A new ID system might just escape some of the past strong city/state privacy laws that protected US citizens from deeper state/federal database sharing.
A "new" digital method could see a lot more new sharing of data at a city, sate and federal level allowing for the discovery of illegal migrates and other criminals.
Criminals and illegal migrants who still expected a city and state "ID" to still be politically part of a "Sanctuary city" and would be an easy path to further build fake US citizenship ID.
The aspect of "LESS secure than a paper ID" was the expected state vs federal privacy protections and activist political protections some US city and states offered for a state ID.
A new ID system might be a great way of finally connecting more ID systems and detecting illegal migrants and other criminals. Digital networks vs past state kept "paper" can share a lot more networked data all over the USA:)
Illegal migrants using one granted "state" ID to build a federal ID and get more services and support from a city/state/federal US gov.
Criminals trying to create a new past with a new state ID.
People who need a new state ID for new fraud and deception attempts.
A state ID in different parts of the USA was a great way for illegal migrants and other criminals to work on getting services, support and more US ID.
What are the big US brands doing to the free internet?
Selling a used book is now counterfeiting.
Buying parts to repair a computer is now counterfeiting.
No talking about the news.
No reviews about movies scripts and the ability of an actor.
No funny political memes.
AC re "foreigners that go bankrupt after accidents and hospital bills in US." That is a US gov problem how? Buy some medical "travel insurance".
AC that "right to not being frisked" has been before many a US court over generations and decades. The US gov finds it can have a secure border.
to make a new innovative network that's community broadband ISP aware.
Let a monopoly telco return with a network they 100% control and demand a town/city accepts that monopoly network they pay for?
Re "bases were there if they were a secret"
Thats the easy part when trying to map and sell maps. Governments allow what was once "spy" maps to be created by anyone who can afford such collection methods from space.
But for that global collection ability the gov/mil still has some power to regulate.
The gov buys an image of a part of the world first and says its not be published. No extra/new copy of that data set/map/image can be sold.
The media can ask to "buy" an image of a base but will be told that data set at that location has been sold and cant be sold again.
A commercial arrangement thats not legal "censorship" but no more data about locations will exist to buy.
Thats how almost all mapping company workers know a site is interesting. The data only has one "buyer", a gov and it can never be sold again.
Gov has the first right of refusal to buy and own when first letting such space collection get approved ie the gov ensured "shutter control" past a set resolution.
China has a CIA problem. The CIA was entering Macau to meet with top officials from China.
The CIA had leverage over the way top official from China where using gov/mil money from China to gamble.
The CIA made offers and thought it then had new gov/mil spies placed deep in China for decades.
Something MI6 and the CIA had failed to do for decades. It was like the results of the CIA Tibetan program https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... again but with long holidays.
US spies in the past had unique spending patterns, names and strange cover stories that really stood out from normal people who holiday.
CIA and its support teams outside the USA like to spend money when on missions. Past US cover stories for such missions show no expected "brand"/"job"/"work"/"bank account" paying for such spending.
A good cover story attracts attention so the USA went with the cover of "average" people. But the CIA contractors had too much to spend. That stood out in each hotel stay once the CIA contractor spending pattern is detected.
The US front companies used to cover for US spies in the past don't hold up under deeper examination and review by China once China has all the CIA "holiday" files.
What China wants to do is use a few different deep database methods to place all its party officials near any CIA agents.
Then see who else the same CIA agents who are "experts" in all things China got talking to around the world.
Spies should not spend above average in a hotel when staying on a mission. Such repeated details stand out and allow other US covert missions to be tracked globally even under different names/cover stories. The extra US spending in each hotel is found to be unique to US contractors.
Using US OS, US designed CPU, US designed GPU.
Parts made in China.
AI in Europe is just another decade of the AI winter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Of users generated content.
Thats your words a big brand and big gov wants to look at and then remove.
What next? Voice? Say the "unwanted" words in real time and get "talking" on the phone blocked?
When a state needs to tax everything tech, considers a ban on ban employee cafeteria?
Wont enforce laws about trash and waste in the streets. Park RV and tents in the streets.
Has to clean waste from its streets.
How many more "tech" tax attempts before tech understands that many other US states are clean, safe, welcoming and low tax?
Move to a state where you don't have to "pay a bit more" in new tech tax and you can invest a lot more.
The US gov is not after "company documents, tax documents, industrial documents". The NSA/MI6/GCHQ/CIA can get all that for free in real time globally.
The US gov wants a person to lie directly when asked a simple question.
The US mil and its support in other nations already know who is entering the USA and what they did globally while on "holiday".
The questions and search at the international border allows for people tracked globally by the US mil/CIA to be questioned as a very random "event".
Such people who support banned groups, have funded banned groups then have to lie about such support to the US gov.
No further "methods" get exposed. That one lie revokes the ability to enter the USA. The "lie" can start a formal investigation without having to show what the US mil found the person doing in another nation.
Its not about "company documents". The US wants to find images of people supporting banned groups, been in contact with criminals.
Once a non US citizen is in the USA they get all the expected human rights that the US gov has set and accepts.
Food, water, health care, visits by their embassy.
People just have to stop supporting/funding banned groups when outside one the USA.
Been part of a banned group and not mentioning that fact when asked is a crime.
Supporting a banned group and related funding is a crime when asked about any such activity.
Traveling in a nation that supports banned groups and not telling the US gov about that extra "holiday" when asked is a crime.
Having images taken with wanted criminals who are active members of a banned group.... and not mentioning that to the US gov..
Creating a fake identity to hide past that had a person supporting banned groups.
Banking for banned groups.
Transferring tech and money to nations that have sanctions imposed.
No loss of rights for a non citizen/illegal migrant. When the US gov asks questions when entering the USA, don't hide past events and expect to be allowed in.
Thats why the search of digital data/images/gps is so important. It finds people who support banned groups outside the USA. People who then lie to the US gov.
A brand makes perfect HDR displays. That totally meet all standards but for $5000~$10000 when sold to the consumer.
Factory tested and consumer grade quality.
Do they get to set the letters "H" "D" and "R" as a standard so everyone has to buy from them?
Want to pay $10000 for an approved "TV" display from one company again?
Another less advanced nation "reverse engineers" anything emerging in TV display tech.
With a low cost of workers, regulations and less product quality control they can get 4K and 60 down to a price range in $100's.
Why not add some "H", "D" and "R" to the 4K TV so a console can "support" 4K, 60 and "H""D""R"? For user who have $1000?
Like Tiananmen Square https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Term limits in China?
Celebrities want their good movie reviews found and bad movie reviews banned?
Big brands want no results on their DRM efforts?
Repairing a computer is now a trade in counterfeit parts?
Time to help Spain with all results about anything to do with any Catalan declaration of independence.
Not find results about French protester?
Only find what a German government approves of politically?
Time for a real search engine again.
Removing content for the politics of NGO, nations, think tanks, European bureaucrats, faith groups, cults, celebrities will not result is a useful search product.
Users know what they enjoy search for. Provide that search service to the users and show them some ads. A search engine is not a publisher of content.
When a search brand wants to publish its own news under it sown brand then it can keep its own staff to its own politics.
Let the rest of the internet publish what it wants and show "search" results for the users who expect to find content.
Censorship is not a result users want to pay for with ads.
Censorship opens the marketplace to competition who can actually "search" the internet without the constant party political removal of results.
The cost of China is too expensive. Workers, engineers. Communist government demands and laws.
Want to replace workers with robots, that another upgrade cost.
Slashdot Mirror
A new ID system might just escape some of the past strong city/state privacy laws that protected US citizens from deeper state/federal database sharing .
:)
A "new" digital method could see a lot more new sharing of data at a city, sate and federal level allowing for the discovery of illegal migrates and other criminals.
Criminals and illegal migrants who still expected a city and state "ID" to still be politically part of a "Sanctuary city" and would be an easy path to further build fake US citizenship ID.
The aspect of "LESS secure than a paper ID" was the expected state vs federal privacy protections and activist political protections some US city and states offered for a state ID.
A new ID system might be a great way of finally connecting more ID systems and detecting illegal migrants and other criminals. Digital networks vs past state kept "paper" can share a lot more networked data all over the USA
Illegal migrants using one granted "state" ID to build a federal ID and get more services and support from a city/state/federal US gov.
Criminals trying to create a new past with a new state ID.
People who need a new state ID for new fraud and deception attempts.
A state ID in different parts of the USA was a great way for illegal migrants and other criminals to work on getting services, support and more US ID.
What are the big US brands doing to the free internet?
Selling a used book is now counterfeiting.
Buying parts to repair a computer is now counterfeiting.
No talking about the news.
No reviews about movies scripts and the ability of an actor.
No funny political memes.
AC re "foreigners that go bankrupt after accidents and hospital bills in US." That is a US gov problem how? Buy some medical "travel insurance".
AC that "right to not being frisked" has been before many a US court over generations and decades. The US gov finds it can have a secure border.
to make a new innovative network that's community broadband ISP aware.
Let a monopoly telco return with a network they 100% control and demand a town/city accepts that monopoly network they pay for?
Re "vertically-integrated"? US car brands tried that with raw materials and their car production lines.
Re "bases were there if they were a secret"
Thats the easy part when trying to map and sell maps. Governments allow what was once "spy" maps to be created by anyone who can afford such collection methods from space.
But for that global collection ability the gov/mil still has some power to regulate.
The gov buys an image of a part of the world first and says its not be published. No extra/new copy of that data set/map/image can be sold.
The media can ask to "buy" an image of a base but will be told that data set at that location has been sold and cant be sold again.
A commercial arrangement thats not legal "censorship" but no more data about locations will exist to buy.
Thats how almost all mapping company workers know a site is interesting. The data only has one "buyer", a gov and it can never be sold again.
Gov has the first right of refusal to buy and own when first letting such space collection get approved ie the gov ensured "shutter control" past a set resolution.
The design of the fence lines and troops on guard duty are the usual hint to all other advanced nations looking down.
China has a CIA problem. The CIA was entering Macau to meet with top officials from China.
The CIA had leverage over the way top official from China where using gov/mil money from China to gamble.
The CIA made offers and thought it then had new gov/mil spies placed deep in China for decades.
Something MI6 and the CIA had failed to do for decades. It was like the results of the CIA Tibetan program https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... again but with long holidays.
US spies in the past had unique spending patterns, names and strange cover stories that really stood out from normal people who holiday.
CIA and its support teams outside the USA like to spend money when on missions.
Past US cover stories for such missions show no expected "brand"/"job"/"work"/"bank account" paying for such spending.
A good cover story attracts attention so the USA went with the cover of "average" people. But the CIA contractors had too much to spend. That stood out in each hotel stay once the CIA contractor spending pattern is detected.
The US front companies used to cover for US spies in the past don't hold up under deeper examination and review by China once China has all the CIA "holiday" files.
What China wants to do is use a few different deep database methods to place all its party officials near any CIA agents.
Then see who else the same CIA agents who are "experts" in all things China got talking to around the world.
Spies should not spend above average in a hotel when staying on a mission. Such repeated details stand out and allow other US covert missions to be tracked globally even under different names/cover stories.
The extra US spending in each hotel is found to be unique to US contractors.
We must not allow... a code of conduct gap!
A new method got approved and its all good again.
Thats more money to invest in more "tech" that's not "free" on consumer level products :)
Using US OS, US designed CPU, US designed GPU.
Parts made in China.
AI in Europe is just another decade of the AI winter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Of users generated content.
Thats your words a big brand and big gov wants to look at and then remove.
What next? Voice? Say the "unwanted" words in real time and get "talking" on the phone blocked?
When a state needs to tax everything tech, considers a ban on ban employee cafeteria?
Wont enforce laws about trash and waste in the streets. Park RV and tents in the streets.
Has to clean waste from its streets.
How many more "tech" tax attempts before tech understands that many other US states are clean, safe, welcoming and low tax?
Move to a state where you don't have to "pay a bit more" in new tech tax and you can invest a lot more.
Want to buy some US "gov and "mil" "data" sets?
Create nice big fake date sets and see who wants to buy what.
The US gov is not after "company documents, tax documents, industrial documents". The NSA/MI6/GCHQ/CIA can get all that for free in real time globally.
The US gov wants a person to lie directly when asked a simple question.
The US mil and its support in other nations already know who is entering the USA and what they did globally while on "holiday".
The questions and search at the international border allows for people tracked globally by the US mil/CIA to be questioned as a very random "event".
Such people who support banned groups, have funded banned groups then have to lie about such support to the US gov.
No further "methods" get exposed. That one lie revokes the ability to enter the USA. The "lie" can start a formal investigation without having to show what the US mil found the person doing in another nation.
Its not about "company documents". The US wants to find images of people supporting banned groups, been in contact with criminals.
Once a non US citizen is in the USA they get all the expected human rights that the US gov has set and accepts.
.... and not mentioning that to the US gov..
Food, water, health care, visits by their embassy.
People just have to stop supporting/funding banned groups when outside one the USA.
Been part of a banned group and not mentioning that fact when asked is a crime.
Supporting a banned group and related funding is a crime when asked about any such activity.
Traveling in a nation that supports banned groups and not telling the US gov about that extra "holiday" when asked is a crime.
Having images taken with wanted criminals who are active members of a banned group
Creating a fake identity to hide past that had a person supporting banned groups.
Banking for banned groups.
Transferring tech and money to nations that have sanctions imposed.
No loss of rights for a non citizen/illegal migrant. When the US gov asks questions when entering the USA, don't hide past events and expect to be allowed in.
Thats why the search of digital data/images/gps is so important. It finds people who support banned groups outside the USA. People who then lie to the US gov.
A brand makes perfect HDR displays. That totally meet all standards but for $5000~$10000 when sold to the consumer.
Factory tested and consumer grade quality.
Do they get to set the letters "H" "D" and "R" as a standard so everyone has to buy from them?
Want to pay $10000 for an approved "TV" display from one company again?
Another less advanced nation "reverse engineers" anything emerging in TV display tech.
With a low cost of workers, regulations and less product quality control they can get 4K and 60 down to a price range in $100's.
Why not add some "H", "D" and "R" to the 4K TV so a console can "support" 4K, 60 and "H""D""R"? For user who have $1000?
Searching the internet is a sin.
The search brand wants results curated for its users.
A party political filter over all results.
Like Tiananmen Square https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Term limits in China?
Celebrities want their good movie reviews found and bad movie reviews banned?
Big brands want no results on their DRM efforts?
Repairing a computer is now a trade in counterfeit parts?
Time to help Spain with all results about anything to do with any Catalan declaration of independence.
Not find results about French protester?
Only find what a German government approves of politically?
Time for a real search engine again.
Removing content for the politics of NGO, nations, think tanks, European bureaucrats, faith groups, cults, celebrities will not result is a useful search product.
Users know what they enjoy search for. Provide that search service to the users and show them some ads. A search engine is not a publisher of content.
When a search brand wants to publish its own news under it sown brand then it can keep its own staff to its own politics.
Let the rest of the internet publish what it wants and show "search" results for the users who expect to find content.
Censorship is not a result users want to pay for with ads.
Censorship opens the marketplace to competition who can actually "search" the internet without the constant party political removal of results.
The cost of China is too expensive. Workers, engineers. Communist government demands and laws.
Want to replace workers with robots, that another upgrade cost.
Non Communist nations start to look great.
Re "trust the conventional media"
That worked so well for past US wars and UK politics.
AC eg Driving licence in Finland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...