Slashdot Mirror


Former MS Security Strategist Joins Mozilla

Handset writes "Former Microsoft security strategist Window Snyder is joining Mozilla to lead the company's effort to protect its range of desktop applications from malicious hacker attacks. eweek.com reports that Snyder, who was responsible for security sign-off for Microsoft's Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows Server 2003, will spearhead Mozilla's security strategy and improve its communications with external hackers and bug finders."

248 comments

  1. MS Trojan by wardk · · Score: 5, Funny

    a human trojan has been inserted into Mozilla?

    glad Safari uses the khtml engine...

    1. Re:MS Trojan by marcello_dl · · Score: 2, Funny
      a human trojan has been inserted into Mozilla?
      Since it's called 'Window' Snyder, i guess it's not even human.
      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    2. Re:MS Trojan by TenLow · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never met her.

    3. Re:MS Trojan by mobets · · Score: 1

      In case you want to see what she looks like...
      Google Image search for Window Snyder.
      She looks kinda young.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    4. Re:MS Trojan by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      spearhead Mozilla's security strategy and improve its communications with external hackers and bug finders.

      I wonder if he's ribbed for our pleasure. Spearhead my ass (not literally)-- I'm wondering if he's an infiltrator, and what kind: Sheik, Trojan, and what kind of Durex LifeStyles he has... Does he wear a Kimono? Will we face eternal CondomNation by letting him penetrate the Inner Sanctum?. I wonder what will be his Crown(ing) achievement-- anything "Beyond Seven" (of 9)? SURELY, he's the "One"...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    5. Re:MS Trojan by Lobais · · Score: 3, Funny

      Snyder translated from English to Danish:
        snyder (100%) (Dansk-Engelsk)
      cheat; cheater; fraudster.

    6. Re:MS Trojan by Desolator144 · · Score: 1

      It's not so much a trojan as it is just being stupid. It's like having an arsonist join the volunteer fire department. Microsoft isn't exactly known for their browser's security, ya know -- understatement of the century

      --
      now stop reading and go play Dance Dance Revolution!
    7. Re:MS Trojan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a trick. Get an axe.

    8. Re:MS Trojan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a she...

    9. Re:MS Trojan by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      You got it all wrong. It's all about industrial espionage. She's not there to break Mozilla. She's to spy and learn their security practices and features to implement them in Windows!

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    10. Re:MS Trojan by biffta · · Score: 1

      There are females working in IT now?

    11. Re:MS Trojan by marcello_dl · · Score: 1
      In case you want to see what she looks like... Google Image search for Window Snyder.
      The "Internet" tubes are full of such "female" shaped humanoid images, but their existence is as yet unproven. My point still stands.
      She looks kinda young.
      You don't expect anyone (anything) to last much in the windows security department, do you?
      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    12. Re:MS Trojan by Dansteeleuk · · Score: 1

      Uh. She Signed off XP2 and Win Server 2003. You know, the OS's. The ones that didn't completely suck security wise. She's pretty enough though I guess. If nothing else it'll make the Moz Devs get in a geek pissing contest - which means you can probably expect double productivity from the Hackers this year... :)

  2. queue the jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict someething about the next version of Firefox being more spyware friendly.

  3. I can't wait to see this thread... by pookemon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will the Mozilla fans throw their arms up in disgust (An MS Security expert - that's a contradiction!) or will they suddenly be supportive of someone they have effectively been bagging for years? (An MS Security expert for Mozilla! - what a coup!)

    --
    dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    1. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by Moofie · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is gonna totally blow your mind, but....here goes.

      Two different people might have two different opinions.

      [neo]WHOA![/neo]

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by Kelson · · Score: 1

      There will certainly be a lot of cognitive dissonance. It'll be interesting to see which side various people fall on.

      Sadly, most people so far seem to be making fun of her name.

    3. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by HairyCanary · · Score: 1

      Or just maybe we recognize that one person is not responsible for Microsoft's security failings. This guy may really know his shit, but if the corporate culture at MS is effectively anti-security it won't matter. Or maybe the codebase is so bad that even with a skilled security wonk at the helm it's just not possible to patch all the leaks. There are definitely alternatives to the two choices you offer.

    4. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He" is a woman. But how could anybody tell with a name like Window?

    5. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sadly, most people so far seem to be making fun of her name.

      At least in the midst of excessive cognitive dissonance, we can all agree on one thing. And that one thing is: her name is pretty fucking weird.

    6. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A security expert at Microsoft is like a goldfish trying to swim up the Niagra falls... its a losing battle.

    7. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      [family_guy]Can't it be both?[/family_guy]

      But seriously -- we're glad to have another contributor, especially as he lends credibility to Mozilla (and takes it from Microsoft). We honestly don't know whether he's the reason IE sucks, or whether it's something in corporate culture, or what.

      And of course, Slashdot isn't always groupthink. We do sometimes diasgree with each other!

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    8. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by pookemon · · Score: 3, Informative

      We do sometimes diasgree with each other!

      No we don't.

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    9. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      He is the guy behind SP 2, which was the first windows version to actually include a firewall...

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    10. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      I am lying.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    11. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by jejones · · Score: 1

      An MS Security expert - that's a contradiction!

      I think the term you are looking for is oxymoron (OTOH, maybe these days that refers to the shouting guy on the Oxy-Clean ads?).

    12. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by Vegard · · Score: 1

      Windows XP SP2 was a great stride forward in Windows security. They did much of what they should have done ages ago, and the security people even was allowed to break functionality for a lot of applications. I respect those people who lead that work tremendously, even though I personally hate using Windows, and avoid it as much as possible.

      I believe this to be a good move. I don't think all people at Microsoft is evil. Even though some people probably are ;-)

      - Vegard

    13. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you all obviously of you have not read the entire article. she's not only an ex-microsoft, you should have read this:

      "Prior to joining Microsoft, Snyder was director of security architecture at @Stake, the old-school hacking group that was acquired by Symantec in September 2004"

      now shut up about ironic 'windows scourge entering mozilla'!

    14. Re:I can't wait to see this thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, all six billion people agree that you're a schmuck.

  4. Innocent Security Strategist or...? by Ichigo+Kurosaki · · Score: 0, Troll

    Double-agent working for Microsoft to bring the downfall of mozilla security?

    1. Re:Innocent Security Strategist or...? by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      I can hear it now.

      At Microsoft, we had a very flexible definition of "security." I would like to keep that definition alive in my work here...

      *shivers*

      --
      I have nothing to say.
  5. That time again? by ikejam · · Score: 5, Funny

    hooray..lets have it...chairs all around..here you go..two for you...Redmond Cherry or Vista White?

    1. Re:That time again? by ronanbear · · Score: 1
      The Steve doesn't like to lose valuable experts on search. Big setbacks to mission 1: destroy google, destroy.

      The Steve doesn't feel that he needs security experts as badly and he's trying to cut down on chairs.

      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
  6. Are you sure? by eclectro · · Score: 4, Funny


    Hey, I am for security and all, but somebody needs to call the phone numbers on his resume. I heard that Microsoft doesn't have a "security" department.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Are you sure? by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 0, Informative

      Somebody needs to call the phone numbers on his resume.

      Window Snyder is a woman.

    2. Re:Are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      didn't read the article then?

      he's a she: http://www.blogger.com/profile/13043301

    3. Re:Are you sure? by Soko · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure Microsoft has a Security Department. They're the nice people who, after you've quit MS to go work at a rival orginisation, walk you from your former office, out the front door and past Steve Balmers office window. Just watch for well aimed office chairs...

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    4. Re:Are you sure? by EXMSFT · · Score: 1

      Her. Her resume. Window Snyder is a woman.

    5. Re:Are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not *his*. *Her*.

    6. Re:Are you sure? by Jonsey · · Score: 1

      I know, I know, ruin the fun... MS has a very good security department, the hard part of their jobs is to get the other coders to use the APIs and the like that they've provided. And getting management buy-in for the code to take twice to three times as long to write securely the first time, as opposed to just trying to patch it up (probably outside the first mentioned managers organization's cost structure).

      --
      I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
  7. So... by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We can draw two possible conclusions from this. Either a: MS' security team was made of good people who were doing the best they could for such a large project with such a large user base and extensive backwards compatability, and thus that Windows security was the best it could have been (even if that wasn't so good). Or Mozilla's security is going to go down the tubes. It's a slashdot paradox! Clearly we can't grant #1, because that wouldn't be sufficiently critical of MS, but be can't grant #2 either because we love Mozilla. I'm just glad Mozilla doesn't think this way.

    1. Re:So... by MacDork · · Score: 5, Funny

      We can draw two possible conclusions from this.

      Ahhh, but you've overlooked the most important factor: Window Snyder is female! Therefore neither of your proposed solutions is correct. Slashdot readers, once they have discovered this will completely forget all context in the discussion. They will find pictures, fawn over teh hotness, and begin building web shrines in their basements throughout the globe.

      Gentlemen, ready your hot grits. :-P

    2. Re:So... by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Mozilla is no more secure than IE anyway. Check it out. I reckon Ms Window will be able to use her experience to help them out quite a bit!

    3. Re:So... by Kelson · · Score: 5, Funny
      Clearly we can't grant #1, because that wouldn't be sufficiently critical of MS, but be can't grant #2 either because we love Mozilla.

      For some reason I want to adapt this to the duel of wits from The Princess Bride:

      But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine from what I know of you: are you the sort of site that would approve of an enemy, or the sort of site that would reject a friend?

      A site that hates Microsoft would complain that because Microsoft's security has been notoriously poor, then Mozilla must be making a mistake. Since Slashdot tends toward favoring Mozilla, clearly I cannot choose the whine in front of you.

      A site that loves Mozilla would have to rationalize the decision, and conclude that the security expert is worth hiring. But since that speaks favorably of Microsoft's security, I can clearly not choose the whine in front of me!

      But Slashdot is known for its vindictiveness. Given a choice between reasoned discourse and pure snark, the site will go for snark every time. So clearly I cannot choose the whine in front of you!

      etc.

      I'm just glad Mozilla doesn't think this way.

      In all seriousness, I've got to agree with you here. Though there's certainly been plenty of "MS has lousy security" rhetoric from people at Mozilla over the last few years.

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a false dichotomy. There's also the possibility that MS' security team has a few good people surrounded by a lot of incompetent people or that management as a collective is fairly incapable of properly making sure their products are secure. I think only the most rabid anti-Microsoft people will claim that no talented people work there.

    5. Re:So... by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Or: Three, Window was a good person to lead a security team, but her work was compromised by policies from Microsoft higher ups. I'm sure there are other possibilities as well. The two options you present aren't the only too possibilities, so there is no reason people would be forced to admit either one.

    6. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be that the MS security team was doing it's job, but other departments or management were mucking things up for them.

    7. Re:So... by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

      Was just wondering the same thing : Would not having "Windows Security" on your resume be a bad thing? :)

      --
      Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    8. Re:So... by ndogg · · Score: 1

      Or it's neither and she's simply contributing her knowledge and experience to the knowledge and experience of the Mozilla organization.

      From reading other posts to this article, it seems she found some resistance to her meddlings at Microsoft.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    9. Re:So... by wayneo13 · · Score: 1

      All products have security flaws. The fact is they get fixed a lot quicker when they are discovered than IE therefore leaving the user less vulnerable to attack.

    10. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truly you have a dizzying intellect!

    11. Re:So... by Locutus · · Score: 1

      Well, Microsoft sure does NOT have a very good record of making a secure system and that record is over 15 years old. But regardless, one thing I was looking for was what/where this person did BEFORE Microsoft to see if there really might be some security talent there. That's when I found that she worked for @Stake before going to Microsoft( http://www.matasano.com/log/mtso/team ). This is the same @Stake which fired one of their own, their CTO no less, when he released a document which was NOT kind regarding Microsoft Windows security( http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/securi ty/story/0,10801,85563,00.html ).

      So, I hope they actually had an expert to interview/test her because those two resume' items are NOT providing strength in any claim of being a security expert. IMO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    12. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kelson wins the thread!

    13. Re:So... by Kelson · · Score: 1
      Truly you have a dizzying intellect!

      Wait 'til I get going!

      Now, where was I...

    14. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      windowsnyder@hotmail.com

      Whoa! Hotmail!!
    15. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "wine". Not "whine". Jesus.

    16. Re:So... by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      You forgot the memory leaks. No self-respecting Mozilla troll fails to point out that Firefox uses up 5 Terabytes of RAM. Get with it!

      --
      blah blah blah
    17. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's "wine". Not "whine". Jesus.

      Allow me to elucidate:

      pun, n. A joke or type of wordplay in which similar senses or sounds of two words or phrases, or different senses of the same word, are deliberately confused.
  8. April 1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cmon Slashdot, a guy from Microsoft whose first name is "Window" and had a job implementing security at Microsoft??? These April Fools jokes get dumber every year.

    1. Re:April 1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you're one stupid motherfucker. Window is a woman asshat. Fuck off and die.

    2. Re:April 1st by jZnat · · Score: 1

      And she's a woman no less! When will the jokes end?

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    3. Re:April 1st by zish · · Score: 1

      Actually, Window is her middle name.

      Her first initial is "M".

      I know her real first name! Nyah Nyah Nyah!

      --
      Spork.

      P.S. Spork.
    4. Re:April 1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know? It could be a lady-boy.

  9. "Former" by kcbrown · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm...."former"...."security" strategist...

    Uhuh. Sure. Whatever you say.

    I think I'll grab a copy of the source code now...

    *Dons tin foil hat*

    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
  10. Joke? by dk.r*nger · · Score: 5, Funny

    This has to be a joke. Microsoft actually employed a named Window S. ??

    1. Re:Joke? by adnonsense · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, they saw a Window of opportunity.

    2. Re:Joke? by Effugas · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, the joke between us for quite some time was that she would normally have gotten the email address windows@microsoft.com...but it seemed to have already been taken.

    3. Re:Joke? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the one that makes you go wacko?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:Joke? by RelliK · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but Window S. was Microsoft's security strategist? This has got to be a belated aprils fools joke.

      --
      ___
      If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    5. Re:Joke? by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1
      This has to be a joke. Microsoft actually employed a named Window S. ??

      She's quite the looker, too.

      Source.
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    6. Re:Joke? by Isotopian · · Score: 2, Funny

      It does cause me some pane in the head.

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    7. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure if you like the Chucky forehead.

    8. Re:Joke? by twitter · · Score: 1
      And another guy there has an interesting anagram name:

      Ivan Arce
      n Avarice

      Oh well, the world is strange.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    9. Re:Joke? by Chacham · · Score: 1

      So, might as well defenestrate *that* idea.

    10. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than being named doorknob...
      Why do parents pull these jokes on their unborn babies???

    11. Re:Joke? by trparky · · Score: 1

      ::groan:: Bad, just really bad. ::laughs::

    12. Re:Joke? by Skrynesaver · · Score: 1

      Actually to include her title,
      Ms Window S.

      --
      "Linux is for noobs"-The new MS fud strategy
    13. Re:Joke? by Perey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ivan Arce

      I've one too.

  11. In a related story by krell · · Score: 3, Funny

    In a related story, Heat Miser has joined the fire department.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  12. Window Snyder? by ktakki · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is he required to change his name to Mozilla Snyder now?

    Sorry.

    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    1. Re:Window Snyder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  13. As long as she replaces the useless Asa Dotzler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Since Asa Dotzler of Mozilla keeps deleting me from his blog, this is just to publicize. I asked a very simple question in an Ask Asa a while back: Who was responsible for the testing/QA failure that led to a security regression in Firefox 1.0.4, how will they be censured, and what is being done to prevent a similar recurrence. He didn't answer and has deleted every comment I post, in which I've said the same thing. I think it's a fair question. Not answering is pretty crappy, but censoring just because he spends too much time being 'visible' and not enough time actually doing QA is truly pathetic. Asa isn't the funloving guy his blog projects, he can be a complete idiot too. Spread the word. I know this doesn't fit into the rose-tinted view of prominent open source projects with 'many eyeballs' having better security, but it's true. The sad fact is that the entity investing most in automatic code checking tools, mandatory design and test cycles, mandatory threat modeling, regular code audits, etc. is Microsoft. Mozilla security practices are rubbish and the sooner someone publicizes the failure the better it will be. Hopefully Snyder is the person for the job.

    1. Re:As long as she replaces the useless Asa Dotzler by krell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Mozilla security practices are rubbish"

      Someday you might realize that you don't define a great security system by how much you have to patch gaping holes in it.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    2. Re:As long as she replaces the useless Asa Dotzler by Kymermosst · · Score: 2, Informative

      A few points:

      (1) Shit happens, including regressions. Yeah, it sucks. Yeah, it should have been caught. Nonetheless, shit happens.
      (2) It's none of your business who was responsible. Are you some kind of stalker?
      (3) The Mozilla team can handle their own internal affairs just fine, I imagine.
      (4) You can always not use Mozilla products.
      (5) I'm pretty sure I've been trolled, but what the hell, I haven't responded to a troll for a while. Then again, I haven't trolled for a while, either:
      (6) Does having Snyder mean we'll see a need for Symantec, McAfee, etc. products for Mozilla just to keep the malware away? That's what we need for Microsoft products...

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    3. Re:As long as she replaces the useless Asa Dotzler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Remember that Mozilla is "open source". The reason its a success is the transparent meritocracy. We get to see who was responsible for a particular bug, but not for a testcase? How does that engender trust, both in Mozilla itself, and in the open source ideals to which it aspires?

    4. Re:As long as she replaces the useless Asa Dotzler by kennygraham · · Score: 1
      (2) It's none of your business who was responsible. Are you some kind of stalker?

      Yes, he is. He's been rambling on and on about this for years now. Maybe by 2010 he'll let it drop. Either that or go on a killing spree while screaming "Asa made me do this!!!"

    5. Re:As long as she replaces the useless Asa Dotzler by TheSeer2 · · Score: 1

      and yet a lot of /. users feel it's correct to say that about Microsoft? Double-standards perhaps (and not by you necessarily)?

  14. Snyder joining Mozilla? by Centurix · · Score: 2, Funny

    First thing that popped into my head was the new Mozilla security slogan.

    "We're not going to take it! NO! We ain't gonna take it! We're not going to take it, anymore!"

    --
    Task Mangler
  15. A good thing? by DeathAndTaxes · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Former MS Security Strategist Joins Mozilla" Guess we'll have to stop using that product (mozilla) out of fear. ;-)

  16. Ahem.... Window is a gal by rsborg · · Score: 2, Informative
    And she's pretty hot.

    Er, eh, not that influences my perception of her value to the Mozilla corp at all...

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:Ahem.... Window is a gal by solevita · · Score: 1

      So now there's a girl that know s more about comp. sec. than I ever will... Another reason to feel intimidated by the fairer sex.

      She's nice, but her friends are a little bit special...

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/windowsnyder/58200265 /

    2. Re:Ahem.... Window is a gal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:Ahem.... Window is a gal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morlocks are real! Who knew?

    4. Re:Ahem.... Window is a gal by Alcoholist · · Score: 1

      She is attractive indeed! And she can hack, too. Smart hacker chix give me goosebumps...

      --
      Bibo Ergo Sum.
    5. Re:Ahem.... Window is a gal by giliposha · · Score: 0, Redundant
  17. His first name... by shadwwulf · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...had to be a product of hippie parents.

    I'd imagine his parents would have just completed the conception of Window and his father stumbled to his feet in a drug induced stupor and suddenly had an idea of what to name their recently created progeny as his eyes came into focus on the first thing he saw, exclaiming "Babe! I just thought of a awesome name for our kid...."

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:His first name... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, "Window" was the second choice. "Roachclip" got too many funny looks at the registrar's office...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:His first name... by JKConsult · · Score: 1

      I have a friend named Toke. No, no shortening, and yes, that is his real name. He has fooled a bunch of people (okay, even me the first time) in my earshot by claiming that his brother is named Roach.

    3. Re:His first name... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      So when his father asked his mother "would you like a toke", she got more than she bargained for?

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  18. downloading... by xoundmind · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Opera right now.

    1. Re:downloading... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is off topic. I personally believe that the use of 'Microsoft', and 'Security' in the same sentence is an oxymoron. And just to add fuel to this bizarre fire, everytime I try to access the anchor to the web article, firefox chokes, I'm using Konqueror right now !!?

  19. So that's how Microsoft will get us by polterbyte · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...to drop Firefox. Great strategy!

  20. adsense rocks by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    One of the linked ads text for this page: Waste Receptacles The Spot To Find It! It Is All Here. Couldn't have put it better myself.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    1. Re:adsense rocks by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      My page was even better (I'm using Firefox). The ad in the middle of the text was an embedded webpage, and the server timed out, so it looked like it was a picture of the Firefox "page not found" error page.

  21. Finally! by ratta · · Score: 1

    Mozilla will now be able to compete with Internet Explorer!

    --
    Wondering why i am doing so strange posts? I am trying to get a "+5,Flamebait" or "-1,Insightful" rating.
    1. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla will now be able to compete with Internet Explorer!

      Compete what? For number of newly discovered security loophole every month?

  22. First Of All, Congrats by Effugas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Window's an old friend of mine, so let me be the first to congratulate her here. W00t!

    So the security world used to be pretty hostile to MS, before, you know, XPSP2, MSRC got taken seriously, etc. Window showed up before all of that, and pretty much took our abuse year in, year out. And then...things got better.

    She'll deny any direct cause and effect there, but she was _the_ interface between Microsoft and the various security cons for quite some time, and I think at least some of the reason we got certain concessions (like 24 hour response time out of MSRC) is that she was there to hear people say things like "I dunno, why should I warn MS, they're just gonna sit on it anyway."

    Firefox is not without problems (understatement). I'm looking forward to seeing what Window can accomplish w/ Mozilla.

    1. Re:First Of All, Congrats by JustNiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >> XPSP2, MSRC got taken seriously

      Yeah sure it did. Keep smoking the doobie.

    2. Re:First Of All, Congrats by EvilGrin666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You seem to be on the inside so I'm curious on why she'd want to leave just at the point where things were working out? Any insights on that?

    3. Re:First Of All, Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So the security world used to be pretty hostile to MS, before, you know, XPSP2, MSRC got taken seriously, etc. Window showed up before all of that, and pretty much took our abuse year in, year out. And then...things got better."

      I still get lots of spam that looks like it's sent through botnets or otherwise 'owned' boxes... Ergo, I'm still waiting for 'things to get better'.

    4. Re:First Of All, Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought your post was going to go something like this:

      Window's an old friend of mine, so let me be the first to congratulate her.

      Sincerely,
      Door

    5. Re:First Of All, Congrats by x-caiver · · Score: 4, Informative

      Window didn't just leave Microsoft to join Mozilla, she actually left awhile back to be one of the co-founders of Matasano Security, http://www.matasano.com/. Founding a company is a good reason to leave a company ;) She did a great job at Microsoft, and I'm sure she is going to do a great job at Mozilla.

    6. Re:First Of All, Congrats by VENONA · · Score: 1

      "So the security world used to be pretty hostile to MS, before, you know, XPSP2, MSRC got taken seriously, etc."

      Used to be? We still are. XPSP2 didn't hold up long. Last July we had HD Moore's "Month of Browser Bugs," which finished up like this:
      MSIE: 25
      Apple Safari: 2
      Mozilla: 2
      Opera: 1
      Konqueror: 1
      then in August we get the 'patch the patch' debacle, against an easy remote admin compromise that was deemed serious enough that the Department of Homeland Security gave it coverage. I wonder what we get in September?

      And yes, I *am* part of the security world.

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
    7. Re:First Of All, Congrats by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      Just a guess, but maybe steveb wouldn't give her the "windows@microsoft.com" email alias...

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    8. Re:First Of All, Congrats by William+Robinson · · Score: 1
      OR,

      I thought your post was going to go something like this:

      Window's an old friend of mine, so let me be the first to congratulate her.

      Sincerely,
      Gates

    9. Re:First Of All, Congrats by Zonnald · · Score: 1

      Why are you using Browser stats to sustantiate a point about her work with an operating system wide service pack? I am pretty sure that Windows (the security expert) had already gone from Windows (the OS) well before August and the so called 'patch the patch' debacle.

    10. Re:First Of All, Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is more history here than meets the eye. Yes, Window used to work for MS but before that she worked for @Stake. . You remember them? The security company founded by a bunch of hackers! Window herself was involved with similar groups before then such as New Hack City and Messiah Village. She has a been a regular attendee at Defcon and other hacker cons such as Pumpcon and Summercon. Even now she has tight relations with group that was formed by old hackers from @Stake and earlier Matasano.com.

      What does all this mean? It means that Mozilla is getting one smart person to work on thier security.

    11. Re:First Of All, Congrats by VENONA · · Score: 1

      "Why are you using Browser stats to sustantiate a point about her work with an operating system wide service pack?"
      Because pieces of SP2 were related to the browser, and because of a generally flawed OS design (It's simply far too monolithic, which is also what caused most of the application breakage with XPSP2.) which ties the browser far too tightly to the OS. The proof of that is the continual flow of remote ownership of exploits due to browser bugs.

      Also, my quote was clipped before the reference to her. My post was in response to the supposition that since XPSP2, Windows security is somehow seen as adequate within the security community, when nothing could be further from the truth.

      I don't know the period in which she was employed at Microsoft, but I can guarantee you there were serious exploits in the wild during that time. I can say that with complete confidence because it's been true since shortly after Windows hosts began to be connected to the Internet. Every new Microsoft OS is supposed to fix everything, and it never does.

      The problem is in the design. MS will never throw it all out and start with a clean sheet of paper, due to the enormous expense. I'd offer the stock price slump of a few months ago, after MS announced they'd be spending $2-3^9 on R&D, in support of that statement.

      You can't bolt security onto a product. It has to be designed in. That fact has been proven time and again in the security world. No matter how talented the lady is, she was working at an insurmountable task. I'd not be surprised to find that this was one of the reasons she moved on. I know I'd have found it very frustrating.

      VENONA

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
  23. Is she an open window now she's at Mozilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eeek teeth! Never be rude to a girl who's that tooled up.

  24. Window huh? by shadwwulf · · Score: 1

    I bet a number of people will soon be able to see right through this move in the next few days.

    Thanks folks, I'll be here all week. Please try the fish.

  25. Poor kid by Jack+Sombra · · Score: 1, Funny

    Could anyone imagine growing up with the name "Window", what were the parents thinking?

    1. Re:Poor kid by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I bet her parents were thinking, "our daughter's going to work at some company that'll name its key product after her..." :)

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Poor kid by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      I had a friend in highschool named "Rainbow" luckily he was a 6ft 2" black guy... but I'm sure things were rough when he was younger.

    3. Re:Poor kid by Gleng · · Score: 1

      I think the meaning behind it is pretty transparent.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    4. Re:Poor kid by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think the real reason she left Microsoft is because she hit the glass ceiling.

      Heh. Heh heh heh.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:Poor kid by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      I can imagine it. When I was born, my parents named me after my dad's best friend, Richard, who had just died in Vietnam. So I understand that, and it's why I will never change my name.

      On the other hand, to have named a child "Richard Burton" in 1967 was pretty flippin' cruel. You have no idea how vapid and unclever allegedly intelligent people can be until you have a name like this. Each time I hear "how's Liz?", it's usually accompanied by a look of "gosh, I must be the smartest person on the planet, to be the first to think of that comment." Yeah. This has not made me a tolerant person; I keep reminding my parents of this when they tell me not to think of people as idiotic and irreflective morons.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  26. The trick is... by tktk · · Score: 1
    to listen to her advice and then do the opposite of what she recommends.

    Also known as the George Costanza rule of management.

    1. Re:The trick is... by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      I thought that was the Dilbert rule of management.

      Or was the Dilbert Rule of Management to fire all the smart people...

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    2. Re:The trick is... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      i was pretty sure that it was "in any organization, each employee rises to their level of incompetence".

      or is that the Dilbert principle?

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:The trick is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And about her fashion sense, hair style, make-up, hygiene, perfume, and so on. I worked with that woman for a while, and everything I listed was just terrible about her. She'd always smell so bad that you'd gag. Adding more cheap perfume just made it worse. She was somewhat smart, but that doesn't make-up for her other many large problems. Mozilla will regret this decision. She will drive people away like she did several of us that had to work with her.

    4. Re:The trick is... by SolitaryMan · · Score: 3, Funny
      to listen to her advice and then do the opposite of what she recommends.
      This works for every woman, btw.
      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    5. Re:The trick is... by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      I do believe that's the Peter Principle, although I could see Dilbert espousing it...

    6. Re:The trick is... by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 2, Funny
      This works for every woman, btw./
      Ah, that explains your user name.
      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    7. Re:The trick is... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      now that i had the presence of mind to look it up, the Dilbert principle is that incompetent individuals will be placed where they can do the least damage, in management.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  27. Duck! by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    If people leaving for Google lead to flying chairs and death threats, what does people leaving for Mozilla get you? Tables rolled down stairs and harshly worded phrases about maternal lineage?

                -Charlie

  28. Great Another Perfectly Good Browser Ruined by electrogeek_dot_com · · Score: 1

    Well there you go. Had to mess up a perfectly good browser. I guess we should expect Firefox 1.5.0.6 SP1 out any day now. I have one question. Why him? Can anyone say Opera.

    1. Re:Great Another Perfectly Good Browser Ruined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can anyone say Opera.

      Oper.

      No, let me try that again.

      Oprah.

      No, that wasn't right, either.

      Au pair, uh...

      Hmm, I guess not.

    2. Re:Great Another Perfectly Good Browser Ruined by morie · · Score: 1

      Relax, they didn't hire him!

      They hired her...

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    3. Re:Great Another Perfectly Good Browser Ruined by electrogeek_dot_com · · Score: 1

      What do you mean her?

    4. Re:Great Another Perfectly Good Browser Ruined by morie · · Score: 1

      read the rest of the thread, especially pay atention to the foto's of Window. You might see some distinct female characteristics.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  29. awwwww crappppp by SP33doh · · Score: 1

    hey guys, guess what I just did!
    that's right, I backed up the current version of firefox onto not just one, but 2 CDs.

    1. Re:awwwww crappppp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox Setup: Insert disk 2 of 2 to continue.

  30. Follow-up news report by eric.t.f.bat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Coming soon to Mozilla: ActiveM plug-ins! Now with the exciting "FORMAT C:" functionality, and complete integration with BOTH kinds of email software - Outlook AND Outlook Express!

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable .sig block which this margin is too small to conta
    1. Re:Follow-up news report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "format c:" might not do what you think: http://hohle.net/scrap_post.php?post=23

  31. I think I speak for a lot of people... by mswope · · Score: 1

    "OH NOES!!1!"
    It's a trick! :-)

  32. oh, wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well...

    there is always Opera or Konqueror...

  33. I don't normally look *at* windows by Hockney+Twang · · Score: 1

    But if we're talking about this Window Snyder she is kinda cute. You know, for a former MS security expert.

  34. Funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    WTF is this? most of the first dozen or two posts are aimed ot be (and are modded) funny. I thought this was supposed to a forum for serious discussion, not a fucking comedy club wanna-be.

    1. Re:Funny? by Kelson · · Score: 5, Funny
      I thought this was supposed to a forum for serious discussion, not a fucking comedy club wanna-be.

      You must be new here.

    2. Re:Funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the link was the point, the rest is just filler.

    3. Re:Funny? by nude-fox · · Score: 0

      you thought wrong

    4. Re:Funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well interestingly enough read my nickname lol..."You are not logged in. You can log in now using the convenient form below, or Create an Account, or post as Anonymous Coward.
      Nick "
      anyways regarding the first comment...a human trojan...okay then...i suppose mozilla security has a chance against viruses as a pose to internet explorer...
      and all those jpeg exploits and stuff
      but then again on certain websites people download malicious .exe files anyways... and these are spyware not detected by antivirus unfortunately.

    5. Re:Funny? by jZnat · · Score: 1

      If you want serious discussions, go to Digg.

      Oh wait...

      How about Fark?

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    6. Re:Funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rotfswl

    7. Re:Funny? by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Well, just consider that the majority of the "up-modded" posts refer to Window Snyder as "He" and many of those who actually read the article enough to realize Window is FEMALE are posting about how "hot" she is. Obviously all they care about is getting a good mod. So much for slashdot's userbase credibility... as if that ever existed.

    8. Re:Funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      WTF is this?

      Yeah Slashdot! You should care more about Window's feelings!
      *winks at AC* ;)
    9. Re:Funny? by psymastr · · Score: 1

      Go into your comments preferences and set it so funny modded comments get -2. That's what I do, makes /. a lot more tolerable. Otherwise 90% of posts in some stories are "funny."

      --
      Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
    10. Re:Funny? by refriedchicken · · Score: 1
      Sounds like someone who is upset all the good "Window" Puns had be taken.

      Oh yeah, except this one...

      Title should have read: "Mozilla Acquires Window's"

  35. Security Strategy by AHuxley · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    ie Marketing.

    This could be great. A big push out into the mainstream.
    Any specific bugs or security problems are now "internet problems...".
    Make ppl feel that is an underlying network problem not application specific.

    You secure mind share by having a strategy to deflect any negative comments about your app with good planning.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  36. MS looking to reformat? by bendodge · · Score: 0

    Are all the key people leaving in MS because some board agreed that it is time for a proverbial reformat?

    --
    The government can't save you.
    1. Re:MS looking to reformat? by x-caiver · · Score: 1

      Actually she left quite some time ago. Before the recent 'oddly coincidental' departures.

  37. You should be sorry. by raehl · · Score: 1

    She'll have to change her name to Firefo Xnyder.

    Or maybe Thunderbir Dnyder. But that just doesn't have the same ring to it.

  38. I call bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a personal problem with Asa, log in or link to your blog. Making accusations like that as an AC is rude and accomplishes nothing. It's not as if you're a whistle blower and the Moz mafia are going to murder your pets in the night.

    1. Re:I call bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      lolwhat

      He admits it himself, he just doesn't accept responsibility (as supposed head of QA) or say what he did/will do to change things like that happening again. Nor has he said (what happened to "open" source and meritocracy) who was responsible for not implementing the unit test that would have caught it - or what managerial changes have been made to ensure that unit tests get properly written. He is simply terrible at QA and much better at self promotion and marketing gimmicks.

      http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/008125 .html

    2. Re:I call bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, where does he admit to anything in that post aside from having a new set of builds that solves the security issue?

    3. Re:I call bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting
      DUMB QUESTION:

      Wait, where does he admit to anything in that post aside from having a new set of builds that solves the security issue?


      ANSWER:

      These builds contain ... the fix for a DHTML regression we shipped in 1.0.3


      He admitted to a security regression (if you look at news sites around that time it was a huge story anyway, but I can't be responsible for your laziness).

      Do you think that security regressions are acceptable for software as widely used as Firefox?

      Do you think that there should be measures in place to prevent security regressions occurring?

      Do you think that after endandering the security of millions of users through mismanagement (remember this was a KNOWN hole) people are entitled to know what is in place to prevent it happening again?

      Do you think that open source is a good idea? Why should coders names be public and testers names not?

      Do you think the head of QA should answer such questions or delete them from his blog?

      This is the sort of mistake which Microsoft were making all the time about 4 or 5 years ago, and keep making today (though not as much) - see the recent patch regression (though in fairness that was limited to XPSP1). Slashdotters rightly mocked and disrespected M$ for it. Why should it be different with Mozilla?

      Please obtain a clue. KTHXBYE.
    4. Re:I call bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He admitted to a security regression (if you look at news sites around that time it was a huge story anyway, but I can't be responsible for your laziness).

      I don't seem to recall that anyone was hiding the existence of the regression. So it's sort of like saying he admitted to wearing glasses, given that he's had a picture of himself with glasses up on the front page of his blog for... I don't know, a bloody long time.

      Given that your post made accusations of censorship and suggested that Asa was in all likelihood personally responsible for the regression, a statement of "he admitted it here" kind of suggests one should look for a more damning admission.

      In other words: Bzzt! So sorry, please try again.

  39. Clearly... by ezzewezza · · Score: 4, Funny

    if they're not already married to other people, Window and Linus need to get married. They could even name their first child Lindow.

    1. Re:Clearly... by geekd · · Score: 2, Funny

      And then get sued by MS, and have to change the kids name to Linspire.

    2. Re:Clearly... by MacDork · · Score: 5, Funny

      Window and Linus need to get married. They could even name their first child Lindow.

      Yeah, but the kid would do nothing but WINE. ;-)

    3. Re:Clearly... by kasperd · · Score: 1

      Since Linus' wife is a six-time Finnish national karate champion, I'd be a little careful about making such jokes.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    4. Re:Clearly... by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      if they're not already married to other people, Window and Linus need to get married. They could even name their first child Lindow.

      And name Fiona Apple as a godparent.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  40. At least.... by Metroid72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can't say that this captain hasn't been through a shipwreck.

  41. MS Security Strategy... by Shadyman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... Duck and run!

  42. They tried it... by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Is he required to change his name to Mozilla Snyder now?

    Well, his original name was Sam Snyder. They tried to change it to Mozilla Snyder, but the name was in use and the legal department made them go with something else, so they picked Windows Snyder instead.

    Then the legal department had a case of deja vu...

    1. Re:They tried it... by morie · · Score: 1

      Sam for Samantha?

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  43. Awesome! by caudron · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now we in the open source world can start benefitting from all those ironclad security techniques that have heretofore beeen the sole purvue of Microsoft's security team!

    Pretty soon our stuff will be almost as secure as Windows!

    Now if only we could only get a defection from whomever it is at Microsoft that is in charge of their world reknown OS stability....

    Tom Caudron
    http://tom.digitalelite.com/

    --
    -Tom
  44. From TFA... by bangenge · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There were no reports about chairs being thrown. Glad to know that.

    --
    . o O ( TwO hEaDs ArE mOrE tHaN oNe... )
  45. Now it all makes sense! by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

    When I first read the summary, I couldn't figure it out. Microsoft hasn't been the best example of "security is job one", and I thought news like this might be rather hidden by the Mozilla team than promoted.

    But after seeing her pic, now it all makes sense. It's another way for some geeks to be near a female!

    j/k I hope she's is very effective (and happy) in her new role.

    1. Re:Now it all makes sense! by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Mitch Baker is female too!

      --
      Have a nice day!
  46. Doing one thing well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Ms. Snyder thought working on a browser that is a stand-alone app rather than a browser that has hooks in the entire OS is a less overwhelming challenge!

    1. Re:Doing one thing well by Zonnald · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Maybe Ms. Snyder thought working on a browser that is a stand-alone app rather than a browser that has hooks in the entire OS is a less overwhelming challenge!

      Correction:

      Maybe Ms. Snyder thought working on a browser that is a stand-alone app rather than the entire OS is a less overwhelming challenge!
      Now, that makes perfect sense.

  47. NO! by TLouden · · Score: 1

    This guy approved SP2? What is this, some sneaky M$ trick to ruin a perfectly fine company with it's 'security'?

    I fear what may come of this.

    --
    -Tim Louden
    1. Re:NO! by initialE · · Score: 1

      Please name one thing inside SP2 that's worse than in SP1. The enhanced firewall? The security center? What on earth do you have to complain about? Sure it's not perfect, but it was clearly a step forward. And all that offered for no extra charge*!

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  48. Wait a minute... by Admodieus · · Score: 2, Funny

    A Microsoft employee called Window? Why, that's like an ice cream man named Cone!

    --
    "It's a reverse vampire...they....they crave the sun!"
  49. Obligatory Overload by MrCopilot · · Score: 1, Interesting
    First of all, Window's working at Microsoft. This is too much.

    Second Mozilla nabs her. Ironic No.
    Microsft's Window jumps ship to Firefox.......(of all the headlines we mangle here this one's begging for it.)

    The comedic possibilities are overwhelming. But here is the strangest one. Mozilla supplies her with 3 workstations. For compatability reasons she's gonnan need a Mac, a Linux, and a Windows box.

    ....

    wait for it.

    But now they are all window's machines. Gasp, This woman is dangerous and must be stopped.

    In all seriousness, If she had anything to do with the sp2 patches, she is my new personal hero.

    Welcome to the light. Don't be afraid. No, no, we promise, it's definately not open sores, I don't care what those dicks in the cafeteria said.
    O.K maybe not in all seriousness.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  50. Window is great, but MS security still miserable by fv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So the security world used to be pretty hostile to MS, before, you know, XPSP2, MSRC got taken seriously, etc.

    Used to be? Maybe you see a different view of them when they hire you for security consulting and fly you out for their Blue Hat conferences and such. But from my outsider perspective, Microsoft is still a security disaster. Not only have we continued to see hundreds of serious vulnerabilities throughout 2006, but MS has in many cases made us wait weeks or months before patching widely exploited bugs. Heck, another actively exploited MS Office vulnerability was just discovered in the wild. If we're lucky, MS will cough up a patch on September 12, otherwise they'll probably leave users vulnerable until the next "patch Tuesday" on October 10.

    Meanwhile, Microsoft recently re-issued MS06-042 with a fix for a vulnerability introduced by their first attempted fix. And they openly admit that they excluded eEye from the advisory credits because eEye embarrassed MS by making their incompetence public. MS is more interested in petty vendetas against researches than actually fixing the flaws.

    Microsoft has made a few positive steps toward securing their products in that last couple of years, but I think most of their efforts and successes are more in the PR realm than anything with technical merit. They have spent so much money sponsoring conferences (their money does come with strings attached) and paying off security researches, that many people seem reluctant to criticize them.

    OK, enough anti-MS ranting from me for now :). My main point in replying is actually to agree with you about Window. She is extremely smart and talented, and her defection to Mozilla is great news for a product which really needs more security attention. We had lunch last week to discuss Mozilla security and Window has some great ideas. Mozilla may already be much more secure than IE, but we should set a much higher bar than that! Best of luck at your new position, Window!

    -Fyodor
    Insecure.Org

  51. You could look beyond people to process. by twitter · · Score: 1
    The umbral blot once again tried to overshadow intelligent conversation with a false and insulting choice:
    1. MS' security team was made of good people who were doing the best they could for such a large project with such a large user base and extensive backwards compatibility, and thus that Windows security was the best it could have been (even if that wasn't so good).
    2. Or Mozilla's security is going to go down the tubes.
    3. Of course the answer has more to do with the differences between free and non free software development than the people involved. In the non free world your resources are limited to the few people you can pay and coerce into signing a NDA. Free world resources are comparatively infinite. Non free software is subject to what's euphemistically called "marketing decisions" which restrict features and waste resources on breaking a competitor. Free software projects are guided by what people want to see in the project and forks can happen if a project ever stalls or becomes less than free. Features that people want multiply and everyone's a winner with free software. Non free software stagnates as marketing types decide how to spend their precious resources on such obvious things as a Mac port.

      There is only one person to blame for Microsoft's security failings and that is Bill Gates. He has championed and created the legal framework for non free software and steadfastly refuses to deviate from it. Until recently, every decision was his.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:You could look beyond people to process. by stony3k · · Score: 1

      While I tend to agree with your sentiments, the realist in me suggests that even the free software world is plagued by "marketing decisions" and feature creep, sometimes even more that the non-free software world.

      --
      Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes. - Mahatma Gandhi
  52. Security Strategist? by 8ball629 · · Score: 1

    You mean to tell me that Microsoft has had a security strategist this whole time? This is a joke right? Not to mention the strangest part - Window Snyder. Who would name their child Window? I wonder if she has a brother named Door.

    1. Re:Security Strategist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered the possibility that her name is not of European/American lineage?

    2. Re:Security Strategist? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Who would name their child Window?
      I wouldn't even name my fucking cat Window.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Security Strategist? by 8ball629 · · Score: 1

      Well, I did a quick search to see if I could find the lineage of "Window" and it seems to originate from the ancient land of DOS.

      But seriously, I couldn't find the lineage.

  53. Did your momma give you that name?!? by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    She (not he!) is such a babe, I could ALMOST forgive her for being named after Microsoft's flagship product!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Did your momma give you that name?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very funny. I don't think there's a man alive that would be attracted to that. The receding hairline alone is disgusting enough to make you look away.

  54. Bug man swat this one by JavaManJim · · Score: 1

    This is wonderful news for Mozilla.

    Then personally and selfishly thinking, I hope the Mozilla Firefox team fixes a bug on my XP SP2 PC. Firefox 1.5.06 always comes up partial screen. Then I click to full screen Firefox and work from there. However "the cat came back the very next day" as the partial screen comes back the next time I start Firefox.

    If any of you /. users know of any HKEY (i.e registry setting) or Firefox setting I could tweak to fix this, that would be great.

    Thanks and go Firefox go,
    Jim

  55. yay! \o/ by fishnuts · · Score: 1

    Window is SCARY smart, and hothothot. I've been friends with her for years, and haven't seen enough of her since she moved out of Cali. Glad she contributed her knowledge to microsoft's efforts, and even happier that she's now on the firefox train.

    Love you, WS, congratulations!

    -ES

  56. Insulting? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    conversation with a false and insulting choice

    Really? Insulting? Do you find it insulting? Please, tell us why this insults you. I'm actually interested.

    1. Re:Insulting? by twitter · · Score: 1
      Please, tell us why this insults you. I'm actually interested.

      A "Slashdot Paradox" of false choices is a way of calling you, the Slashdot reader, stupid. That's insulting, unless you think there's something good about being stupid.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    2. Re:Insulting? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      A "Slashdot Paradox" of false choices is a way of calling you, the Slashdot reader, stupid

      Really. Would you call the "arguments" you present here good examples of this "paradox" concept of yours? For example, when you say:

      The only people still interested in developing anything on Windoze are a handful of legacy program owners
      Aside from the obvious problems with this, it follows that by presenting "us" with that fait acompli of sorts you're also being insulting. Correct? Or do you assert that the phrase above came from someone other than your feverish imagination?

      Then we have this for example:

      Everyone else ran to free software a decade ago
      Would you consider this an "insult"? By your definition, it certainly is.

      What do you think, twitter?

    3. Re:Insulting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you are specifically calling someone stupid. This seems to me to be a stupid way of defending yourself against the charge of insulting people...

      Anyhoo, to get back on the "insult" discussion, you have made the decision matrix extremely limited and the limits show a paradox. Now, either you think that nobody else can think up other reasons ("stupid"), they don't mind being given a paradoxical choice ("stupid") or that you are making up examples so that you can show the slashdot reader as being stupid ("stupid").

      Maybe this will clear up your confusion about how anyone could see your original post as being insulting.

      Now get back to bein stupid, stupid.

      NB: I don't have to be nice to you because I haven't said "i'm not insulting you". Unlike you. Which, again, would be a stupid thing to try and do. Case for the prosecution rests.

      Stupid.

  57. Mozilla, Security, and Microsoft. by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 2, Funny

    What could *Microsoft* teach Mozilla about security...

    that is, other than what _not_ to do!!

  58. rosieriv ftw! by hkb · · Score: 1

    Window is one of the nicest people I've ever met. A great person with clue, etc. Good luck, rosie ;)

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
  59. You lose. by shaneh0 · · Score: 1

    nobody ever knows what defenestrate means.

    1. Re:You lose. by jZnat · · Score: 1

      According to Wiktionary, it means "to stop using [Microsoft] Windows" (or to throw something from a window).

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  60. She's balder than I am! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy receding hairline Batman!

  61. ultimate star-fucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no...

    If you'd ever met Window, and especially if you were good for her career,
    you would know that the Trojan is much more frequently inserted into her.

    (ba-dum-bump)

    1. Re:ultimate star-fucker by darkonc · · Score: 1

      You seem to be implying that she wasn't so much picked by the Mozilla team, as picked up.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  62. ...Wha? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    It's called "Open Source" for a reason. I've never contributed a line of code, but I have all of the source on my box.

    Unless there's an anti-MS clause in the Mozilla license, but I know there isn't in the GPL...

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  63. I win. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia knows what defenestrate means, even wrt MS.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  64. Re:I've heard some weird names before, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This 'Window' was soft and didn't bust into pieces when Steve threw a chair at it. Liquid cleans up easier and is easier to replace. ;-)

  65. Come on, guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Her name is Window S. and she was working for Microsoft. Do you think there's a Windows joke she hasn't heard?

    That said... She was without an appartment for a while, so a colleague asked me:
      - She's crashing at your place tonight?
      - Yeah, yeah.
      - Damn, Window S. has been crashing all over the place lately.

    Not based on any actual event or people, of course.

  66. Try talk radio... by Namlak · · Score: 1

    If you want serious, world-moving discussions, try talk radio. Everyone knows that's where real, serious progress in important issues is made.

  67. Re: MS Security Department by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Apparently, the MS security department is just big enough for members to create headlines when they leave. Far from "not having a security department", it seems MS had several people around, but I surely can't figure out the hierarchy! What's the relationship between a Senior Security Strategist, someone doing a Security Sign-Off, Microsoft Chief Security Officer, and the Vice President in charge of the Security Business Unit?

    In reverse chronological order, here we go:

    We are currently discussing this one:
    "Former Microsoft security strategist Window Snyder is joining Mozilla to lead the company's effort to protect its range of desktop applications from malicious hacker attacks. Snyder, who was responsible for security sign-off for Microsoft's Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows Server 2003, will spearhead Mozilla's security strategy, eWEEK has learned."
    http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2012804,00.as p

    Then there was:
    "Amid the major shake-ups in management at Microsoft, one of the company's more notable security guru's, Jesper Johansson, announced that he is leaving the company to work for the online retailer giant Amazon.com. Johansson said that as of September 5 he will become the Prinicipal Security Program Manager at Amazon. During his time at Microsoft Johansson served as a Senior Security Strategist in the company's security technology unit. Johansson also co-authored a book, "Protect Your Windows Network," with Steve Riley who also works in Microsoft's security technology unit. "
    http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/9303 9/93039.html

    "Gordon Mangione, a 14-year Microsoft veteran who was most recently corporate vice president in the company's Security Products Group, has left the company. Reached at home, Mangione confirmed that his last day was a week ago Friday. "I'm taking some time off, looking to get into a startup. There's no rush. I'm going to parent-teacher meetings," he noted. Mangione, who had been vice president of SQL Server, moved into the high-profile security group in April 2004. There he assumed leadership of security products while Rich Kaplan led marketing. Both reported to Mike Nash, the corporate vice president in charge of the overall Security Business Unit."
    http://bink.nu/Article5408.bink

    At least as of 2003, this guy was also involved:
    "The single largest message is: keep your system up to date with patches," Microsoft Chief Security Officer Scott Charney said.
    http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/biztech/02/01/microso ft.security.reut/index.html

    ----------------------

    The Preview Word for this post is "distort".

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. MS 'security expert' by okshaw · · Score: 0

    Nazi human rights expert Madona's modesty expert Pittsburg's tourist expert

  70. Why do we never hear about the other way around? by Seetee · · Score: 1

    Is this because Microsoft do not publicise who they hire, or do they avoid hireing someone who has worked for or in conection to the Mozilla project?

    Or is this because /. only covers pro-Free Software and nothing else?

    If I want unbiased news about the tech-world, should I go somewhere else? (Like LUGRadio.org? ;-)

    --
    I've learned all I know about politics from /. and I still do not care one bit (or byte).
  71. Re:Window is great, but MS security still miserabl by codepunk · · Score: 1

    So tell me what makes her so smart there cowboy? Actually everything I read about her she sounds like a middle management paper jockey. Same goes for the SP2 sign off BS, she had to sign off she was the middle manager again paper jockey between the developers and the "real" security contractors.

    --


    Got Code?
  72. Can resist... by _Spirit · · Score: 1

    You don't suppose he's one of the original Windows?

    --

    beauty is only a light switch away

    1. Re:Can resist... by niheuvel · · Score: 1

      Apperently the rumour goes that Windows started out as a toy project nicknamed 'That guy Window's OS'.

      Even though it's now of the big cash cows, internally the project never left the toy project status.

  73. uhhh... by mike518 · · Score: 0

    As much as i wanna make a crack about this, it makes sense. Probably a good thing to hire someone who is familiar with the mistakes Microsoft makes and can help make sure that Mozilla doesnt duplicate them. Aside from this he also probably has a lot of knowledge about exploits in a Windows environment.

    --
    Mike
    I heart the RIAA & MPAA, im sure its mutual...
  74. Windows left the building! by g4b · · Score: 1

    Well, first off, the guy is a she.

    She is cute.

    And in Redmond a big flag is hissed printing:
    "OMFG WINDOW S LEFT THE BUILDING"

    seriously: this IS the end of MS.
    and: no matter what ppl flame here, I wish her good luck at mozilla and have to confess, even if win2k3 and sp2 mess up a working desktop, it IS kinda more secure!

  75. Good! by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    This is good news. Mozilla good use someone with experience in securing elephantine bloatware.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  76. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows XP has included a firewall since its release in 2001. SP2 turned the firewall on by default for all connections and made its existence somewhat more prominent.

  77. There is such a thing as image. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lets not beat around the bushes.

    MS has an image problem when it comes to security, it is a problem of their own making, acknoledged by Mr Gates himself and experienced day in day out with their prodcuts by IT professionals.

    Dig a bit deeper and you realize that security is still not properly realized in MS products. AD is a mess waiting to get worst for example.

    I don't care how wonderful SP2 was, that is a drop in an ocean of incompetence and procastination.

    I don't know what the Mozilla organization was thinking. Sometimes you have to take care of the PR situation as well as the technical side of things. Anybody that has worked recently around security in MS products will carry a credibility problem, specially in a highly visible position.

    I am sure that this lady is bright, intelligent and all what his pals say lovingly about her, but she brings with her a credibility problem which becomes all too evident when one reads all the comments on this thread (which are mostly bad jokes, but that drive the same point home: we can't believe it).

    Lets hope that this is a good move, but I think people should be excused for the healthy doses of skepticism.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:There is such a thing as image. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      MS has an image problem when it comes to security

      Mere image problems can be corrected by the application of a sufficient quantity of PR dollars. Microsoft's problem is that they have an actual security problem. One that isn't going to go away until they toss their codebase and start over. Or do what Apple did and pick an existing secure OS kernel as the foundation of their next-generation products, but I can't see that happening (Hell freezing over and all that.)

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  78. to itsatrap tagger by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Indeed, I bet he will maliciously make the source code even more open.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  79. word rosie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rosieriv doin big things.. its comical seeing all of these people on here who don't know who the hell they're talkin trash about.. Window definately knows her stuff and she is one of the most well respected people i know.. drcrackerz in 07

  80. Like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Former Chernoybl saftey inspector joins Three Mile Island team...

  81. Oblig. language remark. by MBMarduk · · Score: 1

    LOL. In dutch snyder (or snijder, the more modern spelling) means 'cutter'.
    Not the ship kind but the tradesman kind.

  82. She looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Isabelle from the 4400.

    What was it that Isabelle was supposed to do again.... ?

  83. Explanation: by cp.tar · · Score: 1

    Would you like some cheese with your whine?

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  84. No, no, no. by ATMD · · Score: 1

    It's not a trick.

    IT'S A TRAP!

    --
    Nobody else has this sig.
  85. Wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...did you just out yourself as working for Microsoft, in a Slashdot thread?

    You're a brave, brave man!

  86. No, I'm not making that up. M$ is doomed. by twitter · · Score: 1
    The only people still interested in developing anything on Windoze are a handful of legacy program owners

    Aside from the obvious problems with this, it follows that by presenting "us" with that fait acompli of sorts you're also being insulting. Correct? Or do you assert that the phrase above came from someone other than your feverish imagination?

    The only "problem" is that you see reality as insulting. Microsoft has screwed the people they depended on and are left all alone in the world. That will be their undoing and the results are visible.

    While it seems obvious to anyone running any kind of M$ platform that nothing new has happened in eight years or so, and M$'s anti-competitive practices are so blatant that ordinary people and the US Federal Government noticed, technical insiders can tell you much more if you look into it. A nice, concise statement of all of the problems can be found here. It states the obvious and well known, but M$'s massive propaganda effort tends to confuse many people. I can quote some of my favorite parts for you,

    Microsoft has a habit of killing off competitors by either buying them or their technologies. ... a recurring habit of reaping the rewards for other peoples' work which started way back in the beginning when Bill Gates bought DOS (no, Microsoft didn't even create the product that was the seed for their entire monopoly). ... Microsoft's fierce competitive nature has alienated everybody in the industry to the point where voluntary supporters are virtually nonexistent. For quite some time Microsoft has resorted to buying public endorsements and there have been documented incidents of Microsoft employees posing as normal software users in public settings ...

    All of that was obvious years ago. The only thing more rare than voluntary supporters is programmers who think that M$ has a future or that making Windoze do what they want is anything but an expensive waste of time. It's easier and cheaper to do things with free software. The lack of programmers working on the M$ platform is the reason Vista has taken six years to develop. M$ has been forced to make their own tools for a change and they chose to waste all of their effort on DRM. Vista is going to suck and it's market failure will be the end of M$.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  87. Re:Window is great, but MS security still miserabl by heybo · · Score: 1

    Fyodor I have the upmost respect for you and if you say she is smart and talented in the field of security then now I do believe that. Still if she walked into this office looking for a job it would then be me throwing the chair to run her out. No matter how smart she is she still signed off on ALL the problems there are with MS products. She is still partly to blame. She still played a part is stealing money from MS customers for the security holes in their system. She didn't stand up and say "Hell no I'm not signing off on that. Go back and fix it!"

    Maybe she does have talent but where are her morals? We just don't hire on talent but also on morals and ethics. Morals and ethics and not just words for with the company I work for they are the back bone of the company. In other words we would rather lose money than rip off our customers by selling them something that will break at least once a week. When we have a security problem on our network we fix it and don't charge the customer extra for the fix. Our customers pay us for our talent, morals and ethincs. They pay us for our advice. We don't give bad advice glossed over by a bunch of MarketSpeak coming out of the mouth of some monkey dressed in a $900.00 suit.

    Still one thing I can say thank you to the Security Team at MS and to Window for is due to continuing lack of security I have switched totally to Linux and will never go back. I have permently fixed my Windows security problems and also a lot of other people's Windows security problems. My fix? Insert disk 1 of Fedora and run the install.

    As for you Fyodor THANK YOU! for the best port scanner ever devised!!!!

  88. Oh, you people are just terrible! by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

    Poor Window... After taking this beating from Slashdotters, you look a bit tired. You should go into the break room and crash.

  89. This is not much either way by McNihil · · Score: 0

    Strategist != Implementor

    But if you have good implementors a good strategist can actually point them in a very good direction and the end product will become VERY good.

    A bad strategist will have much less impact on good implementors. The mozilla team are probably in the good category.

    A bad strategist will have very high impact on bad implementors. The microsoft team are more probably in the bad implementors.

    Now XP SP2 is not bad so that leads me to conclude that the strategists were not bad at Microsoft.

    So this can only mean that it is good for Mozilla.

    and yup she certainly is a hottie.

  90. Re:No, I'm not making that up. M$ is doomed. by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry twitter, between your incompetence at simple quoting, the links to "KMFMS" (where the obvious and well known are stated) and the "M$" and "Windoze" shitstorm I can't really figure out what the fuck it is you're saying. Would you like to try again?

  91. Re:Window is great, but MS security still miserabl by Effugas · · Score: 1

    fyodor--

          My opinion here has less to do with them hiring me for consulting (I've been saying this stuff since before they gave me a dime), and way more with me having to explain to customers back in 2003 why Nachi was taking out their VoIP networks. Dude, I remember doing trade shows back then; running around with Stinger, manually patching boxes left and right, and still there was always some jackass flooding the floor net.

          OK, that got alot better. Universal firewalling and a worldwide patching infrastructure are not mere PR stunts.

          What still sucks? IE6, no question. But nobody can say it's like it was a few years ago, when we had a public page containing dozens of unpatched remote code execution flaws in it. (I assume you know enough to recognize MOBB was nothing like that.) And the infrastructure is still complicated enough that it takes time to come up with a complete patch. Coming up with complete, non-Oracle style patches (talk to the Litchfields about that) requires a crap-ton of investigation and testing. You can't whine in one line that it takes more than a day to get a patch out, and then in another complain that MS06-042 wasn't 100% perfect.

    --Dan

    P.S. Office exists outside the Windows org.

  92. Every time Window, Security, Microsoft makes by MadeInChina · · Score: 1

    to the news. I still remember the last time on Cansec West. Anyway, congras to Window.

  93. Wowzers by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    Not only is a Window a chick, but she's hot! And funny! http://www.flickr.com/photos/windowsnyder/58200550 /

    One can only hope she lets in all kinds of Trojans. Or at least the lambskins.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?