He really did run it almost totally out of fuel, because he had to avoid a huge rock.
As I understand it, the unexpected fuel usage was a combination of avoiding the boulder field (more than one rock), AND the fact NASA miscalculated the shape of the moon. (Scientifically, that very boulder field later produced some of their best rock samples.)
The size calculations were calibrated based on the gravity of the moon, but the moon is gravitationally lopsided compared to the location of its surface. If you spun the moon on a giant table-top like a child's top, it would appear to wobble slightly.
If you notice, the Earth-facing surface of the moon looks different than the back-facing side. The materials near the surface also have a different density between back and front.
This difference was not fully accounted for, and is at least partially why the fuel estimates were off.
Lesson: if you go somewhere new: leave plenty of margin for contingency. You are likely using flawed or imperfect assumptions.
Those writing the lists tend to embellish the actual facts. Further, the C's are rather up there in age, such that their acquaintances are at the age people start dying frequently of age-related ailments.
Why should anyone trust Microsoft? They lie about surveillance, they lie about being "open", they lied about Windows 10 install options, they lied about Windows Tablet having a bigger screen than iPad, they lied to Steve Jobs about their GUI plans in the 80s, etc.
640 lies oughtta be enough for anyone. Ignore them by now.
She is likely a sociopath but when you seen things like her tape on the 12 year old rape victim,
The background of that tape is more involved and nuanced than Fox and Friends make it out to be. Spin meme.
her testimonies before congress where she flat out lies, etc..
I never get a straight answer: how is she supposed to know material sent to her by S.D. staff is classified? I've asked dozens of conservatives, ZERO real answers.
The "c" marker? It appears S.D. forgot to send her to the proper class. The culprit is probably the class manager/scheduler, not Hillary. It's not her job to schedule school. Hang the right person. (And no, a "briefing" is not class. A real class is not "brief".)
If there's a pothole in the road in front of your house, do you fix it yourself? If you don't, or the government forbids you from fixing it, either you're a part of the problem or the government is.
You cannot be serious. What if I decide to fix it at 7:30 on Wednesday morning, and take my sweet time because I bought small tools to save myself money?
because alert people are building up cash reserves
Stronger inflation would give a disincentive to hoard cash, because it would lose purchase value sitting.
Could be. We may be a simulation, and the server owner(s) sell "interference time" to the highest bidders. "Q" and Trump are customers who come to screw around in the "ant farm" as avatars. (Hillary doesn't give the vibe of a vacationer.)
We are toys, analogous to Toy Story, except we don't know, like Buzz.
IBM's stock lost about 40% of its value between early 2013 and early 2016. Granted it's on a slight upswing of late, but possibly because they learned from their mistake.
The "problem" with reputation-based sales is that a new owner/CEO can come along and milk that reputation for profits in the shorter term. They get the short-term profits they want, bail out or cash out before it totally crashes, and leave some poor shlub behind to sell the corpse to somebody else.
That's why IBM took a nose-dive. Not that it had a good reputation before that, but a fairly decent one. It was then milked for quick profits by railroading existing customers and lying to new ones. Eventually enough customers got ticked off that IBM lost significant new sales and is in the sorry shape it deserves to be in.
There's more than enough to be done that requires humans.
Fixing our rotting infrastructure and building greener infrastructure are certainly things needing to be done, but it's difficult to fund those in our current environment.
Funding them either requires taxing the rich, increasing the debt, and/or experimental techniques such as Helicopter Money. These are politically tricky, even if some by chance would work. (Being inflation has been sub-par a while, I'd like to see HM tried.)
It would be interesting to see what happened to all the horse and hay farmers when automobiles made that obsolete.
I imaging many went into say cattle farming instead, but all the other horse farmers trying the same probably made that a difficult position to obtain. Tractors were reducing the market for farmers already.
If you had been farming all your life, would you be able to walk into a factory and sit in a chair sticking widgets into wadgets all day? That could be a psychological shock to somebody used to outdoor and varied work. I imagine some made the transition okay, but certainly not all.
New fields such as oil drilling, gas pump operator, and mechanic opened up, but were there enough of such positions to offset the loss? And were those given mostly to the young due to age bias?
As I understand it, the unexpected fuel usage was a combination of avoiding the boulder field (more than one rock), AND the fact NASA miscalculated the shape of the moon. (Scientifically, that very boulder field later produced some of their best rock samples.)
The size calculations were calibrated based on the gravity of the moon, but the moon is gravitationally lopsided compared to the location of its surface. If you spun the moon on a giant table-top like a child's top, it would appear to wobble slightly.
If you notice, the Earth-facing surface of the moon looks different than the back-facing side. The materials near the surface also have a different density between back and front.
This difference was not fully accounted for, and is at least partially why the fuel estimates were off.
Lesson: if you go somewhere new: leave plenty of margin for contingency. You are likely using flawed or imperfect assumptions.
Those writing the lists tend to embellish the actual facts. Further, the C's are rather up there in age, such that their acquaintances are at the age people start dying frequently of age-related ailments.
Good, then hack BOTH sides.
"It looks like you are trying to tamper with the ball. Would you like help?"
But it's obsolete, Hawaii-Six-0 is out.
His footballs and tablets both fall flat.
Sorry, I don't consider Guardian reliable.
That makes Comcast qualified for Vice President.
Larry Ellison wouldn't take the job because he knows his own company would bilk his administration.
Everything on the Interwebs is true, even the warnings that the Interwebs are not true.
I'd vote for a lizard person over Bill Gates, although I suppose that's not necessarily mutually exclusive.
Why should anyone trust Microsoft? They lie about surveillance, they lie about being "open", they lied about Windows 10 install options, they lied about Windows Tablet having a bigger screen than iPad, they lied to Steve Jobs about their GUI plans in the 80s, etc.
640 lies oughtta be enough for anyone. Ignore them by now.
The background of that tape is more involved and nuanced than Fox and Friends make it out to be. Spin meme.
I never get a straight answer: how is she supposed to know material sent to her by S.D. staff is classified? I've asked dozens of conservatives, ZERO real answers.
The "c" marker? It appears S.D. forgot to send her to the proper class. The culprit is probably the class manager/scheduler, not Hillary. It's not her job to schedule school. Hang the right person. (And no, a "briefing" is not class. A real class is not "brief".)
You cannot be serious. What if I decide to fix it at 7:30 on Wednesday morning, and take my sweet time because I bought small tools to save myself money?
Stronger inflation would give a disincentive to hoard cash, because it would lose purchase value sitting.
Open in the Goatse sense.
Could be. We may be a simulation, and the server owner(s) sell "interference time" to the highest bidders. "Q" and Trump are customers who come to screw around in the "ant farm" as avatars. (Hillary doesn't give the vibe of a vacationer.)
We are toys, analogous to Toy Story, except we don't know, like Buzz.
That does it, I'm gonna troll slashdot more
There are still Note 7 users?
Just rename it Streisand Frog
Certainly? Your personal bias seems to be manufacturing specific evidence.
IBM's stock lost about 40% of its value between early 2013 and early 2016. Granted it's on a slight upswing of late, but possibly because they learned from their mistake.
black helicopters and foil hats.
The "problem" with reputation-based sales is that a new owner/CEO can come along and milk that reputation for profits in the shorter term. They get the short-term profits they want, bail out or cash out before it totally crashes, and leave some poor shlub behind to sell the corpse to somebody else.
That's why IBM took a nose-dive. Not that it had a good reputation before that, but a fairly decent one. It was then milked for quick profits by railroading existing customers and lying to new ones. Eventually enough customers got ticked off that IBM lost significant new sales and is in the sorry shape it deserves to be in.
Fixing our rotting infrastructure and building greener infrastructure are certainly things needing to be done, but it's difficult to fund those in our current environment.
Funding them either requires taxing the rich, increasing the debt, and/or experimental techniques such as Helicopter Money. These are politically tricky, even if some by chance would work. (Being inflation has been sub-par a while, I'd like to see HM tried.)
It would be interesting to see what happened to all the horse and hay farmers when automobiles made that obsolete.
I imaging many went into say cattle farming instead, but all the other horse farmers trying the same probably made that a difficult position to obtain. Tractors were reducing the market for farmers already.
If you had been farming all your life, would you be able to walk into a factory and sit in a chair sticking widgets into wadgets all day? That could be a psychological shock to somebody used to outdoor and varied work. I imagine some made the transition okay, but certainly not all.
New fields such as oil drilling, gas pump operator, and mechanic opened up, but were there enough of such positions to offset the loss? And were those given mostly to the young due to age bias?