The DNC literally rigged a national primary election to get the result they wanted.
1. It's their party. A political party is not part of the government, but is rather a private institution. They can run any candidate they like.
2. I love how you guys keep saying that it was perfectly acceptable for *Trump* to subvert the *GOP* nomination process beyond any shred of creditability while at the same time lambasting the Dems for failing to select a candidate who plainly did not and never was going to have enough votes to secure the nomination, much less the election.
As for the ads, they were the false-flag ops you nutters should have been worried about--the ones used to spread lies much the same as those lies you're spouting now.
Not to mention quite a few dead Chinese--you thought those railroads built themselves, did you?
And not a few dead Mexicans, come to think of it, whom we can thank for California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and chunks of several adjoining states.
I guess I've been away for too long--do they really not teach any US history in US schools any more?
You really need to quit depending on falsehoods and half-truths as a basis for what you seem to think is "logic".
Calling IS a "religious group" is like calling the Nazis an "ethnic affinity group", and you are dishonest and/or just plain stupid to suggest otherwise.
If he really believes that it's okay to counter *any* perceived threat with deadly force and he's acted on it, then he's very likely posting from prison.
We're finding more and more that what were thought to be expressions of free will, such as disliking the taste of coriander, or otherwise random, like being able to roll ones tongue, are instead genetically determined.
WTF? Have you been sleeping under a rock for the last 100+ years?
Neither of those, to the best of my knowledge, has ever been considered an act of "free will".
I certainly don't choose to find licorice disgusting--in fact, I've tried many times to get myself to like it, but, all efforts to the contrary notwithstanding, it still tastes like, well, cat shit to me.
And we've known about the tongue rolling thing being passed on for decades--it was used specifically as an example of an inheritable trait in a text I read as a kid in the 1970s.
After hitting the fourth sentence and wondering what the Sam Hill selling tubers had to do with needlecraft, I realised it was time to clean my glasses. Thanks.
...a gay man and a woman...
You mean, like Ernst Röhm and Leni Riefenstahl?
I never said the GOP rigged their primary*. They did do a nice job of bending over for Trump, though, and didn't even demand any lube.
*And even if they had, it's their primary and they can run it however they choose to.
Don't you worry--you'll get that pesky moose and squirrel some day, I'm sure.
Hugs to Natasha,
Z.
For those of you who are challenged by URL de-obfuscators: Yes, that's a goatse link.
Maybe you should do something about that cognitive dissonance thing, or maybe you've already forgot what your own sig says.
Wrapping *shit somebody obviously made up* in a quote doesn't suddenly make it true.
You obviously know what you're talking about. What are you doing posting on Slashdot?
The DNC literally rigged a national primary election to get the result they wanted.
1. It's their party. A political party is not part of the government, but is rather a private institution. They can run any candidate they like.
2. I love how you guys keep saying that it was perfectly acceptable for *Trump* to subvert the *GOP* nomination process beyond any shred of creditability while at the same time lambasting the Dems for failing to select a candidate who plainly did not and never was going to have enough votes to secure the nomination, much less the election.
As for the ads, they were the false-flag ops you nutters should have been worried about--the ones used to spread lies much the same as those lies you're spouting now.
Coincidence? You think so, really?
... people would find 'workarounds' for every law and spend their days creatively robbing and killing each other.
They do a pretty good job of that already.
Yes, we should totally ignore the fact that the majority of PDP's fanbase is American, and that he knows it.
Yeah, that worked out real well for the Germans ca. 1932.
And a lot of dead black people.
Not to mention quite a few dead Chinese--you thought those railroads built themselves, did you?
And not a few dead Mexicans, come to think of it, whom we can thank for California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and chunks of several adjoining states.
I guess I've been away for too long--do they really not teach any US history in US schools any more?
They should try being left handed if they really want to know oppression.
It's possible to order a refrigerator or freezer with the door hung the other way. I have one.
A lot of dead Native Americans would like to talk to you.
You really need to quit depending on falsehoods and half-truths as a basis for what you seem to think is "logic".
Calling IS a "religious group" is like calling the Nazis an "ethnic affinity group", and you are dishonest and/or just plain stupid to suggest otherwise.
To them even stating that Nazis started WWII is already racist.
Please cite an *original* source for *evidence* backing up this claim.
If he really believes that it's okay to counter *any* perceived threat with deadly force and he's acted on it, then he's very likely posting from prison.
#WhiteLivesAlreadyMattered.
We're finding more and more that what were thought to be expressions of free will, such as disliking the taste of coriander, or otherwise random, like being able to roll ones tongue, are instead genetically determined.
WTF? Have you been sleeping under a rock for the last 100+ years?
Neither of those, to the best of my knowledge, has ever been considered an act of "free will".
I certainly don't choose to find licorice disgusting--in fact, I've tried many times to get myself to like it, but, all efforts to the contrary notwithstanding, it still tastes like, well, cat shit to me.
And we've known about the tongue rolling thing being passed on for decades--it was used specifically as an example of an inheritable trait in a text I read as a kid in the 1970s.
That's not a very nice thing to say about Mrs Cohn. And I don't think she got elected to anything, in any case.
And dumbots like you need sarcasm detectors.
TL;DR: Whooooosh.
Can't have regular Chinese moving their funds overseas like the sons and daughters of central committee members.
That's a pretty silly thing to say and just provides evidence that you've not got a clue about the actual situation there.
(Also: You did in fact mean the tuber and not the root vegetable that's often mistaken for it in the US and Canada, right?)
(Yes, such questions can and do arise when one is sleepless at 3.30 in the morning.)
Didn't Amazon try that and end up offering to sell underwear to everyone?
After hitting the fourth sentence and wondering what the Sam Hill selling tubers had to do with needlecraft, I realised it was time to clean my glasses. Thanks.