If somone bought that $3.99 app, demanded and received the source code, am I right in thinking that they would then under the terms of the GPL, be able to post that source code on the web for free to anyone who wanted a copy, thus enabling people to compile the app for free, with no one ever again having to buy the binary in order to access the source code?
Or perhaps that they may have to make trivial modifications before redistributing it in order the make it a derivate work?
The point is that the Raspberry Pi is much too slow to do anything with the video except storing it, viewing it unmodified or sending it somewhere else.
It's been out for a couple of weeks in the UK and I've seen it twice. In terms of Batman metaphors, If QoS is Batman Forever, Casino Royale is The Dark Knight and Skyfall is the Dark Knight Rises.
The first time I saw it didn't make any sense either. I thought it was some self-important proclomation about the post in which it occured, rather than a reference the parent post. Being a different post, it should be referred to as "that" not "this".
The official religion of China is loyalty to the Party. Atheism isn't a religion, so yes, if China actually had no religion, none of this would be happening.
The size of the population is the force multiplier. It doesn't matter what percentage you reduce each individual's consumption by, the impact is quickly swamped by the larger and larger number of individuals alive. Population control is by far the most effective and realistic way of have a large impact on resource consumption. Financial incentives to have one or less children is one answer.
You're conflating having your physical position logged and having your viewing choices logged. I can't control the former while still using a cellphone, but I can control the latter to some extent by using https forcing and cookie management plugins and a google proxy site like startpage.
Granted it's hardly bulletproof, but it's infinitely better than broadcasting everything in the clear, and having every question that ever pops into my head logged by one corporation.
I'm under no illusion as to how far this setup is from being remotely private. For the tiny amount of effort involved, the modest improvement seems perfectly fine.
Or, I should say for clarity, a single 'line' goes from left to right, and the 'lines' are stacked vertically. So the number of 'lines' gives the vertical resolution.
He's talking about the contextual meaning. In the context of video displays, 'lines' go from left to right, as that's the way CRTs TVs scan, one horizontal line at a time.
Slashdot Mirror
If somone bought that $3.99 app, demanded and received the source code, am I right in thinking that they would then under the terms of the GPL, be able to post that source code on the web for free to anyone who wanted a copy, thus enabling people to compile the app for free, with no one ever again having to buy the binary in order to access the source code?
Or perhaps that they may have to make trivial modifications before redistributing it in order the make it a derivate work?
This is semantic bullshit.
The point is that the Raspberry Pi is much too slow to do anything with the video except storing it, viewing it unmodified or sending it somewhere else.
Then your point is utterly irrelevant.
Weak 1/10
Thanks, I'm glad you've enjoyed my hard work.
This one time, at Bandcamp, I kept saying Bandcamp over and over and over... ...P.S. BANDCAMP
Not having a monopoly is not the same thing as not having any compensation.
Wow- your nuts too I see.
Yoda! Stop looking at my nuts!
None of this explains away the allegation that he was impersonating a CyanogenMod developer to fraudulently establish commercial contracts.
Pick any two.
The breasts?
You'll never make the Kessel Run like that.
That's four times you said exactly the same thing. Not once, but four times. Three times more than it needed to be said; in fact, almost five times.
I still think i'd rather be punched in the back of the head.
Automating a process doesn't mean moving the manual operation to a different location.
I googled PUSY thinking it was an acronym like NIMBY or something, then realised I was a walking stereotype.
It's been out for a couple of weeks in the UK and I've seen it twice. In terms of Batman metaphors, If QoS is Batman Forever, Casino Royale is The Dark Knight and Skyfall is the Dark Knight Rises.
iron man, iron man, does whatever an iron can
The first time I saw it didn't make any sense either. I thought it was some self-important proclomation about the post in which it occured, rather than a reference the parent post. Being a different post, it should be referred to as "that" not "this".
I collect dead social networks.
I can't help picturing you as Egon Spengler when you say this.
The official religion of China is loyalty to the Party. Atheism isn't a religion, so yes, if China actually had no religion, none of this would be happening.
The size of the population is the force multiplier. It doesn't matter what percentage you reduce each individual's consumption by, the impact is quickly swamped by the larger and larger number of individuals alive. Population control is by far the most effective and realistic way of have a large impact on resource consumption. Financial incentives to have one or less children is one answer.
Pilcher's Law of Betteridge's Law of Headlines:
Any headline which ends in a question mark will have Betteridge's Law of Headlines posted right at the top of its comment thread.
You're conflating having your physical position logged and having your viewing choices logged. I can't control the former while still using a cellphone, but I can control the latter to some extent by using https forcing and cookie management plugins and a google proxy site like startpage.
Granted it's hardly bulletproof, but it's infinitely better than broadcasting everything in the clear, and having every question that ever pops into my head logged by one corporation.
I'm under no illusion as to how far this setup is from being remotely private. For the tiny amount of effort involved, the modest improvement seems perfectly fine.
Or, I should say for clarity, a single 'line' goes from left to right, and the 'lines' are stacked vertically. So the number of 'lines' gives the vertical resolution.
He's talking about the contextual meaning. In the context of video displays, 'lines' go from left to right, as that's the way CRTs TVs scan, one horizontal line at a time.