Slashdot Mirror


Tower Switch-Off Embarrasses Electrosensitives

Sockatume writes "Residents in Craigavon, South Africa complained of '[h]eadaches, nausea, tinnitus, dry burning itchy skins, gastric imbalances and totally disrupted sleep patterns' after an iBurst communications tower was put up in a local park. Symptoms subsided when the residents left the area, often to stay with family and thus evade their suffering. At a public meeting with the afflicted locals, the tower's owners pledged to switch off the mast immediately to assess whether it was responsible for their ailments. One problem: the mast had already been switched off for six weeks. Lawyers representing the locals say their case against iBurst will continue on other grounds."

292 comments

  1. "The case will continue...." by DJ+Particle · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fact that the case still isn't dismissed apparently means the lobby of electrosensitives is rather strong there :(

    1. Re:"The case will continue...." by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      It also proves that America doesn't have a monopoly on legal stupidity and that we still export something ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:"The case will continue...." by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      You're both correct.

      Of course once it goes before a judge, and he reviews the evidence that the Tower was shutoff earlier, then the case will be dismissed because there's an obvious lack of causation.

      The symptoms must be caused by something else.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:"The case will continue...." by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that the case still isn't dismissed apparently means the lobby of electrosensitives is rather strong there :(

      Well it was the lawyer who said that the case would continue "on different grounds", not the court.

      What that tells me is that this lawyer is not being paid on a contingency basis. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:"The case will continue...." by nomadic · · Score: 1

      The fact that the case still isn't dismissed apparently means the lobby of electrosensitives is rather strong there :(

      According to the article the lawsuit also alleges failure to follow certain environmental/legal procedures when building the tower. What does that have to do with "electrosensitives."

    5. Re:"The case will continue...." by wizardforce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Olivier added that anyone who thinks that their legal case is based only on health issues is sorely mistaken, adding that their case is not built on health concerns alone, but rather various other aspects related to the mast, including the public participation and environmental approval processes which they are confident are flawed.

      They really really don't want this tower anywhere near them and now that the electrosensitivity excuse didn't work they're trying other approaches.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    6. Re:"The case will continue...." by sonnejw0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      iBurst Corp. should settle the case by offering to pay for a Colonic treatment for each defendant ... sounds like symptoms that "procedure" could "cure".

    7. Re:"The case will continue...." by Manos_Of_Fate · · Score: 1

      iBurst Corp. should settle the case by offering to pay for a Colonic treatment for each defendant ... sounds like symptoms that "procedure" could "cure".

      I didn't know a colonic could cure stupid.

      --
      Isn't enough that I ruined a pony, making a gift for you?
    8. Re:"The case will continue...." by Shatteredstar · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Placebo effect wins another round?

      --
      I do what I must because of what I must do.
    9. Re:"The case will continue...." by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      I didn't know a colonic could cure stupid.

      You have to use a LOT of pressure...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    10. Re:"The case will continue...." by afidel · · Score: 1

      The symptoms must be caused by something else.

      Yeah, hypochondria and/or fraud. The defendant should countersue for lawyers fees for such a frivolous suit.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    11. Re:"The case will continue...." by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I doubt they'd get anything for frivolity, as hypochondria is real and people may have sincerely believed they were being affected by the tower. Frivolous lawsuit laws are to protect against malicious litigation, and I doubt that's the case here.

      That said, they're still a bunch of nutheads. To not have said "oh... it was OFF for the last month? hummm maybe it's just ME". But no, to persist saying the tower is causing their problems, indicates they have "other unresolved issues" besides hypochondria.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    12. Re:"The case will continue...." by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      The symptoms must be caused by something else.

      Emotional stress. Caused by the construction of a radio tower near their houses, leading to stress related illnesses. Maybe there's a lawsuit there if they can make a case for the company being negligent by not properly informing the residents of the impact (or lack thereof) of such a tower near them.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    13. Re:"The case will continue...." by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      It also proves that America doesn't have a monopoly on legal stupidity...

      No, the LSIAA (legal stupid idiots of america association) just hasn't caught wind of this yet.

    14. Re:"The case will continue...." by mhelander · · Score: 1

      Could it also be hysteria?

    15. Re:"The case will continue...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're both correct.

      Shakrai/Commodore64_love, are you talking to yourself again?

      How pathetic is it when someone with two accounts has a conversation with himself?

    16. Re:"The case will continue...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were hypochondria then they could be slapped with a frivolous lawsuit case (strongly depending on the Judge). I think the term you're after is psychosomatic. Of course, it can be extremely difficult to tell the difference in court.

    17. Re:"The case will continue...." by nazsco · · Score: 2, Funny

      but since you can cook an egg with two cellphones then i must assume this was cooking those people. maybe six week was what their bodies needed to cool down and restore the coocked cells.

      the judge simply does not have a reliable technical advisor, like the internet.

    18. Re:"The case will continue...." by Camann · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      I can't believe you don't know what a Hasemalphaginnojinglanaporphomism is.
    19. Re:"The case will continue...." by ppanon · · Score: 1

      It can if you use the person to apply a colonic to an elephant.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    20. Re:"The case will continue...." by Vairon · · Score: 2, Informative
    21. Re:"The case will continue...." by notnAP · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but while you may be right about the lawsuit being legit up until now, the fact it continues seems frivolous.

    22. Re:"The case will continue...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have an impressive amount of belief in the rationality of the Judges.

      It's kinda sweet really, almost a shame reality is going to smack you so hard.

    23. Re:"The case will continue...." by sirlark · · Score: 1

      IANAL but I am a South African, it's more likely we have more important things to put in front of our judges! there's enough of a backlog in the court system as it is, and we actually do prioritize our court time AFAIK

    24. Re:"The case will continue...." by asaz989 · · Score: 3, Informative

      RTFA. They're not continuing their lawsuit by still insisting that the tower radiation causes their health problems. Instead they're talking about how it obstructs their view, violates the zoning laws that preserve the picturesque image of their town, and in general lowers their property values. Turns out there are interests with money behind the hypochondriacs.

    25. Re:"The case will continue...." by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but I find it very hard to believe that a typical /. user would ever believe such tripe. I believe a sound *WOOSH* is in order? ;)

    26. Re:"The case will continue...." by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      I'd say an explosive laxative might dislodge their heads...

    27. Re:"The case will continue...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "other unresolved issues"

      Cognitive dissonance is their issue.

    28. Re:"The case will continue...." by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Could it also be hysteria?

      It could be.

      We should rule out chemical poisoning first though. It's possible these people were made ill by something other than electricity and other than their own minds.

    29. Re:"The case will continue...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends whether they have sony batteries in them...

    30. Re:"The case will continue...." by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Freakin' electrosensitives [sic] need to be put in a cage - perhaps ... dare I suggest ... a Faraday cage? Ninnies.

    31. Re:"The case will continue...." by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

      you can cook an egg with two cellphones

      Step 1: fill 2-qt saucepan with water
      Step 2: add 1 egg, 2 cellphones
      Step 3: cover, turn on heat, and bring to a boil
      Step 4: when water boils, turn off heat and let stand for 10 mins
      Step 5: rinse egg and cellphones with cold water, remove shells, and eat

    32. Re:"The case will continue...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could state this in a polite and politically correct manner, but I'm feeling somewhat irritated right now.

      Africa has been and will continue to be home of the dumbest, most superstitious dumbasses alive. The Salem witch trials pale in comparison to what goes on there on a daily basis.

    33. Re:"The case will continue...." by Xeno+man · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ummm... no.

      iBurst appointed an independent and accredited EIA consultant and that the correct procedures were followed - including notifying the adjacent property owners and publishing notices in the press and on the site itself. He added that he is confident that all processes and procedures were followed to the letter.

      I figure that this is more like what happened. "Damn cell phones. The service sucks out here! I pay good money every month and I can hardly ever get a signal. I've been calling those lazy bastard to do something every week but those corporate fat cats are too busy counting their money. I swear some day I'm gona... what the. What are all those trucks and people doing there? Building a cell tower? I don't want a cell tower in our town. Those things cause cancer and other things. I don't want to look at an ugly tower. Go build that thing in another town. What the hell made you guys thing that we wanted a tower here?"

    34. Re:"The case will continue...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hypochondria- Disorder, believes they have illness or illnesses not actually present, ranges from one shifting illness (as they find more info and apply their overblown symptoms to that knowledge) to believing they have every illness they can find
      Psychosomatic- Psychological effect, not a disorder in itself, sometimes used as proof of man's psychic capabilities. "Mind to Body", the phenomenon of a mental state producing a measurable physical change in the body. Inverse Somatopsychic, "Body to Mind", changes in physical state of the body effecting mental well being.

    35. Re:"The case will continue...." by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

    36. Re:"The case will continue...." by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Step 5: rinse egg and cellphones with cold water, remove shells, and eat

      What do the cellphones taste like?

    37. Re:"The case will continue...." by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I'm not Shakrai.

      I don't know where you got the idea that I am.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    38. Re:"The case will continue...." by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      +1 Insightful

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    39. Re:"The case will continue...." by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      The symptoms must be caused by something else.

      Stupidity, the placebo effect allows idiots to achieve all sorts of medical miracles.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    40. Re:"The case will continue...." by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 4, Funny

      This idiocy also extends to the mysterious malfunctioning of any electronic device in the radio-phobe's houses!

      True Ham Radio story - my mentor told me when putting up an antenna at home, put up the mast and antenna but deliberately DON'T connect a feedline to it or use it for a week or two.

      Sure enough, two of the neighbors on my block came to complain of TV and telephone interference. I casually handed them a binocular so they could notice there was no wire to the bottom of the antenna, yet.

      They sheepshly apologized and went away... Unlike these idiots who are persisting in their delusion.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    41. Re:"The case will continue...." by JWSmythe · · Score: 0

      You know, this is a valid point.

          They jumped to the conclusion that it was EM radiation that was causing their symptoms. That was a mistake. They should look at other things. There are an awful lot of other things to look for too.

          I'll just hit a few what if's, but there are a lot of possibilities that should be investigated properly.

          What if the metal used in the tower construction was recycled and has a significant amount of radioactive materials present? This has come up in the news recently.

          What if, when they dug for the base of the tower, they opened up a pocket of toxic gas, which has been leaking since the construction began?

          What if, since the construction crews first came to the site, the local grocery store changed to a new vendor for a common product (like milk, meat, etc) and that source is tainted.

          All that they have really established is that the problem has started since the tower was constructed. That gives a time when the symptoms started. They haven't conclusively shown the actual cause.

          I had a quick look, and that is a suburb of a metro area. It could be an industrial cause, completely unrelated to the tower.

          I love the "I'm allergic to EM" folks. 99.9% nutjobs. :) I know I was "EM sensitive". Ok, not like the nutjobs say, but I'll continue. When I was a kid, I could hear the capacitors in old CRT's. A room full of monitors would give me a headache. As I got older, my hearing has decreased in the high pitch ranges. That, and monitors have gotten a lot better. :) When someone replaced their old noisy monitor with a newer one, I could tell before I walked into the room. :)

        That is perfectly normal. If you've heard about the cricket ringtone, you know what I'm talking about. Kids can hear the high pitched chirping. Adults generally can't.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    42. Re:"The case will continue...." by malkir · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, I could hear the capacitors in old CRT's. A room full of monitors would give me a headache. As I got older, my hearing has decreased in the high pitch ranges. That, and monitors have gotten a lot better. :) When someone replaced their old noisy monitor with a newer one, I could tell before I walked into the room. :)

      I was able to do that too, I think most children are - it just makes Hearing is much more acute before the bombardment of loud music and the natural decline in the acuteness of ones hearing.

    43. Re:"The case will continue...." by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I blame my hearing on old age, gunfire, and way too much time working in datacenters. :)

          Then again, I hear a lot of things that people miss. I think it's more of a matter of environmental awareness than hearing acuity though. Just like I spot things that people with perfect vision don't necessarily see, even though mine isn't perfect and I am in serious need of new glasses.

          I do know that I could hear high pitches better than a lot of people when I was young. When I was about 19 I took a hearing test, which showed that I could hear high pitches above normal and low pitches at an average level. It explained why I always tuned stereos for a little extra bass. Now when I tune them, people say it's fine.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    44. Re:"The case will continue...." by pydev · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's hysteria, a vibrator or manual massage of the clitoris should fix it:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hysteria

      (I kid you not.)

    45. Re:"The case will continue...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 6: Profit!!

    46. Re:"The case will continue...." by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      It's South Africa - here lawyers don't get paid on contingency anyway.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    47. Re:"The case will continue...." by Draugo · · Score: 1

      That, or like any other 19 year old you just wanted to annoy the hell out of anyone else with an infernal bass bounding.

    48. Re:"The case will continue...." by Shark · · Score: 1

      You learn something new every day... And thanks to you, today it's slightly more memorable than usual.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    49. Re:"The case will continue...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just *knew* there was justification for "therapeutic heavy petting!" :D

    50. Re:"The case will continue...." by Zoolander · · Score: 1

      I'm Shakrai, and so is my wife!

      --
      Meep.
    51. Re:"The case will continue...." by lewko · · Score: 1

      >What do the cellphones taste like?

      Apple.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
  2. Ha! FAIL! by Nabeel_co · · Score: 1

    Man, this kind of horse shit pisses me off. Egg in your faces!

    1. Re:Ha! FAIL! by hamburger+lady · · Score: 5, Funny

      as it turns out, these dudes have egg allergies so being proved wrong is causing more symptoms.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  3. Ha. by Kid+Zero · · Score: 1

    What excuses will they come up with next?

    1. Re:Ha. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wtiches. That's al these lunatics are, the modern day equivalent of people who think they're being cursed by witches.

    2. Re:Ha. by sznupi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Accidentally, many places in Africa (so South Africa too, probably, especially with their number of immigrants from across the continent) still experience hunts for supposed witches .

      Or "witchcraft" generally, for that matter.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Ha. by CuriHP · · Score: 4, Funny

      Incidentally! Incidentally! Incidentally! Incidentally!

      --
      If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
    4. Re:Ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incidentally???

    5. Re:Ha. by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 4, Funny

      No one expects the African Inquisition!

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    6. Re:Ha. by Shatteredstar · · Score: 1

      A place where "putting on your robe and wizard hat" is probably not a good idea.

      --
      I do what I must because of what I must do.
    7. Re:Ha. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Sorry, EN is my 3rd language, and with this you sometimes get such linguistic atrocities...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    8. Re:Ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She turned me into a newt!

      (i got better...)

    9. Re:Ha. by ben0207 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's a place where it IS a good idea?

      --
      cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
    10. Re:Ha. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Oh my, you really had me there...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    11. Re:Ha. by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry, EN is my 3rd language, and with this you sometimes get such linguistic atrocities...

      No worries - incidents happen.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    12. Re:Ha. by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      Everything is a good idea on IRC

    13. Re:Ha. by cvtan · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I had a third language, I would absolutely criticize errors in your third language.

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    14. Re:Ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (at the risk of going further off-topic...)

      In fact, South Africa has a very real problem with witchdoctors (sangomas). These are the people who, for example, will tell you that the cure for AIDS is to have sex with a virgin, and as young as possible -- which is directly responsible for an alarming rate of child rape in the country.
      Witchcraft is alive and well in SA, and causing serious problems.

      Eh. Sorry for going off-topic.

    15. Re:Ha. by internic · · Score: 1

      many places in Africa ... still experience hunts for supposed witches. Or "witchcraft" generally, for that matter.

      In fact, right here in the USA vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin was seen receiving protection against witchcraft.

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    16. Re:Ha. by spineboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought it would be
      Nobody inspects the African Acquisition!

      --
      ..........FULL STOP.
    17. Re:Ha. by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Oh god......

      This post, and "Incidents happen" further up the page, broke me. Where's my damn mod points?

    18. Re:Ha. by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      You know that old joke... You call someone who speaks three languages trilingual. Someone who speaks two is bilingual. It logically follows that someone who speaks only one language is called an American.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    19. Re:Ha. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There's a place where it IS a good idea?

      A Harry Potter fan convention?

    20. Re:Ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a place where it IS a good idea?

      Hermione's bedroom. Just prior to exiting.

  4. Correlation != Causation by iamacat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There can well be something else that causes symptoms of area residents which is not related to microwave radiation. This may or may not be related to iBurst. For example, construction of the tower could have used toxic materials responsible for rashes, headaches and so on. The fact that symptoms appeared at the same time as the tower still bears investigation, but the world is full of coincidences.

    1. Re:Correlation != Causation by CdBee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The world is also full of hypochondriacs

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    2. Re:Correlation != Causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      naw its future microwave radiation coming back in time to get them!

    3. Re:Correlation != Causation by Demonantis · · Score: 1

      I would say water related illness or something in their house. It would be funny if there was a TV, Radio station or something near by.

    4. Re:Correlation != Causation by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There can well be something else that causes symptoms of area residents which is not related to microwave radiation.

      Sure, sure. The symptoms could be "real" (as in caused by a real external factor rather than hypochondria), and caused by something in the environment.

      This is what the end result of the long-time theories that high tension transmission lines were causing cancer. The EM radiation was harmless as always, but the herbicides they used to clear the ground under the towers was not.

      The question in my mind which TFA doesn't answer and could point out whether or not this is the case: When the company announced that they were turning off the tower, did the residents symptoms abate? If so, they're clearly mental in origin. If not, well, maybe they didn't believe the cell company, or maybe there's something in the environment that is actually harming them.

      If their symptoms are real, an actual chemical being their cause makes so much more sense that it just boggles me that this isn't the first thing people choose to blame. But no, their insistence on it being due to EM actually gets in the way of the more straightforward investigation.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Correlation != Causation by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but why is this moderated troll? This sounds like a valid avenue of investigation.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    6. Re:Correlation != Causation by lastgoodnickname · · Score: 5, Funny

      I used to be a hypochondriac AND a kleptomaniac. So I took something for it.

    7. Re:Correlation != Causation by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The world is also full of hypochondriacs

      And opportunists. Particularly of the unemployed kind, which I imagine most people claiming to be electrosensitive are.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:Correlation != Causation by wizardforce · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If their symptoms are real, an actual chemical being their cause makes so much more sense that it just boggles me that this isn't the first thing people choose to blame. But no, their insistence on it being due to EM actually gets in the way of the more straightforward investigation.

      I believe that the simple explanation for this is that the idea of chemicals around the tower didn't occur to them as being the cause; it was so much more obvioys for them to latch on to the idea of microwave "radiation" being the cause. After all, the first thing people generally think about in terms of these towers is the microwave transmission not little things like pesticides used to clear the land near the transmitter.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    9. Re:Correlation != Causation by navygeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Clearly someone disagreed with him.

    10. Re:Correlation != Causation by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      caused by something in the environment.

      They could also be caused by wanting to get money for nothing.

    11. Re:Correlation != Causation by astar · · Score: 1

      I do not have much use for coincidence. On the other hand, I do not have much use for what passes as statistical reasoning. Given that the cell tower had been turned off for some time and the lawsuit is proceeding, I speculate that there is some evil involved on the part of the plaintiffs. I do like patterns. Here in the United States I would assume intentional and conscious anti-development ideology. This is almost a world-wide problem, but the particulars of a country still count for something

    12. Re:Correlation != Causation by eric2hill · · Score: 1

      Ad hoc, ergo propter hoc.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    13. Re:Correlation != Causation by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      Or it could be, you know, a bunch of superstitious morons looking for a payday... Toxic materials are not generally used to build a communications tower, at least not at level that will contaminate the environment for a large radius. Maybe if they spray painted it with lead / asbestos paint...

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    14. Re:Correlation != Causation by Grishnakh · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because "Troll" and "Flamebait" are completely ill-named moderation tags on Slashdot. They should just be combined into one, and renamed "Disagree". I don't know why Slashdot doesn't just do this; they always claim their stupid metamoderation system is supposed to prevent this sort of thing, but it never has.

    15. Re:Correlation != Causation by tool462 · · Score: 2, Funny

      they always claim their stupid metamoderation system is supposed to prevent this sort of thing, but it never has.

      That is not true! If I had mod points, you be down to -1, Troll so fast!

    16. Re:Correlation != Causation by dkleinsc · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I always thought "Disagree" was spelled "Overrated" in the /. mod system. At least, anytime someone wants to slap me with a "I disagree with your politics" mod, that's the one they use.

      There isn't supposed to be a -1 Disagree mod on /., but apparently at least a few mods are doing precisely that.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    17. Re:Correlation != Causation by Tisha_AH · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People claiming to be suffering from ill effects from power lines, radio towers and signals from the martians has been cause célèbre for several decades now. I frequently run across these groups as a communications consultant working with utilities. Sometimes what I want to say is "if you are so concerned about power lines why don't you disconnect the power to your house?".

      Right now since you are sitting in front a computer to read this, you are exposed to a great deal more RF energy than a microwave dish that is 100 feet up in the air is putting out.

      It is like the hysteria surrounding cadmium in children's toys that is also this weeks latest worry. People will cite cancer clusters and anecdotal evidence yet when confronted with the facts they will jump to some other reason. After going through a long process with community groups and concerned citizens it ended up being an issue about what color the antenna was.

      --
      Tisha Hayes
    18. Re:Correlation != Causation by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      The symptoms can be perfectly real and not have an external cause. It's called a psychosomatic illness

    19. Re:Correlation != Causation by parens · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" ?

    20. Re:Correlation != Causation by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      That's why I put "real" in quotes and said that meant due to external factors not the result of hypochondria, as in caused mentally... if that's not precisely the same as psychosomatic, my bad.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    21. Re:Correlation != Causation by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Not that it matters, but I think this is my favourite post today.

    22. Re:Correlation != Causation by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      And you're not going to have any mod points, because you commented in this story. Another stupid thing about Slashdot's moderation, and why I never bother to moderate.

    23. Re:Correlation != Causation by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Oh, it's a lot more than a few. And yes, I had forgotten about the "Overrated" one. But I think plenty also like to use "troll" and "flamebait". It depends on how vehemently they disagree. For instance, if you criticize Microsoft or Windows, you'll frequently get one of those mods on your post from a Windows fanboi.

    24. Re:Correlation != Causation by WoodenTable · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The world is also full of ineffective doctors, the kind who send off a blood test and pronounce you healthy six weeks later despite experiencing constant pain, or who blame swelling on water retention or menopause or a fatty diet, or who think migraine headaches are "stress related", or who cut a mole out and tell you it looks pretty harmless, then call back later to tell you they need to cut some more out because it was malignant, or who don't know the symptoms to a thyroid condition, or who... yeah, I think that's enough examples for now.

      They have much better PR than the hypochondriacs, though. I seem to meet quite a few "hypochondriacs" these days.

    25. Re:Correlation != Causation by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Funny

      Really? I thought all slashdot comments WERE just a variant on agreement or disagreement.

      Interesting: Agree, and you have stated your opinion as "fact"
      Overrated: Disagree, and you have stated your opinion as "fact"

      Informative: Agree, and I didn't know that fact!
      Insightful: Agree, and I DID know that fact!

      Troll: Disagree, but it's the first time I have seen that argument
      Redundant: Disagree, and I have already seen that argument

      Offtopic: Disagree, and your point didn't really make much sense
      Underrated: Agree, but your point didn't really make much sense

      Flamebait: Disagree, and you stated your comment in a particularly offensive way
      Funny: Agree, and you stated your comment in a particularly offensive way

    26. Re:Correlation != Causation by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      If someone uses "Overrated" on anything less than a 3 (displayed to them, not necessarily current) I think it should burn karma. "Overrated" clearly implies disagreement, and the desire to lessen someone's perceived credibility. I don't fault anyone for using it that way. I do not, however, have pleasant things to say about people who use it to censor dissonant thought. It should only be used to lessen the impact of non-thought.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    27. Re:Correlation != Causation by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wait, how do you compare something that has never been proven dangerous (power lines) to a manufacturing plant knowingly using a metal that is known to be both highly toxic and carcinogenic in children's toys?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    28. Re:Correlation != Causation by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      and your chicks for free?

    29. Re:Correlation != Causation by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      A quick trip to Wikipedia:

      Post hoc ergo propter hoc, Latin for "after this, therefore because (on account) of this", is a logical fallacy (of the questionable cause variety) which states, "Since that event followed this one, that event must have been caused by this one." It is often shortened to simply post hoc and is also sometimes referred to as false cause, coincidental correlation or correlation not causation.

      Ad hoc is a Latin phrase which means "for this purpose". It generally signifies a solution designed for a specific problem or task, non-generalizable, and which cannot be adapted to other purposes.

      I'm sure he meant "post hoc", but if he didn't... would he be implying that the tower was placed there for the specific purpose of making residents sick? Or maybe that they wanted a lawsuit instigated against them? This just keeps getting weirder and weirder.

      (Yes, I'm joking. I've learned the hard way that I need to say so to chase off the dumb who periodically receive mod points.)

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    30. Re:Correlation != Causation by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      There is a "Disagree" tag - it's "Overrated". But it only works if a post is modded "Insightful".

      insightful /'nsatfl/
      If you describe a person or their remarks as insightful, you mean that they show a very good understanding of people and situations.

      So if someone thinks a comment shows an good understanding of the situation, that person can moderate the post "Insightful". Later, if someone else comes along and thinks the comment is wrong, reflecting no insight, the correct moderation would be "not insightful" - a.k.a. "Overrated".

      It's no different than using "Overrated" to down-rate a post modded "Funny", if you don't think it's as funny as others did. I've never done this, but this and my first point are the only uses of "Overrated" I can think of, so I have to guess that they are its intended application.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    31. Re:Correlation != Causation by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Ok, I guess if a post is marked "Informative", but it is factually incorrect, I would consider "Overrated" as the correct moderation if I did not believe that the poster was spreading misinformation to be a troll or as flamebait.

      Of course, all these posts should be modded "Off-Topic". C'est la vie.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    32. Re:Correlation != Causation by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      That's probably an ancient joke (Henny Youngman maybe?) but I still laughed.

      Thanks, I needed that.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    33. Re:Correlation != Causation by TexVex · · Score: 1

      If there are two 5-score posts and I think the second one is better and should therefore appear first,I will mod the top one as Overrated so it drops down. This doesn't mean I feel the one I modded down is in any way bad on its own, it's just not as good as the other, for whatever reason. But since I can't mod the better post up any more, my only choice is to mod down the one that I feel is, well, overrated.

      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    34. Re:Correlation != Causation by Johnno74 · · Score: 1

      I used to be a hypochondriac AND a kleptomaniac. So I took something for it.

      Thats nothing. I used to be into necrophilia and beastiality.

      Then I realized I was just flogging a dead horse.

    35. Re:Correlation != Causation by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I smell the beginnings of a Slashdot FQA...

    36. Re:Correlation != Causation by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You're confusing things. He's not comparing power lines to cadmium. He's comparing electromagnetic radiation (which may be harmful to humans, depending on its exact nature - wavelength etc) to cadmium (which may be harmful to humans, depending on the nature of the contact - it's not toxic to touch, for example).

    37. Re:Correlation != Causation by Barny · · Score: 1

      We got to install microwave, err, towers

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    38. Re:Correlation != Causation by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Troll? You clown. Grishnakh is an orc.

    39. Re:Correlation != Causation by pclminion · · Score: 1

      It is like the hysteria surrounding cadmium in children's toys that is also this weeks latest worry.

      Hysteria? From what I heard on the news, it's not just minor cadmium contamination. Parts of toys were composed of something like 80% cadmium. I have no idea if that's a lie or an exaggeration, but if true, it's absolutely ridiculous. Cadmium is an incredibly toxic metal and there is absolutely no reason for its use in children's toys. Period.

    40. Re:Correlation != Causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Custom packet deliveryyyy

    41. Re:Correlation != Causation by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. I generally try to mod good comments up, instead of modding bad ones down. But I occasionally nick a post with overrated when:

      1) Someone with high karma abuses the +1 bonus option on a post that is trite, banal, or otherwise merely mediocre and not (IMO) deserving of said +1. Obviously, the only way I'll ever notice this is if the post is still at a karma of 2.
      or
      2) Someone is obviously trying for a "funny" mod, but fails at... well... actually being funny.

      I think either is a perfectly valid and non-abusive use of "overrated".

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    42. Re:Correlation != Causation by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      The world is also full of hypochondriacs

      And opportunists. Particularly of the unemployed kind, which I imagine most people claiming to be electrosensitive are.

      Ironic post considering the title. Where would an unemployed S. African get the cash to hire lawyers and why would they care about property values? Or was it just that you saw an opportunity to bash the unemployed?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    43. Re:Correlation != Causation by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I could see some merit in the chemical idea if health was their sole motivation and they had something more than anecdotal evidence connecting the ailments to the towers, however also from TFA...

      "Bismarck Olivier from the legal firm Bezuidenhout, Van Zyl and Associates, who represents the Craigavon residents, previously said that there is no talk of abandoning the action against iBurst and that the recent activity surrounding the issue is ‘only the beginning’. Olivier added that anyone who thinks that their legal case is based only on health issues is sorely mistaken, adding that their case is not built on health concerns alone, but rather various other aspects related to the mast, including the public participation and environmental approval processes which they are confident are flawed."

      I read that as, "Yeah we know we are peddling public health FUD but that is not why my NIMBY clients want the tower removed". Notice also that his statement gives no clue as to what his clients motivation actually is now that his FUD has been soundly debunked.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    44. Re:Correlation != Causation by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Actually, cadmium can be absorbed through the skin, though the rate of absorption is pretty low. Kids wearing it all day on a necklace, however, would be a concern even if you didn't have kids sticking charms in their mouths, which they do....

      The bigger problem is that cadmium bioaccumulates very badly. The human body does a terrible job of removing it, with the typical biological half life measured in years. So if you are exposed to significant amounts of cadmium as a small child, a significant percentage of that cadmium is still active in your system well into adulthood.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    45. Re:Correlation != Causation by LingNoi · · Score: 0

      And as we all know children don't things in their mouth right?

    46. Re:Correlation != Causation by gd2shoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, no. I disagree on both counts.

      (1) You now have to go out of your way to turn the +1 bonus off. It's not something that you must turn on for each and every post. People just leave it on, and I don't expect otherwise.

      (2) "Funny" doesn't give karma, but "Overrated" decreases karma. Instead of preventing someone from getting karma for their non-funny post, you're actually hurting their karma. That's why many here (not me) rate jokes as insightful instead (when they get modded down they will have neutral karma that way, instead of negative.) I only mod non-funny jokes down if they fall under one of the other categories (such as "Flamebait").

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    47. Re:Correlation != Causation by zombie_monkey · · Score: 1

      Hm, odd -- I think of Informative and insightful the other way around.

      Informative: Agree, and I DID know that fact!
      Insightful: Agree, and I didn't know that fact!

      EDIT: Oh, right, you weren't being serious.

  5. Perhaps by ircmaxell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps this proves that "electrosensitivity" is more mental than tangible....

    The issue that remains is if a company can be held responsible for the mental anguish that it indirectly caused. (I mention indirectly, because the act of constructing a tower isn't directly changing peoples mental condition, it's simply "turning on" something that may have been there)... Either way, it should be interesting to see how this pans out...

    --
    If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    1. Re:Perhaps by wizardforce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The issue that remains is if a company can be held responsible for the mental anguish that it indirectly caused.

      In this legal climate, I'm sure at some point someone ill try to make them responsible for agitating someone's delusional phobias. Clearly they shouldn't be held responsible for "mental anguish" over "radiation" from a tower that WASN'T EVEN SWITCHED ON.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    2. Re:Perhaps by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can I sue you for putting a curse on me? I am firmly convinced that you are a witch.

      Even if that is not actually the case, I mentally suffered while thinking so.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    3. Re:Perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you can. But you won't get far with it.

    4. Re:Perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you can bring suit for anything. Whether the judge tosses it out is another thing. Judges who don't toss out cases are as much to blame as the lawyers.

      One thing that occurs to me is that electrosensitive/chemosensitive seems to be the modern day equivalent of accusing people of witchcraft anyway.

    5. Re:Perhaps by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      it's just like "multiple chemical sensitivity" or whatever the hell they are calling it these days.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:Perhaps by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Can I sue you for putting a curse on me? I am firmly convinced that you are a witch.

      Even if that is not actually the case, I mentally suffered while thinking so.

      You would have to prove a few things, first would be either:
      a) that the person knowingly put a curse on you intending to do harm
      b) that the person was aware that curses can do harm, and cast it upon you regardless of its ability to do harm

      This just proves intent or negligence. There are other things that you would have to prove though, such as proximal cause:
      a) that if that person had not put that curse upon you that you would not have incurred the harm

      This is just the first few things that I would attempt to attack as opposing council to such a suit.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    7. Re:Perhaps by hacksoncode · · Score: 1

      That depends, did the person accused know about this problem and intentionally exacerbate it, thereby inflicting mental suffering, by pretending to inflict curses on you? If so, it's probably legally harassment. People seem to *always* forget the intent (or negligence as perceived by a "reasonable person") component of these things.

  6. LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by badzilla · · Score: 1

    It's hard to imagine the whole community would get behind this for just no reason at all. What is their concern exactly? Maybe they think it's an eyesore or maybe they really are getting sick for some other reason wrongly attributed to Evil Tower Rays. Doesn't sound as though the issue can just be forgotten about.

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    1. Re:LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Salem Witch trials. Not that hard to imagine at all really. These people are the modern day equivalent of those who think they're persecuted by witches.

    2. Re:LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by Vohar · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's more likely just a kind of group psychology phenomenon (I'm sure someone with more knowledge of the terms involved will chime in eventually). A group of people convinced themselves that this was happening, and with more and more talking about it and believing it even more people believe they're sick from evil towers as well.

      Hell, there were stories a few months back about men in other parts of Africa killing supposed witches, blaming them for shrinking genitals. These men actually believed they had the shrunk junk and killed for it. Not trying to pick on Africa in particular here, just the first story I recalled.

      Come to think of it, I've heard of this exact same scenario played out somewhere in the US--A community complained of these symptoms only to find that the tower in question wasn't even finished and had never been turned on.

    3. Re:LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is Africa. There is a lot of folk religion and superstition there, and they don't really understand how technology works. I remember watching a documentary recently about China's economic development in Angola, and they interviewed an Angolan man about a skyscraper the Chinese were building there, and he said he thought that the glass and steel didn't look safe. All he knew was a world of buildings made of bricks at best, and so regardless of the structural improvements represented by steel, he could only see new/different = suspicious/dangerous. African culture in broad terms is still essentially pre-industrial.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    4. Re:LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by StrategicIrony · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except now it's pedophiles and radio towers.

      It's gonna be a fun decade for child care workers and HAM radio operators.

    5. Re:LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think this is contained to Africa? Look at all the idiotic shit religion convinces people to believe in the USA and Europe. It's all the same.

    6. Re:LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by CecilPL · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is Africa. There is a lot of folk religion and superstition there, and they don't really understand how technology works.

      This is also America.

    7. Re:LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a lot of folk religion and superstition there, and they don't really understand how technology works.

      Welcome to America with the religous right, Cold fusion, Perpetual Motion Machines, Electric Comets, and ID.

    8. Re:LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by emilper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " a lot of folk religion and superstition there, and they don't really understand how technology works"

      TFA proves that this is the same everywhere, just superstitions are different.

    9. Re:LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by gd2shoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that there really are pedophiles. That doesn't excuse the hysteria and baseless accusations which are sometimes flung about (and ruin lives), but at least there really is something to fear. And the "EM sensitive" people are not nearly as numerous as the "every man is a pedophile" people. Comparing the two is kinda funny (in a dark humor sort of way).

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    10. Re:LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some are essentially pre-industrial? Hell, a lot of the continent is still Hunter-Gatherer or subsistence farmers and living in mud/straw hut villages, pre-industrial is a pipe dream for those people because most of them aren't even living in areas that have anything resembling modern infrastructure such as roads or towns so education is going to be minimal if it even exists or they can afford it(and that precludes all the wars and conflicts that happen in Africa in general which pretty much ruins any chances of education for children since most are going to be worrying too much about food or being raped and murdered to care about education.).You add in technologies like cell phones and computers and is it any surprise these people take a sharply negative view towards it? The whole continent is broken except for a few strongholds of civilization, sadly it's going to take decades if not centuries to bring the people there into the modern world. Then there's the cultural issues like the ideas of magic and whatnot that will stick around even after modernization and education, the people that murdered a politician a while back that I read about because he supposedly made several mens penises shrink. Africa needs a lot of work..

    11. Re:LOL, ROFLMAO, ha-ha, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Bangalore (high tech capital of India) we just had a solar eclipse from 11 am to 3 pm. Supposedly it's bad luck to eat during an eclipse. So restaurants all over town had almost no one in them, per Times of India. And just for good measure--the Times also reported that somewhere else in India (I forget where) the local farmers throw lambs at a festival to ensure their flocks against disease. The lambs die. The police didn't interfere.

  7. Faraday Cage by quangdog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had a physics professor who's wife was concerned about the EMF coming off the power lines that ran near the plot of land upon which they were contemplating building (through a common area behind their back yard). His solution? During the construction of his house he installed wire mesh in all his walls, ceiling, doors and floors. While he left his windows as standard windows, he said that he got no cell phone, radio, or TV over the air reception in the house.

    The worst part was that he freely admitted that his wife was a loon.

    1. Re:Faraday Cage by jjohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure if this is brilliant or crazy. On the one hand, the resale value of his house just dropped 30% if that little fact is revealed before closing. OTOH, a house with no outside signals getting in sounds amazingly peaceful.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    2. Re:Faraday Cage by mbkennel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course grounded wire mesh wouldn't do much to reduce the very low frequency magnetic fields coming from power lines. I bet he knew that. I also bet he didn't tell his wife that.

    3. Re:Faraday Cage by alen · · Score: 1

      too bad a lot of modern cell phones receive email and texts via wifi

    4. Re:Faraday Cage by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      And you think that wireless networks are somehow immune to the effects of Faraday cages?

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    5. Re:Faraday Cage by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

      He probably also didn't tell his wife that, in many cases, when a cellphone is in an area of very weak or nonexistent coverage its response is to kick its transmitter into full "Scotty, we need more power!" mode in an attempt to remain in contact.

      This isn't good for battery life; but it also doesn't do much to reduce your EM exposure.

      If he doesn't mind the risk of spending a month of nights on the couch, he should tell her to use a bluetooth headset so that she can keep her dangerous cellphone's danger rays away from her brain. Hilarious, until she finds out that you've advised shoving an RF transceiver in your ear canal in order to reduce RF exposure, then things get ugly...

    6. Re:Faraday Cage by TERdON · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but usually you'd put your WiFi router inside your house. Hence, the house would work as a Faraday cage around the rest of the world, keeping all WiFi signals within the house (might be a good idea for tinfoil-hat wearers, btw)

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    7. Re:Faraday Cage by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      And you think that wireless networks are somehow immune to the effects of Faraday cages?

      No, but if you setup the source of the WiFi signal within the cage, then anywhere within said cage can get that signal.
      At least he wouldn't have to worry about neighbours sniffing/stealing his internet.

    8. Re:Faraday Cage by khallow · · Score: 1

      Of course grounded wire mesh wouldn't do much to reduce the very low frequency magnetic fields coming from power lines. I bet he knew that. I also bet he didn't tell his wife that.

      It should work quite well on external low frequency signals (depending on how grounded it really is). Internal 60 Hz is a different story though. The stuff that gets through the best would have a smaller wavelength the mesh spacing.

    9. Re:Faraday Cage by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

      " a house with no outside signals getting in sounds amazingly peaceful."

      You must have big ears!

    10. Re:Faraday Cage by Amouth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The worst part was that he freely admitted that his wife was a loon.

      It's not the worst part - to be honest that is just how it is - if it made her happy and comfortable living there then he did what he needed to.

      the worst part is - he isn't alone - the rest of us poor suckers would do it too.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    11. Re:Faraday Cage by ettlz · · Score: 1

      the rest of us poor suckers would do it too.

      Install a wire cage in exchange for getting my leg over?

      Yeah, I'd do it.

    12. Re:Faraday Cage by PRMan · · Score: 0

      My house is very similar to this. I only get TV or radio signals next to windows.

      Fortunately I have satellite.

      As far as EMF, I knew a family that had their house FILLED with ridiculous amounts of electronic Christmas decorations. Everywhere you looked there was something. Your skin crawled just being in there because there was a magnetic field everywhere.

      First, the older daughter died of cancer at 16. The mother had had it as well. Then, the younger daughter got cancer. Also, I've known people that lived under the massive power lines where I grew up. Again, the rate of cancer was much higher than elsewhere in the city. I'm not convinced that it's completely unrelated.

      Also, as a food allergy sufferer, I've been told that I can't be allergic to MSG, aspertame/Nutrasweet, soybean oil, etc., but unlike these people, I can reliably tell when I have had any of the 3 in a blind test. Later in life, I found out that the Nutrasweet trials were faked by putting the common cross-allergen MSG in the "placebo", giving "similar effect as placebo". I also found out that while, in theory, soybean oil cannot be allergenic, in actuality people crush the beans because it is cheaper and there is a lot of soy protein in the oil. Only the non-allergenic baby food has the "pure" soybean oil. But it does get frustrating when people are telling you that you could not possibly be suffering when you have a migraine.

      If people are having problems, there is most likely something to it, even if it's not the towers. I think the pesticide angle is worth investigating...

      Notice people in Africa are not complaining about other people's TVs, cell phones or cars being in close proximity to them, even though they have as little understanding of these items as they have of the towers.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    13. Re:Faraday Cage by tixxit · · Score: 1

      If they are inside the cage, then yes.

    14. Re:Faraday Cage by keithpreston · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The worst part was that he freely admitted that his wife was a loon.

      Don't most people freely admit that there wife is a loon?

    15. Re:Faraday Cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Have you considered psychotherapy?

    16. Re:Faraday Cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're on the inside of the house....

    17. Re:Faraday Cage by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most peoples' houses these days are filled with electronic items, plus peoples' houses have had electric wires in the walls for nearly 100 years now, all giving off EM fields.

      I think the family in your post had something else going on in their house, or maybe they were just highly susceptible to cancer by genetics. Did they do a radon test?

      Also, what kind of cancer was it? All three were female, was it cervical cancer? That one is caused by a virus, HPV. Living in the same house (and the daughters being born of the mother), maybe the mother somehow got it and passed it to them in birth, and it took a while to manifest as cancer. There's some other cancers we now know are caused by viruses too.

      As for your allergies, MSG and aspartame are shit, and shouldn't be consumed by any humans. Some people are just more resistant to poisons than others. They knew 25 years ago that aspartame caused problems if it was heated (like in a hot drink).

      As for things like soybean oil, there are people with soy sensitivities. I don't think there's been enough research into some of these sensitivities. My wife can't eat very much wheat gluten, or she gets a migraine and fatigue symptoms. How on earth does gluten cause a migraine? I have no idea, but after living with her for years and seeing her food intake and migraines firsthand, the relationship is pretty clear. She used to get migraines all the time, now she doesn't, and when she screws up and eats too much wheat-based food, she gets a migraine. (A little is OK, but too much sets off the headache.)

      I think there's still a LOT we don't understand very well about the human body and how things work. Back to the cancer thing, remember, it wasn't very long ago that we had NO idea that viruses could cause cancer, but now it's commonplace to vaccinate women against HPV to prevent most cases of cervical cancer.

    18. Re:Faraday Cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it will reduce the chance of their baby children getting leukemia due to *extended* (many years) exposure to *strong* (read: power grid high-voltage line) low-frequency eletromagnetic fields (60Hz).

      It was a damn good idea. You need to be utterly stupid to buy a house near a big power line, unless you shield it.

      This assumes we are talking about a 128kV or higher grid power line, BTW. Not local 13kV power feeds.

    19. Re:Faraday Cage by jbeaupre · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't most people freely admit that there wife is a loon?

      Looks both ways.

      Yes.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    20. Re:Faraday Cage by keithpreston · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks both ways.

      It's ok, you wife either doesn't read slashdot, or already knows she is a loon.

    21. Re:Faraday Cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a physics professor who's wife was concerned about the EMF... coming off the power lines that ran near the plot of land upon which they were contemplating building (through a common area behind their back yard). His solution? During the construction of his house he installed wire mesh in all his walls, ceiling, doors and floors. While he left his windows as standard windows, he said that he got no cell phone, radio, or TV over the air reception in the house.

      The worst part was that he freely admitted that his wife was a loon.

      A woman married to a physics prof? Clearly a loon.

    22. Re:Faraday Cage by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1, Informative

      Of course grounded wire mesh wouldn't do much to reduce the very low frequency magnetic fields coming from power lines. I bet he knew that. I also bet he didn't tell his wife that.

      In general, the mesh will block wavelengths longer than half the length between the wires. If he used chicken wire, with say, 2 cm big holes, WiFi signals are going to get through. I believe most high power AC transmission lines are in the tens to hundreds of kHz, so chicken wire would cover that. It wouldn't even need to be grounded, because it's exposed to so many different pieces of the wave that it's all out of phase and very little would transmit inside. A sufficiently paranoid person could probably line the wall and ceiling sheetrock with aluminum foil before texturing. Toss in some aluminum blinds and I bet you can't get OTA TV.

      It's funny, because I just had this conversation with my dad. He was wondering why he had such terrible cell reception, even though he could see a cell tower -- he wondered if it was because of the metal mesh that went behind the stucco when the house was built. We talked a little bit of math and pointed out that even radios and TV worked inside (KHz and MHz range), and now he's back to being angry with Sprint. There's no sense pointing out that the cell tower he sees is 10 miles away on top of a mountain in the middle of Phoenix and the HOA won't let a cell tower anywhere near them.

    23. Re:Faraday Cage by eth1 · · Score: 1

      the worst part is - he isn't alone - the rest of us poor suckers would do it too.

      Not me. I would have just told my wife that the contractors used special anti-EM gypsum board.

    24. Re:Faraday Cage by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Unless you found a EM senstive nut case. Then the price just doubled.
      Actually except for the lack of cell service "a pico cell maybe" it sounds useful. You use external sources for video and radio and you will be just fine.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    25. Re:Faraday Cage by MSG · · Score: 1

      Hilarious, until she finds out that you've advised shoving an RF transceiver in your ear canal in order to reduce RF exposure, then things get ugly...

      People frequently point that out without acknowledging that a Bluetooth headset transmits at about 1% the power of a cell phone.

    26. Re:Faraday Cage by jjohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aside from the obvious 'correlation does not equal causation' and the absence of a correlation between cancer and EMF fields over the century we've had our houses wired, there are two reasons not to assume that the cancer you saw in that house was due to EMF fields: first, susceptibility to cancer is heritable, so it's not that surprising for multiple family members to get cancer, especially the same kind; second, statistical clumping is a normal and expected effect of any phenomena like cancer, meaning that, just like a series of die rolls will, over time, show long runs of sixes, you can expect to find clumped cases of cancer somewhere with a large enough sample.

      In short, it's predictable that there would be a house with multiple cancer cases in it, as well as towns where the number of cancer cases is significantly higher than the average. This says nothing about local causes, either in favour or against. While it's understandable that the townsfolk would look for a reason, it's actually likely that there's nothing there but predictable statistical effects.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    27. Re:Faraday Cage by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      EMF? really? that's some old bullshit you've got there.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    28. Re:Faraday Cage by fizzup · · Score: 2, Informative

      The frequency of the alternating current transmitted on high tension lines is the same as the frequency of the alternating current you get in your house. Usually, either 50 Hz or 60 Hz. Grounded chicken wire will block nearly all the radiation from a power line. Unless South Africa has some mondo chickens.

    29. Re:Faraday Cage by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      As far as EMF, I knew a family that had their house FILLED with ridiculous amounts of electronic Christmas decorations. Everywhere you looked there was something. Your skin crawled just being in there because there was a magnetic field everywhere.

      First, the older daughter died of cancer at 16. The mother had had it as well. Then, the younger daughter got cancer.

      Could it be that some of those Christmas decorations not only contained electronics, but also cancer-producing substances in the plastic parts?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    30. Re:Faraday Cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when they're inside of the Faraday cage, yes.

    31. Re:Faraday Cage by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Correct -- if the high tension frequency was different from 60 or 50 hertz, it would have to be frequency-divided down to 60/50 hz by some very expensive components. The VOLTAGE is much higher, for efficiency reasons, but stepping voltages up and down can be done simply with two coils of wire and a piece of iron (i.e. a transformer). The frequency is the same throughout the grid. (Of course, some high tension transmission lines are DC, but radiate essentially nothing at all in the first place)

      At 60 hz, the radiation from the transmittion line would have a wavelength equal to the distance light travels in 1/60th of a second -- about 5000 kilometers. Any kind of mesh whatsoever will block it.

  8. it's peanut allergy waves by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    see my gorgeous little child was at a restaurant and a heartless cruel waitress walked by with a thai peanut sauce dish and well my child got a good whiff of it. and now as a result every day for the last 3 months his intellectual development and emotional focus has been totally off. the swine flu shots have only made it worse, i swear he is borderline autistic now

    i've gone to the principle of his school and insisted that all children's bags be searched and sniffer dogs bought in for the sake of peanuts destroying our children, but he babbled something about correlation and causation- completely uncaring and unsupportive!

    to make matters worse afterwards i went to mcdonalds and ordered a big mac and felt nauseous a few weeks later. i didn't know what it was until a friend of mine told me there is a bad case of celiac disease going around. environment destroying corporations just don't care that they give people celiac disease and warm the atmosphere with cell phone waves. now i have to be on a gluten free diet for the rest of my life!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately this is so close to reality that I don't know whether to laugh or put my head in the oven.

    2. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bahaha! As I was reading this, I was thinking to myself "where's the gluten.... i hope there's gluten..."

      So imagine my joy when I saw celiac. Thanks for not letting me down!

    3. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I just met a woman like that yesterday. I asked her a couple questions about, "How do you know peanuts are at fault for your illness?" hoping she'd provide some evidence to back-up her claims, butshe refused to answer. She just saying she "knows" it's the peanuts, and I some stop asking annoying quesions.

      She had no reasoning ability whatsoever.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by lastgoodnickname · · Score: 1

      Do both. The echoes in an oven are cool.

    5. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Are you ever going to finish that movie? Lol.

      Nice rant, btw. Hits entirely too close to home for me. :-/

    6. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by PRMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As an allergy sufferer, I can tell you that she is tired of armchair doctors telling her she is wrong when she has done 100 times as much research on the subject as you ever will.

      If you just met her, I almost guarantee that's the case. I only discuss my allergies with people that care about me and actually want to have an honest conversation (see, Slashdot, I love you). Arguing with you about it is a massive waste of time that she has been through dozens of times already only to be told she's a loon job for not being like everyone else, so why bother?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    7. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      I've done a few tests on some people with "food sensitivity" before.

      A friend of mine had a 100 point list of foods he was "sensitive" to and I used to slip them in his food now and then and then ask him how he's feeling.

      If I told him right after that there was cabbage or Onions in the food, he would complain bitterly for days about low energy and headaches.

      But when I put the same food in and didn't tell him, he was fine. Said he felt great.

      I documented this over about 6 months and then showed him the results.

      He was shocked and has since realized that his "sensitivity" was something he probably got from his hypochondriac mother and simply worried himself into sickness each time he realized he accidentally ate those things.

      Of course, there are "real" allergies. I've had to shoot someone with epinephrine after eating nuts and falling to the floor unable to breathe like a fish out of water, so I know that is damn well true, but many of the "sensitivities" out there are purely mental, I'm quite sure.

    8. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the parent poster may be sensitive to foods, from his previous descriptions, he is not allergic to them. I think he uses the word when he doesn't quite know what it means.

    9. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by tool462 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude! Stop making fun of my mom! :(

    10. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a difference between "sensitivity" and "allergy". Celiac disease is a real thing, and can be confirmed by tests of the intestinal lining, but lots of people have gluten sensitivity and don't have Celiac's.

      My wife is gluten-intolerant. She can only eat a tiny bit at a time (like a bite or two of bread), or she gets migraines. Why? I have no idea, but migraines aren't imagined, and the correlation seems to be real--as long as she avoids gluten and wheat, she's OK. She had migraines for many years before being told it might be caused by gluten, so it's not like she set herself up for it by imagining a sensitivity to gluten. Then, when she tried going gluten-free, the migraines stopped coming.

      Who knows, maybe there's some other cause, but avoiding gluten works for her, so why bash it? After all, doctor after doctor could never help her at all, except to give her extremely expensive painkillers that kept her from being able to work, or just throw up their hands and give up. Honestly, doctors really aren't very helpful unless you have some kind of trauma or injury. Most of the time, they're just pushers for overpriced pharmaceuticals which help alleviate some symptoms at the cost of adding other side-effects, and most of which were discovered by accident. Modern medicine is not at all a scientific practice; if it were, researchers would be trying to learn exactly how biology really works at a fundamental level, but research is slow, hard, and expensive, so we don't bother much with it, and instead come up with lots of random chemical compounds and feed them to test animals and people to see what happens. It's sort of like trying to debug buggy software by injecting random bits of code, instead of actually looking at how the program works line-by-line and fixing the problem.

    11. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. That's real funny. I can tell you actually have children who are allergic to peanuts.
      My son went out to eat with his grandparents who were of your mind. They took him to Perkins where he was given a sugar cookie. They promised it had no peanuts.
      My son died two hours later.
      Very funny, ass hat.

    12. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between "sensitivity" and "allergy"

      I would object to the idea that there's a real line between the two. The difference between a mild allergy and a bad sensitivity is not so clear, and that's particularly obvious when it comes to gluten. The difference between Idiopathic gluten sensitivity and the obvious allergy of celiac disease is quite fuzzy.

      Diagnosing someone with celiac disease is hard. The sort of tissue damage they look for on the biopsy can heal if it's mild, only showing up as mild inflammation which may not even be visible. That means that it can only prove you do have celiac disease, not really the inverse. Mild gluten sensitivity cases can show up on something like an antigliadin antibody test even if there's no visible damage to the tissue yet.

      There's plenty of data showing gluten causes migraines in some people; see Migraine Headaches: Gluten Triggers Severe Headaches in Sensitive Individuals and Migraine Linked to Celiac Disease as two examples, there are a couple more. Your wife probably has something in the Gluten-sensitive idiopathic neuropathies family of issues.

    13. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wow, that was a really helpful response. Thanks for the links!

      Now, why is it that doctors have no idea about any of the information here? With doctors, it's "it's all in your head", or "I don't know; you'll just have to learn to live with it", etc. Is it just American doctors that are so imcompetent? As I've heard about many, many people, my wife had to diagnose and treat herself (I think I helped with searching the internet for info). Doctors were no help at all, nor were any of the numerous and expensive blood tests they performed. I can understand if this stuff is hard to diagnose by direct testing, but we never even heard a suggestion that it could be gluten-related, and to try avoiding gluten for a while to see if that made a difference. With doctors, the mentality seems to be that if it doesn't show up on a standard blood test, then it simply doesn't exist.

    14. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      US Doctors are barely trained on diet related issues at all, so they just don't know. For example, much of the training of a gastroenterologist--the person you'll end up at if a gluten issue is suspected--is focused on surgical procedures and recovery from life-threatening conditions. If you need a section of your colon removed, or are about to die from toxic megacolon, this is exactly the training you want them to have. But if you just have a mild condition that's linked to diet instead, they're not so much help.

      The same principle applies to other doctors too. Do you want your family doctor trained on how to spot life threatening issues, or techniques to track down food sensitivity? There's really not enough time to learn everything in this field. I know a ton about this whole gluten/celiac intersection because my quality of life depends on it (I'm gluten sensitive but not a classic celiac case), and I've never found a doctor who was as informed as I am about it. I know whose knowledge I'm going to yield to if I need surgery or emergency treatment though.

    15. Re:it's peanut allergy waves by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot. I'm allergic to whey protein. It took a while to discover that it was causing me problems because I only ever noticed a reaction when I ate huge amounts of it. Yet, the small amounts that I ate all the time did real, physical damage to my digestive system.

      Next time you want to test someone's food sensitivities, take them to a specialist. Don't sneak it into their food over long periods. That's equivalent to poisoning someone.

  9. Why is this in Idle? by boojum.cat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is this in Idle? It's a real issue, not because the electrosensitives are right, but because they cause real trouble. Good evidence against them is valuable.

    --
    Lost: one sig, witty, 120 chars, sentimental value. Reward offered.
    1. Re:Why is this in Idle? by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a real issue, not because the electrosensitives are right, but because they cause real trouble. Good evidence against them is valuable.

      All the evidence is against them as it is. That hasn't stopped the damage they cause. There needs to be large, punitive punishments against people who use pseudoscience judicially. But this country won't do it for the same reason this country allows people to kill their children over their religious beliefs and kids who have never read a book wear that fact like a badge of pride in many schools.

      I'm sorry to say... but maybe vigilante justice might be a better solution -- they'll worry less about their EM poisoning if they're being chased by heavily-armed scientists.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  10. There is only ONE explanation... by Jorl17 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Placebo waves.

    --
    Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    1. Re:There is only ONE explanation... by tool462 · · Score: 1

      Like the song from Rent: Placebo EM

  11. Well.. by Renraku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps they've been coached into doing this? Like a conspiracy of some kind? Perhaps by lawyers?

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Well.. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I suspect that at least some of them are fully sincere. Hysterical and incorrect; but sincere. It wouldn't totally surprise me, though, if there is also a set of people who just think that the tower is an eyesore, or that some part of the planning process wasn't correctly followed, or otherwise just want the tower scrapped, who are happy to tell the first group "Oh gosh, yes. The terrible headaches, you should sue..." and use them as the useful idiots.

  12. Withdrawal by Ichijo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly they are suffering not from the effects of radiomagnetic radiation, but from withdrawal! Quick, turn it back on!

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  13. This is why Africa can't have nice things. by ZSpade · · Score: 5, Informative

    Either it's placebo from seeing the tower (like a hypochondriac) or they're out for a quick buck. I Vote quick buck.

    --
    Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
    1. Re:This is why Africa can't have nice things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Americans would never be so greedy or gullible.

    2. Re:This is why Africa can't have nice things. by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      Either it's placebo from seeing the tower (like a hypochondriac) or they're out for a quick buck. I Vote quick buck.

      I don't think you have to choose. The residents are plainly suffering from mass hysteria, and the lawyers are out for a quick buck.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    3. Re:This is why Africa can't have nice things. by emilper · · Score: 1

      It's neither: it's the tower lowering the value of their properties, which means they will have more trouble getting loans etc. They want the tower gone and probably would invoke the Babel story if given half a chance.

      NIMBY is something to laugh about until it's your backyard, you want to take/refinance/consolidate loans, and the bank recommends you go take a hike or gives you an interest rate larger by 5% because your house is not worth (for real, idiotic, subjective or hypochondriac reasons) what you paid for it.

    4. Re:This is why Africa can't have nice things. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I love NIMBY. I hope it will allow me to buy a nice house/etc. cheaply from idiots, when my country will finally decide to build a nuclear power plant and hopefully picks one particular area...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  14. Real problem in the US by cdrguru · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This limits the construction of any EMF emitting source including things like cell phone towers and power lines. There is enough belief in the idea that EMF causes medical problems that companies are pretty much unable to push construction projects ahead in the face of opposition.

    The result of this is that building a new transmission line in a new area is pretty much off limits unless it winds around to avoid existing structures by miles and miles. If someone can see it, they can use this as an argument to prevent (or at least delay) construction. I have seen this happen in Illinois.

    Anyone thinking that we are going to get all sorts of new "green" superconducting transmission lines for wind and solar power needs to understand the seriously wacked out nature of these protesters. Until these issues are really put to rest, they will prevent progress on many fronts.

    Think the cell phone brain cancer rumors are over? This is the same people, and it keeps coming up every few years.

    1. Re:Real problem in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unless you're somewhere where earthquakes are a common occurrence just bury the damn power lines. Out of sight, out of mind, and a tornado can no longer get to them.

    2. Re:Real problem in the US by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that burying stuff is expensive, plus they'd have to have enormously-thick insulators around them (whereas the suspended ones aren't insulated at all), which costs more.

      But yeah, I'd agree with burying them. Those huge transmission lines and towers are butt-ugly.

    3. Re:Real problem in the US by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The result of this is that building a new transmission line in a new area is pretty much off limits unless it winds around to avoid existing structures by miles and miles

      My dad was the engineer who planned the route for a new transmission line to a community which was growing very quickly. When the town locals heard about the route, they demanded that they bury the line (there was no alternate route) and they demanded the electric company pay the extra cost.

      The company wasn't going to pay for burying the line, so it resulted in a game chicken. Turns out people stop pulling out these bullshit theories when they start suffering from blackouts.

    4. Re:Real problem in the US by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Burying the line costs a lot more initially and then takes a hell of a lot more effort to troubleshoot. It's all fine and dandy to try to get the lines buried until you have to foot the bill.

    5. Re:Real problem in the US by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      burying power lines is much more dangerous and expensive. if an underground line insulation breaches and the ground is wet random things near the breach will become {hot/hot} sometimes temperature, sometimes charge, sometimes both. just look at what con ed deals with in NYC, a few years ago one of their service covers literally branded a teenage girl, and it's not uncommon to hear about pets getting electrocuted.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:Real problem in the US by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      A good outcome? Wow. I have heard of situations exactly the opposite - where it is not the community directly being served and the utility company pretty much gives up on the idea of the line instead of fighting endlessly in court.

      Absolutely, the only thing that will convince people is to turn off their electricity and make that the only other option to building the transmission line.

    7. Re:Real problem in the US by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Burying the feed for a home is one thing. Burying a transmission line running 400KV (or more) is a whole different thing. The insulation you need is unbeliveable - turns out those big towers have the wires actually insulated by air. Take away the air and you need many inches of materials - like 20 or 30.

      Burying a transmission line is pretty much digging a trench four feet wide and ten feet deep to put all the stuff in it. Maybe a bit more these days. This isn't going to happen for a line that is 100 miles long.

    8. Re:Real problem in the US by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand about this hysteria is why nobody has come up with 'power line cleansers' and other 'EM Protection' products or services to dupe people that aren't smart enough to know they're at no risk into giving away boat loads of money. Anyone smart enough to know it's a hoax also knows the things are harmless.

    9. Re:Real problem in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone thinking that we are going to get all sorts of new "green" superconducting transmission lines for wind and solar power needs to understand the seriously wacked out nature of these protesters. Until these issues are really put to rest, they will prevent progress on many fronts.

      Nah, someone among them will declare that "green" electricity doesn't have the nasty side effects of that dirty coal-fired electricity. Scientific illiteracy can create their fears, and it can also assuage their fears.

    10. Re:Real problem in the US by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      There are all kinds of "anti-radiation" accessories for cell phones (bluetooth headsets are also marketed at these nutbags).

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  15. You mean they can be embarrassed? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

    Hold it a second, are they implying it is possible to embarrass someone who thinks they are "electrosensitive" and is wiling to say so publicly?

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    1. Re:You mean they can be embarrassed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      People claim to be Democrats all the time... what's the difference?

  16. ham operators by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When ham radio operators erect a new mast in their backyard, they often leave it unconnected for a month or two. When the inevitable complaints of baby monitors malfunctioning, televisions going crazy, and other non-sense crap from their neighbors blamed on the mast gets reported to the FCC or the police,
    the ham radio operator calmly leads them outside and shows them the disconnected cable that goes nowhere and does nothing.

    Perhaps commercial entities should take note of this, given our remarkable slide into the cesspool of stupidity where we believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories, vaccinations causing brains to turn into jello and yellow smoke to pour out, and how we're being poisoned by EM waves, and a particle accelerator's going to cause the world to end.

    Seriously... There should be an idiot tax on court filings.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:ham operators by thephydes · · Score: 1

      My ham radio installation did cause interference to one channel on our TV on 30m. I found the reason - resonant frequency of the cabling for the TV, and have cured it. Maybe they problem is the resonant frequency of the pea brains inside their heads. .

    2. Re:ham operators by nschubach · · Score: 1

      There should be an idiot tax on court filings.

      There already are. They call them lawyer fees. ;)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:ham operators by Xaositecte · · Score: 1

      This has already been explained.

      Repeatedly.

      www.justfuckinggoogleit.com

    4. Re:ham operators by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Perhaps commercial entities should take note of this, given our remarkable slide into the cesspool of stupidity where we believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories,

      While I don't believe them myself, there's nothing anti-science with conspiracy theories like this, as opposed to the other things you cite. Conspiracy theorists just don't believe the government, and are probably more interested in real scientific explanations for things than other people.

      The only problem with the whole 9/11 conspiracy angle is that it assumes a government that is competent enough to pull off such a large operation without anyone involved talking, and that's something I don't buy.

    5. Re:ham operators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      @girlintraining

      This isn't twitter. However, I can see how you could get confused as to where you're posting since you're obviously mentally deficient.

    6. Re:ham operators by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      have you ever actually watched a controlled demolition? the key word is "controlled" the WTC collapses were nothing of the sort, they were simply too large to tip over like a jenga tower, they threw debris in all directions and damaged or destroyed neighboring buildings.

      and it's probably the thermal expansion that allowed the tower to start collapsing, after that the falling mass forced the outer supports outward breaking their connections as they went. the leverage of a falling mass inside a frame like that would be extremely strong.

      but don't let that get in the way of your delusions.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    7. Re:ham operators by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm arguing for the nutters at all, but isn't the mere presence of a resonant metal object enough to cause local disturbances in the wavelength 2x the height of the mast and multiples thereof?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re:ham operators by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Stop. Please, just... stop.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    9. Re:ham operators by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      I had to laugh at that because I had the same problem.

      The real problem was my 'mast' was a broomstick painted silver.

      I didn't wind up being reported, but I got a few knocks on the door from neighbours who could see my 'evil antenna' complaining about all those things.

      It's really kind of amusing getting them all together and pulling it down and pretty much spitting in their face about their own stupidity. They all learned a lesson and have never complained again (not that they have reason to; I don't cause them any EMI issues).

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    10. Re:ham operators by sznupi · · Score: 1

      They are not interested in scientific explanations in the slightest. "Scientific" implies non-discriminatory look at available data and theories.

      Whereas conspiracy theorists operate on the basis of strong confirmation bias.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    11. Re:ham operators by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure elimination of any metal objects, with lengths affecting the wide usable spectrum, is anywhere near practical...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    12. Re:ham operators by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      there's nothing anti-science with conspiracy theories like this,

      Truthers say that the towers couldn't possibly have fallen from an impact and subsequent fuel burn. Engineering analysis says that yes, it can -- and it did. There's your anti-science.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    13. Re:ham operators by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      That building was constructed to do two things: Survive a fire of X temperature for Y time; and come straight down rather than turning 300 miles of New York City into a giant Domino Rally setup. It survived a fire of >X temperature (a burning plane full of hundreds of thousands of pounds of kerosene!) for

      There's a reason it fell, and a reason it dropped straight; and that fucker was heavy, the buildings around it couldn't handle the shock of dropping it.

      I'd like to see a cite for the molten steel remaining red hot for months. I'm not sure the thermal properties of this stuff, but I know things less hot than fuel oil can force clay to stay hot enough to explode from thermal shock for almost 24 hours after you shut the heat off... ever work with a kiln? I'd be interested in seeing the exact burn time, temperature, mass of steel (thermal mass...), surface exposure, air flow, and ambient temperature. For several hundred tons of molten liquid red flowing steel in a big pool at earth in the cool air, the biggest heat sink is going to be the ground; I'm not sure the thermal conductive properties of the earth itself there, but with just air cooling that shit would stay hot for a fucking long time. It'd lose temperature fast in the beginning, but once it solidified it's going to cool much, much more slowly. I have doubts it would glow red for months at any starting temperature, though.

      By the way, burning filing cabinets? Fuel oil? A Boeing 747 can accept about 400,000 pounds of JP6 Kerosene fuel, but often flies on around 125,000 pounds. Could you imagine 100,000 pounds of kerosene burning? They brought in two of these fuckers to burn that building... no wonder the damn supports buckled, do you realize how fucking hot diesel is compared to an unaccelerated hotel fire? Hell, it's twice as hot (measured from absolute zero-- it's got twice the energy density as a fuel, maybe more) as an ethanol fire.

    14. Re:ham operators by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Ok, you're right about that one. I was thinking of the ones who claim that the terrorists were actually somehow working for the US government, or somehow pushed into their actions by the government, and that Al-Qaeda isn't real. Not that I believe this idea, but it's not a question of science or physics. It's completely possible that the 9/11 hijackers were working for the government, and it was all a big scheme to support Bush's wars. Again, it's pretty far-fetched, but the only way to disprove it (unlike the idea that the buildings couldn't have been destroyed just by the planes) is to somehow look back into time and verify that they were really put up to it by Osama. With the fuel thing, all you have to do is an engineering analysis to disprove it, which anyone qualified can do.

  17. crank it by cifey · · Score: 1

    perhaps if they cranked it up or put a few more towers it would kill the nerve cells that are bothering every one.

    --
    Hello Cruel World
  18. oh, put your head in the oven by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    spray a giant amount of oven cleaner in the oven, and, most importantly, because this is what makes it work: put the magnetic bands on your wrists immediately. stick your head in the oven and take a few deep centering breaths while chanting the sacred mantras. i find myself going on deeply spiritual vision quests for a few minutes. i wake up on the floor and i can feel the magnetic bands vibrating in the negative chi energy dimension aligning with the crystals

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:oh, put your head in the oven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, spray some of the oven cleaner in your foil hat before you put it on.

    2. Re:oh, put your head in the oven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn man... I just tried that, and you're *RIGHT*, plus... the only problem is that it seems my microwave doesn't work anymore.

  19. Flu vaccine by EsJay · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clearly the culprit is mercury from flu vaccines

    1. Re:Flu vaccine by nschubach · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great... first they put tracking RFIDs in the vaccines, now mercury?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:Flu vaccine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone should tell Jenny McCarthy that there's a vaccine to cure autism.

      They should also be prepared with a video recorder so that everyone can watch her head explode on YouTube.

  20. Counter suit? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    My question is... will the company be able to sue the people in the community for economic damages?

    This sort of stupidity would be much less of a problem if people were held accountable for the nonsense they disseminate.

    At the very least, people like this should be put on a pedestal for other people to point and laugh at.

    The same goes for people who still believe that the earth is flat, and people who say that Y2K was a fraud because 'nothing happened'.

  21. Hey, the placebo effect is very real! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It doesn't matter that the actual tower is completely inert. What people believe about it absolutely can cause headaches, nausea and sleeplessness. You can replicate this effect very easily by giving people sugar pills and telling them that they will lower their blood pressure, but have side effects like headaches, nausea and sleeplessness. The people who eat those inert pills really will sleep less and have more real headaches. It's not because they're somehow crazy. All humans, including the readers of slashdot, are susceptible to placebo effects.

    1. Re:Hey, the placebo effect is very real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not!

    2. Re:Hey, the placebo effect is very real! by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      The placebo effect is mitigated by information. The only way to "treat" the hypochondriacs was to tell them after the fact that their symptoms had been caused by a completely inert tower.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    3. Re:Hey, the placebo effect is very real! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And it’s obvious that people who actually believe in gods, wonders, and other stuff that is detached from reality, are more easily caught in such a delusion. Doesn’t mean they are bad humans. (Mainly because there is no “bad” or “good”. It just is what it is.)

      If you want to do something about it, try to find out why they flee from reality into a fantasy world, and fix that. I think that’s nicer than just calling them idiots...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:Hey, the placebo effect is very real! by rev_sanchez · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about a better lie? I say that the technical crowd starts telling people that towers that give off electromagnetic signals cause increased libido in laboratory mice. Then your biggest problem is people tresspassing to screw under the towers but you can also sell wireless routers in sexed-up packaging in adult novelty stores for a tidy profit.

      --
      If you didn't come to party don't bother knocking on my door. Prince '1999'
    5. Re:Hey, the placebo effect is very real! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Couple getting heavy under the microwave tower:

      "My god, you do have great balls of fire!"

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Hey, the placebo effect is very real! by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Placebo is the wonder drug! It can be used to treat EVERYTHING - albeit not always as effectively - at a fraction of the cost and with roughly the same (often much fewer) side effects.

      Placebo Extra Strength: Now available without a prescription!
      =Smidge=

    7. Re:Hey, the placebo effect is very real! by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      Oh if only I had mod points. Effing brilliant!

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    8. Re:Hey, the placebo effect is very real! by illu · · Score: 1

      It can't be a fraction of the cost ! If it's too cheap then obviously it's medication that won't work and you just counter-placedboed your placebo effect :(

    9. Re:Hey, the placebo effect is very real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter that the actual tower is completely inert. What people believe about it absolutely can cause headaches, nausea and sleeplessness. You can replicate this effect very easily by giving people sugar pills and telling them that they will lower their blood pressure, but have side effects like headaches, nausea and sleeplessness. The people who eat those inert pills really will sleep less and have more real headaches. It's not because they're somehow crazy. All humans, including the readers of slashdot, are susceptible to placebo effects.

      Where can I get one of these inert pills?

    10. Re:Hey, the placebo effect is very real! by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Your post fu is mighty today.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  22. please mod parent up! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    hilarious dead on troll or hilarious WHOOOSH! over the head, either way its funny

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  23. Embarrassed? Doubt it. by GradiusCVK · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think people who go around complaining all day about their electric field allergies are the type who care about their image in the community. Chronic victims crave attention, positive or negative - these people will no doubt end up on the local news talking about how stupid they are because of the way society has abused them over the years.

  24. meta, dude. very meta by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    I used to think I was a hypochondriac...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:meta, dude. very meta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Till you met the man who has everything?

  25. The Fringe Tower...... by jameskojiro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Reminds of the Radio tower in Fringe last night that was being used to mess with people's senses to make ugly mutants look normal. Maybe the answer lies in Mutating the residents so they HAVE to live under it otherwise they will be shunned as weird looking mutants......

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  26. A couple of answers.. by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1
    Some answers to be had in Ring TFA.

    Olivier added that anyone who thinks that their legal case is based only on health issues is sorely mistaken, adding that their case is not built on health concerns alone, but rather various other aspects related to the mast, including the public participation and environmental approval processes which they are confident are flawed.

    So "other issues" are in fact environmental...

    According to Olivier residents are now looking at a solution through the Department of Environmental Affairs, and if that fails they will fight the matter in court.

    So the residents certainly don't seem to be after money, as it seems they're just trying to get the tower gone.

    Another resident, Dave McGregor, is also quoted in The Star as saying that his wife and nine-year-old son suffer bouts of nausea and retching, and have developed skin rashes since the erection of the tower. “We’ve told our son that the tower is only switched on one day a week, so it’s not psychosomatic,” McGregor told The Star.

    Now this is interesting, assuming it's true. One answer might be that the son saw his mom still exhibiting symptoms, and did so in response to that. Another answer - one that seems more likely - is that there is something else added to the environment when the tower was installed, which is having a more direct impact.

  27. Just coz they're crazy doesn't mean... by BlackSabbath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Look, these residents may be complete fucking loons but...

    According to TFA, iBurst furnished technical reports proving the tower was turned off in early October.

    In other news, British American Tobacco furnished reports showing that cigarettes have no negative health effects.
    In other news, Exxon furnished reports showing that increases in CO2 are likely to transform the world into a tropical paradise.
    In other news, CIA medical officers report that water-boarding releases calming endorphins in detainees.

    I'm just saying...

    1. Re:Just coz they're crazy doesn't mean... by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      I think there's a pretty big difference between studies showing statistical effects, and a photograph showing that the goddamned tower wasn't even plugged in.

      According to the article in the OP, there was third party confirmation that the tower was turned off.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    2. Re:Just coz they're crazy doesn't mean... by ashridah · · Score: 1

      Seems like it'd be reasonably easy to independently verify this. If it was off, then the power company should be able to show a difference in consumption. Since when has the power company ever not micro-measured usage? :P

    3. Re:Just coz they're crazy doesn't mean... by sourICE · · Score: 1

      Good thing photographs display every moment in time for any object having it's picture taken and good thing power cables can't be unplugged.

      Oh yeah, it's also a good thing that all third-parties tell the complete truth in all circumstances.

      I guess that confirms everything, the power was never on.

  28. i like to slip a few niacin pills in their food by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    you know, like 4 of those 500 gram ones. odorless, tasteless, and colorless, but boy oh boy!: sure to bring on a huge case of the niacin flush and those itchy eye watering hives all over the body and the nausea. since they don't know what is going on, i tell them i poisoned them and they have 30 minutes to live and so they better tell me the truth about my ex or where the money is, etc. i got a few to admit some really hilarious felonies in that condition

    it backfired once where the guy picked up the steak knife and was hellbent on getting his revenge before he "died", so i had to off him for real, but otherwise, when the massive flush of hives and sometimes vomitting recedes 3 hours later, my friends always get a good laugh out of it and think i'm so freaking hilarious you wouldn't believe it

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i like to slip a few niacin pills in their food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's pretty funny, but all kidding aside, you can blow out someones liver like that if it wasn't in great shape to begin with.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulminant_hepatic_failure

    2. Re:i like to slip a few niacin pills in their food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's pretty funny, but all kidding aside, you can blow out someones liver like that if it wasn't in great shape to begin with.

      Well, I think it would be hard not to notice a 500g pill that must be about the size of half a brick, so it's rather improbable someone would ingest it to begin with...

  29. I always thought this was BS by yabos · · Score: 1

    This also reminds me of the people who complain that the wind turbines put near their house 500m or more away cause them mysterious ailments. Someone should do an experiment where they erect a new tower but don't actually turn it on in the first place and see what happens. My guess is it'll be just like this where people all of a sudden think they are getting sick from a towering non powered antenna.

  30. I Moved Away from a Tower by moehoward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recently moved away from a cell antenna site that was placed within 100 feet of my kids' bedrooms (by literal distance, not just horizontal). When the site was proposed, I googled the research and then I spoke with the scientists regarding possible dangers. They were more than happy to speak with me over the phone. The advice was that there are no longitudinal studies, so they can't say what might happen when growing up so close to a site. That is, they need 10-30 years to actually conduct these longitudinal studies. They said "no problem" regarding the older analog stuff, but they said that there are stats that can't yet be explained. That is, there is a correlation for problems, but they can't figure out the causation when it comes to this multiplexing digital stuff. The ongoing research efforts seem to stress DNA replication (mitosis) errors and later meiosis. So, this would be of particular concern to kids and young adults where you have lots of both going on in particularly interesting parts of the body, like the three B's (brain, bones, balls).

    The really cool thing is that the scientists were more than happy to speak with me. I do the same thing in my line of work. When an interested person calls, I geek-out and am more than happy to take the call and spend the time.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
  31. Wow, nice excluded middle fallacy there Holmes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Either it's placebo from seeing the tower (like a hypochondriac) or they're out for a quick buck. I Vote quick buck.

    Historically, the cause of these problems has almost always the indiscriminate overuse of herbicides during tower construction.

    Usually, the parent company that contracted for erection of the tower or pole is not even aware that the contractors used 10,000 times the recommended concentration of herbicide because "more must be better, right?".

    You pretty much have to do on-the-spot soil sampling to confirm this. The local people who actually sprayed will deny everything, because if they don't the local people who are suffering will lynch them.

    If no real testing has been done, you have no evidence. You need blood samples and soil samples and you need them as soon as possible - after a year it will be impossible to prove or disprove anything.

    But hey, don't let me interfere with the pile-on here... I can think of ten other plausible scenarios but apparently people would rather mock than sympathize.

    1. Re:Wow, nice excluded middle fallacy there Holmes. by ZSpade · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why I got modded informative really, I was making a joke - hence the title. Though If I had mod points I certainly would have given one to your retort - very informative.

      --
      Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
  32. Teach iBurst a lesson in land purchases by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

    Next time, buy a piece of land that is not a toxic waste site. No wonder it was cheap land.

    --
    jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
  33. The sun by Jessified · · Score: 2, Funny

    My vote is we work on a plan to put out the sun, the number one source of electromagnetic radiation.

    Who's with me?

  34. Goldbrick's Syndrome by Hasai · · Score: 1

    I nominate Goldbrick's Syndrome.

    Also known as: SomethingForNothingitis, the Easy Street Flu, and the Gravy Train Trots.

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

  35. A better article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems to be a more level-headed analysis of the situation in South Africa:

    http://www.techcentral.co.za/fourways-residents-vow-to-pursue-iburst-matter/12210/

  36. Goldbrick's Syndrome by Hasai · · Score: 1

    I nominate Goldbrick's Syndrome; also variously known as SomethingForNothingitis, Easy Street Flu, and the Gravy Train Trots.

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

  37. Who the hell named that thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, iBurst?

    I Burst (open into a mist of meat when this thing is turned on)
    (When they turn on the tower I had an) Eye Burst

    LOL

  38. Dear resident, by gd2shoe · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Dear resident,

    You may have noticed that we have recently broken ground on our new electronic communications tower. You will be pleased to note that the eyesore will not cause headaches, nausea, tinnitus, or dry burning itchy skin. Further,there is no way it could possibly disrupt sleep patterns or interfere with digestion. People who have claimed otherwise are loons. Besides, they've only been exposed to other towers and not this one.

    If you notice any health changes, we're sure that you'll find they are imaginary or stress induced. We encourage you to find a responsible health care professional. If they tell you that our tower is involved then they are not responsible health care professionals and can be sued for malpractice.

    Have a good day!

    (Note to mods, this parody is a joke. If you didn't get the joke, step away from the computer and don't come back until you get "more smarter".)

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    1. Re:Dear resident, by toadlife · · Score: 1

      I was going to mod you funny, but then you ruined it by insulting my intelligence at the end.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  39. Can we give the witchcraft angle a rest? by Medievalist · · Score: 0, Troll

    The people complaining are white and according to Google maps live in a walled community with swimming pools and hot tubs. So y'all can stop giggling about your "ignorant benighted darkies who fear witchcraft" meme now.

    I guess there's no use pointing out that these people might have been hit by wind-blown soil sterilants when the tower was put up, and that their alleged symptoms are consistent with accidental exposure to chemical toxins. God forbid anyone should suggest a rational solution that doesn't involve EMF, hypochondria or corporate malice.

    1. Re:Can we give the witchcraft angle a rest? by mjwalshe · · Score: 1
      "live in a walled community with swimming pools and hot tubs"

      ah a light dawns Nimbys well at least its probaly replaced pool side conversations about how the "bleks" are ruining the country :-)

  40. As posted before... by jupiter909 · · Score: 1

    Last year I posted this:
    "I'm willing to give this lady R10,000 CASH if she passes a double blind test in telling me when a tower is on or off. South Africa needs a James Randi, Penn n Teller, aka BS debunker."
    10,000 in South Africa rand is about $1350 as of writing.
    http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthread.php?p=3360119#post3360119

  41. There's a word for this... by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

    Luddites. My guess is they are more concerned with a tower being there than any actual problems.

    --

    -]Phreak Out[-
  42. joking on Slashdot by gd2shoe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If the shoe fits... (I do emphasize that I said "if you didn't get the joke".)

    I discovered long ago that any joke I posted on Slashdot was always modded down by the incompetent unless I explicitly stated that I was joking. I don't need to be modded up on a joke, but I hate it when I get modded down because someone else cannot see the obvious.

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    1. Re:joking on Slashdot by gd2shoe · · Score: 0, Troll

      Comment Moderation sent by Slashdot Message System on Friday January 15, @04:05PM Dear resident,, posted to Tower Switch-Off Embarrasses Electrosensitives, has been moderated Overrated (-1).

      OK jerk. (not toadlife, obviously, unless he's using multiple accounts)

      You've now successfully proven that joking on Slashdot is always dangerous to karma. I hope you're happy. Why don't you try making the world a better place? It's enjoyable too, believe it or not.

      ("happy"... reminds me of people who kick puppies and drown kittens. Such people don't know the meaning of the word "happy".)

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  43. Double Negative by VocationalZero · · Score: 1

    Obviously they should tell people they are now running it in reverse or switched the polarity or something so everyone can feel awesome.

  44. Re:"The case will continue..Or What Would Bono Do? by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Maybe U2 will hold a show for the benefit of South African Electosissytivity syndrome.
    He could then extol the virtues of communication via log drums instead of this modern communications menace we are forcing on a beautiful society of Mandellas charity sponges.
    Who are we to take the music from these people and attack them electronically, filling them with our evil western ways. This is a land where a man takes his fallen brothers place. Bravely in the face of disease he will fulfull his dead brothers obligation to extend his family out 10 more kids and not forget his own. Who are we to call their superstitions religion? or whatever.
              Lets just all hold hands and sing....

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  45. then sue the churches as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps this proves that "electrosensitivity" is more mental than tangible.... The issue that remains is if a company can be held responsible for the mental anguish that it indirectly caused. (I mention indirectly, because the act of constructing a tower isn't directly changing peoples mental condition, it's simply "turning on" something that may have been there)... Either way, it should be interesting to see how this pans out...

    Then I want to sue the churches for mental anguish. They spent years telling me as a child, "If your not a christian your going to burn forever." and "the rapture could happen any day!". That shit's pretty terrifying for a child.

  46. You forgot to look back ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    ... And that's where you should check at all times when married ;)

    [commercial pitch] Thinkgeek has some handy mirrors for that ..[/commercial pitch]

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  47. I like your approach a lot better ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    ... Plastic & Eggs would taste like shit anyways!

    Who on earth would eat eggs .. yuck!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  48. Mod Parent Interesting ;-J by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1

    Agree, and you have stated your opinion as "fact"