Slashdot Mirror


CNN Sits Down With Linus Torvalds

just_another_sean writes "Calling him 'reclusive' and the 'leader of the Open Source Revolution' CNN has an interview with Linus Torvalds. From the article: "I actually only work with a few handfuls so I tend to directly interact with maybe 10 - 20 people and they in turn interact with other people. So depending on how you count, if you count just the core people, 20 -50 people. If you count everybody who's involved; five thousand people -- and you can really put the number anywhere in between... Almost, pretty much all, real work is done over e-mail so it doesn't matter where people are."

264 comments

  1. If being reclusive means by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Travelling all over the world, I wish I was a hermit!

    1. Re:If being reclusive means by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think what they meant by reclusive is that he prefers to stay out of the limelight and doesn't do any attention whoring like many famous people tend to do. Unfortunately for CNN the word recluse usually has some negative connotations with it, so it makes it seem like they are taking a demeaning stance (which perhaps the writer is, if he's a pro-Microsoft zealot)

    2. Re:If being reclusive means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just as the word 'zealot' has negative connotations. As if the people on /. weren't Anti-Microsoft zealots...

    3. Re:If being reclusive means by gijoel · · Score: 0
      I think what they meant by reclusive is that he prefers to stay out of the limelight and doesn't do any attention whoring like many famous people tend to do.


      What? Like this guy
    4. Re:If being reclusive means by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      oh the irony!

  2. Leader? by kanzels · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He is just working on Linux kernel, there are thousands of other open source projects. I wouldn't call him OSS leader :)

    --
    Pixel image editor - http://www.kanzelsberger.com
    1. Re:Leader? by 10kelvin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But the Linux kernel accounts for the lion share of the symbiotic relationship between those other projects and the allocation of those precious resources which they all require.

    2. Re:Leader? by McDutchie · · Score: 2, Funny
      He is just working on Linux kernel, there are thousands of other open source projects.

      Oops. Looks like you dared to challenge the Linus Torvalds personality cult. Please stand by while the Slashbot army prepares for correctional action against you.

    3. Re:Leader? by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think he thinks that of himself reading the interview

      "KLS: Over the years, Linux has spawned other open technologies and even an open source spirit or open source philosophy. It has engendered stuff like Wikipedia, the online open source encyclopedia or even, some could argue, citizen journalism. What are your thoughts about that?"

      LT: We shouldn't give credit to Linux per se. There were open source projects and free software before Linux was there. Linux in many ways is one of the more visible and one of the bigger technical projects in this area and it changed how people looked at it because Linux took both the practical and ideological approach. At the same time I don't think this whole "openness" notion is new. In fact I often compare open source to science. To where science took this whole notion of developing ideas in the open and improving on other peoples' ideas and making it into what science is today, and the incredible advances that we have had. And I compare that to witchcraft and alchemy, where openness was something you didn't do. So openness is not something new, it is something that actually has worked for a long time"

    4. Re:Leader? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Looks like you dared to challenge the Linus Torvalds personality cult.

      Actually, I do not think there is such a thing, at least not to a degree that most brainless "celebrities" get. For a "personality cult" one needs continuous media hyping in places watched by the sort of sheeple who are prone to falling for "personalities" in the first place.

      Linux and FOSS crowd is far more likely to become zealous about ideas (such as the whole concept of FOSS or the GPL) rather then people. Sure, some do admire Linus personally, but we are not beyond getting into regular flame wars with him when he is demonstrably wrong. Just check out the whole BitKeeper saga on the LKLM.

    5. Re:Leader? by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please stand by while the Slashbot army prepares for correctional action against you.

      For better or worse, I think your comment suggest that he is a leader.

    6. Re:Leader? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      That was supposed to be LKML, as in Linux Kernel Mailing List, but my keyboard got the upper hand (key?) in its revolt against me, temporarily.

    7. Re:Leader? by diersing · · Score: 1

      The headline asks the question if he is the leader, its not a statement but since you brought it up, whom would you declare the OSS leader? Al Gore?

    8. Re:Leader? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Saying something like this on Slashdot is like going into a Church and saying "I wouldn't call Jesus divine" or going into Saudi Arabia and saying something derogatory about Muhammed.

      Linux isn't an operating system, it's a cult. It's sad, but there are actually people out there that will buy a product specifically because it says it supports Linux. They believe that Linux is the answer to everything. They'll buy iPods and install Linux on them. They'll choose their mobile phone based solely on the fact that it runs Linux, even though it has no bearing on the device's functionality what-so-ever. They just need to see that "runs Linux" sticker on the box. If, for example, Apple swapped out XNU for the Linux kernel, and made no other changes to Mac OS X, I bet you'd see hundreds of Linux zealots buying Macs -- even if it made no difference in the performance or usability of the OS whatsoever. They need that piece of mind that they can always say they're running Linux.

      Just having the industry support Linux as a mainstream OS isn't good enough for these people. They won't be happy until there are no other OS's available accept their precious Linux, which they consider to be God's gift to computers.

      It's only a matter of time before I start having geeks knock on my door wanting to tell me the message of the Lord and savior, Linus Torvalds.

    9. Re:Leader? by hackstraw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wouldn't call him OSS leader :)

      I would. I mean its pretty much between RMS and Linus, and I would give it to Linus.

      Sure GNU did come first and Linux would be impotent without it, but Linus has something Stallman does not. Brand name recognition and a damn good OS that powers a bunch of the internet, routers, printers, digital picture frames, you name it.

      Also, Linus is more suit and general public friendly than RMS will ever be.

      If its not Linus or Stallman, who is the OSS leader or is there no leader but rather just a bizarre style of underground thing?

    10. Re:Leader? by i_should_be_working · · Score: 2

      I agree. But that's what happens when people refer to the whole OS as "Linux". Torvalds gets credited with creating and leading the whole thing.

    11. Re:Leader? by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Linus and RMS are both kinds of "leaders" in the open source movement, at the same time, the movement isn't a top-down organization, but, well, a diverse movement, so its not all that much something that is "led" by "leaders". A better word -- as someone else suggested in the thread for Linus -- for both might be "icons", as there role in the movement, from my perspective, is largely one of inspiration rather than direction.

    12. Re:Leader? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's sad, but there are actually people out there that will buy a product specifically because it says it supports Linux. They believe that Linux is the answer to everything. They'll buy iPods and install Linux on them. They'll choose their mobile phone based solely on the fact that it runs Linux, even though it has no bearing on the device's functionality what-so-ever. They just need to see that "runs Linux" sticker on the box. If, for example, Apple swapped out XNU for the Linux kernel, and made no other changes to Mac OS X, I bet you'd see hundreds of Linux zealots buying Macs -- even if it made no difference in the performance or usability of the OS whatsoever. They need that piece of mind that they can always say they're running Linux.

      I'll confess to this. I purchase products to run linux, and products known to run linux, and products not known to run linux with the intention of running linux. I do this because it's linux. The reason it matters why it's linux is because I know that I will probably be able to use this hardware and exploit it's resources in ways that are limited by other software - be it windows, osx, wm5.0, xbox kernel, etc. I also know the product will be very flexible, or could be if I chose to spend the time. I purchase it also because it's generally lower cost because there's no software license - though it could be higher cost because they actually have to put quality hardware in because it has to work with linux. I choose linux because though there's normally not commercial support available, I know the guys who will be doing the supporting are almost always technically minded and normally know a thing or two more than an average person who purchase hardware. I choose linux because it's clear that linux will be around for a very long time, with any other os, I wouldn't be so sure. I choose linux because I can modify the code even if every other developer in the world has long given up on it. I choose linux because it's very secure in it's native form and moreso if you spend some time configuring it.

      So what exactly are the arguments for NOT choosing linux again? Do they outweight the above? Probably not for me, though I admit I am a rational being and my choices are subject to change.

    13. Re:Leader? by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      no way, gcc is what binds almost all of OSS together

    14. Re:Leader? by linvir · · Score: 0
      You have two choices:
      1. Linux
      2. The distro name chosen by the vendor
      Either way, according to your way of thinking, someone's getting undue credit.
    15. Re:Leader? by Soko · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, Linus is more suit and general public friendly than RMS will ever be.


      Congrats. You are now our current leader in the " Understatment of the Year " competition. Winner to be announced when ESR actually matters again.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    16. Re:Leader? by tate-o · · Score: 1

      It is very important, and cannot be overstated, that OSS does not have a leader.

    17. Re:Leader? by muszek · · Score: 5, Funny

      you're wrong, it's Frozen Bubble

    18. Re:Leader? by bogado · · Score: 2, Funny
      no way, gcc is what binds almost all of OSS together


      Gcc? No you're wong man. Actually it is ldd who bind OSS together, gcc only compiles. :-D hehehe Jusk kidding, no bad feelings I hope... :-D
      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    19. Re:Leader? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The reason it matters why it's linux is because I know that I will probably be able to use this hardware and exploit it's resources in ways that are limited by other software - be it windows, osx, wm5.0, xbox kernel, etc. I also know the product will be very flexible, or could be if I chose to spend the time. ...and how many times have you actually "exploited it's[sic] resources in ways that are limited by other software"? How many times have you "chose to spend the time" to make the product more flexible? Have you messed around with your phone? Have you written something for it that turned it into a brick? Have you modified the way your home networking router behaves? I'm probably like you... "having it" is enough reason a lot of the time but if you don't actually do those things you say are reasons, then they aren't really reasons other than rationalizing your zealotry, and I'll be the first to say that's the real motivation behind some of my purchases.

    20. Re:Leader? by escay · · Score: 1
      The submitter's summary appears skewed and 'flamebaity' quoting CNN's monikers (really, did anyone think linus would agree with that?) especially in comparison to the summary (quote) on digg which was more interesting and correct:
      "A lot of the core people just feel excited about the technology. And that's why a lot of people just start ... At least from the developers' standpoint, nobody does it because they hate Microsoft. None of the people I work with do it for that reason. They do it because they love doing what they do."
      i like the way linus handles the microsoft question too, saying the whole anti microsoft thing is played for more than it really is. Amen to that.
    21. Re:Leader? by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      Well, there's a third option of GNU/Linux. But actually I'd prefer option number 2 (The distro) and that's what I'm starting to lean towards when someone asks me what OS I use. Calling it by the distro name and letting people know that there are lots of distros lets them know that it's a wide scale planet wide thing, not lead or created by any one person.

      And for me it's not just who gets the credit, but the history of the whole thing. People talk about the OS as "Linux", then use the information that Torvalds created the Linux kernel in '91 and come to the conclusion that the whole OS was invented in '91. Which is just plain wrong.

      Either:
      a) What Torvalds created (the kernel) is the only thing refered to as Linux and it is recognized that there is alot more to the OS, much of which was already invented.
      b) The OS is called Linux, but it's recognized that Linux was started in the early 80's by the FSF before Torvalds even got to university.

      One of those options makes logical sense. The other, not so much. I'm not going to ignore facts and history just because of convenience.

    22. Re:Leader? by sumbry · · Score: 1

      the movement isn't a top-down organization, but, well, a diverse movement, so its not all that much something that is "led" by "leaders"

      OMG - we're terrorists!

    23. Re:Leader? by khedron+the+jester · · Score: 0

      5 is the original metaphor.

      Why?

    24. Re:Leader? by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the movement isn't a top-down organization, but, well, a diverse movement, so its not all that much something that is "led" by "leaders"

      So true, I agree completely. Just like ESR's "Cathedral and the Bazaar", OSS is the bazaar, there is no real leader, someone to sue, someone to blame, its just there, and it works, and that is what scares the suits and whatnot.

      I see Linux as "ours". It started out as Linus' baby, but its free, and anybody is capable of doing a fork of it at anytime just like XFree86 to X.org did. Heck, look at slashdot. Its open source, anybody can go to http://slashcode.com/ and put up a slashdot "killer" at any time, but does it happen? No. Why? Because slashdot is more than slashcode, its people like me and you that make slashdot work. We openly bash on slashdot all the time and the editors don't delete the posts, they frequently get modded up and the discussion diverges from there.

      The cathedral way of doing things is certainly a way of doing things, but its not the only way. A big topic that comes here multiple times a week is the failing cathedral way of music distribution and the RIAA. The bazaar method of music distribution is scary for them, and they go to the bigger cathedral, the government and court rooms to maintain their cathedral existence.

      I really think this newer bazaar way of doing things is pretty cool. Look at Wikipedia, slashdot, GNU, Linux, etc. All of these things are very successful, but there is no real boundary or ownership of any of these things. They are free. And the bizarre thing about it is that people make money off of it.

      Another thing that is cool about Linux and OSS is that the "cathedrals" are participating in the bazaar as well. Big brand name companies like Apple, IBM, SGI, HP, etc are embracing and contributing and benefitting from this stuff.

    25. Re:Leader? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I would. I mean its pretty much between RMS and Linus, and I would give it to Linus.
      You would choose between two people who aren't even in the running?

      RMS doesn't consider himself a supporter of Open Source. And Linus Torvalds has made it clear on several occasions, most infamously with the BitKeeper debacle, that he's NOT an Open Source, or Free Software, advocate, he's quite happy with proprietary software.

      I'm not sure who qualifies as an Open Source leader. There's the official one, Michael Tiemann, the current head of the Open Source Initiative. There's the most vocal one, Eric S. Raymond, who arguably was the person who made the single biggest contribution, for better or worse, to popularizing the Open Source concept. And then there's Bruce Perens. In terms of people heading specific projects, it's hard to really come up with a name. Torvalds simply is not in the running, he's popular, but he's not someone anyone who considers FS or OS important takes seriously when it comes to pronouncements on the future of Open Source because he's not an Open Source advocate. Other "Open Source" projects, be they Apache, Mozilla, or whatever, have less well known characters in charge, and generally the few that do have fairly controvertial characters (OpenBSD's Theo springs to mind) rather than natural leaders.

      It would be great if Torvalds took the concept more seriously and stepped into the shoes so many people want him to wear. He clearly has the charisma, but he's no more the leader of Open Source than John McCain is leader of the Republican Party.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    26. Re:Leader? by sloanster · · Score: 1

      Mr Torvalds has led this particular open source project for the past 15 years. Thus he is by definition a leader. To say that he is not a leader because there are other open source projects is missing the point.

      As if that weren't enough, Linux is certainly among the most ambitious and far reaching open source projects ever.

      Just for laughs, we'd love to hear your candidates for "an open source leader", and your rationale.

    27. Re:Leader? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Pour some more cola on it. That always reminds mine who is boss!

    28. Re:Leader? by apokryphos · · Score: 1

      You're a little confused. Linus created the kernel; there's an awful lot more to an operating system than the kernel. It's a major part, indeed, but it's nothing without everything else.

    29. Re:Leader? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let me see...

      My xbox runs xbmc and linux to give me things m$ didn't. My phone runs linux to give me things wm5 didn't. My laptop runs linux to give me things that xp didn't. My linksys wrt54g openwrt gives me many more things linksys didn't. I'm planning on buying a roomba, and if I feel the need a gumstix to exploit its resources.

      Other than hardware - I've submitted many OSS patches, and I've modified stuff for myself and companies I work for to get things to work the way I want them to.

      I doubt this story is much different for most linux advocates on /. at least.

    30. Re:Leader? by marc_gerges · · Score: 1

      I find myself to check Linux availability for my stuff, too. But the reasons tend to be more pragmatic: I can have the features I want by having a free system. My wireless router runs Linux because that allows me to use the network topology that works best for my setup. Not the one the manufacturer thought was the best compromise. My Ipod runs not linux, but an open source firmware (rockbox), because that allows it to do gapless playback, and I can tailor the display so it's actually usable in a car. My Mediaplayers run Linux because that way they can integrate nicely with the Mythtv server sitting in the basement. The 'runs linux' badges simply says the device can do whatever the hardware is capable of and the user wants it to do. It will not miss functionality because the manufacturer thought it's not worth it or didn't want to cannibalise more expensive gear, and it will not lose functionality over time due to firmware 'upgrades' that block stuff. Often just turns out to be the better buy, in the long run...

    31. Re:Leader? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd say both are leaders and icons. Personally I follow the Linus model more than the RMS model, in that I bathe and try not to frighten animals and small children with loud noises. One nice thing about both of those guys though is that they lead by example.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    32. Re:Leader? by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      Sweet so Open Source is like science and, when applied correctly, leads to incredible advances. Closed source is like witchcraft or alchemy...

      MS better find some better spell books or a philosopher's stone...

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    33. Re:Leader? by stienman · · Score: 1

      The revolution is called Open Source. And its leader? Linus Torvalds, the reclusive founder of Linux.

      CNN just likes to drive RMS batty.

      And really, who doesn't?

      -Adam

    34. Re:Leader? by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      "Meta" is greek for "after".

      It's a stupid, stupid pun.

    35. Re:Leader? by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1
      >But the Linux kernel accounts for the lion share of the symbiotic relationship between those other projects and the allocation of those precious resources which they all require.

      I run FreeBSD and a MIT licensed open source project. Linux is sort of irrelevant for me. It's another clone of an age-old operating system, run by a millionaire. It strikes me that most big mouths in OS (yes Linus might not be a leader but he does have a big mouth) are either filthy rich or at least on a payroll to make or market open source software, unlike the vast majority of volunteers. I applaud them for it, but I feel they are too far detached from reality to be called leaders or icons.

    36. Re:Leader? by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      Mine is forever reminded who's boss by the dried yogurt under 'K'.. I know it's in pain, but I can't be bothered to eat like a human being when I'm at my keyboard.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    37. Re:Leader? by rumcho · · Score: 1

      remember - this article is in the "business" section of cnn.com. those people out there always think there must be a leader one-and-only monarch that runs everything and has the knife and the bread. that's their mentality. when Linus tells them he's just one of us, OSS developers, they are like "WHAT? This is impossible!". They just don't get it. That's all. They think the world they live in is the world everybody else lives in and everything follows the same principles. For the most part the interviewer sounded like an ingorant moron who thought s/he was interviewing Bill Gates or Larry Elisson.

    38. Re:Leader? by daigu · · Score: 1
      Also, Linus is more suit and general public friendly than RMS will ever be.

      Being popular doesn't make one a leader. Linus is the technical leader. RMS is the ideological leader. Ideological leaders aren't typically pretty either - Einstein, Marx, Banjamin Franklin, etc. It's almost to the point where you might think that ideas might make you ugly.

    39. Re:Leader? by rdwald · · Score: 1

      If its not Linus or Stallman, who is the OSS leader or is there no leader but rather just a bizarre style of underground thing?

      You misspelled "bazaar."

    40. Re:Leader? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I do not think there is such a thing, at least not to a degree that most brainless "celebrities" get.

      Why quotes around "celebrities"? "Celebrity" merely means famous person, and surely you don't deny that they are famous, though you may question whether they are so for good reason.

      For a "personality cult" one needs continuous media hyping in places watched by the sort of sheeple who are prone to falling for "personalities" in the first place.

      It's pretty naive to think that mainstream media attention is necessary for a personality cult to appear. If the personality cult concerns someone who has a fringe interest, it is much more important to get attention in media solely directed at people with such interests. Like Slashdot, in this case.

      It's also pretty condenscating, and again, naive, to think that only "sheeple" are prone to excessive admiration. Computers geeks tend to have knowledge of many technical areas that the average person does not. In my experience, that's the only such thing. In general, I think such people tend to be less well rounded intellectually than "normal" people. As such, they are just as much, if not more, prone to simplistic and uninformed opinions. You need only watch how one sided discussions of topics like Microsoft, Google, Apple, GW Bush, etc. are around here to see that Slashdotters, and by extension people with similar interest, have a hard time maintaining attitudes of admiration or disdain that stand in proportion to the object of the attitude.

      Linux and FOSS crowd is far more likely to become zealous about ideas (such as the whole concept of FOSS or the GPL) rather then people.

      Well, they are that too.

      Sure, some do admire Linus personally, but we are not beyond getting into regular flame wars with him when he is demonstrably wrong. Just check out the whole BitKeeper saga on the LKLM.

      That's probably the only case where people have not agreed, by and large, with Linus, and even then there was fierce discussion. Face it, people's opinions on Linus are remarkably one sided. To think that the subgroup you belong to happens to be immune to personality cults is merely to be in denial.

    41. Re:Leader? by Quino · · Score: 1

      It's not supposed to be a popularity contest -- it's about who did what.

      So I disagree with you: Linus coded and manages a kernel, a project that due to timing got the most visibility. Somehow though, he gets credit for an OS and a movement where credit for managing a kernel is due.

      Stallman actually got the whole ball rolling.

      IMHO, if Linus had never been born I'd still be sitting right now in front a GNU OS that'd be running a different kernel coded by someone else -- the need for that last remaining bit was pressing and there are many who can competently code an OS kernel.

      If Stallman had never been born, Linux (the kernel) would not have come to existence and no one would have heard of Linus Torvalds. Not without the copyleft GNU license, and all the groundwork that went into creating a 100% free OS. Ironically, this was born out a "live free or die" philosophy for which Stallman is derided even among free software advocates.

      I'll go even farther and say that IMO Stallman has every right to demand that the OS that is called "linux" be rightfully called "GNU OS" -- it's a more accurate description, and it actually gives credit where credit is due.

      I honestly think that, unfortunately and like many before him, Stallman will be long dead before the history books actually give him the credit he deserves.

    42. Re:Leader? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      It's also pretty condenscating, and again, naive, to think that only "sheeple" are prone to excessive admiration. Computers geeks tend to have knowledge of many technical areas that the average person does not.

      Who says that the two groups have no overlap? It is quite possible for people who are otherwise techically competent to be "sheeple" as far as the rest of their social life is concerned.

      You need only watch how one sided discussions of topics like Microsoft, Google, Apple, GW Bush, etc. ....

      Right. If there was ever a thing that called for a one-sided treatment, it would be GW Bush and all those who support him. Or are you going to tell me that under all circumstances, no matter how patently obvious the evidence is, there is always two sides to the story? Like for example that "2+2=4" (in a decimal system) is an "opinion" and one should allow "alternative positions" on the subject, otherwise one is just a member of a "personality cult of the number four"? And speaking of Microsoft, the evidence against them in many, many areas is overwhelming. Google is at this point just another greedy corporation with a pretty PR spin. Ditto for Apple. Alas, both Google and Apple do have some quality products. With Microsoft that depends on your definition of "quality".

      That's probably the only case where people have not agreed, by and large, with Linus, and even then there was fierce discussion.

      You clearly do not visit LKML too often. Long before the BitKeeper there were flamewars about the devfs, the device number allocation schemes, about the 2.4 and then later 2.6 VM managers, the OOM handling, etc and so on.

      Face it, people's opinions on Linus are remarkably one sided.

      Yea that he is a clever programmer, most of the time. That seems to be the prevailing concensus.

      To think that the subgroup you belong to happens to be immune to personality cults is merely to be in denial.

      The subgroup I mentioned (i.e. FOSS coders/users) is pretty much immune to a "personality cult" of people like Linus or RMS. They might not be immune to a "personality" cult of, say, Natalie Portman, but the topic of discussion was Linus, no?

    43. Re:Leader? by dicarve · · Score: 1

      Is is someone forgot Richard M. Stallman???

  3. Kinda odd by drewzhrodague · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's kinda odd that it would take them so long to interview Linus. How long after Microsoft made it's day did they interview Bill? or Steve? It is definately due, and kudos to Linus!

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Kinda odd by vasqzr · · Score: 3, Funny

      At least they didn't do a photo shoot with Linus, like they did with Bill Gates...

    2. Re:Kinda odd by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but as the Stephen Colbert press incident show weeks ago, centralized news media like CNN or magazines like Newsweek (not talking AP or Reuters here) is becoming more and more irrevelant - well, at least if you want to be current on what's actually happening versus what's safe and fun to show/print or in the case of trends, what has actually already happened.

    3. Re:Kinda odd by rumcho · · Score: 1

      Huh, I bet they asked him for a long time to do the interview - he just ignored them. I would imagine publicity is nonsense to Linus and this is what such interview would create

  4. Why `reclusive?' by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I wonder why CNN of all media comapnies had to use the term `reclusive'. Reclusive from a dictionary on my desk is defined as:

    Seeking or preferring seclusion or isolation.

    Does this describe Linus?

    1. Re:Why `reclusive?' by debiansid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the perfect case of ignoring a person all the while and later coming up to him and saying "hey, where have you been hiding all this time?". I guess by reclusive they mean that he doesn't keep shouting his own name off the top of a hill.

      I don't think Linus is reclusive, just that the "corporate world" prefers to use his creation without giving him much due.

      While there will be many posts claiming that he's not THE leader of OSS there is absolutely no doubt that he is one of the most important figures in the OSS revolution along with RMS, Bruce Perens/Eric Raymond, Ian Murdock, etc.

    2. Re:Why `reclusive?' by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Does he seek the limelight? Does he parade or strut around like Balmer or W? Does he try to take credit for things that he did not do like Gates? Does he sound off like Ellison, McNealy, or Chavez?

      Nope. He is quit a bit more like buffet; he prefers to have a small group surround himself, but he interacts when needed.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Why `reclusive?' by 14CharUsername · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He doesn't give interviews to traditional media all very often. If you are traditional media, he is reclusive.

    4. Re:Why `reclusive?' by manifoldronin · · Score: 1
      He is quit a bit more like buffet;
      So... how much for "Linus All You Can Eat"? ;-)
      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    5. Re:Why `reclusive?' by Sludge · · Score: 1

      I would prefer 'iconoclastic'.

    6. Re:Why `reclusive?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the article he keeps talking about how he likes to sit alone infront of his computer in his den. He says he perfers communicating via email, and face-to-face meetings are a waste of time.

      To us geeks, that sounds normal. To the average liberal artsy person, that sounds reclusive.

    7. Re:Why `reclusive?' by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Sort of, kind of. From what I can tell, Linus does not really talk much to traditional media, and he does not announce his personal plans or activities. For someone as high profile as him, it probobly does count as 'reclusive'.

      I live in the Portland area, Linus basically lives in the next town over. There is a very heavy geek population around here, but Linus does not have the kind of local physical presence you would expect from a guy of his stature in the geek community. I know one friend who has managed to meet him at a party, but that was mostly by luck. Apparently he keeps his plans pretty private. I met Ward Cunningham, the guy who invented Wikis and the Portland Pattern Repository, and he apparently doesn't see much of Linus, either.

      He also does not come to many geeky functions or meetings, AFAIK he has not come to any local LUGs or conventions recently. When PSU dedicated its new CS/Engineering building, the governer and Steve Ballmer came, but no Linus. Maybe he didn't want a chair thrown at him :)

      I think it is a combination of relative shyness, combined with a fear of having a horde of fans follow him or form a personality cult. There are so many Linux geeks around here that Linus might be able to form an actual cult if he tried. If he ran for mayor, he might actually come second or third. He wants to avoid that kind of limelight, I'm guessing. I don't see him on much traditional media.

      However, he does talk to some alternative media: some random zine put out by a internet cafe managed to get an interview with him a few months ago.

      So anyways, for reasons that are totally understandable, Linus is a reclusive hermit living in a hobbit-hole in the hills around Portland :) It is this very reclusiveness that has made him the ring-bearer, for none other than him can sneak undetected into the depths of Mordor...

    8. Re:Why `reclusive?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oxford English Dictionary
      SECOND EDITION 1989

      reclusive, a.

      Marked by reclusion or retirement. Now freq. of persons.
      Hence reclusively adv., in the manner of a recluse; reclusiveness.

      recluse, a. and n.

              A. adj.

              1. Of persons: Shut up, secluded from society, esp. as a religious discipline. a. In predicative use, or placed after the n.

              b. In attributive use (usually denoting attachment to seclusion or retirement).

              c. Shut off, retired from company, etc. Obs.

              2. Of one's life, condition, etc.: Characterized by seclusion or close retirement.

              3. a. Of places: Secluded, hidden from observation, solitary. Now rare.

              b. Of things, actions, etc.: Hidden, secret, private. Obs.

              c. Of words or ideas: Recondite. Obs. rare.

              B. n.

              1. a. A person shut up from the world for the purpose of religious meditation; a monk, hermit, anchorite or anchoress, spec. one who remains perpetually shut up in a cell under a vow of strict seclusion. b. One who lives a retired life, one who mixes little with society.

              c. Comb., as recluse-like adj.

              2. What is shut up; contents, store. Obs. rare.

              3. a. A place of seclusion. Obs.

              b. A reservoir for water. Obs.1
          Cf. med.L. reclausa in the same sense (Du Cange).

              4. Reclusion; retirement. Obs.1

  5. Anybody noitced how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linus looks more and more like a penguin as he gets older?

  6. I Can Hear It Now... by dduardo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stallman: I'm going to f***ing kill CNN. It's GNU/Linux damn it!

    *Chair goes flying across room*

    1. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Keyframe2 · · Score: 1

      He would have used chair in the process too, if the method was GPL

    2. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by gowen · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not, though. The bit Linus does is Linux.
      What Stallman calls GNU/Linux is what distributions distribute. i.e. Linux (a kernel) + GNU (a shell / compilation toolchain) + X (a window system) + a desktop environment + a bunch of servers + 93 scripting languages, all under different licenses + a whole bunch of other things.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    3. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by GNUrdom · · Score: 1

      Well, what can I say. The man has got a point.

      --
      - I don't know if it's physically possible but M$ sucks and blows !
    4. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      It is because people like you can't distinguish a monkey from a profet that we've ended up with the world we have now.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    5. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahem, I believe you meant to say "F***ing Kill (TM)". Our lawyers will be contacting you shortly.

    6. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What Stallman calls GNU/Linux is what *some* Linux distributions distribute.

      On the embedded side, there are more and more distro which are using replacements for the GNU tookchain and glibc like busybox and uClibc, thus avoiding many of the GNU tools you typically see in a Linux distro.

      Stallman's generalization is mostly true, but not always true...

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    7. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by kwerle · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. Which is the monkey, and which is the prophet? What does either have to do with "the world we have now"?

    8. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by badfish99 · · Score: 1

      But you still have to compile these with GNU gcc. So I suppose Stallman would want us to call that "GNU/Busybox/Linux".

    9. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by idiotdevel · · Score: 0

      *two seconds pass* ... *flute goes flying across the room*

    10. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      By that measure, shouldn't FreeBSD be a GNU/BSD distro?

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    11. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by linvir · · Score: 1

      It is because of people like you can't distinguish a monkey from a profet that we've ended up with the world we have now.

    12. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      It is still all compiled with GCC, the GNU compiler.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    13. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why that measure is irrelevent. Is Photoshop MS Photoshop because they use Visual C++ (or whatever) to compile it? No because that makes no sense. Stallman's argument is that Linux is just a kernel and worthless without the GNU stuff, which likewise isn't very useful without a kernel. As one is as important as the other, he seems to take offence that you call everything combined 'Linux' when that's just the kernel part of the equeasion. BSD on the otherhand is not compeletely dependent on on GNU tools. It is compiled by gcc yes, but the userland AND kernel are developed by the BSD team. Even if you do not compile Linux with gcc, everything else is still GNU (with exceptions as one of the parent posts states).

    14. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Fallingcow · · Score: 0

      So if I compile Apache with GCC, I have to call it "GNU/Apache"?

    15. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. Which is the monkey, and which is the prophet? What does either have to do with "the world we have now"?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    16. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by arose · · Score: 1

      And how often do you hear Stallman talking about embeded GNU/Linux?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    17. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by arose · · Score: 1

      It is because of people like you can't distinguish money from profit that we've ended up with the world we have now.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    18. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      That includes various single-diskette distros as well. I always pull out the old Coyote Linux as a prime example. It uses busybox and uClibc, NOT the GNU equivalents. ...or are we being deliberately slow today?

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    19. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      I agree completely.

      Linux is a kernel, but the GNU runtime is equally worthless without such a kernel, and both are not as useful as a desktop OS without X, window managers, and various other things that are not provided by either party. The fact of the matter is, both Linux (the kernel) and GNU are important elements, but they are not the only important elements, and they might not even be the MOST important elements by some peoples' measures.

      I think the whole "GNU/Linux" argument is asinine. Linux distros were called "Linux" back when I first booted SLS 0.98, and Stallman didn't care then, or if he did he wasn't saying anything. His place in history is ensured. So why engage in a purely semantic argument?

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    20. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      It is still all compiled with GCC, the GNU compiler.

      Says who? Why couldn't I use, for example, Intel's compiler?

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    21. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by arose · · Score: 1

      I don't think I have ever heard RMS talk about signle floppy distros, so what are you talking about?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    22. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by badfish99 · · Score: 1

      Don't take my remark so seriously. I'd been hoping to be moderated "funny".

    23. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      Sorry... I meant it in jest, but forgot the smiley. :-) :-(

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    24. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      No, he (and others) mainly make the sweeping assertion that *all* Linux distros should be called GNU/Linux, and that is a false assertion IMSNSNhO.

      If you want to qualify it further, I'll probably still disgree, but it's a more reasonable position to take. :-)

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    25. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by arose · · Score: 1
      In the small embedded systems, Linux may be most of the system; perhaps "Linux systems" is the right name for them. They are very different from GNU/Linux systems, which are more GNU than Linux.
      -- GNU/Linux FAQ
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    26. Re:I Can Hear It Now... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      Ah. It seems the FAQ is a lot more reasonable than the statements I tend to see being made by "GNU/Linux" proponents.

      Thanks!

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  7. Vulnerability by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    All it takes to throw the entire open source revolution into chaos and disarray is one well aimed chair-throw.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Vulnerability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, classic.

    2. Re:Vulnerability by Volanin · · Score: 1
      All it takes to throw the entire open source revolution into chaos and disarray is one well aimed chair-throw.

      I believe this would be very true for corporations. We could make an analogy as these corporations being supported over a pit by a very strong chain. If this chain is attacked, be it by stupid moves from the corporation itself (Sony anyone?), or by very bad press and FUD, it might become very hard, sometimes even impossible, not to fall for doom.

      But the way I see open source, it's more like being over a pit supported by many, many very thin and fragile straws. There are many views, many distributions, many projects, many leaderships, some stronger and centered, some diffused. It's a lot easier to completely destroy a lot of these straws, but since they are so many and quite independent of each other, it's becomes a lot harder to make open source fall down.

      You would have a hard time throwing open source into chaos with a single chair throw.
      --
      If I clone myself, can I call it a thread?
      If a girl winks to us, can I call it a race condition?
  8. The Beating Drums by Quirk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The tribes that talk through the likes of CNN count anyone as reclusive who won't go down on an ego dildo (microphone) and help CNN sell advertising space.

    The maddening crowd seems to be too intellectually limited to understand that their need for heroes, saints and sinners is about as interesting as reading a popularization of a first year anthropology text book.

    Not to mention the hours lost mugging for CNN that could have been spent productively.

    just my loose change

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
    1. Re:The Beating Drums by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0

      Ok Bob Dylan is a recluse but Linus? He is very affable, especially for a software engineer. I guess only attention seeking whores aren't recluses.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    2. Re:The Beating Drums by Quirk · · Score: 1
      "One of the best and most succinct documents on netiquette is RFC1855 (RFC stands for "Request for Comments"). ...from this document:

      Don't wander offtopic, don't ramble, and don't send mail or post messages solely to point out other people's errors in typing or spelling. These, more than any other behavior, mark you as an immature beginner."

      p.22
      Self-Service Linux
      Mastering the Art of Problem Determination
      by Mark Wilding and Dan Behman

      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
    3. Re:The Beating Drums by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Except that he isn't citing Thomas Hardy, so he is free to find crowds maddening.

  9. Has /. ever done an interview with Linus? by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems like he would be a perfect candidate

    1. Re:Has /. ever done an interview with Linus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Linus doesn't give a flying fuck about Slashdot, and thinks it's full of moronic mouth-breathers.

      And he's pretty much right.

    2. Re:Has /. ever done an interview with Linus? by xerxesdaphat · · Score: 1

      And yet you still post here?

      --
      The Shoes of the Fisherman's Wife Are Some Jive Ass Slippers
    3. Re:Has /. ever done an interview with Linus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh-So-Funny statement about "ACs"

      Ok, A customer was continually bothering the waiter in a restaurant; first, he'd asked that the air conditioning be turned up because he was too hot, then he asked it be turned down cause he was too cold, and so on for about half an hour. Surprisingly, the waiter was very patient, walking back and forth and never once getting angry. So finally, a second customer asked why didn't they just throw out the pest. "Oh I don't care." said the waiter with a smile. "We don't even have an air conditioner.

    4. Re:Has /. ever done an interview with Linus? by Dasher42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No. Think of all those tech types getting giggly and shy. It's not pretty.

    5. Re:Has /. ever done an interview with Linus? by parme · · Score: 1

      Unlikely Linus would agree to be interviewed on /. Judging from previous comments by Linus, he reads /., thinks it's kind of fun, but does not wish to be associated with the community.

    6. Re:Has /. ever done an interview with Linus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep thousands of times a day.

      And for some reason my posts keep getting deleted in older articals. They need to fix that. And my blog is not working either. I also swear someone else is posting as me.

    7. Re:Has /. ever done an interview with Linus? by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

      Please, please, and ask him why the Reiser4 filesystem is not in his Linux kernel. It has worked for over a year better than any other for me. Even if it's tagged 'Experimental'.

  10. Stallman or anyone else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Stallman is gonna be pissed. Is this really the only leader they could find?

      Bas.

  11. At the same time, Stallman... by alexhs · · Score: 4, Funny

    The revolution is called Open Source. And its leader? Linus Torvalds

    RMS rolls in his... beard.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:At the same time, Stallman... by doodlebumm · · Score: 1

      No respect for GNU/Linux, and now a coup!! Poor guy!!!

    2. Re:At the same time, Stallman... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Stallman may also want to have a few words with somebody who failed to notice the distinction between "open source" and "free software" :)

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    3. Re:At the same time, Stallman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus can have the Open Source movement leadership if he wants it.
      RMS is the Leader of the Free Software movement.

      OSS != FSF

      and in my opinion FSF > OSS.

      Although similar in practice, the philosophy is WAYYY different.

      (dammit. i have to make an /. account)

  12. The real question is... by G-Man · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...how many degrees is he from Kevin Bacon?

    1. Re:The real question is... by Venner · · Score: 1

      >>...how many degrees is he from Kevin Bacon?
      Infinity.

      I found it really amusing that he was on IMDB to begin with, but apparently he can't be connected to Kevin Bacon. C'est la vie.

      --
      A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
    2. Re:The real question is... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      ...6 degrees

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:The real question is... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Then the Oracle is wrong. I came up with a number of 10, and I'm sure its not optimal.

      Susan Egan (Revolution OS) is the key.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:The real question is... by Fallus+Shempus · · Score: 1

      Linus was in The Code Dir. Hannu Puttonen
      Hannu Puttonen directed Mr. Bragg goes to Moscow which featured music by Joe Strummer
      Joe Strummer's music appears in The Royal Tenenbaums, which featured Alec Baldwin
      Alec Baldwin is the brother of William Baldwin
      William Baldwin appeared in Flatliners with ...
      Mr. Kevin Bacon

      Ok so in some circles the use of the Baldwin family is cheating...

    5. Re:The real question is... by smidget2k4 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Three degrees. Linus Torvalds was in The Code (2001) with Miguel de Icaza. Miguel de Icaza was in Antitrust (2001) with Tim Robbins. Tim Robbins (I) was in Mystic River (2003) with Kevin Bacon.

    6. Re:The real question is... by LocoMan · · Score: 1

      Only if you count only actors... but if you count everyone in the IMDB:

      Linux Torvalds was in Revolution OS, written and directed by J.T.S. Moore.
      J.T.S. Moore was firearms master in Recon, starring Valarie Trapp
      Valarie Trapp was in No Mercy (1986) with Mike Bacarella
      Mike Bacarella was in Stir of Echoes (1999) with Kevin Bacon

      and for the record, yes, I have nothing else to do, I'm waiting for this computer to finish rendering... :)

    7. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nope. Linus' Bacon number is two:

      Linus was in The 5 Keys to Mastery with Stephen Tobolowsky
      Stephen Tobolowsky was in Murder in the First with Kevin Bacon

  13. does linus even talk to his mum? by joe+155 · · Score: 4, Funny

    KLS: I understand, but let's say your mom or my mom, they're surfing the Internet but maybe they're not surfing with Firefox just yet or they don't really know what Linux is just yet.

    This went unchallenged... you would have thought that she would be one of the first people to know about linux (even if she never will understand it and proabably still needs him to install a printer - as all mothers do)

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    1. Re:does linus even talk to his mum? by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 1

      Hell, printers are HARD. Even I could use some help from Linus if I was installing one...

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
  14. Dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Get on a treadmill, Linus! You're getting seriously fat. As in, unhealthy levels of fat. We all understand the growth of girth in one's thirties (happens to us all). The only solution is daily exercise. Do it! Personal health is more important than Linux.

    1. Re:Dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He's a typical finnish hacker. As young they are so thin you can see the sunshine through them, but by early 30s all the pizza and coke catches up and they develop a seriously big gut. Even those that somehow manage to get married.

    2. Re:Dude! by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      I took a look at the picture of Linus on the CNN link. I was like "whoa". It's sunny in California, somebody buy him a bike. Not to throw stones from a glass house, but Pizza is not its own food group.

  15. He needs to take some lessons from Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus needs to learn a few marketing lessons from Steve Jobs. Apple seems to be slowly and surely becoming the home base for open source and cutting edge development and is moving out to dominate the "gadgets" market. Linux needs to play catch up and Linus needs to get out and about more often.

    1. Re:He needs to take some lessons from Steve Jobs by phantomflanflinger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Steve Jobs is Admiral Akbar, Linus is Obi Wan, they can't learn much from each other. Yes, RMS is Yoda.

      --
      shin phantomflanflinger
    2. Re:He needs to take some lessons from Steve Jobs by jimwelch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My son, who is a Star Wars Expert Extraordinaire, blames the fall of the Jedi on Yoda. He remade the Jedi in his own image and caused the Jedi to miss the clues to the rise of the Dark Side.

      I sometimes think RMS matches Yoda in thiw way too!

      --
      Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
    3. Re:He needs to take some lessons from Steve Jobs by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am intrigued by your son's theory, and would like to know more. (No, seriously, I'm really curious. For some reason debating Star Wars is great fun.)

      --

      What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
    4. Re:He needs to take some lessons from Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we talking about the same Apple that's close-sourcing XNU, a key part of Darwin (and pretty much the only major part of Darwin they wrote themselves?)

    5. Re:He needs to take some lessons from Steve Jobs by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      No, Yoda has better control of his verbs. Have you actually looked at the LISP that Richard wrote EMACS with?

  16. oh wait....correction.... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    it's GNU/reclusive

  17. The proper term by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe the proper term would be "icon."

    1. Re:The proper term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      having linus in the dock or on the desktop? I guess I'll pass.

    2. Re:The proper term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the proper term would be "icon."

      "Ooh, shiny!"

      "Leenoos!! Wait! Clicky-shiny! Clicky-shiny!!" :P

  18. Did he just compare Microsoft to witchcraft? by RocketRay · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds like it to me:

    To where science took this whole notion of developing ideas in the open and improving on other peoples' ideas and making it into what science is today, and the incredible advances that we have had. And I compare that to witchcraft and alchemy, where openness was something you didn't do.

    Zing!

  19. But... by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Funny

    But... does he run Linux?

    (Sorry, someone had to say it.)

    1. Re:But... by Surt · · Score: 2

      Well, since Linux clearly wasn't developed on Linux originally, I think we can safely conclude that Linus must have used some other OS to develop it. So he probably runs Windows?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:But... by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new CNN Interview giving reclusive overlords
      In Soviet Russia, Linux interviews CNN

    3. Re:But... by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      I believe (I have no sources to cite for this) that his original host environment was MINIX?

      --
      Why not fork?
    4. Re:But... by Khaed · · Score: 1

      So he probably runs Windows?

      Oh my God the balls is took to say that on slashdot. I am surprised you have not been flamed to all hell by the horde by now. Even still, I will say a flamewarriors prayer for you. "Yae though I walk through the valley of the shadow of flames... I will fear no trolls... for asbestos is with me."

      Seriously man. +1 Ballsy.

    5. Re:But... by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      No. BSD/Linux is dying. *duck*

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    6. Re:But... by Surt · · Score: 1

      I was aiming for a +1 funny, but i've gotten next to no responses, and no moderations either. Oh well, maybe it wasn't really humorous enough.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  20. Favourite quote by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For example I long ago decided I will never go to meetings again because I think face to face meetings are the biggest waste of time you can ever have.

    Amen to that.

    1. Re:Favourite quote by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 4, Funny

      For example I long ago decided I will never go to meetings again because I think face to face meetings are the biggest waste of time you can ever have.

      Hi, this is Dan from Human Resources. You probably don't know me, because you were absent from the Workplace Amicable Relationship Promotion Meeting. After meeting with your supervisors, we have come to the decision that we should meet with you RE your attitude toward workplace gatherings.

      Not only does your absence from group meetings project the wrong image to the rest of the company, but some employees have taken it as a personal affront. There have been complaints, and many people at the last Work/Life Socialization Meeting have asked us to step in. Is 2:00 PM okay for everyone?

      Thanks,
      Dan
      Human Resources

      --

      Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    2. Re:Favourite quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listed as Insightful, and although true, I cant help but read 100% sarcasm in between the lines. Which makes your post a 5 Funny to me.

    3. Re:Favourite quote by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Workplace Amicable Relationship Promotion Meeting.

      WARP'M?

    4. Re:Favourite quote by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 2, Funny

      ** fraud!! **

      Notes from HR types always have a flowery background with animated GIFs in the signature.

    5. Re:Favourite quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol too true, although I suppose if it were my job to poop out logs all day I'd probably drop them in smiley face formation too.

    6. Re:Favourite quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Dan,

      Fuck off cocksucker.

      Signed,
      The rest of the human race.

  21. Best Quote by CrayzyJ · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Normally I am not recognized, people don't throw their panties at me."

    Nice to know he thinks like the rest of us guys.

    --
    Holy s-, it's Jesus!
    1. Re:Best Quote by IainMH · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Normally I am not recognized, people don't throw their panties at me."

      Nice to know he thinks like the rest of us guys.


      A considerable majority of the open source movement are guys. I for one wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of a crusty boxer short shower!

    2. Re:Best Quote by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

      He'd be in big trouble if they did. His wife *is* a karate champ.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Best Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for yourself...

      us samba hackers get lots of lovin'

    4. Re:Best Quote by C_Kode · · Score: 3, Funny

      WOW, I didn't know you could marry an arcade game!!!

    5. Re:Best Quote by ndogg · · Score: 2, Funny

      The next time I go to a conference with him as a speaker, I'll be sure to stop by at a Victoria's Secret beforehand.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    6. Re:Best Quote by bcnstony · · Score: 1

      people don't throw their panties at me

      What else don't people throw at Linus? Can we say . . . Baked Goods?

    7. Re:Best Quote by DMoylan · · Score: 1

      obligitary red dwarf line

      no way are these my underwear! these bend! -lister

    8. Re:Best Quote by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      While Linus might enjoy the joke, you'll be surprised how quick a 10-ft perimeter forms around you as the crowd nervously retreats.

    9. Re:Best Quote by Ibn+al-Hazardous · · Score: 1
      "Normally I am not recognized, people don't throw their panties at me."

      I was thinking; isn't this related to his wife being an (ex-?)karate champion?

      --
      Yes, I am a biological organism. All rumors to the contrary are just that, rumors.
  22. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who don't know who Linus is don't belong on Slashdot.

  23. Rock Star? by sasha328 · · Score: 1
    KLS: Now you are something of a rock star in tech circles...

    LT: I don't notice that in normal life. I don't actually go to that many conferences. I do that a couple of times a year. Normally I am not recognized, people don't throw their panties at me. I'm a perfectly normal person sitting in my den just doing my job.

    Do I sense a bit of disappointment here, a Freudian slip perhaps?
    All in all, not a bad interview. Good insight into why he does what he does.
    1. Re:Rock Star? by linvir · · Score: 1

      I doubt he's disappointed. I imagine he's been invited to every IT conference, gathering and conversation since the late nineties. When he says "I don't go", I think it means just that.

    2. Re:Rock Star? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just as he revealed something, I think you just revealed quite a bit about yourself as well. The parent poster wasn't talking about the conferences part, he was talking about the throwing underwear part.

  24. a Stallman quote on Linus' leadership by H4x0r+Jim+Duggan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Talking about a t-shirt which showed Linus as a sword-wielding leader:

    "It's ironic," says Stallman mournfully. "Picking up that sword is exactly what Linus refuses to do. He gets everybody focusing on him as the symbol of the movement, and then he won't fight. What good is it?"

    From Chapter 13 of the biography of Stallman.

    1. Re:a Stallman quote on Linus' leadership by phrasebook · · Score: 1

      "It's ironic," says Stallman mournfully. "Picking up that sword is exactly what Linus refuses to do. He gets everybody focusing on him as the symbol of the movement, and then he won't fight. What good is it?"

      It's plenty good. You don't win by having a big fight and getting in people's faces, all that does is make you look like a dick and alienate the people you're trying to convert. Believe me, I've tried it with christians, the motherfuckers just don't want to know.

    2. Re:a Stallman quote on Linus' leadership by SEE · · Score: 1

      Had Linus not wrote a kernel, we'd be in a BSD world today, because there still wouldn't have been a working GNU-based system in October and November 1994. How much attention would the FSF have gotten if, instead of using a GPLed kernel and userland, the only working free Unixlike kernel-and-userlands when the Internet went mainstream were FreeBSD and OpenBSD?

      RMS is complaining that because his people utterly failed to make timely delivery of a kernel, somebody non-ideological wound up the symbol of the movement. In fact, he should be thanking Linus for saving him from utter irrelevance by delivering a GPLed kernel soon enough to matter, after the failure of TRIX and the disastrous decision to go with Mach rendered the GNU project unable to deliver a system in a relevant timeframe.

  25. Beating a dead horse.... by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of Linus Torvaldses!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  26. I just gave Linus, +1, insightful: by Starker_Kull · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the interview:

    LT: Absolutely. There was a bit of bragging, there was also a bit of, hey, I still, the way I do my work is I sit these days downstairs in my basement alone. And it's nice to just talk to people and a lot of it was probably just social, just saying, hey this is a way to interact with other geeks who are probably also socially inadequate in many ways.

    Pretty good insight - it's a way for geeks to socialize other than Star Trek conventions!

    (Ducks)

    On science and software development:

    LT: We shouldn't give credit to Linux per se. There were open source projects and free software before Linux was there. Linux in many ways is one of the more visible and one of the bigger technical projects in this area and it changed how people looked at it because Linux took both the practical and ideological approach. At the same time I don't think this whole "openness" notion is new. In fact I often compare open source to science. To where science took this whole notion of developing ideas in the open and improving on other peoples' ideas and making it into what science is today, and the incredible advances that we have had. And I compare that to witchcraft and alchemy, where openness was something you didn't do. So openness is not something new, it is something that actually has worked for a long time.

    Great comparison between open software and science, both of which a lot of people don't get.

    On the uselessness of meetings:

    KLS: So the face to face thing is a little bit overrated?

    LT: I think so. For example I long ago decided I will never go to meetings again because I think face to face meetings are the biggest waste of time you can ever have. I think most people who work at offices must share my opinion on meetings. Nothing ever gets done. When things get done, you usually have someone come into your office to talk about it. But a lot of the time the real work gets done by people sitting, especially in programming, alone in front of their computers doing what they do best.

    Dilbert freed from the pointy-haired boss type - Pretty cool. Interesting interview, I may and try and watch it rather than read it.

    1. Re:I just gave Linus, +1, insightful: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Face to Face meetings ARE worthwhile... but mostly for introductions...
      I notice that most people treat you differently/better once they have met you...

      after the initial meeting, yeah... lets do it all via chat/email/conference call
      [in that order]

      -E

    2. Re:I just gave Linus, +1, insightful: by malraid · · Score: 1

      sorry, Linux is not supported. but if you install windows on the other hand...

      --
      please excuse my apathy
  27. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the most pathetic attempt at karma whoring I've ever seen. For those who can't follow the parent post because it contains big words, I offer the following guide (mod me up!):

    for
    people
    who

    Ah, screw it.

  28. CNN scuks balls by clicketyclicky · · Score: 0, Troll

    TFA is not worth reading. Linus - the reclusive leader of open source? Yeah, right. I would think that CNN would do at least some kind of research before interviewing him.

    1. Re:CNN scuks balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH CNN Do research .. HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH

    2. Re:CNN scuks balls by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Eric Cartman, is that you?

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:CNN scuks balls by clicketyclicky · · Score: 0

      Mom?

  29. GNU/Linux Rocks! by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

    What's your number? If I can't copy/paste it into Ekiga, I won't call you.

  30. reclusive by mdmarkus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    reclusive (adj): Not having a publicist lobbying to get onto CNN.

  31. Are you trying to be funny? by mangu · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Apple seems to be slowly and surely becoming the home base for open source and cutting edge development and is moving out to dominate the "gadgets" market.


    If by "dominate the gadgets market" you mean selling lots of iPods, maybe you are right. But "home base for open source"? The Apple operating system isn't open source, for chrissake! There's no intersection between Linux and Apple, Linux is an open source operating system, Apple is a system which has some open source elements, but the OS isn't one of them. It used to be but, thanks to the BSD license, that detail has been fixed.


    As for this "cutting edge development", could you be so kind and point us to any big OSS project whose development began in Apple and was later adopted by others? I mean, like Konqueror was the basis for Safari, only the other way round?


    Oh, sorry, I forgot, don't feed the trolls, or maybe that big "whooosh" was the joke going over my head?

    1. Re:Are you trying to be funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "dominate the gadgets market" you mean selling lots of iPods, maybe you are right.

      Hey! I just realized that iPod rhymes with iDiot!
      -- returns to his cave.

    2. Re:Are you trying to be funny? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      Apple is a system which has some open source elements, but the OS isn't one of them. It used to be but, thanks to the BSD license, that detail has been fixed.
      It was less closed than it is now, but it was never OSS.

      Overall though, the reason why Mac OS X is a "home base for open source" is simply because it's a Unix-like system which uses GNU toolchain for development. Most OSS development these days is in the same camp. This means that porting an F/OSS application from Linux to Mac OS X is much much easier than porting it to Windows. Thus, Mac OS X users have more F/OSS available to them than Windows users, and more likely to play with some at least.

  32. It's good to see that he didn't bite by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seemed that CNN were trying to ask very pointed questions, trying to make Linus out to be some warrior against Microsoft. I like this part:


    KLS: Another reason, because it's an alternative to Microsoft?

    LT: Well that is, I think, played up more than it necessarily needs to be. Because there is a very vocal side to this which is the whole anti Microsoft thing. I think it makes a better story than is necessarily true in real life.


    For a techie guy who doesn't have reams of PR guys behind him and telling him what he should say, he handled the press pretty well.

    I thought CNN were supposed to be respectable, like the US version of the BBC or something? It seemed like they were just looking for some big scoop with regards to people being Anti-Microsoft rather than trying to have an interesting interview with a major contributor to an alternative OS.

    1. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by Rob_Bryerton · · Score: 1

      I thought CNN were supposed to be respectable, like the US version of the BBC or something?

      Mod parent up +5 hilarious.

      Please tell me you're kidding. I can't read this subtle brand of sarcasm without the tags, so maybe I'm just dense. Anyway, CNN is about as 'respectable' as FOX; they just have a slightly different agenda. Actually, same agenda, different presentation.

      Of course, you *were* supposed to beleive they're respectable, but now you know different. Right?

      Oh well, I guess I'll go read TFA...

    2. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

      Well, I usually get my news from the BBC, RTE (they're Irish) and Euronews (that's a great channel!). I look at Fox News for pure entertainment purposes. Every now and again I flick through CNN and it doesn't seem as crazy as Fox... I suppose appearances can be deceiving.

    3. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by aetherspoon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No such equivilence in the US.
      Just watch how they react to news stories on the air - you'll see it after awhile as long as you pay attention. Just like MSNBC and Fox News (although to different points of view).

      Major television news outlets in the US are worthless, and this comes from a US citizen.

      --
      --- Ãther SPOON!
    4. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seemed like they were just looking for some big scoop with regards to people being Anti-Microsoft rather than trying to have an interesting interview with a major contributor to an alternative OS.

      Actually, this kind of questioning probably comes from the point of the interviewers looking at the open source community... Let's face facts, there are a lot of OSS mouthpieces out there who take every oppertunity to slight Microsoft. It's part of the subculture and probably for all the wrong reasons. How many slashdotters, if they were asked the same question, would have replied "Gates is a fucktard! OSS 4 Life, Holmes!"

      The unfortunate part of all of this is that I think some of the more vocal MS bashers have less to do with Linus' appreciation of open source and his own goals than just trying to find acceptance in a geek culture. The active MS basher probably does little for the OSS community whereas the active member leading or contributing to OSS projects probably shrug MS off and realize they (the OSS community) do what they do to make new software, not to piss on MS's parade.

      Or as Ian MacKaye once put it: "Empty barrels make the most noise".

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    5. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by MilwaukeeCharlie · · Score: 2, Informative

      No comment on the respectability (or lack thereof) of CNN, but it's not apt to compare them to the BBC. The BBC is a public broadcasting company; CNN is private.

      The BBC is more comparable to PBS, although I believe the BBC is funded, at least in part, through a direct tax on those who use the service by way of a "tv license" that one must buy to purchase a tv, while public media in the US compete for grants from the CPB, which is in turn funded by taxes.

      (Not to start another flamewar about public broadcasting and taxation in the US...just wanted to point out that if your impression of the interview is "It seemed like they were just looking for some big scoop with regards to people being Anti-Microsoft..." that could be explained by the profit motive inherent in a private news company.)

      --
      [[Jdapnc. O,..y (Nuts...keyboard stuck in Dvorak mode again.)
    6. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by Photar · · Score: 1

      In the US nobody respects the media.

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    7. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by DragonWriter · · Score: 1
      I thought CNN were supposed to be respectable, like the US version of the BBC or something?
      They were, and with some justification, in the early 1990s. The last several years of trying to out-Fox Fox News have really destroyed CNN.
    8. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      uhm...since when does the BBC not ask pointed questions?
      I listen to the BBC about 2-3 times a week and evey interview has confentational and pointed questions.
      since when doess asking pointed questions make you unrespectable?

      --
      --meh--
    9. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

      That's true. But they're usually asked in that manner because the interviewer wants to be 'tough' on the interviewee. These questions were pointed in an underhanded way. They served no purpose other than to try and get some quote from Linus that bashed MS.

    10. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by jafac · · Score: 1

      For a brief period during the first half of 1992, CNN *was* respectable. Then they realized that on Cable, all they had to do was pander to the lowest common denominator to get more Ad dollars. Cable News (and journalism in general) has been in a downhill slide ever since.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    11. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by Damek · · Score: 1

      CNN isn't crazy like FOX, but they're not a good source for real journalism, either. Their brand of bad journalism is less intentional - it's more from simple laziness and corporate-media silliness. That and general US journalist paranoia about being perceived as "too liberal." Heaven forbid conservative nutjobs write reams of letters and books about a liberal media. They'll do that no matter what...

      But I digress.

      I would argue there is no respectable news source in the USA, at least not akin to the BBC.

    12. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by iroll · · Score: 1

      Worthless "for the most part." Conventional wisdom would suggest that the cable news companies are a bad example because they have 24 hours to fill up. Meanwhile, the broadcast networks only have 20 mins, so they're just whoring for ratings.

      But that's just for the most part. I've actually found that CBS does a decent job of reporting. Sure, you probably read it first on the news.bbc.co.uk, but it trickles over to CBS and generally without too much spin.

      And if you're willing to turn off your tv and turn on the radio, NPR does a decent domestic impression of the Beeb. They run the stories nobody else has heard of (like civil wars in countries with hard to pronounce names), and they provide deeper coverage than the cable or broadcast networks. NPR's slant can probably be best classified as center-left, but the same can be said for the BBC. And hey, in the immortal words of Stephen Colbert, "Reality has a well-known liberal bias."

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    13. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by sickofthisshit · · Score: 1

      CNN *International* is actually pretty similar in tone to the BBC World Service.

      The CNN shown in the U.S. is becoming less and less straight news in an effort to regain the audience lost to Fox and other cable news outlets.

      In any case, from what I've heard on the BBC World Service radio, the interviewers often do ask baited or aggressive questions, flipping sides when they interview people on opposite ends of a conflict. There's nothing inherently non-"respectable" in asking questions of this sort.

    14. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as I like Ian MacKaye (I really do), the proverb "Empty vessels make the most noise" is extremely old.

    15. Re:It's good to see that he didn't bite by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Believe me, I'm sure that he didn't coin the term but it is a reference that fits the situation well.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  33. Roots by Dashcolon · · Score: 2, Funny

    "hey, I still, the way I do my work is I sit these days downstairs in my basement alone"
    He may be rich and famous, but Linus keeps it real

    --
    Trout's epitaph: Life is no way to treat an animal.
    1. Re:Roots by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

      Granted, his basement probably is better modeled and furnished than most of our houses.

  34. Speaking of which by ex-geek · · Score: 1
    *Chair goes flying across room*

    Where is the militant wing of the FOSS-movement nowadays? Or in other words: haven't heard from ESR for some time.
  35. As far as I remember... by Hymer · · Score: 1

    ...an article here from last year (2005) stated that Linus uses a dual G5 Macintosh ... wich he btw. got for free.

  36. He duidnt answer the real question.... by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
    Who would he rather have an in-depth interview with:
    • Katie Couric.
    • Paula Zahn.
    • Connie Chung.
    1. Re:He duidnt answer the real question.... by Eleazer · · Score: 1

      Katie Couric is the correct answer here. RAWR!

    2. Re:He duidnt answer the real question.... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Robin Meade. w00t!

    3. Re:He duidnt answer the real question.... by NaCh0 · · Score: 0

      Megyn Kendall.....Yummy!!!!!!!

  37. DOH! Forgot proper formatting, too early still... by smidget2k4 · · Score: 1

    Three Degrees

    Linus Torvalds was in The Code (2001) with Miguel de Icaza.
    Miguel de Icaza was in Antitrust (2001) with Tim Robbins.
    Tim Robbins (I) was in Mystic River (2003) with Kevin Bacon.

  38. just buy a mac ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod yourself up.

  39. I used GNU before Linux existed by mangu · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There was a shop in Venice, in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, which sold open source software in the late 1980s. You picked your choice of OSS and sat in the waiting room while they prepared your 360kb 5.25" diskettes. I went there a few times, but it was like buying some herbal tea from a chinese shop.


    If you ask me, the biggest contribution of Linux was turning the OSS movement from a "niche" to a "community". Linux got a recognition from the mainstream software world that GNU never came even close to obtaining.

  40. Re:FYI by linvir · · Score: 3, Funny
    And for people who aren't sure what to make of the above post, here's a useful link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma_whore#Karma_who res
    Karma whores are individuals, or messages themselves, that attempt to receive feedback in the form of karma points. Often these will be needless information (such as a link to a Wikipedia article relevant to the subject being discussed)
  41. Windows Sucks! by linvir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Call me when the text editor can handle new lines consistently.

    1. Re:Windows Sucks! by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newline

      * Systems based on ASCII or a compatible character set use either LF (Line Feed, 0x0A) or CR (Carriage Return, 0x0D) individually, or CR followed by LF (CR+LF, 0x0D 0x0A).

                          o LF: Unix and Unix-like systems, Linux, AIX, Xenix, Mac OS X, BeOS, Amiga, RISC OS and others
                          o CR+LF: CP/M, MP/M, DOS, Microsoft Windows
                          o CR: Apple II family and Mac OS through version 9

      * EBCDIC systems--mainly IBM mainframe systems, including z/OS (OS/390), i5/OS (OS/400)--use NEL (Next Line, 0x15) as the newline character. Note that EBCDIC also has control characters called CR and LF, but the numerical value of LF differs from the one used by ASCII. Additionally, there are some EBCDIC variants that also use NEL but assign a different numeric code to the character.

      * OpenVMS uses a record-based file system and stores text files as one record per line. No line terminators are actually stored, but the system can transparently add a terminator to each line when it is retrieved by an application.

      Most textual Internet protocols (including HTTP, SMTP, FTP, IRC and many others) mandate the use of ASCII CR+LF (0x0D 0x0A) on the protocol level, but recommend that tolerant applications recognize lone LF as well. In practice, there are many applications that erroneously use the C newline character '\n' instead (see section Newline in programming languages below). This leads to problems when trying to communicate with systems adhering to a stricter interpretation of the standards; one such system is the qmail MTA that actively refuses to accept messages from systems that send bare LF instead of the required CR+LF.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    2. Re:Windows Sucks! by linvir · · Score: 1
      Your "adhering to a stricter interpretation of the standards" is my "lacking basic exception handling", and it's the exact same sort of thing that creates the copy/pasting issue cited by the original poster.

      In other news, Tribbin graduated to nerd level 49 today, after responding to a light-hearted joke with a long-winded description of the technical specifications of the technology in question. In a long press conference drawn out by his insistence on correcting the grammar of each question asked, he told reporters "lol wikipedia ftw!"

    3. Re:Windows Sucks! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I didn't think it was a joke. It was marked "insightful" by the mods... of course, moderation around here is so hit-and-miss that I doubt half the mods even know what "insightful" even means. But either way, it stuck me as a stupid criticism of Windows, especially since you can use other text editors. (But you can't use "another" copy and paste mechanism, and it's obvious the one in Linux *is* broken if you're trying to move anything except text.)

  42. Re:DOH! Forgot proper formatting, too early still. by Golthur · · Score: 1

    Well done. If I had mod points, they'd be yours for this magnificent feat of searchitude :)

    --
    Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law.
  43. Headline/content disconnect by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The headline: Reclusive Linux founder opens up

    The first Torvalds quote in the article: "Well today what I do mostly is actually communication."

    And working directly with 10-20 people counts as being part of a farily large team. If you spent an average of an hour a week discussing issues with those individuals, then that amounts to half your work time.

    Note that headlines and articles are usually written by different people, and often different viewpoints and motivations are evident.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  44. thanks Linus by SebNukem · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I had to choose between Linux and the Pope, I'd choose Linus.

    I always enjoy reading interviews with Linus. They are rare which makes them more enjoyable. Linus is an interesting guy and probably a model for a significant number of geeks in the world. So thanks for granting an interview and making my life better.

    S.

    PS. someone should tell him that people DO HATE microsoft.

    1. Re:thanks Linus by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 1

      He didn't say people didn't hate Microsoft. He said the people he knows don't work on Linux just because they hate Microsoft.

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
  45. It's the community by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    I would say just the opposite. For me, it's all about the community which RMS had a big part in building. Linux is just a kernel; I use Debian, and GNU, and other Free Software, that's well engineered, developed in public, supported in public, etc. As far as the kernel underneath it all goes, I really don't care if it's Linux or HURD or some BeOS clone, or something else, as long as it's under a Free license.

  46. Re:FYI by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    If anyone read this far down the thrad and STILL doesn't know who Linus is, I think this link might help.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  47. Must be a mistype by MrYotsuya · · Score: 1

    Stallman: I'm going to f***ing kill CNN. It's GNU/Linux damn it!

    *Chair goes flying across room*


    Are you sure you don't mean Steve Ballmer?

  48. Linus = The Babe; RMS = Ty Cobb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you are even remotely aware of baseball history, then you'll understand this analogy perfectly:

    Linus is Babe Ruth to Stallman's Ty Cobb.

  49. Woof by glas_gow · · Score: 1

    The reclusive thing has more to do with CNN self-aggrandisement, than any quantifiable reclusivity inherent in Torvalds. Maybe if they had an interview with J.D. Salinger, I'd sit up and take notice. Type Linus Torvalds in Google image and you'll see just how reclusive the guy is. There's one photo of him topless, drinking beer. By the turn of the next century, language will have all the meaning of a dog's bark. Woof. Whatever, Move-on, Get-over-it.

  50. Panty/boxer shower by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1
    "Normally I am not recognized, people don't throw their panties at me."

    A considerable majority of the open source movement are guys. I for one wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of a crusty boxer short shower!

    Come the next Linus-attended Linux convention, we need to respond to Linus' between-the-lines appeal for a panty shower one way or another. Will the geekgrrls and the linuxchixs please stand up(, remove panties, aim, let loose) and be counted to preempt the crusty boxer short shower scenario!

    (PS. If there really are no females available, would the brave volunteer kindly remember to shower and shave prior to executing the maneuver in order to add a dash of realism... oh, and [ask someone to] wash those boxers too!)

    --

    Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

  51. Who's the leader? by MarkusQ · · Score: 4, Informative

    The headline asks the question if he is the leader, its not a statement but since you brought it up, whom would you declare the OSS leader? Al Gore?

    Maybe, but only if he picks Feingold as his running mate.

    But seriously, it would have to be RMS. Linus pointedly isn't trying to lead a movement (at a conference he reportedly said "I really don't like the idea of thousands of people following me. (pause) But I'd appreciate it if someone could tell me where the men's room is.").

    RMS, on the otherhand, has been pointently "leading" for going on three decades now.

    --MarkusQ

    P.S. And what Gore actually said was: "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system." Which was true.

    As Vincent Cerf, said "The Internet would not be where it is in the United States without the strong support given to it and related research areas by the Vice President [Gore] in his current role and in his earlier role as Senator."

    And Dave Ferber said without Gore the Internet "would not be where it is today."

    And Marc Andreesen said "Gore made [Mosaic] possible with the High Performance Computing Act."

    And Joseph E. Traub said "[Gore] was perhaps the first political leader to grasp the importance of networking the country. Could we perhaps see an end to cheap shots from politicians and pundits about inventing the Internet?"

    See Seth's page.

    1. Re:Who's the leader? by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      "Stop whining." -- Detective John Kimble

    2. Re:Who's the leader? by natedubbya · · Score: 1
      And what Gore actually said was: "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system." Which was true.

      It's true if you believe R&D only happens because of the government. It's true if you believe the government is the creative force behind all its funded projects. It's true if you believe research is not possible without the government.

      It was quotes like that that truly drove people (like me) away from Gore. He was (and still is, I think) of the single mind that the government is the sole driving force of the country and in this case, technological innovation. Not the people, not the college grads, not the researchers. The government. Hence, when people lashed back at him about his quote, he was utterly confused. He's probably still confused to this day, but well, that's just conjecture on my part :)

    3. Re:Who's the leader? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Richard is not always right, but he is definitely the prophet of open source software in the full sense of "open" or "free". Linux makes more money, is easier to talk with, and bathes more frequently: it makes him easier to interview. And the Linux kernel was the final missing bit of a full open source operating system. Just as Mitch Kapor stepped into the Lotus Notes project, finished it, and got credit for creating the whole business, Linus broke a pent-up logjam and gets credit for the resulting river.

      Linus is good and deserves respect, but iconifying him as the "leader of open source" confuses the matter.

    4. Re:Who's the leader? by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

      It's true if you believe R&D only happens because of the government. It's true if you believe the government is the creative force behind all its funded projects. It's true if you believe research is not possible without the government.

      Nuts. I don't believe any of those things, yet I can see that Gore was telling the truth. You don't have to believe that all cars are made in Detroit to recognize that some particular car was. And you don't have to believe that government drives all R&D to recognize that the internet (the backbone, not the content) was a an outgrowth of research and development by the US government.

      It was quotes like that that truly drove people (like me) away from Gore. He was (and still is, I think) of the single mind that the government is the sole driving force of the country and in this case, technological innovation.

      Nuts again.

      While Gore may have worked in government, he has certainly done a great deal in the private sector as well. Since the 2000 election, he has started his own TV network, made a movie, appeared on several TV shows (Futerama, Saturday Night Live, etc.), chartered planes to evacuate Katrina victims, taught a college journalism class, served on the boards of Apple and Google, and all sorts of other things.

      So far as I know, he didn't look to the government to help with any of these projects, even in cases where it was arguably the government's job to be doing what he did.

      During those same years, the advocates of "smaller government" ran up a huge national debt, dramatically increased the intrusion of government into our lives (including, to keep this post sort of on topic, aiding their corporate owners in trying to squeeze out Open Source software), and engaged in the largest corporate welfare program in history.

      --MarkusQ

    5. Re:Who's the leader? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the people, not the college grads, not the researchers

      where do you think they got the money to do research? The government.

      Who do you think spearheaded the funding process? Gore.

      There is a great deal of research done without government funding, most of it is done with government funding. Grants make the world turn in research.

      The Internet's infrastructure was also almost entirely created by government grants. Universities that create such cool things as Pine == government $$.

      You are a complete idiot.

    6. Re:Who's the leader? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      It's not whining, it's called stating the truth.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  52. Benedict -vs- Benedict by Tribbin · · Score: 1

    Linus Benedict Torvalds

    -vs-

    Benedict XVI

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  53. Apologies - posted in wrong place by twasserman · · Score: 1

    Will repost in Lenovo discussion. Sorry about that.

  54. Porky by easter1916 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Christ, Linus has porked out... he's approaching blimp size.

  55. Re:Leader? -1 Pedantic by andreyw · · Score: 1

    LD binds. LDD just shows the binds.

  56. A return from the Coin bank in the Machine? by Netw0rkAssh0liates · · Score: 1

    Did Linus insert his 25-cents on a string, and after done playing he pulled out?

    I bet she's really one of those $5 machines that you strapon into, like at Disneyland...at-least you can sit inside her and rotate upside, downside, sideways, and wonka-ways. I landed the plane at the end too, but it's a one-level arcade game they don't want to let anyone play longer than 10 minutes/2000watts.

    She was called GForce, or some similar title for a Cockpit sit-in fighter, kind of like After-Burner. I always wanted to own one of those After-Burner arcade consoles--she's the one that vibrates my hand when my Jet is hit-on. I played that version in Whiskey Petes in Nevada, or perhaps Pizza Hut.

  57. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did you expect someone who codes Linux & reads Slashdot to be married to? :)

  58. Re:oh wait....correction....and another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GNU/CNN

  59. sour grapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can read between the lines in the article, he's just mad there aren't hordes of geeky chicks throwing their panties at him, so he took his code marbles and went home.

    j/k *snort*

    It would be nice if geeks at least had some cheerleaders though....

  60. anything to accomplish goin forward? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    KLS: Is there anything else you want to accomplish going forward?

    LT: No, ...


    What a dumb fellow!!!! If a leader has no goals, no vision, fantastic right? :) No wonder he doesn't understand the importance of drivers from OEMs to bring Linux to masses.

  61. Re:FYI by miro+f · · Score: 1

    I don't know whether to laugh or cry... ;)

    --
    being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
  62. Linux is not one man effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alarming and Disgusting, a leader with no dream and goal.

    Is not a one man effort for Linux, come on wake up Mr Linux.

    Mr Linux is just getting a ride on many others who contribute to this.

    The Saga of the Linux patent was a complete disaster.

    Mr steve and Mr Bill must be open their jaws now after this interivew article.

  63. The work on GNU proves something by H4x0r+Jim+Duggan · · Score: 1

    Stallman hasn't asked for people to stop crediting Linus - he suggests "GNU/Linux", not just "GNU".

    The existence of Linux took away the big need to develop a GNU-compatible kernel. If Linux didn't exist, maybe the kernel of FreeBSD would have been adapted, or maybe Hurd would have remained a core project. But this is just speculation.

    Having written GNU, I have confidence that the GNU project would have met the challenge of developing a kernel if the pressure wasn't taken off by Linux.

    So Linus wrote Linux, and the GNU project wrote GNU.

    1. Re:The work on GNU proves something by SEE · · Score: 1

      You're ignoring the timeframe.

      A GNU kernel would have been delivered, and in the 1990s even, if Linux hadn't come around. But the HURD was a hard project, and many of the same factors that made the FSF decide against the adoption of Linux as the GNU kernel would have delayed adoption of a BSD kernel (and then there would have been development time, on the same in-house development model). Given that, a complete GNU system with FSF-supplied kernel may have been available by as early as, oh, late 1995.

      And nobody would have cared. Because one of the BSD systems would have already had the mindshare, not a GNU system. Which means the GPL, copyleft, FSF, and RMS wouldn't have gotten the mindshare that they got from being attached to the pre-eminent free Unix.

      The point here is not any technical achievement on Linus's part, or any lack of credit RMS wants to give him for his role in the GNU system. Rather, it's that if it weren't for a GPLed kernel being delivered in '93-'94, instead of '95-96, the "political" climate would be far less favorable to RMS. That he's asked to comment about Linus is the result of the prominence Linus gave him; nobody would have bothered asking him his opinion of the FreeBSD kernel developers if FreeBSD had become the leading free Unix.

      There's a bit of ettiquette that's expressed as, "Dance withy the one that brung ya." When RMS criticises Linus's lack of zeal, that's the courtesy he isn't exercising.

  64. Was Gore correct when he said this...? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.

    That is the key point.

    You've proved the Internet would not be where it is today without Gore's help.

    You haven't proved that the Internet was created due to Gore's initiative.

    1. Re:Was Gore correct when he said this...? by MarkusQ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.

      That is the key point.

      You've proved the Internet would not be where it is today without Gore's help.

      You haven't proved that the Internet was created due to Gore's initiative.

      Nuts. Saying you took the initiative in doing something does not mean that you accomplished it single handedly, or even that you cause it to happen. It means that you got off your butt and started working towards a goal before others joined in, and that is obviously true in this case.

      RMS, for example, clearly took the initiative in creating the free software movement, even though Linux got done long before the Hurd.

      -- MarkusQ

      P.S. If a statement like Gore's, that can be misread to imply something that is (harmlessly) false sets your blood boiling, I'll bet you are fuming mad when you hear politicians say more outrageous stuff, like:

      • "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction."- Dick Cheney, Vice President, Speech to VFW National Convention, 8/26/2002
      • "Iraq has stockpiled biological and chemical weapons, and is rebuilding the facilities used to make more of those weapons. We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have."- George W. Bush, President, Radio Address, 10/5/2002
      • "The Iraqi regime...possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons. It is seeking nuclear weapons. We know that the regime has produced thousands of tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, sarin nerve gas, VX nerve gas."- George W. Bush, President, Cincinnati, Ohio Speech, 10/7/2002
      • "We know for a fact that there are weapons there."- Ari Fleischer, Press Secretary, Press Briefing, 1/9/2003
      • "We know where they are."- Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, ABC Interview, 3/30/2003
      • "No one ever said that we knew precisely where all of these agents were, where they were stored."- Condoleeza Rice, US National Security Adviser, Meet the Press, 6/8/2003
      • "I think the burden is on those people who think he didn't have weapons of mass destruction to tell the world where they are."- Ari Fleischer, Press Secretary, Press Briefing, 7/9/2003
    2. Re:Was Gore correct when he said this...? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      "[Gore] started working towards a goal before others joined in, and that is obviously true in this case."

      Gore start working toward what? Creating the internet? Before others joined in? And this is "Obviously true"? Your sources?

      Or read here: http://reason.com/9905/ed.vp.source.shtml

      Second, in 1985 the National Science Foundation agreed to fund a "backbone" network among five supercomputer sites. Academic institutions could connect to the backbone if they organized regional networks of their own; the NSF provided two-year grants to cover the regional networks' startup expenses, after which universities paid their own way. Combined with the communications power of TCP/IP, this NSFNet boosted the number of interconnected computers to critical mass. It displaced ARPANET as the driving force in the development of a worldwide network of interlinked computers.

      In this important sense, "the Internet" dates not to 1969 but to the early 1980s. Gore enters the picture a bit later--in 1987, when he supported a drive by universities to expand funding for NSFNet.


      Re: your reference to Bush & Co -- "oh, look over there!"

  65. I'm picturing you holed up on an island somewhere by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    No one is saying Gore invented electrons (though, I wouldn't be surprised if there weren't some wingnuts claiming that he claimed it--after all, there were little pockets of the Japanese army still holed up and fighting on islands in the South Pacific for a long time after WWII was over, and no doubt Election 2000 has its share).

    No one is saying that he invented transistors either. In fact, there are a whole slew of steps to creating "the Internet" (ASCII, anyone?), and no one person could possibly have contributed to more than a small fraction of them. And, consequently, no one expects that anyone seriously believes this.

    So, expecting you to be intellectually honest, I wrote the sentence which you quote:

    "[Gore] started working towards a goal before others joined in, and that is obviously true in this case."

    But given how hard you were working to twist Gore's words, I was foolish to expect that you'd leave mine untwisted. Your response:

    Gore start working toward what? Creating the internet? Before others joined in? And this is "Obviously true"? Your sources?

    ...is amazingly obtuse. My sources? How about you? You admit that Gore started working towards the goal of creating the internet sometime in the 1980's. Unless you are claiming that no one hopped on the Internet bandwagon in the 1990's this was clearly before others (in fact, given the growth of the internet in the 1990's, clearly before the vast majority of others) joined in. And, as the quotes I cited demonstrate, the people who were deeply invoved at the time support Gore's statement.

    I know you'd like Gore to have said that he created the internet. But he didn't say that because it isn't true. I know you'd like me to have said that taking the initiative means "doing something before anyone else" but I didn't say that because it doesn't mean that. You can take the initiative in getting your friends to "go watch the game in person instead of on TV" even if there are thousands of people in the stands already. Taking initiative isn't about being first, it's about moving forward when the people around you aren't.

    Re: your reference to Bush & Co -- "oh, look over there!"

    Yes, exactly. At least here you claim to have understood my point. Why are you waisting your time beating this horse? Look over there! A bunch of madmen have taken over your country and are bankrupting it, building a monstrous police state, and killing tens of thousands of innocent people, all based on transparent lies. And you're still trying to malign somebody who had the effrontery to try (but fail) to stop them.

  66. Re:Leader? -1 Pedantic by bogado · · Score: 1

    hehehe ops. My bad... :-D

    --
    []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

    ^[:wq

  67. your fantasy machine still running? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    Gore said: "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. "

    You say:
    Unless you are claiming that no one hopped on the Internet bandwagon in the 1990's this was clearly before [...] the vast majority of others) joined in.

    That he preceded the vast majority doesn't matter... what matters is others preceded him. Technologists, researchers, government officials, and the like. Gore provided political support for funding, and worked with officials from the Reagan administration. But you still have to provide the evidence that the _initiative_ in creating the internet was his.

    And talking "hey, look over there": you've assumed I'm American: I'm not.

  68. What a fanatics!! by LnxSlck · · Score: 1

    Linus only made one part, one part of an entire operating system, and yet people choose him as the leader of open source ?? Give me a break.. If there were to be a leader that should have been Stallman... Think before you talk... Sorry for my bad english..

    --
    Software is like sex. It's best when it's free.