Googlebot crawls Slashdot without logging in. Therefore it doesn't see sigs.
I remember the guy here who used to spam religiousfreaks.com links within his message - not in the sig - so that it would get higher Google pagerank. A search for 'religious freaks' shows the results.
I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. The parent poster's point was valid - that cells all have a telomere, which effectively limits the number of times it can divide. This is because each time the cell divides, the telomere is split between the two daughter cells. A cell with too short a telomere cannot divide.
GP's point was that if we used adult cells to produce stem cells, the telomere would remain the same length as in the adult cell - the cell's 'age' would not have changed. Therefore the (theoretical) organ being grown with the regressed adult cells would not be 'new' - it would be the same age as the adult cells, except that the rapid growth of the organ would mean that aging actually happened *faster* to the stem cells. That is, unless stem cells have a way of preventing such cell aging...
If the range is smaller, all the identity thieves have to do is get closer to you. Brush past you, and they have identified you. Isn't easy identification the idea behind it?
I got a good phrase from IT Week one week (erm) about such sentences:
Does anybody know what this is supposed to mean? The words are all in my dictionary but this statement strings them together in such a way as to eliminate any real meaning.
I'm not so sure about this study - I am bilingual and play computer games, yet I have serious trouble remembering what my mother told me ten seconds ago. I don't think I'd do so well at the harder mental tasks...
Slashdot Mirror
Googlebot crawls Slashdot without logging in. Therefore it doesn't see sigs.
I remember the guy here who used to spam religiousfreaks.com links within his message - not in the sig - so that it would get higher Google pagerank. A search for 'religious freaks' shows the results.
I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. The parent poster's point was valid - that cells all have a telomere, which effectively limits the number of times it can divide. This is because each time the cell divides, the telomere is split between the two daughter cells. A cell with too short a telomere cannot divide.
GP's point was that if we used adult cells to produce stem cells, the telomere would remain the same length as in the adult cell - the cell's 'age' would not have changed. Therefore the (theoretical) organ being grown with the regressed adult cells would not be 'new' - it would be the same age as the adult cells, except that the rapid growth of the organ would mean that aging actually happened *faster* to the stem cells. That is, unless stem cells have a way of preventing such cell aging...
That basically is sniping, minus the bidding close to time limit.
To prevent moderations they have done on the thread from being reversed when they post a reply.
Great. You just killed the discussion.
Haha first post actually answering the question and it is modded offtopic. Good job mods.
Exactly. The phrase "Natural Selection" is misleading. They should rename it "Natural Elimination".
Wow - 700 leachers...
5 is the original metaphor.
Why?
I guess you could say that email's ease-of-use is simultaneously its greatest asset and its biggest weakness.
Unfortunately, there is no "-1, Fish" option for moderators.
The font/font size is much better than the other entries I have seen. You seem to be the only one so far thinking of readability as well as looks.
DHT. Allows you to get a list of peers when the tracker is down, I believe.
:) - the article title should read "R.M.S. Deviation"
lol - poor you...
No, sorry, Uncyclopedia's full of articles that try to be funny or satirical or something but fail miserably. This is different... maybe Trollpedia...
Maybe people could be given Phishing numbers by the bank - they give these out to phishers and the bank pulls them up when they try to use them.
Oh, please, mod parent informative :)
This text had been classified as
INAUTHENTIC
with a 31.2% chance of being authentic text
Last time I was in the theatre the guy behind me kept moaning and the floor was all sticky. I'm not even sure what they put in my popcorn.
What is this again, the cinema or porn?
If the range is smaller, all the identity thieves have to do is get closer to you. Brush past you, and they have identified you. Isn't easy identification the idea behind it?
I got a good phrase from IT Week one week (erm) about such sentences:
Does anybody know what this is supposed to mean? The words are all in my dictionary but this statement strings them together in such a way as to eliminate any real meaning.
I'm not so sure about this study - I am bilingual and play computer games, yet I have serious trouble remembering what my mother told me ten seconds ago. I don't think I'd do so well at the harder mental tasks...
Is Firefox vulnerable to such an exploit as well?