Slashdot Mirror


User: rsynnott

rsynnott's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
411
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 411

  1. Re:Details? on Conquering the LaGrange Points? · · Score: 1

    Erm, to annoy them, I think. Google it; don't have time right now. I think it's mentioned in the wikipedia article on the big Russian ground-to-space laser.

  2. Re:Three cheers! on BBC Open Source launched · · Score: 1

    Actually, you used to have to pay for radio, you don't anymore.

  3. Re:Because it's not a body on Conquering the LaGrange Points? · · Score: 1

    Came close tho. The USSR fired a laser at a shuttle from Siberia.

  4. Re:In Soviet Russia... on Falling Window Cover Damages Discovery · · Score: 1

    Actually, Energias aren't flying so much, any more (sadly). America made a serious mistake with the shuttle, as did the USSR in following it. It's a recoverable mistake, though.

  5. Re:If God Had Meant Man to Go Into Space on Falling Window Cover Damages Discovery · · Score: 1

    He did, lots of things, but they were generally killed for political reasons (see Orion Project, NERVA).

  6. Re:It fell on its own? on Falling Window Cover Damages Discovery · · Score: 1

    That's the theory. In practice, it works out very, very expensive; probably moreso than Soyuz, which is from the 60s.

  7. Re:Be prepared on Conquering the LaGrange Points? · · Score: 1

    Eh, I think we should give Orion another shot...

  8. Re:Be prepared on Conquering the LaGrange Points? · · Score: 1

    I was refering to the never-launched arrangement comprised of an Energia-4 with 8 boosters, and an Energia-2 as a second stage. (It had a name, which I can't remember). It was 180tonnes to LEO.

  9. Re:Of course this is too harsh on Death Penalty For Hackers? · · Score: 1
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3384667.stm

    Turkey has abolished the death penalty, as is mandatory for joining the EU.

  10. Re:Justice and practicality on Death Penalty For Hackers? · · Score: 1

    Jigsaw Man, anyone?

  11. Re:Could someone please cite a published study? on Death Penalty For Hackers? · · Score: 1

    One of the two developed world countries that does it (US) has one of the highest rates of violent crime in the developed world. Looks like the deterrant value isn't so good. (In fairness, the other, Japan, has a moderately low crime rate)

  12. Re:Be prepared on Conquering the LaGrange Points? · · Score: 1

    Quite possibly; the biggest Energia, in particular, was larger than anything the US ever had.

  13. Re:France on Conquering the LaGrange Points? · · Score: 1

    Those are ESA, not France. France is one of the major driving forces of the ESA (and the largest contributor at 30%) but the ESA is certainly not a French possesion. Before the founding of the ESA, Britain, France and Germany all had small independant programmes.

  14. Re:I agree. The very idea of such a penalty is evi on Death Penalty For Hackers? · · Score: 1

    Are you a lobbyist from the colostomy bag industry?

  15. Re:Obligatory BugMeNot Link: on Death Penalty For Hackers? · · Score: 1

    China have that. Apparently it's moderately effective, if a bit draconian.

  16. Re:France on Conquering the LaGrange Points? · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    France doesn't have an independant space capability.

    And the Americans will have to wait till they find terrorists somewhere near the leGrange points, like Saturn or Andromeda, before they can invade ;)

  17. Re:Regulators Raid Intel Offices on AMD Alleges Intel Compilers Create Slower AMD Code · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The got fined quite a lot of money in Europe...

  18. Re:If the terrorists want to kill you at 30k feet. on Flying the Wiretapped Skies · · Score: 1

    The more power you give the secret police, the more the potential for abuse. Look at the good old USSR? Want to be like them? No? Well then stand up for your rights while you still can; no doubt soon, protesting against the USAPATRIOT act and similar will be a public order offence; once that happens, that's the end of any vestiges of democracy in the US.

  19. Re:No pain, no gain on 107 Cameras to Scan Discovery for Damage · · Score: 1

    I'd imagine NASA is more concerned with the possibility of losing another horrifically expensive shuttle, tbh.

  20. Re:They should ask the Russians on 107 Cameras to Scan Discovery for Damage · · Score: 1

    It's interesting to note that the Russian space agency has NEVER used any rocket other than Soyuz for manned travel. They had a developmental moon rocket that blew up a lot, they nearly had a mini-shuttle to launch on the Proton rocket, and they had Buran; none of those ever flew manned, however.

  21. Re:Flashback on 107 Cameras to Scan Discovery for Damage · · Score: 1
    This sort of "macho" shite is one thing that really irritates me about Americans (or about stereotypical Americans; I realise not all real Americans have this issue).

    Anyway, a gun is less that dramatically useful on a plane, you know...

  22. Re:This is what its all about on 107 Cameras to Scan Discovery for Damage · · Score: 1

    Actually, pioneered by Channel 4's Big Brother.

  23. Re:Why not just reinvest in current technology... on NASA to Research Antimatter Rocket · · Score: 1
    People don't like the idea of the Orion Project; 8million tonnes shooting into the air on hydrogen bombs is intimidating, you have to admit.

    And the fallout from an Orion thingy isn't dramatic.

  24. Re:The world is riding on American healthcare! on Possible Breakthroughs in Cancer and AIDS Research · · Score: 1

    Or, taking a little money away from the shareholder, who now tragicly won't be able to buy a new Merc this season, to prevent people from DYING. A sufficiently unjust law is no law at all (tho most non-generic drugs are sold with considerable profit in Europe anyway, you know; just not as much profit.)

  25. Re:PowerPC on IBM Officially Unveils Dual-core PowerPC Chips · · Score: 1

    It's also very likely that they'll have customers who are heavily dependant on Altivec/AMX, which, given code optimised for it or naturally suited to it, still blows SSE out of the water.