Most definately... for me that has been Fire Emblem (both of 'em, but especially the second). The graphics surely don't make this a hit; for me it is the grind gameplay. There is enough choice IMHO to justify replaying this game many times. To each his/her own.
Agreed... while I would see the obvious conflict if Bill ran, I believe an Atheist should run for president. I noticed some people touched on the issue of morality of atheists. The biggest difference is simply that atheists do not have anything to base their morality from; it is not that they don't have morals and sometimes have better ones than some religious people.
In the reality of the U.S. an atheist would not win. Which really sucks because IMHO atheists tend to be more objective about things. Of course, all it takes is one person to screw up the ideals of an entire group - so let's hope we pick the right one.
At one point I had 'borrowed' a Cisco 2600 and used that for my home connection. That with a sensible access-list and NetFlow to easily check up on things seemed to work well for me:-D
I also noticed how many russians liked to poke and prod at my router, grrr...
I had same problem with X breaking because of custom DRI to support my S3 Twister K on HP laptop. I moved the file as suggested. Ran apt-get -f update and apt-get dist-upgrade until all was satisfied. Everything now is working minus... gksudo (I think): When I try to open something that would normally require root priviledges instead of asking me for a password, it just errors out. I haven't taken the time to fix that yet, but I'm sure it won't be too difficult. My DRI is still working with no additional work so I'm happy.
When I read this I said what, 'Google provides updates?'. Then, 'And they're getting slack with putting them out!'. Only drug-induced reasoning provides confusion like that... sigh
Well I guess I better get over this damn cold so I don't have to drink anymore sizzurp.:-D
yes I believe Sun Tzu said:
'Generally in warfare, keeping a nation intact is best, destroying a nation second best... '
and also this may be pertinent:
' Therefore, to gain a hundred victories in a hundred battles is not the highest excellence;
to subjugate the enemy's army without doing battle is the highest of excellence.'
to be cautious when signing in to any google services with '/u/servicename ' in the url. I can see how this could be potentially bad; even people checking to see if it was google.com in the address bar would not see anything to merit phishing.
The current exploit was intentionally vague so that attackers would not have the upper-hand. The previous researcher mentioned was arrested for something prior to his presentation; I do not correlate the actions together.
I would say that is pretty dependant on hardware. In my case, wireless was tricky until 6.06 came out. Before I had to run through the GUI, set gateway manually, edit text files, etc. Now, it works automagically - I'm impressed. Good job dev / support team!
Wireless: Netgear WG511
Side note (not ubuntu related, more xfree86/xorg):
my HP laptop came with a TwisterK graphics card and that was a lot of fun getting DRI working.
If anybody else had/still has this problem, let me know and I will help you out.
And it seems to me that the only way that HiFn will make any reaction to this, is if we have actual customers (not developers) complain about the situation. Tell them it makes you uncomfortable (as a customer) to use their hardware which may not be supported in the future. I think they would have to respond to that.
Indeed, seeing how this article is about vuneralibilites this fits. However anyone who knows anything about setting up an email server would not allow relaying such as that. Now if you already know someones email address in that company then...
Interesting... I've also used the network edition and I have one question for you: were the clients XP SP2? If so, you needed to open ports / program access in your firewall. I know because the push feature does not work with the default firewall turned on. Other than that, my experience has been wonderful with AVG. I've only seen a few viruses that it couldn't clean, and at least in those cases it detected them so that I was able to manually remove them.
Yeah, I agree with parent to a point. But my personal take is this: if you only make one product, but make it exceptionally well then what's the problem? I think this could be a 'risky' approach; but if nothing else, I believe this would drive them to make a best product possible. Just my 2 cents.
So basically IT security experts can't test their own networks? I'm sure that will go a long way towards making the Internet more secure!
Yeah I see a pattern, it's called ineffective and ignorant legislation... it seems to be quite popular these days.
Slashdot Mirror
Most definately... for me that has been Fire Emblem (both of 'em, but especially the second). The graphics surely don't make this a hit; for me it is the grind gameplay. There is enough choice IMHO to justify replaying this game many times. To each his/her own.
Agreed... while I would see the obvious conflict if Bill ran, I believe an Atheist should run for president. I noticed some people touched on the issue of morality of atheists. The biggest difference is simply that atheists do not have anything to base their morality from; it is not that they don't have morals and sometimes have better ones than some religious people. In the reality of the U.S. an atheist would not win. Which really sucks because IMHO atheists tend to be more objective about things. Of course, all it takes is one person to screw up the ideals of an entire group - so let's hope we pick the right one.
"You can't fight what 99% of the population accepts as the definition"
:-D
You mean Wikiality?
At one point I had 'borrowed' a Cisco 2600 and used that for my home connection. That with a sensible access-list and NetFlow to easily check up on things seemed to work well for me :-D
I also noticed how many russians liked to poke and prod at my router, grrr...
Yes, unfortunately that would only filter out the really bad spellers that make commercials :-D
I had same problem with X breaking because of custom DRI to support my S3 Twister K on HP laptop. I moved the file as suggested. Ran apt-get -f update and apt-get dist-upgrade until all was satisfied. Everything now is working minus... gksudo (I think): When I try to open something that would normally require root priviledges instead of asking me for a password, it just errors out. I haven't taken the time to fix that yet, but I'm sure it won't be too difficult. My DRI is still working with no additional work so I'm happy.
yes. :-D
When I read this I said what, 'Google provides updates?'. Then, 'And they're getting slack with putting them out!'. Only drug-induced reasoning provides confusion like that... sigh Well I guess I better get over this damn cold so I don't have to drink anymore sizzurp. :-D
Unfortunately, that also goes the other way... My stress / anxiety causes me lose appetite; on the other hand, I feel smarter every day :-D
"He told me to rewrite the script...I said fuck it! I'll just make a copy." -Mitch Hedberg
But does it have hyper-threading support? eh? eh? :-D
yes I believe Sun Tzu said: 'Generally in warfare, keeping a nation intact is best, destroying a nation second best... ' and also this may be pertinent: ' Therefore, to gain a hundred victories in a hundred battles is not the highest excellence; to subjugate the enemy's army without doing battle is the highest of excellence.'
to be cautious when signing in to any google services with '/u/servicename ' in the url. I can see how this could be potentially bad; even people checking to see if it was google.com in the address bar would not see anything to merit phishing.
If it can't electrocute someone, then it's not good enough for me :)
The current exploit was intentionally vague so that attackers would not have the upper-hand. The previous researcher mentioned was arrested for something prior to his presentation; I do not correlate the actions together.
Wireless: Netgear WG511
Side note (not ubuntu related, more xfree86/xorg): my HP laptop came with a TwisterK graphics card and that was a lot of fun getting DRI working. If anybody else had/still has this problem, let me know and I will help you out.
I think my favorite was Weird Al... not that there are too many examples, but those shine (especially All about the Pentiums)
All right, giggity giggity...
We can look forward to important life lessons like that hold true in today's time...
"The best way into a girl's bed is through her parents. Have sex with them, and you're in."
And I think the 'base' requirements should be:
*better hardware than what you have now
*no cares about privacy or freedom
*etc, etc
And it seems to me that the only way that HiFn will make any reaction to this, is if we have actual customers (not developers) complain about the situation. Tell them it makes you uncomfortable (as a customer) to use their hardware which may not be supported in the future.
I think they would have to respond to that.
Indeed, seeing how this article is about vuneralibilites this fits. However anyone who knows anything about setting up an email server would not allow relaying such as that. Now if you already know someones email address in that company then...
Interesting... I've also used the network edition and I have one question for you: were the clients XP SP2? If so, you needed to open ports / program access in your firewall. I know because the push feature does not work with the default firewall turned on. Other than that, my experience has been wonderful with AVG. I've only seen a few viruses that it couldn't clean, and at least in those cases it detected them so that I was able to manually remove them.
Yeah, I agree with parent to a point. But my personal take is this: if you only make one product, but make it exceptionally well then what's the problem? I think this could be a 'risky' approach; but if nothing else, I believe this would drive them to make a best product possible. Just my 2 cents.
So basically IT security experts can't test their own networks? I'm sure that will go a long way towards making the Internet more secure! Yeah I see a pattern, it's called ineffective and ignorant legislation... it seems to be quite popular these days.