1. Make an act of thanksgiving that you're not dealing with code written by someone trained in FORTRAN, where all variable names are two characters long and all function names are six characters long. "You can write FORTRAN in any language." If you do happen to be dealing with FORTRANesque code, give up now.
2. Become familiar with the idioms of every programming language, of every programming paradigm (structured, object-oriented, functional, event-driven, dataflow, etc.), and of every programmer educational background (high school/self-taught, CS degree, startup pressure cooker, etc.). If you don't have time to do that prior to starting on the current project, then let your attempt to reverse engineer the current project serve as a building block for the next time.
The MPEG standards track (that eventually became the digital HDTV standards) was "in-the-works" in the mid 90's (not the 80's).
DIgital or no, the sense in the 80's was that HDTV was "just around the corner". On CompuServe's Consumer Electronics Forum (CEFORUM), we were all agonizing over whether to buy new televisions, or wait for the HDTV's to come out. The forum moderator, Marc Weilage, chided us that HDTV would not be able available in the next 10 years, although I doubt even he thought it would take 20 years. Although CEFORUM archives are not available, a 1989 UseNet post shows one of the hot topics of the day in HDTV standards definition: square pixels (to satisfy computer users) vs. rectangular pixels (to satisfy broadcasters, presumably for backward compatibility, interlace, and bandwidth issues).
The 1998 alt.video.dvd FAQ thought it necessary to include the question, "Will DVD support Digital TV (HDTV)?" Some people thought that by buying a DVD player, they were preparing for the HDTV future.
Brief? LaserDisc was available for almost as long as VHS, having come out in 1978 compared to VHS's 1976. DVD killed them both circa 2000. Coupled with a $10,000 Kloss projection TV, LaserDisc ushered in "home theater" 20 years before DVD made the term popular. (In fact, LaserDisc had been out for so long, the release of DVD caused a collective groan due to the market confusion it created over whether its 480p was "hi-def" and the delay in HDTV standard that had been in the works since the 80's.)
Target house brand box red wine. That's right, you buy it at Target (at locations where they're allowed to sell wine).
The three varieties, Merlot, Shiraz, and blend are all good. It's like the best $12 bottle you've ever had -- not a typical $12 bottle, the best. The box is $16 and contains the equivalent of four bottles, of course with the self-sealing spigot and collapsing plastic bladder to prevent oxidation. Stays fresh for weeks or even months after opening -- provides a glass a day for three weeks.
I consider PDF to be powerful because it can contain JavaScript, and even embedded mouse-driven interactive animated 3D. I consider PDF to be a lateral alternative to embedding JavaScript in XML as I presented.
I agree, self-describing formats, such as the Voyager pixel image and the Contact engineering diagrams, are interesting. They solve the extreme of the problem, in a survivalist way. It's the bomb shelter level of planning, whereas it would be reasonable for most people to instead just stock 7-30 days of provisions on a shelf. A shelf is convenient, as is a data file that executes itself against a widely-available interpreter.
Yes, I see the chain of operating systems as the solution just for the closed source world, and I'm hoping those days are behind us or soon will be.
In my presentation, you'll see that the strategy of embedding XSL in an XML file has the code in the top half and the data in the bottom half, clearly delineated. They are easily separable. But by having them in a single file, they will not get separated by someone copying them.
So when distributing an old OpenOffice file I should also put OpenOffice?
OpenOffice should have an option to save to an XML file that includes an embedded XSL/HTML5/JavaScript viewer program as I described in my presentation.
The likely long-term viability of PDF does not discredit the long-term viability of JavaScript.
You agree with Vint Cerf about PowerPoint 97 being an archival format. I disagree with him. As I wrote, I believe software archives will maintain VMs, copies of OS's, and copies of Microsoft Office due to the historical installed base of tens of millions.
The question is whether you would be able to find a JavaScript interpreter on a search engine in 2100. I believe the answer is "yes," because it was an important (by installed base) piece of software. Admittedly, it won't help you in an apocalyptic scenario.
The installed base of any given NDT system is typically less than Qty. 100, often much less. The installed base of HTML5 interpreters is on the order of a billion. The installed base of PowerPoint 97 at its peak was in the tens of millions. To be honest, I think Vint Cerf is complaining a bit much. Anyone (including him) could download the appropriate VMs, archival operating systems, and archival Microsoft Office systems to read PowerPoint 97 and even convert it to a modern format where the file could even be further edited and modified. In his search to provide an example, I don't think Vint Cerf came up with a good one.
A life-critical system with an installed base of less than 100 where the data must be preserved for 50 years is a better example, and answers your question: why code can be more useful than data. Code from an installed base of 100 is useful if it relies upon software that had an installed base of a billion.
I presented a solution to this long-standing problem last year to the Denver HTML5 Meetup.
Code should never be separated from data. This is possible with HTML5, JavaScript, and open source.
In the presentation, I steal and repurpose Hofstadter's analogy of DNA to an LP vinyl record, which is an information bearer, but useless without its information retriever (the record player). Like the cell of an animal, which contains both DNA and the means to "play" it, I ask why not the same with software?
My maxim is: data should always carry the code with it to play itself. It was inspired from the field I've spent 50% of my career in: non-destructive testing where, for example, X-Rays and ultrasounds are performed on safety-critical industrial parts with 50-year service lives. If one of those parts fails and kills someone, you're going to want to go back into the old data and find the earliest indication of the flaw or fault and reinspect every other part in the world like it that is still in service. And maybe you need to go back 50 years. Under such a context, not providing the code with the data could be considered an act of gross neglect.
In my presentation, I use the 1990's era trick of embedding XSL into an XML file, with the addition of the XSL now being able to use HTML5/JavaScript. Sadly, I've only gotten it work with Firefox -- the other browsers consider it a security violation.
I really don't understand why people are even discussing this anymore. I have this game, it sucked, it was 20 something years ago - no one should care. Moon Patrol was the shit.
Indeed, that is why the previously linked arstechnica.com story includes:
reports suggest the dump may also contain unsold consoles, PCs, and even prototypes of the Atari Mindlink controller
The "oh we'll find 3.5 million copies of E.T." is just the satire -- that they'll have to dig through waist-deep crap to get to the gems.
Lotus Notes may well be the worst piece of software ever to exist
Lotus Notes was awesome before IBM bought it, and before the web seemingly made it obsolete. But replacements for Notes are only just recently appearing, such as Drupal and Joomla. That's right, what was called "groupware" back in the 90's is called CMS now. And Notes was decades ahead in terms of CMS back in the 90's. But then IBM bought it and its original vision was lost.
If the Copyright Act of 1790 were still in force, the first version of Lotus Notes 1-2-3 Millennium Edition from 1998 would have become public domain last year.
Some offices don't even bother with Ethernet cabling anymore; they just use WiFi. This was unheard of 15 years ago, when Slashdot users were no doubt grousing about their homebuilder's oversight for not incorporating Ethernet into their homes during construction.
I predict 15 years from now, the constant need to be tethered to A/C will be obviated, either through wireless recharging, through improved device charge capacity, or through increased energy efficiency.
The spacing of the films -- every few years -- is supposed to be the opportunity for epic character and situational changes, for tragedy and redemption. Star Trek II-IV was an epic trilogy. Star Trek VI was kind of epic, due to the tie-ins to TNG and DS9. Star Trek VIII was epic. Star Trek 2009 was obviously epic.
The rest are just episodes -- everything gets resolved in a single movie with the universe completely unchanged. Star Trek VII was not epic even though Kirk died -- he didn't really die in a tragic way critical to the plot; he was just unceremoniously killed off. Plus it was a bad movie all the way around.
Thus, I liken Into The Darkness to Nemesis and Insurrection. It's just an episode.
I feel Abrams and the script writers were just rushed due to all the delays, and didn't have time to allow their collective creativity to be fully manifested.
Oh, it was a good movie. But it was an episode, not an epic.
By the 1980s the Soviet Union had matched the United States in military might and far surpassed it in the production of steel, timber, concrete, and oil. But the electronic whirlwind that was transforming the global economy had been locked out by communist leaders. Heirs to an old Russian tradition of censorship, they had banned photocopiers, prohibited accurate maps, and controlled word-for-word even the scripts of stand-up comedians. In this compellingly readable firsthand account, filled with memorable characters, revealing vignettes, and striking statistics, Scott Shane tells the story of Mikhail Gorbachev's attempt to "renew socialism" by easing information controls. As newspapers, television, books, films, and videotapes flooded the country with information about the Stalinist past, the communist present, and life in the rest of the world, the Soviet system was driven to ruin. Shane's unique perspective also places one of the century's momentous events in larger context: the universal struggle of governments to keep information from the people, and the irresistible power of technology over history.
Slashdot Mirror
Two steps:
1. Make an act of thanksgiving that you're not dealing with code written by someone trained in FORTRAN, where all variable names are two characters long and all function names are six characters long. "You can write FORTRAN in any language." If you do happen to be dealing with FORTRANesque code, give up now.
2. Become familiar with the idioms of every programming language, of every programming paradigm (structured, object-oriented, functional, event-driven, dataflow, etc.), and of every programmer educational background (high school/self-taught, CS degree, startup pressure cooker, etc.). If you don't have time to do that prior to starting on the current project, then let your attempt to reverse engineer the current project serve as a building block for the next time.
DIgital or no, the sense in the 80's was that HDTV was "just around the corner". On CompuServe's Consumer Electronics Forum (CEFORUM), we were all agonizing over whether to buy new televisions, or wait for the HDTV's to come out. The forum moderator, Marc Weilage, chided us that HDTV would not be able available in the next 10 years, although I doubt even he thought it would take 20 years. Although CEFORUM archives are not available, a 1989 UseNet post shows one of the hot topics of the day in HDTV standards definition: square pixels (to satisfy computer users) vs. rectangular pixels (to satisfy broadcasters, presumably for backward compatibility, interlace, and bandwidth issues).
The 1998 alt.video.dvd FAQ thought it necessary to include the question, "Will DVD support Digital TV (HDTV)?" Some people thought that by buying a DVD player, they were preparing for the HDTV future.
FTFA:
Brief? LaserDisc was available for almost as long as VHS, having come out in 1978 compared to VHS's 1976. DVD killed them both circa 2000. Coupled with a $10,000 Kloss projection TV, LaserDisc ushered in "home theater" 20 years before DVD made the term popular. (In fact, LaserDisc had been out for so long, the release of DVD caused a collective groan due to the market confusion it created over whether its 480p was "hi-def" and the delay in HDTV standard that had been in the works since the 80's.)
Looks like it'll be great fun for pets and kids alike to roll around on the floor.
This, I believe, is the first time an acronym has been expanded in a Slashdot summary.
Target house brand box red wine. That's right, you buy it at Target (at locations where they're allowed to sell wine).
The three varieties, Merlot, Shiraz, and blend are all good. It's like the best $12 bottle you've ever had -- not a typical $12 bottle, the best. The box is $16 and contains the equivalent of four bottles, of course with the self-sealing spigot and collapsing plastic bladder to prevent oxidation. Stays fresh for weeks or even months after opening -- provides a glass a day for three weeks.
A viewer that complies with W3C standards for HTML5/JavaScript.
I consider PDF to be powerful because it can contain JavaScript, and even embedded mouse-driven interactive animated 3D. I consider PDF to be a lateral alternative to embedding JavaScript in XML as I presented.
I agree, self-describing formats, such as the Voyager pixel image and the Contact engineering diagrams, are interesting. They solve the extreme of the problem, in a survivalist way. It's the bomb shelter level of planning, whereas it would be reasonable for most people to instead just stock 7-30 days of provisions on a shelf. A shelf is convenient, as is a data file that executes itself against a widely-available interpreter.
Yes, I see the chain of operating systems as the solution just for the closed source world, and I'm hoping those days are behind us or soon will be.
In my presentation, you'll see that the strategy of embedding XSL in an XML file has the code in the top half and the data in the bottom half, clearly delineated. They are easily separable. But by having them in a single file, they will not get separated by someone copying them.
OpenOffice should have an option to save to an XML file that includes an embedded XSL/HTML5/JavaScript viewer program as I described in my presentation.
The likely long-term viability of PDF does not discredit the long-term viability of JavaScript.
You agree with Vint Cerf about PowerPoint 97 being an archival format. I disagree with him. As I wrote, I believe software archives will maintain VMs, copies of OS's, and copies of Microsoft Office due to the historical installed base of tens of millions.
The question is whether you would be able to find a JavaScript interpreter on a search engine in 2100. I believe the answer is "yes," because it was an important (by installed base) piece of software. Admittedly, it won't help you in an apocalyptic scenario.
It's an issue of installed base.
The installed base of any given NDT system is typically less than Qty. 100, often much less. The installed base of HTML5 interpreters is on the order of a billion. The installed base of PowerPoint 97 at its peak was in the tens of millions. To be honest, I think Vint Cerf is complaining a bit much. Anyone (including him) could download the appropriate VMs, archival operating systems, and archival Microsoft Office systems to read PowerPoint 97 and even convert it to a modern format where the file could even be further edited and modified. In his search to provide an example, I don't think Vint Cerf came up with a good one.
A life-critical system with an installed base of less than 100 where the data must be preserved for 50 years is a better example, and answers your question: why code can be more useful than data. Code from an installed base of 100 is useful if it relies upon software that had an installed base of a billion.
I presented a solution to this long-standing problem last year to the Denver HTML5 Meetup.
Code should never be separated from data. This is possible with HTML5, JavaScript, and open source.
In the presentation, I steal and repurpose Hofstadter's analogy of DNA to an LP vinyl record, which is an information bearer, but useless without its information retriever (the record player). Like the cell of an animal, which contains both DNA and the means to "play" it, I ask why not the same with software?
My maxim is: data should always carry the code with it to play itself. It was inspired from the field I've spent 50% of my career in: non-destructive testing where, for example, X-Rays and ultrasounds are performed on safety-critical industrial parts with 50-year service lives. If one of those parts fails and kills someone, you're going to want to go back into the old data and find the earliest indication of the flaw or fault and reinspect every other part in the world like it that is still in service. And maybe you need to go back 50 years. Under such a context, not providing the code with the data could be considered an act of gross neglect.
In my presentation, I use the 1990's era trick of embedding XSL into an XML file, with the addition of the XSL now being able to use HTML5/JavaScript. Sadly, I've only gotten it work with Firefox -- the other browsers consider it a security violation.
Just to clarify: crude by the standards of 1982, when the E.T. game was released, not by the standards of 1977 when the console was released.
Indeed, that is why the previously linked arstechnica.com story includes:
The "oh we'll find 3.5 million copies of E.T." is just the satire -- that they'll have to dig through waist-deep crap to get to the gems.
Looks blocky, like they were modeling after a small Lego model kit rather than an X-Wing as portray in the movies.
I don't recall Lotus Notes pre-IBM having calendaring.
Lotus Notes was awesome before IBM bought it, and before the web seemingly made it obsolete. But replacements for Notes are only just recently appearing, such as Drupal and Joomla. That's right, what was called "groupware" back in the 90's is called CMS now. And Notes was decades ahead in terms of CMS back in the 90's. But then IBM bought it and its original vision was lost.
If the Copyright Act of 1790 were still in force, the first version of Lotus Notes 1-2-3 Millennium Edition from 1998 would have become public domain last year.
Some offices don't even bother with Ethernet cabling anymore; they just use WiFi. This was unheard of 15 years ago, when Slashdot users were no doubt grousing about their homebuilder's oversight for not incorporating Ethernet into their homes during construction.
I predict 15 years from now, the constant need to be tethered to A/C will be obviated, either through wireless recharging, through improved device charge capacity, or through increased energy efficiency.
SPOILERS
The spacing of the films -- every few years -- is supposed to be the opportunity for epic character and situational changes, for tragedy and redemption. Star Trek II-IV was an epic trilogy. Star Trek VI was kind of epic, due to the tie-ins to TNG and DS9. Star Trek VIII was epic. Star Trek 2009 was obviously epic.
The rest are just episodes -- everything gets resolved in a single movie with the universe completely unchanged. Star Trek VII was not epic even though Kirk died -- he didn't really die in a tragic way critical to the plot; he was just unceremoniously killed off. Plus it was a bad movie all the way around.
Thus, I liken Into The Darkness to Nemesis and Insurrection. It's just an episode.
I feel Abrams and the script writers were just rushed due to all the delays, and didn't have time to allow their collective creativity to be fully manifested.
Oh, it was a good movie. But it was an episode, not an epic.
No matter how many digits King Louis XIV had in his bank account, he was still limited by the speed of horses for transportation and communication.
"Immortality" will probably happen within this century or millennium.
But then, we're ultimately limited by available matter/energy in the universe.
Jupiter is no longer consider "alien"? I take this as evidence that people have already secretly colonized Jupiter.
Dismantling Utopia: How Information Ended the Soviet Union
Synopsis from Google Books, emphasis added:
As I write whenever the topic of smartphone muggings come up:
In the 70's, people were held up for their watch and cash (remember cash?). Different decade, different stuff.