A brand might have a part of "working" for them that demands a cell phone is always "on".
Re "would have seen the journalist in one place and the leaker in another and not been concerned. "
What governments do to find a leaker is see who they spend time with. Who was sitting next to a person been tracked for 10 mins, 1 hour.
The other person is detected spending time with "media".
Its not been "seen together" its the result of location and time been correlated to find everyone who was with the any worker.
The tracking of all known "media" in the area.
Know the location of all workers as part of their job.
Are workers spending time with known media?
Who are workers spending time with?
Is that unknown person with a cell phone "media" at the same location, over time? Yes? What workers did they spend time with?
Tracking works from the worker to cover anyone they spend time with.
The NSA had a system called FIRSTFRUITS that would find journalists using terms and project names for the first time and then work back to who they had been talking to.
Given all the legal activism by German courts what can US and multinational brands do?
Move their "German" services to a less legal invasive EU zone like Austria? Switzerland? Namibia? Slovenia? Then sell back into Germany via Germans seeking a service that is not censored by German courts.
AC the problematic part is having the gov find the budget every year to keep everything working and presenting the USA as a modern nation.
The next part is the total upgrade of the parts people look at and use. That 1960's styling that needs a lot of work and budget just to keep as is.
Other nations sell off their airports and let the private sector take that huge risk.
No more having to cover the costs of upkeep every year and new design work every few years, over the decades.
That tax money once used to keep an airport looking nice can then go to bridges, roads around the USA and other vital work that really needs doing.
Medical experts look at what they think will be a problem for the year.
Different strains are selected for a nations anti-virus program depending on a nations medical skill and what they want to pay for that year e.g. the trivalent.
For a given heath budget per person nations have to consider spending on the best anti-virus program they think they can pay for and will give good cover that year.
i.e. is the quadrivalent now cost-effective given the numbers of people needing hospitalization.
From history, comments to freedom after speech, news on social media.
Now Germany wants to enforce its laws on computer games?
Time to see what German censorship is and publish around it.
That works until a human spy well placed in the USA starts seeing the results of such missions and has worked their what up to clearance access to the "how" of contractor social media communications.
Then the other nation just has to watch for everyone interesting in their own nation reading the "official" US gov social media.
Plant a few must have, top secret new fake project names and see what the USA gets as results.
A short list of information given to the USA and who has such gov project access in the other nation can then be created.
Who on that project is reading the "official" US gov social media a lot?
Install a camera above their computer to see if they are decrpting. Install malware in their computer to see if they are decrpting.
Thats why the smarter nations fill other "cyber" nations with decades and generations of real human spies.
Read along with the cyber spy results and pass back who is spying on what project. Lists of turned staff with project access and who are reading a lot of US gov social media make for a not long list.
The NSA and GCHQ think people working for the USA who will be reading such messages will not be tracked in their own nations due to lack of "collect it all" skill in other nations.
Other nations just see their population are using social media all day, everyday.
That other nations fail to have the granulated per account real time collection to show a person visited a section of social media.
That other nations can only bait and trap their citizens on social media over time with fake accounts not log all social media use in real time.
Perhaps some defector "told" the CIA, NSA, MI6 of everything another nation of interest can do, cant do and that using social media in that way was considered safe. i.e. the other nation was so far behind in digital collection skills they still had to do very classic in person police work per account.
The NSA/GCHQ looked at that nations imported collection tech and considered what collection could be done and accepted that tech "story".
The new social media messages get posted as a "number station" and random people working for the USA in another nation feel confident/secure to read the messages without been detected.
The question for an FBI, MI5 is then who knows of the social media message system and has told the other side.
Have long in place and top level human spies been allowing social media to feel safe in their own nation so everyone reading the messages gets tracked long term.
That the spy working for the US might just decode the messages on their computer or with paper work in front of their computer? Malware on the computer or a camera at the location of their desk could get the decoded message.
Thats the problem with networks. The radio number station works as it offers privacy and anonymity when broadcast into a nation, globally.
Using social media only offers the privacy of the message in code. Anonymity is lost in having to visit social media to collect the messages.
If a well placed long term human spy in NATO, NSA, CIA passed on such social media methods, then not having number station privacy and anonymity was a real risk.
The use of new contractor "social media" communication methods could see the real time tracking of new and old US spy networks.
Wonder what was used to sell "social media" communication to the clandestine services?
That the new spy did not need one time pad equipment and would never be found with it?
That just using the "internet" in their nation was not a risk due to a lack of real time collect it all?
That a new social media message system could be faster at anytime than needing the to find the real privacy to work on number station radio decryption?
Re the medical comment.
A helicopter service with the very best crews who can fly day/night without a lack of skill and transport people to the very best local hospital.
At the hospital the best team is waiting who all passed their nations medical exams and who all work under the very best medical staff in that nation.
Not that the two very best people are on holiday and "someone" "new" on duty is going to try "their" best that night.
The best engineer to state something was designed to the correct standard and is ready for use as needed. Their signature and documentation has to be able to look after all the people who will use that product, service over a set time time
Not that some design team with no engineering skills felt the design had the right "art" look to it after some creative changes.
Someone who works on an OS who can understand crypto, the gpu, the cpu and not just be an average worker and let complex issues become part of an OS due to their lack of academic skills.
Why should a brand have to accept such results from its average workers?
Why should the consumers, customers have to pay for such poor quality work from that brand?
Look for the person who could study. Who had the ability to learn how to study.
Who can be given something new and learn that new method to a good standard.
Thats a skill that takes years of quality education.
Why risk a company, a brand with people who will need "support" due to complex past "issues".
Skilled staff within a company, brand will then have to take time away from their productive, profitable projects to offer support and guidance to below average workers.
A should seek out the best educated workers who can work hard on project that move the brand forward. Not looking after below average workers all day, everyday.
A brand and company is not some place of further education for well below average workers who have no skills.
Look into the past of all people seeking work. Did they study hard, past their exams, tests, show up to their lab work, have a good attitude to study?
Did they spend a lot of time becoming politically active on campus rather than working hard on the course work?
Be aware of educational systems that social advance graduates for political reasons and for virtue signalling to other academics.
Find the people who passed on merit and who have usable skills.
Is their past work littered with poor work quality and complex legal problems?
Why should their issues become a reputation problem for a later brand?
Avoid below average workers, their many problems, their lack of ability to study, their lack of ability to learn.
The reason why a top brand wants the best is every aspect of their tech changes every few years. Staff who cant keep up due to not been able to learn new skills not going to be able to be productive.
A skill for music, art, sport, spoken languages is great for related employment in arts, music, sport.
Been able to keep up with all changes in tech and study new tech skills is a skill worth looking for in staff.
Support a charity for people who need support, don't have the brand become a charity with the best staff having to support new full time workers who cannot be productive.
Privacy.
More ram, more OS/app/display gpu color support, more cpu, more network bandwidth.
Crypto that works and is not a backdoor, trapdoor for the creator, police, mil, gov.
Color that works from a game creators code to the users OS, to the gpu, to the display.
Color that works from a dslr brand to an OS, to an app, to a display.
An OS that is not designed to report back on a user.
A cpu thats tested when designed and not sold with security problems for generations.
AC in the past the internet "social" media was positioned as been open and free to all as a type of commons to upload media.
To then talk about that media, comment on it, to make a video to respond to that news, politics.
A lot of people invested their time, skill in building their reputation. To now have a brand go full party political on the ToS is a change that could have been mentioned before so many people used some social media brands.
The problem with SJW censorship AC is so many protected groups have a reason why.
Once the SJW start to ban, derank, remove some topics they soon welcome many other topics to ban, report, derank, remove.
A cult or faith finds some "history" of their teaching blasphemous? Report and ban. No more on the history of the faith, no more on escaping the faith.
A movie studio finds a negative review? Remove the review, ban the account as the "celebrity" made the request to a SJW.
A university professor says something interesting 2h into a talk. Remove the video to protect the university brand.
Talk about DRM? Crypto? A media release by mil/gov whistleblower? Can the security services ask for a SJW ban on that topic?
Party political users report a video as a larger group on a video they don't like due to political content? The SJW doing the review feels the same way politically and bans the account and video? A later review by another SJW allows the ban.
Reports on gov to gov mil sales? Both govs demand a video is removed for security reasons? Trade and jobs are at risk?
A local political leader is caught on video, a live mic. For privacy and legal reasons the SJW removes the discussion of that local party political matter.
A state and its ag gag laws? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Mining laws? A state demands a video gets removed showing their states farming/pollution regulations?
A political party loses an election and wants all news of why banned as political interference by another nation? No comments, links, news about the role of a candidate?
The ToS can work for any reason but not after lots of suggestions about been a commons open to political, artistic and news worthy content, to all of civil society.
If a site wanted to go full SJW, why not say from day one that the site would have US party political leanings and all content would fall under a restrictive party political policy.
People could then have found better US sites that would have allowed their years of content to thrive in conditions of free speech, freedom after speech.
Their content and creativity could have allowed another more open and less restrictive site to grow.
Keep the NN rules so the existing big brand monopolies and their paper insulated NN networks can stay in place?
All the federal NN rules did was further protect a few part political connected monopoly telcos and their POTS networks.
Let the innovative private sector move in and create some really great new networks all over the USA.
With no competition and protective federal NN rules nothing is upgraded by the few NN network monopoly telcos.
Someday a wealthy walled community, city, town can build its own new community broadband and bring in new ISP.
Competition at last.
It depends. ASICs work great for one set of math for one currency given power prices.
If the math gets more complex, the currency of interest changes that ASIC is a paperweight.
A good GPU with a new mining ready gpu BIOS and lots of memory can be useful.
The gpu can also keep some of its value when sold later.
The "liberals" mostly hold up a failed nations like Venezuela, Cuba, China as their Communist vision for the USA.
Denmark still has a working economy and liberals are pushing for a more Soviet Socialist government.
The SJW liberals would like the thought crime part. Spreading information as a crime is something a SJW would covert for their go-to nations.
A low IQ AI learning to talk for 2 hours would be an art movie. Going full "Rain man" in the computer lab...
A very smart AI having its human engineering cult looking after its political funding could result in a drama/thriller.
We are beyond the AI winter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
That AI should be more self aware to move the movie plot along.
In other words a montage to get past that the AI needing so much human support.
A smart AI that knows someone is getting political with its project funding.
Thats why the "Dreadnought" example is so good. The UK got its best engineers to build a new system that worked on time.
The engineers took pride in building a new design and ensured it worked.
They had to hand the working design over to the navy and did so knowing they had done a good job and had put real effort into the work.
The trick is to find your nations very best private sector engineers who know what they are doing and to support them.
Get political with the design and the navy is left with a ferry that needs more work.
How to prevent "bribery"?
Get a nations federal/secret police to offer bribes to everyone with a top level clearance. Often. After work, at work.
Two police to witness each other get talking to a person with project access and offer a bribe.
The approach is reported? Great. The bribe is accepted? Not so great.
Once workers know that mil "secrecy" is no protection to ensure a bribe can be hidden, not reporting every bribery attempt becomes a risk.
The US does that all the time pretending to be other "contractors" around US navy projects.
US navy officers and contractors have to immediately report every approach as they are never sure who they really got approached by.
A US contractor goes on holiday to the EU. They get approached in the EU with an offer. They get another approach again in the USA with details about their conversation in the EU and a new offer is made.
Did they report both conversations?
Was it their own nations security services, another contractor, another nations spies... both times? Hesitation starts investigations.
Thats how the US used to try and enforce security.
Slashdot Mirror
A brand might have a part of "working" for them that demands a cell phone is always "on".
Re "would have seen the journalist in one place and the leaker in another and not been concerned. "
What governments do to find a leaker is see who they spend time with. Who was sitting next to a person been tracked for 10 mins, 1 hour.
The other person is detected spending time with "media".
Its not been "seen together" its the result of location and time been correlated to find everyone who was with the any worker.
The tracking of all known "media" in the area.
Know the location of all workers as part of their job.
Are workers spending time with known media?
Who are workers spending time with?
Is that unknown person with a cell phone "media" at the same location, over time? Yes? What workers did they spend time with?
Tracking works from the worker to cover anyone they spend time with.
The NSA had a system called FIRSTFRUITS that would find journalists using terms and project names for the first time and then work back to who they had been talking to.
Given all the legal activism by German courts what can US and multinational brands do?
Move their "German" services to a less legal invasive EU zone like Austria? Switzerland? Namibia? Slovenia? Then sell back into Germany via Germans seeking a service that is not censored by German courts.
AC the problematic part is having the gov find the budget every year to keep everything working and presenting the USA as a modern nation.
The next part is the total upgrade of the parts people look at and use. That 1960's styling that needs a lot of work and budget just to keep as is.
Other nations sell off their airports and let the private sector take that huge risk.
No more having to cover the costs of upkeep every year and new design work every few years, over the decades.
That tax money once used to keep an airport looking nice can then go to bridges, roads around the USA and other vital work that really needs doing.
Medical experts look at what they think will be a problem for the year.
Different strains are selected for a nations anti-virus program depending on a nations medical skill and what they want to pay for that year e.g. the trivalent.
For a given heath budget per person nations have to consider spending on the best anti-virus program they think they can pay for and will give good cover that year.
i.e. is the quadrivalent now cost-effective given the numbers of people needing hospitalization.
Tax reporting and banks are waiting for the transactions.
From history, comments to freedom after speech, news on social media.
Now Germany wants to enforce its laws on computer games?
Time to see what German censorship is and publish around it.
AC who wants a person hired on "creativity" trying a profession that always needs an expert?
That works until a human spy well placed in the USA starts seeing the results of such missions and has worked their what up to clearance access to the "how" of contractor social media communications.
Then the other nation just has to watch for everyone interesting in their own nation reading the "official" US gov social media.
Plant a few must have, top secret new fake project names and see what the USA gets as results.
A short list of information given to the USA and who has such gov project access in the other nation can then be created.
Who on that project is reading the "official" US gov social media a lot?
Install a camera above their computer to see if they are decrpting. Install malware in their computer to see if they are decrpting.
Thats why the smarter nations fill other "cyber" nations with decades and generations of real human spies.
Read along with the cyber spy results and pass back who is spying on what project. Lists of turned staff with project access and who are reading a lot of US gov social media make for a not long list.
The NSA and GCHQ think people working for the USA who will be reading such messages will not be tracked in their own nations due to lack of "collect it all" skill in other nations.
Other nations just see their population are using social media all day, everyday.
That other nations fail to have the granulated per account real time collection to show a person visited a section of social media.
That other nations can only bait and trap their citizens on social media over time with fake accounts not log all social media use in real time.
Perhaps some defector "told" the CIA, NSA, MI6 of everything another nation of interest can do, cant do and that using social media in that way was considered safe. i.e. the other nation was so far behind in digital collection skills they still had to do very classic in person police work per account.
The NSA/GCHQ looked at that nations imported collection tech and considered what collection could be done and accepted that tech "story".
The new social media messages get posted as a "number station" and random people working for the USA in another nation feel confident/secure to read the messages without been detected.
The question for an FBI, MI5 is then who knows of the social media message system and has told the other side.
Have long in place and top level human spies been allowing social media to feel safe in their own nation so everyone reading the messages gets tracked long term.
That the spy working for the US might just decode the messages on their computer or with paper work in front of their computer? Malware on the computer or a camera at the location of their desk could get the decoded message.
Thats the problem with networks. The radio number station works as it offers privacy and anonymity when broadcast into a nation, globally.
Using social media only offers the privacy of the message in code. Anonymity is lost in having to visit social media to collect the messages.
If a well placed long term human spy in NATO, NSA, CIA passed on such social media methods, then not having number station privacy and anonymity was a real risk.
The use of new contractor "social media" communication methods could see the real time tracking of new and old US spy networks.
Wonder what was used to sell "social media" communication to the clandestine services?
That the new spy did not need one time pad equipment and would never be found with it?
That just using the "internet" in their nation was not a risk due to a lack of real time collect it all?
That a new social media message system could be faster at anytime than needing the to find the real privacy to work on number station radio decryption?
Re the medical comment. A helicopter service with the very best crews who can fly day/night without a lack of skill and transport people to the very best local hospital.
At the hospital the best team is waiting who all passed their nations medical exams and who all work under the very best medical staff in that nation.
Not that the two very best people are on holiday and "someone" "new" on duty is going to try "their" best that night.
The best engineer to state something was designed to the correct standard and is ready for use as needed. Their signature and documentation has to be able to look after all the people who will use that product, service over a set time time
Not that some design team with no engineering skills felt the design had the right "art" look to it after some creative changes.
Someone who works on an OS who can understand crypto, the gpu, the cpu and not just be an average worker and let complex issues become part of an OS due to their lack of academic skills.
Why should a brand have to accept such results from its average workers?
Why should the consumers, customers have to pay for such poor quality work from that brand?
Look for the person who could study. Who had the ability to learn how to study.
Who can be given something new and learn that new method to a good standard.
Thats a skill that takes years of quality education.
Why risk a company, a brand with people who will need "support" due to complex past "issues".
Skilled staff within a company, brand will then have to take time away from their productive, profitable projects to offer support and guidance to below average workers.
A should seek out the best educated workers who can work hard on project that move the brand forward. Not looking after below average workers all day, everyday.
A brand and company is not some place of further education for well below average workers who have no skills.
Look into the past of all people seeking work. Did they study hard, past their exams, tests, show up to their lab work, have a good attitude to study?
Did they spend a lot of time becoming politically active on campus rather than working hard on the course work?
Be aware of educational systems that social advance graduates for political reasons and for virtue signalling to other academics.
Find the people who passed on merit and who have usable skills.
Is their past work littered with poor work quality and complex legal problems?
Why should their issues become a reputation problem for a later brand?
Avoid below average workers, their many problems, their lack of ability to study, their lack of ability to learn.
The reason why a top brand wants the best is every aspect of their tech changes every few years. Staff who cant keep up due to not been able to learn new skills not going to be able to be productive.
A skill for music, art, sport, spoken languages is great for related employment in arts, music, sport.
Been able to keep up with all changes in tech and study new tech skills is a skill worth looking for in staff.
Support a charity for people who need support, don't have the brand become a charity with the best staff having to support new full time workers who cannot be productive.
Privacy.
More ram, more OS/app/display gpu color support, more cpu, more network bandwidth.
Crypto that works and is not a backdoor, trapdoor for the creator, police, mil, gov.
Color that works from a game creators code to the users OS, to the gpu, to the display.
Color that works from a dslr brand to an OS, to an app, to a display.
An OS that is not designed to report back on a user.
A cpu thats tested when designed and not sold with security problems for generations.
AC in the past the internet "social" media was positioned as been open and free to all as a type of commons to upload media.
To then talk about that media, comment on it, to make a video to respond to that news, politics.
A lot of people invested their time, skill in building their reputation. To now have a brand go full party political on the ToS is a change that could have been mentioned before so many people used some social media brands.
The problem with SJW censorship AC is so many protected groups have a reason why.
Once the SJW start to ban, derank, remove some topics they soon welcome many other topics to ban, report, derank, remove.
A cult or faith finds some "history" of their teaching blasphemous? Report and ban. No more on the history of the faith, no more on escaping the faith.
A movie studio finds a negative review? Remove the review, ban the account as the "celebrity" made the request to a SJW.
A university professor says something interesting 2h into a talk. Remove the video to protect the university brand.
Talk about DRM? Crypto? A media release by mil/gov whistleblower? Can the security services ask for a SJW ban on that topic?
Party political users report a video as a larger group on a video they don't like due to political content? The SJW doing the review feels the same way politically and bans the account and video? A later review by another SJW allows the ban.
Reports on gov to gov mil sales? Both govs demand a video is removed for security reasons? Trade and jobs are at risk?
A local political leader is caught on video, a live mic. For privacy and legal reasons the SJW removes the discussion of that local party political matter.
A state and its ag gag laws? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Mining laws? A state demands a video gets removed showing their states farming/pollution regulations?
A political party loses an election and wants all news of why banned as political interference by another nation? No comments, links, news about the role of a candidate?
The ToS can work for any reason but not after lots of suggestions about been a commons open to political, artistic and news worthy content, to all of civil society.
If a site wanted to go full SJW, why not say from day one that the site would have US party political leanings and all content would fall under a restrictive party political policy.
People could then have found better US sites that would have allowed their years of content to thrive in conditions of free speech, freedom after speech.
Their content and creativity could have allowed another more open and less restrictive site to grow.
Keep the NN rules so the existing big brand monopolies and their paper insulated NN networks can stay in place?
All the federal NN rules did was further protect a few part political connected monopoly telcos and their POTS networks.
Let the innovative private sector move in and create some really great new networks all over the USA.
With no competition and protective federal NN rules nothing is upgraded by the few NN network monopoly telcos.
Someday a wealthy walled community, city, town can build its own new community broadband and bring in new ISP.
Competition at last.
The good part was getting a working turbine. That took some real engineering skill at the time.
Lock the gpu BIOS. With no ability to push in an new mining BIOS that card is great for computer games as sold.
It depends. ASICs work great for one set of math for one currency given power prices.
If the math gets more complex, the currency of interest changes that ASIC is a paperweight.
A good GPU with a new mining ready gpu BIOS and lots of memory can be useful.
The gpu can also keep some of its value when sold later.
4K, 5K and 8K games will need a gpu. Intel is not ready with that kind of cpu just yet.
Re "ideal situation"
Its almost like law enforcement made them to be super-traceable.
In the USA the lab secrets walk out to waiting spies from China for cash.
In Russia secret cash generated by hard work in lab.
The "liberals" mostly hold up a failed nations like Venezuela, Cuba, China as their Communist vision for the USA.
Denmark still has a working economy and liberals are pushing for a more Soviet Socialist government.
The SJW liberals would like the thought crime part. Spreading information as a crime is something a SJW would covert for their go-to nations.
A low IQ AI learning to talk for 2 hours would be an art movie. Going full "Rain man" in the computer lab...
A very smart AI having its human engineering cult looking after its political funding could result in a drama/thriller.
We are beyond the AI winter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
That AI should be more self aware to move the movie plot along.
In other words a montage to get past that the AI needing so much human support.
A smart AI that knows someone is getting political with its project funding.
Thats why the "Dreadnought" example is so good. The UK got its best engineers to build a new system that worked on time.
The engineers took pride in building a new design and ensured it worked.
They had to hand the working design over to the navy and did so knowing they had done a good job and had put real effort into the work.
The trick is to find your nations very best private sector engineers who know what they are doing and to support them.
Get political with the design and the navy is left with a ferry that needs more work.
How to prevent "bribery"?
Get a nations federal/secret police to offer bribes to everyone with a top level clearance. Often. After work, at work.
Two police to witness each other get talking to a person with project access and offer a bribe.
The approach is reported? Great. The bribe is accepted? Not so great.
Once workers know that mil "secrecy" is no protection to ensure a bribe can be hidden, not reporting every bribery attempt becomes a risk.
The US does that all the time pretending to be other "contractors" around US navy projects.
US navy officers and contractors have to immediately report every approach as they are never sure who they really got approached by.
A US contractor goes on holiday to the EU. They get approached in the EU with an offer. They get another approach again in the USA with details about their conversation in the EU and a new offer is made.
Did they report both conversations?
Was it their own nations security services, another contractor, another nations spies... both times? Hesitation starts investigations.
Thats how the US used to try and enforce security.