I have been using QNX for an industrial batching solution for years. The company I am working for has been using it for a bit longer.
I know it is RT, but....
you pay a hek of a price. With the previous version we could not use procesors with an odd clock speed ( odd as in 233 is bad but 200 or 266 or 200 is good... 333 is bad) does that make any sence to you?
Support for even serial and parralel cards in 4.15 is sketchy...
It works, but I do not see why everyone is going crazy over it. Linux or *BSD is far more superier as a web/mail/name/whatever deamon as well as desktop (just try getting your rage iiid or whatever top of the line video card to work under QNX)
Oh you say RT for multimedia? There are plenty of latency patches out there for Linux kernels or you can apply the RT patch (yuk! Id go for the latency patches... wich may become mainstream if it can be 'presented' well enough to Linus)
well thats my two sence. QNX is nothing new, nothing spectaclular. If you have no Industrial needs, you have no QNX needs.
A proccess where by launguage is expressed by the use of a tool or machine. An arrangement of buttons or 'keys' are pushed to represent launguage that may be then transmitted in an electronical and/or digital form.
Mozilla is still a long way from being useful. It still eats up 80Meg just for one session... Until they clean that up, Navigator and IE will be the best options.
I hope that was a typo.. or is that the new math, or is it non-dotted notation?
I think you need to get a new subnet calculator, your numbers do not add up.
It will not let you log in. It pops up with an error that this Beta is not supported.
The browser works. Click on get AOL 5.0 and the AOL browser (Obviosly Mozilla based) pops up to the AOL page. You cannot enter a url but you can get wherever by entering in a search.
I am writing this now in the AOL browser.
TOP reports aolbin is only using 260Meg... hehehe bloat... then again M17 is about 170Meg... while nutscrape is nice at ~ 10Meg....
Kinda neet. I may soon be able to upgrade my sister with her AOhelL to a real OS.
I understand the NSA is developing a Secure Unix distrabution based on the GNU/Linux platform, or rather out-sourcing this project. Can you say if the NSA plans on releasing the changes made to GPL licensed modules back to the Copyright holder -- even if the NSA plans on only using the Distrabution internaly? I asume if the Distrabution is publicaly released the NSA will abide by the rules of the GPL software liscense.
30G is nothing.There are hundreds of thousands of SAP instalations on Unix with 300G (yes three zeros) and more. You know what DB they run. Oracle. SQL 7.0 is based off of the single user PC enviroment and has been scaled up to the enterprise server. I am not saying it is not a good DB. It has not out performed Oracle yet. That is a fact. Oracle was designed for enterprise DB and scaled down to PC servers. If anyone is interested in the fastest platform for enterprise ERP go to http://sap.com I was surprised to find it is Oracle on Linux. It beat out Oracle on HPUX, Oracle on NT and SQL 7 on NT.
I understand that TUX was primarily designed and coded by Red Hat. Did other Distrobutions/Vendors have there hands in parts of this project? Who and what did they contribute?
Ok I know Tux is the penguin Linux mascot.. But I want to know what Red Hat Tux 1.0 is? I checked Red Hats web site and ftp site... nothing. Any ideas?
I know this has allready been posted but... Make the front end web based. It has two very important attributes. 1. Cross platform. 2. Easy on network. What happens when the CFO decides he wants to access the application remotely (dial-up, extranet, telecomute...ETC)? With a Web based application it is easy. Back end can be cross platform as well. PHP is supported on all/many systems, as well as Coldfusion, as well as ASP(Yukkie).
The virrus puts your Linux box in frame buffer mode and if your monitor can not handle the Virticle Sync... BOOOOMMMM hehehe man I cannot believe someone accually published that story:P
Well there is no ia-32 ISO at metalab yet so I will waite. If this is more stable than the beta, I will be very impressed. 6.2-Beta is more stable then any other version of redhat I have seen.
Why don't you ask ETOYS.COM? They have been running there E-Comerce applications on Linux since day one. Just for starters. Ask Compaq. They only recomend running SAP-R/3 on Linux for Application Servers that support over 1,000 concerent users. Other wise Unix, NT or OS/390 is fine. Just to name two.
This sounds to much like Y2K to me, really. Nothing happened, someone got disapointed that technology did not end the world.
So now its, "Well would if 'hackers' (Crackers) break into our systems and blow everyone up." Good thing there is no time table to disprove this one. Can't wait for the new anti-craker-terrorism laws....
Im an old Amiga guy. But its dead. I wonder what they mean by Amiga powered? Netscraft reports www.amiga.com running IRIX and www.amiga.de running NT4. Why not change the logo on the page to IRIX/NT4 powered?
I was just at a GeoTrain (Global Knowledge) class for Cisco certification, THEY HAVE REDHAT CERTIFICATION CLASSES ALL OVER THE US. Sylvan does the cert. so what is the big deal. $5000? no problem, a CCIE cost $25,000 with classes (no joke) with only 3,000 CCIE's in the US the 1,500 RHIE's does not look bad at all. The MCSE is worthless 'cuz anybody and there brother can pass it, and have. IT companys want us to have some letters and numbers behind our names that help them sell product, but dont help us sell our carreirs. I just wish they would make a spell checker for HTML forms:P
George, Im not trying to be a net flame, but X.25 is a layer 2 protocol like frame relay, ISDN and xDSL. TCP/IP works on every layer but layer 2 (if you include stuff like telnet.. ya know layer 7 stuff) The US back bone origanaly was HDLC (or someother awful frame type... not that HDLC is bad) at layer 2... not TCP/IP.
He was made at the same place as Netscape too. U of I in Champaign-Urbana. I think HAL was an acronymn for Holistic Algarithmic Learning.... Not just the letters before IBM.
This is real. I have used this, it works well. If your not going to download it that is fine. But it is real. I am running it on my Pentium 200 mmx (not a PII). With a SB16 kernel driver. No OSS-Comercial. I am not using the Video features, just the Audio. For Audio it is the fastest editor for Linux. If you are still a sceptic, but want to believe. Check out freshmeat. Look up the previos version Broadcast on the net. This is real, I guess you nay-sayers just don't have faith in Open Source -- or know what it means.
I have been using QNX for an industrial batching solution for years. The company I am working for has been using it for a bit longer.
I know it is RT, but....
you pay a hek of a price. With the previous version we could not use procesors with an odd clock speed ( odd as in 233 is bad but 200 or 266 or 200 is good... 333 is bad) does that make any sence to you?
Support for even serial and parralel cards in 4.15 is sketchy...
It works, but I do not see why everyone is going crazy over it. Linux or *BSD is far more superier as a web/mail/name/whatever deamon as well as desktop (just try getting your rage iiid or whatever top of the line video card to work under QNX)
Oh you say RT for multimedia? There are plenty of latency patches out there for Linux kernels or you can apply the RT patch (yuk! Id go for the latency patches... wich may become mainstream if it can be 'presented' well enough to Linus)
well thats my two sence. QNX is nothing new, nothing spectaclular. If you have no Industrial needs, you have no QNX needs.
A proccess where by launguage is expressed by the use of a tool or machine. An arrangement of buttons or 'keys' are pushed to represent launguage that may be then transmitted in an electronical and/or digital form.
SAP themselves do not develop on SAP DB. SAP themselves use DB2 for all development.
It seems to me that they are doing this for not because it is a good product but they do not want to develop it anymore.
Most SAP instalations do run on Oracle, DB2 or MS-SQL.
This is big news as it is the first ERP database to be GPLed.
Mozilla is still a long way from being useful. It still eats up 80Meg just for one session... Until they clean that up, Navigator and IE will be the best options.
I hope that was a typo.. or is that the new math, or is it non-dotted notation?
I think you need to get a new subnet calculator, your numbers do not add up.
The browser works. Click on get AOL 5.0 and the AOL browser (Obviosly Mozilla based) pops up to the AOL page. You cannot enter a url but you can get wherever by entering in a search.
I am writing this now in the AOL browser.
TOP reports aolbin is only using 260Meg... hehehe bloat... then again M17 is about 170Meg... while nutscrape is nice at ~ 10Meg.... Kinda neet. I may soon be able to upgrade my sister with her AOhelL to a real OS.
I understand the NSA is developing a Secure Unix distrabution based on the GNU/Linux platform, or rather out-sourcing this project. Can you say if the NSA plans on releasing the changes made to GPL licensed modules back to the Copyright holder -- even if the NSA plans on only using the Distrabution internaly? I asume if the Distrabution is publicaly released the NSA will abide by the rules of the GPL software liscense.
30G is nothing.There are hundreds of thousands of SAP instalations on Unix with 300G (yes three zeros) and more. You know what DB they run. Oracle.
SQL 7.0 is based off of the single user PC enviroment and has been scaled up to the enterprise server. I am not saying it is not a good DB. It has not out performed Oracle yet. That is a fact.
Oracle was designed for enterprise DB and scaled down to PC servers.
If anyone is interested in the fastest platform for enterprise ERP go to http://sap.com I was surprised to find it is Oracle on Linux. It beat out Oracle on HPUX, Oracle on NT and SQL 7 on NT.
I understand that TUX was primarily designed and coded by Red Hat. Did other Distrobutions/Vendors have there hands in parts of this project? Who and what did they contribute?
Ok I know Tux is the penguin Linux mascot.. But I want to know what Red Hat Tux 1.0 is? I checked Red Hats web site and ftp site... nothing. Any ideas?
I know this has allready been posted but... Make the front end web based. It has two very important attributes.
1. Cross platform.
2. Easy on network. What happens when the CFO decides he wants to access the application remotely (dial-up, extranet, telecomute...ETC)? With a Web based application it is easy.
Back end can be cross platform as well. PHP is supported on all/many systems, as well as Coldfusion, as well as ASP(Yukkie).
I get there point, but Red Hat is not linux says that Red Hat is something other than a Linux OS or distrabution.
It should be: Linux is not Red Hat
The virrus puts your Linux box in frame buffer mode and if your monitor can not handle the Virticle Sync... BOOOOMMMM :P
hehehe man I cannot believe someone accually published that story
There is an iso at ftp.kernel.org
Well there is no ia-32 ISO at metalab yet so I will waite.
If this is more stable than the beta, I will be very impressed. 6.2-Beta is more stable then any other version of redhat I have seen.
Why don't you ask ETOYS.COM? They have been running there E-Comerce applications on Linux since day one. Just for starters. Ask Compaq. They only recomend running SAP-R/3 on Linux for Application Servers that support over 1,000 concerent users. Other wise Unix, NT or OS/390 is fine. Just to name two.
Broadcast 2000 Rocks!!! It is the best audio editing program for linux, thuogh you can edit video as well. Have been using for a while. No complaints!
This sounds to much like Y2K to me, really. Nothing happened, someone got disapointed that technology did not end the world.
So now its, "Well would if 'hackers' (Crackers) break into our systems and blow everyone up."
Good thing there is no time table to disprove this one. Can't wait for the new anti-craker-terrorism laws....
Im an old Amiga guy. But its dead. I wonder what they mean by Amiga powered? Netscraft reports www.amiga.com running IRIX and www.amiga.de running NT4. Why not change the logo on the page to IRIX/NT4 powered?
I was just at a GeoTrain (Global Knowledge) class for Cisco certification, THEY HAVE REDHAT CERTIFICATION CLASSES ALL OVER THE US. Sylvan does the cert. so what is the big deal. $5000? no problem, a CCIE cost $25,000 with classes (no joke) with only 3,000 CCIE's in the US the 1,500 RHIE's does not look bad at all. The MCSE is worthless 'cuz anybody and there brother can pass it, and have. IT companys want us to have some letters and numbers behind our names that help them sell product, but dont help us sell our carreirs. I just wish they would make a spell checker for HTML forms :P
George,
Im not trying to be a net flame, but X.25 is a layer 2 protocol like frame relay, ISDN and xDSL. TCP/IP works on every layer but layer 2 (if you include stuff like telnet.. ya know layer 7 stuff)
The US back bone origanaly was HDLC (or someother awful frame type... not that HDLC is bad) at layer 2... not TCP/IP.
Real surfers dont even need a computer to surf the net. They can just sence the packets and feel the frames moving accross the net :)
He was made at the same place as Netscape too.
U of I in Champaign-Urbana.
I think HAL was an acronymn for Holistic Algarithmic Learning....
Not just the letters before IBM.
This is real.
Here is a link of me using it. http://thunklife.com/bc2k.jpeg
It seems like half of us have sence. And look, im not posting anonymous.
This is real. I have used this, it works well. If your not going to download it that is fine. But it is real. I am running it on my Pentium 200 mmx (not a PII). With a SB16 kernel driver. No OSS-Comercial.
I am not using the Video features, just the Audio. For Audio it is the fastest editor for Linux.
If you are still a sceptic, but want to believe. Check out freshmeat.
Look up the previos version Broadcast on the net.
This is real, I guess you nay-sayers just don't have faith in Open Source -- or know what it means.