Slashdot Mirror


Acer Laptop W/Fingerprint Recognition System

Dekaner writes "Acer has announced the TravelMate 740 with a built-in fingerprint recognition security system. The fingerprint sensor is part of the notebook? s palm rest. Users must train the recognition system, which is then used to boot the machine or to decrypt files stored on the hard disk. The TravelMate has a 1.2 GHz Pentium III processor, a 15-inch screen with a resolution of 1400 by 1050 pixels, built in 56K modem and Ethernet connection, and it can be supplied with either 128 or 256 MB of memory. It can be configured with a second hard disk, CD-ROM, DVD, or a DVD-CD-RW drive. It will go on sale in October."

246 comments

  1. FP by ellem · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Finger Print!

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  2. Not for use with *really* valuable data by Bonker · · Score: 5, Funny

    If there is one thing I learned from 'Demoliton Man' with Rocky^H^H^H^H^HSylvester Stallone is that Wesley Snipes will come and cut parts of your body off if he needs them badly enough.

    Don't keep data on this thing that's worth dismemberment, because scary terrorist-types will cut your fingers off.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Not for use with *really* valuable data by Snootch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't keep data on this thing that's worth dismemberment, because scary terrorist-types will cut your fingers off.

      Nah - these things can tell a dead finger - blood, pulse, rigor mortis etc. You need to have it attached to you when you use it. Of course, this presents a problem if you do something disfiguring to your finger (don't joke, it happens!), and you can't get at your files. What's more, someone can just hold a gun to your head until you put your finger on the pad...so it's by no means foolproof.

    2. Re:Not for use with *really* valuable data by lythander · · Score: 1

      Last "Ultra-secure data hosting company" I worked for always pointed out this sort of biometric device to tourists and journalists, but explained that they looked for a pulse, too, so cutting off the finger wouldn't work. Maybe Acer should advertise this feature, too.

    3. Re:Not for use with *really* valuable data by mirko · · Score: 2

      So, you just made a good point:

      With a standard passwd, you had to consent to give this valuable information to a bad guy.

      With this system, you just have to stand nearby, and, whether you agree or not, a pirate will find it less difficult to *borrow* you to hack into your computer.

      In conclusion, this fingerprint system will make both our lives and computers less secure.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    4. Re:Not for use with *really* valuable data by peccary · · Score: 2

      these things can tell a dead finger - blood, pulse, rigor mortis etc

      Some do. The question is, can Acer's?

    5. Re:Not for use with *really* valuable data by haruharaharu · · Score: 1

      Nah - these things can tell a dead finger

      That's all fine and dandy if $BAD_GUY knows it, but what if he doesn't keep up on tech trends? He cuts off your finger and, when it doesn't work, he gets so mad that he shoots you.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    6. Re:Not for use with *really* valuable data by meara · · Score: 1

      Umm.. can we spell paranoia?

      There's nothing to prevent anyone from password-protecting their files underneath this, so it's hardly LESS secure.

    7. Re:Not for use with *really* valuable data by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

      I wonder if you can use the scanner to save prints, or if it's only usable for their security system.

      It would suck to have one of these and not be able to scan in other people's prints, and play with the resulting images.

      Apple's voiceprint secuirty is like that: The only way to "save" a voiceprint is to create another user in the Multiple Users control panel. They built a whole extension for vioce recognition, you'd think they'd make it accessible to more than one place!

      I'm sure someone will make a linux driver with all imaginable options. Right? Right?

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    8. Re:Not for use with *really* valuable data by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      > Don't keep data on this thing that's worth
      > dismemberment, because scary terrorist-types
      > will cut your fingers off.

      Would this scanning system also recognize a wanger-print? The only problem would be having to unzip your pants each time you want to turn your computer on...

  3. New Crypto Rules by FatRatBastard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, but according to the new crypto laws you'll have to cut off your pinkies and give 'em to the FBI to keep in "finger escrow."

    1. Re:New Crypto Rules by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I'm already wondering, in the wake of 9-11, if there isn't already an FBI approved backdoor, considering the hijackers used laptops and a "secure" laptop would be attractive.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:New Crypto Rules by passion · · Score: 2

      Well, they've been collecting fingerprints for years and years now...

      --
      - passion
    3. Re:New Crypto Rules by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      nah - they just have your fingerprints on file (by way of a national id of course) and a "hand" that can create the fingerprint pattern.

      who needs a back door when you have a skeleton key?

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  4. well it's about freakin time... by Rackemup · · Score: 2
    Now maybe those government officials won't have to be "quite" as worried when they lose laptops full of top secret files.

    These small, integrated fingerprinter scanners have been in the works for a while now. It's good to see that they're finally being put to use. What's next? Fingerprint ID car-starters? Cell-phones? so many possibilities...

    1. Re:well it's about freakin time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.bergen.com/biz/carkeys200106237.htm

    2. Re:well it's about freakin time... by shokk · · Score: 1

      It's easy to smash the laptop open and take out the hard drive. The real value of the laptop is the data, so when they take that drive and connect it to a similar machine that doesn't have any fingerprint or smartcard or security fob or SecurID protection, then you've still lost. Encrypting the hard drive or portions of it as with PGPDisk is still the most secure.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    3. Re:well it's about freakin time... by shokk · · Score: 1

      Decrypting files is *not* the same thing as decrypting the filesystem. Given the choice of encrypting files, the end-user is going to get frustrated with having to type passwords each time they access a file and will end up not encrypting something important. By making a drive letter or filesystem encrypted, the user is forced to do it, thereby ensuring that security procedures are happening.

      Remember that security is a process, not a technology bandaid. The most devious users will find a way to work around things that are not convenient and this screw the whole system. Reprimanding or firing the employee does nothing to get back the information that has been lost, so it cannot be left up to "maybes" and "shoulds".

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    4. Re:well it's about freakin time... by cj_goth · · Score: 1
      Well, one would hope that some kind of miniture fingerprint scanner could be incorporated into firearms sooner rather than later.

      -- in Mar '00, 40/60 looked like a good cash/stock split.

      --


      -- now where did I put that .sig
    5. Re:well it's about freakin time... by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      And then tap our ruby slippers together and wish that the criminals only buy the fingerprint reading guns.
      You've been watching too much Judge Dredd. Good comic, stupid movie.

    6. Re:well it's about freakin time... by Rackemup · · Score: 2
      There is something like this already ... a company named livegrip.com has info on their page about their gun lock technology.

      Apparently it uses infra-red light to take a sub-dermal photo of your hand to compare with a stored image. No match, gun doesn't work. Interesting idea, but I wonder what happens if a police officer NEEDS to shoot and the gun mis-scans.

    7. Re:well it's about freakin time... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      And then tap our ruby slippers together and wish that the criminals only buy the fingerprint reading guns.

      Why in tarnation would that be relevant? Oh, you think we're talking about guns that magically encode the fingerprint on the bullet. No no no.

      Lots of guns possessed by criminals were originally stolen. Steal a signature gun and the only thing you can do is hit someone on the head with it. Ditto if a kid gets hold of his parents' gun.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    8. Re:well it's about freakin time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, so then i will get a laptop with a finger print id needed, then a will dust the laptop for prints.... well-
      so much for that eh?

  5. reset? by simetra · · Score: 1

    10 cents says you can boot into the bios and reset it, or use a paperclip.
    If not, how could you ever sell it, or let anyone else use it?

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:reset? by simetra · · Score: 4, Funny

      This could've been a Seinfeld Episode:
      George inherits this laptop, only to find it's fingerprint protected, so at the funeral, he tries to sneak it up to the corpse to get the print...
      Yadda yadda yadda....

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    2. Re:reset? by swb · · Score: 2

      There's probably a way to make it boot off of a bios-update disk or a specially prepared boot floppy that will cause the saved settings to get wiped and put it into "new computer" mode again.

      I had a DEC PC that had a bios recovery mode that would reflash the bios from floppy without a flash program or a bootable floppy. The catch was you had to make a recovery floppy before you foobar'd the machine. I presume it was just a raw dump to disk media of the old bios.

      Whatever ROM the machine had was capable of doing disk reads and flash writes.

      I'm sure there's a way to make this one go into "recovery" mode which would at least make it a working laptop.

    3. Re:reset? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what is so offtopic about this post, moderators?

    4. Re:reset? by mutt+lynch · · Score: 1

      Worst case - couldn't you open the case, pull the HDD and stick it in another laptop w/o such security measures?

      --


      icksnay on hacking my boxsnay.
    5. Re:reset? by w00dy_aus · · Score: 1

      Our entire Laptop fleet are Acer machines, many with this fingerprint technology on them.

      You cannot simply get into the bios/open the machine or anything of the like unfortunately. If for some reason the finger used to 'open' the machine is no longer available then it has to be sent back to Acer to get the machine working again. The data on the HD is also lost in this process.

      Each laptop can store 5 seperate prints, the idea being that you could have an IT person put their print in as a master on each laptop.

      This presents problems in a) Distance of IT person to said laptop b) The IT person leaves the company.

      We have chosen to not implement this protection at all and have removed all the software from our users machines that will enable it as its more hassle than its worth in my opinion of practical experience with them.

  6. So I ask you this... by sporty · · Score: 1
    If.. "The Identix software is integrated with the Windows 2000 user management database, so you can enroll through an option in the log-in dialog or by navigating the system administration dialogs." to quote http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,38898,00 .asp

    What stops you from reformatting the hd to get rid of this thing?

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    1. Re:So I ask you this... by jmenezes · · Score: 1

      Well, the idea is to keep the data safe, not the laptop itself.
      If you reformat the hard drive, then whoever had valuable secret data in there has nothing to worry about it getting out in the open or in the wrong hands.

      --
      Stop over-analyzing your analizations
    2. Re:So I ask you this... by UnhandledException · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then you'd erase all the protected files. This isn't so much a computer protection thing as a file protection thing.

    3. Re:So I ask you this... by sporty · · Score: 1

      What then stops you from mounting the drive off of a boot disk?

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    4. Re:So I ask you this... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      well, if the fingerprint recognition is used at the BIOS level (i assume that it would), then the boot disk would still require fingerprint recognition in order to work.

    5. Re:So I ask you this... by $eRvmanIO · · Score: 2, Informative

      Win2k & XP Pro support NTFS encryption. Sensitive files would be safe even if you mount it outside the system or with a NT boot disk. Plus, you have to log into the file system anyways for access. Still, you could reformat the HD, but the files would go with it.

    6. Re:So I ask you this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could be useful for a 'security' agency that keeps sensitive information on laptops that can be easily stolen (just how many laptops has MI5 lost in the last couple of years, anyway?). Even if it gets stolen the information's useless. They still lose the laptop, but the data's inaccesible. Reformatting the drive erases it, and even if they recover the data, it's encrypted.

    7. Re:So I ask you this... by sporty · · Score: 2, Informative

      read my orignal post, its not in the bios in this case..

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    8. Re:So I ask you this... by sporty · · Score: 1

      How strong is the encrytion? ANd you dont' really have to "log on" to see an ntfs partition, there are already utils just to look at the partition regardless of the user.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    9. Re:So I ask you this... by stungod · · Score: 1

      Strong enough...128 bit, I believe. I had my documents encrypted with NTFS encryption and then whacked my partition table trying to install Red Hat in a dual-boot config. I was able to use a utility to recover the files, but couldn't get the key (tied to the user account database and the SID). The files looked like they were all there, but contained only gibberish.

      Yes, it sucked. and Yes, I use VMWare now instead.

    10. Re:So I ask you this... by turbine216 · · Score: 2
      the file system is encrypted, most likely using a proprietary encryption key. If someone booted the drive using a boot disk, they would be able to read anything that is not encrypted on that drive. If they somehow got access to the encryption key, then there is an entirely different type of problem that needs to be addressed.


      There's always a way around security...it just depends on how much that data is worth. And if it's worth so much that someone would be willing to manually decrypt an entire HDD, then maybe that data shouldn't be on a laptop in the first place.

    11. Re:So I ask you this... by $eRvmanIO · · Score: 1

      Your right about looking into an NTFS file system without logging in. My head was somewhere else this morning. However, as a previous poster said, the encryption is 128-bit, as long as you install the 128-bit encryption disk (if your dealing with an orginal Retail box product) or download it. I think 128 is now installed automatically after you install SP2.

    12. Re:So I ask you this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the file system is encrypted, most likely using a proprietary encryption key.

      IOW, security through obscurity.

    13. Re:So I ask you this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win2k & XP Pro support NTFS encryption. Sensitive files would be safe even if you mount it outside the system or with a NT boot disk.

      And where exactly is this key stored? And how exactly does the software read it?

  7. Dang by El_Smack · · Score: 1

    Now I will have to use both hands to run the laptop. No more Pr0n surfing for me. :(

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
    1. Re:Dang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says it needs to be a fingerprint?

  8. It is interesting... by frleong · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article is short on details but it seems not to be very reliable. In corporations, the IT department usually has a master key so that even when the employee leaves, the company can still retrieve the data. What about this fingerprint-recognition system?

    Second, this article makes me wonder if Slashdot will consider inserting text ads like Google by masquerading as submissions. I think it is a great way to get income to maintain this heavyly used site (banners at the top are no longer very effective), given the financial conditions of the parent company VA Linux.

    --
    ¦ ©® ±
    1. Re:It is interesting... by swb · · Score: 2

      Here's my guess about how it works and some questions:

      The BIOS probably interacts with this and tells you to put your finger on it before it will complete booting. There's probably a finger-less way to update the bios which puts the laptop back into "new" mode, forgetting its fingerprint settings. This seems like the most likely way to override this security as a method of getting a working laptop.

      Presumably this wouldn't allow decryption of files encrypted to use fingerprint as an access method to some other encryption keys, but it would make the laptop a functional computer again.

      Regardless of the fingerprint system, it still seems possible to part the laptop out as individual components (of limited usability since its a laptop) as well as replace the motherboard or flash RAM if its socketed.

      This computer is kind of confusing because its trying to solve two problems: laptop security (keep the laptop from functionality if stolen) as well as data security (protect the data even if the computer is made workable).

      The latter is hard, but the former is very desirable to me as a corporate IT guy. I'd love a hardware-key system that would render the laptop useless if stolen. Fingerprint is a PITA since they're kind of tied to humans, but access cards would be great since presumably there could be many cards capable of accessing or modifying the laptops (ie, master key).

      It still might not prevent disassembly or other hardware attacks, but my guess is that most laptops that are stolen are stolen to be resold as complete units, not sent to back-alley chopshops to be sold as parts..

    2. Re:It is interesting... by tmark · · Score: 2

      Second, this article makes me wonder if Slashdot will consider inserting text ads like Google by masquerading as submissions. I think it is a great way to get income to maintain this heavyly used site (banners at the top are no longer very effective), given the financial conditions of the parent company VA Linux.

      What's so special about this article in particular that made you start suspecting this ? The situation you propose is already here: the book reviews already look very much like text ads, very very big text ads that come with very large endorsements from -presumably- unbiased reviewers and that come complete with hyperlinks to buy product. From this admittedly jaded perspective it comes as little surprise that 1) the majority of book reviews are very positive; anyone who reads many tech books would be suspicious at this alone, 2) a suspiciously large number of them seem to be published by O'Reilly, who as I recall run banner ads here.

    3. Re:It is interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably made the comment since the article goes on like an advertisement for quite a while after giving the actual interesting bit. Listing specs, etc.

      As for books, keep in mind that the links to buy the book are almost always to FatBrain, which seems odd considering that ThinkGeek is the OSDN bookstore, and they sell all books that get reviewed on /. As for the O'Reilly ratio being suspicious... no one publishes books that are more universally used by the geek community than O'Reilly, so it makes a lot of sense that they both advertise here and get reviewed here. Advertising to a market that actually uses your stuff, what a novel idea.

  9. I wouldn't trust it by w.p.richardson · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Simply because it's made by Acer. Everything with that brand name turns to crap, a' la the old Packard Bell.

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    1. Re:I wouldn't trust it by ButtChicken · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Agree, this brand is useless

    2. Re:I wouldn't trust it by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      I disagree.

      While Acer Desktops aren't exactly cream-of-the-crop, their laptops aren't bad at all. I personally own an Extensa 501T and it runs Slackware Linux. Everything works beautifully - Display, Sound, and there's even support for the Winmodem. I've enjoyed this laptop for the past four years, and I've only ever had trouble with the floppy drive.

      In that event, Acer paid to have it returned to the factory, fixed it, and had it back to me the same week.

      I would definitely recommend Acer laptops. I've had nothing but good things to say about mine.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    3. Re:I wouldn't trust it by epodrevol · · Score: 0

      Ive had a few of acers older (P133-P233) model laptops, and they are crap. Nothing that Acer makes is really great, except CDrom drives are OK. You should ask the Philadelphia Water Dept or any other Philly City agency what they think of ACER. They collectively bought over 1000 various units and tried to return most(~800) of them for replacement by a more stable PC.

      --
      "I am a warrior, and information is my weapon..."
    4. Re:I wouldn't trust it by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Everything with [the Acer] brand name turns to crap

      That's unfair! There's nothing wrong with my Travelmate 507, apart from the faded keys, jerky touchpad, cracking hinges, heavy weight, crappy video card, noisy hard drive, crackly sound, fragile modem socket, erratic parallel port, blocky display, overheating CPU, short battery life, sluggish system speed, minimal upgradability, and the lack of WinME/Win2K/WinXP support for all of the wierd hardware in it.

      </sarcasm> (OK, OK, but it was cheap, the CD reads burned discs very well, and it runs Linux better than it runs the bundled Win98SE)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:I wouldn't trust it by WellColorMeGreen · · Score: 1

      The one I have seen at work is actually an acer laptop with a 'verdisign' finger print scanner built in.

  10. A valid reason by smaughster · · Score: 2, Informative

    I knew someone would eventually find a way to make all those fancy CEO's give their laptop the finger.

    Btw: for all the l337 hackers suggesting cutting off fingers: proper finger recognition systems can sense whether the finger being scanned is attached to a living body by checking for temperature, pulse etc. So instead of just stealing your thumb and laptop, they will have to steal you as well.

    --
    I intend to live forever, so far so good.
    1. Re:A valid reason by woodenbadger · · Score: 1

      They could always microwave your severed finger to get the temperature right.

  11. Rebooting the laptop by red_dragon · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Gives new meaning to the phrase "three-finger salute," doesn't it?

    Ctrl-Alt-middle finger, indeed.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    1. Re:Rebooting the laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give it the middle finger to reboot, and any other finger to login/decrypt data.

  12. Linux fingerprint software by evenprime · · Score: 1

    this article mentions java-based smart card readers that work with Linux. Does anyone know of a similar biometric product?

    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
    1. Re:Linux fingerprint software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashsheep moderators to the rescue again. There are no fingerprint readers with Linux support. You've stated a fact, Slashsheep moderators don't like it, so they moderate you down. Amazing isn't it?

  13. Just add a DNA analyzer too... by TheMidget · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    and cuming up with a suitable source of DNA samples should not be difficult...

    1. Re:Just add a DNA analyzer too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those samples don't contain a complete set of genes -- only half of them.
      Hey, that gives me an idea for a new public key algorithm!

  14. Good for corporate types by Chocky2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This should be very popular with companies - problem #1 with giving managers/execs laptops is they'll lose them or have them stolen, which, when combined with the lack of (transparently) easy security means that a lot of important data can be compromised very easily.

    For the same reasons it should be popular with MI6 who last year seemed to be losing a laptop a month.

    So long as it's implemented sensibley, I think Acer are on a winner here.

    1. Re:Good for corporate types by MeNeXT · · Score: 1
      or NOT.


      What happens when someone gets fired? Is there a way to get around this feature? Can more than one fingerprint be stored? I have a fwe more questions but I think you get my point.


      I think there is not enought information to really say either way.


      As for MI6 they should use handcuffs....

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
  15. off with thier hand by jglow · · Score: 0

    I've heard of systems that have technology to make them NOT work unless a full body is behind the hand. I believe it detects body tempurature as well. Any idea if this technology exists on this machine?

    --


    There's no "I" in Linux.. err..
  16. When is the verification done? by laserjet · · Score: 1

    What I am wondering is when is the verification done? Is it completely seperate than the OS, or does the OS load up some program? I would hope it does it immediately after you turn it on, that way it would be much hard to bypass. Still, though, when things like this usually come out, it normally only keeps Normal Joe User out, and it a gifted person that knew what they were doing (the type that would probably steal the laptop to begin with), they could probably access the data somehow. None the less, though, some security is better than none!

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    1. Re:When is the verification done? by josquint · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing thatsome part of the OS would have to load. The BIOS would have to have a quite larege program to analyze the scan, and some pretty hefty storage to store the unlocking print.
      Possible maybe BIOS level though.. it'd be alot nicer to lock the OS out totally(waay too easily bypassed)

    2. Re:When is the verification done? by arkanes · · Score: 1

      The article says it's part of win2k, but you COULD do it in hardware, storing the print in WORM memory, rather than writing it all into BIOS firmware. Of course, you'll need some sort of hardware level security as well, otherwise someone can just open up the case, take out the reader, and insert thier own....

    3. Re:When is the verification done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      We have one of these in the office. It happens
      in the BIOS (you need to thumbprint if you want
      to change the BIOS settings). I assume that you
      would be able to reset it in the BIOS after
      validating, but haven't actually tried it out.

    4. Re:When is the verification done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's not implemented in the BIOS then what is stopping me from just pulling the hard drive to get the information. My Dell Inspiron's drive can be pulled in about 15 seconds by removing two screws and pulling. If I was really after your information (not your hardware) I could lift your laptop at the airport, pull the drive, and ditch the computer itself.

      Imagine having to explain to the authorites what they should be looking for, (or what the problem is for that matter - ala "What's the matter, you got the computer back, right?")

      You better back up your biometrics with strong encription, because it's useless without it.

  17. This is neat, but not really useful by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This sort of biometric authentication is not really all that vital for most of us, and the effort required to keep it functional, in this case at least, outweighs any advantage gained.

    Don't get me wrong -- I can see this being very useful for corporations and governments who have valuable information to keep encrypted. For those applications, this is a good idea.

    The problem I see is that fingerprint sensors require maintenance. The human fingertip exudes oil, used to increase the traction of the fingertip. This is not good for a sensing surface, and will necessitate regular cleaning. Anyone who has owned a trackball can tell you that anything the finger touches regularly, builds up gunk quickly.

    Another problem is susceptibility to damage -- scratches in particular. I wouldn't want to be locked out of my files due to clumsiness. Also, damage to the recognition system through any form of clumsiness will keep you out of your encrypted files. Using an ordinary encryption method, you'd just hook the HD up to a different machine and be back in business.

    I'll assume that the device is good enough to detect your print accurately. I wouldn't think the company would willingly release a half-engineered product in such an important area as authentication.

    --

    Denial isn't just a river in Italy

    1. Re:This is neat, but not really useful by atlep · · Score: 1
      Another problem is susceptibility to damage -- scratches in particular. I wouldn't want to be locked out of my files due to clumsiness. Also, damage to the recognition system through any form of clumsiness will keep you out of your encrypted files. Using an ordinary encryption method, you'd just hook the HD up to a different machine and be back in business.

      The moral is an old one, keep backups of important data. Nothing new here.

      This sort of biometric authentication is not really all that vital for most of us, and the effort required to keep it functional, in this case at least, outweighs any advantage gained.
      Also I am sure you can choose to use ordinary encryption, if you want to. This is a facility you can use if you want to. Using it takes a little bit of effort from the user. Nothing new here.
    2. Re:This is neat, but not really useful by Tchaik · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't want to be locked out of my files due to clumsiness

      It seems pretty easy to have two ways to access the encrypted info: using fingerprints or passphrase. This would insure never being locked out of your files.

    3. Re:This is neat, but not really useful by sker · · Score: 1

      "Fingertime" on your trackball is probably around 360x or more than whatever it would be on a fingerprint entry pad (1 sec vs an hour of trackballing?) -- and that entry pad would not need to be designed for high friction, thus with much fewer places for such residue to reside. Remember, this is not like the fingerprint sensors at a bank or something with many users. I'd even hope it would be covered when not in use - again not even a minor inconvenience compared to keystrokes with "ordinary encryption". Given that, this could probably last 8-12 months with zero maintenance .. longer?

      --
      nonsig. unsig. desig.
    4. Re:This is neat, but not really useful by e.a.kendrick · · Score: 1

      Rather than a replacement for passwords, I consider this a complementary technology - you should always have the option of typing in the password, but use your thumbprint as a shortcut.

      I would like to see a password manager that was enabled by your thumbprint. It would enter your passwords into your email application, encrypted files, favourite web pages etc. You only need to memorise one password, that you use if your thumb is gunked up.

    5. Re:This is neat, but not really useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I wouldn't think the company would willingly release a half-engineered product in such an important area as authentication.

      I'm sure people are saying the same thing about Hailstorm...

    6. Re:This is neat, but not really useful by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> any form of clumsiness will keep you out of your encrypted files

      Yeah, and what are you going to do when your machine locks up; give it the finger?

    7. Re:This is neat, but not really useful by Qui-Gon · · Score: 1

      Your right... this isn't really useful to the common person, but I still think its a cool idea.

      Although, I am still waiting for my mp3 player/Retina scanner. ;)

      --

      We are blind to the Worlds within us
      waiting to be born...
    8. Re:This is neat, but not really useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why bother having the fingerprint system at all?

    9. Re:This is neat, but not really useful by garcia · · Score: 2

      umm, a friend of mine had her laptop stolen from her house off campus this year. She ended up getting a laptop w/a thumb print authentication and it works quite well.

      She said that other people in her house were all pissy (girls, go figure ;) b/c those w/o computers were using her laptop to talk on AIM but can't now.

      Seems to work just fine. Kinda cool as far as I am concerned. Although I really don't know how effective this is for stopping stealing.

  18. Well... by Vain · · Score: 0

    The only problem with finger-print recognition that I've seen so far is that if the pads of your fingers are scuffed or damaged you'll get an incorrect read. Could you imagine being an executive trying to get to his files after a weekend of fishing/boating/gardening or whatever, just to find out your thumb pad had been scratched up a bit? Whups.

    I'm not positive, but I think they only take a read from one finger too... So you couldn't store say 3-4 prints just incase one finger gets scratched up.

    --
    "Stop saying 'Don't quote me' because if no one quotes you, you probably haven't said a thing worth saying" -KMFDM
  19. In combination with... by josquint · · Score: 1
  20. cool idea but by notext · · Score: 1

    this will only keep out your friends. Your enemies would just steal your notebook and then take it apart and eventually get the stuff off your hard drive from another machine.

    At least this is a step in the right direction.

    1. Re:cool idea but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that the fingerprint scanner is also used to encrypt the files, right? And that it's required to login to the filesystem?

  21. seems unnecessary... by turbine216 · · Score: 2
    ...when all you really have to do is set a strong BIOS boot password. Of course, even that can be reset by clearing the CMOS, but i'm sure this fingerprint recognition system works the same way.


    This should definitely add to the FUD-factor at your local Best Buy, though...i can see it now:


    Salesman: But if you don't have fingerprint recognition, ANYONE can get into your private personal super-top-secretest files!!! Even TERRORISTS!!!!

    Customer: I'll take fifteen of 'em!!!

    1. Re:seems unnecessary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...when all you really have to do is set a strong BIOS boot password. Of course, even that can be reset by clearing the CMOS, but i'm sure this fingerprint recognition system works the same way.

      I'm sure it's possible to bypass. Physical access to the machine pretty much means you can get whatever non-encrypted data is on the hard drive, even if you have to take out the hard drive to do it. On the other hand, just like a BIOS boot password, it is a deterrent, and unlike a BIOS boot password, there is nothing for you to memorize, nothing for a hacker to guess, and nothing for someone to look over your shoulder and see (or for a keyboard bug to detect). If it's cheap and relatively secure and effective (no false positives or negatives), I'd prefer it to a BIOS password.

  22. And if it fails?? by billmaly · · Score: 1

    I'd hope that they've tested this thing 9 ways from Sunday. Hate to be 6-12 months into my ownership of one of these, and suddenly have the scanner stop working. Let's hope it's a rugged, fail resistent (IE, SIMPLY made), piece of hardware, that can be overridden by some alternate means.

    I like the idea of a backup password to allow you to still boot the machine should fingerprint ID not work. It's not quite as secure as the standard "Have something, know something" protocol, but it'd at least let you check your email until the scanner could be replaced.

  23. Tech Support by silphium_laciniatum · · Score: 1

    And here I left my hand in my other pants. I really have to get those files to the Boss!

    --

    "No one will smell that."

  24. questions by mirko · · Score: 2
    • Autonomy: what does "up to 4 hours" mean? (hint on my personnal laptop, this means 2 hours)
    • Modem: Winmodem or real modem?
    • Finger print stuff: Do they give this detector's specs? what about a Linux driver? (Could be fun to bypass the Linux login sequence or ssh communication keyboard-oriented establishment)...
      BTW, what if I scorch my finger?(I guess it could work but I would like to be sure)

    Finally, some more details are given just a click deeper...
    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  25. Next idea:Thief Identification Honeypot by McFly777 · · Score: 1

    When the laptop is stolen, if the thief tries to log in, perhaps it could let them continue a bit while it sends the fingerprint to the police for identification.

    Damn, I should've patented this instead of releasing it to public domain by posting in a public forum!

    --

    McFly777
    - - -
    "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
    1. Re:Next idea:Thief Identification Honeypot by frknfrk · · Score: 2
      from your comment:
      Damn, I should've patented this instead of releasing it to public domain by posting in a public forum!
      from the slashdot copyright notice:
      Comments are owned by the Poster.
      patent away, dude.
      --
      The REAL sam_at_caveman_dot_org is user ID 13833.
    2. Re:Next idea:Thief Identification Honeypot by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Sure, but since it's published it's no longer patentable.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  26. finger print loggin for linux by mikespice · · Score: 1

    Office Max (and I am sure others) sell a $50 USB finger print reader. I have always thought it would be cool to make a driver for this in Linux. It could also be used to loggin, protecte files, etc.

    Anyone wanna help?

    1. Re:finger print loggin for linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't you be working on the USP Token Ring driver for linux first?

      I can just picture a bunch of geeks sitting around a filthy card table, the floor littered with HoHo wrappers:

      Geek 1: "Dude, we need to code something up to play that Wolfenstein thing, it comes out this weekend. I'd do it but I'm still trying to get my sound card to work."

      Geek 2: "I got a Star Trek convention to go to, I can't work on anything for at least a week."

      Geek 3: "And I'm working on Token Ring support! There is one guy left on earth who uses it so of course we have to half ass support it."

      Geek 1: "There's a Star Trek convention?"

      Geek 2: "Yeah, next weekend at the food court in the mall. I think a girl will be there."

      Geek 1: "Really? Count me in, I still have my Spock outfit from last time."

      Geek 3: "The hell with Token Ring, I'm in too."

      And so goes the Linux support Team.

  27. anyone know? by SuperguyA1 · · Score: 1

    What happens if something goes wrong with the
    finger print reader?

    --
    "as plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee" - Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz. (One man's humorous is another mans flamebait)
    1. Re:anyone know? by Ghengis · · Score: 1

      An Acer fingerprint reader... hmmmm... it probably won't work to begin with... might make a good coaster to go along with my Acer Desktop, er, i mean end table.... right there next to my Macintosh Door Stop

      --

      "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

  28. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Acer already produces a laptop with a built-in fingerprint scanner--and earlier version of the same travelmate line. We reviewed their laptop for use at my school, and found that the fingerprint ID could not be configured to work with a bios password, and the machine they supplied us with had the worst password validation program (complete with James Bond style voice prompts). In short, my school actually specified that they didn't want the "integrated" fingerprint scanner when they purchased this year's laptops.

  29. Does this mean by jxqvg · · Score: 1

    We'll get Passport integration, too? Once the DNA readers come along we can keep our genetic code on file in Redmond. {feelings of unsettle}

  30. Acer by jmu1 · · Score: 1

    Ok, does anyone remember acer desktop machines?

    Is there any reason that we would want to buy a piece of malfunctioning junk like that again, even if it does have it's own paranoia system installed?

    Perhaps if it were a company that didn't make utter junk, I would consider it. But then again, I'm not stupid enough to put data that sensitive on a bloody laptop!

  31. It's to protect data only, right? by dafoomie · · Score: 1

    My guess is that it's only intended to protect the data, and that you could still use the laptop itself if you formatted or something. If you want real security on your laptop, install lo-jack. Or go retro and just handcuff it to yourself like those guys with the briefcases.

  32. This is not new by geoffsmith · · Score: 1

    I've had an old older model travelmate with fingerprint recognition for over 6 months now.

    I don't use it because I'm worried I won't be able to get back in. (apparently even different levels of grease on your fingers can throw off the sensor)

    If you use it for you hard drive, and you get locked out, you have to ship the drive back to the manufacturer so they can physically reset it.

    I'll stick to passwords for now.

    1. Re:This is not new by 1337+$14X0r · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm glad somebody finally said it - this stuff is almost a year old already. This article [PCWorld] explains the technology, including built-in support for 'multiple users'.

      --

      --- Sigs are dumb.

  33. Hope the thief reads the sticker... by thesurfaces.net · · Score: 1

    Is a thief more likely to:

    a) Read the warning label before taking it, or;

    b) Take it and see what he's got later?

    If b), you've lost it anyway...

    --

    http://www.blitzbasic.com/
    Graphics3D 640, 480

  34. Quite simple by shiva600 · · Score: 1

    In corporations, the IT department usually has a master key so that even when the employee leaves, the company can still retrieve the data. What about this fingerprint-recognition system?


    You leave. Your finger stays.

    1. Re:Quite simple by shiva600 · · Score: 1

      You leave. Your finger stays.

      Which btw could evolve into a real problem after you switched your job the 5th time.

  35. Yeah, it's redundant but... by Matey-O · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can have my laptop when you pry it out of my cold-dead-er-nevermind.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  36. WOW! by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

    "...a 15-inch screen with a resolution of 1400 by 1050 pixels..."

    When will these types of screens be available in standard laptops??? I'm not interested in the finger print technology, I just want that display!!!

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:WOW! by uradu · · Score: 2

      > When will these types of screens be available in standard laptops???

      Dell has been selling their Inspiron 8000 with 1400x1050 and 1600x1200 screens for quite some time. I have the 1400x1050 display, and it's very nice indeed. Not to mention the Dolby Digital sound, TV out, dual monitor capability (LCD + external), or 1394 port.

    2. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, the Inspiron 8000 is a beautiful machine.

  37. bah by British · · Score: 2

    Forget the finger print, how about that resolution!?

    1400 by 1050 pixels? That's better than my desktop's!

  38. Secure One touch logins for Linux? by richie123 · · Score: 1

    This would be a great way to both improve ese of use, and security at the same time. no more repeaded logins to do simple maintenace.

  39. False security is worse than no security by pesc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article fails to give a technical explanation on exactly how the fingerprints enhance security. Does anyone here really believe that this laptop can protect its data when it is stolen? In order to do that it must encrypt the data on the disk.

    Using what encryption key? Your fingerprint? Does anyone believe that your fingerprints are secret? You are putting thousands of copies of your prints on various objects every day. You probably have several fingerprints on your laptop! And once your secret encryption key becomes known, how do you change your key? :-)

    The key (sorry) to good encryption security is to change your keys often.

    Until a good technical description on the security is provided I will regard this laptop as techno-babble trying to impress PHB types.

    --

    )9TSS
    1. Re:False security is worse than no security by Syberghost · · Score: 3, Informative

      Using what encryption key? Your fingerprint?

      Obviously not. More likely, a key generated at some point in the setup process, and your fingerprint is merely the passphrase to access the key. Same way PGP does it, really.

    2. Re:False security is worse than no security by Fatal0E · · Score: 2

      Actually most fingerprint scanners derive mathematical equations from the image of your fingerprint. Thats how the recognition part works. It wouldnt be much of a stretch to carry it over as part of the key used to encrypt the data.

    3. Re:False security is worse than no security by sker · · Score: 1
      Using what encryption key? Your fingerprint? Does anyone believe that your fingerprints are secret?


      Knowing what your fingerprint looks like and getting it to register on a touch sensor involve two very different levels of sophistication. I'm guessing the ability to reproduce the actual physical pattern of the print would correspond to an entity with resources that would make many other "security" measures similarly ineffective.

      --
      nonsig. unsig. desig.
    4. Re:False security is worse than no security by Panaflex · · Score: 4, Informative

      (disclaimer, I worked for a few years on a fingerprint security project)

      Actually, the problem is that you have to keep a copy of the fingerprint to match. Getting a copy of this fingerprint from disk or memory would be fairly simple.

      Also, you can not hash a fingerprint. Each scan of the same fingerprint is different from the previous one. You can't protect the b' enrolled fingerprint.

      The only way this would work is by:
      (a) using a dual password/biometric. The password would unlock the b' biometric(enrolled) and the fingerprint would be used to extract it.

      (b) using a hardware protection and matching system. Whereby the hardware is responsible for protecting itself. Simular to a smart card concept, the hardware would encrypt the data on disk, and also gather and match the fingerprints. Still, a bit of reverse engineering could defeat this. Also, a cheap fingerprint scanner could probably be fairly suseptable to rubber finger attacks. ;-)

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    5. Re:False security is worse than no security by pesc · · Score: 2

      Obviously not. More likely, a key generated at some point in the setup process, and your fingerprint is merely the passphrase to access the key. Same way PGP does it, really.


      And when I have stolen your laptop, and I remove the disk and put it in my own Linux-controlled laptop, exactly how is the fingerprint scanner protecting the disk / flash ROM?

      And how is the "passphrase" in the scheme above secret? And how do I change it once it has become known?

      How does a "fingerprint scanning device" that operates with known inputs make ANY memory device (bar smartcards which isn't used here) on your stolen laptop "secret" from me?

      --

      )9TSS
    6. Re:False security is worse than no security by hacker · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Having worked at $LASTJOB{PHARMA} where the FDA was looking over our potential implementatation of biometrics in wireless handheld webpads in 1998, I can tell you how this is done:

      CFR 21:11 , the Code of Federal Regulations, goes through this fully. In order to be "validated" as the real person, you must hold at least two of three key pieces of information:

      1. Something you have: A keycard, a physcal key, an iButton
      2. Something you know: A password, passphrase, memorized key
      3. Something you are: Iris scan, fingerprint, voice, some other biometric.
      . If you have two of those things, any two in combination, you are said to be one of two things:
      1. Truly that person to which the biometric belongs, or
      2. A conspirator, working with that person, since you cannot have obtained the second piece of information without consent from the holder

      This is how our Federal Government looks at it anyway.

      Biometrics have come a long way, and contrary to popular belief, this fingerprint-style technology does not compare a "picture" of your finger. It measures datapoints (the FingerChip for example, measures many more datapoints than most biometric scanners, and is a fraction of the size).

      The "retraining" you have to do is so that your "personality" is measured as one of the datapoints. If this was a signature capture biometric, it would measure whether or not you dot your "i" before your words are finished, or after. That "personality" is set in the equation as part of the measurement. This is why even if you have someone's signature on paper, and can replicate it perfectly freehand, a good biometric will rule it out, since the "personality" (speed to write, dot i's first/last, etc.) will certainly not match.

    7. Re:False security is worse than no security by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Answer; it doesn't.

      The fingerprint idea will basically keep folks entertained at your next 2600 meeting, but it won't keep anybody out of your data other than casual intruders, who would have been just as easily kept out by a BIOS password. This product is snake-oil.

    8. Re:False security is worse than no security by wheel · · Score: 1
      [slightly OT]

      I'm curious to know if the 'picture password' described by Clifford Pickover (and others, I'm sure) falls under the heading of 'false security.'

      Essentially, the user is presented with a detailed image, and is required to 'point' to a preselected set of features, in sequence, to gain access to the system. Alternatively, the user may be required to select, say, 10 faces out of 100, in the correct order.

      Not being much of a statistician or cryptologist myself, I'm curious to know what the current (slashdot) view of this method is, ie, 'false' or 'real' security.

  40. sounds great! by mosch · · Score: 2

    This sounds great, except for the fact that it's an Acer.

  41. Acer laptops are impressive by proxima · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After doing some research, I recommended to my girlfriend that she buy an Acer laptop. The reasons were simple - it had a modem, ethernet, and wireless ethernet built in, it had a large 14" screen, and it was only 5.2 pounds with the dvd drive installed, 4.5 without, and came installed with Windows 2000.

    I looked at a variety of other laptops, especially Dell and Compaq, and none could build in everything (she wanted wireless ethernet for use at college and in the future) at such a low weight. The price wasn't too bad either, for last June - about $2100 including Windows 2000 and Office 2000 from CDW.

    When it arrived, there was a feature I sort of brushed over - a smart card reader. Its primary purpose in this laptop is to restrict access if the card is not installed. It looks like a credit card, and is easily removable. By default, the security settings are such that the smart card must be installed for the computer to boot. Of course, this isn't perfect protection against things like theft, but it is more convenient than a boot password to prevent people from simply using the laptop.

    So I am not surprised to see that Acer is leading the way with more laptop security features. I absolutely hate the many old desktops that I have had to fix over the years, but the quality of the laptops is quite nice. They fit a lot of features, including some pioneering ones, into a laptop that is comparable in price to Toshiba and Dell with less weight.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Acer laptops are impressive by huh_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      After doing some research, I recommended to my girlfriend that she buy an Acer laptop. The reasons were simple - it had a modem, ethernet, and wireless ethernet built in, it had a large 14" screen, and it was only 5.2 pounds with the dvd drive installed, 4.5 without, and came installed with Windows 2000.

      And without Windows 2000 installed it was only 1 pound right?

    2. Re:Acer laptops are impressive by Sara+Chan · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this. One question: how quiet is the Acer? Is there a fan, and if so, how much is it on?

    3. Re:Acer laptops are impressive by proxima · · Score: 2

      Yes, since they have PIIIs, there is a fan. I can't really tell you how much it's on, 'cause I haven't used it longer than about 30 minutes doing simple web browsing and such (it's not mine, as I mentioned).

      The bottom can get kind of warm for your lap if you're doing higher powered things, because normally the processor is clocked down using Intel Speedstep (to preserve battery length and heat). It didn't strike me as being any more or less noisy than the average quality laptop - I didn't really pay attention to it though.

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  42. Hope it's in the BIOS... by WareW01f · · Score: 1

    Linux users beware. I was the proud owner of a AcerNote 370. What can I say, it was cheap. Not only were the PC card slots sunk in to the case (sorry folks, no x-jack) but all of the nifty "features" like 0-power sleep mode, were Windoze drivers, i.e. wiping the hard drive and installing Slackware wiped out all those options. You get what you pay for I guess. I wrote Acer, hoping to maybe get some specs on the BIOS hooks so I could hack my own... no go. I would imagine this laptop is the same, with all the features meshed into W2k

    I've got my Vaio now, life is much better.

  43. But what about it's innards? by kaszeta · · Score: 2
    The article is short on details but it seems not to be very reliable. In corporations, the IT department usually has a master key so that even when the employee leaves, the company can still retrieve the data. What about this fingerprint-recognition system?

    Indeed, if we don't know how it works internally, how do we know that Acer hasn't built a huge backdoor into it (like how their CEO's fingerprints or an easily reproducable pattern will always work)?

    I expect it uses some system to "hash" fingerprints into simpler indentifiers, but how do we know that this function is unique? I've already dealt with iris-identification products that, given a large enough input sample, start incorrectly identifying people since the hashing function didn't produce unique hashes.

  44. Gun to your head; your finger on the sensor. by dstone · · Score: 2

    Pretty simple. This technique has proven itself at cash machines. Biometrics may marginally help prevent someone from stealing a machine outright when you're not there. So if someone really needs the data, it just means they're going to wait for the owner/key to arrive. Yoink.

    1. Re:Gun to your head; your finger on the sensor. by Fjord · · Score: 2

      Even worse, you have to be conscious to enter your pin. You don't have to be conscious or consenting to be knocked out and have you finger put on a pad.

      --
      -no broken link
  45. Are you dumb? by Glothar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Risking getting modded down for flaming...

    You're dumb.

    Someone can hold a gun to your head and demand your password too.

    If you are dead, the fingerprint wont work. If you'd do any research and actually think you'd realize this. Using a fingerprint actually requires that the pirate keep you alive.

    In conclusion, you're dumb, and fingerprints are an order of magnitude more secure and safe for people to use.

    1. Re:Are you dumb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some information you may be willing to die to protect. For example, giving information that a terrorist could use to kill thousands. Where are the nukes, and how do you launch them? I'm not sure how well I could take turture, but I'm pretty sure I could deal with a bullet in the head.

    2. Re:Are you dumb? by mirko · · Score: 1

      Exactly, "someone" can demand my password but I may not give him, as it was replied before by AC.

      The same "someone" may just knock me out and use my hand which will be easier than forcing me to reveal a password...

      So, no, I think the above guy made a good point.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:Are you dumb? by Glothar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You've never used a fingerprint scanner.

      But thanks for continuing the pattern of Slashdot posters who pretend they know what they are talking about, and pass off their guesses as fact.

      If you were unconcious, your fingerprint would not work. If someone forced your finger onto the scanner it would not work. If someone got a copy of your fingerprint off a glass, it would not help them. You need to be present, alive, conscious and willing to supply your print.

      Come back when you have actually used one.

    4. Re:Are you dumb? by drsoran · · Score: 1

      You don't need to be dead for me to use your finger to access your computer. Chances are you're probably a scrawny computer geek in the first place. Any football player on your high school football team will be able to force your finger onto the pad to decrypt all your child pornography.

    5. Re:Are you dumb? by drsoran · · Score: 1

      And how exactly can a cheap laptop fingerprint scanner tell the difference between your finger whether you're concious or unconcious? Besides, you don't need to be unconcious for someone to force your finger onto a scanner. Now, the way to make this decent is to use two factors... the password AND your finger.

    6. Re:Are you dumb? by VulgarBoatman · · Score: 1

      You're dumb.

      And you're mean. You do not have to be conscious or "willing" (whatever that means) for fp scanners to work. You saying so doesn't make it true.

      You've never used a fingerprint scanner.

      Talk about passing off your guesses as fact!

      I for one would like to hear what you have to say. That is, if you can inform folks without insulting them.

      --
      "Because I love Pat Benatar." -- Britney Spears, when asked why she covered Joan Jett's "I Love Rock 'n' Roll"
    7. Re:Are you dumb? by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      No, a terrorist could kill you and then immediately afterwords use your finger, which would still retain enough properties to be identifiable, to gain access to the configuration and then just change the identity required for access. Or at least gain temporary access to the information. C'mon, think, it's not that hard.

  46. easy by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0

    you lose all the important information that needed the fingerprint to begin with.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  47. Now What if... by Ghengis · · Score: 1
    Now What if i'm trying to copycat the psycho from Se7in and have been cutting my fingerprints off of the tips of my fingers... will it recognize me or just report me to the FBI via spyware??

    "No, no, no, Lisa. If adults don't like their jobs, they don't go on strike. They just go in every day and do it really half-assed." -- Homer Simpson

    --

    "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

  48. Now all we need by Sagarian · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is breathalyzers for email!

    1. Re:Now all we need by Nurgster · · Score: 1

      not to mention C compilers and text editors...

      --
      "Faith is the last resort of a desperate man" - Me
  49. PC World copying Apple again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly a cheap ripoff of thier iFinger security system. They invented everything, you know?

  50. Biometric Authentication Experience by Nishi-no-wan · · Score: 4, Troll
    Finger print recognition has been a pain for me. We had it installed at work a few years ago, and it worked fine for the first couple of months. However, my hands start peeling due to dryness in the winter, and it soon came to the point that the system wouldn't let me in. This wouldn't have been a problem except that I was usually the first one to work in the morning, and was getting locked out.

    We tried registering all of my fingers to no avail. In the end, I got a magnetic card to get in.

    I had tried one of those systems where you sign for authentication, too. But it turns out that I can't write my own signature the same twice. I haven't had much luck in having biometric authentication figure out who I am.

    1. Re:Biometric Authentication Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... my hands start peeling ... I was usually the first one to work in the morning ... I can't write my own signature the same twice ... I haven't had much luck ...

      Whine whine whine. Sucks to be you.

    2. Re:Biometric Authentication Experience by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Have you considered the possibility that you may just be multiple people sharing a consciousness?

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    3. Re:Biometric Authentication Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I weep only because I share the same planet as you, and I can't help but think that someone who doesn't exist right now could be using the space that you're taking up and make a much better use of it.

    4. Re:Biometric Authentication Experience by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Maybe the Yoyodyne computer knows the difference between Red Lectroids and Black Lectroids but nobody programmed the popup for it before the economy turned.

      --Blair
      "Requirements-based testing: it's not just for breakfast any more."

  51. Creepy by zarathustra93 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not so sure that biometrics are really a good idea. People have already pointed out various means to thwart the system, i.e. chop off your finger, put a gun to your head. Facial recognition systems have proven so far to be less than reliable. I don't understand how biometrics will make any information more secure than already well established best practices for security.

    This trend towards biometrics just seems like a way to make security somewhat brainless. The big problem is that security that is brainless isn't security.

  52. no big deal by mikey504 · · Score: 1

    So pop your severed finger in the microwave for a few secs and give it a healthy sqeeze every so often during the logon...

    I guess it might take some trial and error to get the microwave times right.

    Logon failed... you should see a doctor.

  53. Getting laid off REALLY sucks by jgerry · · Score: 1

    Dear employee:

    Take the day off today! You'll be glad to know that we, Company X, will now be providing you with a virtually unlimited amount of vacation and personal days. Acceptance of this policy is mandatory and paychecks will stop being deposited in your bank account starting today.

    Please stop by your vacation advisor's desk on your way out so that we may guillotine your finger off in case we need to retrieve any of your files and documents.

    Thanks, and have a great vacation!

    -management
    -Company X

  54. fingerprint dusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about some silly people who touch their screens all the time as though they have a point to prove when they try and squish out the LCD showing some PPT.

    if the print remains you could dust it off and possibly use that to auth.
    also did acer remove all clear plastic surfaces from the device?? (logo tags etc?)

  55. yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... good thing it doesn't use a built-in willyprint recognition security system!

  56. This reminds me of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "the club"... you remember those, those things you put on your steering wheel to "prevent car theft" ? They were made really hard so you couldn't saw through them? Consequently it was easy just to saw through part of the steering wheel instead and slide the club off.

    This thing is probably the same way. "Oh no, I can't make it boot without the fingerprint". "Okay, let's take out the hard drive and put it in a different computer"

    Gimmick, yes.

  57. Fun with reading comprehension! by -=OmegaMan=- · · Score: 2

    "Encrypting the hard drive or portions of it as with PGPDisk is still the most secure."

    "Users must train the recognition system, which is then used to boot the machine or to decrypt files stored on the hard disk."

    --

    This sig is xenon coated, and will glow red when in the presence of aliens

    1. Re:Fun with reading comprehension! by aozilla · · Score: 2

      decrypt files stored on the hard disk


      And where exactly is that decryption key stored? If it's something volatile, you're in big trouble if it gets accidently erased (or the person dies in a big fire). Otherwise, just get the key after disabling the fingerprint mechanism. Unless the fingerprint itself is the key (in which case it can be copied), I don't think you can come up with a non-self-destructing system which would not be subject to physical attack.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    2. Re:Fun with reading comprehension! by MacGod · · Score: 1

      I heard an interesting (possibly apocryphal) story about something like this on a password system. A few years back, Symantec Tech Support got a call from a user looking for a backdoor to Norton DiskLock. What was happening was this: They were a government employee and the capital was under seige as part of a rebel coup. All the weapons were stored in one high-security building which was locked with a combination lock. The ONLY person who knew the combo had been killed, and had only recorder the combo on his password-protected computer. The governemt forces (obviously) really wanted into the armory, but couldn't break in. As a result, the government fell, apparently with less than expected defense.

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  58. Clones by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    Does this mean my clone can boot my laptop? Hope it's not my evil twin...

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    1. Re:Clones by chinton · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. Fingerprints are not genetic -- they are an after effect. From what I remember, as a fetus develops, it is filled with a liquid under the skin. As it grows, the liquid is removed and the fingerprints are left behind.

    2. Re:Clones by ragnar · · Score: 2

      I don't know about clones, but twins have different fingerprints.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
  59. Your data will be totally secure! by -=OmegaMan=- · · Score: 2

    Until it spills out into the air via the "optional Acer InviLink IEEE802.11b wireless LAN PC Card." ;)

    --

    This sig is xenon coated, and will glow red when in the presence of aliens

    1. Re:Your data will be totally secure! by MadAhab · · Score: 2

      Or until someone hacks their way in through the installed-by-default IIS, or the latest Outlook worm simply mails your data out.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  60. Needs Saying by mlknowle · · Score: 1

    This needs saying again:

    IF YOU HAVE PHYSICAL ACCSESS TO A COMPUTER, THAT COMPUTER IS INSECURE.... fingerprints or not

    Why not just rely on the far cheaper system of text passwords?

    1. Re:Needs Saying by frknfrk · · Score: 2

      because then Joe Bob, COO, has to remember 5 different password instead of having to remember to bring his fingers along with him to each meeting.

      -sam

      --
      The REAL sam_at_caveman_dot_org is user ID 13833.
    2. Re:Needs Saying by droleary · · Score: 1

      because then Joe Bob, COO, has to remember 5 different password instead of having to remember to bring his fingers along with him to each meeting.

      If Joe Bob doesn't realize that security isn't supposed to be easy, he shouldn't be COO. He'll be the first to lose a finger when someone discovers they can't get what they want off the computer they just stole.

      Sorry, but when it gets right down to it, for better or worse I (and my employees) want something they can give to a bad guy if they absolutely have to. I can give them a key card or a password, but I'm in trouble if they need body parts, attached or not, to get what they want.

  61. Great.. now I'll *never* be able to re-activate XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lost my index finger in a freak accident, and had to reset the laptop to use another finger.

    But WinXP logged it as a complete system change and told me to call M$ Customer Support for a re-activation.

    Upon calling M$ and going through 3 levels of management, I was finally told that I would need to buy a new license of WinXP, and that I should remember even though I lost a finger, Microsoft requires giving an Arm and a Leg in order to get a version of XP without the activation feature.

    Me and my nine fingers are installing Linux right now !!

  62. impossible dream by bliss · · Score: 0

    "Nah - these things can tell a dead finger - blood, pulse, rigor mortis etc. You need to have it attached to you when you use it. Of course, this presents a problem if you do something disfiguring to your finger (don't joke, it happens!), and you can't get at your files. What's more, someone can just hold a gun to your head until you put your finger on the pad...so it's by no means foolproof."

    I would love to know of a system that gets rid of this limitation. Perhaps an AI of sorts.

    --
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
  63. Cool but... by SGDarkKnight · · Score: 1

    how is the information on the fingerprint stored on the system? If its just kept in a generic file (encrypted of course) what happens if a virus gets on the system and screws up the data on the fingerprint? If there any way of resetting the FP information? But hold on now, if there was a way of resetting the information on the FP's then what would be the point of having it in the first place? Maybe you would have to send the notebook back to acer for them to reset the information... or am i just way out there on this... anyone else have any ideas or links to more specific information on the security system for the notebook?

    --

    ...A no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool...
  64. USP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Universal Source of Power? GREAT IDEA! I'm in....except I have to go get my batlath polished for the convention as well... KAPLAH!

  65. drugs by bliss · · Score: 0

    "If you are dead, the fingerprint wont work. If you'd do any research and actually think you'd realize this. Using a fingerprint actually requires that the pirate keep you alive. "

    simple solution get some industrial strength sodium pentathol and it's all over even sleeping pills.

    --
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    1. Re:drugs by Glothar · · Score: 1

      See my response to mirko's response to me.

      Everyone seems to think these can take exact fingerprints. Use one. You'll see why no one has come up with a scheme to "steal" your fingerprint yet.

      Sodium Pentathol (especially industrial strength) wont work. Hell. A couple of shots of vodka would make it impossible for you to get into your laptop. Try again.

      Face it. Its simpler to just wait till someone is logged in and take the data then. But the print is much more secure than a password and involves completely insane (sodium pentathol?, why not just ask about what is on the drive then) measures to bypass.

  66. [*] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *unless JonKatz is writing a book about geek attitudes in a post-Colu^H^H^H^WTC world.[1]




    1nobody likes a smartass, son...

  67. total data loss? by passion · · Score: 2

    Hmm, so if you got in a car accident, and lost your hands - all your data would be totally and permanently unrecoverable?

    Will this drive up the incidence of finger mutilation as people could potentially try to hijack your computer?

    --
    - passion
    1. Re:total data loss? by Nurgster · · Score: 2

      If you got into a major car accident, you'd prolly have bigger things to worry about than getting data off your laptop...

      --
      "Faith is the last resort of a desperate man" - Me
  68. Re:Great.. now I'll *never* be able to re-activate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Lost my index finger in a freak accident, and had to reset the laptop to use another finger."


    So how'd the plastic surgery on your nose work out?

  69. Re: Possible solution for Corporations... by BluePenguin · · Score: 1

    "In corporations, the IT department usually has a master key so that even when the employee leaves, the company can still retrieve the data"

    I'd think about adding your senior IT staff to laptops when they're checked out. I think that with the lifespan of hardware, your turnaround on senior IT staff is usally not as fast as the replacement cycle on hardware.

    Thoughts from Cubeland....

    --
    If I can't see it in Lynx I'm not interested.
  70. terrorists and other fun things by bliss · · Score: 0

    "Some information you may be willing to die to protect. For example, giving information that a terrorist could use to kill thousands. Where are the nukes, and how do you launch them? I'm not sure how well I could take turture, but I'm pretty sure I could deal with a bullet in the head."

    That's why you try to kill him and hopefully you are armed.

    --
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
  71. Demolition Man? No...Red Dwarf ! by oneiros27 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I doubt Red Dwarf was the first show to use it, but they were much funnier about it....

    They come upon a door.

    KRYTEN: Uh-oh, a door. We'd better use an air vent.
    LISTER: No need.
    KRYTEN: Sir?
    LISTER: Look, I'm gonna do something now, Kryten, that's totally, totally
    gross. I don't want you to look. Turn around.
    KRYTEN: What?
    LISTER: Trust me, you don't wanna know!

    KRYTEN reluctantly turns around. LISTER pulls the object he picked up
    earlier out of his jacket: it's a hand. He presses the severed hand to
    the palm-print device, and the door opens. He puts the hand back in his
    jacket and turns around. KRYTEN has a sick look of realization on his
    face.


    KRYTEN: Logically, sir, there is only one way you could have possibly
    have opened that door. I feel quite nauseous. Where is it?
    LISTER: Where's what?
    KRYTEN: Oh, sir!! You've got it in your jacket!!
    LISTER: I got us out of the hold, didn't I?
    KRYTEN: Sir, you are sick! You are a sick, sick person! How can you
    possibly even conceive of such an idea?
    LISTER: Cheer up! Or I'll beat you to death with the wet end!
    KRYTEN: Sir, if mechanoids could barf, I'd be onto my fifth bag by now.
    You're a sick person! Sick! Sick!

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  72. I'm so bad at this stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Geez... Shortly after I started playing around with Apple's Voice Recognition login, I lost my voice. That kind of thing always happens to me... I don't even want to think of what would happen if I started using one of these...

  73. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn Mods, this is FUNNY

  74. I've had a TravelMate 739T for a year now. by slashbaby · · Score: 1

    It also has Fingerprint recognition to boot/decrypt files. The 740 isn't the first notebook that has that technology.

    I think it works as a theft deterent (with me going to school and all), but there are problems with it.

    The software to input and change your fingerprints will only run on windows 2000. (I haven't tried WINE though).

    the software writes the fingerprints it "ok's" to the BIOS (or firmware somewhere) and then checks your prints against that on boot. so if you use win2000 (preinstalled) to input your prints, and then format install another OS, you can't change the fingerprints without reinstalling Win2k.

    it looks cool though.

  75. Great Toy, Little Value by cnladd · · Score: 1

    This is a great little technical toy - offers peace of mind to management and such - but that's really about it. There are several things that aren't mentioned, and one thing (for a biometric system of this sort) that is glaringly absent.

    First, how easily can the device be damaged? Scratched? Can you register more than one finger (in case you get a cut or scratch on the one registered)?

    Finally, there are plenty of companies who would find a laptop like this useful. But there are several organizations that would not only find this neat, but would demand that this level of security be mandatory. For this crowd, the device is next to useless without an included heat sensor. And don't forget one of the most important things: for decent security, it should be a combination of what you have (a finger) and what you know (password/phrase/etc). Unless you use them in combination, having just one isn't much better that just having the other.

    --

    --
    Welcome to the land of the easily amused...

  76. I'm guessing it's not that effective by thejake316 · · Score: 1

    It's probably about the same security-wise to those little locks they used to put on the front of PC cases to disable the keyboard. Once you have physical access to anything, it's just a matter of time until you can compromise it.

    --
    AC's cheerfully ignored
  77. Another reason it might not be useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting


    How many bits worth of unpredictable information, exactly, is in a fingerprint? I know it's "a lot", but is it enough? 48 bits is "a lot" too, but it has been demonstrated to be not enough for protection against a simple brute-force attack.

    Ultimately, it's all just bits. This fingerprint-recognition device ultimately must convert your fingerprint into a binary key, and use that key to perform the encryption/decryption. If someone can get a copy of your encrypted data, they could run it through software which tried binary keys until it found the right one. If the adversary could lift your fingerprint from something you've touched, that might give them information which helps them narrow down the search.

    Until I found out just how many keys they'd have to try before exhausting the keyspace, I wouldn't trust this to be secure. A good mixed-case/numbers password with a - or ! (et al) thrown in can easily have 67**8 > 48-bit strength. A 5-word english passphrase can have up to 38619 ** 5 > 76-bit strength (38619 words in /usr/dict/words, and that's assuming no case variations). For very secure stuff, I'll keep a 1024-bit RSA keypair on a floppy disk in my lapel (no, I'm not just being a smart-ass, I already do this.)

    Seriously, though, does anyone know the strength of a key generated by Acer's gizmo? And how much it might be narrowed down with a sample fingerprint to work from?

    -- TTK

    1. Re:Another reason it might not be useful by Mwongozi · · Score: 1
      For very secure stuff, I'll keep a 1024-bit RSA keypair on a floppy disk in my lapel

      Doesn't your disk become corrupt? What then? Disks are incredibly unreliable.

      Hey, I finally thought of a use for 8cm CD-Rs. :)

  78. what would kevin mitnick have done... by esoteric0 · · Score: 1

    if he'd have used one of these instead of the cryptography system he did use? he couldn't have claimed that he forgot the password, that's for sure. and he'd probably still be in jail. i think i'll stick to standard cryptography, screw all the biometric stuff.

  79. Encryption - but with what key???? by chamoru16 · · Score: 0

    As far I am aware - there is not a company out there that has figured out a way to generate a secure and reliable encryption key based upon a scanned fingerprint. Everytime your finger is scanned, the scan is different and the authentication is done using an algorithm that checks a certain number of minutae points. If the match is with a certain percentage, it authenticates. Multiple scans cannot produce the same binary result, so fingerprint scans cannot be used to generate a reliabel encryption key.
    So, how do they encrypt files??? Usually, a hard coded key is built (or defined by the user at installation) into the system and fingerprint authentication merely unlocks the key. Most systems also have an override password - which makes this system as secure as the user defined override password.
    Biometrics should not be used for high security. They are good at identifiying, but not good in a single token authentication system when encryption is involved. For me, biometrics is a cool convience tool.
    My favorite use for fingerprint scanners is simply for the convience. The software remembers all my passwords and I just use my fingerprint to log in to Slashdot.

  80. dumb ? can you repeat ? by mirko · · Score: 1
    1. yes, of course, I never used one, and BTW, I'd prefer facial recognition (like on the sony vaio c1vx) or retinal scanner. you get this point. but if you want me to use one, just explain me why I am "plenty wrong", not just "about"...
      You may also continue insulting me and just get your precious argumentation wasted.
    2. how does it take to your inanimed body to reach the bloddy pressure stage that'd warn this device of your unavailableness? don't you think that if I just blast your head I may enter the system within one second or 2?
    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:dumb ? can you repeat ? by Glothar · · Score: 1

      Because these things arent accurate.

      Sorry for the insulting remarks. When I said you were dumb, it was more "acting dumb", as I am often known to do. I was getting annoyed by lots of people spouting crap which was simply their guesses and claiming them as fact.

      You have to put your finger on the scanner with the same pressure in the same orientation and the same position. These are things someone else simply wont know. Beyond normal false acceptance rates, its very difficult for one person to even get another persons finger to scan right, when they are conscious. The normal weight of the human arm is too much, and gives a poor quality print. The weight of the finger is too little, and gives too light of a print. The arm must be supported as if the person was supporting it. If you've recently washed your hands with soap that was a bit harsh, your finger will be drier than normal and it may take a few minutes before your print will return to normal. If your palms are sweaty (as mine might be if someone had a gun to my head), then the print might be too dark. Two fingerprints taken from the same scanner when it was at two different positions on the same desk might not match. Altering the height of the chair you are sitting in, or the desk you're sitting at can be enough of a difference to have the print rejected. This list keeps going. An unconcious person will not apply pressure in the right pattern since someone will force the entire print down, instead of applying the most force on tip as if tendons were pulling on the bone. A person with a gun to their head will be trembling. A person who's drunk or spiked with sodium pentathol will be sloppy and skew their print.

      And dont be fooled. Its not because the scanners are high tech. Its because they arent. Image recognition isn't involved. Mathematical pattern matching is. Its much easier to foul up the latter of the two. So, as a result, false reject rates can get annoying, but false accepts are generally very low

      Also note that it implies that someone actually set the scanner up to provide this security, which Acer is not known for. But this is a theoretical discussion on the security of a fingerprint scanner.

      In short, name one instance where fingerprints are less secure than passwords and/or do not provide safety to the person who has them.

    2. Re:dumb ? can you repeat ? by mirko · · Score: 1

      thanks, I was actually hoping to understand the system since your first remark. ;-)
      I once heard about a guy who wanted to check not the passwd but the rythm along which the user would type...
      sounded interesting...

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  81. Capacitance Detection for Living Humans by kc0dby · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's easier to detect the authenticity of a finger than one might think.

    After being unable to activate my touchpad with anything other than my finger, my curiosity had been captured. After a great deal of experimentation, and actually getting 5 other engineers running around looking for something to fool the touchpad, we finally resorted to technical support. Here was my letter:


    I have a prosthetic limb which I am unable to use
    the synaptics touchpad with. I am unaware of the type of touch sensing it uses, and have been unsuccessful in my attempts to 'simulate' a fingertip on my prosthesis.

    I even bought a rubber hand and cut the finger off
    and stuck it to my prosthesis, but to no avail.

    I have also tried heating the prosthesis to my body temperature.

    The pad works fine for the other engineers in the
    group with real fingers, so I don't believe there is a problem with the pad itself.

    Do you have any suggestions for a tip I can use to
    properly activate the touchpad?

    If not, do you plan on releasing something I would
    be able to activate
    with a prosthesis?



    And their reply was:


    Hi Chris,

    Unfortunately, as you have discovered, our touchpad uses finger-sensing technology. Basically, the touchpad determines that a touch is made through the capacitance of the human body.

    I'm very sorry to say that we cannot recommend a
    product you can use to activate it at this time.

    Best regards,


    So what have we learned other than how fun messing with tech support can be? Even a heated pulsing finger isn't going to work if the electrical properties aren't right. Capacitance is a tough thing to trick. Try putting probe leads on two parts of a finger, and plot the voltage / current patterns. Very, very difficult to duplicate.

    Of course, medical science will always find a way to stick severed fingers on hands, and we know that your average bin Laden follower won't scoff at the replacement of one of his fingers with a victims...

    --
    I apparently forgot that sig != uptime...
  82. Old news... by AssNard · · Score: 1

    Old info... Acer had this same technology in their old TravelMate 739 which has been out since last year or very early this year.

  83. Umm, this is OLD. by TrevorB · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A co-worker of mine got one of these Acer laptops with fingerprint recognition several months back, perhaps around April.

    The fingerprint recognition was OK for one person, but as soon as we tried to configure it to recognize two people, we had horrible problems. It seemed like there were differences between the BIOS level recognition and the software OS level recognition. We were eventually both locked out and just sent the laptop in to be reset.

    1. Re:Umm, this is OLD. by Asikaa · · Score: 1
      "We were eventually both locked out and just sent the laptop in to be reset."

      And that's when the Government copied all your data. ;)

      --

      Asikaa
      Come in, twenty-seventy-seventy, your time is up.

  84. Custom Keyboard Controller + Fingerprint sensor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One scheme I saw for making the system a bit more secure (i.e., you can't just clear the CMOS settings or pop out the BIOS FLASH chip to circumvent the security settings) was to install a custom keyboard controller chip.

    On many motherboards, the keyboard controller is a Hitachi H8 uP, with mask-programmed ROM code. *It* can process the fingerprint startup and basically disable the rest of the motherboard through a new "enable" output unless the right code/fingerprint is provided. Only way to circumvent this is to replace the keyboard controller, which requires SMT reworking.

  85. .. probably runs windows.. by josepha48 · · Score: 2

    .. adds your fingerprint to a global FBI like database, that is used with MS passport and knows all the porn sites you visit... once it knows who you are it does not let you out of its site..

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!

  86. Fingerprints and Privacy by masq · · Score: 1

    This seems like an frighteningly easy way for the Feds to gather evidence linking individuals to certain anti-social computer-based actions; for example, "Sorry, Mister Gates, but those incriminating emails REALLY WERE written by you - we've got your fingerprints on your keyboard, and at the time the mail was sent, to boot!"

    I'd be more worried about the fact that with the new "call home" systems, "they" can pin YOU down as the guy they're after for downloading MP3s or playing with crypto or using warez or whatever you're into. Having your prints kinda kills plausible deniability...

    ...and god forbid any of our *wives* should ever get their hands on these records... (*shudder*)

  87. Yeah right by zpengo · · Score: 2
    Finger print recognition has been a pain for me. We had it installed at work a few years ago, and it worked fine for the first couple of months. However, my hands start peeling due to dryness in the winter, and it soon came to the point that the system wouldn't let me in. This wouldn't have been a problem except that I was usually the first one to work in the morning, and was getting locked out.

    Yeah right. You're really just worried because your fingerprints might be hard to read after those late nights reading playboy.com

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  88. I have to disagree by Snootch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After all, if you struggle at all, it will be unable to get a good fix. Even twitching the muscles in your finger violently should be enough, and if $BADGUY hold your finger down hard enough to stop that, you'll get a screwy reading anyway

  89. I wonder... by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    Can the same sort of recognition be able to apply to files that I save on the laptop?

    If so, I'm all over it!

    Then I can save all the porn I want and not worry about my wife getting into the files!

    It's good bye doghouse and hello bedroom!

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  90. positive feedback by twitter · · Score: 2
    ...my hands start peeling due to dryness in the winter, and it soon came to the point that the system wouldn't let me in. This wouldn't have been a problem except that I was usually the first one to work in the morning, and was getting locked out.

    Locked out, standing in the cold, your hands getting dryer and less likely to work the next day. Oh my!

    We use a hand and plastic card system here for entry. It seems to work well. Key numbers work where there is no card reader or if you forget your card. The hand readers themselves tollerate changes in my hands from exercising, but not gloves, and are speedy. This might not work for a laptop, but it's tops for building entry.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  91. high tech sneaker defense. by twitter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Train it to recognize your toe prints. They change less than your finger prints, and anyone who would steal your foot will have to smell it all day.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:high tech sneaker defense. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I can hardly wait until I'm sitting next to some guy on a plane who ran to make liftoff, take off his shoes to boot up his laptop... I estimate about three to four rows around us would have to suffer!

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  92. As the NRA says by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    They will take my fingers from my cold dead hands.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  93. knowing acer by vbrtrmn · · Score: 1

    Knowing the high quality of Acer products, the finger print recognition will probably work fine for about 1 week, after that, it will work every other week, then less and less. You'll have to send the laptop back to Acer to have them reset it, which will probably cost $500 per reset. My suggestion, buy a nice toshiba, install linux on it and use a nice hard bios password.

    --
    it's a sig, wtf?
  94. How secure is this once it's stolen? by ehud42 · · Score: 1

    What is the intended application?

    If it's just to protect my machine from snooping employees or cleaning staff, then proper use of NTFS and a dilligent password is more then suffecient.

    If it's supposed to protect a companies trade secrets kept on a travelling sales person's laptop, the maintenance would be a nightmare. How does a company recover the data if the employee is let go? A corporate spy would simply use the same technique.

    If it's supposed to keep top secret documents related to national security safe from well funded agencies, I wonder (again), why wouldn't a secure file system and well managed password work?

    In short, this seems like the wrong tool for the job. Finger prints should be used to verify the id of a person entering / leaving a secure area where there is a guard watching to ensure it is a live hand being used.

    On the otherhand, there was a cool (if in concept only) technology demonstrated years ago that used a PC mounted camera and some trivial face recognition software to activate / deactivate a screen saver. This would be perfect in cubicle farms where you want to make a quick trip to get coffee / get rid of coffee. I remember to lock up my station at night when I go home, but not always for those spontaneous flights of fancy.

    --
    I'm in my right mind and I have the answer to everything!
  95. MOD THIS UP !!! (+1 informative) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forgot something... (see subject)

  96. Just like in the movies by DarklordJonnyDigital · · Score: 1
    Someone could:

    Kidnap you and use your thumbprint to open it

    Spray some kind of latex onto their hand and high-five or shake hands with you to get your prints

    Get a really, REALLY good camera and take a picture of your fingertips...

  97. what is the scanning method ? geographic or photo? by beanerspace · · Score: 2

    The success of this technology is going to depend on what type of fingerprint image is being scanned.

    Is it photographic ? That is, the mechanism captures a photo of the fingerprint using lighting differences to create a pattern. If so, then what happens when I get the errant pen mark or paper cut across my finger ?

    Is it geographic ? There are some nifty technologies out there that either through sonographic or similar means create a viritual image of the fingerprint pattern. These are far more accomodating in ignoring things like dust, dirt, pen marks, paper cuts, chaffing/sluffed skin, boogers and other stuff that sticks to our hands.

    Does anyone know which type is being used on this laptop ?

  98. Yikes! by base2op · · Score: 1

    How long before you have to employ your fingerprint to register software? : /

  99. password backup by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

    maybe redundant, but I didn't see it yet while scanning over the comments. This article says "As a backup, both systems let you use a password to get in." If you can use a password to get in..... what's the point of the fingerprint in the first place? Is it really more convenient to try to hold your finger in the same place every time than it is to type in your password? The article also has some info on how "error-free" (or not) these systems are... seems to me it still needs a little work.

    --

    Place sig here.
  100. no hard feelings... i hope by Glothar · · Score: 1

    I'm not a fan of the whole key rhythm thing as far as passwords go. It seems tremendously weak once you figure out what the "password" part is (the fact that its rhythm not keys), and humans would pick this up after watching only a few times.

    And that SSH thing... like I dont slam the password into the keyboard in a blinding flurry of keys and fingers anyways.

    I can now sleep happy knowning that I have educated at least one person. It seems that explaining convinces people better than saying they're dumb.

  101. cool... by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 2

    cut off your finger accidentally and you won't be able to access your files. :-)

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  102. Apple's Voice Login by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Mac OS9, people have been able to login with a voiceprint - saying a specific phrase, where the phrase and the voice has to be matched. Evidently, it works decently accurate. People have tested it with twins, and it can tell the difference, but at the same time, a guy with a cold can log in, though it takes a couple of tries for the stuffed up person.

  103. More details on the chip itself... by fluffhead · · Score: 2

    According to the Acer site the chip is made by Authentec, Inc. (based in Florida); here are some more tech specs: Products; and some other details are in their Media Coverage Archive.

    --

    #include "disclaim.h"
    "All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." - Steve Wozniak
  104. Re:Cocktail Sausages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I can gather from your postings, you most certainly like a bit of cock in your tail.

    Wingnut

  105. what about theft?? by gol64738 · · Score: 1

    i can understand the reason behind the fingerprinting authentication scheme for encryption /decryption purposes, but what about down and out theft??

    'oh', you say, 'the thief won't be able to use the laptop without my fingerprint'.
    yes, but if your laptop is stolen, then you won't be able to use it either...

    most thieves don't know anything at all about computers anyways -otherwise they probably wouldn't be thieves in the first place.

  106. Some possible error messages by S.I.O. · · Score: 1

    1: "Please *don't* use your penis for authentication."

    2: "This fingerprint is way too simple. Use one of your more complex fingers."

    3: "Your fingerprint expires today. Please change it immediately."

  107. Acer required to send fingerprints to FBI by sjonke · · Score: 1

    As soon as you log in to the internet with a fingerprint set it sends the fingerprint to the FBI, their systems search their databases, and soon agents are at your door holding a glove for you to try on.

    --
    --- What?
  108. 739TLV has it as well - IT SUCKS by SmegTheLight · · Score: 1

    I have had a 739TLV from Acer since last December. It has the built in Veridicom finger print scanner as well - right on the palm rest like the 740. One problem with it : The crappy bundled software that Acer provides.. The software has not been maintained and the only version that exists pops up a "DUMMY" dialog box (It actually says 'dummy') during login as a remnant that they must have needed for development. There are also hotkeys for the software that offer very limited selection. The hotkeys cannot be turned off. The wide range of choices are Shift End, Ctrl End (Can't write code now.. I depend on those !), and the F11 key.. Oh, and I can't forget the Registration Nag screen that forces you to go to the makers web site to register it. The nag screen can't be turned off with out the registration, and they don't even have an automated web based registration - just a page that tells you to CALL them or send them an email.. ...And no specs available to try and make it work under Linux.. So, after one year "Living with it" I wish they had left it out and made the unit cheaper...

    --
    Time travel is possible. We are quickly heading for 1984.
  109. But what about... by rant-mode-on · · Score: 1


    Does this fingerprint recognition system prevent anyone from opening the case, taking the disk out and installing it in another laptop/PC somewhere?

  110. Good for porn, terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds great for concealing porn or plans
    to kill lots of people but not much else. Very useful!!!!

  111. Acer TravelMate 740 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowolf Cluster of THESE!!!

  112. Ye Gads by alexburke · · Score: 2

    I have two holes to punch into Acer's new notebook:

    (1) Their illustration of a Pentium III-M processor is good for a laugh. Check out the lower-right corner of the second page of the brochure, and tell me that isn't an FCPGA Coppermine Pentium III sitting on top of a circuit board.

    (2) More than likely, they've implemented the hard drive protection using an IBM Travelstar hard drive, which has a password-protection option (although this is very rarely used in the real world). Why am I poopooing this? Keep reading.

    Section 11.8 of the Travelstar 48GH Specifications (page 87, PDF page 101) details IBM's security system. I would imagine this can be circumvented in one of two ways, the first being in the hard drive itself and the second being part of the notebook's security implementation.

    First, there's a Master Password in addition to the normal User Password. If you don't know what the Master Password is, and don't know that only you know both passwords, anyone with access to the Master Password (quite likely any high-level Acer technician) can send a Device Unlock command to the drive along with the Master Password and voilà, the oyster opens to reveal the pearls inside. (No, you can't read the passwords out of the drive's EEPROM; it's stored in a non-externally-addressable area of the disk. Even if you know and control both passwords, though, I'd imagine there are undocumented commands to reset the password or unlock the drive regardless of the password. If you're thinking that IBM would need to be able to unlock drives to refurbish/repair them, they wouldn't, because there's a command which will write zeroes to every externally-addressable sector on the drive then unlock the drive and erase the password. No hard drive maker that I know of guarantees the integrity of the data on any hard drive that's sent to them.)

    Second, I'd be very surprised if they had gone any further than storing the Travelstar's access password in CMOS or an EEPROM part, and sending it to the drive if the fingerprint matches what's stored there as well. (They couldn't store a one-way hash of the drive password, because any obfuscation would have to be reversable to be able to feed the password to the drive.) Therefore, anyone with an SMD rework station and an EEPROM reader could probably extract the password from the CMOS/EEPROM.

    In summary, I wouldn't trust state secrets to this. I would recommend PGP Corporate Desktop instead as the closest thing a mortal can get to decent data security. (An interesting aside: You know how the government erases drives holding classified information before they're resold? They don't. The drives are physically destroyed. For good reason.)

  113. Don't leave it lying around anyways... by adoll · · Score: 1

    Only the Canadian 'spy' agency goes leaving important data lying around. You all heard about the briefcase fully of documents that were stolen from a spymaster at the parking lot of a hockey game? Seems some bums were scrounging for booze money and broke into her car. Not thinking the documents were valuable, they emptied them into a dumpster and sold the case.

    Fingerprint recognition won't stop people from stealing things.

    -AD

  114. Not to rain on your parade of objections ... by SimCash · · Score: 1
    Using an ordinary encryption method, you'd just hook the HD up to a different machine and be back in business.
    Not to rain on your parade of objections but the biometric systems we build would let you get a new sensor, since the algorithms are designed to work with a non-image form of the biometric data anyway. We can even enroll you with one sensor and use a second type of sensor to match with the enrolled print biokey.
  115. Seinfeld episode by SimCash · · Score: 1
    Wasn't that the "George gets fingered" episode ...

    That was a great post, we need a site that like the "It was a dark and stormy night" Bulwer-Lytton site that lets us post our favorite title-synopsis skits for Seinfeld.

  116. MacGyver by Kallahar · · Score: 1

    To get around this, just do it the way MacGyver did! Take a glass that the subject touched, heat some wax, put the wax on your finger, press your finger to the print on the glass, go press that to the reader and viola' you're in!

    What this would be good for is _supplemental_ security. So you would need a valid password AND a print to get in. Or you could use the print to access semi-private data while you would still need the password to get to the really sensitive stuff. It's not like we need one security level for everything.

    Travis