Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Could Move Some Jobs Abroad Because of US Immigration Policies, Top Exec Says (cnbc.com)

Microsoft does not want to move jobs out of the United States but certain decisions out of Washington could potentially force its hands, the company's President and Chief Legal Officer Brad Smith warned. From a report: The Trump Administration's tough stance on immigration has attracted a lot of criticism from big technology firms, which rely heavily on skilled foreign workers from around the world. Smith previously spoke out against efforts to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program -- an Obama-era policy that provides legal protection for young immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children. Microsoft has advocated the protection of DACA and more broadly supported immigration as a way to make sure U.S. companies are hiring talented people. "We do worry about a couple of the very specific immigration questions that people appear to be debating in Washington," Smith told CNBC's Akiko Fujita in an interview on Wednesday.

[...] "We don't want to move jobs out of the United States and we hope that we don't see decision making in Washington that would force us to do that," he said, adding that Microsoft has been openly speaking to people in Congress, at the White House and even the Canadian government to safeguard the interest of its employees. Microsoft has a development center in Vancouver, which Smith described as a "bit of a safety valve." "We're not going to cut people loose. We're going to stand behind them," he added.

293 comments

  1. Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by cunina · · Score: 3, Insightful

    âoeWe want the cheapest workers possible that will endure the most abuse, and if Trump wonâ(TM)t let us have them, weâ(TM)ll go someplace where we can get them. Obama knew to play ball on this, why canâ(TM)t Trump?â

    1. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      You think Microsoft jobs are cheap? They are not. Highly paid. It costs more to hire a foreigner.

      Fact of the matter is half of the r&d staff are foreign. Because that's where the talent is.

      Have you worked or applied at Microsoft before?

    2. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by pak9rabid · · Score: 0

      Fact of the matter is half of the r&d staff are foreign. Because that's where the talent is.

      [Citation needed]

    3. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sweet summer child. Some foreign talent is good, and some of them end up in management. At that point they want more of their culture there, and will desperately try to hire people of their culture over anyone else.

    4. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Archfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I call BS. It is all about who will accept the abuse and work 80+ hours for peanuts. There is no shortage of talent here in the US, it is all about cost of living and a decent wage. I've had to train many of those so-called high talent workers from foreign lands, their biggest asset is their willingness to do whatever is asked of them regardless of what it does to their life.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    5. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by AHuxley · · Score: 1, Insightful

      AC if it cost more to hire a foreigner every job would go to someone in the USA. To keep costs down.
      Why would any brand pay more every year for the same skill?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      LOL, "Because that's where the talent is" - are you that stupid? How is every illegal running across the boarder "THE TALENT". And for the rest, its not based on talent.

    7. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you ever worked for a large left-coast tech employer. I've worked for many, including Microsoft. Microsoft is unique in have so many Americans on their payroll - it may even be as high as half! I worked at 2 places where it was about 2%.

      If MS is complaining about "immigration policy" they're not worried about lettuce pickers, they're worried about H1-Bs. MS already has offices in Canada, specifically because they max out the bodies they can bring into the US. Hardly a surprise if they do more of that.

      This is not just virtue signaling by MS, t's also blatant corporate self-interest.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      It's not even that. To the best of my knowledge, Trump has not altered the H-1B visa in any meaningful way. I've heard the idea floated that visas will be granted to the jobs that pay the highest. If that is true and Microsoft really needs the "best" people who just happen to not exist or be in shortage in the U.S., they still shouldn't have a problem because they have to money to pay up for the "best" talent.

      This is a threat due to Microsoft's opinion on illegal aliens who are great majority unskilled and uneducated (not even high school education). There is no such thing as throngs of college-educated people entering the U.S. illegally. As for DACA, very few will end up getting degrees in STEM. You know how many Hispanic people I saw when I was in college for an electrical engineering degree? One, and neither he nor his parents were illegal immigrants.

    9. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much, so transparent. How about hiring American workers and paying them well? 'We have no choice.'? Give me a fucking break.

    10. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Endure the most abuse? Seems like the current president is the one doling out abuse to anyone who isn't white, be they an immigrant or not. Things aren't perfect here in Canada, we are stuck with Justin Trudope for a while yet unfortunately, but I'll take him over President Drumpf any day. It is like he is taking your country back to how things were in the 1980s.

    11. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Shared experience.

    12. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I am working to Microsoft for 2 years ago. All of Windows 10 program is done by India.

      The problem is that too many people in US are not understanding MS security models.

      People in US wish to hide their data for privacy, but this is very bad. You cannot be hiding this data.
      You must share every data to Microsoft so it can be examined for security, and to make a better advertising.
      That is why Microsoft has gone to India, because we know that privacy is a problems.

      - Prakesh, MCSE

    13. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

      Having a hard time distinguishing farce from fact on your post, either way I LIKE IT!

      --
      Caution: Contents under pressure
    14. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US there is a shortage of talent, an awful lot. And in any other country at a given time. The question is whether you stop everything until that local talent shows up, or you can look for talent abroad and carry on. Go to Google, Microsoft, Apple, Harvard, Stanford, Caltec, MIT, Berkeley... there is a TON of foreign talent working alongside local talent. You wait for the local talent to be a proud 100% american company X... you get behind. I bet Afghans are very proud they do almost everything themselves.

      And this happens in every country that wants to be at the cutting edge of the world. Those countries who don't care... we can afford to have 100% local. On a side note, it is rather amusing (or sad) that a country founded by immigrants (local Americans now live in what you call Indian reservation) have such views.

    15. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Americans are dumb that's why you need immigration.... but the problem is that Trump's approach doesn't work because if you stop immigration then all you have are dumb fucks.

      Just joking :) really have a nice day.

    16. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention cost of education, while some of the foreign workers study in the US, a lot of them study in foreign countries where college is either free or greatly reduced in price compared with the ever increasing prices of a college education here.

      It's a shame that Trump is cracking down on this more out of racism than as a means of addressing a real problem. I considered getting into technology when I was younger, but seeing that there were no job openings being posted for people with fewer than 3 years of experience, I lost all interest in dealing with that bullshit. And those jobs were to read a script at a help desk, not do things that required any actual skill. A pulse and being a trustworthy person should have been sufficient.

    17. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you have not worked there, or a top company. The reason they want the H-1Bs is because they are cheap, and will not hesitate to work 60-100 hour weeks and do anything it takes, even backstabbing co-workers, to keep their job, since if they get fired, they get deported, and likely never rehired.

      Control. It is about control. The H-1Bs will do anything short of outright murder for their employer, while native US citizens will move to other companies when things get bad.

      Oh, we are staring down the barrel of a recession. Expect more machinations for cheap foreign labor and excuses for that. We saw it in the 1990s recession that Japan workers happily worked until they died at their jobs, and US workers were lazy, saw it in 2008 with offshoring to China, and we are seeing it again now. Same crap.

    18. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It wasn't an issue in the past, it's only an issue now because companies refuse to train their own employees or invest in them in any way.

      It's unrealistic to expect that graduates fresh out of college are going to be suitable without more training.

      What's more, look at the pointless bullshit that talent we're producing is being used for, developing better and more clever scams to trick people out of their hard earned money. New financial schemes that should be illegal, but aren't due to bribes. And let's not forget taking things that we already do and turning them into apps because apps.

      There's also plenty of older workers complaining about not being able to get new jobs in the field once laid off.

      The problem here isn't a lack of talent, it's a lack of companies behaving responsibly with their talent and failure to invest in new people trying to enter the industry.

    19. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a good one. Very funny. As a PM for someone who had to get a task off the ground, I went to a local uni, picked up a number of CS and EE grads, and had a project completed on time, and on target. No pining for foreign labor needed. The US has a great pool of talent. However, businesses want the cheap stuff and want to tap the pennies-on-the-dollar people, saying that there is a "talent shortage". There is no talent shortage. It is just pure greed that is in play here.

    20. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't even make it out of the summary without getting pissed at the spin on display. "an Obama-era policy that provides legal protection for young immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children". What a crock of shit. There were no legal protections there because it wasn't a law - it was a memo that Homeland Security published about how they were going to NOT ENFORCE THE LAW in a specific way. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Watching people try to defend this kind of end-run around the legislative process tells me everything I need to know about them.

    21. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, "Because that's where the talent is" - are you that stupid? How is every illegal running across the boarder "THE TALENT". And for the rest, its not based on talent.

      You sir, are an idiot. I seldom resort to those kinds of expressions, but sometimes there is no nicer way to tell someone what they are –you just got to hear it straight. No one said everyone running across the border (also, please learn how to spell, and that is coming from someone for which english is a second language) is "the talent". But alt-right points for you trying to paint a strawman –straight out of the troll handbook. Go back to your indoctrinating officer and pray to your ideological overlords for guidance.

      In tech, many western countries have a hard time filling positions because we have more demand for skilled workers than there is supply. Many lower income countries have skilled workers that would nothing more than get a good position in a big tech company. These people mainly don't "sneak across the border". They come in on visas sponsored by or even applied for by their employers depending on the country. But even among illegal immigrants, their children often get a higher education than the parents, that is one thing the parents dream about when they leave everything they own behind and risk their lives to go to a new country.

      Of course, you would not likely know much about this based on what you are writing. I am wondering if you ever graduated college or perhaps even high school, thus making you ineligible for the any of these positions Microsoft is hiring for.

    22. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is the case, the solution is simple. Let MS have more of the H-1B Visas to bring actual talent over, and stop letting Disney replace tier 1 support with cheap imported labor that's willing to work for peanuts because they don't mind living 6-per-apartment because it still beats where they came from.

    23. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS. Nobody said the US talent is rubbish. You think that someone all 300 million (?) american people want to have the same job and therefore is utterly impossible to have shortages. But guess what, they don't. Just like not every American wants to go to university/college for whatever reason (this can be applied to any country), not all jobs demands are going to be met by locals. Unfortunately, being a 1st world country comes at a price: having the biggest X. Biggest GDP (so you can spend it all in F35 instead of looking after your people, but it seems having the biggest dick is more important), the biggest number of cutting-edge companies, the _best_ supercomputers, knowledge, etc. But if all you want to do is to hunt alligators... you don't need anything, just alligators and a firearm (I wrote knife before I realised, how naive, it's USA, not Australia).

      See, I haven't put money. Zimbabwe's "president" has lots of it. Probably more than all /. combined... but man, I don't want to be anywhere near him.

    24. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey I liked the 1980's, from a broad perspective things really have not changed except people were more happy. Everybody seems angry today over anything and everything.

      Yes politicians are bad, but they always have been and always will be regardless of party, its just their nature.

      Already people are cluttering up their yards again with politicians endorsements. What a waste, promoting their hate of the "other party" that is ruining the world.

      And lets keep the race hate up, it's great for control and lots of money in it. Divide and conquer, the oldest trick in the book.

    25. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by dr.g · · Score: 5, Insightful

      +1, anticipated my post

      Which was gonna be something along the lines of "Wait. What the fuck does DACA have to do with the H1B program that provides all this foreign "talent"?" Answer: nothing at all. This is clearly political.
      Now...since we know MS has gotten some nice considerations from government, and we can see this as a political attack on Trump, not an explanation of real business concern, WHO is MS paying back? And the answer is, the Dems. Of course, that can't be because "The Narrative"© clearly states that only the Republicans do favors for big companies and get political returns from it. So, more cognitive dissonance, lefties?

      --
      "To be fair, I was left completely unsupervised." ~Anon
    26. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It is all about who will accept the abuse and work 80+ hours for peanuts

      MS employees are well compensated. You must be mistaking them for other large, well-known US tech companies. Can you actually point to stories about MS employees "working for peanuts"?

    27. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From a business standpoint its smart because it increases profit and they are profit driven. The problem our society has had as of late is understanding that awhile these capitalistic behaviors have provided some of the best living conditions humanity knows of, unchecked, it disproportionally rewards a very few in society.

      As a society we need to understand this and change it, that's how the US is set up to work. We can stop rewarding and instead penalizing these business practices. Maybe current law allows them but we can essentially, as a people, change the law however we see fit. It isn't easy because it requires a massive level of agreement across society and our elected representatives which is why it hasn't changed for the better.

    28. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      The problem here isn't a lack of talent, it's a lack of companies behaving responsibly with their talent and failure to invest in new people trying to enter the industry.

      Societal decay. It's just a very slow process. The end-game is making enough money to survive on their own and to promptly fuck everyone else off. It's parasitic, and there's no returning from that hard drop.

      It's the "fuck you I've got mine" attitude of decay that will cause cascading breakdown of trust that will inevitably lead to war. Possibly worse.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    29. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. Tax MS to a rate where it's no longer economically worth it. Fuck the tax revue, it's not about that. Just tax them to knock that fucking shit off. Or else, they can plan their HQ in India and have them deal with THEIR politics. And it won't be pretty.

    30. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by nowwith25percentmore · · Score: 1

      Substantiate with evidence or GTFO.

    31. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's the dirty secret at Microsoft that no-ones wants to talk about.

      Diversity policies resulted in the promotion of lots of Indian workers.

      Indian workers, who aren't the slightest bit interested in diversity beyond themselves, promoted other Indians.

      White workers have been all but eliminated in Seattle.

      If you even mention this purge... you are branded a racist.

    32. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Legal protection" does not mean protection which is legal. It means protection from legal judgements. The fact that your reading comprehension fails to realize this tells me everything I need to know about you.

    33. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So while gov is inefficient snd vile, gov should ALSO save and redeem you..?

      Find out eho you, and the state, are first perhaps?
      The biggest problem is the golden rule. lowercase.

    34. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Depends on which kind of talent. There are popular jobs where these skills are taught and used all around the world, then you're going to find more workers outside of the US very easily. But it's also cheaper to outsource these than to directly hire foreign workers to work locally in the US. However for jobs that are in demand because they're harder to fill then it makes sense to be allowed to hire from anywhere just to find the few people who can do it (older technology no longer in fashion, or newer technology that's not taught in the IT job mills). Those hard to fill jobs pay above average, whereas for cookie cutter jobs will not.

    35. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There is a shortgage in some areas. That's why COBOL programmers still get paid big bucks. It's hard to find good C programmers too, even though it's vital in a lot of areas, IoT, embedded, etc. Above average Verilog or VHDL programmers are relatively rare as well. And when it comes to finding senior level workers with good skills and experience for designing new products from scratch, they're always in demand, and it rarely works to outsource those jobs.

    36. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely somewhere like Vancouver.

    37. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you actually point to stories about MS employees "working for peanuts"?

      Well, it does sound like the kind of company that would leave bowls of free peanuts, soda, pizza, etc. lying about just in case their incredibly expensive employees are feeling a bit peckish :)

    38. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show bobs and vagene.

    39. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not "legal protection" when all it took was the stroke of one person's pen to create or destroy it.

    40. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

      Do you actually have information about this, or are you just making things up? Reviews of Microsoft as a place to work are pretty positive. They have their issues as a company, but abusing their workers isn't one of them. As a rule, large US tech companies treat their engineers well. They may be dysfunctional in a lot of ways, but they pay well, give good benefits, and don't demand insane hours.

      Low skilled workers are another matter. You really don't want to end up filling boxes in one of Amazon's warehouses. But they aren't going to waste H1Bs on jobs like that. Unskilled workers are easy to find.

      --
      "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
    41. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 2

      You're making incorrect assumptions based on a few lines from the summary. Read the full article. He was very clear what policies he was referring to, and they're entirely on topic. Here is the relevant passage.

      "We do worry about a couple of the very specific immigration questions that people appear to be debating in Washington," Smith told CNBC's Akiko Fujita in an interview on Wednesday.

      He pointed to two particular examples. The first is another Obama-era rule that allows some spouses of people who have a non-immigrant H-1B visa to take on paid work. The Trump administration has proposed revoking that type of work authorization last year but a lack of update has left many in limbo, according to reports.

      The second is a rule that allows international graduates in science, technology, engineering or mathematics from U.S. universities to continue working while they're trying to apply for a work visa.

      This isn't a political attack on Trump as you claim. It's legitimate concerns about specific proposed changes that really would affect their ability to hire skilled workers.

      --
      "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
    42. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Except you can never live on your own.

      You will need someone else to make your bullets, make your knives, make your guns, to make the roads you travel on to get those things. To make your farm gear.

      You want running water, flushing toliets, showers a soft bed? You need other people.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    43. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Labor demand is up. Every indicator imaginable points to that.

      The facts don't care about your feelings.

    44. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm not rationalizing it as sane behavior. It's anything but. However, stupid greedy people are still going to be stupid and greedy.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    45. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't read a goddamned bit of what you typed, apple shillboi.

    46. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I'm torn here. On the one hand your question is easily answered by countering that your assumption involves a spherical cow. In a perfect world your argument is correct. In the subset of the world that is the management world ... Not so much. On the other hand I'm glad this is happening as the longer it takes for Trump's decisions to have very visible negative consequences the more we will pay in the long run.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    47. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      What I've wondered for a long time is why industries don't go into local colleges and universities and teach soon to be graduates what they want the job candidates to know when they graduate. Surely a semester of Cobol, or any of the specialties you mentioned could only benefit both the companies, and the students soon to be in the market for jobs in the area.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    48. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can. Sort of. For the most part, MS pulls the BS practice of contracting an entire team of 48 guys, and putting some fresh H1B1 on the payroll to be in charge of everybody. Half the time he can't even speak proper English.

      If there is such a shortage of talent, why is it so easy to pick up contractors? Why does the entire tech sector in the great tech forest seem to orbit the various staffing agencies?

      Why does a bachelors and 4 years experience in X only open the door to the staffing agencies if you're looking to get in on one of the local big tech giants?

    49. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES IT IS. They were powers provided by your representatives, your law makers to the President. These are the same powers Trump is using today.

      You want to be pissed, stop looking at Obama for doing what he was empowered to do. Look to your Congressman. And if your Congressman can't or won't work across the isle to compromise to get your needs across... That's still a fault of theirs. The blame still falls on them and their voters.

      Clearly this is too hard to understand; it's just easier to blame Obama.... you know the guy who actually CAUGHT Bin Laden. That actual terrorist who actually attacked the US.

    50. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have major campuses in India and Canada.

    51. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporate America jumped ship on the republican party and took over the dems the instant Trump got the nomination. Public perceptions are slow to catch up, but suffice it to say the Bernie people aren't going to be happy about it.

      Pretty much every industry not only donated overwhelmingly more to Hillary than Trump (the oil industry did give 2.5% more to Trump than Hillary), they usually even gave more to Trump's primary opponents, who weren't even around for the general.

    52. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So MS is employing immigrants who are covered under the DACA program. And if Congress doesn't do their job MS will have to allow these people to telework from another country. Trump voided Obama's executive order and handed the DACA legislation decision to Congress. The people covered under the DACA program are already in the country. Most of them have been in the country for years. SO WHAT"S THE FUCKING PROBLEM! This is about the easiest immigration policy decision ever put forward to the ass hats in Congress. Pass some DACA legislation and move on to the next clusterfuck that the legislative branch of the government has caused. It's a no brainer issue that even those spineless whores in Congress can understand. When is Congress going to start ignoring the lunatic fringe on both sides and do their FUCKING JOBS! And their job is not running for election 24/7 and posing for the cameras as they "investigate" others for the problems they have created. For one minute people need to point their anger and disgust away from the President and to the group of people who are actually running this country into the ground. Those who have no term limits or limits on the amount of money they can accept from their masters. Those who have passed laws shielding themselves from the same type of investigations they foist upon others. Right now all Congress is doing is blaming Trump for all the illegal immigration related problems they have created through years of incompetence and avoidance. "Oh the poor children!" Trump didn't cause the current kiddy drama all he did was push to have an existing law that was passed and enacted by Congress to be enforced. If those nimrods in Congress want the kiddies saved they should start doing their job instead of prancing around be moaning the consequences of their incompetence and scrambling to make sure the blame is pointed elsewhere. Right now the morons in Congress have effectively made US immigration laws null and void as long as you drag a kid or two with you over the border. The children guarantee entry and the way things are going the US will be required to give these new immigrants a house, car, and job to reverse the inequities in these poor peoples lives. People should not be surprised when Trump issues his own Executive Order to close the US southern border. Only those with green cards, US citizens, and valid passports will be allowed to cross the border. Those found wandering across the border will be immediately returned to the border and forced to leave. Lets see how Mexico likes Trump's version of the catch and release program. As an alternative the US could offer free bus rides to the Canadian border and let Canada save the poor souls. I would love to see Canada's reaction.

    53. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanna see dumb? Find a bunch of European "football" fans. Now there is some world class idiocy!

      Just joking :) Really, have a nice day.

    54. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      If the Chinese (or whoever) invade, and Trump orders the army to repel them, will that also be 'cuz racism?

    55. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Average pay, as advertised in job postings, is NOT up.

    56. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      I know this was meant as a joke... But I do wonder if this is a major reason Surveillance Valley has been so eager to exclude Americans in favor of imported labor.

      Tech company business models have become hostile to freedom and privacy. Perhaps American workers are less willing to obediently implement anti-privacy and anti-freedom software, compared with workers from certain other countries.

    57. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      The inbred upper class Damasos running the VC cabal have a strong social interest in reducing or eliminating upward mobility of the middle classes.

      http://sasamat.xen.prgmr.com/m...

    58. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, seen this all over silicon valley. Most (not all, of course) Indian managers only hire Indian workers. And their position on the team is determined by their caste. Non-Hindu Indians are decidedly unwelcome.

      Now bend over and celebrate Diversity, you deplorable racists! Firings of American workers will continue until the company is 100% diverse... meaning 100% Hindu.

    59. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Microsoft can afford to astroturf Glassdoor.

    60. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just ... wow. For someone who screams about "reading comprehension" you sure as shit don't have any.

      Obama CAUGHT Bin Laden - Oh yeah. Fuck the SEALS / Intelligence Officers / Soliders that did the work, OBAMA (the strategic mastermind) personally caught Bin Laden. That's some strong ass Koolaide you've got there. Also telling that you pull this out, because it has nothing to do with what we're talking about.

      On the subject of DACA - Not one single court decision has sided with you in the way that matters. Of the cases you will undoubtedly try to pull out to say there was support:
      Arizona Joe's case was thrown out for lack of standing.
      Mississippi's Customs Officers' case was thrown out due to ... lack of standing.

      Meanwhile, the attempted expansions (DAPA) of it were blocked by the courts. Were it not for the death of Scalia, the Supreme Court would almost certainly have struck down DACA during 2016. But the deeper level of mistake is this - you continue equate a decision to prioritize enforcement elsewhere to somehow constitute PROTECTION. "Good news, we'll ignore you (for now)." But DHS deciding that what is a priority this year is NO PROTECTION when next year's priorities can just ... be different.

      I don't care which administration issues executive orders that attempt to create new law, I will not support the elevation of the President to King. President Cheeto is awful. But King Cheeto? That is terrifying.

      The shitstains in Congress won't do their jobs? They need to be held accountable and DO THEIR JOBS. Outrage needs to build until the whole bloody lot of them are thrown out and representatives that will legislate effectively are put in place. Modification of law or the creation of new law goes through Congress. Full stop.

      Here's some reading to educate yourself with:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://aclj.org/immigration/e...

    61. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If the chinese invade."

      Listen to yourself you freakazoid conspiracy nut.

    62. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faggot INCEL traitor, your king Trump is going to DIE in prison.

    63. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC if it cost more to hire a foreigner every job would go to someone in the USA. To keep costs down.

      If it costs significantly more to hire a foreigner, they would just move the jobs to somewhere where it did not cost extra to hire them. Software product development does not gain much, if any, efficiency by doing it locally.

    64. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at this INCEL white nationalist crossburner Nazi faggot pedophile. Racists like you and your family don't deserve to live.

    65. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile the inbred pedophile from hicksville has a strong social interest in moving to a 3rd world country where they look the other way when he rapes babies. You are the last one to have any standing to criticize the rich from exploiting the poor you fucking baby raper.

    66. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, its george soros and the liberal cabal that's gaming glassdoor to trick people into working at microsoft. In fact, I am a george soros whistleblower, he has been paying me to follow you all over the web and dishonestly malign your brilliant analyses because you are the messiah and soros is the antichrist and I can no longer throw my lot in with the devil.

    67. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking communist INCEL faggot, you're literally a Nazi. You know what that means - punch a Nazi!

    68. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Do you have evidence to back this up?

      Checking Microsoft's own stats they claim that 56% of their workers are caucasion, which is what I presume you mean when you say "white": https://www.microsoft.com/en-u...

      The EEO-1 report is here: https://query.prod.cms.rt.micr...

      Of course that is for the whole company, but it would be quite incredible if somehow at their main HQ "white workers have been all but eliminated" and yet all other locations put the overall figure at 56%.

      Unfortunately it's hard to say how many of their employees are Indian because the EEO-1 form lumps them in with a lot of other nationalities and ethnicities: "A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian Subcontinent, including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam." But it's certainly less than 31% which is the total for all of those, and of course that number includes all Americans who are "Asian" but not foreign nationals.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    69. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not like the mechanism, but it it was still a legal protection.

      And of course you're at least as angry about Trump's excuse of 'national security' to start a trade war by decree. Right?

    70. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you have evidence to back this up?

      I would say the link you provided is evidence.

      Caucasians make up like 70% of the US population, while Asians make up only 5%.

      Contrast this to MS having 56% and 30%

    71. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that broken down by Seattle HQ?

      No.

      Seattle is the centre of the company... what happens there dictates the strategy for the rest of the company - and yes, white people are being fucked over because they are stupid enough to think anyone else thinks diversity is good.

    72. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by NickGnome · · Score: 2

      âoeIn the US there is a shortage of talent, an awful lot. And in any other country at a given time. The question is whether you stop everything until that local talent...â You should give the âoedon your wadersâ warning. There has never been any actual evidence of a STEM talent shortage published. Yah, sure, every few months a few STEM executives get together at the country club or congress, but I repeat myself... and whine that they want cheaper, more pliant, low-skilled laborers with ever more spurious non-merit-based credentials & âoequalificationsâ, with ever more flexibility in ethics, to implement their latest privacy violation, barriers to entry schemes. That is NOT evidence of shortage. They still refuse to relocate talent, still refuse to fly talented USA citizens/ UK citizens/ German/ Scandinavian... citizens for interviews, still refuse to invest in training (or at least not anywhere near as much as they did in the decades before H-1B was hatched), still refuse to purchase print ads, still refuse to do their recruiting in such a way that illegal discrimination in hiring can be caught and prosecuted, still retain sheisters to fabricate phony/spurious pretexts on which to reject able and willing USA...citizen job applicants. IOW, their behavior is evidence that there is plenty of talent. Every year for several decades, tens of thousands of USA citizens have been getting degrees (plus more who attain other academic & non-academic credentials) in STEM fields... only for one-third to two-thirds to be rejected for STEM employment. One could understand if they rejected the lowest 1%, 5%, maybe even 10%. But, of course, if there were actually a severe talent shortage, the execs would be rushing to grab even those up and bring them up to speed through customized training... Only they donâ(TM)t.

    73. Re: Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly my thoughts everyone here is commenting on talent abroad and workers when Everyone here is missing the point.

      Microsoft is basically stating that if the US doesnt allow children brought into our country Illegally they will move...?

      So Microsoft is employing working who are importing their children here illegally???

      This is the biggest bunch of nonsense I have ever heard of? So Microsoft your talented workers need to be ensured that they can illegally bring all their children here in order to work for high paying microsoft and they want to stand behind this issue??? Are they serious??? Lmao

    74. Re:Hereâ(TM)s the Translation: by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Because Canada, and Vancouver especially, is known as a place for sweatshops, right?

  2. Yes... by SharpFang · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We don't want to move our asses from our comfortable offices, but as we can't continue importing cheap labor, we'll have to follow where that cheap labor used to come from."

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lol they hire foreigners because they cannot find local talent at any price point. It does not exist in sufficient numbers.

      Have you worked for or applied at Microsoft? It's very hard to get in there - they want top notch folk. They pay very very well. Half if the r&d staff are foreign because that's where the talent is. These are not sweat shop jobs.

    2. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lol you realize what you posted was pure garbage. Plenty of talented people right here in the US, Microsoft does not want to pay the going rate. They just want cheap labor. Which explains Windows 10.

    3. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have obviously never worked with foreign and domestic coders side by side at the same time. Every job I have had, bar 1, where we worked together they have had subpar code and understanding of what they were suppose to do.

    4. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you worked for or applied at Microsoft?

      It's a tell. Sock puppet.

    5. Re:Yes... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I agree with your statement, as far as it goes.

      All businesses want cheap labour accompanied by excellent skills, be the employment in the tech industry or the service sector.

      Let's step off the silicon valley trolley and enter the space of landscaping.

      We want cheap labour, good work ethics, competency, and reliable attendance.

      Appreciate that the labour force spends their wages on items in proximity to their living quarters.

      That's housing, food, petrol, entertainment, taxes, etc.

      Businesses don't give a flying rat's ass about social issues or patriotism or othe cry-baby bullshit.

      The objective is to make lots of money.

      If that means moving some work overseas, so be it.

      I think it would be a lot better to encourage immigration. America has the room and the resources to support such a system.

      But do they have the common sense God gave a piss ant to take advantage of immigration?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    6. Re: Yes... by ichimunki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In my 20+ years of experience, natural born US Citizens are no better than foreign born developers who work in the US. And I've run into a handful of natural born US coders that were, in fact, terrible at their jobs... whereas I've seen a lot of foreign-born techies come to the US and thrive, do great work here -- and can't recall a single foreign-born coworker who was below average.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    7. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm same AC. I'm a manager at Amazon, 12 staff. One is American. He's awesome. But the Indians are incredible as well, most have US degrees and moved from OPT -> H1B. You have worked with crap indians I bet becuase the roles have low pay.

      Believe me, these are not low cost jobs. I'm paid 360k, i purchased a house in Seattle within 2 years and will pay it off in another 5. The engineers I hire have offers from 160k to 250k in the first year, that rises with stock. These roles in Microsoft are similar, I poach and AM poached from all the time. These are NOT low cost positions. I need to interview 10 people to hire a single one, most don't get through the data structures and algorithms section of the 5 interviews we grill candidates with. I'm always loathed to have to go import someone, but the choice is like this: Jobs been open for 6 months, I've interview 15 people. None have passed. Money isn't the issue. We have an option, open the role in Sydney/Dublin/Hyderabad office and fill it within 2 weeks, or import a H1-B into the role.

      It's not the money. It's the availability in the first place of the talent. And if you think paying even MORE above 160-250 is the answer, we'll CERTAINLY move the role overseas.

      Please, if you think you can get through the interviews, APPLY. We'll pay relocation and you can own a house in the Seattle region in a very reasonable timeframe.

    8. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but then these people were not selected for their skills. There is no reason to assume that coding talent is restricted to the USA, to the contrary. Especially if you compare the USA with countries that have the same level or a higher quality level of education than the USA. However, nowadays it is quite possible that non-US talent is not willing to migrate to the US.

    9. Re:Yes... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Is it cheap labour or are they trying to hire highly skilled people?

      Because hiring highly skilled people is hard, especially when your immigration system makes it harder. In the UK we are finding that with doctors. Even when they can get a visa they naturally want to bring their families with them, who all also need visas. They also want certainty about the future, so there has to be a solid path to permanent rights to stay in a reasonable timeframe, otherwise why build a life somewhere you might get kicked out of?

      The cheap labour angle doesn't seem that compelling anyway. If they really wanted to do that surely it would be easier to just outsource the work to India or wherever and demand they work shifts that match US office hours, with Orwellian telescreens running Skype everywhere. It would be much cheaper than paying someone enough to live in the US, even on subsistence wages.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft doesn't have cheap labor, please focus. Microsoft employees are paid at least $100K. There might be some outsourcing companies that provide workers for Microsoft that screw over those workers, but the amount that Microsoft pays is not cheap.

      Can't wait for them to open a massive office in Canada and I hope Amazon HQ2 comes to Toronto for the same reason. The USA doesn't realize why it is great, it's great because it's been taking the smartest people from across the globe for 50 years. Let's hope that stops soon.

    11. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as we can't continue importing cheap labor, we'll have to follow where that cheap labor used to come from

      Seems like a reasonable strategy. Why wouldn't you do that? And the only reason they're having to do it anyway, is government interference. They're just adapting to a slightly more business-hostile environment. Wouldn't you? Shouldn't everyone who reasonably can, depending on the kind of work it is?

    12. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your experience is distinctly rare.

      As an example, at my university a new professor came in from the best and brightest subcontinent university where some of your foreign-born coworkers were educated by him in computer science.

      His knowledge was so bad and skills so poor, that to retain his position as a professor, he had to take undergraduate classes in algorithm design, memory management, and modern coding practices.

      He would not have graduated in the US, yet is the best of the best in the Ivy leagues of India. No US born professor would have gotten the privileges he acquired, nor be given a second chance after showing stark incompetence, but it made the school look good so here he is. Maybe you are doing the same ichimunki.

      Worth pondering.

    13. Re: Yes... by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's selection biased- only the best get to come over here. The rest don't get jobs here. Work with some outsourced developers and you'll see utter crap. Or hang out on stack overflow and read the questions posted in broken english.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    14. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked in the US for 16 years in tech and I've had the opposite experience, vast majority of foreign born workers were a drag as they didn't understand the work. They could copy/paste though.

    15. Re:Yes... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 0

      "We don't want to move our asses from our comfortable offices, but as we can't continue importing cheap labor, we'll have to follow where that cheap labor used to come from."

      So why is it on these stories, the Slashdot zeitgeist can see the value of limiting immigration?

      While on all other stories, it's all about how raaaacist any naysayers must be, etc.

    16. Re: Yes... by ichimunki · · Score: 2

      Absolutely agree. Whereas the foreign-born who come to the US have barriers to entry, the US-born who work here do not have the same limiting factors.

      Off-shoring/outsourcing seems to be a way to hire those "left behind" at really low cost... penny-wise/pound-foolish if you ask me. Never seen outsourced work produce results to match domestic by a long shot... but what MS is planning here isn't really off-shoring in that vein, rather "right-shoring" in the sense that they will be still co-locating a team built from a global pool, just not putting them in Redmond.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    17. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am an American software engineer looking for work in Seattle, and I actually passed my data structures and algorithms class. Where exactly would I go to apply for this position?

    18. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol you realize what you posted was pure garbage. Plenty of talented people right here in the US, Microsoft does not want to pay the going rate.

      Show us the source that Microsoft coders aren't paid enough.

    19. Re: Yes... by Type44Q · · Score: 0

      In my 20+ years of experience, natural born US Citizens are no better than foreign born developers who work in the US.

      Objectively speaking, youre either delusional or a liar but we thank you for your contribution nonetheless.

    20. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one said that all foreign coders are excellent. I have met plenty of all kinds of developers, both domestic AND foreign. And it is up to the employer to weed out those that are sub-par, it is in their interest, isn't it?

    21. Re: Yes... by Type44Q · · Score: 0

      s it cheap labour or are they trying to hire highly skilled people?

      Having trouble telling those two apart, are you.

    22. Re: Yes... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      This is anecdotal evidence to be sure.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    23. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my company (a fortune 50 one, no less) has an office in a tech park in India. The place is a shit show of low end garbage that simply want to move up to H1-B status. They way they do that is stepping through multiple in country offices, learn English, and get a visa out of the shit hole they live in.

      Their code is garbage, when we have to get an Indian level 2 or 1 analyst on the phone we know we'll have to walk him through the systems he's supposed to be an SME in.

      Are their bad US citizens? Sure, but not on the same level of garbage as a foreign born one that really just wants to scrape as much money together and send it home. H-1B workers know they can be sent home at a moments notice so they really don't excel, they just survive.

    24. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need to interview 10 people to hire a single one, most don't get through the data structures and algorithms section of the 5 interviews we grill candidates with.

      Funny, here in the Midwest at Fortune 100 companies we don't have that type of interview process and we find top-notch developers all of the time. We just talk to them for a couple of hours and if they can't do the work we cut them within 90 days. (FWIW I receive headhunter emails from Amazon HR on an almost-weekly basis.) Maybe Amazon's interview process is part of the problem? Maybe your specific slice of AWS infrastructure code requires someone to know those details off the top of their head instead of knowing where the dragons are and knowing which references to look up when the dragons appear, but in my experience those positions are usually the embedded firmware guys working on mission-critical systems (think medical devices and aerospace).

      On the other hand, why on earth would I move to Seattle to have some bozo nitpick questions at me on a specific implementation of an algorithm or data structure only to be paid less relative to the total cost of living than I can make here? Maybe that's part of the problem, too.

    25. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You work at Amazon and can't find talent locally? I can tell you why. I've considered applying at Amazon, I'm a US born software engineer, and at least according to my reviews from my coworkers, customers and partners, I'm pretty damn good. A job at Amazon would probably net me an extra $50k a year. But everything I've heard from everybody is that Amazon is an absolutely miserable place to work. And an extra $50k a year isn't worth a miserable job. My job only expects me to work 40 hours a week, I get a lot of vacation and management doesn't say a word to me when I go to use it, even if it's not the best time, project wise, to use it. The work is also generally interesting. My position isn't exactly unique. Why would anyone take a job at Amazon when there's better jobs out there. They may not pay quite as well, but they pay more than enough to be comfortable and suck a lot less.

    26. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Fantasy Land?</ThorntonMelon>

    27. Re: Yes... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Broken english is not the problem. (Keep in mind asian languages e.g. are so far away from english grammar that is extremly hard to learn english for them)
      You find plenty of questions where it is completely clear that the poster does not grasp the simplest things about programming. That is the problem.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    28. Re: Yes... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Oh definitely agreed. It makes answering harder, but they speak my language better than I speak theirs. Broken english is how you tell they're foreign. And you'll see the degree of correlation is high (not 100, there are broken english questions where you can see they have a legit question and understanding. But high).

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    29. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm nodding my head in agreement until the last sentence.
      I don't personally work with any bad coders from overseas but I encounter them dealing with our customers. Somehow we're able to screen out bad eggs.

    30. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 does not give any indication that this 50% foreign talent is all that good at all.

    31. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One flaw. Your proposal is complete bollocks and would fail all parties catastrophically.

    32. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally how can you think that?

      What fucking magic sauce makes an American some kind of untouchable engineering god that no foreigner could match?

    33. Re: Yes... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      All evidence is anecdotal.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    34. Re:Yes... by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      These immigrants are educated, work hard, and probably won't turn into Democrats.

    35. Re: Yes... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Oh, I apologize for my shortcomings.

      I just read up about World War II and how the whole fucking goddam end was orchestrated by not one single solitary American scientist.

      I see my error.

      Thank you.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    36. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      160k in Seattle gets you a rented studio apartment. Yeah, real big bucks you're offering...

      I have an idea - let's replace YOU with an H1-B!

    37. Re: Yes... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Not all anecdotes are evidence.

    38. Re: Yes... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Is it cheap labour or are they trying to hire highly skilled people?

      I'm not sure why you seem to think that those two things are mutually exclusive.

    39. Re: Yes... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Note, for H1B, it's not enough for the foreign developers to write same quality, or somewhat better. They must do things domestic developers are completely incapable of. If you have sub-par (but still workable) domestic dev, and a superior foreigner, H1B doesn't apply. Only if the domestic just can't deliver at all.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    40. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least one of those things doesn't mean what you think it means.

    41. Re: Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well ... your experience has not matched mine. I've seen bad coders both domestic and from overseas. In my case, foreign-born techies have generally been worse. Depending on the type of job, sometime abysmally worse.

      It sounds highly unlikely in a period of 20+ years that none of your foreign-born coworker were below average.

  3. Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Politics can do what they want, if we want to hire cheap foreigners we'll hire cheap foreigners. Here or abroad.

    Ya know, while he's at it, couldn't Trump start putting tariffs on software?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Translation by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      How would you tariff software? They'd just compile it in a local subsidiary or whatever, physical goods at least have the inconvenience of moving a factory.

    2. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was just being a dork

    3. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the authors of the software, by nationality and cost of development of that module. Thanks to Trump, a figure of 25% plucked from the aiir is now acceptable.

      Anything undocumented can pay 50-300%. MS has the breakdowns by product, and can exclude marketing advertising and back to back tax dodges.

    4. Re:Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Indirectly. Put a tax on every piece of software sold and in turn reduce the tax on labor for domestic software production.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Translation by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      How are you going to tax cloud services?

    6. Re:Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In the end, someone will have to own something. And that's what you tax. If you try to circumvent taxes, a crafty state can always find ways. The question is only whether a government WANTS to tax something, because they invariably can.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Translation by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      That's easy. A company in the US buys software from India and owns it. A company in India does all the development.

      Who is going to be taxed? You can tax the sale, but you can bet that it's not going to reflect the full cost. And you simply can't tax the _use_ of a foreign-made software.

    8. Re:Translation by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Careful what you wish for, the US is a huge exporter of software, you really don't want a trade war on this .

  4. waaah... by dunnomattic · · Score: 1

    ...look what you made me do.
    -Microsoft.

    --
    ...when everything is a crime, everyone is a criminal.
    1. Re:waaah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats so weird is before the election everybody on Slashdot hated the H1B's and wanted something done about it.

    2. Re: waaah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still do. Slashdot likes Trump and loves MAGA.

      Notice how all the anti-worker and anti-Trump posts come from anonymous cowards or brand new accounts with no history. Democrat-affiliated political operators are spending heavily to astroturf Slashdot.

      Slashdot, with its pre-commercial (and therefore fair & effective) moderation system, is the best forum for sociopolitical debate on the English language internet. Because of that, ideas that start here tend to ripple outwards and shape online public discourse.

  5. Feel-good bullshit by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's see the actual demographic makeup of their devs. Spoiler: it's overwhelming male and white / Asian / Indian like all other big tech firms. This is just a cheap soundbite to placate the SJW crowd with absolutely no substance behind it, and everyone knows it. Besides, I'm confused: doesn't the H1B program that Microsoft et al abuse exist in practice solely to bring (temporary) immigrants into the country (to work as indentured tech servants and save big corps money)? Their statement here about caring about immigrants is 100% trash -- follow their money.

    1. Re:Feel-good bullshit by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Let's see the actual demographic makeup of their devs. Spoiler: it's overwhelming male and white / Asian / Indian like all other big tech firms. This is just a cheap soundbite to placate the SJW crowd with absolutely no substance behind it, and everyone knows it. Besides, I'm confused: doesn't the H1B program that Microsoft et al abuse exist in practice solely to bring (temporary) immigrants into the country (to work as indentured tech servants and save big corps money)? Their statement here about caring about immigrants is 100% trash -- follow their money.

      I personally know a bunch of Iranians who've gone to work for Microsoft (and other big tech firms) and I'm pretty sure it was under HB1, and I know many of them made really nice salaries and now have green cards.

      Now I don't know how typical their story is, but certainly not all use of HB1 is abuse.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    2. Re:Feel-good bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it occur to you that even if your prediction of the statistics are correct, Microsoft may be right? Foreign white / Asian / Indian males may not want to come to the USA any more because the USA is going crazy. (Note: this is not about Trump; he is a symptom of this crazyness rather than the cause).

    3. Re:Feel-good bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you have to understand is that an H1B is the only way to legally immigrate into the US to work. You can't get a green card until after you're on an H1B.
      I'm a Canadian with a master's degree working in a very niche field. I'm working in the US now, and the immigration system was a pain in the butt. Under the current system there's no way to distinguish between cheap temp workers and those who want to immigrate and make a home in the US and contribute.

    4. Re:Feel-good bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the direct hire H1Bs that microsoft exploits, they actually have a sweet deal there. There are clusters of outsourcing companies all around the microsoft campus and microsoft exploits them for cheap labor while dodging the bad press.

  6. Just Another Big Business by rally2xs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...that wants to hire cheap foreign labor within the USA. They claim they can't get good US help. Well... maybe they can't. If you are about to embark on a career, and are looking at studying for 4 or more years, incurring massive debt, and then having to wait to be hired by businesses that have lowered their wage scale substantially by importing cheap foreign labor that you have to compete with, what are you going to do? Maybe take up law or medicine, if your that smart, because the software industry is now a comparatively low pay industry, and often with insane work hours to boot. These people are smart, and lots of 'em are smarter than lining themselves up to be mediocre middle-classers instead of upper middle-classers is not all that appealing.

    Back before the dot-bomb of the early 2000's, actual Americans were making 6 figures, even in those more valuable year-2000 dollars, because real Americans were doing the work. Then the outsourcing and H1B Visas had their impacts, and news from the software wage front has been pretty dismal. This industry sabotaged itself with complicity by the US gov't working against it's citizens.

    1. Re:Just Another Big Business by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Once the USA was totally accepting of workers from other nations every generation?
      Bring the worker over to the USA for a short time project under their own nations brand and use them as posted workers.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Just Another Big Business by rally2xs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, I have no memory of that. Up until about the 1990's, US industry was populated pretty much exclusively by US workers. Then, the US gov't made it possible to hire 100's of 1000's of foreigners at the behest of big business that wanted to pay less for their labor, and the destruction of good-paying tech jobs began.

    3. Re:Just Another Big Business by meglon · · Score: 1

      Your memory doesn't go back far enough. Reagan was the one who started pushing the "service" economy instead of the manufacturing economy.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    4. Re:Just Another Big Business by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The change was rapid. From doing everything possible in the 1980's to totally protect US secrets and prevent exports to Communist nations.
      The US then just let the world in to study all its secrets.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Just Another Big Business by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know the service economy, but it was being done with US workers, at least.

    6. Re:Just Another Big Business by Hodr · · Score: 2

      Might be new-ish in white collar jobs. We have been importing migrant labor for farming for as long as we have been a country.

    7. Re:Just Another Big Business by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, was talking about tech. I went to school with migrant kids, and that was 50's / 60's. They've been around forever.

    8. Re:Just Another Big Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of them, we had to sell some of them to China to help re-elect our politicians.

    9. Re:Just Another Big Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I graduated with a software engineering degree in 2004. I have a love/hate relationship with the university. Most of my professors were smart and I learned alot from them, particularly Dr Arch and Mr Stambaugh (no disrespect; he only had a masters at the time though).

      However, I felt the department chair was a charlatan. Her department was a real let down. I never saw recruiters on campus. We never had any speakers invited that were relevant to CS. When I was mandated to do an internship, I had to find it entirely on my own. During that internship, I had to report to this woman and never received any feedback so I don't know that she even read any of my reports. The university itself was pretty useless in terms of career counseling, job fair, etc so I graduated without a job lined up. Hell, putting in application after application (literally hundreds - I kept a log at the time to prove to my mother that I was, in fact, looking for work), it was nine months before I had a short term contract.

      Now I guess the SJW or Randites will chime in. Randites, I scored As in my CS classes. The other 2/3 of a college education is liberal arts. College has a way of ruining our interests in art and history with ideology and billing demands. SJWs, it's not misogyny, although I did notice the university's desperate efforts to bring female participation up from about 5% by any means necessary. Not being impressed with two girls who had all their work done by the guys is different from disparaging all female programmers.

      I never felt like the department really had any interest in student welfare. I really felt like this woman had a chip on her shoulder and was very deliberate about excluding people. She also hated me because she was a Java-is-the-only-way type. If I hadn't taken up C++, VB and, later, C# on my own, I would never have gotten a job in this area. Forget anything Windows related, even though Windows was EVERYWHERE by the late 1990s. Even today there are practically zero jobs in Linux (forget UNIX).

      Anyway, the first contract I had fell apart after about a month. The place had hired with no clear direction and laid off most oft he contractors over the course of about a month. It was another four months before I had another contract and five months after that before I had my first permanent job. With the government. because fuck if anybody else was hiring.

      Over the years since, even government has been outsourcing to Indians, either overseas or here on an H1B. And what people say about Indian managers is absolutely true. They do give preference in hiring and work on weeding out non-Indians. Just yesterday, I was on an interview, somewhere else in the government because fuck the private sector and it was all I could do not to run away screaming when I met my potential supervisor. I worked under another Indian woman shortly in the private sector and she was a monster, a micromanager that didn't know how to do anything but micromanage. if I could have just gotten a raise at my first full time job, I would never have left. The only good thing about leaving was a 50% raise. I just had to go through 4 awful jobs and a few bouts of unemployment to get it.

      I hate my current job so much. I had decided to get away from women and Indian developers by going into as DBA role. Now I just cope with disaster after disaster. It doesn't matter that I can do more and better work than 10 of them put together. I get paid to basically say "lol, idunno, reboot" because nobody listened when I provided actual solutions. Most days I'm just really bored because I don't care anymore.

      I never stopped writing software though. I have a side business that I write software for because the available products out there are so bad. But do you think that matters to anybody hiring? Nope. The industry doesn't really provide any incentives for me to be good at what I do. The jobs don't pay anything, more of them are short contracts, and you can be a fucking wizard but not knowing yesterday's newest JScript framework means you can't do or learn anything ever. I would kill myself if I didn't think that was what they wanted.

    10. Re:Just Another Big Business by Solandri · · Score: 2

      While I agree the program is abused, the program was started due to other countries running similar programs. A study found that the U.S. was suffering a net drain of talented graduates leaving for jobs in these other countries. These work visa programs are basically ways for countries to poach talent from each other, and the U.S. had been on the losing end. So it started its own work visa program.

    11. Re:Just Another Big Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While I agree the program is abused, the program was started due to other countries running similar programs. A study found that the U.S. was suffering a net drain of talented graduates leaving for jobs in these other countries. These work visa programs are basically ways for countries to poach talent from each other, and the U.S. had been on the losing end. So it started its own work visa program.

      Does not follow. If US workers were making six figures within the US and were poached by other countries, presumably they were being paid more elsewhere. How would bringing in foreign workers to the US, resulting in severe downward pressure on US wages, alleviate the desire felt by US workers to be paid more outside the country?

      I understand spin. It's immoral but understandable. This whole-cloth revisionism is something much worse.

    12. Re: Just Another Big Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I was pulling down 150 an hour at pacbell. Sbc etc in San Ramon. Then Ed Whitaker said we are done. That was the whole yahoo dsl deal. He was like pots we charge when we turn it up. No joke I got a call from Paul the cfo. As a contractor with super user access I turned up 300 thousand pending dsl orders and we met the target of 800 thousand. My boss found out on a company wide call when Ed singled me out as outstanding employee. I was immediately fired. Not sure my point but it does not matter. Money is money. I'm still in telecom. Always will be. Overseas wholesale. Fuck my country the us. I do good now. I make about 56 an hour now. But not part of the evil att then pacbell then sbc. Then att. Best part about it was once I turned up the pending dsl orders. The Bay Area news crews showed up. Lovely. 2001 ish.

    13. Re: Just Another Big Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wholesale business is crazy. No clients in the US. But now the overseas market is about rounding. That is 60/60 or 60/1. Every thing to make a buck when your minutes are hundreds of a penny! So glad I left the mother ship at bishop ranch in San Ramon.

    14. Re: Just Another Big Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry my point was Ed said why am I paying these people in the Bay Area 100+ when I can find people for 20. Fired 2001 December 15th. Merry Christmas. All good. I took it and moved on.

  7. Re:Why not employ skilled Americans? by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The best US university courses are still graduating the best graduates who got accepted on merit. Every year. For decades.
    From artists, to engineers to every kind of computer expert.
    What is some other nation doing that the USA cant get from its educational graduates?
    Cost of work?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  8. Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by nowwith25percentmore · · Score: 1

    Tech companies can find experts in any skill they need right here in the US. Any jobs they move abroad are moved to save costs, not because of scarcity of talent.

    1. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      That's a distinction without a difference in practice. If a business cannot afford to buy labor with certain talents at the going rate, then labor with those talents might as well not exist as far as that business is concerned.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by swb · · Score: 1

      If a business cannot afford to buy labor with certain talents at the going rate

      For definitions of "afford" that include guaranteeing rich executive pay packages, stock buy-backs, a corporate jet.

      American executives need to wake up and smell the coffee and start understanding their own personal enrichment is part of the cost structure.

    3. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the business is mismanaged to the extent that they can't afford market labor rates for required staff in their industry, maybe they don't deserve to be a player in that industry.

    4. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't conflate "cannot " and "don't want to", which is the actual case.

    5. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by meglon · · Score: 1

      Like this:

      https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/07/06/mar-lago-foreign-worker-visas/764053002/

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    6. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a business cannot afford to buy labor with certain talents at the going rate

      Sorry, this is Microsoft, not some small company.

      If companies can't afford to pay people to do the job, they should not be given the option of changing the rules of the game to import cheaper labour. This is an externality which changes the market to suit them.

      All those people who say "let the market decide" tend to forget the market is a lie, and the big players can change the field in ways the rest of us can't. "The market" is big corporations saying "since we're not willing to pay what market rates for salaries are, let's bring in people who cost less from somewhere else".

      That aint no free market.

    7. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Right there is no reason to move all but the smallest subset of professional jobs over seas other than seeking lower labor costs.

      Sure there are handful of PHD level specialist positions for which there may only exists 100's or few qualified candidates the world over - but that does not describe the vast vast majority of positions available at Microsoft, which they seek to fill with foreign workers.

      Global trade imbalances, immigration (legal and not), are the cause of the increasing wealth gap! Liberals and non-populist Conservatives alike need to square that. They are not being honest with the public about their polices and their effects.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    8. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft rakes in billions in profits each quarter. They can afford the labor, but they choose the cheaper route because it's available and make the excuse to appease idiots.

      If they want the cheaper labor, then they can do what IBM did and start laying off US employees in favor of Indian ones in India, and they will make their shareholders very happy for about 3-5 years until the quality sets in and they realize what they literally paid for. Just own the idea and stop pissing on us while telling us it's raining.

      The US government should simply stop giving these large businesses federal contracts if they're going to staff them with foreign workers (which is illegal in the case of most DOD contracts, but not so for many others). It seems quite obvious. If you're going to bite the hand that feeds you, then it's time to stop feeding you. The loss of those contracts almost certainly outweighs the gains from shifting H1Bs to direct hires in foreign countries.

    9. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Global trade imbalances, immigration (legal and not), are the cause of the increasing wealth gap! Liberals and non-populist Conservatives alike need to square that. They are not being honest with the public about their polices and their effects

      Why would they be? That's intentional. Liberals are communist, and Conservatives are act like a feudal .05% upper class. We get the mindset of blue-blooded Conservatives. The real issue with the closet communist Liberals is that they create policies in a "do as I say not as I do" stance with the blind assumption that they themselves will be rich as part of the new political elite class.

      In both cases, it leads to a "have / have-not" society with an eviscerated middle-class.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    10. Re: Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by nowwith25percentmore · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

    11. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Wake up. The average salary for H1B employees at Microsoft is $129k ( https://www.myvisajobs.com/Rep... ). Apple leads the pack with $147k. And this is the base salary, H1B regulations don't take into account relocation packages, RSUs and other bonuses.

      $129k puts you into top 5% of the incomes in the US. These is pretty much the definition of a specialized high-qualification position.

    12. Re: Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump left a deuce in my shoe!

      Trump Trump Trumpity Trump Trump TRUMP!!!! Reeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

    13. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      and 129K is very good society if you live in any part of fly over country - its perhaps enough to cling by your finger tips to the bottom rung of middle class in Palo Alto.

      The first thing we need to get past is the BS definitions of middle class the media and government pushes. He is a definition we should work with. Middle class means you enjoy some level of autonomy. You could afford to leave your job or be fired; you have enough personal assets that you could if need be you could move yourself and your family somewhere else; and you can do all this without jeopardizing your standard of living. I don't care if you live in a McMansion and lease to two Cadillacs. If being unemployed for less than a year or so means you'd have to give these things up - you are in fact not middle class you just look like it superficially. if you don't think you could easily find an equivalent job / more work etc in a short time you are not the renaissance free merchant - you are a vulnerable wage slave.

      The reality is people living in say Davenport Iowa earning 129K a year are not interested in moving to Palo Alto for a 129K a year. They know they would in fact enjoy lower standard of living and increased vulnerability in doing so. So they won't take that offer. What does that really mean? It means the suppliers (potential workers) won't make labor available in the market place at that price point. In other words 129K is below market rate. The fact that employeers only offer 129k averages for those positions is because their demand is being satisfied by the 'cheap' labor imports. The vast majority of these H1Bs are exactly what I have described them as "cheap alternative labor."

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    14. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      The thing is, the top median income in Iowa is $51k per year. The top 80% percentile income is $95k. People are quite likely to move to California if they are offered $35k more.

      Or we can look at the median income in the Bay Area which tops at around $100k for Santa Clara county. Again, the average H1B salary in Google or Microsoft tops this. H1B salaries are near or slightly above the median software developer salaries.

    15. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is, the top median income in Iowa is $51k per year. The top 80% percentile income is $95k. People are quite likely to move to California if they are offered $35k more.

      Or we can look at the median income in the Bay Area which tops at around $100k for Santa Clara county. Again, the average H1B salary in Google or Microsoft tops this. H1B salaries are near or slightly above the median software developer salaries.

      You have to divide income by cost of living to compare states. When you do this, you find Iowa is ranked #16 in US states, California #43 (Byron Schlomach, 2017).

      The average person is Iowa has far more spending power than the average person in California. $35k more isn't enough to offset that for jobs in many places in California.

      Admittedly the Bay Area skews the cost of living - but that's probably the area we're talking about for most of the H1b's.

      Proposition 13 makes things far worse for those thinking about moving to California, since it penalizes people for exercising the right to travel (despite the fact the infringing fundamental rights "under the colour of law" is a federal felony). You might as well decide to make people pay 20x the income taxes they otherwise would pay, for posting to Slashdot and exercising their freedom of speech.

      Econometric studies show that 64 to 73% of the cost of living differences in US states are due to government policy, so California only has itself to blame for the high cost of living. It's no surprise that companies are engaging in H1B abuse in such an environment. It's immoral, illegal, short-sighted, and dumb - but incompetent government encourages that sort of behaviour.

      There's a big price that comes from having a population that doesn't understand economics - it should be a required class in high school, along with a few other classes in how real life works, in other words, the skills and knowledge needed to make life work in the real world, and to make good voting decisions instead of dumb ones. But California can no longer afford adding more requirements to high school, so that's not an option.

      We live in interesting times (old Chinese curse).

    16. Re:Cost Issue, Not Skill Issue by drsquare · · Score: 1

      America has 5% of the world's population, what makes you think they have 100% of the tech talent?

  9. US fail, Canadian win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fact: there is a global shortage of IT talent.

    Fact: US firms import some talent, on either a permanent on temporary basis, to deal with the domestic part of this shortage.

    Fact: The current US administration is virulently xenophobic and scares many immigrants.

    Fact: US firms need talented workers, regardless of location or nationality.

    Fact: Knowledge work can be relocated much more easily than other kinds of work.

    Conclusion: Firms will continue import talent to North America, but locate them in Canada rather than the US. This is a lower cost jurisdiction in any case, and while far from perfect has a far more sane political system than the US. Moreover, Canada does not import many temporary foreign workers (it does some, but the bar is set quite high). It imports far more permanent immigrants, which is healthy for all concerned.

    1. Re:US fail, Canadian win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fact: Green is purple.
      Conclusion: statements following the word "fact" aren't necessarily true.

    2. Re:US fail, Canadian win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So which of them do you actually disagree with?

  10. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Quantity. For the size of America the number of graduating engineers is really quite small. Hence they imort from all over the world. Also many smart Americans choose mba instead of engineering generally speaking.

    You may have noticed you basically need to be rich to get a degree in America. Not so elsewhere in the world. I'm Australian, imported to Seattle on the strength of 6 yeas uni that cost me 30k.

    Fix the eductation problem and you'll fix the hire local problem.

  11. Labor exploitation problem has been solved by mrops · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is the wrong kind of immigration policies in US that allow for this "cheapest labor exploitation". Speaking as a Canadian, the work permit here, which is equivalent to H1-B in US is bound to the employer, but the permanent resident status, equivalent to green card is not. So you get here on work permit, apply for permanent resident status couple years later and your employer effectively has no leverage except a just pay and a healthy work environment. Sure it costs 2 years before you can apply, however its not like a decade or so in US at the mercy of your employer.

    1. Re:Labor exploitation problem has been solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      US immigration law is horrendous, unjust and uneven. If you come here illegally, you are VIP and every politicians want to shake your hand. If you apply thru proper channel, be prepare to wait 20 years.

    2. Re:Labor exploitation problem has been solved by lgw · · Score: 1

      You can switch employers on an H1-B. Most lager companies and left-coast start-ups have lawyers to manage just this. The incentive to stay put is that many companies promise to pay for the legal work for your green card submission after some delay (I believe Google uses the lack of a delay as its own hook).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Labor exploitation problem has been solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

    4. Re:Labor exploitation problem has been solved by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      It is the wrong kind of immigration policies in US that allow for this "cheapest labor exploitation". Speaking as a Canadian, the work permit here, which is equivalent to H1-B in US is bound to the employer, but the permanent resident status, equivalent to green card is not. So you get here on work permit, apply for permanent resident status couple years later and your employer effectively has no leverage except a just pay and a healthy work environment. Sure it costs 2 years before you can apply, however its not like a decade or so in US at the mercy of your employer.

      You've pretty much perfectly described the system in the US as well. I have no idea what you think is different, except maybe the green card process is a bit longer here.

    5. Re:Labor exploitation problem has been solved by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is the wrong kind of immigration policies in US that allow for this "cheapest labor exploitation". Speaking as a Canadian, the work permit here, which is equivalent to H1-B in US is bound to the employer, but the permanent resident status, equivalent to green card is not. So you get here on work permit, apply for permanent resident status couple years later and your employer effectively has no leverage except a just pay and a healthy work environment. Sure it costs 2 years before you can apply, however its not like a decade or so in US at the mercy of your employer.

      You've pretty much perfectly described the system in the US as well. I have no idea what you think is different, except maybe the green card process is a bit longer here.

      No. It's not a bit longer. It's damned atrocious. I know cases of engineers and doctors waiting for 8-10 years for a decision.

      I'm like, why are we doing this? If we have a professional working here for 8-10 years, just give the papers to him/her automatically. That person has obviously shown value.

      And why wait 8-10 years of more? Put a cap, and tell them yes/no within 2-3 years. That way people can plan accordingly instead of living in a damned limbo.

      Our incompetence is turning into cruelty, honestly. This is why I get so pissed at people saying "huurr durr come here the right way" without knowing we are making that all but impossible in the most idiotic, dysfunctional and capricious ways possible.

    6. Re:Labor exploitation problem has been solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that amnesty laws get passed on occassion, so someone working illegally then has the same footing as someone who has waited in line for 20 years. You can thank Reagan for that.

    7. Re:Labor exploitation problem has been solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the state of beer in the USA, I am glad to hear that the lager companies are hiring foreign workers, hopefully Belgians or Germans.

    8. Re:Labor exploitation problem has been solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure you have your facts completely correct, or know some weird edge cases.

      https://www.us-immigration.com/us-immigration-news/us-citizenship/how-long-does-the-us-citizenship-process-take/

      This is much more what I've heard from my friends who have emigrated here. This is not that much crazier than the rest of the world, generally. Yes, our government could be more efficient, I would support that in a heartbeat.

      But you should immigrate the right way - I've done it to two countries. If you're not even willing to respect that amount of the law of the land you're moving to, I for one think you're a disrespectful cunt that shouldn't be allowed to move anywhere.

    9. Re:Labor exploitation problem has been solved by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      You're looking at the very last step of the process - getting the citizenship. It's very easy and simple.

      What takes most of the time is he US green card processing. They are assigned based on a country, so Chinese people will have to wait for about 6 years as of now to get a regular employer-sponsored green card.

      You can look them here: https://www.trackitt.com/curre... - right now the USCIS is processing cases from 2013 for Chinese nationals. And it is even worse for India.

    10. Re:Labor exploitation problem has been solved by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you have your facts completely correct, or know some weird edge cases.

      https://www.us-immigration.com/us-immigration-news/us-citizenship/how-long-does-the-us-citizenship-process-take/

      This is much more what I've heard from my friends who have emigrated here. This is not that much crazier than the rest of the world, generally. Yes, our government could be more efficient, I would support that in a heartbeat.

      But you should immigrate the right way - I've done it to two countries. If you're not even willing to respect that amount of the law of the land you're moving to, I for one think you're a disrespectful cunt that shouldn't be allowed to move anywhere.

      Oh shut the fuck up. I came here easily and legally and I had no problem becoming a resident and later a US citizen. My case is not the norm, however.

      I'm referring to the millions others who also come legally and the right way and still, as a matter of being a numbers' game, they end up in decades-long limbo waiting for an answer or worse.

      Go project your sanctimonious bullshit somewhere else.

  12. Lots of people in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, the top 10% of the U.S. are better than the top 1% of dem Indians.

    Unfortunately only 4.4% of the world's population lives in the U.S. So, even if the top 10% of the U.S. actually is better than 99% of the world... That 1% of the world, 72 million people, is still twice the number of "10% of the U.S. population".

  13. Stand behind their people!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    âoeWe're not going to cut people loose. We're going to stand behind themâ.....a couple days after their annual RIFâ(TM)ing.

  14. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you work on policy to make Americans the talent you need dumb ass - its simple. Government is for its own people.

  15. Free markets aren't cool in USA anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fuck free market capitalism! Planned economies always outperform the free market. WE WILL BURY YOU!" -- Comrade Trump (in his essay explaining his immigration and tariff policies)

    The stupidest thing about US politics today, is that the people who complain the loudest about the president, are called "the left" or "liberals" and the ones who support him are (this is hilarious, you won't believe it!) are called "the right" or "conservatives."

  16. Any chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any chance they can move their Windows 8x, 10x UI with them and leave us stuck with the 9x/XP/7 interface? *Hopeful look*

  17. Re:Here's the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We want the cheapest workers possible that will endure the most abuse, and if Trump won't let us have them, ...

    Because he wants to hire them himself.

    https://www.eater.com/2018/7/6/17540914/mar-a-lago-trump-foreign-workers-immigration

    http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/396346-mar-a-lago-requesting-permission-to-hire-78-foreign-workers

  18. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus Christ. Broken record much?

  19. Easy Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We just need a Federal excise tax on all domestic sales of software produced outside of the United States. End of problem.

  20. in other words by Tsolias · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We can't import them, so we export our offices... and because we don't want to seem like we are the bad guys who outsource everything to non-americans, we will blame the goberment.

    1. Re:in other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can't import them, so we export our offices... and because we don't want to seem like we are the bad guys who outsource everything to non-americans, we will blame the goberment.

      Yup, that sounds like an accurate description of reality. They don't want to outsource but they have to, so they publically explain that government regulations force them to do this. Makes sense to me.

    2. Re:in other words by meglon · · Score: 1
      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  21. Cool by Kohath · · Score: 1

    More skilled people can live and work near their families and we don't need to agree to import tens of millions of welfare recipients or millions of eager workers to bid down wages. Let's go ahead with that.

  22. Why not hire and train? by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    You want to talk the talk about diversity and racial bias - hire minorities from within your own cities that you're currently located at and TRAIN them.
    No no... better to leave the country because you can't find "good people" here in the US.

    1. Re:Why not hire and train? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Training takes years, and in that time that the local trainee is under-performing (compared to a fully trained worker) money goes away without getting much in return. OK for charitable organisations or if your business wants to go broke. If it doesn't... it needs to bring in a competent worker quickly to carry on doing business.

    2. Re:Why not hire and train? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I work at Amazon. About 30% of my team are direct college hires. Amazon offered them a job straight after graduation.

      All these college hires require mentoring and a huge investment - a college hire is generally not going to produce quality code from the start, but Amazon has to pay them anyway.

      Still, it's very difficult to find engineers. As a result, my team is something like 90% immigrants (from all over the world).

    3. Re:Why not hire and train? by KC0A · · Score: 1

      If it were possible to just train the general public to program, programmers wouldn't be paid so well. After almost fifty years of trying, we still don't know how to train programmers. It's a performance profession, like sales or music or creative writing. Plenty of CS graduates, not nearly enough programmers.

  23. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By looking at Windows 10, they really are short of talents. Even if they hired a bunch of blind hobos and crack whores to design their UI, the end result could not be any worse.

  24. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may have noticed you basically need to be rich to get a degree in America.

    Utter fucking bullshit.

  25. Just Dont Want To Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This says "we dont want to pay high salaries for workers" all over it.

  26. Not about "skills" by mi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Smith previously spoke out against efforts to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program

    DACA is not about skilled technology workers at all. The man, quite clearly, is against US enforcing its borders in principle...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Not about "skills" by mi · · Score: 1

      -1 Offtopic

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  27. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re 'For the size of America the number of graduating engineers is really quite small."
    The USA gave the world modern computing. Both in terms of theory, production line design and global manufacture.
    Traitorous eight https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Nothing outside the USA is beyond what the USA can teach its own students.
    The USA is still selecting most of its engineering students on merit. They have to pass exams and have to know their work.
    Been rich does not grant a person the needed ability to study and the ability to pass an exam.
    The US system still looks for all people on merit. When sitting a free exam.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  28. Maybe Microsoft can't find talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because most of the Talent doesn't want to see their labor locked behind a license?

    Or to have anything to do with their business model?

    The "starving artist/prodigy" is a real thing. There are incredibly talented and high quality people out there that money simply won't be able to buy.

    Are they obvious? Or doing as much as they could with M$oft behind them? No. But they are doing as well as they can with what they have to work on their own goals in life.

    Corporations, and the market in general are increasingly losing touch with the fact there is more to life than wealth hoarding.

    Labor is just as fickle as Capital. Microsoft and any big business out there needs to start paying attention to that.

    Taft-Hartley won't protect them forever.

  29. MSFT defends DACA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has advocated the protection of DACA

    Why? Because they are hiring child labor?

    1. Re:MSFT defends DACA? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Why? Because they are hiring child labor?

      Sigh.

      Anonymous Coward, please turn off Fox news and go read a newspaper.

      The average age of a Dreamer enrolled in DACA is 24 years.

  30. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

    You have posted this clap-trap reply at least 3 times on this article as an AC. If you are so sure of yourself why don't you act like an adult and put your name to it?

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
  31. Re:Why not employ skilled Americans? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What limits production of highly skilled workers in the US is the US education system.

    Public schools vary immensely in quality and funding levels. Higher education is expensive and also of variable quality. Those top schools you mention are pretty exclusive and many can only afford them with assistance.

    That's one of the reasons why tech companies are trying to help schools with STEM education. They are trying to increase the supply.

    But that's not what people opposing immigration of skilled workers want. If supply increases, there is downward pressure on wages. Better education, more women and minorities entering the tech jobs market, it all has the same effect as tech workers immigrating.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  32. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Drethon · · Score: 1

    You may have noticed you basically need to be rich to get a degree in America. Not so elsewhere in the world. I'm Australian, imported to Seattle on the strength of 6 yeas uni that cost me 30k.

    I'm from the US, been working for 14 years from a 4 year degree that cost me $20k, move onto a master's degree that my company paid for. Costs are higher than they were, but the key to me is going to a good priced state college, rather than a 6 figure a year college that doesn't teach anything more.

  33. Microsoft is self-destructive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All of Windows 10 program is done by India."

    Prakesh, that is interesting. Windows 10 has made Microsoft's bad reputation far, far worse, in my opinion.

    You also said, "That is why Microsoft has gone to India, because we know that privacy is a problems."

    In 2 of your sentences, there are 2 mistakes in your English. That's what we are seeing in Windows 10. There are many, many sloppy bugs.

    Windows 10 is possibly the worst spyware ever made. "Buried in the service agreement is permission to poke through everything on your PC." (August 4, 2015)

    7 ways Windows 10 pushes ads at you.... (March 3, 2016)

    Microsoft again forced upgrades on Win10 machines specifically set to block updates (March 12, 2018)

  34. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    They'd hire local if they could, but the talent doesn't exist in sufficient numbers at any price point.

    I just don't believe it. Sure maybe the talent pool in the region is exhausted but they could certainly hire people away from the midwest or the east coast if they offered enough incentives. They don't need to be non-citizens. Finally if there is no domestic talent why is that?

    Could it be because by allowing the mass outsourcing and insourcing of international labor we have allowed the capital owner class to effetively become international tourists? Is that why: they don't invest in our own communities. They don't both developing local talent. They are not working on influencing and funding our educators to create people who can fill other than their sweatshop level needs /?

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  35. first job to shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the first position to be shifted to overseas, I recommend President and Chief Legal Officer.

  36. Re:Why not employ skilled Americans? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Why not just get people in the USA to pass an exam on merit?
    Pass the same exam as everyone, get into university.
    Study a lot to enter a profession.
    Apply for a job.
    Work for a US company.
    Pay back the loan. Some will get merit-based scholarships.
    The US education system has added a lot of money per student since the 1950's and every decade.
    Books, calculators, computers, the internet, laptops, robot kits, new buildings, more computers and money.
    The exams are not exclusive. The person just has to have the ability to study and pass the same exam in a set time.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  37. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude that article is from 1956. America in 2018 just isn't comparable to 1956. It's lost the will to build. Consider there are 550 million europeans with access to education easily as good as American, at a fraction the cost. There are 2 billion Indian and Chinese, of those a small % but high number are rich enough to send kids overseas to get a great education, previosuly the prime target for that was the USA (until Trump, now they go to Europe/Canada/Australia).

    This high tech advanced tech stuff is common now and has gone global. Hence, there are more foreigners than Americans with the skills. Hence, it's hard to find Americans.

    The choice is this: Import the foreigner, or export the job. Which would you prefer? We can move the jobs to Vancouver/Sydney/Dublin/Berlin/London easily enough.

  38. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That policy, assuming it is respected and applied by other administrations down the line, will take decades to show up. What do you do in the meantime?

  39. As if they didn't offshore the jobs already ... by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

    That can be offshored.

  40. More leadership BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft recently had a silent round of layoffs (like they do every fiscal year) which are not performance based.

    If the business is struggling so hard to find workers, why are they not utilizing their current personnel to fill open positions instead of letting them go? I find it hard to believe with the breadth of skill sets being let go that there isn't someone in that group that would qualify for these openings.

  41. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by sjames · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they should consider older workers or open an office somewhere in the midwest where the cost of living is more reasonable.

  42. Go Global by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Branch out to any countries that provide sufficiently stable and corruption free environment and argue to the other countries that want the jobs for the same. Don't go there until the conditions are suitable. That will get the lazy, or power hungry politicians moving. A better world all around. Meanwhile US does what US does with these issues. It's their right within the law and if their policies are failures, they pay a price for them just like everybody else.

  43. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excuse me, but the old continent gave the world modern computing. Luigi Manabrea made the hardware (aka Analytical engine) and Ada Lovelace the software. And that was in the 1840s (yep, 1800s). Ada even predicted that computers would be able to compose music... Then Alan Turing rediscovered Ada's work, and the rest is history.

    Britain, Italy... definitely not USA.

  44. Re:Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great schools here sure, but if you look at the grads especially in CS/Engineering and especially at grad school you'll find that most of them are going to need Visas if they want to stay and work here...

  45. Microsoft Could Move Some Jobs Abroad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So?

  46. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by AHuxley · · Score: 0

    AC all the good things that moved computing along got released from the USA.
    The "million europeans" attempted computers in the 1970's - early 1980's.
    What did consumers want to import? MS and Apple.

    Re "This high tech advanced tech stuff is common"
    Where is the EU? Canada? Dublin? Trying to impress local political leaders that with some more tax support they too can get a production line working in a decade? Just like they attempted in the 1980's?

    The USA has the freedoms the EU and other nations do not.
    Freedom of speech. Freedom after speech.
    The freedom to invest. The freedom to invent. The freedom to fail and try again. The freedom to hire on merit.

    Thats what made the USA unique. No having to go to a gov to ask for investment, for permission to start a company, to pay all new profits as a tax.
    To get a gov accept a product design, service after a grant was given.
    To make any new computer product fit in with a nations education policy. So tax payers would buy an educational computer.
    The USA has the freedom to grow. The EU has the freedom to tax.

    The choice is to go to any great US university and find people who passed their exams on merit and hire them.
    The jobs cant move to a Vancouver/Sydney/Dublin/Berlin/London as their system of laws are not set up to attract investors and keep tech jobs.
    Wages, laws, taxes all shape the ability to move a job into another nation. Other nations see productive work and resulting profit as something to tax.
    Make a profit and their nations tax system will take it.
    Laws surround who must be hired and how. The hours they work and wages.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  47. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you work on policy to make Americans the talent you need dumb ass - its simple. Government is for its own people.

    The trouble is when you need that workforce today, and not a decade from now.

    If you don't know this simple model of supply and demand you should really look into mirror to find the dumb ass.

  48. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This needs to get upmodded.

    I have friends who graduated top of their class here in Sweden as MSc CS and got hand-picked for special positions within IT-companies in the US. Some didn't even graduate, they got snatched way before. And believe me, they are not getting paid any substandard wages.

    To top it off, we did not pay for our degree out of our pockets since all Swedish citizens have the right to go to the university if you have the merits, and the government both give you money (albeit a very small sum per month) and gives you a reasonable loan if you need to take it.

    But I am living in that socialist/communist shit-hole so many "Americans" (yes, in quotes, since I know a lot of real Americans that don't want to run their country into the ground) love to take a dump at, so don't believe my indoctrinated mind, just steal my buddies.

  49. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Utter fucking bullshit.

    [citation needed]

    Because I know for a fact that it's going to cost us about $150k per kid to put them through the public in-state big-name land-grant institution here for a 4-year degree when they hit college age. Fortunately for them they have grandparents and parents that will be able to cover that cost (or near enough to it) that they won't have to worry about debt.

    We have encouraged both of our kids to do extremely well academically in the hopes that they get full rides and won't need the 529 money we've saved for them. If that happens we'll have a windfall we can move right into our 401(k)s.

  50. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by skam240 · · Score: 1

    How does your post address the comment you quote at all?

    Are you saying America has plenty of engineers now because we invented modern computing decades ago? That just doesnt follow at all.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  51. Sayonara Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has been a foreign company residing in the United States, ever since then Chairman Bill Gates campaigned successfully to flood the American labor market with H-1B visas and bring in cheap tech labor from abroad to work in his offices in Redmond, Washington and elsewhere. So lawyer Brad Smith is the mouthpiece for his foreign bosses. He doesn't necessarily represent the American point of view, when he whines about Beltway policies.

    There is no reason why Microsoft shouldn't move abroad, where they can find cheaper labor markets, and where they can feel more at home in the international marketplace. Good riddance, Microsoft. Maybe Bill Gates will take his foundation offshore, too. Good riddance Bill and Melinda. Sayonara. Hasta la vista. We no longer need you. Once we import your software from abroad, we'll put a tariff on it, and Washington will be very happy filling its coffers.

  52. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed, there are more free rides in college than ever before, especially if you are not American.

  53. ok want to play like this microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If microsoft wants to play like this i suppose my investments into microsoft will be reevaluated and moved according to the politics of the company. Im sure other companies will be more than happey with my money helping them!

    Cost me 500 the first time i invested gaine me very little the second time. other companies pay better dividends and have more people friendly management.

  54. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    The USA has the freedoms the EU and other nations do not.
    Freedom of speech.

    That is bolocks.

    No having to go to a gov to ask for investment, for permission to start a company
    Thats bolocks.

    to pay all new profits as a tax.
    Corporate tax on profuts is between 20% and 25% all over Europe.

    The jobs cant move to a Vancouver/Sydney/Dublin/Berlin/London as their system of laws are not set up to attract investors and keep tech jobs.
    That is bollocks, of course the laws are set up to attrack any kind of job.

    The USA has the freedom to grow. The EU has the freedom to tax.
    Thats bolocks.

    Make a profit and their nations tax system will take it.
    Why do you write nonsense like this? How would the economy in such a nation work? (*facepalm*)

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  55. M$ is BS by thunderclees · · Score: 1

    M$ may have a harder time obtaining incompetent yet cheap and exploitable labor from South Asia so they are offshoring.
    Weren't they doing this already? (hint: yes).

  56. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You may have noticed you basically need to be rich to get a degree in America.

    Utter fucking bullshit.

    ^^^ This. I don't think a person fitting the economic profile I had 30 years ago could go to college. No way no how.

    I made it by sheer luck, a lot of people helping me, pell grants, a scholarship and a non-trivial amount of student loans (which I'm still paying.)

    Now, and due to the exorbitant cost of living, all of that is almost gone, except student loans. You either fail to graduate (because you have fucking eat sometimes) or take so much loans you end up in financial indenture for life.

    This is not the same for all, though. If you live within driving distance of a 4-year university, you *still* get a chance to make it through college while poor.

    But if you do not live within commuting distance from a college or university, forget about it.

    I could see the changes coming when I was in college, and boy I'm glad I could graduate. No way I could do it again. And I see how much I need to save in college funds for my kids, it might be cheaper to send them to study overseas (or move my entire family).

    I. AM. NOT. FUCKING. KIDDING.

    The game is rigged against you unless your parents are within the 13% upper income bracket. Believe it. Believe it now more than ever.

  57. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    Agreed, there are more free rides in college than ever before, especially if you are not American.

    Oh really? Mention a few if you can.

  58. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

    Dude that article is from 1956. America in 2018 just isn't comparable to 1956. It's lost the will to build. Consider there are 550 million europeans with access to education easily as good as American, at a fraction the cost. There are 2 billion Indian and Chinese, of those a small % but high number are rich enough to send kids overseas to get a great education, previosuly the prime target for that was the USA (until Trump, now they go to Europe/Canada/Australia).

    This high tech advanced tech stuff is common now and has gone global. Hence, there are more foreigners than Americans with the skills. Hence, it's hard to find Americans.

    The choice is this: Import the foreigner, or export the job. Which would you prefer? We can move the jobs to Vancouver/Sydney/Dublin/Berlin/London easily enough.

    Well, a lot of this folks still think the World operates as if we were in the 50's. It explains a lot.

  59. as opposed to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as opposed to bringing them here on H1-B visas.

      Is this supposed to make me feel one way or another for some reason?

  60. Trump hasn't reduced the # of H1-Bs by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    in the slightest. He talks a big game but never does anything. He could undo the Obama era rule regarding spouses of H1-Bs whenever he wants, instantly adding 100k jobs for Americans (and putting pressure on the H1-Bs to demand higher salaries to afford stay at home spouses). He promised to do it on the campaign trail, so it's not like he's unaware of the issue too.

    Trump runs his businesses with H2-Bs. This is well known. Cutting back on work visas reduces his businesses profitability. Anyone expecting him to do anything that doesn't benefit him personally hasn't been paying attention.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  61. Nazis are bad! by mi · · Score: 0
    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  62. Apartment buildings around Microsoft in Redmond by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    Lots of Indian contractors living 5-6 to an apartment building, just walking distance to Microsoft, hardly any furniture except a TV, they work crazy hours, and send money home.

    M$ has been using cheap visa workers for years, everyone around the Seattle area knows it, sees it.

    Are these the workers M$ will move overseas? Or the flux of middleman project managers they burn through?

    1. Re:Apartment buildings around Microsoft in Redmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That area on 148th is known as Bellecutta.

  63. H1 Visa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is MS(Microsoft) crying? Microsoft has many offices in other countries. Microsoft makes $Trillions$ of dollars so why do they want to hire people for very cheap pay? Because it's called Capitalism. Have a large pool of talented people for the type of job skill set and hire them very cheap. If Corporations of America doesn't take the responsibility of training their workers and misplaced workers then they should have Tariffs on their products. Some of the tariff monies can go to misplaced workers for re-training until they are able to find a new job or transition to their own Open Source company. If the Governments transitioned to Open Source and Linux then there would be lots of new companies across the nation. Why keep on buying Microsoft products if they don't hire Americans? Lets have our government migrate from Windows to Open Source and Linux. So that we all can be employed.

  64. Companies are behaving responsibly by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    to their shareholders, which is the only legal requirement they have.

    If we want them to behave well to their employees we have to force them, and that means electing the kinds of people who will do that. That means less Nancy Pelosi and Paul Ryan and more Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-cortez. But the latter leaves a bad taste in people's mouth because nobody likes paying taxes, even if it's for things they want (like enforcing pro-worker regulations)

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Companies are behaving responsibly by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      Thing is, most candidates who say they want to raise taxes also support every anti-worker bill that comes along. And most candidates who say they want to lower taxes, are lying.

    2. Re: Companies are behaving responsibly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in your fevered imagination.

  65. This. So much This by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    if they could have outsourced the jobs to someplace cheaper they would have already done it. You can safely ignore these threats. Lack of H1-Bs will never be a reason to lose jobs. The ability to outsource them is. Capital flows to where labor is cheapest (and yes, that's from Marx, he was right about some things ya know).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  66. I've found the US citizens better by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    note I said "US Citizens". Because they're here for the long haul. They're citizens. They expect to have careers. Throw away contractors know they're throw away contractors and behave accordingly; spending as much time preparing for the next contract as doing their jobs.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  67. USA Graduates Scholarships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can checkout for usa graduates scholarships here https://mystudyaid.org/category/usa/

  68. the best choice omong bad solutions by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Yes, government is inefficient and vile, and should never be trusted out sight, but despite that we DO need it in certain instances. The challenge is to keep it reigned in and on target, while ensuring it doesn't take over everything and do what it does best, bureaucratize everything to a stand still.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:the best choice omong bad solutions by StikyPad · · Score: 2

      "The challenge is to keep it reigned in and on target."

      Not really. The challenge is that people have a wide range of opinions about what the target is.

    2. Re:the best choice omong bad solutions by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      I would think that setting the target is part of the process, but I agree with your point.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  69. Already has been tried, not so easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies find it is very difficult to move projects over seas as then you have issues with : 1) Coordination 2) Time difference 3) Project management.

  70. Might be "forced"? by Jerry · · Score: 1

    It's time the US put tariffs on Microsoft products manufactured in China and the EU, and it is time to send H-1B workers home and give those jobs back to Americans.

    https://www.oregonlive.com/sil...
    " Microsoft was moving production to the same place it makes all other Surface products. ... Microsoft has previously said it makes its other Surface computers in China."

    And, it's been going on for a long time:
    https://gizmodo.com/5517137/mi...
    "The conditions—supported by photographic, not just anecdotal evidence—sound downright horrendous:
      Workers are hired as "work study students" as young as 16 years of age
      They work extremely long shifts, typically "from 7:45 a.m. to 10:55 p.m," for $0.65/hr, less food deductions. (Actual wage: $0.52/hr.)
      As is common in large manufacturing operations in China, the workers live onsite:
            Fourteen workers share each primitive dorm room, sleeping on narrow double-level bunk beds. To "shower," workers fetch hot water in a small plastic bucket to take a sponge bath. Workers describe factory food as awful.
      Workers are kept from leaving campus, except during designated hours
      There are reports of sexual harassment of female workers by male security guards
    "

    And, its been going on for years. Learn how NOT to employ Americans here in America:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  71. How is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they'll hire non-American workers in their own countries, instead of bringing them to the US and having them work here. Is that supposed to be a bad thing?

  72. Sick of the this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am so sick of hearing the rich, Tech giants and Hollywood, pretending to be so caring about people and demonizing their opponents, just to exploit foreign workers for low wages.
    Let MS move overseas. Unless they are moving to Asia, they are going to find workers overseas have much better protections than in America.
    I am pretty sure they are bluffing because they are re-inventing themselves right now. And reinventing themselves into a company that is a traitor to the country where they were founded is probably not the best position they could find themselves in. Trump has already proven he is willing to tussle with companies that aren't acting in America's interest. He's also proven he will back companies that work to improve the country. Given how well the current administration and Apple have been working together I find it hard to believe MS would be stupid enough to make their competitor's ally into their enemy.

  73. The problem is US workers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the US tech workers I've come across ( white ones that is) have been generally pretty good, but they have a flaw.

    That flaw is they can't easily adapt to new circumstances, or show much initiative. They need quite a bit of coaching and direction.

    They're nowhere near as bad as the Indians, but it's still apparent. I suspect it's due to their subconscious "Yes Massa!" mindset they carry around with them. They know if they even so much as look at their boss the wrong way they can be fired and the total financial ruination that would inflict on them.

    Just an observation.

  74. there IS a talent shortage in the US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a shortage on people talented in being overworked for shit pay and no benefits..

  75. Business as usual by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    We are now used to this stance: big corporations take economy as an hostage, and elected leaders must accept their rule.

    But the news is that president Trump may have no problems with having the hostage killed to prevail.

  76. Re:Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What limits production of highly skilled workers in the US is the US education system.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA /.... wait wait.. wait .... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA

    As someone who works for a living along side some of the imported workers... their education is complete HOOEY.
    I mean, the people from India do so-so I guess, but the people from the Philippines might as well have rocks for brains...

  77. Head em' up and move em' out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let them move all their jobs out of the country - then void all their patents and copyrights in the US. let another company willing to hire US labor build it and replace them.

  78. Ban the sale of M$ products in the USA then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    watch as they suddenly figure out ideas to train, skill and employ US workers.

  79. I know how they are going to update notepad now by BrookSmith · · Score: 1

    I know how they are going to update notepad now, get some foreigner who knows how to code to do it.

  80. Re: Here's the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eater.com is a Vox Media property. #FakeNews

  81. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They hire foreigners because of the foreigners being involved in the hiring. The non-foreigners can't protest too much about the foreigners leaning heavily towards hiring a fellow foreigner for any position, or the non-foreigner will be accused of racism and fired.

    I used to do off-site contract work for Siemens in Florida. We'd fly in to visit their offices every few months, and sometimes stay for a few weeks for specific projects. Every time we went, there were more Indians employed there than the last time. The main VP over the area we worked for was an Indian, and obviously hired an Indian for every position that he could. We contractors joked about cloning vats hidden in the basement that were churning out more Indians each quarter. White Siemens employees would ask if we (the contracting firm) were hiring, but our contract specifically banned us from hiring their employees.

    Our contract wasn't renewed after the percentage of Indians in that division hit about 60%. I guess they'd reached critical mass.

    Don't tell me there's no local talent. Most local talent is weeded out of the hiring process at the beginning by the non-locals in HR, then those left are rejected as often as possible by the non-locals every step of the interviewing process.

  82. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's because foreigners think all of the US is like the big cities on the coast. They live there because it's better (in most cases) than the big cities they came from. They don't know that the cities on the coasts of the US are overpriced hellscapes that are turning into open sewers. All the media in the cities tells them that all the klan members outside the city want them all dead. There's a reason the media keeps pushing the "all people in the middle of the country are horrible hate-filled cannibals that'll eat you while they screw their sister" memes.

    That's why a lot of citizens in the midwest would never move to work on the coast. They know better.

  83. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They won't come to the midwest, because they don't know how to follow the square dance caller, or know where the hootenanny is held.

    They see a corn field and think "Children of the Corn" and run away.

  84. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by sjames · · Score: 1

    Then they're not all that serious about there being a shortage.

  85. Re: Here's the Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I do wonder if this is a major reason Surveillance Valley has been so eager to exclude Americans in favor of imported labor.

    The guy who doesn't even live in the US is bitching about US hiring practices. Lady, thy name is hypocrisy.

  86. so... you admit that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the DACA "children" are mostly fully-grown adults competing in the workplace against actual US citizens?

    Unlike "anchor babies" who illegal alien parents give birth to in the US in order to "anchor" the entire extended illegal family here, these DACA "kids" were "grappling hook babies" whose illegal alien parents tossed over the wall to use to pull the entire extended family across without even the fig leaf of a claim that the child was a citizen. They're far worse than the "anchor babies", having absolutely no claim of any rights at all to be here which is why all the arguments are made based on emotion and sympathy ploys centered on "children".

    Sheesh!

    The whole damned thing is an anti-American scam. If we decide to grant amnesty to the DACA "kids" then they will be allowed to bring in their parents (who are already here committing ID theft, pushing down the wages and benefits of American citizens, etc) to be made legal - something NO Democrat and no RINO will prohibit in legislation. In effect, the whole family gets to keep their ill-gotten gains because a child was involved. It's like a bank robber taking his kid along on the heist and then demanding he cannot be arrested (because that would separate him from his kid) and he must be let go (because it would be unfair to jail his kid with him) and the child should be allowed to keep the loot (because the child is innocent and had no role in the crime) and then after a couple of years the kid should be allowed to give a big chunk of the stolen money to the parent (because, hey! it's all in the past, dude). But, don't call this "amnesty" (deliberately letting somebody get away with a crime) which it definitely is, that would be racist.

    When's the last time an American politician (other than Trump) spent as much time worrying about American citizens as so many of these current politicians and captains of industry spend fawning over these illegal alien "dreamers" and DACA "kids"????

    All American citizens should demand the right to wantonly violate all the laws they want to violate, without penalty. If we're gonna destroy the rule of law and celebrate law breaking, we should stop being such anti-American bigots and go all-in - allowing the population who were born here as citizens of citizens to get in on the action. Amnesty for everybody and for everything!

  87. Trump Derangement Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies should think long and hard about threatening national governments, which is what Microsloth is doing here.

    After all, if Microsloth needs those DACA kids from south of the border to do the work and is claiming the work needs to follow these experts to where ever they get deported to then why would they move the jobs to India rather than El Salvadore and Venezuelea? This is clearly not a case of "you deported my slaves, so I must move the plantation to where the slaves went". This is more like "you deported my slaves, so to get back at you I am opening a new plantation in a place where I get to have even more desirable slaves".

    It's actually mighty funny in a sense to watch Microsoft being so publicly racist, like lots of the celebs who threatened to leave the US if Trump got elected. Nearly all those celebs said they's move to white-majority countries; not a damned one of the high-profile jerks announced a pending departure for Senegal or Mexico, etc - it was all about Canada, France, and New Zealand. Same here with Microsoft: Most DACAs are from South of the US-Mexico border, but Microsoft would move all the jobs to a spot in India.... ha ha ha ha... total anti-Hispanic racist plan by Microsoft who should be forced to move to Nicaragua to prove they are not "white supremacists" (or Indian supremacists?) ha ha ha.

    You know, if they want a real fight with the US Govt, they should consider what might happen if their Windows operating system was declared a national security threat and banned from all government computers. Bad idea to pick this fight, especially over illegal immigrants.

  88. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Microsoft isn't a h1b sweat shop."

    Hahahahahahahaha - good one!

  89. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Freedom of speech.
    That is bolocks."

    There's total freedom of speech in China, right comrade? Now as for freedom *after* speech...

  90. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a good priced state college, rather than a 6 figure a year college that doesn't teach anything more."

    You're paying for the name and the connections. Membership in the (totally coed) old boys club.

    In Silicon Valley it's the difference between $150k for 60 hrs/wk as a programmer vs $350k for 30 hrs/wk as a "product person". Funny how those product people have no fucking idea what products will actually sell... but all seem to have gone to the same handful of elitist schools.

  91. sell low quality MSFT to the Red Chinese by NickGnome · · Score: 1

    They already gave them their source code. Ill-Begotten Monstrosities already sold them Lenovo. This could drag down the Chinese economy for decades, while the USA is freed of kludgey baggage to advance the state of the art. Way to Win!

  92. Odd... so... by Doctrinsograce · · Score: 1

    This is weird. Does this mean that Microsoft is uninterested in hiring US citizens?

  93. Labor Participation Rate by callahan2211 · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of developers here now in the U.S. It boils down to money, tech giants don't want to spend money on more expensive home grown talent or spend money on training.

    --
    "There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and
  94. Mis-worded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Trump Administration's tough stance on immigration has attracted a lot of criticism from big technology firms, which rely heavily on CHEAP foreign workers from around the world.

    FTFY

  95. adios, MF...sorry, MS by geowash01 · · Score: 1

    Bye, don't let the door etc.

  96. They hate US, all about stock by Contract+Gypsy · · Score: 0

    This is the classic liberal approach to shutting down the cheap labor from overseas. The problem is that they think they are saving money, they will spend more per byte just to ensure the get good code. This is a classical liberal fallacy.

    --
    Life is in a state of dynamic equilibrium, it both blows and sucks
  97. You know Reagan did the same thing by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    right? Business want cheap labor. The left doesn't want to be unnecessarily cruel. Personally, I'd like to see us legalize drugs so Mexico & South America can stop being hell holes and maybe fix out foreign policy. While I'm at it tariffs should be based on working conditions & environmental impact.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  98. Do it MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Push peopl to wake up MS. Sick of folks standing on the sideline criticising tough stance on immigration ... until it hurts their pocketbook.

    Hows it feel to see one of the richest lib companies ditch your job opportunities while at the same time kissing your ass for your liberal vote?

  99. Re:Why not employ skilled Americans? by KC0A · · Score: 1

    Plenty of CS graduates, both American and foreign, but not nearly enough programmers to meet demand. I've been interviewing developers for about 30 years now, and it's still the case that about 80% of the candidates can't solve simple programming problems in an interview, or answer basic questions about the fundamentals of CS.

    Why Can't Programmers Program? (https://blog.codinghorror.com/why-cant-programmers-program/) is just as true today as it was in 2007, in 1997, in 1987.

  100. Re: Why not employ skilled Americans? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    Agreed, there are more free rides in college than ever before, especially if you are not American.

    Oh really? Mention a few if you can.

    Still waiting. Don't let the crickets chirp.