"Songs are sold through albums, which average $15 for maybe 13 tunes [...] Artists get - from a generous publisher - three cents on the dollar. That's 45 cents an album sold. [...] By eliminating the middle-man - the record industry - artists can charge, say, 5 cents per song and STILL come out ahead of what they'd have gotten through selling CDs" (E2) (Trying to find the link on google says even lower numbers...)
1) I noticed a new one, or maybe it was to be expected.
Pro-arab = anti-american.
(So I could assume the replyee implies whatever is anti-american can safely be removed without their knowledge)
In this one, the replies say it's "leftist" thinking, I didn't see anything of that, just opinions.
The bushism WP article is still up, even with a want of changing it to "Bush opponents select quotes from his speeches to create an impression of incompetence. Other politicians make just as many mistakes, but get a pass (see liberal media bias)."
So the main thing seems to be whatever the media indoctrinates as "american" one should (as a right-ist) blindly follow.
For "crackpots" I mean them in the "anti-science" way, whatever questions commonly held scientific facts based on psychedelic induced visions, or just plainly thinking about it (philosophy). (Now is that more left or right? Must train my stereotyping skills)
In relation to "blindly follow", here's some crackpot theory:
- Doubt as sin - Christianity has done its utmost to close the circle and declared even doubt to be sin. One is supposed to be cast into belief without reason, by a miracle, and from then on to swim in it as in the brightest and least ambiguous of elements: even a glance towards land, even the thought that one perhaps exists for something else as well as swimming, even the slightest impulse of our amphibious nature - is sin! And notice that all this means that the foundation of belief and all reflection on its origin is likewise excluded as sinful. What is wanted are blindness and intoxication and an eternal song over the waves in which reason has drowned. {Nietzsche's Daybreak, s. 89, R.J. Hollingdale translation}
(From a random casual chat) I can't see photobucket stuff. China firewall blocks? Yup. And bbc, blogspot.com, geocities, angelfire are the main ones that are blocked. Sometimes google when political events occur. Or you type stuff like "china nuclear weapons". When some leader from I dunno, egypt or something visit china they'll block google for a few days.
*
BTW, I found this post from 2004 mentioning arab sites being blocked (guess where).
Damn terrorists... we need to inject democrazy bombs there and fill their women with liberty silicone! They look a little skimpy too, some freedom fries would do them good.
It's all egoism one way or another. Finding things to exploit makes you feel good, dollars make you feel good, being able to make the world panic makes you feel good, having your name on this particular "monster" which does this makes you feel good.
"Every takeoff and landing, when the plane banked too much to 1 side, I prayed for a crash. That moment cures my insomnia with narcolepsy when we might die helpless and packed human tobacco in the fuselage. [...] Life insurance pays off triple if you die on a business trip. I prayed for wind shear effect. I prayed for pelicans sucked into the turbines and loose bolts and ice on the wings. On takeoff, as the plane pushed down the runway and the flaps tilted up, with our seats in their full upright position and our tray tables stowed and all personal carry-on baggage in the overhead compartment, as the end of the runway ran up to meet us with our smoking materials extinguished, I prayed for a crash"
See, back in my day, when Democrats went to Democratic conventions, nobody sat there and bitched about how far to the left everyone was.
Well said.
You know, since I'm not in the land that invented freedom, 1 year ago I had no idea what all this "left vs right" thing meant.
After having read slashdot and wikipedia, I wish I still didn't know (and didn't hate english since [WP] writers obsess over spamming in as many ie / etc / eg as possible). It made me realize I've never understood politics in my country either, but what is there to get?
You blame all problems on "the other side", then you say you'll fix everything, and when you get elected you don't do any of them.
Left is the openminded ("crackpot theories") and poor, and right is the educated and rich. Did I get that right? Then you put every single action and thought into those 2 camps, so you can say stuff like "no, that's a leftist way of thinking, how can that be when he's a republican?".
In the 1980s, when really super awesome elite cool rad computer programming hacking phreaking script kiddies thought they were being eTapped by the FBI on their IRC chat, to get past their filtering software, and since they were too stupid to know about encryption, they'd instead replace letters that looked like numbers. You could call it steganograpomilunami-something.
If you write enough though, you'll realise that stream of concious is the opposite grazism - or, as you'll also realize, "the comma people". Man, I'm so awesome. I would add explanations, but I'm too busy fapping to my ingeniousity.
Google cares about bloggers, why, you might ask? Bloggers make links a lot, Google likes this, it "improves" their PageRank.
That is, if there weren't such a thing as "commercial interests". Which is the whole reason the retarded "splogs" word exists, because Google is so damn good at indexing their own blogging service. I've also seen some spam which didn't contain links at all, just "mind control". Searching on part of the message (crazy huge 2k words) returned 7k hits.
Another thing I just figured out (wow that's great mr smartypants) is any link is counted as positive. I would think a truly honest writer (journal-ist, blog-er, diary-ist) presents just as much positive as negative thoughts (and thus, links) on subjects.
Righto, so back to mr ugly: "One reason why Google is stinkin' rich is because webmasters have never been organized. Even today there are no associations of webmasters that can represent them in court. [...] A copyright decision that addresses search engines in terms of opt-in as opposed to opt-out, would make the web a better place. It may also help solve some of the privacy issues and identity-theft problems that occur when crawlers grab files that they should not be allowed to have"
I think he at least mentions something I haven't thought about, as opposed to mr F-google who just repeats the same shitty drivel over and over, and is of course, a fucking blog. That also brings to light something else - as opposed to websites, the only thing that matters is "speed", you won't notice revisions or any formatting beyond linebreaks (and those stupid ass pictures he must spend half of the site-updating-time to) or any sorting beyond "by date".
You're completely right, rational = dead. Why didn't he write logically about his ideas? Because people don't learn that way. = Socrates + Shakespear.
"Everyone else doesn't know anything, but pretend they do. But I know I know nothing"
Oh, mr Unabomber. The rotten/library page says he needed to get laid. Except that I don't know anything about him, Charles Manson though said a lot of wise things,
"No sense makes sense"
For one, goes well with Einstein's
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen"
(He never figured out eternity though, so not one of my favorite philosphers)
I really need to save my links better, there was a topic about Google stealing all minds of the world, and one guy said grades don't count for anything, since you only get good ones because you can remember things = intellectual, which isn't related to coming up with things = genious.
Dopehead actually. People should cling to that instead of the horse thing, but people are fucking shallow. One learns 100 words on him, and null of it is what he wanted to teach people. So it's my duty to do that, like:
"Some students [...] used the monitoring function to view administrators' own computer screens"
Hmm. So you could sneak into the principal's office and look at a bunch of secret documents or whatever. "But the security was so low". It's not ethical, but that's not related to the hacker ethic of course.
- The Profound - Men of profound thought appear to themselves in intercourse with others like comedians for in order to be understood they must always simulate superficiality
"The facts show that capitalism is the system of freedom - and that it creates wealth. The facts similarly show that statism is the system of repression - and that it causes poverty. Capitalism is the system of freedom and prosperity. Its antithesis - statism in any form - is the system of oppression and destitution"
It's been long since I had the opportunity of coming into contact with such strong propaganda, so, thanks.
Us them us them us them us them us them us them us them.
Return-Path: Original-Recipient: Received: from pne-smtpin3-sn1.fre.skanova.net (81.228.11.100) by pne-ms6.vip.skanova.net (7.2.060.1)
id 42ACD58D01032D7A for 08.53031910@telia.com; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:59:26 +0200 Received: from smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.28) by pne-smtpin3-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.060.1)
id 42B93757010A21FE for 08.53031910@telia.com; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:59:26 +0200 Received: (qmail 17387 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 02:59:22 -0000 Received: from maxwell2.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.192)
by smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 02:59:22 -0000 Received: from [192.168.2.111] ([210.24.127.237])
by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with SMTP
id
for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:59:21 +0800 Message-ID: Reply-To: "goodair4u" From: "goodair4u" To: Subject: No more clean air? Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:59:08 +0000 Organization: sender Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0034_01C221EC.6C64F7B 0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced by Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Dear friends
What happen when air got polluted? Can I just close the door and switch on air-conditional?
What kind of sickness we can encounter? The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome?
Who could be affected next?
If you can't even foresee, how to prevent it?
"Cleaner Air For People Who Care. Healthier Air With BEL'AIR"
For the price of a cup of coffee, You can help to secure your family's health.
For more information, please contact: goodair4u@hotmail.com
Not only this items can produce oxygen, help to give you clean air for your house. It is so good till it is adopted as an Aroma Biotechnology, the choice is Bel'Air
Only we have the Following: TEST CERTIFICATES FROM AROUND THE WORLD
* Test certificate from FRANCE'S AGROHALL
* Test report from TAIWAN'S National Yang Ming University
* Test report from BEIJING'S Institute of Science and Preventive Medicine
* Test report from The infection Management and Research Department of CHINA PLA General Hospital
* Test report from NIHON University
* Test report from SINGAPORE'S PSB
Bacteria elimination rate up to 96% to give clean and healthy air.
Regards goodair4u@hotmail.com
PS: Many of us who started part-time and have turned full-time running it as own business from home and now earn more than what we can ever believe it is possible. Best still, it pays for life! Retire young and retire rich!
Note: If you would like to remove from the list, please mail to goodair4u@hotmail.com with remove me as subject.
Well, it was a quick writing, so 1 error I see now is writing 30% regeneration instead of 3%. Right, after re-reading the September 1993 issue of Spin magazine, interview with professor Peter Duesberg [WBM], some quotes:
With drugs, the dose is the poison. You take one aspirin, you lose your headache, you take 200, you drop dead. You smoke one pack of cigarettes, you're fine, but if you smoke two packs of cigarettes [a day] for 10 or 20 years, you may get emphysema. It is the same with drugs. If you snort a line of cocaine on a weekend, you probably won't notice the difference. But if you inject it intravenously two or three times a day, that's when the toxicity shows up. We're designed to take some shit. But we're not designed to inject cocaine three times a day. People have been having a little cocaine in their tea in South America, yes, but not injecting it three times a day, and nobody was inhaling nitrites - nitrites are toxic as hell. Nobody was taking amphetamines at those doses; they were not available. That's what's new.
*
An autoimmune disease is a misdirected immune response. It cannot tell a harmful virus from a harmless one, it overreacts. If the virus were the trigger, that should follow as soon as the virus gets in you.
*
They call it "Idiopathic CD-4 lymphocytopenia." Or ICL. When you're HIV-free now, it's no longer called AIDS.
*
They accept what you call "presumptive diagnosis" - AIDS cases without HIV tests. You know what that means? The guy wears a leather jacket, has an earring, and is coughing. And he's from San Francisco. That's an AIDS case. I don't even have to check it, his physician thinks.
[...] Even in the latest AIDS definition, in January 1993, they allowed presumptive diagnosis. In other words, a good number of them even now will be reported without an HIV test.
*
Now, what's the prediction for a non-infectious disease, a toxic disease? One of them is, it's not distributed equally between the sexes or randomly in the population, it's distributed according to exposure. The smokers are the ones who get lung cancer, the nonsmokers hardly ever get it. The alcoholics get the liver cirrhosis and not the milk drinkers. And so it's exposure to the toxin. The health consequences are not immediate. You don't get sick from one cigarette. It takes years of build-up. You have to reach a certain threshold of toxicity.
*
In 1984, in Science, Gallo said HIV kills T-cells and that is the cause of AIDS. Also in 1984, in May, he signed under oath to the U.S. Patent Office that this same virus can be produced in permanently growing human T-cells. And these T-cells are still growing in his laboratory, in dozens of companies on this planet, enough to conduct at least 25 million tests per year in this country alone, over 20 million in Russia, millions all over the world. These T-cells have yet to die.
[...] If I understand you correctly, if you isolate the polio virus, and you apply it to healthy cells, it will infect those cells?
It will kill those cells in 8 hours.
*
That is the reason why we have chased retroviruses so dearly in the last 20 years, because we thought they might be a cause of cancer. Because they don't kill cells. That's why Gallo is a retrovirologist, or David Baltimore [Nobel Prize-winning researcher who discovered reverse transcriptase] or me. We were chasing this class of viruses as possible carcinogens. Cancer is caused by cells that grow out of control, not by cells that are dying.
*
A scientist is not a politically correct crowd pleaser, he is supposed to find the cause of disease. Otherwise, we get what we get now: we try to please the gays by approving AZT, and now 200,000 of them are dying for it, and we keep telling them that this is the best we can do for you guys, because we mix politics with science.
*
Drug addicts have always been described with the same d
The interview mentions that? (Didn't know slashdot broke WBM)
What about teenagers with AIDS?
780 in the United States in the last ten years, so divided by year that's 78 per year in a country with 30 million teenagers. A third are hemophiliacs, another third are gay prostitutes, and another third are IV-drug users who started at 10 and 11. Those are your 780 American teenagers with AIDS. That's not a lot. The only significant number in people under 20 are the infants. One-or twoyear-old, possibly three-year-old babies born with AIDS in Europe and in America. A full 80 percent of them were born to mothers who were injecting drugs during pregnancy. These kids are intrauterine junkies. They have been on drugs since before they were born.
What about the other 20 percent?
Another 5 or 10 percent are congenital conditions like hemophilia. Some are simply infant mortality under a new name, "ghetto kids." Infant mortality is higher in this country than in all comparable industrialized nations. We have the suburbs, where you get every health care you want, and then we have places like Harlem, Richmond, Oakland, deep impoverished conditions, that you don't find in Europe where you have socialized medicine. Starvation, malnutrition, all these kinds of things. Teenage mothers who run away from the kids, or are working on the streets while the kids are alone at home. Those are the American AIDS babies.
Is it really true that the death rate among hemophiliacs with HIV is identical to those without HIV?
As far as we can tell from the few studies available, it's the same. In fact, the irony is, it is probably even lower. And I tell you how I arrived at that. There are 20,000 American hemophiliacs, 75 percent of them are HIV-positive. 75 percent-or 15,000-have HIV, for nearly ten years now, because as of 1984-85 they started AIDS testing, so they eliminated blood with HIV. Now, in the last 10 to 15 years, the median age of hemophiliacs has doubled. They are now twice as old as they were 10 to 15 years ago. The fact is, during that same 10 to 15 years, the Factor-VIII treatment has been developed and perfected and everybody gets it. That's the clotting factor that's missing in hemophiliacs, extracted out of blood donations and because they extract it, you extract viruses, too; that contaminated FactorVIII. But they are irrelevant, mostly harmless things, because a blood donor is typically not a terribly sick person-you wouldn't collect blood from somebody who's dying from a disease. So these are usually your ubiquitous little microbes that don't harm you. As a result, they picked up HIV. So the treatment that also brought them HIV has doubled their life.
HIV didn't hurt them?
No. In fact, it disproved the virus hypothesis in the largest human experiment ever done. 15,000 people infected with HIV. And now they live twice as long as hemophiliacs ever lived before in history. Better, longer.
It's really an overwhelming point. It's not a minor experiment. We have a huge population: 15,000 people with HIV. Sure, it's true, some of them get what they call AIDS now. But they get less of it than they did before, and they get it because of transfusions. Because even now, they constantly get these transfusions. They need FactorVIII. It's not chemically clean, and that is immunosuppressive.
Slashdot Mirror
It only has the higher rez at the starting screen.
It's just filetypes they have fully indexed (though they could index the id3 / metadata).
"Songs are sold through albums, which average $15 for maybe 13 tunes [...] Artists get - from a generous publisher - three cents on the dollar. That's 45 cents an album sold. [...] By eliminating the middle-man - the record industry - artists can charge, say, 5 cents per song and STILL come out ahead of what they'd have gotten through selling CDs" (E2) (Trying to find the link on google says even lower numbers...)
1) I noticed a new one, or maybe it was to be expected.
Pro-arab = anti-american.
(So I could assume the replyee implies whatever is anti-american can safely be removed without their knowledge)
In this one, the replies say it's "leftist" thinking, I didn't see anything of that, just opinions.
The bushism WP article is still up, even with a want of changing it to "Bush opponents select quotes from his speeches to create an impression of incompetence. Other politicians make just as many mistakes, but get a pass (see liberal media bias)."
So the main thing seems to be whatever the media indoctrinates as "american" one should (as a right-ist) blindly follow.
For "crackpots" I mean them in the "anti-science" way, whatever questions commonly held scientific facts based on psychedelic induced visions, or just plainly thinking about it (philosophy). (Now is that more left or right? Must train my stereotyping skills)
In relation to "blindly follow", here's some crackpot theory:
- Doubt as sin -
Christianity has done its utmost to close the circle and declared even doubt to be sin. One is supposed to be cast into belief without reason, by a miracle, and from then on to swim in it as in the brightest and least ambiguous of elements: even a glance towards land, even the thought that one perhaps exists for something else as well as swimming, even the slightest impulse of our amphibious nature - is sin! And notice that all this means that the foundation of belief and all reflection on its origin is likewise excluded as sinful. What is wanted are blindness and intoxication and an eternal song over the waves in which reason has drowned.
{Nietzsche's Daybreak, s. 89, R.J. Hollingdale translation}
Well, it's more than just that:
(From a random casual chat)
I can't see photobucket stuff.
China firewall blocks?
Yup.
And bbc, blogspot.com, geocities, angelfire are the main ones that are blocked.
Sometimes google when political events occur.
Or you type stuff like "china nuclear weapons".
When some leader from I dunno, egypt or something visit china they'll block google for a few days.
*
BTW, I found this post from 2004 mentioning arab sites being blocked (guess where).
He just forgot
"then cross out all stories which could serve as wanking material"
"One should no more deplore homosexuality than left-handedness"
{Towards a Quaker View of Sex}
So,
fag.
I read all ads as aids. Also sew as screw. It's kinda fun. I suppose.
Damn terrorists... we need to inject democrazy bombs there and fill their women with liberty silicone! They look a little skimpy too, some freedom fries would do them good.
It's all egoism one way or another. Finding things to exploit makes you feel good, dollars make you feel good, being able to make the world panic makes you feel good, having your name on this particular "monster" which does this makes you feel good.
and most likely will welcome death after 30
"Every takeoff and landing, when the plane banked too much to 1 side, I prayed for a crash. That moment cures my insomnia with narcolepsy when we might die helpless and packed human tobacco in the fuselage. [...] Life insurance pays off triple if you die on a business trip. I prayed for wind shear effect. I prayed for pelicans sucked into the turbines and loose bolts and ice on the wings. On takeoff, as the plane pushed down the runway and the flaps tilted up, with our seats in their full upright position and our tray tables stowed and all personal carry-on baggage in the overhead compartment, as the end of the runway ran up to meet us with our smoking materials extinguished, I prayed for a crash"
See, back in my day, when Democrats went to Democratic conventions, nobody sat there and bitched about how far to the left everyone was.
Well said.
You know, since I'm not in the land that invented freedom, 1 year ago I had no idea what all this "left vs right" thing meant.
After having read slashdot and wikipedia, I wish I still didn't know (and didn't hate english since [WP] writers obsess over spamming in as many ie / etc / eg as possible). It made me realize I've never understood politics in my country either, but what is there to get?
You blame all problems on "the other side", then you say you'll fix everything, and when you get elected you don't do any of them.
Left is the openminded ("crackpot theories") and poor, and right is the educated and rich. Did I get that right? Then you put every single action and thought into those 2 camps, so you can say stuff like "no, that's a leftist way of thinking, how can that be when he's a republican?".
In the 1980s, when really super awesome elite cool rad computer programming hacking phreaking script kiddies thought they were being eTapped by the FBI on their IRC chat, to get past their filtering software, and since they were too stupid to know about encryption, they'd instead replace letters that looked like numbers. You could call it steganograpomilunami-something.
If you write enough though, you'll realise that stream of concious is the opposite grazism - or, as you'll also realize, "the comma people". Man, I'm so awesome. I would add explanations, but I'm too busy fapping to my ingeniousity.
900,000 vs 16,000,000
That's real clever sir
Still, something of note:
Deviantart is a shit-site that you might not care about, but I noticed something really strange about the Google "indexing"...
Any kind of communication on the site is saved in the "comment" subdomain. (If you delete a pic/journal the comments on them are still stored)
So to find something easily, you just do site:deviantart.com inurl:comments
This gives us: "Results 1 - 10 of about 951,000"
Over 900k man, that's a lot!
Now the hit that includes that part of the site is the third anyway, this one:
comments.deviantart.com/5/6169392/159452388
You know what we do next? We take the first 10 words from that text, and we search for them.
I tried this a week ago, and now I was thinking Google might of noticed that and indexed it, or something.
Has it?
No.
THE FIRST HIT OF NEAR A MILLION.
Something else of note is the last number in the address, 159452388
159,452,388
160 million.
There has only been 160 million comments, and Google somehow has indexed 6x the amount.
(Trust me, ok, the other numbers are just for sorting)
That's easy to explain though: because of the tree structure ("nested" on slashdot) of comments.
But what should that mean? THAT I'D GET MULTIPLE RESULTS.
So what does this whole anti-indexing mean?
Now, a link to the ugliest site in the universe (The author seemingly surfs with 640x480 4/8-bit in win3.1... and uses the evil empire's toolbar)
Google cares about bloggers, why, you might ask? Bloggers make links a lot, Google likes this, it "improves" their PageRank.
That is, if there weren't such a thing as "commercial interests". Which is the whole reason the retarded "splogs" word exists, because Google is so damn good at indexing their own blogging service. I've also seen some spam which didn't contain links at all, just "mind control". Searching on part of the message (crazy huge 2k words) returned 7k hits.
Another thing I just figured out (wow that's great mr smartypants) is any link is counted as positive. I would think a truly honest writer (journal-ist, blog-er, diary-ist) presents just as much positive as negative thoughts (and thus, links) on subjects.
Righto, so back to mr ugly: "One reason why Google is stinkin' rich is because webmasters have never been organized. Even today there are no associations of webmasters that can represent them in court. [...] A copyright decision that addresses search engines in terms of opt-in as opposed to opt-out, would make the web a better place. It may also help solve some of the privacy issues and identity-theft problems that occur when crawlers grab files that they should not be allowed to have"
I think he at least mentions something I haven't thought about, as opposed to mr F-google who just repeats the same shitty drivel over and over, and is of course, a fucking blog. That also brings to light something else - as opposed to websites, the only thing that matters is "speed", you won't notice revisions or any formatting beyond linebreaks (and those stupid ass pictures he must spend half of the site-updating-time to) or any sorting beyond "by date".
You're completely right, rational = dead. Why didn't he write logically about his ideas? Because people don't learn that way. = Socrates + Shakespear.
"Everyone else doesn't know anything, but pretend they do. But I know I know nothing"
Oh, mr Unabomber. The rotten/library page says he needed to get laid. Except that I don't know anything about him, Charles Manson though said a lot of wise things,
"No sense makes sense"
For one, goes well with Einstein's
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen"
(He never figured out eternity though, so not one of my favorite philosphers)
I really need to save my links better, there was a topic about Google stealing all minds of the world, and one guy said grades don't count for anything, since you only get good ones because you can remember things = intellectual, which isn't related to coming up with things = genious.
Dopehead actually. People should cling to that instead of the horse thing, but people are fucking shallow. One learns 100 words on him, and null of it is what he wanted to teach people. So it's my duty to do that, like:
In music the passions enjoy themselves
"Some students [...] used the monitoring function to view administrators' own computer screens"
Hmm. So you could sneak into the principal's office and look at a bunch of secret documents or whatever. "But the security was so low". It's not ethical, but that's not related to the hacker ethic of course.
- The Profound -
Men of profound thought
appear to themselves in intercourse with others
like comedians
for in order to be understood
they must always simulate superficiality
[Nietzchse]
"The facts show that capitalism is the system of freedom - and that it creates wealth. The facts similarly show that statism is the system of repression - and that it causes poverty. Capitalism is the system of freedom and prosperity. Its antithesis - statism in any form - is the system of oppression and destitution"
It's been long since I had the opportunity of coming into contact with such strong propaganda, so, thanks.
Us them us them us them us them us them us them us them.
Lesse if I got it right:
Freedom = capitalism = christianity = cash wealthy = imperialism = marriage = fact = beer <> french = communism = islam = soul wealthy = feudalism = hedonism = fiction = acid.
Results 1 - 10 of about 6,150 for inurl:slashdot.org google beta. (0.03 seconds)
News results for inurl:slashdot.org google beta - View today's top stories
GMail Out Of Beta - Slashdot - 3 hours ago
This business would of appretiated it:
B 0"
Return-Path:
Original-Recipient:
Received: from pne-smtpin3-sn1.fre.skanova.net (81.228.11.100) by pne-ms6.vip.skanova.net (7.2.060.1)
id 42ACD58D01032D7A for 08.53031910@telia.com; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:59:26 +0200
Received: from smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.28) by pne-smtpin3-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.060.1)
id 42B93757010A21FE for 08.53031910@telia.com; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:59:26 +0200
Received: (qmail 17387 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 02:59:22 -0000
Received: from maxwell2.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.192)
by smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 02:59:22 -0000
Received: from [192.168.2.111] ([210.24.127.237])
by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with SMTP
id
for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:59:21 +0800
Message-ID:
Reply-To: "goodair4u"
From: "goodair4u"
To:
Subject: No more clean air?
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:59:08 +0000
Organization: sender
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0034_01C221EC.6C64F7
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
X-MimeOLE: Produced by Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Dear friends
What happen when air got polluted? Can I just close the door and switch on air-conditional?
What kind of sickness we can encounter? The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome?
Who could be affected next?
If you can't even foresee, how to prevent it?
"Cleaner Air For People Who Care. Healthier Air With BEL'AIR"
For the price of a cup of coffee, You can help to secure your family's health.
For more information, please contact: goodair4u@hotmail.com
Not only this items can produce oxygen, help to give you clean air for your house. It is so good till it is adopted as an Aroma Biotechnology, the choice is Bel'Air
Only we have the Following:
TEST CERTIFICATES FROM AROUND THE WORLD
* Test certificate from FRANCE'S AGROHALL
* Test report from TAIWAN'S National Yang Ming University
* Test report from BEIJING'S Institute of Science and Preventive Medicine
* Test report from The infection Management and Research Department of CHINA PLA General Hospital
* Test report from NIHON University
* Test report from SINGAPORE'S PSB
Bacteria elimination rate up to 96% to give clean and healthy air.
Regards
goodair4u@hotmail.com
PS: Many of us who started part-time and have turned full-time running it as own business from home and now earn more than what we can ever believe it is possible. Best still, it pays for life! Retire young and retire rich!
Note: If you would like to remove from the list, please mail to goodair4u@hotmail.com with remove me as subject.
The guy I got the links from says you can fix it by going raw vegan. He also says staring into the sun improved his vision.