No you couldn't, as there's no computing hardware in this device to read the display to save it to a flash drive. It's just a puddle of liquid crystals that you displace with the pen, and then get zapped back into position when you press the 'clear' button. It would need a lot more stuff to save the screen to memory.
No, I'm not suggesting anything. I'm saying quite explicitly they cannot buy themselves ANYTHING on the company dime, unless they like wearing orange.
Sure, some probably do it anyway and get away with it, but some people commit murder and get away with it too (roughly 50% of murders--for that matter less than 10% of burglaries are solved). Doesn't make it any less illegal.
Why don't we get real for a minute? If these guys were forced to live like they only earned $1 I would agree with you completely. They own the company you moron! They can pay themselves whatever they want without selling the stock. They can also buy anything they want in the name of Google and not pay any taxes on it.
I want to live in your fantasy world. Its 10-25 in federal resort prison for what you just described.
It's NEVER management's fault. If they hire the wrong person, hire an incompetent or (as you say) simply fail to hire a necessary person THAT PERSON's still responsible. That's why they get the big bucks and the stock options, and the rank-and-file are lucky to get health benefits.
Uh...no. It's for everything. From your the macro (your hand) to the micro (your junk). It's just that the uncertainty minimum is only significantly large for very small things. But it applies to everything.
No, no its not. Demand at the zero price point is NOT demand at any price point. If a poor kid borrows books from a library those are not lost sales--the kid didn't have money for the books anyway. No sales are lost.
Salem Witch trials. Not that hard to imagine at all really. These people are the modern day equivalent of those who think they're persecuted by witches.
Which the article already linked to agrees with (well, last major famine in 1947), and doesn't negate that millions of people died of starvation in the USSR. Was it pre-war? Well, mostly, but also during and immediately after WWII as well. Point is, millions did die from famine in the USSR.
Were you trying to add to the conversation, or just going for Funny mods like I was? If the latter, you're even worse at this than I am.
Identify the Enemies in question. Enemies implies entities--identify them.
Unconstitutional? Possibly (though I can think of two or three ways SCOTUS could justify it as constitutional). Adhering to their Enemies? Not as far as I can see.
You haven't studied enough British history if you think that is a new development. In the English language, that has ALWAYS been the meaning of 'treason,' back to at least the 12th century.
Slashdot Mirror
A honest question:
Are yo a masochist?
Only if masochist is a synonym for karma whore.
No you couldn't, as there's no computing hardware in this device to read the display to save it to a flash drive. It's just a puddle of liquid crystals that you displace with the pen, and then get zapped back into position when you press the 'clear' button. It would need a lot more stuff to save the screen to memory.
Sure, as far as you or I are concerned. But management will never believe you or me, that is my point.
No, I'm not suggesting anything. I'm saying quite explicitly they cannot buy themselves ANYTHING on the company dime, unless they like wearing orange.
Sure, some probably do it anyway and get away with it, but some people commit murder and get away with it too (roughly 50% of murders--for that matter less than 10% of burglaries are solved). Doesn't make it any less illegal.
Why don't we get real for a minute? If these guys were forced to live like they only earned $1 I would agree with you completely. They own the company you moron! They can pay themselves whatever they want without selling the stock. They can also buy anything they want in the name of Google and not pay any taxes on it.
I want to live in your fantasy world. Its 10-25 in federal resort prison for what you just described.
Given the inability of Congress to fix social security, neither will anyone else.
Which is why we should have a VAT, rather than an income tax. A VAT actually taxes wealth.
Yes. Because the balloon does not propel him. That's what 'aid' means in this context. Propulsion.
We're hoping more for a 'rends him limb from limb' kind of spin....you know, like being blended.
It's NEVER management's fault. If they hire the wrong person, hire an incompetent or (as you say) simply fail to hire a necessary person THAT PERSON's still responsible. That's why they get the big bucks and the stock options, and the rank-and-file are lucky to get health benefits.
FTFY
Anyone who isn't already part of the grey goo, I'd wager.
I even keep a netbook by my bed in case something comes up I'd like to check *while trying to fall asleep*...
I see I'm not the only one who needs porn to fall asleep.
Let me google that for you:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=EMI+earnings
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Sony+BMG+earnings
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Warner+music+earnings
Was that hard?
Uh...no. It's for everything. From your the macro (your hand) to the micro (your junk). It's just that the uncertainty minimum is only significantly large for very small things. But it applies to everything.
Just because she calls it nano doesn't mean....aw.
American paranoia. Most of us don't shit ourselves every time there's a clown around. A guy shouting Allahu Akbar, AK-47 or no, will get noticed.
no one walks in LA
Yeah, its abnormal to walk more than a mile total in your entire day in LA (excluding treadmill time at the gym).
No, no its not. Demand at the zero price point is NOT demand at any price point. If a poor kid borrows books from a library those are not lost sales--the kid didn't have money for the books anyway. No sales are lost.
Salem Witch trials. Not that hard to imagine at all really. These people are the modern day equivalent of those who think they're persecuted by witches.
Wtiches. That's al these lunatics are, the modern day equivalent of people who think they're being cursed by witches.
Which the article already linked to agrees with (well, last major famine in 1947), and doesn't negate that millions of people died of starvation in the USSR. Was it pre-war? Well, mostly, but also during and immediately after WWII as well. Point is, millions did die from famine in the USSR.
Were you trying to add to the conversation, or just going for Funny mods like I was? If the latter, you're even worse at this than I am.
Identify the Enemies in question. Enemies implies entities--identify them.
Unconstitutional? Possibly (though I can think of two or three ways SCOTUS could justify it as constitutional). Adhering to their Enemies? Not as far as I can see.
You haven't studied enough British history if you think that is a new development. In the English language, that has ALWAYS been the meaning of 'treason,' back to at least the 12th century.
Sorry
I thought the end of the world wasn't for another 3 years?
Try waiting for it to full buffer?