Slashdot Mirror


Nvidia Will Focus on Gaming Because Cryptocurrencies Are 'Volatile' (vice.com)

Graphics card manufacturer Nvidia made almost $10 billion dollars in the last fiscal year, that's up 41 percent from the previous period. The GPU company broke the news to its investors in a conference call on Thursday, and said that video games such as Star Wars: Battlefront II and Playerunknown's Battlegrounds as well as the unprecedented success of the Nintendo Switch led to the record profits. That and cryptocurrency. From a report: Graphics cards are the preferred engine of today's cryptocurrency miners. It's led to a shortage of the GPUs, a spike in their prices, and record profits for the company that manufactures them. "Strong demand in the cryptocurrency market exceeded our expectations," Nvidia chief financial officer Colette Kress told investors during its earnings call yesterday. "We met some of this demand with a dedicated board in our OEM business and some was met with our gaming GPUs." But Nvidia is having trouble keeping up with the demand and it's recommended retailers put gamers ahead of cryptocurrency miners while supply is limited. Kress acknowledged the shortage on the call and reaffirmed Nvidia's commitment to gamers. "While the overall contribution of cryptocurrency to our business remains hard to quantify, we believe it was a higher percentage of revenue than the prior quarter," she said. "That said, our main focus remains on our core gaming market as cryptocurrency trends will likely remain volatile." When Kress finished her statement and opened up the line to questions, the first question was about cryptocurrency. "Is crypto being modeled more conservatively?" An investor from Evercore asked. "We model crypto approximately flat," said Jensen Huang, Nvidia's chief executive officer.

122 comments

  1. On the other hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NVIDIA likes it when they sell out of graphics cards.

    1. Re: On the other hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Games is something you enjoy, and virtual hash numbers is a sick gambling.

      I sense there's a connection, in both cases Nvidia turns you into a vegetable.

    2. Re:On the other hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, unless they literally they sold to each possible customer most likely there's lost opportunity. It means there are people who didn't pay nVidia money but would have if they had product.

    3. Re: On the other hand by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      How about us who like Seti@Home?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re: On the other hand by mandark1967 · · Score: 2

      Might I recommend the Trident TVGA 8900C?

      --
      Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
    5. Re:On the other hand by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      When these cards don't end up in hands of gamers, and empty shelves drive the prices up in retail sector, it's a disaster for two gaming GPU companies.

      Nvidia especially has invested a lot into getting PC gaming market to grow from a small actor well behind consoles in importance to the primary gaming platform in the world. And maintaining this status requires gaming PCs to remain price competitive and available to gamers.

      Losing this means that gamers will just move away from gaming on PCs and use a much cheaper and much more available console for their gaming needs, and companies like Nvidia will once again be stuck as just OEMs for giants like Microsoft, working on razor thin margins.

    6. Re: On the other hand by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's a volatile market though. So Nvidia likes it when they sell more, but they don't like it when sales suddenly plummet and the new manufacturing plants they invested in are idle.

    7. Re:On the other hand by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Or, somebody will decide that ATI and NVidia aren't satisifying the market, and we'll be back to the old days when you had to choose between S3, Matrox, ATI, NVidia, 3dfx, PowerVR, Intel, Rendition, Trident....

      NVidia really doesn't want somebody else deciding that this might be an opportunity to upset the apple cart and jump into the home 3d graphics card market.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    8. Re:On the other hand by Durrik · · Score: 2

      Or that high end gamers who can't get the $1000+ cards realize that they can stay with their current cards, or go with cheaper cards.

      Game studios will also start to optimize their graphics more and not rely on Nvidia and AMD to save their asses for having a poorly optimized game. This will lower demand for the high end cards, because they aren't needed to get stunning graphics.

      Nvidia probably realizes this and don't want to start back at square one with their marketing program, to convince gamers they need $1000+ cards, and to convince game studios that there will be enough cards out there to be lazy with their optimizations.

      And once game studios learn to optimize their graphics, they'll realize that there is a much broader market out there they can service, and this will lower demand for those super high end cards, and maybe even for the $300+ cards too.

      When the cryptocurrency bubble pops, they want the demand for the high and higher end cards to still be there, and it might not be if the bubble lasts too long because gamers have learned to settle, and game companies have learned to optimize better.

      --
      Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
    9. Re:On the other hand by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      Or, somebody will decide that ATI and NVidia aren't satisifying the market, and we'll be back to the old days when you had to choose between S3, Matrox, ATI, NVidia, 3dfx, PowerVR, Intel, Rendition, Trident....

      Please no. I don't want to go back to a "Works best with Voodoo 3dfx!" world. At least with only two big graphics companies things are usually compatible and interoperate pretty well.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    10. Re:On the other hand by malditaenvidia · · Score: 1

      That would be the best outcome, a competitive market is better for the customers. The question is, aside from intel, who has the infrastructure and R&D to even compete in the GPU market at this point?

    11. Re:On the other hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple, but they have no interest.

  2. Oh now the want our (gamer's) money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck them.

  3. Don't get me wrong but ... by PIBM · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As a gamer I afforded quite a lot of great cards just because they were paying for themselves when I wasn't gaming. I now have enough good computers that my friends don't need to bring theirs when we have a lan.. =)

    1. Re:Don't get me wrong but ... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      What's your address? Do you have a lot of friends and family who'd be curious if you disappeared? Are the local police diligent in investigating disappearances or are they a bit sloppy?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Don't get me wrong but ... by PIBM · · Score: 1

      I'm a small player in this field, and I've not been lucky with my investments, there are much better fish to fry :)
      At least it's keeping the house warm even with the -30C we are getting!

      Anyway, just getting to my remote location would cost most of your profits!

    3. Re:Don't get me wrong but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your address? Do you have a lot of friends and family who'd be curious if you disappeared? Are the local police diligent in investigating disappearances or are they a bit sloppy?

      That's an interesting online terroristic threat that might get you "time to think about it" or at least investigated in many interesting ways.

    4. Re:Don't get me wrong but ... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Easy on there. I'm just joshing him. GPUs are expensive, but they're not that expensive.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  4. Kinda Given Up On Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to put together a new system for gaming and when I saw the price of a good graphics card, I put it off thinking that prices would drop. I went back a year or so later...same deal. So I've kinda moved on from gaming. I've found other things to do with my time.

    1. Re:Kinda Given Up On Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After getting married and having kids, I don't have time for gaming anymore. Or time for much of anything, for that matter.

      Ah, but I miss playing Unreal until the sun came up and then sleeping until noon. The good old days...

    2. Re:Kinda Given Up On Gaming by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I bought a couple of (at the time) highend gpus in the early days of bitcoin, i only have time to play games for a few hours a day at most so the rest of the time i let them mine bitcoins just out of curiosity as the gpus would otherwise sit idle or rendering a stupid screensaver.
      Turns out those bitcoins paid for both the power used and the cost of the GPUs.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:Kinda Given Up On Gaming by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Because of negotiated pricing, it is cheaper to buy a prebuilt gaming computer then to build one right now. some people are buying them for the graphics cards and then selling the striped computer.

  5. I thought GPUs were so 5 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hasn't everyone switched to ASICs?

    1. Re:I thought GPUs were so 5 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hasn't everyone switched to ASICs?

      No, that was years ago.

    2. Re:I thought GPUs were so 5 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you're just ignorant as hell. do you work for the stupid fucks at nvidia?

    3. Re:I thought GPUs were so 5 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only a few coins (Bitcoint, LiteCoin, for example) are able to be done on ASICs, many of the others are only more memory-intensive algorithms that only GPUs can handle efficiently.

      Speaking of volatility I need to figure a way to short these damn coins as anytime I buy a few even for trading purposes the damn coin tanks in value almost immediately.

    4. Re:I thought GPUs were so 5 years ago... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

      Most of the new cryptocurrency is resistant to ASICs, hence the return of demand for GPUs

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    5. Re:I thought GPUs were so 5 years ago... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      It depends. ASICs work great for one set of math for one currency given power prices.
      If the math gets more complex, the currency of interest changes that ASIC is a paperweight.
      A good GPU with a new mining ready gpu BIOS and lots of memory can be useful.
      The gpu can also keep some of its value when sold later.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  6. Games made Nvidia, not BitTrash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To expand on the subject, Nvidia and ATI outlasted other GPU manufacturers because they handled games better. That's it. ATI has become a subsidiary of AMD, and their quality has dropped accordingly, but both companies still owe over a decade of their existences to gamers.

    On the other side, any devout BitMiner will tell you that GPU mining is not cost-effective anymore, so there is no good reason for Nvidia to waste their time advertising to a small and fanatical market that has already moved on to more specialized hardware.

    1. Re:Games made Nvidia, not BitTrash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ATI has become a subsidiary of AMD, and their quality has dropped accordingly...

      Unless you care about open source graphics in which case ati/amd has never been this good. And vulcan support is likely to be even better than opengl.
      https://mesamatrix.net/
      Meanwhile Nvidia makes running open source drivers harder.
      https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Nouveau-XDC2017

    2. Re:Games made Nvidia, not BitTrash by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Nvidia don't care about Nouveau drivers for Linux. In fact they probably see it as being a long term threat to them because an open source driver might reveal that their hardware violates patents.

      They care about gaming on Windows, scientific computing on Linux and having decent Android performance. And all of those use the closed source drivers.

      Actually they do have an open source driver they support, NVGPU. But that's probably only ever be intended to be just enough to get a GUI working on Linux. So if you download an purist open source Linux, your card will work.

      What they don't want is a third party, full featured, accelerated open source driver which they don't have any control over.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:Games made Nvidia, not BitTrash by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Gamers don't care at all about them, because they're useless for gaming.

    4. Re:Games made Nvidia, not BitTrash by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      If you care more about the source code then performance, you are probably using Intel HDGraphics (or AMD equivlant) anyway. If performance comes first, you are running nVidia on closed source binary blobs.

    5. Re:Games made Nvidia, not BitTrash by rfengr · · Score: 1

      AMD sucks though; the Radeon windows drivers are bug riddled crap. I think the complexity is getting so high (22 billion transistors in Volta) that there will be only 1 player that can afford the R&D.

  7. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    except everything points to big budget gaming is rising and fake money is falling

    might want to get more up to date than 2 years ago

  8. "Volatile" by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's an efficient way to write "about to be squished like a bug by regulations, due to massive criminal finance capability that has amazingly been overlooked so far."

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:"Volatile" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like they regulated peer to peer file sharing out of existence.

    2. Re:"Volatile" by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Have fun sharing your buttcoins around with no legal way to convert them to or from cash. Will you enjoy just watching them, like movie files?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:"Volatile" by pots · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's been overlooked. Bitcoins are super-traceable, people just think that they're anonymous. As far as law enforcement is concerned, that's an ideal situation.

    4. Re:"Volatile" by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "ideal situation"
      Its almost like law enforcement made them to be super-traceable.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:"Volatile" by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      They are anonymous. Your name is not on a wallet address:

      https://thetinhat.com/blog/pri...

      If it were, people couldn't use BTC for buying drugs on darknet sites, receiving ransomware payments, funding North Korea after being stolen, etc.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  9. It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's be honest here, crypto-mining seems to be on the way out now that the bubble has deflated. But even if it was still soaring, it's nothing to bet your company's future on.

    nVidia has a competitor. AMD/Radeon. Right now, nVidia is what game makers optimize and tweak their engines for, so nVidia can sell their cards at a premium to gamers, knowing that gamers want their cards rather than buying from the competition, because, well, let's face it, the compatibility is simply higher. Since nVidia cannot deliver enough units to satisfy both demands, miners and gamers alike, one of them will have to look for alternatives.

    If they go for the low hanging fruit and simply crank out mining rigs that will probably still sell like hotcakes (and you can make a pretty penny with it right now because miners can easily afford turning the profits they make back into mining systems, that system keeps itself running), gamers will not be able to buy an nVidia card, even though they would want one, and will look for alternatives. And at some point, it will actually make sense for studios to stop optimizing for nVidia and start looking at how to tweak their games for AMD because now suddenly the majority of their customers, i.e. gamers, is using AMD hardware.

    This would be devastating for nVidia. And pretty much the very LAST thing they could possibly want.

    Because at some point, mining is saturated. We probably have already reached that point, but I don't want to discuss whether BTC will rise again or whether it's plummeting back to penny stock quality, because it does not matter. What matters is that it's a risk. It may work out, it may not.

    Gamers have been here, are here and will be here. And they needed, need and will need fast GPUs. Yes, they need fewer GPUs than the miners do. But if you can't satisfy the market demand anyway, why risk anything?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by Khashishi · · Score: 2

      True, but people also use AMD for cryptocurrency.

    2. Re:It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except Radeon cards are sold out too. They are the preferred brand and miners shifted to Nvidia only after Radeons were difficult to get. None of mid-range or high end GPUs from either AMD or Nvdiia that were made within 5 years are available. New or used, both are gone from sellers. And any cards that pop up are selling twice for their MSRP.

    3. Re:It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2

      NVidia should hire some people to contribute patches that optimize mining on AMD hardware.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    4. Re:It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by houghi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My dad was a sales person. He always told me "The easiest sale is the firsat one. You will always be able to close the first sale. You can lie and cheat how much you like. You can drop the price to 0. You will be able to make the first sale.The hard ones are the sones after that. To make that easier, you have to build a relation. That is the hard part of sales."

      nVidia seem to focus on the second (and later) sales to their customers, something they are not sure about with mining. I am sure they would LOVE to get rid of that mining business if it would be possible without hurting the rest. They probably already looking at how they can have fast gaming and slow mining GPUs.

      As far as I understand, AI (used in e.g. recognition in self driving cars) also benefit from GPU. So I could see it being a separate type of business where you have GPU without the graphic output being specially made for things where GPU is abused. And this at much lower prices than what we have now available when you look at the price for the speed you get.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because at some point, mining is saturated.

      That's ridiculous, mining CAN'T become saturated.
      The value for a miner in buying a GPU is the expected value that it can generate over time.
      It's no different that buying farmland or anything in the coin-op realm.
      At some point the earning value of the card will dip below the gamer market price and things will go more normal, but until then fighting it is just throwing money away.

    6. Re:It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Nope. Cryptocurrency is here to stay. The price has gone up over $300 in the past few hours and is already past $8000 again.

      Citation https://www.coindesk.com/price...

    7. Re:It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Self driving cars have no AIs.
      And their pattern recognition algorithms run on 2 200MHz ARM Cortex'.
      You don't need a GPU to analyze a 2 Dimensional gray scale picture with 800x600 pixels.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re:It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because once it goes back up a bit, it will never drop again. Nothing bad could ever happen in the future like a complete crash of the market.

    9. Re:It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cryptocurrency is here to stay.

      top kek

    10. Re:It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you get this information from? I'm requesting that you need a citation.

    11. Re:It's sensible for nVidia to put gamers first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's got a Citation. It's controlled by two ARM processors analyzing SVGA video apparently.

  10. Corrected : Nvidia will focus on crippling games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Innovating is hard, paying studios to cripple the competition is easy.

  11. I thought they were focused on Web Services by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    Don't most of the major players in Web Services have Nvidia GPU farms for processing? I'd think they would be putting most of their focus there.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  12. So you don't want money? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    41% increase, and they're telling them no, keep your money? Seems like a bad idea. If I was a nvidia investor I would want to hear nvidia kissing miner butt for making nvidia so rich because surprise, mining isn't disappearing overnight. It might decrease, but cryptocurrancy is here to stay.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:So you don't want money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I, for one, and incredibly happy to see a company make decisions NOT motivated entirely by short-term gains. Even if cryptocurrency were the future (which is debatable), it's refreshing to see a company decide to keep to their core market and not branch out into the first new thing that makes money.

      That said, I think you have a sever misunderstanding of how GPU's fit into concurrency mining. Even if mining isn't disappearing overnight (which is debatable, unless you know something that millions of other investors and researchers don't) it WON'T be done on Nvidia's GPUs. Up until recently, GPU's were considered garbage for mining, since the electricity cost to run them would outpace the currency mined. Mining was already moving to countries with cheap power, and done almost entirely with ASICs.

      The only reason GPUs have picked up again is that BTC's meteoric rise allowed people to mine alt coins and then exchange them for massively inflated bitcoin. As bitcoin falls, so will the perceived value of altcoins and miners will once again start dumping GPU's for more power efficient miners.

      I think NVidia is being incredibly smart. To open themselves up to a new market means diverting resources from their core market. As other posters have noted, if they lose their core market, the moment cryptocurrency moves on from GPU mining they will be left with no market for their new product and major losses from their core market.

      Could they move to produce cards that rival ASIC? I suppose, but again, that's a huge risk of company resources into a market that may exist, but may not depending on government action and public perception. To risk that much money on a gamble and at the cost of their main source of historical profits and market dominance would be an incredibly short sighted move.

      If you were an Nvidia investor, you should be thrilled they are not dumping your money into a short term profit game, where THEY could cash out rich, and you'd end up footing the bill and holding their worthless stock years later.

    2. Re:So you don't want money? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      If you can't trend it then you can't forecast production based upon it. They're being sensible about planning their future capacity rather than ending up in a lurch with a bunch of unsold product once the crypto bubble pops.

    3. Re:So you don't want money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might decrease, but cryptocurrancy is here to stay.

      That is at best a guess. It's clear than Nvidia isn't so sure.

    4. Re:So you don't want money? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      AMD is hitting crypto hard (CPU, GPU, and drivers-wise) and by all indications AMD gear will be the dominant gear in the near future. nVidia is saving face here, while placating their traditional customers.

      "We model crypto approximately flat,"

      So, they're saying they know better the economic forecast in this space than mos of the markets.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re: So you don't want money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a shitty investor.

      Thank God no one cares what you want.

    6. Re: So you don't want money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why you don't run nvidia.

    7. Re:So you don't want money? by rfengr · · Score: 1

      That obvious, because if you want to use an AMD GPU for graphics, they suck.

  13. Re: Dumb by Bert64 · · Score: 2

    However any sufficiently popular cryptocurrency moves towards ASICS, rendering GPUs useless for mining.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  14. Why not branch out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make one GPU that's absolutely shit for everything but mining Shitcoins, and the other that's great at rendering graphics? Then people using the hardware for its intended purposes won't get bent over by the morons rushing to collect as much pretend money as they can before the whole thing caves in.

    1. Re:Why not branch out? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      There already are GPU boards on the market that have no video out port.

      They're not very popular, because miners prefer hardware they can sell when mining boom becomes another hard crash and they have to care about efficiency.

    2. Re:Why not branch out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit. they are sold out as soon as they hit the shelves. the only time they don't sell immediately is when people try and scalp them for outrageous prices. the problem is these dumb ass pieces of shit at nvidia and amd won't increase GPU production b/c they are either cowards or purposely repressing the cryptocurrency markets on behalf of their bankster overlords. instead of windows using, nvidia buying "gamers" (idiotic slaves) complaining about poor GPU production they run their mouths about shit they know nothing about.

    3. Re:Why not branch out? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Do you know what "lead time" is? Why should they spend a year gearing up for increased production, when they literally have no evidence that the demand will still be there a year from now?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Why not branch out? by enjar · · Score: 1

      There already are GPU boards on the market that have no video out port.

      These boards come at a considerable cost premium versus the GeForce/Titan ones, and require the chassis to provide cooling, they have no onboard fan. A Titan XP is ~$1500 vs the P100 at ~$4600, a Titan V is ~$3000 vs the V100 at $8400. If you compare the non-Titan GeForce cards your money goes even farther. There are some more advanced features on the Tesla cards (memory, bandwidth, etc), and for the Pascal ones, the P100 does doubles math really well, the Titan V is nearly the same. As I understand it, these extra features don't matter to crypto miners. Why buy one card for $$$$ that can do X amount of processing when you can spend $ for one card end up with 3-4X the processing power for the same money?

    5. Re: Why not branch out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It obviously doesnt know much beyond its parents' basement. Its certainly never had a real job, stop talking to it like an adult.

    6. Re:Why not branch out? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You're talking about compute cards. I'm talking actual GPU cards without video out.

    7. Re:Why not branch out? by rfengr · · Score: 1

      The are popular for scientific computing. I have 4x K40 in my workstation.

    8. Re:Why not branch out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMD said recently they are constrained by memory from increasing production. In early 2017, memory manufacturers started shifting some production away from GDDR5 to DDR4 to help alleviate the tight supply. You cannot just move production on a dime and any change will affect something else. The demand for memory has outstripped supply. It is going to take years for more production capacity to become available. There is nothing AMD or Nvidia can do other than request the retailers to limit sales.

    9. Re:Why not branch out? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      There was a recent tweet from nvidia exec that in fact stated the exact opposite. Gist was that "we're big enough to get priority on memory, unlike some of our much smaller competitors".

    10. Re:Why not branch out? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You're talking about compute cards. I'm talking about cards like nvidia's GP (instead of GTX) branded cards. i.e. GP106 being the GTX 1060 without display out ports.

  15. Wayland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now only if they would work on their Linux driver so that using a notebook with their Optimus GPUs wasn't an awful experience.

  16. Here to stay? Who knows? [Re:So you don't want...] by XXongo · · Score: 1

    ... surprise, mining isn't disappearing overnight. It might decrease, but cryptocurrancy is here to stay.

    Do we have any reason to think this? Right now, cryptocurrency isn't really currency-- most cryptocurrency use is done an investment, which is to say, a gamble that the price is going up.

    Will it ever become a currency (which would require stable value. Rising prices for a currency would be deflation, which is bad for currency.)? The answer to this is very unclear.

  17. Remove CUDA and OpenCL support by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    If nVidia really wanted to do something about this, couldn't they just release a line of gaming cards that only supports the popular gaming API's (OpenGL, Direc3D, Vulkan) and not CUDA and OpenCL, or do games make use of CUDA and OpenCL nowadays for other things like physics processing offloading?

    1. Re:Remove CUDA and OpenCL support by Hydrian · · Score: 1

      That'd hurt both GPU companies. OpenCL and CUDA are used by both education, science, and big compute industries. That math is is very similar to the same that crypto-currencies use. The sword cuts both ways.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished.
    2. Re:Remove CUDA and OpenCL support by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Well, you could use Vulkan to do all things computing, and even OpenGL, that's how the whole GPGPU idea started. In the long run Vulkan might be more efficient than Cuda/OpenCL as it gives more low-level control. Of course people are not switching overnight, and the old interfaces are generally maintained as they make sense for those specific needs.

      Frankly, the article sounds like Nvidia wants to sell locked-down game consoles instead of general-purpose computers. I guess they don't want any customers who do non-gaming things on GPUs, such as scientists or graphic artists.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Remove CUDA and OpenCL support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also DirectCompute as part of DirectX, and games use it. Sometimes as part of a rendering step.

    4. Re:Remove CUDA and OpenCL support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the card that supports things like OpenGL or CUDA. Those language and API details are understood in drivers running in the host computer and generating code for the GPU. The GPU is pretty much just doing brute-force arithmetic and memory access according to the program that has been launched on it by the driver.

      That's the whole point of the general-purpose GPU architecture revolution that started almost 20 years ago. There isn't really a "geometry" or "pixel" circuit in the GPU anymore, just lots and lots of processing power and some slightly esoteric memory buses and caches tunes for the typical workloads needed by the applications expected to run on it.

  18. How? Just how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, are they going to ask a buyer if they intend using their recently basket-added GPU for gaming and not mining?
    Ah yes, the honour system. That's totally worked.

  19. Should they care? by Espectr0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is just public speaking to make them look good. In reality, they don't care who is buying their products as long as they get sold. In fact i would say they like crypto miners even more since they will tend to fry their hardware from extended use and they get an additional sale.

    1. Re:Should they care? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Yes, they should care. This is them saying 'Yeah, we had a great year last year thanks to these idiots that think that 'doing math' somehow translates into physical weath, but this bubble gonna pop, and then we're back to selling to video game nerds. So, enjoy the bonus sales while they last, but don't bank on them, or be surprised when they go away real sudden and real fast.'

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Should they care? by sqorbit · · Score: 1

      Yes we should care that a company is not trying to exploit short term profits at the cost of it's investors. They could easily predict huge growth because of mining, but they are saying it probably won't last. They are setting clear expectations that they are making more money now, but long term they will need to keep to their core for growth and continued business. With all the companies out there spewing random shit, this is actually refreshing to see a company speaking some sense.

      --
      Sent from my TARDIS
    3. Re:Should they care? by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      they are not exploiting anything. they are making their product, that despite being originally designed for a specific function (gaming) is good for another (mining)

      this is just empty words, because they don't change anything.

    4. Re:Should they care? by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      so? they will continue to sell them. have you seen nvidia actually advertise something "good for mining" or similar? no you haven't. and why should they? wasted money, they are selling like hotcakes.

      Now, pc gaming being in decline for so long, could use a boost, and selling video cards at $900 won't do, especially when buying a complete console is only $200.

      they don't care who buys their product. they are a company, profit is their only objective.

  20. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC gamers are history - games are moving onto cell phones and becoming less graphically complex.

    Hi John Romero! Tell Stevie Case I said hello!

  21. Re: Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The death of PC gaming was first declared before you were born, before Nvidia was created, before smart phones and tablets and just after the discovery of fire.

    If you weren't a smart ass know it millennial you'd actually know something that's true instead of made up in your little Ritalin soaked brain.

  22. Re: Dumb by war4peace · · Score: 1

    Hmm let's see...
    Here's a list of all mineable coins: https://coinmarketcap.com/coin...

    I'll let you figure out how many of those are ASIC-mineable. Answer: not many.
    This doesn't mean ASICs can't be built for them, after all you can build an ASIC for anything. The issue is some of the algorithms make building and using ASICs prohibitively expensive.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  23. Re: Dumb by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    However any sufficiently popular cryptocurrency moves towards ASICS, rendering GPUs useless for mining.

    That's not the case. Both Blockstream Core (the fork that goes against the Satoshi model) and the Cash chain still use the same old hashing algorithm and there's not a movement to move those to an ASIC-hard algorithm. Same with Ethereum which loves to eat 8GB GPU cards.

    Those represent the top three mined cryptocurrencies of the past six months, so they're "suffciently popular".

    By all means, more CryptoNote PoW, please, but that's a separate issue.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  24. Great to Hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glad to hear they are not wasting resources on cryptocurrency garbage.

    Day Traders are called fools because they buy/sell stocks for short term gain and don't really know what they are doing. They want to get rich quick. Crypto traders make day traders look like geniuses.

  25. Future Used Market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the hype fades, I'll buy 2 GTX 1080s for $150. I hope the hype punches all these bandwagon luddites in their faces and they lose the shirts off their backs.

    1. Re: Future Used Market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they'll burn out the first time you run Crysis. What a deal on used garbage you'll get!

  26. I think the question is who ramps up prod first by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    right now neither AMD or nVidia want to ramp up production to meet demand because they don't think demand will last. Worse, they're getting ready for a huge drop in demand when the bottom drops out of the crypto currency market and those miners dump their cards on eBay. Current gen graphics cards are much, much better built so a lot of those cards will hold up fine, making a card from an old mining rig practical in ways it wasn't 5 years ago.

    The question is are Crypto-currencies here to stay? If either side takes that bet and wins they become the dominant graphics card manufacture for the foreseeable future. But if they lose they over extend themselves and go bankrupt. So far both sides are sitting put.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  27. Quit talking about them by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    It would seem cryptos do just fine when people are dismissive towards them.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  28. If so-called cryptocurrencies are really currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really currency, why no company/store can use Bitcoin as currency anymore?
    Because the price of Bitcoin proved to be extremely unstable to use as a currency?
    Would the result be different, if Bitcoin replaced by any other "cryptocurrency"?
    Aren't all work the same way?

    Or, they are not actually virtual currency but virtual investment?
    But, if they are actually investment, why we need/want them?
    What would happen to world economy, if people invested in virtual investments, instead of real investments?

    Or, all so-called cryptocurrencies are actually just a modified (made decentralized and paying variable interest) Ponzi Schemes?
    (Price of cryptocurrencies would keep increasing in the long term (by their design), so it is equivalent of paying variable interest to all long term investors.)

    As more and more people invest in cryptocurrencies, it will become harder and harder to ban their trading everywhere!
    All cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally before it is too late!

  29. It's sensible for market to put money first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cryptocurrency collapse means market flooded with used video cards, alleviating demand, but hurting ability to selling new cards, both Nvidia and AMD.

    1. Re: It's sensible for market to put money first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because everyone wants to buy a USED gfx card thats been run at max for months or years on end. Such a good deal!

      Moran.

    2. Re: It's sensible for market to put money first by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Most people read a guide and in those guides they're told to undervolt their GPU, thus letting it run cooler. But I see you don't bother reading the manuals, so hey.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re: It's sensible for market to put money first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      weaboo who spends 24 hrs a day on slashdot for years sez ^

  30. you are too stupid, nvidia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's real simple. if you stay sold out of all the fucking 1060's, 1070's and 1080's then you need to pull your braindamaged head out of your cavernous ass and make more fucking GPUs! i won't buy any of your shit, cause "fuck you nvidia"(linus) but these windows using drones will. save your pandering propaganda for your mirror.

    1. Re:you are too stupid, nvidia! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I bought an HP Omen with a GTX 1080 Ti already installed, which seems like the best way for the manufacturer to ensure the card will be used for gaming instead of mining. The problem with "just make more!" is that historically, every time a tech firm massively scales up production, quality goes way down, sometimes to the point where it actually causes the company to go out of business.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  31. What I'm wondering... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Can they design a card that's good for 3D graphics, but sucks for mining, so that people will be able to buy cards for gaming again? Stupid miners are running up the cost of GPUs because they haven't done the math that says it will take over a year to amortize the cost of the hardware, even if your electricity is free.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:What I'm wondering... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      It's not the card, it's the driver support.

      Also, easier to make a harder algorithm.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:What I'm wondering... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Lock the gpu BIOS. With no ability to push in an new mining BIOS that card is great for computer games as sold.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  32. Re:If so-called cryptocurrencies are really curren by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    The irony here is that even the black market is moving away from bitcoin. In other words, even criminals are now saying, "Oh no, we can't use that, it's too unstable!"

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  33. VR by sremick · · Score: 1

    I considered building a VR rig but no way in hell when GTX1080s are over $1200. Makes me wish I had snatched a bunch late last year when I could get them on sale for $400

  34. Re:If so-called cryptocurrencies are really curren by James+Carnley · · Score: 1

    Black markets aren't moving away from Bitcoin because it's "too unstable". They are moving away from it because it's not private/anonymous. Which is kind of important when buying illegal goods. Now that true privacy coins like Monero are available there is little reason to accept Bitcoin.

  35. Re:If so-called cryptocurrencies are really curren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are also moving away from it because of the ridiculous transaction fees and times.

  36. Luckily most of them will end up broke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are people that use cryptocurrencies such terrible people?

    Has anyone here ever met a crypto-enthusiast that wasn't a complete douche?

  37. nNvidia's not JUST for crypto/gaming by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    A good chunk of nVidia hardware is used in machine learning and computer vision.

    Guess who has cornered the markets for self-driving car computing, image classification algorithm hardware, or GPGPU?

    It's the company with a stable and high--performance Linux driver (and it's been that way for over a decade).

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  38. Re: Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not Steve Case

    I think you meant Steve Perlman

    Onlive

  39. Because it's common sense? by foxalopex · · Score: 1

    AMD cards initially were more efficient at Cryptocurrencies because they're more general purpose in that you can do more things with them. Eventually when the AMD cards ran out, they went after the next most efficient to use use cards which are the Nvidia cards. It would be silly for either AMD or Nvidia to dedicate resources to making cards more attractive because let's face it, they both sold out of everything they have. Why make your product more attractive when you can't even keep it in stock? AMD revealed too that they would make more video cards but the rapid sell-off of graphics cards has caused a memory shortage from their provider Samsung. Considering the size of Samsung, this means Nvidia is likely facing similar shortages too.

    Eventually popular CryptoCurrencies either move on to dedicated hardware or they wane in popularity and vanish for the market so they're not a good way to bet your future on. The whole put in roadblocks to stop users from using GPUs for anything other than gaming is silly. Why would anyone realistically want a limited product? Who care what people do with their expensive graphics cards when you have people on youtube breaking Iphones for fun. Just be patient, the market will eventually swing back to normal.

  40. Re:Dumb by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    4K, 5K and 8K games will need a gpu. Intel is not ready with that kind of cpu just yet.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  41. Signs of the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I walked by a vacant lot the other day where somebody had done an illegal dump. I've found burner phones and stuff on the street here, and small appliances. This time I saw what looked like a busted-open rack server. My first thought was: "I wonder if that was a Bitcoin mining rig?".

  42. If that is the case..... by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

    If they are going to dedicate themselves to gaming then bring the price of the video cards back down to the prices in 2016 before all this started. I bought a high-end video card for my machine in late 2016 for $375 US and that was outrageous, that same card is now $1295 OMG!!! I need to buy another card for my other gaming computer but there is NO WAY I am paying $1295 and lesser cards are $800. There are some deals on older cards for $650. If they are not "catering to mining" they sure are making the money!! I call BS!

  43. I love cryptomining because cheap video cards by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    I soon will need an upgraded videocard for ML. In fact, I would like two or three really good ones. The timing is about perfect as in the coming months cryptominers are going to be flooding the market with them as they try to pay their rent.

  44. Cryptos shifting away from Proof of Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ethereum is the main coin that people still mine using GPU's, because BTC is only really effective with ASIC's these days.
    During 2018, Ethereum will be moving to a Proof of Stake model instead of Proof of Work.
    i.e. No more mining.

    I expect NVidia knows this.