India has used satellites to improve weather and crop forecasting, fisheries management, and just plain ol' land use data gathering and other metrics. Their space program largely serves their people by making government and commerce more productive and efficient.
This mission will further develop their technical capabilities, and if it leads to more commercial paid-for launches, they will probably piggyback their own birds on these, saving more money and letting India further exploit space technology to their benefit.
There may be more examples. I just hit the easy ones.
The issue is that the utilities are being coerced into buying back excess subscriber solar production, not that they could or not engage in their own production.
Eventually, perhaps, these net generators need to reconsider selling their excess at all, but banking it instead. Supercapacitors, better batteries, even underground pneumatic makes as much sense as selling to the utility and then buying it back in the evenings at a markup. At least, if solar installations make sense at all, then maximizing it makes sense in most cases.
"most plentiful and free in that particular state"
Except, perhaps, at night. See, there is one of the problems; Solar make sense when it;s available, but not when it isn't. Arizona is blessed with largely cloudless days, but the nights include half the peak demand, and so some other sources are needed alongside solar.
And yes, this did seem like a troll right up the point where you are encouraged to look back at the solar claims; clean, available. Either of these have debatable points.
Not that I care much for APS or SRP, as a customer of both I'd rather see them play fair, but no one is playing fair in this. NO ONE.
Please, I'm as dumb as a blade of grass and I see why this explanation is hooey. Target is not connected to the network. What on the target got the audio network up and running? Magick? USB stick? That's sneakernet. Nothing? then the audio on the target isn't talking or listening.
But I'm still trying to figure out where March went to...
So make the sponsor either responsible or penalize them. Overstays could be considered 'working after expiration'. And if they aren't working for the sponsor, make the sponsor, liable for losing them.
These were short term visas. Require these 'visitors' sponsors to delivery proof of exit (plane tickets, etc) or deliver the 'visitors' to INS for deportation for overstaying. Failure by the sponsor results in daily fines to cover 3x costs of arrest and deportation, and equal punitive damages. Too many and these sponsors lose their privilege to use these visas, fire at least 3 years.
And after, say, 7 days overstay, fine the sponsors client where the visitor was working, which is registered in advance.
And here I am pretty proud of having the SMs and PMs for Selectrics, Mag Cards, Displaywriters, and IBM Electronics. I may never actually fix another one. Darn.
"IE was removed from my network desktops" "(sadly can't properly get rid it of for several reasons)" "As far as I'm concerned, still running IE on your desktop means you don't know any better. "
Which of these doesn't belong? (Hint, the number is greater than two)
More helpful advice from the Anti-Microsoft community. With a smile.
Merging would necessarily result in combining common administrative functions, for instance. Commerce and labor merging would result in reducing the number of statisticians and data collection workers. Be creative - lots of opportunities to avoid duplication of effort. If you're not getting this, don't worry. You're not alone.
I was thinking about eliminating the Department of Education first. Merge Commerce, Agriculture,and HHS. If you really want an Education department, merge it into Labor. You could also merge Labor and Commerce, as they were up to 1913 or so.
Merge DHS into Justice as an extension of the FBI.
You could put Energy into Commerce also.
Now, to complete the initial reduction, radically overhaul the tax code and put half the IRS out of work, along with a third of the CPAs and corporate counsel. These are clever people, and will find a job on K Street if nowhere else.
Disbanding Social Security, Medicare, and such requires decades, as current/prospective retirees are locked into these programs. Leaving Medicaid to the States would not take much. The ACA is a major impediment, bit if we did all of the above, then we are probably killing the ACA also.
None of this will happen unless there is a cultural change in Washington, which is probably only going to happen when a third political party achieves significant victories in elections and changes the dynamic. I'm mildly optimistic, but very mildly.
So if I want to buy 1000 shares of Coca-Cola, I can expect the 'market makers' to take $0.10 for their troubles.
I assume this doesn't include custody, etc.
And I suspect you are full of it. think NYSE, and find me a broker that charges less than $5 for an online trade for a simple trade. This example would, right now, be around $3878.00, so it should fit most discount houses minimums. E-Trade would maybe charge the $9.95 or less, but even half of that seems like $.05/share, not $.001/share.
And that's cheap, and was like that before HFT was skimming liquidity out of the market.
BTW, $.125/share would have cost me $12.50 for this share. If only I could get it for $0.10. No, fees aren't lower because HFT makes it anything. the HFT guys merely engage in arbitrage. This was once considered 'sharp practice', and not confused with good business or even honest.
Can't wait to see them bail when the correction comes. And maybe never come back. We think the DJIA swings big when it varies 0.96%, which is the gain since 10/8. narrowing the spread is the best thing going for the brokerages. They always risk-shift, and this is fabulous for that.
I work at a Fortune 100 company, and we are well along in converting our spaces to more collaborative, open space. While we are encouraged to work at home if compatible with our purpose and function, the goal here is to maximize use of the real estate. Fair enough.
I see HP making this announcement for two reasons:
1. Advance notice for those who will not convert to in-office workers. Let them find other opportunities. 2. Fewer workers means less real estate, and of course voluntary layoffs.
Good plan. HP could use some vitality, and you can't easily get that with workers at home. Not easily.
Slashdot Mirror
I suspect you have a very limited definition of 'Europe'.
Duh. Seriously?
India has used satellites to improve weather and crop forecasting, fisheries management, and just plain ol' land use data gathering and other metrics. Their space program largely serves their people by making government and commerce more productive and efficient.
This mission will further develop their technical capabilities, and if it leads to more commercial paid-for launches, they will probably piggyback their own birds on these, saving more money and letting India further exploit space technology to their benefit.
There may be more examples. I just hit the easy ones.
The rich use their yachts primarily as vacation homes. And they rent them out to defray the costs. Or lend them out to impress their buddies.
Nope. It's just harder to DO than just running a gas plant.
The issue is that the utilities are being coerced into buying back excess subscriber solar production, not that they could or not engage in their own production.
And batteries are part of most solar installations?
Midday is not the only peak demand.
Eventually, perhaps, these net generators need to reconsider selling their excess at all, but banking it instead. Supercapacitors, better batteries, even underground pneumatic makes as much sense as selling to the utility and then buying it back in the evenings at a markup. At least, if solar installations make sense at all, then maximizing it makes sense in most cases.
"most plentiful and free in that particular state"
Except, perhaps, at night. See, there is one of the problems; Solar make sense when it;s available, but not when it isn't. Arizona is blessed with largely cloudless days, but the nights include half the peak demand, and so some other sources are needed alongside solar.
And yes, this did seem like a troll right up the point where you are encouraged to look back at the solar claims; clean, available. Either of these have debatable points.
Not that I care much for APS or SRP, as a customer of both I'd rather see them play fair, but no one is playing fair in this. NO ONE.
Please, I'm as dumb as a blade of grass and I see why this explanation is hooey. Target is not connected to the network. What on the target got the audio network up and running? Magick? USB stick? That's sneakernet. Nothing? then the audio on the target isn't talking or listening.
But I'm still trying to figure out where March went to...
So make the sponsor either responsible or penalize them. Overstays could be considered 'working after expiration'. And if they aren't working for the sponsor, make the sponsor, liable for losing them.
These were short term visas. Require these 'visitors' sponsors to delivery proof of exit (plane tickets, etc) or deliver the 'visitors' to INS for deportation for overstaying. Failure by the sponsor results in daily fines to cover 3x costs of arrest and deportation, and equal punitive damages. Too many and these sponsors lose their privilege to use these visas, fire at least 3 years.
And after, say, 7 days overstay, fine the sponsors client where the visitor was working, which is registered in advance.
And here I am pretty proud of having the SMs and PMs for Selectrics, Mag Cards, Displaywriters, and IBM Electronics. I may never actually fix another one. Darn.
Building the wall sans gun emplacements is already a good idea, so stop piling on, ok?
"IE was removed from my network desktops"
"(sadly can't properly get rid it of for several reasons)"
"As far as I'm concerned, still running IE on your desktop means you don't know any better. "
Which of these doesn't belong? (Hint, the number is greater than two)
More helpful advice from the Anti-Microsoft community. With a smile.
Apparently she likes being called by anyone. Even HER exes.
Merging would necessarily result in combining common administrative functions, for instance. Commerce and labor merging would result in reducing the number of statisticians and data collection workers. Be creative - lots of opportunities to avoid duplication of effort. If you're not getting this, don't worry. You're not alone.
So we institute a government to acts that problems of other governments.
Yup. That'll work.
I was thinking about eliminating the Department of Education first. Merge Commerce, Agriculture,and HHS. If you really want an Education department, merge it into Labor. You could also merge Labor and Commerce, as they were up to 1913 or so.
Merge DHS into Justice as an extension of the FBI.
You could put Energy into Commerce also.
Now, to complete the initial reduction, radically overhaul the tax code and put half the IRS out of work, along with a third of the CPAs and corporate counsel. These are clever people, and will find a job on K Street if nowhere else.
Disbanding Social Security, Medicare, and such requires decades, as current/prospective retirees are locked into these programs. Leaving Medicaid to the States would not take much. The ACA is a major impediment, bit if we did all of the above, then we are probably killing the ACA also.
None of this will happen unless there is a cultural change in Washington, which is probably only going to happen when a third political party achieves significant victories in elections and changes the dynamic. I'm mildly optimistic, but very mildly.
So if I want to buy 1000 shares of Coca-Cola, I can expect the 'market makers' to take $0.10 for their troubles.
I assume this doesn't include custody, etc.
And I suspect you are full of it. think NYSE, and find me a broker that charges less than $5 for an online trade for a simple trade. This example would, right now, be around $3878.00, so it should fit most discount houses minimums. E-Trade would maybe charge the $9.95 or less, but even half of that seems like $.05/share, not $.001/share.
And that's cheap, and was like that before HFT was skimming liquidity out of the market.
BTW, $.125/share would have cost me $12.50 for this share. If only I could get it for $0.10. No, fees aren't lower because HFT makes it anything. the HFT guys merely engage in arbitrage. This was once considered 'sharp practice', and not confused with good business or even honest.
Can't wait to see them bail when the correction comes. And maybe never come back. We think the DJIA swings big when it varies 0.96%, which is the gain since 10/8. narrowing the spread is the best thing going for the brokerages. They always risk-shift, and this is fabulous for that.
And as is being asked above, how does this benefit buyers ?
"the buy-sell spread has fallen dramatically "
Is this good, and for whom?
"Successful giant endeavors evolve organically out of small, working endeavors."
Proving their point. I see what you did there.
I work at a Fortune 100 company, and we are well along in converting our spaces to more collaborative, open space. While we are encouraged to work at home if compatible with our purpose and function, the goal here is to maximize use of the real estate. Fair enough.
I see HP making this announcement for two reasons:
1. Advance notice for those who will not convert to in-office workers. Let them find other opportunities.
2. Fewer workers means less real estate, and of course voluntary layoffs.
Good plan. HP could use some vitality, and you can't easily get that with workers at home. Not easily.