Good points, and C++ has one thing going for it. Qt framework. Java-like interfaces for fast development, with C++ performance, and a minimal memory management.
Eclipse's gcc code parser integration is better than IntelliSense. It actually understand OO code. VS struggles badly with understanding OO code. for example, if every class re-implements one virtual function, VS cannot figure out usage of one particular implementation; even if there are object declared with that class.
Thus VS is good for debugging, for everything else in C++... not much so.
Unless you block them (ahem, hosts file), they do have data on you... it is enough to browse any web page that has deal with Facebook so that they have data on you.
And less money for Microsoft. Now one more reason to stick with what you got & not buy a new PC with a new Microsoft OS in it. It will cost you even more.
Hell, most regular people are still struggling with fact that Windows != Office. They don't get it why office costs as much as it does.
Could it be that Microsoft is OEM-ing Office just like they did Windows on retail computers? It is cheaper than the full retail license, but it is less flexible in the end.
and later it will make good profit. All these consoles were like that. once manufacturing of these components gets full steam, they get cheaper in a mass number.
Microsoft wants back on browser market at any cost. So this was thing to differentiate IE from rest of pack.
Other one was to support only few Windows versions. Haha. How stupid. They want to win the browser war by not supporting OSes that half of people have.
You failed as CEO. Google gives you all apps for multimedia, so you don't have to do anything there. But they give you 0 enterprise apps, so that is what you could have done. Its not like corporations are going to pirate your apps and risk being sued.
Most companies are afraid to derive products from projects with GPL license, in fear that they will have to share all their code (even unrelated) with customers, and that exact obligation from license is unclear, and might change in court.
Now, article seems to be more about using SW tools developed with GPL license; not developing their own products from GPL components. That is lesser issue.
Slashdot Mirror
Good points, and C++ has one thing going for it. Qt framework. Java-like interfaces for fast development, with C++ performance, and a minimal memory management.
with the "Deal"
now we are on long term consequences, and everybody told you it is not a good idea to stick with !Win phone and nothing else.
Eclipse's gcc code parser integration is better than IntelliSense. It actually understand OO code. VS struggles badly with understanding OO code. for example, if every class re-implements one virtual function, VS cannot figure out usage of one particular implementation; even if there are object declared with that class.
Thus VS is good for debugging, for everything else in C++... not much so.
Martian Republican party once ruled on Mars ;)
Because otherwise nobody would pay extra for a touch screen PC with Windows 8
Unless you block them (ahem, hosts file), they do have data on you... it is enough to browse any web page that has deal with Facebook so that they have data on you.
that won't be able to tolerate being hit. Like a child. Or drying concrete. Or another UAV.
And less money for Microsoft.
Now one more reason to stick with what you got & not buy a new PC with a new Microsoft OS in it. It will cost you even more.
Hell, most regular people are still struggling with fact that Windows != Office. They don't get it why office costs as much as it does.
Could it be that Microsoft is OEM-ing Office just like they did Windows on retail computers? It is cheaper than the full retail license, but it is less flexible in the end.
and later it will make good profit. All these consoles were like that. once manufacturing of these components gets full steam, they get cheaper in a mass number.
You might find it, but it might not be where you expect it.
http://theamazingios6maps.tumblr.com/post/32042128251/taken-on-my-ipad
They did not ban Google Maps, afterall censors are not that sadistic.
Play turn based strategies and adventures. Most of them need just mouse or keyboard. You can use both with one hand - one at a time.
I have a patent on filling of patents. Thus your patent is invalid.
Microsoft wants back on browser market at any cost. So this was thing to differentiate IE from rest of pack.
Other one was to support only few Windows versions. Haha. How stupid. They want to win the browser war by not supporting OSes that half of people have.
70 yrs after death of Tesla we're not able to figure wireless power distribution.
You failed as CEO. Google gives you all apps for multimedia, so you don't have to do anything there. But they give you 0 enterprise apps, so that is what you could have done. Its not like corporations are going to pirate your apps and risk being sued.
I paid $23 for The Orange Box, which had 3 games. My total play time across all of them is around 1,000 (thousand) hours.
Sorry, your explanation makes some sense, but in the end, you are paying for overpriced product and more profits are going to EA's exec pockets.
It has
Nvidia graphics with HW DX9 support
1680x1050 display
dualcore CPU
was selling with vista at that time.
Stop talking shit of things you know nothing of, I didn't even mention the model name.
I bought my Dell laptop in 2006. Guess what? It is Windows 8 compatible & I'll be getting it.
Profit > *
is more accurate.
Not good with history?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesar's_Civil_War#Crossing_the_Rubicon
And what do you think it would be called if somebody did this to US?
what, you mac is great because it can run Windows?
Then Windows PC is as good if it can run OSX.
But it is actually better. I don't need OSX for anything, and you just admitted that you need Windows or Linux.
is better than one he does not use.
Not defending Word here, but MS PR can also write article '12 ways word tops writer'.
Most companies are afraid to derive products from projects with GPL license, in fear that they will have to share all their code (even unrelated) with customers, and that exact obligation from license is unclear, and might change in court.
Now, article seems to be more about using SW tools developed with GPL license; not developing their own products from GPL components. That is lesser issue.