Slashdot Mirror


Futurama Returns

GrumpySimon writes "Good news everyone! Straight from a one-eyed alien's mouth - 13 new episodes of Futurama have been confirmed by Katey Sagal on Craig Ferguson's Late Late Show. All the original actors have signed up too."

553 comments

  1. YAY! by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

    I love the smell of Slurm in the morning - it smells like ... walrus!

    1. Re:YAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Considering that the recent thread on global warming is about to reach 600 posts, I think I should remind everyone that there is hope:

      Fry: This snow is beautiful. I'm glad global warming never happened.
      Leela: Actually it did. But thank God nuclear winter cancelled it out.

    2. Re:YAY! by ringmaster_j · · Score: 1

      Brought to you by Fishy Joe's: Ride the Walrus!

    3. Re:YAY! by rf0 · · Score: 1

      Washes down that bachelor chow real good

    4. Re:YAY! by tolan-b · · Score: 2, Informative

      in a rare (*snigger*) continuity error there were two explanations for global warming not destroying the planet in Futurama. The other being that they drop a huge ice cube in the ocean once a year. /pedantic obsessive fan

      "glowbal wopple?"

    5. Re:YAY! by BakaHoushi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't think Futurama actually even tries to have a real continuity. In the beginning of the series, they make references to Star Trek all the time, but later on the name becomes a "forbidden word."

      I just think of it like I did the Simpsons in some jokes. Lisa once stated the Springfield Oil Field is 3 times the size of Texas. This means either they live in Alaska (possibly, I need to consult a map for scale) or it's a joke because it's too ridiculous to be true.

    6. Re:YAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ride the walrus!

    7. Re:YAY! by tolan-b · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah that was kinda what I was getting at.

      I suppose there's no real need for that sort of continuity, as long as the continuity for the main characters broadly fits together, and it gives them more room for humour without being penned in by what they did before.

    8. Re:YAY! by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1
      Washes down that bachelor chow real good
      You young whipper-snappers, back in my day our "Bachelor Chow" didn't even have flavor. You kids have it to easy.
    9. Re:YAY! by Xiaran · · Score: 1

      And it would seem that the opening title promotion of "See you on some other channel" has now come true :)

    10. Re:YAY! by amias · · Score: 1

      the court also finds polygamy constiutional

      --
      [site]
    11. Re:YAY! by DarkShadeChaos · · Score: 1

      We can look forward to important life lessons like that hold true in today's time...

      "The best way into a girl's bed is through her parents. Have sex with them, and you're in."

      --
      The machine unmakes the man. Now that the machine is so perfect, the engineer is nobody. -Ralph Waldo Emerson
    12. Re:YAY! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Well, the effects of nuclear winter eventually wore off. And then we realized that dumping a huge iceburg in the ocean every year would not only continue to keep global warming at bay, but it would also provide us with an endless supply of bags of 50 ice (as opposed to the 20th century, when we had to pay a whopping 99). So now it's cold in the winter, and a party all summer!

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:YAY! by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Lisa states that "West Springfield" is three times the size of Texas. It appears to be roughly the same shape too. All this does is constrain Springfield's location towards the east of the USA - nobody said West Springfield was all in the same state.

      (You have to know these things when you maintain the Where Is Springfield? file.)

    14. Re:YAY! by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

      That actually made me remember when I used to play a lot Freeciv... in the advanced years, almost to the end, when we had lots of global warming and our lands turned into useless deserts, my friends and I wondered if nuclear winter would cancel it... it actually made it worse :P we had useless deserts AND tundra.

    15. Re:YAY! by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Farnsworth [exasperated]: Professor! Lava! HOT!

    16. Re:YAY! by syrrys · · Score: 0

      Thweeeeet Nebula'th!

      --
      "Patience is not a virtue, it's a waste of time."
    17. Re:YAY! by Cyraan · · Score: 1

      There were actually a few instances of excellent continuity in the series. In the pilot, Nibbler's shadow is visible on a wall just before Fry leans over/is pushed into the freezer, just as explained a few seasons later in "The Why of Fry".

      --
      "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from a religious conviction." - Blaise Pascal
    18. Re:YAY! by Golias · · Score: 1

      Springfield is clearly a midwest American town with an ocean port.

      Which is the same thing as saying it's everywhere and nowhere.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    19. Re:YAY! by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      good lord, so it is! (shot of the foot of fry's chair as it over-balances)

    20. Re:YAY! by camg188 · · Score: 1

      There really was a famous inventor named Philo Farnsworth, but I don't think he was a professor. He invented the "Image Oscillite" which later came to be known as the TELEVISION.

    21. Re:YAY! by NumerusSpy · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure which episode it is in but you can also see nibblers eye looking out of the garbage bin before fry gets frozen. IT might be in the jurassic bark episode.

      --
      There they are a conga line of suck holes. On the conservative side of Australian politics. - Mark Latham
    22. Re:YAY! by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      Yeah I remember seeing that in one of them.

  2. Restrike while the iron is still warm? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I applaud it, I remember the resurrection of Ren & Stimpy and how it just wasn't quite the same anymore. The making of a popular series can often rest on the frenzy of creating the episodes and the chemistry of those at work on it. Add an interruption, time for other projects and influences, what will become of pulling the team back together? Will it be the same, or will it be like, "well, Bender saying, 'bite my shiny metal asee' doesn't totally suck, but it's just, you know, different now."

    Other news in the It's About Time Department:
    In other good news, finally on DVD, Yellowbeard! Arr! July 27 for USA & Canada or July 10 for UK No word yet on extras, like Group Madness, the documentary of making of the film.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by notBowen · · Score: 1

      Yes well, let's hope that they don't fuck with Futurama in it's return as much as they did Ren & Stimpy. "I'm the pitcher your the catcher!" /me shivers

      --
      The few surviving samurai survey the battlefield. Count the arms the legs and heads and then divide by five.
    2. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...but see I remember watching the old episodes of Ren and Stimpy and thinking, "why did I like this? This is horrible." Especially those two minute ultra-grotesque stills.

      It's not because the writers got worse. It's 'cause you got better. Or at least, I did. I can't stand the old Ren and Stimpy episodes now.

      Just like Family Guy, Futurama still cracks me up. If they make more, I'll still like 'em.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    3. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember watching the old episodes of Ren and Stimpy and thinking, "why did I like this? This is horrible."

      Ah, well, I bought the 3 dvd set of the originals and still get a big laugh out of them. Some are kinda weird, but I think they were weird back in the day, too. Best of the series were the Cmdr Hoek and Cadet Stimpy space serial send ups.

      I've been to a Spike and Mike's Festival of Animation and have thought, "Whaaaattt? This stuff is supposed to be funny?" Then I realise about 75% of the audience smoked a bong before coming in.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Joebert · · Score: 1

      I don't think Ren & Stimpy is a fair comparison, there's more than twice as many main characters to cover eachothers asses after a blunder in Futurama.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    5. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I applaud it, I remember the resurrection of Ren & Stimpy and how it just wasn't quite the same anymore.

      Yeah, but they put that on Spike TV, the network for men. Ren and Stimpy became another victim of the man-o-centric male-ocracy.

    6. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by alshithead · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I love your sig Hitler

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    7. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by alshithead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unlike Family Guy, Futurama is funny. I'm off now to eat my lobster self.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    8. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Joebert · · Score: 2, Funny

      *shakes head*

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    9. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by misleb · · Score: 2, Informative

      I seem to remember reading that the Ren and Stimpy characters were sold to Nickelodeon or the creator was fired or something like that after the first batch of episodes. So there is good reason why it changed dramatically. As long as Futurama keeps the same creative bunch, there is a good chance that it will be good as ever.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    10. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Ren and Stimpy were not exactly what I'd call the funniest cartoons in the world. Only so long you can drag on body fluid jokes before it gets redundant. A lot of the "new" cartoons of its kin are equally unfunny. If I wanted to watch a people farting and pissing and blowing snot all over things I'd just go to the laundromat and watch the coked out locals tweaking.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    11. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by alshithead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      To be more specific...tongue in cheek... "My honor student sterilized your kid." What the FUCK is that supposed to mean?

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    12. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by GersonK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, they won't make the same mistake they did with the new R+S - I'm sure they'll get Billy West back. Seriously, there are a lot of factors that led to the failure of the Ren and Stimpy's adult swim or whatever it was called that aren't present here. There wasn't the bloody custody battle like John K. had with Nick and the resultant split of the creative staff. The show's not going from "a kid's show written for the adults who make it" to "a show for adults. or at least, not for anybody under 18". The gap in production, while long, is nowhere near a decade. While David X. Cohen hasn't gotten a lot of (any?) projects of the ground in the iterim, he and Matt Groening are not the "do not play well with others" personalities who had to spend the post Fuuturama time coasting on their past success. Though, I will agree that there's a good chance the show will not come back on track, but there's little chance it won't come out better than Drawn Together (Damning with faint praise, I know). Anyhow, this is probably the first time I've had a good feeling towards Comedy Central since they canned MST.

    13. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because Ren and Stimpy didn't come back with the original talent. Of course if they bring it back in the "we're gonna cripple your creative control and censor you" sense then it will suck.

    14. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      While I applaud it, I remember the resurrection of Ren & Stimpy and how it just wasn't quite the same anymore.

      But Ren & Stimpy was halfassed to start with.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    15. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by alshithead · · Score: 0, Troll

      How is this flamebait? What is the sig supposed to mean? "My honor student sterilized your kid. Unless I'm missing a contemporary comedy related reference that isn't Nazi or eugenics related then the obviously sarcastic comment stands. Mange, merde, et morte...

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    16. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by mysteryvortex · · Score: 2, Informative
      I seem to remember reading that the Ren and Stimpy characters were sold to Nickelodeon or the creator was fired or something like that after the first batch of episodes.
      Yes sir, you are correct!

      John Kricfalusi creater and the original voice of Ren was fired after Nickelodeon started rejecting many of his ideas for being inappropriate. I still have the Kricfalusi episode on a VHS tape, good stuff.

      From the Wikipedia article:
      Nickelodeon eventually fired Kricfalusi from his own creation and systematically censored the cartoon down to little more than a remnant of its former self. Eventually, several episodes were deemed unairable and have never been broadcast by Nickelodeon again.
    17. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well not me, I just caught "Stimpy's Fan Club" for the first time in years and was just as entertained by Ren's Macbeth-ian lapse into madness, and noticed details I never had before. I think the frantic and concerning mental state that John K. could conjure up is a niche he can't be beat in, and the later seasons written after his departure reflect this. The show fell flat, and I couldn't stand those later seasons when they first aired, nor when they're on nowadays.

      But I still get a huge kick out of Log (tm), Powdered Toast Man, Lummox herds, lambasting the materialism and exposing the fetishism in western society, and the fact that the show could ever have been marketed as a kid's cartoon to start with.

    18. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if you like Family Guy more than the 1st season of Ren and Stimpy you just have no taste.

    19. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Nutria · · Score: 1
      "My honor student sterilized your kid." What the FUCK is that supposed to mean?

      I think it's a reverse of "my Bud-swilling brat beat up your honor student" bumper stickers, using Science to sterilize the ass-wipe before he could beat up the nerd.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    20. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Nutria · · Score: 1
      John Kricfalusi creater and the original voice of Ren was fired after Nickelodeon started rejecting many of his ideas for being inappropriate.

      Absolutely. Ren & Stimpy are about as suitable for Nickelodeon as Celebrity Death Match is.

      But CDM is 1000x funnier than R&S.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    21. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Atario · · Score: 0
      It's 'cause you got better. Or at least, I did. I can't stand the old Ren and Stimpy episodes now.
      Has it occurred to you that maybe you're just a novelty-fetishist? Unable to appreciate that which you've gotten used to?

      Or maybe just a typical Usenet-style "I'm-better-than-those-who-like-what-I-denigrate" mewler?
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    22. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Sathias · · Score: 1

      While I applaud it, I remember the resurrection of Ren & Stimpy and how it just wasn't quite the same anymore. The making of a popular series can often rest on the frenzy of creating the episodes and the chemistry of those at work on it. Add an interruption, time for other projects and influences, what will become of pulling the team back together? Will it be the same, or will it be like, "well, Bender saying, 'bite my shiny metal asee' doesn't totally suck, but it's just, you know, different now."

      I'm not sure that is a very good comparison, as the later episodes of Ren and Stimpy were after Nickelodeon fired John Kricfalusi. It would be akin to Fox getting rid of Matt Groening as the creator of the Simpsons and Futurama. The new episodes may not have the same magic, but if so, it won't be because the creator has been turfed, as far as I know.

      --
      Blessed are the 1337, for they shall pwn the earth.
    23. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Kremmy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Onward and Upward.
      "This episode was originally written for the original series' second season. It was conceived as an answer to the fans who wrote to Spümcø, wanting to see an episode made purely out of gross-out gags, but not originally as "adult" as this version became."
      While it doesn't say whether That Scene was in the original cut ... it doesn't say it wasn't. I'm afraid this may not have been them fucking it up - just letting us know how bad it would have been if Nickelodeon had let it.

    24. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

      I absolutely love futurama and i think that the 5 seasons they have now just keep getting better every episode. I definately agree it will take a lot to not make this a flop.

    25. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      As a kid I was constantly either horrified or disgusted by Nickelodeon, it would take quite something for an episode to be unsuitble for THAT network.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    26. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      CDM has also been revived -- new episodes Saturdays at noon ET on MTV2. They've pretty much picked up where the original show left off, qualitywise.

    27. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Jugalator · · Score: 1
      While I applaud it, I remember the resurrection of Ren & Stimpy and how it just wasn't quite the same anymore. The making of a popular series can often rest on the frenzy of creating the episodes and the chemistry of those at work on it. Add an interruption, time for other projects and influences, what will become of pulling the team back together? Will it be the same, or will it be like, "well, Bender saying, 'bite my shiny metal asee' doesn't totally suck, but it's just, you know, different now."

      Hmm, I dunno... I have no big problems with Family Guy because of this.
      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    28. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Lately I've been going on a retro cartoon kick, trying to collect the series' I watched when I was younger. No Ren & Stimpy (i thought it was garbage even back then, lol) But lots of things I've gotten, and re watched thinking "this is utter crap"

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    29. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by scotch · · Score: 1

      Why would sterilization prevent someone from beating up another?

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    30. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by bjb · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ...but see I remember watching the old episodes of Ren and Stimpy and thinking, "why did I like this? This is horrible." Especially those two minute ultra-grotesque stills.

      It's not because the writers got worse. It's 'cause you got better. Or at least, I did. I can't stand the old Ren and Stimpy episodes now.

      I bought seasons 1-3½ on DVD which contains the original John K. episodes and the obvious downfall episodes after he was fired and Nickelodeon took over. All I can say is that the original first season still cracks me up, but everything afterwards is a sharp downwarn decline.

      The interesting thing is to watch the episodes with the audio commentary by John K. Suprisingly, he does commentary on episodes after his departure, and he really gives a lot of insight to help understand why anything after season 1 simply was garbage. To hit a specific comment of yours, "two minute ultra-grotesque stills": it was something new and unique to R&S. In the early episodes, you can see how those scenes helped build storyline, express context or otherwise simply drive a concept home. However, most people took these scenes at face value and just thought, "ooh! he's got a booger!" or something like that. Yeah, it is accessible at that level. Unfortunately, this is the level that the post-Spümcø felt they needed to continue and exaggerate. To put it in John K's words when seeing a gross close up of Stimpy in a season 2 commentary, "ugly for the sake of being ugly". In other words, no purpose to the scene like there would have been in season 1 episodes.

      Of course, this is a cartoon we're talking about, so it wasn't trying to save the world or teach you to eat your vegetables or anything; it was meant to be stupid humor for you to laugh at. All I'm trying to say is that this really was a groundbreaking show in cartoons and the first season was really something special in its own way. Unfortunately, that "magic" (if you will) was completely mis-interpreted and lost in subsequent episodes once John K. no longer oversaw production.

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    31. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Why would sterilization prevent someone from beating up another?

      It doesn't. But it prevents the asswipe from reproducing.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    32. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 0

      Will it be the same, or will it be like, "well, Bender saying, 'bite my shiny metal asee' doesn't totally suck, but it's just, you know, different now."

      As long as the writers don't use the show as a platform for constant haranguing about Matt Groening's political views, I don't think Futurama will fall into the lameness trap that some other previously-canceled-Fox-animated-comedy-shows-with -iconoclastic-creators-that-are-inspired-by-the-si mpsons have fallen into...

    33. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I like Family Guy and American Dad...

      The difference is that Family Guy and American Dad are funny the first time you watch them while the Simpsons and Futurama are funny every time you watch them.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    34. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Family Guy's humor depends a lot on unexpected randomness.

    35. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by rwhamann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I rented Dangermouse to watch with my kids, and it was sad for me not to get the same kick out of them. Sometimes memories are best left as memories.

      --
      seg fault
    36. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1, Informative
      The difference is that Family Guy and American Dad are funny the first time you watch them while the Simpsons and Futurama are funny every time you watch them.

      Actually, Family Guy will hopefully be the mold for Futurama. I find Family Guy hillarious every time I watch them - so does the entire Adult Swim viewing audience, because when they took Family Guy off for a week, the message boards went crazy, and Family Guy was returned to the Adult Swim lineup.

      Further to that, the new episodes stuck to the original formula and are as funny for a single reason - Seth McFarland is still at the helm. Hopefully, Futurama will retain the same writing staff, geniuses in their fields, people who actually understood and could properly mock science and physics.

      American Dad was never funny.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    37. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by AzsxQuii · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah....What about what happened to Family Guy...And when it came back it mocked fox on the intro of the first episode of the new season...By making a remark to the effect that if all these wonderful shows get canned maybe we have a shot. The joke is that all the shows mentioned where shows that fox aired and cancelled.

    38. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by kimvette · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, Family Guy humor comes from their making jokes which are so repetitious that they aren't funny any more, but annoying, and then taking it a step further until it becomes funny that they're dragging the joke out, then they drag it out just a little more to make it that much more annoying.

      Futurama humor and plot development is actually quite clever, especially since (like Arrested Development) some of the jokes and plot twists aren't revealed until later episodes (e.g., Nibbler's being present but unseen in the first episode but upon subsequent viewings after seeing "The Why of Fry" (4ACV10) it becomes obvious Nibbler was there and that plot line was planned from the beginning).

      Oh, and the Dave Matthews Band does not rock.

      Anyway, if this is actually true, I shall no longer refer to Fox as Faux and I shall no longer say that Faux can bite my shiny metal ass. Furthermore, I shall have to now watch Fox's crap reality shows because I've repeatedly sent them emails promising to watch their crap reality shows and buy from their crappy sponsors if they bring Futurama back as a series. I wonder if watching just one episode of American Idol or whatever crap they're airing now will fulfill that obligation, or is that like making a deal with the devil?

      Anyway, here is what I really posted to say:

      <Amy>Yay!</Amy>

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    39. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by mrtivo · · Score: 1

      That's not saying much. :)

    40. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I think it could go either way - when Family Guy returned, it was as good as ever.

    41. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by kimvette · · Score: 1
      American Dad was never funny.


      Actually I'd dispute your claim. America bad IS funny. Not ha-ha funny, but so badly written that it's funny. Kind of like watching bad sci-fi like Plan 9 from Outer Space, Starship Troopers, Battlefield Earth, Invaders from Mars, or This Island Earth. They're just so poorly written and have such cheesy dialog that they're painful AND side-splittingly funny to watch, all at the same time.
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    42. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Actually it would have been great if that was the case. Unfortunately Nibler is not present in episode 1 and is only added later.

    43. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually it would have been great if that was the case. Unfortunately Nibler is not present in episode 1 and is only added later.

      Watch the scene where Fry falls into the cryochamber frame-by-frame. A mysterious shadow will be seen.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    44. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's the Nomad kind of sterilization. :)

    45. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Durinthal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually.. when Fry falls out of his chair and into the pod, it briefly cuts to a view of the bottom of the chair with his noisemaker falling to the floor. You can see Nibbler's shadow on the left side of that shot.

    46. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I wonder if watching just one episode of American Idol or whatever crap they're airing now will fulfill that obligation, or is that like making a deal with the devil?"

      Spleesh. Like any good restart, they're probably going to re-show the old episodes to milk as much out of it as possible, which means you might be able to get away with it if you watch some old Futurama episodes on Fox too. That wouldn't be so bad. It's not like you'll have to give them back your robot hands or something.

    47. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Actually, Family Guy humor comes from their making jokes which are so repetitious that they aren't funny any more, but annoying, and then taking it a step further until it becomes funny that they're dragging the joke out, then they drag it out just a little more to make it that much more annoying.

      Largely why I don't watch Family Guy unless I'm too lazy to turn TV off. You see a few shows and that's pretty much all you're going to see, just with different characters and settings, but the same crap over and over. American Dad is worse.

      Futurama at least had a story to each show, with the humour rolled into it, where it seems Family Guy drifts all over the place simply for the purpose of setting up a joke, some of which go on far too long. They could dump Family Guy and American Dad and I wouldn't miss them.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    48. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But I still get a huge kick out of Log (tm), Powdered Toast Man, Lummox herds, lambasting the materialism and exposing the fetishism in western society, and the fact that the show could ever have been marketed as a kid's cartoon to start with.

      Thank you. The thing a later half generation doesn't seem to get is this was fairly cutting edge, underground stuff. Why Nick even picked it up is beyond me, it should have played late evening on Viacom's other network MTV, as Beavis and Butthead did. RnS (as it was referred to back in the day) was a huge hit with the college age group. Little kids could laugh at the nose-goblins or Mr. Horse sniffing a pan of Gritty Kitty, but the content wasn't really intended for them. John K. waged epic battles with Vanessa Coffey, who would eventually get him the sack, which dramatically altered many finished cartoons, which then went back to the shop for some modification and as John once said, just to mock Coffey, they'd make no sense, like the butchered PC Looney Tunes of the 70's.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    49. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not because the writers got worse. It's 'cause you got better. Or at least, I did. I can't stand the old Ren and Stimpy episodes now.

      You call losing your sense of humor "better"? I feel sorry for you. Ren and Stimpy is brilliant beyond words. Not only that but it's been hugely influential. Spongebob Squarepants would not exist without Ren and Stimpy leading the way.

      I don't understand why people change what they like. Ren and Stimpy, Rocko's Modern Life, Eek the Cat, all are as entertaining today as they were 10 years ago. And they're still better than most of the drek they play today.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    50. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? I distinctly remember some fan pointing out Nibbler's silhouette in episode one (to peer skepticism) not long after the character's introduction but long before the episode confirming it.

      Of course, I took it to be a coincidence that the writers subsequently decided to use.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    51. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      OMG! you're right. I actually went back to check if Nibbler was there, but didn't see him.

      Only by now going through it frame-by-frame is the shadow visible.

    52. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Actually, Family Guy humor comes from their making jokes which are so repetitious that they aren't funny any more, but annoying, and then taking it a step further until it becomes funny that they're dragging the joke out, then they drag it out just a little more to make it that much more annoying.

      I think Matt and Trey put it best in their South Park vs. Family Guy episode..

    53. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative
      Nibbler's shadow was, however, added in the flashback scene in an entirely unrelated episode earlier that season. You can see his eyestalk if you look for it. (But you can't see Fry's shadow, because presumably that didn't happen 'yet'. Actually, that didn't happen at all.)

      I.e., they did plan it out. Just not that far in the past.

      The story of The Why of Fry is hilarious. One of the writers came in and pitched it, and they all just stared at each other in shock, because it completely explained two completely unrelated episodes they'd already done, the flying brain episode, aka Fry's-brain-thing, and the Fry's-his-own-grandfather episode, and linked in stuff from the first episode, like what Fry was doing at the cryogenic place in the first place and the 'almost fall into the tube right before he actually did it' gag.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    54. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      I loved Eeek the Cat. I wish I could find them on DVD.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
    55. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by camg188 · · Score: 1

      Fox is not bringing the series back. According to the story, it's Comedy Central.

      Comedy is like art or food, people have different tastes. I think that Family Guy is hilarious. Their rip on Christine Aguilera was probably the single funniest joke of 2005.

    56. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      That's fine, I have Futurama on DVDs, and before that I had MPEG2 captures plus DivX downloads of the episodes I'd missed from before the DVDs were released, and I STILL watch it on Adult Swim. Heck, I'll even buy new box sets this year and give them out as X-mas gifts just to help prime the pump for Futurama demand. :)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    57. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Fox still owns the show, so Fox had to approve ANY Futurama production. According to various rumors you might find online, Cohen and Groening have been wanting to bring it back in any form, but Fox has been the stumbling block. Groening made a huge mistake when he did not retain ownership of his work. Understandable, considering most of the time if you keep ownership, you'll have a hard time getting the networks to fund the production.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    58. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comedy is like art or food, people have different tastes. I think that Family Guy is hilarious. Their rip on Christine Aguilera was probably the single funniest joke of 2005.

      Yes, kudos to the Family Guy writers. One has to be exceedingly clever to make fun of Christina Aguilera.

    59. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by C0rinthian · · Score: 1
      Yes, kudos to the Family Guy writers. One has to be exceedingly clever to make fun of Christina Aguilera.
      Am I the only one that heard this line in my head delivered by Stewie?
    60. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Family Guy, now Futurama? Does this mean Fox is going to bring The Simpsons back from the dead, too?

    61. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      I agree. American Dad is pretty crappy. I may have gotten a few huh's out of it. Maybe even a laugh, but other than that it's complete rehash of the formula used in Family Guy gone wrong. Hell, even the pet fish has the hots for the semi-attractive matriarch (Brian and Lois). I remember reading an interview with Seth McFarlan talking about why he think the would succeed and all he talked about was which charecter on AD was equivilant to FG. When I read the inteview I thought, "Great! I hope this works out, I'll actually watch TV on Sunday nights."

      After three episodes I just turned it off. I tried watching some of the later episodes, but they still aren't funny. It doesn't even have the Monte Python effect. You know, where it's kinda funny when you watch it the first time, but the second time, and every time you talk about it, it's frickin' hilarious! I tried watching a couple reruns... the show isn't worth the electricity to have it on in the background.

      Family Guy still has it, American Dad is trash. I'd have modded you up, parent poster. You don't deserve Troll status.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    62. Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? by mink · · Score: 1

      I wish that as well. Right now the only way to see them is find torrents. And I have never seen a torrent of season 3.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  3. Better News Everybody! by carterhawk001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    All thirteen episodes will come in a suppository!

    1. Re:Better News Everybody! by cybereal · · Score: 1

      This should be a 5, awesome reference!

      --
      I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
    2. Re:Better News Everybody! by KingPrad · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what flavor?

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    3. Re:Better News Everybody! by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      "Did you watch the new episodes yet?"

      "Yes, now stop asking me that!"

    4. Re:Better News Everybody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Yes, but what flavor?

      Depends what flavor Jessica Alba's ass is.

    5. Re:Better News Everybody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe she has a sweet ass.

    6. Re:Better News Everybody! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Now available in new Molten Boron flavor!

      Nobody doesn't like Molten Boron!

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:Better News Everybody! by jdoss · · Score: 1

      Did everyone take their suppository? YES. NOW STOP ASKING.

    8. Re:Better News Everybody! by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      While I'm perfectly willing to believe that, I'd like to hear from someone who's sampled the flavor...

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
  4. YES ! by Joebert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Complete with New shinier, easily bitable metal ass.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:YES ! by alshithead · · Score: 1

      My ass is reflects more visible light. Bite it...

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    2. Re:YES ! by Lurker187 · · Score: 1
      Complete with New shinier, easily bitable metal ass.
      ...and it's 30% iron, 40% zinc, 40% titanium, and 40% Dolomite, baby! Aw yeah! That's right, I know it, baby! Do the Bender!

      (Yes, I spend way too much time watching Futurama.)
      --
      [command INSERTWITTYQUIP failed: insufficient wit]
    3. Re:YES ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bite my glorious golden ass!

    4. Re:YES ! by aslate · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention the 0.04% nickel impurity!

  5. Three cheers for Comedy Central by King+Shazbot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hip, hip, huzzah! Hip, hip, huzzah! Hip, ah screw it.

  6. Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good news everyone, it's about f-in' time!

  7. choice quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sweet Zombie Jesus!!!!

    1. Re:choice quote by wobblygeek · · Score: 1

      I can't believe this is -1 Flamebait.

      Who on here with mod points doesn't recognize the parents post? Seriously...

    2. Re:choice quote by m00j · · Score: 1

      I can't believe someone marked you flaimbait for a legit quote from the show. Though now I am going to have to go watch that episode (The Deep South) again :D

    3. Re:choice quote by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was gonna do this as a Halloween costume. I was going to paint my face up all gray/green and rotting, sores and all, wear a white robe, and a crown of thorns, and get a couple broken 4x4s tied to my arms like I broke my way down from the cross... but every time I described it, all I got was this look of horror, even from non-Christians.

      Same thing with the Christopher Reeve loose fitting Superman suit and a wheelchair idea. This was before he was dead, of course, I know poor taste when I giggle uncontrollably at it.

      Trick or treat
      Feel my feet
      I can't.

      *sigh*

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    4. Re:choice quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was gonna do this as a Halloween costume. I was going to paint my face up all gray/green and rotting, sores and all, wear a white robe, and a crown of thorns, and get a couple broken 4x4s tied to my arms like I broke my way down from the cross... but every time I described it, all I got was this look of horror, even from non-Christians.

      I'm laughing here. Seriously thats an awesome costume! If people can't see the funny side of their own religions then they need to be shot for the good of humanity.

      [Posted as AC, coz I'm not in the mood for a Karma dent purely for having an opinion.]
    5. Re:choice quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh man. Where have you been all my life?!? That' is *exactly* my sense of humor!! :) :)

      I got banned from my favorite motorcycle forum for posting too many Terri Schiavo jokes.

      What's the hardest thing about eating a vegetable? The chair.

    6. Re:choice quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That. Is. Awesome.

    7. Re:choice quote by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      What's the hardest thing about eating a vegetable? The chair.

      Maybe you weren't banned for tasteless jokes, but for posting jokes that were already considered stale in 1978.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    8. Re:choice quote by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is what happens when those of us who moderate correctly aren't given points. You're stuck with the asshats who mode people as Flamebait and Troll simply to drive down the post.

      But hey, what do I know. I haven't had mod points in probably a year no matter how much I meta-mod (which I've stopped) and can't get stories accepted.

      As people keep telling me, the systems broke. Accept it. Once you do you'll be better off.

      Or, to put it in terms a geek should understand, "It's dead Jim."

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    9. Re:choice quote by 14CharUsername · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah its really time to pull the feeding tube out of those jokes.

    10. Re:choice quote by Will_Malverson · · Score: 5, Funny
      Sweet Zombie Jesus!!!!

      As an avid watcher of the reruns on TBS and CN, I just gotta say, you're misquoting. The correct quote is

      "Sweet Zombie <weird, unnatural silence while the lips keep moving>"
    11. Re:choice quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:choice quote by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      his was before he was dead, of course
      Then, it appears you are also safe with Jesus then, depending on your beliefs. :)

    13. Re:choice quote by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Friend, the RNG is broken.

      I've been picked to mod about 5 times in the past 7 days.

    14. Re:choice quote by snowballs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh. Your. God.

      - Bender

    15. Re:choice quote by Amouth · · Score: 1

      damn.. and i was about to say that.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    16. Re:choice quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought something was messed up...I hadn't gotten mod points in 3 months (excellent karma the whole time), then I got some the other day. About an hour after I got them (had only used 3/5 points), I received more.

    17. Re:choice quote by spun · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that I get the opportunity to mod more when I post less. I think there is a built in bias towards letting lurkers moderate, so that people who post consistently will continue to post.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    18. Re:choice quote by Matimus · · Score: 1
      Same thing with the Christopher Reeve loose fitting Superman suit and a wheelchair idea. This was before he was dead, of course...

      Why not do 'Sweet Zombie Christopher Reeve' (more offensive ALWAYS means more laughs)

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    19. Re:choice quote by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      That's one of my most used real-life quotes stolen from Futurama. And I tend to type "oyg" whenever somebody types "omg" at me. Heh.

    20. Re:choice quote by srobert · · Score: 1

      Oh man! Don't do it. They'll crucify you

    21. Re:choice quote by script_daddy · · Score: 1

      But it's Jesus man! Lovers of fine woodworks always mod down posters who put carpenters in a bad light..

      --
      One of a Kind <-- You probably won't be interested..
    22. Re:choice quote by jZnat · · Score: 1

      I think you've got a point. Then again, you could always just check the damn source to see how it works...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    23. Re:choice quote by spun · · Score: 1

      Then again, you could always just check the damn source to see how it works...

      No thanks. Reading slashcode has been shown to be only slightly less insanity producing than chatting with Cthulhu.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    24. Re:choice quote by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      Run Slashcode through a text to speech program and you'll summon Cthulhu.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
    25. Re:choice quote by savorymedia · · Score: 1

      You could always, for Halloween, go around in a wheelchair with a dollar bill stapled to your collar.

      When people ask what your costume is, just tell them that you're Christopher Reeve in a strip club. *evil grin*

      --
      1 is the square root of all evil.
    26. Re:choice quote by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Oh God that's beautiful. I need to find a wheelchair.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  8. Santa is real! by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and apparantly, he's finally gotten around to having that *talk* with the folks at Fox.

    They've been VERY naughty this year. Now they must be trying to make up before Xmas.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Santa is real! by alshithead · · Score: 1

      usuage nazi...apparently

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    2. Re:Santa is real! by FlyingCheese · · Score: 0

      Spelling Nazi - "usage"

    3. Re:Santa is real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Santa Claus is gunning you down. Santa Claus is gunning you down...

  9. I believe it 100%!!! by denebian+devil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Cuz the actors never get it wrong.

    P.S. I feel like it's some futurama reference that my CAPTCHA was "breeder." Is Slashdot trying to say something about the human race?

    1. Re:I believe it 100%!!! by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

      But remember: If GrumpySimon says....

    2. Re:I believe it 100%!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Straight from a one-eyed alien's mouth

      She is not an alien. She is a mutent. No, not X-Men you insensitive clod! She is the most normal looking of all the mutents so her parents left her at Cookieville with a note that passed her off as an alien so that she could live a better life.

    3. Re:I believe it 100%!!! by Nefarious420 · · Score: 1

      HA HA HA... "breeder" was my Captcha on digg.net today.

    4. Re:I believe it 100%!!! by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 1

      What is up with all this captcha talk? I've never seen one on slashdot. Anywhere, for any reason. Ever.

      --
      Unpleasantries.
    5. Re:I believe it 100%!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I read on some fansite where he apparently posts, Billy West has said that everyone's known about this for some time but hasn't been allowed to talk about it while details were still being finalized. I guess one of those details was the number of episodes, which is a fairly big one as details go.

    6. Re:I believe it 100%!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might have changed in the last couple of months, but IIRC you have to solve one to create an account or to post when you're not logged in. (If you just click the "post anonymously" button while logged in, you don't have to solve one)

    7. Re:I believe it 100%!!! by CamDawg · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's now posted on Reuters and confirmed by Comedy Central, if it makes you feel any better.

    8. Re:I believe it 100%!!! by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Also, if you aren't logged in but fill in the username and password on the "Post Comment" page (as was apparently the case for the GGP) you don't have to complete the CAPTCHA.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    9. Re:I believe it 100%!!! by jZnat · · Score: 1

      It's probably for new users or users with less than $n comments already (e.g. 100 comments). I'd check the source, but it's hard to find anything meaningful when you look for the first few dozen times. :(

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    10. Re:I believe it 100%!!! by denebian+devil · · Score: 1

      If you don't sign in prior to starting your comment, and you submit your login info at the same time as you are writing your post, you see a CAPTCHA.

  10. Movies? by CompSciStud4U · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if this will affect the 4 movies that are currently being planned. Ride the Walrus!

    1. Re:Movies? by alshithead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Congratulations! You correctly used the word "affect" where 99% of the U.S. English speaking public would have used "effect".

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    2. Re:Movies? by Eideewt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      For a minute, I thought you were being sarcastic.

    3. Re:Movies? by tehgimpness · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      For a minute, I thought you were being sarcastic

      --


      ZOMGWTFPWNtKKTHNXBIBI!!!ONE!111!!!
    4. Re:Movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u am all poop

    5. Re:Movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a minute, I thought you were being a faggot.

  11. Futurama by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Maybe it's just me but, I don't get why futurama is popular. I don't get why any of the comedy animated shows are even cloe to popular. They very rarely make me laugh and it seems to be more "Well theres nothing better to watch" than "wow! I must catch it this week" as other series (like Doctor Who for example) bring out in me.

    So can someone explain to me the appeal of these shows or are they just drivel for the masses with the odd geek joke throw in to keep us happy? It seems nothing ever changes and what does change is instantly ignored, which really gets my goat. One week Lisa will be super smart and a veggie and the next week suddenly she's as dumb as Bart and eating a pork chop. So WTF?

    Someone please explain to me how this sort of thing is more popular than something with a real plot or something which is really funny?

    Not trolling, I just don't get it.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Futurama by whichpaul · · Score: 1

      You're not supposed to admit that kind of thing...

    2. Re:Futurama by kaufmanmoore · · Score: 1

      Part of the appeal of the Simpsons is how they are a "real" family. They are more realistic than alot of tv families out there, especially the #1 show when the Simpsons came out, The Cosby Show.

    3. Re:Futurama by toddhunter · · Score: 1

      I don't get why any of the comedy animated shows are even cloe to popular
      They are funny for a lot of people. Pretty simple really. For me the simpsons is just smile funny these days, whilst family guy makes me laugh out loud quite often. I don't like American dad though. Each to their own.

    4. Re:Futurama by CompSciStud4U · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the issue is exactly that they don't have to worry about what happened last week if the writers don't want to. That the characters don't have to age. I live in the real world. When I watch TV I don't want reality. I want something different. Something to tickle my imagination. And the surreal world of many cartoons is great for that. A show like Doctor Who doesn't appeal to me as much, because I would much rather pick up a book and supply a much cooler image of a sci-fi world in my own head.

      That being said, Futurama isn't the best example to be picking on for nothing ever changing. The series did have an advancing plot and the important events of previous episodes did matter in future ones. Individual events didn't matter as much, but the evolution of the character's relationships to each other definitely progressed based on the events of the show. I also felt it was much better written then other popular cartoons and didn't rely as much on mind-numbing pop-culture references.

    5. Re:Futurama by Zebai · · Score: 1

      Well personally, it comes on like around 11 for me, I'm almost ready to go to bed but not quite yet, I have nothing important to do but If i go to sleep right then and there i'll toss and turn for the 30 minutes anyway. I find the show amusing, and while I do not laugh out loud at the jokes, I do enjoy them, and I would love to see more seasons as watching these reruns will eventually dull out ( but not yet !) . Better than anything else I can watch that hour, god forbid I watch the selective reporting (ie report bad things only ) news channel.

    6. Re:Futurama by heinousjay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that everyone thinks they have a sense of humor, even when they don't.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    7. Re:Futurama by Se7enLC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Futurama does have order to it, and I can't think of any time where it just leave you right where you started with no explanation. Some examples of things that carry between episodes:

      - Nibbler shows up and sticks around, the order of those episodes has some significance
      - Leela's parents are discovered, then are characters on the show after that.
      - Farnsworth's clone is created and is in future episodes.

      Just to name a few.

      typically everything that happens is straightened out by the end of the episode as needed. It's just not in the typical cartoon genre to have numerous-episode-arcs, because reruns are not often shown in order.

      And PS, the "OMG PONIES! AND NEW FUTURAMA EPISODES!!" is *really* old news. I assume this number of episodes is really just the dvds that were mentioned months ago. It's been on adult swim bumps for awhile now.

    8. Re:Futurama by afaik_ianal · · Score: 5, Interesting
      One week Lisa will be super smart and a veggie and the next week suddenly she's as dumb as Bart and eating a pork chop. So WTF?

      Dude - It's just a cartoon.

      Someone please explain to me how this sort of thing is more popular than something with a real plot or something which is really funny?

      Noone's really saying that Futurama is better than Dr Who, but that doesn't mean it's not enjoyable. Plot? No way. Funny? Absolutely! More importantly, it's just entertaining.

      it seems to be more "Well theres nothing better to watch" than "wow! I must catch it this week" as other series

      That's something I love about these kind of shows. You don't need to make the investment to watch them. I hate it that I can't watch a lot of "running plot" shows because I know I'm going to miss a bunch of them. With Futurama/Simpsons, I can just watch them if I'm free.
    9. Re:Futurama by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Humour is like colour; I can't explain to you WHY I like blue, I just do.
      Even if you try to persuade me for hours that red is a much better colour, you won't be able to win me over.

      In short, nods to classic bits of comedy coupled with a great sense of absurd and sprinklings of science make a cartoon I love to watch. I love the voice-work in Futurama too, great characterizations.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    10. Re:Futurama by alunduil · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's funny simply becuase it is. I enjoy the more scientific humour of the show. Things like winning by a quantum difference (I know I'm misquoting this) being responded with things like: "No fair! You changed the result by measuring it" It adds a humour for the physicist in me. Regards, Alunduil

    11. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone please explain to me how this sort of thing is more popular than something with a real plot or something which is really funny?

      You're missing something really obvious: different people have different tastes, and having different tastes than yours does not make somebody stupid or wrong. Just because you don't like these shows doesn't mean they are not "really funny".

      You don't like them, and that's fine. Your tastes simply don't line up with the majority, and there's nothing wrong with that. Where it becomes wrong is when you become a condescending ass about it.

    12. Re:Futurama by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'll attempt a response.

      In a nutshell, shows like Simpsons, Family Guy, The Critic, and Futurama make me laugh, and greatly entertain me for their 30 minute duration. Okay, there's a dud episode every now and then, but for the most part they're really fun. And funny. There have been a few scenes from these that would just make me laugh a few days later when I would think about it, for instance.

      The fact that it bothers you that Lisa's mental acuity isn't entirely consistent from one episode to the next sort of implies you're greatly outside the demographic they're looking for, in which case I'd suggest stick with the shows that really make you happy. I watch these shows for their comedic value, not for a consistent basis upon which to do a comparative literary analysis.

      Similarly, there are shows that other people love that I can't stand at all (eg Everybody Loves Raymond). it's all your own personal tastes. Regarding not liking the Simpsons, my Mom cannot get into the Simpsons either. She's tried and either doesn't get the jokes or just doesn't think they're funny whatsoever.

      That said, at the end of your post you mention other shows that are 'really funny'. Can you give an example? I'm not trolling you either, just curious what you find funny.

    13. Re:Futurama by Durinthal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You apparently didn't watch much of Futurama, in that case. Time actually did advance over the course of the show, starting in 3000 and ending in 3004. Relationships between characters also changed over time.

      As for why Futurama is popular.. you may not find it funny, but a lot of people do. I, for one, like that there's a lot of geek jokes in there. One that I can think of off the top of my head was that there were a pair of books in the background of one scene labeled P and NP.

    14. Re:Futurama by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Why would you seek out an explaination of why something has value when you see no value in it to begin with. Chances are you, you just don't like it, and thats OK. Lets hope its not coupled with a *desire* to avoid things because they're popular .. but don't feel bad for not liking something. Each and every one of us can't see the value in something that other people do see a value in, what is important is just to respect that if other people see a value in it, then there must something to it. You don't need to understand it to give credit to it.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    15. Re:Futurama by wolf369T · · Score: 0

      Uhm, I think this is Married with Children... They clearly said that the Cosbies were a anti-inspirational source for the producers.

    16. Re:Futurama by alshithead · · Score: 1

      So...you've never seen "The Simpsons"

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    17. Re:Futurama by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe its just me, but I don't get why there is always one guy who feels the need to ask questions like this, or alternatively state that he hates a particular obscure thing. Its not like anyone is trying to shove Futurama down someone's throat. It is like going to a Star Trek convention and standing around saying, "You know, I really don't understand the appeal of this show!" There are a ton of shows on TV that are not Futurama - why not go watch one of them instead of commenting here to the effect that you don't like Futurama?

      Hell, there are a ton of other Slashdot articles you could be commenting on. Perhaps you could have found one that interested you. But no, you had to click on the Futurama article just so you could post a comment musing about the lack of appeal Futurama has for you.

      It kind of reminds me of people who love Windows and hate the Macintosh. OK, your favorite computer platform has 90+ percent of the market, so why go seek out places online where Mac people congregate and try to rain on their parade? They have less than 5% of the market. Leave them alone. Hell, I've seen people go onto Atari ST forums and say ridiculous things to the effect that the Atari ST is long dead and ST enthusiasts should just move on and get a Windows PC. Was that you?

      When you see a kid playing with a balloon, do you have an uncontrollable urge to go and stick a pin in it?

      There are a lot of things that do not appeal to everyone. Sane people ignore them. Personally I have no interest in Chritianity. That doesn't mean I show up to church every Sunday and say, "You know, I just don't understand the appeal...could you explain it to me?" It would be gouche and idiotic to do so.

      "Not trolling"? Bite my shiny metal ass!

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    18. Re:Futurama by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 1

      One week Lisa will be super smart and a veggie and the next week suddenly she's as dumb as Bart and eating a pork chop. So WTF?

      If your after continuity then stop watching cartoons.

      Someone please explain to me how this sort of thing is more popular than something with a real plot or something which is really funny?

      If we all liked the exact same things then there would be only one tv channel and simpsons and futurama would be on 24/7

      --
      serenity now!
    19. Re:Futurama by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      flamebait...

      My take was that it was consistant that Lisa was a little hippie shitdisturber. Maybe you watched an OLDER episode where they haven't yet developed that trait? Simpsons is popular because it's older than most of the audience. It came out in the late 80s. I was babysitting kids born in the 90s who liked the show even though their first memories of the show were probably from 1996 onward.

      Futurama is funny because it's silly and creative. Family guy is funny because it's a bit more adult and off the wall. South park is funny because they're highly objective and use hyperbole.

      That doesn't mean EVERY episode is comedy gold. But normally people tend to watch the series not just specific episodes which means watching the occasional shit-fill-the-season-out episode.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    20. Re:Futurama by Mikya · · Score: 2, Funny

      One week Lisa will be super smart and a veggie and the next week suddenly she's as dumb as Bart and eating a pork chop. So WTF?

      It's less confusing if you watch the episodes in order. ;)

    21. Re:Futurama by 0racle · · Score: 2

      It's funny because it's poisonous.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    22. Re:Futurama by Infernal+Device · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it's just me but, I don't get why futurama is popular.

      Because it's not about you.

      --
      "My God...it's full of trolls!"
    23. Re:Futurama by Elminst · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually... I find the container labelled "Condensed Milt" much more interesting, and very disturbing.
      Milt, for the non-biologists, is the sperm and seminal fluid of fish.

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    24. Re:Futurama by RealGrouchy · · Score: 0

      Futurama makes a lot of cultural references which, for whatever reason, you simply don't recognize. I had a friend--one of the coolest guys on campus (you know, that one)-- and when I sat next to him at Family Guy Club airings in the biggest hall on campus, my side would be splitting, when he'd be like, "what? I don't get it." He simply didn't grow up with the same cultural references--the "zeitgeist", if you will--that this type of show brought us back to.

      One advantage of the medium of cartoons is that things can *both* change *and* be the same. For example, none of the characters on the Simpsons gets any older, but Maude Flanders dies, and the show goes on. Hell, Phil Hartman died, and the show went on. Despite these losses, the show is no less "Simpson"-y than it was before.

      Compare with a show like Home Improvement. The *only* thing it can do is change. The kids get older, and eventually Jonathan Taylor Thomas starts his movie career (short lived, I guess. Anybody heard from him lately?), and they have to come up with some ruse for his character being away for whole seasons. Because it's a show that centres on family values, it went downhill at this point; because it's a show that is very much grounded in reality, they don't have the option of the horrendous deaths that befell South Park's Chef or the Simpsons' Maude.

      Ironically, I don't watch TV any more.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    25. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so why go seek out places online where Mac people congregate and try to rain on their parade?

      Just mention the word "Vista" anywhere on the Internet and a the red alert siren sounds in Cupertino alerting all appledroids to dive in and start flaming. Maybe that's why?

    26. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      One week Lisa will be super smart and a veggie and the next week suddenly she's as dumb as Bart and eating a pork chop.

      You obviously don't have a sister.
    27. Re:Futurama by KingPrad · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's anything to explain. Different people enjoy different humor. I enjoy non-sequitors and absurdist humor. I think the "real plot" shows are not funny. They just bore me. But I don't ask you to explain that humor of them to me because it's never going to make it funny to me.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    28. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wait, I can't decide whether to mod you up or down. Were you with the parent, or against?

    29. Re:Futurama by kv9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      yadda-yadda, I'm too good for animation

      perhaps its the big stick up your shiny metal ass?

    30. Re:Futurama by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 5, Funny
      When you see a kid playing with a balloon, do you have an uncontrollable urge to go and stick a pin in it?

      Dude, why would you want to stick a pin in a kid?

    31. Re:Futurama by wheany · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On the other hand, having a sense of humor does not mean that you laugh at everything.

    32. Re:Futurama by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd have to say mostly - you can't compare Futurama to the Simpsons.

      The second of the two jumped the shark a while ago - although it came back from the groaner pile a bit it never compared to Futurama which was just getting a decent groove when Fox pre-empted it into oblivion.

      After Futurama came out - the Simpsons seemed just wholesale tame by comparrison and even in some of the comentator tracks on the DVDs you could see where Matt G.'s passion was going (or at least more of it). It's not just the geek factor - it's the ubber geek factor that made it great among other things. Plus not having to be tied down to earth led to a much broader swath of possiblities - continuity be damned. Or at least horribly twisted if one recalls brain-burners like the Farnsworth parallel universe boxes. That was a particularly fun episode.

      I don't really know where I'm going with this so I'll just stop now.

    33. Re:Futurama by Skreems · · Score: 1

      Except that Futurama is genuinely funny. Plus it actually had somewhat of a continuing story, and some very touching moments. In one of the last episodes, Fry drinks 100 cups of coffee, and after drinking the last one, essentially becomes enlightened. Time stops, he just looks around, nods, and proceeds to fix everything. That's a beautiful moment. Few shows have that AND the level of humor that Futurama did.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    34. Re:Futurama by Nutria · · Score: 1

      and when I sat next to him at Family Guy Club airings in the biggest hall on campus, my side would be splitting, when he'd be like, "what? I don't get it." He simply didn't grow up with the same cultural references--the "zeitgeist"

      My wife doesn't get FG & Futurama either. But then, she's normal.

      Except for marrying me.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    35. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid it's one of those situations where "if you have to ask, you'll never know" applies. Some people like reality TV shows, some don't. Some like cartoons with an incisive observation, humorously phrased and delivered with impeccable timing, some don't.

    36. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't explain why you like blue, and somehow you're okay with that?

    37. Re:Futurama by phantomflanflinger · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome obscure references that few recognise.

      --
      shin phantomflanflinger
    38. Re:Futurama by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      It must suck to be you.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    39. Re:Futurama by Joebert · · Score: 1
      I can't watch a lot of "running plot" shows because I know I'm going to miss a bunch of them. With Futurama/Simpsons, I can just watch them if I'm free.

      It's like the story of the grasshopper and the octopus. All winter long the grasshopper collected acorns while the octopus sat on the couch watching tv and mooched off his girlfriend. Then the winter came, and the grasshopper died, and the octopus ate all his acorns, and he also got a racecar. Is any of this getting through to you?
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    40. Re:Futurama by Duds · · Score: 1

      ER.. Lisa never reverted back to eating meat after she became veggie that I remember.

    41. Re:Futurama by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1
      [...] and mooched off his girlfriend

      You must be... oh, never mind.
    42. Re:Futurama by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, why would you want to stick a pin in a kid?

      Spoken as someone who has never tried it. Geesh. ;)

    43. Re:Futurama by bitt3n · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The problem is that everyone thinks they have a sense of humor, even when they don't.

      that's why I love the Slashdot 'Funny' mod. It always lets me know when to laugh at a joke, so I don't feel left out.

    44. Re:Futurama by BeardsmoreA · · Score: 1

      If we all liked the exact same things then there would be only one tv channel and simpsons and futurama would be on 24/7

      You've visited us here in the UK then?

    45. Re:Futurama by Metostopholes · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up... or down. I need someone to tell me which.

      --
      "With rare exceptions people cannot use that picture to masturbate, therefore it is not the internet."
    46. Re:Futurama by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      You don't like them, and that's fine. Your tastes simply don't line up with the majority

      Actually I think his taste does line up with the majority, unless you mean the majority here.

    47. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, why would you want to stick a pin in a kid?
      Don't knock it till you've tried it!

      (verification word image of the day: screwed)

    48. Re:Futurama by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      South park is funny because they're highly objective and use hyperbole.


      Don't you mean objectionable? They are different. South Park is NOT objective, whatever it would mean when applied to a cartoon. They very opinionated, rude and crass. Somee people like it, some don't. I don't. Others do. Big deal, but objective it is not.

      OTOH, Futurama was a great show, and I'm glad they are bringing it back. Now, if they would only bring back other good shows.

      Speaking of, why did they have to ruin Alias for the last season? It was like, "Oh, this is our last season, let's make sure that everyone is glad its over so they aren't being tortured by bad writing, poor plots, obvious devices, terrible scripting, and unbearable directing. Oh, and to top it all off, let's get rid of all the original cast as much as we can, so that by the time the show is over we'll only have two or three left. Then we can forget to close major plot lines, like with Vaughn, and nobody will care because they'll be so glad its over!" At least they won't be bringing that back (I hope).

      FWIW, I would love to see Firefly again, even without Wash and Shep, although I never felt like they really cleared up Shep's past the way I would have liked. The movie rocked though, and I wish there were more.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    49. Re:Futurama by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I think I've seen pretty much all Simpsons episodes and I can't remember any episode in which Lisa was as dumb as Bart or in which she was not a vegetarian.

      Perhaps you could refresh my mind and proof you're not talking out of your anus, as I currently suspect you are.

      As for Dr. Who; I don't like it. But that's no reason to suggest Dr. Who's drivel for the masses with the odd geek joke thrown in to keep you happy. It just isn't my taste.

      And as for the explaination why Simpsons is more popular than shows with real plots and really funny material. I guess your definition of "plot" and "funny" is just different from most people's.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    50. Re:Futurama by SamSim · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is, will they maintain the real time thing? I heard they planned to actually have people get older as the series went on. Certainly the years advanced as far as 3004 by the end of the first series, and Professor Farnsworth advanced from 158 to 161 years old. So will it be 3006/7 in the new series? If so, will any of the characters have visibly aged (Cubert and Dwight in particular)? And what will have happened in the intervening years?

    51. Re:Futurama by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      What Futurama episode is a dud?

      --Curious

    52. Re:Futurama by 14CharUsername · · Score: 1

      Doug: In episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a
             xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he
             produces two clearly different tones.  I mean, what are we to
             believe, that this is some sort of a [the three nerds chuckle]
             magic xylophone or something?  Boy, I really hope somebody got
             fired for that blunder.
      June: Uh, well, uh...
      Homer: I'll field that one.  Let me ask you a question.  Why would a
             man whose shirt says "Genius at Work" spend all of his time
             watching a children's cartoon show?
      Doug: [embarrassed pause] I withdraw my question.  [starts eating a
             candy bar]

    53. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun fact... you can see Nibbler's shadow in the very first episode pushing Fry's chair over into the cryogenic freezer. You know, because he was the only being who could stop the floating brains from season three. That's planning ahead!

    54. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      FYI, they were probably referring to the author John Milton (often referred to simply as "Milton"). Instead of (or in addition to) condensing his writing, they condensed his name.

      Hmmm, an inside joke for both English majors _and_ Biology majors. Not bad.

    55. Re:Futurama by schiefaw · · Score: 1
      Humour is like colour;
      It's spelled "color"! If it is good enough for Americans, it is good enough for the rest of the world.

      Pushing ALL the buttons today!

      --
      Angleyne: You can't bend that girder - it's unbendable! Bender: Well I don't know anything about lifting, so that ju
    56. Re:Futurama by dmnic · · Score: 1

      "Noone's really saying that Futurama is better than Dr Who"

      I'll say Futurama is better than Dr. Who(the tv show on SciFi).
      I havent met the first person who thinks Dr. Who is even remotely good!
      horrible writing, and even worse special effects.

    57. Re:Futurama by evil_Tak · · Score: 1

      They say everybody loves that guy...
      8:00.
      NBC.
      No, on your television.
      No, 8:00, on NBC.

    58. Re:Futurama by A.+Bosch · · Score: 1

      > Personally I have no interest in Chritianity. Perhaps this will help: http://www.theonion.com/content/node/32294

      --
      Where there is the necessary technical skill to move mountains, there is no need for the faith that moves mountains.
    59. Re:Futurama by jeffgeno · · Score: 1

      The Harold Zoid episode. A couple good moments with Leela and Fry trying to find parking, but otherwise a dud.

    60. Re:Futurama by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      One week Lisa will be super smart and a veggie and the next week suddenly she's as dumb as Bart and eating a pork chop. So WTF?

      Reruns don't always show in their production order.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    61. Re:Futurama by ZX-3 · · Score: 1

      Blue sucks!

    62. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bull donkey! That episode gave us the extremely useful line one can use in every day life:

      "Now you know why I used the qualifier 'practically'."

    63. Re:Futurama by Leigh13 · · Score: 1
      Things like winning by a quantum difference (I know I'm misquoting this) being responded with things like: "No fair! You changed the result by measuring it" It adds a humour for the physicist in me.

      Interesting... I always took that joke as a shot at the 2000 U.S. Presidential election. Specifically, going after the folks who complained that the votes in Florida shouldn't be recounted.

      --

      What I should have said was nothing.
    64. Re:Futurama by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I think they tend to show both sides of the debate. It just happens they pick popular debates for which the side they eventually blast is stupid.

      Take for instance the anti-smoking one. They clearly show that there are other evils out there [like fast food] that are just as bad for children as smoking. The one where Cartman becomes a cristian rock star is pretty much dead on. The anti-hippie one as well. Same with the anti-walmart.

      Sure they use hyperbole but that's because it's a 30min cartoon and they have to entertain by exageration. If they just said "smoking is dumb but so is fast food" it wouldn't be as funny as "smoking is bad, being a fat zealot is stupid and hypocritical".

      People who tend not to like South park are the same folk who tend not to watch it or pay careful enough attention. Sure if you watch only 5 mins of any one episode you won't get the message and therefore take it all out of context. But I can do the same with the bible. Watch this


      If a man lie with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood [shall be] upon them.


      OMG the bible says we should kill heteros!!! OMG PONIES!

      Taking shit out of context makes you look ignorant and stupid.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    65. Re:Futurama by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      My favourite bit is where Bender is meshing programs with the ship. He's running away from the ship's program through a circuit-board maze, and runs up against a diode facing the wrong way.

      That's the type of humour you won't find on Family Guy.

    66. Re:Futurama by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I hope not, because they left Fry and Leela's relationship in kinda an odd place. Skipping years would suck.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    67. Re:Futurama by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      Taking both sides of a debate (which is not what you demonstrate with that example from what I can tell) is not necessarily objective. And yes, they are objectionable--I am not necessarily referring to their take on different religions or anything like that, but I am more referring to the language and whatnot. I know this comes as a shock to many people, but there are a good number or intelligent adults that don't really like to hear crude language. I tend to ignore it, but I don't really like to hear it. One of the main reasons I don't watch South Park.

      OTOH, I do understand that they make sometimes valid points about interesting hot button issues. I just don't always care about those issues.

      FWIW, I fully agree that the Bible or anything else, is easily distorted. I wasn't trying to do this with South Park or anything else. Just saying that the way it was worded didn't seem right. I'm still not convinced that it is.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    68. Re:Futurama by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      I found Fraiser funny, Young ones, Bottom, Black Adder, Black books, The IT crowd if we're talking stuff you'd know or at least could Google, but I also enjoy stuff like Keroro Gunsou and Panda Z, which are comedic animes based on the giant robot genre in Japan. So it's not like "oh it's a cartoon it can't be funny". I'm not trying to say Simpsons isn't funny, I'm just saying at best it's a weak smile and at worse it's just "oohh pretty colours".

      Maybe it's just that I like characters to be constant and keep incharacter, where you don't seem to have this in Simpsons.

      I also hate Raymond, I'd rather fuck a bulldozer's exhaust than watch it.

      --
      I like muppets.
    69. Re:Futurama by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      I think that I gravitate towards animated comedy series because they usually don't have those damn laugh tracks.

    70. Re:Futurama by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Yea thats why my name is made up of two animated characters names. Well fucking done you. You just completely owned yourself.

      --
      I like muppets.
    71. Re:Futurama by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      I figure sometimes Lisa just acts dumb, I do it ALL the time for so many reasons.

      Neices asking for help with homework, I instantly know that 24*8 is 192, but I think it through, slowly, aloud, so that my neices learn something from the process.

      Also, for the 'Scotty' method, if you make it look easy, they'll think your job is easy.

      And nobody likes a smart-ass. I bet most of the people reading this are thinking "He's not that smart, he's just trying to look smart"

    72. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hope not, because they left Fry and Leela's relationship in kinda an odd place. Skipping years would suck.

      It could be comical. They could make constant references to the divorce, do "flashbacks" if they wanted to cover something from that period, etc

    73. Re:Futurama by _pi-away · · Score: 1

      I would be just fine if they ditched Farnsworth's clone and Hermes kid, they were by far the least entertaining characters.

      --

      "The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw."
    74. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are /.ers who don't know about quantum indeterminacy? C'mon, you should've picked this up by accident when reading Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency.

      Wait.

      You do have a Douglas Adams leatherbound compendium sitting in a place of honor on your bookshelf, don't you?

      Don't you?

    75. Re:Futurama by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 0

      And so many of us just thought you were a bisexual Frenchman. Actually, that would be an improvement over the pompous, self-aggrandizing, indy-geek-cred seeking tool that you are. Sad.

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
    76. Re:Futurama by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 1

      actually yes. i went for a week and stayed for 3 years.. what can i say, im an aussie!

      --
      serenity now!
    77. Re:Futurama by demental · · Score: 1

      Wow... good eye. Thats only one of the million sight gags that make the show great to watch, and great to re-watch. I really appreciate the effort of the writers and animators. Seriously, 1 in a million people is going to appreciate that (myself excluded), but there is a joke for the nerd in everyone. One of my personal favorites is bender getting strung out after seeing 1010011010 in the mirror. I hope to god Rough draft continues the animation, and X. Cohen and his band of writers are still involved because they made the show absolutely timeless. Even if it didnt appeal to the masses, the creativity and hard work should be commended. Good work rupert, you fixed f*&k up number 2. We'll talk about arrested development later.

  12. Good news everybody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ah but the whole use of celebrity heads was lame. Discuss

    1. Re:Good news everybody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I disagree.

      -Richard M. Nixon's head

    2. Re:Good news everybody! by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      It was worth it for the head museum scene and Conan O'Brien.

      COB: There's one thing I've got that you'll never have: a soul!
      Bender: Eh...
      COB: And freckles!!!
      Bender: [cries]

      Plus without the heads-in-jars we'd never have had the pleasure of cyborg president Nixon.

      Interesting side note: as a head in a jar, I envy the dead.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    3. Re:Good news everybody! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ah but the whole use of celebrity heads was lame. Discuss

      It was a plot device so that they could have guest stars playing themselves without resorting to overused time travel plots like some other serious Sci-Fi shows. It sucked most of the time, but cameos often do elsewhere. It certainally had it's moments with some people though.

      I'm not holding my breath. Series 4 and 5 of Family Guy suffered by having different writers etc and it just wasn't the same show. For example, Stewie has lost his "kill lois, take over the world" zeal which for me was one of the highlights of the show. I expect the same sorts of disappointment with Futurama, but the talent is there to surprise us if they put their heads together.

    4. Re:Good news everybody! by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 1

      Better one was when Jonathan Frakes moves to the front...

      "Alright, Front Row!"

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    5. Re:Good news everybody! by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      Al Gore: "I have ridden the mighty moon-worm!"

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    6. Re:Good news everybody! by mranchovy · · Score: 1
      Series 4 and 5 of Family Guy suffered by having different writers etc and it just wasn't the same show.

      Yeah, it's just like the time I wrote that Spongebob Squarepants cartoon.....

      FLASHBACK: quick cut to Squidward beating Spongebob senseless with a baseball bat.
      --
      I am so smart!
      I am so smart!
      S-M-R-T!
      I mean S-M-A-R-T!
    7. Re:Good news everybody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A coworker of mine, while working on charity event, had the opportunity to meet Al Gore. Being a huge Futurama fan, the coworker, while being introduced to Al, said "It is a pleasure to meet the first Emperor of the Moon." to which Al Gore replied "I have ridden the mighty moon worm" with a huge smile on his face.

      At least that is how the story was related to me.

    8. Re:Good news everybody! by Damvan · · Score: 1

      Sorry, didn't mean to post that AC. Repost without the AC:

      A coworker of mine, while working on charity event, had the opportunity to meet Al Gore. Being a huge Futurama fan, the coworker, while being introduced to Al, said "It is a pleasure to meet the first Emperor of the Moon." to which Al Gore replied "I have ridden the mighty moon worm" with a huge smile on his face.

      At least that is how the story was related to me.

    9. Re:Good news everybody! by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      See, that's why he can never get elected.

      Americans have a deep-seeded hatred of nerds, and Al Gore is a gigantic nerd. (Bush was a nerd-beatin' jock.)

      (But I do wish Gore would run again.)

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  13. HYPNOTOAD LIVES by Asbradley21 · · Score: 4, Funny

    HYPNOTOAD LIVES!!!!

    1. Re:HYPNOTOAD LIVES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have THE best noise for that toad. THE BEST.....

    2. Re:HYPNOTOAD LIVES by Durinthal · · Score: 4, Funny
  14. *sigh* by Jethro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's too bad. Sure, I'm sad it ended, but it DID end well. Go figure what'll happen now.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:*sigh* by SoapDish · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you listened to the DVD commentaries, you'd know that they actually had much more planned in the underlying plot of the series, but it got cut short. The final episodes were in no way a conclusion to the series.

    2. Re:*sigh* by Jethro · · Score: 1

      No, I know that. But it STILL ended well. I'd LIKE to think that they won't ruin it, but... you know. This isn't Family Guy.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  15. All the original actors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How'd they get Phil Hartman on board with this one?

    1. Re:All the original actors? by OzRoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Phil Hartman was never in Futurama. He died in 1998. Futurama started in 1999.

    2. Re:All the original actors? by Jfleegle · · Score: 1

      Phil Hartman was never on Futurama. Are you thinking of Phil LaMarr?

    3. Re:All the original actors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're thinking he did Zap Branigan but thats billy doing the voice. think back to all those voice overs in Ren and Stimpy... Zap Branigan-ish, right? Voices are just similar.

    4. Re:All the original actors? by bitt3n · · Score: 1
      Phil Hartman was never in Futurama. He died in 1998. Futurama started in 1999.

      ok, I can accept that, but I hope at least they resign Richard Nixon.

      whoa! I mean re-sign! RE-SIGN Mr. Nixon! We miss not having you to kick around any more.

  16. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure! ...anything's got to be funnier than you.

  17. F'in A Cotton, F'in A by jaxon6 · · Score: 1

    Let's hear it for ancient readme files.

    --
    Do you see the sig? Do you have it in your sights? Why yes, Miss Moneypenny...
  18. I have a reason to live again by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know, that sounds sad, even for a geek, but what can I say: Futurama is my favorite show and if you don't like it, you can bite my shiny metal ass.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    1. Re:I have a reason to live again by alshithead · · Score: 1

      "Brevity. is. Wit!" Your sig says it all... The quick one-liners are focused on geekness. Futurama actually gives us something to think about to find the humor. It's there on different levels especially for those of us who have more than two brain cells to rub together. If you don't know history, science, and current events, then you won't find the humor.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    2. Re:I have a reason to live again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Universe 1729 anyone?

    3. Re:I have a reason to live again by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      > "Brevity. is. Wit!" Your sig says it all...

      I can't take credit for it, it's a nod to The Simpsons; the episode where Lisa writes an essay about America and wins a trip to Washington. The contest was sponsored by Reading Digest, whose slogan seemed to be a condensed version of the quote by Shakespeare. I thought that was hilarious: Shakespeare can be quite wordy, but the writers of The Simpsons managed to convey Will's idea while being able to remove 50% of the words in the phrase, just like Reader's Digest purports to do... Hmmm... Maybe I AM a bit too geeky, sorry.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    4. Re:I have a reason to live again by Yewbert · · Score: 1
      That's always been one of my favorite Simpsons jokes that no-one else seems to have gotten. ('Cept, being not especially familiar with Shakespeare, I'd always mentally attributed the original quotation to Dorothy Parker - not sure exactly why my brane picked her,...)

      And, as long as I'm off-topic, another Simpsons gem that slips by most people is early in the episode where Homer builds and mans the battle-bot; just after Bart has wrecked the poorly-assembled bike, Homer chases him down, armed with his spring-loaded first-aid kit. For maybe two frames, you can see that the last of the sharp, pointy, dangerous first-aid kit items that springs out and lodges itself razor-sharp-edge-first into Homer's face is,... a Band-Aid! That whole scene, in fact, starting with the bike falling apart piece by piece and ending with the band-aid, just kills me - the best slap-stick in the whole series, for my money.

  19. Does this make me happy? by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does this make me happy?
    Is the space pope reptilian?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
  20. Like the NRA man said by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    "Amen, brother. I don't go anywhere without my mutated anthrax... You know, for duck hunting".

    Trying to explain why the above example is funny is like trying to legislate common sense.
    Both attempts are certainly futile.

    If I were you I just wouldn't worry about this too much and just wait for the year 2008 and use one of those America's favorite Stop 'n' Drop booths.

  21. Why so long? by SoapDish · · Score: 1

    Katey was on the late late show on Tuesday night, why did it take until Thursday night for this to get on slashdot?

    I'm disappointed. I would expect this sort of news about Futurama to get on /. within the hour of it being said.

    1. Re:Why so long? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 5, Funny

      We'll I'm sure they'll post a dupe to make up for it.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    2. Re:Why so long? by DeathFire · · Score: 1
      Because they reject stories. I submitted this yesterday morning and the story was promptly rejected. This is what Billy West posted on his forum regarding it:

      Yes! A full season of new Futurama episodes is on the way on Comedy Central! I already knew but every time I said anything,I got my ass spanked for ''jumping the gun.'' Everyone is coming back and we start recording in July.So,ahh.....Death to my enemies! This'll be so much fun. Billy
    3. Re:Why so long? by foxhound01 · · Score: 0

      because people on slashdot watch adult swim while the late show is on!

      --


      Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
    4. Re:Why so long? by fribhey · · Score: 0
      Katey was on the late late show on Tuesday night, why did it take until Thursday night for this to get on slashdot?
      maybe nobody knew because nobody watches the late late show
      --
      / http://suffocate.us
      / http://johngrayson.com
  22. Re:Neat by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    "Will they make it funny this time around?"

    "I just thought I'd come into a thread about a show I don't like and spend 20 seconds posting that I don't like it."

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  23. Stewie Griffin by NivMizzet · · Score: 1
    E! Weekly rep: "Hi, do you know if Fox has any plans to bring back Futurama?"

    Stewie: "What magazine are you From?"

    E! Weekly rep: "Entertainment Weekly"

    Stewie: *Cracks neck*

  24. Re:Neat by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

    As much as I disagree with GP, I think you just disproved your own point.

  25. Welcome back! by tkarr · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's about time! I love Futurama but you can only watch that show so many hundreds of times.

    1. Re:Welcome back! by 0racle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except Jurassic Bark. You can only watch that once unless you have no heart.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:Welcome back! by mikael_j · · Score: 1
      True, that's probably the most emotional cartoon episode I've ever watched, I actually tend to skip that episode because it's not fun, just sad..

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    3. Re:Welcome back! by k_187 · · Score: 1

      that's what I really loved about futurama. Especially the episode where fry goes into the underground to find his 7 leaf clover. That one nearly had me in tears.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    4. Re:Welcome back! by stokkie · · Score: 1

      Thank God. I thought I was the only one.

    5. Re:Welcome back! by fuzzix · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ha ha ha ha... oh wait, you're serious... Let me laugh even harder!

    6. Re:Welcome back! by klparrot · · Score: 1

      Nope.

    7. Re:Welcome back! by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

    8. Re:Welcome back! by Jerf · · Score: 1

      This is of course the first episode of Futurama my wife, with her degree in Zoology and corresponding love of animals, sees in its entirity. I hadn't seen it yet, so I didn't know what was coming.

      I'm now "banned" from watching Futurama. "Banned" is in quotes because it's not a real ban, but it's not to be on when she's around.

      I never dreamed the motherfuckers would end the episode like that. It was just wrong in every way, and I'm not including "it was sad"; I'm fine with that. But it was out of character for Fry to be philosophical, and if he was going to be philosophical, that's not the way he'd have been philosophical. And it was incredibly dumb-ass philosophy too. Wrong, wrong, wrong. It was like I was suddenly watching some other show that was a thinly-disguished vehicle for Hollywood sham-ethics. (As if there aren't enough of those.)

      Perhaps worst of all, the show has in the past picked up characters, so they couldn't even have been afraid of that.

      If one of the new episodes somehow reversed this, I'd be much obliged.

    9. Re:Welcome back! by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

      I cried. There, I admit it. I'm not afraid.

      Make the wife watch another episode. As a zoologist, might she enjoy the one where the emperor of Omicron Perceii 8 (sp?) wants Fry's human horn?

    10. Re:Welcome back! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      No, it was not wrong. The ending was exactly the opposite of the ending in AI..

      In that way it is GOOD, and a really good commentary.

      Btw. Read some of the original H.C. Andersen fairy tales. Most of them end much more tragic than this. Very educational for small children.

    11. Re:Welcome back! by ttrafford · · Score: 1

      I'm always a bit amazed by the response this episode gets. Not that people find it sad, of course it's incredibly sad- but the fact that people don't want to see it because it is sad. Any television show or book capable of convincing you to feel something is an achievement.

      There's nothing particularly bad about being sad.

      As to "out of character", this is the same Fry who sabotaged his own super-intelligence so he could find out if Leela liked him for who he really was. I totally got his decision- even though perfect knowledge would have indicated he not take that path.

    12. Re:Welcome back! by Jerf · · Score: 1

      As I explicitly said, it's not the sad that bothers me.

      It's the situation, at least as I recall it: "Here, say the word and I'll unfreeze this dog for you that loves you and you loved him. No negative consequences have been discussed and unfreezing things from the 20th century works out pretty as you prove yourself, Fry. There's no reason to expect any negative consequences."

      "No, he's better off dead. No, I have no reason to say that. Just leave him as he is. Apparently I want to be sad for no reason and I want everybody at home to be sad."

      It's stupid. Sad for lost parts of the 20th century was done in the show. The episode about Fry's brother was great. But this is stupid. Like I alluded to, the only even remotely plausible reason I can see that they did it the way they did (and this is at the "real world" level, not the story level) is that they suddenly tuned into that Hollywood Ethics band, with their strange obsession over maintaining The Way Things Are at all costs, so they can feel nice and santimonious about it.

      It's not that the dog died. It's that Fry killed the dog. For no effort to himself it would have lived; in a very real sense it was alive, until he went to the effort of preventing its revival.

      No, it's a horrible episode. I do not apologize for hating a death-affirming episode in an otherwise excellent series.

    13. Re:Welcome back! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Any television show or book capable of convincing you to feel something is an achievement.

      Certainly! "Jurrasic Bark" and "Luck of the Fryrish" are great pieces that move the heart.

      However, on any given day, I may not be in the right frame of mind for a great work that moves the heart. Just like I don't re-read Animal Farm or The Grapes of Wrath unless I'm in the right mental place; to experience a moving work of art requires commitment.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    14. Re:Welcome back! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Except Jurassic Bark. You can only watch that once unless you have no heart. - I watched it a few times, what's the problem?

    15. Re:Welcome back! by the+Brightside · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The progression of the plot provides us a reason for Fry not to clone his dog. It isn't a revival, it isn't a resurrection, it's cloning. The dog he knew was in every sense of the word already dead. Cloning his dog won't get his dog back. It's the same pattern but a different animal. That the actual biology of the situation reinforces what Fry already believes to be true is the setup for the kick in the gut. He would have gotten a representation of it; and it was the idea that his dog loved him that drove his desire for the representation, and a misguided desire at that. But the kick in the gut is that the dog lived on, waiting for Fry's return, while to Fry it looks as if he was abandoned. The dog is Fry's nascent wish to return to the life he had, to return to "the way things were" as you scornfully put it, but that wish is nothing more than delusion. He can never return to the way things were. When a family member dies, if you were given the option NOT of having them back, but of having a simulacrum of that loved one again, what would you choose? What would be psychologically healthier? To continue to believe that this stranger is the person you loved who is never returning, or to accept that there are things you cannot and will never change? And "death-affirming"? It's an inexorable part of existence that living things die. Part of growing up is accepting that fact, because to rail against the inevitable is simply a waste of the short amount of time you've got. If Fry cloned his dog, what would he have? Would he have his dog back? No. He'd have a pale representation of his old dog in a new form. The episode isn't "death-affirming." It's about Fry learning to cope with the basic reality of being human. At some point you have to turn away from mindlessly gazing back into your memory and deal with what's in front of you. Fry didn't kill the dog. Fry just didn't clone the dog. He was already dead--hell, he was already a fossil, almost entirely dolomite. To create a new life as your own mnemonic device or to fuel your delusions is a horrible act. What Fry does is what everyone must do to heal from grief.

    16. Re:Welcome back! by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      It wasn't frozen. It was dead. Farnsworth was going to clone it, and copy some memories across so it would be like the dog Fry knew.

      Fry was right. Well, he was wrong, but he was right in the sense that, had the facts been what he assumed, his dog had lived out a full and happy life, and wouldn't even remember him. There's no reason to put him in a new body, except for Fry wanting to have his dog back, and he decided he wasn't that selfish if it was going to result in a dog that had died happy and contented surrounded by its family having to figure out what the hell was going on and who these people were.

      Fry repeatedly decides that getting what he wants isn't worth it if it hurts other people or he 'cheats' to get it. Witness his apology in 'Time Keeps on Slippin' to Leela for anything he might have done that they didn't remember.

      And because he's an idiot, he's often wrong about these things, like he was here.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    17. Re:Welcome back! by Jerf · · Score: 1

      "the way things were" as you scornfully put it,

      No, I didn't mean it that way; I'm referring to something completely different. Wishing to return to a past bit of your life may be healthy, may not be; depends on context and how it affects the rest of your life. (As an example of where I'd say it's healthy, for instance, it's healthy for a prisoner to want to return to when he was free, and hopefully take appropriate action in his life to bring that state about and keep it, whereas Fry wanting to return to the 20th century would be mostly wrong. ("Mostly" because the reason it would be wrong is that you should not spend your life desiring the absolutely unattainable, but in the Futurama universe it may not be absolutely unattainable, as he manages to visit the 20th century at least twice. Were time travel impossible it would be completely wrong.))

      In my post I'm talking about Hollywood (mostly the Hollywood liberals*) desire to keep things the same at all costs, especially when "the same" means all the bad stuff happens to other people in other places. For instance, the way "maintaining stability" is considered so important, even when that "stabile state" is "tens of thousands of people being randomly murdered every year".

      I recall the episode as being that the memories of the dog, which I'd say are the dog, as being intact. (In the real world this would be nonsense, but so is a lot of other things on Futurama.) If I am misremembering and it is just a clone on offer with no memory/personality transfer, then I agree with you; in fact I agree with you so much so that I should have felt that way originally. So until I see it again, or I suppose read a transcript since I don't have that DVD collection (though not for this reason), I'm inclined to think that it was what I would consider the real dog on offer.

      (A body clone + full, accurate brain pattern transplant is the same dog ethically, as far as I am concerned. I reserve the right to change this opinion as the actual technology to do this comes online, depending on how it works, but for now this is my opinion.)

      (*: Note, I'm not accusing "liberals" in general of this trait; I'm saying that most of the people I see with this pattern are also "liberal" in the traditional sense, and quite a lot of them seem to be from the Hollywood subculture.)

    18. Re:Welcome back! by kimvette · · Score: 1
      I'm now "banned" from watching Futurama. "Banned" is in quotes because it's not a real ban, but it's not to be on when she's around.


      You need to upgrade to wife 2.0.
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  26. Hang on... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 0

    Richard Nixon was on Futurama, or rather his head was, why not Phil Hartman's?

    1. Re:Hang on... by OzRoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      My reply was in response to the GP's post suggesting Phil Hartman was one of the actors who worked on Futurama. He wasn't.

      The character Zapp Branigan was written for him, but he died before they started production, so Billy West took the part instead and happen to play the character in a similar way to Phil Hartman's audition.

    2. Re:Hang on... by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

      Billy West did Nixon, Zoidberg, the Professor, Zapp Brannigan, and Fry. He did such a good job that the first time I saw the show, I didn't realize he was doing all those characters until I saw the credits.

  27. Re:Neat by SirSlud · · Score: 0

    Isn't it about time you go rile up the WoW nerds on blizzards forum?

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  28. Everyone must hear this news! by dark_requiem · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps I'll breed some kind of albino shouting gorilla...

    1. Re:Everyone must hear this news! by proind · · Score: 1

      You know, this is a VERY good idea. But seems to me that only if the actual process of breeding an albino shouting gorilla was described it would be informative(right now the parent post is rated 4 informative).

      --
      When Geiger counters are outlawed, only mutants will have Geiger counters
    2. Re:Everyone must hear this news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you and your atomic monsters.

    3. Re:Everyone must hear this news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately I must direct you to Washington D.C., USA for many, many examples of prior art.

  29. Get yer facts straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straight from a one-eyed alien's mouth [...]

    If this is a reference to Leela, she's not an alien but a mutant! Release your nerd pass!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leela's_Homeworld

    1. Re:Get yer facts straight! by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Spoilers, dude!!!!

  30. Who needs comedy central? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok that's indeed great news... the sad news is Futurama is still dependent on Comedy Central. Why do shows still need this kind of deals? Idealy this would happen: There is an official Futurama web-site, they say they want a new season, they need US $ X to produce it. They sell shares on their website or through ebay using a dutch auction in order to finance the project. Geeks buy them. They make the episodes. They realase them on the internet in a non DRM format and using bittorrent so they don't have to pay for bandwith. People pay a small amount of money to download the .torrent file. If they want to pirate it anyway nothing will stop them so why bother with protection. Many people download that great show, the benefits are given to the shareholders. Everyone is happy. That's really what the RIAA really is affraid of. Artists now have a way to have vertical control, marketting, distribution etc. They claim to fight piracy but really want to make this come as late as they can. Once the artists realize they can actually make more money by short circuiting the distribution cartels a) price will also fall for the consummer b) more competition of works, more quality

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
    1. Re:Who needs comedy central? by michaelmateyko · · Score: 1

      because the animators, artists, writers, and voice actors need to feed their families. it takes a lot of money to start up a production workflow, and all the people involved need to know that yes, they are going to get a steady paycheck out of it.

    2. Re:Who needs comedy central? by dfjghsk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it costs 1-2 million dollars to produce each episode of Futurama. We could debate whether they could raise that kind of money over the internet..

      also, your model doesn't work for new shows.. if your model was in place before Futurama, it would have never been created.. people won't donate to a show they've never heard of and have no idea if they'll even like it.

      --
      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    3. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      You seem confused, of course they do. When they raise the money by selling shares that covers all the production costs, including their paycheck. And they keep shares to themselves so that they also have an interest in the profits of the show. Look the only difference with the actual system is that they rely on public fundraising instead of comedy central. There are relatively few TV channels that Futurama could be on, they form an oligopoly. Getting on their schedule means concurrence with a lot of shows, so the channel is in a good position to require a great part of the benefits (i.e force a low "share" price if you want). There is no such problem on the Internet. And yes they could include commercials in the shows you download and yes they could allow you to pay a little more to get no commercials etc. Free market capitalism at it's best.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    4. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Maybe you wouldn't invest in the next Mat Groning show but hell would I!
      What about new artists? Well as I said there's no difference with the actual system except on who finances the show. New artists would start small, not with 1-2 million dollars episodes, then if they have success be able to raise more funds. And what do you mean "donate" ??? What part of "BUYING shares" don't you undersand ? It's not about people "giving" 1-2 million to produce the show, it's about people investing in the show... Heck, it could even be people who don't give a shit about Futurama but think it'll make money.
      Theeeeeen it's about selling the show, people (different people) pay to download it and see it, plus it can have commercials in it. I'm not sure how many downloads it would get... it's true that internet has a harch concurrence with TV and much more persons will watch TV, so that kind of thing would work at first for geek audiences. Well guess who would be a good candidate?

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    5. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By going from new Futurama episodes into something anti-RIAA, you've ruined this news for me.

      Thank you.

    6. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Joebert · · Score: 1
      it costs 1-2 million dollars to produce each episode of Futurama.

      Perhaps you missed the "Complete with New shinier, easily bitable metal ass".
      Better make that 2-3 million pal.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    7. Re:Who needs comedy central? by servognome · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's really what the RIAA really is affraid of. Artists now have a way to have vertical control, marketting, distribution etc. They claim to fight piracy but really want to make this come as late as they can.

      How does this pertain the RIAA? The people they go after are the ones sharing material to which the RIAA has rights to. Nothing is stopping individual artists from doing what you describe, in fact there are many independent artists on the net doing their thing and the RIAA/MPAA leaves them alone. Stephen King did his own online distribution of "The Plant" and while it did disturb the publishers, there wasn't a frenzy of lawsuits to shut him down.
      The strength of the labels, studios, and publishers isn't distribution itself. It's the hype machine, that creates markets and encourages people to try something and like it (even though it sucks). Distribution control of their material, is merely a method to collect money from people. The labels are also changing, to capitalize on their marketing strength. American Idol is a perfect example. Not only do they make money selling CDs by some no talent pop singer, they are making money on the show whose main purpose is to create a frenzy around a disposable one-hit wonder.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    8. Re:Who needs comedy central? by myspys · · Score: 1

      people won't donate to a show they've never heard of and have no idea if they'll even like it.

      no, hence the need for what they call "pilots"

      wait.. that's just like it is now.. hmm

    9. Re:Who needs comedy central? by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Informative

      Idealy this would happen: There is an official Futurama web-site, they say they want a new season, they need US $ X to produce it. They sell shares on their website or through ebay using a dutch auction in order to finance the project. Geeks buy them. They make the episodes. They realase them on the internet in a non DRM format and using bittorrent so they don't have to pay for bandwith. People pay a small amount of money to download the .torrent file. If they want to pirate it anyway nothing will stop them so why bother with protection. Many people download that great show, the benefits are given to the shareholders. Everyone is happy.

      You bitch needlessly. All the tools you need are but a few hundred dollars away!

      1) Registering a domain name and getting cheap-ass hosting costs less than a few hundred dollars per year.

      2) You can put a link to your project on your slashdot sig and get surprising amounts of attention that way.

      3) You only need to come up with an idea for a show, and recruit some star talent. Really, you're on your way already, since you have a business plan that's pretty detailed!

      Unless you aren't serious about your business plan. Maybe you wouldn't know a real business plan if it kicked you in the nards. Maybe the idea of actually doing anything outside your mother's basement scares you. In which case, your post is just so much whining and incoherent noise on a populate public blog. There's lots of that already.

      The proof of whether or not you have a good idea is in your ability to make it reality. Otherwise, it's just so much hot air, and thanks to global warming, we have more than enough of that.

      But, I suggest you give it a try. You'll either succeed, or learn lots about how the world around you works - either way, you win, and win BIG.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    10. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      talk about your obvious karma whore...

    11. Re:Who needs comedy central? by kingsean · · Score: 1

      This idea is pretty sweet if you ask me. Carlos Mencia would be out of a job.

    12. Re:Who needs comedy central? by hagenman · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that header read Cartoon Network?

    13. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Seldon_21 · · Score: 1

      Here Here!!!! That would be a great model. I don't mind paying for good to excellent content. I do mind paying for most of the crap we are stuck with! It really begs the question "Why we go to the movies?"

      As we get closer to this new reality we need a sponser! Who can we sign up? Who's starving in Hollywood and wants to start a movement?

    14. Re:Who needs comedy central? by junglicio · · Score: 1
      it costs 1-2 million dollars to produce each episode of Futurama.
      1-2 million, no problem. All we gotta do is sell a little Human Horn on the Internet...
    15. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Wolfger · · Score: 1

      1-2 million dollars? Well, how much of that is spent on airing the show on TV? Advertising? Other associated overhead costs? Guaranteed, producing an internet-only show is cheaper than producing a TV show. How much cheaper? Not sure. I just can't imagine it actually costing a million or more.

    16. Re:Who needs comedy central? by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      it costs 1-2 million dollars to produce each episode of Futurama

      That's because some episodes are painstakingly drawn before a live audience!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    17. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Strog · · Score: 1

      Protect your lower horn.

    18. Re:Who needs comedy central? by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      That would be a great idea, if it had ever worked even ONCE before.

      And you do realize we're talking something like $20 million for a single season alone, don't you?

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    19. Re:Who needs comedy central? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      I'll second what another poster said: if you really think this could work, don't talk, do. Go register a domain name, recruit some talent, write some scripts (you'll have to do it yourself, since professional script writers don't work for free), and convince a million people to give you a dollar for the first episode.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    20. Re:Who needs comedy central? by hagenman · · Score: 1

      My bad, didn't RTFA.

    21. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      You are right and I agree with you, but you're mistaking me for someone I'm not:

      - I rent a pretty expensive apartment on my own.
      - I own private equity shares.
      - I have a thorough background in finance.

      Should I surrender my slashdot card?

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    22. Re:Who needs comedy central? by mranchovy · · Score: 1
      some episodes are painstakingly drawn before a live audience!


      No they aren't--it's a terrible strain on the animators' wrists.
      --
      I am so smart!
      I am so smart!
      S-M-R-T!
      I mean S-M-A-R-T!
    23. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, everyone knows there is no money to be made on the internet.

    24. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Bendejo · · Score: 1
    25. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it costs 1-2 million dollars to produce each episode of Futurama. We could debate whether they could raise that kind of money over the internet..

      So, the answer is "yes", then.

      also, your model doesn't work for new shows.. if your model was in place before Futurama, it would have never been created.. people won't donate to a show they've never heard of and have no idea if they'll even like it.

      What the fuck is broken in your brain? People have heard of Matt Groenig through the Simpsons (duh) and people loved the Simpsons, so they could be inclined or manipulated into giving money to him for a new show idea. The Simpsons grew out of the Tracy Ullman show, and some people (for whatever reason, I don't know) seemed to love Tracy Ullman, so they would have been the ones to subsidize the creation of the Simpsons. Tracy Ullman came to television from another media. Ta-da! The cycle is complete, the idea would work, and nothing would prevent Futurama from being created in the environment described, outside maliciousness or happenstance.

      His idea is good. Your brain is stupid. Fix it.

    26. Re:Who needs comedy central? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please see the opening caption to "ANTHOLOGY OF INTEREST I".

    27. Re:Who needs comedy central? by paRcat · · Score: 1

      please see the Itchy, Scratchy & Poochie Show studio scene where Homer asks if it will be broadcast live.

    28. Re:Who needs comedy central? by dfjghsk · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. well the problem with me, is that I live in the real world (it's that bright area you can see through your window.. you know with a Sun, wind, and fresh air)

      In the real world, a TV show can be put on a TV network, where people from around the country can view it for free. Millions will watch the show, and advertisers will pay millions to put their ad in front of those viewers. They will watch the show on a device called a Television, or TV for short. These TVs are in virtually every household, and will display the show (virtually) without any problems. The TV is also very easy to use, and both young and old have absolutely no problem operating it.

      In your fantasy world, someone will place a show on the internet, where it will instantly get attention from people around the world. People will then put up tens of millions of dollars for a show they've never heard of. 9-10 months later (which is how long Futurama takes to produce a single episode), they will download it and watch it on their computer. They will put up with lag, jittery scenes, and the audio and video not syncing correctly. Alternatively, they will download the entire show over (in most cases) dialup, and will watch the show after waiting hours for the download to finish. They will then watch the show in a barely visable 480x440 window (which is approximately NTSC resolution). Those who have problems operating a computer (older people, and children) need not watch the show.

      Give me a break.. his idea is a joke and is ridiculous and would never work in the real world. A high budget TV show like Futurama needs a lot of money, and a lot of viewers. A TV show needs to be on TV to get a lot of viewers.. not the friken internet.

      Sorry for crushing your dream.

      --
      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    29. Re:Who needs comedy central? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Well, it's late in the game, but it's neat. Somebody responding to one of my many "so go and get off yer duff!" posts, with something intelligent!

      Nice that you have a life and some skills! Since you have a good background in finance, you would make a perfect partner for a young, brash startup. As far as I can tell, a startup needs the following:

      1) Salespeople capable of selling something that barely exists as an idea.
      2) Quality legal representation to keep company out of hot water. The first (and most important) legal rudiment is a strong, clear, well-written agreement between all the partners.
      3) Shrewd financial management. Not the "I know all about IRA accounts and mutual funds" type, but the "we earned X dollars, and what we spend Y had better have a X >= Y relationship" type.
      4) Delivery. Depending on the business plan, this could be programmers, people answering the phone, or a contract with a manufacturing plant.
      5) All of the above willing to work for peanuts, driving a 1992 Saturn SL1 hundreds of miles at a time, eating beans/top Ramen and sharing the couch for a while until the ball gets rolling.

      In short, I reiterate that you have everything you need to make your idea a reality. And, if you are right, you'll buy apartment complexes rather than rent.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  31. requesting more snoo snoo by saurabhdutta · · Score: 4, Funny

    and brannigans antics

    1. Re:requesting more snoo snoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The spirit is willing, but the flesh is bruised and spongy.

    2. Re:requesting more snoo snoo by Kankraka · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Nixon... aroo..

    3. Re:requesting more snoo snoo by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Brannigan was the most god awful, irritating and utterly unfunny part of Futurama.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  32. 2 F's down, 1 to go! by CharAznable · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First Family Guy, then Futurama. Where's Firefly?

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    1. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Raptoer · · Score: 1

      Well they kinda killed half the cast.

    2. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, 2/9th of the cast.

    3. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by batkiwi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It wouldn't be the same, which is the point. Firefly is a moving show where things happen. Neither Wash nor the Sheperd were in the original concept.

    4. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      You can't compare those.. Family guy is neither fun nor exciting.. It's just mediocre.

    5. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Simple, just turn it into a prequel. Add some bollocks about a space academy, job done.

    6. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by goodEvans · · Score: 1

      Actually, 2/11ths of the cast. If you listen to the commentary on the DVD, the tenth member of the crew is Serenity itself.

      The eleventh? River's bare feet...

    7. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      In television HELL, where it belongs.

      Seriously, that show was Buffy in space, but where all the characters were stupid, immoral, degenerates.

      Good Riddance.

    8. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by bitt3n · · Score: 5, Funny

      firefly is taking a bit longer because of the extra F.

    9. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by mshiltonj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude! At least give spoiler alert!

    10. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by mshiltonj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. The cancellation of Firefly was one of the catalysts of me dropping cable a few years ago. If shows like Friends stay on the air for 9 or 10 years, but Firefly gets cancelled after 9 *episodes* -- then I obviously don't fit into whatever demographic group that most tv networks are looking for. I opted out.

    11. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny
      Where's Firefly?
      Right here. What do you want?
    12. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm. Firefly wasn't on cable. Way to zing'em, boy!

    13. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

      Nor were River and Simon.

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
    14. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Scuff · · Score: 1

      a show that was cancelled by network tv caused you to drop cable? Phrased like that it doesn't make much sense. It seems even stranger when you realize that it was then picked up by a cable channel to rerun the episodes that were there. If anything, the phrasing of your post would seem to lead you towards watching more shows based off cable channels

    15. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Dan+Slotman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd be pretty comfortable with Wash and Sheperd magically reappearing without explanation.

    16. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      After the opening weekend receipts on Serenity, I'd imagine you could find it in a Hollywood graveyard.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    17. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      that show was Buffy in space, but where all the characters were stupid, immoral, degenerate
      Well you sold it to me, where can I find it?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by anti-human+1 · · Score: 0

      Of course you know, Farscape comes before Firefly. Duh.

    19. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa, thanks for the spoilers! I was on episode 12 and just getting ready to watch the movie!

    20. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by mj_sklar · · Score: 1

      Firefly was on Fox, a network TV channel. Now, I don't know the way things work where you are, but here in Quebec, if you don't have cable, you don't have Fox. Network channels are part of the cable tv package. So if these so-called "network" channels drop good shows, there's nothing good for me to watch on my cable TV.

      (Yes, you can get a dish, but you'll still get the same crap, just in three timezones instead of one, so I'm ignoring that option.)

      --
      The wii is the revolution, comrade! ...use the fucking wiimote or I'll gut you like a fish!!!
    21. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Well, here in the states we have network channels. NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, and to a lesser extent Fox are the big ones that are available for free over the airwaves just about everywhere in the country via local affiliates, each with their own news teams but they all run the same prime time programming. They're also the channels that have over the air HD... Cable, although it will carry local channels (in better quality since its not OTA), is what has all the other channels. Fox is a network channel avalible over the air, FX and Fox News are cable channels and ONLY avaliable through a cable (or dish) subscription.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    22. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Avaliable in a convenient boxed set with great commentaries for your purchase at local retailers. Or the pirates bay or tv underground or shareprovider or wherever the hell else. I've got the DVDs, but i wish i could find it for download in HD...

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    23. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by mj_sklar · · Score: 1

      Oh, well see that I did not know. Thanks for the insight. Here, over-the-air is like 3 channels. CTV, GlobalTV, and some french stuff. All with quite bad quality. Pretty much, if you want TV up here, it's cable (or a dish), or bust. Not the best system, but there's still some good stuff on...

      --
      The wii is the revolution, comrade! ...use the fucking wiimote or I'll gut you like a fish!!!
    24. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by esper · · Score: 1

      I'd be pretty comfortable with them pretending the movie never happened. Yeah, what they did with River was pretty cool for the short-term catharsis and the one-shot "wow" when the hatch opened back up, but if they continue on from there, she's no longer a character, she's a plot device. The resolution of every episode would simply come down to whether she's called in to serve as a deus ex machina or not and everyone else would be marginalized in her shadow.

      So, yeah, let's just ignore the movie and pick up the story from the end of the TV episodes.

    25. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Um, believe it or not, there ARE non-Americans here on slashdot. We are not alone in the world! ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    26. Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! by chihowa · · Score: 1

      It's been a little bit since I saw the movie, but weren't the movie and the series somewhat parallel anyway? They seemed obviously not contiguous to me, so I would think they could (if it was possible) just restart the series where it left off and "pretend the movie never happened."

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  33. But what about...? by mlow82 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, so all of the original actors have signed up. But what I'd like to know is if all of the original writers have signed up.

    1. Re:But what about...? by pilkul · · Score: 1

      Eh, probably. It's not like writers are always overwhelmed with lucrative commitments and have to turn down job offers.

    2. Re:But what about...? by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How come no one is asking the questions that would interest us nerds the most? "Will it be in HDTV format?"

    3. Re:But what about...? by echocharlie · · Score: 1

      Someone should axe the actors that. Or maybe it's info we can find at the liberry?

    4. Re:But what about...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because who cares?

    5. Re:But what about...? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      It's an animated series. 320x240 or 2048x1536, who cares? What I care about with animated shows is the voice acting and of course the writing.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    6. Re:But what about...? by dosguru · · Score: 1

      Because then we'd be able to see Amy's obscene tatoo.

  34. reruns by sentientbrendan · · Score: 0, Troll

    >One week Lisa will be super smart and a veggie and the next week suddenly she's as dumb as Bart and
    >eating a pork chop.
    those are called reruns.

    As for lisa being super smart and being a veggie, I think you must be confused. Lisa starts out a smart and talented saxophonist, later in the series she just becomes preachy and loses most of her character.

    Also, vegetarians are never smart.

  35. Future Futurama to be... by Hymer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...DRM'ed. "Geeks don't want DRM, geeks want Futurama (just see @ the Internet) so we will release new episodes of Futurama to sell DRM to those bloody nerds..."
    This is the only reason for Fox to start it again.

    --

    This is not a flamebait... this is bloody serious... Just wait'n'see.

    1. Re:Future Futurama to be... by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      But then if it's to be broadcast on Comedy Central, it will be DRM-free and will be on the p2p networks within minutes of finishing.

    2. Re:Future Futurama to be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...this is why they want the broadcast flag... wich also is a form for DRM.

      --

      You can not win if you do not want to fight...

  36. I ask for just one thing by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Lots and lots of Morbo laughing at puny human misery!

  37. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass by trogdor8667 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Professor: Good news everyone. While Fox's quality programming is out of our reach, Comedy Control has decided to take us for some new episodes.
    Fry: Don't you mean Comedy Central?
    Leela: No, Comedy Control. Comedy was outlawed in the year 2045, during the Great War with the Neptutians. Comedy Control comes around and kills everyone involved with animated shows.

    1. Re:Bite My Shiny Metal Ass by zig973 · · Score: 1

      (Cryogenic freezer dings) Leela: Well, that was a waste of time. Bender: Let's go again! Terry: Welcome to the world of tomorrow! Leela: Cram it, Terry. (Cue intro)

    2. Re:Bite My Shiny Metal Ass by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Professor: Good news everyone. While Fox's quality programming is out of our reach

      Peter: Everybody I've got bad news. We've been cancelled.
      Lois: Oh no Peter! How could they do that?

      Peter: Well unfortuantely Lois, there's just no more room on the schedule. We just gotta accept the fact that FOX has to make room for terrific shows like Dark Angel, Titus, Undeclared, Action, That 80's Show, Wonder Falls, Fast Lane, Andy Richter Controls The Universe, Skin, Girl's Club, Cracking Up, The Pitts, Firefly, Get Real, Freaky Links, Wanda At Large, Costello, The Lone Gunman, A Minute with Stan Hooper, Normal Ohio, Pasadena, Harsh Realm, Keen Eddy, The Street, American Embassy, Cedric The Entertainer, The Tick, Louie, And Greg The Bunny...

      Lois: Is there no hope?
      Peter: Well I suppose if ALL those shows go down the tubes we might have a shot.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  38. "Good news everyone!" by Mike+Peel · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... I don't get it. Where's the usual downside following "Good news everyone!"? Do we have to go and wrest the episodes from giant killer bees, or something?

    1. Re:"Good news everyone!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse... we have to hope that CC don't butcher the show... I'd rather face killer bees any day.

    2. Re:"Good news everyone!" by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1
      Leela: "Yes, but what about the animals?"

      Professor: "The wha?"

      Leela: "The animals."

      Professor: "I didn't say anything about animals. Now it seems the planet will collapse within three days. Incidentally, this will kill all the animals."

    3. Re:"Good news everyone!" by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      It's on Comedy Central, which is pay cable, and not free. Thankfully, it's coming out on DVDs so I will catch it when it comes out then.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  39. Obligatory Futurama reference by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quoth the Incompetent Robot Elders:

    Silence!!!

    1. Re:Obligatory Futurama reference by mitchskin · · Score: 1

      Silence!!!

      I concur

    2. Re:Obligatory Futurama reference by the+web · · Score: 1

      Silence!!!

      The Robot elders are corrupt, not incompetent!!!

      --
      __
      Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
  40. Re:Futurama DOES have a plot (spoilers) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Futurama does indeed have long-term plot elements, more so than most live action television shows (and at least comparable with Doctor Who and its Daleks and Cybermen). Generally the plot centers around Fry.

    - Fry and the Brains (and the Nibblonians)
    During the series it transpires that Fry is the only human being capable of resisting the psionic attacks of the Brains, a group of free-flying brain beings that want to take over/destroy the universe. Fry's brain waves are different from other peoples because Fry, as a result of events in the episode "Roswell that Ends Well", is his own grandfather.

    In the first encounter with the Brains Fry is abducted by Nibbler, who is not only Leela's pet, but also an agent of the ancient and stupendously powerful Nibblonians (which explains why he was the only one of his kind on the planet where he was found). Nibbler explains Fry's abnormality and assists him in fending off the Brains' attack on earth. After Fry succeeds Nibbler wipes Fry's memory (everyone else was too stupefied by the Brains to remember what happened) and resumes his life as Leela's pet.

    Later, in The Why of Fry, we learn that Fry was not frozen by accident. In fact Fry was brought into the future by Nibbler, whose much younger self was present on New Years' Eve '99, and who gave Fry the nudge that tipped him backwards into the cryogenic chamber. In this episode Fry is press ganged into service to destroy the Brains' ultimate project, a device that will acquire all knowledge in the universe and then destroy the universe to prevent its knowledge from becoming outdated.

    Once Fry is inside the Mega-Brain and has activated the bomb with which he is to destroy it, the Brains reveal what Nibbler did to Fry and offer Fry a choice - he can stay there, blow up the Mega Brain and vanish along with it due to the failure of his escape scooter, or he can let the Mega Brain catapult him back in time to the space-time nexus centred on his own fall into the cryochamber.

    Fry elects to travel back, and in fact initially prevents Nibbler from knocking him into the tube, until Nibbler persuades him that he should sacrifice himself and fulfill his predestined mission, because...

    - Fry Loves Leela
    Fry has an unrequited passion for Leela throughout most of the series. In a sense there is a lack of follow through here, because they do pull kind of a "will they/won't they?" thing, but Fry does succeed in communicating the depth of his feelings at times, and when he wins the devil's hands and uses them to make a holophoner opera in Leela's honour Leela realises that Fry has a depth of character and feeling that is concealed by his physical and social clumsiness.

    - Leela and Her Parents
    As someone else mentioned here, Leela's parent enter the series late in the piece and stick around. In fact I was surprised that nobody responded to the "straight from the alien's mouth" in the article by pointing out that Leela, as we discover when her parents emerge, is not an alien but a mutant, whose xenolinguist parents left her at an orphanage with a note in an invented alien script, so that she would be taken for an alien and avoid the apartheid-style restrictions places on mutants. This is a major shift for Leela both in the sense that earlier episodes made much of her search for her species and homeworld, and in that at least two episodes towards the end of the series are heavily concerned with her relationship with her newfound parents.

    - Amy and Kif
    Amy, the engineering student from Mars, and Kif, Zapp Brannigan's XO, fall in love early in the series and their developing romance is the subject of multiple episodes throughout subsequent seasons.

    i'm sure there are other examples of long-term continuity that have slipped my mind, but really nobody could accuse Futurama of forgeting its past.

  41. Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stirring defence of Futurama and the Simpsons there. But I think you're pretty much wrong in everything you say. To respond to your three main points:

    1. The characters in the Simpsons are surprisingly consistent; the clearly distinct characters and their traits are one of the shows great strengths. Lisa is BOTH intelligent AND a member of the archetypal working class family; these are not mutually exclusive, and the show is subtle enough to deal with this.

    2. Futurama IS better than Dr Who whichever way you spin it (allowing for taste), and its PLOTS are amongst its great strengths. When you compare the Simpsons to Futurama, one thing that is very apparent is that Futurama has much more comprehensive, less formulaic, better written storylines. The episodes, and the series, feature an internal logic which is stronger than the Simpsons, or indeed almost any other comedy other than Seinfeld or Arrested Development.

    In many cases the humour is directly derived from the strength of the plot. For example, Fry travels back in time and becomes his own grandfather. As a result, he is unique in the universe, and his uniqueness ties in to the whole Nibblonian vs Brains subplot. Similarly, Leela's origins story is tightly woven throughout the various episodes and across the series. I know for a fact that Groening, Cohen and co set out to write lengthy thematic arcs which in some cases spanned series 1-4 inclusive.

    If you think it's a plot-less cartoon with jokes, you're not really watching it.

    3. Well, this basically explains why you think what you think. I agree to the extent that each episode of Futurama is self-contained. However, they are also intricately linked with other episodes, and you miss a lot of important context and detail from some episodes if you treat them as a one-off 'adventure'.

      Try watching Futurama, in order, from start to finish. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... by afaik_ianal · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The characters in the Simpsons are surprisingly consistent

      I never said otherwise - I was just hassling my PP for overanalysing. What next? "Oh, but at the end of The Simpson's 3D, homer ends up in the real world, but then in the next episode he's back in the Simpson's universe!". Or "Buffy is just so fake: There's no such thing as vampires!"

      Futurama IS better than Dr Who whichever way you spin it

      No. Like many people here (yourself included), I prefer Futurama to Dr Who. Anyone who tries to argue that one successful show is better than another successful show is an idiot, and you might as well be trying to prove the existence or non-existence of god, or the general superiority of one OS over another. It's a personal thing. One is better than the other for you.

      Try watching Futurama, in order, from start to finish. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

      I have - many times. The first time I watched it, I watched it out of order. Yes, I didn't pick up on the exact history behind each character, but I didn't miss out on any important story-line elements. (Ok - so the same is probably actually true for Dr Who, but there are many other shows where missing a couple of episodes makes the later ones not worth watching).

    2. Re:Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... by LainTouko · · Score: 1
      No. Like many people here (yourself included), I prefer Futurama to Dr Who. Anyone who tries to argue that one successful show is better than another successful show is an idiot,

      And by the standards of Doctor Who, (30-40% audience share and exceptional audience appreciation levels, bringing sci-fi to a mainstream audience, single-handedly reviving the notion of family television, has a fanzine show on the nation's most popular channel, best drama award at the BAFTAs, three Hugo award nominations this year, in a category which has always been "Americanocentric" to the point of absurdity), Futurama is not actually a successful show.

    3. Re:Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... by stinerman · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I know for a fact that Groening, Cohen and co set out to write lengthy thematic arcs which in some cases spanned series 1-4 inclusive.
      In fact, when it is revealed that Nibbler pushes Fry into the cryogenic freezer, they show his (Nibbler's) shadow on the wall. If you go back to the pilot episode when it originally happened, Nibbler's shadow is on the wall.

      I was amazed that the writing team had thought that far ahead.
    4. Re:Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "I was amazed that the writing team had thought that far ahead."

      Heh. I still think the writing team saw the original episode and thought "That shadow looks like Nibbler!" and went from there.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... by roman_mir · · Score: 1
      Futurama IS better than Dr Who whichever way you spin it
      No. Like many people here (yourself included), I prefer Futurama to Dr Who.


      I watched 2 episodes of Dr. Who and found it pathetic, tasteless, pointless and boring. I watched all episodes of Futurama and found them to be witty, funny, intelligent, ironic and enterntaining.

      For me Futurama is better than Dr.Who (should be Dr. Who cares?)
    6. Re:Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... by l4m3z0r · · Score: 1
      Anyone who tries to argue that one successful show is better than another successful show is an idiot, and you might as well be trying to prove the existence or non-existence of god, or the general superiority of one OS over another.

      Ill bite. Futurama, No God, BSD...

      P.S.: Yes I am an idiot.

    7. Re:Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Damn, I'm glad that at least one other person doesn't like that show!

      I watch the first 3 or 4 episodes when they started showing it here, but I just couldn't remember to plop down in front of the TV at the right time each week. It wasn't compelling enough to make me want to watch it. During one episode that was supposed to be suspenseful and tense (I think), I walked away from the TV at the height of the "tension" and simply forgot to come back in time to see it. It's THAT bad.

      Mediocre dialogue, mediocre (and often simply BAD) acting, poor pacing, uspectacular special effects. It really has nothing going for it at all.

      At this point, I put it at about the same level as Stargate:SG1 and Atlantis. If it's on the sci-fi channel, and there's nothing good on any other channels at all, and I don't have anything better to do, I might watch it. Oops, South Park on Comedy Central? Bye-bye, Dr. Who.

      It doesn't hold a candle to: Babylon 5, Farscape, and Battlestar Gallactica (the new one), all of which had me desperate for new episodes. I've not watched Firefly, but give its following I'd image that it's better, too.

  42. You silly moo-cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of a fan would not know that Stewie would neverend his Sentence with a Preposition?

  43. That's great and all... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    but it was just a joke. You must be a riot at parties.

    1. Re:That's great and all... by OzRoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I see...

      Um... Promise me you aren't one of the writers on the new series.

  44. Actors? by Trojan35 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great. Good to see the Actors are on board. What about the writers though? I have to imagine the highly talented futurama writers found new homes that have been enjoying their talent for a while.

  45. Hurray for ZOIDBERG! by pwgawron · · Score: 1

    The best news I've heard for several month!

  46. Holy Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holy crap! I can't believe it-- someone was actually watching Craig Ferguson!

    1. Re:Holy Crap! by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1

      I watch Craig Ferguson. He's the funniest of the four late night talk show hosts.

    2. Re:Holy Crap! by bilbravo · · Score: 1

      You forgot your tags!

    3. Re:Holy Crap! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      funniest

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it does.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Holy Crap! by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      I take it this is not the same Craig Ferguson as the character on "Malcolm in the Middle"? (the overweight neighbor who worked with Lois at Luckyaide had that name, yes?)

      'cause I could tottally see him running an animated TV show fansite. Except he's fictional.

    5. Re:Holy Crap! by Jarnin · · Score: 1

      Nah, this Ferguson is a the guy who played the boss on the Drew Carry show.

  47. Aw man... by Sippan · · Score: 0

    After Futurama died, I tried to fill the void by watching excessive amounts of The Simpsons. Now I don't know if I can watch Futurama again without being confused by the absence of Homer.

    --
    Frog blast the vent core.
  48. *crosses fingers* by SamSim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    please not have jumped the shark please not have jumped the shark please not have jumped the shark

    1. Re:*crosses fingers* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, the show features a main character who was cryogenically frozen for 1000 years, an alcoholic robot who smokes cigars, a one-eyed purple-haired mutant, a 150+ year old man, a Jamaican accountant, an asian girl, a lobster man, a "dog" that is really a super advanced alien that eats everything, floating brains, and a bazillion other things that would get the thrown out of any studio other than Fox. What can they possibly do to jump the shark?

    2. Re:*crosses fingers* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What can they possibly do to jump the shark?
      Bring Ted McGinley in?
    3. Re:*crosses fingers* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget the annoying smart-assed young clone of the professor.

    4. Re:*crosses fingers* by Yvan256 · · Score: 0

      Is the shark mechanical in some way?

    5. Re:*crosses fingers* by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Bringing Ted McGinley's head in would be pretty funny, actually. They've already spoofed Married With children. :D

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  49. Here here! by Rhinobird · · Score: 5, Funny

    If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  50. Good news... kind of. by Arimus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good news on the surface but until it is confirmed the original writers have signed up I won't be keeping too many expectations of the new series.

    The actors can be replaced, the writing team can not - not if you want to keep the same style of humour.

    --
    --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    1. Re:Good news... kind of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actors can be replaced

      No, no they cannot. While I agree that the writers are just as important, all of the actors on Futurama were amazing and if any were replaced I (for one) probably would not watch the new show. If you haven't before, get the DVD's and listen to the commentary on _every_ episode. You'll learn to love the actors as much as the writers (:

    2. Re:Good news... kind of. by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1
      The actors can be replaced, the writing team can not - not if you want to keep the same style of humour.

      Come, now—there are plenty of Mathematics Ph.D.s handed out every year, so there's a pool to choose from.

    3. Re:Good news... kind of. by |/rad|/oder · · Score: 1

      You're right, DiMaggio and West are totally replaceable.

      Idiot.

      --
      but then again, commenting on a katz story is almost as self-serving as the katz story itself. -tensionboy
    4. Re:Good news... kind of. by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      I second this.

  51. Firefly Killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Screw fox, they killed firefly.

    1. Re:Firefly Killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      screw firefly. it brought down whatever timeslot it was in.

  52. The box by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 1

    The box says YES!

  53. Re: Spoilers ahoy! (above post) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Former post is a spoiler. Or, at least for those unhip enough not to have seen Serenity.

    But me, I'm so hip that I can't go through most doorways without having them enlarged.

  54. The X-Files 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    David Duchovny (remember him...?) has been claiming for ages that a new XF movie is going to be made. Gillian Anderson (remember her...?) has also said the same thing, as has Robert Patrick (Agent Doggett), Annabeth Gish (Agent Somebody...), Mitch Pileggi (Skinner), and other actors from the show.

    Chris Carter and Frank Spotnitz have both said they are working on a script, or have written one, or are thinking of a number between 0 and 20, or something...they have been negotiating with FOX for years, and all sorts of interesting conspiracy theories are circulating as to what the hold up may be.

    Duchovny's career is dead in the water. He left the show in midstream (and in the lurch) to pursue what he believed would be a stellar movie career, only to produce a small string of absolute stinkers (eg 'Evolution', 'Return to Me'), as well as his own home movie effort ('House of D')...now he has nothing, so talks up 'XF2' in the hope it may happen if he wishes it to hard enough.

    Anderson has been luckier: her movies have been mostly mediocre, but her stage career in London has kept her alive.

    Chris Carter seems to be on permanent vacation, and Spotnitz seems to be on the brink of a nervous breakdown.

    If an actor or director or producer or craft services flunky claims something is happening it can be safely ignored. They have a vested interest in generating enough buzz to convince the money men to finance more work for them.

    Even studio announcements mean fuck-all (especially if they're from FOX).

    I wouldn't get too worked up about this 'Futurama' claim.

    1. Re:The X-Files 2 by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      as has Robert Patrick (Agent Doggett)

      That's a SURE sign it's bullshit. If it really was happening, he would never know.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:The X-Files 2 by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Evolution wasn't a stinker. I like to think of it as about 75% of Ghostbusters, which still makes it a damn funny movie.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    3. Re:The X-Files 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK RP won't be in a/the new movie. He has said as much. I believe he lamented to some entertainment rag journo that he's not going to have a role in the X Files II.

    4. Re:The X-Files 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Evolution wasn't a stinker.
      Yes it was.

      I like to think of it as about 75% of Ghostbusters...
      I can only think of it as 100% feces, and so does almost everybody else who saw it.

      ...which still makes it a damn funny movie.
      Possibly. If you are dead. And have never, ever seen an actual funny movie before. And you have a head made from styrofoam.

      Seriously dude, Evolution was about as funny as leprosy, and less desirable than Ebola.
  55. De ja vu by Mantrid42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ooooohhhh no. I fell for this one before...

  56. When you see the robot, drink! by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Let the feast of a thousand hams begin!"

    -----

    Sig Sauer

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  57. Heard this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope this dosn't turn out like before. When Billy West said on his forum that they are making new episodes, then later on he said he got it wrong!

    Anyway, not getting my hopes up to much, but if it happens then great!

  58. The spirit is willing by saurabhdutta · · Score: 1

    but the flesh is soft and spungy..

  59. You're Welcome, Guys... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    I can't help but feel that it's because of me that the show has been optioned (correct word usage?): You see, I bought the first two DVD sets just over a week ago, right before the actors were re-signed! *takes a bow*

    It is upon this occasion that I will venture to make the obligatory reference: woop woop woop *scuttles* woop woop woop *scuttles*

    1. Re:You're Welcome, Guys... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think maybe you could pickup Invader Zim on the way home? I've been craving some new episodes of that as well....

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  60. And the writers? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    I hope they also get back some of the original writers from seasons one and two; in my opinion the quality of the writing went downhill in seasons three and four, to the point where it was probably just as well to call a halt. (There were some good episodes but the jokes and dialogue just weren't as funny.)

    (There were four seasons of Futurama made, though in the USA they were screened in a slightly odd order.)

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  61. Obligatory anti-wow link by dino213b · · Score: 1

    http://www.redrival.com/hateown/

    partially anti-wow anyway

  62. Robot Santa is real! by mahju · · Score: 1

    Well if he explained about Robot Santa then I'm sure they had been good, rather than face his violent rampage through their christmas...

  63. Thank god for futurama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first I didn't fall in love with it, but once I got it tivo'd I sucked down all 5 seasons and watched them in like a month. Now I regret it, because I want so much more. I think it was a little ahead of it's time, but now people are ready for much much more. I prefer it to the simpsons in terms of raw hilarity now. I hope it has the same longevity!

  64. I watched them all in order... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you can only enjoy all 3 seasons shows in order when watching with a brain slug.

    Please, put this brain slug on, you will enjoy every show much more!

    Avoid garlic shampoo...

  65. Well, bite me! by MyShinyMetalAss · · Score: 0

    Let the biting commence!

    --
    This is not an automated signature. I type this in to the bottom of every message.
  66. Go on, mod me down all you want... by Atario · · Score: 1

    But I am not going to stand by while someone tears down classics like Ren & Stimpy in order to ego-masturbate.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  67. I swear! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If this is yet another false hope, I'll go ahead and make my own Futurama.

    With blackjack and hookers!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:I swear! by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

      Awwww forget the blackjack and the hookers.

      Eh, screw the whole thing.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    2. Re:I swear! by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1

      Infact, forget futurama the blackjack!

  68. Continuity error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fry: This was our storage closet. My Dad spent years turning it into a bomb shelter.
    Leela: [sadly] And yet you guys never had a single nuclear war.
    Bender: [sadly] What a waste.

    1. Re:Continuity error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also in another episode IIRC, it's stated global warming happened. Meh, who gives a shit.

    2. Re:Continuity error by Traiklin · · Score: 1

      that's not really a continuity error.

      When they said "You never had a single nuclear war" they were refering to people in the 21st century/Fry's time (80's - when he got frozen in 99), if anything they continuity error would be that his house was in the same condition in the year 3000 as it was in the year 2000.

      Plus it's a cartoon, there's more leverage in them cause they work on getting that joke across but if they were to do it then it would cause problems for an earlier episode.
      ,br> They might of found data later to, Remember the second (or was it third?) coming of Jesus wipped out a lot of optical media.

  69. Karma boost for joke. by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    What's the hardest thing about eating a vegetable? The chair.

    :)

  70. That's not good news by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Professor: That's not good news. That's not good news at all!

  71. Even my two year old likes Futurama by limabone · · Score: 1

    Every night at 8pm we watch Futurama reruns on Teletoon (even though I have all the dvd's, go figure). He loves Bender (or 'bot bot') as he refers to him, but then again who doesn't love Bender? He will be very pleased that the show is coming back!

  72. This show's been going downhill since Season 3 by SamSim · · Score: 1

    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD

  73. Fooled, again? by Ice+Wewe · · Score: 1

    This is all well and good, but Slashdot's already gotten my hopes up once by saying that Futurama's returning, then beaten me to a bloody pulp when I find out it isn't really true! I'd like to actually see some episodes to prove it. You still have Zoidburg, you all still have Zoidburg!

    1. Re:Fooled, again? by ezeecheez · · Score: 1

      Yes. Let's all talk to Zoidberg!

  74. I have a heart.... by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

    I keep it in a box under the bed.

  75. Fool's Gold by kahrytan · · Score: 2, Insightful


      The last time /. posted on Futurama coming back, it was a hoax. I suggest you all keep your cool until 'Comedy Central' posts a on it's site.

    On that note, I would personally love for Futurama to return but I won't get my hopes up.

    --
    \
  76. Fool's Gold pt2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Addendum to previous post:

    comments on Katey Sagal's comment on his site.

    I was waiting for someone else to announce the show's return to television so I wouldn't get clobbered if I had any information that was inaccurate!

    Yes-- what Katey said is true so there is every reason now (with no reservations) to go nuts.I'm glad to go back to work on my favorite show!
    I'm sure I'll be on a bunch of shows to promote this.I've never seen Craig
    Ferguson--what's his story? Futurama lives!

    Billy
  77. Family Guy Season 4+ sucks. by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As long as they don't try too hard like Family Guy is doing. I have to say, Family Guy these days is boring as anything. First three seasons were mint, but what they're coming out with now is total crap. Previously it was edgy, but funny. Now they just go for offensive for the sake of offensive. The plots are horrible, and just aren't trying.

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
    1. Re:Family Guy Season 4+ sucks. by pinkfloyd89 · · Score: 1

      So I'm confused are they trying too hard or not trying at all?

    2. Re:Family Guy Season 4+ sucks. by Senzei · · Score: 2, Funny
      So I'm confused are they trying too hard or not trying at all?

      Yes.

      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
    3. Re:Family Guy Season 4+ sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you get offended by a cartoon, you should be lynched.

    4. Re:Family Guy Season 4+ sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more. Something definitely changed after season 3, although I have to say that the Mel Gibson episode (4x01?) and a few others have been quite good.

  78. Wow - that's great news! by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    Wow - that's great news! I'd phone my friends to tell them, but I swallowed my mobile phone again.

  79. Logic? by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most shows have some kind of continuity and Futurama does. Sure they'll be a bit random and break rules at times (take that Bender is made of 40% of Zinc, 40% of Titanium and 40% of Dolomite- 120% for those of you who are reading this early in the morning), but in general unlike the Simpsons, the show progresses. The characters age, have different birthdays, refer to events in the past. You'll also notice the love between Fry and Leela developing. Take the later episodes like 'The Sting' where Fry takes a giant bee for Leela, and the many loving things they do that continues to bring them closer, as well as the same thing on the Amy side.

    PS: best episode ever: Jurassic Bark.... poor Seymour the dog.

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
    1. Re:Logic? by stinerman · · Score: 4, Insightful
      PS: best episode ever: Jurassic Bark.... poor Seymour the dog.
      I have trouble watching that one and "Luck of the Fryish". They are both really, really sad, but excellent episodes.
    2. Re:Logic? by vostok4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Jurassic Bark was easily one of the most touching comics I have seen. It's right up there with the Pinky and the Brain Christmas Special.

    3. Re:Logic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "take that Bender is made of 40% of Zinc, 40% of Titanium and 40% of Dolomite- 120%"

      And a 5% nickle impurity!

    4. Re:Logic? by Gneral+Tsao · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with the parent. One of the things that's really great about the show is that (with exceptions of course) it's remarkably internally consistent. A lot of times they're will be jokes within jokes that reward long time fans and/or obsessive nerds (hence it being so popular with our crowd I guess...).

      I noticed a pretty funny gag like this in last night's episode (the one where Leela becomes a blernsball pitcher): On Hank Aaron XXIV's Atlanta Braves uniform the tomahawk has been replaced by a faux-Native American looking trident, a reference to the episode with The Lost City of Atlanta.

    5. Re:Logic? by CyDharttha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      unlike the simpsons? how about lisa becoming a vegetarian in season 7; apu getting married, later having kids, then cheating on his wife and going to marriage counseling (this story spanned 4 seasons). or barney going sober in season 11, and not relapsing till season 14? cripes, maud died in season 11 or so, and flanders spent the next year getting over it and then started dating. there is tons of progression happening in the show, its one of the things that makes the simpsons world so great. there is story, depth, history.

    6. Re:Logic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heart that episode :(

      Er, I mean, I totally pwned that thing with that other thing. Growl.

    7. Re:Logic? by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1
      unlike the simpsons? how about lisa becoming a vegetarian in season 7; apu getting married, later having kids, then cheating on his wife and going to marriage counseling (this story spanned 4 seasons). or barney going sober in season 11, and not relapsing till season 14? cripes, maud died in season 11 or so, and flanders spent the next year getting over it and then started dating. there is tons of progression happening in the show, its one of the things that makes the simpsons world so great. there is story, depth, history.


      I'm not saying that there's no happenings that they cary through. That'd be silly if it didn't. Unlike the Simpsons, Futurama characters age. They develop in personality. They constantly refer to past experiences. The next episodes takes into account the previous, allowing relationships and interactions to develop with the characters.

      You'll also notice that I'm talking about main characters and the only one you mentioned was Lisa being a vegetarian. Funny- seems Bart has been int he same grade for 14 seasons, Homer has been fired so many times yet mysteriously has his job the next week, and so on. Yes they still call Marge's sister a lesbian in recent episodes, but these are all gimmicks. There is minimal progression with the main characters beyond the occasional reference.

      Yes the Simpsons has history, but they don't make enough use of it. A part of what makes people interesting is freshness, is seeing characters grow up. Think of your typical 'family' show... ummm... Full House, Family Matters, etc. You watched these folks grow up. You see that on Futurama. You don't watch Bart grow as a person. You don't watch Homer change. You just see him doing stupid jokes that he gets written for.

      Simpsons should have died around season 11-12 when it was already bad for a few years (though of course firing the writers a few seasons before that because they asked for raises because everyone else got them but them probably didn't help). It's painful to watch these days. I'd say the movie in 2007 will be the farewell.

      -M
      --

      when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
    8. Re:Logic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best episode ever: Jurassic Bark.... poor Seymour the dog.

      Agreed, it has the magic that the Simpsons lost... That episode is good. It actually evokes emotions and thought and compassion out of me... and I hate dogs!

    9. Re:Logic? by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a certain amount of progression that keeps the show interesting, and a certain amount that ruins it. For example, would we really want to see a teenage Bart, or college student Lisa? I think that would ruin the show. Especially since these characters would be too hard to replace. Thank God the writers realize this, or the Simpsons would go the way of Saved By The Bell.

    10. Re:Logic? by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Luck of the Fryish is one of the top 10 episodes of any TV show ever.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    11. Re:Logic? by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Especially since these characters would be too hard to replace. Thank God the writers realize this, or the Simpsons would go the way of Saved By The Bell.

      Ugh... other examples would probably be Olivia of the Cosby Show or Seven from Married w/Children... man, were those ever bad ideas... Oh and that kid from Diff'rent Strokes.. I wish people would just end on a high note instead of trying to replace the kids with new kids... in my MWC example, I think Kelly and Bud got even -funnier- as they got older, no need to 'replace' the child aspect with that jackass Seven..

    12. Re:Logic? by Dhar · · Score: 1

      break rules at times (take that Bender is made of 40% of Zinc, 40% of Titanium and 40% of Dolomite)

      They're not breaking the rules, that's the joke...if it's to his advantage, Bender's 40% anything!

      -g.

    13. Re:Logic? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      and "30 percent Iron Chef"

      155% so far.

    14. Re:Logic? by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      I was delighted, not too long ago, to find out the origin of the phrase "jumping the shark". I'd forgotten all about that. I'm not sure if I'm better off for remembering it.

    15. Re:Logic? by ultraseamus · · Score: 1
      take that Bender is made of 40% of Zinc, 40% of Titanium and 40% of Dolomite- 120%

      You missed one, bender is also 30% Iron.
    16. Re:Logic? by kibe · · Score: 1

      Luck of the Fryish has my vote.

  80. Re:Futurama DOES have a plot (spoilers) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the first episode, when the crew shows up at the professors door looking for work, he removes his former crews job chips or whatever from an envelope titled "space wasps stomach contents". We later see the tie in back to this about 4 seasons later. good stuff.

  81. WHO/WHAT/WHEN/WHERE! by Seldon_21 · · Score: 1

    First they better put it in a timeslot that doesn't get screwed! Hard for anyone to watch when it was consistently being bumped because of football.

    Second, Family Guy has done quite well since being restarted.

    "She's built like a steakhouse, but she handles like a Bistro!"

    Amazon Women in the Mood

    Zapp Brannigan

  82. She's not an alien. by computersareevil · · Score: 1
    1. Re:She's not an alien. by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen it in a while but is says the machine decoded the alien language.
      Didn't the machine do nothing but they found some other way to translate it?

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  83. Re:Futurama DOES have a plot (spoilers) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, somehow those space wasps become space bees instead. Hmmmmm..

  84. It's in the budget by the+web · · Score: 1

    Doubt it.

    Even if either tanks or gets in the way, they can afford it.
    They're all back at severely reduced pay, remember!?

    --
    __
    Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
  85. Finally, Zoidberg can eat!!! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Take that snooty soup kitchen workers! Zoidberg is getting a paycheck this week!

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  86. Zorbo is pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your inevitable doom will be delayed for another day.

  87. 2008? That's not soon enough! by fak3r · · Score: 1

    To quote Fry in "Fry and the Slurm Factory"

    Fry: Uh, could I have some Slurm please?
    Glermo: No food or drink allowed on the tour. You'll have to wait until you're partying with Slurms McKenzie.
    Fry: When will that be?
    Glermo: Soon enough.
    Fry: That's not soon enough.

  88. One-eyed alien? by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    "Good news everyone! Straight from a one-eyed alien's mouth"

    What one-eyed alien? I don't remember any one-eyed alien on Futurama.

    A one-eyed mutant maybe, but no alien.

    1. Re:One-eyed alien? by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      She is to the people of Omicron Persei Eight.

    2. Re:One-eyed alien? by GrumpySimon · · Score: 1

      I could hardly put a spoiler in the summary now, could I?

  89. HUZZAH! by dkfjunk · · Score: 1

    HUZZAH !

    --
    If life is merely a joke, the question still remains: for whose amusement?
  90. I just hope it doesn't turn into... by Cheeze · · Score: 1

    The family guy. That show has consistently gone downhill since it got on mainstream tv.

    --
    Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
    1. Re:I just hope it doesn't turn into... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Family Guy started out on "mainstream TV" (as you put it) in the first place. Family Guy has always gotten by on lowest-common-denominator pop references, dick and fart jokes, and repetition. Nothing has changed, it is just that you've finally noticed it! ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:I just hope it doesn't turn into... by Cheeze · · Score: 1

      it was on mainstream tv, just not on a mainstream timeslot. It then got cancelled. and renewed by Fox.

      Since then, i find it mostly repeats basic scenarios.

      It's funny, don't get me wrong, but Futurama should have been renewed instead of the family guy back in 2005.

      I can't imagine shows like these cost much to make. I don't see why it took so long to return.

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
    3. Re:I just hope it doesn't turn into... by kimvette · · Score: 1
      I can't imagine shows like these cost much to make.


      Why is Futurama so expensive?

      1. Billy West
      2. Katey Sagal
      3. John Di Maggio
      4. Maurice LaMarche
      5. David X. Cohen
      6. Quite a bit of Futurama is actually rendered in 3D. Watch closely sometime.

      It has a great cast and great writers, and blends both 2D and 3D animation. It is not a cheap production. Want to see a cheap-to-produce animation? See Family Guy, or even better, South Park. Or, a lot of the Saturday-morning animated crap from the '70s.
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  91. Awesome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome to the max!

  92. Actually... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    It seems like the new episodes are going to be broadcast on Comedy Central, not Fox, so Faux can continue to bite your shiny metal ass.

    1. Re:Actually... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Maybe they won't air on Fox, but Fox had to approve production of new episodes, and for that I am grateful. yay Fox!

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  93. Heard it all before. by brjndr · · Score: 1

    You raised my hopes and dashed them quite expertly, sir. Bravo!

  94. Thank God! by ezeecheez · · Score: 1

    Thank God one of the 5 people that watched Craig Ferguson's Late Late Show passed this on to those of us who read Slashdot.

  95. Apply north pole to what? by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    To quote pinky: yeah but ... "apply north pole to what?" :)

    It was a great episode. Forgot about that one. Though that was 10-11 years ago by now.

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  96. Re:Futurama DOES have a plot (spoilers) by SamSim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And now for the unresolved plot lines of Futurama, all of which I am hoping to see picked up in the new series:

    -Fry loves Leela

    The most obvious over-arching story during the series was Fry's adoration of Leela and Leela's continuous indifference to Fry. Obviously this IS something which is meant to work out with a happy ending. Episodes such as "Parasites Lost", "The Farnsworth Parabox", "Time Keeps On Slippin'" and the series finale, "The Devil's Hands Are Idle Playthings" make this pretty clear.

    The question is how they'll eventually get together. Leela keeps rejecting Fry because he doesn't have a lot to offer. He's a dumb, dropout delivery-geek - she's a smart, attractive spaceship pilot. Alternate/previous Frys have managed to get close to Leela with romantic gestures: a diamond scrunchie, a holophonor serenade, a love message written in stars. There's another key point, and that's Leela's oft-mentioned but never-seen ex, Sean. In "Devil's Hands", she describes Sean as pasty, unambitious individual whose redeeming feature was his skill as a jazz saxophonist. So it seems like creativity, specifically musical creativity, is the key. The problem is, even though he works hard at it, Fry doesn't even have musical skill. Not as far as his hands are concerned, at any rate. Nor can he sing. Or draw. And he won't artificially enhance his skills if this distorts his personality - "Parasites Lost" makes this clear.

    The solution? Either Fry will come up with some other amazing romantic gesture, or he'll find a musical instrument he CAN play well. Or perhaps he'll find some other, more successful creative outlet.

    -Fry is the single most important person in the universe

    This arc was intended to occur from the very beginning of Futurama's production. "Space Pilot 3000", act three of "Anthology Of Interest", "The Day The Earth Stood Stupid", "Roswell That Ends Well" and "The Why Of Fry" are the relevant episodes. Thanks to his being his own grandfather, Fry is the only person in history to lack the delta brainwave, making him the only person able to fight the evil brainspawn on behalf of the Nibblonians. Fry has twice defeated the brains, but as Nibbler wiped his memory of the events of "The Why Of Fry", he doesn't remember the second time and possibly not the first either.

    At the end of said episode, Fry remarks, "If you ever need a saviour again, just ask." Nibbler replies, "Oh, we will. We will." Presumably Fry will need to fight the brains at least once more. And obviously it must be the brains that he fights: against any other foe, Fry is all but useless.

    Earlier in that same episode, Fry mentions Leela and Nibbler remarks, "Ah. She must be the other. You must not give up on her..." and promises to help Fry make things work with her. This suggests not only that Leela has some critical part to play in saving the universe next time around, but also that much more hangs on Fry and Leela getting together than just Fry's happiness. These two arcs are obviously strongly linked together.

    Side note: while "Anthology Of Interest" is mostly non-canon, the spacetime warp which tears open as a result of Fry failing to be frozen is very important. During "The Why Of Fry" the enormous brain explains: "There is a nexus point between universes at the space-time where you entered the cryogenic tube." Here's why: if Fry fails to enter the tube, he fails to go to the future. If he does that, he isn't present at the supernova and doesn't go back in time, where he doesn't sleep with his grandmother, meaning Yancy Fry is never born and so Fry himself is never born either. The result is a paradox which, as seen in the "Anthology Of Interest" story, destroys the whole universe.

    How Fry and Leela's fates are linked, and what shape the next (final?) brainspawn threat will take, remains to be seen.

    -Morbo

    Newsmonster Morbo is an extremely poorly-disguised spy for his (unnamed) home planet. His race is plotting to take over the Earth. Will they ever do it? Will

  97. Not to be Devil's Advocate, by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    But we have heard this before. Billy West made the same statements and he retracted them. This might suggest that there is some momentum in the Futurama camp to make it live again. However; I won't believe it until Fox airs Futurama sporadically at 7:30 on a Sunday night, preempted by baseball or football, following another dismal episode of King of the Hill, with little to no advertising or promotion ensuring that the show fails to capture a large enough audience so Fox believes it a failure and yanks it off television once again.

    Why does anybody work with Fox? Fox is the bigget show killer of all time!

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:Not to be Devil's Advocate, by kimvette · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention the patented "musical timeslot" game that Fox likes to do to shows that are loved by viewers but hated by one or more execs, and then there is actually the airing of promotions and publishing the schedules only to preempt it with a "special presentation" of their crap sci-fi movie ID4.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:Not to be Devil's Advocate, by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      Billy West (Fry) has confirmed this on his site as well. And he seems to be the one that has his pulse on the project as well as anyone not named Cohen or Groening. He has made it very clear that Fry is one of his favorite Characters and that he'd love to play the character again.

      At the moment the new plan is 3 direct to DVD movies and 13 New Episodes to air when comedy central assumes the rebroadcast rights to Futurama from Cartoon network / Adult Swim. Bottom line, there will be new Futurama content. With Black Jack. And Hookers.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  98. Finaly by darky83 · · Score: 1

    Have been waiting for this for ages... I just hope they kee the humor of most of the old episode's

    --
    -- http://blog.troublenow.org/ Just a reference base
  99. slashdot easter egg by desiderius7 · · Score: 1

    curl -sI slashdot.org|head -6|tail -1

    1. Re:slashdot easter egg by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points right now, you'd get all of them....

      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
  100. Most of those sucked, but.. by Faw · · Score: 1

    Wonder Falls, Andy Richter controls the universe and Keen Eddy were great.

    The Pitts was the worst thing I have ever seen...

    1. Re:Most of those sucked, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pitts was the worst thing I have ever seen...

      I've been waiting patiently for someone to say how ironic this statement is so that I can explain how little they know about irony. But no reply has been forthcoming.

      It looks like I'll have to go build my own slashdot. With blackjack. And hookers.

      In fact, forget the slashdot and the blackjack.

  101. If I Don't Survive... by Wolvie+MkM · · Score: 1

    ... Tell my wife, Hello.

    --
    I Like Pie...
  102. for the non-biologists by pavon · · Score: 1

    I was up in northern California a few years ago, visiting my grandma. We had often made family trips up there when I was a kid growing up in New Mexico, but due to the shortness of vacation time, never saw much of the surrounding country, instead spending our limited time socializing with relatives. Because of this, my grandma decided to take me around to do some sight seeing. Among the places that we stopped was the Chico Dam. It was nice solid dam, with lush vegetation on the banks, and behold, fish trying to jump over the dam. After a closer look I noticed a fish ladder coming from the base of the river.

    I had seen these on the discovery channel before - they were designed create a detour so the fish could swim up and around the dam to mate upstream. I followed the ladder from the base of the dam as it wound up the hill. Along the way were signs describing the different fish in the river, and I spotted several of the varieties among the travelers. I was struck with a sense of awe watching these fish. With such determination and perseverance they swam, often doing everything they could to keep in place against the current, but slowly and steadily jumping up one step of the ladder at a time.

    I followed the fish ladder to the top of a hill, where it went into small building. Ah I thought, this must be where they tag the fish for studies. I bent over to one of the large windows to block the glare from the sun. A metal rod rammed through the fishes head, and it was thrown limply into one of two piles. Workers grabbed the fish from one pile and and sliced open their gullet with a smooth swipe, causing orange gunk to fall into a bucket. At the other pile, workers were squeezing a white liquid from them. I stood there dazed for a moment, and then looked down and saw a little plaque that stated that the orange stuff was called roe, and the white stuff was called milt.

    That, my friend, is the day I learned the term Milt :)

    I later learned that all the fish swimming up the river would have died naturally after mating anyway, that only a small percentage make it this far up the river, and that the number of fish born at this hatchery far exceeded the number that would have been born naturally. So it was a good thing, if a bit shocking for the uninitiated. I also learned that fishing is for suckers - why hassle with nets and lines, when you can have your dinner swim to you.

    1. Re:for the non-biologists by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      heh. Interesting story. Thanks.

    2. Re:for the non-biologists by tommy_traceroute · · Score: 1

      Damn. No "+1 Disturbing" mod available.

      --
      o 1 Sig beneath your current threshold
  103. Brain Slug vs. Hypno-Toad by ElrondHubbard · · Score: 1

    So there's my question: what happens if a brain slug latches on to a hypno-toad? Who would win? My guess is, we all would lose.

    --
    "The deep-fried Mars bar is a symptom of a wider crisis." -- Nutritionist Ann Ralph, on the Scottish diet
  104. Next thing you know by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Bender will fish a shark out of his own body and beat the crap out of it, then feed it to Nibler.

  105. 'Cause 'e sounded about forey-seven. by bignobody · · Score: 0

    Damn this has been a good day for me! New Futurama and now this! Yes! Yellowbeard! I've been waiting years for this. I actually paid $40 a couple years back to have my VHS version converted to DVD. I can't wait!

    --
    "Your mother's a bloody liar... That's what I liked about her." - Yellowbeard
  106. WRONG. New R&S IS ARTIST'S ORIGINAL VISION. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    Still, not many people have seen the Ren & Stimpy pre-pilot from Spike & Mike's twisted animation. They fuck a baby's head. From my blog, https://clintjcl.wordpress.com/2006/04/18/ren-and- stimpy/.

    So to all the people who complained about Ren & Stimpy Adult Cartoon Party "not being like the original Ren & Stimpy": YOU'RE WRONG.

    Adult Cartoon Party is far closer to the original than Nickelodeon's watered-down versoins. In fact, many of the episodes for SpikeTV's Ren & Stimpy Adult Cartoon Party were actually Nickelodeon episodes that got censored out of existence!

    Ren & Stimpy Adult Cartoon Party is the true realization of the artists original vision for Ren & Stimpy. That SpikeTV only produced 6-8 episodes IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.

    Remember, in the pre-pilot, they fuck a baby's head. It was never supposed to be a pleasant show.

    I have spoken.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  107. The ending of A.I. was awesome. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    I feel sorry for the rest of humanity who disagrees.

    Feel free to add your two cents here:

    http://clintjcl.wordpress.com/2004/12/15/ai-was-a- good-movie-fuck-you-all/

    (Or here... but this discussion will be archived before long.)

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  108. One of these things is not like the other. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Futurama: Excellent show. Original. Funny. Well written. Beautifully acted.
    Family Guy. Okay show, often funny, but has a huge and dedicated audience.
    Firefly. Extremely un-original. It's a western, but set IN SPACE!! Even Battlestar Galactica has better plots and better actors. Small but extremely aggressive audience that can't take criticism (watch how quickly this post gets moderated down).

  109. Replace? Nah! by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    The show didn't replace with Seven. It was in the 'valuable life lesson' stage, where they were trying to _teach_ you to never let visitors go out for cigarettes and leave their child in your home. Especially when your wife wants another kid. It's an important thing to teach the future parents of this world. They need to include something similar on Sesseme Street.

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  110. Leela's a mutant! by witch · · Score: 1

    She's no one-eyed alien, she's a one-eyed mutant. Boy, you'd think nobody here had actually watched the show when it was on.

    --
    They're taking their dog to get its two shots before it's too late. You're taking your dog there too, right?
    1. Re:Leela's a mutant! by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's rarely discussed because if her being a mutant becomes public, she would then lose her career chip and would be banished to the sewers.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  111. Re:Futurama DOES have a plot (spoilers) by Kenshin · · Score: 1

    "Leela keeps rejecting Fry because he doesn't have a lot to offer. He's a dumb, dropout delivery-geek - she's a smart, attractive spaceship pilot."

    Leela has as much trouble in the romance department as Fry does. Perhaps moreso. (Aside from Zap Brannigan.)

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  112. They finished farscape. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    They didn't bring the show back completly, but they did at least do a mini-series and wrapped up all the loose ends.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:They finished farscape. by anti-human+1 · · Score: 1

      I know I've got the mini-series downloaded somewhere, but I never have watched it. I figured it was a tack-on, so excuse my ignorance. :P

    2. Re:They finished farscape. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Nope, it picked up right where S4 left off, wraps up all the plot threads.

      From IMDB: After being crystallized in a case of mistaken identity, John Crichton and his pregnant lover Aeryn Sun are reassembled by their comrades D'Argo, Chiana, Noranti, and Rygel with a little help from some new allies. They believe that they are all free to live their lives in peace away from the war between the universe's dominant races, the Peacekeepers and the Scarrans, but soon find out that the wormhole knowledge that Crichton holds in his mind is the key to victory for either side, and are back on the run. Matters are made worse when Crichton and Aeryn's unborn child is transfered from Aeryn's body into Rygel's in a freak turn of events and they have to find a way reverse things back to their correct state. Meanwhile, they're forced to align themselves with their mortal enemies, Scorpius and Sikozu, in order to survive while trying to locate a race of people who have the power to spread peace before the war destroys all living things in the universe.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  113. Re:Replace? Nah! by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

    The show didn't replace with Seven.

    Well you're right, they didn't replace with Seven, they added him on to sort of replace the 'child element' of the show though.. whether it was as a lesson or not.. Kinda like Olivia didn't REPLACE Rudy (and have you seen her lately? wow..) but she took her place as the 'cute little kid who does cute little kid things like call 900# joke lines'..

  114. I have a coment to make. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Yawn!

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  115. That's Morbo, puny human! by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

    And you will be punished for your error!

    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
  116. Re:Replace? Nah! by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    for the record, that was intended entirely as a joke, treating Married With Children as a lesson-teaching show. Yeah- Seven sucked.

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  117. Zim is DOOMED!!! :-( by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    Sadly, it ain't gonna happen. Nick made sure that the experience of creating Invader Zim was as traumatic as possible for all involved. I think that the end result was absolute brilliance (parts of my house are like a shrine to Invader Zim- it's kinda scary really), but nobody involved has any interest in picking it back up. *cries*

    As a side note, you probably already have the DVD box set, but in case you don't the first volume is now available on the iTunes Music Store. :-)

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    1. Re:Zim is DOOMED!!! :-( by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      but nobody involved has any interest in picking it back up. *cries*

      It's not that there's no interest. Adult Swim doesn't bother trying because Zim is a Viacom (nickelodeon's parent company) product. Their motto is, "If you wanna watch it, watch it here or no where else." Viacom has quickly rebuffed any attempt by Williams Street to pickup any of their stuff. That's why you don't see classic Nick stuff like Doug, Zim, or Ren and Stimpy on any other network. Viacom controls the rights, and won't come up off of them for love nor money.

      (I refuse to believe that partial birth abortion that they called those new Ren and Stimpy Episodes ever happened. Ever. You hear me? They're unepisodes.)

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  118. Ack! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I can't be in the room when Jurassic Bark is playing, and I'm a heartless monster!

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  119. Re:Futurama DOES have a plot (spoilers) by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

    I think the Zap Brannigan incident qualifies as trouble in Leela's romance department.

  120. Pulling a Lucas by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    Or they digitally edited the first episode before rebroadcasting it.

    1. Re:Pulling a Lucas by stinerman · · Score: 1

      I have a copy of the originally broadcased episode on VHS tape.

      Its there.

  121. Re:Futurama DOES have a plot (spoilers) by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    but there are HUGE GAPING HOLES in the ongoing plot.

    In one of the first few episodes their career chips are taken from an envelope labeled "Contents of Space WASPS Stomach", while in the later episodes they try to complete the previous failed misson, and find the last ship in a hive of "Space BEES".

    (I suppose that the envelope may have been mislabeled, or as Lucy Lawless said: "It was a wizard.")

  122. Are we sure? by mr_zorg · · Score: 1
  123. Re:Replace? Nah! by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

    for the record, that was intended entirely as a joke, treating Married With Children as a lesson-teaching show. Yeah- Seven sucked.

    Hey now you're getting personal, my parents used that show to teach me about morals and being an upstanding successful human being.. ;]

  124. before this one goes into yesterday's news by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    Just noticed a trailer for Al Gore's new epic at YouTube which was produced and voiced by the Futurama crew. Enjoy - unless it's been posted already - in which case enjoy again:

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=5BjrOi4vF24

  125. Re:Neat by Golias · · Score: 1
    "Will they make it funny this time around?"

    "I just thought I'd come into a thread about a show I don't like and spend 20 seconds posting that I don't like it."


    "I'm so angry I can't even remember to close my italics tag."

    20 seconds? You don't give me much credit for being able to type at a reasonable speed.

    Seriously, though, the "20 seconds" wasted on making a wise-assed remark about how I don't find the show to be very funny (and the additional seconds spent replying to you) pale in comparison to the 3 or 4 hours of TV viewing I spent trying very hard to give that show a fair chance, out of respect for the writers and voice talents involved.

    It mostly suffered from the same disease as "The Critic" (the failed cartoon featuring the usually-funny Jon Lovitz), in that the writers seemed to think that (not so) obscure pop-culture references are automatically funny, even if they are not used to say anything funny or witty. The formula gets old very quickly.

    So I ask again, not rhetorically, will it be funny this time around?

    Because that would be awesome. I like it when comedies manage to be funny.
    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  126. Re:Neat by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Troll

    "I'm so angry I can't even remember to close my italics tag."

    Nice try, but the whole post was in italics, and yes the tag was closed.

    "20 seconds? You don't give me much credit for being able to type at a reasonable speed."

    Slashdot requires you to wait 20 seconds to post.

    "Seriously, though, the "20 seconds" wasted on making a wise-assed remark about how I don't find the show to be very funny (and the additional seconds spent replying to you) pale in comparison to the 3 or 4 hours of TV viewing I spent trying very hard to give that show a fair chance, out of respect for the writers and voice talents involved."

    So why not spend 20 seconds writing the letters instead of making snide comments intended to annoy the people who saw what you didn't see in it?

    "It mostly suffered from the same disease as "The Critic" (the failed cartoon featuring the usually-funny Jon Lovitz), in that the writers seemed to think that (not so) obscure pop-culture references are automatically funny, even if they are not used to say anything funny or witty. The formula gets old very quickly."

    I think you're confusing Futurama with Family Guy.

    "So I ask again, not rhetorically, will it be funny this time around?"

    It was funny the first time around. Don't feel bad, though, I didn't get Austin Powers the first time around.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  127. Re:Neat by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Troll

    "So why not spend 20 seconds writing the letters instead of making snide comments intended to annoy the people who saw what you didn't see in it?"

    That was supposed to read "writing letters to the writers". Sorry.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  128. Re:Futurama DOES have a plot (spoilers) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is just unbelievably nerdy and in-depth. I love this site.

  129. This is great news!!! by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    Well, this thread is either going to be one person saying this is good and one person saying it's bad, or otherwise we all get to express our opinion :-P

    As someone who only started watching the series after it was cancelled (and then watched at least one every night until he had seen them all) I am tentatively excited about this :)

    Just don't mess it up. It ended so well.

  130. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    What is this, Digg? Link to the story, not some fuckhead's blog: http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/back_to_the_fu turama_entertainment_don_kaplan.htm

  131. Hermes is the best! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Manwich!

  132. Re:Neat by Golias · · Score: 1

    So why not spend 20 seconds writing the letters instead of making snide comments intended to annoy the people who saw what you didn't see in it?

    Because it amuses me to make a snide comment every once in a while.

    I think you're confusing Futurama with Family Guy.

    With you there. "Family Guy" sucks hard.

    Don't feel bad, though, I didn't get Austin Powers the first time around.

    Okay, I can see somebody thinking Austin Powers was not funny. It's not for everybody. But to not get Austin Powers??? It's an hour and a half of fart and dick jokes disguised as a spy-movie parody! I think you must be the first person I've ever meet to say they didn't get it right away.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  133. Oblig Bender Parody by cybercobra · · Score: 1

    Fine! I'll make my own Futurama episodes! With Blackjack! And hookers!
    In fact, forget the hookers and the Blackjack!

    Aw, screw the whole thing.

  134. Re:Futurama DOES have a plot (spoilers) by mink · · Score: 1

    Isn't Morbo just a send up of bad '50s era rubber suit space monsters? He looks like one I remember from back inthe day. I figured all his dialog was based on those kind of old films, not any immpending invasion by some unknown alien race.

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.