This sounds like an Inergen type system... the two failings are the particulate matter it stirs up and the vibration caused by the sounds of a freight train rolling through...
This isn't the shoulder, this is the carpool lane on the 405. Notice the double yellow lines on the far side and single yellow on the nearside. Somewhere around 33.990053, -118.400939.
Filters require a tech/truck roll to remove, you would loose the "self install" option and would see the return of setup/install fees for most services/changes.
No argument there if you wish to spawn on access, or just use a frozen image with COW.
However, you failed to read, or at least quote the one line that makes this relatively possible...
It sounds as if this is intended to be on an "infrequent" and "exception" basis.
In other words, allow them to do what they need to do, up to the point it becomes a risk, and then step in. I mean, really, if you have people with a legitimate need to download that much to do their jobs, is it not possible that you may have a poorly spec'd image for your systems?
So far it seems everyone is trying to bring "open internet" to the users computer... why?
It sounds as if this is intended to be on an "infrequent" and "exception" basis.
Deploy a terminal server in a DMZ, users can then remote in and browse from there. If you want to allow open downloading, provide a restricted AV protected share to retrieve downloaded files, if you do not want to allow open downloading, provide one anyways but require an IT person to review it manually. Reimage nightly if paranoid.
Also, I believe the city had some say in where they started, and in what order zoning/permitting was/is being approved.
Now if you want to go and say they are cherry picking markets as in those where it will do well (big cities), let me show you every commercially available communications advance (POTS with > 28.8, DSLAMs, ISDN, Cell Service, 4G, Cable, Broadband)
Please note that under Section 512(f) any person who knowingly materially misrepresents that material or activity is infringing may be subject to liability for damages. Where YouTube has a good faith belief that a person is materially misrepresenting that material or activity is infringing of their rights or the right of a copyright owner for whom they are authorized to act, YouTube may, in its discretion, not remove the cited content. In this case, we will notify the complainant.
I hope to see a Defamation/Libel case coming to a court room near you!
If you had not posted as AC I may have given this response more effort. No reveling here, just a responsible attitude. How much does Google make off of 1.de user on average, how many emails from annoying entitled freeloaders do they get from.de and what is the cost to handle it all?
Are you saying to take into account the costs is not a valid thought process?
Downside to that is the law applies to all German companies, not just business who publish under.de domains. Additionally it is about Consumers, so one could say you register in the US, but the company has a presence and users in.XX then you have to deal with the laws that cover.XX's users even if they are not paying for it as a.XX user.
Simple solution for Google, claim it as a business loss or start charging for it.
Want a personal reply? Open a Google wallet, €1.75 per email and you get your personal response. Can't charge for it? Any costs associated with complying, go ahead and bill it against the corporation formed in Germany. Once it starts having net losses then close it down and forward the.de domain to somewhere else. Then the only page you publish is a redirect header. Easy to support with 100% accuracy any time in an automated email reply.
They said they will destroy it, either they do or they don't, it doesn't matter because they will do what they choose. But why go handing a copy over to every state who asks for it?
Really, if you're concerned about privacy, you want this information in the LEAST number of hands possible.
From the original complaint, the USPS apparently does treat them differently as far as machine handling... it would be interesting to see what happens.
The issue here is why does GameFly have to jump through hoops and spend alot more on packaging to survive automation even when the class of service they used allows for non-machine sorts, while the other companies get separated for special treatment.
Alot of the questions go to what effort did GameFly invest into research, planning and execution, of the shipping and return process. Things from the material the mailer is produced from to simply how the dvd is secured inside the envelope to prevent shifting through the sorting process.
And the really big question, are you sure they really were "stolen" and not just kept.
I think pretty much all of the questions are valid and while written in legaleze, quite understandable given the severity of the complaint. If GameFly worked with the USPS in planning the mailing portion of their service and co-operated in tracking down these "thefts" before filing this case, then they should have no problems answering every one of them honestly and fully.
Take this example:
You come up with this fantastic way sending data through sewer pipes. You patent it because it's a really unique and inovative idea and since almost everyone has sewer pipes it means you have a huge potential market.
Next you try to market it to Big Company[A-C], they turn you down because they see the market potential but think they can save money building their own then paying to license from you. You now have an idea that you have tried to market but can't.
Finally Company A comes along with their own version of your idea using your process but you don't get a dime.
All because they are big and took your idea and made it their own.
I neither agree or disagree and shall only post one simple fact. ----- /base-files-4.0.1ubuntu5.8.04.2/etc# cat motd
The programs included with the Ubuntu system are free software; the exact distribution terms for each program are described in the individual files in/usr/share/doc/*/copyright.
Ubuntu comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by applicable law.
To access official Ubuntu documentation, please visit: http://help.ubuntu.com/ -----
Slashdot Mirror
This sounds like an Inergen type system... the two failings are the particulate matter it stirs up and the vibration caused by the sounds of a freight train rolling through...
https://youtu.be/yM80eBR_b2w
48 Hours without Google Maps or Waze for the LA Metro area....
This isn't the shoulder, this is the carpool lane on the 405. Notice the double yellow lines on the far side and single yellow on the nearside. Somewhere around 33.990053, -118.400939.
Considering how narrow it is... I'm sorry for him...
Filters require a tech/truck roll to remove, you would loose the "self install" option and would see the return of setup/install fees for most services/changes.
No argument there if you wish to spawn on access, or just use a frozen image with COW.
However, you failed to read, or at least quote the one line that makes this relatively possible...
It sounds as if this is intended to be on an "infrequent" and "exception" basis.
In other words, allow them to do what they need to do, up to the point it becomes a risk, and then step in. I mean, really, if you have people with a legitimate need to download that much to do their jobs, is it not possible that you may have a poorly spec'd image for your systems?
So far it seems everyone is trying to bring "open internet" to the users computer... why?
It sounds as if this is intended to be on an "infrequent" and "exception" basis.
Deploy a terminal server in a DMZ, users can then remote in and browse from there. If you want to allow open downloading, provide a restricted AV protected share to retrieve downloaded files, if you do not want to allow open downloading, provide one anyways but require an IT person to review it manually.
Reimage nightly if paranoid.
Oh and I will hate over ATT for the green soup that our land lines on the poles have turned into without any reinvestment.
let me know the next time Google wires up a violence plagued ghetto somewhere.
https://fiber.google.com/citie...
Oh trust me... there are plenty...
Also, I believe the city had some say in where they started, and in what order zoning/permitting was/is being approved.
Now if you want to go and say they are cherry picking markets as in those where it will do well (big cities), let me show you every commercially available communications advance (POTS with > 28.8, DSLAMs, ISDN, Cell Service, 4G, Cable, Broadband)
Please note that under Section 512(f) any person who knowingly materially misrepresents that material or activity is infringing may be subject to liability for damages. Where YouTube has a good faith belief that a person is materially misrepresenting that material or activity is infringing of their rights or the right of a copyright owner for whom they are authorized to act, YouTube may, in its discretion, not remove the cited content. In this case, we will notify the complainant.
I hope to see a Defamation/Libel case coming to a court room near you!
UT / Longhorns....
If you had not posted as AC I may have given this response more effort. .de user on average, how many emails from annoying entitled freeloaders do they get from .de and what is the cost to handle it all?
No reveling here, just a responsible attitude. How much does Google make off of 1
Are you saying to take into account the costs is not a valid thought process?
Downside to that is the law applies to all German companies, not just business who publish under .de domains. .XX then you have to deal with the laws that cover .XX's users even if they are not paying for it as a .XX user.
Additionally it is about Consumers, so one could say you register in the US, but the company has a presence and users in
Simple solution for Google, claim it as a business loss or start charging for it.
Want a personal reply? Open a Google wallet, €1.75 per email and you get your personal response. .de domain to somewhere else. Then the only page you publish is a redirect header. Easy to support with 100% accuracy any time in an automated email reply.
Can't charge for it? Any costs associated with complying, go ahead and bill it against the corporation formed in Germany. Once it starts having net losses then close it down and forward the
Ok, Google has it...
They said they will destroy it, either they do or they don't, it doesn't matter because they will do what they choose. But why go handing a copy over to every state who asks for it?
Really, if you're concerned about privacy, you want this information in the LEAST number of hands possible.
Obviously anyone with half a brain cell would have named it
Lawrence Livermore Array for Microbial Assessment (LLAMA)
From the original complaint, the USPS apparently does treat them differently as far as machine handling... it would be interesting to see what happens.
The issue here is why does GameFly have to jump through hoops and spend alot more on packaging to survive automation even when the class of service they used allows for non-machine sorts, while the other companies get separated for special treatment.
Alot of the questions go to what effort did GameFly invest into research, planning and execution, of the shipping and return process.
Things from the material the mailer is produced from to simply how the dvd is secured inside the envelope to prevent shifting through the sorting process.
And the really big question, are you sure they really were "stolen" and not just kept.
I think pretty much all of the questions are valid and while written in legaleze, quite understandable given the severity of the complaint. If GameFly worked with the USPS in planning the mailing portion of their service and co-operated in tracking down these "thefts" before filing this case, then they should have no problems answering every one of them honestly and fully.
to profit from death!
How could such an audience miss this opportunity to quote Python (Monty)!
Dork to Dork
Take this example: You come up with this fantastic way sending data through sewer pipes. You patent it because it's a really unique and inovative idea and since almost everyone has sewer pipes it means you have a huge potential market. Next you try to market it to Big Company[A-C], they turn you down because they see the market potential but think they can save money building their own then paying to license from you. You now have an idea that you have tried to market but can't. Finally Company A comes along with their own version of your idea using your process but you don't get a dime. All because they are big and took your idea and made it their own.
Ditto to this, with the infrastructure you seem to have, maybe you might offer something in trade. I see the chance to build a better mousetrap here.
But...
/usr/share/doc/*/copyright.
I neither agree or disagree and shall only post one simple fact.
-----
/base-files-4.0.1ubuntu5.8.04.2/etc# cat motd
The programs included with the Ubuntu system are free software;
the exact distribution terms for each program are described in the
individual files in
Ubuntu comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by
applicable law.
To access official Ubuntu documentation, please visit:
http://help.ubuntu.com/
-----
'nuff said.
Next J_DarkElf will debate the page sized used, was it Letter, Legal, A4, Memo?