I saw this one pop up in my RSS feed and thought maybe/. was broken. Then I went through the comments and realized it wasn't a repost of something old, nor was it really anything new. It was something in between.
I don't know when/. devolved into what it is today, as I've been reading for years now. It's always had a bit of an anti-MS twist to it, and while I didn't always agree with the article bias, I could see how it could be used as constructive criticism for not just MS, but for other companies as well. When you're the 800-lb gorilla, people notice you. When you're the 800-lb gorilla and you tie your shoes together and fall, other people tend to not tie their shoes together.
This post doesn't really fall into a constructive criticism category, though. It's pure, unadulterated, trolling. I mean the source is a joke. It has to be. The "author" of that blog clearly understands computers. Ed's written over 30 books on software use. He's just griping about something everyone already understands. A slow news day. It happens.
By why, oh why, do the editors here feel the need to pick it up and make it front-page news along with news of Ozone holes, Corn shortages and Social Engineering your way into the Super Bowl? Those are nerdy news stories. This... is not. If you wanted to fill up the front page with stories like this, you should be including the following gems:
- Windows 8 installation DVDs; easily scratched by nails?
- Magnets prove harmful to MS Office installations
- Microsoft Surface Pro sells better than expected; maybe it isn't so bad? (just kidding)
I don't expect this post to actually get anything done, but I'm making it just the same. Something has to change around here. While I know I'm just a drop in the bucket (just like I am with AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and T-Mobile...who I loathe), I'm out. My Excellent Karma, ad-viewing eyes, and borderline nostalgic insightfulness are out. I don't intend on letting the door hit me on the way out, either.
I'm guessing you've not used Visual Studio, SQL Server Management Studio, MS Office, Windows 8 or any other MS product. When you install an app that has ties to the "Customer Experience Improvement" stuff, there is a handy balloon at the bottom of your taskbar which invites you to click to opt out. If you dismiss the balloon, the icon in your systray stays there showing that you're collecting data.
I'm not sure how much more upfront you can get. Honestly. (And I opt out immediately for anything I use.)
Re:Here we see the difference between Free and Sla
on
OS X Mountain Lion Review
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Your analysis is like an analogy of an airline passenger. You can choose to be a consumer and fly one of the major airlines. You get the seats the give you and the snacks they serve. You don't get to pick the flight path to your destination, and you don't get to pick your own schedule. To "best the system", you went to get your own pilot's license. You can fly where you want, when you want and choose the path. You're part of an elite bunch alright.
From up that high, you might not be able to see it, but not everyone has the ability/time/desire to be a pilot. An overwhelming majority of the people who use planes to get from A to B are content with that choice. And frankly, I don't really hear a lot of private pilots droning on about how much better they are that they can fly themselves to somewhere when they want to.
And btw, nobody is free. Don't pretend to be free just because you're a computer enthusiast. You're still a slave to the farmers, the electric company, the sanitation and water sources that feed your house and every other item in your world that you pay for. For you, this may be about freedom and choice and all that other jazz that 90% of the world doesn't care about when it comes to an operating system. If you sleep better at night, then cookie for you. The "Aura of Rightness" that you're projecting just comes off as a bit juvenile, though.
Look people, let's all step back and look at what's going on here./. is an anti-MS site. From the Bill Gates Cyborg, to the inherent bias of the articles published, it's not a fanboi of MS. Let's get over that.
Linux/OSS Fans: Take the feather out of your cap, it doesn't mean anything. It's probably not even valid (just like it is invalid here).
Windows Fans: Stop getting butthurt about these types of articles. The OS market share is there, and that's the revenue generator.
/. would be a lot more fun to read if everyone would just get off their high horse already. Goddamn.
"Attention, busy middle-aged folks. You may be healthy and thin, but if you habitually sleep less than six hours a night, you still could be boosting your risk of a stroke."
That sure grabs a headline, but seriously. What proof do you have that that is the cause? What if there's something broken elsewhere, that we don't know about? That's not nearly as sensational enough for Mainstream Media, though.:(
From a purely "secure from brute force attacks"... yeah, I do think it's a lot different. The main point is to make the length greater than 16. You're never going to fix the social engineering aspect of it, like leaving it on a sticky note on your monitor.
I'm simply addressing the issue from the article - Five Character Passwords Suck.
Um, how about a simple rewording of "Password" to "Passphrase" and make the minimum required length 20 characters.
If you take the utterly easy passphrase of "My favorite password is the word password.", you're talking about 7.1 x 10^61 years to crack it. A measly 20 character phrase would take 1 sextillion years.
And really, from a development side of the coin, implementation doesn't get much simpler. You should already be storing hashes of the passwords, not the passwords themselves. Don't over-think this. Nobody else will.
First step would be to evaluate everything as posted above.
Then build a Action Priority Matrix. It'll help you fit together an action plan and block out time for what appears to be major projects. It also allows you to get some Quickies done to show management you're the right guy to keep doing the job.
Why do we still put a mandate of "liquid water" in the hospitable zone requirement? Are we really naive enough to think that life out there CAN'T POSSIBLY FORM without water?
Even my Samsung Focus hasn't had any issues, and I've been running it since Day 1. It's not an iPhone, but it's pretty damn stable and does everything I need a phone to do.
The last sentence here is probably the biggest thing for me. I got bored of the party games. They were cute at first, but I wanted a game I could sink my teeth into. Something that took 60+ hours to get through. I beat MP3 in what.. 19 hours? Really? 5 nights of gaming for $60? It felt like a ripoff at that point. I wanted something like FF13, Elder Scrolls, hell... anything would have done. Zelda was cool. I love zelda. It was again...too short and shallow.
I won't be hopping on the Wii2 bandwagon until I can see they have games with meat on their bones. Something epic needs to be there for my gamer tastes..
I was wondering the same thing. This isn't AI. This is OCR with a Sodoku solver. Tell me that it solves the puzzle without knowing it's a Sodoku, and we'll drop the AI word.
Oh, I'm on the same boat as you. I didn't even bring up the pat down crap. I don't think that's legit in any way, shape, or form. The photographs from the full-body scan are one thing, physical contact is an entirely new ball of wax.
So, they pull all the money out of security, and something happens? Would that open up the government to lawsuit? My guess would be "oh hell yes, and then some." Where do we sit then?
I'm all for efficient government, but not one that does so by sticking their head in the sand and hoping nothing goes wrong. If there's some other method that is proven more capable at detecting and thwarting terrorist attacks on the airlines, then people should complaining why those AREN'T in use, not why these things ARE in use.
That's cute rhetoric, but really doesn't mean anything. What's not dignified about body scans (under the hypotheticals I posted). What's oppressive about them?
You keep saying this, but it really doesn't convey anything. Grats on the post, though.
Slashdot Mirror
I saw this one pop up in my RSS feed and thought maybe /. was broken. Then I went through the comments and realized it wasn't a repost of something old, nor was it really anything new. It was something in between.
/. devolved into what it is today, as I've been reading for years now. It's always had a bit of an anti-MS twist to it, and while I didn't always agree with the article bias, I could see how it could be used as constructive criticism for not just MS, but for other companies as well. When you're the 800-lb gorilla, people notice you. When you're the 800-lb gorilla and you tie your shoes together and fall, other people tend to not tie their shoes together.
I don't know when
This post doesn't really fall into a constructive criticism category, though. It's pure, unadulterated, trolling. I mean the source is a joke. It has to be. The "author" of that blog clearly understands computers. Ed's written over 30 books on software use. He's just griping about something everyone already understands. A slow news day. It happens.
By why, oh why, do the editors here feel the need to pick it up and make it front-page news along with news of Ozone holes, Corn shortages and Social Engineering your way into the Super Bowl? Those are nerdy news stories. This... is not. If you wanted to fill up the front page with stories like this, you should be including the following gems:
- Windows 8 installation DVDs; easily scratched by nails?
- Magnets prove harmful to MS Office installations
- Microsoft Surface Pro sells better than expected; maybe it isn't so bad? (just kidding)
I don't expect this post to actually get anything done, but I'm making it just the same. Something has to change around here. While I know I'm just a drop in the bucket (just like I am with AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and T-Mobile...who I loathe), I'm out. My Excellent Karma, ad-viewing eyes, and borderline nostalgic insightfulness are out. I don't intend on letting the door hit me on the way out, either.
I'm guessing you've not used Visual Studio, SQL Server Management Studio, MS Office, Windows 8 or any other MS product. When you install an app that has ties to the "Customer Experience Improvement" stuff, there is a handy balloon at the bottom of your taskbar which invites you to click to opt out. If you dismiss the balloon, the icon in your systray stays there showing that you're collecting data.
I'm not sure how much more upfront you can get. Honestly. (And I opt out immediately for anything I use.)
No evidence they weighed as much as a duck....
Your analysis is like an analogy of an airline passenger. You can choose to be a consumer and fly one of the major airlines. You get the seats the give you and the snacks they serve. You don't get to pick the flight path to your destination, and you don't get to pick your own schedule. To "best the system", you went to get your own pilot's license. You can fly where you want, when you want and choose the path. You're part of an elite bunch alright.
From up that high, you might not be able to see it, but not everyone has the ability/time/desire to be a pilot. An overwhelming majority of the people who use planes to get from A to B are content with that choice. And frankly, I don't really hear a lot of private pilots droning on about how much better they are that they can fly themselves to somewhere when they want to.
And btw, nobody is free. Don't pretend to be free just because you're a computer enthusiast. You're still a slave to the farmers, the electric company, the sanitation and water sources that feed your house and every other item in your world that you pay for. For you, this may be about freedom and choice and all that other jazz that 90% of the world doesn't care about when it comes to an operating system. If you sleep better at night, then cookie for you. The "Aura of Rightness" that you're projecting just comes off as a bit juvenile, though.
Look people, let's all step back and look at what's going on here. /. is an anti-MS site. From the Bill Gates Cyborg, to the inherent bias of the articles published, it's not a fanboi of MS. Let's get over that.
/. would be a lot more fun to read if everyone would just get off their high horse already. Goddamn.
Linux/OSS Fans: Take the feather out of your cap, it doesn't mean anything. It's probably not even valid (just like it is invalid here).
Windows Fans: Stop getting butthurt about these types of articles. The OS market share is there, and that's the revenue generator.
FTFA
:(
"Attention, busy middle-aged folks. You may be healthy and thin, but if you habitually sleep less than six hours a night, you still could be boosting your risk of a stroke."
That sure grabs a headline, but seriously. What proof do you have that that is the cause? What if there's something broken elsewhere, that we don't know about? That's not nearly as sensational enough for Mainstream Media, though.
I was also keying off the fact the parent wanted to a reality-based situation. There's relatively little change involved.
From a purely "secure from brute force attacks"... yeah, I do think it's a lot different. The main point is to make the length greater than 16. You're never going to fix the social engineering aspect of it, like leaving it on a sticky note on your monitor.
I'm simply addressing the issue from the article - Five Character Passwords Suck.
Do you really need three?
Um, how about a simple rewording of "Password" to "Passphrase" and make the minimum required length 20 characters.
If you take the utterly easy passphrase of "My favorite password is the word password.", you're talking about 7.1 x 10^61 years to crack it. A measly 20 character phrase would take 1 sextillion years.
And really, from a development side of the coin, implementation doesn't get much simpler. You should already be storing hashes of the passwords, not the passwords themselves. Don't over-think this. Nobody else will.
First step would be to evaluate everything as posted above.
Then build a Action Priority Matrix. It'll help you fit together an action plan and block out time for what appears to be major projects. It also allows you to get some Quickies done to show management you're the right guy to keep doing the job.
http://www.showingnaturally.com/ActionPriorityMatrix.png
No Bing Bar on Win 7.....
Come for the tech, stay for the fiscal policy lectures.
Why do we still put a mandate of "liquid water" in the hospitable zone requirement? Are we really naive enough to think that life out there CAN'T POSSIBLY FORM without water?
Am I just totally nuts here?
Even my Samsung Focus hasn't had any issues, and I've been running it since Day 1. It's not an iPhone, but it's pretty damn stable and does everything I need a phone to do.
You can actually force it down to your phone. This worked on my Focus.
http://www.wpcentral.com/force-mango-update-early-through-zune-software
http://www.wpcentral.com/force-mango-update-early-through-zune-software
Worked on my Samsung Focus
Agreed. It's really tough to make a case when you don't have a set of three.
Thanks for the heads up.
*Drops Mrs. Lattimer from her plan*
Sincerely,
-Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas
I'll ignore the pun part.
The last sentence here is probably the biggest thing for me. I got bored of the party games. They were cute at first, but I wanted a game I could sink my teeth into. Something that took 60+ hours to get through. I beat MP3 in what.. 19 hours? Really? 5 nights of gaming for $60? It felt like a ripoff at that point. I wanted something like FF13, Elder Scrolls, hell... anything would have done. Zelda was cool. I love zelda. It was again...too short and shallow.
I won't be hopping on the Wii2 bandwagon until I can see they have games with meat on their bones. Something epic needs to be there for my gamer tastes..
Let's not muddy up humor with fact, mmkay? ;)
Who said technology can't be aesthetically pleasing?
Pretty sure it was Roger Ebert.
I was wondering the same thing. This isn't AI. This is OCR with a Sodoku solver. Tell me that it solves the puzzle without knowing it's a Sodoku, and we'll drop the AI word.
Oh, I'm on the same boat as you. I didn't even bring up the pat down crap. I don't think that's legit in any way, shape, or form. The photographs from the full-body scan are one thing, physical contact is an entirely new ball of wax.
I purposefully left that out, btw....
So, they pull all the money out of security, and something happens? Would that open up the government to lawsuit? My guess would be "oh hell yes, and then some." Where do we sit then?
I'm all for efficient government, but not one that does so by sticking their head in the sand and hoping nothing goes wrong. If there's some other method that is proven more capable at detecting and thwarting terrorist attacks on the airlines, then people should complaining why those AREN'T in use, not why these things ARE in use.
That's cute rhetoric, but really doesn't mean anything. What's not dignified about body scans (under the hypotheticals I posted). What's oppressive about them?
You keep saying this, but it really doesn't convey anything. Grats on the post, though.