A generation of people sit the same free exam and show they can study and have the ability get into a university.
Once accepted based on merit they can they select from a long list of study options.
Without a gov, mil, faith telling them what they can study if they have the needed skills.
From that freedom to select what a person will study the individual has the freedom to find their own profession.
The freedom to get into a university. The freedom to select any area of study they want. Then graduate and find a job they like.
From some it can be math. Some it can be medicine. Law. Arts? Sport. Languages. Physics. History. Anthropology.
Thats down to having the skills to study and getting good results in a free exam in the USA.
The individual who can study in the USA can be trusted to find the profession they want in the USA.
Re "... and the love of low cost labor"
To fill jobs that need skilled experts with workers based on demographics rather than merit.
That allows a skills shortage to become a legal reality.
People who cant study, who wont study, who need constant support in their new "tech" job.
The only fix for that is more low wage workers from outside the USA.
Bring in low wage workers from other nations to fill the need for experts.
Lowers wage costs for US brands.
A work force from outside the USA that has to keep working for a low wage or it will face the loss of its ability to stay in the USA.
The next stage will be posted workers in the USA. Working on their own nations wages in the USA for short term projects.
So people only get their news from a select short list of news sites social media approves of.
No showing most nations in NATO are not paying for mi budgetsl.
No showing how much energy Germany imports and from what nations.
Who Germany exports mil products to.
AC all the good things that moved computing along got released from the USA.
The "million europeans" attempted computers in the 1970's - early 1980's.
What did consumers want to import? MS and Apple.
Re "This high tech advanced tech stuff is common"
Where is the EU? Canada? Dublin? Trying to impress local political leaders that with some more tax support they too can get a production line working in a decade? Just like they attempted in the 1980's?
The USA has the freedoms the EU and other nations do not.
Freedom of speech. Freedom after speech.
The freedom to invest. The freedom to invent. The freedom to fail and try again. The freedom to hire on merit.
Thats what made the USA unique. No having to go to a gov to ask for investment, for permission to start a company, to pay all new profits as a tax.
To get a gov accept a product design, service after a grant was given.
To make any new computer product fit in with a nations education policy. So tax payers would buy an educational computer.
The USA has the freedom to grow. The EU has the freedom to tax.
The choice is to go to any great US university and find people who passed their exams on merit and hire them.
The jobs cant move to a Vancouver/Sydney/Dublin/Berlin/London as their system of laws are not set up to attract investors and keep tech jobs.
Wages, laws, taxes all shape the ability to move a job into another nation. Other nations see productive work and resulting profit as something to tax.
Make a profit and their nations tax system will take it.
Laws surround who must be hired and how. The hours they work and wages.
Why not just get people in the USA to pass an exam on merit?
Pass the same exam as everyone, get into university.
Study a lot to enter a profession.
Apply for a job.
Work for a US company.
Pay back the loan. Some will get merit-based scholarships.
The US education system has added a lot of money per student since the 1950's and every decade.
Books, calculators, computers, the internet, laptops, robot kits, new buildings, more computers and money.
The exams are not exclusive. The person just has to have the ability to study and pass the same exam in a set time.
Large amounts of data has walked before. No encryption, plain text, internet connected. The people interested don't even try to search for projects when they get deep into "secure" US networks. They have the internal network freedom to copy it all out.
US investigators seem fixated on watching what "bad" people want to do when in US mil/gov/contractor networks.
Like a search term used could be total bait, real, a fake project, a term a spy had seen.
So US investigators wait and see what happens as networks get accessed. They then watch as data just gets copied out in real time.
The idea that its not 1978, 1982. The data is on a big tape that will be found in a bag, car search at the gate. So all network use has to be on the network as it cant be copied.
The change was rapid. From doing everything possible in the 1980's to totally protect US secrets and prevent exports to Communist nations.
The US then just let the world in to study all its secrets.
Re 'For the size of America the number of graduating engineers is really quite small."
The USA gave the world modern computing. Both in terms of theory, production line design and global manufacture.
Traitorous eight https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Nothing outside the USA is beyond what the USA can teach its own students.
The USA is still selecting most of its engineering students on merit. They have to pass exams and have to know their work.
Been rich does not grant a person the needed ability to study and the ability to pass an exam.
The US system still looks for all people on merit. When sitting a free exam.
Once the USA was totally accepting of workers from other nations every generation?
Bring the worker over to the USA for a short time project under their own nations brand and use them as posted workers.
AC if it cost more to hire a foreigner every job would go to someone in the USA. To keep costs down.
Why would any brand pay more every year for the same skill?
The best US university courses are still graduating the best graduates who got accepted on merit. Every year. For decades.
From artists, to engineers to every kind of computer expert.
What is some other nation doing that the USA cant get from its educational graduates?
Cost of work?
1. Find a university that graduates CPU experts who pass on merit.
2. Get them to focus on security this time, not just how fast.
3. Set up production line.
4. Sell a well designed CPU thats safe and fast.
Someone is actually going to have to design a new CPU then? The quick OS software fix wont work and save existing CPU brands and designs?
Got some experts ready for years of testing and hard work? Experts who can design an entire new way of thinking about a CPU and can think about past security flaws?
Make a CPU go faster is not going to be the only skill needed.
Without past federal NN rules to enforce such state granted NN monopolies? That only a monopoly telco in that state could provide the needed legal NN networks.
The timeline is the tell. That start data begins with the request by an illegal migrant for a needed real CA id. Every new document used then follows that easy to get 'real' CA ID.
Re "some identifying paperwork including an address"
The illegal migrant is already in the USA illegally so creating some paperwork including an address is just a way to get more documents from a gov CA.
Paperwork turns into a type of useful photo ID in CA due to a gov not doing more work to see if the paperwork presented is correct and that of a US citizen, person in the US legally.
Its not a problem. The US mil likes its contractors so most work is done in plain text. So every contractor gets a fair and equal bid on any US work offered.
So the entire US gov is wide open internally so all the contractors can bid for and keep working.
Start adding encryption to every part of the US gov and mil and then contractors feel locked out.
The contractors contact political leaders and demand access for their products and services.
So any good encryption within the US gov is removed and contractors can then understand what is ready to accept their bids.
Security in the US gov/mil is just as interesting when it comes to encryption.
The US gov likes to watch data moving along networks. Who is doing what, when and how much. What data is getting searched for, moved, requested, saved. Thats easy when its all plain text and using simple computer commands.
No spy is going to use US encryption to hide for such long term gov/mil tracking.
The final part is the level of computer education of US gov workers in 2018.
Having to find encryption keys, require the new key, get approved for a key for a set time is a lot of new work for people with other work to do.
A lot of new people get hired on demographics only not their merit and for having advanced computer skills.
So moving a lot of plain text data around is a better way of getting work done with that gov/mil work force.
More encryption just adds to more problems trying to get support to allow access to a network/system for a set time.
The final part is the way the US gov responds to security problems. The US likes to study what another nation, person is doing deep in secure US networks in real time.
What the spy is searching for and what project names they know of. What bait networks full of fictional projects they avoid and what they know to look for.
A very open and simple computer system allows spies deep in the US gov/mil to be tracked in real time by very advanced US security systems.
Too much encryption would slow such tracking of all workers in the US gov/mil down. Their away from work computer use too.
When a spy knows their computer system is locked down, cant be used, is tracked and encrypted they will ask people for information.
The CIA and FBI cant fill the US gov with their over educated undercover staff waiting for a spy conversation to start.
The new smart people placed as counter surveillance would get noticed for their level of education and ability to work.
Better to have the spy search a computer network so their deep spying can be detected in real time.
Thats US method of bait that caught so many spies looking up projects they had no access to deep in US networks.
Until smarter nations just had a really simple idea. Copy out entire US database structures. All of it. Dont search, don't stay, don't look. Copy it all.
The US networks are not big on encryption as every user is approved and in a secure location so the network is trusted... for a text search
US computer security is designed for approved workers at desks in the 1970's with computer systems secure on site/base/fort.
The rather good idea was that US intelligence officials need total access to all data in real time to look for a hint of the next Tet Offensive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
So the US army gets the intelligence support it needs faster as all gathered information can be seen by experts. Wide open database access to approved people up and down many secret US networks. So contractors can search collected intelligence without requesting 100 of keys.
It all worked so well until everything just gets copied out. Encryption would have been a good idea, not fast new networks and all the plain text.
Now all US security experts are sure of is that data gets copied to a device in a secure US building.
No what was searched, not who searched. Only that it was all copied out.
Slashdot Mirror
A generation of people sit the same free exam and show they can study and have the ability get into a university.
Once accepted based on merit they can they select from a long list of study options.
Without a gov, mil, faith telling them what they can study if they have the needed skills.
From that freedom to select what a person will study the individual has the freedom to find their own profession.
The freedom to get into a university. The freedom to select any area of study they want. Then graduate and find a job they like.
From some it can be math. Some it can be medicine. Law. Arts? Sport. Languages. Physics. History. Anthropology.
Thats down to having the skills to study and getting good results in a free exam in the USA.
The individual who can study in the USA can be trusted to find the profession they want in the USA.
Re "... and the love of low cost labor"
To fill jobs that need skilled experts with workers based on demographics rather than merit.
That allows a skills shortage to become a legal reality.
People who cant study, who wont study, who need constant support in their new "tech" job.
The only fix for that is more low wage workers from outside the USA.
Bring in low wage workers from other nations to fill the need for experts.
Lowers wage costs for US brands.
A work force from outside the USA that has to keep working for a low wage or it will face the loss of its ability to stay in the USA.
The next stage will be posted workers in the USA. Working on their own nations wages in the USA for short term projects.
So people only get their news from a select short list of news sites social media approves of.
No showing most nations in NATO are not paying for mi budgetsl.
No showing how much energy Germany imports and from what nations.
Who Germany exports mil products to.
The links could provide facts from deep within the USA?
Only a short list of trusted news sites that party political social media staff approve of?
AC all the good things that moved computing along got released from the USA.
The "million europeans" attempted computers in the 1970's - early 1980's.
What did consumers want to import? MS and Apple.
Re "This high tech advanced tech stuff is common"
Where is the EU? Canada? Dublin? Trying to impress local political leaders that with some more tax support they too can get a production line working in a decade? Just like they attempted in the 1980's?
The USA has the freedoms the EU and other nations do not.
Freedom of speech. Freedom after speech.
The freedom to invest. The freedom to invent. The freedom to fail and try again. The freedom to hire on merit.
Thats what made the USA unique. No having to go to a gov to ask for investment, for permission to start a company, to pay all new profits as a tax.
To get a gov accept a product design, service after a grant was given.
To make any new computer product fit in with a nations education policy. So tax payers would buy an educational computer.
The USA has the freedom to grow. The EU has the freedom to tax.
The choice is to go to any great US university and find people who passed their exams on merit and hire them.
The jobs cant move to a Vancouver/Sydney/Dublin/Berlin/London as their system of laws are not set up to attract investors and keep tech jobs.
Wages, laws, taxes all shape the ability to move a job into another nation. Other nations see productive work and resulting profit as something to tax.
Make a profit and their nations tax system will take it.
Laws surround who must be hired and how. The hours they work and wages.
Why not just get people in the USA to pass an exam on merit?
Pass the same exam as everyone, get into university.
Study a lot to enter a profession.
Apply for a job.
Work for a US company.
Pay back the loan. Some will get merit-based scholarships.
The US education system has added a lot of money per student since the 1950's and every decade.
Books, calculators, computers, the internet, laptops, robot kits, new buildings, more computers and money.
The exams are not exclusive. The person just has to have the ability to study and pass the same exam in a set time.
Large amounts of data has walked before. No encryption, plain text, internet connected. The people interested don't even try to search for projects when they get deep into "secure" US networks. They have the internal network freedom to copy it all out.
US investigators seem fixated on watching what "bad" people want to do when in US mil/gov/contractor networks.
Like a search term used could be total bait, real, a fake project, a term a spy had seen.
So US investigators wait and see what happens as networks get accessed. They then watch as data just gets copied out in real time.
The idea that its not 1978, 1982. The data is on a big tape that will be found in a bag, car search at the gate. So all network use has to be on the network as it cant be copied.
The change was rapid. From doing everything possible in the 1980's to totally protect US secrets and prevent exports to Communist nations.
The US then just let the world in to study all its secrets.
Re 'For the size of America the number of graduating engineers is really quite small."
The USA gave the world modern computing. Both in terms of theory, production line design and global manufacture.
Traitorous eight https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Nothing outside the USA is beyond what the USA can teach its own students.
The USA is still selecting most of its engineering students on merit. They have to pass exams and have to know their work.
Been rich does not grant a person the needed ability to study and the ability to pass an exam.
The US system still looks for all people on merit. When sitting a free exam.
Once the USA was totally accepting of workers from other nations every generation?
Bring the worker over to the USA for a short time project under their own nations brand and use them as posted workers.
AC if it cost more to hire a foreigner every job would go to someone in the USA. To keep costs down.
Why would any brand pay more every year for the same skill?
The best US university courses are still graduating the best graduates who got accepted on merit. Every year. For decades.
From artists, to engineers to every kind of computer expert.
What is some other nation doing that the USA cant get from its educational graduates?
Cost of work?
High ground that follows the topography.
Photo work.
Later?
The powerful rocket the humans used on Mars.
They are fully covered by the chips, systems they buy and deals they do.
The skilled workers know what they are doing with the workflow they have.
really know the user is looking and only approved ads get displayed.
1. Find a university that graduates CPU experts who pass on merit.
2. Get them to focus on security this time, not just how fast.
3. Set up production line.
4. Sell a well designed CPU thats safe and fast.
Thats why its 1.1 and 1.2 with a new list of brands and their CPU's.
Someone is actually going to have to design a new CPU then? The quick OS software fix wont work and save existing CPU brands and designs?
Got some experts ready for years of testing and hard work? Experts who can design an entire new way of thinking about a CPU and can think about past security flaws?
Make a CPU go faster is not going to be the only skill needed.
Without past federal NN rules to enforce such state granted NN monopolies? That only a monopoly telco in that state could provide the needed legal NN networks.
The timeline is the tell. That start data begins with the request by an illegal migrant for a needed real CA id. Every new document used then follows that easy to get 'real' CA ID.
Re "some identifying paperwork including an address"
The illegal migrant is already in the USA illegally so creating some paperwork including an address is just a way to get more documents from a gov CA.
Paperwork turns into a type of useful photo ID in CA due to a gov not doing more work to see if the paperwork presented is correct and that of a US citizen, person in the US legally.
Its not a problem. The US mil likes its contractors so most work is done in plain text. So every contractor gets a fair and equal bid on any US work offered.
So the entire US gov is wide open internally so all the contractors can bid for and keep working.
Start adding encryption to every part of the US gov and mil and then contractors feel locked out.
The contractors contact political leaders and demand access for their products and services.
So any good encryption within the US gov is removed and contractors can then understand what is ready to accept their bids.
Security in the US gov/mil is just as interesting when it comes to encryption.
The US gov likes to watch data moving along networks. Who is doing what, when and how much. What data is getting searched for, moved, requested, saved. Thats easy when its all plain text and using simple computer commands.
No spy is going to use US encryption to hide for such long term gov/mil tracking.
The final part is the level of computer education of US gov workers in 2018.
Having to find encryption keys, require the new key, get approved for a key for a set time is a lot of new work for people with other work to do.
A lot of new people get hired on demographics only not their merit and for having advanced computer skills.
So moving a lot of plain text data around is a better way of getting work done with that gov/mil work force.
More encryption just adds to more problems trying to get support to allow access to a network/system for a set time.
The final part is the way the US gov responds to security problems. The US likes to study what another nation, person is doing deep in secure US networks in real time.
What the spy is searching for and what project names they know of. What bait networks full of fictional projects they avoid and what they know to look for.
A very open and simple computer system allows spies deep in the US gov/mil to be tracked in real time by very advanced US security systems.
Too much encryption would slow such tracking of all workers in the US gov/mil down. Their away from work computer use too.
When a spy knows their computer system is locked down, cant be used, is tracked and encrypted they will ask people for information.
The CIA and FBI cant fill the US gov with their over educated undercover staff waiting for a spy conversation to start.
The new smart people placed as counter surveillance would get noticed for their level of education and ability to work.
Better to have the spy search a computer network so their deep spying can be detected in real time.
Thats US method of bait that caught so many spies looking up projects they had no access to deep in US networks.
Until smarter nations just had a really simple idea. Copy out entire US database structures. All of it. Dont search, don't stay, don't look. Copy it all.
The US networks are not big on encryption as every user is approved and in a secure location so the network is trusted... for a text search
US computer security is designed for approved workers at desks in the 1970's with computer systems secure on site/base/fort.
The rather good idea was that US intelligence officials need total access to all data in real time to look for a hint of the next Tet Offensive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
So the US army gets the intelligence support it needs faster as all gathered information can be seen by experts. Wide open database access to approved people up and down many secret US networks. So contractors can search collected intelligence without requesting 100 of keys.
It all worked so well until everything just gets copied out. Encryption would have been a good idea, not fast new networks and all the plain text.
Now all US security experts are sure of is that data gets copied to a device in a secure US building.
No what was searched, not who searched. Only that it was all copied out.
The US mil and its contractors.