The UN actually works. Remember the Korean War? The ITU does an amazing job of managing radio frequencies. And what about all the successful peacekeeping operations the UN has conducted? Do you see smallpox around? A lot of the UN bashing in America is about how badly the UN works when America doesn't cooperate. And I would prefer to have essential functions under the control of a bueracracy that has no effective leadership when it comes to devisive issues then to a bueracracy that caves to special intrests every single time.
One idea I had would be to make a watermark that gets destroyed by downsampling by more then a certian amount. This would mean that low-rez copies would be permitted, but high-rez would not. Not because the recordering devices would fail, but the guy who made the song would cancel the account of the person who leaked the high-rez copy.
Yeah, and we could have a bunch of nuts who want the benefits of science without respecting it. I seriously think we should establish Coventry for guys like Harrison.
Do they prevent you from using your car for driving? If a 18-wheeler is about to hit you, I don't think any of those devices would make collision inevitable. But this one would.
My idea of a good interface. A list of websites and protocols the customer can control with a priority for each one. So it would say '$PRIORITY for $PROTOCOL_LONGNAME from $WEBSITE'. You could also have a thing for default priority for a protocol.
What did they bungle? If you just watched the two videos you have no idea who is telling the truth. But the Guardian published a story confirming Oxfam's position.
If you actually bothered to look up the hot coffee case you would find out that the coffee was served at boiling. That's a good case for a lawsuit, being served toxic liquid at a restaurant instead of coffee.
Actually it does. Also, the 2 browsers quote was about your list of exploits. You were counting these as being holes in OpenBSD. They would also count as Windows bugs if you used the same methodology for both.
Slashdot Mirror
The UN actually works. Remember the Korean War? The ITU does an amazing job of managing radio frequencies. And what about all the successful peacekeeping operations the UN has conducted? Do you see smallpox around? A lot of the UN bashing in America is about how badly the UN works when America doesn't cooperate. And I would prefer to have essential functions under the control of a bueracracy that has no effective leadership when it comes to devisive issues then to a bueracracy that caves to special intrests every single time.
One idea I had would be to make a watermark that gets destroyed by downsampling by more then a certian amount. This would mean that low-rez copies would be permitted, but high-rez would not. Not because the recordering devices would fail, but the guy who made the song would cancel the account of the person who leaked the high-rez copy.
If we are coming out of an ice age, where is all the ice?
Yeah, and we could have a bunch of nuts who want the benefits of science without respecting it. I seriously think we should establish Coventry for guys like Harrison.
Well, just filter out all Bloodhound Gang lyrics and we're ok.
Do they prevent you from using your car for driving? If a 18-wheeler is about to hit you, I don't think any of those devices would make collision inevitable. But this one would.
My idea of a good interface. A list of websites and protocols the customer can control with a priority for each one. So it would say '$PRIORITY for $PROTOCOL_LONGNAME from $WEBSITE'. You could also have a thing for default priority for a protocol.
Pasaderna is near LA, and they count it in LA's score. But Berkley is near San Fransisco, and so San Fransisco deserves the rating.
Well, Ars Technica doesn't think so.
Seriously, write it in Emacs Lisp. This will let you have a GUI and a command line interface with the same code.
That should be polyhedron farms. Face isn't greek.
It's not needed. Remember the Lisp machines? And Haskell can be used to make an Operating system. So we don't need C anymore.
What did they bungle? If you just watched the two videos you have no idea who is telling the truth. But the Guardian published a story confirming Oxfam's position.
I would like to point out that Friedman's work fails a crucial test: Actually being true.
That's Oppenheimer who you are thinking of.
Then EGold gets a lot more use and exposure.
Haskell has garbage collection and no VM.
How is that insightful? Everyone knows that probability is just a Boreal measure on the set of outcomes and you go from that.
It's situations like this that should make small countries upgrade to IPv6. What surprises me is that they haven't already.
Sure. But that line would have a lot of semicolons!
How does using a Microsoft solution for a video streaming problem pay better then using mpeg?
The disk keys *cannot* be revoked as they are burned into the disk. That is what is being used to decrypt.
It's not what you think the time is, it's what they think it is that you need to find out.
If you actually bothered to look up the hot coffee case you would find out that the coffee was served at boiling. That's a good case for a lawsuit, being served toxic liquid at a restaurant instead of coffee.
Actually it does. Also, the 2 browsers quote was about your list of exploits. You were counting these as being holes in OpenBSD. They would also count as Windows bugs if you used the same methodology for both.