You can see who is visiting your site, unless they are using an anonymizer proxy, or other system to hide your headers. The HTTP-REFERRER header gives you exactly this information.
Technically this is not true. The HTTP-REFERRER only shows you who sends people to your site by a link, not who links to it. Just because you can tell where someone came from doesn't change the structure of a link. The link its self is truly one way.
We(anon) switched to using GNU Autoconf about 2 years ago, there is nothing like it to make it easier to build on mulitple architectures. All the info you need to #ifdef your heart away is easily accessable.
For some reason in the past decade or so, there has been a real movement to convince the consumer that if something can make money it should. This basically throws fair use out the window and requires the consumer to keep spending more and more for less and less. It frightens me to think what the end result of this path would be.
The Game rocks!!!! I bought it yesterday. The single player is better than average(good story, graphics and gameplay) but the multiplayer is the best out there. Combining the best parts of Team Fortress Classic(characterization and strategy) with Plot and Objectives. Plus smooth play, cool weapons and Huge maps!!!!!!!! Definatly worth the more than average new game price in my opinion.
This doesn't affect the ability of States to tax internet sales does it? I know Michigan keeps telling me I am required to pay taxes no matter where I buy from. Is this correct?
It doesn't matter if it takes a long time for linux to gain a share. It isn't there to make money. Sure it matters to Red Hat etc... but if they don't change their business models to keep up with changes someone else will.
I don't think these are really intended for 1st world markets. If you haven't eaten in a couple of days I bet the purple potato caserole would start
looking pretty good.
Despite the rhetoric. Communal effort can have a good effect in a democratic capitolist society(before you flame I am not anti capitolist, quite the contrary). Supply and demand economics require a limited supply, in software great effort is spent making the appearance of limited supply... hence much of the stuff we 'love' about MS.
The fact is software once written is extrodinarily cheap to copy. In a communal software enviornment everyone benifits. People who wish a better product have the right to make any product so, and they don't lose anything(as in a commodity) by giving it away. This of course will not work with cars or any other material item as there is an actual limit on supply.
Just because something can make a profit doesn't mean it neccisarily should. Some unnamed companies say they are innovating but if they would let the open source community do their thing they could make something new and actually innovate and then EVERYONE would benefit.
Why doesn't this happen? When you have a product that is making gobs of money why bother! Now the interesting thing is IMHO this is not the corporations fault. This is what the corporation is supposed to do, make money and provide jobs. It is the CONSUMER's responsibility to make sure they are not being abused by the corporation and the GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE's responsibility to provide the consumer with the channels to do so.
You're missing the point.
In order to be able to claim %99.99999 uptime you
would have to do your reboot in 3 seconds. It is
possible to boot in 2.1 seconds in a high
performance box with a tight kernel. If the person
running the box is 'a silly fool still running ext2, then they probably don't care about the
%99.99999 uptime.
Slashdot Mirror
You can see who is visiting your site, unless they are using an anonymizer proxy, or other system to hide your headers. The HTTP-REFERRER header gives you exactly this information.
Technically this is not true. The HTTP-REFERRER only shows you who sends people to your site by a link, not who links to it. Just because you can tell where someone came from doesn't change the structure of a link. The link its self is truly one way.
Given that this theory is what? 40-50 years old. I would guess that the cat is dead, regardless of the isotope.
We(anon) switched to using GNU Autoconf about 2 years ago, there is nothing like it to make it easier to build on mulitple architectures. All the info you need to #ifdef your heart away is easily accessable.
For some reason in the past decade or so, there has been a real movement to convince the consumer that if something can make money it should. This basically throws fair use out the window and requires the consumer to keep spending more and more for less and less. It frightens me to think what the end result of this path would be.
The Game rocks!!!! I bought it yesterday. The single player is better than average(good story, graphics and gameplay) but the multiplayer is the best out there. Combining the best parts of Team Fortress Classic(characterization and strategy) with Plot and Objectives. Plus smooth play, cool weapons and Huge maps!!!!!!!! Definatly worth the more than average new game price in my opinion.
Ahh yes, the girl next door. I have to agree.
What about Ginger?!?
Come to think of it.. what about ginger?
I can understand the problems for a business, but why is it so bad for someone just to know the toplogy behind the average user's firewall?
This doesn't affect the ability of States to tax internet sales does it? I know Michigan keeps telling me I am required to pay taxes no matter where I buy from. Is this correct?
Did you goto seaholm? I only ask because I did and never realized Bruce was from Birmingham.
It doesn't matter if it takes a long time for linux to gain a share. It isn't there to make money. Sure it matters to Red Hat etc... but if they don't change their business models to keep up with changes someone else will.
In terms of techspertise (I think I just made that up!)
Great! Patent it!!!
It's not like they are going to reject it.
They should have sent in Snuffalufagus(sp?). He's invisible.
What happens if something goes wrong with the
finger print reader?
If you think it's a dumb question...
Why are you answering it.
1) I wonder what a distributed blue screen looks like?
2)Will we have to reboot the internet once a day or so?
I don't think these are really intended for 1st world markets. If you haven't eaten in a couple of days I bet the purple potato caserole would start
looking pretty good.
I recently got a plextor 16x burner, man that thing is super fast and super quiet.
Despite the rhetoric. Communal effort can have a good effect in a democratic capitolist society(before you flame I am not anti capitolist, quite the contrary). Supply and demand economics require a limited supply, in software great effort is spent making the appearance of limited supply... hence much of the stuff we 'love' about MS.
The fact is software once written is extrodinarily cheap to copy. In a communal software enviornment everyone benifits. People who wish a better product have the right to make any product so, and they don't lose anything(as in a commodity) by giving it away. This of course will not work with cars or any other material item as there is an actual limit on supply.
Just because something can make a profit doesn't mean it neccisarily should. Some unnamed companies say they are innovating but if they would let the open source community do their thing they could make something new and actually innovate and then EVERYONE would benefit.
Why doesn't this happen? When you have a product that is making gobs of money why bother! Now the interesting thing is IMHO this is not the corporations fault. This is what the corporation is supposed to do, make money and provide jobs. It is the CONSUMER's responsibility to make sure they are not being abused by the corporation and the GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE's responsibility to provide the consumer with the channels to do so.
So get off your chairs and make a stink!
You're missing the point.
In order to be able to claim %99.99999 uptime you
would have to do your reboot in 3 seconds. It is
possible to boot in 2.1 seconds in a high
performance box with a tight kernel. If the person
running the box is 'a silly fool still running ext2, then they probably don't care about the
%99.99999 uptime.
Well Stevie is quite a dancer. We love to see him boogie.
I think the number of "* for idiots" chapters
in the references section of the pattent says so much.
The original clone. Dolly the sheep.
As the Reg reports, the journal Science contains the original article. Best of luck getting at it though.
I suppose it is hard to get through with the wrong link:)
Try this one instead(Reg required).
And if I do find him, do I send the cops, or just my 6-foot-4, 260-lb ex-eastern-block buddy Radek?"
Given what I know from my own Eastern block friends.
If you ever want to see your beer again... send the cops:)