Not seeing mobile data doing that until coverage is perfect and the price plummets - at least for Canada. Considering how long people were/are still on dialup past people saying 'everyone has broadband'?
I ran it in parallel with Firefox, mirroring every action, back when Firefox when firefox changed its UI: 300 tabs on each, playing videos and long text pages heavy css, and without closing for a few weeks.
The memory footprint was over a gig in PaleMoon-64s favour, and it wasn't showing any appreciable slowdown in performance. Can't speak towards Firefox nowadays, but I will note Pale Moon does seem to pick up a stutter with some videos lately if not shutdown. That could be entirely unrelated though.
You assume the question was asked without already knowing the answer:P I find it amusing to spark them into a chain of excuses as to why 'that is different!', until they are willing to talk instead of demand.
So does this mean the children will not be posting things about their family in return? They won't be over-sharing about their classmates or drunk uncle or rant how parent x is doing this that and the other thing?
If someone calls in the middle of the night, it's the middle of the night. The End. I've had calls simply because other person didn't realise it was late, because of pocket dialing, because of wrong number, because they assumed I'd be awake, because time-zone differences, and because they assumed it'd have went straight to voice mail. Hardly by any stretch is a night-time phone call automatically an emergency.
Overhearing both sides of a conversation is less attention-demanding than just hearing one side - brain gets the fun puzzle of trying to recreate the unheard side.
Which is amusing when it comes to things like "Yes, your servers are in another nation, but you are American/do business in America, therefore we demand to see what's on your servers.'
Pretty much distills to: "whatever view favours us"
What are the numbers for damage to humans and environment from the rare-earth manufacturing from china? One can hardly tout numbers resultant from accidents from stupidity without equally making accounting for cost-cutting malfeasance.
If the timeline for the incident is as tight as the the various papers had the eyewitness accounts, there was another vehicle between him and the parked, no-lights car. The driver of the vehicle in-between barely swerved out of the way in time upon noting the parked car, then stated she saw another vehical (the motorcyclist) didn't clear it. That distraction of her swerve could have drawn the motor cyclists attention just long enough to prevent him from swerving himself.
As for speed, police estimate speeding of of 20 to 30kmph over the limit (no idea what speed the vehicle that swerved was doing, but unlikely to been slower than the motorcyclist else the cyclist would have been up in her muffler - so assuming 'keeping with flow'), while the wife is saying 'we were doing 5kmph under the speed limit because I'm a nervous driver but we were traveling together as a family'.
From the article, that was the upper end estimated by the police. 70~80 [113~129 kmph] was the estimate, and at least in the Ontario highways (yes, I know that it's Quebec, but they are even worse) it is extremely common for traffic to flow at 15km over the speed limit. Of course, the wife of the motorcyclists claims they were only doing 85 kmph.
She also didn't even bother to put on the hazard lights when she stopped in the passing land, simply stopped and hopped out - not even closing her door. Additionally, other drivers nearly struck the parked car, saying they had no ability to stop but could only swerve. She definitely deserves negligence for deciding to park in the middle of a highway.
You know, I'd almost say you had a point, excepting those people that bought Win 7 then woke up to Win 10. Then put Win 7 back on, only to wake up to Win 10 as it was now an important update. They chose to run a different one of the OSs after all. Don't recall anywhere in the installs that says they can freely use up bandwidth either (of import for those that tether).
For the record, you're stating that prescience is a requisite of posting on/., and before this information became known they should have already known and turned the non-advert-labeled option off or used a different OS? Also, those that do not post on/. but are outraged by this behavior, are they allowed to be so?
Seriously. We were watching it in my eighth grade class, and the debris was still falling when the first wisecrack "...they let the woman drive" got mentioned. By the end of the day the NASA one and "Why did the vending machine serve only coke? They couldn't get seven up" were made.
Later, found the same jokes/variants were made at other schools. The take-away I got from that event was that jokes (and ideas) can have multiple independent sources, so claiming 'ownership' seemed silly. Somewhat think that was the most important thing I learned at school that year.
As long as you and whomever else watches HD TV want to watch the same show, sure. It breaks down when the wife is watching house renovations, the husband is watching some old war movie, and the kid is watching minecraft videos while also playing it. As people turn from watching cable/sat tv to watching streamed programs, I'm seeing this become more common.
Not all (few?) trans are SJW, but the seeming majority of SJW compete in an 'Oppression Olympics' where the more 'oppressed groups' they can self-identify (intersectionality, ho!) they can gain more 'oppression points' and thus a higher place in the hierarchy: 'I am more oppressed than you, so my view is more valid'.
Thus was born the 'non-binary gender-fluid, pansexual transracial somethingsomething and a toaster too', fresh off of tumblr.
If you look at them and meet/don't meet their eyes, it was literally rape. And please, never ever ask if they want to have a coffee. That's worse than ISIS.
I'm in favour of plugging the leak by throwing upper management into it. If that doesn't suffice, throw middle management into the leak. If it still fails, there shouldn't be anyone to complain about just burning the methane. Deterrent and solution, all rolled into one.
Slashdot Mirror
Never make me tea.
Don't. Give. Them. Ideas.
~Rest of Canada
There was an entire cell of terrorists that did.
Presumably: 'Attention Whore'.
People end up paying for both?
Not seeing mobile data doing that until coverage is perfect and the price plummets - at least for Canada. Considering how long people were/are still on dialup past people saying 'everyone has broadband'?
I ran it in parallel with Firefox, mirroring every action, back when Firefox when firefox changed its UI: 300 tabs on each, playing videos and long text pages heavy css, and without closing for a few weeks.
The memory footprint was over a gig in PaleMoon-64s favour, and it wasn't showing any appreciable slowdown in performance. Can't speak towards Firefox nowadays, but I will note Pale Moon does seem to pick up a stutter with some videos lately if not shutdown. That could be entirely unrelated though.
You assume the question was asked without already knowing the answer :P
I find it amusing to spark them into a chain of excuses as to why 'that is different!', until they are willing to talk instead of demand.
So does this mean the children will not be posting things about their family in return? They won't be over-sharing about their classmates or drunk uncle or rant how parent x is doing this that and the other thing?
Almost assuredly could be, especially if the other person has an allergic reaction to it.
http://www.torontosun.com/2011/10/02/woman-charged-in-perfume-assault
If someone calls in the middle of the night, it's the middle of the night. The End. I've had calls simply because other person didn't realise it was late, because of pocket dialing, because of wrong number, because they assumed I'd be awake, because time-zone differences, and because they assumed it'd have went straight to voice mail. Hardly by any stretch is a night-time phone call automatically an emergency.
Overhearing both sides of a conversation is less attention-demanding than just hearing one side - brain gets the fun puzzle of trying to recreate the unheard side.
Which is amusing when it comes to things like "Yes, your servers are in another nation, but you are American/do business in America, therefore we demand to see what's on your servers.'
Pretty much distills to: "whatever view favours us"
What are the numbers for damage to humans and environment from the rare-earth manufacturing from china? One can hardly tout numbers resultant from accidents from stupidity without equally making accounting for cost-cutting malfeasance.
If the timeline for the incident is as tight as the the various papers had the eyewitness accounts, there was another vehicle between him and the parked, no-lights car. The driver of the vehicle in-between barely swerved out of the way in time upon noting the parked car, then stated she saw another vehical (the motorcyclist) didn't clear it. That distraction of her swerve could have drawn the motor cyclists attention just long enough to prevent him from swerving himself.
As for speed, police estimate speeding of of 20 to 30kmph over the limit (no idea what speed the vehicle that swerved was doing, but unlikely to been slower than the motorcyclist else the cyclist would have been up in her muffler - so assuming 'keeping with flow'), while the wife is saying 'we were doing 5kmph under the speed limit because I'm a nervous driver but we were traveling together as a family'.
From the article, that was the upper end estimated by the police. 70~80 [113~129 kmph] was the estimate, and at least in the Ontario highways (yes, I know that it's Quebec, but they are even worse) it is extremely common for traffic to flow at 15km over the speed limit. Of course, the wife of the motorcyclists claims they were only doing 85 kmph.
She also didn't even bother to put on the hazard lights when she stopped in the passing land, simply stopped and hopped out - not even closing her door. Additionally, other drivers nearly struck the parked car, saying they had no ability to stop but could only swerve. She definitely deserves negligence for deciding to park in the middle of a highway.
It's called 'reversed out into traffic'.
You know, I'd almost say you had a point, excepting those people that bought Win 7 then woke up to Win 10. Then put Win 7 back on, only to wake up to Win 10 as it was now an important update. They chose to run a different one of the OSs after all. Don't recall anywhere in the installs that says they can freely use up bandwidth either (of import for those that tether).
/., and before this information became known they should have already known and turned the non-advert-labeled option off or used a different OS? Also, those that do not post on /. but are outraged by this behavior, are they allowed to be so?
For the record, you're stating that prescience is a requisite of posting on
Seriously. We were watching it in my eighth grade class, and the debris was still falling when the first wisecrack "...they let the woman drive" got mentioned. By the end of the day the NASA one and "Why did the vending machine serve only coke? They couldn't get seven up" were made.
Later, found the same jokes/variants were made at other schools. The take-away I got from that event was that jokes (and ideas) can have multiple independent sources, so claiming 'ownership' seemed silly. Somewhat think that was the most important thing I learned at school that year.
As long as you and whomever else watches HD TV want to watch the same show, sure. It breaks down when the wife is watching house renovations, the husband is watching some old war movie, and the kid is watching minecraft videos while also playing it. As people turn from watching cable/sat tv to watching streamed programs, I'm seeing this become more common.
Not all (few?) trans are SJW, but the seeming majority of SJW compete in an 'Oppression Olympics' where the more 'oppressed groups' they can self-identify (intersectionality, ho!) they can gain more 'oppression points' and thus a higher place in the hierarchy: 'I am more oppressed than you, so my view is more valid'.
Thus was born the 'non-binary gender-fluid, pansexual transracial somethingsomething and a toaster too', fresh off of tumblr.
If you look at them and meet/don't meet their eyes, it was literally rape. And please, never ever ask if they want to have a coffee. That's worse than ISIS.
I'm in favour of plugging the leak by throwing upper management into it. If that doesn't suffice, throw middle management into the leak. If it still fails, there shouldn't be anyone to complain about just burning the methane. Deterrent and solution, all rolled into one.
...I think the worst part is that with way things are, I'd actually have to search to find out if you're serious or not.
Depends where he put the noose I suppose.
Neither is being Israeli; Judaism. is. Which goes to another issue, of conflating race and religion when there is significant overlap.
That said, most of Japan is Buddhist, they only die Shinto =P
Japan