illegal, assuming one is following applicable laws. Taking a bottle one owns and turning it into a bong or pipe for smoking marijuana and then selling it as such is against the law.

      Thanks for playing, you lose

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    26. Re:They force you to lease software by quintesse · · Score: 1

      Oh great, a car analogy! Finally! :)

      But actually, yes, all things that you mention are perfectly legal! NOBODY prevents you from tinkering with your car. You just have to look at all the custom built cars that exist. You just have to make sure everything works according to the rules once you make use of a public road. Even rolling back an odometer isn't illegal... of course if you sell the car it would be fraud to pass the number on the odometer off as being correct.

      In this case the modding of the console should be perfectly legal... what the owner of the console does with it afterwards is his/her resposibility (and if illegal face the consequences).

    27. Re:They force you to lease software by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      You can still use the modified things for legal purposes, just not necessarily the purpose for which it was originally designed.

      My water bottle example was overly simple because it didn't demonstrate any modification for it to be useable. Modifying an existing device into a Bong is not illegal everywhere nor is it illegal to sell them everywhere in the US. The distinction there is that you can't advertise them for use with illegal drugs, though tobacco use is fine. That's a silly distinction in my opinion and is along the same lines as laws that ban the sale of "sex toys", but "adult novelties" that are marked as not for actual use are okay. The people that press for these laws should push for making spoons, open flames and syringes all illegal also.

    28. Re:They force you to lease software by Marcika · · Score: 1

      You can legally mod cars (for financial gain even) to exceed speed limits to the extreme.

      You can also legally modify a bagel by slicing it open with a knife and spreading cream cheese on it. That doesn't mean that I should try doing the same thing to people who cut in front of me in line.

      Bad analogy - you don't own the person in front of you, but you do own the bagel, the car and the X-Box.

    29. Re:They force you to lease software by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      Modifying a car doesn't run afoul of the DMCA.

      I suppose this is true if your car was built well before the 1980's when fuel injection and engine control units were mainstreamed. For example, I have a friend who owns an early 00's Nissan Sentra SpecV SE-R which comes from the factory with an encrypted ECU. This prevents him from swapping certain parts and making certain modifications. The DMCA made it illegal for us to reverse-engineer the ECU and crack the DRM so that we may make modifications to his engine.

      The officials who passed this into law should be lined up and executed by firing squad. The officials who drafted it should be put to death slowly by torture, with periodic intervals of medical rest and recuperation (Seven style).

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    30. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The catalytic converter provides a direct feature to reduce damage to the environment. That requirement reduces the negative effects you have on the health and safety of other humans and creatures.

      Odometer laws is, in essence, are fraud protection where, once again, by partaking in that action your action directly affects what is supposed to be reliable information which does pertain to a long-term large cost.

      Seat belt laws are in effect to directly limit harm from unintended accidents where the alternative is serious personal injury.

      Modding a console (not pirating a game -- those are two separate actions) does not damage the environment or the health of others, does not fraudulently increase the value of your system nor does it result in a larger-than-expected total cost of ownership, and it does not cause or contribute to the direct personal injury of others.

    31. Re:They force you to lease software by Lostlander · · Score: 1

      Damn straight! And if someone wants to remove the catalytic converter and muffler from his car, that should be legal too! Fuck the environment and the neighbors!

      And, if someone wants to roll back an odometer, that should be legal. Caveat emptor, baby.

      And, if someone wants to remove the seat belts in his car. Who cares if he and/or his passengers die?

      Fuck all these laws that control how we use stuff we own!

      Catalytic converters are for environmental protection and smog control which is to the benefit and safety of all people. Mufflers protect people from damagingly loud exhaust systems.

      Rolling back of an odometer is an honesty in sale doctrine. A car with significantly higher mileage can be a safety hazard as there are certain things that need to be checked every so many miles. Not to mention the additional wear and tear on the vehicle.

      This one is hard to argue about requiring someone to protect the life of themselves is one thing. However requiring him to protect the safety of his passengers is another requiring only passenger seat belts seems a reasonable compromise assuming someone wants to be suicidal. The same thing could be said of helmets.

      These don't really control the things we own but the manor in which they operate. That is you can remove all those devices (with the possible exception of the catalytic converter)if you want and not get into trouble. It's when you attempt to operate these things on public roads that it is actually illegal as you endanger the public safety.

      You seem to be missing the point it's not a safety issue it's a control issue. All of the issues you listed are safety related. The modification of an electronic so long as it is done for private purpose and only used in private environments should never be illegal. (Note I did not say that this should have to be modified by a private individual after all so long as it's not operated in close relation to the public it poses no danger.) Unless it can somehow be proven that it is a danger to public safety. The only real examples I could think of is modifying an electronic device so it causes harmful interference or randomly shoots electricity or lasers at people. In general it's my belief that if it has no considerable effects on the day to day operations of society (excluding purely economic trivialities) there is no reason you shouldn't be able to modify your own devices.

    32. Re:They force you to lease software by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      Ah, but it is only illegal to "operate on public roads" or to "sell" vehicles after these modifications. I cannot be arrested for having a car in my garage with no seat belts, a rolled-back odometer, and missing muffler. That is because those actions affect other people. When you hack a console, you are not affecting other people unless you use it to violate the terms of service for their network service or to steal games. The mod does not do this, you need to make a conscious decision to damage others by stealing games or cheating online.

      For example, I hacked my Wii to run homebrew (Mplayer for the Wii is pretty nice) and to run my games that I purchased off of a USB hard drive to speed load times and to reduce wear on the DVD drive, which is a common issue with Wiis. This does not affect others using their Wiis and I do not pirate games. Why should this be illegal?

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    33. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If the beverage companies got a law passed so that no one could re-use their bottles would you find that law valid?"

      There are (I think) laws that state, you are not allowed to refill a liquor bottle with ANYTHING, not water, not nothing...

    34. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of cars: why government allows selling the cars that could run faster then speed limits?! To me that is the same as selling cocaine, but prohibit its usage. This only shows how (most of) traffic laws are stupid.

    35. Re:They force you to lease software by ohcrapitssteve · · Score: 1

      Good point, modern cars do have DRM-protected ECUs. My old Grand National had no such protection though :)

      I was more responding to modifying for reason xyz vs. modifying for reason of circumventing copyright measure, and why modifying the consoles was different from making a general modification to a car, even one that might lead to you breaking other laws (like speeding.)

    36. Re:They force you to lease software by The+Moof · · Score: 0

      Sure this flies in the face of hypothetical fair use

      I think the "fair use" claim goes out the window as soon as you start producing these for the sole purpose of selling to others.

    37. Re:They force you to lease software by RedK · · Score: 1

      ECUs don't have DRM on them, stop being ridiculous. You can reflash the base maps on a stock ECU for most cars with no problems (cars people bothered to reverse engineer). Where it becomes illegal is not because of the DMCA, but because of emission laws. Basically, modifying exhaust and injection systems will usually result in higher emissions. Replacement ECUs are listed as offroad only because they are usually installed in cars that do not pass emissions anymore. This is especially true of California (a lot of engine modifications are 49 states legal... guess why.)

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    38. Re:They force you to lease software by ohcrapitssteve · · Score: 1

      Oh certainly, no argument there. I didn't say this guy could use the fair use defense, I was just saying that the DMCA itself, on paper, shuts down a lot of fair-use avenues.

    39. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Congress passed a law making it illegal.

    40. Re:They force you to lease software by tomkost · · Score: 1

      Good question. Unfortunately, the answer is because the "company" who benefits by cars going faster than the speed limit is the local government. And they have already proven they don't care about safety. They install red light cameras and reduce the yellow light time to increase revenue thus causing higher chances of accidents. They are actually in favor of cars going faster than the speed limit. In the case of consoles, the corporatists are alarmed they may lose a few thousand dollars (which amounts to factions of a percent of their revenues). But, when most every thing is illegal, it's easier to control the populace by making them all petty criminals.

    41. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? If I happen to want a car that can run at 350 km/h (fuck the miles), it's my right to have one (perhaps I just one to brag about it). IF I actually exceed the speed limit THEN you should punish me. You shouldn't assume what is that I'm going to do with the said car.

      Unless I misunderstood your point, in which case I'll shut the fuck up.

    42. Re:They force you to lease software by Krneki · · Score: 1

      And it doesn't scare you that such law has been proposed and actually passed?

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    43. Re:They force you to lease software by ohcrapitssteve · · Score: 1

      Everyone's putting words in my mouth. Of course it's scary, I don't agree with it, I was just answering the question how one thing could be illegal but another thing wasn't. The DMCA is an affront to free speech and fair use.

    44. Re:They force you to lease software by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Apparently a lot of people here will fight your communist ideas. And for god sakes, don't give them more ideas! P.S: How about a license on food? If you buy a pizza you are not allowed to share it with your friends.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    45. Re:They force you to lease software by jenn_13 · · Score: 1

      No other obvious purpose? How about wanting to play a (paid for) foreign version of a game? Or what if you really do back up your (paid for) game and want to play the copy while keeping the original protected (Probably a good idea for anyone who has cats or toddlers in the house...). Or, (and this one I have to admit is kind of lame), I had a game a long time ago that somehow I managed to lose. It was legitimately purchased for me, and after a few moves, I just can't find it. Now, it turns out to be a pretty rare/hard to find game, and if I want to purchase another copy, I have to pay over 100$ on Ebay or the like. You could say it's my own fault for losing it, and I'd have to admit you had a point. But, if I were to download and burn a copy and mod my system to play it, I think you'd have to admit that I wasn't stealing or otherwise being immoral by doing so.
      It's too bad that there are people who will also pirate games, which I still believe is wrong. But the fact remains that there are plenty of (at least ethically) legitimate purposes for a modded console, and I don't think that other people's bad behavior should prevent me from using my console for those purposes. The automatic assumption of guilt seems to be what really bothers us here.

    46. Re:They force you to lease software by Krneki · · Score: 1

      And this is why we get so angry, it's a clear violation of freedom, yet all involved happily did their job.

      We have an IQ above 20, and we know why the kid got in trouble.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    47. Re:They force you to lease software by Chees0rz · · Score: 1

      You can mod cars to use illegal (in some states) underglow, or violate noise laws. I am not sure if the cops would go after the modder after slapping the fine on the modee.

    48. Re:They force you to lease software by dreamer.redeemer · · Score: 1

      Just to nitpick, there are many ways in which these restrictions do not apply. For instance, in most states older cars do not need to pass any emissions tests, and some safety requirements are omitted as well - I have a vehicle made in 1964 and seatbelts are optional (as they were at the time, they constituted an upgrade option when purchasing the car). They might as well be optional anyway, no airbags, no headrest and a metal dashboard/steering wheel make the lap belts downright counter-productive. Just the same, when I dropped a new engine in the car and reconditioned the whole drivetrain I could have rolled back the odometer and presented it as accurate afaik, though I didn't bother.

      --
      the most powerful intellect is that unbounded by indubitable preconception
    49. Re:They force you to lease software by tonyreadsnews · · Score: 1

      Usually only if you drive it on the street. In most cases it is perfectly acceptable to mod the car, take it to a race track (on a trailer) and then race it there.
      If it is just sitting in your garage while you mod it, they shouldn't be able to do anything most of the time. There may be a few places where that's not the case, but I doubt it is the norm.

    50. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with /this/ car analogy is that you use a car on public roads, so naturally the public has some say over what you do with that car. If they want to say that you can't take a modded xbox on Live, then that's fine, but if you're using it yourself, that's where the line should be drawn. It'd be like using a car on a farm; As far as I know, no one cares if you don't buckle up.

    51. Re:They force you to lease software by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      You are also allowed to do whatever you want with an Odometer in your own vehicle. Just don't go and claim that the reading is accurate.

      Sure about that? I'd argue that section 32703(b) might contradict your assertion. Notice that the next paragraph specifically includes the bit about not operating on the street with intent to defraud, but paragraph (b) contains no such stipulation. It just says "thou shalt not".

    52. Re:They force you to lease software by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      By the strict letter of the law it might be illegal. but in common practice no one cares what your odometer reads unless you try and present it as accurate. I've owned multiple vehicles with odometers that were not accurate for various reasons. Whenever I interacted with a government official regarding the vehicles mileage my answer that the odometer was not accurate never even raised an eyebrow. They just mark it as having an unknown mileage and move along.

    53. Re:They force you to lease software by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      It's not at all stupid. The government is quite pleased when you break the speed limit, because it's probably not going to hurt anything, but they get to ticket you and make you pay them. There's a reason that most speed limits are set well below the agreed-upon 85th percentile. The speed limit law is doing exactly what it was intended to do, which is the same thing as many other traffic laws, and virtually every non-moving violation: Generate revenue for the state.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    54. Re:They force you to lease software by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Craftsman has made that tool for years and years, it's a pair of wire cutters. It's the advertising of them as the means to do such that would make it sketchy.

      So in this case the kid was definitely promoting his business in a bad way, but telling people what they can do with their hardware once you've modded it for them shouldn't be illegal. How many times have you seen advertisments for high speed internet service that boasted enough bandwidth to download all the movies and music you want. Granted they don't specify whether that's something you paid for or shared on a P2P network, but ask anyone under 30 what they'd take it to mean.

    55. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try making a business of removing catalytic converters from automobiles, and see how long you stay in business.

    56. Re:They force you to lease software by skorch · · Score: 1

      But in any of those instances, would they arrest the mechanic who did the modifications, or the owner who paid for them and drove the no longer street-legal car out of the shop?

    57. Re:They force you to lease software by JJP · · Score: 1

      But it's not. Even making a business of modding consoles so that people can import games or use homebrew, I think, would be tolerated.
      But advertising that you make a business of modding consoles to play pirated games, I understand that won't be tolerated.

      As far as I understand the DMCA it is not. Converting a console is considered circumventing a protection system and is as such illegal. That's one reason why the DMCA is such a crap piece of law.

    58. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even have to RFA to know why, just read the blurb:
      "because he is disabling a 'circumvention device' it is a criminal issue"

    59. Re:They force you to lease software by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Bad analogy - you don't own the person in front of you, but you do own the bagel, the car and the X-Box.

      I also own a cat. Now what?

    60. Re:They force you to lease software by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      Good point, modern cars do have DRM-protected ECUs. My old Grand National had no such protection though :) I was more responding to modifying for reason xyz vs. modifying for reason of circumventing copyright measure, and why modifying the consoles was different from making a general modification to a car, even one that might lead to you breaking other laws (like speeding.)

      I guess the correlation would be something like: Xbox DRM is to prevent Xbox from runninng unsigned software as ECU DRM is to prevent running unsigned software. The only difference really is that the Xbox software is a game, and the ECU software manages your engine.

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    61. Re:They force you to lease software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think they would care if I opened up my console and turned it into a flowerbox?

  14. Simply ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply ridiculous! When will this end?

  15. Back before it was even called the DMCA by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I remember back when the WIPO copyright treaty that would lead to the DMCA was being quietly passed by member nations. Only a few of us were even talking about it at the time. But the implications were pretty clear to me even then. Making it illegal to even CIRCUMVENT copy protection measures would inevitably lead to people being prosecuted for even the most innocuous and widely accepted activities (at that time, it was mostly stuff like bypassing Macrovision, copying videotapes, copying CD's, and taping stuff on cable). It was quietly outlawing activities most people considered sacrosanct, and we let it happen. The U.S. signed onto the treaty, the Congress passed to DMCA to implement it, and everyone just sort of ignored it--figuring that the local guy in the neighborhood who copied a CD or VHS for you would never be effected. But it was always only a matter of time before they got down to enforcing it in at the local level. It may have started with the big pirate operations, but it was bound to come down to local modders too. It was only a matter of time.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Back before it was even called the DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're running out of boxes. I think the cartridge box is all thats left.

  16. What's the issue here? by Shivani1141 · · Score: 0

    I agree that it's not a guarantee that every system was used to run pirated copies of games. I have friends who have an old hacked xbox and all it does is run XBMC. but in all likelihood they were stealing software. this man knew what he was doing and for the majority of his customers that was providing a means to steal console games. he may not have provided the isos, but his work is the critical step in enabling piracy on a console. this is far less of a moral grey area than downloading is.

    1. Re:What's the issue here? by p1r4t3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would be similar to someone putting performance parts on their car and a cop pulling up and arresting them for street racing on the basis that they would be using said modifications to do so. No crime has been committed unless it has become illegal to modify purchased devices and hardware. I know they say he was circumventing parts of the hardware that protect copyrights of games against piracy but I do not see how that is against the law unless it is proven without a doubt that he did so with piracy in mind.

    2. Re:What's the issue here? by Jellybob · · Score: 2, Informative

      this is far less of a moral grey area than downloading is.

      No, you've got that backwards.

      Downloading a game ISO has only one purpose. The playing of that game, without paying for it.

      Modding an Xbox, as you say yourself, allows you to run XBMC on it. A legitimate use of the hardware, which harms nobody.

    3. Re:What's the issue here? by funkatron · · Score: 1

      in all likelihood they were stealing software.

      Ignoring the choice of words, why are these people not looking at 10 years?

      this is far less of a moral grey area than downloading is.

      Correct. The idea that people can use (and modify) hardware that they own in any way they like (short of harming others) is not a moral grey area.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    4. Re:What's the issue here? by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      this is far less of a moral grey area than downloading is.

      I think you have that backwards.
      downloading (as implied in your post) is specifically to avoid paying for content.
      Modding an Xbox can lead to playing homebrew games, apps, and other very cool stuff that has little to nothing to do with piracy. Hell I modded countless Xbox 1's to run linux.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:What's the issue here? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      That would be similar to someone putting performance parts on their car and a cop pulling up and arresting them for street racing on the basis that they would be using said modifications to do so. No crime has been committed unless it has become illegal to modify purchased devices and hardware. I know they say he was circumventing parts of the hardware that protect copyrights of games against piracy but I do not see how that is against the law unless it is proven without a doubt that he did so with piracy in mind.

      Because they wrote a law (DMCA) that explicitly says it is against the law to circumvent copy protection. The way it was worded makes what he was doing expressly a violation of the DMCA. It was noted by many people when the DMCA was passed in 1998 that this would be a consequence of the law.
      For those that say "What's the news here? He clearly broke the law. It's a bad law, but we knew that.", there have been many people who have said that the DMCA wasn't aimed at people like this guy, so they would never go after somebody like him. Well, now they have.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    6. Re:What's the issue here? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Informative

      Downloading a game ISO has only one purpose. The playing of that game, without paying for it.

      No, it doesn't. Optical media is delicate.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:What's the issue here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut down all gun shops then. They know guns *can* kill people.

      Shut down card modding shops. They know their mods will likely be used for illegal racing, breaking speed limits, etc.

      Shut down all bars and stop selling alcohol. They know alcohol makes people stupid and dangerous.

      Don't you see how ridiculous this is? And Americans ridicule other countries for being "oppressive". This is no different. 10 yrs for tweaking electronics.

    8. Re:What's the issue here? by Anne+Honime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are sooooooooo wrong. Downloading an iso to replace the original DVD I legally own but innocently scratched is not a violation of the copyright nor of the license. In criminal law, you must prove the intent and the actual criminal facts ; you should never deduce from a neutral fact which outcomes can be both legal and criminal that it is criminal by itself. Of course there are statute laws that criminalize simple facts, because it makes the prosecution job easier, but this is a sloppy job and should not be tolerated in a free society. This type of justice has only be extensively used in red dictatorships like soviet Russia, and it's disheartening to see it invade our 'still not so long ago' free societies.

    9. Re:What's the issue here? by ookaze · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's not a guarantee that every system was used to run pirated copies of games.

      But then you would be wrong. Again, by this more informative link (http://www.scpr.org/news/2009/08/03/xbox-crime/), the guy was advertising that he modded consoles specifically to run pirated games, and made a business of it. It's guaranteed every single system he modded was used to run pirated games.

    10. Re:What's the issue here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of the gigantic nonsense you've just posted.

      It is just wrong wrong wrong to prosecute people for modding computers, which the xbox clearly is. If I OWN and xbox I can do whatever I please with it. If I use it to play pirated copies THEN AND ONLY THEN I've done something illegal. When did people just became stupid and accepted this kind of insult?!? "OK you pay for it, I give you the console and you can do anything you want with it except unlocking it to run unsigned software" IT IS MY DAMNED XBOX.

      You can't go arresting people for events that 'in all likelihood' could happen. When did we start living in a 'Minority Report' society?

    11. Re:What's the issue here? by Shivani1141 · · Score: 1

      There are limits to that. You can own and modify a coat hangar all you like until you create a tool to unlock car doors with it, at which point it becomes illegal to posses, with good reason.

      I agree that people should be able to modify their own hardware however they like, but with that comes the responsiblity for those modifications. this case goes beyond that in that he was modifying hardware commercially for other people, where he was aware that the majority of his customers were using his service to enable the theft of game software. it's morally grey right up until you realize that us as geeks are pretty much the ONLY people who're going to use modified hardware for good means. we mod for XBMC, regular students and youth mod so they don't have to pay for software.

      The law that they are prosecuting on is a bad law. I agree. They should have to prove that his hardware modifications were used to steal software and that he was aware or perhaps advertised that this is what you could do and will do with these modifications. prosecute on the basis that he's a copyright thief instead of the basis that he circumvented protection measures. when the DMCA was introduced it was stated they weren't going to use this law this way, now they have. this a bad thing, I agree. this man is still a thief and should be treated as such.

    12. Re:What's the issue here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant to say CAR modding shops, not card.
      thanks

    13. Re:What's the issue here? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      It is? I've never had any pressed optical media fail on me. I've got 15 year old PSone games that still work fine. Burned is a different story, of course.

    14. Re:What's the issue here? by jgostling · · Score: 1

      By your same argument, gun manufacturers' work is the critical step in committing murder.

      Cheers!

    15. Re:What's the issue here? by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      So where do you buy your Xbox games nowadays? How about Playstation or Saturn games?

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    16. Re:What's the issue here? by jhoger · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. Read it again... it says "Krause says Matthew Krippen advertised online and had a large clientele."

      That's presumably a fact, but it doesn't say anything about advertising specifically to run pirated games.

    17. Re:What's the issue here? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I said delicate. Heh. I have lost optical media. Sometimes because it's my fault, but not always. I recently had my XBOX eat one of my games. Ask anybody with kids their stories about games and DVDs.

      In any event, I've never had a enough interest in downloading images from cartridge based systems to even find out what's involved.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    18. Re:What's the issue here? by russotto · · Score: 1

      There are limits to that. You can own and modify a coat hangar all you like until you create a tool to unlock car doors with it, at which point it becomes illegal to posses, with good reason.

      I've unlocked car doors with an _unmodified_ car antenna. And no, there's no good reason for car unlocking tools to be illegal.

    19. Re:What's the issue here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Downloading a game ISO has only one purpose. The playing of that game, without paying for it.

      Oh, so I guess your downloader automatically detects if you've already bought the game, and if so, stops the download?

      Man, you gotta remove that spyware and do it *fast*, else you risk continuing to look like an idiot in front of millions.

    20. Re:What's the issue here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downloading an ISO has more than one purpose -- what if your original disc were scratched to all hell because you had one of those faulty XBOX 360s that liked to eat discs? Or if you just didn't want to add to the wear and tear of your original disc -- or wanted to keep it in its original packaging if it were a limited edition release? Or maybe your discs are sitting in your mom's basement because your choice was to pack your XBOX and games into your tiny car or another duffel bag of clothing before going off to college and chose the clothes because your roommate was going to have a 360?

    21. Re:What's the issue here? by mjhorn · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately you're incorrect, the way the DMCA is written, it is in fact illegal in the case of a console like the XBox as it is bypassing the DRM that is built in. I certainly don't agree this should be the case but at the moment it is. With that in mind, the argument at this point should not be whether or not the student in the article committed a crime (he did), rather what should be done about the fact that as things currently sit what he did is illegal and could result in such a ludicrous amount of jail time.

    22. Re:What's the issue here? by donut1005 · · Score: 1

      Unless I already paid for a game that I lost.

      --
      3A 4E 22 05 C1 83 0B 7A
      It's random, but my posting it here is probably considered illegal to someone.
    23. Re:What's the issue here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is far less of a moral grey area than downloading is.

      No, you've got that backwards.

      Downloading a game ISO has only one purpose. The playing of that game, without paying for it.

      Modding an Xbox, as you say yourself, allows you to run XBMC on it. A legitimate use of the hardware, which harms nobody.

      Wrong, downloading a game ISO does not have only one purpose. Say I legally bought a game and lost or damaged the disk. Being half smart, I saved the CD key for the game in a text file or kept the original box, and I want to play the game now, and fortunately someone has an ISO of it on the internet that I can use as a backup. Have I not paid for the game? Did I just download a game to play it while paying for it?

    24. Re:What's the issue here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downloading an iso to replace the original DVD I legally own but innocently scratched is not a violation of the copyright nor of the license.

      [citation needed]

    25. Re:What's the issue here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could I see your cd's for a moment?

    26. Re:What's the issue here? by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      It seems I jumped to conclusions there, in downloading an ISO only having one purpose. I'm not even sure why, seeing as how I've done exactly the same thing myself, to replace lost games.

      However, at the most that makes them equally grey areas.

  17. Parity? by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is insane. This kid is looking at 10 years for modifying hardware while another story linked right at the bottom of the same article describes a cop getting a one day suspension (with pay) for running down a child with his car

    1. Re:Parity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you are seeing here is the difference in doing something intentionally for profit and doing something accidentally. Should that kid really have been biking in the middle of the road at night with no reflectors? Probably not.

    2. Re:Parity? by jpmorgan · · Score: 1, Informative

      I clicked your link... The kid was struck crossing a busy, unlit road at night, by a car coming around a blind corner. Sounds like tragic accident to me. If anybody is to blame it's the kid's parents for letting him out at night on a bike, without proper safety instruction.

      So what's your point? That we should be punishing people severely for things they have no control over? I presume you believe the punishment for violating the DMCA to be disproportionate, but you picked a poor example.

    3. Re:Parity? by diamondsw · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Ever heard of a thing called "intent"? This guy was modding consoles so people could pirate games. The cop was doing his job ("responding to a disturbance call") and hit a kid who was riding in the street AT NIGHT. It is a shame what happened, but the only thing the cop did wrong was not turn on his lights. Sadly, the only thing the kid did wrong was ride at night. Shit happens, and you don't crucify people for it.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    4. Re:Parity? by marcop · · Score: 4, Informative

      I disagree it was the kid's fault. The cop was responding to a "disturbance call without starting his lights and sirens" and he "sped around a short curve". So he was speeding to the call without putting on the safety devices that allow him to break normal traffic laws. He caused the accident by driving carelessly on a dangerous road. A 1 day suspension for what is basically reckless endangerment is laughable.

    5. Re:Parity? by dbet · · Score: 1

      I've heard of "intent", and if I intentionally rape someone I might get 5 years, down to maybe 2 on good behavior. The crime in question has the penalty it does because the people who it hurts have enough money to buy laws.

    6. Re:Parity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Watch the video in the story. He was doing 72 in a 40, and department policy forbids him doing that. At least they are "considering" filing additional charges perhaps even criminal. The officer should be thrown in jail for his careless misconduct.

    7. Re:Parity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's really not so terrible as you make it seem.

      "We understand that it was (his) time to go, and we know that wherever he is, he's safe and he's happy." - Eva Havens, victim's aunt

      If the family can forgive a police officer who was merely a victim of destiny, why can't you?

    8. Re:Parity? by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 3, Informative

      I clicked your link... The kid was struck crossing a busy, unlit road at night, by a car coming around a blind corner. Sounds like tragic accident to me. If anybody is to blame it's the kid's parents for letting him out at night on a bike, without proper safety instruction.

      Read the article. The cop was speeding around a blind corner without his lights or siren on. Yes, he was responding to a call, but he was breaking police protocol, and probably state and local laws, by speeding and by failing to turn on his lights and siren. Should the kid have been in the street? Well, there's no law against riding your bike in the street that I've heard of. How do you know that the child had no safety instruction? It seems to me that the cop is the one without adequate safety instruction. Hitting and killing that child seems to have been caused by the officer's negligence - driving too fast without his lights and siren on.
       

      So what's your point? That we should be punishing people severely for things they have no control over? I presume you believe the punishment for violating the DMCA to be disproportionate, but you picked a poor example.

      My main point is that there is a severe lack of parity in the US justice system. Those with money and/or power (cops, giant corporations) can basically do what they want while the little guy (kid on a bike, hardware hacker) get screwed or worse. A side point would be that a crime that has actually caused significant harm (the cop killing the kid) goes basically unpunished while the "crime" of modifying game consoles which hurts basically nobody can be punished by 10 years in jail.

    9. Re:Parity? by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the kid's parents for letting him out at night on a bike, without proper safety instruction.

      Studies have shown that crossing a street from a sidewalk on a bike can be MORE dangerous than riding in a lane on the street, because drivers are less likely to see you. On "busy streets" in my town, the cops will give cyclists a ticket for riding on the sidewalk.

      And regardless, the cop was doing nearly double the speed limit WITHOUT having his lights or siren on.

    10. Re:Parity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say "parity", I say "parody", let's call the whole thing off.

    11. Re:Parity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree that 10 years is a bit much, comparing a for-profit activity where the legality (while generally considered unfair) is well-known to a tragic accident (even if it could have been prevented) isn't even apples and oranges. More like apples and orangutans.

    12. Re:Parity? by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

      I don't think "tragic accident" is the most appropriate way to describe what happened to that kid. Tragic? Yes. Accident? No, this word does not accurately describe the situation.

      It seems pretty clear that the cop was grossly negligent. Read the article. Watch the news footage.

      The cop was doing 72 miles per hour when the speed limit was 40. Even if he had his lights and siren on, which he did not, he should have not been going more than 30 miles per hour over the speed limit. Not only that, but he didn't even swerve to avoid the kid.

    13. Re:Parity? by dissy · · Score: 1

      The kid was struck crossing a busy, unlit road at night, by a car coming around a blind corner. Sounds like tragic accident to me. If anybody is to blame it's the kid's parents for letting him out at night on a bike, without proper safety instruction.

      Which just proves the point being made.

      It is a tragic accident. The car driver is not at fault.

      However if this was any other car driver (read: not a cop), they would be in jail for vehicular manslaughter right now, and under a civil lawsuit from the parents which would win hands down.

      Only the fact it was a police officer doing the damage is why the law's applied more fair, although inconsistent.

      The xbox moder who committed no crime at all (Even the DMCA allows for this) gets up to 10 years in prison, yet if a corporation or member of government did the exact same thing, crime or not, nothing worse than a tiny fine in-line with parking ticket amounts, if that.

      A person does an act, life in jail, life slavery, and total loss of freedom.
      A company or government does the same act, and worst case is a fine that is not even a tiny fraction of 1% of their profits, and most times its 'business as usual' which somehow makes it all OK.

      This is what is bullshit and needs to end.

      If the people that made and enforce the laws actually had to live under them, they would change overnight.

    14. Re:Parity? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Coming around a blind corner?!? There's a rather sickening video of the actual event on the same page as the article. (http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local-beat/Officers-Who-Struck-Killed-Child-Gets-1-Day-Suspension-52187867.html) He was going around a left hand bend in the road at speeds in excess of 70MPH. At the *very* least, any one of us doing the same would be charged with involuntary manslaughter, but more likely second degree murder for engaging in wantonly reckless behavior.

    15. Re:Parity? by tomkost · · Score: 1

      Easiest way to sum this all up is that this country and all of us citizens are all getting it worse than Ned Beaty in Deliverance... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj4LnfkdJDM

    16. Re:Parity? by Krneki · · Score: 1

      From a kid you can expect something stupid, but from a cop, who is supposed to be there to make us safe, such reckless behavior can not be tolerated.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    17. Re:Parity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That story is fucked up. You can watch the dashcam video of the cop hitting the kid. My first thought was, "well, that sucks, but the kid did come out of nowhere and it could have been me hitting him too." Then I learned that the cop was doing 72 in a 40 mph zone without his flashing lights or sirens. Cops are allowed to go only 20 above the speed limit and that is with the lights and sirens on.

      One day suspension for killing a 10-year-old kid. That's fucked up.

    18. Re:Parity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the kid was crossing the street illegally as seen in the video.

      Nobody wins here...

    19. Re:Parity? by westlake · · Score: 1

      This is insane. This kid is looking at 10 years for modifying hardware while another story linked right at the bottom of the same article describes a cop getting a one day suspension (with pay) for running down a child with his car

      It would be a modest accomplishment, I think, if the geek began to grasp the essentials of a federal system - federal, state and local jurisdiction.

      ICE is the enforcement arm of US Customs and Immigration. That's a big gun and not a cap pistol.

      To make it into their sights you really have to work for it.

       

    20. Re:Parity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cop was doing ~30MPH over the posted limit without his lights/siren. This is not only against stated department policy (lights/siren required when speeding and even then can only exceed posted limit by 20MPH), but is pretty stupid too. A 1 day suspension is obscene.

    21. Re:Parity? by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

      A 1 day suspension for what is basically reckless endangerment is enraging.

      FTFY.

  18. the poll on the nbc site ... by neonprimetime · · Score: 3, Informative

    on the right hand side of the article, did anybody notice the poll that allows you to rate the story?

    your options are ... "We are ..." a.) Laughing b.) Furious c.) Bored d.) Sad e.) Thrilled f.) Intrigued

    I voted Furious ... cause the charges are kinda ridiculuous ... and I'd be pissed if it happened to me.

    But the current scores are ... Laughing 50%, Furious 33%, Bored 17%, Sad/Thrilled/Intrigued 0%

    1. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot.... vote! My vote alone changed the percentages 3%.

    2. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a poll about that poll I could vote "Sad" in?

    3. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      Thanks to the slashdot crowd, it's 64% furious as i type this.

    4. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by Aim+Here · · Score: 4, Funny

      From the percentages you post, I deduce there had been exactly 6 votes posted, so we now know there are at least 3 assholes on the internet.

    5. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by babywhiz · · Score: 1

      Kudos to /. crowd. It was 48% laughing 10% furious.. when I first RTFA...now it's 79% furious 8% laughing.

    6. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is, that someone will spin that as

      "64% of people were FURIOUS that this nasty little toe-rag was hacking consoles and cheating the companies out of their God-given profits!!!"

      It's now 82% furious, by the way.

    7. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by Fantom42 · · Score: 1

      From the percentages you post, I deduce there had been exactly 6 votes posted, so we now know there are at least 3 assholes on the internet.

      Really 6n, where n is a positive integer.

    8. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by Draek · · Score: 1

      "Laughing" is a perfectly valid answer for those of us outside the US who remember similar idiocies committed by your country's pathetic law enforcement agencies in the name of multinational companies' profits, and marvel at how little things have changed since Dmitry Sklyarov's arrest 8 years ago.

      "Sad" would be a more appropiate response if you live in the US, however, or are planning to visit it any time soon. "Terrified" would be another but its sadly absent from the poll, pity.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    9. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      ...and when the corporations see these percentages they'll know to push the law to 20 years to satisfy how everyone is so furious that this guy modified consoles...

    10. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by EventHorizon_pc · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they're furious on the inside. Either that or they didn't RTFA.

    11. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by EventHorizon_pc · · Score: 1

      I just noticed something a little disturbing about that webpage. Did you notice that under the NBC logo it says "is furious about playstation piracy"

      We're not furious at the piracy, we're furious at how the DMCA is being used to throw people in jail for 10 years for modifying other's hardware with permission. He was not arrested for piracy...

    12. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      After my vote, it's up to 88% furious.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    13. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      The voting up of furious has now caused the site's banner to say 'Is furious about Playstation piracy'. Great.

    14. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by babywhiz · · Score: 1

      88% now.

    15. Re:the poll on the nbc site ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like nbc decided that we are furious about piracy. They have the phrase "furious about playstation piracy" at the top of the site.

  19. modification of hardware.. hmmm by stillpixel · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Time to go out and arrest all those people who modify their cars with after market equipment.. and the makers of the after market equipment.. and the publications that advertise and showcase that after market equipment. I'm sorry, but once the hardware is purchased it should not matter if I play games on it, install linux or turn it into a f**king planter. If I want to see the hardware after modifying it then that should be my right, it is my property why can't I? Because it circumvents some DRM??? If I tweak a car until it can do 180mph and then sell it is that illegal? It can break the speed limit... oh wait.. most cars can..hmm WTF? We can manufacture cars capable of breaking the law but can't modify a game console that may or maynot then be used to break the law? I'm sorry, if you need restrictive technology (DRM) just to make your business model profitable then you need to change your business model. I don't think we need laws to prop up that business model either.

    1. Re:modification of hardware.. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post entitled "first post.." in the thread "Korean DDoS Bots To Self-Destruct" received a final score of 3, Funny. HOWEVER, it also received some troll mods and an insightful mod. Because "Funny" ratings do NOT affect your karma, and the troll mods outnumbered the insightful mod, the net outcome of that post was to lower your karma. Because you were dead neutral before that post, the "first post.." one pushed you over the edge, and into negative territory.

      Now, all of your posts will start off as -1... until you get modded positively, that is.

    2. Re:modification of hardware.. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like someone MODERATED your ORIGINAL POST positively. MAYBE NOW you won't be FUCKED with your KARMA.

      Also, why the LIVING FUCK did you not THANK ME for explaining why your STUPID POST, which was UNDESERVING OF THE "INTERESTING" MOD YOU RECEIVED, started as -1.

      Eat a pixel!!! Fucking eat it.

  20. Devil's Advocate by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, I'm going to say something that I'm certain will be enormously unpopular here - what he was doing is a crime and he almost certainly knew it was. Sorry. He got caught breaking the law.

    Now, should it be a crime? Should it be a crime with a possible 10 year penalty? Should law enforcement resources be wasted on inane garbage like this while there are real, serious criminals out there that are still walking free? I think the answers to all those questions are obvious (at least I hope they are...) but the reality is what he was doing is a crime and thus he broke the law. I would hope people will be sufficiently bothered by this situation (and the ten year sentence for something so insignificant while people who commit violent crimes get much less time...) that they will be motivated to write their government and demand a change. If enough people raise their voice, maybe, just maybe, the government will pay attention. As it is, the only voice they hear are those of lobbyist for major media companies who want laws like this on the books. They got their way and now this guy is (presumably) guilty of something that shouldn't be a crime, but currently is...

    1. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cracking/modding a console to enable home brew software should not be a crime.
      Cracking/modding a console to enable the use of ISO images/CDR/DVDR copies of legitimate software should most definitely be and is a crime.

      The problem here is the lack of distinction the law posses between the two. Judging from the article this man is complicit in many copyright violations, as well as DMCA issues (which are total crap, really. I agree these need to go). instead of charging this man for freeing the hardware, find evidence of (if it exists) his modifications being used to run illegal copies of software, prove his cooperation in this, and charge him on that basis.

    2. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they will be motivated to write their government and demand a change

      That doesn't work. See the current economic/political disaster in progress in the US, despite all of your nicely written letters, as evidence. Personally, I'm just waiting for the rest of the country to wake up and take notice of the fact our government has been replaced by tyrants, and to swiftly rise up against our oppressors in a bloodthirsty vengeful unstoppable blitz to regain what these assholes have taken from us and what our great Constitution granted us at birth.

      The sad part is that in times like these, I'm scared to not post these thoughts anonymously :(

    3. Re:Devil's Advocate by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, he broke the law and got caught. What's your point? That we shouldn't be outraged? I'm not surprised this happened, but it's still outrageous. Every person involved in the investigation and prosecution of this act, and the passing of the legislation that criminalized it, is complicit in evil. They are far more dangerous than the "criminals" they claim to protect us against.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Devil's Advocate by drkoemans · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't normally post but your comment is crazy. That is not how the law should work. There is discretion that was clearly not used here. Example: two kids in Utah, one 16 year old girl and one 17 year old boy. They take naked pictures of each other and send them to his email account. Boy gets charged with rape and both of them are charged for creating child pornography. Obviously this is an illegal activity, they got caught so by your logic they should both be convicted sex offenders and on the registry for life. Is that justice? If laws were black and white we wouldn't need lawyers. That said, there is no way this guy is getting convicted. this is not why the law was created and seems clear to me that the higher courts would not want a precedence like this set or else the courts will be jam packed with people making back-ups of DVDs.

    5. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I'm going to say something that I'm certain will be enormously unpopular here - what he was doing is a crime and he almost certainly knew it was. Sorry. He got caught breaking the law.

      You're right. He got caught operating a hardware modification business without a business license, they should throw that at him too and make him pay the IRS as well as serve more jail time.

      Sarcasm aside, I find it interesting that if someone modifies their own console (do a search for portable n64 and you'll see a tackle-box conversion) they don't get any crap, no matter how much they publicize it. The minute someone gets any money for doing something like that, all of a sudden the lawsuits start flying. Makes you wonder if people bought him beer or food if the attention would be any different, since beer, as universal of currency as it is, is not legal tender.

      Another interesting concept in addition to the "it's my hardware and I'll mod if I want to" mantra going on is that they are considering his actions illegal, not the ramifications of those actions. The claim is made that piracy costs billions of dollars, but he wasn't participating in "piracy" unless he was selling copies of games as well. It's a lot like the car modification mentioned elsewhere. I realize it's a lot like the "I never inhaled" defense, but there is a distinction between having the ability to go 230 on the freeway, and actually going 230 on the freeway.

    6. Re:Devil's Advocate by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      There were time driving in the car with my father and I'd want him to drive faster and he'd say no. He used to tell me "plain and simple its against the law", that was for speeding, seat belts, jay walking, etc. If it was illegal that was his response. When I was growing up I thought that it was smart fatherly advice and I accepted it. Now that I'm grown and see how laws are passed; I never realized how wrong he really was. There are a lot of stupid laws on the books that should have never been put on the books. I have my own children now and I won't be passing that little bit of advice along to them. My advice instead will be to be respectful of others, but always question authority; just be respectful in the way you do it. If I don't spend some time in jail in my lifetime I will have done something wrong. So far when I've gone to court I've managed to argue my cases properly and proved my point and had charges dropped. I just don't think most people are willing to fight for what is right, its easier to plea out and pay the fines and the courts are designed to encourage this behavior. If everyone challenged every abuse of authority and used every method of appeals the system would grind to a halt, the system couldn't handle the full case load.

    7. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully, someone on the jury will suggest jury nullification. That would set a good precedent for squashing the DMCA

    8. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And another point that it seems some are missing is that
      the individual did it not just for himself, but for others.
      Not just one mod, but many. The individual violated the law
      not only on an individual basis, but for profit from many.
      The system has always taken a dim view of mass violations.

    9. Re:Devil's Advocate by Locklin · · Score: 1

      It's infuriating to those of us in other countries as well. Here in Canada, the government is looking at re-introducing yet another "Canadian DMCA." Fortunately, this time they are doing a public consultation, but few people are speaking up:

      http://copyright.econsultation.ca/

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    10. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What crime? He modified a piece of electronics that is NOT a crime.

    11. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the first point is: don't break the law even if it is silly. If you don't like the law then you should work to get it changed, instead of just ignoring it.

      The second point probably is: If you break the law don't be outraged if you get punished. Neither the police nor the judges can do anything about it. It is their job to punish you. In fact if you think you live in a well working society you should expect to get punished. See first point.

      I really wish all the people pirating movies, music and games would put that effort into changing copyright law. That would be effective. A better timed and targeted outrage would accomplish so much more. Imagine thousands of people demonstrating in Washington for their rights. That would get shit done. Bitching when got cought does not. You can hardly do anything useful for that matter inside a jail.

    12. Re:Devil's Advocate by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      Cracking/modding a console to enable the use of ISO images/CDR/DVDR copies of legitimate software should most definitely be and is a crime.

      No it shouldn't, since I'm allowed to make a backup copy for archival purposes, either they have to let me mod my console to play it, or they have to provide me with a way to purchase the tools to create and run the backup copy on the unmodified console. They can't take 80% of the DMCA and ignore that part.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    13. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Modifying consoles does not circumvent copyright; claiming that the copyright is connected with a device instead of software or media is both insane and non-productive. Even in the case of original xbox consoles where modifications allowed for games to be stored on the hard drive instead of played from a disc: while it could be argued that the xbox then became a tool toward piracy (people would get the modification and then "rent" games only to rip them to the hd) the hard drive storage was still protected by fair use. Modern console hacks involve the ability to play non-original media, without ever storing the game on the system. While this form of modification is again protected by fair use, the game system cannot be considered to circumvent copyright either.

      Console modification can be considered similar to a region free dvd player. You can buy new dvd players at retail which are region free, it's not even the slightest bit illegal - again because the device is not capable of copyright circumvention.

    14. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why people doing it? Because a bad law is no law. (St. Thomas Aquinas)

    15. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I'm going to say something that I'm certain will be enormously unpopular here - what he was doing is a crime and he almost certainly knew it was. Sorry. He got caught breaking the law.

      Now, should it be a crime? Should it be a crime with a possible 10 year penalty? Should law enforcement resources be wasted on inane garbage like this while there are real, serious criminals out there that are still walking free? I think the answers to all those questions are obvious (at least I hope they are...) but the reality is what he was doing is a crime and thus he broke the law. I would hope people will be sufficiently bothered by this situation (and the ten year sentence for something so insignificant while people who commit violent crimes get much less time...) that they will be motivated to write their government and demand a change. If enough people raise their voice, maybe, just maybe, the government will pay attention. As it is, the only voice they hear are those of lobbyist for major media companies who want laws like this on the books. They got their way and now this guy is (presumably) guilty of something that shouldn't be a crime, but currently is...

      I agree with you in theory, but our outrage over this law started years before this particular case. We've been standing on our soapboxes decrying the law that this kid allegedly broke, and we've (hopefully) been attempting to vote in people who would reverse some of the effects of this law. Now, someone is about to stand trial for it. If those who are eligible for jury duty in this California locality feel so strongly about this law being unjust, then the next logical step is clear. The law is the law, but we the people need to reclaim our spot as the finders of law and fact.

    16. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, the problem is that we are treading into territory where writing to your government in order to spur change will redirect the same government to pay attention to you. In a government where modding console hardware (a GAME system) leads to 10 year jail terms, and in a system that is so complex that none of us can safely claim to be in total compliance with every law on the books, that is attention that you may not want. People are beginning to understand that we are living in a system that no longer says to stick your head up so you can see a way to make things better. It now says to stick your head up so that whoever runs this show can quickly identify it and lop it off.

    17. Re:Devil's Advocate by visible.frylock · · Score: 1

      As it is, the only voice they hear are those of lobbyist for major media companies who want laws like this on the books.

      Are you seriously making the argument that the poor little Congressmen's minds are confused about basic right and wrong because they're overwhelmed with the voices of lobbyists?

      They're not confused, they're complicit. To be fair, so are the cops that arrest people for crap like this, judges that don't throw out cases like these, and juries who convict people on charges like these.

      --
      Billy Brown rides on. Yolanda Green bypasses Gary White.
    18. Re:Devil's Advocate by NickW1234 · · Score: 1
      Yes, but the law is wrong. Try and get the laws fixed, rather than leaving them open to interpretation.

      He broke the law. It's a stupid law, so it should be changed, not ignored.

    19. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the people who buy locked up shit like iphonies and consoles who should be thrown to prison for not giving a shit about freedom, not this one douche bag.

      DON'T BUY GAY SHIT!!

    20. Re:Devil's Advocate by KudyardRipling · · Score: 0

      The problem is that there exists a critical mass of individuals who either derive wages from their employers that create intellectual property and/or have retirement and/or other investments in entities that produce intellectual property. We cannot have people toiling for seven plus years in college to practice law and others who "have to be weird be discovered" that bust their asses creating stuff only to have "fully informed people" (especially those of us who got screwed out of college) acquit defendants thus accused. With what else can the U.S. Dollar be backed other than pledging all federal lands to Chin[SLIT!Gush!Gush!Gush!Passout-THuD!]

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    21. Re:Devil's Advocate by Ceseuron · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised this happened and, as much as I'll probably be modded "Troll" for this, I'm not really outraged by it. Everyone responding to this article is fixated on the fact that he got arrested because he was modifying consoles. What I think most people are missing is that he modified them for personal profit, charging people money to have their consoles hacked. IANAL, but it seems to me that had Mr. Crippen provided his hacking services at no charge, he would have probably received (at worst) a simple cease and desist letter or a minor slap on the wrist.

      For the record, I'm not against modifying devices to allow them to do things that would fall outside manufacturer specifications. In fact, there's some pretty neat stuff that can be accomplished by using consoles as something other than a video game system.

      In short, I don't see anything wrong with Mr. Crippen hacking the XBox, Wii, PS3, or any other console. However, charging money for the "service", knowing full well that content developers would wind up losing out on profits from the sale of games, probably wasn't a smart choice.

    22. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he broke the law and got caught. What's your point? That we shouldn't be outraged? I'm not surprised this happened, but it's still outrageous. Every person involved in the investigation and prosecution of this act, and the passing of the legislation that criminalized it, is complicit in evil. They are far more dangerous than the "criminals" they claim to protect us against.

      Yeah and the guys that arrested Tommy Chong are assholes too

    23. Re:Devil's Advocate by phillipsjk256 · · Score: 1

      Um.. the law prohibits circumventing effective copyright protection measures.

      I it was me, I would ask my lawyer to argue I wasn't breaking any laws. (Because they are subject to interpretation.)

    24. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he was doing it for profit. Are you saying that he should be doing it for free? Tell me where I can get it done for free, as I would like my Playstation mod-chipped to be able to watch region one movies, and even more to be able to skip the f**king commercials (including the FBI one).

      I should be able to have this done, without the me OR the guy doing it risking jail or even a fine. Where does profit make any difference?

    25. Re:Devil's Advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not so sure what the mods allow for in the first place. Can anyone shed some light on this? If the mods allow for some cool stuff that is totally cool than I am all for it. If the mod's only function is the ability to play pirated content then I can really feel for him.

      It's like playing around with your cable or sat box to get free programming. If you want what they have then you will pay their asking price. If you don't like the price, do without. We are talking about a desire here, not a necessity to life.

  21. Duh, ICE is a Dept Within DHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The DHS wants you to think of them like this: http://www.dhs.gov/index.shtm

    But this is what they really are: http://www.ice.gov/

    No quarter to tired, poor, huddled masses yearning to breathe free.

    Well, from Wikipedia:

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is a federal law enforcement agency under the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) ...

    Of course ICE is a agency under DHS ... I don't understand what your point is. So they have a division that deals in customs and immigration. Can you just shut up? There's no need to post on every goddamn story.

    1. Re:Duh, ICE is a Dept Within DHS by rliden · · Score: 5, Funny

      What? How about taking your own advice Anonymous Coward. I see you post on every feckin story I read. You always take this tough guy stance and say exactly what you mean without fear of karma or being modded to oblivion. I wish you would just shut the fuck up and quit posting in every article I read..

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame, more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage.
    2. Re:Duh, ICE is a Dept Within DHS by Verdatum · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seriously. 4chan was a Garden of Eden before that Anonymous guy showed up.

    3. Re:Duh, ICE is a Dept Within DHS by neutrak · · Score: 1

      if 4chan was a garden of Eden, shouldn't it have been quarantined by a flaming sword? someone should get on that...

    4. Re:Duh, ICE is a Dept Within DHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I write some great poetry though.

    5. Re:Duh, ICE is a Dept Within DHS by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Scientology too.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  22. What is to be done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, with more cases like this erupting lately (insane punishment over inane actions) there are no legal routes to take.
    This man should escape from his detainment and go into hiding.

  23. The hyperbole is staggering... by cptdondo · · Score: 2

    [quote]âoePiracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers,â[/quote] Right. A kid in his basement modifies a Wii and this poses "a significant health and safety risk"??? WTF? Piracy like this is mostly a victimless crime. It's a crime created artificially by a corporate culture. Crimes are supposed to be something that hurts real people directly. Piracy doesn't do that.

    1. Re:The hyperbole is staggering... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      It's not a victimless crime if the point of modding is enabling people to play pirated games. The game companies then are still victims. How damaging it is to the victims is not agreed on.

      As far as health and safety, that's certainly hyperbole. Technically, though, a modified console could potentially expose the user to the system's laser and could potentially present an increased fire hazard (due to faulty wiring, soldering, etc. -- not the laser).

    2. Re:The hyperbole is staggering... by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's not a victimless crime if the point of modding is enabling people to play pirated games.

      It depends on how you define pirated games. Would you deem Quattro Pro a pirated copy of 1-2-3? Or would you deem Frozen Bubble a pirated copy of Bust-A-Move?

      a modified console could potentially expose the user to the system's laser and could potentially present an increased fire hazard (due to faulty wiring, soldering, etc. -- not the laser).

      Even a console that is only soft-modded?

    3. Re:The hyperbole is staggering... by infalliable · · Score: 1

      Yes, technically there is a potential increase in risk. But it is blown way out of proportion. The risk is small and certainly not significant. If you have any experience with electronics/electrical systems, the risk is exceedingly small.

    4. Re:The hyperbole is staggering... by amplt1337 · · Score: 2, Funny

      A kid in his basement modifies a Wii and this poses "a significant health and safety risk"???

      Maybe the modification is taking off the wrist strap.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    5. Re:The hyperbole is staggering... by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      A company is not a real person. It cannot be harmed in any direct way (you can't beat it up, burn it, shoot it.) Crime should be a crime against persons, not against companies. Companies are "persons" by a particular perversion of the law (at least in the US).

    6. Re:The hyperbole is staggering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piracy like this is mostly a victimless crime. It's a crime created artificially by a corporate culture. Crimes are supposed to be something that hurts real people directly. Piracy doesn't do that.

      Piracy is very much like being a bum - as long as only a minority does it, sure, it's harmless.

      But what would happen if *everyone* decided to become a bum overnight?
      Society as we know it would be wiped out... might be good, might be bad, I don't know.

      If society/culture (as an "organism" that lives "above" us) labels something as a crime it is because it's feeling threatened by it.
      And, as you pointed out, we're in a corporate culture...

    7. Re:The hyperbole is staggering... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      In the US, companies are not people, but have many of the same rights as people. In other countries, for that matter, companies have sufficient rights to be harmed for the purposes of the law.

      In law, financial damage is most certainly direct harm.

      If you want to talk about "should be", you should make that clear. Rather than it actually being a victimless crime, you think it should be one. Completely different.

  24. H&SW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "they [Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations] can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers"
    Robert Schoch, ICE/DHS (from the article/link)

    health and safety risk!?

    wait, what - piracy/counterfeiting poses a health/safety risk because the ps3 game they buy is safe for them? then whats with all the warnings?
    nintendo has warnings, playstation has warnings, xbox has warnings. not to mention the ratings for games being "safe" (laughs) for certain age ranges/restrictions.

    what about the RF radiation from electronics?
    the RF radiation from most consoles these days (wifi, bluetooth controllers, etc)?

  25. Worse than manslaughter? by b1nary+atr0phy · · Score: 1

    It's a sad sad day when you can get more time in prison for manipulating electronic hardware than for say vehicular manslaughter...

  26. Once again the media completely misses the point by sqrt(2) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article

    Counterfeiting and piracy have grown in recent years in both magnitude and complexity, according to ICE.

    That's nice. Now how is that connected to the "crime" of modding a console? How is what he did connected to piracy other than the strained connection that modding consoles inevitably leads to piracy which he should be held responsible for? Even if you buy that, how is any of it inolved with "counterfeiting"? No one is stamping out illegal copies of games to be sold as the real thing here. Wrong issue entirely.

    Some estimates indicate that 5 percent to 8 percent of all the goods and merchandise sold worldwide are counterfeit.

    Again, a completely irrelevant fact mentioned only for the purpose of trying to connect his "crime" to a larger and more obviously illegal sounding one.

    I wish mainstream news outlets would hire people to do research and write informed articles, because the alternative seems to be just parroting whatever the alphabet soup of government agencies tells them about the issue. Though, I guess now I know to watch out for those counterfeit modded game consoles.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  27. Health and Safety issue??? by MadCow42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >> âoePiracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers,â he said.

    Health and Safety risks? Give me a f*&%ing break... at least with regards to Intellectual Property. Sure, counterfeit aircraft replacement parts pose a real safety problem (and it's a real problem... go after that one, guys!), but copying videogames?

    If the guy was overtly doing this to enable the use of pirated games, then sure, he's guilty. But if the majority of his work is to enable homebrew or emulation software, they should set him free and give him a pat on the back. I lose all sympathy for the copyright holders when they try to use FUD about "Health and Safety" to prop up their failing business model.

    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    1. Re:Health and Safety issue??? by 2phar · · Score: 1

      Way to go NBC reprinting ICE press releases. Not pursuing an explanation of the "Health and Safety" claim is a classic example of non-journalism.

      This agency reminds me a bit of the drugs one fighting against cannabis users. Do they really think they are working for the people?

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Apphrended by DHS by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure glad that the Homeland is secure from this miscreant.

    1. Re:Apphrended by DHS by tuxgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're also monitoring this forum, soon they will be at your door as well
      Hold on ... gotta go, someone is pounding at my

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Apphrended by DHS by Lostlander · · Score: 1

      I have never liked the word Homeland especially in reference to security and police forces. It reminds me a bit too much of the word fatherland. Which in turn reminds me why the Godwin rule has developed in the first place.

    3. Re:Apphrended by DHS by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps he was dictating?

    4. Re:Apphrended by DHS by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      The name itself reminds me of KGB.

    5. Re:Apphrended by DHS by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 1

      you mean the KGB?

      --
      "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
    6. Re:Apphrended by DHS by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the Ministry for State Security.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    7. Re:Apphrended by DHS by Marcika · · Score: 1

      The name itself reminds me of KGB.

      Or the east-German Stasi (Ministerium fur Staatssicherheit), or the Rumanian Securitate (Departamentul Securitatii Statului)... The name is the same, the concept is the same - they're protecting the security of the homeland against freaks, geeks, hippies and the rest of the freethinking criminal element.

    8. Re:Apphrended by DHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was very kind of the federal agent to press the 'Submit' button for you!

    9. Re:Apphrended by DHS by Lostlander · · Score: 1

      Ah yes the ever dangerous passive freethinkers. You never know when they might sit down for a few hours and refuse to go to war. Or when they might decide to stand still for a while in protest to a unlawful imprisonment or other injustice. They wield terribly dangerous weapons called words and since they tend to actually think about things they sometimes bring up points that make the great and all-knowing ruling body look as if they do not really know anything. We must stop such people for if they succeed they will make the world a better place and as a better place our power derived from fear mongering will diminish. /sarcasm

    10. Re:Apphrended by DHS by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      if thats true, where was the

      arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh help, don't taze me, bro ?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  30. Pirated PS3 games gave me swine flu by Fierythrasher · · Score: 2, Informative
    Did anyone read the article? I quote Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers

    Um...exactly how does a pirated PS3 game create a health or safety risk?

    1. Re:Pirated PS3 games gave me swine flu by maxume · · Score: 1

      Counterfeit pills are probably being lumped in (because the guy working for the agency is a PR guy who wants to talk about ALL the good that the agency does, not just the good they do enforcing the DMCA).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Pirated PS3 games gave me swine flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone read the article? I quote
      Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers

      Um...exactly how does a pirated PS3 game create a health or safety risk?

      Counterfeit Pharmaceuticals i would think.

    3. Re:Pirated PS3 games gave me swine flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pirate a game, go to jail, get ass raped, contract AIDS, and die. If that's not a health or safety risk, I don't know what is.

  31. Troubling by mewsenews · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Joe Public will read this story and think "so what, some kid who helped destroy game company profits got his comeuppance," but the technically astute on this site will notice that this law, while currently applied to a trivial domain like game consoles, will be affecting the whole computer industry for years to come. The iPhone, like most game consoles, has a mechanism to prevent unsigned code from running. It is protected by the DMCA. The Kindle from Amazon is probably protected by the DMCA.

    Your legal ability to do what you want, with the hardware you own, is slowly being eroded by new hardware with DRM baked in, and lawsuits like the one in the article. The issue is about personal freedom as much as it's about piracy.

    1. Re:Troubling by maxume · · Score: 1

      No one has forced me to purchase an iphone yet.

      I don't like that particular portion of the DMCA, but the current situation is not all that bad, and it does not appear to be eroding (Android, Palm Pre, etc., are all more open and capable than phones available 5 years ago).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Troubling by jhoger · · Score: 1

      So it falls on us to explain it to anyone who will listen.

      Pick one person to explain it to today while you are fired up.

    3. Re:Troubling by Locklin · · Score: 1

      Could you imagine what the computer industry would have turned out like if the DMCA and DRM were available in the 80's and 90's? Sorry, IBM decided not to authorize your word processor because it competes with their text editor.

      People are going to look back at this and shake their heads.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    4. Re:Troubling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and lawsuits like the one in the article. The issue is about personal freedom as much as it's about piracy.

      The article isn't about a lawsuit. ICE arrested the kid and he is facing up to ten years in federal prison, for modifying hardware in such a way as to make piracy possible. The issue is entirely about personal freedom, not about piracy at all. It's also about overstepping bounds on the part of the federal government. Immigration and Customs? Nothing was imported, no visa involved. The federal govt shouldn't be involved anyway the devices were modified in california I don't see any mention of crossing state lines so where is the interstate commerce? Furthermore it's about our prison system and law enforcement in this country. approximately 1 percent of the US population is in prison, approximately 3 percent is on probation or parole. That's insane. Furthermore by the governments own figures as much as 10 percent of inmates report being raped by either other inmates or guards. This is in violation of the constitution, as sentencing someone to multiple rapes, or death by AIDS is quite clearly cruel and unusual punishment (once again by the governments own admission). If sentenced to 10 years in prison the likely outcome is that this person, as a nonviolent offender who never hurt a fly, will be severely abused and beaten by our sadistic prison guards and the other inmates until he either kills himself or is released with so many psychological problems that he really is a danger to society. But we have to save the MS DRM don't we, one innocent life is a small price to pay.

    5. Re:Troubling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution is quite straight-forward - although probably unpalatable for most: don't buy such DMCA'd products.

      There are alternatives in some cases. Otherwise, learn to live without. I can think of none that are essential to life.

      If this is unacceptable, then it seems to me that convenience is valued over freedom.

    6. Re:Troubling by SenseiC · · Score: 1

      and again... read the flipping EULA. You never HAD the "legal ability to do what you want with hardware you own" because that's not the issue. The ISSUE, which you'd learn in the first week of any Copyright Law course, is he broke the EULA which, by LAW, applies to the console the instant you break the seal on the box.

  32. Just wait. by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

    Wait until the US and it's socialist/communist collaborators pass the ACTA.

    If you think reverse-engineering is your right as a human being; you should be buying your guns and ammo now, and start preparing to use them on our tyrannical government officials should something so fundamentally flawed be passed into law.

    --
    "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    1. Re:Just wait. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Wait until the US and it's socialist/communist collaborators pass the ACTA.

      No, this is fascist, extreme authoritarian capitalism, if this was communism (extreme authoritarian socialism) they would be asking for a tax in exchange for production, not the ability to charge people more money and prevent any kind of competition.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Just wait. by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      Wait until the US and it's socialist/communist collaborators pass the ACTA.

      No, this is fascist, extreme authoritarian capitalism, if this was communism (extreme authoritarian socialism) they would be asking for a tax in exchange for production, not the ability to charge people more money and prevent any kind of competition.

      So you're saying all the 1st world countries are fascist?

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    3. Re:Just wait. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      So you're saying all the 1st world countries are fascist?

      Most of them, yes. They all lean towards authoritarian right wing (even the so called left).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  33. Imagine if Trusted Computing had taken off... by javacowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...then people who modified generic PCs to run "unauthorized software" would receive the same sentence.

    Frightening.

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
    1. Re:Imagine if Trusted Computing had taken off... by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Trusted computing does not and has never had the ability to stop you running arbitrary software. You are spreading FUD.

  34. Pirate Party? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm curious if the Pirate Party will start getting enough traction in the U.S. to matter.

    Cases like this only really piss-off young, highly technical persons. But if you factor in the RIAA's and MPAA's actions over the last 5 years, it makes me wonder.

    1. Re:Pirate Party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely to happen. Interest in politics in the US is so low that 50 states were only able to produce 2 political parties and one of those thought that Sarah Palin was a good idea.

    2. Re:Pirate Party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious if the Pirate Party will start getting enough traction in the U.S. to matter.

      Alas not. Americans are cowards these days. No one protests, even over travesties like Bush/Cheney's wars. As long as Fox put out drivel reality shows, no one gives a crap about anything, and certainly won't get off their asses to do anything about it. Unless it's claiming outrage at the thought of trying to address the screwed up medical system, or restrict firearm access.

    3. Re:Pirate Party? by russotto · · Score: 1

      I'm curious if the Pirate Party will start getting enough traction in the U.S. to matter.

      Cases like this only really piss-off young, highly technical persons. But if you factor in the RIAA's and MPAA's actions over the last 5 years, it makes me wonder.

      The RIAAs actions just bring it up from .01% of people caring to maybe .5%. And the RIAA and MPAA member companies pretty much control the media (literally, no conspiracy theories required), so it matters even less than that.

    4. Re:Pirate Party? by skeeto · · Score: 1

      I'm curious if the Pirate Party will start getting enough traction in the U.S. to matter.

      You won't see it happen in the US. Our electoral system is fundamentally flawed leaving us permanently with two parties. The powers that be are also strongly against fixing the problem.

  35. Playing pirated games will cause you do die by VinylRecords · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article:

    "Playing with games in this way is not a game -- it is criminal," said Robert Schoch, special agent in charge of the ICE investigations office in Los Angeles. "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers," he said.

    Emphasis mine. What health risks are there? Pac Man fever?

    1. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think he meant modifications could pose a safety hazard, not piracy itself. It is not outside of the realm of possibility that he might fuck it up and cause the console to overheat, short, etc (i.e. fire hazard). Not very likely, of course, but still a possibility.

    2. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't you think of the children? That homebrew code has no epilepsy warning now does it? *gasp* someone could go into a seizure you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, playing pirated games will cause that dude health and safety risks in prison, no?

    4. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I'd like to direct you to this story which has been sitting on Pending for, like, forever.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    5. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article:

      "Playing with games in this way is not a game -- it is criminal," said Robert Schoch, special agent in charge of the ICE investigations office in Los Angeles. "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers," he said.

      Emphasis mine. What health risks are there? Pac Man fever?

      Worse

      Nintendo Thumb

    6. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems like that statement is trying to suggest that a modified XBox 360 or Playstation 3 will explode or shock the consumer when they use it or something. When really it is just soldiering a Mod Chip to a part of the motherboard so that Homebrew games and other unsigned games can be played.

      Actually since he is a professional, he'd do a better job than if the consumer tried to modify their game console by themselves and risk bricking it or something worse.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    7. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emphasis mine. What health risks are there? Pac Man fever?

      I'm leaning more toward the GTA-inspired crimes. When we see enough yakuza in pirated games, we'll see an uprising of drive-bys and hooker beatings.

    8. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facing a 10 year prison sentence causes a lot of stress. That's the health risk.

    9. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Minwee · · Score: 1

      "It's impossible for me to fire a pistol. If you'll check me medical records, you'll see I have a cripplin' arthritis in me index fingerrrs. Look at 'em! I got it from "Space Invaders" in 1977."

      "Aw, yeah. That was a pretty addictive video game."

      "Video game?"

      (From Episode 2F20, "Who Shot Mr. Burns? Part 2. Like you needed me to tell you that. Honestly, I could sneeze around here and it would only start an argument as to whether it was a quote from Futurama or Firefly.)

    10. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I assume that they're talking about modifying the hardware. A bad solder job, a short circuit, and your modded console fries. No one around to notice, and it burns down your house.

      Of course, even the un-modded hardware does that occasionally...

    11. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by motherpusbucket · · Score: 1

      The only health risk I can think of is sphincter damage if you get caught and sent to jail for 10 years.

      --
      "You can't really dust for vomit" --Nigel Tufnel
    12. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The health risks are: they breaka you face.

    13. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by eulernet · · Score: 1

      First, you start with pirating games.

      Since you are a thief, you become a bigger thief, by stealing bigger objects.

      Then, you start drug trafficking, and become a consumer too.

      Finally, you get caught, and spend several years behind the bars, where you contract HIV.

      Isn't that bad for health ?

    14. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Informative

      To these kinds of people alterations done to electrical equipment not done by a certified electrician could potentially cause short-circuits and fire. IIRC electrical fires are the main cause of home fires.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    15. Re:Playing pirated games will cause you do die by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      The comment was about "IP Crime" in general, not video game copy protection circumvention.

      The health and safety risks are from counterfeit drugs and Underwriter's Laboratories stickers. Food full of melamine with Purina or Kraft on it that consumers trust. Lawnmowers with Honda labels and deadman levers that fail unsafe or leak gas.

      Conflating trademark infringement/counterfeiting with copyright infringement (or in this case facilitating but not inducing or committing) is pretty lame, though ultimately, it seems that technical measures such as forging a digital signature could lead to risks such as Therac-25. For instance counterfeit Bosch ABS units that even appear to have Bosch firmware.

  36. How are these even related? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations . . . can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers,â he said

    Wait, what? How?

  37. Really? by Tokah · · Score: 1

    "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers," he said.

    Really? Health and safety risks, from modchips? Perhaps they could elaborate on that one?

    1. Re:Really? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That statement does not pertain specifically to mod chips or software, but is a general statement about such goods.

      Hardware, batteries, etc that are counterfeit can and have caused injury and death.
      Counterfeit medicine, vitamins, and supplements have caused sickness and death.
      Counterfeit toys and children's clothing contain dangerous chemicals, lead based paint, are missing flame retardants, or are made of flammable material.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:Really? by erbbysam · · Score: 1

      That statement does not pertain specifically to mod chips or software, but is a general statement about such goods.

      Hardware, batteries, etc that are counterfeit can and have caused injury and death. Counterfeit medicine, vitamins, and supplements have caused sickness and death. Counterfeit toys and children's clothing contain dangerous chemicals, lead based paint, are missing flame retardants, or are made of flammable material.

      Absolutely counterfeit good are bad for the market and for public health, but what he was arrested for ("felony tinkering" not for attempting to misrepresent his product as the real thing) will always lead to cries of absurdity.

  38. correcting an error in my post - apologies by TechForensics · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can't understand how the freedom of a business comes before the freedom of the people.

    There is a quote attributed (perhaps erroneously) to Mussolini, but he is alleged to have said "FASCISM should more properly be called corporatism, because it combines the power of the business sector with the power of the state".

    I do believe America is suffering now under a kind of corporatism. The term seems more accurate than capitalism. At least since we are also a democracy there may be hope.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    1. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by eln · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Good thing you made that correction...socialism is the exact opposite of corporatism. Fascism, at least the way it was implemented by Mussolini and Hitler, was very much corporatist, though. It's really kind of funny how much people scream "socialism" these days when we're so much closer to corporatism than we are to socialism. In socialism, the government controls the industry. In corporatism, the industry (the corporations) control the government. We are much closer to the latter.

    2. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your correction: that's a pretty important difference. I've often wondered at those who call very corporate-friendly policies (e.g. big bank giveaways) as "socialism" when they are in fact fascism.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good thing you made that correction...socialism is the exact opposite of corporatism.

      Actually, socialism is not the opposite of corporatism/fascism. They are both forms of command economy where the government decides how to distribute resources. They are also both about the group being more important than the individual.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      It's really kind of funny how much people scream "socialism" these days when we're so much closer to corporatism than we are to socialism. In socialism, the government controls the industry. In corporatism, the industry (the corporations) control the government.

      What's really funny is that some people think it actually matters which one controls the other, when the point is that under either system government and "big business" amount to a single entity.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    5. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "Actually, socialism is not the opposite of corporatism/fascism. They are both forms of command economy where the government decides how to distribute resources. They are also both about the group being more important than the individual."

      This is nonsense, the fact of the matter is socialism/capitalism/communism are misnomers elements of every one of them is practiced at all times.

      John Adams often pondered the issue of civic virtue. Writing Mercy Otis Warren in 1776, he agreed with the Greeks and the Romans, that, "Public Virtue cannot exist without private, and public Virtue is the only Foundation of Republics." Adams insisted, "There must be a positive Passion for the public good, the public Interest, Honour, Power, and Glory, established in the Minds of the People, or there can be no Republican Government, nor any real Liberty. And this public Passion must be Superior to all private Passions. Men must be ready, they must pride themselves, and be happy to sacrifice their private Pleasures, Passions, and Interests, nay their private Friendships and dearest connections, when they Stand in Competition with the Rights of society."

      Quite certainly just because one wants to redistribute some wealth or have some degree of control over certain industries has nothing to do x/y/z ideology their are pragmatic concerns that overtake anything else.

    6. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer to think of it as corporate feudalism.

    7. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      In socialism, the government controls the industry. In corporatism, the industry (the corporations) control the government. We are much closer to the latter.

      Does it really matter what we call it when there's an unholy marriage of the two?

    8. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mussolini used to be a socialist before founding fascism.
      And the fascist "corporazioni" had nothing to do with modern corporations,was more like medieval guilds.
      For instance, Ford and its employees would all belong to the car industry one.

    9. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Fascism is a flavor of socialism. Any political philosophy born in the early 20th century had to have a socialist core or it would never sell. Socialism was the flavor of the day.

      It's 'opposite' was (by both sides definition) communism.

      I never saw the difference myself.

      Strong state control of the economy, state takeover of uncooperative businesses/corporations, state payoff of 'the unwashed' with bread and circuses.

      Corporatism in it's modern usage (corporate takeover of government) was certainly not practiced by any self described 'fascist' state (Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Franco's Spain are the defining three in my book).

      As mentioned in a SP Italian 'corporati' were not what we think of as corporations today. More like industrial blocks arranged by industry/interest but including competitors in one 'corporati'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      In socialism, the government controls the industry. In corporatism, the industry (the corporations) control the government.

      One offers a kick in the balls. The other, a punch to the face. No matter the direction (left, right), it's the common man who ends up losing freedom and liberty.

      Did you really think government officials abide by the same set of rules as everyone else? Oh hell no!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    11. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter what we call it when there's an unholy marriage of the two?

      Yes.

      Communism* is where the government assumes total control of production (own the means of production as it were). Corporatism (facism) is where the business interests take control of the government. It is an important distinction, just because both are bad does not mean we should not make that distinction. Fascist governments were typically made up of wealthy businessmen. Hitler was a notable exception but the rest of the Nazi's weren't, Hitler tried very hard to sit at the big (business) table by forcing the captains of industry (like Ferdinand Porche) to be his "friends".

      * Communism is what we are discussing, not socialism. Communism is Authoritarian (police state) socialism, Environmentalist/Agrarian government is Liberal (anarchist) socialism. The same goes for the other extreme of the left-right spectrum. Fascism is Authoritarian (police stare) Capitalism, Libertarianism is Liberal (anarchist) Capitalism. These are all forms of extremist government and all are bad.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    12. Re:correcting an error in my post - apologies by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Good thing you made that correction

      You can say it either way 99.9% of the time. And you will appear awfully smart. Although I do find that Trotsky's sayings get me lots more tail.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  39. Re:Not that disturbing by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 2, Informative
    Googling "Odometer Jail" returned this story.

    Aug. 21--A former Spokane Valley car dealer, who now sells used cars in Post Falls, avoided a likely prison term and a substantial fine by helping investigators unravel an international odometer rollback case. Instead of low-mileage bargains, more than 135 buyers were stuck with high-mileage Canadian imports with altered mileage gauges. For his part in the conspiracy, Richard "Rick" Shafer got no prison time Thursday, but must complete six months of home detention when he's not at work and repay a Spokane credit union $172,792.

    There's another where a dealer got 10 months.

    Anyway, last time I sold a car (In Indiana), when you sold the car there was a checkmark on the form where you could say that the odometer was not correct. (I knew it wasn't because it rolled around past 00000) Modifying your own odometer was perfectly legal, as was paying someone to do it, as long as you didn't sell the car as having that mileage.

    Modifying game consoles isn't fraud, unless you don't tell a future buyer that it's been modded.
    They say it's a circumvention device, but like the Sony Betamax case, if he can show that there are significant, non-infringing uses of a modded console, he could win. (If he has the resources to fight)

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  40. Punishment vs. the crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?prov=ap&slug=ap-stallworth-pedestriankilled&type=lgns

    It's a good thing that the punishment fits the crime. Kill someone get 24 days in prison. Hack a console, it's 10 years for you. Once again this proves that money is more important than life.

    1. Re:Punishment vs. the crime by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      He won't get 10 years. Anybody who reads any modicum of news from the press knows that the press always reports the maximum possible punishment, which is usually far divorced from reality. It makes the article more shocking, a la yellow journalism... Anyways, expect the actual sentence to be less than a tenth of that.

    2. Re:Punishment vs. the crime by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      When Stallworth was at this stage of his arrest/trial I believe that he was facing up to 25 years in jail. the 10 years in this article is only the most he could get, not necessarily what he will get.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:Punishment vs. the crime by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

      I don't know they may want to make an example of him
      I mean what he did is worse then rape and murder to these soulless companies.

    4. Re:Punishment vs. the crime by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      I mean what he did is worse then rape and murder to these soulless companies

      this sentence has no syntactical meaning, I think you meant:

      "I mean what he did is eorse THAN rape and murder to these soulless companies.

      Please folks "then" is a sequence, "than" is a choice.

    5. Re:Punishment vs. the crime by Monolith1 · · Score: 1

      Anyways, expect the actual sentence to be less than a tenth of that.

      I still wouldn't want to be locked up for even a year for soldering a few mod chips, unlocking another GPS, phone, device, etc so I can use better open source software. Let alone get dragged through the mud in the process. This sort of thing screws peoples lives permanently, and IMO it is just bullshit scare tactics trying to force populations into corporate greed driven compliance.

  41. Get involved by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been involved in a Civil Liberties group that reviews and lobbies legislation for appropriate changes prior to them becoming law, something quite different from the EFF. From my initial conversations organisations like this are in need of people with a technological bent to advise them on the ramifications of technology legislation before it passes into law.

    It's not the first time I've done it and I've found that if you you are polite to the ministers involved they are quite responsive and will listen to what you have to say and if they see your name often enough they will ask you for advice, they asked me. It's interesting to see the changes you suggest actually either make it into law or not make it into law due to your lobbying.

    Thing is, it's not a game. If you don't act then, incrementally, freedoms will be whittled away. If it's not by the lobbying of a special interest group (for example Microsoft with the Xbox) then it will be by a knee jerk reaction to something else that has happened. Once it's passed into law it's very unlikely that it will *ever* be rolled-back.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:Get involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is, it's not a game. If you don't act then, incrementally, freedoms will be whittled away. If it's not by the lobbying of a special interest group

      Thing is, your civil liberties group is likely a special interest lobby group too. Stop painting things with such a big brush or you end up looking like a) a hypocrite or b) a know-nothing.

    2. Re:Get involved by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Thing is, your civil liberties group is likely a special interest lobby group too.

      This is quite an idiotic statement. All these professional people (including me) *donate* their time to maintain *your* freedom. No one gets paid to do this, no one pays the politicians involved via campaign donations.

      Stop painting things with such a big brush or you end up looking like a) a hypocrite or b) a know-nothing.

      I spent *my* time lobbying to have previsions like full body cavity searches taken out of anti-terrorism laws and you may have got commercial benefit from not having to pay thousands of dollars in fees to have your web site rated in the same way television media (amongst other things).

      So I ask you How much time have you spent reviewing proposed legislation? What have you done to protect your fellow citizens rights? How many letters have you written to politicians? If you don't have an answer to those questions I'd suggest you should probably take your head out of your ass.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  42. Re:Not that disturbing by Zedrick · · Score: 1

    "Would you be 'disturbed' if someone went to jail for modifying odometers on automobiles?"

    I would be even more disturbed if someone went to jail for putting in new car stereos (that enables the owner to use USB-sticks instead of just CDs) in automobiles, which is a better analogy.

  43. Who gets cheated? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Both are examples of modifiying hardware in an effort to cheat someone, and both are against the law.

    The article gives no evidence of what kind of "pirated games" the accused was dealing in. If I develop a game for my Wii console, and I mod my friends' Wii consoles to play it, who gets cheated? Certainly not Nintendo, who wouldn't sell me a devkit anyway because students and hobbyists don't qualify.

    You don't want to go to jail? Don't break criminal laws.
    And especially don't make a full-time business out of breaking the law..

    It was once a crime to possess alcoholic beverages.

    1. Re:Who gets cheated? by tepples · · Score: 1

      What should people who want to develop video games to be played on TVs do instead of hacking a console?

    2. Re:Who gets cheated? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Was this guy developing his own games?

      No, but he might have been setting up consoles to play homemade games that someone else developed. Homemade games are only as "pirated" as Frozen Bubble.

  44. Simple Cause by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when lobbyists have more influence over laws than voters.

  45. Give examples please by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    the games a modified console could run may simply not be signed by the vendor

    Please provide a list of, preferably all, the games that are not signed by the vendor.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    1. Re:Give examples please by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Just for the Wii, we have SCUMM VM, OpenTyrian, Super Mario Wars, and countless other small games, GPL or other opensource licenses. Completely illegal to install due to the DMCA, but otherwise legal, using a reverse engineered library to access the 3D hardware and OS calls ;) I tried porting StarControl II but the load times were terrible and it had some sort of memory issues or something that made it crash after a few comms interactions, or after about 20 minutes of SuperMelee, so I gave up.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    2. Re:Give examples please by maxume · · Score: 1

      Is there some threshold below which the anti-circumvention provision of the DMCA makes sense?

      I'm comfortable simply taking the fact that companies insist on being gatekeepers into account when I make hardware purchases, but that doesn't make me any happier that congress enshrined it into law.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Give examples please by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      The exercise is to demonstrate an actual, legal use for the modifications. If there is no legal use for the modifications, then by making the modifications one is being an accessory to a crime before the fact.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:Give examples please by jhoger · · Score: 1

      It is quite popular to make homebrew games for consoles. Just, say, google for "homebrew wii games"

      Here's a

      Linux distro for the Wii:

      To run it, you would have to mod the console violating the DMCA.

      QED.

    5. Re:Give examples please by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I am not sure how that would play though.

      While that is a possible use, I am not sure it could be argued that it was a common use. And, all it would take would be for the prosecution to show that the one of the consoles was not used for that, or even that the consoles were used to play pirated games.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    6. Re:Give examples please by maxume · · Score: 1

      I disagree. The exercise is to first justify the law.

      Hardware would still be able to refuse to run unsigned binaries without the DMCA.

      Anyway, XBMC fits the bill.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:Give examples please by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Hardware would still be able to refuse to run unsigned binaries without the DMCA.

      But, there would be no penalty for removing that function with modification chips, ergo a law to prevent such modification.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    8. Re:Give examples please by maxume · · Score: 1

      What purpose does the penalty serve? You comment as if it is self evident that hardware companies should be able to enlist the government to enforce their business needs (the signing, law or not, serves the business need of giving the manufacturer significant control over most of the consoles, I doubt penetration for mod chips would be particularly higher if they were clearly legal).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Give examples please by gabebear · · Score: 1

      I think the best use-case for a modded console is provided by XBMC. It let your XBox1 play movies of almost any format. The XBox1 have 1080i component output and TOS link sound, it doesn't handle H264 movies well, but is an awesome player of SD content with a nice upscaler. The XBox1 v1 and v2 could be completely soft-modded(no soldering or extra components). The XBox Media kit was far less functional and cost $50.

      Another good use-case is making the PSP more usable. The spinning UMD optical drive was a poor design decision. Modified PSPs can run games off memory sticks which makes the hand-held much more robust and cuts load times to a fraction of what they were.

  46. Health and safety risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would guess that being locked up in a federal prison is a significant health and safety risk.Especially for a geek wiyhout the right connections to protect his a$$.

  47. Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wait until he tries to fix the air conditioning. /he can haz grappling hook gun too?

  48. Give me a break by brkello · · Score: 1

    If you are going to write a summary, write it non-biased. I really don't care what you find distrubing. If the guy gets 10 years, that is certainly excessive. But he wasn't doing this for himself, he was selling it to others for a profit. He should know better. And try to be a little honest. If you really believe that this would be used for anything other than piracy for the vast majority of cases, you have been drinking the Slashdot kool-aid too long.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    1. Re:Give me a break by Abuzar · · Score: 0

      If you are going to write a summary, write it non-biased. I really don't care what you find distrubing. If the guy gets 10 years, that is certainly excessive. But he wasn't doing this for himself, he was selling it to others for a profit. He should know better. And try to be a little honest. If you really believe that this would be used for anything other than piracy for the vast majority of cases, you have been drinking the Slashdot kool-aid too long.

      Uh, the summary says he was doing it for profit. I don't know how much more clear he could have been. Maybe you should've bothered to read the summary?

      There's no reason to assume it was done for piracy. Time and again we're seeing people wanting to use their gadgets without pathetic restrictions. Look at the whole online music trading conflict. On the one hand file traders are called pirates and thieves who are stealing from artists and they are relentlessly pursued by the music industry mafia. On the other hand, the music industry is cashing in on profits big time and itself is stealing from artists. This is a power struggle.

      It's true he is probably biased and so am I, but then again so are you. In addition, your IQ seems to be kind of low.

    2. Re:Give me a break by jhoger · · Score: 1

      I'm not a journalist, so I don't have an obligation to write an unbiased summary. I added my interpretation intentionally. If you want an alternative bias, just read TFA.

      Doing something that should be legal, in a country that loves liberty, for profit, doesn't make it more or less wrong.

  49. Let's waste more Taxpayer Dollars by gubers33 · · Score: 1

    We are in an economic depression, lets spend millions of dollars prosecuting pointless cases.

    --
    Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
  50. Next student'll get arrestd for pikin in his nose by alukin · · Score: 1

    Next time student will get arrested for picking in his nose. Imagine that some TinySoft will patent or copyright "nose content".
    Well, if someone modifies, actually "tunes" the car for money, it is OK. If someone "tunes" some electronic devise - it is crime! Ridiculous!!! Incredible!!!

    Guys, USA is very very strange country, isn't it? I am happy I live in Ukraine, fellows!

  51. Re:Not that disturbing by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    That would certainly be disturbing because I just had a nice man install just such a head unit in my car.

  52. Re:Not that disturbing by funkatron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't want to go to jail? Don't break criminal laws.

    You don't want people to break criminal laws? Don't write shit laws.

    --
    "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
  53. MOD UP by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1

    where are my points when I need them ?

    Those letting pass those treaties and laws are arsonists ; they intend to burn down big pokets of wild bush at once instead of getting dirty by doing a correct job with axes and chainsaws (ie, crafting good, reasonable laws with balance and exemptions clauses), but like fire itself, once the target has been burnt, the thing they created keeps on spreading by eating everything around, good crops and all.

  54. CIA,FBI,ICE,DHS,ATF,ETC by bogidu · · Score: 1

    Will someone please explain to me why something that took place on US soil and was presumably committed by a US citizen falls under the jurisdiction of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency to investigate?

  55. Pirate party? Probably not ..... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    This stuff is part of a much bigger issue ... govt. transitioning towards fascism. We're rapidly turning into a police state, under the guise of "keeping us safe from terrorist threats".

    The Pirate Party only focuses on one specific issue that interests them, so MANY people who fully agree with their stance still wouldn't take them seriously as a viable political party. (I expect a political candidate I elect to handle a myriad of issues thrown at them. As such, they better have a fairly comprehensive list explaining their positions on the topics. The Pirate Party, last I checked, really didn't even try to weigh in on topics like foreign relations and wars, economic strategies, taxes for small businesses, gun ownership rights, healthcare, public schools (and vouchers for students opting to attend a private school?), or even term-limits for politicians.)

    I'd suggest that if you want reform with these issues, you look for candidates advocating smaller government and less govt. control. A "lean" govt. that sticks to the basic, vs. a bloated one with a department for everything imaginable is FAR less likely to waste their time and money prosecuting nonsense like a guy making hardware mods to game systems for a living.

  56. democracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    democracy?

  57. What is next 10 years for loading linux?, 10 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is next 10 years for loading linux?, 10 years for using a non dell video card in a dell system when you can get the same card for $100 less at a on line store vs dell BTO, 10 years for not using apples over priced ram? If the people at pystar are not looking at 10 years why is this kid?

    What if you got 10 years for non using the car dealership to change your oil as the car has a light only they can turns off and they call it hacking if you trun it off or jiffy lube does it for you.

  58. No sense of balance by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ten years for hacking consoles? He should have stuck to arson and murder, he'd have gotten less than five.

    1. Re:No sense of balance by nomadic · · Score: 1

      In federal court? Are you serious? Violent crimes that make it to fed court tend to carry huge prison terms.

  59. Re:Not that disturbing by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    I would.

    If someone then tried to sell the car claiming the odometer had not been modified there would be a problem.

    Just as their would be if someone tried to sell an modded XBOX and claimed it hadn't been modified.

    But if the modification is disclosed why would I care?

    Yes it's illegal under the DMCA and hence not surprising, that doesn't mean people aren't "disturbed" when unjust laws are enforced.

    I'd be disturbed if someone was sent to jail for three months because they cheated on their wife in New York even though that's what the law says.

  60. Ridiculous by Aurisor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't comprehend how this should be a *criminal* offense.

    Really? This person is so dangerous we need to lock him in a metal cage for ten years?

    I agree if we allowed people to completely, freely, brazenly enable piracy on a commercial scale, there might be some damage to the production of video games that might hurt us all. Confiscate the guy's hardware, take his profits, and figure out how many consoles he sold, and fine him the cost of, say, two or three video games per console.

    Honestly, it's this kind of batshit-insane loss of all perspective that makes young people hate The Establishment so much. I swear, if prison times reflected actual *physical peril* that someone represents to society and fines represented *actual damages* (plus a slight disincentive (like 10%, not 10,000%)) the relationship between authority and youth in this country would be dramatically different.

    1. Re:Ridiculous by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      To business, losing any money is a criminal offense.

      Civil rigths come on second.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    2. Re:Ridiculous by ring-eldest · · Score: 1

      To business, losing any money is a criminal offense.

      To a business, losing money is the ONLY criminal offense.

      That's just the way it goes when you have an intersection of tort law and criminal law. These problems, if they're problems at all, should be problems that civil courts handle in an effort to root out damages. It's how things used to be before the DMCA and even though it was far from a perfect system it still made more sense. You can't rape a company. You can't violate a company's civil rights. The only damage you can do to a corporate entity is monetary in nature, and crimes against that company should be measured and prosecuted as such.

    3. Re:Ridiculous by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      Take away his profits? all he's doing is soldering a chip in a console with a few wires. That should be perfectly legal regardless of the intended use.

    4. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if it is a criminal offense isn't he still allowed a trial by jury if he requests it?

      If so I'm thinking a jury might acquit him for how ridiculous this is.

    5. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have to say 10% is extremely low (although things like the RIAA's 10,000% or more are just plain ridiculous). If there was only a "profit plus 10%" cost for breaking the law, it would simply become profitable to break the law against the risk of getting caught. Nearly anyone who wanted to make some quick money would do it.

      However, some people will just plain be criminals regardless of how steep the fine is while most people prefer to be law abiding, but could easily be tempted if penalties dropped to virtually nothing.

    6. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? This person is so dangerous we need to lock him in a metal cage for ten years?

      Based on the article...probably not. However, we're all getting our undies in a bunch over the maximum penalty he faces. What's the minimum or even average penalty? Probably not as sensationalistic or newsworthy I suspect. Although admittedly I had difficulty finding good numbers on actual DMCA conviction penalties.

      Honestly, it's this kind of batshit-insane loss of all perspective that makes young people hate The Establishment so much. I swear, if prison times reflected actual *physical peril* that someone represents to society and fines represented *actual damages* (plus a slight disincentive (like 10%, not 10,000%)) the relationship between authority and youth in this country would be dramatically different.

      Dude...read again your suggestion. You really think that *actual damages* plus 10% would really serve as sufficient deterrent to commit a crime? Plenty of people make the call that crime pays even when the penalties are much higher. To lower the bar seems like it would make that moral barrier that much easier to pass for those willing to break the law to make a buck...especially if you weigh the likelihood of getting caught.

      "Hmmm....I could make a few extra bucks selling counterfeit games. I know it's wrong but.."
      a) fine if caught is up to $250,000 and 5 years in jail ==> I might get away with it, but can't afford to get caught. Nope, keep slogging away in cubeville...besides it's the right thing to do.
      b) fine if caught is only damages plus 10% ....I don't plan on selling many and my odds of getting caught are fairly low....What the heck...my 401K investments were more risky than this. Sign me up!

    7. Re:Ridiculous by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      His lawyers will probably use that in his defense. When a prosecutor asks for too much the eighth amendment comes into question. Regardless, even if he does get convicted, I doubt they would give him ten years.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    8. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except that in the case of most crimes that result in jail time (other than the big ones like rape, murder) the jail time is meant to serve as a deterant to others than as a protection mechanism for society against the incarcerated person.

      The idea is not that we need to be protected from this guy for 10 years but that others will say "shit - 10 years - screw it, I'm not doing that anymore"

  61. The American Federal System by westlake · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And hundreds, if not thousands, of violent crime offenders go without jail time every week. I love a functining legal system.

    It functions as it was built to function.

    In the American federal system, violent crimes are traditionally prosecuted at the state and local level.

    The federal government has no general criminal jurisdiction outside of Washington D.C., its island territories, military bases, Indian reservations, and similiar enclaves.

    The Secret Service was orginally organized to fight counterfeiting - a purely economic crime with an interstate dimension. ICE is the criminal enforcement division of the customs and immigration service - and these are not guys you want to fool around with.

    Violent offenders who do enter the federal system get hammered. There is little willingness to plea bargain. When the judge says twenty-five years to life, you serve twenty-five years to life.
     

  62. Re:Once again the media completely misses the poin by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    What gets me is this... all many writers in mainstream outlets have to do to get an opinion on how ridiculous their tech writing is would be call up one of their solid I.T. guys at their organization.

    But the arrogance level of most reporters is way too high to admit that some tech guy (a job that holds a lowly place in their mind) might know more about this stuff then they do. They are way to self-absorbed to think that they might be getting it wrong. But they are actually good writers so they can put it into a piece and make it make sense therefore people without tech knowledge think it's legitimate white all the people with any tech knowledge are laughing their ass off behind their backs...

  63. Re:Once again the media completely misses the poin by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    shit! I guess I know why I'm not a copy editor now...

  64. Ars Technica dug up sources a year ago by grimJester · · Score: 4, Informative

    Link

    The 750k jobs is a dubious claim from 1986 about counterfeit goods. The $250 billion is a 1993 figure given for the worldwide market of, again, counterfeit goods.

    1. Re:Ars Technica dug up sources a year ago by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Link

      The 750k jobs is a dubious claim from 1986 about counterfeit goods. The $250 billion is a 1993 figure given for the worldwide market of, again, counterfeit goods.

      The assumption that every dollar spent worldwide on counterfeit goods is equivalent to a dollar simply thrown into the trash in the USA is mind blowing.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  65. So he's restoring security? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    But it seems because he is disabling a 'circumvention device' it is a criminal issue.

    He's disabling an anti-circumvention device. If he was disabling a circumvention device, he'd be restoring protection to a modded system.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:So he's restoring security? by achenaar · · Score: 1

      Damn you I was just about to bring that up.
      He's either applying a 'circumvention device' or disabling an 'anti-circumvention device'.
      Silly author.

  66. He's not a damn murderer by Binder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Besides the fact that this shouldn't be illegal...

    The most frightening part of this is that you can kill someone and get less jail time. How can this be seen as a greater threat to society than killing someone?

  67. Re:No sense of balance. Remember PGP? by alukin · · Score: 1

    Remember the case of PGP? Phil Zimmermann faced more then 15 years for just publishing in Internet source of his cryptography program, based on published in books algorithms.

  68. Reminds me of The Shawshank Redemption by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    As Time Robbins said in the flick "Yeah. The funny thing is - on the outside, I was an honest man, straight as an arrow. I had to come to prison to be a crook." I fear we'll be turning a whole generation into crooks for mild infractions.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Reminds me of The Shawshank Redemption by darthvader100 · · Score: 1

      Time Robbins? Is he a new actor? was he third prisoner from the left? was he the one who spoke when Tim Robbins mouth moved?
      Other funny names for him>>
      Tin Robins
      Tin Bobbins
      etc

  69. So which is it? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

    "Specifically, the college student is accused of modifying for personal financial gain technology affecting control or access to a copyrighted work, according to an ICE statement."

    Specifically, that's not very specific. Was he selling pirated games or modded consoles or possessing and not paying for pirated games or modding consoles? I'm assuming the former, but the article is a tad murky outside of the piracy = evil stance. If it is the former, than yeah, he broke the law and was selling non-taxed counterfeit goods, something that will send you to jail. I may not agree with that sentencing, but you don't screw with Mama Gov't and her bread and butter.

    If it is a latter, then this is entirely messed up, though I couldn't imagine a judge sending a 27 year old to prison for 10 years for two counts of stealing a game or ordering a mod chip. You know, cruel and unusual punishment and all. Maybe this will finally shine some light on the nuke-kills-ant mentality of the DMCA, though I seriously doubt that. I'm sure it will probably be used as another 'you act like children, we'll treat you like children' scenario.

  70. I find the stupid here disturbing by diamondsw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look, we all know that the DMCA is evil and has been repeatedly abused. This is not one of those cases. The guy was modding consoles for profit. You can go on and on all you like about homebrew, but *you* know, *I* know, and *everyone else* knows that's not why he was doing it. He was doing it so cheap bastards can play copied games. This has nothing to do with your rights. If there was no DMCA, he'd be gotten on other laws - this was just the most convenient one. He's a stupid-ass student criminal, plain and simple. Now, feel free to debate the severity of the sentence - that's legitimate. But defending him as some noble kid who got put down by "the man" just hurts our cause. Pick your battles, people.

    And also, stop putting out the crap of "why aren't they working the important cases?". Ever think that some officers/agents are assigned to different areas based on their expertise? And perhaps putting these cops on the homicide or gang squad isn't going to catch a killer or shut down a gang any faster? To put it in terms you'll understand, you don't want the guy who wrote Notepad working on the kernel. Just because you have resources spent on many tasks, does NOT mean that putting them all on a particular task will get that task done any sooner or better. I would have thought technical people would have understood resource allocation better, but the amount of stupid and kneejerk reaction around here really surprises me sometimes.

    Welcome to Slashdot. I must be old here...

    --
    I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    1. Re:I find the stupid here disturbing by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I have the skills and equipment to perform basically any modifications required. I don't mod consoles because of the legal liability.

      If I'm modding my own for [insert purpose], that's one story. I take the risk of bricking my console and losing $300. That's my choice.

      If I'm actively selling the service for cash to strangers, that's another thing altogether. That goes from "personal use" to "commercial purposes with direct financial gain".

      You could probably argue a grey area if you're doing it as a personal favour for a friend or family member, but it gets iffy if you're charging them cash.

      Playing off backups? Well, if you buy a lamp and knock it over, Wal-Mart doesn't owe you a new lamp.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:I find the stupid here disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's trying making and analogy out of it and see how it works, "Look, we all know that the DMCA is evil and has been repeatedly abused. This is not one of those cases. The guy was selling computers for profit. You can go on and on all you like about homebrew, but *you* know, *I* know, and *everyone else* knows that's not why he was doing it. He was doing it so cheap bastards can download music. This has nothing to do with your rights. If there was no DMCA, he'd be gotten on other laws - this was just the most convenient one. He's a stupid-ass student criminal, plain and simple. Now, feel free to debate the severity of the sentence - that's legitimate. But defending him as some noble kid who got put down by "the man" just hurts our cause. Pick your battles, people."

    3. Re:I find the stupid here disturbing by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

      >

      Playing off backups? Well, if you buy a lamp and knock it over, Wal-Mart doesn't owe you a new lamp.

      True. They also don't claim that you only paid for a license to use that lamp, and that you never actually owned it...

  71. Re:Not that disturbing by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    So, you solution to people breaking the law is to do away with the law. What an interesting suggestion. What laws should we do away with? Just the ones you don't like? Or should we include the ones I don't like as well?

    Of course, getting rid of the ones I don't like could very well be fatal to you.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  72. Consentual acts with consoles by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    You aren't buying material. You are paying for a license to use the material in a certain way.

    When you buy a game console, does the store have you sign some licensing document? No? Then the "you don't own, you're just licensing" theory is a steaming pile of horseshit.

    These game consoles are the rightful property of their owners, who can rightfully use them in an consensual act, including hiring someone to repair or modify them.

    Ah, but most of the consoles people care about these days haven't reached the age of consent...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
    1. Re:Consentual acts with consoles by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, but most of the consoles people care about these days haven't reached the age of consent...

      Nintendo is over a hundred years old.

    2. Re:Consentual acts with consoles by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, but most of the consoles people care about these days haven't reached the age of consent...

      Nintendo is over a hundred years old.

      Nintendo the company is. But the Gamecube is... what, eight? And the Wii is like two or three?

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    3. Re:Consentual acts with consoles by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      ...and her name is Sony.

    4. Re:Consentual acts with consoles by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Informative

      This thread is PedoBear approved!

    5. Re:Consentual acts with consoles by shervinemami · · Score: 1

      Ah, but most of the consoles people care about these days haven't reached the age of consent...

      Nintendo is over a hundred years old.

      Nintendo the company is. But the Gamecube is... what, eight? And the Wii is like two or three?

      Yes but the Super Nintendo is 19 :-)

    6. Re:Consentual acts with consoles by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Ah, but most of the consoles people care about these days haven't reached the age of consent...

      Nintendo is over a hundred years old.

      Nintendo the company is. But the Gamecube is... what, eight? And the Wii is like two or three?

      Yes but the Super Nintendo is 19 :-)

      Whoo! "Barely legal"!

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  73. They do charge you by the button press... by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    And Now they expect you to only lease hardware as well?

    Let's be honest here; they do charge you by the button press on your game pad if they can get away with it. With the way things are shaping up of late, I would be surprise if they aren't in another decade.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  74. We Didn't Listen! by Normal+Dan · · Score: 1

    We Didn't Listen!

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
  75. Re:Not that disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the fuck are we, the average americans, supposed to do fucking anything about the laws that are written? I vote. I don't believe voting does fuck all in this broken system, but it's all I have. Going to a protest will get me arrested. Posting on the internet will get me ignored. Writing a letter will get me an insincere and derogatory reply that lacks any consideration. There is NOBODY WHO WILL LISTEN.
     
    Why can't the rest of the world understand? Some of us are TRAPPED here having to deal with these unjust laws as an accident of birth. Many of us don't have the resources to leave. What are we supposed to do? How are we supposed to change the world around us?

  76. This is a scary future by shoutcast+hosting · · Score: 1

    I can see guys in vans stopping next to you at a stop light saying "pssst.... hey man you want to buy a hacked console?"

  77. Re:Once again the media completely misses the poin by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

    I think laziness and incompetence is the culprit here, less so than arrogance, although that may still play a part some of the time. The writer of that article probably thinks he understands the issue, and never bothered to check if he was getting something wrong.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  78. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  79. Re:Misread(feeding a troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who benefits from this?

    The MAFIAA.

    Who owns the media? Who tells you what to think every day, through almost every channel you get information from? Who owns the publishing industry?

    The Democrats.

    Who would put somebody in prison for ten years for this 'crime', but would never imprison a 'rabbi' who sexually tortures babies and sucks their penises?

    Citation needed.

  80. Heh, the EFF by lewp · · Score: 1

    Guess it's time to kick a few dollars over to the EFF

    Clearly that's doing a lot of good.

    --
    Game... blouses.
  81. Re:Once again the media completely misses the poin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the problem with counterfeiting anyway? If I can afford a Rolex, why shouldn't I just get a fake at a lower price and get some of the benefits? I'd only have a problem if a fake was fraudulently sold as the real deal.

  82. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  83. Re:Whoa, whoa -- mod parent up, dump original by amateur6 · · Score: 1

    he is alleged to have said "FASCISM should more properly be called corporatism, because it combines the power of the business sector with the power of the state".

    I knew that was wrong, but SO many people here may not... C'mon, Mods, get with the program!

  84. Selective enforcement and prosecution by TheLink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uh, they do that. There are thousands of laws. Many not enforced in practice.

    If they enforced them all, they might not even get out of their neighborhood. Might be a bit like Robocop when he was loaded with hundreds of directives :).

    According to the laws in Michigan, committing adultery would get you a life sentence. Seems the courts and prosecutors there are talking about repealing the relevant law. So that's selective prosecution as well.

    But you know, maybe one should take a poll of betrayed spouses (and maybe even their children) and ask them what their opinion on adultery is. Do they view it as less or more negative than being mugged at gunpoint? How about being beaten up (but resulting in no broken bones or major scarring)? I won't be surprised if many of them would get over being mugged at gunpoint far more easily.

    The average sentence for robbery in the 1st degree when armed with a deadly weapon (not necessarily a gun) appears to be 10 years.

    http://www.cga.ct.gov/2000/rpt/olr/htm/2000-r-0510.htm

    Of course one has to factor in that a robber could in theory more easily rob more people than a person could commit adultery with. Perhaps a robber is a danger to more people and thus should be put in jail for longer?

    --
    1. Re:Selective enforcement and prosecution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who has never been robbed at gunpoint.

    2. Re:Selective enforcement and prosecution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Spoken like someone who has never been robbed at gunpoint."

      As long as he doesn't bash you up, and it's nothing personal, what's the big deal? You lose your wallet and contents, and maybe you can't sleep for a few nights.

      Being robbed at "bankpoint" would hurt more- e.g. the banks go belly up due to greedy people taking risks with other people's money.

      How many people commit suicide because someone robbed them at gunpoint?
      How many commit suicide if their wife left them?
      How many, if they've lost most of their money?

  85. Welcome to the New World Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the New World Order! What? Did you think that nothing would change? Info wars dot com.

  86. Re:Not that disturbing by jhoger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously? Are there legitimate applications for modifying an odometer other than cheating people?

    There are legitimate reasons to jailbreak an iPhone, or a game console: running unsigned binaries on equipment you own.

    The government shouldn't take your liberty to protect a business model.

  87. Re:Not that disturbing by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    True. But it is usually an effort to cheat the game programmers/studios/publishers out of their work.

    Well then just like with an odometer alteration, where you have to show that fraud took place in order for it to be a crime, and the crime is fraud not odometer-diddling, here they should have to demonstrate that he actually made unauthorized copies of games, and then that would be the crime. Not modifying game consoles.

    But because we have a shit law in the DMCA, even if nobody was copying games illegally, it would still be a crime.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  88. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  89. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  90. This guy gives Makers a bad name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There is no piracy going on"

    This is laying it on a bit thick given that the number one reason to mod a console is to play pirated games. I'm sure Crippen will be performing his Claude Rains impression in court that he was shocked, shocked to find out his customers were coming to him to enable pirated game play. Plus this guy is not some hobbyist, he is doing it for profit. This guy is exactly the criminal Congress had in mind when they drafted the DMCA.

  91. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  92. But will the case law reflect this by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

    you mention a very important distinction. There is a huge difference between marketing the modding service to simply run unsigned code, even for legal uses (XBMC comes to mind), and telling people that his for-profit service will allow them to play pirated games. I wouldn't want to be him if the plaintiffs decide to call his customers to the stand and ask why they wanted their xboxes modded.

    To continue with the jailbroken iPhone analogy, there is a world of difference between jailbreaking with the intent of running SwirlyMMS or Winterboard, and jailbreaking to run Crackulus. The former are simply unsigned apps that Apple won't let me run. The latter is designed to simplify the pirating of official apps. The former are officialy distributed via Cydia directly from the writers, the latter is not. Pirating applications using crackulus is and should be illegal. Making jailbreaking illegal because of this is pointless, because iPhone app pirates are already committing an illegal act, thus adding another to the list isn't likely to dissuade them.

  93. Bad analogies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does modding a console pollute the environment or endanger the safety of other people?

    Those laws you refer to are actually for our safety. The DMCA is to safeguard corporate America's profits.

  94. Scare tactics 101 by cil1mia · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone here can explain this statement in the article because I just don't get it!

    "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers."

    "significant health and safety risks to consumers"??? You've gotta be frikin' kidding me!

    1. Re:Scare tactics 101 by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers."

      "significant health and safety risks to consumers"??? You've gotta be frikin' kidding me!

      He's probably using lead-based solder. That's been banned by the State of California as a known carcinogen.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  95. Re:Not that disturbing by funkatron · · Score: 1

    As a starting point I would suggest that "shit laws" would include any law making actions that are not harmful to others (or their property) illegal. I would think that this isn't a controversial choice. Preventing people from rewiring a computer that they own (or paying someone else to do it) would fit this definition nicely.

    --
    "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
  96. WiiBrew by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

    I'm curious if something like Wiibrew counts as circumvention. I used the Twilight Hack to install the Homebrew Channel. Mostly I use it for listening to my favorite radio station on the nice stereo in the living room. Though, I have downloaded some of the free applications from the website. I bought the Space Quest collection and play it under Dosbox* on the Wii on my TV. In the future, I might consider playing Gauntlet on it, though I might buy a used NES version to make myself feel better about it.

    Is that so wrong?
    -l

    * I tried the ScummVM port, but it was crashy. The only problem with Dosbox on Wii is the mouse emulation for the Wiimote.

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  97. Soft drink analogy by tepples · · Score: 1

    The problem there is that we all seem to have this sense of entitlement. Many people apparently don't consider it an option to simply do without these things.

    I can't think of a car analogy, so I'll think of a soft drink analogy. Imagine a market for cola in which 50 million people drink Pepsi and 50 million drink Coke. If a million Pepsi drinkers stop drinking cola, Pepsi's market share drops to 49.5 percent. But if instead a million Pepsi drinkers switch to Coke, Pepsi's market share drops further: to 49 percent. So letters to PepsiCo stating "I'm switching to Coke" would appear more effective than just stating "I'm not drinking Pepsi anymore".

    1. Re:Soft drink analogy by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      The problem there is that we all seem to have this sense of entitlement. Many people apparently don't consider it an option to simply do without these things.

      I can't think of a car analogy, so I'll think of a soft drink analogy. Imagine a market for cola in which 50 million people drink Pepsi and 50 million drink Coke. If a million Pepsi drinkers stop drinking cola, Pepsi's market share drops to 49.5 percent. But if instead a million Pepsi drinkers switch to Coke, Pepsi's market share drops further: to 49 percent. So letters to PepsiCo stating "I'm switching to Coke" would appear more effective than just stating "I'm not drinking Pepsi anymore".

      Yes, that's true...

      But if there were no alternative to drinking Coke, then writing to Coke and saying "I would boycott you, except that I haven't found an alternative to your product yet" does no good. All it does is tell them that they have you over a barrel.

      So saying that one can't boycott Nintendo 'cause there's no equivalent alternatives to Smash Bros. or Mario Party isn't quite true. One can boycott Nintendo - they just have to be willing to accept the price of doing so.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    2. Re:Soft drink analogy by tepples · · Score: 1

      So saying that one can't boycott Nintendo 'cause there's no equivalent alternatives to Smash Bros. or Mario Party isn't quite true.

      I wasn't saying it was true. I was asking other Slashdot readers whether one existed. The kind of answer I was looking for is "They exist, and they're called A, B, and C" or "They don exits, and here's why publishers don't deem it worthwhile to make one".

    3. Re:Soft drink analogy by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      So saying that one can't boycott Nintendo 'cause there's no equivalent alternatives to Smash Bros. or Mario Party isn't quite true.

      I wasn't saying it was true. I was asking other Slashdot readers whether one existed. The kind of answer I was looking for is "They exist, and they're called A, B, and C" or "They don exits, and here's why publishers don't deem it worthwhile to make one".

      You were suggesting that the answer to that question had some bearing on whether it was possible to boycott Nintendo...

      My point is simply that if that is the case, then Nintendo basically already owns your ass.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  98. One more reason not to buy a DRMBOX or Rootkit3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, its hard enough to justify buying such crippled hardware in the first place. Now the evil capitalist pigs are going after people who want to use their hardware as a multi-function device?

    This nation (and California) have sold out to the entertainment industry. They produce a bunch of brainless drones who have no real technical knowledge (except for clicking buttons). God forbid someone actually learn how to get more out of a device they *paid for* and *own*.

    I do wish the game industry would crash again (as it did in the "80s. The publishers have no respect for the customers. I do everything I can do drive the game business down. I only buy used, older titles. :)

  99. um yeah... by sbeckstead · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    could lose 10 years of his freedom for providing the service of altering hardware.
    Yeah he could lose 10 years of his life because he lost the gamble that he wouldn't be prosecuted for something he probably knew was illegal.
    I don't understand the righteous indignation of law breakers caught breaking the law.
    And before the anti-dmca idiots can say so, we live in a state that is governed by the rule of law.
    Don't like the law? Then change it by any legal means available to you. But please quit bitching when someone gets arrested for breaking it.
    Set up a fund for this guy's legal defense and try to take it to the supreme court but please enough with the crap.

    1. Re:um yeah... by Daryen · · Score: 1

      Don't like the law? Then change it by any legal means available to you. But please quit bitching when someone gets arrested for breaking it.

      How do you think laws get changed? Magic? A bunch of people discuss them (like we're doing here), and then get angry (like some of us are doing here), then work together to get them changed (like the EFF and other organizations are doing).

    2. Re:um yeah... by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Over 40% of the blacks are at risk of being arrested and prosecuted for crimes they did not do and the AG knows they did NOT break the law.
      Are you supporting racist policy?

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    3. Re:um yeah... by russotto · · Score: 1

      How do you think laws get changed?

      A bunch of lobbyists suggest their changes to legislators. Money appears in the legislator's re-election campaign fund, while the legislator finds himself able to take free vacations to exotic locales. Legislators pass legislation into law.

    4. Re:um yeah... by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      whooosh, left field much?

    5. Re:um yeah... by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Ahhh..
      U suggest that if i, the common man, doesn't like the law, i can get it changed at will.
      Are u even from this country? From this planet?
      How many times has congress actually listened to voters to pass a law the voters wanted or block a law the voters protested against? Or even repealed one? Care to remember or recall?
      How many times has congress kowtowed to Pressure Groups, Lobbyists to do the same? I can recall many, but the TARP seems to be the most recent one.
      When the law criminalizes 90% of the normal activity i do as a person, like backing up my music, using a song i like & bought as a ringtone, bringing my DVD to my friend's home to watch it there, crack an encryption because the company has gone bankrupt, what is there to law?
      The law taxed Tea. We had Tea Party at Boston.
      When the majority in a democracy hate a law and the congress critters refuse to listen to the majority but instead bow down to money, why should we obey it? Because corporate profits take a hit?
      Tell me.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    6. Re:um yeah... by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Well at least you got back to the infield. Ok you obviously don't realize exactly how much power the common people have. If you can find the rest of the people that feel like you do, they each have a small amount of money, but when you put it together they have a ton of money. Now take that money and buy a senator or two. Go for the small state guys first cause they don't have that big a base to draw campaign funds from so they are relatively cheap. Buy a bunch of those and keep raising money, and you can get a large state senator or two. This is what the lobbyists are doing now. It's why the small state senators look so far out of it cause they keep getting bought up by the fringes. Become a bigger fringe than the birthers and you too can change laws.

    7. Re:um yeah... by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      We Did.
      We got ourselves the highest post in the land: President Obama.
      His campaign was funded on an overwhelming majority by the $10, $20 donated by people like you.
      Which is why he is butting his head against the Medical Monopoly and getting the congress to pass a Govt. funded single-payer health care that forces Aetna, Cigna and Blue Cross to improve their patient satisfaction rate instead of profits.
      Your advice is sound, and excellent. Am Sorry for my earlier outburst.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    8. Re:um yeah... by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Now you're talking. Thanks and no problem.

    9. Re:um yeah... by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Oh but what is on the table is not single payer. But it is good competition for the Insurance companies. Too many people and probably rightly so do not want a single payer system but it will come. Small steps, small steps.

    10. Re:um yeah... by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      True. It is not single-payer 100%, but a a Govt. run healthcare company on the lines of NHS would definitely provide hard competition to the Aetnas and Cignas so much that they would have to improve.
      But, sigh.. knowing how corrupt congress is, after 2016, they would pass a law effectively limiting the same Govt. company after Obama retires.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  100. Consumers union? by tepples · · Score: 1

    The 'corporations' referenced by corporatism does include business groups, but also includes trade unions and guilds, military organizations, religious groups, farming lobbies, etc...

    So Mussolini's conception of corporatism involves rule by unions. In that case, is there a place for a consumers' union?

  101. Console Modding, the DMCA, and you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In case anyone is curious about the legal side of this issue, 17 USC Â 1201 (The anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA) states:

    (2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that -

    ( A ) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;

    ( B ) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title; or

    ( C ) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.

    (3) As used in this subsection -

    ( A ) to "circumvent a technological measure" means to descramble a scrambled work, to decrypt an encrypted work, or otherwise to avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair a technological measure, without the authority of the copyright owner; and

    ( B ) a technological measure "effectively controls access to a work" if the measure, in the ordinary course of its operation, requires the application of information, or a process or a treatment, with the authority of the copyright owner, to gain access to the work.

    So yes, it is definitely a legal grey area. Basically, it is illegal to sell/make modchips and provide modification servcies in the United States IF their primary and only real purpose is to get around a copy protection measure.

    Console modification has the primary purpose of enabling the play of legal imported games and fair use backups, as well as enable the use of homebrew code that GREATLY expands the capabilities of the system (a perfect example of this is Xbox Media Center for the original xbox) and thus isn't just about bypassing a copy protection measure to enable piracy. In fact, if you have an original xbox and your hard drive dies, the only way to replace it is with a chip or with a TSOP flash, as the stock bios doesn't recognize non-locked hard drives (and the drives don't just have to be locked, they need to be locked with the key stored on the onboard eeprom). A modchip/tsop flash with a modified bios lets you bypass all that nonsense and just use any standard IDE/ATA hard drive with the system.>
    The DMCA is a seriously terrible law to begin with. It fundamentally changes the way traditional copyright has always worked, and violates consumer rights in the name of helping big business. To quote one of my law textbooks on it:

    The DMCA changes the traditional fair use doctrine of copyright law. Historically, it has never been a crime to access or make a copy of a copyrighted work; what has been a crime is the misuse of that information. This rule remains valid for the nondigital world of copyrighted works. The DMCA changes this rule for digital protected works, making it illegal to merely access the copyrighted material by breaking through the digital wrapper or encryption technology that protects the work.

    As a side note, nowhere does the DMCA say it is illegal to USE or BUY modchips, just to make and sell them. So that leaves the end user (you) in the clear so long as they're not using it for piracy.

    The sellers and makers of "anti-circumvention" devices and services on the other hand seem to be where the law is aimed at, and while I honestly don't believe the DMCA applies to chips and modding servcies, apparently the US government and the gaming industry disagree.

    The only precedent for chip sales and the DMCA I could find was a September, 2006 case in which Sony sued Divineo (SCEA vs Divineo Inc, et al(457 F. Supp. 2d 957; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74878; 81 U.

  102. Exact Quote by forand · · Score: 1

    "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
    from:
    http://thinkexist.com/quotation/fascism_should_more_appropriately_be_called/163211.html

  103. Re:Not that disturbing by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Unless, of course, the re-wiring job resulted in overheat and a fire killing people. But, that is just crazy talk, right?

    Here, let me make your post more clear:

    Yes, I think only the laws I don't like should be repealed, because I know so much more than everyone else. It shouldn't matter that I am a self-serving asshole.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  104. Poor atribution info by forand · · Score: 1

    It appeared in a translation of Mussolini's work Enciclopedia Italiana. More here:
    http://www.publiceye.org/fascist/corporatism.html

  105. It's all about perception by devleopard · · Score: 1

    We question the ethics of the arresting officials, but we understand the issues. Do we honestly think whoever processed this warrant comprehends what it means to "hack" a console? That sounds evil and nefarious. Compare it to if someone said your car was boosted - that could mean it was stolen or that you put a new turbo in it. Yet we blissfully embrace ignorance, choosing to perpetuate these loaded terms. Not only the popular media, but Slashdot too apparently. (Console "modding" carries with it a much different perception.)

    --
    The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
  106. Did I violate the law when I installed Linux? by mmell · · Score: 1
    I mean, I really did affect the fundamental operations of my computer, removing a great many security-related programs written by MicroSoft as part of their Windows operating system when I installed Linux (no dual-booting here!).

    For bonus points, when I blew away "PC Angel"'s hidden partition full of restore data, was that a violation of the DMCA? How 'bout when I changed the BIOS passwords? When I flashed my firmware?

    Next they'll arrest me for installing (or even just having an executable copy of) nmap.

    1. Re:Did I violate the law when I installed Linux? by Satanboy · · Score: 1

      careful now. . .

      You should have posted this under AC, you might just have federal agents at your door!

    2. Re:Did I violate the law when I installed Linux? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Next they'll arrest me for installing (or even just having an executable copy of) nmap.

      I believe this is already the case in Germany, herr friend.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  107. Well, his life is basically over by adewolf · · Score: 1

    His involvement will follow him forever, conviction or not. Basically, his life is over.

    --
    "The Brady Bunch is back...working homicide"
  108. And as usual... by mea37 · · Score: 1

    when we don't like a law, a violation is described in the most vauge terms possible so as to make it sound even more inane than it really is.

    I don't believe the DMCA anti-circumvention clause is a good law. I'm also disinclined to believe that this guy's clients were on the up-and-up, though I'd have a hard time finding evidence that meets the criminal standard of proof to convince me one way or the other. As it stands, the criminal law doesn't hinge on that quesiton, though.

    Regardless of my personal view of the law, what I really want to rant about at the moment, is this ridiculous description of the act in question - he just modified some hardware! Gee, O.J. Simpson probably just flailed his arms around a bit, and he was found liable for wrongful deaths. Bernie Madhoff just provided a financial service, and look what happened to him!

    The details and the context are everything. Don't discredit those who oppose the current law by misrepresenting what the law addresses.

  109. I love how people here take his side..but by spicyed · · Score: 1

    I love how people here take his side..but he was SELLING his service of circumventing disk protection. If he was not selling the service I would have supported him too. I would still say no more then 6 months jail time and maybe a stiffer fine however...

  110. California Student Arrested For Console Hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whine about it all you want. Want some real action?
    Vote with your wallet, stop buying stuff that has ridiculous strings attached to it.

    Mandatory term limits! Clean out ALL the incumbents in congress in 2010!

  111. Is it real ? by idhx · · Score: 1

    You know, with cases like this, I sometimes wonder : do these people facing incredible charges - thinking also of that woman who had to pay quadrizillions for downloading one album on bittorrent - actually exist, or are they faked just to scare people ?

  112. Re:Not that disturbing by funkatron · · Score: 1

    I was trying to suggest laws that ban actions that have no effect on anyone else (I admit that phrasing it as harm rather than effect was probably a mistake). I thought it would be uncontroversial because people can't really have too many objections to things that don't harm (or affect to use the better phrasing) them.

    Unless, of course, the re-wiring job resulted in overheat and a fire killing people. But, that is just crazy talk, right?

    Failure to do things safely can affect others and wouldn't fit into the suggested criteria for shit laws.

    self-serving asshole.

    Who else would I serve?

    --
    "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
  113. The Third Key by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue

    There are now three keys to the Constitution:

    1. Child abuse
    2. Terrorism
    3. The economy
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:The Third Key by operagost · · Score: 0

      4. Health care

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:The Third Key by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      4. Health care

      Not quite yet. When it makes the list, it'll be "4. Biohazards" and coincide with the next big plague.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  114. Console Modding, the DMCA and You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In case anyone is curious about the legal side of this issue, 17 USC (s) 1201 (The anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA) states:

    (2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that -

    ( A ) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;

    ( B ) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title; or

    ( C ) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.

    (3) As used in this subsection -

    ( A ) to "circumvent a technological measure" means to descramble a scrambled work, to decrypt an encrypted work, or otherwise to avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair a technological measure, without the authority of the copyright owner; and

    ( B ) a technological measure "effectively controls access to a work" if the measure, in the ordinary course of its operation, requires the application of information, or a process or a treatment, with the authority of the copyright owner, to gain access to the work.

    So yes, it is definitely a legal grey area. Basically, it is illegal to sell/make modchips and provide modification servcies in the United States IF their primary and only real purpose is to get around a copy protection measure.

    Console modification has the primary purpose of enabling the play of legal imported games and fair use backups, as well as enable the use of homebrew code that GREATLY expands the capabilities of the system (a perfect example of this is Xbox Media Center for the original xbox) and thus isn't just about bypassing a copy protection measure to enable piracy. In fact, if you have an original xbox and your hard drive dies, the only way to replace it is with a chip or with a TSOP flash, as the stock bios doesn't recognize non-locked hard drives (and the drives don't just have to be locked, they need to be locked with the key stored on the onboard eeprom). A modchip/tsop flash with a modified bios lets you bypass all that nonsense and just use any standard IDE/ATA hard drive with the system.>
    The DMCA is a seriously terrible law to begin with. It fundamentally changes the way traditional copyright has always worked, and violates consumer rights in the name of helping big business. To quote one of my law textbooks on it:

    The DMCA changes the traditional fair use doctrine of copyright law. Historically, it has never been a crime to access or make a copy of a copyrighted work; what has been a crime is the misuse of that information. This rule remains valid for the nondigital world of copyrighted works. The DMCA changes this rule for digital protected works, making it illegal to merely access the copyrighted material by breaking through the digital wrapper or encryption technology that protects the work.

    As a side note, nowhere does the DMCA say it is illegal to USE or BUY modchips, just to make and sell them. So that leaves the end user (you) in the clear so long as they're not using it for piracy.

    The sellers and makers of "anti-circumvention" devices and services on the other hand seem to be where the law is aimed at, and while I honestly don't believe the DMCA applies to chips and modding servcies, apparently the US government and the gaming industry disagree.

    The only precedent for chip sales and the DMCA I could find was a September, 2006 case in which Sony sued Divineo (SCEA vs Divineo Inc, et al(457 F. Supp. 2d 957; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74878; 81 U.S.P

    1. Re:Console Modding, the DMCA and You by hesiod · · Score: 1

      So yes, it is definitely a legal grey area.

      While I agree the law is wrong, I don't think it's so "grey" in this case.

      In referring to your bolded sections of text, this guy was "offer[ing] to the public [a...] service" that meets sections 2A and 2C perfectly. The only part I can see questioned there is 2B, as it may have a "commercially significant purpose" in allowing homebrew games to be played, as you stated further down (when referring to a modchip's primary purpose). However, the protection method disallows the unsigned games from being played, so even if that was the only intended purpose, it still circumvents "a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work", assuming the "work" is the device itself.

    2. Re:Console Modding, the DMCA and You by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      (B) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;

      This wording is indeed telling. This, AFAICT, precludes a defence that the modification was to enable home-brew software. Home-brew software does not make money, the usual measure for commercial significance, and therefore is not "commercially significant" as another purpose for the modification. Playing an import game is commercially significant to the US rights holder, but only in the negative sense that they consider to be in breach. An import game is one where the takings have gone to a foreign entity. This clause is heavily stacked: if the US rights holder isn't the one making a buck then the modification is in violation of this clause.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    3. Re:Console Modding, the DMCA and You by Atiniir · · Score: 1

      As someone who despises things that can be considered 'defective by design', I'd just like to point out that you don't actually need a chip or TSOP flash to swap hard drives in the original xbox - one can format and lock a replacement drive using the original drive's key rather easily. I put a 120 gig hard drive in my old xbox years ago to use it as a media center with XBMC, and I'd only soft-modded the thing using the MechAssault exploit.

    4. Re:Console Modding, the DMCA and You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very interesting post. I read the entire thing and, I'm sorry, had to be a massive pedant and point out that in your last paragraph you wrote "looses" instead of "loses". We need to stop this here and now - it's getting out of hand...

    5. Re:Console Modding, the DMCA and You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed correct; you can replace your HDD with just a softmod... While that's nice for normal hard drive upgrades, a softmod wont do you any good if your hard drive dies on you and you have no way of loading said softmod ;-) (Hence why I said chip/TSOP flash.. though really only a chip is a viable solution if your hdd dies as you don't have any way to flash the TSOP with a dead hdd either)

    6. Re:Console Modding, the DMCA and You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, sorry about that.. In the last paragraph 'manufactures' should be manufacturer's too. In addition, the whole post is all over the map.

      I also found an additional case, Sony Computer Entm't Am., Inc. v. Filipiak, 406 F. Supp. 2d 1068 (N.D. Cal. 2005). Steven Filipiak ran a modding business out of California (the-console-corner), was really stupid and continued to sell chips after signing an agreement saying he would cease and desist, and lost his case. Sony was awarded over $6m in damages.

      Does anyone know of any other cases that set precedent?

      Also, if anyone is still reading this, does anyone have any comments on the constitutionality of the DMCA? (namely, under the 'copyright clause': "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries")

      One example of how the dmca may violate the constitution is that it effectively puts unlimited protections on copyrighted works; even after the typical "limited times" have expired would still be illegal under the dmca to circumvent a copy protection measure to access the work. Also, whether or not the dmca "Promote[s] the progress of Science and useful Arts" is certainly up for debate. While on the one hand it does offer some incentive for inventors and content creators to produce and release their works, it also is imho a huge hindrance to many forms of progress, including, as an example, interoperability. Thoughts?

  115. Good for the Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He broke the law, he should take the punishment. There is no way he didn't know that what he was doing was against the law. Yet he did it anyway. Even if the law is completely ridiculous, it can still be enforced. Take responsibility for your actions.

    As a side note:

    IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE LAW, GET IT CHANGED! Write to your representatives. Sue the companies. Start a campaign to get the law changed. If enough people stand up and demand change, it can happen. It is your right and responsibility, as an American, to raise your voice if you feel you are being treated wrongly by your government.

    Otherwise, leave the country. Emigrate to a different country. Maybe you'll like their laws better.

    *but I doubt it*

  116. Godwin's Law? by tj111 · · Score: 1

    Does this count as Godwin's Law?

  117. Re:Not that disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you could buy a modded Xbox/PS3/Wii at BestBuy, would you even consider the non-modded version?

    Would you ever pay money for another game?

    Yes. Buying a game is a vote with my dollars for more games / sequels from that company. (For the same reason, I buy games either near release or used.) Piracy has been nearly trivial on pretty much every console ever. No one buys games because piracy is too hard.

  118. Health and Safety? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

    "Piracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers"

    Ok, WTF? If I use a mod chipped console then how will that effect my "health and safety"? It seems like whenever the government wants to pull the wool over citizens eyes for ulterior motives they tell us that whatever they are doing is for our own "health and safety". No doubt the MAFIAA would like to have Joe Sixpack believe that using mod chips causes blindness, brain cancer and impotence but why should the public money be spent tracking down console modders? If the MAFIAA wants to bust these guys then they should foot the bill, not the much beleagured American taxpayer who is already reeling from the prospect of paying for ever increasing bailout deficits and a US Government take-over of the health care system.

  119. Jury Nullification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really are outraged about how the legal system is working and how the law has progressed than you need to do something about it. One easy way is learn about Jury Nullification and tell your friends about. It only takes one person in twelve understanding the power available to them by this concept to stop this kind of prosecution.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification

  120. Re:Misread... Fortunately, he's not a by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Player HATER.... doh!

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  121. Oh well. by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

    This is bullshit, but it's one person who made himself obvious. As much as I'd love to see these awful laws overturned, it's easier to make breaking them a natural habit for everyone so that one day the laws will be forgotten to all but the most pragmatic.

    Of course, that won't actually work, because we all know that Orwell was right and the government is destined to have the all-seeing eye and will eventually have the resources to pacify every thought-criminal. Instead we should focus on la revolution.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  122. It's Illegal! by itwasgreektome · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This guy was hacking systems, to make money for himself, so that people could allow their systems to read pirated games, because they are thiefs and don't want to pay people who worked hard to create the games. No ifs ands or butts about it. If you wrote a book, and someone went out and copied all those books and sold them and reaped the profit for it when they did jack sh*t, don't you think that would be illegal? What you are going to say is that this is a bad analogy, because the guy wasn't copying games. But he was allowing the systems to play copied games, without which the people copying games would have no job. And he is therefore an accomplice. And should be punished. Pot smokers support drug dealers supports the drug trade which results in countless deaths and costs each year. The drug user is just as guilty in creating the drug trade. This guy is just as guilty in the piracy. Boo Hoo.

  123. America is becoming idiocracy by jmickle · · Score: 1

    I can really go for a starbux right now but i dont think we have time for a gentleman's late........ only in america can a man be prisoned for for interupting someone from watching ouch my balls!

  124. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  125. personal fair use vs. personal financial gain by lophophore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are legitimate reasons why you may wish to "circumvent" the copy-protection on your game console. For instance, suppose you have a XBox, and you want to run the XBox Media Center (xmbc.org) on it. Guess what! The XBox won't run unsigned code. XBMC is not signed. The only way to run XBMC (the "award winning free and open source software") on the XBox (which you **own**) is to either install a modchip, or use a "softmod" -- both of which actually do "circumvent" the copy-protection scheme in the XBox. A Federal Crime. That's a sad state of affairs, and why the DMCA is bad.

    Modding your console for your own personal use to run F/OSS software (or something else) is not going to attract the attention of the feds.

    Running a business (that's the "for personal financial gain" in the complaint) modifying game consoles so people can run bootleg (or other stolen) games -- well, that is criminal behavior. This guy had it coming to him.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  126. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  127. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  128. We have DMCA because YOU did not vote against it by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    I admit I'm probably over-generalizing "you." Maybe a tiny handful of you, Slashdot users, actually did. But most of you voted for keeping DMCA. I did too. I hate DMCA, but when I was in the booth, for all seats in Congress in all the time since DMCA became law, I voted exclusively for Democrat and Republican candidates. No one else was running, in my state. Presidents have been the only positions where I've voted against the worst of the bad guys, and I'm not even sure my presidential candidates actually favored repealing DMCA. I don't remember them talking about that particular law.

    Name a candidate for any office, legislative or executive, that ran on repealing DMCA. If you can name one, then: did you vote for him? Three presidents and hundreds of congressmen can't be wrong, especially when the voters continually say they are right.

    If we want government to not be evil, then we need some serious candidates for government. Who is willing to actually step up and run on a non-evil platform?

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  129. Media consolidation led to massive cuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish mainstream news outlets would hire people to do research and write informed articles, because the alternative seems to be just parroting whatever the alphabet soup of government agencies tells them about the issue.

    This is exactly what happens. A significant proportion, even a majority of newspaper articles are touched-up PR pieces.

    What is important to understand is why. It is not because journalists are lazy or corrupt. But there have been huge cuts to staff over the past couple of decades as media companies became larger and more concentrated. The news business has become part of the entertainment business, and is expected to generate similar profits. Just as TV networks produce cheap reality TV instead of expensive dramas, news organizations are forced to to more with less. Local news has been cut, foreign offices have been cut, and expertise has been cut.

    PR people take advantage of this. They send journalists nice, neat summaries of issues. If you're a journalist who needs to file a certain quantity of content in a short time-frame, this helps you do your job. Journalists use the PR materials because they need to in order to keep their jobs.

    The whole system sucks. It's broken. But it doesn't do much good to blame the folks writing the articles. I have been interviewed several times about copyright. The journalists impressed me. They were thoughtful, intelligent people who wanted to understand. But they didn't have much time.

    Those of us in the copyfight need to do the same thing the PR flacks from Big Content do. We need to make the journalists' jobs easier. Give them the press releases, the summary sheets at relevant times and events, point them to concise resources. Make it easy for them to report accurately, and many of them will.

  130. Re:Not that disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless, of course, the re-wiring job resulted in overheat and a fire killing people. But, that is just crazy talk, right?

    What part of "harmful to others" did you not understand, fuckwit?

  131. Where does the money go? by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

    "Industry and trade associations estimate that counterfeiting and piracy now cost the U.S. economy as much as $250 billion a year and a total of 750,000 American jobs."

    Where is this money going?!? Are pirates burning the money or something? I cannot understand how this money disappears.

    To me it would seem that this actually introduces money to the economy. This guy hacks consoles for a fee, thus creating "money." Since there is a monetary transaction, this is good for the economy, at least in the short run. But why are people paying this student for his services? To save money that they would have otherwise spent on games!

    What's happening to that money that they have saved? That must be the money that the pirates are burning, since it isn't going back into the economy, that is, if we are to believe the "Industry and trade associations." In reality, that money is either being spent or saved. If these console hacker customers are spending the money, then the economy benefits in the short run, and, indirectly, the long run. If it is saved, it should still benefit the economy in the long run, as it makes more money available for loans, which would then be used to make business more efficient, allowing for job creation, or just spent outright on a house or car or something.

    So how is this piracy costing the economy jobs? I just donâ(TM)t get it. I get that this is costing the âoeindustry and trade associationsâ money, and thus costing money to all those who are along the supply lines of the video games, but really, this money is just being spent elsewhere, not disappearing.

    Now donâ(TM)t get me wrong. I think that this guy deserves to be punished. He broke the law and should be punished. I do not agree with piracy and understand the harm that it does to the creative process. Less money for video game makers means worse games, etc. I just hate this specific argument.

    --
    But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
  132. This "kid" is 27 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm dissappointed at the comments on this website. It seems very few of you read the source article that this originated from. The "kid" is 27 years old and is altering the consoles for PROFIT. There is a line in this little piracy game that you cannot cross without putting yourself at risk of breaking some laws and landing yourself in prison. That line is distribution.
    I am capable of learning how to mod consoles and profit from it because it is illegal and hurts our country. He is not paying taxes on his income, causing hundreds if not thousands of video games not to be sold, causing a loss of revenue to businesses that in turn takes jobs away from people like me.
    Do you remember the Minnesota woman who was fined 1.9 million for downloading 24 songs? That is false, She was distributing them. Anyone who is arrested for distributing is a moron. If you are capable of doing what he is, then keep it to yourself and friends. It will then not result in an investigation that lands you in prison. Why should any of you be on his side? What he is doing hurts you!

    1. Re:This "kid" is 27 by ziggy_az · · Score: 1

      What he's doing does not hurt me. What does hurt me/us/the whole country is when a vendor welds their device closed so that it cannot be modified by the rightful owner *or their agent*. He has the wrong approach. IMO, if the product is locked down so that I don't have the rights to do whatever the hell I want with it, I'd rather not buy it.

      --
      "Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup."
  133. DMCA Abuse by ViViDboarder · · Score: 1

    This is just so outrageous. This was from the article from an ICE agent âoePiracy, counterfeiting and other intellectual property rights violations not only cost U.S. businesses jobs and billions of dollars a year in lost revenue, they can also pose significant health and safety risks to consumers,â he said. What? There are LOTS of reasons to mod a system that do not cost any jobs, any loss in revenue or any health and safety risks to customers. To backup a copy of a game I bought, I shouldn't have to buy it again. To create homebrew software to run on a system (It's just a computer in a fancy case) I shouldn't have to open a huge development studio, to learn about how circuits work and possibly be the guy who develops the next gen system, you shouldn't have to go to jail. The DMCA has been twisted in to all kinds of garbage. Its original purpose is good and all, to prevent people from illegally distributing digital goods, but the things it's been used against customers is appalling. I'm already boycotting the RIAA, Microsoft Xbox, Nintendo and Sony will follow.

  134. Re:Not that disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think the laws are shit? Vote for decent politicians. Harrass the reps that are voted in with letters and phone calls. Yeah I didn't think so.

    You could also go make your own country.

  135. ZOMG ... THINK OF THE CHILDREN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Counterfeiting and piracy have grown in recent years in both magnitude and complexity, according to ICE. Industry and trade associations estimate that counterfeiting and piracy now cost the U.S. economy as much as $250 billion a year and a total of 750,000 American jobs."

    He altered the consoles, he as far as the report says, was not copying games or selling pirated versions of games.
    You can have chips in cars replaced to remove RPM limiters, You can't then blame the person who installed it if the owner THEN breaks the law.
    But throw up a smoke screen of he's a pirate, and everyone wants him to burn.

    Counterfeiting and piracy are bad things, these people do it with the motivation of making money.
    Little Joey down the street who downloads a song to see if an album is worth buying, should never be thought of in this category, but all consumers are thought of as thieves now.

    $250 Billion - are these numbers backed by actual hard facts, or just parroting the special math allowed to big IP owners?
    750,000 jobs - thankfully these people were purged so that the execs could keep their bonuses, they are to big to fail after all. So what if they keep technology and innovation out of the marketplace, their dinosaur business model must survive!

    Want to do something shitty? Blame it all on piracy.

  136. Is giving money to the EFF the best action? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    "Guess it's time to kick a few dollars over to the EFF."

    I don't know how effective the EFF is at lobbying, but perhaps it would be more efficient to contact your congressional representatives who have the actual power to vote on these matters.

  137. Oh Snap by Tofuik · · Score: 1

    I guess its time for me to destroy all evidence of my modded xbox. I can hear the feds coming now.

  138. What are you going to do about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A thousand people saying "this is wrong". That's the easy part. The question is, What Are You Going To Do About It???

  139. Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. It is not clear whether he received pay on his suspension date. The pay he received was part of the time due to the investigation, when he was placed on leave.
    2. He did not run down the child. He (merely) struck the child. In other words, there was no pursuit, no intention to hit the child. This was manslaughter not murder in the first/second.
    3. He's still subject to other punishment, and probably a civil case soon.
    4. Yes, 10 years would still be an insane amount of time for what equates to money lost on the order of a few thousand dollars by his clients. But I strongly doubt that he'd get the ten years. Remember: this is a maximum penalty, not a minimum.

  140. He needs to seek political asylum immediately by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    by jumping into Chinese, Russian, Mexican, or Swedish embassy where these countries respect IP laws.

  141. Re:We have DMCA because YOU did not vote against i by russotto · · Score: 1

    I hate DMCA, but when I was in the booth, for all seats in Congress in all the time since DMCA became law, I voted exclusively for Democrat and Republican candidates. No one else was running, in my state.

    It's rather silly to blame yourself for not voting against the DMCA when you literally did not have the option.

  142. Re:Not that disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is modifying a console an attempt to cheat someone?

  143. Logic and reasoning, folks. Either will do. by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

    The Nuremberg defendants were charged with crimes against humanity - and, and among the specific changes, the crime of institutionalized murder on an industrial scale. That is why the defense of "just following orders" does not work. They were the ones giving the orders.

    (Emphasis mine).

    This makes no sense.

    Does the "just following orders" defense not work because the magnitude of the crime, or does the defense not work because "they were the ones giving the orders?" You need to pick one. Or, if both are the reason, you need to put the second clause before the phrase "that is why" or it doesn't make any fucking sense.

    (Incidentally, the people claiming to have been following orders during the Nuremberg trials were not the ones giving the orders. I mean, just how fucking stupid is that? "I'm sorry, your honor, but I was just following my own orders.")

  144. Bruce Willis by xdor · · Score: 1

    Of course! Didn't you watch Live Free or Die Hard?

  145. Close but no cigar! by xdor · · Score: 1

    I think you completely missed his point. Try rereading his post.

  146. What is next 10 years for loading Linux?, 10 years by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    What is next 10 years for loading Linux?, 10 years for using a non dell video card in a dell system when you can get the same card for $100 less at a on line store vs dell BTO, 10 years for not using apples over priced ram?

    What if you got 10 years for non using the car dealership to change your oil as the car has a light only they can turns off and they call it hacking if you trun it off or jiffy lube does it for you.

  147. If the people at pystar are not looking at 10 year by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    If the people at pystar are not looking at 10 years why is this kid?

  148. What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have non-minimal gov, there is power to be bought, and the political system is the auction. Who has $ to buy power?

    Thus, corporations and special interests come to dominate in some mix of oligopoly.

    People have a mix of traits, which we call human nature. Among those traits is a complete inability to NOT take advantage of the situation we are in. Thus, spouse abuse, elder abuse, child abuse and abuse of trusts of all kinds.

    Human nature is the constant in history, we recognize all of this in all of written history.

    SO, if you want to change things, you fix the problem of non-minimal government. The early US experience wasn't perfect, by any means, but it was and is the best technology of gov so far. We know a lot more about the specification of systems than the people who wrote the Constitution, should be able to do a better job next time.

  149. Re:Not that disturbing by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

    You can already run unsigned binaries on an XBox 360, just go download the XNA dev kit. You can run unsigned binaries on a PS3 too, go install Linux.

    There seems to be a mass delusion on Slashdot that there are armies of wannabe home-brew console developers out there, when 99.9% of people who get their console modded want to play pirate games. End of story. And yeah, I think inconveniencing a tiny minority of people from selling (!) modded consoles is alright to encourage better and more numerous games, so sue me. If you want a 100% open platform, buy a PC.

  150. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  151. Re:Not that disturbing by dissy · · Score: 1

    Would you be "disturbed" if someone went to jail for modifying odometers on automobiles?

    Extremely, since modifying an odometer is not a crime. Trying to defraud someone by lying and claiming it is true when you know it isn't is a crime. The odometer being wrong is not. You modifying it is not.
    So yes. Being put in jail for doing something that is not a crime, would disturb me.

    In fact, the DMV has a specific form to fill out if your odometer is off and by how much and how you determined that.
    One common case is changing out the odometer with a 2nd hand part. Another common case is driving for more than a couple weeks on different sized tires than the current odometer is calibrated for.
    Another common reason is changing an engine. Miles is only tracked PER ENGINE, not per car. You are not required to sell your odometer with the engine.

    In fact, if you never plan to sell the car, you can almost ignore all of those laws. They only come into play when you hand off ownership and inform them of the total millage on the engine.
    Never sell it, it never matters.

    Both are examples of modifiying hardware in an effort to cheat someone, and both are against the law.

    In this case, I will admit that is most likely true. But it is so far from a given that the way you state it is always true sickens me.

    My 3 xbox are modded. Not a single pirated game on them either. I use it for xbox media center and watching video files on my TV.

    Since you are clearly arguing that a mod has no other intent than defrauding game programmers, you are trying to claim the fact I pirate no games, is the very and only reason game developers are going out of business.
    I guess you share the blame with me, since you purchased some eggs at the store thus defrauding the game companies (Eggs and TV have the same lack of relevance to game companies here)

    You don't want to go to jail? Don't break criminal laws.

    You seem to be under the impression that going to jail has anything to do with breaking laws.
    lawls!

    Modifying hardware for compatibility reasons is LEGAL. The DMCA you haven't read specifically says so.

    Now, while the crime that he did (copying games) is no doubt the Only charge that will stick here, the fact remains is that is the only crime he comitted. When the cops claim he broke one minor law, and did all this other crap that isn't illegal, then one tends to disregard everything they are accusing him of.

    And especially don't make a full-time business out of breaking the law..

    Tell that to Sony, or Nintendo, or the banks, or car manufacturers, or pretty much most of the top 100 companies in this country.
    Breaking the law is factored in under 'expenses'.
    Your advice would have prevented them from becoming worth billions, and would be extremely poor advice today. They would laugh at you.

    The 10 years is simply the maximum sentence.
    If he has no prior convictions, he will likely be sentenced to something substantially less.

    But his crime was on a computer.
    The magic words 'on a computer' with the rest of the ignorant FUD means he will get slammed with a max sentence.

    And you might want to talk to the thousands of people sitting in jail for months still waiting for their trial, or the few people that shared a CD or two and now are in debt for multiple millions of dollars. They would disagree, and anyone who's actually paying attention would say their 100% track record of using the max penalty by default has held true.

  152. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  153. What a Win by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    Just think. The cops spent money arresting him and now the jails are spending money. Soon the courts will spend money on him followed by some nice prison expenses. Maybe the tax payers could keep a bit more of their money if law enforcement stops winning in these stupid arrests. Maybe the prison can put some real beast on the street to make room for this guy who has done nothing at all!

  154. Re:Not that disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't want to go to jail? Don't break criminal laws.

    You don't want people to break criminal laws? Don't write shit laws.

    You don't want shit laws written...don't vote for shitty legislators....uhhhhh nevermind.

  155. What exactly did the mods do? by Cooldrew · · Score: 1

    I'd understand the kid getting arrested if he was putting in modchips to play pirated software, but was it for that? Or import games?

  156. hmm. by cti · · Score: 1

    How come the cops/elected officials/DA, whoever (lets just call them "law enforcement") can track this guy down, but can't find those responsible for stealing my stereo/car/bike?

    I guess I should save up for some lobbyists.

  157. Freedom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our freedom is threatened more every day. Total control, abuse of authority, repression laws - it's our depressing society. // kyle, PT

  158. Too little too late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess it's time to kick a few dollars over to the EFF.

    The time to kick a few dollars over to the EFF was about 10-12 years ago, before the DMCA was enacted. Still, better late than never. Makes me wish I'd gone to law school instead of becoming an engineer. I keep telling my wife I want to quit my job, go to law school, and then go work for the EFF. If only I could afford it. In the meantime, the EFF is on my short list of charities that I give to when I can.

  159. Libertarian party by Well-Fed+Troll · · Score: 1

    The Libertarian party has always been the Pirate Party.

  160. Re:Not that disturbing by KudyardRipling · · Score: 0

    Let's get it right:

    Voting for opposition candidates gets your phone tapped.
    Participating in a protest gets you points on your driver license.
    Posting on the internet gets you a sneak-peek warrant.
    Writing a letter to your representative gets you disappeared.

    The rest of the world is already finished the race toward tyranny and the USA is already in the home stretch.

    --
    Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  161. Not all car modifications are legal by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

    Modding a car to go faster is not illegal, but other modifications (such as removing the Cats, tinting the front windshield, installing radar jammer, etc...) are illegal.

    1. Re:Not all car modifications are legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If tinting the windshield is illegal, then why are there so many companies advertising it?

  162. This is really dumb. by Nafeasonto · · Score: 0

    SO basically this kid gets screwed up the ass in jail, literally because he modded an XBOX wow. What an asshole, soon he will be robbing liquor stores and selling crack. DOWN WITH THESE CRIMINALS. Yes that was sarcasm.

  163. But cops don't wear Level IV body armor. by jpstanle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But cops don't wear Level IV body armor. Level IV body armor is usually a heavy metal/ceramic "impact plate" that covers only the most vital organs in the center of mass. It is generally only found on military infantry, or occasionally on very few SWAT teams. Level IV impact plates are really heavy, bulky, and uncomfortable. They are completely impractical for a patrol officer, and even rarely found in SWAT/Entry teams.

    Level III or IIIA soft vests, which is what 99% of cops actually have, is only effective in defending against handgun calibers and shotguns. This is usually 'good enough' for cops since handgun calibers compose the majority of their threat. But don't think cops are trotting around in level IV impact plates, because they're not. The worlds best IIIA vest can't even hold up to 'small' centerfire rifle calibers like 5.56 NATO, 7.62x39mm. And even Level IV impact plates can only take a couple shots from big game calibers like .30-06 or .300 Win Mag before failing.

  164. Give it 40 years... by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Ok us, 30 year olds that grew up with computers, through the bbs years, and warez scene.... with our nes, and our c64, and first macs, and 286s pcs....

    We're still a minority relatively speaking.

    Give it 40 years...

    Those in their teens the past 10 years will have grown up with a better understanding of sharing information due to youtube, torrenting, napster... etc

    They will grow up into the leaders of tomorrow. Granted relatively few... but we will have a better chance winning this war once the "infected" are in power :)

    Right now... its still the Bush's, the Clintons... and older...

    They dont get it and they never will.

    This is a new world view that the old will never understand.

    The question is... will power and corruption alter the leaders of tomorrow in the same way that it currently does now?

    Just maybe we have a chance... that one day someone who grew up as a file sharer, a youtuber, a slashdotter, an anonymous member, etc... just maybe the kids of today will retain some sort of sense of what free information and fair use means to them.

    Right now, its hard to be of our generation and in power because so many still are of the old world. So much that we look bad standing up for these issues. BUT.... give it 40 years and we will see many adults around us... who understand because their idea of information will be based on what they do today as a teenager/young adult. On that day we can look around and see others who understand.

    Right now its like trying to explain to grandpa how email works.

  165. Re:Not that disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't want to go to jail? Don't break criminal laws.

    You don't want people to break criminal laws? Don't write shit laws.

    this man is my hero lol.

  166. Re:Once again the media completely misses the poin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You make a good point about the "crime". What people do with their modded consoles is up to them. A metaphor would be to say "Albert Einstein's Theories led to the development of atomic weapons" (for example), so does that mean it's his fault? Of course not.

    I think it's fair enough for him to charge for modding - he should be able to put value on his time for performing the service and procurement of the mod-chips etc. He was not selling pirated games.

  167. Which part of "Rich and Powerfull" didn't you get? by anw · · Score: 1

    I think there is this American fantasy that because you can all vote and own property, there is no such thing as privilege and power. Feudal kings didn't have the sort of relative wealth that these people do - whatever made you think that your legal system wasn't going to be just as rigged to make their behaviour legal and yours not?

    Take the money away from them, or get used to being a serf. But please stop complaining that their wealth makes them powerful, as if the world was some sort of game where they have to play fair.

  168. Nowadays people here don't think before posting. by mxh83 · · Score: 1

    Modifying hardware or software in any manner that makes it function differently than it was intended has long been illegal (unless specified), and with good reason. What if this 'student' created a bomb out of the components instead? Should they allow that too? What if his modified XBOX blows up in the customers face. Who is responsible? And why the hell should this individual profit from thousands of people's real hard work in researching and developing the games and consoles? What right does he have to deprive these people of their profits? Just because he knows how to? He deserves the punishment he's getting.

  169. America used to be free but not anymore by hiddenharmony · · Score: 1

    All my teens I grew up hearing that America is a free country but what I see today is exactly opposite. A guy can loose 10 years of his life for modifying a circuit ? And the homeland security is after a college guy instead of chasing a criminal ? Clearly this seems to be an act written by a manger who is trying to spoil others lives just to save his high paying job... or homeland security guys are getting scared of being laid off in times of recession so they are running after low hanging fruit like college kids to rake up brownie points in the eyes of seniors ? I cannot understand how can people accept DMCA, something that takes away your freedom. You paid full price for the hardware and you are not allowed to modify it, why ? If this violates the guarantee/warranty I can understand but sracthing the itch becomes a crime can only be classified as blunder by the lawmakers. Each innovation is a modification of an existing design/solution and now laws are being passed not to allow anyone to touch the stuff... If I am not allowed to modify the device that means I am renting the device and I should not be paying full price... this also means manufacturer should take the device back when I am not interested in using it... Looking at so many copyright/DMCA related issues I seriously thinking if the dark age is returning ? You pay full price for something but you dont own it... This is outright stupid... the matter of fact is innovation is dying from US and business are trying to hide behind stupid methods to keep themselves profitable. What is more shocking here is that lawmakers are helping these rich guys and blocking innovation. As if we did not have enough stupid patents to prevent development of lots of new technologies in US, we now have DMCA, RIAA, MPAA and what not. Is the era of freedom ending ? Are we moving from freedom to control ?

  170. drug paraphernalia is illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >but buying bongs or fashioning pipes out of weird shit is not illegal.

    drug paraphernalia is illegal
    maybe decriminalized in certain localities (california),
    but by and large it is illegal

  171. read this book by Finite9 · · Score: 1

    The Corporation by Joel Bakan. It goes into great depth about how the corporate system works, details all of the issues in this thread. I found it to be a real eye-opener, and will never trust the corporate model again.

    --
    "Everyone knows that vi vi vi is the number of the beast" -- Richard Stallman
  172. video of the accident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Police cruiser strikes, kills 10-year-old

    Now I remember riding my bicycle at night as a kid, but never in the middle of the road (40mph limit road), without lights, at night, at 10 years old.

    Now, cop did what I would do (just run the kid down) as opposed to trying to swerve (and sacrifice his life for the kids).

    The 1day suspension is about what you'd expect in America. If it was anyone else in the same situation, they'd get charged with murder, but its always a slap on the wrist for a cop. This wasn't some misidentified innocent unarmed man running away from police with his back turned, a drugged up rape victim holding a 2-inch penknife, or a tiny asian woman chopping vegetables in her own kitchen minding her own business.
    Those bastards deserved to get shot to death, this was a 10 year old boy on a bicycle.

    Fucked up situation, fucked up police, fucked up parents.

    SUBLIME - APRIL 26th 1992

  173. Humor become reality: the joke is on us by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    But isn't violating a "business model" a seriouser threat to our homeland security?

    "Credit Fraud? My God, that's worse than murder!"

    --A line from Max Headroom, a television series about an uploaded personality and his human counterpart that aired in the early 1980s.

    What was once hilarious spoof is now reality. The show should be required viewing for anyone living in the developed world of the 21st century.

    Other great lines include "I know, let's fire someone" and "Security Systems. In your home, in your place of work, wherever you go, there we are." I used to look forward to science fiction becoming reality--pity our culture seems to have only opted for the dystopian visions becoming reality.

    I still don't have my flying car.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  174. on black hat by shnull · · Score: 1

    defense is looking for new recruits but this guy gets 10 years in prison :p The american way ?

    --
    beware he who denies you access to information for in his mind, he already deems himself to be your master (SMAC-ish)
  175. Re:Justice:head shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Men, you are all marksmen - don't one of you fire until you see the whites of their eyes." - Israel Putnam

  176. You know you're a nerd when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you read 2850 fps as 2850 frames per second, then become confused about the text and skip the rest because of brain deadlock...

  177. Jail time is what he should get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I'm in the minority here, but he should get jail time!

    1. He KNEW modding the systems was illegal, yet he did it anyway.

    As for the "what about the customers rights!" arguement.

    1. The customer knew the systems had DRM hardware within it, yet the customer bought the system anyway!
    2. If the customer was SMART he/she would purchase (or support) another system that had "free to use" standards.
    3. Companies like Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft, etc all need to learn what the consumer wants! But that is never going to happen if everyone keeps on supporting the crap they bring out!

    This is just like jail-breaking an iPhone - don't do it, instead support the mobile that is "free to use".

  178. From an Aussie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor bastard.

    If he'd emmigrated to Australia FIRST, then he'd be right. It's specifically legal here - we have a supreme court decision on the matter of modding consoles.

    If he survives the US crime system without being made into a career crook, he should just come over here and set up a shop doing modding. Reckon that'd get the news headlines back.

    And what's with this "lost money and jobs" argument proponents of Intellectual Prisonship keep trotting out? Do they reckon we're all dumbasses or something? Obviously when something is copied by a computer, nothing's been lost in the world - only gained. That so-called "lost" money has already been spent elsewhere in the global economy. In reality it never existed. Sorta like a scammer being pissed someone wised up and he "missed out" on taking a packet of money from a mark.

  179. Re:We have DMCA because YOU did not vote against i by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    We always have the option, it's just that the option is exercised long before election day. We can sometimes abandon our duty and miss an election cycle, but DMCA has been on the books for over a decade now. If we still don't have candidates to even run and lose, I can't blame Hollywood.

    I don't take all the responsibility, just about a hundred millionth of it. So it's not like there's a lot of self-loathing here. But it's something. I hope everyone reading this, feels their share of the shame, too.

    We know what will happen if we wait until November 2010 to act. We can choose that destiny, or try for something else. That's voting. Tonight I'll probably go home and drink beer: another vote to keep DMCA.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  180. Re:We have DMCA because YOU did not vote against i by russotto · · Score: 1

    We know what will happen if we wait until November 2010 to act. We can choose that destiny, or try for something else. That's voting.

    What are our other options? If you're into the "box" thing, we tried the soapbox but theirs was bigger. We tried the ballot box but they owned all the candidates. We tried the jury box but were excluded from the jury. There ain't any boxes left. And the EFF threw in the towel years ago, with 2600 v. MPAA.

    I'm not going to have any self-loathing for losing to a juggernaut.

  181. California Prisoner's Irony by metaforest · · Score: 1

    The 9th Appellate court recently ordered the State of California to come up with a plan to reduce their prison population by at least 27% over the next 2 to 3 years. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/05/us/05calif.html?hp

    The order recommends, among many things, a drastic reduction in sentencing non-violent criminals to prison terms. So far the CA AG has taken the position that he will force an appeal to the Supreme Court to fight this ruling. Most Republican/Law and Order mouth-pieces in the State are screaming about the Fed over-reaching it's authority and meddling in State's rights.

    Let's see, State violates well established Federal prohibition on cruel and unusual treatment of prison inmates due to gross negligence, over crowding, and over-zealous enforcement/sentencing. Previous order in 2005 is upheld on appeal, but CA GA and Governator pretty much succeed in undermining attempts by court appointed stewards to reform the state prison system.

    Now the State has been ordered again on the same cases that appeal failed to stop in 2005. CA GA and the Governator again refuses to cooperate.

    The DMCA is pretty clear.... good law or bad law, it is the law.
    This kid is probably going to get convicted, mostly for being a stoopid git. Hopefully the 9th Circuit order will lead to this kid getting no more than fines and home detention; a more reasonable sentence fitting of the 'crime.'

  182. Smart Student - Stupid Outcome by xaboo · · Score: 1

    The Lesson here is not to be intelligent, learn, and share. Consoles are for being stupid. You are supposed to rot in front of your proprietary hardware. Never learn from it. Think of all the great things society could fail to accomplish by going to prison for 10 years instead of being innovative. What would be the alternative? We could all just wise up and stop buying proprietary hardware, start purchasing open source hardware and tinker with that. Then we could learn, share and sell ideas for things like the Arduino and Lemote Yeeloong laptop. Naaahhhh, give all his money to lawyers, and make him rot. After all, he did spend his money on a proprietary counsel, and no one should do that unless they are willing to waste money and time.

  183. Mr. Limbaugh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What quote? He must have changed it.

  184. Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you feel you are getting your moneys worth outta the law enforcement agencies? Gosh I am happy when I see that all the taxes from my hard work are applied so appropriately!

    Don't you all just feel as safe and secure as I?