Of course it's not, but decreasing the noise floor certainly does increase dynamic range, unless you are talking about SFDR. The oversampling I'm talking about directly increases the ENOB.
I’ll ad to that, in theory, with a perfect converter and clock, you can oversample 64x with a 1-bit converter and get equivalent performance of a 16-bit converter.
Oversampling, then decimating, certainly does increase dynamic range. It does this since quantanization noise is spread out over the entire band, then decimating averages that noise, decreasing the noise in the decimated band. If you oversample 2x, then decimate 2x, you get 3 dB decease in noise. This is quite common in comms systems. The drawback is that you need very low clock jitter, but that is simple at audio frequencies.
No you don’t. A 22 kHz sine sampled at 44 kHz is a series of impulses. A perfect anti-aliasing filter reconstructs that to a perfect sine. Of course nothing is perfect, hence slight over sampling.
What people don’t realize is the extra dynamic range obtained by decimating an oversampled stream. Decimating from 96 kHz to 48 kHz gets you an additional 3 dB, or about 1/2 effective number of bits. It has nothing to due with frequency response of your ears, unless you are talking about intermodulation.
The stock market was up due to the prospects of having a non-socialist president, and the repatriation of foreign earnings. Do you really think the economy would have improved under Clinton or Sanders?
No one watches the weather for the weather, only to look at the bimbos. Fire the old codgers at the NWS and replace them with more bimbos with big boobs.
Slashdot Mirror
They also put it in reverse and back over you. https://www.google.com/amp/amp...
New ass spectrum analyzers have USB. Old ass spectrum analyzers have analog pen plotter outputs.
The mule was likable.
Ha ha, well I wasn't. I was talking about the initial capture.
http://www.analog.com/en/techn...
The noise floor is made of of quantaniztion noise, thermal noise, etc. The former has nothing to do with the analog front end.
Of course it's not, but decreasing the noise floor certainly does increase dynamic range, unless you are talking about SFDR. The oversampling I'm talking about directly increases the ENOB.
I’ll ad to that, in theory, with a perfect converter and clock, you can oversample 64x with a 1-bit converter and get equivalent performance of a 16-bit converter.
Oversampling, then decimating, certainly does increase dynamic range. It does this since quantanization noise is spread out over the entire band, then decimating averages that noise, decreasing the noise in the decimated band. If you oversample 2x, then decimate 2x, you get 3 dB decease in noise. This is quite common in comms systems. The drawback is that you need very low clock jitter, but that is simple at audio frequencies.
No you don’t. A 22 kHz sine sampled at 44 kHz is a series of impulses. A perfect anti-aliasing filter reconstructs that to a perfect sine. Of course nothing is perfect, hence slight over sampling.
What people don’t realize is the extra dynamic range obtained by decimating an oversampled stream. Decimating from 96 kHz to 48 kHz gets you an additional 3 dB, or about 1/2 effective number of bits. It has nothing to due with frequency response of your ears, unless you are talking about intermodulation.
Earthing something has absolutely nothing to do with electromagnetic shielding.
S band is perfectly fine for RADAR and comms; no water resonance. http://www.rfcafe.com/referenc...
Yes. General aviation in the USA has a crash about every 3 days.
Boeing does not make engines. They choose another manufacturer at time of order. It’s probably GE, RR, or P&W.
Wish I had points to mod you up.
The stock market was up due to the prospects of having a non-socialist president, and the repatriation of foreign earnings. Do you really think the economy would have improved under Clinton or Sanders?
He wrote “green cards”.
It’s not “single payer”. It’s 48% of taxpayers paying for everyone. At least call it what it is.
CDs are cheaper now than the early 90’s, even including inflation.
They don’t have those top shelf magazines. Have to go to truck stops for those.
Ahem, that’s thunk it.
B&N sells the books for list price, which is typically 50% over Amazon. That’s too damn much, physical store or not.
It is, isn’t it? Not that it’s important.
No one watches the weather for the weather, only to look at the bimbos. Fire the old codgers at the NWS and replace them with more bimbos with big boobs.