Slashdot Mirror


Riot Breaks Out At Foxconn

Presto Vivace writes with news (as reported by Engadget) of a riot at Foxconn's Taiyuan plant, reportedly over guards beating up a worker, and writes "Something is going on at Foxconn. Do any Slashdotters know of a good source for news about Chinese labor disputes?" Reports of the riot are also at Reuters, TUAW, and CNBC, to name a few.

456 comments

  1. Strange by rhavan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was trying to find the plant in question on IOS Maps, but I don't see it.

    1. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd be lucky to find China with those maps.

    2. Re:Strange by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wish there were a +1 Frightening moderation option

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    3. Re:Strange by postmortem · · Score: 5, Funny

      You might find it, but it might not be where you expect it.
      http://theamazingios6maps.tumblr.com/post/32042128251/taken-on-my-ipad

    4. Re:Strange by morcego · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd be lucky to find China with those maps.

      It is right between Italy and Venezuela.

      --
      morcego
    5. Re:Strange by Guppy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was trying to find the plant in question on IOS Maps, but I don't see it.

      Funny you joke, but mainland China considers accurate maps to be a state secret. All exported maps, including those used for GPS units, are required by law to introduce deliberate distortions (although some devices have hacks available to correct them).

    6. Re:Strange by Tough+Love · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh so you're saying, Apple actually developed iOS 6 maps to please the Chinese government and we shouldn't just ascribe it to incompetence?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    7. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Testing this thing out

    8. Re:Strange by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Fool, that's San Francisco.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:Strange by SomePgmr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, it's a feature, not a bug. Also, you're holding it wrong.

      I know this routine. ;)

    10. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah or maybe Guppy was just trying to share some info that the joke had reminded him/her of. Slashdot has become such a cesspool of jackassery. The post wasn't defending Apple's crappy maps replacement it was just sharing info...come one you insufferable slashdot baboons act decent for a change.

    11. Re:Strange by cultiv8 · · Score: 1

      Next to the ocean?

      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    12. Re:Strange by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      Actually, China's easy to find. It's everywhere else that's missing.

    13. Re:Strange by lhunath · · Score: 1

      He wasn't saying anything about iOS 6 maps.

      --
      ``OK, so ten out of ten for style, but minus several million for good thinking, yeah?''
    14. Re:Strange by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Funny

      In your map of China, there's a lot of something that is not China. Don't worry, here is the corrected version.

    15. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was trying to find the plant on my S III but I first had to reboot, after which the battery promptly went dead.

    16. Re:Strange by rjames13 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not that Venezuela the one floating off the coast of Zambia.

    17. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because of the name. Try "Taiyuan Federal Prison and Reeducation Facility" where people sentenced to hard labor toil away for free for 20+ hours per day making all your little iDevices.

    18. Re:Strange by NickFortune · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was trying to find the plant on my S III but I first had to reboot, after which the battery promptly went dead.

      I'm just waiting for the new to break that even bigger riots have been reported from at least three Samsung factories. And Samsung senior executives have been personally executing the rioters. By crucifixion, I expect.

      C'mon, you Appleturfers! Time to earn your salary!

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    19. Re:Strange by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      I wish there were a +1 Frightening moderation option

      -1, Frightening.

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    20. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, when you use your iOS6 device in China it will switch to a different map provider, AutoNavi, which is licensed to provide pretty accurate maps for China. I've found no issues with it, not yet anyway.

    21. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was trying to find the plant in question on IOS Maps, but I don't see it.

      Funny you joke, but mainland China considers accurate maps to be a state secret. All exported maps, including those used for GPS units, are required by law to introduce deliberate distortions (although some devices have hacks available to correct them).

      *exported from China
      *required under Chinese law

      Last I checked, they did not develop the mapping application In China nor do they get their mapping data by means of Chinese exports, so nothing in your post is even relevant unless you happen to be in China.

    22. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't saying anything about iOS 6 maps.

      Then he shouldn't have replied to a post specifically about the maps in iOS 6. In doing so, he IS saying something about those maps.
      Anyhow, seeing as the Chinese don't have any say in the iOS6 maps, just like they don't have any say in Google's maps, it's completely irrelevant.

    23. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody with a modicum of education knows that China is in the middle.

    24. Re:Strange by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      So you say Apple not only had the iPhone made in China but also the maps? Now it starts to make a lot of sense.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    25. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for riots to break out at the Samsung factory, and then for Apple to sue them as their riots came first!

    26. Re:Strange by yuje · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, after years of development, the Reality Distortion Field is now available on iOS apps!

    27. Re:Strange by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Does the TOC require the iphone to send your GPS coords to the govt every 10 seconds?

      Dont like it?

      Leave.

      Where to..... other democractic nations.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    28. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish there were a +1 Frightening moderation option

      That is metamod, the iFans will take a beating on it. How dare anyone poke fun at their religion? Sounds like another religion rioting over nonsense, doesn't it?

    29. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so you're saying, Apple actually developed iOS 6 maps to please the Chinese government and we shouldn't just ascribe it to incompetence?

      Incompetence and Malevolence are not necessarily mutually exclusive. I see "incompetent malevolence" quite often.

    30. Re:Strange by koxkoxkox · · Score: 1

      What a coincidence ! The plant we are talking about is in China.

    31. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foxconn only makes Apple products? Wow - what a fucking droitard. Slice a razor through your neckbeard - specifically, your neck.

  2. Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The code here must suck. No matter what OS or browser I use there is always some kind of rendering issues. I don't get that from other sites.

    1. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same with me, the code is total ass, have to refresh the bitch like 20 times to get it to load properly.

    2. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works well enough in firefox and chrome, on both windows 7 and ubuntu.

      Does not work correctly in any mobile browser I've tried.

    3. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      malpha.slashdot.org

    4. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. It looks even worse on malpha...

    5. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by Aryden · · Score: 1

      Works perfectly well with Chrome, IE, FireFox, Opera on Windows 7, OSX, XP and Ubuntu. Has to be you mate.

    6. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like hell it does. 7 out of 10 times comments fail to load properly, though that may not matter, afterall this is /.

    7. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by tsa · · Score: 1

      You're usingbit wrong.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    8. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Nope. On my netbook it crops most of the logo and the menus for channels, library etc.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have the asshole flag set. Clear your cookies and you should be fine. Every time you are an asshole, SlashCode sets the asshole flag on the next reload.

    10. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Used to do that on my netbook with a 1024x600 screen. Gave that away. Using a laptop with a 1366x768 screen, and it renders fine no matter what browser I use. Same for my work PC, which is 1680x1050, and my gaming machine, which is 1920x1080. Can't be bothered to give it a go on my tablet (1280x600) or my phone (800x480).

      Bad juju to expect a minimum screen resolution, or even to design for a minimum screen resolution in this day and age, but I think that explains why it looks wonky for some people, and others have no problems at all, even though they're using the same platform and browser.

    11. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by Aryden · · Score: 1

      Could agree with that. I would still design for a minimum of 1024 x 768 if setting a minimum at all.

    12. Re:Why doesn't Slashdot render the same way twice? by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      I tried that malpha version with androids built-in browser, and it works quite well.

      Posting comments works (which is new), and it was relatively easy to read... much like my RSS reader. I'd say that's a huge improvement over what we've had for mobile.

      I'm not sure what the style gripes are about... there's not much to it.

  3. Workers rights by drwho · · Score: 0

    They rioted because they didn't get the free iPhone 5s they were promised.

    1. Re:Workers rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They each gave a kidney to Foxconn and all they got was the lousy iPhone 5 promotional T-shirt.

      We could send in our meddlers like we did with the Arab Spring. And this time, we could call it "Red Dead Revolution."

      -- Ethanol-fueled

    2. Re:Workers rights by Jahf · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well duh, the iPhone 5s won't be released this year.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  4. Srsly? by ugen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, and slashdot readers are a great source of news from Chinese sweatshop plants because demographics are, like, so close.

    1. Re:Srsly? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the Washington Post:

      "The fight, the cause of which was under investigation, erupted Sunday night at a privately managed dormitory near a Foxconn Technology Group factory in the northern city of Taiyuan"

      "The violence did not appear to be work-related"

      The anti-Apple hysteria on /. has gone nuclear, and now any disturbance on the planet is attributed to one company. Crazy.

    2. Re:Srsly? by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Well, some of us do work for EA, so...

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:Srsly? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      From the New York Times and other places I saw this morning, it may have been started by guards. Which makes me wonder, why do they need guards in dorms? But it does appear to be work-related:

      Many of the protests this year appear to be related to the countryâ(TM)s economic slowdown, as employees demand the payment of overdue wages from financially struggling companies, or insist on compensation when money-losing factories in coastal provinces are closed and moved to lower-cost cities in the interior.

      But the level of labor unrest in China this year has not yet matched 2010, when a surge in inflation sparked a wave of worker demands for higher pay, Mr. Crothall said.

      Mr. Crothall said that while the cause of the latest dispute in Taiyuan remained unclear, his group had found an online video of police there using a megaphone to address âoeworkers from Henanâ â" the adjacent province to the south of Shanxi. The police officer said that the workersâ(TM) concerns would be addressed.

  5. cnn? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1, Troll

    CNN has no story on this.

    It goes against their "wanking off to apple" policy.

    1. Re:cnn? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 2

      Of course CNN has no news about it, neither Britney Spears nor the likelihood of Hell existing were involved.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  6. Labor disputes by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Something is going on at Foxconn. Do any Slashdotters know of a good source for news about Chinese labor disputes?"

    This is China. There won't be any news.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Labor disputes by pokoteng · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that this news like this actually got out is news in itself.

      --
      the game
    2. Re:Labor disputes by artor3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There will be tweets (or weibos as the case may be), until the government gets around to blocking them. For example this one and these.

      It's pretty clear that this wasn't just a little fight, but it seems to be under control at this point. The cops were out in force, and there appear to have been military personnel on the scene as well.

    3. Re:Labor disputes by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is China. There won't be any news.

      Typical western elitist propaganda.

      I saw the story prominently covered on Sina Weibo. The Foxconn workers held a contest to see who was the happiest. The winner won the right to shake the Foxconn chairman's hand. So many Foxconn workers wanted to shake the chairman's hand, they all surged forward and broke a fence. Smiling security workers were dispatched to assist the few who received minor injuries.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Labor disputes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yes. look at data for consumption of dietary staples like rice. when it drops precipitously in a given area where there was political unrest, and news is prevented from coming out, you can probably surmise the reason for the reduction in demand for the basic necessities of life is a reduction in the amount of life there. in other words, the falloff of sales of things that everybody needs is the result of everyone gettIng killed.

    5. Re:Labor disputes by unixisc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Looks like China needs a Communist government. Such things would then be ended. Oh, wait....

    6. Re:Labor disputes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Really? The story I read said that there were riots however it's assumed at this time that they were started by agents of a man named Emmanuel Goldstein who were spreading rumors of an upcoming decrease in the choco ration. The party then officially stated that the choco ration was actually going to be INCREASED to 30g a week and that they were still at war with Eurasia and allied with Eastasia. There will be no interruption in the printing of the 10th edition Newspeak dictionary as a result of these disturbances.

    7. Re:Labor disputes by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would be an improvement over their fascist government.

      Just because someone labels himself one thing doesn't make it so. Allegedly, the US is a republic, you see?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Labor disputes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is China. There won't be any news.

      Actually, since FoxConn is a Taiwanese company, rather than a PRC company, I think you'll find that many of the media controls are relaxed. Probably the only reason we've heard as much as we have already

    9. Re:Labor disputes by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      So, in short, you're saying that this is Shiny Happy People holding hands (and if you don't understand the reference, learn where REM got the title of that song).

      I mean, that's the only thing that could possibly be happening in a worker's paradise like the People's Republic of China, right?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    10. Re:Labor disputes by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      This is China. There won't be any news.

      No, it's Apple. There won't be any news.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:Labor disputes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, there will be news on this. Foxconn is Taiwanese owned. Chinese news outlets will be encouraged to report on it.

    12. Re:Labor disputes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At time of writing the two top hits on http://search.chinadaily.com.cn/all_en.jsp?searchText=foxconn are about injured workers at Foxconn. Note that China Daily is controlled by the Chinese Government. There are without doubt room for a lot of improvement on the freedom of press and expression in China but this story is not a good example of repression of newsworthy topics.

    13. Re:Labor disputes by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is China. There won't be any news.

      No, it's Apple. There won't be any news.

      Well, now we know what Apple will do with its cash reserves. After China's growth bubble pops they will be acquired by Apple. The Ghost of Steve Jobs will rise from the grave and take charge, and a billion Chinese people will don iGlasses (you don't think Apple's going to let Google just have that one, do you?) and march on THE WORLD.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Labor disputes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where in the world are you supposed to get meaningful, up to date data about the consumption of dietary staples from different areas of China? Can we deploy probes for that?

    15. Re:Labor disputes by unixisc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe, but the party that runs China today is the same party that was founded by Mao Zedong. It's very different from Russia, where the CPSU was ousted.

      Whether the US is a republic or not is totally off-topic & irrelevant to this discussion.

    16. Re:Labor disputes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name a country that practices Communism that hasn't eventually evolved into a fascist tyranny of some sort. Simply because with a large group of people not everyone will agree, the Communist party, who "knows best, and is in the interest of the people", eventually brings about tyrannical or fascist ideology in an attempt to bring about their ideals.

      China is a Communist government. They also have fascist and tyrannical tendencies. Fascism and Communism, while their own separate ideologies, are not necessarily exclusive.

    17. Re:Labor disputes by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 2

      Or most of the world at this time, sadly. The idea of workers rights is too communist to many people that grew praying to God to be protected from atheistic communism to understand the real value that a fair share of wealth brings to a modern, service based economy.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    18. Re:Labor disputes by toriver · · Score: 1

      Believing that a Communist regime is beneficial to workers is like believing that anyone can become rich in a capitalist society.

    19. Re:Labor disputes by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      The fact that this news like this actually got out is news in itself.

      Word. It's china. They control the media and the internet. They will kill before allowing bad press to make it out of their communist regime. When something does slip they discredit them and the source disappears if they happen to still be alive. We make fun of democracy in the US but at least we can say bad things about companies/government without going to jail.

    20. Re:Labor disputes by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      This is China. There won't be any news.

      Typical western elitist propaganda.

      I saw the story prominently covered on Sina Weibo. The Foxconn workers held a contest to see who was the happiest. The winner won the right to shake the Foxconn chairman's hand. So many Foxconn workers wanted to shake the chairman's hand, they all surged forward and broke a fence. Smiling security workers were dispatched to assist the few who received minor injuries.

      So now that you posted the edited version, let's see the real details.

    21. Re:Labor disputes by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the younger members here won't get the references. Good try, though.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    22. Re:Labor disputes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I propose a socialist movement. It will end the suffering of the worker and bring equality. With my brother Mao and Stalin we shall bring this to China

  7. Who cares? by AntiBasic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who cares? I'm sitting in a coffee shop sipping on fairtrade coffee on blogging on my retina macbook pro about Obama and talking on my new iphone 5.

    Scumbag western liberals: claims to support the working class, gladly buys products from a communist dictatorship with an abysmal human rights record

    1. Re:Who cares? by ugen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you suggest that they stop using computers (or, in general, any electronics) completely? That would be "survivalists" then.

    2. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      But my Raspberry Pi was assembled in the UK and it is clearly better than a retina MBP so hah!

    3. Re:Who cares? by formfeed · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know dude!

      Here I am, buying cheap electronic components, and I know that by doing so I support a state
      where the police can arrest you if they don't like the way you look and your papers don't convince them that you are a good citizen.
      A place where any worker can just be fired and replaced without reason.
      A state, where workers have no right to organize and might even be arrested for trying.
      -But on the other hand, I like the cheap stuff I get from Arizona.

    4. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And taking your business elsewhere supports the working class by taking away the only jobs they have?

      Frankly, shitty global working conditions and pay is the least of my worries. It sucks for them and hopefully their government will rectify it. It's not my job to fret day in and out about your working conditions. It's not like these people were picked up off the street and forced into some sort of labor camp against their will. Getting paid poorly and treated badly is an issue for their own labor forces and government and lawyers and activists to address

      Also, it's amusing that if I buy a laptop that was built in a corporation in China that is taking American jobs for shit pay and shit treatment makes me a "TERRIBLE PERSON", but if I buy a cell phone, DVD player, ceramic figurine, tee-shirt, or hammer that is made in China... nobody gives a fuck.

      How about we focus on how we're going to compete as a country and a people in a world with India and China undercutting us left and right rather than trying to waste our time making sure they have perfect lives at the expense of our jobs overseas in what is essentially an adversarial country?

      Boy, I sure hope that guy robbing my house doesn't trip down the stairs on his way out, the poor fella!

    5. Re:Who cares? by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This has nothing to do with a "communist dictatorship" (though it should be noted that China is about as far from communism as can be), it has everything to do with companies in the wealthy part of the world using workers in poorer parts of the world as virtual slave labor. It is the epitome of capitalism, for owners to make as much money as possible simply by virtue of already having a lot of it, while paying their workers as little as they can possibly get away with.

    6. Re:Who cares? by artor3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need to stop basing your views on sitcom caricatures.

    7. Re:Who cares? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0

      You need to stop basing your views on sitcom caricatures.

      Fox News?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:Who cares? by Aardpig · · Score: 2

      Obvious fake is obvious. No self-respecting liberal would sip coffee -- it *has* to be a latte!

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    9. Re:Who cares? by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Who cares? I'm sitting in a coffee shop sipping on fairtrade coffee on blogging on my retina macbook pro about Obama and talking on my new iphone 5.

      Scumbag western liberals: claims to support the working class, gladly buys products from a communist dictatorship with an abysmal human rights record

      You imply that only liberals buy Apple products. They also supply different Android and consumer electronics.

      Foxconn produces so much stuff that even buying an American pick-up or SUV is going to potentially have some of their components.

    10. Re:Who cares? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You need to stop basing your views on sitcom caricatures.

      Yes, China really is just communist in name only.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    11. Re:Who cares? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Doubt it, the first batches were assembled in China. I don't think the UK assembly plant has shipped anything yet.

    12. Re:Who cares? by atriusofbricia · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I know dude!

      Here I am, buying cheap electronic components, and I know that by doing so I support a state
      where the police can arrest you if they don't like the way you look and your papers don't convince them that you are a good citizen.
      A place where any worker can just be fired and replaced without reason.
      A state, where workers have no right to organize and might even be arrested for trying.
        -But on the other hand, I like the cheap stuff I get from Arizona.

      Hey, know what's so insightful and awesome about this post? Nothing.

      Do you have even a single example of someone being arrested for trying to form a Union? Oh, none? Awesome.

      A single example of a US citizen being arrested for the way they look and not having papers?

      If you really think the situation here is even remotely similar to there, then you are clearly very clueless. Go travel. See the world. Come back when you've acquired a clue.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    13. Re:Who cares? by kimvette · · Score: 2

      Are you sure it's better because it's made in Britain?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EBfxjSFAxQ&t=1m0s

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    14. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A single example of a US citizen being arrested for the way they look and not having papers?

      That never happens here... oh wait.

    15. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It should be noted as well that China, although authoritarian, is not a dictatorship. Apparently people like to throw the "dictatorship" word too easily at anything that is not a democracy.

    16. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about most "liberals" are... well... they don't get it/aren't really liberal. I'm probably as close to liberal as you get. Now that's provided your saying freedom loving live and let be. I'm not for burdening small business and am for burdening large corporations with regulations that ensure fair competition, safe drinking water, and similar. I'm not for letting the little people live in squalor. I'm not so selfish that I have to buy the latest iProduct. I don't even like cellular phones over there privacy evasiveness. I have held onto each phone I've bought until it died and even then not bought a new phone. I just replace it with a new old free as can be obtained phone. I might use Ubuntu although I avoid non-free software and contribute to purely free distributions. I'm the guy contributing significant dollars to free software projects (NOT "open source"), Tor, EFF, ACLU, FSF, and other such projects/organizations which promote privacy, anonymity, and human rights.

    17. Re:Who cares? by jandersen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This has nothing to do with a "communist dictatorship" ...

      Only too true.

      There is a strange irony to the fact that these abuses arise from a combination of the kind of corruption typical of pre-Communist China and unfettered Western-style Capitalism. And hasn't it always been one of the criticisms of Communism, that it stifles progress because nobody feel an incentive to work hard, when the state takes care of you even you are lazy to the bone?

      Some Americans in particular imagine that nobody could possibly feel genuinely happy with life under Communism. Well, apart from the "47% that feel they are victims", but they don't count, since they are "plebs", to quote one Tory MP. On that background it is strange that so many of those that sympathise with Socialism are well-educated high-achievers, while so many of the most conservative and reactionary are found amongst those with little or no education.

    18. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know you were probably being semi-sarcastic, but....

      1. Buying an Apple product is not buying a product from the Chinese government.
      2. Communism and Dictatorship are mutually exclusive (at least in theory).
      3. China doesn't have the best human rights record, but they don't exactly have anywhere near the worst one either. The US isn't any saint either:
          * The US set up Guantanamo Bay to purposely get around constitutionally guaranteed rights when they were inconvenient.
          * The white people who settled in the US basically killed all of the existing red people.
          * Privacy as a right went out the window a while ago with all the warrant-less wiretaps, GPS vehicle tracking, etc.
          * From my understanding, anyone can be detained without trial or attorney, as long as they are classified as a "terrorist".
          * The "Child labor" that bleeding hearts in the US complain about was considered normal and routine in the US not all that long ago, and is still considered normal and even desired in many countries overseas.
      4. Many of the components in said "Made in China" products are made in Japan and South Korea, and then just assembled in China. Almost all products these days are global, except for basic textiles and some food.
      5. People don't necessarily "gladly" do something. Many times they don't have a great deal of choice. People can pay $4.50 instead of $4.40 for a cup of coffee without unreasonable burden, so they do if they want to buy fair trade coffee. People can pay a few percent more for wind or solar electricity in some places, or pay extra for energy saving LED lights instead of incandescent lights, so they do. What would you propose they do about their laptop? Do you know where you can buy a laptop that is 100% made in country X? The closest I know is some domestic model Sony Vaio models (the most expensive ones) are supposedly 100% "made in Japan" - even those will probably have at least some parts from Taiwan, Korea, etc. In fact, even if the CD drive in it is made in Japan, and even if the capacitors in that CD drive are made in Japan, the rare earth materials in the capacitor probably came from China! You can't realistically choose where your product is "made".

    19. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship
      In contemporary usage, dictatorship refers to an autocratic form of absolute rule by leadership unrestricted by law, constitutions, or other social and political factors within the state.
      China fits the pattern.

    20. Re:Who cares? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      How did a Drudgereport commentor end up here?

    21. Re:Who cares? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Who cares? I'm sitting in a coffee shop sipping on fairtrade coffee on blogging on my retina macbook pro about Obama and talking on my new iphone 5.

      You do realize that Foxconn is the manufacturer of choice for quite a few PC (and tablet) manufacturers, including Acer, Dell, Toshiba, and Hewlett-Packard, don't you? And that they also manufacture the Playstation 3 and XBox 360, right? As well as Android phones for Motorola Mobility?

      I realize it's much easier to just pretend this is an Apple problem, though.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    22. Re:Who cares? by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder if Foxconn can turn America off faster than the computer shops in India can. We should have a race!

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    23. Re:Who cares? by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      CHommunist In Name Only.

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    24. Re:Who cares? by gnasher719 · · Score: 5, Funny

      A single example of a US citizen being arrested for the way they look and not having papers?

      They made a movie about that. I think it was called "Rambo".

    25. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey pal. It isn't 1960 anymore. Liberal in the US is no more liberal than conservative is conservative. Liberal is now a flavor of corporatism that cares nothing about people who work and has replaced such concerns with the fight for gay rights and mandatory payments to health insurance corporations.

    26. Re:Who cares? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Chino?

      "Name Alone" works.

    27. Re:Who cares? by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      It's better for your soul.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:Who cares? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You imply that only liberals buy Apple products

      He's using the US English definition of liberal, which is a synonym for the US English definition of socialist and communist. It means 'person or idea that I don't like'.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    29. Re:Who cares? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      China should actually be the shining example of capitalism. A government that supports the creation of companies, while pretty much outlawing any and all labor unions and worker organisation, a bare minimum of worker protection (afaik you can't simply kill them if you don't like them anymore), no interference with your hiring, firing, paying or worker treatment policies...

      And STILL we're not happy. What more could we possibly want them to do to be good capitalists?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    30. Re:Who cares? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Never, ever contributing anything. Always showing up out of nowhere to make some cowardly one-liner hit-and-run attack.

      Your post got me to go look at some of his posting history. Are you sure you're replying to the right person? I don't share some of his opinions, but there are a lot of good comments in there, even the ones with which I disagree.

    31. Re:Who cares? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Western 1% are the important ones, the worldwide 1%, well, they're really poor, they don't count. Oh, and I'm being ripped off if I buy anything that's not at the lowest price, so if companies aren't using cheap Eastern labour then it's blatant profiteering.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    32. Re:Who cares? by yuje · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the scumbag western rich who outsourced the manufacturing to that communist dictatorship in the first place?

    33. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm glad we live in a country where it's illegal to exploit workers and where everyone makes a decent living wage which has kept up in proportion to the massive productivity boost we've enjoyed over the last few decades. Oh, wait...

    34. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China? Communist?
      Is that like the US is a democracy?
      LOL

    35. Re:Who cares? by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are the shining example of capitalism.... and the poster child for why neither unfettered communism nor unfettered capitalism is a system that works.

    36. Re:Who cares? by makomk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ah, this tactic. The nice thing about this particular bullshit derailing tactic is that there's always someone else who's worse off, so you can use it to effectively stonewall any discussion of any social problem and make sure nothing gets done about any of them. The other nice thing is that - by definition - anyone who can actually talk about their problems is better off than someone who can't, so you can use it to stop anyone talking about issues that affect them.

      It's a very convenient way of looking like you care about the poor, the disenfranchised, ... whilst you're actually making sure that nothing gets done to help them. Not very imaginative though; been done before a billion times.

    37. Re:Who cares? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      And STILL we're not happy. What more could we possibly want them to do to be good capitalists?

      Give them guns, bibles and privatized healthcare?

      I think of China as a mega-corporation - much like the US would be if led by a single corporation instead of a small bunch of them.

      It's certainly not communism - they abandoned that idea when they embraced money instead of working to abolish it. It's not socialism either, after they turned their back on "to each according to his needs". I'd say it's ur-capitalism, also known as greed.

    38. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story bro. my phone manufacturer isn't on your list.

    39. Re:Who cares? by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      "There is a strange irony to the fact that these abuses arise from a combination of the kind of corruption typical of pre-Communist China and unfettered Western-style Capitalism. "

      Its not rocket science - china is a capitalist dictatorship. The economic model has no bearing on the social model.

      "On that background it is strange that so many of those that sympathise with Socialism are well-educated high-achievers, while so many of the most conservative and reactionary are found amongst those with little or no education."

      Its not strange at all. A lot of high achievers suffer from middle class guilt complex and so tentatively support socialist policies to assuage that guilt. Meanwhile its natural that the people who actually suffer from socialist policies such as unfettered immigration are going to be against it.

      Btw , "reactionary" is standard liberal lefty shorthand for right wing views they don't agree with. Same for "populist" which The Guardian is so fond of using. As if a view being popular by a demographic other than psudo intellectual liberals somehow renders it null and void.

    40. Re:Who cares? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      * The "Child labor" that bleeding hearts in the US complain about was considered normal and routine in the US not all that long ago, and is still considered normal and even desired in many countries overseas.

      The US is still one of the few so-called civilized countries that allow child labor inside its borders. What kind of child labor is permitted has been restricted, but they still allow it. A father can force his child to work unlimited hours at the farm, and, with the law in hand, beat him if he doesn't.

    41. Re:Who cares? by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Informative

      The funny thing about most "liberals" are... well... they don't get it/aren't really liberal.

      The problem with that is, you can't really define things in a binary. It's not a liberal/conservative dichotomy, because there's too many issues to be divided on. How do you define somebody who believes in small government, supports the death penalty in some cases (repeat offender, serial murder, for example), is pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, etc.? Even dividing it on lines of fiscal versus social liberalism is an oversimplification, because then you get people like me, who self identify as a fiscal conservative (shouldn't be spending money we don't have), but still believe in socialized health care and subsidized education on the basis that as a long-term investment they end up increasing tax revenues and pay for themselves. And like you, I also believe that we should be paying for fair trade products (there's a reason I drink Ceylon tea), and avoiding products with blood minerals, because even though they're more expensive, they promote quality of life around the world. Unlike you, I do buy my electronics new, but I am also careful about what I buy, and don't replace them just because something shiner comes along.... I find I get better economy by buying something that's relatively high quality, even though it may be more expensive up front, because it lasts longer.

      So what does that make me? A liberal, or a conservative? By American definitions, I'm ultra-left-wing commie pinko liberal (pro-choice, pro-gay rights as well... no I don't support the death penalty, I believe in restorative justice rather than punitive), but by European standards I'm actually pretty conservative, at least fiscally... I'd fit right in in Germany. And this is where the whole thing falls apart, and why we can't draw a binary comparison. :)

    42. Re:Who cares? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      By buying their products wages in China have been going up 12% each year for couple of years now and worker conditions have improved as well.

      I wouldn't call it paradise of course.

      Some European manufactures have started producing in Europe again, cause ? Those previously mentioned higher wages in China and higher oil prices driving up cost of transport.

      Some companies in the US have actually opened up previously closed factories. The wages of what people make in those US factories is still lower than when they closed.

      But it's a start...?

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    43. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so many of the most conservative and reactionary are found amongst those with little or no education.

      The conservative and reactionary are, for the most part, either ignorant or stupid (although occasionally they are of the few who benefit). The trouble is that the modern system of education and work entrenches ignorance and rewards stupidity, creating a pliant workforce which asks for its chains to be made tighter.

      Arguing with reactionaries is a waste of time, in the same way that arguing with, say, an anti-Semite is a waste of time: they lack the capacity for sound reason. At best you can provide them with material to help educate them. Otherwise you must ignore them and carry on regardless, because they will come out with the same tired assumptions and talking points which come down to (i) I am strong therefore I have the right to dominate you; or (ii) I one day aspire to be strong therefore see (i). Once you realise that nature doesn't care what anyone thinks, and all their nonsense about "inalienable rights" to owning and doing absolutely anything becomes as the emperor with no clothes.

    44. Re:Who cares? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Yes... that actually sounds perfect.

    45. Re:Who cares? by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      I realize it's much easier to just pretend this is an Apple problem, though.

      Absolutely. Apple never puts on airs about it and its' customers being hipper, sexier, smarter, cooler, and never, ever more enlightened than everyone else.

    46. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This has nothing to do with a "communist dictatorship" (though it should be noted that China is about as far from communism as can be)"

      Indeed, it always has been far from communism, and it always has been and still is a dictatorship.

    47. Re:Who cares? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Scumbag western liberals: claims to support the working class, gladly buys products from a communist dictatorship with an abysmal human rights record

      Don't forget the scumbag western conservatives who openly outsource labor to countries with the lowest labor costs...

      You're correct... Shame on those scumbags for providing jobs to poor Chinese workers. Those workers should remain on farms or worse... Oh wait.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    48. Re:Who cares? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      They have.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    49. Re:Who cares? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you have even a single example of someone being arrested for trying to form a Union? Oh, none? Awesome.

      You only asked for one example, so here you go: 23 people arrested for protesting against being fired for trying to form a union. I could find more examples, but you only asked for one.

      A single example of a US citizen being arrested for the way they look and not having papers?

      How about for the way they look even though they have papers?.

      If you really think the situation here is even remotely similar to there, then you are clearly very clueless. Go travel. See the world. Come back when you've acquired a clue.

      I have. It's amazing people still think we're #1.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    50. Re:Who cares? by Stormthirst · · Score: 1

      The economic model has no bearing on the social model

      I think this is one of the mistakes that Americans seem to make - on here at least. If you're entire waking life is based around the "economic model" (ie you spend 6 or 7 days a week, doing a 14-16 hour day), there's no such thing as a social model. And yet this is exactly what many of the Foxconn workers are subjected to - and what many Americans seem to think is acceptable - for themselves as well as the Chinese.

    51. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On that background it is strange that so many of those that sympathise with Socialism are well-educated high-achievers, while so many of the most conservative and reactionary are found amongst those with little or no education.

      Curiously enough that is true of pretty much any single ideological/political/ethical position you adopt.

      I bet lots of bankers back small government. Oh, wait, they don`t count because they are the wrong sort of high achievers. Lawyers and accountants would be even worse, right?

      What about all those high achievers who believed in God? Is their opinion less valid because there are scores of dumb people who believe in Him also?

    52. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But seriously folks:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolender_v._Lawson

      Anecdotally: (Because this is Slashdot)
      First-hand report from a male, African-American friend, "DWB" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driving_While_Black) leading to brief arrest. Life-changing experience for him, to say the least.

      Sorry for AC, but new security at work breaks /.

    53. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not easier, more entertaining. Trolls will troll about whatever gets the biggest results.

      I'm an android person myself, but I realize this is a problem that is endemic of all of the electronics factories in that part of the world. All of us are guilty of the same thing.

      Now if one of these companies wanted to rid itself of the stigma, they might start making their stuff in the US. Apple (used here because it was easy to find a article with specifics, it would probably apply to most other phones). Currently makes 450 dollars profit per iPhone. if they were to build it in the US they would still make 290 dollars profit. http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-04-24/tech/31390837_1_iphone-supplies-apple-profits

    54. Re:Who cares? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not only have they but I've seen on G+ that people have got them.

      Yes, yes I know, G+ is not real. But why would Google help R-Pi like that?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    55. Re:Who cares? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A father can force his child to work unlimited hours at the farm, and, with the law in hand, beat him if he doesn't.

      That might be true in cowfucker country, but out here in Californy CPS just loves to get up in your business, because it justifies their existence. Out here the abuse is more likely to be psychological.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    56. Re:Who cares? by cusco · · Score: 1

      No, reactionaries have had the same definition for a long time. They're the people who want a return to the fantasy 'Golden Age' of unfettered capitalism of the Victorian era. Yes,most thinking people find the thought abominable, but that's what they have been about for a long time. The definition hasn't changed for my entire lifetime.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    57. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, in your protester example to be accurate they were arrested for trespassing not protesting. They were on the company property blocking the entrance to the business. Regardless of their motivation they were arrested for violating the law.

    58. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but those companies admit they are capitalists and don't mind exploiting workers for profit. Apple claims they don't do this and cultivates this holier-than-thou corporate attitude. That is why folks highlight Apples hypocrisy.

    59. Re:Who cares? by ilsaloving · · Score: 0

      The reason manufacturing is moved to China is nothing more than a desire for quality... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgTLx93vyrU

    60. Re:Who cares? by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      I'd wager to say this is a case of confirmation bias or generalizing the population with your thoughts. Specific demographics tend to migrate to specific locations and specific proffessions, and that does not give you the ability to generalize the population based on your small little world. If I was to do so, working in my heavy fixed assets business that's constantly kneecapped by cartel-style labor unions, all middle class would be frustrated conservatives who get laid off because outdated liberal policies on organized labor eat 75% of all costs in a high cost fixed-assets industry, which is downright sad.

      See the fallacy? One lead designer in bass ackwards California does not make for world view on the middle class, just as one finance manager in jaded labor union strangled industry doesn't make for the world view on middle class.

    61. Re:Who cares? by rjejr · · Score: 4, Informative

      First Blood. Rambo was First Blood 2 and it has absolutely nothing to do with First Blood. Good point though.

    62. Re:Who cares? by jandersen · · Score: 1

      You're getting the logic wrong - I'm not saying "all high-achievers ...", only "... many of ..." which is not at all the same thing. And my implication goes the opposite way - you are trying to make out that I say "All high-achievers are socialists", while what I actually say is "Many are Socialists because they are well-educated". I think it makes sense: With better education comes the ability to think critically, and when you are young, you haven't yet grown cynical about the unfairness in the world; it is very natural to become a Socialist at that age, and it is not surprising that it will still colour your outlook when you get older.

    63. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that you still haven't provided an example of being arrested for trying to form a union. At least the article you linked to certainly does not contain such an example (hint: "trespassing" != "trying to form a union").

    64. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes. China. The shining beacon of the central tenet of capitalism: (self-)ownership. Property rights and civil rights all abound. Oh wait... China is a perfect example of Stamocap (which one can still hold to be capitalism, but I really don't).

    65. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communists would always complain that Communism has never been implemented in practice. Now it's Capitalists' turn.

    66. Re:Who cares? by poity · · Score: 1

      On that background it is strange that so many of those that sympathise with Socialism are well-educated high-achievers, while so many of the most conservative and reactionary are found amongst those with little or no education.

      On the other hand, 'well-educated high-achievers' never have to live with the 'plebs', never to realize that the view of the indolent and irresponsible is just as true as their own view of the downtrodden and exploited, while those 'reactionaries' with little or no education get to live and experience it first hand. I'm not ready to toss aside their beliefs as you so easily do. They're lower middle class who work their butts off to stay afloat. They don't have the insulated luxury of living with like-minded high-achievers, their neighbors are Jane, who has time to juggle 3 boyfriends and get pregnant yet again but none to study for her GED, or Tom, twice divorced and not a dime sent to his struggling ex-wives. And yet people think these folks believe what they believe only because they lack education?

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    67. Re:Who cares? by jandersen · · Score: 1

      ... china is a capitalist dictatorship ...

      China is a whole lot more complicated than your statement would have it. Describing China in the same terms as, say, Syria or similar, is like describing the US as "a right-wing theocracy". Not entirely accurate, I imagine. You use sweeping statements that cover the fact that you don't have any real knowledge about the subject.

      A lot of high achievers suffer from middle class guilt complex and so tentatively support socialist policies to assuage that guilt. Meanwhile its natural that the people who actually suffer from socialist policies such as unfettered immigration are going to be against it.

      Middle class guilt? It is in other words impossible to imagine that an educated person can simply be genuinely idealistic? Does the same apply for a Christian? I mean, the teachings of Christ do sound a lot like Socialism, so it is easy to imagine that Christians must suffer from middle class guilt as well, then.

      And you bring new insights to the table as well: "unfettered immigration" is a form of "Socialism". Well, we live and learn, don't we just.

      "reactionary" is standard liberal lefty shorthand for right wing views they don't agree with.

      And this is the standard whinge that we hear all the time from people like yourself when they can't come up with proper arguments.

      According to Wikipedia:

      A reactionary is an individual that holds political viewpoints which cause them to seek to return to a previous state (the status quo ante) in a society.

      This is the sense in which I use the word; it isn't used as an insult, it simply describes a viewpoint. To my mind you can split the political spectrum in two: those who define themselves in terms of what they are for, and those who define themselves in terms of what they are against. Many reactionaries would fall in the second category, I think. The thing is, when you are anti-something, then your opnions depend on that something; thus they are no longer under your control.

    68. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while so many of the most conservative and reactionary are found amongst those with little or no education.

      Interesting tautology argument. People disagree with me so therefor they are 'stupid', and your not stupid are you? This argument is used to not argue with people but to insult them and to change the argument to something else.

      If you stopped, and used those vaunted grey cells between your ears that you praise so highly, you would see both pure capitalism and pure communism do not work. Not without the threat of force. In capitalism you end up creating rules to make everyone equal and make sure players are not distorting the market. In communism you end up creating rules to ensure everyone is contributing. In practice so far most socialist societies we have created have failed or at best become police like states (see China, North Korea, Nazi Germany, USSR, Cuba, Venezuela, etc...). Or take most of the contenet of Europe right now. They have been creating a socialistic like society for awhile now. Its pretty nice having others pick up the tab on everything. Work rules are pretty good. However, Communism is like the old dot com motto give it away and we will get customers. Eventually someone has to pick up the tab. Europe is one big mess now because they owe a lot of money. Its not going to be pretty.

      Socialism and capitalism are opposite extremes of people really. In one case you have an overachiever who will distort the rules to their gain. In the other it takes one person to be very lazy to distort the rules to their gain. One way sets out to build things to get people to spend money, the other sets out to make everyone exactly the same. However, once 'rules' become how these systems are controlled there will pop up another group who want to run the rules and like the power of telling others what to do. Plus the nice side effects of being close to those 'in power' and the wealth it entails.

      Some Americans in particular imagine that nobody could possibly feel genuinely happy with life under Communism
      You are just as guilty of doing the same thing. Except you sweep 'Americans' into your pot of 'those with little or no education'. You are failing to look at it from all points of view and using your very narrow definition to decide what is 'right and wrong' for people.

      You I can see have no idea what a 'conservative' is other than what you have read and a sense of 'go team'. Go thru the history of the united states and you will find many of the great ideas of our country came not from the 'liberal' (and I deliberately put that in quotes) but from the 'conservative' (also in quotes) side. You do not even know where the words that both 'teams' use to describe themselves mean. Conservatives want to conserve the nation, make it the best it can be for everyone. Liberals want to 'liberate' the nation, only making it best for themselves (often at the cost of themselves thru other groups they do not see as equals). You can follow the rules set forth by both sides and see that.

    69. Re:Who cares? by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      "China is a whole lot more complicated than your statement would have it."

      I wasn't writing a dissertation on it , but as an overall soundbite it is a capitalist dictatorship.

      "You use sweeping statements that cover the fact that you don't have any real knowledge about the subject."

      And you're making out I was pretending those sweeping statements were the last word on the subject simply so you can argue the toss. Straw man anyone?

      "Middle class guilt? It is in other words impossible to imagine that an educated person can simply be genuinely idealistic?"

      Possibly, or stupid , but usually its guilt.

      "I mean, the teachings of Christ do sound a lot like Socialism, so it is easy to imagine that Christians must suffer from middle class guilt as well, then."

      Certainly guilt. Ask any catholic. Bit out of touch arn't you.

      "And this is the standard whinge that we hear all the time from people like yourself when they can't come up with proper arguments."

      And "can't come up with proper arguments" is usual whinge from lefties like you who don't like the argument put forward. Your idea of a "proper argument" is one which you agree with. End of.

      "The thing is, when you are anti-something, then your opnions depend on that something; thus they are no longer under your control."

      What total and utter crap. What Sociology for Dummies textbook did you parrot that out of? All opinions depend on some existing state, whether for or against. If they didn't they wouldn't be opinions, they'd be ideas. As for not being under your control, whatever, when you figure out what the hell you're talking about let me know because I have dont' have the first clue.

    70. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A single example of a US citizen being arrested for the way they look and not having papers?

      Briseira Torres jailed for four months without bail for looking too Hispanic. http://ed.msnbc.com/_news/2012/08/10/13223063-us-citizen-falsely-imprisoned-under-arizonas-show-me-your-papers-law?lite

    71. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? I'm sitting in a coffee shop sipping on fairtrade coffee on blogging on my retina macbook pro about Obama and talking on my new iphone 5.

      You do realize that Foxconn is the manufacturer of choice for quite a few PC (and tablet) manufacturers, including Acer, Dell, Toshiba, and Hewlett-Packard, don't you? And that they also manufacture the Playstation 3 and XBox 360, right? As well as Android phones for Motorola Mobility?

      I realize it's much easier to just pretend this is an Apple problem, though.

      When you're the biggest, and you don't need to use slave labor, but you do anyway for more profit, and ultimately less competition, then yes... Apple is a HUGE fucking problem.

    72. Re:Who cares? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Ummm, in your protester example to be accurate they were arrested for trespassing not protesting. They were on the company property blocking the entrance to the business. Regardless of their motivation they were arrested for violating the law.

      Do you honestly think they would explicitly state that the employees were arrested for forming a union? They were fired which made them trespassers and gave the police the authority to make the arrest. You probably believe the Chinese press would explicitly say the employees were arrested for forming a union. They would instead say that the arrests were made on similar grounds as the ones in the US.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    73. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people were arrested for trespassing and breaking the law - not for trying to form a union. But you knew that and are just trying to pretend it's the same thing, aren't you?

    74. Re:Who cares? by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      "I'm not for burdening small business and am for burdening large corporations with regulations that ensure fair competition, safe drinking water, and similar."

      The problem is that a big corporation can hire a legal team and a regulatory compliance officer to deal with regulations and/or frustrate the regulators. A small business owner has to navigate 1000s of pages of regulatory nonsense while also trying to run the business.

      Then you have the regulators themselves, who, in my experience are generally power-tripping little bureaucrats that like bullying small businesses. The 10 year encounter between my family business and the army of government bureaucrats shaped my views on government forever.

      Every regulation you pass to combat big business almost surely burdens the small business much more severely.

      Maybe if lawmakers would pass readable bills and bureaucrats didn't enforce the laws to the exact letter, it would be more effective.

    75. Re:Who cares? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It wasn't meant to be a comprehensive list. If you care, do some digging - Foxconn handles all sorts of brands.

      Unfortunately, most of us (including me) will rationalize our continued use of these products without doing much of anything to try to make things better for the people who put our gizmos together.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    76. Re:Who cares? by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      You only asked for one example, so here you go: 23 people arrested for protesting against being fired for trying to form a union. [sott.net] I could find more examples, but you only asked for one.

      Those were 23 trespassers arrested for the crime of trespassing. They were not arrested for trying to form a union. That's like saying the OWS people got arrested for their message and beliefs and not for the pooping in public and camping where it isn't allowed.

      There is a giant difference between getting arrested for how you deliver your message and getting arrested for the message itself.

      How about for the way they look even though they have papers?

      Arrested for lying on a document and saying they aren't a US citizen. I'm shocked, shocked I tells ya, that someone who said they weren't a citizen (even though they were) was treated like they aren't a citizen. To prove the case you need something more like: "A person who looked Mexican was minding their own business, was approached and arrested for not having their papers". Otherwise, you're reaching for corner cases where a person could prove nearly anything.

      I have. It's amazing people still think we're #1.

      Where? If the US isn't "#1", who is?

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    77. Re:Who cares? by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      Ummm, in your protester example to be accurate they were arrested for trespassing not protesting. They were on the company property blocking the entrance to the business. Regardless of their motivation they were arrested for violating the law.

      Do you honestly think they would explicitly state that the employees were arrested for forming a union? They were fired which made them trespassers and gave the police the authority to make the arrest. You probably believe the Chinese press would explicitly say the employees were arrested for forming a union. They would instead say that the arrests were made on similar grounds as the ones in the US.

      If you're blocking access to a business on the business' property, you're a trespasser. It doesn't matter whether you're protesting for a union or just being a pain in the rear, you're breaking the law. Your message isn't the issue, but the delivery method is. They could have just as easily picketed on the side walk, but that doesn't get the "Union organizers arrested!!!" headlines they wanted so badly.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    78. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bit of a false example there. The 23 people weren't arrested for trying to form a union. They were fired for trespassing and obstructing traffic. Big difference. Also, your "travel" of the world must have encompassed a very narrow set of destinations (exclusive gated resorts in 3rd world countries don't count) for you to have the opinion that the US is not a great place to live.

    79. Re:Who cares? by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      Would you suggest that we assess taxes on the whole population so that we may hire government bureaucrats to micro-manage labor relations between parents and children? Would you ban children from working in a family business? How about washing dishes and cleaning at home?

      I worked in a family business and also doing seasonal labor on a lot of different farms, orchards, etc. We busted our asses, and on rare occasions worked until we were probably in violation of many child labor laws. Such is hay season and harvest season however. It's actually a very rewarding experience to put in 2 or 3 sixteen hour days to get a big job done. Nobody that I know felt genuinely abused or went on strike. The work needed to be done, so we did it.

      I can't imagine living in a country where we have government interfering in this. Sounds like 1984 come to life.

    80. Re:Who cares? by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

      I despise many of the things that the Chinese government does, but US'ians or europeans outside Scandinavian countries don't have enough moral authority to criticize; their governments have a long stablished pattern of supporting the worst kind of murderous scum around the world as long they are subservient to their interests, and their citizens turned a blind eye at best. For its many ills, the Chinese government is managing to improve the standard of living of the Chinese population in significants ways; meanwhile, the western "democratic" governments are so busy licking the boots of the rich that they are unable to raise their eyes and see that they are destroying their nations.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    81. Re:Who cares? by tacokill · · Score: 2

      Covey leader to Raven: Excellent correction.

      I'm not sure why they named a later sequel "Rambo" but whatever. Here in Jerkwater, USA we all know First Blood was the original and by far, the best.

    82. Re:Who cares? by toriver · · Score: 1

      Well, it starred the same Italian Stallion as the same character but turned the original message inside-out.

    83. Re:Who cares? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      There's a reason I refuse to travel to the republic of America anytime soon. I've got my own government issues up here in Canada, but the last thing I need is being arrested because my legally downloaded music got noticed when I crossed the border for some cheap recession-priced shopping.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    84. Re:Who cares? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Wait, hold up, you think the police always charge people with the crime they actually committed?

      Jeez, you need to meet more police officers.

      And I quote one I know, "we can always find something to arrest the guy on if we really need to."

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    85. Re:Who cares? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      China reminds me a lot of a very large feudal state again ... its like a slow regression to a system where people are allowed to believe they have freedom so long as they recognize their overlords.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    86. Re:Who cares? by toriver · · Score: 1

      Right: When "everyone" has an iPhone it's for everyone. Not just for the old guard of designers who bought Macs back before the turn of the century. Clinging to that outdated stereotype is like thinking only pizza-faced teen freetards use Linux and Android.

    87. Re:Who cares? by toriver · · Score: 1

      They are paid 40% above the average - since when is that considered slave labor? Slaves are usually just provided food and shelter for their pains. Oh you mean they earn less than Americans would have? Well, their costs of living are also comparatively lower.

      But I am sure American companies would love a law that mandated U.S. companies to use domestic manufacturing. I am sure the companies would not relocate their headquarters out of the country to get away from such "socialism", but would take it on the chin like the patriotic citizens they are.

    88. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story bro, what are you typing that there comment on?

      I missed your point though.. were you saying you weren't a scumbag because you didn't claim to support the working class?

    89. Re:Who cares? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      A single example of a US citizen being arrested for the way they look and not having papers?

      See page 20 and references 86 through 88:
      http://www.amnestyusa.org/pdfs/JailedWithoutJustice.pdf

    90. Re:Who cares? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Oh well... now you can support Sony instead of the Chinese

    91. Re:Who cares? by Esteanil · · Score: 1

      Where? If the US isn't "#1", who is?

      Try Scandinavia?

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    92. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what people think when they study U.S. history. Apparently, "freedom" goes both ways, freedom to kick someones ass to the ground if they try to organize and "freedom" to organize. Because of these two extremes you have "unions" that are nothing but work-maffias working for neither the employers or the workers but their own benefit.

      You americans need to get out in the world (if you can figure out it's outside of your "great" borders) experience a more balanced world.

    93. Re:Who cares? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Now, now, now... that's not Feudal, in the medieval, feudal times you were not allowed to believe you're free, you belonged to your lord.

      Today, in our western democracies, you're allowed to believe you're free.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    94. Re:Who cares? by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      Wait, hold up, you think the police always charge people with the crime they actually committed?

      Always? No. In this case, I'm going to go with the pictures which clearly show them sitting in the middle of the street. Likely it is the entry way to the Casino instead of a public street (which would also have gotten them arrested).

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    95. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should reread that, the link text counters you claim. The original poster say asked for an example of someone being arrested for joining a union but you provided an example of people be arrested for a protest. the specific reason was trespass.

      Your second link doesn't carry much weight, the woman sign a statement saying she was born in Mexico. I don't care what you look like that's going to make things difficult.

      your last statement isn't worth comment...

  8. Qualcomm demand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems related to similar problems in China with Apple manufacture - huge demand. Foxcon rolling out a lot of Windows 8 smartphone devices from there maybe. Qualcomm has all their chips fabbed there so they not, and every Windows 8 smartphone runs on a qualcomm chip so...demand?

    BTW, it's Taiwan guys. They're still relatively democratic, co the news sources are probably ok.

    1. Re:Qualcomm demand? by Guppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      BTW, it's Taiwan guys. They're still relatively democratic, co the news sources are probably ok.

      (-1: Clueless). Foxconn may be headquartered in Taiwan, but the Taiyuan plant is in the province of Shanxi, in Mainland China.

    2. Re:Qualcomm demand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Note that the police actually showed up to this. The police didn't show up to protect the Japanese-branded businesses last week.

    3. Re:Qualcomm demand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true, the police did show up near the end of the week when things got more out of control.
      They also showed up to the earlier riots, undercover, to help encourage them to try to put pressure on Japan.
      (Didn't work though).

    4. Re:Qualcomm demand? by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1
      " Foxconn may be headquartered in Taiwan, but the Taiyuan plant is in the province of Shanxi, in Mainland China."

      China made a cheap knock-off of a whole island?!

    5. Re:Qualcomm demand? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Serious question: Could there be some kind of mis-branding going on here? Foxconn products being labelled as "made in Taiwan" because either the company is headquartered there or the place where the plant is located could be reasonably spelled the same way?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  9. How Much by sycodon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Makes me wonder how much an iPhone would cost to manufacture in the U.S. I wonder how automated the production line could be.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:How Much by Kenja · · Score: 2

      In the long term I dont think it would cost a massive amount more. However there would be a large initial cost to setup a manufacturing center. The issue is not so much the labor costs but that we dont have manufacturing facilities here anymore.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:How Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The value in the iPhone isn't in the device. It's in the services. Think about it.

    3. Re:How Much by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Apple says It's more about worker abuse than cost cutting.

      something along the line of a last minute design change and waking up a bunch of people from their dorms, give them coffee, then put them on 12 hour shifts (this was Apple's take on it anyway).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    4. Re:How Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would cost an extra $65. So they'd still have very healthy profit margins.

      Captcha: Avarice

    5. Re:How Much by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      In the long term I dont think it would cost a massive amount more. However there would be a large initial cost to setup a manufacturing center. The issue is not so much the labor costs but that we dont have manufacturing facilities here anymore.

      And start-up costs in the US would be higher since we tend to do more automation instead of manual work.

      There's some device that's supposed to be heavily American that was only 20% more expensive to produce.

    6. Re:How Much by Guppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      The issue is not so much the labor costs but that we dont have manufacturing facilities here anymore.

      It's worse than that, we don't have the supply chains anymore.

      You might be able to manufacturer the large structural components and key high-value items here, but then you'd have to import tons of different little bits, individually too low value to spend money to rebuild the supply network, but numerous and specialized -- so you might as well pre-assemble big chunks of it there. At which point, you might as well assemble the whole thing there.

      I remember some old Slashdot poster that once related a story about trying to manufacturer some electronic device domestically. They had so much trouble sourcing some minor discrete component, that it turned out it was cheaper to buy finished consumer widgets from China, and salvage that one part to get what they needed.

    7. Re:How Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the final assembly could be done in U.S., but exporting the whole manufacturing ecosystem is pretty impossible. China has all the components produced within short distance making it faster to gather them up and made into devices. Reduces warehouses, allows changes in design fast, etc.

    8. Re:How Much by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      Wow. The issue is not labor costs - but that we don;t have manufacturing facilities? Did it never occur to you to wonder why we don't have those facilities any more?

      How does disconnected-from-reality drivel like this get modded up?

    9. Re:How Much by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      How much automation is possible with the iPhone or iPod type device? How much does the automation equipment cost? How much of it can be re-used with little re-tooling when a new model is introduced?

    10. Re:How Much by sycodon · · Score: 1

      I don't know. That's why I ask.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    11. Re:How Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't have them anymore because China could do it cheaper ( through cheaper labor ). Doesn't necessarily mean that we couldn't do it at all ( it would just be very expensive ).

      So at this moment, it's more profitable to do it in China.
      If for some reason that would change, we would probably go to the second cheapest place for manufacturing.
      Which wouldn't be a bad idea anyway, just to show China it's not alone.

    12. Re:How Much by Aryden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      also the huge issue with the fact that China has the largest piles of rare earth minerals that are commonly used in electronic components. Getting them to export them, which they have already banned in some cases, to us so that we can take jobs out of their economy would be tantamount to declaring war on them.

    13. Re:How Much by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder how much any of the products that pass through there would cost to manufacture in the U.S. I wonder how automated the production line could be.

      FTFY.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    14. Re:How Much by shadowofwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Equipment costs have always dwarfed manufacturing labor costs in the IC industry. Government subsidized fab construction is a major reason it moved to Asia. And other production like assembling phones is cheaper closer to where the components are made.

    15. Re:How Much by srwalter · · Score: 1

      You can automate quite a lot, and you can even get the per unit cost competitive with a low wage worker. The problem is design changes, whether small tweaks to a current product or bring-up the next generation of a device. It's quite cheap to have a one hour meeting with the line workers to say, "look, you're going to put the screw 5mm to the left now." It's quite expensive to make even trivial changes to a largely-automated manufacturing process.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say that 2 + 2 = 4
    16. Re:How Much by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder how much an iPhone would cost to manufacture in the U.S.

      Probably a similar amount to any other phone being manufactured in the US but let's make this about the iPhone and ignore that other phones are made a) at Foxconn and b) in China factories essentially identical to Foxconn. Let's also ignore the fact that _NO_ smartphones are made in the US and make it sound like Apple is the villain because _THEY_ don't make their phone in the US.

      Or, to put it differently, I know that mentioning the iPhone generates page views and heated conversation but this is about a whole lot more than the iPhone. If people are upset with the worker conditions in China, then there are a LOT of phones (and TVs and toasters and refrigerators and...) that they should also be upset about.

    17. Re:How Much by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      It would cost about fifty bucks more

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    18. Re:How Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that different from what happened to our economy?

    19. Re:How Much by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      And yet some big companies do manufacture high end equipment in high wage countries. Take Panasonic as an example. Their plasma TVs are made in Japan in a big high tech factory. They also make their laptops in Japan. Samsung manufacturers a lot of stuff in Korea, including phones and screens.

      China might be a bit cheaper and is now competitive on quality, but what it really boils down to is making an extra few cents profit on a high value product.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:How Much by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Since we aren't talking about IC production, I fail to see your point. Doubly so IC's constitute only a very small portion of the hardware volume or cost or assembly time...

      And doesn't it occur to you to wonder *why* it's cheaper to assemble there? You think a couple of hundred bucks a year (there) versus several hundred bucks a week (here) doesn't make any difference?

    21. Re:How Much by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Oh lord, not this myth again.

      China has no more domestic rare earths than anyone else. The only reason they have piles available is because almost everyone else has quit mining them - because almost everyone else has environmental regulations.

    22. Re:How Much by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      So-Called Rare Earths aren't all that rare - It's just that it's been so much cheaper for them to produce with near slave labor that all the US-based rare earths production shut down... it's only been since China got uppity about it that some in the US have realized that Rare Earths production capability is of strategic value - I'm guessing our industry will be subsidized to some degree to ensure that it gets back on its feet so that we're not beholden to China.

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    23. Re:How Much by sycodon · · Score: 1

      I have an iPhone. So that's why I asked about it instead of an Android.

      Besides, if Apple were to switch back to he U.S. for manufacturing ( pie in the sky, I know), then I bet many other major companies would follow. I think Apple would be able to effectively market a Made in America campaign.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    24. Re:How Much by sycodon · · Score: 1

      You and an AC get the prize for actually answering the question. And you are only $25 different.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    25. Re:How Much by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's ever been a case of cost. I recall, for example, the issue with the Rasberry Pi wasn't that it'd cost more to produce domestically, it was that it would take longer to set up the manufacturing process.

      Commodore was producing cost effective computers until the early-nineties where the vast majority of each product was assembled in the US from components largely made in the US. Did they have problem? Well, yeah, but that has more to do with stupid management refusing to sell newer designs than anything to do with its manufacuring process. It could have reduced the manufacturing costs of its computers by outsourcing, but that wouldn't have solved any actual problems.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    26. Re:How Much by Aryden · · Score: 1

      That's fine if and when it actually does, but until then... we are quite beholden to them.

    27. Re:How Much by Aryden · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter whether the myth is who has what or not. It's what's available and what's not. You can have all the Neodymium, Lanthanum, Cerium, Yttrium, Terbium, or Europium you want, if it's still "up in the hills" and not ready for use in production, then it is useless and you don't have it.

    28. Re:How Much by Pirulo · · Score: 1

      it is still difficult to automatize the beating

    29. Re:How Much by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Unless and until you set up the falsehood you did in your original post - that the Chinese "have the only piles" and the only option is to "force them to export". Then, you shift from reality into myth.

    30. Re:How Much by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Cheaper is so much more expensive, in the long run.

      China does more because it is cheaper, more jobs there, fewer here.
      Fewer jobs, less buying here
      Less buying here, less profit here ( more profit there ) ( fewer to collect taxes from here )
      Less profit here, fewer jobs
      It will settle out, when the wage arbitrage evens out. leaving wages somewhat above China's, way below US/Europe.
      Lots of people working for wages will ( have been ) lose houses, cars, other consumer goods ( and not be able to buy things ), leaving a glut on the market to be disposed of at fire sale prices. Basically, prices will also have to come down and stabilize in line with wages.
      The market *does* work, it will even out. But how many will have to pay ( and have been paying ) what kind of cost for it?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    31. Re:How Much by toriver · · Score: 1

      Yeah that worked so well for Detroit... (Okay, the issue there was more complacency and a blindness to the emerging competition, but still...)

      Remember, one of the reasons Apple computers were much more expensive than their PC counterparts back in the day was that Apple retained manufacturing here while HP and Dell moved manufacturing to Asia, until demand outstripped capacity and they, too, had to start manufacturing in countries more focused on mass production of something else than cars.

    32. Re:How Much by suss · · Score: 1

      12%. This question gets asked in most of the Apple-related threads...

    33. Re:How Much by Aryden · · Score: 1

      China has the largest piles of rare earth minerals

      Quote me right or don't comment

  10. One man's riot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  11. Are human rights better or worse in China since by Brannon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Western countries starting buying products made there?

    Maybe the Western countries aren't the problem. Maybe China is the problem.

    1. Re:Are human rights better or worse in China since by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not China per se, but the situation they're in. They're still in the industrial revolution, which is notorious for few worker rights not only in China but everywhere else. Despite its problems, it's a necessary step they cannot avoid, not unless they plan on going back to the feudal age (which won't happen). Give China ten years and I'm sure things won't be so bad for their workers, although their industry will take a hit and start moving, perphaps to India if they manage to fix their problems by then.

    2. Re:Are human rights better or worse in China since by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a sweet back-handed apologetic. I think I just threw up a little in my mouth.

    3. Re:Are human rights better or worse in China since by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said, people don't realize the rest of the world also went through this as well. If china can start building robots, then they might be able to keep manufacturing costs low while giving workers an easier life.

    4. Re:Are human rights better or worse in China since by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Wait, wait, wait... what do you say there? China just plays by the rules of the free market, you see? They saw there's a market, they tapped into it, they provided goods cheaper than the competition.

      Free market good, don't you dare to question that!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Are human rights better or worse in China since by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Are human rights better or worse in China since Western countries starting buying products made there? Maybe the Western countries aren't the problem. Maybe China is the problem.

      Maybe starting your comment in the subject line is the problem. Stop that.

      I don't know the answer to your question, unless the products you're talking about are human organs, in which case the answer is pretty clear.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Are human rights better or worse in China since by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Free market good"

      And the alternative that you are proposing is?

    7. Re:Are human rights better or worse in China since by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      A restricted free market system that makes sure that a healthy amount of competition arises, i.e. one that favors new competitors and smaller businesses. Smaller businesses are quite a bit more beneficial to a government, small businesses usually cannot just uproot their production facilities and ship them overseas when they don't like your tax or briber... I mean subsidiary system anymore.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Are human rights better or worse in China since by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

      China wouldn't build any if they couldn't sell any.

      It's called enabling. Don't pretend that the West doesn't do it.

      Just like "fences" don't steal, but they enable theft, and why even if you didn't help uncle Joe kill someone, but you hid him, or helped hide the body, you'll still be charged with murder. It's called being an "accessory after the fact".

      Anybody who buys something made by slave / inmate / child labor is guilty of supporting the practice.

      Just as the drug trade would stop if it couldn't find a market.

      --

      THINK! It's patriotic

  12. I really dont care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No one really cares what's happening at foxcon. This is not news or of importance.

    1. Re:I really dont care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're like an abused wife, in America. First we give them all of our jobs at our own employment expense and then wee work ourselves into a self-loathing frenzy over how the people we gave our jobs away to are treated. Fuck them. It's their problem an China's problem. They have their own government and over a billion people. They can fix their own shit. We have our own shit to care about. I don't have time or energy to give a fuck about some dude living in bamboo sticks and mud making low wages working long hours for a shitty boss. I get enough of that in my own life.

    2. Re:I really dont care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live in a bamboo hut held together with mud? Lucky bastards all we got is dirt no water for mud

  13. More trouble for Apple!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YIPPEEEEEE!

  14. That's moronic, look at Apple's financials... by Brannon · · Score: 3, Informative

    almost all the money they make is from sales of hardware. It is their entire business model.

    1. Re:That's moronic, look at Apple's financials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's Revenue?

      What would that tell you about the value of the iPhone?

      Try looking at the whole picture.

    2. Re:That's moronic, look at Apple's financials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Historically, Apple sucks at realizing a profit from services. Check out the list on wikipedia (ignore the training and repair services). Do you remember half of them?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Apple_Inc._services

    3. Re:That's moronic, look at Apple's financials... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      Historically, Apple sucks at realizing a profit from services.

      No they don't because historically people buy Apple products for services (iTunes, iCloud, etc).

      Sure those services do not make much money directly, but they help provide more reasons to buy the hardware.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:That's moronic, look at Apple's financials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't remember any of them, I'm not a customer for Apple in general, so I pay less attention to them than what a Vegetarian thinks about a steakhouse.

      But I'm seeing a focus on Apple for some reason.

      Again, that's not why the iPhone is valuable.

  15. Breaking news from China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese government reports that there was no riot and all Foxconn employees are happy, enjoying their productive lives in a workers' paradise.

  16. APPLE !! APPLE !! APPLE !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There !! All fixed now !! Carry on !!

  17. Over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AC just removed the Slashdot RSS Feed from his browser. Bu Bye.

  18. "Good source for news" ? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do any Slashdotters know of a good source for news about Chinese labor disputes?

    I am sure, Foxconn, Apple, CIA, Chinese Communist Party and Dalai Lama have plenty to say about those things. Or, by "good" you mean something that is not pure spin? Then no.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  19. Reuters Has The Story by guttentag · · Score: 5, Informative
    It was on the front page of the NY Times earlier, but has since been buried here.

    Key points:
    • The plant has 79,000 workers, makes parts for automotive electronics and "assembles various electronic devices" including the iPhone 5 (yeah, I know, so what... but you know that's what everyone wants to know out of morbid curiosity and how this might relate to them)
    • As many as a thousand workers may have been involved, but the fight took place at the company's dormitories, not in the factory itself
    • 10 people injured, no one killed
    1. Re:Reuters Has The Story by Aardpig · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gentlemen -- welcome to Foxconn Club. The first rule of Foxconn Club is...

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  20. Automotive electronics? Apple makes cars? by Brannon · · Score: 1

    Since when? ;-)

    1. Re:Automotive electronics? Apple makes cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Foxconn has like something sick like 1.2 million employees. For comparison that's something close to 3 times the number of Walmart or Exxon employees. I'm pretty sure they're not all churning out apple products.

    2. Re:Automotive electronics? Apple makes cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple != Foxconn, but trololol harder.

  21. But I thought... by Tough+Love · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But I thought Apple told us they made it all right and everything is good at Foxconn. We can believe what Apple tells us, can't we?

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:But I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because Apple is responsible for EVERYTHING that happens. Tom Cook himself must have ordered the security robot to hit that worker. As we all know they are all remote controlled from Cupertino. /s (- Sheldon Cooper hint)

      *sigh*

    2. Re:But I thought... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      But I thought Apple told us they made it all right and everything is good at Foxconn.

      You know when you guys fixated solely on Apple's products being made there and you claimed that you were doing it for the good of the workers by picking on the 'biggest offender', then you were quiet about every single other manufcaturer there that was abusing the workers? This is the result. If you guys didn't just feed your hatred of Apple, the heat could have been kept turned up on Foxconn and more improvements would have been made. Perhaps we wouldn't have even seen this riot.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:But I thought... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      We don't even know what happened. For all we know, this could be the Chinese version of the Virginia Tech massacre.

      Also note that riots have been going on all over the place in China recently. Maybe this was an anti-Taiwan riot.

      Guessing before you have data is a good way to be wrong 90% of the time.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:But I thought... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Seriously, here is a story about a recent riot because a concert was late in starting. That country is very riot-friendly right now.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:But I thought... by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Actually, this has been a problem ever since news of the labour practices in Nike's subcontractors' factories broke (if not longer).

      It is only when it was pointed out that Apple also profited from these slave labour practices that the fanbois suddenly starting making noises of 'you're only hating on Apple'.

      I hate to spoil your privileged life, but that you have ignored this problem until your iDol got attention is not the rest of the world's problem.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    6. Re:But I thought... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I hate to spoil your privileged life, but that you have ignored this problem until your iDol got attention is not the rest of the world's problem.

      In other words: Nobody knows that a particular company uses sweat shops until noise is made about them specifically. By fixating on Apple, nobody is made aware that there are over a dozen other companies using those mistreated workers as well.

      Yeah, nice rebuttal.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:But I thought... by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Here's a hint, fanboy: if you become popular, people tend to pay attention to you. Why is that so hard to understand for you iZombies?

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    8. Re:But I thought... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      It is only when it was pointed out that Apple also profited from these slave labour practices that the fanbois suddenly starting making noises of 'you're only hating on Apple'.

      There were reports like "300 workers threatened suicicde at iPhone plant" - because Microsoft was reducing XBox production and these workers were in danger of losing their jobs.

      Fact: There are riots in many places. Quite bad in Britain. There have been riots this year in Florida, and in Germany. Type in "riot country name" in Google and you'll find riots. Well, and in China.

    9. Re:But I thought... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      You should take a moment to re-read my posts and notice that I wasn't defending Apple. What I did say, and you're unintentionally proving, is that you don't give a shit about the workers unless you can make Apple look bad in the process.

      Maybe you shouldn't throw the term 'fanboy' around.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    10. Re:But I thought... by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Fuck off. You do nothing but defend Apple, just as you do now; in this case by trying to deflect attention away from your iDol.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    11. Re:But I thought... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      You do nothing but defend Apple

      Oh, really? Heh.

      in this case by trying to deflect attention away from your iDol

      Meanwhile... The only workers that have seen any sort of relief at Foxconn are the ones working on iDevices. Again, nice rebuttal.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    12. Re:But I thought... by toriver · · Score: 0

      At least they are looking into it : http://www.apple.com/supplierresponsibility/

  22. Android phones are made out of hemp in the USA by by Brannon · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    union labor.

  23. Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YES! Go China! Riot and take down Apple! PC FOREVER! 3

  24. Sounds like old days in USA where workers faced th by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sounds like old days in USA where workers faced the same work conditions.

    They need real workers rights fast or soon the workers may just burn the factory down.

  25. Nerve staple them! by Aardpig · · Score: 3, Funny

    Chairman Yang would approve.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    1. Re:Nerve staple them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Lal of the U.N. Peace Keepers hereby pronounce Vendetta upon you!

    2. Re:Nerve staple them! by Aardpig · · Score: 2

      Sunspots have disrupted communications, you're breaking up, bzzzz bzzzz.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    3. Re:Nerve staple them! by rdwulfe · · Score: 1

      This little thread just brought me back. Thank you.

    4. Re:Nerve staple them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon the Gaians will sweep in with swarms of mind worms and consume your remnants, in order to replace the damage you've done to Planet with beautiful fields of fungus!

  26. Re:Android phones are made out of hemp in the USA by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, not hemp; it's rainbows shat out by unicorns and then sun-dried.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  27. No first-hand accounts by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Something is going on at Foxconn. Do any Slashdotters know of a good source for news about Chinese labor disputes?

    Drat! If only there was someone on the scene with a smartphone with a really good camera and fast data connection!

    1. Re:No first-hand accounts by jsse · · Score: 2

      Something is going on at Foxconn. Do any Slashdotters know of a good source for news about Chinese labor disputes?

      Drat! If only there was someone on the scene with a smartphone with a really good camera and fast data connection!

      Actually the first batch of video footages are taken by civilians with their smartphones, rather than news reporters coming to the scenes promptly with their flashy video camera. That is the only real trusty news source nowaday in China. Sad, very sad.

    2. Re:No first-hand accounts by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      Drat! If only there was someone on the scene with a smartphone with a really good camera and fast data connection!

      You mean like an Android Lenovo 750? Hopefully, that person had the presence of mind to steal someone else's phone before taking and posting pictures for everyone to see, because otherwise he certainly doesn't seem to be covering his tracks very well.

    3. Re:No first-hand accounts by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      He tried to use one of the copious rounded $30-to-manufacture phones lying around that he'd seen heavily marketed on TV, but the voice recognition couldn't find a place to send the photo, the browser had problems rendering a site to upload them, then he couldn't get reception because of the incorrect way he held the phone. The battery proceeded to overheat, burning his hand which caused him to drop the phone from chest height, it landed on some soft ground and the screen shattered, fortunately the display was usable under the cracked glass. A replacement battery would have saved the day, but unfortunately there was no easy way to do this despite access to specialised tools.

      He has since committed suicide by jumping off the building. Unfortunately the safety nets actually sliced him into pieces and he died a slow painful death - they were designed to be trendy, stylish and minimalistic - okay for a phone, apparently not good for a suicide net. You live and learn.

    4. Re:No first-hand accounts by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That is the only real trusty news source nowaday in China. Sad, very sad.

      That's how it is in every country of which I have an inkling of how it is. The state controls the media, because it handles licensing. They decide who we'll hear. That's why the battle for net neutrality is so critical, and it's also why the cops have such a hard-on for photographers, videographers, and of course, people with cellphones who point the cameras at cops. The media does its job by not reporting on them, and they're upset that The People aren't as willing to fall in line. The only thing that keeps the masses from rising up is that they're not getting pissed off enough. There's good and bad aspects to that, but I don't think we can keep going in our present direction without falling off a cliff, so perhaps it's time for a change even though upheaval costs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  28. what will happen to rioting workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will they be thrown into the iCube?

    1. Re:what will happen to rioting workers? by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Doubtless they will be invited to supercharge their craniums with the iBullet.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:what will happen to rioting workers? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First riot, with a good attitude back to your village with no pension - many many years later. Your extended family is watched, no promotions.
      Second riot, you have contact with outside NGO, CIA, MI6.... the questions start and never stop.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:what will happen to rioting workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they must have signed the consent form, before entering the factory.

  29. Riots broke out in shopping malls across the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when people realized that there might be shortages of iPhone 5's as a result of the Foxconn riot.

    1. Re:Riots broke out in shopping malls across the US by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Don't forget $RAPPER's new sneaker line.

    2. Re:Riots broke out in shopping malls across the US by toriver · · Score: 0

      Heh, just google "Black Friday sale video" if you want to watch American riots... every year, like clockwork.

  30. Reports differ by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The guys at wehateapple.com are saying it's the worst thing in history and that Apple will finally get what's coming to them for all teh evils. But the guys at appleisgreat.com are saying it's no big deal and stuff like this happens all the time.

    Meanwhile, the guys at mindyourownbusiness.com don't have a report about it at all, but they do have some good reports that seem relevant to my own life. At mindsomeoneelsesbusiness.com, they're extremely interested in whether African tribes that make their own beer are at a greater risk for gout from too much yeast and they think it's the fault of the US government for some reason.

    At newsfornerds.com, they're just trolling for clicks, so they put up a story with no information to get Apple haters and Apple fanboys sniping at each other. Later, they'll be posting stories about evolution, Mitt Romney's failure to announce any female cabinet members, an ask newsfornerds.com question about whether Dragon Age 3 will be more heterosexual-friendly than Dragon Age 2, and a statement from RMS about how the government should stop paying school teachers because they should be sharing their knowledge for free.

    1. Re:Reports differ by hax4bux · · Score: 1

      You sir, are mighty. Bravo!

    2. Re:Reports differ by mejustme · · Score: 1

      Score:5 Insightful works too, but personally, I would have rated this funny...!

    3. Re:Reports differ by Kohath · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wouldn't anything of value be off topic?

    4. Re:Reports differ by thygate · · Score: 1

      You Sir, are a gentleman and a scholar.

    5. Re:Reports differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You win the Internet for today

    6. Re:Reports differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than a pretty accurate description of the news landscape? I guess (s)he does not.

    7. Re:Reports differ by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      It's sad how insightful and accurate that post was...

    8. Re:Reports differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are the only person in the world who gets it...

      seriously, TCP/IP connections shouldn't even open until the user can repeat your post from memory.

      i would subscribe to your newsletter.

    9. Re:Reports differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot slashbi.com. But then so did everybody else.

  31. The truth is by jsse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "a fight among workers from different production lines,"

    From the local news "" Translation: Foxconn security started the fight, which triggered riots in Shandong and Henan.

    How could this become "a fight among workers" in international news I wondered.

    The only thing international news coverage is correctly accounted for is that the root cause is still a mystery, but we would imagine it should be more along the line of suppression under high working pressure.

    1. Re:The truth is by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      "a fight among workers from different production lines,"

      Sadly, this fight was just the latest round in the war between Apple and Google. Production line 1 were the Foxconn workers building the iPhone 5, while production line 2 make Android phones for Motorola Mobility. Conflict was inevitable.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:The truth is by commodore73 · · Score: 1

      How could this become "a fight among workers" in international news I wondered.

      Security are workers too.

  32. Re:Sounds like old days in USA where workers faced by Osgeld · · Score: 2

    no, no they do not

    the chineese factories rely on on near slave labor, the US makers can do nearly the same cost per unit with high levels of automation

    robots do no rebel, no matter what jizztastic si-fi fan fict you read, and you dont have to stay up till 3 am to talk to some low level dumbass who speaks 3 words of english cause your getting screwed over

  33. Re:Sounds like old days in USA where workers faced by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Except there was no progress in industrial automation since cheap workers became available. Good luck translating iPhone assembly procedure into GE/Fanuc G-code.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  34. If the Chinese aren't careful... by istartedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the Chinese aren't careful, they're going to have a communist revolution on their hands.

    Sorry, I might have trotted that one out before; but it has fit so perfectly the past decade or so.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:If the Chinese aren't careful... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      If the Chinese aren't careful, Vietnam and Indonesia are going to look very welcoming.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:If the Chinese aren't careful... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If the Chinese aren't careful, they're going to have a communist revolution on their hands. Sorry, I might have trotted that one out before; but it has fit so perfectly the past decade or so.

      It fits this decade better than you might have thought, actually.

    3. Re:If the Chinese aren't careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If the Chinese aren't careful, they're going to have a communist revolution on their hands."

      Or worse: a labor movement as we had in Europe and the US around the turn of the previous century.

  35. It's on by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    ATTICA! ATTICA! ATTICA!

  36. Re:Sounds like old days in USA where workers faced by Osgeld · · Score: 2

    and why not? you can take a funcionally illiterate farmer into a g-code processor in a day and make them feel good about it

  37. Re:Such a caring company by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

    What about all the other companies that buy from Foxconn?

    --
    If you can't convince them, convict them.
  38. Play hardball w/ China and the US wins. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    If the US decides to stop giving China(and like countries to prevent shifts to other non-US countries) the kid gloves treatment, one could make it more profitable in the US by default - with a lot less impact than you think.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Play hardball w/ China and the US wins. by toriver · · Score: 1

      Yes, American consumers would find it in their patriotic hearts to pay a "home made" premium* on items manufactured in the good old homeland.

      Or... they would just go to Chinatown and buy a cheap imported knock-off.

      *) The numbers sometimes quoted that the "premium" would not be particularly high makes the assumption that the parts assembled are imported: But to truly be "Made in America" should not as many of the components be manufactured there as well? And there are few places where you can build enough capacity to meet demand - China "wins" because they use cheap manual labor instead of expensive automated plants.

  39. Then cast a wider net than China for trade policy. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Those countries won't look inviting when trade policy has the choices being a non-front-company in the US(and not in a RTW state) or the same in the higher-cost EU. The US just needs someone willing to play hardball.

    If they want to manufacture closer to their customers in the US, then by all means make it effectively impossible to reward a despotic Third World country.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  40. "Hungry people are especially clear thinkers" by pentabular · · Score: 1

    Quoted from Terry Gou

    1. Re:"Hungry people are especially clear thinkers" by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      I doubt Terry Gou has been hungry enough to mistake desperation as clear thought.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  41. You're splitting hairs. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    China is as despotic as any of the US's declared enemies and their government shows it.

    That country will not get out of that era as long as businesses want a large & pliant pool of workers.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:You're splitting hairs. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      What are the "US declared enemies", and who declared them?

    2. Re:You're splitting hairs. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Iran, (Taliban/Al Qaeda controlled) Afghanistan, Cuba, Venezuela, Belarus, Zimbabwe, and Somalia to name a few.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    3. Re:You're splitting hairs. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      What really hurts is that the Iran is closer to a democracy than China has been in half a century.

      Yes, yes, the democracy in the Iran is quite a bit of a show since there are only parties that pretty much offer the same program, but then again, what's the difference to a lot of western countries?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:You're splitting hairs. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That's a curious list. Does Belarus know that it's a 'declared enemy', for example? And what, exactly, did it to to US to deserve such a title?

      Other entries are also suspect. I assume you simply forgot about DPRK, but what about Vietnam - enemy or no? Somalia - which of half a dozen governments in place do you consider enemy? The one that's currently officially recognized by UN (which would be the one struggling against local Islamists, al-Shabaab)?

      I also find it interesting that you list Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, but not the "liberated" part of it, despite army and police forces of said "liberated" part recently engaging in a sport of "how many US troops/contractors can you shoot in the back insha'Allah?".

      Oh, and who compiles the list?

    5. Re:You're splitting hairs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush Jr. had his "Axis of Evil" list but I don't know if that's been updated.

    6. Re:You're splitting hairs. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Oh, and who compiles the list?

      Old out-of-touch white men.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    7. Re:You're splitting hairs. by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      The US government declared them.

    8. Re:You're splitting hairs. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Can you give a reference to US government declaring China the enemy?

    9. Re:You're splitting hairs. by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      I can't. As far as I know, China is not in that list... If you actualy read what you are replying to, you'd notice that this is the entire point.

    10. Re:You're splitting hairs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To name a few? You should simply say, "most of south america, middle east, and asia". USA has probably less friends than enemies.

    11. Re:You're splitting hairs. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      That comes with the attribute of the US being the world's remaining superpower (if not hyperpower). There is no shame in living in the modern version of the Roman Empire.

      I opt for accuracy over your blanket statements.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  42. lovely summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A reputable editor would have mentioned that the "riot" broke out in a private dormitory, not that it matters on /.

  43. Well don't look to Google for answers! by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by mvdwege · · Score: 5, Funny

      Behold the sense of iHumor.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    2. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by CodeheadUK · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmmm, I've seen that list somewhere before.

      http://search.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3138293&cid=41431711 in the last Apple story (and in other /. Apple story too but life is too short to go looking).

      Is this now the standard reply trotted out to rebuff the iOS6 map problem?

      'Think Different' sounds more like Scientology every day.

    3. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by CodeheadUK · · Score: 1

      No one said Google maps were perfect. If fact, I don't think Google were mentioned at all here before your wall of anti Google links.

      Other online map providers like Bing and National Geographic are available, There's plenty of alternatives to plug the gap while iOS Maps are fixed. However, I understand that choice is a difficult concept for those trapped in the walled garden.

    4. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also known as iLol.

    5. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by AlXtreme · · Score: 0

      The other funny thing about posting that Tumblr link is that from time to time it shows Apple maps are better in some cases.

      iOS6: Perfect if you're not leaving North Korea anytime soon!

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    6. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by tbird81 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yep, SuperKendall, BasilBrush, and a few others are there to try to eliminate adverse talk about Apple Corp.

      I don't know why, but I assume they work for them. I can't really see why they'd die in a ditch defending Apple's relentless unethical and stupid decisions if they were only fans.

      I guess there's more to Apple marketing than black turtle necks, rounded corners and misleading ads.

    7. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't aware that outright fabrication about map issues had become humor.

      Ha ha, I guess?

      Really, that touchy? It is one of the most common premises of humor - you have a case of obvious issues with/focus on "X", that makes room for funny exaggerations, that many people find funny, but yeah, I guess you can claim that most jokes are 'outright fabrication'. Look at a humor talkshow.

    8. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Macthorpe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, all your examples are from 2010, and from cursory glance, they're all resolved. Also you included at least one link to errors that were appearing in Google Places, not Google Maps.

      You might think it's unfair that we're judging a map that's been out for less than a month to one that's been out for years, but if you're going to release a new product it's going to be compared to what is currently available. The fact is, there are too many errors in obvious stuff - misspelled capital cities, duplications of entire islands, famous landmarks with incorrect coastlines. It's a complete abandonment of the philosophy of "It Just Works".

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    9. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, that touchy? It is one of the most common premises of humor - you have a case of obvious issues with/focus on "X", that makes room for funny exaggerations

      Humor is usually based on truth. There is nothing true about that image. The whole feed until that images has been humor based on truth.

      If you start mixing in fabrications you are polluting all the real examples of issues. Are they all humorously real problems? No-one can tell any more. And it's simply less funny to boot.

      yeah, I guess you can claim that most jokes are 'outright fabrication

      No. Again, most humor is based on exaggerations with some core truth.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    10. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So either your a complete "Sheldon" who happens to be a Mac Fanboiy or you really are a shill/troll

    11. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Worthless_Comments · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a number I can give you for a good stick-remover. You know, if you get tired of having one up your ass.

    12. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure sign #1 of a religious or political fanatic: Claiming that all evidence that runs counter to Holy belief must be a fabrication.

    13. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Canazza · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Humor is usually based on truth.

      Based on, but not necessarily true.

      There is nothing true about that image.

      Except, ofcourse, as an exaggeration of the other issues that Apple's map software currently has.

      The whole feed until that images has been humor based on truth.

      No, the whole feed until that image has been Humorous Truths. Now we have a Humorous Exaggeration.
      And, as sibling post said, pull the stick out your arse and laugh once and a while.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    14. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if Google Maps won't show Americans where to find an Arby's, I'd say it's not a bug, it's an intervention.

      Better would be if instead of Arby's, it directed those Grade A U.S. porkers to the nearest gym, or cardiac center.

    15. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not possible to need Arby's.

    16. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Humor is usually based on truth.

      Yes, it is, and the truth of the matter is that the maps in iOS 6 plain suck. It was a huge step backwards.

    17. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why, ...

      Some (all?) of them are probably slashdot staff shills or sock puppets who's job is to create controversy by being contrarians.

      Controversy sells, or in this case leads to more user generated content, readers and ad clicks.

    18. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Stele · · Score: 5, Funny

      The map is fine - you're just reading it wrong.

    19. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      My local town doesn't exist on their map.

      It is, however, in the Domesday Book.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    20. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by MrSenile · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that outright fabrication about map issues had become humor.

      Siri,
      Where is Earth?

      "I have found Earth. Displaying on iMaps."
      http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ywQvbF86xjs/Sx30uuAmANI/AAAAAAAABdA/EdmbkorO-00/s400/536J++earth+and+nebula+web.jpg

    21. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Siri: Nearest Starbucks

      I'm sorry but I don't do java

    22. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, that touchy? It is one of the most common premises of humor - you have a case of obvious issues with/focus on "X", that makes room for funny exaggerations

      Humor is usually based on truth. There is nothing true about that image. The whole feed until that images has been humor based on truth.

      If you start mixing in fabrications you are polluting all the real examples of issues. Are they all humorously real problems? No-one can tell any more. And it's simply less funny to boot.

      yeah, I guess you can claim that most jokes are 'outright fabrication

      No. Again, most humor is based on exaggerations with some core truth.

      You must be a comedian, because I'm laughing my balls off at your post.

      You may want to watch some real comedy. It isn't all truth... In fact, most comedians make shit up all the time.

    23. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      Also note that some of the issues on the Tumblr blog are not real either. So those should be dropped from consideration too, right?

      If you can show they're not real, sure. However, when the BBC carries it as a news story, where maps in the UK are missing entire well-known towns (Shakespeare's birthplace, Stratford-upon-Avon, for example), and others are moved miles out of place, it shows that it really is a widespread issue. This is really basic stuff.

      Apple had to launch maps in a beta state

      Which, as they've stated they simply didn't renew the agreement with Google, increasingly looks like their own fault.

      there simply is no other way to start improving it rapidly or really at all.

      I'd be interested to hear how they will gather user feedback on individual mistakes, as from searching I cannot see any mechanism by which it's possible to provide that feedback with creating a Tumblr account and hoping Apple look at it. What they should have done in the first place, is:

      a) Swallow their pride and renew Google Maps for another year or two, then
      b) Pay a decent amount of money for proper maps from the myriad of mapping organisations that have accurate data.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    24. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by powerlinekid · · Score: 2

      Yes the core truth that iOS 6 Maps isn't perfect. See this is the humor... its not perfect, just as any other software vendor's apps are not. However for some reason Apple gets treated as the golden child perfect company which makes it that much funnier when they screw up.

      Nobody laughs at the D student for spelling a word wrong... but it can be funny when an A student does it.

      Make sense yet?

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    25. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Jeng · · Score: 1

      I don't know why, but I assume they work for them. I can't really see why they'd die in a ditch defending Apple's relentless unethical and stupid decisions if they were only fans

      I doubt that anyone would be that fanatical over a paycheck. Fans are much more willing to sing the praises of that which they are fans of vs employees singing the praises of their employer.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    26. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though it might be mutually enjoyable, I do not think he wants your number.

    27. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      If you think humour is typically a wrapper for truths, you may wish to stop watching those "news" shows like SNL.

      The news is supposed to be based on facts and truths, while humour takes pot shots at true, semi-true, perceived, and utterly false issues. A fictitious story about a funny situation doesn't stop being humour because its untrue.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    28. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to planet Earth. How was your flight?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    29. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It hurts, doesn't it? Coming to the realization that Apple sucks. Just sucks. Sucks. And you paid extra for the suck. Your were a fool to do so. That's what hurts: the dawning realizaion you were taking to the cleaners by such an obvious scam artist. Fr a whil eyou try to explain and ratinalize and pretent it wasn't all a scam, but evenutaly there's no denying it - sucker.

    30. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iLol'd.

    31. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by raedeon · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone, for any reason, even need to find an Arby's?

    32. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but that is not necessarily an inaccurate rendering given we are in a galaxy.

      It was funny though.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    33. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      If you can show they're not real, sure.

      As I mentioned the very one linked to, showing a globe with "Australia" over America was totally made up (tested on an iPad). People seem fine with that, as it's humorous even though then it makes you wonder if any other examples are made up... but it's easy to check.

      Stratford-upon-Avon search DOES work. When you use the "-". I tested that myself.

      Yes some of the examples are real, like things being moved out of place - I think all of those examples were correct.

      Which, as they've stated they simply didn't renew the agreement with Google, increasingly looks like their own fault.

      There is no way to know if Google make them an offer it was impossible to accept. Google as a company is better off with a map app they write and can present ads though - and do more tracking of users using the app.

      I'd be interested to hear how they will gather user feedback on individual mistakes

      It's right in the app. When you lift up the corner (to change from satellite to road mode and other configuration changes) there is a link for "report problem" with a number of categories of problems you can report.

      a) Swallow their pride and renew Google Maps for another year or two,

      Why? They'd launch with essentially the same quality of data. You can only get a certain level of usability with in-house testing before you just have to have more people looking at it.

      b) Pay a decent amount of money for proper maps from the myriad of mapping organisations that have accurate data.

      This is probably more realistic, though not having to have purchased maps for the entire planet I'm really not sure other sources would not have simply had different issues. As noted in my examples, Apple already finds one thing even Google gets wrong. Also there is the case of Apple maps being better for users in China... that's a lot of people that now have better maps, and a possible reason why they might have chosen the source they used as China is pretty important to Apple for long-term growth.

      It is what it is now, the important thing is how quickly Apple repairs map issues. If all the things on that Tumblr blog that are real now still show as issues in a month, Id say they have a problem.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    34. Re:Well don't look to Google for answers! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      All hail Jobs, for all Jobbies are good!

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  44. Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by sethstorm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    2. Communism and Dictatorship are mutually exclusive (at least in theory).

    In implementation, they end up one and the same. See the USSR, Venezuela, Cuba, and post-WWII China.

    3. China doesn't have the best human rights record, but they don't exactly have anywhere near the worst one either. The US isn't any saint either:
            * The US set up Guantanamo Bay to purposely get around constitutionally guaranteed rights when they were inconvenient.

    I see your GITMO and raise you one Tiananmen Square Massacre. In order to put down the event, the CPC brought in military from the countryside to guarantee enforcement of orders. In addition, involvement meant that you would be completely disappeared.

    With GITMO and other places, you're not completely removed from existence as deeply as performed in China. Never mind that GITMO treats its detainees quite well compared to China's equivalent - to the point where detained Uighurs are not sent home to China.

    In addition, the United States does not have closed regions like Tibet that restrict foreigners from entry.

    * The white people who settled in the US basically killed all of the existing red people.

    Then you might explain the flood of Han Chinese in Tibet - the same region that has excluded foreigners for purely political reasons.
    In addition, the monks get the same treatment if not worse by CPC policies(as implemented, not as written).

    * Privacy as a right went out the window a while ago with all the warrant-less wiretaps, GPS vehicle tracking, etc.
            * From my understanding, anyone can be detained without trial or attorney, as long as they are classified as a "terrorist".

    It takes a LOT more effort to fall foul of those provisions in the US. As for China, you can just tell a bad joke about a government official and you are gone. Even high-up officials like Bo Xilai are not immune to such provisions - even if their family has favor.

    In China, there would be no equivalent to the Tea Party or Breitbart that survives in the open.

    * The "Child labor" that bleeding hearts in the US complain about was considered normal and routine in the US not all that long ago, and is still considered
    normal and even desired in many countries overseas.

    Those practices refer to a society that willfully forsakes freedom for all. 50 years will pass and China will still be as despotic towards its workers in deference to its little princes that run their factories like fiefdoms.

    The closest I know is some domestic model Sony Vaio models (the most expensive ones) are supposedly 100% "made in Japan" - even those will probably have at least some parts from Taiwan, Korea, etc.

    With IBM, some machines do have an order code for a US-friendly setup. That is, the machine will be made from parts that would pass muster with the DoD as being from the US and close allies with the US - China not being one of them. At one time, this also included US assembly of laptops for government contracts but is primarily for their midrange machines.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      So, the black spots in US history... simply weren't?

      Whitewashing the past and ignoring the significant problems even today and excusing them as "China is worse". Hitler was worse than Stalin.

    2. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Venezuela is neither a communist state nor a dictatorship: Under the elected government of Hugo Chavez, it has engaged in some redistribution policies to help the extremely poor, but that's not the same has having a state-planned economy with Five Year Plans or people getting sent to the gulag for political reasons or Great Leaps Forward.

      Also, if we're going to allow references to bad things that have happened in the history of a country, the US has to own up to, since the 1930's alone, Japanese-American internment, Jim Crow and the many lynchings that came out of that, the repeated acts of aggression against foreign countries (many of whom present little-to-no threat against the US, like Grenada), overthrowing democratically elected governments and replacing them with brutal dictatorships (Iran and Chile being the most important examples), and occasional acts of putting down political protests with force (e.g. Kent State, Chicago '67, Occupy Wall St). Communist governments often do really bad things. The US government also often does really bad things. I'm in favor of condemning governments when they commit obvious moral evils, regardless of who they are, but thinking that "my government is always good, and their government is always evil" is not a useful or correct position to take.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 2. Communism and Dictatorship are mutually exclusive (at least in theory).

      "In implementation, they end up one and the same. See the USSR, Venezuela..."

      Venezuela is neither; it is a socialist democracy.
      RW-ers have been accusing Chavez of being a "wannabe dictator", but they dropped that since the dictatorship has failed to manifest during the past 13 years.

    4. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by Stormthirst · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that the US is the only country to be convicted of terrorism by the international courts. Not that it matters - it's the US, the biggest bully on the block.

    5. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lookee lookee, the US has its own 50 Cent Party!

    6. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Whitewashing the past and ignoring the significant problems even today and excusing them as "China is worse". Hitler was worse than Stalin.

      On one hand, you're right. On the other hand, he's right. China really is worse to live in than the USA by most available metrics. They admit to ten times as many executions per capita than we've got, for example. And then there's the prison labor camps, where cheap consumer goods are assembled with slave labor under the eye of the government. You think that sort of shit has stopped because we're arguing about college students being pressed into forced labor at Foxconn? Please. Christmas lights are still being assembled by slaves. Wrap that around your tree this year.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler was worse than Stalin.

      Hitler: ~12 million
      Stalin: ~25 million
      ...and the high score goes to...
      Mao Ze-Dong: ~70 million

    8. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They admit to 10 times the per capita executions that we admit to. Your point still stands, but spread the skepticism around.

    9. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      They admit to 10 times the per capita executions that we admit to. Your point still stands, but spread the skepticism around.

      Well, we have different problems. They kill people and maybe harvest their organs, we lock people in a rape factory to keep the plebes scared. And of course, we have a moderately efficient making-money-bombing-people system in operation. I don't mean to imply that the USA is a shining beacon of truth and justice, and I apologize if I came off as that much of a cheerleader.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      If you include events like the Civil War, no.
      If you include events such as the violent era of unionbusting, no.
      If you include the introduction of the income tax, no.

      It'll take a lot more than just Iraq and Afghanistan to count for a bad part in the history of the US.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    11. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly, the red people killed quite a few white people as well, but that doesn't exactly fit with your narrative now does it?

    12. Re:Your 50 Mao membership card is showing. by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      On the relevant hand, my point from the beginning was "China being worse doesn't make the problems the US has any less severe". That's why I used Hitler and Stalin - you can argue one to be worse than the other, but even if you're successful, that doesn't change that they both were Very Bad People.

  45. Re:Sounds like old days in USA where workers faced by tftp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The biggest problem is that at this level of assembly you have to account for variations in parts. Just try to use a robot to snap a clamshell. A human will apply the right amount of force where it is needed, and he will immediately see if something goes wrong. The vast majority of consumer electronics is not designed for easy assembly; they are designed for low cost, and as result half of the assembly is on glue, another half is snaps, and yet another half is all sorts of tiny special screws. You have to keep fragile flex connectors plugged correctly, you have to check that no wires are sticking out, you have to make sure that all 17 pieces of the puzzle are in before you put the last one on top.

    Robots are very good with pick and place because these operations require minimal feedback. Once your activity starts depending on the feedback the first thing you need to develop is fingers with a good number of pressure sensors and with fine motors that can drive those fingers just like human hands do. Those robots will cost you more than the peanuts that a Chinese worker costs you today. There are only a few experimental fingers that are getting close to what is needed.

    It's certainly possible to design for robotic FA&T, just as through hole PCBs were replaced with surface mounted parts. However this will impact the end product. It will be hard to make enclosures that look like solid pieces of material, with no seams or with no obvious means to open and close them. You would have to give up on technologies that only humans can do efficiently (like mating of small connectors.) You would want the assembly to consist of very few basic moves, with blind mates for all parts and with easy means to check that the mating is complete.

    I don't want to sound like automation of the final assembly is impossible. I only want to mention that it is not a simple replacement of the worker with a robot.

    On top of that, imagine that 1000 factory owners own all factories in the country and they need no workers. Owners still want money to pay for the raw materials, for the investments into robots, and for their wear and replacement, and for taxes, and for their own profits. Who is going to come up with the money to buy their goods if hardly anyone in the whole country is employed? The current thinking centers around the government becoming the center of ownership of robotic factories and of distribution of their products. IMO, this only changes one boss for another boss; even worse, you can never leave the new boss.

  46. ker-lap alap alap! by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

    You need to stop basing your views on sitcom caricatures.

    You're just a cowardly insecure little bitch who didn't know life was going to be this way

    Is his job a joke? Is his love-life DOA?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:ker-lap alap alap! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      This is /.

      His love life was stillborn.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  47. Re:Such a caring company by SilenceBE · · Score: 5, Informative

    Major customers of Foxconn currently include:

    Acer Inc. (Taiwan)[40]
    Amazon.com (United States)[7]
    Apple Inc. (United States)[41]
    Cisco (United States)[42]
    Dell (United States)[43]
    Hewlett-Packard (United States)[44]
    Intel (United States)[45]
    Microsoft (United States)[9]
    Motorola Mobility (United States)[43]
    Nintendo (Japan)[46]
    Nokia (Finland)[41]
    Sony (Japan)[8]
    Toshiba (Japan) [47]
    Vizio (United States)[48]

    You don't care about these workers, you are only bothered with your Apple hate so that you even ignore the facts. Only on slashdot this can be modded up. Sickening !

  48. Re:Such a caring company by unixisc · · Score: 1

    And that's where a Lemote Yeedong running gNewSense comes in! I wonder whether emacs comes in Cantonese?

  49. I care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...Because clearly the brawl was between employees working on Samsung phones, and employees working on Apple devices.

    Fanboyism just got real, yo!

  50. Depends on the design by Kupfernigk · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There is a big difference in design for automation and design for hand assembly. One important factor is that design for automation involves eliminating fiddly assembly - things that have to slot into things at an angle and then be rotated into place, for instance. Before cheap manufacturing abroad, Japanese watch and camera manufacture became highly automated, but then a lot of designs were changed for hand assembly.

    I think the answer is you could pretty well 100% automate phone assembly and packing if you had the right design. The downside would be that repairability might be low (it's easier to dispense glue than insert screws) and the design might be more constrained. The cost of the equipment would vary according to the complexity of the final assembly and the expected volumes, but we are probably talking in the 1-10 million dollar range for an assembly system. Re-tooling is the expensive part. Ideally you want to decide on a form factor and stick to it until the tooling wore out, which is the most economical approach. But the basics of an assembly machine - pick and place, automatic screwdrivers, robot arms- would stay pretty constant.

    Which is cheaper? The short answer is that in the long run automatic assembly will be cheaper again, it is just a question of when. Every Chinese riot brings that day a little closer.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  51. This has been the goal since the 80s by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    The ability to take small alterations to an automated manufacturing process quickly has been a focus of research since the 80s. I've been out of for a while (in fact since I got out of manufacturing when my then company decided that they needed a plant in China so the VPs could boast about it) and I wonder if eyes have been taken off the ball. But with the latest generations of small manufacturing robots, I suspect the example you gave no longer holds. A lot of the expense in trivial engineering changes is documentation required for the human activities around the change. CAD to machine workflow automation should take care of that.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  52. That's really not accurate about automation by tlambert · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The robotic automated control systems are typically shit, but that doesn't mean it's not doable, it just means that mechanical and electrical engineers should not write robotic control systems, they should leave it to software engineers. In other words, it's the same problem that the Diamond Viper video cards had back in the day when they let EE's write the video BIOS, instead of hiring a software engineer to do it.

    I recently spent some quality time programming a Toshiba CA10-M00 controller interfaced robot for the purposes of doing testing on capacitive touch devices, such as trackpads, and the programming interface at the lowest level was, to put it bluntly, incredibly badly designed. The one saving grace was "palletizing" mode, and all that let you do was do things like fill columns in a biological sample tray while moving the pallet on which it was situated over one row at a time, and then repeating the previous instruction.

    In any case, the controller was pretty terrible, very limited in capability, and only capable of controlling 4 degrees of freedom without being ganged to another controller for the next 4 degrees of freedom; even then; you'd want to install optional interface modules to use for step-signalling between the controllers, rather than ganging them, based on the limited number of steps available under the control of a single controller, and the inability to do anything remotely useful in only 1000 steps (with 4 degrees of freedom, 1000 steps was pushing rationality as it was).

    As delivered, the hardware didn't actually function (had to send it back once to have a servo replaced), and when driven from other than the EEPROM, the command language is insufficiently rich to perform motion on more than a single axis at a time (which basically meant writing a program to write a program, rather than controlling it directly). Additionally, the plat was oriented incorrectly, and there were no registration marks on any of the manual adjustments, and the robot was not set up to be capable of non-2-d self interference (read: if incorrectly programmed, it could beat itself to death).

    To top all this joy off, they very much expected you to use a "teaching pendant" to do a single static program, and I had to reverse engineer how to talk to the thing with a documented list of serial functions, with no documentation of order or the requirements for baseline settings.

    All in all, to get a suite of repeatable test motions that could be applied to multiple devices with different form-factors required some fairly clever hackery. What I ended up with was a library of code that could be used to write a program that could program the robot. The most interesting of those are not in the public repository, but the rest of the code is here: http://git.chromium.org/gitweb/?p=chromiumos/platform/touchbot.git;a=tree

    The bottom line is that by using meta-programming, instead of using the default crap interface you get by applying teaching-pendant programming, it'd be pretty trivial to change over the location of a screw, or even radically alter the layout.

    And just practically speaking, fetching a screw is a subroutine, putting in a screw is a subroutine, and where to put the screw in is a point in the X,Y,Z,R point table, if you wrote your code correctly in the first place, which you'd be unlikely to do if using the teaching pendant, but which was still technically possible using one. Which'd mean just rewriting the point table after issuing a region erase command to the robot controller over an RS232C link, after jamming the robot into a receptive mode with 5 other command would move the screw.

    But doing the metaprogramming approach, it'd also be possible to radically alter the robot behaviour pretty trivially and be up and running on the real assembly line once you got your test line working correctly to the new model.

    Which is to say, the argument that you can't as trivially recon

    1. Re:That's really not accurate about automation by Asmodae · · Score: 1

      I agree with your premise, but disagree with the ad-hominem. I've seen software engineers write some shit code to (for instance, trying to do 20k iteration loops of signal processing inside an ISR and wondering why they were missing interrupts). Don't let the wrong people do the wrong job, full stop.

      As an aside, control systems theory is usually taught better (or at all) in EE courses anyway, but maybe you didn't mean control theory...

  53. Image fabricated by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You do realize that image is a fabrication, right? On the iPad currently maps correctly labels the countries.

    How easily are the Apple Haters fooled...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Image fabricated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How easily you are trolled by an obvious joke...

  54. Re:Such a caring company by tuppe666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Major customers of Foxconn currently include:
      You don't care about these workers, you are only bothered with your Apple hate so that you even ignore the facts. Only on slashdot this can be modded up. Sickening !

    What is sickening!! you have posted a list of companies that use these workers without bothering with a good list like Samsung have manufacturing plants in America, and Goggle famously left China for ethical reasons and introduced a new Nexus product made in America. I think its time you stopped queuing for the iPhone 5 and wend and bought a Samsung Galaxy III.

  55. Re:Such a caring company by SilenceBE · · Score: 2

    China Labor Watch reports worker abuse, underage employment at Samsung factories

    http://www.theverge.com/2012/9/5/3293674/china-labor-watch-samsung-labor-abuse-underage-employment

    So how is that Nexus III going for you ?

    You really claim that these days you can buy stuff that doesn't has one or mulitple components not manufactered in China ?

  56. Single Point of Failure by martijnd · · Score: 1

    Mmm... and who is the No 2 manufacturer for Apple, Acer, Dell, Toshiba, HP, Sony and Microsoft ?

    Capable of scaling up to 200% when the need arises.

    Just in case -- a factory burns down or something; riots break out in a country, a government gets nasty, or the place gets hit by an earthquake?

  57. Re: by andrew2325 · · Score: 0

    It's obvious, he stood up to the oppression there and their hatred pitted the workers against each other.

  58. Re:Such a caring company by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    You really claim that these days you can buy stuff that doesn't has one or mulitple components not manufactered in China ?

    Absolutely not!! Do I buy from the companies that are producing hardware in companies where worker rights are protected like America like Intel; Samsung and companies trying to move manufacturing to countries protected by workers rights like Google with the Nexus Q. Do I Boycott companies like Apple that charge a premium and laugh at the prospect of producing hardware in places where workers rights are protected...to the president no less. Its not complicated to be an ethical consumer...give money to companies that act ethically don't give money to those that don't. ....have a biscuit!!!!

  59. Guards beating workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the good ole US of A - Ludlow Massacre

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDd64suDz1A&feature=fvsr

  60. Re:Sounds like old days in USA where workers faced by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

    Either real worker rights, or they need to find somewhere else their own "China", with 30+ billion population, that will provide slavery manufacturing services for 1+ billion of Chinese people.

    --
    839*929
  61. Guards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That single word right there, shows the horror in all its detail.

    A company needs no *guards* against its workers. A factory needs no *guards* against its workers.

    A slave labor prison does.

    1. Re:Guards... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      A company needs no *guards* against its workers. A factory needs no *guards* against its workers.

      Most companies need security guards. Well, mine does. Keep the doors and windows locked in the night, deter anyone who wants to break into an empty building at night, and call the police if there is real trouble. On the other hand, if there are 79,000 workers and dormitories for them, then it's obvious that among those 79,000 there are some rather unpleasant ones, and you would want some security guards around. You might ask just all the single women among them if they'd rather have security guards around or not.

    2. Re:Guards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhhh that neckbeard also believes that faggot playwright who claimed they were under armed guard too. Next time a neckbeard tells you how to shop push the fucker down the stairs and break his neck.

  62. Correction is not elimination by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yep, SuperKendall, BasilBrush, and a few others are there to try to eliminate adverse talk about Apple Corp.

    It's odd that YOU speak of elimination, when I have never down-modded an anti-Apple post.

    Instead what I do is constructive; I provide the needed counterpoint. For that, I am in fact silenced (in this case) by people that agree with you, not me. I am the one being censored because you hate what I have to say.

    I don't know why, but I assume they work for them.

    Should we all then assume you work for Google? I guess so, according to you it is the only answer.

    The why for myself is plain; I hate misrepresentation. I dislike people being misled, and seek to correct such things where found, for any topic - not just Apple.

    I can't really see why they'd die in a ditch defending Apple...

    I would not lay my life out for any company. But I will seek to help PEOPLE, not companies, where I can.

    You seem to be the person all about companies, specifically stopping at nothing to try and take Apple down a notch without regard to who you mislead to do so. As long as it hurts your despised Apple, all is fair game.

    I guess like you said we should presume you are a Google shill. Is it really worth it for you, getting money to try and mislead people? That's something I never could understand.

    I'll let you have the last post because it's exactly at this point paid Apple Haters such as yourself go off on rambling tirades of no interest to anyone, certainly not myself; I understand you probably have some kind of quota to meet though.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Correction is not elimination by Pax681 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SuperKendall..... blatant shill, no sense of humour
      now you are accusing others of doing what you are doing.... pot and fucking kettle...
      yeah i am probably gonna burn some karma here.. but meh, you just keep digging yer own hole. the apple maps fiasco is the joke of the day, weeze of the week and other words i could have taken out of Holly from Red Drawf's mouth during the end of the "Queeg" episode
      Apple maps are just utterly shit, and no amount of excuses or shill nonsense can cover it. A simple, fact is that Google maps are a far more superior and mature product. You don't have to be a shill to see that fact and no matter how much you try, you are only going to look an even bigger dick for trying to.

    2. Re:Correction is not elimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's odd that YOU speak of elimination, when I have never down-modded an anti-Apple post.

      That'll be because you need to be modded upwards before you gain mod points.....

  63. Re:Such a caring company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's because while all those companies are guilty on this account, and some are guilty on many accounts, Apple (and Microsoft) are guilty on *all* accounts.

    They are the multiple-time convicted mass-murderer / mass-rapist criminals of the IT business world.
    If they were people (@Neocons: They are not!) they would be that guy with the many tattoos, the psycho look, and more mutilated bodies in his basement than any of the famous mass-murderer/-rapists. And on top of that, he would be the guy who manages to get a constant free pass from the judges, because they are in his pockets.

    You'd not even *think* about going anywhere near that guy!

    Buuut, because it's a company... Aaand because in the US, restricting the crimes of companies with *any laws whatsoever* is apparently considered "eevil guvnment destroyin’ teh FREE_MARKET_FUCK_YEAH!", this is somehow totally awww-right

    It is exactly the core of what is wrong with this disgusting mutation of capitalism. (Same as what North Korea is, is what's wrong with that disgusting mutation of communism.)

  64. Re: by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Guards are "workers" too by many definitions. A fight among workers can easily be spin from "clash between guards and assembly workers."

    Lots of spin going on here. That a simple fight can turn into a riot? With cars turned over? Doubting it. Most such fights are simply watched by people as a form of entertainment. But when the dispute is something close to the observers' hearts (such as working conditions and abuses) others joining in and working together is natural.

  65. OpenStreetMaps dude, give it more publicity by cheekyboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why arent more linux people promoting OSM.

    Why isnt Ubuntu using it in its desktop maps app?

    Why isnt slashdot using links to OSM maps when ever a map is needed.

    The fact that you can download all 9GIG and have a 100% local maps kicks but over all maps, and its OSS for gods sake.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:OpenStreetMaps dude, give it more publicity by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why arent more linux people promoting OSM.

      The agony of trying to get the OSM data and a useful app into my computer. I'll promote it when I figure out how to use it. Playing with gpsdrive on R-Pi lately, ugh.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:OpenStreetMaps dude, give it more publicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if Linux cares. I've used every Ubuntu since the 1st version, patched bugs, read many posts, etc & know of no maps app. It's more of an open data / public records thing that's popular for "let the culture persist" library types.

    3. Re:OpenStreetMaps dude, give it more publicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool! didn't know about it for now. thanks for mentioning it. I'm sick of google and I'm sick of apple. Samsung i still have a few units of patience left for.

    4. Re:OpenStreetMaps dude, give it more publicity by timeOday · · Score: 1

      A really good guy on my software development team spent almost a week trying to make a simple panel to display maps with OSM and never got it to work. There was a step of converting it from a sql database to something else that would always bomb out. I know it can be made to work, it just wasn't worth it when we tried.

  66. They're fighting for better hours by Grayhand · · Score: 2

    The workers rioted trying to reduce the 25 hour work day to 24 hours.

  67. Corporate News NTainment by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you should try the real CNN, CNNi, the international version, or CNNAsia.

    Who wants to hear about mitromney or american crap all day.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:Corporate News NTainment by cusco · · Score: 1

      No one wants to hear about Mitt Romney, including the Republican faithful. if there weren't a black guy in the White House the Republican turnout this election would be almost nil.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    2. Re:Corporate News NTainment by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Who wants to hear about mitromney or american crap all day.

      Umm...Americans?

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    3. Re:Corporate News NTainment by minijedimaster · · Score: 1

      It's just as racists to vote FOR someone because of their race as it is to vote against them for the same reason. Troll harder next time.

    4. Re:Corporate News NTainment by cusco · · Score: 1

      The only reason why I voted for Obama, the product of one of the most corrupt political machines in the country, is because the alternative was even worse. Since it looks like Romney has effectively lost Washington state already maybe I'll have a chance to vote for someone that I actually like this time, for the first time in almost two decades. Sad when most election cycles our choices are Corrupt Party Hack A, because he is slightly less objectionable than Corrupt Party Hack B, or vote your conscience and allow Hack B to win.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  68. Area51 dude by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    I know its not a prison camp, but it is an area where you can get shot at for walking.

    Plus if there are aliens there, they are being treated badly.

    Plus if you havent heard there are lots of national parks where entry is strictly enforced as NO ENTRY.

    http://www.infowars.com/house-gop-backs-homeland-security-powers-for-natl-parks-in-border-zone/

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  69. Labor Disputes in China? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they usually end with a bullet going through the disputer's brain.

    Now shut up and get back to work. Clean up the blood and guts on your own time.

  70. Rare Earths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "China has the largest piles of rare earth minerals"

    Such a bunch of nonsense. Rare Earths are everywhere. Have a look here. Until 1983 or so, the biggest producer was USA. China was insignificant. Production moved to China because... it was cheaper. For that reason, USA mines closed shop.

    With the price rise, there are efforts underway to re-open old USA sites.

    1. Re:Rare Earths by phorm · · Score: 1

      Production moved to China because... it was cheaper

      I believe this was also related to health regulations. In the USA there's a lot more employers need to do to ensure worker safety etc.
      Unfortunately it's cheaper to just send the work to China than comply for many companies.

  71. Re:Sounds like old days in USA where workers faced by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    english cause your

    Ooh, this is that "irony" thing everyone's always talking about, isn't it?

  72. Re:Such a caring company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's what really blows me away about Foxconn, China and our willingness to have them produce our electronics. They could easily open Foxconn stores and sell rebranded iPhone's for pennies on the dollar and absolutely destroy Apple. China would support them and any labor contracts they would lose from the US would easily be made up by the increase in demand for the new FoxFone. Do you think the US, in its weakened economic state, totally dependent on cheap Chinese labor would start a trade war over that? I don't.

  73. GOGO workers! by Muramas95 · · Score: 0

    Stick it to apple!

  74. Re:Such a caring company by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Actually, I have pushed Apple for some time. The reason is that they have a decent OS. In fact, my 75 y.o dad switched my 70 y.o mother from Windows to Apple based on what I was suggesting. Why? Because once he does die, he needs to leave my mother in a decent situation.

    My post is about the issue here is that Apple likes to portrait themselves as a different company. They are not. That is my point. And you need to re-read what I wrote. if you noticed, I DID in fact list off other companies that I knew used foxconn. Apple still sux as bad as the rest. Simple as that.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  75. Apple Moving to Japan, Korea based by retroworks · · Score: 1

    Oddly, I was just researching news on Digitimes that Apple was moving away from Taiwan-Shenzhen touch screen production, moving the work to Japan and Korea. http://retroworks.blogspot.com/2012/09/revolution-number-nine-apple-google.html Stay tuned for opinions to swing on axis.

    --
    Gently reply
  76. Re:Such a caring company by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's so simple as to say that Samsung is ethical and Apple isn't. Both do stuff that is and isn't ethical. It may well be reasonable however to say that Samsung is more ethical than Apple. I suspect it's true since Samsung has been moving in this direction and Apple has been moving in that direction (physically, I mean!) but I don't have omniscience either.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  77. Labor disputes in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It usually goes something like this. The police order the slaves back to work and if they don't then the shooting starts.

  78. One Place to Look for Answers Is... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Their Jails.

  79. Nobody is stating the obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RIM have stopped innovating.

  80. Re:Sounds like old days in USA where workers faced by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    GP is probably referring to the way US factories were like in, say, 1903 when Upton Sinclair wrote The Jungle, before OSHA and the FDA existed. Sinclair specifically mentions in the book an incident he observed where a guy fell into a vat of beef waiting to be ground up and ended up becoming part of people's "ground beef". The public was outraged about this, not because somebody had died in the factory but because of the contamination of their food.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  81. Why not a free market for labor by Troy+Roberts · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder why in many examples of capitalism, all markets are free except labor. If a nation is truly based on capitalist ideas, why not have a market for labor. In this case workers could band together and sell their labor to the highest bidder. For some reason, this is never considered a part of capitalism, which I believe is just a convenient inconsistency by the rich.

    Because China does not have a free labor market, it is not a shining example of capitalism. It is a shining example of the powerful taking advantage, which happens everywhere.

    1. Re:Why not a free market for labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What in the world are you talking about "workers could band together and sell their labor to the highest bidder"?

      Her in the US you are as free as a bird to do such a thing. Have you tried and failed? Is there some law that you believe prevents this?

      Honest question.

    2. Re:Why not a free market for labor by Troy+Roberts · · Score: 1

      I was replying to the comments about China, not the US. I was responding to the claim that China was a shinning example of capitalism, which I think is a hard claim to support.

    3. Re:Why not a free market for labor by Troy+Roberts · · Score: 1

      I suppose I should point out that the US does not implement a purely capitalist economy. There are regulation on many parts of the economy, including how and when labor can organize.

  82. Re:Sounds like old days in USA where workers faced by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

    You're not aware of the history of labor in this country. Our history has been whitewashed of what workers went through to get that 40 hour week and overtime pay Americans seem to think was decreed by God in the Constitution. I've seen some great documentaries on labor struggles in this country; e.g getting your head bashed in by Pinkertons for a raise. One of the coolest I saw was about the *real* rednecks; West Virginia miners who wore scarves during their labor protests. Of course, it has a whole new connotation derived from insults against these poor, uneducated rural folk.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  83. Alt media FTW by pigrabbitbear · · Score: 2

    Motherboard has been following Foxconn for a while and they have a new report out today, which talks about the OTHER riots breaking out in China over the last 24 hours. But they have a whole cache of material pertaining to Foxconn over the past couple of years. I would also look to BetaBeat's story today and The Verge.

  84. MOD PARENT DOWN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S.A. is IN FACT a republic. The notion that you disagree with the outcome of a scenario does not change the nature of the scenario.

  85. Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mechanical and electrical engineers should not write robotic control systems, they should leave it to software engineers

    You mean the guys who created Vista?

  86. Who won? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, its China, there was a big old brawl.

    We don't care why, or whose "human rights" were affected. If we cared, we'd be embargoing or something; but they don't have oil we can easily gank.

    So, lets get down to the only thing we really do care about. This is China, there was a big fight.

    I want movies, and I want ninja kung-fu action. Chop chop!!!

  87. Re:Real map shows surroundings... by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with mods today!!!!???? The modding privilege granting algorithms really need tweaking, or slashdot will go down like the comments at Yahoo.

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  88. Re:Such a caring company by WindBourne · · Score: 1
    U mean like

    ...Microsoft, HP, IBM, Dell, GE, etc.

    ? They do not present themselves as 'caring' companies. Apple does.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  89. More information available by houghi · · Score: 2

    Some more information on
    this page
    Apparently 10 deaths.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  90. Video of the 'iPhone Riot' by Daniel_Stuckey · · Score: 1

    http://motherboard.vice.com/2012/9/24/the-foxconn-iphone-riot-was-just-one-of-hundreds-in-china-today While it might have been an intramural fight between the Foxconn employees in this case, this is the mere tip of a giant Chinese iceberg. Sure, Foxconn builds electronics as cheaply as it can for whomever wants to cut a deal with them... That's been part of the company's mission statement since it was founded, but should this stop people like Anthony Kosner at Forbes from approaching or musing on the idea that the heightened demand for a product like iPhone has just gotta be killing people in China for the sake of consumer contempt over issues like the phone being too lightweight. Ugh, the absurdity. I wonder if we can find out how many iPhone units have been returned because the customer 'didn't like it enough.'

  91. Doesn't change that it was Unionbusting. by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    The most common tactic to cleanse unionbusting is to make it look like a legally clean action. Whether it is to find a policy violation or another termination condition that is beyond the NLRB laws, no unionbusting activity is performed in the open. It is always hidden behind another offense, especially when they were terminated upon making their union status known.

    Sounds like you'd have fit in with the CCC folks in the massacres of late 1890's-1900's Colorado. I may not have the desire to join a labor union, but they have acted as a counterweight against China-like practices making a return.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  92. Someone call the Trustafarians! by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Now that the OWS crowd all has their iPhone 5's they should be free to scream and pout and whine about the evils of Apple.

    Smithers, Release the Hounds!

  93. Re:Such a caring company by toriver · · Score: 1

    Er, Samsung recently moved their camera production TO China from Korea in order to make it cheaper. Try again with your white-washing of that giant with its tendrils deep in the South Korean government - military dictatorship or fledgling democracy alike.

  94. Re:Such a caring company by Truedat · · Score: 1

    All companies try to market themselves as different than the competition, that's a given.

  95. Re:Such a caring company by Truedat · · Score: 1

    Well at least you are trying to engage in the discussion rather than just throw insults around. But the point the parent is trying to make is that on the contrary it's very difficult to determine if the smartphone you have in your hand is ethically sourced. To do the research for yourself you either have to be rich and have a lot of time on your hands, or have a really weird hobby. To rely on the various scare stories, for and against, probably just involves reinforcing the opinions you already have. I know I'm susceptible and tend to look for the argument that puts apple in the best light - it's a hard skill to learn to listen to arguments from the "other side".

  96. Re:Such a caring company by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Yes, but there was a time when companies were HONEST. Not anymore. Far too many of these companies are disgusting liars. CONSTANT liars.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  97. Fox Fur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPhone is like the electronic equivalent of a Fox Fur coat. People with iPhones just look icky to me.

    1. Re:Fox Fur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People with neck beards who tell me how to shop make me sick. Shoot them on sight, and let them bleed out in the streets.

  98. Re:Such a caring company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you think the neckbeards here give a flying fuck? They only want you to shop for the same shit they buy. Fuck them in the ass with a broken bottle.

  99. Re:Such a caring company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow - your understanding of the business world is so bad you must believe in creationism too.

  100. I mention it when I can... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I totally agree, in fact the nav app I mostly use is Waze, a cross-platform crowdsourced traffic/police/hazard notating app that rests atop OSM.

    In fact I feel like Apple would have been better off if they would use OSM as a primary source of trust over TomTom data. I think Apple is using OSM to some degree but it's hard to say how much. They already give credit to Waze (pretty sure that's where Apple's traffic data comes from), so a credit link for OSM would not be a huge burden...

    OSM is why I feel like Apple has a chance of catching up to Google in a short timeframe.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  101. Good for them! by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

    a riot at Foxconn's Taiyuan plant [in China], reportedly over guards beating up a worker

    Good for them! Now if they can just start standing up for all their mistreated and underpaid workers, maybe they'll push wages high enough to bring some jobs back to the US!

    I know, I'm dreaming. But it's not a bad one!

    --

    THINK! It's patriotic