I've had 2 Logitech MX Revolution mice. Each of them lasted about 6 months to a year, before they were unable to recharge again. Second one also had a very annoying bug where every so often a single click got interpreted as a double click. Extremely annoying.
I can't believe you're peddling that crap here.
The fact that you throw out 60 years of built up credibility because they disagree with you on one standard (or, according to you, non-standard) might just be a sign of your own zealotry. Or, at the very least, show
I call troll for literally interpreting "as a club" to mean something violent, but I'll bite:
So I guess that when she said Julian Assange should be treated in the same way the US treats terrorists, she didn't imply use violence to quell speech?
First of all, I don't think Google has a copyright on any of the content they index, do they?
Second, as I understand it, clickstream data points are only a small part of the equation. Notice how Google could only reproduce this by using totally bogus keywords, ensuring that the data they fed to Bing through the toolbar were the only data points being considered for those keywords?
Bing tracks when users search for something, and what sites they visit as a result. I'd almost be offended intellectually if this was not part of their game to provide me with better search results.
Disclaimer: I use Google almost exclusively. Bing can suck it, but this debate is ridiculously biased.
I guess you missed the part where government officials went on public record stating they want him assassinated, labeled a terrorist and on trial for espionage?
My WP7, which has 3G enabled all the time, uses about 100MB of data every month, and that includes my own data use. So I guess this must only occur in certain circumstances.
But hey, this is Slashdot. Bash ahead!:)
Manning is being held in the most inhumane and unconstitutional conditions imaginable, because Lamo and Poulsen, both convicted felons and both not known for their trustworthyness [citation needed] ratted him out to the government.
You implying that they're keeping the logs secret to protect Manning's or Assange's cohorts is ridiculous at the very least.
I don't think you should call yourself an artist if your first goal isn't to get your music to as many people as possible. A musician, maybe, but an artist? Not in my book, sorry...
But if this is all so logical, common sense and accepted modus operandi, why are they going after Assange in such a big sensationalistic way? If this is nothing out of the ordinary, then why all the big fuzz? Why not say "DUH" and be over with it?
Seriously, am I the only who's thought about what we could do if we could get get Anonymous to focus on digging up information on corrupt politicians / cops / other government employees?
What do you think Wikileaks is ?
Slashdot Mirror
When was this, 5 years ago? By now, Silverlight has a penetration rate of over 70%. And over 95% of those are Silverlight 4.
Explain to me how to make those things "free" without making them free of charge.
Are you saying COBOL is not a failure?
I've had 2 Logitech MX Revolution mice. Each of them lasted about 6 months to a year, before they were unable to recharge again. Second one also had a very annoying bug where every so often a single click got interpreted as a double click. Extremely annoying. I can't believe you're peddling that crap here.
I think that went something like "where the woman are men, the men are 10 year old boys and the 10 year old boys are FBI agents".
Except for that it is.
These days, except for the registry, pretty much everything goes in C:\Users\. But nice try.
I love you so much.
I don't need to leave userland, I'm more than happy messing around in your documents. Sincerely, Flash 0-day.
The fact that you throw out 60 years of built up credibility because they disagree with you on one standard (or, according to you, non-standard) might just be a sign of your own zealotry. Or, at the very least, show
That was not pretentious at all, you jack-off.
I call troll for literally interpreting "as a club" to mean something violent, but I'll bite: So I guess that when she said Julian Assange should be treated in the same way the US treats terrorists, she didn't imply use violence to quell speech?
First of all, I don't think Google has a copyright on any of the content they index, do they?
Second, as I understand it, clickstream data points are only a small part of the equation. Notice how Google could only reproduce this by using totally bogus keywords, ensuring that the data they fed to Bing through the toolbar were the only data points being considered for those keywords?
Bing tracks when users search for something, and what sites they visit as a result. I'd almost be offended intellectually if this was not part of their game to provide me with better search results.
Disclaimer: I use Google almost exclusively. Bing can suck it, but this debate is ridiculously biased.
The marketplace is free. You pay $99/year as a developer to put apps on it. Same goes for Apple.
I guess you missed the part where government officials went on public record stating they want him assassinated, labeled a terrorist and on trial for espionage?
My WP7, which has 3G enabled all the time, uses about 100MB of data every month, and that includes my own data use. So I guess this must only occur in certain circumstances. But hey, this is Slashdot. Bash ahead! :)
Manning is being held in the most inhumane and unconstitutional conditions imaginable, because Lamo and Poulsen, both convicted felons and both not known for their trustworthyness [citation needed] ratted him out to the government.
You implying that they're keeping the logs secret to protect Manning's or Assange's cohorts is ridiculous at the very least.
Are you somehow looking to imply that we should start to ignore this?
Informants names are redacted.
The idea that diplomacy and transparancy are mutually exclusive is a cop-out.
The misrepresentation is debatable.
At what point are you going to stop being a propagandists tool?
Right back at you, sir.
I don't think you should call yourself an artist if your first goal isn't to get your music to as many people as possible. A musician, maybe, but an artist? Not in my book, sorry...
But if this is all so logical, common sense and accepted modus operandi, why are they going after Assange in such a big sensationalistic way? If this is nothing out of the ordinary, then why all the big fuzz? Why not say "DUH" and be over with it?
Maybe because he's an individual and the USG is not? Maybe because the USG is supposed to work for the people and he is not?
To be honest, I don't think *YOU* got it... leet version of S3, pssh.
You mean spying as in "The US spies on UN officials" ?
Seriously, am I the only who's thought about what we could do if we could get get Anonymous to focus on digging up information on corrupt politicians / cops / other government employees?
What do you think Wikileaks is ?