Cloudberry Kingdom, Spelunky, and many rogue-likes all do this on a smaller level, but are always constrained by parameters. While they seek to create an AI that will take on more of the tasks, it will still have to be fed parameters created by an author, so unless this AI can create itself, how can it be called truly creative? Rather it is just procedural generation. It may be worth doing but calling it creative is hyperbolic.
Are they talking about the data collected on those outside the country, or spying on US citizens? Those are very different things in the context of "the threat of terrorism".
The article states that this initiative is designed to expand the touch-based app ecosystem of Windows 8. I don't see a lot of desire for touch-based apps on a desktop, this probably will make Android look bad more than it will scare MS, since touch based apps on a desktop will provide a terrible experience.
Defending something for which you have no part in its success is silly to me. Whether it be sports or being a Windows fanboy, I just don't get it. The blind patriotism some people have is also baffling. Being a groupie and making arguments on behalf of people/companies/teams as if their actions somehow reflect on you as a person is delusional, sorry.
Sorry BTW, I was mostly trying to play devil's advocate, not exactly trolling, either way I didn't believe what I was saying. Hope I haven't jostled ya.
It's a clear and unanimous sentiment. They now understand what they have to do very clearly to serve the needs of their people, their business, and their pals in the rest of the world. There are no mixed messages here. So where is the problem?
Let it connect to my router and let me link them up via a built-in web interface and control them that way. There's no reason this shit has to go outside my LAN.
I don't think anyone has followed Microsoft since 1820. Partially because they'd be dead by now, and, oh yeah... Microsoft didn't exist until 1975. Very important detail.
Slashdot Mirror
That's because it isn't a moral dilemma, it's virtual reality.
Or copy the city like Springfield. See? Cartoons have all the answers.
If the algorithm or equipment kills an innocent, then kill the person who designed that particular point of failure.
Shouldn't have sold off your old favorites only to repurchase them later.
They are public servants and should have to answer to public scrutiny.
...because there's a typo in it. *ducks for cover*
Cloudberry Kingdom, Spelunky, and many rogue-likes all do this on a smaller level, but are always constrained by parameters. While they seek to create an AI that will take on more of the tasks, it will still have to be fed parameters created by an author, so unless this AI can create itself, how can it be called truly creative? Rather it is just procedural generation. It may be worth doing but calling it creative is hyperbolic.
That's it SEC, try to crush everyone who tries to organize toward a mutual goal. We simply mustn't let that happen.
Not Bob and Alice I guess!
Some didn't and are just getting into Linux now, where it's Gnome and KDE and LiveCDs. How about helping some newbies?
Besides when it's caused by interference from background radiation?
Holy shit, that's pathetic!
Are they talking about the data collected on those outside the country, or spying on US citizens? Those are very different things in the context of "the threat of terrorism".
The article states that this initiative is designed to expand the touch-based app ecosystem of Windows 8. I don't see a lot of desire for touch-based apps on a desktop, this probably will make Android look bad more than it will scare MS, since touch based apps on a desktop will provide a terrible experience.
Please spend this on education and food instead. You'll save more lives that way than with the cameras. Take the long view.
Oh, the makers of Grand Theft Auto!
They're good decisions if you're happy with them, that's all the validation I need.
By who? The "tribe" that likes pigeonholes?
Defending something for which you have no part in its success is silly to me. Whether it be sports or being a Windows fanboy, I just don't get it. The blind patriotism some people have is also baffling. Being a groupie and making arguments on behalf of people/companies/teams as if their actions somehow reflect on you as a person is delusional, sorry.
Now if only Apple would bring out new iPod Touch hardware...
Sorry BTW, I was mostly trying to play devil's advocate, not exactly trolling, either way I didn't believe what I was saying. Hope I haven't jostled ya.
No, I was actually trolling. People took me seriously though which is scary.
It's a clear and unanimous sentiment. They now understand what they have to do very clearly to serve the needs of their people, their business, and their pals in the rest of the world. There are no mixed messages here. So where is the problem?
Let it connect to my router and let me link them up via a built-in web interface and control them that way. There's no reason this shit has to go outside my LAN.
I don't think anyone has followed Microsoft since 1820. Partially because they'd be dead by now, and, oh yeah... Microsoft didn't exist until 1975. Very important detail.