Re "citation needed please."
How the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA) was used. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Prism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and what it could access.
Some US states might have changed laws but federally its all about access.
US states might offer some electronic device searches, real-time GPS tracking protections or the use of cell site simulators.
For all that access to work in the USA someone in the gov/mil is getting help or been giving help.
Different nations have laws, some just need for a court to allow access.
But once granted, access is full.
Someone is helping with source code in other nations too. If not governments would be locked out thanks to having to work on very different networks and complex secure systems.
Other governments are not worried so they have found a way into all network or have been helped to access any networks of interest.
Some nations ask for source code. Other nations just get total legal access as needed as part of their own laws.
The work of the Equation Group https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
A gig consumer ready plan could be an idea of what a "fast" could be in 2017.
"Fast" as in gig ready speeds for a consumer priced account would be expected. Expensive for a consumer every month but not having business grade support costs.
"Lane" as in the service can be expected to keep that speed most of the time down a network and to that account as the better quality services is been paid for.
Not a business grade product but more network care is provided than on low end consumer grade networks.
For that a new network has to be offered into an area to paying users expected to take up the new services on offer.
Someone has to pay in full for that upgrade and then get funds back for all that new work.
Just build out wealthy areas?
They have the income to pay for new fast plans every month. So some areas get access to a fast lane and enjoy all the new products and services.
A poor area might have to just keep using existing networks and never get a fast lane service.
Poor areas pay just enough to keep the networks they have now but never enough to cover the costs to bring in new fast networks.
So different groups like to talk of "fast lanes" as a new term to ensure all areas get new networks. Even areas that will never make a profit or can even pay for new services.
Its a political way of forcing the private sector to network very poor areas that will never pay back for the new services provided.
As tax payers or as users of a private sector network, someone is expected to have to pay for new networks in very poor areas.
So expect a lot of talk of fast lanes, network neutrality, what is a lawful website and service, respect, discriminate...
Its just new words to talk about passing on the full costs new expensive networks in very poor areas.
Set plan speeds to force more expensive plans to be needed?
Set data caps to ensure people have to pay much more?
Take out a huge loan, have the government pay it back over years and build a new network everywhere?
Just build out wealthy areas and let networks stay as they are in poor areas?
A lot of cash has to be extracted from users to build new networks and keep network owners and shareholders very happy.
A person has the option to buy more bandwidth when they have saved up some wealth.
Someone worked hard and can now pay for more bandwidth.
Provide a set slow internet to all users all the time. Enough to pay taxes, surf the web and watch a movie.
It might be a lower standard but a low quality video stream will be supported.
Want more bandwidth? Pay for more bandwidth to be connected to an account.
That could need work in a building. In the street. To get the needed new connection.
Want 4K, pay for a better connection, the needed 4K ready bandwidth and the account that supports that speed every month.
Why should any network owner just have to keep building out their networks for free to create instant new fast lanes for poor consumers who will never fund such upgrades?
Wealthy areas get the networks they can support. Other areas that won't pay for new networks get working internet over existing networks.
Poor areas get to keep their internet connections. Wealthy areas get to enjoy advanced new networks.
Listen to the critics. Stop pushing for really positive reviews on social media to sell very average movies.
Select scripts with more care so people in the USA can enjoy a movie.
Find much better actors that more people actually enjoy seeing in a movie.
Find actors on merit who test well with audiences for the needed role.
That might be a new face or an actor thats been liked for decades. Test and see who would work well for a given role. Dont just place an actor in a role for some other reason.
Find better funding so fun movies do not have to be altered to fit in with the history, faith or politics of other nations or groups.
Sell the freedom and fun of Americana to the world. The USA has freedom of speech, sell that globally. Any other nation can do a boring censored movie.
Stop trying to sell America and the world on very limited scripts.
Consider mini series to fill out franchises with complex plots.
If a new movies has hours of backstory to past movies to remove that would have been better as a series.
People on average like a hero, fun and drama. Stop trying to push politics or placate the people providing the funds. Audiences want a story not a lecture for the price.
If a script has to be censored, walk away from that funding.
Re "The EU is going down the road of China and other totalitarian regimes."
Small steps on the way to 100% positive EU news.
Happy government news.
Happy movie reviews.
Good news from all local community reporters.
Communist nations tried to really push positive spin on their failing nations in the 1980's. Their closed populations craved US freedoms.
The more the EU now tries to reshape the internet the more the internet move on to become more fun and free.
The EU can regulate social media, news and ads all it wants.
People will just get a VPN service and enjoy their time and money on the US internet.
Returning to the EU internet to pay their taxes. Why would anyone risk using the internet in the EU anymore?
Retroactive internet laws make investing in the EU a risk.
By that time the UK and US had everything they needed. Turing was been replaced by a new generation of smarter, trusted people who had used all the new methods and tools.
The future was getting ready for TICOM (Target Intelligence Committee) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
The race was on to find and keep German and Italian cryptanalysts with the needed Russian skills at the end of ww2.
Germany had codebooks on Turkey, Romania, Bolivia and Ecuador. Some material from Switzerland, France and the Vatican.
German and Italy also had some British and American code traffic.
Enigma was the past even with later German improvements during ww2. Spying on the Soviet Union, France, the rest of the world was the new tasking. Collect it all.
Some security issues had to be allowed for at the very start of ww2, they would not be allowed after ww2.
A lot of staff hired could not be trusted near the end of ww2 and after 1945.
Re "... in the world spend that much money on a short-lived program?"
Governments like to know where their staff are, what they are doing and saying.
Some features had to be supported.
Most city and suburbs do not span 450-600 miles.
Vans and trucks can work all around a city and suburbs.
How could longer range be added?
Swap the truck battery pack out for the trip.
No need to wait for a recharge for each truck.
The used battery pack out stays at the destination or along the way to the destination to get recharged.
The truck has a full battery pack.
The driver does the same number of hours as they are now. With a stop to swap a battery pack.
Thats going to be the future given the bandwidth.
Social media will be pushing consumers to pay for content.
Users will find a much better way to internet.
New brands will have fun as people rediscover the www beyond a social media paywall.
A new look web site with new news everyday.
Free links, lists under topics and often updated.
No subscription needed. No payments needed.
The old www is the new freedom again. Social media goes full paywall.
Should be a proper look out and be using other means. Radar and lookouts.
A lot of ELINT and SIGINT in the area?
Computer issues don't alter the role of people been on duty and having to look around.
A testing phase should have found most computer related work that needed to be corrected.
Some password to be entered after the face scanner just to make sure it really was the user who wanted access?
The option to enter a different code to wipe and reset the device too?
Security services and police will enjoy holding a phone up to get access.
Walk the suspect in front of their phone and the phone grants access. Fun with the Fifth Amendment.
Re: "will other countries extradite citizens to face the music in the UK"
Extradite would be difficult. Requesting a list of all UK users would then allow for UK users to be discovered in the UK.
A UK person living outside the UK using a VPN to comment on UK issues? Just ensure a return to the UK for any reason. The legal system will be waiting.
Commonwealth nations and EU nations have agreements to support courts in the UK in many matters?
Finding a VPN that works in some nations could be an issue for UK users.
Once a site starts getting traction expect the UK courts and security services to start trying to collect all UK users ip's.
Different methods to make an average VPN covering an OS or browser show its UK ISP ip by requesting new connections a bit different to VPN supported http/https.
People without a VPN protecting their entire network could be discovered with a list of simple browser or application/OS supported networking requests.
Their UK isp ip would then be logged.
UK based CC payments to another nations VPN from within the UK would also be an issue to track if the status of using any type of VPN product in the UK was to change.
The main ability to detect an UK ip using a VPN service would be the legal agreements between the UK and the VPN nation.
The UK requests full international treaty support for a criminal facing many years in prison?
The VPN host nation could be obligated in their own nation to request the VPN to log the UK users given the nature of the request and any international/UK treaty they have to fully support.
For that full list of UK VPN account users the UK gov/mil would be very thankful to that nation.
Once that UK ISP and ip is found that user can be discovered in the UK.
The UK user lists will be extradited, discovered or logged.
Re "German Law" hasn't done anything to curtail free speech
The only speech that is allowed in Germany is legal speech that supports democracy.
Some of the origins of modern German law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Thats very different to the USA and having free speech fully protected before and after speaking or publication. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Finds new ways around social media censorship and SJW bans.
If the activist big brands want to remake the www, the internet will just find new services and methods of moving new content and data around.
The more social media and big search engines ban words, thoughts, authors, publications, politics, reviews, comments, users, blasphemy, history, whistleblowers, cryptography the more people seek new networks that support freedom of speech.
The users now have the bandwidth to move text around globally.
Having to go to some portal on a 28.8 modem to get information to download is the past.
People can publish their own content and text now. Then they will do video. Video content that does have a big brand SJW correcting search results.
A new generation of search engines will search the net again for content rather than filter smaller sets of SJW approved content.
German law goes after anyone who could upset democracy as put in place in West Germany and now in Germany.
Left, right, faiths, publishers, political parties all face the same political laws and have to be very aware of what they say and comment on.
The US has freedom of speech and freedom after speech. A much better legal system to publish in as rights are fully protected from any governments:)
Been able to learn math and get a full scholarship could be a understood as a privilege.
Maths is now about feelings and any number of experiences.
Been able to use and understand 1, 0, F will soon be seen as irrational by the SJW.
What produced the very best generations that understood math, science and computers?
Basic? Ada? Logo? Pascal?
Teach the advanced math needed and then add computer projects.
Go back to what worked well in the past. Math and science. A few computer labs with tasks that built on math skills.
Learn more math at home. Code in the lab. Build math skills. Then create projects that build on new math skills.
Putting a GUI together from a few pre set options in some educational software to create an instant app is not an education.
Over the decades most nations slowly find out that new computers and more computers don't really educate most people to an amazing level new of educational results.
Did the UK become a super computer nation with all its access to years of computers?
A few really smart people in the UK made really great games, hardware and software over a generation.
All the access to computers did not result in an advanced computer exporting workforce a generation later.
The USA kept on winning thanks to its educational system always supporting the very best students.
Pouring cash into education is great news for support services, overtime and selling generations of computers.
The USA had the key to the worlds best educational results many decades ago.
Test all students often and reward only the very best students with full academic scholarships to the best university educations in the USA.
Put the more funding back into the students who always get the best results.
Lots of testing and access to full scholarships ensures everyone who can really pass the same tests well has the ability to access the best university system.
Merit testing to get in, good jobs for the very best designers and engineers. Enjoy exporting to the world for generations.
Then Tor, some other encrypted or p2p network will become the next internet to use.
Only governments and big brands will have traditional domains and hosting services.
A www site takes a browser to the gov or some big brands approved content.
Social media lets a person only read a positive comments about a movie, history, products, services, a nation or faith.
Www becomes as fun as paying taxes or watching a TV broadcast while standing in long line.
Slashdot Mirror
Re "citation needed please."
How the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA) was used.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Prism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and what it could access.
Some US states might have changed laws but federally its all about access.
US states might offer some electronic device searches, real-time GPS tracking protections or the use of cell site simulators.
For all that access to work in the USA someone in the gov/mil is getting help or been giving help.
Different nations have laws, some just need for a court to allow access.
But once granted, access is full.
Someone is helping with source code in other nations too. If not governments would be locked out thanks to having to work on very different networks and complex secure systems.
Other governments are not worried so they have found a way into all network or have been helped to access any networks of interest.
Some nations ask for source code. Other nations just get total legal access as needed as part of their own laws.
The work of the Equation Group
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
A gig consumer ready plan could be an idea of what a "fast" could be in 2017.
"Fast" as in gig ready speeds for a consumer priced account would be expected. Expensive for a consumer every month but not having business grade support costs.
"Lane" as in the service can be expected to keep that speed most of the time down a network and to that account as the better quality services is been paid for.
Not a business grade product but more network care is provided than on low end consumer grade networks.
For that a new network has to be offered into an area to paying users expected to take up the new services on offer.
Someone has to pay in full for that upgrade and then get funds back for all that new work.
Just build out wealthy areas?
They have the income to pay for new fast plans every month. So some areas get access to a fast lane and enjoy all the new products and services.
A poor area might have to just keep using existing networks and never get a fast lane service.
Poor areas pay just enough to keep the networks they have now but never enough to cover the costs to bring in new fast networks.
So different groups like to talk of "fast lanes" as a new term to ensure all areas get new networks. Even areas that will never make a profit or can even pay for new services.
Its a political way of forcing the private sector to network very poor areas that will never pay back for the new services provided.
As tax payers or as users of a private sector network, someone is expected to have to pay for new networks in very poor areas.
So expect a lot of talk of fast lanes, network neutrality, what is a lawful website and service, respect, discriminate...
Its just new words to talk about passing on the full costs new expensive networks in very poor areas.
Set plan speeds to force more expensive plans to be needed?
Set data caps to ensure people have to pay much more?
Take out a huge loan, have the government pay it back over years and build a new network everywhere?
Just build out wealthy areas and let networks stay as they are in poor areas?
A lot of cash has to be extracted from users to build new networks and keep network owners and shareholders very happy.
A person has the option to buy more bandwidth when they have saved up some wealth.
Someone worked hard and can now pay for more bandwidth.
Provide a set slow internet to all users all the time. Enough to pay taxes, surf the web and watch a movie.
It might be a lower standard but a low quality video stream will be supported.
Want more bandwidth? Pay for more bandwidth to be connected to an account.
That could need work in a building. In the street. To get the needed new connection.
Want 4K, pay for a better connection, the needed 4K ready bandwidth and the account that supports that speed every month.
Why should any network owner just have to keep building out their networks for free to create instant new fast lanes for poor consumers who will never fund such upgrades?
Wealthy areas get the networks they can support. Other areas that won't pay for new networks get working internet over existing networks.
Poor areas get to keep their internet connections. Wealthy areas get to enjoy advanced new networks.
Listen to the critics. Stop pushing for really positive reviews on social media to sell very average movies.
Select scripts with more care so people in the USA can enjoy a movie.
Find much better actors that more people actually enjoy seeing in a movie.
Find actors on merit who test well with audiences for the needed role.
That might be a new face or an actor thats been liked for decades. Test and see who would work well for a given role. Dont just place an actor in a role for some other reason.
Find better funding so fun movies do not have to be altered to fit in with the history, faith or politics of other nations or groups.
Sell the freedom and fun of Americana to the world. The USA has freedom of speech, sell that globally. Any other nation can do a boring censored movie.
Stop trying to sell America and the world on very limited scripts.
Consider mini series to fill out franchises with complex plots.
If a new movies has hours of backstory to past movies to remove that would have been better as a series.
People on average like a hero, fun and drama. Stop trying to push politics or placate the people providing the funds. Audiences want a story not a lecture for the price.
If a script has to be censored, walk away from that funding.
Re "The EU is going down the road of China and other totalitarian regimes."
Small steps on the way to 100% positive EU news.
Happy government news.
Happy movie reviews.
Good news from all local community reporters.
Communist nations tried to really push positive spin on their failing nations in the 1980's. Their closed populations craved US freedoms.
The more the EU now tries to reshape the internet the more the internet move on to become more fun and free.
The EU can regulate social media, news and ads all it wants.
People will just get a VPN service and enjoy their time and money on the US internet.
Returning to the EU internet to pay their taxes. Why would anyone risk using the internet in the EU anymore?
Retroactive internet laws make investing in the EU a risk.
By that time the UK and US had everything they needed. Turing was been replaced by a new generation of smarter, trusted people who had used all the new methods and tools.
The future was getting ready for TICOM (Target Intelligence Committee) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
The race was on to find and keep German and Italian cryptanalysts with the needed Russian skills at the end of ww2.
Germany had codebooks on Turkey, Romania, Bolivia and Ecuador. Some material from Switzerland, France and the Vatican. German and Italy also had some British and American code traffic.
Enigma was the past even with later German improvements during ww2. Spying on the Soviet Union, France, the rest of the world was the new tasking. Collect it all.
Some security issues had to be allowed for at the very start of ww2, they would not be allowed after ww2.
A lot of staff hired could not be trusted near the end of ww2 and after 1945.
Re "... in the world spend that much money on a short-lived program?"
Governments like to know where their staff are, what they are doing and saying.
Some features had to be supported.
Most city and suburbs do not span 450-600 miles.
Vans and trucks can work all around a city and suburbs.
How could longer range be added?
Swap the truck battery pack out for the trip.
No need to wait for a recharge for each truck.
The used battery pack out stays at the destination or along the way to the destination to get recharged.
The truck has a full battery pack.
The driver does the same number of hours as they are now. With a stop to swap a battery pack.
To better detect competing ad services trying work arounds.
Alert the user and the proxy will only pass the approved ads.
Thats going to be the future given the bandwidth.
Social media will be pushing consumers to pay for content.
Users will find a much better way to internet.
New brands will have fun as people rediscover the www beyond a social media paywall.
A new look web site with new news everyday.
Free links, lists under topics and often updated.
No subscription needed. No payments needed.
The old www is the new freedom again. Social media goes full paywall.
The Dornier Do 31 VTOL jet transport https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... is back.
All that was needed was a better DO-960 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... computer.
Should be a proper look out and be using other means. Radar and lookouts.
A lot of ELINT and SIGINT in the area?
Computer issues don't alter the role of people been on duty and having to look around.
A testing phase should have found most computer related work that needed to be corrected.
Ease of use is all fun and games until an official asks for a password.
Always good to give users the option of some extra account protection too.
A big walk in faraday cage to work on setting the date to 1984?
Some password to be entered after the face scanner just to make sure it really was the user who wanted access?
The option to enter a different code to wipe and reset the device too?
Security services and police will enjoy holding a phone up to get access.
Walk the suspect in front of their phone and the phone grants access. Fun with the Fifth Amendment.
Re: "will other countries extradite citizens to face the music in the UK" Extradite would be difficult. Requesting a list of all UK users would then allow for UK users to be discovered in the UK.
A UK person living outside the UK using a VPN to comment on UK issues? Just ensure a return to the UK for any reason. The legal system will be waiting. Commonwealth nations and EU nations have agreements to support courts in the UK in many matters?
Finding a VPN that works in some nations could be an issue for UK users.
Once a site starts getting traction expect the UK courts and security services to start trying to collect all UK users ip's.
Different methods to make an average VPN covering an OS or browser show its UK ISP ip by requesting new connections a bit different to VPN supported http/https.
People without a VPN protecting their entire network could be discovered with a list of simple browser or application/OS supported networking requests.
Their UK isp ip would then be logged.
UK based CC payments to another nations VPN from within the UK would also be an issue to track if the status of using any type of VPN product in the UK was to change.
The main ability to detect an UK ip using a VPN service would be the legal agreements between the UK and the VPN nation.
The UK requests full international treaty support for a criminal facing many years in prison?
The VPN host nation could be obligated in their own nation to request the VPN to log the UK users given the nature of the request and any international/UK treaty they have to fully support.
For that full list of UK VPN account users the UK gov/mil would be very thankful to that nation.
Once that UK ISP and ip is found that user can be discovered in the UK.
The UK user lists will be extradited, discovered or logged.
Re "German Law" hasn't done anything to curtail free speech
The only speech that is allowed in Germany is legal speech that supports democracy.
Some of the origins of modern German law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Thats very different to the USA and having free speech fully protected before and after speaking or publication.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Finds new ways around social media censorship and SJW bans.
If the activist big brands want to remake the www, the internet will just find new services and methods of moving new content and data around.
The more social media and big search engines ban words, thoughts, authors, publications, politics, reviews, comments, users, blasphemy, history, whistleblowers, cryptography the more people seek new networks that support freedom of speech.
The users now have the bandwidth to move text around globally.
Having to go to some portal on a 28.8 modem to get information to download is the past.
People can publish their own content and text now. Then they will do video. Video content that does have a big brand SJW correcting search results.
A new generation of search engines will search the net again for content rather than filter smaller sets of SJW approved content.
German law goes after anyone who could upset democracy as put in place in West Germany and now in Germany. :)
Left, right, faiths, publishers, political parties all face the same political laws and have to be very aware of what they say and comment on.
The US has freedom of speech and freedom after speech. A much better legal system to publish in as rights are fully protected from any governments
Been able to learn math and get a full scholarship could be a understood as a privilege.
Maths is now about feelings and any number of experiences.
Been able to use and understand 1, 0, F will soon be seen as irrational by the SJW.
What produced the very best generations that understood math, science and computers?
Basic? Ada? Logo? Pascal?
Teach the advanced math needed and then add computer projects.
Go back to what worked well in the past. Math and science. A few computer labs with tasks that built on math skills.
Learn more math at home. Code in the lab. Build math skills. Then create projects that build on new math skills.
Putting a GUI together from a few pre set options in some educational software to create an instant app is not an education.
Yes help find the next Stuxnet, Equation Group, Duqu.
Kaspersky Lab https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The UK tried it for a generation with BBC Micro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
France had advanced networks with its Minitel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Over the decades most nations slowly find out that new computers and more computers don't really educate most people to an amazing level new of educational results.
Did the UK become a super computer nation with all its access to years of computers?
A few really smart people in the UK made really great games, hardware and software over a generation.
All the access to computers did not result in an advanced computer exporting workforce a generation later.
The USA kept on winning thanks to its educational system always supporting the very best students.
Pouring cash into education is great news for support services, overtime and selling generations of computers.
The USA had the key to the worlds best educational results many decades ago.
Test all students often and reward only the very best students with full academic scholarships to the best university educations in the USA.
Put the more funding back into the students who always get the best results.
Lots of testing and access to full scholarships ensures everyone who can really pass the same tests well has the ability to access the best university system.
Merit testing to get in, good jobs for the very best designers and engineers. Enjoy exporting to the world for generations.
Then Tor, some other encrypted or p2p network will become the next internet to use.
Only governments and big brands will have traditional domains and hosting services.
A www site takes a browser to the gov or some big brands approved content.
Social media lets a person only read a positive comments about a movie, history, products, services, a nation or faith.
Www becomes as fun as paying taxes or watching a TV broadcast while standing in long line.