This stem cell debate being pushed by those "pro-choice" people who are looking for benefits to abortion. It serves their agenda to dehumanize unborn children. They call them "blastocysts, fetuses, genetic material, but never unborn children. All that aside, when it comes to stem cells, they have yet to give me an decent, honest answer to these questions: ---> That is the worst case of veiled trolling (or horribly illogical reasoning) I have ever seen. Unborn children? If you're willing to call a group of cells, if not a single cells unborn children...
Also you call them "children, humans, adults" but why not "walking monstrosities", "undead dead people", "living flesh". You're just doing the opposite for your agenda to humanize living people.
Your arguments are all moot and are appealing to emotion! Logical fallacies are afoot.
Congradulations! Welcome to the world of the foocher!
Here were have a wide selection of trolls and fanboys for you to either join or rationally debate in the most futile way against! but wait... there's more!
Constant anti-Microsoft mudslinging and anti-Sony mudslinging!
So... enjoy the world of the future! Enjoy Slashdot.
I know you're being sarcastic but a lot of people aren't. So either many of them are unreasonable or they really don't know how to use a computer.
Any decent person would probably not encounter a "crash" or something along those lines by Windows (Firefox crashes more than Windows, but then again, that isn't generally too much Firefox's fault but the fault of the shoddy websites that cause the crash...) any more than they would with Linux.
The technician is over-stepping his bounds in the name of OSS zealotry.
A lot of proprietary software works fine and I haven't had a crash or lock for a long time. Except for Firefox + Java.
Ok, fine, it wasn't a game, it's a TV series, but isn't that reasonable competition for, say, the Halo movie?
1. Yes it isn't a game.
2.... you really think the movie is going to appeal to the same people RvB does? Perhaps there will be overlap but I doubt the Halo movie will be a comedy.
---
If they left them alone they risk losing their trademark.
If they sign over rights to a small group of people they don't control, who knows what could happen. If you controlled such a big franchise would you want a bunch of... sub-indies doing what they will with your intellectual property?
1. Jew's isn't protected.
2. Apart from a select few vulnerable pages [for example, the vandalism page] protection is usually dropped very rapidly.
3. I've seen many heavily edited articles that have never been protected... ever.
4. Profit!!!... don't make unsubstaniated claims.
Slashdot Mirror
This stem cell debate being pushed by those "pro-choice" people who are looking for benefits to abortion. It serves their agenda to dehumanize unborn children. They call them "blastocysts, fetuses, genetic material, but never unborn children. All that aside, when it comes to stem cells, they have yet to give me an decent, honest answer to these questions:
--->
That is the worst case of veiled trolling (or horribly illogical reasoning) I have ever seen. Unborn children? If you're willing to call a group of cells, if not a single cells unborn children...
Also you call them "children, humans, adults" but why not "walking monstrosities", "undead dead people", "living flesh". You're just doing the opposite for your agenda to humanize living people.
Your arguments are all moot and are appealing to emotion! Logical fallacies are afoot.
Congradulations! Welcome to the world of the foocher!
Here were have a wide selection of trolls and fanboys for you to either join or rationally debate in the most futile way against! but wait... there's more!
Constant anti-Microsoft mudslinging and anti-Sony mudslinging!
So... enjoy the world of the future! Enjoy Slashdot.
83% + 23% = 106%? I call BS.
I've read that multiple times and it does appear to be talking about the same question.
Says he who hath an anti-microsoft sig.
They didn't spend a cent on legal costs but they closed. Think about it. They're just trying to create a marketing problem for Sony.
Indeed. IE may be poorly made by MSOffice is a very, very useful office suite.
There is one bad thing.
In Australia we only have only have an _implied_ right of free speech.
Lik Sang claim to be out of business for defending the court case but they didn't show up at court ala the recent spamhaus case.
Opera has the same things. Except they're called Widgets.
Of course Firefox has the XUL bonus.
I know you're being sarcastic but a lot of people aren't. So either many of them are unreasonable or they really don't know how to use a computer.
Any decent person would probably not encounter a "crash" or something along those lines by Windows (Firefox crashes more than Windows, but then again, that isn't generally too much Firefox's fault but the fault of the shoddy websites that cause the crash...) any more than they would with Linux.
"people without TVs choose what to watch, when to watch it." There is petty. Then there is just expanding terms to be non-sensical.
You mean from AdWords? ;)
Just because something is free doesn't mean it is better.
Well let's go around asking the non-technical people about fstab and see how they fare shall we?
What operating system caters for these "non-technical people"?
The technician is over-stepping his bounds in the name of OSS zealotry. A lot of proprietary software works fine and I haven't had a crash or lock for a long time. Except for Firefox + Java.
I pay a hobo $5 a month to keep the CDs for me. Top quality service!
Google.org has existed for a very very long time now. Many months, before the new year even.
You've never heard of mistrust? You must have been living under the cloud :)
The were modifying C&C Generals. How does this make Halo any better? If anything it creates more competition for Microsoft.
In all seriousness. Stop going with the uninformed Anti-Ms-OMGZors crowd and look into some facts.
Ok, fine, it wasn't a game, it's a TV series, but isn't that reasonable competition for, say, the Halo movie? 1. Yes it isn't a game. 2. ... you really think the movie is going to appeal to the same people RvB does? Perhaps there will be overlap but I doubt the Halo movie will be a comedy.
---
If they left them alone they risk losing their trademark.
If they sign over rights to a small group of people they don't control, who knows what could happen. If you controlled such a big franchise would you want a bunch of ... sub-indies doing what they will with your intellectual property?
It still somewhat applies. They have to protect their Halo trademark rather then their Halo copyright.
and yet a lot of /. users feel it's correct to say that about Microsoft? Double-standards perhaps (and not by you necessarily)?
1. Jew's isn't protected. 2. Apart from a select few vulnerable pages [for example, the vandalism page] protection is usually dropped very rapidly. 3. I've seen many heavily edited articles that have never been protected... ever. 4. Profit!!! ... don't make unsubstaniated claims.
We're talking Slashdot here. It's usually days behind when it comes to news.