When "searchability" is adjusted with "filters" its not censorship in the free West?
Freedom is now only within the content that is allowed to be available?
Re: The original of the term 'to “sin” in an internet context?
The term "sin" in the context of the internet needing curation. The word "sin" was from a speech in 2018:)
From history.
To news.
Politics.
Memes and funny political cartoons.
Movie script reviews.
Comments about bad religions and spreading faith.
Now its images and words used that needs some new curating. Whats "searchable" and what will be allowed to be found.
What topic is next for some extra censorship and gets to be made unsearchable using powerful tools?
Whats the next "sin" that needs new filters on the "internet?
AC, people want to enforce a CoC and offer guidance, how language should be used. Then find time away from working on great code to consider social consequences?
The people with skills who create the great code in their own time for free now have to "clean it up" too?
How many hours do the best people have to now put in the consideration of "social consequences" before they can get to code?
When skilled people who do the "commercial contributions" write all the code they can set what is "professional" in their code.
Then give the "code" away for free?
Until then anyone who actually writes great code for free in their own time can use any comments they want in their own code.
Code they publish for free that everyone can use... ie its their own content, comments and all:)
Freedom is like that. People who do the actual work get to work in any way they want.
People then have the freedom to use the code. To go their own way with their "commercial contributions" and "professional" use of comments.
The EU will make its energy users pay more and more for their energy. More EU nation tax to pay and less quality of life for people all over the EU. More EU energy taxation.
India and China will keep on using coal/energy imports to provide low cost power to their own nations to advance with. Winning.
The USA will have low cost power and grow its own industrial base. Low cost exports and jobs for the USA. Winning.
France needs to extract a lot of tax money from its citizens. Wonder what France has to pay for with all its new attempts at extra tax collection?
Who in France needs more and constant support from the French tax payers?
Say a very smart person puts in hours of their free time. Years of their hours of free time for project.
The reaction they get is words like "professionalism" and the need to go back over all their great code to look for a list of the reported "wrong" words?
Thats hours and project time lost to looking at past comments in old code.
That feeling of community, fast code and free time is now gone.
Self censorship over past work is not a productive task given the hours in a day.
That smart person is going to look at other better, more fun projects in their free time.
Do they have a CoC? No. Do they track how users "use" the code? No.
They reach out to a fun dynamic community that does great code.
Soon they are creating new code again in their own free time for a different project. No more going back over their working code doing self censorship.
Every generation has so many projects but needs great people with the time, freedom and skills to code.
The best people can always find/start another project.
The good part about using your own internal code and products is that the smart people have to use their own products.
The first real test should not be end users and paying customers.
Find top experts to create a new method to code and create an OS.
Why cant staff learn the new code quickly and to a good standard?
Hire staff who can learn and understand how to code on company time and let them do internal quality control.
Workers learned all kinds of different code at university, they should have the skills to "learn" any needed new code at/for work.
When something is not working: fix it. Cant fix it? Hire better workers who can learn how.
When a product has not made internally is so great, why cant expert staff make and equal or better product for the brand?
Immediate feedback is good.
Management has to use the same product and services. Thats some great customer experience without needing customers.
Do new features work on different hardware?
Version drift is internal.
The ability to create your own internal manual. Not having to see what someone totally external to the company has changed the code to.
That allows for improvements. In code, the GUI, speed, hardware, software, networking, the testing and documents on how to use the product/service.
People who sell and support the results of that same internal code all day have to use the same product.
Should a "professional" environment want good code they can pay for that their own clean code.
Using their own staff. Hire staff to write code for them that is "professional".
Why should anyone have to worry about their code been '"professional" and what "environment" then later selects to use that code.
Who gets to set the SJW standards? The people who work on the code every day?
A '"professional" who later wants to use that code?
AC when the US gov grants extra protections for a "utility" the rights are protected.
Thats what made US tech grow and stay fun and free. US tech had legal tools like the Communications Decency Act to ensure they could keep working rather than stop to get legal questions over ever users comment, link, image, cartoon.
For that utility like protection, a user is the publisher not the "ad" site.
Can a "utility" say they won't connect a service as they don't like the past "politics" of a consumer?
Does the water company turn the water off over a political sign detected by the water company in the front yard?
Would a gas company stop its service over the reported "politics" of a consumer?
Does a telephone company activity listen into all call it connects and stop calls depending on the side of "politics" talked about?
That "special platform" is what the freedom of speech and US legal wisdom like the Communications Decency Act protected.
That gov granted legal cover allowed many US tech brands to grow as a utility and not have to worry about published "content".
The user who actually "published" their own work had to worry about their own content.
Thats what made US tech great as other nations tech attempts got stuck in their own legal systems.
AC the past has some great code to show for its efforts.
Complex code that worked well and was supported over changing CPU, GPU and network use.
Todays efforts at computer "code"? A complex CoC looking over comments and what code is "used" for....
How about just letting the smartest people use their free time to write and look after the best code?
Thank them for their work and try and sent in a bug report.
Rather than placing political CoC over entire projects.
Have max bandwidth use by a broadcaster around the world. No attempts on adsl, low end 3rd world consumer ISP.
Work out what the original material was created in, film, HD, 4K, 8K.
Find the same show globally.
Sort for the bandwidth, compression, chip sets used.
And only selling so much bandwidth to broadcasters?
Are 2nd and 3rd world nations broadcasters trying to fit many shows over a set amount of bandwidth they can use in that part of the world?
Its not a conspiracy to make TV look bad in 2nd and 3rd world nations.
Only so much "TV" will fit in the bandwidth allowed in 2nd and 3rd world nations. To make money more "TV" is made to fit so more ads get played. So it looks different to the HD and 4K products offered in advanced normal nations. More shows, more ads, more profit.
Why? People in advanced nations "pay" at lot every month for more the amount of "bandwidth" to enjoy HD and 4K content.
Want better quality? Try DVD. Buy Blu ray. Pay for a broadcaster that "buys" the needed bandwidth for their broadcasting.
Teaching people not hired on merit how to code and do their jobs - every shift.
Collaboration is the smartest person at work having to stop their work and teach people hired on "demographics" about computers.
Collaboration is a government making your place of work fill as "free" education and university for people who cant/won't study.
Hire on merit, find the best workers and give them a complex problem.
They cant work on it? Hire much more smart people from a better university.
When the problem is solved, make a profit. Work on the next big thing.
Collaboration slows down your best workers and has them doing "education" support work with people who should not be hired for that level of work.
Stop looking at code comments.
Stop making political speech demands the most gifted, smart, amazing people who give their free time to write the best code in their generation.
A person writes great code. With few computer problems. Use the code and attract more skilled people.
Micromanagement of language use, politics, comments just makes "free" feel like another day at work.
Want a business model? Sell your code.
Want to do open source? Work in your free time and see what others can add to your hours and years of work.
No politics, comment reading, CoC needed, reviews of "how" the programming language was used.
Past years of code resulted in the best OS and best software over generations. No "crisis" as real experts just got on with really great code.
Big tech should have stayed an ad company.
Let the users be the "publishers" and have the full protection of been a "utility".
Now that big tech wants to ban, report, detect and curate users they have become more than just an ad company.
Wonder when the full protection of the Communications Decency Act stops when a platform becomes a publisher?
Want art great Section 230 to stay? Just let your users content pass.
Start to publish and take political sides? Become a partisan censor?
What was government protected allowed platforms to grow.
Try for algorithmic and human political censorship and the gov free expression legal protections stop as the "ad" company is now just another publisher.
Study their past. Their online life. Did they study a lot for their education? Have a part time job? Wealthy but always studied a lot?
Did they study their way to a great job?
Get free non academic consideration for "demographics"? Never really show an ability to study, move from job to job for "reasons"?
Become friends with political activists, take part in party political activism? Show any interest in unions?
Look for personality traits and changes over a person working life and their education level. Work and how they present their past when seeking employment with your company.
Do they lie directly when asked about the years worked? Trying to span missing months and years with one "job".
Strange gaps in their working life? Months and years "missing" that get covered over by a past job extended on a resume to cover the gap?
Look into their actual start and stop dates for all their past work before an interview. Do the actual working years follow their "up to date" resume and lies told during an interview?
A wealthy person can afford to enjoy life and not work. See what they did over that time and why they needed to hide that time.
Will they have the same lifestyle need to walk out again?
A poor person was doing "something" at that time, but now wants to hide something. Look into what they did and why they feel the need to hide that time span.
Will they walk away again?
Needed a "holiday" in anther nation but try to hide that lost time? Do their mil service in another nation? Have a split loyalty to your nation and all work in any company? Faith and cult considerations that needed years that will not be talked about? An under cover journalist who had to hide some years?
Undercover police who rushed their resume preparation and will only be staying weeks to place spy hardware?
Dont hire people who cant work, never learned how to study, who did not show a good attitude when learning. Who lie on applications. Who have pasts they want to hide.
Who got a free pass on their academic results for non academic reasons.
In todays networked and digital world its hard to totally hide a working past.
Some investigation over every part of a resume before accepting a person can ensure only the best workers get hired on merit.
Got ghosted?
Look back over every aspect of the present story and how that person got work.
Police? Spy? Under cover journalist? Worker with no ability to work?
Did they do something to your network firewall, security, take data? Do searches for projects and terms they did not work on and should have no normal reason to know about?
Learn how they got their resume in and got a job. Do someone help them get work?
Look for their same traits in all other workers and anyone seeking work.
So contractors can make money on all kinds of new mil work they can do on a network.
A large international company can hire a few US lawyers and approved gov/mil staff and use the "internet" to bid for US gov/mil work.
Using a larger number of low wage staff outside the USA do the work. Low wages and a small "trusted" front company in the USA to win any US mil bid with.
The NSA likes the wide open "network" too as they can spy back down the "internet" at who is spying so well and deep on the US mil.
A few NSA people can spy on the world as the spies have to network into the USA.
The CIA creates fake files and see who they can fool into starting projects in their own nations from "fake" advanced US projects and files.
Everyone gets their very own version of Operation Merlin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Want some "free" laser isotope separation files?
Nations waste money and show their own spy networks trying to work on junk US bait projects found deep in US mil networks:)
A few CIA "projects" found by other nations can set other nations mil spending back decades.
Th FBI likes the networks as they can detect who is moving large amounts of files around to sell to spies.
The FBI can stay waiting deep in networks and see who is looking for what files and moves files around using what methods and accounts.
A few FBI people can track a lot of US contractors all over the world.
The FBI in an undercover role can ask any contractor to copy files out from a mil network and see if they do that task for money.
The FBI can then watch such files and see in the contractor reports the "approach" to spy or starts to copy the files.
The FBI kind of expects spying in the traditional way. A file structure will be searched in real time and the FBI can spy on words/names and terms in real time.
What the FBI finds is the other nations just copy out the entire US database. No security, no encryptions allows all the US data to walk. The FBI never finds out what was so interesting as all the data is copied out.
That's why so many US systems are kept wide open - its a trap.. Security wants to see what is getting look for/at/search terms used from what account. The bad nations just copy it all out.
Spies know they are watched on US networks and dont show what they are looking for on US networks anymore.
Consider the comfort of staying in the USA. No having to follow the US mil work around the world and do months of security work in person at some cold/hot/dusty/isolated US camp/fort/base/port. For an average wage and then get taxed a lot.
A wage lost to US taxes and rent in some other nations to work on a US base in person. That can all be done on a network?
Do US internet security globally for the US mil from some nice US city. Keep the wage and save on rent.
Nations trusted like the UK and New Zealand can place their own bait "files" deep in wide open US mil networks. The CIA and trusted 5 eye workers wait to see who looks for a project in say ~ the UK. MI5 uncovers a real spy network in the UK for free using a fictional file placed as bait in the USA.
The "internet" was great for everyone around US mil projects.
Except for the ability to copy out all the US secrets in plain text.
Past efforts at state ID systems saw the problems with sanctuary city ID, use by illegal migrants and fraud.
The new systems should help detect illegal migrants and prevent further criminal use of a new ID.
US citizens' privacy will be ok as they are not criminals, illegal migrants.
What are the options?
Go to the big US brand shop and have a worker see the person and their ID in front of them?
Send the person a letter in the mail?
Accounts and people using "digital" services want instant support.
Governments all over the world can study people and craft the exact messages needed to induce that one needed click from within the "dissidents"/interesting computer system.
Slashdot Mirror
Seems they have found another nation and China in an update. Strange how its always Russia until its not, but its still Russia :)
When "searchability" is adjusted with "filters" its not censorship in the free West?
Freedom is now only within the content that is allowed to be available?
And yet here we are in the free "West" with terms like unsearchable, filters, alternative spellings and no results.
Re: The original of the term 'to “sin” in an internet context? :)
The term "sin" in the context of the internet needing curation. The word "sin" was from a speech in 2018
From history.
To news.
Politics.
Memes and funny political cartoons.
Movie script reviews.
Comments about bad religions and spreading faith.
Now its images and words used that needs some new curating. Whats "searchable" and what will be allowed to be found.
What topic is next for some extra censorship and gets to be made unsearchable using powerful tools?
Whats the next "sin" that needs new filters on the "internet?
AC, people want to enforce a CoC and offer guidance, how language should be used. Then find time away from working on great code to consider social consequences?
The people with skills who create the great code in their own time for free now have to "clean it up" too?
How many hours do the best people have to now put in the consideration of "social consequences" before they can get to code?
When skilled people who do the "commercial contributions" write all the code they can set what is "professional" in their code. Then give the "code" away for free? :)
Until then anyone who actually writes great code for free in their own time can use any comments they want in their own code.
Code they publish for free that everyone can use... ie its their own content, comments and all
Freedom is like that. People who do the actual work get to work in any way they want.
People then have the freedom to use the code. To go their own way with their "commercial contributions" and "professional" use of comments.
The EU will make its energy users pay more and more for their energy. More EU nation tax to pay and less quality of life for people all over the EU. More EU energy taxation.
India and China will keep on using coal/energy imports to provide low cost power to their own nations to advance with. Winning.
The USA will have low cost power and grow its own industrial base. Low cost exports and jobs for the USA. Winning.
France needs to extract a lot of tax money from its citizens. Wonder what France has to pay for with all its new attempts at extra tax collection?
Who in France needs more and constant support from the French tax payers?
is called spying so ads can gather more data.
Don't let any new "computer" do this.
Say a very smart person puts in hours of their free time. Years of their hours of free time for project.
The reaction they get is words like "professionalism" and the need to go back over all their great code to look for a list of the reported "wrong" words?
Thats hours and project time lost to looking at past comments in old code.
That feeling of community, fast code and free time is now gone.
Self censorship over past work is not a productive task given the hours in a day.
That smart person is going to look at other better, more fun projects in their free time.
Do they have a CoC? No. Do they track how users "use" the code? No.
They reach out to a fun dynamic community that does great code.
Soon they are creating new code again in their own free time for a different project. No more going back over their working code doing self censorship.
Every generation has so many projects but needs great people with the time, freedom and skills to code.
The best people can always find/start another project.
The good part about using your own internal code and products is that the smart people have to use their own products.
The first real test should not be end users and paying customers.
Find top experts to create a new method to code and create an OS.
Why cant staff learn the new code quickly and to a good standard?
Hire staff who can learn and understand how to code on company time and let them do internal quality control.
Workers learned all kinds of different code at university, they should have the skills to "learn" any needed new code at/for work.
When something is not working: fix it. Cant fix it? Hire better workers who can learn how.
When a product has not made internally is so great, why cant expert staff make and equal or better product for the brand?
Immediate feedback is good.
Management has to use the same product and services. Thats some great customer experience without needing customers.
Do new features work on different hardware?
Version drift is internal.
The ability to create your own internal manual. Not having to see what someone totally external to the company has changed the code to. That allows for improvements. In code, the GUI, speed, hardware, software, networking, the testing and documents on how to use the product/service.
People who sell and support the results of that same internal code all day have to use the same product.
Should a "professional" environment want good code they can pay for that their own clean code.
Using their own staff. Hire staff to write code for them that is "professional".
Why should anyone have to worry about their code been '"professional" and what "environment" then later selects to use that code.
Who gets to set the SJW standards? The people who work on the code every day?
A '"professional" who later wants to use that code?
AC when the US gov grants extra protections for a "utility" the rights are protected.
Thats what made US tech grow and stay fun and free. US tech had legal tools like the Communications Decency Act to ensure they could keep working rather than stop to get legal questions over ever users comment, link, image, cartoon.
For that utility like protection, a user is the publisher not the "ad" site.
Can a "utility" say they won't connect a service as they don't like the past "politics" of a consumer?
Does the water company turn the water off over a political sign detected by the water company in the front yard?
Would a gas company stop its service over the reported "politics" of a consumer?
Does a telephone company activity listen into all call it connects and stop calls depending on the side of "politics" talked about?
That "special platform" is what the freedom of speech and US legal wisdom like the Communications Decency Act protected.
That gov granted legal cover allowed many US tech brands to grow as a utility and not have to worry about published "content".
The user who actually "published" their own work had to worry about their own content.
Thats what made US tech great as other nations tech attempts got stuck in their own legal systems.
AC the past has some great code to show for its efforts.
Complex code that worked well and was supported over changing CPU, GPU and network use.
Todays efforts at computer "code"? A complex CoC looking over comments and what code is "used" for....
How about just letting the smartest people use their free time to write and look after the best code?
Thank them for their work and try and sent in a bug report.
Rather than placing political CoC over entire projects.
Have max bandwidth use by a broadcaster around the world. No attempts on adsl, low end 3rd world consumer ISP.
Work out what the original material was created in, film, HD, 4K, 8K.
Find the same show globally.
Sort for the bandwidth, compression, chip sets used.
And only selling so much bandwidth to broadcasters?
Are 2nd and 3rd world nations broadcasters trying to fit many shows over a set amount of bandwidth they can use in that part of the world?
Its not a conspiracy to make TV look bad in 2nd and 3rd world nations.
Only so much "TV" will fit in the bandwidth allowed in 2nd and 3rd world nations. To make money more "TV" is made to fit so more ads get played. So it looks different to the HD and 4K products offered in advanced normal nations. More shows, more ads, more profit.
Why? People in advanced nations "pay" at lot every month for more the amount of "bandwidth" to enjoy HD and 4K content.
Want better quality? Try DVD. Buy Blu ray. Pay for a broadcaster that "buys" the needed bandwidth for their broadcasting.
Teaching people not hired on merit how to code and do their jobs - every shift.
Collaboration is the smartest person at work having to stop their work and teach people hired on "demographics" about computers.
Collaboration is a government making your place of work fill as "free" education and university for people who cant/won't study.
Hire on merit, find the best workers and give them a complex problem.
They cant work on it? Hire much more smart people from a better university.
When the problem is solved, make a profit. Work on the next big thing.
Collaboration slows down your best workers and has them doing "education" support work with people who should not be hired for that level of work.
Stop looking at code comments.
Stop making political speech demands the most gifted, smart, amazing people who give their free time to write the best code in their generation.
A person writes great code. With few computer problems. Use the code and attract more skilled people.
Micromanagement of language use, politics, comments just makes "free" feel like another day at work.
Want a business model? Sell your code.
Want to do open source? Work in your free time and see what others can add to your hours and years of work.
No politics, comment reading, CoC needed, reviews of "how" the programming language was used.
Past years of code resulted in the best OS and best software over generations. No "crisis" as real experts just got on with really great code.
Big tech should have stayed an ad company.
Let the users be the "publishers" and have the full protection of been a "utility".
Now that big tech wants to ban, report, detect and curate users they have become more than just an ad company.
Wonder when the full protection of the Communications Decency Act stops when a platform becomes a publisher?
Want art great Section 230 to stay? Just let your users content pass.
Start to publish and take political sides? Become a partisan censor?
What was government protected allowed platforms to grow.
Try for algorithmic and human political censorship and the gov free expression legal protections stop as the "ad" company is now just another publisher.
A nation state that cant cover the banDNWIDTH?
Study their past. Their online life. Did they study a lot for their education? Have a part time job? Wealthy but always studied a lot?
Did they study their way to a great job?
Get free non academic consideration for "demographics"? Never really show an ability to study, move from job to job for "reasons"?
Become friends with political activists, take part in party political activism? Show any interest in unions?
Look for personality traits and changes over a person working life and their education level. Work and how they present their past when seeking employment with your company.
Do they lie directly when asked about the years worked? Trying to span missing months and years with one "job".
Strange gaps in their working life? Months and years "missing" that get covered over by a past job extended on a resume to cover the gap?
Look into their actual start and stop dates for all their past work before an interview. Do the actual working years follow their "up to date" resume and lies told during an interview?
A wealthy person can afford to enjoy life and not work. See what they did over that time and why they needed to hide that time.
Will they have the same lifestyle need to walk out again?
A poor person was doing "something" at that time, but now wants to hide something. Look into what they did and why they feel the need to hide that time span.
Will they walk away again?
Needed a "holiday" in anther nation but try to hide that lost time? Do their mil service in another nation? Have a split loyalty to your nation and all work in any company? Faith and cult considerations that needed years that will not be talked about? An under cover journalist who had to hide some years?
Undercover police who rushed their resume preparation and will only be staying weeks to place spy hardware?
Dont hire people who cant work, never learned how to study, who did not show a good attitude when learning. Who lie on applications. Who have pasts they want to hide.
Who got a free pass on their academic results for non academic reasons.
In todays networked and digital world its hard to totally hide a working past.
Some investigation over every part of a resume before accepting a person can ensure only the best workers get hired on merit.
Got ghosted?
Look back over every aspect of the present story and how that person got work.
Police? Spy? Under cover journalist? Worker with no ability to work?
Did they do something to your network firewall, security, take data? Do searches for projects and terms they did not work on and should have no normal reason to know about?
Learn how they got their resume in and got a job. Do someone help them get work?
Look for their same traits in all other workers and anyone seeking work.
So contractors can make money on all kinds of new mil work they can do on a network.
:)
A large international company can hire a few US lawyers and approved gov/mil staff and use the "internet" to bid for US gov/mil work.
Using a larger number of low wage staff outside the USA do the work. Low wages and a small "trusted" front company in the USA to win any US mil bid with.
The NSA likes the wide open "network" too as they can spy back down the "internet" at who is spying so well and deep on the US mil.
A few NSA people can spy on the world as the spies have to network into the USA.
The CIA creates fake files and see who they can fool into starting projects in their own nations from "fake" advanced US projects and files.
Everyone gets their very own version of Operation Merlin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Want some "free" laser isotope separation files?
Nations waste money and show their own spy networks trying to work on junk US bait projects found deep in US mil networks
A few CIA "projects" found by other nations can set other nations mil spending back decades.
Th FBI likes the networks as they can detect who is moving large amounts of files around to sell to spies.
The FBI can stay waiting deep in networks and see who is looking for what files and moves files around using what methods and accounts.
A few FBI people can track a lot of US contractors all over the world.
The FBI in an undercover role can ask any contractor to copy files out from a mil network and see if they do that task for money.
The FBI can then watch such files and see in the contractor reports the "approach" to spy or starts to copy the files.
The FBI kind of expects spying in the traditional way. A file structure will be searched in real time and the FBI can spy on words/names and terms in real time.
What the FBI finds is the other nations just copy out the entire US database. No security, no encryptions allows all the US data to walk. The FBI never finds out what was so interesting as all the data is copied out.
That's why so many US systems are kept wide open - its a trap.. Security wants to see what is getting look for/at/search terms used from what account. The bad nations just copy it all out.
Spies know they are watched on US networks and dont show what they are looking for on US networks anymore.
Consider the comfort of staying in the USA. No having to follow the US mil work around the world and do months of security work in person at some cold/hot/dusty/isolated US camp/fort/base/port. For an average wage and then get taxed a lot.
A wage lost to US taxes and rent in some other nations to work on a US base in person. That can all be done on a network?
Do US internet security globally for the US mil from some nice US city. Keep the wage and save on rent.
Nations trusted like the UK and New Zealand can place their own bait "files" deep in wide open US mil networks.
The CIA and trusted 5 eye workers wait to see who looks for a project in say ~ the UK. MI5 uncovers a real spy network in the UK for free using a fictional file placed as bait in the USA.
The "internet" was great for everyone around US mil projects.
Except for the ability to copy out all the US secrets in plain text.
Past efforts at state ID systems saw the problems with sanctuary city ID, use by illegal migrants and fraud.
The new systems should help detect illegal migrants and prevent further criminal use of a new ID.
US citizens' privacy will be ok as they are not criminals, illegal migrants.
What are the options?
Go to the big US brand shop and have a worker see the person and their ID in front of them?
Send the person a letter in the mail?
Accounts and people using "digital" services want instant support.
Governments all over the world can study people and craft the exact messages needed to induce that one needed click from within the "dissidents"/interesting computer system.
Its win, win for China.
It grows their own Communist approved brands with every sale.