So how do we find out what is going on? This kind of self-censorship is what leads people into complacency and passivity. And we all know where that leads in a democracy.
Well, you want an additional layer of containment between device drivers and the Operating System, but you also want to bar apps from sending things to devices directly.
Or we could use Remote Attestation. Every machine would have a light attached that would glow if the Remote Attestation was successful. Switching the lights around would make an attack hard. Or we could use multiple machines to check the voting machines. Allow voters to bring their own.
We could just use Trusted Computing for most of those points. While some people shout "Evil!" it does have its uses, and this is one of them. Linux has support for Trusted Computing in the kernel. But ideally we would use a PROM with the code blown in once. Make a tiny Scheme VM and write the rest in Scheme to make it easy to check correctness. And open source it. Possibly even include a TPM to verify that the code on the machine is what it should be.
How are they going to keep compeditors out on the internet especially ones focused on one thing? A lot of search engines got killed by Google, then Google expanded into their other buisnesses. When you have a lot of competing projects angling for resources you get problems. And it only takes 1 good idea to beat a lot of incremental improvements.
Not really. Quality isn't about opinion, it is about what gets the job done best. For computing purposes, Unix wins hands down. FFTW, BLAS, LAPACK are all on unix. Getting them on windows is a PITA. The only thing Microsoft has going for it is Active Directory with its centeralized administration, as opposed to PAM+LDAP+NFS, as well as hardware support.
This makes no sense. Apple could use quicktime on all of the videos with ease, or resample. But instead they make the quality worse then if they had used Quicktime. I don't see how Apple wouldn't have used Quicktime in the first place considering they made it. Computer time really isn't an issue for Apple.
That's why C is reaching its limit. Things like Erlang and Clean, as well as parallizing Lisp compilers will become more widely used to handle these multiprocessing systems.
The student would have the rights. Not the school. The inventor owns the patent rights unless he transfers them, and he isn't transfering them by attending school. But IANAL.
Slashdot Mirror
So how do we find out what is going on? This kind of self-censorship is what leads people into complacency and passivity. And we all know where that leads in a democracy.
Able to output panels with total capacity of 500 megawatts every year? That would work.
Well, you want an additional layer of containment between device drivers and the Operating System, but you also want to bar apps from sending things to devices directly.
So why not provide that API to intercept system calls? This is very important when debugging, and pirating software.
They could just go to a different vendor.
Or we could use Remote Attestation. Every machine would have a light attached that would glow if the Remote Attestation was successful. Switching the lights around would make an attack hard. Or we could use multiple machines to check the voting machines. Allow voters to bring their own.
Shakespere is public domain.
We could just use Trusted Computing for most of those points. While some people shout "Evil!" it does have its uses, and this is one of them. Linux has support for Trusted Computing in the kernel. But ideally we would use a PROM with the code blown in once. Make a tiny Scheme VM and write the rest in Scheme to make it easy to check correctness. And open source it. Possibly even include a TPM to verify that the code on the machine is what it should be.
It was patched up.
Name one instance of illegal tatics used by a reporter leading to a Pulitzer Prize.
But the sick and disgusting stuff is exactly what the parent (this posts grandparent) is saying should be blocked.
Because forcing children to do something on the basis of you being an adult is an immoral and sickening action.
How are they going to keep compeditors out on the internet especially ones focused on one thing? A lot of search engines got killed by Google, then Google expanded into their other buisnesses. When you have a lot of competing projects angling for resources you get problems. And it only takes 1 good idea to beat a lot of incremental improvements.
Not really. Quality isn't about opinion, it is about what gets the job done best. For computing purposes, Unix wins hands down. FFTW, BLAS, LAPACK are all on unix. Getting them on windows is a PITA. The only thing Microsoft has going for it is Active Directory with its centeralized administration, as opposed to PAM+LDAP+NFS, as well as hardware support.
At MIT some students compute the energy of a students splattering the sidewalk. That's from The Idea Factory by Pepper White.
How I wish I could enumerate pi easily, since all these fucking mnemonics prevent recalling any of pi's sequence more simply!
They could just tell everyone on 98 to switch to Linux+emulator.
This makes no sense. Apple could use quicktime on all of the videos with ease, or resample. But instead they make the quality worse then if they had used Quicktime. I don't see how Apple wouldn't have used Quicktime in the first place considering they made it. Computer time really isn't an issue for Apple.
That's why C is reaching its limit. Things like Erlang and Clean, as well as parallizing Lisp compilers will become more widely used to handle these multiprocessing systems.
That's safety, not efectiveness.
The student would have the rights. Not the school. The inventor owns the patent rights unless he transfers them, and he isn't transfering them by attending school. But IANAL.
Unless they are manufacturing new ones. Then buying more means more of a loss.
Slashdot needs a +1 Pendantic for posts like the above.
You could compare the binaries. The point the GP is making is that there is no way to do that for statically linked libraries.
- The law of conservation of momentum is never violated.
- The drive is a closed system.
- So it cannot accelerate.
Also he made a mistake in his calculations. The forces at the end might be different, but forces aren't only being exterted on the ends.