democrats dont care about helping ALL, at least not this administration. They want to help their fundraisers, just like as you said bush was helping his fundraisers.
if you are going to blame bush to this day, you need to open your eyes and see obama is no better, and in many ways worse than bush.
That is a complete lie, There are 15 bars that have live music and 17 concert halls, theaters within a 30 minute drive from me and im not in a city. I set up shows at these places and have had 2 acts that I gave their first gig move on to bigger and better things in just the past 4 years.
well sure if we want to get to that point, clearly we were both talking about normal photos and not private photos. If you are at a party hitting a bong and I take a photo of you I can post that photo without issues, ask Micheal Phelps.
sorry but legally you are wrong. If I take a photo of you, i am allowed to do whatever I want with it, including posting it on FB, 4chan etc. I can give it to a newspaper for free, I can even post it on a billboard for free. I may not agree with it however it is the law, how do you think paparazi get to do what they do? do you really think britney spears gave her ok to gawker or whoever to post up photos of her vagina? I doubt it.
well not for nothing if someone else took the photo you really have no ownership to you being in the photo. (unless its commercial of course) Not that I disagree with you, especially on your other points, but if I take a photo, and you are in it, you have no right to tell me what i can or cannot do with it, UNLESS i am getting paid off it
Anytime my name is tagged, i get a email that asked me if i want the info published to my friends or not. BEFORE my name is added. This goes for posts and photo tags. I find this to be a fair trade off.
on one of the channels, i dont recall which i do so get those stations streaming, There are NFL channels and espn channels with highlights corrrect, but those are not what i am talking about
Actually the XBMCWizard addon that was released in december does give me those options. I dont get "full local" streaming but i do get the 3 you referenced.
they claim cash discounts, but in truth you pay more for CC when you are 10 cents higher on CC at the ones who charge more vs the ones that are same cash v credit
as a typical/.er I did not RTFA... but how can he claim rights to a cover? he covered a song, and he is claiming copyright on the cover of a song, that is copyritten by someone else? Am I understanding this correctly???
also true. I would wager doing years and years of work and not getting credit, and even being sued for the work you did would drive anyone to insanity however
Slashdot Mirror
democrats dont care about helping ALL, at least not this administration. They want to help their fundraisers, just like as you said bush was helping his fundraisers.
if you are going to blame bush to this day, you need to open your eyes and see obama is no better, and in many ways worse than bush.
That is a complete lie, There are 15 bars that have live music and 17 concert halls, theaters within a 30 minute drive from me and im not in a city. I set up shows at these places and have had 2 acts that I gave their first gig move on to bigger and better things in just the past 4 years.
well sure if we want to get to that point, clearly we were both talking about normal photos and not private photos. If you are at a party hitting a bong and I take a photo of you I can post that photo without issues, ask Micheal Phelps.
Also I am not using a photo for payment, Did I have to post the photo to use FB? no , i didnt, therefore it is not payment
sorry but legally you are wrong. If I take a photo of you, i am allowed to do whatever I want with it, including posting it on FB, 4chan etc. I can give it to a newspaper for free, I can even post it on a billboard for free. I may not agree with it however it is the law, how do you think paparazi get to do what they do? do you really think britney spears gave her ok to gawker or whoever to post up photos of her vagina? I doubt it.
Did they also beat stan kyle and eric to heaven?
well not for nothing if someone else took the photo you really have no ownership to you being in the photo. (unless its commercial of course) Not that I disagree with you, especially on your other points, but if I take a photo, and you are in it, you have no right to tell me what i can or cannot do with it, UNLESS i am getting paid off it
Anytime my name is tagged, i get a email that asked me if i want the info published to my friends or not. BEFORE my name is added. This goes for posts and photo tags. I find this to be a fair trade off.
dont forget 15 years ago there was no google. If google can do it, anyone can do it.
exactly. Why anyone trusts the media these days is beyond me
maybe they should play games where they use guns if they dont.. you know believe in guns...
why not? for years car makers wouldnt allow "real damage" or in some cases any damage shown on their cars in racing games. How is this any different?
there are many if you are honest with yourself.
because gunz are teh scary these days and anyone who supports guns by any means at all is equally teh evol. At least thats what the media tells me
on one of the channels, i dont recall which i do so get those stations streaming, There are NFL channels and espn channels with highlights corrrect, but those are not what i am talking about
sorry, thats XBMCHUB Wizard
Actually the XBMCWizard addon that was released in december does give me those options. I dont get "full local" streaming but i do get the 3 you referenced.
simple "for helping people in oppressive regimes"
they claim cash discounts, but in truth you pay more for CC when you are 10 cents higher on CC at the ones who charge more vs the ones that are same cash v credit
Although illegal in NY, it seems that gas stations have been doing this since gas rose above 2 bucks. Not all of them but some of them
as a typical /.er I did not RTFA... but how can he claim rights to a cover? he covered a song, and he is claiming copyright on the cover of a song, that is copyritten by someone else? Am I understanding this correctly???
oh I will gladly read all the links. I am big on "real" history, not a big fan of revisionist history so I thank all of you for the information
By thatt logic we shouldnt give anyone credit for anything because "its obvious and would be discovered in time"
didnt he get fired from a job for never showering?
also true. I would wager doing years and years of work and not getting credit, and even being sued for the work you did would drive anyone to insanity however